They say the island of Patmos Fathers

.

MY GOOD VOICES FROM CINEMA EROTIC SEVENTIES: ALLEGED "Heresies PAPAL" THE COMMUNION TO DIVORCED, CRISTINA SICCARDI THE SABAUDA, ANDREA TORNIELLI TO GOGNA …

.

there is no sin so serious, from which you can not break free and divine forgiveness. We should not assume that the divorced and remarried are always in a state of mortal sin. This would be a rash judgment, that would deny free will, as Luther did, and the power of divine grace.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Dear Father Giovanni.

The ban on communion for divorced and remarried is not a mere ecclesiastical law that the Pope can abolish, but it depends directly on the divine right, which requires a student to be in the grace of God to communion. For thus says the Council of Trent: "If anyone says that faith is sufficient preparation for receiving the sacrament of the Holy Eucharist, let him be anathema ".

Davide

.

.

Dear David,.

the post-synodal exhortation of the Holy Father Francis

The Pope has already explained in 'The joy of love that remarried divorcees, though it is in an irregular status, which strongly induces to sin and though they can also commit mortal sins, however, if they repent and do penance, They can regain the grace. That is why, in principle, They could go to Communion.

.

Remember that there is no sin so serious, from which you can not break free and divine forgiveness. We should not assume that the divorced and remarried are always in a state of mortal sin. This would be a rash judgment, that would deny free will, as Luther did, and the power of divine grace. If they fall into sin, they can always regain grace.

.

The Supreme Pontiff signed the Post-Synodal Exhortation

Dad, once it was to give Communion to divorced and remarried in a canonically correct document, not attenterà to any divine law. Indeed, in this matter the divine laws in play are two: the law of the indissolubility of marriage and the sanctity of Holy Communion.

.

To understand the meaning of the ecclesiastical law change, that the Pope should prepare to do - from the prohibition of Communion to the permission of Communion -, We have to make the following considerations:

.

.

1) It should be noted an underlying theme, now it is known to all, which it is the basis of the pontificate of Pope Francis, and is that of mercy, understood here as research and willingness to do everything possible, even better than the past, to make available salvation to those who are most at risk. And it is the case of divorced and remarried along with many other cases.

2) It is true that God can save even without the Sacraments [cf. WHO]; but if it is possible to open the door of the Sacraments to a greater number of available people, without offending the dignity of the Sacraments, it's better, and indeed it is right;

3) Pope Francis invites us, on this issue, to turn our gaze in a different direction from that of the past. Up to San Giovanni Paolo II [CF. Familiar Consortium n.84] the church, about the problem of pastoral care for the divorced and remarried, he had under his eyes the dignity of the Sacrament and the public scandal given by the divorced and remarried (“It was irregular”, “public sinners”).

.

The Reigning Pontiff, instead, without of course aside these considerations, It invites us to take rather that God may grant to remarried divorcees, in some cases - to be specified by the new law -, to be in grace, despite their irregular status.

.

4) The granting of the Holy Communion in those particular cases would not be offensive to the sacrament of marriage, but it would safeguard the dignity, although in different ways and even it is contrary to what so far has followed the ministry to divorced and remarried.

.

the post-synodal exhortation of the Holy Father Francis

This is the most difficult point to understand. The moral principle says so: "One and the same moral law, intelligently interpreted, It can be applied in ways materially inconsistent, depending on the circumstances'.

.

Take the case of the commandment Do not kill. Just this command allows you to kill the unjust aggressor, but there is not space here to explain this apparent paradox, for which reference to a treatise of moral theology.

.

Regarding our case, we can then say that the law of the indissolubility of marriage may continue to be respected in certain circumstances, not only with the prohibition of Communion, but also by making it, provided that the divorced and remarried are in a particular situation, which must be specified by the new law.

.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

Dear Father Ariel.

This war on the field of the Communion for divorced and remarried is getting stronger. Some say that you should not obey the Pope because it is wrong. Then I wonder: who can judge if the Pope is wrong, do not obey him and invite to disobey? the, as a woman, as well as Piedmontese, I am irritated by some comments about carbolic acid covered in honey written by Cristina Siccardi on various blogs, then cited by others as a truth of faith. This writer is probably a star of theology? As a priest, how she reacts, in front of certain subjects?

daisy Altieri

.

.

dear Margaret.

Edwige Fenech, film poster The doctor of the military district, left Alvaro Vitali, very talented stage actor discovered by Federico Fellini. But how he had this to say: « … the theater is an art that does not pay, while with light flicks I could support his family »

Years ago I explained in my book that everyone is able to obey an authority figure with a strong personality, spirituality and holiness of life, but this is not the challenge of faith addressed to priests and religious, nor to lay Catholic. The challenge is to obey a bishop or major superior to a fragile, limited and mediocre, provided that he does not command things contrary to the doctrine and the Magisterium of the Church and do not use its authority to commit crimes and offenses, because in that case you are required to disobey imperative for the Christian conscience and to inform the supreme ecclesiastical authority of its abuses, order is restored justice violated.

.

If the Roman Pontiff He gives me a wrong order and I was aware of what, First I would try to convince him of the error and demonstrate the substantial mistake the given command, But if it were to maintain in this case the eseguirei, unless it was not contrary to the deposit of credit and Catholic morality. He said this would add: I do not know who can demonstrate how many commands given by the Roman Pontiffs in the course of Church history results are in conflict with deposit of credit and Catholic morality, because I personally do not know of any case.

.

Why is it better to make a mistake to make an order that may appear incorrectly, instead of making the right choice by disobeying the Roman Pontiff? Because in the second case the error would be more and more serious. Then the Roman Pontiff will have to answer before men and history, but especially before God, if it had imposed the wrong order.

.

Cover the film The high-school student, with Gloria Guida in a fancy school in Cinecittà …

Affirm this, and maybe blind obedience in contrast with the logic, free will and human dignity, as some tend to believe, marching on those “good intentions” whose streets are paved Hell? Far from it, assert that means to proceed on the path of prudent wisdom. Indeed, the Roman Pontiff enjoys special assistance from the Holy Spirit, therefore a grace which was not enjoyed by individual bishops, priests and even lay Catholics. If in the history of the Church has no memory of erroneous commands imposed by contrasting with the Popes deposit of credit and Catholic morality, Instead they have abundant evidence of how right they later were seen in the years ahead of the choices on the spot hotly contested. This is based on the obedience of believers of Christ and gods ministers of the sacred : the prudent and wise understanding that the Roman Pontiff has a special grace of state and entitled to special assistance of the Holy Spirit that makes it infallible in matters of doctrine and faith [refer to the article of John Cavalcoli: The tasks and the degrees of the infallibility of the Supreme Pontiff, WHO]. And who does not accept this, assuming, if anything, to be invested for greater grace was the power of judgment on certain decisions of the Roman Pontiff on matters of doctrine and faith, or is a heretic, or simply a fool, I saw that the heresy in itself calls for intelligence and talent. And if you always heretics I take them seriously with due respect, fools take them instead around …

.

The Reigning Pontiff, that "deserves" respectful criticism with the devotion due to the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles and Vicar of Christ on earth, He has never given orders, in no act of their supreme magisterium, which are contrary to Catholic faith and morals; and whoever claims otherwise shows at best not to be able to make elementary distinctions between private doctor, the ordinary pastoral ministry, the supreme Magisterium of Peter. Or better understood: It is shown not to know the basics of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, then giving rise to questions only intended to disorient and simple to sow the poison of confusion among the people of God [I refer to my previous article, WHO].

.

