The Synod of youth. The church, after the Holocaust of the Catholic world, It will be judged in the new Nuremberg Trials, where the cardinals and bishops will respond: 'But I only obeyed orders from above ! »

- ecclesial news -

THE SYNOD OF YOUTH. THE CHURCH, AFTER THE HOLOCAUST OF THE CATHOLIC WORLD, It WILL BE HELD IN NEW PROCESS OF NUREMBERG, WHERE THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS MEET THE COURTS: "BUT I HAVE ONLY obeyed OF OVER !»

.

When more inappropriate historical and ecclesial was held a synod of young people while the visible Church, after the Holocaust of Catholicism, It is going to end up on the dock at the Nuremberg trial, that on you will issue a ruling that will remain written in history. In the course of this process we will be judged one after the other all those on trial have led the visible church under the eyes of the world, after the commission of serious crimes consumed to the detriment of the Church the Mystical Body of Christ [cf. With the 1, 12-20]. And as happened seventy years ago, We feel cardinals and bishops meet: "I just obeyed the orders from above!»

.English version – English version

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

Doing process any intentions, the feeling one gets is that the synods are likely to be set as it was the Assembly of People's Deputies of the Soviet Union, or as it is now in the parliament of North Korea. Let us assume that within the synods can also discuss, as it happened during the Synod on the family. Of course, is being discussed, Synods are used for this purpose. What, however, they serve threads, then when the final document was seen approve what the Synod Fathers had rejected so also agreed and a large majority? If in fact the Court of Miracles, as I call it, or the Magic Circle, as Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller calls it instead, He has already prepared an agenda with a whole range of issues already established, but above all in fact already approved, because convene synods? Perhaps to give the semblance of collegiality in the same way in which the young dictator of North Korea, Kim Jong, He wants to give a semblance of parliamentary democracy? And what happened to the Korean dissidents, They are perhaps finished tied on the heads of the missiles launched then below for the experimental tests?

.

We come all’agenda from the Court of Miracles O Magic Circle : the Synod of young people will have to serve, as has already been amply demonstrated, to clear the LBGT lobby. And although the representatives of young people have never used or referenced in this acronym in their policy documents, There has, however, provided the Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisserri, not failing to express themselves imprecise and contradictory, which in some ways it seems tantamount to lying [please refer to chronicle, WHO].

.

The mention of Acronym LGBT, which as we know means lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender, It is above all a matter of form and law, which subsequently will then have implications not indifferent in terms of doctrine and magisterium. Let's try to understand: if you work Ai organizations Commentarywhich incidentally has nothing to do with gays, but with the famous jurist Gaius who compiled their own commentaries in 180 about d.C. - it had been added to the problem of oral copulation according to the case law of the late principality Augusteo, from the year 30 circa a.C, is obvious that this pleasant erotic practice would first rank and dignity in the Roman legal system of law. Whereas, the problem of oral copulation, It does not exist in law and in fact in the case; I doubt there also can be reached, including implementation in the most extensive form other laws. It does not exist because, Always law and fact, there is precisely the legal institution of oral copulation. The law can not in fact treat or regulate what the law does not exist. That's why in any kind of legal system, both in those of the Roman plant both in those based on common law, the use of words and terms is always very delicate, because the Law, long before punish - the punishment is in fact only the extreme final act conclusive -, It aims to recognize, to establish, then to regulate.

.

Add to this, Always by way of example, a fact that few within the visible Church today can deny: in many Catholic theological institutes, for example by treating the Holy Eucharist, They are increasingly used theologies and terminology taken from the Lutheran lexicon, from consubstantiation. If certain Roman pontifical universities one dares to refer to the school and to Thomism, then at the end of transubstantiation, He runs the risk of being mocked or referred to as pre-reconcile (!?). E, the scoffers, prerogative of which it is the most crass ignorance, will step forward to ignore that one of the two Popes of Vatican II, the very one who has managed the, brought forward and then closed, the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI, that day will be canonized, has defined as appropriate and non-replaceable this term theological [Encyclical The Mystery of the Faith, n. 47, text WHO]. And what we are we to infer that Blessed Pope Paul VI was in actual fact a pre-conciliar? But, as I wrote several times, in today's visible Church will sign with one hand the decree of beatification and canonization of the Roman Pontiffs, with the other hand they rather sign documents affecting, or in some cases zero, their supreme magisterium.

.

The fact that today we live in a visible Church in which you can define how the term transubstantiation school archeological, then reject it or contest it in the classrooms of the pontifical universities, but at the same time, however, they fit into the ecclesiastical vocabulary terms such as LBGT, with the risk that this Luciferian acronym then enter into the vocabulary of the Magisterium of the Church, can not touch and not just rattle Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, below with all the coryphaeus of Journalists true Pontificia for which ever, as "the time of this epochal revolution", things had gone so well. And that things, Russian Revolution in full Pontifical go well like never before had gone, prove increasingly empty churches, the lost and disillusioned believers, the clergy in disarray, the fall in vocations, abandonments priesthood as numerous as ever over the past five years, but on which, however, it is silent on a statistical level, the Congregation for the Clergy, chaired by another friend of Court of Miracles, O Magic Circle.

.

S. AND. Mons. Charles Joseph Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia

Like this, of The Assembly of People's Deputies of the Soviet Union Pontifical It has dawned, thank God, the voice of S.It is. Mons. Charles Chaput, Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia, that prompted the use of correct words [cf. chronicle WHO, WHO], because in terms of Catholic doctrine, the words is then linked to the substance: words and outward signs are used to express the substance. What this should be familiar to anyone who has studied, not even in depth, the first great dogmatic councils of the Church, in which first of all to define the nature of Christ, God made use of precise terms modulated by greek philosophical lexicon, as the concept of ὑπόστασις [hypostasi, nature if seen].

.

Archbishop of Philadelphia invite you to read his article: "Charity, clarity and their opposite » [item WHO].

.

Someone, to define today - then sdoganare - the various forms of exercise of human sexuality, place God "male and female he created them" [Gen 1, 26-27], perhaps he wants to enter in the ecclesial vocabulary terms as LGBT, if anything, giving birth to a new nature quatripostatica, namely the lesbian nature, gay, bisexual, and transgender?

.

The Synod on the family He left a divided Church and disoriented, as well as several deaths from sudden heart attacks among the rows of the vineyard of the Lord. And after you have tried to clear adultery, It was followed by the Synod of young people in which it appears they are at once by attempting to clear the various practices of sexual expression, without posing the question - how to complain about a saintly Archbishop Charles Chaput - that LGBT Catholics can not exist, least of all the Church can legitimize the existence. O, said with another example, anything but paradoxical: a person can be called Catholic atheist and claim as such, ie as an atheist, its full membership in Catholicism? Yup, It can do it in exactly the same way that, a transsexual proud of their transsexualism, It can call himself a Catholic-transsexual and demand full citizenship rights in the Catholic Church Body and demand the full legitimacy of all its instances. Because, if the laudatori of the Russian Revolution Pontifical not they were aware, in different forms, just that we are going, to a figure entirely new Catholicism and Christian: Catholicism of the Catholic atheists, provided both as church and as a lay, the exercise of an evil prerogative, which it is to harass and persecute believers.

.

We'll see how it turns out even this Synod, but above all we will see if, as in the previous, what will be rejected by the Synod Fathers will end up in the final document, if anything hidden, Also this time, somewhat ambiguous expression or in some marginal notice placed at the bottom of page, the series ... "I crafty, you fools!”. But, the only matter, It is to listen to all, thus giving the impression of being Synod, collegiate and especially Democrats, just as is the Korean dictator Kim Jong, which first convened puppet parliament of North Korea, then does strictly what they like.

.

After this Synod that was opened by the insertion of Acronym dogmatic quatripostatico LBGT, not required by anyone in tool of labor, shortly after it opens another, the Synod Pan Amazon, which it has long been on the agenda of the priesthood clearance granted to married men. But beware, all alone ... to experiment. In the meantime, in the Diocese of Rome, although the fact has not called attention and produced news, They are already underway rehearsal, if we consider that a few days ago was named "pastor" of a metropolitan parish - of course it is: to experiment a permanent deacon, He arrived in the rectory with his wife and four children. And this family, from the official page of the deacons of Rome, which are, however, a real branch of the Neocatechumenal Movement, It was listed as ... "diaconal family" (!?) [cf. service WHO]. Having said that let me know: members of my family, their joint having a presbyter, They may be referred to as "priestly family"? And my mother and my brother, They may be referred to as "mother priestly" and as "brother priestly", obviously extending the title to my "sister in law priestly" and my "priestly grandson"? And do we want to forget my "priestly cat"? Needless to say that the discussion would be very long, However, given that those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it in the form pejorative, worth remembering, albeit briefly and quickly, that the permanent diaconate said today, He fell into disuse as the order and became only a passing stage for priestly ordination, after that just in Rome, between the centuries VIII and X, deacons had acquired a prominent role. The deacons were now at the head of the main churches and would not even be ordained priests, why then, these prestigious churches, had access directly to the episcopate. The permanent diaconate will be so restored only after a thousand years, from the Second Vatican Council. And note that not all the dioceses of the world, the bishops ordained permanent deacons, which are absent, for instance, in most African countries, to avoid causing confusion in Catholic populations; and in species where, for anthropological and cultural reasons, the rules related to the chastity of celibacy by priests are not always implemented. In the heart of Europe, in Poland, the first two permanent deacons have been ordained just four decades after Vatican II, In the 2009.

.

In the Eastern Rite Catholic clergy have always been married priests, but they could exercise their ministry only in belonging to their rite diocese; a regulated ritual, against the other, Also from the special Code of Canon Law of the Eastern Churches. Since, however, are being large rehearsal, here is that several of these priests and their families were welcomed in our various Italian dioceses, starting from the Archdiocese of Perugia, Metropolitan Archbishop of which is not a bishop among many, but the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference. I supersede two different facts of a legal nature, and I just ask: in case of any disputes involving a married priest, which law will be applied, the Latin or that of the Eastern Churches? Of course I know it well, that the canon law has long since been replaced by the more savage free will which then turns into the real arrogance that comes to life by the lack of any rule, But the rhetorical question sounds good, and even if the appeal equally useless. Next, as it regards the possible incardinated in the diocese of the Latin Rite, nicely how the priests incardinated married Eastern rite Latinized specifically for rehearsals underway, purpose of which is to please the Head of soviet Pontifical and the circle of his most trusted councilors? there, This could explain it to Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti himself, which it is Archbishop of Perugia and President of the Italian Bishops and home to two priests in his diocese married, to anticipate such decisions of the Synod of the Amazon, that we remember: He has already been taken before its opening [interview, WHO].

.

Having said that a question arises: in the Amazon, they ask themselves to experiment married priests, because the shortage of clergy is very high. Smell, instead, to entrust a parish to a permanent deacon, as a dramatic shortage of clergy there? Because giving a diocesan yearbook look we find that metropolitan parishes 332. The Roman presbytery counts 1.256 presbytery, to which are added 2.929 priests of other dioceses residents in Rome. To these secular priests are then added 5.317 members of the regular clergy, who are the religious priests, and others 87 Priests belonging to various personal prelature [see yearbook, WHO]. In Rome then they reside a total of about 9.580 Priests in the Roman priests, resident priests in the diocese and priests of various religious families. The Diocese of Rome has about 2.350.000 baptized, being divided between the number of diocesan priests living in the canonical territory, damage as a statistic to one priest for every 250 faithful about, all in a Rome with increasingly empty churches. You should then point out that the territory of the Diocese of Rome, It is limited only to the capital of Italy, because out of town, in the City of Rome, arise various dioceses suburbicarian. Request: it was therefore necessary, to exotic experiment, entrust a parish to a permanent deacon in the Mother Church and Mother of all the Churches of Catholic world? Let us act so that while we are celebrating the Synod of youth, They are already underway rehearsal for the Amazon that will give us married priests, It has already been established. I repeat, all alone to experiment and advance notice of Pontifical Parliament North Korea, where dissidents allegedly linked end on missile warheads fired during exercises, but make no mistake, because in Rome's mercy, to the be merciful, also happens a lot worse.

.

to open the video click on the image

If the Cardinal Gerhard Mueller, in a long interview with Raymond Arroyo - that deserves to be heard by all who understand English -, He is back on various topics. The argument from the bad friends who surround the Roman Pontiff, which if it is searched with Diogenes' lantern; S.It is the topic that. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò told nothing but the truth [cf. WHO, WHO], this was because the former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is a true man of God. Add to this that the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, about the human person, It encapsulates the strength of the Teutonic barbarian, in the most noble sense of the term war. Recall that when the barbarians descended from Northern Europe while the Roman Empire was in agony, They found the defending power drunk and made up by women committed to play in the alcoves with youngsters [cf. My previous article, WHO]. O, said in other words: the Romans were taken to live the LBGT lifestyle that had long since absorbed the lifestyle of S.P.Q.R, acronym that once epitomized the concept and foundation of The Roman Senate citizens, and thereafter SPQR. The difference, how many times I have remembered, was that the barbarians, manly affected by hardening of the great Fathers of the Church, in that atmosphere of total decadence were converted en masse to Christianity. In Rome today, on who should be the new barbarians conquered, maybe four crazy fennel entwined like polyps to the throne, which after all they are extremely useful, these being the most devoted ruffians, the most interested servants, informers and spies more efficient, and easily managed and manipulated by the ruler, who knows one by one all the rotting corpses that they keep locked in their graves, even well whited, as it were the graves recalled in the Holy Gospels? [cf. Mt 23, 27-32].

.

I am afraid that no one has then analyzed the historical relationship between the psychology of the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller at the history of his native country, which it is Germany. If we think about it, Today the situation of the visible Church is comparable to the defeat of Germany in 1945, Adolf Hitler penned in bunker Berlin with the narrow courtyard of his loyalists, while before the defeat continued to fight, until enlisting teenagers of sixteen. At the same time he continued to deceive the people that soon would be completed and used the Great Secret Weapon. Just like today they are trying to do before the defeat of journalists mainstream from the true Pontificia, not so much defending the indefensible, which can also be understandable and even justifiable on the human and psychological, but denying, even knowing good and even while knowing all the details, how many lives of good and holy priests have been ruined for not having them folded to complicity with evil. And this makes certain journalists mainstream from the true Pontificia of unscrupulous human real criminals, as well as lack of basic Christian sentiments. We know, however, these, the bridge over now viewers patients overflowing river that await the passage of their bodies dragged from the current, when with an ease that even scandalize whores lower level, Immediately after the next conclave will attempt to recycle and to change color like chameleons, but above all as if nothing had happened. They, however, make a right from this moment: do not have to change skin color, They will just change jobs, because at each their minimum sigh, They will be whipped publicly on the face of all the writings with which they have supported the untenable and defended the indefensible. They do not even hesitate to distort facts and information, with a terrible aggravating circumstance on which any Catholic conscience can never be waived: the whole, they did and carried on to the detriment of the victims and the suffering, towards which showed an indifference that is not simply inhuman, because it is satanic. But what is worse is that they have licked ass of the executioners, showing complete indifference to the affected victims and persecuted within the Church, they knew very well, and also in all the smallest details, both stories is the great suffering. And the Devil never lets you back through the window in disguise, after being kicked out the door; and if by chance he asks for forgiveness pretending to be regretted, We should absolutely believe him, because it is the Supreme Principe lies and deception.

.

After the death of Adolf Hitler, Germany was crossed by a wave of suicide; whole families, If suicidarono. The most common phrase that ran between the good Germans - we remember were many - it sounded something like this: "I am ashamed to be German". Phrase that I have already heard several times in private by bishops and priests: "Faced with this situation is no shame to be part of this Church", with this expression implying that the shame is all linked to ecclesial and ecclesiastical structure of this poor visible Church, certainly not to the mystery of the Church the Mystical Body of Christ.

.

As we know, from the Berlin bunker was then passed at the Nuremberg Trials, where the charred corpse of the man who was the Führer, but especially on the ruins of Germany, They were tried and sentenced the main Nazi leaders, many of whom then sentenced to death, vigendo not at the time the New Church of Mercy that seventy years after the Catechism will remove even the most remote possibility of the death penalty and outstanding. Therefore, tomorrow if something similar happens again, we will be merciful makers symbol of millions dead and millions of people and entrust them to social services [cf. our previous articles WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

In the Church it is about to repeat the Nuremberg trials. Tomorrow, sooner or later, on the disastrous debris of destruction, while bishops and priests will say before the world "I am ashamed to belong to this Church", see paraded before the courts an army of cardinals and bishops who attempt to claim ignorance,: "I just obeyed the orders from above!». With the press of the former true Pontificia that, No longer able to recycle, affirm their part: "We just wrote what we have been ordered to write!». Asked judges: "Your Excellency ... ... Eminence Monsignor ... but she realizes that obeying" superior orders "covered those guilty of serious crimes and has hit the innocent, who they were subjected to all kinds of suffering and oppression under your helpless eyes?». And when the day of their judgment, God will ask, "Why did you not defend the Church and the People of God that I have entrusted to you", they will respond: "But I was bound by pontifical secret!».

.

The death of Christ the Lord It renews and time recurs in different ways, in substance but renewing his sacrifice; not by chance, his Glorious Body, after the resurrection lives bringing still imprinted with the passion signs. Therefore today, Christ the Lord, He died on the cross because bishops and cardinals have "obeyed orders over" and in doing so were more a "bound to the pontifical secret".

.

It's just a matter of little time, let this monster gives the last dangerous and deadly blows tail, because soon we will be in the great hall of Nuremberg, to hear repeated by those directly responsible of the Holocaust of the Catholic Church: "I just obeyed the orders from above!». And we, with all due respect to mercy, because of deep and genuine mercy, We will grant them the atoning grace of the scaffold. Because they are death, us that today we are suffering, harassed and persecuted in our house, Instead we are the salvation and future of the pilgrim Church of Christ on earth. And nobody, We will never prevent you from fulfill our mission for Christ, with Christ and in Christ. Why is the Church of Christ, it is not the private property of Peter, that Christ is the Vicar, not the Successor, least of all the corrector of his word. And the power given to Peter is not total and absolute as some would have you believe, rather: It is a very constrained power. The power of Peter is closely tied to the deposit of the Catholic faith, Tradition and doctrine. Peter is not the absolute master of the Church, on the contrary: It is his first and faithful servant, called to guard the truth and to confirm his brothers in faith [cf. LC 22, 31-34]. The mission of Peter, It is not to convene the "democratic" parliament of North Korea. Peter's mission is not to confuse the people of God, using ambiguous and unclear words, because Christ teaches us: "Let what you speak" yes, Yes; no, No "; the more you from evil» [cf. Mt 5, 37].

