The false ecumenism of Cardinal Kasper
– Theologica –
THE FALSE ECUMENISM OF CARDINAL KASPER
.
In front of the picture painted by Cardinal Walter Kasper in his new booklet, not only St. Thomas Aquinas but the same Luther disdain and consider Kasper hypocritical imposter. St. Thomas, with his measured language, he would have said: «Kasper thinking person skeptical and unbelieving ». While Luther, with his colorful language would have said: "Theologian makes “theology kneeling”? No, theologian who does “Theology in the toilet”!». And this ambiguity Kasper has reappeared on the occasion of the recent publication of the The joy of love the Holy Father Francesco.
.
.
Author
John Cavalcoli OP
.
.
the book on Luther Walter Kasper [WHO]
A note of humanity in this despicable and outrageous booklet he is given by dedicating his sister Ingeborg, recently deceased. who Kasper, unless it shows compassion for the living, at least the exhibition for the deceased.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
To read the article click below:
06.06.2016 Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON – THE FALSE ECUMENISM OF CARDINAL KASPER
.
.
.
.
.
.
I would say that the problem is general, concerns precisely all Catholics, not just the priests.
Chaos and confusion.
And if we also put the words of Msgr. Gaenswein on the double papacy…
Dear Fathers and Brothers,
I read from when you opened the Island, ma, confessing my involuntary superficiality, only today I became fully aware of the message contained in the name and in the subtitle of this online magazine … The Island of Patmos, the site of the last revelation … thanks to the comments of Mr. Ettore.
You have chosen the one that basically we are living … Capt. 12 Apocalypse of John.
I support you with the estimate and prayer.
I endorse what others have expressed fellow priests and Mr. Hector.
I add: through the ambiguity, that is likely to characterize this pontificate, I had to say and not to say, of half-sentences, the many statements about the fact that you might be but no, or maybe not but you … we priests are living a moment of total confusion, to which I try to react, before the faithful that poorly interpret the words of the Pope (which it is often open to different interpretations), answering that “Church doctrine is this”.
For instance, in my diocese, now there are many priests who give communion to divorced and remarried saying that Pope Francis allowed. The bishop took no position and did not respond to those like me who have asked for an explanation and precise directives. I and others, We do not pull the divorced and remarried to receive Communion, but others …
And I also noticed (thing that deserves reflection) than to be indulgent, are the priests from 65/70 years and up, the one who are more careful and “severe” are the few below 40 years in the chancel of our old diocese, old age for clergy.
If this is not to create chaos, due to lack of clarity and non-response, what is it?
And now even that Kasper praises Luther, and then next year the Pope's visit to Lutheran celebrating 500 years of what for us, as they explained the patmosiani fathers, is not a “reform” but a heresy, a fracture.
Then? What else awaits us yet?
Dear Don Angelo, if during the seminary and theological studies, I had a professor as a theologian Father Cavalcoli, I would not have spent 7 years of time (after becoming a priest "pubescent" in 26 year old), to understand that 80 100 of what I had been taught it was wrong.
I have become convinced that the priest Martini (pace all'anima sua) Ambrose was a new, convinced that Rahner had freed us from the Tridentine hood, Bianchi was convinced that the future of “new church”, convinced that Vatican II were the interpretations of the post-conciliar theologians, in the Neocatechumenal convinced that there was the future of the church … and all this world, dear Don Angelo, I fell apart when I found myself parochial vicar in a parish where everything was in the hands of the Neocatechumenal, including thoughts, words, works and omissions. I got in friction with the Neocatechumenals, because I had an inkling that something was wrong, and I paid a very high price. And I had neither the preparation nor theology enough to deal with certain shots. Having said that I fell in crisis.
I met the father Ariel 2011 as I pondered leaving the priesthood. He told me ... "before leaving the priesthood, you read three books? Then we'll talk about it again, and if you want I'll help himself to leave the priesthood ".
These books that gave me: 1. Imitations of Christ, 2. Conferences on the Creed of S. Thomas Aquinas, 3. The text of the spiritual exercises of the Roman Curia Divo Barsotti (1971).
At the time I was put in this condition: 1. I did not know the Imitation of Christ, 2. During his theological studies had mentioned a professor S. Thomas to say that Thomism and the school were outdated, 3. Barsotti not I just never heard of.
After 2 Ariel weeks went back to his father. Today I have 38 years and have always priest, and they are got rid of Martini, Rahner, Bianchi, Kasper, etc …
I would have much more to say and add, but this is enough, I think …
Esteemed Father John Cavalcoli,
now more than ever would wonder: Why, Horses, After decades devoted to the defense of the doctrine of the faith, it is not, fully responsible, cardinal … and why, Levi di Gualdo, no less acute theologically, and offering healthy pastoral setting, It is bishop of a large diocese?
I hope your understandable embarrassment not censor me this comment, Why, to ask myself questions like, I'm not the only priest, I'll I can well guarantee.
The answer I was hatched just reading your two recent articles on this good man's card. Kasper praising Luther, and I also said … perbacco, I had never thought about it!!
And the answer is simple … but because you are above! And our ecclesiastical authorities, for they are mediocre, They are aware that you are above. And as, Two people like you, it only discusses rigorous basis of theology and law, will leave say, they are silent and … who knows how many bishops share will.
The test I think this: if I called you Kasper “useful idiot” or if alludessi to the fact that instead of having “kneeling theology makes theology to the toilet”, surely I would end, undoubtedly, inexorably crushed by my bishop and others, from not only my fellow pro-modernist priests and fans of Kasper.
The problem is that you have not alluded, you have made a flippant joke … no! You have just explained, the legal literature, how and why, this “useful idiot” fa “Theology in the toilet” distorting ecumenism and praising Luther.
And that means being on top of a red biretta, means being above the bishopric of a large diocese.
And please, not imbarazzatevi, to my words.
How well, you did for so many priests, Today disoriented and lost, nothing but red berets, that another large bishoprics!
Fathers Island, founded this magazine, choosing a name like “strongly evocative”, you hired a task to shake your wrists.
With your writings, You're fighting the “good fight” for the affirmation of the truth with tireless commitment, acuteness of thought, transparent with respect, animated by the indomitable faith and conscience clear. Over time the magazine has certainly attracted interest and attention, acquired authority among readers, (see quality and variety of comments, growing number of contacts).
On the merits of your unique work of Kasper, I appreciated the breadth of analysis and observations delicacy.
Then, recalling the review made Osservatore Romano to book Kasper, identifying with thought: Fathers have a problem, huge! Of gigantic disproportions: Butter, ergo the effectiveness of your warnings, against the massive presence on the "media" Kasper – his thought, the role, pastoral action, the consequences for the Church's journey, on the conscience of the faithful ...
Dominated, We rely on you