For this I have never raised the issue "This Pope we do not like" [Gnocchi & palmar, cf. WHO], and I never fell into the traps of some strong criticism in this pontificate, brandishing towards it charges more or less subtle heresy, formulated through the theories served up by overt heretics unrepentant, how those Lefebvre to be discovered in the aforementioned Christian Siccardi recalled from our Reader, and to which I come now with joy and happiness …

.

nadia cassini, film poster The teacher dances with the whole class. Top another great actor of Italian theater: Renzo Montagnani [1930-1997]. He, too, had this to say: "In Italy with the theater he caught you hunger, with light flicks you shop for the home kitchen '

… I do not know who this Lady who writes about Siccardiana correspondence, already Correspondence Romana, on which occasionally has delighted readers with articles rose on the Royal House of pirates, anticlerical Freemasons and these were the Savoy [cf, WHO, WHO, etc..], or on levied Siccardiana, already Levied Christian, where articles are published every year to commemorate with the tear to the eye of that figure holy man Benito Mussolini [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO etc..]. At this point I note by the way, before proceeding over, at what levels reach the spirit of these people that thunder for two years against any sacrilege of communion for divorced and remarried persons, including accusations of heresy and some columnist who even invites to resist with disobedience to the Supreme Pontiff. Well, despite their rigor toward adultery and cohabitees, to keep as far away from these Eucharistic canteens, If the adulterer is however the former Duce of Italy, married with children, or her lover and accomplice close friend in adultery, heard what sweetness and Christian charity express the tender souls of levied Siccardiana:

.

"The exact circumstances, the place, time, where they were killed Mussolini and Claretta Petacci, whose only crime was love for Duce, It was in turn covered by a part of history that had a vested interest in spreading a stereotyped vision of events in which there was very little decent and honest " [cf. WHO].

.

Movie poster busted, gassed completely melted, behind Edwige Fenech actor Enrico Maria Salerno [1926-1994] famous for being one of the great actors of the Italian theater among the most gifted in the interpretation of the most disparate roles

Oh, poor Claretta, sweet unhappy creature, considered by bloody rabble partisan and by historical dishonest guilty of having given to adultery with Benito Mussolini. In conclusion, what's wrong with it? What's wrong, to love a married man, husband and father of four children?

.

Once written similar amenities, the same people then go to comb through old articles of the Vatican correspondent Andrea Tornielli, these days in the pillory because “reo” of having reported the news regarding the events of Ettore Gotti Tedeschi and the IOR in a way “uneven” the antecedents of 2013 [cf. WHO]. Well, if from 2013 al 2016 the accounts given by the Holy See or by the Archbishop George Ganswein it differs, the fault lies not with the Vatican expert who reported the facts as they were presented, but who over time has changed version. This is perhaps a Vatican “guilty” not to have pointed out this discrepancy, as Roberto de Mattei says so right on a formal level [cf. WHO]? I honestly do not know which of us, He is having written in the space of three years beyond 200 articles, can remember the precise passage and the exact detail of one of them; What this is true of all the publicists, but for all, including Andrea Tornielli working alone, what I doubt Roberto de Mattei does instead, on the basis of a simple calculation based on his writings and activities. Indeed, Roberto de Mattei, He is engaged as an academic at the European University, Director of Correspondence Romana, director of the monthly Christian roots, director of the Lepanto Foundation, promoter March for Life, consultant to several institutions, author of an average of two articles per week with extra articles published also on The Republic e The Gazette, author of two books a year, He engaged in numerous appearances as a lecturer in Italy and abroad … it is not by chance that this man of the help of collaborators ready to seek benefits sighs and commas of articles written to three years away from a Vatican expert who works alone, so all in all honest and without paleologi–palletizers on its payroll? Come on, you monsters to Andrea Tornielli least the same pity that certain subjects show for Benito Mussolini and Claretta Petacci sweet, which it was not - as many might think, obviously wrong - his mistress, her his concubine, she who helped him to commit adultery at the expense of the legitimate wife Donna Rachele. Absolutely not! Claretta was the only woman who "loved the Duce" and that perhaps the columnists of levied Siccardiana they would not hesitate to admit to the sacraments, together with all well-known womanizer of the House of Savoy, including the last king of Italy, Umberto II, an "honest man" dear to the pink of journalism Siccardi [cf. WHO], also separated from his wife and a nidata of children along with their children have plunged this house of pirates ridicule of the tabloid press and deserved the talk show televisions [see the last glorious heir to the House of Savoy, video WHO].

.

film poster The teacher, with the inevitable Edwige Fenech and Alvaro Vitali

… But back to the Siccardi, whose crass ignorance, with regard to the Church's history and fundamental theology, to me indeed to spare. And it's not my judgment ungenerous, because such crass ignorance oozes from his books, articles and video-conferences, which are public documents, non-confidential material or material covered by Privacy Act. But since you can bacchettare the reigning Pontiff up to accuse him of heresy, I just want to see if it is not to criticize this lady claims the legitimate freedom to bacchettare like a conductor the entire teaching of the Church of the last fifty years, again according to his books and articles, I repeat that public acts are and shall remain. Therefore worth revisited told: “Who acid injures die by acid”.

.

I was then asked how I react before certain figures. To understand this it should first be given that I am not only the son of Dante Alighieri, but also by Giovanni Boccaccio, Pietro Aretino, Cecco Angiolieri and so. Given the above, They say they are not accustomed take seriously some people, I tend to make fun of them and the Profitable circulate the tradi–Protestants which they are derived in part their place in the sun and part of their publishing market, between halberdiers boasting quarters of nobility among the laces&laces of Masses in the ancient rite and aspiring Contessine by Liala novel that poignant recollections of the House of Savoy. I prefer to throw it into a joke, also because this lady from the voice miagolosa, It reminds me of certain actresses erotic film of the seventies. Obviously I am referring to the item, be clear: only to the Voice. Also because we are talking about a sex cinema that nowadays is accordingly punished and modest point that these old films could be screened in cinemas schools for children of the Daughters of Mary Help of Christians.

.

Lilli Carati, film poster Professor of Natural Sciences. Also in the program of this lightweight comedy, stand out the names of some of the largest and most talented actors of the Italian theater of the twentieth century

Hearing the voice miagolosa the Siccardi - Objective observation, certainly not irreverent mockery [cf. audio WHO] - I was reminded of the actresses who also spoke with voices miagolose : Edwige Fenech ago The doctor of the military district [cf. WHO]; Glory in the shoes of the Guide night nurse [cf. WHO], Nadia Cassini in the shoes of Professor dancing with the whole class [cf. WHO], to follow with other actresses and soubrette who troubled the sleep of most of us, today fifties, in the seventies when we were teenagers, children in our turn of healthy fathers whose sleep was rather upset in their teens from the image of Wanda Osiris, who wore dresses much more monastic than those worn today by rebel American nuns who have had unfortunate as teachers and spiritual directors the Jesuits of the new Company of the Indies. Even for this many years later we became healthy priests, fell into the world of faith and the real, pace of prudish Lefebvre theater that one out fragrance virginity of heretics which in itself and by itself is more impure adultery [cf. WHO].

.

I can not conclude this survey of actresses from the voice miagolosa forgetting the beautiful and unhappy Lilli Carati, born Ileana Caravati [1956-2014 – cf. WHO, WHO] I will keep a poignant reminder, while avendoci spoken once, after the disease that tore the life had been diagnosed in 2014, meeting her by chance at a cancer center where I went to visit a friend who was in a terminal state. It would be nice to be able to tell what appeared mild and Christian cross the mind of this woman who was preparing to end his life after a long series of bad choices, but it is those talks and remember that a priest must bring with him to the grave. As the tender conversation I had years ago in Ladispoli, while I was a guest of friends, with that soul as unhappy as beautiful Laura Antonelli [1941-2015], that was an icon of beauty and eroticism, now of poor health and physically destroyed, to which I gave a rosary blessed by the Holy Father, before which he bursts into tears of joy.