.

In short: in the Holy Gospels, everything is very clear and no "clever", in two thousand years of history, It never entered ambiguous small footnotes page. Said this, Finally it should be clarified: it is true, no priest, bishop or cardinal is bound to be a hero. But for a priest, a bishop or a cardinal, is certainly not a great human and Christian honor to be a rabbit before the judgment of history, he replies: "But I have only obeyed orders from above ! ».

.

the Island of Patmos, 7 October 2018

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

From decadence to the grotesque farce: Enzo Bianchi, a secular heretic who with the approval of the bishops preach a retreat for priests on the universal patron of priests tomb

- ecclesial news -

BY THE DECLINE farce GROTESQUE: ENZO BIANCHI, A Heretic THAT LAY WITH THE APPROVAL OF BISHOPS PRIESTS TO PREACH THE SPIRITUAL EXERCISES ON UNIVERSAL TOMB OF THE PATRON OF PRIESTS

.

Who today still shocked that Enzo Bianchi will preach the world retreat for priests, He has no reason to take it either with the reigning Pope or with the prefect of the congregation for the clergy who will attend this global event known as a notary may be present in a house where a room is the corpse of the dead, the other heirs attending the opening of a will by which, with immense astonishment, will find out soon, from its public reading, who did not inherit a penny, but only a deluge of debt to pay. Exactly those debts finally presented to the Pope Francis I by John Paul II and Benedict XVI, Enzo Bianchi even.

.

Authors
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
Jorge Facio Lynx

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

Enzo Bianchi, an overt heretic in the chair to preach the world retreats to the clergy on the tomb of the Patron of Priests of the Universal Church, The Holy Curé of Ars

When we analyze Birth and development certain intra-ecclesial monsters, we must always try to go to the source of the problem. Often, the nature of the problem, It consists precisely the same issue that was not taken, analyzed, isolated and solved in time. So that, to those before the heretic unbowed and unrepentant Enzo Bianchi, false prophet, bad teacher, pernicious poisoner of the deposit of the Catholic faith, Today they point to the Pope Francis I, we should remember, first of all for honesty, then historical fact, that the real responsible for the development of bianchiano cancer within the Church were the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger Prefect for two decades of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, later the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, under whose pontificate Enzo Bianchi, public speaker Christological heresies, pneumatological, ecclesiological and esegetiche, He was invited to the Synod on the New Evangelization.

.

We understand that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith presided over by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, over the years they reached many complaints, together with numerous requests from several bishops who diplomatically asking for opinions to the competent department on doctrinal orthodoxy of books and public lectures by Enzo Bianchi; and this since the late eighties early nineties of the twentieth century. To someone, it is no accident that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger has taken some measures?

.

If the story of Enzo Bianchi - the name of which today is one of the Fathers of the next Synod on the young -, it wasn't, as it is, placed in our ecclesial sad tragedy and contemporary ecclesiastical, It could be a real factor in grotesque comedy, why invite a heretic to the Synod for the New Evangelization under the pontificate of Pope Theologian, It is paradoxical than it would be to invite a famous porno star to speak at the Confederation of Superiors of the Poor Clare Nuns, together to determine the best way to propose to young aspiring religious virtue of chastity in the Third Millennium. but yet, Benedict XVI, he did it. E, could not he does not know who he was Enzo Bianchi, we can only conclude by saying: while Francis I, the contradictions of the manifest and, as they say, slams you in the face, Benedict XVI, over time, a good son of German Romanticism tried instead to merge harmoniously water and fire, opposites and antonyms, as if everyone had the right to have a say, even Enzo Bianchi. So included heresy, call to coexist harmoniously and so pluralistic and conciliatory with the theological orthodoxy.

.

For painful duty of intellectual honesty must then add: is Enzo Bianchi, under the pontificate of Giovanni Paolo II, He had touched on two key issues, these were the condoms and family, It would be done off instantly, just as they were held back and rightly repudiated the proponents of Liberation Theology marxisteggiante. But unfortunately, during this pontificate so attentive and sensitive to condoms, to the family and to Marxist tendencies, at the same time not seen and no one cared that in the same Brazil, large tank of Theology of Liberation incubated in that country with the thought and especially with the money of the Germans, They were taking life priests who now present themselves to the altar dressed and made up as if they were Drag Queens that rise on the stage of a gay disco. The Whites therefore had the cunning, under that long pontificate, embarking upon his entire sowing heresies, But covering behind the great meaculpism inaugurated by John Paul II, without ever touching the barbed wire high voltage of condoms and family.

.

With identical cunning acted well Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez, founders of the Neocatechumenal Way, who havoc liturgy and Holy Eucharist until forms of real sacrilege, But, to Giovanni Paolo II, They showed a movement made up of regular couples who had seven or eight children each and they considered contraception one of the sins which cry before God. E, under the pontificate, who had many children and was opposed to contraception, He could also write catechisms parallel to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, He could also decide when their followers could recite the Nicene-Constantinopolitan symbol of faith, but above could reduce the Eucharistic Sacrifice to a middle way between a The Pesach Seder [dinner of Passover] celebrated on Saturday evening at 21, Dinner and a Calvinist in remembrance of Jesus Christ. It should not be touched, But, the high-voltage barbed wire of condoms and bioethics. This is to reiterate what Enzo Bianchi is neither guilt nor responsibility of the Pope Francis I.

.

Who today still shocked that Enzo Bianchi will preach the world retreat for priests in Ars, where the remains of the saint are preserved universal patron of priests, He has no reason to take it either with the reigning Pope or with the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, His Eminence Cardinal Beniamino Stella, who will attend this global event known as a notary may be present in a house where a room is the corpse of the dead, the other heirs attending the opening of a will by which, with immense astonishment, will find out soon, from its public reading, who did not inherit a penny, but only a deluge of debt to pay. Exactly those debts finally presented to the Pope Francis I by John Paul II and Benedict XVI, Enzo Bianchi even.

.

Enzo Bianchi called to preach to priests, Is it something to be taken seriously? In this bitter reality you can only react with the capture of around, just as with the grotesque case in point a while ago about the image of the porno star and nuns who try to learn from her the right language to proclaim the value of virginity aspiring nuns of the Third Millennium.

.

Among Satanists and Enzo Bianchi there is this tremendous difference: and Satanists, just as such, are real believers; few as they believe it deeply - to give just one example -, the real presence of Christ living and true God, in body soul and divinity in the Holy Eucharistic Species. Enzo Bianchi is rather an atheist, one that has decisively ateizzato the entire Mystery of Revelation. Words undoubtedly heavy these our, but witnessed by hours and hours of public speeches given by this character, in fact atheist and ateizzante.

.

We come to our work, and strictly based only on evidence; a work carried out for over a year by the young philosopher and theologian Jorge Facio Lince, collaborator of Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. The work was conducted by the diligent researcher in this way: were collected and stored a very large number of films in which Enzo Bianchi, shot and recorded, He kept their heretical rants, mainly at church structures, if not, really, from the pulpits of many churches Italian cathedrals, with as many numerous diocesan bishops seated in the front row to drink smiling, them first, its enormous heresies. And when a bishop invites a heretic of this kind to utter heterodox thoughts from the pulpit of his cathedral church filled with the faithful, It is obvious that we are dealing with an unworthy pastor who instead guard the portion of the People of God entrusted to it [cf. GV 21, 15-19], directly invites the wolf in the sheepfold. The pastor inviting the wolf into the sheepfold is a lot worse than the pastor before the wolf flees for fear, and the wolf snatches them and scatters the sheep [cf. GV 10, 12]. Indeed, Fear is a human emotion, Also we must also remember that no one is obliged to be a hero. Of course, who by nature has no courage, should avoid accepting, even if one attempted to impose it upon, Episcopal appointment.

.

There were diocesan bishops who sent generations of seminarians at the Monastery of Bose exotic doing retreats before their sacred ordinations. There were diocesan bishops who have secured the presence of Enzo Bianchi at its seminars, affinch'egli could give with his lessons of wisdom to future priests. E, said this, It would be futile, at least in normal times, state that a bishop who poisons thus their future priests, or that invites this Mr. Lay to preach retreats to the members of his presbyterate, It should not be allowed to Bishop. In fact, it is necessary to clarify that a bishop who lived in the episcopal palace with a harem concubines, but in the exercise of his sacred ministry he was - beyond its immoral private life and sin -, a defender of the faith and of the doctrinal integrity of its priests, committing a less serious sin, only because that kind of sin of lust would be poison for the soul. Instead, a bishop who favors the spread of heresy among his priests and their faithful diocesan subjects, It accomplishes the greatest sin that can carry a high priest whose task is to hold, in the sacramental fullness of his apostolic priesthood, all living members of the Body of Christ which is the Church.

.

The long work of Jorge Facio Lince search finally it resulted in the accumulation of more than three hundred pages of materials, which I am nothing more than the exact words spoken in many different public occasions by Enzo Bianchi in lectures and conferences, all it documented with no possible penalty denied, because - it is good to repeat it again -, not about deductions, or interpretations, it comes to this heretic, this atheist who ateizza the listener, filmed and recorded while speaking before the audience in the course of hundreds of hours of recordings, not infrequently in the presence of various Italian bishops.

.

So, of two things one excludes the other: or the bishops who invited him, that host it, and that they do speak directly into their cathedrals, are such and such to him, or we must realize that a large chunk of the episcopate has proceeded in concrete facts to make public apostasy from the Catholic faith.

.

Is in one that in the other case - and both are very serious cases -, this kind of bishops that fact untied their priests and their faithful diocesan subjects from each branch must respect and obedience towards the bishop. Indeed, to exception of people with inevitable and invincible ignorance, therefore unable to come to similar conclusions and analysis, denying the legitimate authority, but above all obedience to a bishop who has a heretic as a model in his cathedral church to its priests and to the faithful diocesan subjects, It is a must, because a bishop like you should just never obey. And you should not obey imperative of conscience, as well as the duty of Catholic faith. Otherwise instead, a bishop who holds a service in your episcopal palace concubines a team, but despite their immoral private life, defends publicly and protecting the deposit of the Catholic faith, Despite some of its serious human frailties we owe respect and obedience, although it could seriously risk going all’Inferno to burn forever in what Dante indicates as the circle of the lustful.

.

From about six hundred hours of film recordings in which Enzo Bianchi offers the best of the worst of his heretical thoughts, we chose not limited to a few passages in which he openly denied some of the main foundations of the faith. For instance: the correct figure of God Father reduced to analysis imprinted on Freudian matrix patterns; the denial of the procession of the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, namely the fact that an article of faith the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son; to follow with a Christology that embodies the true characteristics of blasphemy, followed by the wildest theological and religious relativism presented as ecumenism and interreligious dialogue as. All things that utters Bianchi and seeding for decades, especially in cathedral churches and seminaries; all things that, the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, seems, at least put to the test, that you have never noticed.

.

Request: but is it possible that for half a century in this part He lives in a Church in which many poor and ignorant Popes were betrayed and deceived everyone, then beatified and canonized? Just so. Why then, when certain evidences are no longer in any way deniable, and especially when it comes to precisely Blessed and Santi Pontefici, at that point it is now customary to use to announce: "The Supreme Pontiff has been betrayed and deceived!».

.

Some might ask: Why, all these materials do not present them to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith? Simple answer: first of all, to know that White is a heretic, we had not hardly wait, in this church where the heresy is no longer such but it is only considered a "free different opinion". Then, to what purpose do, if that department, today, would be able only to condemn as a major heresy that someone dares to question the Church and ecclesiastical task of a cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church should not be to, and species of these times, to bring the hot coffee in the evenings to the homeless in the colonnade of St. Peter? [chronicle: WHO, WHO]. And even if it did, it would not be appropriate to do so without pulling back an army of journalists, Photograph and cameraman? Today, task of a Cardinal, with the doctrinal foundation of the house trembling under the high-magnitude earthquakes, It is to bring ice cream to immigrants in Rocca di Papa, if anything running after them with ice cream in hand while these, just arrived in the reception center available to them out of spite policy with the Italian government in place by the Italian Episcopal Conference, They had already fled? [chronicle, WHO]. And behind them Cardinal, that chased them with ice cream in hand …

.

… there, say these things so, which it is heresy, little denial, how does the Bianchi, the article of faith that says, "The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son"? Or that original sin is an invention of which he said "There is no trace on the Book of Genesis" [citation and movie follow later]. In conclusion, These Bianchi, They are "different opinions". Instead, to fall into heresy, Today we must deny alms to a gypsy, do not make the collection of waste, or pollute the environment with conditioners. All things that soon will be enclosed by the new theology in the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, for which there is no forgiveness and pardon [cf. MC 3, 29].

.

Enzo Bianchi, lay not in the sense of Christi faithful but in the sense of secular, focused his say and write about the importance of dialogue as the best way for a "humanization" for man. So this collection of texts was made by taking one hand the message contained in the spoken or written word in recent years by Enzo Bianchi around the whole Italy; and the Message of Jesus Christ, the one entrusted to the Catholic Church, sum Mater et Magistra. The Enzo Bianchi message is impossible to be misinterpreted because they are all claims made or written by him; while on the other side of the dialogue, ie on the side of Jesus' message, of the Church and of the same story, It will be put in a simple and concise form, so that each reader can draw their own conclusions.

.

Sociology FROM POLITICS TO THE "SOCIAL THEOLOGY": THE STORY ABOUT GOD

.

So let's start from the beginning, first clarifying what he thinks and what transmits Enzo Bianchi on the mystery of creation. If in fact the Catholic Church claims that:

"Holy Church, our mother, holds and teaches that God, beginning and end of all things, It can be known with certainty by the natural light of human reason, starting from created things” [First Vatican Council: Denz. -beautiful, 3004; cf 3026; Conc. ecum. Vat. (II), Of the]. Without this capability, the man can not accept the revelation of God. Man has this capacity because he is created “in God's image” [Cf Gen 1,27]» [1].

.

Enzo Bianchi, inspired by writers critical towards religion and the figure of God as Father, and clearly influenced by the thought of Sigmund Freud, It presents us with the figure of the Creator as a pattern or historical and socio-political superstructure:

.

full video, to open click on the picture

«[…] we must confess that Paul Ricœur [2] was right when he said that especially religious institutions had created the Phantom Father, God the Father often shaping the experience of human fatherhood that men had done. Watch, if there is a terrible mistake that retraced the history of the Church it is to have thought you could say that God is father beginning of human fatherhood. While in reality it would have to be that divine fatherhood told by Jesus that was to inspire, that was to shape the paternity of our parents. It's exactly the opposite occurred. But this has meant that God really took on the face of the father-master. that face, let me say, Of perverse god […] that image of God that especially in the last centuries, They were more because of their atheism than they have been movements and ideologies; we accused of being harbingers of atheism. I am convinced and I often say: has created more atheists the reigning father image in the Church in the last century and the first half of this century, than did the Marxist ideology, industrial society or the secularization. And we must have the courage to say this. Because really the father image of God was delivered to a father-patron, sometimes a perverse father. Especially in his relationship with Jesus. That Father had wanted to sacrifice his son to satisfy his anger and wrath, because in the name of punitive justice, someone had to serve out the sin that marked the history. By the grace we now get out of this season with great difficulty […] Also we make it difficult to recognize God as Father. At some point in our lives, we hear God as a demanding presence,. We feel his will as something that strikes against our. We feel the presence of God as the One who tells us: there is a limit for yourself, because there are others your brothers. That's where God reveals himself Father. Then, through the commandments, There also says there is a law for you to experience love with others. And when God shows us the limits and the law, we feel that the relationship with Him is like a prison. Tempted by evil, we hear God as an enemy. We feel the Christian life as a prison. Hearing his voice is like an oppression. Here is our need to move away. I would say that if each of us were really honest should say that sometimes he felt the need to kill God. Even forgetting God to do without Him […] then, above all, watch: There is a thought that grows in us. especially in adolescence then. We believe that God is God is good, God is love. But this God who loves us if we are good; otherwise we punish, He does not love us more. Priests, nuns, devote mamme; all ready to tell us one day for a good purpose: "look, that if you're good Jesus loves you, God loves you. But if you make the villain not love you anymore ". How many times we have heard this word. It's the only one, when we hear the word, It says the heart: It gave, forgive them, they know not what they say. That is how gradually his face Deform. This is how we hear God as father-patron […] here is the simultaneity: from our sin, enmity and wickedness; by God's love reconciliation, pardon […] visceral love where there is no trace of retributive justice. God's retributive justice does not know. This is coming from the philosophy of Roman law and has crept into the Church, its institutions and in its theology. But it is not the God of the Bible […]. What face you reveal God to men, to the others. Tell me the face of God that you and tell you what kind of man you are. He said Theophilus of Antioch. Show me your God and I will tell you that man you are; but it is also contrary show that humanity you and tell you the God that you have "[cf. video WHO] [3].

.

Simply said,: this God, in the figure of Father, Enzo Bianchi is the psychoanalytic event and socio-linguistics of the first fears that the man lived and that still has within himself about the human person as manifestations of his animal instincts. As instead it regards the correct concept of 'retributive justice', the bosiano should do is read the major encyclicals on the social doctrine of the Church, starting from Of the new things of Pope Leo XIII [text WHO], up to Annus the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II [text, WHO], to find adequate explanations to their states of confusion, such as those that follow below:

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"Fear of God, that according to the Bible was the first fear that man has experienced you remember the story of Genesis? To the question of God: where are you man? The man responded by confessing I heard thy voice in the garden, God and I was afraid Genesis [3, 10]. Fear of a God who we called in antiquity; but do not think that what we have experienced in antiquity sian not experienced in other forms today. We called in ancient times did, destiny, need. The ananke Greek gods. Master father, stern judge, omnipotent legislator. All forged projections from human to think of God as a necessity or as the case. As fate or incomprehensible game of a world without reason. Jacques Monod said well [4] for my generation when in 1969 He titled his book The Chance and Necessity. From biologist, observer had placed the issue on which you actually play our freedom and our capacity for love. Paul VI said that the presence of atheists, of non-believers, those who deny God militantly, should first and foremost not to scandalize. Do not become therefore a goal opponent but we Christians should question. It should prompt us to ask ourselves: but as images of God we have built and we transmit to others? Because most of the men who say they do not believe in God, do not deny God, they deny the God that Christians show them, we tell them. We pervertiamo the face of God. We ourselves have taken the fear of God and we transmit this fear to others. I'm just a small example: just say that a Christian, feel normal and common statement, in the Christian space. As long as a man say that love of God is deserved and that is the image of God perverse, that leaves no hope. We Christians humbly, but also with pride we should just go back to listen to the scriptures and the heart to the Gospel that is Jesus Christ, and Jesus Christ is the Gospel. The Gospel, I hope you will understand my statement. He testifies that Jesus preached God. Not in the sense that Jesus went to preach the good news of God. But in the sense that Jesus was able to make God's gospel, good news. Because often the God that was preached even pages of the Old Testament can be transposed by men like bad news, not as a source of hope and fullness of life. The Prologue of John ends: God no one has ever seen, None, but his son Jesus, Exeghésato, Greek word for [that Jesus] any exegesis did the narration authentic story. Here then is the Christian hope resonates with those words of Pasquale cry: Do not be afraid. Do not be afraid. Because Jesus of Nazareth, the Crucified is risen. This is the outcome of all the gospels that we want to tell Jesus […] and how it can decline to non-Christians until intrigarli? Just tell them that when we Christians say Resurrection, we especially want to say in terms of not theological but very human that every man can understand, that believer or not that love conquers death. Why write that announces a duel with death, which it is not a duel of life against La More; but love duel lived, not an abstract love, no idea; but a love lived flesh and bones in a person who is worthy of fighting against death and to win it. Faith in Jesus man like us but a child of God does, then we believe and separate with the hope of hope. And if love lived by Jesus who he has conquered death, then we understand that at the end of the New Testament there is the statement never done before in all the scriptures, last statement and definitive after which there will be another, When, in the First Letter of John: God is love. No fate but freedom. Not the case but love can enlighten our life give way by shutting down all fear of the fact, the need, of death. Fear that enslave us and alienate us. It is grasping Jesus Christ as the man who narrated God as the God who gives meaning to our poor human life. This everyday life is a craft. What are so difficult to revel. But if illuminated by hope, which always arises from hoping together, from solidarity, from communion. It can give our days actually make sense '[cf. video WHO] [5].