.

The poster for the film The duck à l'orange, main protagonists of this film of the seventies two sacred monsters the theater and the Italian cinema: Monica Vitti and Ugo Tognazzi. In 1975 the vision of the film was banned in theaters for children under 14 years because he could see from a distance a small glimpse of the backside of Barbara Buochet, although it was more prudish of certain images painted within our baroque churches. So it worked in that period, except, however, jump to the other extreme a few years later, when in the early evening the Rai offered a butcher's shop worth a lot per kilo [cf. WHO] …

Who is Cristina Siccardi I then try his writings on the bizarre historical and theological level, and his lectures were built on ignorance castles. Instead about how to take it, I would say that could be taken as one that meows in Lefebvrian, while in his rambling lectures enhances the confused and stubborn Bishop Marcel Lefebvre comparing it to the Holy Bishop and Doctor of the Church Athanasius of Alexandria, ie equating facto the Second Vatican Council to the Arian heresy [cf. WHO, WHO].

.

Even more so back with human and pastoral tenderness to my mind the memory of the suffering soul of Lilli Carati, ready to admit their past mistakes, those austere papessa lefebvriana as Siccardi would never admit, ie of being wrong for indomitable pride to self-elect to the rank of expert spin doctors in complex and delicate disciplines such as the history of the Church, dogmatic sacramental, canon law and so on, knowing the hurt the Catechism of St. Pius X, and acting accordingly versus the Church instead in church, versus instead of Pietro under Pietro. All because it presumed to be not only a true Catholic, but the Almighty dealership that owns the authentic truth of the Mystery, just like the boutique d'owns the exclusive license for the sale of intimate Via Monte Napoleone in Milan baby doll and of beehive by Christian Dior.

.

I “immoral moralists ” that the result of the Siccardi and related they tear their garments for months about the danger "heretical"Communion for divorced and remarried, to forget their obvious convenience that the first of the deadly sins, It has always been considered the queen of all the deadly sins, it is not lust, but pride. And this does not teach him the "diabolical secret meeting"Vatican II, to whom, as stated by the Siccardi, the heroic Marcel Lefebvre resisted like St. Athanasius of Alexandria opposed the Arian heresy; This teaches the most holy is always very valid Catechism of Saint Pius X, that they know and teach only when it's convenient to them and where it suits them, to support a pseudo-Catholic ideology increasingly grim, certainly not the Catholic unhappy and unorthodox book published recently by Cardinal Walter Kasper to the praise of Luther [see article by John Cavalcoli, WHO]. This Cardinal is undoubtedly a pro-Protestant and an irreducible rahneriano, with an incorrect theological vision of ecclesiology and ecumenism; in his thought they contain several of the major mistakes of modernism and perhaps it is also the direct proponent of some bad advice given to the Supreme Pontiff, but he would never dare to accuse Peter of heresy or apostasy from the Catholic faith, or break the unity of the Church. This is why, if it really was led to a forced choice with no possibility of rejection, as a devoted son of the Church and devoted priest always I will choose Kasper, never Lefebvre and meows of their acidic kittens e cute that wiggle Masses in the ancient rite, among Halberdiers boasting quarters of nobility and countesses aspirants they beatify not worth the ridiculous historical calamity that was to Italy and the Catholic Church lamented their House of Savoy, advocate of anti-ecclesiastical laws passed by the House of Savoy under the legislative model of Napoleon Bonaparte, as well as written under the direct dictation of Freemasons. All this happened at a time when, at the Royal Senate and the Royal Chamber of Deputies of the Kingdom of Italy, Senators and MEPs state that it was Pius IX calling "pig" and the Pope Leo XIII calling "shitty bone». This is so, if the painful novel siccardian alla recently per aspiring Contessine dreamy, we want to go instead to the serious historical analysis, What this requires first of all that educated people, competent and above series. E la vera culture, the true knowledge and the true seriousness, born and proceed from the rejection of the arrogance and the extraordinary virtue of humility that leads to listening, What unfortunately impossible for those who hear only the reasons for yourself and then change the first absolute truths, then closed ideologies and aggressive.

.

.

.

.

.

.

PAEDOPHILIA: "IF THE SPOTLIGHT 'IS A GOOD REPRESENTATION OF PLAGUE film dell'omertà CLERICAL

.

“The case of Spotlight"It is a film that deserves appreciation for the way in which the director and the actors have been the heart of this painful problem, It consists of clerical quell'omertà that has always characterized and wraps both the worst cases of child abuse and the various sexual disorders experienced by many members of our secular and regular clergy. And now I'll explain I lived on my life and on my skin, what it means for a priest violate the clerical conspiracy of silence, since the prices I paid them all, one by one …

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

PDF print format article

.

.

the movie poster

A devoted reader He pointed me to two articles in the New Daily Compass, one signed by Massimo Introvigne [cf. WHO] and one by Stefano Magni [cf. WHO]. The object of these two items is the film "The case of Spotlight”, award-winning film-complaint on cases of child abuse that shook the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston and the Catholic Church in several corners of the world [cf. Italian trailer, WHO].

The two authors on Compass Daily They signed their articles, treat the problem with that journalistic propriety that at times can lead to fall in the partial and superficial. Or Massimo Introvigne, which shows a very complex problem through its known sociological preparation; nor Stefano Magni, who in his excellent article could in my opinion avoid defining the work as "ideological film", are not even touched by the partial and prevailing superficiality today appears the main protagonist.

I that certain problems I have touched them with his hand and there I found myself embroiled finally paying a heavy price, I say that this film, far from “ideological”, It is above all free from any "strong scene" stretched to touch the feelings of the audience to arouse in them contempt for the Catholic Church; otherwise feelings aroused by many other films, for instance “Primal Fear” [USA, 1996, WHO], “rebellious angels” [Ireland, 2003, WHO], “Magdalene” [2002, UK, WHO], etc ..

“The case of Spotlight”, despite some inaccuracies due to the vast complexity and severity of a theme not easy to treat, It deserves appreciation for the way in which the director and the actors have been the heart of this painful problem, It consists of clerical quell'omertà that has always characterized and wraps both the worst cases of child abuse and the various sexual disorders experienced by many members of our secular and regular clergy.

And now I'll explain I lived on my life and on my skin, what it means for a priest violate the clerical conspiracy of silence, precisely because the prices I paid them all, one by one …

The limit for years reflected in many who "presumed" to be able to talk about certain topics that touch and shake at times our entire ecclesiastical system, It is given by the reluctance often shown by more or less authoritative representatives of the Catholic world to take the bull by the horns, because we all know that you can run the risk of being impaled, so better to stay on the stands of the arena to scream for the bullfighter or the bull. Or rather: if you have the best bullfighter, he shouts "Long live the bullfighter!”, if you have the better the bull, he cries, "Long live the bull!”.

In the years I deepened the complex problem of the gaysmo within the Church and in doing so I never looked at anyone, paying until now the consequences. What they have not however ever paid certain committed lay Catholics and militants, I am taken to shout seconded the wind pulling the arena for "the bullfighter" or "the bull". These committed Catholics and militants, although notified in detail, well they looked from raising time low voice in my defense, When I was within my church passed into the meat grinder from the worst ecclesiastical conspiratorial for daring to utter the truth and to have complained to the Ecclesiastical Authority certain intolerable situations. Something proven by the fact that for two years, in the diocese of the Bishop of Rome - which is not governed by the Bishop of Rome but his Vicar General - he celebrated the Holy Mass in the Catacombs of Priscilla [2011-2013], assisted by my precious student and collaborator, only person. While in, those who could say a few words in my defense, I do not say they were fugitives, They were simply engaged in political correctness, all we are taken to pay their respects to their masters for whom they were committed to leading as the devotees owner-operators vans-goods made available to them.

On certain topics I think I can speak with sufficient authority why sigh sigh behind, everything I have said and all complaints at the time presented to the Vicariate of Rome, the Congregation for the Clergy and the Secretariat of State, I paid beating behind beating, nastiness nastiness behind, ostracism ostracism behind.

loneliness, often a companion of the priest …

I do not know how many lay Catholics that every evening they return home with no one erodes them, I can speak with my knowledge of the facts, at the end of the day instead I remained in my house, which is the church understood as the ecclesiastical world, enveloped by gloom of that silence the clerical ruling whose evil results are now detailed in the written judgment given by several courts scattered around the world. Judgments anything but unfair and far from being moved by anti-Catholic sentiments, enough to consider that on the words of those judgments was then celebrated the painful liturgy of the MEA culpa by those same clerics who until shortly before had rebuked, threatened and ostracized the few priests who courageously had reported facts, situations and, above all, those high-risk individuals protected by entire roped powerful prelates. And certain people, in this case the homosexual clergy on the one hand, pedophiles on the other hand, They have always had, inside the church world, protectors armies, but above all the diligent and often powerful "copertori".

And whoever pays the price I paid, as it is beaten to a pulp, however, Leisure, and being free I have no debts to pay, because the "secret" of the Christological freedom that really known if will make us free [cf. GV 8, 32] It is based on the lack of any aspiration of career and ecclesiastical benefice; despite claims by certain careerists, not potendomi define "free man", if anything, they have called me ... "dangerous man”, or "loose cannon” (!?). This is also why I have no creditors dressed in red who knock on my door to introduce bills due to be paid, or that remind me of the loans obtained, or if anything donations or gifts bestowed to me in the form of accommodation, prebends and ecclesiastical privileges, I saw that I have donated only copious slaps; and slap - as we all know - we are always free, get the grace to the soul that receives and often lead to Hell that of those who grants it free or calculated nastiness, in supreme contempt for the evangelical truth that will set us free.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. And Satan came Trino. Relativism, indivdualismo, disobedience. Analysis on the Third Millennium Church. Published in 2011 and shortly in print

In 2011, in my book currently in print, I analyzed in depth the problem of omosessualizzazione of the Church and the number of gay priests always higher, stating the reasons, triggers the origins and also the possible remedies, even if with these results: not a single bishop and cardinal, those who later approached me, gave me wrong for what I had written and for the clear way in which I had written the. Far from it, collezionai compliments sometimes even embarrassing, inside the closed private rooms of the various sacred buildings. It made only except for an elderly owner archbishop, who welcomed me at the end of 2011 taking care of my father's lifelong training for the priesthood, None, these prelates in private laudatori, middle finger moves for me, while an army of mediocre monsignorini incattiviti tried to attack me like a pack of hyenas angry.

Facts are facts and these remain, but especially documented. And the Ecclesiastical Authority, from Roman, You know this, in what way I am accustomed to document the facts; and also how do they never speak without proof.

Preaching in the desert sands and reeds in the wind I needlessly spoke a omosessualista coup inside the church [see WHO]. In vain I explained that the gay lobby does not just aim high, because a long time is now arrived at the top. In fact years that gay clergy and their gay friendly affect the episcopal appointments of more or less candidates belonging to the gay "pious confraternity”, and once they become bishops begin first to place their faithful friends in key positions in the dioceses, in many of them more or less overt gay reign in all of them the so-called the nerve center, with immediate access to activation buttons of the launch of the ground-to-air missiles on the good priests, or on the few that survive in some dioceses where, those who have the misfortune to participate in them at a meeting of the clergy, It may sometimes have the impression of being finished by mistake in a branch of the Gay village.

new insight into the religious style, before which St. Pio of Pietrelcina would surely jump for joy …

How is all this never happened? The problem is upstream in the early seventies, when in the post-conciliar season it ran from the previous penalty, perhaps excessive, responsive to lax. And so, in a society undergoing rapid transformation and with the so-called "sexual liberation" now prevailing, seminars you went emptying, more still novitiates and student halls of religious families and the same historical orders. It was then that many bishops and superiors of religious orders opened wide the doors and allowed access to training for the priesthood and religious life in people who never, earlier, They would be admitted to a seminary or a novitiate. And when you create nests of vipers, it happens that the vipers reproduce with each other and the occurrence all together good bite and attempt to poison anyone looking for some way to hit them.

If forty years ago it was reasonable to say that the problem was born upstream from the formation of future new priests and religious, today, Fully occurred degeneration, it is rather reasonable to say - but unfortunately no one tells him - that the problem is all the episcopate. For as I explained in my book that the 2011: "Those who in the seventies capeggiavano inside of the seminars gay fraternity, Today we find them bishops, and just become such, first they have placed in all important positions and carried on in the hierarchy or in the so-called ecclesiastical career of related matters to them ". This is the dramatic root of that problem pointing to for years, but unfortunately to no avail, because no one in the church wanted to pay even hear my words, especially when the evidence of the facts gave me full reason.

I also explain, always in that my work, that physical homosexuality, that actually practiced, It is only the tip of a now radicalized that homosexuality itself is much worse and harmful: that psychological homosexuality She is gone now in power and in virtue of which the Church was finally omosessualizzata. And today we are not infrequently before priests, but especially before bishops and "men" in delicate positions of authority who sometimes think with the anger of women's psychologies living with their typical disorder, which it is hysteria, word the meaning of which says it all, since the greek etymology of this lemma [afterbirth, hysteron] It means uterus.

the palace of the Vicariate of Rome

But let's rigorously documented facts, given that certain documents and reports the handed in my own risk following the Ecclesiastical Authority: the then Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Rome S.It is the center of the field. Mons. Ernest Mandara, man I will keep the memory alive and lovable; the then Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, at the hands of then my Bishop. It's still: to Cardinal Giuseppe Bertello, former apostolic nuncio in Italy, office at the time vacant, appointed Governor of Vatican City, which went to deliver my text in its new office at the Holy See with a prayer to have that my relationship to the then Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, because at stake it was the image of the Diocese of Rome, ie the particular Church of the Supreme Pontiff that on certain issues and problems had already been expressed in a decisive and severe expressions and through more documents, Therefore it was necessary to prevent precisely in his Diocese, without his knowledge and because of the bad people's government, certain burst scandals.

In my two different reports drawn up at the beginning 2011 They were referred to various cases, from that of the rector of a prestigious and ancient Roman basilica which for years maintained a round of young prostitute, What, however, that for years everyone knew: He knew Cardinal Agostino Vallini, he knew his predecessor to the Vicariate of Rome Cardinal Camillo Ruini, He knew the Prelate Secretary of the period at the Vicariate, Mons. Mauro Parmeggiani, later promoted Bishop of Tivoli; He knew the then Archbishop Angelo Bagnasco castrense, later promoted Archbishop of Genoa and President of the Italian Episcopal Conference, who attended the official business for several years that basilica during his apostolic ministry to the Armed Forces, to follow with so many other silent prelates, all variously masters of that sum “prudence” leading sometimes to see and at the same time not to act. What was, indeed, the reaction of Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, at the time when the then Bishop handed him my hand that my relationship? He took note of it and said that the unfortunate situation of the basilica had long been known to them. And shortly after, The bearer bishop of my report - which with all its strengths and weaknesses, however, has always been a true believer and above all a man of moral and ethical sense that the extent of its possibilities tried to protect me from that grave injustice -, He came out of the Sacred Congregation for the Clergy, saying: "Let's go well, We informed them of what they already knew!». And he added: "But what's worse is that nothing do '.