.

After this show, let's see what the Church teaches through the Catechism:

.

"In many religions he invokes God as" Father ". The deity is often considered the "father of gods and men". At Israel, God is called the Father as Creator of the world [Dt 32,6; Ml 2,10]. Even more, God is Father because of the covenant and the gift of the Law to Israel, His "firstborn son" [Is 4,22]. It is also called the Father of the king of Israel [2Sam 7,14]. Most especially he is "the Father of the poor", the orphan, widow, who are under his loving protection [Shall 68,6]. By calling God as "Father", the language of faith indicates two main things: that God is the first origin of everything and transcendent authority, is that, at the same time, goodness and loving care for all his children. God's parental tenderness can also be expressed by the image of motherhood, [Is 66,13; 239; Shall 131,2] which emphasizes God's immanence, the intimacy between Creator and creature. The language of faith thus draws on the human experience of parents who, somehow, They are to man the first representatives of God. Such an experience, But, also it shows that human parents are fallible and can disfigure the face of fatherhood and motherhood. We ought therefore to recall that God transcends the human distinction between the sexes. He is neither man nor woman, he is God. Therefore it transcends human fatherhood and motherhood, [Shall 27,10] although it is their origin and model: [Ef 3,14; Is 49,15] no one is a father as much as God " [6].

.

The figure of God the Father is then reduced in the story of Enzo Bianchi a product of subjectivity, this is the animality, both in the sphere of fears both as historical and social superstructure. On the other hand the story of Enzo Bianchi sends in a clear and unequivocal that only in the narration of another man, Jesus called this time, it reveals the face, the meaning and the source of what the end might instead be called the God's "love”. A beautiful speech but still not immune to the criticism of a sweetened form of agnosticism or historicist and atheist immanentism [7]. These statements are also affected heresy Marcionite, but in the most pejorative sense of the term, because not only the Whites out the God-father harsh taskmaster and punisher of the Old Testament by God's good love essence of the New Testament, because contrary to the heretical bishop Marcion [Synopsis 80 - Rome 160], bosiano in love and goodness are not referring to Christ God, in transcendental or metaphysical way, but only to Jesus man. Therefore, Bianchi, enhances and expands the same heresy of Marcion demonstrating in words documented, publicly expressed and filmed, As his thought heretical is a real and dangerous cluster of old heresies return, similar in substance, but much worse in their shape.

.

Continues Enzo Bianchi …

.

full video, to open click on the picture

“God, in order to have something that was not divine, withdrew to make room for the world, the world in its depth. The world is not divine, the world is a creature, the world's otherness, the world is really a partner before God who can say no to God, It is not obligated to tell you. That's the size that we want to tell these stories of God. God created an autonomous world from Him. We men can say to God, "thou hast not created, we do not believe in you ". You're nothing for us. We deny. And he who created us cannot help but accept our rejection of otherness, this is the extraordinary " [8].

.

Enzo Bianchi, with these statements that define confused would only say the least, dangerously confuses freedom and free will of man with God's indifference, claiming that the main theses of the exponents of the "theology of the death of God", But hidden behind his words. Almost as if God had withdrawn indifferent to original sin, as if the experience in the Old Testament had not repeatedly re-established its alliance with the People of Israel. And before the image of this indifferent God who withdraws from a "world not divine ', Bianchi how will read the incarnation of the Divine Word who became the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world [cf. GV 1, 29-36]? The truth, de facto, is that Enzo Bianchi, adopting criteria purely socio-political post-Enlightenment, It presents the figure of a sort of secular god that seems to come out right from Voltaire's pen.

.

AN ESSAY ABOUT IS THE WHITE Heretic "Bible scholar", PROVIDING THAT AN ATHEIST READING-Marxist-AFFIRMS FREUDIAN: "IN THE BIBLE THERE IS NO ORIGINAL SIN"

.

This says Enzo Bianchi …

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"The Bible can affect all. Because I would almost turn over what you normally think: everyone thinks that the Bible is a book about God. No. However, the Bible is a book about man. He tells us what God thinks of man. It is not so much a book about God, but it means the vision God's thought about Man and when one makes the journey to seek God I asked God actually looking for the man this must be said clearly why and in this sense that the Bible serves as the believer a path as a path to follow […] the path is to a humanization. There is wisdom in the Bible, a distilled wisdom of a thousand years. Few realize it, but the Bible, especially for us Christians, It is a library, because it contains seventy books written on the arch of a thousand years time at least. if not a thousand percent. Anyway, the story, which tells the stories, I am more than a millennium. It was written in three languages: Jewish, Aramaic Greek. It was written in an area, in a region extending from Babylon, the current Iraq, to Rome. So it is truly a crossroads of experiences of people search and this is to say that the Bible contains human wisdom, these are all reasons why it is worth, in my opinion, to read it, to scrutinize, to think, to meditate, because it is half of our quality of life and our humanization, especially for us in the West " [cf. video WHO] [9].

.

For the evaluation scheme of Enzo Bianchi about what is true and false, good and bad, right and not fair, It imposes the supremacy of culture or production written and spoken man, then the Bible does not possess and can not possess in itself no other value than that of the testimony of centuries of liturgical and moral traditions of different civilizations that lived in the Middle East. In the words of the White sounds funny but dangerous turn of phrase in a story of culture yddib nineteenth: "Man created God who created man, so then, either, they were happy ". An expression that recalls the statement of one of the very different authors cited by Bianchi, German Ludwig Feuerbach, disciple of Friedrich Hegel, which states: "It is not God who created man, but the man who created God " [10]. In conclusion, if we think about, the White satanicità consists precisely in this: sow behind the words apparently bogged down and always mingled practice of lovingness, the most poisonous thoughts of these authors. And these are facts, processes are not the intentions of the heretic Enzo Bianchi.

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"The Bible contains, like a mirror in which we can have glimpses of truth but the truth is beyond the script, is beyond the text can never be reduced to a formula it will to a concept that as far as telling the truth is a cultural concept expressed in human words, expressed in human language expressed in human images. The truth always transcends this "[cf. video WHO] [11].

.

… and continues:

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"Attention in the Bible there is no original sin. You know that, This is part of theology, in the Bible there is no original sin. There are different sins in the third chapter and the tenth chapter. several sins. They want answers to questions that men did and that men do. The first question you know that we do when we begin to have some awareness of being in the world the first thing we see and that our parents quarrel among themselves, his father and mother quarrel among themselves. And we begin to understand that there is a bump that there is a difficulty between man and woman, and we wonder why? […] and how can the life of a brother come out through pain and screams of the mother as well? Because giving birth in pain? And then the father who goes to work back tired, any work tired and because the work is so alienating degrading? Here were the first questions. And to answer the first questions you begin to say,, in conclusion, men when they tried to get in touch with things han done now to make bad choices. Everything is a mythical language. Warning you understand well, we are on the texts of four millennia ago maybe with some even older roots certainly were not the historical sciences there was not even the human sciences much less the possibility of a psychological reading of things. The Greeks later they did not know it, the problem that every boy and his father and his mother did not know mica say, as Freud says; but Freud had to say that the Oedipus complex was still possibly a myth of the Greeks, a tale with which the Greeks said that they were not able to say at the scientific level. So what, you see, we have this story from God that all the trees of this place man, everyone, All food, think millions of trees, and though he says: look. one not. That puts a limit. Think about it well. It is a very simple thing: the one which is called original sin, do not go find many stories like those who do not want to read it in its truth, and they do not read it […]. Because you Adam the limit that is I'll put a woman. And for you women the limit is that there is a man near you. And from the day that you are two the world is no longer totally your. If Adam was alone, if the woman was alone the whole world was his […] But the man in himself in his eagerness to live, Survive at all costs wants everything at once. Then you hear this limit of a tree on millions like frustration and, Simply putting in relationship with food; that food, do not go in thinking that apple was who knows what. We were having fun all to think what it was that apple ... Simply the relationship with food, there to eat, but if there is another, I can not eat everything. But here that at that time there is a disturbance of the relationship between man and woman […] And they started arguing. And from that moment here then, in the form of decrees of God, it is said that God said to the woman: here you will try to fight your husband. but your husband will subdue. because the result of the time was the patriarchy. If at that time there was matriarchy. one would have said to Adam: Your instinct is to your wife. but she will subdue. They are the fruits of time these here, neither more nor less. Then it is said that God has cursed the land with sweat […] in conclusion, all bad, It is the first response. Another problem in chapter four: but how is it that you arrive between brothers to suicide? Celebrities, the first report that each of us has with the parent is the first report that we discover. But then, whether manually, we find out if we have the brothers straight away and we see that we fight with them. The problem of Abel and Cain. At one point Cain kills Abel. You get to hate among brothers […] it is clear that all things are read on a social level: there is a Cain is a farmer and Abel a shepherd who is; probably we are in a time when the shepherds class is supplanted by the farmer class. You know, then, farmers will be completely supplanted by the workers and the workers are now supplanted by those in the service sector ... it continues. nothing new: classes are always downgraded the other one o'clock […]. After that is narrated an attempt also to God. With strange mythical language is said that the children of God and the children of men mated, that is, an attempt to put God in the man's hand. these divine beings, these rites, with every sexual likely, avvivano that in antiquity, as you know, to forms of sacred prostitution, which abounded throughout the Middle East and who they were still practiced in Rome; They were still under the empire. In short, there were couplings inside the temple between men and women with priests and it was said that they were couplings with God […]. Here comes the flood. that man has produced the evil produced a deadly condition. In short it means. certain subcategories of a divine punishment time. but simply that if the man calls the road of death finds. Who makes the death if found on him is not to say more. Try to decode this ancient language a bit ' neif a bit 'naive. but that reflected what was happening in the family existentially […] And here at one point almost a new beginning a new humanity. With us, after the flood. And from that moment then the split of this humanity in many lands, An attempt of this humanity to stand against the sky in Babel, make a tower that is a challenge to God, Perhaps a name, create a totalitarian power. A humanity, one nation, a single power, one king, one capital. It gave, Certainly, the text says, disperses, because God does not want totalitarianism, He wants the difference. This too I venture to say it is hard to understand why we, instead, especially we Catholics, We always thought that when everything is equal, everything is much better ... uh no! There is no unity within the Bible, if not through the plurality. The unit, to be good, must be plural, God wants a different humanity, with different languages, with different cultures, we would say with men, ethnicities and different races. This is what it means, He does not want the totalitarian dream of a uniform units because that impoverishes humanity. »[cf. video WHO] [12].

.

Just so: "In the Bible there is no original sin". In practice there is only one story, as it were: mythical. A story that tells how man, created the most perfect of angels, rebels against God, using their own freedom and their own free will, thus breaking the whole harmony of creation, and by bringing into the world the pain and death. But, you pay attention well … "In the Bible there is no original sin" (!?). Why is this original sin will come to life not by how light narrates the Book of Genesis, but born, according to the heretic Enzo Bianchi, as well as theological categories.

.

Really surprising that the audience of listeners no one has stood to ask: "And the theology, where he brings out the original sin, place "In the Bible there is no original sin"?”. What does, the theology, he invents, I deduced, or simply take note of what the Book of Genesis really tells?

.

It continues …

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"Let's say that the New Testament canon, it seems impossible, but he has not had a synod as the Synod of Public around ninety made by the rabbis after the destruction of Rome by the Romans, who have made a list. We, to tell the truth, to have a real list of New Testament books say so magisterial level, we even get to the Council of Trent. For us Catholics, in reality, we in the middle of the second century the canon Muratori which is a document found precisely from Mason who from a list which is that of the New Testament that we possess, but it is not a list with authority, let's say so, The tradition has welcomed, but also with times varying. The Apocalypse of John, in the Catholic Church, the largest church in the east has had to wait until the fourth century before it was read in the liturgy and really considered part of the New Testament. So there has been some fluctuation and precisely for this reason, at a certain point, the reform made by Luther did not challenge the canon, but almost he was tempted to do a fee in the traditional canon, and it is them that the Council of Trent responded to the Protestant Reformation by making a list of twenty-seven books that we still have, and all the churches now accept as the New Testament "[cf. video WHO] [13].

.

We bless Luther and therefore one that Enzo Bianchi - and not only - they do not call "heresy" and "schism", but "Reform". Indeed, without the major reform the equally Great Reformer Luther, the Catholic Church, that for centuries the Bible has kept hidden and indeed has even prohibited the reading to the faithful - as they teach and say Bianchi and the like -, he would not even have made "the list of twenty-seven books that we still have and that today all the Churches accept as New Testament". Because among other things, according to the lexicon of bosiano, the last of heretical sects born in the United States in the late nineteenth century by the split of the split of the split from the original nucleus heretical Lutheran, rightfully deserves the title of "Church". In fact today, the term "Church", It is no longer connected to Pauline theology [cf. With the 1, 12-20] or to John's Principle unit [cf. GV 17, 20-26], it's just nothing but a purely technical term for different ways to feel and to live the same message, or text. Always in fact, deconstruction of faith, part from the emptying of the words from their true philosophical meaning, theological and ecclesiological. And of this, Bianchi, It is a diabolical master [please refer to Article Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo: Babel and the Newspeak, text WHO; and its conference: The problem of doctrinal language and neolinga new theologians, WHO].

.

THE IDEA OF SOCIAL CHRISTIANITY IN ENZO BIANCHI

.

In his lectures and writings Enzo Bianchi - as a "child of his time", that is as old man who has lived his youth between the wars and after them in old age - narrates and reveals the wickedness to which arrived the same men; fruit of more than a sorrowful memory screaming tirelessly on the unanswered question of how can God, if there is evil? [14].

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"Everything changes in Christianity, you understand that there, really, we open something that does not belong to the world of religions. I have great respect for religions, but I must tell you all those who fear religions frighten me, who fear competition of the Book. They are people who have no faith, if they had a bit 'of faith, We can not fear competition from the only faith that speaks of man and all the other, which is fine if we speak of a transcendent God who is in heaven and that we must make efforts to make this good news. It is not possible, It is not possible. If one has faith and there has, the Christian faith, Jesus Christ is exegetical, as I always say that I love. It is he who has told us God, What we can know about God we know only through Jesus Christ and what Jesus Christ did not live as a man of God we do not know, and if someone says something that Jesus did not say and did, I am not absolutely bound to believe. This is Christianity, otherwise we are in this sea of ​​religion when religion prevails over faith " [cf. video WHO] [15].

.

For Enzo Bianchi the message of Christianity He should lose its form of tragedy with eternal presence dominatrix and bad for something or someone who was appointed by the concepts or God or Father; to turn into a romantic comedy, or more truthfully in a monologue that he could also recite the same Narciso love with himself ...

.

Bianchi said a: CHRISTIANITY "IS NOT A MONOTHEISM DEEP, IS THE EXPERIENCE OF JESUS ​​CHRIST THAT GOD HAS TOLD "

.

He says Enzo Bianchi …

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"My belief is that a true Christian must speak less, much less of God, It is to understand that the word of God is a terribly ambiguous word. In the first and second centuries AD, when Christianity was spreading and was not Christianity, those who were not yet the Fathers of the Church, but they were the ones who were trying to make people understand Christianity to the pagan world greek roman; and they said they had the courage to say these words. Caution, Fathers are, Sant'Ippolito have to speak, they said: God is an ambiguous word, or God is a word that is empty because everyone in God is a projection of what he wants, what he wants. there, you think as in Christianity instead, For centuries, with Christianity first place was due to God, and teaching the transmission of faith was God. I dare to say that even I was a child I received an inheritance, a faith in God completely, not in Jesus Christ. The Gospel was absolutely not teach someone: perhaps it is allowed to read the gospel? […] Now, Christianity is built to become deism and Pascal ... you know, but Pascal has never enjoyed a good reputation in Catholicism. And Pascal said most likely the best atheists who do not theists, that is, those who always speak of God and pray for God. there, I am convinced that the word God is an ambiguous word, an empty word, a word used today to mean the competition between the three monotheistic religions. While on the other hand, Christianity is not monotheism, ultimately in depth. It does not need any competition, nor Judaism nor Islam. Because Christianity is nothing other than Jesus Christ, who hath declared God. That's enough on exegesis Giovanni 1, 18. God remains as we have ever seen. Christ. No one better than the Torah. And each of us, when you think of God, think again: It is the projection. So every so often we hear but the God of Islam's not the Christian God. And, nominally he says if; because Mohammed was referring to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. To the God of Jesus Christ. But the word is so empty. So in God you can put any content and I believe that even the great attention, the great battle atheism was very wrong. The early Christians had the courage, you know that, not to fear, not to be ashamed if they were called atheists. The pagans called the atheists. We have all the testimony of the fathers apologetic and said they. Because we are without God, we are no Ara, the altar there and we have no temple. This has its own truth. God is an ambiguous word less we talk about it the better. And for us Christians, I believe in deeply religious level, It should be worth more than the word of Jesus: no one can come to God except through me. That is the claim of a mad man but say: I, with my humanity, my humanity nothing but my humanity. I have given you of the tracks to move on the trail of God. Not so much ask the identity of God not so much ask God's face look how I lived. In my experience that is love; In fact, because it has come to mean that God is agape and said he was only after Jesus Christ has had the courage to say that apostle that we do not know if John, but no matter; but it has come to this expression God is agape, what ever you find it in the Bible before, but because Jesus told the love to the end, anything else that, and he said that is the face of the divine. Whereby, in commenting on these four parables actually is telling the love of men and women, It is to tell the love of a man, Jesus of Nazareth, But for me it is the only traces to go to God. So much so that I say: After Jesus' commandment that he called new, but want you all know that in greek new means final and definite, it does not mean new as opposed to something that was there before. The commandment that sums up everything you love one another to each other […] But Jesus says: As I loved you, He does not say you love. This makes him tell his ministers. But as I have loved you, you must love one another. The commandment is not really geared lover to be loved in return, but well-loved by all other. This in my opinion is really a revolution […] All this is so from hearing the Gospel but from everything I've heard from men and women who have told me just how hard the business of living, nothing else […] This is the eclipse of God that I am working but not to deny it, not to say it is dead, but to say that there is another way to go to him who is our full humanity, specific. Our senses, because everything we live spiritually must pass through our senses. To touch, see, feel, enjoy, smell. If you do not go through these senses there is no spirituality, there is no search for God is an imaginative and alienating imaginary " [cf. video WHO] [16].