Underground the church of Santa Teresa in Rome

In one of those two reports Also I pointed to the delicate problem of the Carmelites of the Parish of Santa Teresa, from which year after a scandal erupted from hell implications [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO]. But as soon as I named the Carmelites, the prelate my interlocutor's face darkened and he said: "Molla suddenly the piece! The Carmelites are in the good graces of Cardinal Agostino Vallini who wanted to promote one, His notorious protege, also like him canonist, prior to the post of auxiliary bishop Napoli, then to that of the Bishop of Sora-Aquino-Pontecorvo. And I'll tell: He is trying to take him to the Vicariate as archbishop vicegerent ". And so, effectively, occurred shortly after the 2012, when the Carmelite S.It is. Mons. Filippo Iannone was elected to that position, so that “staffing manager” the Vicariate was complete in its framework of fearful and obsequious “secretaries” e “subalterns“, certainly not the brother bishops are called to collaborate in perfect communion for the good of the diocese of the Bishop of Rome with his Vicar General. It is known that certain ringleaders want around itself of subalterns, not the brother bishops, much less of the minds who reason; and they want those in the proportion in which they are subconsciously aware of being mediocre sensational that must precisely why try to shine in every way and by every means in its own light.

After a time as private as dramatic interview had with two senior officials of the Digos of Rome in the early 2012, I was made aware of the "wild life" conducted by the then Archabbot of Montecassino, Dom Pietro Vittorelli, whose blatant gayezza he would have seen and perceived even a blind man, except the good Ecclesiastical Authority, literally falling from the clouds when it was finally made public that this unworthy successor Luciferian of St. Benedict of Nursia was an unrepentant addict and equally unapologetic gay that it still good life and the services of its expensive prostitutes gay with the money withdrawn from the Caritas of the Diocese of him entrusted. Needless to mention today - although to have to remember though - what brought all these cases I reported years in advance, thanks to the inaction of the well informed Ecclesiastical Authority, that if you put in front of some of their responsibilities for action, before certain nasty business is mutassero in public scandals, it is not uncommon that irritate against those who warn certain things, if anything, making her pay dearly to the victim, just as it did to the undersigned.

this great soul rest …

Apart from certain information related to me in a confidential way by various members of the police who frequented the Roman basilica in which at the time was serving, before proceeding further I must incidentally clarify how I became aware of certain facts …

… from a few weeks after my priestly ordination I began to be a confessor and spiritual director of a growing number of priests, religious, secular and religious seminarians in formation, which several times, in the internal forum and external forum, prostrate in a deep inner pain conditions or real shock told me the very serious situation that they found themselves living and appropriate to incur. Because not all are born lions or eagles, several of these brothers and several seminarians and religious, not knowing how to act or simply as contact their superiors and remain unharmed, They freed inviolable sacramental seal of confession and after having me they provided free transfer details, evidence and documents, authorizing me to report cases and to talk to the competent ecclesiastical authority. Think, between the various documents I delivered a playful figure even complete photo collection in which, seminarians of a prestigious Roman College, had found nothing better to do than celebrate Christmas itself as "whores" in a bacchanal of Bacchus and Ceres, then devising a photo shoot in which you were mounted on photo-images of naked and half-naked female paired with their trainers, of women with shapely figures and so to follow. This institution obviously has a name, however, even prestigious, It called Almo Collegio Capranica, breeding ground of many bishops and cardinals Italian, of different species of our worst current, which all together, as a sort of "secret lodge”, if necessary protect this almo College, within which happened at all and more, with dismay of the same Secretary of State to which he belongs and from which its jurisdiction, in addition to the dismay facts long known, we would expect these measures are still far from coming; from the organic unless the Secretary of State should not proceed before you fire the affiliates to seletta “secret lodge” the Capranica [cf. Correspondence Romana, WHO].

Here then explained why for which, those responsible, He was always treated with caution, knowing that when I talk or say certain things, I never do nonsense, neither hearsay nor the devastating "seems ... seems ... it says ... 'that emerges instead punctual on the lips of those clerics who wish wholeheartedly impallinare anyway someone. I speak for always habit and only on the basis of evidence tested and documented.

a little uplifting glimpse of video taken by the service “The good nights of gay priests”

In what has been narrated Also join a precedent dating from the late 2009, at the time that I lived in an international priestly house of Aventine Hill. At that time it happened that from that hill I became aware of what was happening "downstream", ie to Testaccio, where an alarming number of priests attended plainclothes various gay clubs. Something quite understandable that these gay priests would pass unnoticed, because it seems that the monsignorini the Vicariate were too busy making jokes on me when I dared to present myself on several occasions in their offices with the dress I wear cassock, transposed as though that my ecclesiastical vestment represented some kind of contempt of others injured clerical majesty; or rather the majesty of those who, instead of laughing on my cassock - that the practices I wear, and I always carry every day -, perhaps they should be cured of many priests who jeans e t-shirt They went to "palpate the bird" in between the legs to the Cubists dancing half-naked in the Testaccio gay clubs.

When I signaled the coming and going of priests in these gay clubs, in tones flush with the threat the Mafia was clearly made me realize that if I wanted to live well in Rome, I had to learn to mind my own business; and in that sense I was invited to do mine and to live the clerical pernicious silence so well depicted by the director and the actors of "The case of Spotlight”. Spent less than a year, while in the summer of 2010 I was in Germany for in-depth studies, I was joined by telephone by a family member who told me: "You can get the weekly Panorama?». And he explained to me: "From the cover on, you will find written there all that you have reported on time but to no avail to the Ecclesiastical Authority". And the title on the cover was as follows: "The good nights of gay priests' [see WHO]. the service center were reports, accompanied by videos of the gay revels in the Testaccio local to which participated many priests, one of them even dared to celebrate the morning Mass in the apartment's living room in which he had given to sodomitic bacchanalia with his friend occasional, This is also the sacred celebration [watch movies WHO].

the sad cover of the weekly Panorama in July 2010 He published by Carmelo Abbate service then accompanied by video footage still visible on the net

Faced with such evidence, think that the Ecclesiastical Authority has summoned me and said: "... We note that you were right, and that in advance we had shown the true, pointing out people and situations scabrous, but unfortunately we have not acted "? Never! And it was precisely because I was right, because I had seen it right, that have been subjected to harassment by repeatedly ringleaders army of conspiratorial who judged me guilty of conspiracy of silence denied clerical. Because as you can well understand, the important thing is that the Church ask forgiveness from the Jews, to Muslims, to the Lutherans, I pentecostali, the natives ... well: to everyone, unless its priests devotees, which in serious danger if necessary they have risked all and for all, just to find some way to defend it.

Besides, let's be clear, Why, especially in this climate of stifling mediocrity ecclesiastical, if I had accepted the omertose rules of the game and all that it entails, not only I would have already become the holder of a professorship in a pontifical university, not only I would have had a very different kind of accommodation, not only I would have been entered in the ambits of the so-called most prestigious ecclesiastical career … more still: perhaps, after a short period of years, I would even find themselves “strut me” with the miter on his head and the pastoral in his hand in the midst of an army of bishops who see but do not see, who they know but pretend not to know, who bow their heads before the bullies who beat up and the weak, which often punish the victims and defend the executioners. And I was - I always -, the right choice, because I have never pointed the immediate present, but to eternity, namely the salvation of my soul that aspires to attain the beatific vision in the Trinitarian mystery of the Father, of the Son and the Holy Spirit, to which I intend to also drive many more believers of Christ as a pastor in the care of souls. And to point LORD must choose to need the cross, without which there is no resurrection.

when in 2009 I said to a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that the young Bishop. Krzysztof Charamsa, amiable and good person dogmatic theologian, It was clearly gay [cf. WHO]; when I explained that in his studies on the "theology" of "human suffering" [cf. WHO] I had found hidden behind the lines discomfort coming upstream from its definitely due to his sexuality was human-affective inner, behold, in response, This respected member, meeting following the then my Bishop, He complained that I saw homosexuals everywhere and I was obsessed by homosexuals in the Church. Even in that case, the then my Bishop, instead of reproach he said: "The problem, It is not that homosexuals see them you, the problem is that instead he did not see them!».

retrospectively demand nothing short of lawful: after the public coming-out Mons. Charamsa, He arrived at a young age to the prestigious post of assistant secretary of the International Theological Commission, what you should tell me, today, this time a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, promoted later also bishop for his "vision" estrospettiva?

I find really impressive that these prelates e prelates, although aware of a mistake, have criticized in the past only one who was right because he said, and pointed to them the true; that although aware of the fact that I had been right while they in fact no, for no reason at all they never admit they were wrong, even at the cost of denying the obvious facts. Or maybe because they are too busy in the painful "liturgy"Presented the apology and directed by the Holy Mother Church to the Jews, to Muslims, to the Lutherans, I pentecostali, the natives ... well: to all - as I said - unless its priests devotees?

image of the main character of the young in the film adaptation of Tdazio Death in Venice Luchino Visconti, accentuating in a masterly way ephebophilia contained in the pages of Thomas Mann

And I close this long "litany" with the last in the series of order: months ago, upon direct knowledge of the person, the situation and the facts, I informed a Tuscan bishop that a young man was kept at a distance prudently from contact with adolescents in parish areas, because affected by proven instincts efebofili. I addressed at a respectable priest of that diocese, with psychological experience, a teacher of my acquaintance to accompany with him one of the former teenage palpeggiati in the past by this character, moved by a report to be defined with the faith and the Church, both lived in a sort of aesthetic dimension decadent flavor of "Death in Venice" by Thomas Mann. Of course I wrote a detailed report at this Bishop, who, when in May 2015 I crossed at the plenary of the Italian Episcopal Conference - where I had gone to greet some prelates and meet others who wanted to talk to me -, in response to my letter-report he said that he was not a magistrate and that if I had something to report I had to turn not to him but to the judiciary. And a few months later, this bishop, he found something better to do than to demonstrate its maximum villainy admitting this efebofilo, lover of the beautiful and liturgical-musical aesthetics, in his seminar.

Needless to say: if that person became a priest for our great misfortune, and once a priest palpeggiasse a teenager, I immediately take my report sent to his time, Witnesses sent to make private testimony to that bishop and, without any hesitation, I will turn to the judiciary, but not to denounce the efebofilo caught in the act, but the bishop. And in my exposed make clear that not only he did not acknowledge listen when I warned him in time with a wealth of evidence, but after being informed at all points on the subject of very high concern, He deemed it right and good to admit it in your workshop. And we'll see, especially with the times they live today, with what face this bishop will say to the judges who knew nothing; or in what spirit will dare argue before the courts that he is not a judge and therefore, not being such, He had no duty and obligation to oversee the diocese entrusted to him, to the point of admitting no problem a fox into the chicken coop, although this had been warned to advance and with all the details of the case.

Archpriest of the Papal Basilica of Saint Peter, Cardinal Angelo Comastri, It imposes the ashes on the head of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI

That the Church has issued documents on the subject it is not in doubt, as there is no doubt the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI wrote a memorable Pastoral Letter to the Catholics of Ireland [cf. WHO], I considered one of the most important acts of his apostolic ministry to and for this several times stated in my paper referenced above. Document which, The Holy Father then reigning, He explained how and to what extent dangerous many bishops have not taken into account, and how seguitino to ignore those exhortations, continuing undeterred to admit in their increasingly empty seminars veritable armies of asexual - best hypothesis -, if not worse than the people who reveal a clear lack of male hormone testosterone and are looking for aesthetic apparatus, and aesthetic-liturgical or aesthetic-clerical species, their point of refuge, vent and, unfortunately, secure career, that practices and rigor make, because if on the one hand aim to redeem, the other aim to exercise power over others through roles of great importance.

Over the past few years It was not missing on some serious issues or the foresight of the Popes nor the documents that give clear guidance, like the one in which he urges the non-admission in the seminaries of people with homosexual tendencies [cf. WHO]. The problem is that when a "government" system is found to be infected from these now over people inserted in key leadership roles, this may be the result: I end up for two years to celebrate Mass without people Catacombs witnessed by my pupil and assistant, while many "Bishops-Madame"Acting with the typical moodiness of menopausal women, they do not find something better to do than to take one of your favorite gay and naming it directly rector of the seminary, ... nothing but non-admission in the seminaries of people with homosexual tendencies! Unfortunately, in many religious seminaries and novitiates, the first gay were found to be precisely the trainers. And if you do not want to believe me, then you believe that the judgments given by criminal courts in various European countries, including Italy, based on facts and evidence of a shame and squalor that disfigure the poor Church of Christ with the launch of the worst organic substances on his face.

What I pointed solutions, in the pages of that my study? First, the obvious solution: with authority, severity and courage, vipers was severed head. I wrote this in 2011, except see several of these vipers becoming one behind the other bishops in later years.

asexual worldwide: unite!

Why not wrong but devastating judge, that today there are clergy who continue to think that if one has homosexual tendencies, what matters it is that physically does not exercise his homosexuality? I consider this wrong because, Catholic morality, too long it is only focused on the physical-sexual dimension and little of the psychological, forgetting that sex and sexuality is above all a mental thing, an attitude. And as I have stated in the past, Following today to reiterate that the repressed homosexual, he who does not give any kind of physical outlet for their sexual urges, It is always more dangerous than what at least is unleashed in sex with other men. The repressed, by me also defined as "homosexual psychic”, is more dangerous because he lives in a captive dimension and increasing incattivimento that is mainly found vent in three things: the perverse pleasure he derived from bear harm to others, the lust for power and the rampant careerism, in attachment to money and material goods. These people are also blackmailed, easily manipulated by their "benefactors", ready to betray and to violate the secrecy, if they thereby give thanks or benefit from their godfathers, or simply protect one of their members gay fraternity. For this repeat: the "psychic homosexuals" who are self-repressed are worse, so why vent their worst repression in the Church and often give good priests is healthy, that have always been their favorite victims, under the eyes of more and more powerless and bishops of the ecclesiastical authorities.

after midnight when teenagers dancing half-naked on the cubes of gay nightclubs, in this case it is not legitimate to speak of either adolescents nor pedophiles, indeed we must proclaim “sacred dogma” Of “faith” that Gay is Beautiful. But if a priest groped a young hustler Of 17 years and eleven months, it is rather a dangerous pedophile.

In our society schizophrenic dominated by the ideology of gender, the Church is showing a distressing weakness and inadequacy. For instance: How come, whenever newspapers, sites and powerful blog Gay lobby They are thrown in your face the inevitable "pedophile priests", no one has the courage to reply that most of the alleged pedophile priests, far from being such, in truth they are homosexual priests, as such deserving of the best protections and safeguards as part of the all-powerful socio-political and economic mother known as Gay lobby?