.

Enzo Bianchi, leaning back in a twisted reading of texts of the Fathers of the Church, unable to accept all that is related directly or indirectly with God, confusing the criticism of the thinker Blaise Pascal towards the rationalization made to God by theism and natural religion developed in post-Renaissance Europe, He wants to convey - and perhaps to become - who reads and listens, a revolutionary follower of a movement born on the testimony of Jesus, a simple man who spent his life doing good for others. So, the Christian, He should stop depositing his confidence and his belief in "empty" concepts or tangibly demonstrable as are God, religion, dogmas ... to configure his confidence, their belief, their own sense of morality and spirituality, in brotherly love storytelling, that is the true meaning of life, death and testimony left by Jesus.

.

The love and the man then become the basic elements of the story of Enzo Bianchi. Two concepts that were unveiled and revealed the true essence of the enigma that was pronounced and described the eminent figure of God. Now, in our present time, This story becomes, It is created and lives, and it is a "way" - as I like to say to Enzo Bianchi - experienced in research and in the understanding of man with himself in what will be the humanization ...

.

... for so alleviate the tragic and severe heaviness of these texts, we could cite the film My friends, now incorporated in the history of Italian cinema, when Count Mascetti speaks of the "supercazzola prematurata with scappellamento right ' [cf. WHO].

.

DIALOGUE ON THE HOLY SPIRIT FIRST PLACE THAT DO NOT PROCEED FROM THE FATHER AND THE SON, READS AS THE ARTICLE OF FAITH

.

From a past event, This was the life of a single man, there is another decisive event for understanding the narrative made by Enzo Bianchi: the Second Vatican Council. The first event was a lonely man, Jesus Christ, This second event of man in common. This community event is renewed and incorporated concepts and aspects that were forgotten, as in the case of the Holy Spirit, on which the Bianchi gives us these genuine pearls, but they require a premise. Before giving voice to the pneumatology of bosiano, let's see what the Church teaches about the Holy Spirit:

.

"The apostolic faith concerning the Spirit was confessed by the second ecumenical council 381 in Constantinople: "We believe in the Holy Spirit, who is Lord and gives life; who proceeds from the Father " [Denz.-Schönm., 150]. So the Church recognizes the Father as "the source and origin of the whole divinity" [Council of Toledo VI (638): Denz.-Schönm., 490]. The eternal origin of the Holy Spirit, however, is not unconnected with the Son: "The Holy Spirit, which it is the Third Person of the Trinity, and me, one and equal with the Father and the Son, of the same substance and also of the same nature… However, It does not say that He is only the Spirit of the Father, but that is, at a time, the Spirit of the Father and of the Son " [Council of Toledo XI (675): Denz. -beautiful, 527]. The Creed of the Council of the Church of Constantinople confesses: "With the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified" [Denz.-Schönm., 150] The Latin tradition of the Creed confesses that the Spirit "proceeds from the Father and the Son [And the son] ”. The Council of Florence, In the 1439, explicit: "The Holy Spirit has its essence and its subsistence at once from the Father and the Son proceeds eternally from the One and the Other as from one principle and through one spiration. And since all that is of the Father, the same Father gave him to his only-begotten Son, with the exception of his being Father, even that of the Holy Spirit proceed from the Son receives from his Father from eternity that generated the Son himself " [Council of Florence: Denz.-Schönm., 1300-1301]» [17].

.

That said let's see now how Enzo Bianchi, beyond and above the Catechism of the Catholic Church, He speaks of pneumatology:

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"... but after the Council [Vatican II] We can not say that the Holy Spirit is absent or unknown in the Catholic Church. Because in reality, I believe that our faith has taken an opening to this great theme, He certainly has not known in the past. At the level of catechetical preaching dare I say now the Holy Spirit has a presence. In the Christian spiritual life, I feel however that there is not enough attention paid to this operation that takes place in us, and that is essential both in our effort to conformity to Christ, both in our round effort towards God the Father. The Holy Spirit is the great protagonist of this. And we are not often very conscious. Certainly it is a grace for me is not a criticism, Western Christianity focuses on Christ, with a central role for me is really extraordinary and I tell you right away because: because to the extent that focuses on Christ, This Christ is the gospel. And with a formula I say and repeat it obsessively lately. For me Jesus Christ is the Gospel and the Gospel is Jesus Christ. There is another Christ […] we must never separate the Spirit of the Word. Look at all the diseases in the history of the Church, They have occurred to those who have separated or has removed this balance of Spirit and the Word. That especially the East has preserved […] They are an inseparable reality. If you disgiungete Christ and the Spirit you have two results: Christ alone is the fundamentalism, It is really at some point prevail in the end, the institutions, anything else. If you put the emphasis only on the Spirit you drift lit. Caution, It has nothing to do with the Enlightenment. I'm thinking of all comes in the Protestant churches of the enlightened [Ed. two names are mentioned in the video recording incomprehensible] … and the others. If you want a drift already mentioned in the west alas with Gioacchino da Fiore. If you end up saying for example that the Spirit is the one that now prevails and that this is the hour of the Spirit taking away that the time of the Spirit is the Spirit of Christ. Not another Spirit […] The Spirit is the Spirit of Christ and in this sense the Catholic Church in my opinion, He has reason when he talks about the Spirit who proceeds from the Father and the Son. Beware when the Church did this in a thousand, he did it without a council. He did so under pressure of the German emperors. It was a disaster. Because you can not change the Creed without a council with the Church of the East. And the Church of the East also why he broke away. Of course the reasons are more political, historical, cultural. It is separated from us. But beyond the procession then today is distinct, between that which is the ontological procession from procession instead of economic history. The Catholic Church still had a concern: He is saying that the Holy Spirit proceeds also from the Son. What was that saying: it is however also the Son. It is independent from the Son. It is the Spirit of Christ. Although undoubtedly we have to say: proceeds from the Father. It is not true that proceeds from the Son. The Son to send it in the story he asked the Father: I will ask the Father who will be the consoler. The Christ did epiclesi. But it was his spirit that led to the Church. Not a Spirit independent from him […] The Holy Spirit tells us God can not be represented. We can imagine a figure of the Father and of the Son as happened. Of the Holy Spirit, no. That the Holy Spirit we can not retain or, or grab. It does not have a defined icon '[cf. video WHO] [18].

.

In this talk torrential, Enzo Bianchi proves to be, plus a non-biblical scholar and a non-theologian, a subject infused with crass ignorance in the history of the Church and ecclesiology. But most of all, Once again, It provides the socio-political explanations that are simply not debatable, but completely false and falsanti.

.

We understand the friendship of Bianchi with some autocephalous Orthodox Churches, but above all we understand that with all the trickster spirit that is his own - as is Andrea Riccardi, founder of the Community of Sant'Egidio -, they periodically meet bishops of autocephalous Orthodox Churches, then announce, or rather vaunted throughout Catholic world to pursue a fruitful dialogue with the orthodox. And since when, the Orthodox are a unitary phenomenon that responds to a common authority and to a central structure, place that are a thousand years, Orthodox bishops are engaged in the ancient sport excommunicated constantly with each other? [cf. WHO] So, with such the talk these deceivers, and braggarts, Whereas the bishops of the Orthodox Church are the quintessence of contentiousness, to the point that in a thousand years have failed to celebrate a pan Orthodox council? Indeed, not having the Orthodox a central authority equipped with the prerogatives of the Roman Pontiff, nothing can approve a sacred council that is binding in matters of doctrine and morals throughout the orthodoxy if there is complete unanimity [chronicle, WHO].

.

We fly so knowing, obvious and painful, Whites and Riccardi that the day of reckoning eventually talk only about themselves and believe doing dialogue with the orthodox. however, we can not gloss over the fact that Bianchi implicitly denies that and openly, while Rome wanted at all costs the unity, the Eastern Church was looking for any excuse division. History, on the contrary, shows that while the Church of Rome was trying in every way to not be subject to the moods and especially to the domineering interference of political powers, the Church of the East, presented in various forms from Bianchi as Virgin pure, pure!, from political power, and also from the worst political powers, instead he wanted to be totally dependent. Or maybe forget, Bianchi, that all the first great church councils, albeit only formally, They were summoned and chaired by the Emperors of the East, the last in order of time by the Empress Irene? Or by chance, for his monk's sake orthodoxy and its much vaunted 'back to basics', Bianchi would be able to invoke a new ecumenical council convened, albeit only formally, then presided, albeit only formally, President of the European Union? Why the "return to the true origins' has price tags, although Bianchi, ignorant of church history at levels of real embarrassment, prefer to ignore the past and create the fanciful origins him most own terms, but which are, however, never existed. Because not everything was to the ancient origins it was good needs, otherwise the Church today would be just a stale pond, not certain earthly pilgrimage.

.

This discourse in itself and by itself would be very complex, It may be closed with the statement of denial made available publicly by Bianchi which precisely denies the so-called And the son inserted in the Latin version Symbol of Nicea-Constantinople where it says faith: «, And to the Holy Spirit, The main and zῳopoion, The emanating from the Father» [And in the Holy, Lord and Giver of Life:who proceeds from the Father and the Son].

.

The Bianchi said in a heretical way: "It is not true that proceeds from the Son. The Son to send it in the story he asked the Father: "I will ask the Father, the comforter who will" ». So cites in confirmation of his rant heretical sentence of Christ the Lord is from the Gospel of John [cf. 13, 16]. It's here, Bianchi, not a fundamental question: Who is speaking, who and where? Well, this is what the Divine Master who caters to their disciples, while it is with them on this earth. And with this it has shown that White has a hard time distinguishing, obviously the same person hypostatic, the pre-Easter Jesus and the Christ after Easter resurrected and ascended to heaven; unless for him, resurrection and ascension, are not only two beautiful metaphors to interpret the categories of theology.

.

So not only is a dangerous heretic Bianchi, but also a very ignorant heretic, because the doctrine that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son is not a stroke of political hand, as he states, played by secular forces for the sake of dividing the Church of the West from the East, It is part of the Latin tradition from the early third century. In this regard it would be enough that the ignorant bosiano read the comments of Tertullian [Carthage 160 - Carthage 220], Novatian [Phrygia 200 - Rome 258] Hilary of Poitiers [Poitiers 315 – Poitiers 465], Sant'Ambrogio [Trier 338 – Mediolanum 397], San Girolamo [stride 347 - Bethlehem 420], St. Augustine [You will return 354 - Ippona 430]. Because all these, well before the year 1054, supporting the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son. For all of them, who are authors of various works and action on the Trinitarian mystery and the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son, we use the comprehensive commentary of St. Augustine:

.

"One who can understand the timeless generation of the Son from the Father, intending the timeless procession of the Holy Spirit by both. And who can understand by these words of the Son: As the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son to have life in himself that the Father has given life to the Son, not as a being that already existed without life, but that generated outside of time so that the life that the Father gave the Son is co-eternal begetting the life of the Father given it to him; these include, I say, that as the Father has in himself also the property of being the beginning of the procession of the Holy Spirit, He gave also to the Son to be the beginning of the same Holy Spirit Procession, Procession out of in one time and in the other case, and understands that it has been said that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father because it is intended that the Son also be the principle of the Holy Spirit procession, He comes to the Son of the Father. If in fact all that the Son has, He receives from the Father, he also receives from the Father that he too is the principle from which the Holy Spirit proceeds " [cf. The Trinity, XV, 26,47].

.

Incidentally: the And the son was added to "patchy" well before the year 1054, to be exact almost five hundred years before, from the Council of Toledo 587. We reiterate therefore that Bianchi is a dangerous snake oil salesman and consequential thoughts smoky, a person who plays with words, hiding behind them its deep and crass ignorance on patrology, church history and dogmatic Trinitarian. And despite this, This ignorant large intestine, He made the rounds of many cathedrals of Italy, where invited by several members of the Italian Episcopal Conference has offered these pearls of wisdom to believers of Christ. And in the face of all this, one wonders if they are more harmful for the people of God certain contemporary bishops, or the ancient bishops who followed the heresy of Arius.

.

ENZO BIANCHI: THE MADONNA You VIRGIN, AND, BUT …

.

Roman cat Hypatia, particularly devoted to the Blessed Virgin Mary Gattara (also known as Madonna dei Gatti), He suggested to seriously consider whether to practice the greatest exorcism Enzo Bianchi

We conclude this excerpt of pearls, which as we said is a filmed lectures and transcribed material in over three hundred pages, to see not so much, What Enzo Bianchi thinks of the Immaculate Conception, but the sneaky way in which the newspaper of the left radical chic he presents the Blessed Virgin Mary:

.

«[…] the theme of "Virgin Mother" is not only present in the Christian: echoed throughout the Mediterranean to the point that many have wondered if the veneration of Mary, Mother and Virgin, He has not absorbed the worship of pagan goddesses mothers and virgins. Think of Astarte, Assyrian and Babylonian goddess worshiped in Canaan, goddess of love and fertility who knew the hostility of the biblical prophets; Artemis, the eternally virgin goddess who at Ephesus had its grand sanctuary, stigmatized by Paul; Rea-Cybele, great Mother, venerated in Phrygia and Greece; even in the late fourth century, Augustine testifies to a cult in honor of the heavenly Virgin and Mother of the Gods in Carthage. It is true that the archetype of the female fed the symbolic world of the pagan religions as well as Christianity; one can affirm that with Philippe Borgeaud, beyond the similarities and mutual influences, the figures of the virgin goddesses and mothers and that of the Virgin Mary "remain absolutely distinct". At the same time, It should not be forgotten that the apologists of the second century Christians had a tendency to assume complex without the echo of mythological conceptions […]» [full text WHO].

.

What does it consist of, the luciferino element of bosiano? Caution: they, lecturing dottamente, does not question the dogma of the Immaculate Conception. We must therefore understand that in that case you should touch, not so much dogmatic theology, matter that the reckoning concerns the very tight group of theologians; in this case you should touch the most susceptible of devotion and popular faith ropes. And White, that the Christian People I must conquer in order to be able to lead astray, It is not a fool, precisely because of the people's applause, he needs. Here then the Bianchi, without question the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, It offers in historical order, chronological and metaphorical, all the pre-Christian beliefs related to the figures of the various virgin dee or the various virgin mothers.

.

Enzo Bianchi says that children need to shoot with firearms, It is limited only to explain, on a purely technical level, how they work and how to use firearms. And so, when children are then put to fire, Enzo Bianchi will come out, as it were, completely clean.

.

Tomorrow Enzo Bianchi will preach at Ars, on the grave of the universal patron of priests, St. John Mary Vianney, revered as the Holy Curé of Ars, The world retreats to the clergy. We reiterate that this heretic in the chair did not have it put the Pope Francis I, have it made and then maintained the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Pope Benedict XVI. And among all these, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, He was in truth the most honest of all, because he has always shown for what he really is. Indeed, to the proven proof of the facts, It does not appear that ever, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, one side has fought the Liberation Theology and condoms, the other has allowed people like Enzo Bianchi to come up to get in the chair before the priests at the shrine where the saint's remains are preserved Patron of Priests of Catholic world; that they have allowed its Supreme predecessors John Paul II and Benedict XVI.

.

As superfluous, remember, however, that errors, sometimes coarse, do not affect the heroic virtues, as in the case of the Holy Father John Paul II, nor can lead to a negative judgment on the beautiful theology and on the precious reign of Venerable Pope Benedict XVI. And whoever wants to know more about this, just to read the latest article dedicated to holiness by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo: Dal Bello to Moro: holiness is not decayed Nobel Prize, canonizations are infallible teaching of acts from which then, back, you return [cf. WHO].

.

The apology of the heresies of Enzo Bianchi, It will be published as soon as possible in a rich documentation Book. This article will only be a small advance paid on the occasion of his preaching of world spiritual exercises to the clergy held in Ars, that sound precisely, as we said at the beginning, as an invitation of a porno star at the meeting of the top of the Poor Clare Nuns wishing to know how best language to propose the virtue of chastity to young aspiring nuns of the Third Millennium.

.

the Island of Patmos, 22 September 2018

.

_________________________________

NOTE

[1] Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 36.

[2] French Philosopher Paul Ricœu (Valence 1913 – Châtenay-Malabry 2005). Among the major witnesses and protagonists of the philosophical consciousness of the twentieth century. The high value of his original work and multiform, the result of a philosophical path that from phenomenology and existentialism, He turned to hermeneutics and psychoanalysis is evidenced by numerous awards and international awards conferred in the course of his career […] From the original interest in phenomenology and existentialism, to which he devoted the first studies, his interests were oriented toward a then connected to the reflection hermeneutic perspective on the concept of symbol, engaging in investigations into the language of myth, of religion and poetry, in which he considers prove categories (the sacred, blame, fallibility) that define man's situation in the world and his way of understanding and be. In this hermeneutic perspective also we place the interest of R. in psychoanalysis, that he sees as one of the major attempts to problematize the Cartesian notion of the subject in favor of human image that is revealed and comprises only through symbols. To remind his reflections on metaphor and narration, that, despite their inherently creative dimension, represent R. authentic forms of understanding and knowledge [cf. WHO].