.

When it comes to us priests, it happens by magic that gays suffering from “puri” and "wonderful" homosexual instincts, as such deserving of protection and if not of homophobia shouted accusations against anyone who dares to dissent, putacaso become pedophiles. a arcano, this, now I will explain, as the trembling ecclesiastical authority has not yet explained, while having available a deluge of Catholic magazines, Press agencies and offices for social communications. however Rasserenatevi, dear Catholics, because thanks to God there The Island of Patmos, John's last place of revelation, with its aggressive Fathers who do not have godparents e masters other than our Lord Jesus Christ.

Montecassino, the historic West abbey founded by St. Benedict of Nursia in the seventh century.

The truth is that priests They decry in two main ways, or better with the two notorious "they": sex and money. Of course: as clergy, in recent years we have given the worst of ourselves in balance sheet scandals and sexual. Just return to the paradigm Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, that to the best so far ascertained arrived to spend on whims, and especially in the vagaries of a sexual nature, 36.000 euro in a single month. But before we continue I open sore parentheses the Ecclesiastical Authority hath looked from opening: what kind of relationship "ill"Passed between the previous Archabbot of Montecassino, Dom Bernardo D’Onorio [1983-2007], later promoted Archbishop of Gaeta [2007], and his successor Dom Pietro Vittorelli [2007-2013]? Why will the first Vittorelli responsible for training monks as novice master and vocational animator - always to return to the speech of the fox guarding the chicken coops placed - hereafter as his personal secretary, it was the then Arch-Abbot Bernardo D'Onorio. Therefore I ask: it is legitimate to ask where ever had eyes and with them the wisdom and Christian prudence, quell’asexually psychic Arch-Abbot Bernardo D'Onorio, when he brings up such delicate roles a person from apparent disordered sexuality like Pietro Vittorelli? And while a asexual He passed their own to a ministry sexed messy, in such matters they were bustling the authorities of the Holy See, to whom belong the acceptance and then the confirmation of the appointment by Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino? Because, as you can see, certain tragedies stem from an evil chain that no one has yet taken care of interrupting, because to do so would have to go against entire roped parties of friends of friends of friends … And who has reasonable grounds to deny them, who denies me, if necessary also with strokes of complaints, I can not wait to receive at least one! And if some Ecclesiastical Authority raised a sigh of what has been said by me, if anything, accusing me of "disrespect" and "inappropriateness", my defense will call a team of urologists experts, andrology e Psicologi. And after they have appraised the D'onorio, father giving birth the monster Vittorelli, oozes really manly male hormone testosterone from all the pores of the skin, I genufletterò to publicly ask forgiveness, I will retire to private life and not even write more article, indeed I not write more I miss my name. And if I will be forced to sign it will be with an "X" to stop so as not to write, proof that a real man and a real priest - if you really do not want and can not be conspiratorial - then it is good that not even write, because it must be deaf, blind, dumb and even illiterate.

Nichi Vendola with fellow Ed Head testimonial of the twentieth edition of the Gay Pride Roman [cf. WHO]

On the ultra-secularist newspapers, on sites and the powerful blog Gay Lobby, anyone can read the written words of fire sull'Arciabate of Monte Cassino Pietro Vittorelli, about who, the ultra liberals, omosessualisti to the gender and the ideologues who have pointed to the public pillory, However it lacks a critical step that disingenuous ignore: the Vittorelli was neither a pedophile nor a dangerous bankrupt, but simply an unrepentant homosexual, that in a government role, or if you prefer to power, used means and money to have a good time around the world with young men paid so much per centimeter, based on the length and the circumference of their virile member. Just as they always most of the gays, having money available, whims can afford paying them with necessary travel, with designer clothes, with stays in hotels with five stars ... all so much per centimeter, calculated for both the length and the circumference of the male member of their lover on duty. If in the end the turns, some gay also take a womb for rent, pay a woman in need, and if anything, they manufacture a toy boy for the consumption of their unbridled egotism satanic. And frankly, per me, do this and promote it all as "right”, is much worse than what the steal - as did the Vittorelli - money to Caritas to pay the marchettari, pace of new father-gay Nichi Vendola just returned to the doors of the sixty years since an American factory children with her partner, which in turn could be his son. Because before this people, I do not say I'd be willing to rehabilitate the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, but surely to consider, in due proportion, As his guilt is less. Ben is in fact more to blame for a Gianna Nannini, of Elton John and a Nichi Vendola that manufacture children to their own use. Indeed, while the hustler adult is free and consenting in their mercimoni with prelates and priests just as consenting adults, a child or a child in similar places inhumane conditions, are neither free nor consenting to choose similar aberrations destined to score all their lives in a negative way and deeply traumatic.

Hyenas Of One Italian, now specialized in hunt priest

Request: if this and more is permissible at all moneyed homosexuals that the poignant music of Sir Elton John clamoring "Gay is beautiful”, Why should it not be the same for the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino? I wonder then that the very Gay lobby they have not protected, or who have written that all in all it was a great to have a good time as he could, exactly as they are accustomed to the rich gay lobbyists.

Rather than have them protected as homosexuals on the basis of genderista "dogma” Of “faith"That" gay is good ", just gay lobbyists have rather literally massacred over time various ecclesiastical, often using the armed wing of the Hyenas of Italy One, who went to film them and hunt them down one by one on the sly. And are those same Hyenas at the same time protect the culture of gender, marriages between same-sex couples and their "right" to adopt or buy fabricate and children.

Well I challenge anyone to see a member of the scientific community, the specialized field of neurology, neuropsychology, of psychiatry and clinical psychology, willing to support that an adult who has today a sexual relationship with a willing guy 16/17 year old, which if anything is a prostitute for three or four years and that 10/11 old was full of porn films collected files in his computer and his cell phone, is a dangerous pedophile. I believe that no member of the scientific community never assert such a thing, especially knowing what levels of knowledge and sexual degeneration have already reached many of our young people at the age of 13/14 year old.

Lecco, lush city in the Alps

A Rome is a hospital that treats infectious diseases Also related sexual apparatus. Now I invite anyone to chat to the specialists of this hospital, which is the San Gallicano, because it will be their eagerness to explain how teenagers of both sexes in the age group between 14 ed i 16 years come with serious infections for practicing pleasant little things that, as known and known, ... it is just "typical" of the "early adolescence", for example the so-called anal intercourse, the so-called oral reports, the so-called relations group where only one person is infected to transmit the infection to all, or the contact of the mouth and tongue with the vagina and the anal orifice and so on ... …

To save me from disapproving of those few individuals ready to manifest scandal before certain details related to the sexual sphere provided by a priest, clarify and precise that wanting to be understood by everyone in some of my writings, addressed to the general public and not only to theologians or specialists, put me to flaunt clinical latinisms, you know well, to indicate the existence of precise reality, it would not be appropriate, if hugging the ridiculous and especially the prudish spirit that should never be confused with the human value, social and Christian modesty. If in fact the boys and girls of 14 years end up with serious infections at the San Gallicano because an already sailed girl sent an infection of the mouth of a peer who has hunted the language in the vagina and the anal orifice, you understand well that it is useless to use euphemisms. And if this happens, I think it is urgent to ask themselves a serious question, especially then if one of these teenagers will gladly let you groped by a priest in back of the Ipad change, We are wishing that we can and should also call perverse and perverted, we must isolate, condemn and suspend from the exercise of the sacred ministry, but always pointing with his real name, which it is to "homosexual", not to "pedophile", at best we can mark it as efebofilo. And as homosexual, or as efebofilo, this priest, according to contemporary trends, It should also be safeguarded and protected if attacked with an outcry by the Gay Lobby shouting "homophobe, homophobe!"Directed at anyone who dares to question its legitimate sexual tastes.

Cardinal Agostino Vallini, taken from a fragment of the interview movie SIR

From the playful speech the openings and infectious diseases the most experienced lower than they were half a century the fifties ago, I would like to conclude by switching to a reply given by the vicar general of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome, Cardinal Agostino Vallini, about which I refer to video in which he responds, in his capacity as President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, about the exploits of the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, and as such was for several years a member of the Italian Episcopal Conference and then the local Episcopal Conference of Lazio. Cardinal Vallini, also known as the greatest canonist of the world, before the exploits of Vittorelli, making use of a language typical of the politicians and not the shepherds in charge of souls, referring only to the capital illicit said that if the judiciary will experience the elements to proceed with a conviction, in this case the Church of Cassino is a civil party through an action for damages (!?) [cf. movie with interview WHO]. In short: were years that the Vittorelli led a life not in keeping, who attended the most discussed Roman salons, that was absent when and how he wanted the abbey, that made luxury holidays; but mainly it was obvious to anyone that his poses and his way of porgersi were more similar to the movements of a Princess capricious instead of a man trained in the rigors of the monastic cloister, but above all to a man. And despite all this, someone wants us to believe that no one knew … that no one had ever noticed anything?

i whatsapp messages exchanged by Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino with its marchettari: «I do everything what I want» … «I'm going to look’ cocks». But this dissolute life no one knew anything …

I also have another question to ask how many now tear their clothes because they say They knew nothing. This is the question: the agents of the anti-narcotics team, How long before the scandal broke, They did leak out discreetly to the Ecclesiastical Authority this Princess-priest used drugs? Because in a totally informal and secretive, with me some insiders of the anti-narcotics, They consulted at the beginning of 2012, lying to treat the delicate case of this prelate somewhat in view that, inter alia, acquired illegally and equally illegally held drugs such as ecstasy, Cocaine and crack. And besides doing nothing, What did the Ecclesiastical Authority, albeit informed? Perhaps he began to prepare the ritual of cloth robes and dell'addolorato “we did not know”, to use in the day when the inevitable public scandal would erupt, as evidence the video reproduced here from which radiates all the terrible sufferings of the President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, first ahead of all in … I know nothing? [cf. movie with interview WHO]

Sincerely, in terms of Catholic morality and Canon Law, the appropriation and squandering money, in this case just described is just the consequence of much more serious disorders and everyone summarized in the dissolute life of Vittorelli, that with such attitudes and expressions of disgust even the irreverent Marchese de Sade, in phone calls and intercepted numerous messages through which communicated with marchettari Gay his more or less strong providers of sexual services, used to define drugs, sex and vice as "Paradise". Of course, no other Italian court will condemn the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino to have practiced extensively homosexuality, or for the personal use of drugs, nor to have had around him a court of young men, nor to have sought sites in gay young consenting adults who were particularly gifted in between the legs, because none of this is pursued and is punishable by the Criminal Law Code.

image of the Papal Basilica of St. Peter surrounded by an unusual fog

So here's my question accurate and in no way nebula facing the greatest canonist of the world: it is not by chance, pending the ruling of the Italian criminal court, the ecclesiastical Tribunal, in the hole of its powers, He would have already had to act and proceed from time through strict canonical penalties paid to load this unworthy ecclesiastical finished for the entire sum disfavor catholicity head and guide of the historic Abbey West mother? And once paid these canonical penalties, it would not be appropriate to give public notice, to clarify how and when necessary with what severity the Church falls dark mercy of some of his sons unworthy and harbingers of enormous public scandals? None of this has happened, however,, because the Cardinal Vallini, which apparently it seems to be the emblem of hyper-legal guarantor and that perhaps has run out of more liberal sudden Cavour, most partisan of Garibaldi and Mazzini Republican, completely forgotten that he was for years also the Chairman of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, declares and states that it is awaiting the … judgment of the Criminal Court of the State so that it is then assessed how to act (!?).

there, I hope that no one, in high political and administrative spheres of the Italian Republic, discover that in our home we have a canonist of this kind, because they could “rubarcelo” to name the first President of the Supreme Court and then afterward a senator for life.

Having said that now you see, dear readers of 'Patmos Island, to who we are in hand for years and years? We are in the hands of the bicycles that are put on the racing track of Monza in the sure belief that they could run like the Ferrari. We are in the hands of people enveloped by the most appalling mediocrity yet convinced that the People of God is made up of villagers from the countryside Obtuse unable to understand and grasp the immense gravity of their turns of phrase, just as the greatest canonist of the world that claims to await the judgment of condemnation of the State - regarding offenses asset background - only to see eventually how to proceed against a prelate who managed their lives as S'Essa had been a brothel ancient Pompeii; a living proof that, however,, if it is not declared as such by the State Court, no one can the ecclesiastical Tribunal?

Ten girls, Old cover a 45 rounds of Lucio Battisti

Given these premises, I could safely take and implement the song by Lucio Battisti's wit "Ten girls for me, Possoni enough " [cf. WHO]. And no one could tell me anything and least of sanzionarmi canonically, because if before the Vittorelli who has rehearsed young men far and wide, Vicar General of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome, President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, as well as the largest in the world canon lawyer and former President of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, He declares to wait to know the judgment of the Italian criminal court if there are figures of exquisitely asset relief offense to eventually act, flying on a life marked on a immorality that really the satanic; That said you know well that I can enjoy myself without any moral problem with ten girls, that as the Baptists 'Possoni said enough'. All without any ecclesiastical law pursues me canonically, unless the Italian criminal court determines that for a priest, have a good time with ten girls, it is a crime; I do not think we'll ever establish, if anything, could you give me a certificate of merit and perhaps the honorary citizenship of the place where the crime has unfolded, if it can prove to them straight and brightened all of them.

Mindful that some ringleaders no case Spotlight He teaches nothing and still they claim to continue to rend their garments to the false cry of sorrow “we did not know”, I hope in the Jubilee Year to the greatest canonist of the world be able to complete as soon as their mandate as Vicar General of His Holiness, devoting the time of life that the grace of God will decide to grant him, to ask for forgiveness from Christ for the damage he went to the Church, in particular the Church of the Bishop of Rome, which maybe someone, from its powerful Secretary of State, would do well to print and take my writing, because right when the Vallini and their flattering scagnozzi Career will allow you to beat the priests like me, damage which consequently will accrue to the Church will be increasingly incalculable and irreversible.

.

dall’Patmos Island, 3 March 2016

.

.

Author
Drafting
of the island of Patmos

.

.

Appendix posthumously [7 March 2016]

We report PLEASURE WITH AN ARTICLE APPEARED ON SIR (RELIGIOUS SERVICE INFORMATION) A FEW DAYS AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF THIS OUR S ARIEL ARTICLE. LEVI of GUALDO

click to open WHO

..

.

Appendix posthumously [4 March 2016]

In the picture: Federico Lombardi, S.J. Official spokesman of the Press Office of the Holy See

.

We point A NOTE OF VERY INTERESTING 4 March BY

FEDERICO LOMBARDI, S.J.

OFFICIAL SPOKESMAN OF THE HOLY SEE PRESS OFFICE

.

To open click WHO

.

______________________________

Dear Readers.

We thank you for giving us your valuable support thanks to which we can provide for the management of expenses'Patmos Island for the year 2016. From time to time please remind us and our scientific and pastoral work, as it has concretely demonstrated, worth your economic support..

And what we are deeply grateful.

.

.

.

.

.