[3] "Enzo Bianchi – What we lack a father,” YouTube video 58:30, posted by I roll my eyes 2 May 2015. Web, 3 September 2018, [03:24 – 06:25; 22:06 – 25:29; 43:08 – 43:56; 56:38 – 57:10]. Adapted from:

HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y983sxcSQ2Q

[4] Jacques Monod: French biologist (Paris 1910 – Cannes 1976). Assistant in the zoology laboratory of the Sorbonne, He went in 1936 with B. Ephrussi al California Institute of Technology, where he came into contact with the geneticist group T. H. Morgan. In 1941 He received his doctorate in science at the Sorbonne with a thesis on the growth of bacterial cultures in which he showed that bacterial growth obeyed simple quantitative laws. After the war, during which he played an important role in the Resistance, He came to’Pastor Institute (1945), as head of the laboratory in direct service from A. Lwoff and 1953 he was appointed director of the new cellular biochemistry Service. While continuing to carry out its research findings to’Pastor Institute, He held the chair of biochemistry in the Faculty of Science (from the 1957) in order to pass, In the 1967, to molecular biology chair at France secondary school. The inaugural lecture at Middle School It was an opportunity to submit its vision of science and life, later developed in the book Chance and necessity: essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology (1970; Trad.. en. 1970), which had considerable eco provoking lively debate and discussion. In 1965, in the meantime, It had been granted, along with F. Jacob e A. Lwoff, the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology. The scientific problem that affected M. was the synthesis of enzymes, controlled by genes and induced by a substrate, as a model system for the study of protein synthesis and relationships between genetic and cellular physiology. In 1957 M. He began collaboration with F. Jacob who worked on the lysogenic / lysogenic phenomenon, ie the induction of a bacterial virus. The pooling of the results of these two research areas both techniques led to the clarification of the mechanisms concerning the genetic regulation of protein synthesis, is the definition (1961) of the concept of RNA Messenger, and the operon notions (as units coordinated expression of multiple genes) and interaction between distinct sites of a macromolecule (allosteria). In 1971 M. He became general manager of’Pastor Institute, post he held until death.

CF. http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/jacques-monod/.

[5] "120524 inaugural Evening - Hope in the Scriptures,” YouTube video 02:01:19, Posted by "Telechiara Productions" 29 May 2012. Web, 3 September 2018, [51:38 – 01:00:45]. Adapted from

HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v = 12Fv15Lysmg.

[6] CF. Catechism of the Catholic Church, NN. 238-239.

[7] "I'm not the ethic that shakes the world today. It is not a doctrine. It's something existential is to occur in meat […] in the human body, in the hand. Eye against eye. Face against face. Not nell'astrattismo ideas. Not only are over ideologies, You have ended any architecture that does not occur in the thickness of human life in our bodies and our flesh ". CF. “FATHER ENZO BIANCHI IN NAPLES,” YouTube video 01:26:42, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 11 May 2013. Web, 3 September 2018, [28:10 – 30:04]. Adapted from:

[8] "Enzo Bianchi creation and origins of the world" YouTube Video 01:18: 54, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 5 June 2013. Web, 3 September 2018, [55:00 – 59:25]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBBZynXukfk.

[9] "Enzo Bianchi – Reading the Bible Introduction,” YouTube video 01:14:40, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 5 June 2014. Web, 3 September 2018, [16:10 – 18:30]. Adapted from:

HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v = pDcZCRk1vc0.

[10] In The essence of Christianity, 1841.

[11] "Reading the Bible Enzo The conflict of interpretations,” YouTube video 44:00, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 5 June 2014. Web, 3 September 2018, [22:50 – 24:50]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4WpIaXId28.

[12] "Enzo Bianchi – Encounters with God: Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Elia, Isaiah,” YouTube video 01:03:50, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 3 July 2013. Web, 3 September 2018, [22:40 – 33:37]. Adapted from:

HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v = -XrfSAxWOwE.

[13] "Enzo Bianchi – Reading the Bible from the Old to the New: the two Testaments,” YouTube video 43:24, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 5 June 2014. Web, 3 September 2018, [23:30 – 25:26]. Adapted from :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmz9pVeWVvU.

[14] "Then we must say that in the creation God made was present evil, This is reality. The Bible tells us not to God's will, He not the created God, but there was. He has led humanity to induce bad as each of us ".cf. "Enzo Bianchi Mystery and scandal of suffering,” YouTube video 01:29:31, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 30 October 206. Web, 3 September 2018, [53:15 – 57:15]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJlnEeXJ90w.

[15] "Enzo Bianchi the resurrection of Christ and our,” YouTube video 59:52, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 11 March 2016. Web, 3 September 2018, [01:13:42 – 01:14:55]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opwrLaDnqF4.

[16] "Jesus tells the love Enzo Bianchi in dialogue with Umberto Galimberti,” YouTube video 39:00, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 23 May 2015. Web, 3 September 2018, [11:20 – 20:06]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqkQkWh3B4&feature=youtu.be&t=679.

[17] Catechism of the Catholic Church, NN. 245-246.

[18] "Enzo Bianchi – The Holy Spirit in biblical revelation,” YouTube video 58:50, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 15 August 2017. Web, 3 September 2018, [2:32 – 4:10; 32:26 – 34:00; 36:34 – 38:00; 50:04 – 50:32]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yOfOdrzzBI.

.

.
.
«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

Giovanni Cavalcoli
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Giovanni

The scandals of the powerful gay lobby ecclesiastical and drama of the formation of the clergy

ecclesial topical

SCANDALS OF POWERFUL LOBBY GAY CHURCH AND THE TRAGEDY OF THE FORMATION OF THE CLERGY

.

Based on the analyzes and observations of the Fathers The Island of Patmos They are doing for some years now both the conduct of the clergy and ideas of the Italian bishops least, in front of all these facts inevitably it arises a terrible suspicion, not unfounded, though not always accompanied by specific tests: in many cases the orders for these priests and these bishops, founded on the false conception of the priesthood, may be invalid.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

… Dear Mario Bonfanti [cf. WHO] and various related associates, no one is stopping you to be gay and to practice sodomy with all the safeguards that civil law itself recognizes you, But you can not do the priests, because instead become a priest is not a right.

The facts scandalous growing in number in various countries around the world, of which more and more is news, relating to sodomy sins committed by priests with children or young, or worse the abomination of child abuse, They encourage us to ask ourselves what are the causes of so abhorrent and unnatural phenomenon. The existence, indeed, concubinage among the clergy is a phenomenon that runs through the whole history of the Church. She knew even the case of a concubinage Pope, Alexander VI. But in the end, Here is at stake, what is physiologically normal sexual intercourse, although sinful. Quello of which is hard to understand how it can happen is a shame so severe against the priestly celibacy or chastity, which is supposed to have been desired, wanted, decided and promised solemnly and publicly to observe to the death, freely and consciously, by psychologically normal people, after receiving a normal and regular priestly and religious formation, and having been carefully screened and tested by superiors responsible for training. But you need to add to this gloomy picture is the question that arises, even more dramatic, on the quality of trainers, teachers and educators of these people and in the first place of the bishops, the superiors and vigilant about the good education of their priests, as well as the competence and virtue of teachers and educators responsible for their education.

.

The questions are not finished yet. It must be held, as Father Ariel has repeatedly pointed out in its previous editorial publications and on The Island of Patmos, that the deep roots of these sexual sins can not be that it has received a bad if not very bad education, not based on the directives of the Magisterium of the Church and the true masters, but of heretical ideas or condemned by the Church, which they include the objectives a false concept of God, of man, of faith, of grace, of the law, of sin, of the Redemption, of the church, of the sacraments, priesthood and episcopacy, as it happens for example in the theology of Karl Rahner.

.

Another disturbing fact in this affair is the inappropriate behavior or reckless bishops, which: or reluctant or minimize or cover the misdeeds or take ineffective measures. To about, seem blatant and dictated by severe lightness collective resignations in May 2018 Members of the entire Chilean episcopate as a result of yet another scandal in Chile. Good was the letter in which the bishops expressed repentance, willingness to correct and gratitude to the Holy Father for his paternal attention he has given to the story [cf. WHO]. It notes however that a bishop can resign because certainly aware of serious faults or because he feels sure his own unworthiness or incapacity to continue to conveniently carry out his office, the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI in this perspective has made its solemn act of renunciation. But that an entire episcopate of 34 bishops, although it has experienced in its widespread scandal involving and persisted for many years, serious reach the unprecedented decision to give the bloc resignation, with a compactness that knows what forced, as it might be in union protests or in a factory committee, It seems not to witness an act of repentance, but an act adversely affecting the episcopal dignity, to draw to itself the world's attention. Quite different from similar spectacular gestures it takes to solve the problem. The real and more serious charge should have come forward and not hide in the pile.

.

The real educational solution It is that the bishop will decide a good time to give serious a seminary training and to carry out a diligent supervision of the clergy, so that it is protected and defended from the unhealthy ideas and cultivated sound doctrine, clarifies well the very high value of the priestly and episcopal vocation and they fall in love with all your heart, with ardent desire for perfection and holiness and to be totally at the service of souls and of the Church. The priest truly convinced and in love with his vocation and mission is all and only took the things above and not those of this land. It is moved by the Spirit and has no time to meet the desires of the flesh. The true pastoral solution involves the education of the will and emotions, and the strengthening of attachment to the good, the stimulation of hatred for sin, the will to reform and correct itself. If St. Paul says that love "bears", He is referring to the delicacy of the father who does not throw his son fed to ridicule, I do not want to humiliate. Yet he wants to correct. It is a father, so, who knows if necessary recall, reprove, to threaten, To chastise. This too is charity. But it is also ready to cover where possible, useful, lawful and proper, if there is to excuse or patience; certainly not in the sense of covering or hiding the sin that is not punished. Here should not cover, but reveal to the proper authorities and to the sinner the same. God does not cover the sins of those leaving, as Luther believed, but it covers them for mercy waiting to remove.

.

Mercy does not suppose the reduction of the blame on pain. There is not only the wounded soul, but there is also that feritrice. You have to have compassion for those who can not make it, not for those who want to engage. This goes incited. Otherwise mercy becomes connivance and complicity. And with that bisogna add in our considerations on this issue thorny and, on the basis of that I and the Father Ariel we analyze and observations are we doing for some years now both the conduct of the clergy and ideas of the Italian bishops least, in front of all these facts, It has inevitably arisen in us a terrible suspicion, not unfounded, though not always accompanied by specific tests, so we came to the conclusion that in many cases the orders for these priests and these bishops, founded on the false conception of the priesthood [1], are invalid [see our articles on Theologica, WHO e WHO].

.

It should also say frankly that the moral confusion, that is at the origin of the phenomenon of widespread homosexuality among priests, It is in turn caused by the concept of human action rahneriano, that is not based on the acceptance of the essential purposes of human nature, because he does not accept either the idea of ​​a fixed and objective human nature, whose happiness depends on obedience to an immutable and inviolable law of nature, established by the Creator; but according to him the man, and each of us is free to determine how he likes the concrete contours and then the act of his own nature. Hence the result that the individual subject the sexual field is free to choose one's sexual orientation is not based on a sexual activity aims inherent in the nature, regardless of the subject, but based on the research of sexual pleasure, obtained by means created by the subject itself, different from subject to subject and all lawful, They enjoy them as long as the subject. Thus there is no longer a universal rule to distinguish a good deed from sin. So I can not say that this commits a sin of sodomy or pedophilia, but that his act is simply different from mine, an act that I must not convict, but respected. It is clear that when you give way to a morale like that, the jeremiads for the pedophilia of priests are crocodile tears and the scandals are hypocrisy.

.

So how much longer will we have to go on in reaping the bitter fruits of rahnerismo? What has yet to happen because the Pope will decide on a reform of priestly formation according to the directives of the Council? They by no means provide the rahnerismo, but rather an essay back to St. Thomas, as the same Council's Decree on Priestly Formation Oct:

.

"To fully illustrate how much more can the mysteries of salvation, the students may learn to deepen them by means of speculation, St. Thomas having to master " [n.16].

.

And the Declaration on Christian Education Education:

.

"By investigating very carefully the new questions posed by age and research that evolves, will seize more clearly how faith and reason meet each other in the only truth in the footsteps of the doctors of the Church, especially St. Thomas Aquinas " [# 10].

.

It is necessary that the educator forth abundantly available being educated means of grace, propose the example of Santi, give himself an example of virtue, educate him in the study of Scripture, to prayer, to intimate union with Christ the High Priest, to communion with the Church and with the Pope, the works of fraternal charity and mercy.

.

We must honestly acknowledge that in these fifty years in which they should have been put in place these wise directives, the Council was simply mocked by those - the rahneriani -, that they consider the successors. So it happened that instead of the conciliar reform, It rose a Modernism which is worse than that of St. Pius X times. You have to start all over again and return to the directives of the Council, otherwise things will go from bad to worse, in a situation where we started with gay priests scandals, but in a short time it has come to the involvement in these scandals of their bishops and cardinals protectors, some of which it has come even to take away the dignity of cardinal. So I do my Father Ariel's question in his article: "All of this, It could not possibly be avoided?» [cf. WHO].

.

Varazze, 21 August 2018

.

.20

__________________________

[1] CF. The concept of priesthood in Rahner, The ministerial priesthood in. «The love of the Heart of Jesus», edited S.M.Manelli and S.Lanzetta, Proceedings of the Theological Convention organized by the Franciscans in December 2009, Cantagalli, Siena 2010, pp. 183-230.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

The death penalty and the holy man Mastro Titta, is misercordioso boia where Papa

- a touch of summer lightness: er Roman scribe de Gatta Hypatia -

THE DEATH PENALTY AND THAT holy man MASTRO TITTA, ER Misericordioso boia DER PAPA

.

Giovanni Battista Bugatti, said Mastro Titta, is Misericordioso boia where Papa in office until 1869, He was a true man of God, as well as a great professional. With a decisive and precise shot you mozzava the foreman made no pe’ noffink he suffered. Instead, today and merciful of His Holiness Executioner, on the one hand you praise peace and love with rainbow flags, on the other make you regret not dead. Li mortacci their: how much do I know’ merciful !

.

.

Author
Hypatia Gatta Roman

.

.

To enter the bookshop click on the cover

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

Onanism and theology: the relationship between metaphysics and extra uterine pregnancy, while our aesthetic obstetricians abort the little that remains of the sensus fidei

— Theologica —

Onanism AND THEOLOGY: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METAPHYSICS AND EXTRA PREGNANCY UTERINE, WHILE THE MIDWIVES ESTETICHE abortions THE REMAINS OF THE LITTLE the senses

.

Scattered in the jungle of the communication network there are sites and blogs of “true Catholics” and of “true defenders” of the purity of tradition citing the one iota Romano Amerio like it verb Of the, while his students, real or presumed, beano in fancy turns of phrase which show the unmistakable taste of ... "Oh, Darling! How like myself, what are the aesthetic, they are metaphysical!».

 

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

the ruins of Metropolitan Cathedral of Messina after the earthquake of 1908

Samantha with the longed-for final "h" is a twenty year old girl who celebrated her eighteen years ago two years ago, reaching fifteen boyfriends. During his turn our love life began at the age of thirteen, He has had some small hiccup, trivial things but mostly solvable, that are part of the normal course of developmental age. Like when she became pregnant at fifteen, prompting her mother, Jessika, con the "k", forty-two years, to be a severe self-criticism with his third companion series, a twenty-eight year-old boy, also called toy-boy, to whom she confides: «Michael» - named after his mother in honor of pop singer Michael Jackson - «I admit I was wrong, because I did not bother to make taking birth control pills to Samy "- affectionate diminutive of Samantha with the" h "end-awaited -. "Sure, if she had not she kept it hidden for days, I would have done immediately prescribe the abortion pill '. The toy-boy Michael heartened: "Jessy" - affectionate diminutive of Jessika with "k" - "I do not think you have the wrong. Sai, Samy your daughter has a breathtaking body, with the pill could run the risk that it be cellulite. In the end it was resolved: a raschiatina, a blood clot removed, and the problem is gone to counseling in a flash ". Then Jessy feels relieved and sighs to toy-boy: "You are right, Miky "- short for Michael -, Sylvester also gave me reason, but not only him, also Christian, his former fellow Brits, was in agreement and solidarity.

.

Messina earthquake of 1908

And here to understand you need an engraved: Sylvester, father of Samantha with the "h" awaited final, He was the first husband of Jessika, so he named by his father who was a bodybuilder inflated anabolic and great fan at Rocky Balboa, the famous film series starring Sylvester Stallone from 1976. After the wedding Sylvester discovered his true identity and, after a coming-out made a famous talk-show in front of millions of viewers, present in the studio also Jessika wife with "k", declared their gaysmo. After that - twist! At that same moment his first man stood up from the audience, all’epoca Christian, he appeared publicly to his wife as his partner. Moved, his wife hugged them both declaring themselves happy and hoping that they will be so happy. The scene was accompanied by a haunting melody of a famous singer who died of AIDS and the gay icon, Freddie Mercury: «We are the champions […] of the world» [we are the champions of the world].

.

Messina earthquake of 1908

Now, Samantha with the "h" awaited final, He is doing their university studies, He chose psycho-pedagogy, in fact he wants to become a champion of the theory of gender. His father, rich cry architect on the way to the age of fifty, meanwhile he changed partner and now lives with a young Brazilian model shooting -nothing of twenty-two, certo Ricky, so he named by his parents in honor of Ricky Martin, another gay singer, father of two children bought from a surrogate mother and convolato recent wedding in Puerto Rico with his young companion [cf. WHO]. The Sylvester gay dad is very proud of her daughter, He is also experiencing a happy relationship with a new partner, sure John, a native of Bari, but so he called because his father and his mother are two fans John Lennon, and son, through this former Beatles, They sent their deepest values ​​of life through song Imagine :

.

Imagine there's no heaven

he tries, it's easy

No hell below your feet

Above us only Heaven

Imagine that people

Live the present ...

Imagine there are no countries

it is not difficult

Nothing to kill and die

and no religion

Imagine all

Living life in peace ...[Original text English, WHO]

.

The messages of love Samantha with "h" final direct longed to his John, They constitute a veritable apotheosis of contemporary poetry, here's one to give everyone the perception of this poetry-loving mood:

.

gives when msidt [1], my life has changed

xched [2] xme [3] tu6 qlc [4].

For this tvb girls [5], xched 6Sxme [6].

MMT+ [7] xchè you 6 the + [8].

T tel + hard [9], I recommend resp to cel [10]

dp vng [11] and cmq Cvd [12].

.

Faced with this so intense expression of love poetry, what ever can be compared to a quatrain Dantesque type:

.

So gentle and so honest it seems

my woman, when it greets others,

ch'ogne lingua Deven, shivering, move,

and eyes not dare to look [13]

.

.

Friuli earthquake of 1976

Remember that Samantha with the final "h" longed for, is a girl now considered high culture that passes an examination after another at the university and in a few years will be a professional psycho-pedagogy, engaged in social and political. Obviously, the level of universities, university and teachers studying at the same, and corresponds in a sense, has had to adapt to these new generations of students.

.

This is reality, and in this kind of reality, us has the unenviable task of proclaiming the Holy Gospel to young people who have heard of so vague a strange concept of the Church and Christianity in the words of a famous Italian intellectual, Lorenzo Cherubini, aka Jovannotti, that in his song Think positive, It expresses the best of Catholic doctrine and theology of metaphysics in this way:

.

I believe that in this world

It exists only a great Church

That passes by Che Guevara

It is up to Mother Teresa

Going from Malcolm X through

Gandhi and San Patrignano

There comes a priest in the suburbs

What goes on in spite of the Vatican

[full text, WHO]

.

.

Friuli earthquake of 1976

This is the real society with which we have to deal, although this does not seem to even touch those four cosmetic and aesthetic pundits that among codicils, columns and four spells of no great school, but most of the decadent neo-scholastic, They never cease to announce that we must start from metaphysics. And when I use the word "metaphysical", feel stuffed up in seventh heaven, because the very word excites you at times to really perverse way.

.

Scattered in the jungle the electronic network there are sites and blogs of true Catholics and authentic purity of tradition defenders mentioning one iota Romano Amerio like it the word of God, while his students, real or presumed, beano in fancy turns of phrase which show the unmistakable taste of ... "Oh, Darling! How like myself, what are the aesthetic, they are metaphysical!».

.

Friuli earthquake of 1976

Good, but Samantha with the "h" awaited, student of psycho-pedagogy and tomorrow practitioner and trainer psycho-pedagogical, daughter Jessika with "k" happily accompanied by his new boy-toy, ex-wife of Sylvester rich architect currently cohabiting cry with his new Brazilian boy-nothing, Who leads and who offers the message of redemption and salvation of the incarnate Word of God, "who died and rose, ascended to heaven and now seated at the right hand of God, that one day come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his reign will have no end?» [cf. Symbol of faith].

.

But the better to excite the aesthetic beauty of true and pure tradition, Also we insert the original text of the I believe, as the greek, as the Latin liturgy, love it especially to those small groups of lay people who do not know, and that for this favor of its use arcane magic, because when you are not able to penetrate and live the essence of the sacred mysteries in the substance, then you end up worshiping the external accidents, as of the same language:

.

Te crucified for us under Pontius Pilate,
and victim
and was buried.

Καὶ ἀναστάντα τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρᾳ
according to the Scriptures.

And ascended into heaven
and is seated at the Father EV dexiᾷ.

Again Coming after glory
judge the living and the dead,
th CDK reign ESTA fee

.

Friuli earthquake of 1976

This message of salvation, Samantha with “h” and longed to John, maybe bring him the pundits of codicils and Directories, if anything, with a couple of teacher's lessons on the assumption that St. Augustine was of a philosophical Platonic? But Samantha with the "h" awaited final, albeit he graduated with honors and today university student of psychology and pedagogy, It is convinced that the Platonic Krizia is just the fragrance launched by the design house of Mary Mandelli, known with the pseudonym Krizia [cf. WHO]. Samantha with the "h" final longed not even imagine that Κριτίας [Crisis] It is taken from the last unfinished dialogue of Plato, all based on female vanity. And that while her new boyfriend, John, also a university student at the faculty of pharmacy, when a few years before he was questioned in the literature graduation examination, When asked who was the Tasso [cf. WHO], after a moment of reflection replied: "The inventor of cedar Tassoni" [cf. WHO]. And at the pharmacy faculty, where also passes an examination behind the other, for teachers is a real funny guy, I always remind everyone, This Bari named John, when an examination answered the question of the examiner professor who asked "tell me whence comes an extra uterine pregnancy», replicating after brief reflection: "Originates from anal intercourse".

.

Irpinia earthquake 1980

To these two subjects, you can touch the heart and convert them to explain what relationship exists between the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle and the metaphysical speculations of St. Thomas Aquinas? But most of all, is to convert them is to bring them to the right path of faith, Perhaps we will share the diatribes against the German Jesuit theologian Karl Rahner, explaining them as he reduces be thomist, which it is act and perfection, being aware of, identifying the man be, knowing and being known, thus putting standing an anthropological reduction of metaphysics? And we can then continue to explain, Samantha with the "h" final and longed to her last boyfriend Bari called in honor of John Lennon, Karl Rahner overturns the fundamental principles of Thomistic realism to give birth to the modern principle of immanence?

.

Irpinia earthquake 1980

A Samantha with the "h" awaited final, between little psycho-pedagoga, convinced that it is a perfume Krizia, and her latest boyfriend Bari, John named in honor of Lennon, soon pharmacist, convinced that an extra-uterine pregnancy is originated from anal intercourse, to stimulate them to a journey of faith, what we have to offer? Maybe we have to give the conference proceedings against Karl Rahner promoted years ago by the Franciscans? We advise them to read the texts of the late Brunero Gherardini, Serafino Lanzetta and Roberto de Mattei, that advance the thesis of Vatican Council II which only pastoral and not dogmatic? We are we to convince them to read the valuable and excellent work True and false theology by Antonio Livi [cf. WHO], difficult to read even for scholars of philosophical and theological sciences? Or are we to drag in the sci-liturgical debates of some minds schizophrenic, convinced that the crude and simple Galilean fisherman of the Blessed Apostle Peter came to a solemn altar basilica escorted by four deacons in shining baroque dalmatics, aided by several assistants clad priests of solemn copes, cheering under the steps of the altar "Introibo altar Gods», then opening the missal given by Saint Pius V in the sixteenth century and starting to celebrate what these poor schizophrenic aesthetic liturgy and their retinue of the sci-liturgy scholars call "The Mass of All Time»?

.

earthquake of the Friuli 1976, funerals of the victims

In short, poor John, named in honor of Lennon, raised by parents on the driving pattern of the lyrics Imagine, we can also forgive did not even know how to develop an extra uterine pregnancy, but certain ladies and gentlemen of the true and pure Catholic tradition, which abound in circles dreamlike self-styled theologians and liturgists, They can not be too convinced as John that an extra uterine pregnancy "is spread by anal intercourse", because that would mean, against the other, not knowing even Aristotle in his capacity as a biologist, on diagrams and logic of which St. Thomas Aquinas develops its own method, hence its title Doctor Common, ie Universal Doctor of the Church. And this precise title and indicates that Aquinas is not merely a "theological school" special, but a common patrimony of the whole universal Church, and at the same time a method that, albeit with some defect and shortcoming, It remains valid today and especially unsurpassed.

.

And note well that Samantha with the "h" awaited, with all its poetic "msidt [14], xchè you 6 the + [15]" … and so on, it is not even the worst. Just imagine those who arrive not even the kind of evolution which came anyway Samantha with the "h" awaited, that it will soon be a doctor in psycho-education and promoter of the theory of gender.

.

Irpinia earthquake 1980, the bodies prepared for burial

I do not despise the scholastic and metaphysical, of which I am expert and scholar who are both at the base of my philosophical and theological formation, but since I am first and foremost a pastor in the care of souls by the grace of the priesthood was received, I am aware that my primary and fundamental task is the proclamation of the Holy Gospel in a de-Christianized Europe and decadent in which new generations no longer know even the basics of Christianity. And in this situation of collapse, affirm the spirit of closed and exclusive lounge that we must start from metaphysics and St. Thomas Aquinas, stubborn way in explaining the only pastorality of Vatican II, or supporting the concept of aberrant "the Mass of" - what in the philosophical sense of aberatio understanding —, all it referred to a Roman Missal given by the Holy Pontiff in the sixteenth century, It is equivalent to use the XXXIII canto of Paradise to teach reading and writing to adults joints of the age of majority in state of total illiteracy, convinced that we must start from the Opera de Dante Alighieri to eradicate illiteracy. All in blind disregard the theological structure of the final of the three books of the Divine Comedy Canto is not even including today by those who teach and explain to the students the work of the great poet, one need only read certain explanations to the text printed on the books for school use, or enter into any high school as a teacher gives absurd explanations to students during class send SMS, send photos to Istgrm O whatsapp with cell phones under their desks.

.

Irpinia earthquake 1980, transportation of remains from the Fire Department

To say with smug narcissism We have to start from metaphysics and by St. Thomas Aquinas, It is like trying to give a one year old son with severe malnutrition problems such as a T-bone steak meal. Which St. Thomas Aquinas we have to start, dovendoci today confronted with a large number of priests and bishops who seem to know more about the basics of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and the talk is a whole swarm of worldly sociologisms? But we want to account, what comes out of the mouths of priests and bishops, when today speak of charity, of mercy, poor in spirit? At best he comes out of the dull and spineless gooders, and without their knowledge - because now you have to talk about quite unconscious ignorance -, from their mouths out of the terminologies that are typical of the Enlightenment and Masonic language, from ambivalent concept and totally distorted "solidarity", Freemasons who is pure and exclusive philanthropic social commitment, exactly what we see today the visible Church has reduced the sense of charity emptied of its Christological transcendence and filled with worldliness man-centric.

.

In question - and it is good puntualizzarlo to avoid any potential misunderstandings -, I'm not sure the school and Aquinas, I remember are two methods, which as such require a solid base, a high degree of culture, but above all a language and mental fitness and concentration that today the majority of the clergy themselves can not be proposed, because they have neither the training nor the means to face it all. When it unfortunately lacks basics, culture and language, how can you say in a logical and reasonable way that you have to fly high in the sky? Or maybe you can ask a chicken to fly as if it were an eagle?

.

Aquila earthquake 2009, The funeral of the victims

The school and Thomism, over the past half century have been razed to the ground by high theological magnitude earthquake triggered first by the para-council of theologians and then by post-Vatican Council II false interpreters. Now, we should all know that the violent earthquakes of high magnitude earthquake, in a few minutes can bring down entire cities. Once this happened, and then rebuild those cities will not be enough certainly many minutes, take decades, because it will be necessary to start almost from zero. And when it comes to ancient towns completely destroyed, as it has often happened in Italy over the centuries, It will not even be possible to reconstruct more or less the same state, because certain ancient architectural works are not playable, except create a fake antique or a clumsy reproductions, such as the decadent neo-scholastic and pseudo Thomism. So that, to assert in certain salons ghetto that we must start from metaphysics and St. Thomas Aquinas, perhaps some dreamlike subject gives more excitement than I can give a disturbing erotic image of a teenager in the throes of hormonal storms, but on the other hand denotes to what extent they are motivated by an irrational spirit that makes them incompatible with any true philosophical and theological speculation, reliable and secure as they can rebuild in time of a ballet entire cities after a high-magnitude earthquake that has razed; riedificandole rather stagnant with four formulette the decadent neo-scholastic, that they have nothing in common either with the school or with Thomism. That said note also something, various lay Catholics who throw themselves into diatribes internetiche on the revival of metaphysics and of St. Thomas Aquinas, if I caught and removed from their world-Onorico telematics and placed in front of an audience, the question addressed to them: "We clarify the concept of" authority "and “to be”, of "substance" and "accidents" ', would dumb show. And this I say this not because I imagine, but because I have frequently and repeatedly experienced. It is not by chance that these lions behind computer screens, flee to every kind of discussion and public debate, He is having never studied nor metaphysics nor Thomism, albeit perversely excited by these two magic words, of which they do not know the complex structural essence, which first requires the construction of solid foundations, then years and years of study.

.

Ascoli Piceno, earthquake of 2016, funerals of the victims

All this to the great pundits do not care, because in them it prevails narcissistic sense of pleasure and self-gratification, certain and sure that is just sinful and severe physical masturbation of a teenager, not dangerous mental masturbation of certain adults, unable to understand that even if to humiliate our being intellectual and cognitive, or our philosophical and theological speculation skills acquired and developed over many years of study and work, we must start with the announcement of the most basic elements of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and all even with very uncertain outcomes, in a society that has developed social and political aversion to Christianity. Everything moved by the painful awareness that in contemporary society, the feeling and the same concepts of man and nature, of human life and ethics, family and human relationships, legal and law, are completely antithetical to all Christians feel and experience. And if anyone, before this reality, really think to start from metaphysics and from St. Thomas Aquinas, in which case it would be good to run as soon as an ambulance and have it transported tied in a straitjacket at the nearest mental health center. If not, Christianity will be turned into an intellectual speculation, cosmetic and aesthetic, carried out for the masturbatory pleasure of his selfish "me" by people much more and much worse than the modernists and rahneriani from their much-criticized, have long forgotten that the shepherds in charge of souls, not of parlor intellectuals that if they sing and if they play each other in a world that not only does not want them to hear, but also I am wanting to make the effort to listen to willing, It has its own plus the intellectual means to understand this kind of language.

.

Or to put it more with another concrete example: it would be like if I, going to be shopping at the fruit market in Campo dei Fiori in Rome, I rivolgessi the seller with this language: "Good day my Messer, no man hath said ch'eziandio keep robe stories high Goodness? Ordunque, ere largitemi these graceful herbs, afterwards these fruits fertile ". I am almost certain that I would answer the greengrocer: "Dear father, I sell herbs, but if it seems like she used to smoke herbs of those who give to the head, then you must go to buy them somewhere else '. At that point I could probably replicate saying … "My dear, she misunderstood and did not understand: we must start from the language of Dante!». there, this is exactly what they do the inhabitants of the ghetto-aesthetic when they say that we must start by metaphysics and by St. Thomas Aquinas and to save deposit and the sense of faith we must celebrate "the Mass of" using the magic of Latin, place that Latin is a far more effective instrument of salvation of the absolution of sins through the Sacrament of Confession or the Sacrament of the Sick given to people who are going to die together with the expected full absolution. Having said that I add: Anyone who thinks that faith works together to save, commits a grave error: to save souls are the Latin Missal and the so-called "Mass of Always," St. Pius V.

.

Also to explain what happens when you lose a language I also offer another example: those great fathers of democracy and that unspecified civilization, these will still believe the British, after having plundered certain countries around, what ultimately deprived them? Li deprived of their language. And still today, in India, to communicate with each other Indians of the various regions are forced to speak in English. Naturally, the best of themselves, the British have given it with 'apartheid in South Africa in the singing of God Save the Queen [God Save the Queen]. And today, in the dying British company - the capital of which is likely to be stabbed in the street by two children a decade -, the same that until yesterday kept standing in the scheme of’apartheid in Sud Africa, They are able to send you in the galleys of Her Britannic Majesty with accusations of racism or its variant that is the so-called homophobia, if you dare to express that their pop icon Elton John, He married with two children and a man bought from the wombs for rent, She would cry foul even the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah. But on the other hand, paradigm of British society are the toilets of their public places, where it happens to find a toilet squat on the floor without even a small sink for washing hands. What this denotes what some people are filthy dirty inside and out, but even though convinced they are the fathers of civilization, perhaps hygiene. All this although the early 2000, a group of Italian students living in London with the project Erasmus, He withdrew peanuts and chips brought by containers along with beers at the tables of one of the many pubs in London, and just returned in “dirty” ed “uncivilized” Italy made her examined by a laboratory of the University of Bologna, with this surprising result: those foods contained traces of fourteen different types of urine … God Save the Queen !

.

Earthquake of Amatrice 2016, funerals of the victims

This is the nefarious work brought to completion over the past half century: The destruction of language and radical subversion of the very concept of humanity. We must therefore again teach the language to communicate, to give man a "new heart" [cf. This 36,26-27. 26] and transmit the mysteries of faith, aware of how long it takes to rebuild a city destroyed by an earthquake. Only after years of work that engage different generations, which will require first of all holy pastors in the care of souls and true servants of theology, we groped to say: … and now let's start from the metaphysical and St. Thomas Aquinas. Any true shepherd care of souls, and any authentic theologian who is not a conceited narcissist onanist stale in the pond of his own ego-theology, It should understand how urgent it is to start from the most basic foundations, with all due respect to one iota Romano Amerio, headings and codicils of the drawing-room exclusivist that both like each other when in their circles ghetto-speak of the purity of the true doctrine or of the highest metaphysical speculations, but that nothing of Revelation announce the mystery of the Redemption and the neo-pagan society of a world now in an advanced state of decay. And with this society and this world, esclusivisti the drawing-room of the metaphysical dream share a large common element: their love and their complacent drowning decadent aesthetics.

.

To those who still had doubts about what I have said so far, proceeding on the logical basis that anyone can deny equal and better through logic, It could be enough simply to compare this:

.

gives when msidt, my life has changed

xche XME tu6 qlc.

For this tvb girls, xched 6Sxme.

MMT + xche tu 6 the +.

T tel + hard, I recommend resp to cel

.

with this other text:

.

Let us then resuming etc.. In the prior preamble, Here, Aristotle goes to deal with science. It is divided into three parts;. The first determined congratulated, which is among the highest human good luck leading into consideration the fact that the operation power. The second part discusses the virtues, there, If the operation is a success, according to some power etc.. In the third completes its handling of happiness, there is a happiness, and what is the nature of the operation, showing the power of […] [16]

.

the cathedral rebuilt in Messina 1929 after the earthquake 1908 that had destroyed

… and compared these two texts, we will see and we will establish from where better to start to bring the announcement of the Holy Gospel to the people of an increasingly blind world, deaf and hostile to all that is contained in the Revelation of the Mystery ...

.

That's why we Fathers de The Island of Patmos even at the cost of "stifling" our so-called "intellectual spirit" and speculative -, we decided to start from those basic foundations that involve a careful pedagogical work which first requires extreme clarity and a thorough explanation of the meaning of words. We must not take anything for granted, with the times they live today. So you can not mention, for example the word transubstantiation, or the philosophical and theological terms of substances e damn it, without explaining clearly and simply the precise meaning of these terms [by way of example reference is made to John Cavalcoli, o.p. WHO]. All this always in the sad realization that certain terms transposed the classical philosophical vocabulary in theological language, today are not even included a large number of bishops and priests, not to mention certain laymen made teach catechism to our children, or the teachers of religion in schools.

.

Obviously, occasionally, We continue to write longer articles and specialized cutting our page Theologica, but certainly not limiting ourselves only to these writings almost always complex, as clear, mostly directed at a more specialized audience.

.

Only after we have reconstructed the language it can happen that in a few generations our posterity - when we are now dissolved bodies inside the tombs and our souls stay in purgatory -, They will try to say: Now we try to start from the metaphysical and St. Thomas Aquinas.

.

the Island of Patmos, 29 April 2018 ― St. Catherine of Siena, Doctor of the Church

.

.

_____________________

NOTE

[1] I fell in love with you

[2] Because

[3] Per me

[4] You are someone

[5] I love you I think of you

[6] You are special to me

[7] I miss you so much

[8] You are the best

[9] I'll call you later.

[10] Reply on phone.

[11] I come later

[12] I'll see you.

[13] Both noble heart and so full of decorum is
my woman, when he addressed to other greetings,
that every language becomes, shivering, move,
and the eyes do not have the courage to look [Dante, The new life, XXI]

[14] I fell in love with you

[15] You are the best

[17] San Tommaso Aquino, Free I Lectio IV.

.

.
.
«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

Dear Readers,

as our loyal know, The Island of Patmos it has management costs that it has always supported with your offers.

first of all take this opportunity to thank all those who supported us and allowed so far to cover these expenses, especially those who, monthly, They always send their contributions.

To those who might intend to offer their valuable support for our apostolic work, we propose to make a monthly subscription in favor of The Island of Patmos, even for a few Euros, using the convenient and safe system PayPal

God reward you.

.

.

.

.

.

 

.

.

the problem is not Eugenio Scalfari but man Jorge Mario Bergoglio lacking in prudence and sanity, but it can also be a valuable instrument of God's grace

The man's indiscretions Jorge Mario Bergoglio and our fire service

THE PROBLEM IS NOT Eugenio Scalfari MA MAN WANTED JORGE MARIO BERGOGLIO PRECAUTIONARY AND MENTAL BALANCE, BUT THAT WILL BE TOO VALUABLE TOOL OF GOD'S GRACE

 

.

Among the various events of imprudence of Pope Francis I also is no stubbornness senile to persevere stubbornly to speak with a dangerous person like Eugenio Scalfari, then forcing the official organ of the Holy See to make public figure of useful idiots when they can not say that the Church is now in the hands of a reckless, scrambles to explain that the other person has not understood, or that the meeting was just a private conversation and not an interview. Well wonder, Lords of the official organ of the Holy See: feel - of course is just one example academic! —, that before a crazier monarch King George III Hanover, the best thing to do is perhaps to make fun of the people by explaining to it than are the others to have misunderstood, while he had hopped suit only white nightgown in the throne room to receive the highest dignitaries of the House of Lords on official visit?

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

 

 

.

.

dangerous friendships …

Liutprand, bishop of Cremona, at the beginning of the 10th century, in his The deeds of the emperor Otto, reports a sentence attributed to this famous monarch that on the young Pope John XII [Rome 937 - Rome 964], elected to the holy throne in the year 955 when he was just eighteen years old, He had this to say:

.

«The boy says, East, good example of an easy unchanged, which translated means: "The Pope is still young and will moderate only by the example of noble men" [readable original text WHO]

.

Since then it has been more than a thousand years, but occasionally the stock history of strange surprises, and in different ways in the form, though similar in substance of different people, unfortunately repeats. E, as he learns Greek wisdom, if the epic beginning was marked by the noble tragedy, the end - or as in our ecclesial and ecclesiastical case the irreversible decadence - is instead marked by that satire that drowns everything in ridicule. Having said this very: anyone who intends to dissent from this proven matter of historical and social fact, if not take it with me, but with Greek history, the Greeks and their literature. I have limited myself to only bring a fact that no scholar who is really responsible and serious may in any way deny and refute: the decadence always comes to its climax in the sinking satire. Suffice it to think of the periodic scandals of the clergy, and especially those of a sexual nature, with the inevitable theaters of gay priests pinched in situations so incredible in their grotesque absurdity, that not even arouse the indignation, but only laughter, just as if the whole thing was a real comic comedy to laugh, but certainly do not take seriously.

.

Like this, in the satire in which now we have sunk, we were shaken at the very beginning of the Easter Triduum from the words published by the founder of the newspaper La Repubblica, which he attributed to Pope Francis I of the expressions that touch the heart of the mystery of salvation:

.

"Holiness" - Eugenio Scalfari question - "in our previous meeting she told me that our species will disappear at some point and always God from his creative seed will create other species. She never told me about souls who have died in sin and go to hell forever for scontarlo. She talked to me instead of good souls and admitted to the contemplation of God. But the bad souls? Where you are punished?». To this question the Pope would respond: "You are not punished, those who repent and receive God's forgiveness are among the ranks of souls who watch, but those who do not repent and therefore can not be forgiven disappear. There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls " [see text, WHO, WHO].

.

Even the most superficial knowledge of the Catechism of the Catholic Church He understands that in this response are contained serious heresies not formal but substantial. Shortly after the publication of the text - with all that this news entailed and unleashed on Holy Thursday - comes the denial of the Holy See:

.

«The Holy Father Francis recently received the founder of the newspaper The Republic in a private meeting on the occasion of Easter, But not issue him any interviews. As reported today by the author in the article is the result of its reconstruction, where the exact words spoken by the Pope are not cited. No quotation marks in the above article should be considered then as a faithful transcription of the Holy Father's words " [ Official text WHO].

.

Caravaggio: Flagellation of Christ at the Column in the judgment hall of Pilate

Pacific is the fact that the patch is worse than the tear, given that the umpteenth slap is reached, however, on the face of believers of Christ at the beginning of the Easter Triduum, while the Pope is involved in what - and I say this with no disrespect - we could define how the theater ideological bergogliano better known as the rinsed feet in jail, He made equally to men and women, Christians and non-Christians. On this theater I do not mean to repeat myself, I have already written in the past and in anything but ironic tones [see article WHO]. We need only remember that on this holy day, we priests, we celebrate the institution of the priesthood and the Holy Eucharist; although that day has now been changed by the reigning Pontiff in Bergogliano jubilation of the pedicure to the prisoner.

.

Unfortunately I consider unnecessary to remind the Pope - as I wrote recently that it is not even a provincial psychology, since belonging to that sub-category of provincialism which is the quartering [see article WHO] - that this gesture in the Gospel of John the Apostle Blessed acclaimed right in Mass of the Lord's Supper [cf. GV 13, 1-15], Christ the Lord is fulfilled on the Apostles chosen as priests of the New Covenant and ministers as stewards and custodians of the Holy Eucharist.

.

Caravaggio: Christ Crowned with Thorns

And while pel joy of the Radical Party members, the logic of which there is the concept of "poor victims of crime", but "poor prisoners who have committed crimes" - all according to the same diabolical logic of "poor women who have abortions", Never rather "poor children killed by their mothers in abortion" -, the Supreme Pontiff again ignored that in his own Diocese of Rome there are elderly Bishops and Presbyteries, sick and severely sick, who have spent their lives to serve the Church of Christ and to be faithful stewards of the grace of the Sacraments. Some are hospitalized, others live in clinical and geriatric facilities because they are no longer independent and therefore need to be well cared for simply move to toilet facilities, admitted there may bear and should not however perform their bodily needs in bed, with the assistance that it requires, and with all the sense of discomfort and humiliation that this entails for any human. Anyhow, what only matters is that the Supreme Pontiff - who immediately hath been said from the other side of the world and that after this announcement has not been slow to start making things of this world -, go to rinse your feet in the giovanottoni in perfect physical health in prison are not for injustice, but because they have committed various crimes; because they used violence against other human beings, robbed people dedicated to honest work, including people who are struggling to come to their families at the end of the month, they sold drugs, They have exploited prostitution, They have committed rapes and so on, and the whole, of course, pace of the Radical Party members who hail the "poor prisoner" and equal pace of the reigning Pope who goes to rinse your feet with these angels of God.

.

We all should be taught the Supreme Pontiff Christ Lord admonishes: "I was in prison and you visited me" [cf. Mt 25, 36]. Christ the Lord does not say at all: "I was in prison and you have washed my feet ', because your feet, Christ gave, has washed them only to the Apostles chosen by Him and by Him consecrated priests of the New Covenant, everything else has to be considered only a sort of modern apocryphal Gospel that we could reasonably owner “The Gospel According to Jorge Mario Bergoglio”.

.

Caravaggio: particularly in the work of the feet Madonna of the pilgrims

It is for it legitimate to ask why, Holy Thursday, The Pope arrived on the other side of the world that seems to yearn for things of this world, to give an example of humility and the spirit of service to which Christ the Lord calls us He first washed the feet of his disciples - and note, his disciples, not to prisoners nor to the whores of Jerusalem -, not adversely instead at some downtown geriatrics to give the parrot for urine or defecate in the pan to a saint Bishop and sick priest who spent his entire life to serving Christ and his Church, certainly not to steal, to rape, cashing in on prostitution and selling drugs as the angels of God made the subject of Liturgy bergogliana the annual flushing of the feet. Having said that I add: man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, come halfway around the world and in fact competed for five years from the things of this world, to his conscience as a man and the Apostles Prince Successor she should asked this question: while he found time and maybe even delight in receiving Eugenio Scalfari, dispensing with it a precious time by God, it went to the Holiness of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I for other purposes well and high missions, how many times he was informed that the Bishops and Priests, including several of its direct and close acquaintance, They were hospitalized, They had been subjected to large and invasive surgeries, or who were in recovery at various rehabilitation centers and so to follow? And how many times, Sanctity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, although informed, It was careful not to pick up the phone - which always makes extensive use and abuse - to extend to them an omen and a sign of the apostolic nearness, just as he did by calling Lucifer even two sons of the caliber of Marco Pannella and Emma Bonino, otherwise inviting them to 'hold on', although it is not known on what the father and mother of abortion, dell'eutanasia, of genetic testing, dell'omosessualismo, of marriage between couples of the same sex and of children given to them for adoption or by the same purchased from wombs for rent, They should and should continue to "hold on"? [cf. WHO, WHO].

.

Caravaggio: the kiss of Judas

All this proves that for the first time in history we are to deal with a legitimate successor of Peter that is likely to impress all the worst enemies ever the Church and Catholicism, without giving rise to confusion and bewilderment in believers of Christ, while Eugenio Scalfari - and not just him -, praising the Pope revolutionary, in chorus with that other bad person by Antonio Spadaro, that acts as a counterpoint melody to "leader revolutionary" [cf. WHO], both unaware that the concept of "revolution" and "revolutionary" does not apply to the Church and the papacy, I am taken as they are by their dramatic and destructive drift utopian and secularist [cf. Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p, WHO]. Doing so would effectively confine the Church on the one hand, the papacy on the other hand, by patterns and socio-political logic reductive them all worldly, related to a present based on everything and immediately and not stretched to any eschatological perspective. It was just that two thousand years ago the error of certain Jews, who in Christ they wanted to see the "revolutionary" that would set them free from Roman rule, while much higher was his mission: free them from sin, until it became the Lamb of God who washes the sin of the world [cf. GV 1, 29-34]. Between these, one who saw Christ in a leader of this kind, a revolutionary, a popular leader liberator, but remaining very disappointed in understanding how much He was not and did not intend to be such, was a character known as Judas Iscariot, a kind of socio-political scientist at the Antonio Spadaro twenty centuries ago, which at least, after having betrayed the Divine Master, He does not put it to launch Tweet rambling and interviews that subvert the basic principles of ecclesiology. Indeed, Judas Iscariot, with a gesture so to speak “consistent” and dramatic hanged himself, which happened because he was a Jew in his own way “consistent” with its complete closure to the grace of Christ's actions, it was not a time-change Jesuit riding high, convinced that this time will never pass, because the so-called "revolution" would rely on to tell them of the "irreversible epochal changes". In fact, we remind poor Spadaro - but also passing through to the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, Father Arturo Sosa, He confessed several times amenamente suffering from hives before the rigidity of doctrine [cf. WHO] - that irreversible, in the Church of Christ, They are only those dogmas of faith that today certain Judas would like reversible to better enforce their human dogmas, sometimes even openly evil. All this in the name of their celebrated and brazenly declared irreversible, built on a present moment that must not pass, because it is the everything and immediately they care, things do not last and eternal. And these, come to think, are the worst forms and expressions of atheism: the cleric atheism.

.

Of the personality of Pope Francis I, to inquietarmi is that its serious lack of caution that only the blind and uncritical supporters of the correctness and opportunities of each of its slightest sigh, They own and do not want in any way to see; as well as, for other reasons far more serious, They do not want to see her courtiers pimps who long coveted career shooting, to arrive at which today are shrouded in poor, of poverty, of refugees and existential peripheries. E, between the various manifestations of imprudence of Pope Francis I also is no stubbornness senile to persevere stubbornly to speak with a dangerous person like Eugenio Scalfari, then forcing the official organ of the Holy See to make public figure of useful idiots when they can not say that the Church is now in the hands of a reckless, scrambles to explain that the other person has not understood, or that the meeting was just a private conversation and not an interview. Well I ask the Lords of the official organ of the Holy See: feel - of course is just one example academic! —, that before a crazier monarch King George III Hanover [cf. WHO], the best thing to do is perhaps to make fun of the people and to treat it as a set of perfect cretins which explain that only others to have misunderstood, while Her Majesty was presented hopping suit only white nightgown in the throne room to receive the highest dignitaries of the House of Lords arrived on an official visit? You understand him, Lords of the official organ of the Holy See, that such a run of George III in the throne room in her nightgown, What is less crowds and especially less reckless than the stubborn obstinacy by the reigning Pope to want to converse in all ways with a subject like Eugenio Scalfari?

.

Caravaggio: Peter's denial

Let's start then from San Tommaso d’Aquino, through which we can learn what prudence has its true place that proceeds through an equally precise definition: «Wisdom is the driver of the virtues» [Summa Th. I-II, q.58 a.5]. Prudence is the wagon that hauls all the other cardinal virtues [cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1806], and the mother virtues, the guide and the mother of all how much the moral virtues, in the absence of which none of these virtues can reach that their formal and substantial act which is the rectum virtuous behavior. It is not just the desire to be just and temperate, because it is necessary to grasp and then follow that line of conduct by which justice or temperance is realized and concretized. Without this action, which is characteristic of prudence understood as driver's virtues e mother virtues, the other virtues would remain only a dead letter, because they could not express themselves, they would just like to express, so they never would reach to consolidate itself in the person making it truly and genuinely virtuous, least of all right.

.

At the Aquinas school so we learn that prudence is not only the first among the cardinal virtues, why it, the other virtues, leads them all, since 'Reason connection virtues:». Therefore the virtue of prudence has such natural moral order autonomy. In both orders there is a virtue CONNECTING, ie a virtue that connects all the other, It gives the shape - so to speak - the other virtues. And yet, Aquinas says that in situations regarding the operation, operations, or act, in agilibibus, the form it takes or is apparent from the order. So that virtue which has closer to the ultimate goal of human existence, is the virtue that gives form to the other virtues and connects them to each other [his prudence and access, cf. Tomas Tyn, o.p. Lectures on Prudence, Bologna, 1988].

.

Caravaggio: Behold the man

A man void of reason it therefore behaves in an excessive way, lingering at the humoral and the irrationality. E, lingering in these excesses, the man devoid of reasonableness is unable to moderate and adapt to the measure and to the real, until fall for inevitable and logical consequence of the imbalance and the surreal, because the unreasonable man is always and per se a man devoid of measure, cleaved from the reality and therefore devoid of or poor balance. Sincerely, analyzing the figures and the facts, I fear that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is lacking in balance and that - as I wrote over a year ago - "the true “dubia” are those about his mental clarity, But no one says " [cf. WHO]. And no one says, between the timid clerical army that is rampant in the Church today, even if the facts show that he often creates even serious and dramatic divisions, It does not offer the People of God certainties, but doubts, the clarity required by the doctrinal language prefer to prefer to interpret ambiguous expressions in both directions, thereby generating heeling in Bishops, Priests and in the body of believers of Christ. Pet the rapacious wolves, solidarizes and shows large openings towards the sheep dispersed in the prairies of heresies Lutheran, except then take a beating the faithful sheep remained within the Catholic fold. He is able to say decisively and clearly “and” O “no”, only when it comes to those elements that are now beds within its obsessional neurosis: refugees, migrants, poor ideological and Ecology, while on all other rest, including standards based on the truths of faith, conquer the “perhaps” and finally the worst and most devastating “you do”. He showed to the Islamic world a treat to say the least improvident, He has repeatedly defined Islam as a religion of peace and love, totally ignoring, so dangerously uncritical, ch'esso he born and brought to life by a complex assemblage of mixed messages together by a false prophet, and also ignores the fact that by virtue of the many violent children and murderers who take the moves from this religion of peace and love, all the area surrounding the Vatican City are armored to prevent terrorist attacks. Ignore also that the historic Via della Conciliazione, continuously open from 1929 up to recent days, It was closed to traffic with concrete columns and iron railings placed at its inception to prevent young Islamic fundamentalist, in the name of peace and love, is intende, you branch out with a padded means of explosive charges in the direction of among the people St. Peter's Square, or better between the infidels. Now, because the facts do not liable to easily disproved these are, I wonder: how can we speak of him as a prudent and balanced man? Not to mention human government showing for years now of being able to choose one of the following figures very harmful to the Church, imposing subjects but are part of the so-called "magic circle", or who are unable to enjoy its sympathies without caution and above all the sense of the government by the grace of the Holy Spirit by which, for years now, man Jorge Mario Bergoglio would have to cease to be such only and exclusively be the Pope Francis I, loyal a slave of slaves.

.

We want to use in that sense a paradigm also not subject to easy denial, to clarify to what extent this Pietro has never abandoned its being previously Simone? Soon said: the reigning Pontiff, ignoring or perhaps pretending to ignore that he is, among other things, Also Sovereign Chief of a State with its own square kilometer of land guarantees the precious independence of the Roman Pontiff from any secular political power, In the 2014 gives us one of the beautiful pearls renewing - obviously in the spotlight and with photos published and disseminated [cf. WHO] - passport of Argentina (!?) [cf. see WHO]. God bless so if the last election, the citizen Jorge Mario Bergoglio, anagrafe Pope and Bishop of Rome by profession, no person has gone to his country of origin to vote in the presidential elections. E, said this, I think it said more or less everything, from my initial opening engraved: epic tragedy, when you slide into decadence, He always ends up in the satirical grotesque farce. E, sincerely, We clergy have now surpassed the most hilarious pages of ancient Roman satyrs. Ma, like all fools, we are such and we boast. E, as we try to take us seriously, more audience laughter of us, because it has always, as the ancient theater, nothing is more comical and grotesque buffoon who takes quite seriously. The problem is that if the general public laughs at, the children of the buffoon rather mourn; and cry of pain, to see their beloved and revered father engage in such antics and imprudent, through which it will eventually be entrusted to the harsh judgment of history, as well as perhaps the most severe even God. That's why the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio aroused embarrassment in the faithful but is enhanced by the non-Catholic world and all the worst enemies of the Church of all time: because there is plunging in the satire. It is true that he has stripped the church of its so-called "Renaissance princely trappings", He has stripped the day after day of divine dignity.

.

Caravaggio: Deposition of Christ from the Cross

I which are devoid of any ambition ecclesiastical career and that unlike the dense army of clerics who are silent cowards "cautious" waiting for better times - the rise of which will come to light and then groped the big leap on the bandwagon of new leader, in the hope of profiting from him every benefit and best prebenda -, never cease to grieve for them that, with rare cynicism, giving now finished for this pontificate and patients awaiting the Pope's death, do not realize, both those who aspire to the episcopate future of both those who aspire to the future cardinal, what a day after day, the damages caused to the Church, They are becoming more severe. E, if all goes well, more we will move forward on this degenerative state, most take time to only partially repaired this damage, with an aspect ratio more or less like this: compared to five years of ruinous pontificate but these are the result of fifty years of devastating ruin upstream doctrinal, liturgical and ecclesial, it will take five hundred years to remedy this damage that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not the cause, but only the ultimate consequence. Unfortunately, the irreducible aspiring to the limelight, all this does not take into account, because they are serious and foolishly believe that the next conclave will be enough to close what they call with a rare cynicism as a simple “hiccup”, then turn the page just as if nothing had, and in style. These are the real evil destroyers of the Church, certainly not that poor imprudent man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, that of all the previous decades of damage done, It is only the first victim, or as I wrote in the recent past using an allegorical: he is only the last of the customers come in the restaurant and that crossing the threshold was attacked by waiters who demanded from him payment of the accounts of all those before him had had lunch and dinner without pay, but leaving fine suspended accounts.

.

Caravaggio: Mary Magdalene pained

From the Four Cardinal Virtues it is necessary to pass to the three theological virtues, of which I have often had occasion to speak during these last five years, pointing out that although the most important of these is charity, as we learn from the Blessed Apostle Paul [cf. The Cor, 13], at the center of them, between faith and charity, there is hope, task which, in my opinion, It is to combine and mix the other two great virtues. Therefore, in view of the hope that you have to read this pontificate, through which it seems that the Church of Christ alive paralyzed in an eternal Good Friday. This Pontiff and this pontificate have their great utility in the economy of salvation, we do not know yet what, But I am sure that one day, perhaps not far away, understand that even through the humoral and the apparent carelessness of this Pope that manifests itself devoid of balance, God has filled his Church of thanks, He has cleansed and set in the renewal condition for real.

.

None of this, however, can understand those who live day by day, paralyzed in the present, deprived of that great future eschatological perspective that is the hope, that theological virtue that binds together the faith and charity; and that ultimately saves us, even after being plunged into satire, including monkeys playing at the queens and court jesters who think they are the authentic teachers of the Church, or better … from the “new church” born from “irreversible revolutions”.

.

the Island of Patmos, 30 March 2018 – Good Friday

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

 

Postponed two years the appointment of Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo the Archbishop of Naples

- resignations and new appointments -

.

POSTPONED TWO YEARS OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE FATHER ARIEL S. LEVI of GUALDO THE SEAT ARCHBISHOP OF NAPLES

.

The Supreme Pontiff, making use of wisdom as deep as ancient, He has decided to appease the souls of the many suitors vying with each other, giving the Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe, the completion of his 75th year of age, Two more years of the Diocese Government, entrusting him at the same time a very specific assignment: keep the place for the Father Ariel, already chosen by time as his successor.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF text print format

.

.

.

Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe, Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, 75 years old, shows the vial of the blood of San Gennaro

Before Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe, Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, make up 75 year old, as usual the accounts were unleashed a father died [cf. Academy of Bran, WHO]. Like this, the Reigning Pontiff, He found himself before a dense line of suitors vying with each other in presenting their propensities for the poor, refugees, the existential peripheries; not to mention those ready to put the law on Soli juice among the articles of the Catholic faith. Because since the Holy Father has required that the new bishops were authentic shepherds with the smell of the sheep, it happened that at the Vatican warehouses they stopped selling cigarettes - an undoubted source of damage to health and pollution for the environment -, But they began to sell at the Vatican perfume shops, for priests and bishops in kicking career, a perfume which in recent years is selling like hotcakes: Water sheep fragrance for men [Perfume for men Water Sheep], signed and manufactured by Christian Dior. Personally, among the perfumes distributed by Dior I continued to be fond of Water wild fragrance for men [Wild Water fragrance for men].

.

A few months ago it was then officially announced my nomination as the successor to Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe, after that during a private meeting I moved the reigning Pontiff with the story of my life, explaining that I was born into a poor family of two poor parents, with an existence made up of social and economic hardships. All of them valuable life experiences that they had then led me to spread a theological study on the poor and poverty: "The poor and poverty are the Mystical Body face of Christ".

.

Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, 54 years old, next successor to the See of Naples, It exercises to show the vial with the blood of San Gennaro

I write these lines return from the Philippines, where I gave a day ago keynote under the auspices of the School of Bologna in the presence of Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, Archbishop of Manila, one of several supporters of my application, well supported by other Cardinals, including the Cardinal Edoardo Menichelli that, together with Cardinal Renato Corti, They can be considered two of the greatest theologians of the twentieth century, but especially two episcopal models of shepherds in the care of souls, as evidence the state where both have left their respective Diocese of Ancona and Novara, but especially their clergy.

.

Among the poorest candidates for the poor, I was and am the most quoted, but the reigning Pontiff could not leave with a bitter taste, not so much the pretenders, but the current large piazzatori bishops, by Andrea Riccardi Alberto Melloni. Like this, making use of a deep and ancient wisdom, He has decided to appease hearts, giving the Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe another two years of the Diocese Government [cf. WHO], entrusting him at the same time a very specific assignment: retain a place for me, already chosen by time as his successor.

.

On the occasion of this event, we represent the Readers reading our previous article with attached studio that has benefited me the appointment to the See of Naples, currently only postponed for two years.

.

the Island of Patmos, 28 January 2018 – San Tommaso Aquino

.

.

__________________________________

.

FATHER ARIEL S. LEVI of GUALDO APPOINTED TO HEAD ARCHBISHOP OF NAPLES. THE POPE FRANCIS I HAVE BEEN MOVED FROM HIS MEDITATION: "THE POOR AND POVERTY IS THE FACE OF THE MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST"

.

Dear Letters of The Island of Patmos, is with trepidation and joy that I give you this good news: I was chosen as Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, and at the stroke of the 75th birthday of His Eminence Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe, I will take his place on the episcopal chair of San Gennaro. Since this ad, Now I intend to publish my writing through which, the Roman Pontiff, for friends "Father Francesco", She saw in me the ideal candidate and decided: "You will be the Bishop of existential outskirts of Naples".

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF text print format

.

.

.

.

.

the episcopal coat of arms of the Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, He explained later in the second part of this short essay in which he is shown his theological and pastoral meditation on the poor and the poverty that earned him the appointment as bishop

This my short essay It opens and closes with an exhortation made by Blessed Apostolo Paolo in a letter addressed to his discepolo Timoteo:

.

"If a man desire the episcopate, He desires a noble task. But a bishop must be blameless, the husband of one time, sober, prudent, decent, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not attached to money […]» [The Tm 1, 2-3].

.

In another passage, the Blessed Apostle exhorts:

.

"But earnestly desire the higher gifts! And I'll show you a more excellent way […]» [The Cor 12, 31].

.

But most of all, the Word of God made Man is very clear when in a special parable speaks of the talents that each of us were given [cf. Mt 25, 14-30]. First of all, each of us, must be aware of the talents received, because if it were not could never outa. It goes without saying that the most talented in a particular way, They must never fall into the devil's schemes of pride, redoubtable Queen locomotive and all the other deadly sins, because awareness of their objective capacity must always be combined with another consciousness: the talents are not our own merit, but mysterious gift of God's grace; no data for our honor, but for the glory of God, to serve God through them Christ and His Church. I for one do not doubt that a bit 'I will have deserved Purgatory for the purification of my soul, but it is equally true that if I had to introduce myself shortly before the immediate judgment of God, one thing I would go safe in the presence of the Creator: the objective certainty of having loved, worshiped and obeyed the Church, and he has served in every way the people of God, spending my priestly life to make up for the thousand laziness of many my brothers, from those taking refuge behind unspecified "pastoral duties", They never have time to confess, to visit the sick, to bring them Holy Communion, to administer the sacred anointing of the sick and the dying, to stay close to people in need and so to follow, because for this we have become priests, not to send the "pious women", or as any intrusive "priestesses", to visit the sick and bring them Holy Communion.

.

I like to do the theologian and through the theology I think of making a valuable service to the Holy Church of God, especially in these times of wild widespread heterodoxy, but I would not hesitate to abandon any theological speculation if it meant neglecting the pastoral and apostolic dimension, why I became a priest to celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice, to absolve sins, to administer the sacraments according to the power of my sacramental able, to assist believers of Christ. That is the priority, and this priority is sacrificed everything, Also theological speculation. Or to quote an example: if the faithful, as it has often happened, They are calling me at home because they do not find a priest in every parish in the City going to give the anointing to a sick man - being young pastors engaged in exhausting and unspecified "pastoral activity" -, and I'm going out at that time to go and hold a keynote the mystery of the Incarnation of the Word of God, well: before I go to administer the holy anointing to the sick, then I'm going to hold keynote, Why, if it did so, I would prove not to have understood why, the Word of God became man. Which among priests, not have realized, are unfortunately very many, alas, more and more.

.

Do you want to know then where that are found, always and rigor, the kind of lazy and absentee priests poc'anzi mentioned? Soon said: placed by their bishops in the largest and wealthiest parishes of the diocese, protected and made untouchable by authentic mafias formed mostly from lazy and mediocre priests and how much they, who live with the terror that anyone can in any way alter the brain death was generated by them in the particular Churches, offering examples of priestly life totally different from their. E, if everything goes well, these priests often find them to make no grown children to the house of mothers and fathers, I repeat: if everything goes well. Or we find them surrounded by their beloved grandchildren, full of a thousand needs and many vices, which I await that throws priest uncle sooner or later the bucket, to have in rightful inheritance everything in a life of laziness and greed have stolen from the coffers of the Church, from whom everything had, and to which all should give - or at least return - to their death.

.

Despite my sins are clear about God's judgment, because it is not based on "divine emotion", For God is not emotional, it's right. And his justice sustains the pure aequitas, which if necessary is aequitas compensatory. How were the holy men and women who had a really bad temper, or when they opened their mouths were able - as they say - to leave if necessary bishops, priests, religious literally "thrown to the pigs"? Yet all of them were judged on charity, why they are sanctified; as well as each of us, It will be judged on charity. And charity, before the eyes and judgment of God, It produces a large compensatory effect. Or how often I happen to say in the confessional to penitents: "Love is like a baptism, which renews us the grace and erasing blame, sometimes, maybe, in the eyes of God you can erase even the sentence to be served for the sin forgiven, but that He alone can know, He alone, despite our faults and sins committed, may decide to admit us, for compensatory charity merits, directly into Paradise among the blessed souls ".

.

IF BY THE GIFT OF THE GRACE OF GOD I BELIEVE TO BE A PRIEST OF TALENT, WHY NOT ME THE SAY FRIENDS, BUT WHY THE CLAIM MY WORST ENEMIES

.

If I think of being a man of talent, It is not to believe it because they tell me friends, or the so-called admirers, because those do not own text. I think because I always say my worst enemies. Indeed, none of those clerics that if they could they would have taken me not only the Sacrament of Orders, but even the Sacrament of Baptism and then burned alive, He never said that I am a mediocre theologian, or an immoral priest, why my worst enemies, well-looked by any kind of confrontation with me in matters of doctrine and faith, They are always used to say: "It has brilliant intelligence and profound theological preparation". Adding below: "And what makes it very dangerous". To follow up with statements like,: "Ha one encyclopedic», "He has an evil intelligence", "It is not a sentimental emotional that can be done in the trap to fall into its sentimentality, because when harsh criticism directed always builds his thesis on objective data and criteria based on pure logic, in which case you should not deny it, because you run the risk of being made still more blacks from his bloody tongue and his even more bloody pen his tongue itself ". But most of all, despite themselves, They are forced to admit: "He leads a morally impeccable priestly life". If they do not admit this, They would laugh behind by people, as my life unfolds to the public sunlight, under the eyes of the people who always know where they are, with who I am and what I do, but above all they know what I do and who I am not. E, these enemies loved ones, mostly characterized by a bleak mediocrity, They have always kept me away from all academic ambits, without any ecclesiastical authority has never had urologic manly attributes to tell: "In conclusion, if God sends his Church to men of skill and talent, can we marginalize them not to irritate the army of highly poor people who are doing disappearing day after day the universal Church in the ridiculous, It uttering heresy bursts from the chairs of our academic institutions and from the pulpits of the largest historic churches?».

.

Having said that, we can then add that none of the bishops at the apostolic authority which have been subjected over the years, He never raised a half sigh about my way of life, Why, always the proof of facts not subject to easy refutation, I am a priest who never caused any problems of a moral nature, doctrinal and asset. Even despite, their Bishops who are impossible with a clergy in the most serious moral issues, doctrinal statement and balance sheet, to me they have never given any official pastoral assignment, because if they did there would be a violent uprising against them by priests whose moral conduct, doctrinal statement and balance sheet, constitute public scandals in the sunlight, strictly tolerated, sometimes even hidden and protected, by those same bishops ready then to hide behind pathetic speeches such as: "Ah, the situation is delicate, I have to handle fragile equilibrium ". By reaching out to the shameful concluding sentence: "What can I do?». And before this question, someone he was told to me in these terms: "When it was proposed the appointment as bishop, and along with it the was shown in a clear and realistic severe actual state besetting the diocese who wished to entrust, why she accepted? Maybe then say ... "What can I do?”».

.

Unfortunately it is the human mystery - certainly not the mystery of faith -, the poor little men prancing for certain honors, but by no direction and no reason, however, they want to take the well heaviest burdens arising from their high office.

.

BISHOPS ELECTED IN RECENT YEARS resemble snooty TEENS THAT GIVE TUNES FROM AUTHENTIC MULL FEMALES

.

Not a few, among the bishops elected in recent years, They resemble certain small and snooty teenagers, the break of the first fragile hair on pubis, they go around telling, as authentic mulls females, had made raids with amazing women in their thirties ultra surf, as well as almost impossible to achieve by virtue of their beauty and social position. This kind of adolescents, of always, in civil society make tenderness, Why, with their absurd-fanciful stories, cause to die laughing anyone who will listen. Unfortunately, in today's ecclesiastical body, this kind of adolescents are instead elected mulls females official of the Holy See, then declared the spouses of some great and ancient particular Church, for their, It should be entirely comparable to a woman almost impossible to achieve for its beauty and its social position. E, once it becomes bishops, tenderness nor do they die laughing, but do cry, because by their actions incompetent produce so many and such damage that only partially be repaired will require decades of work by vescovi santi, admitted that tomorrow they always find, saints bishops, after the terrible devastation of the earthly Jerusalem wrought by this new generation of bishops who first popped fragile hair on their pubic priestly suffering from diseases caused by congenital micropenis, But they believed most gifted of a thoroughbred stallion and most beautiful of Rodolfo Valentino.

.

He is now a man 54 year old, here in maturity, or rather now on the way to old age, I began to aspire to the "best gifts". E, as well capita, the face of ever larger slice of the episcopate showing that he had serious problems on knowledge of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, following the admonition of the Blessed Apostolo Paolo, "If a man desire the episcopate, He desires a noble task ", I began to aspire to the episcopate. And I sucked you animated by the serene and conscious awareness that these days would also be a great bishop, compared to some teenagers at the break of the first pubic hair they were declared by the Holy See stallions and then married some great and ancient particular Church.

.

CHURCH AND ECONOMY BANK. HOW FARMI ROAD TOWARDS EPISCOPATE, I CAN NOT BE RECEIVED WITH ONE OF THOSE CHECKS IN WHITE SIGN THE FACTS FROM A Roman Pontiff "COURT OF MIRACLES" FORMED BY THE AUTHENTIC bankrupts sessantottino POST IN POWER ?

.

Like all men of faith at the same time endowed with talents bestowed on me by mystery of grace from God, I first had to deal with those who are at the same time my great limitations; because a man is not able to confront their human limitations, It can be neither a man of genuine intelligence, or a man of faith. And my first insurmountable limitation was the fact of not having my part contacts with the "court of miracles" that have long encircles the Roman Pontiff, leading to His Holiness the pizzini with the names of the bishops in all the best trappings of modernism, but incensed with the smoke of the great censer of the poor and poverty. In short, just to be clear: we all know that the reigning Pope gave clear provisions on the selection of new bishops, stating that wants them "shepherds with the smell of the sheep" and a "special preference for the poor". Or good, I understand that the story would be very long, but perhaps, the reigning Pontiff, It is not sufficiently enlightened on what was, in a country like Italy, Sixty-eight. Then, in case the Holiness of Our Lord Jesus Christ I read, I try to narrarglielo me soon, What it was our pathetic Sixty-eight ...

.

... Sixty-eight Italian It was formed a protest movement and carried out by the richest children of fathers who spoke of the proletariat, the working class and the class struggle, and then return to their homes where they were served by the rulers and the liveried servants. Protesters with the proletariat odor on him, were the scions of industrial families and entrepreneurs took to struggle against bourgeois political class and the old academic baronies. They were also and above all the great uneducated, because while the old and commendably contested old academic barons, behind they had a great tradition, but above all a great culture, protesters faux-proletarian, behind instead they had an abysmal ignorance, and one after the other have graduated in political collective discussing the imagination in power, on forbidden to forbid, or discoursing on Cuban cigars smoked by Ernesto Guevara said Che. And so, Sixty-eight in the post, we ended up in schools and academic structures an army of ignorant licensed, just as it happened in the political class. Of ignorant characterized by a precise setting: were aggressive and coercive as few - or in some ways like never before had seen -, with those who did not think like them. E, since the seventies, these posts sessantottino in the chair have devastated entire generations of students, targeting rare destructive spirit with all those who were not willing to homologate their indisputable thought. And of this, Who is writing, He has been both victim and witness.

.

there, not knowing and not imagining with such opportunists and false-change would eventually play, the reigning Pontiff, shouting "Odor of sheep ', "Poor and poverty", to a fifty years away from Sessantotto Episcopate has created the same situation ruinous. A situation that, with all the most devoted and sacred respect, It could only be created by a naive Argentine who does not listen to anyone and that does not live in the world, but in his idea of ​​the world. E, said this, as far as my words, I conclude by saying that it will be the time, to give me right or wrong in tomorrow's day, while the episcopate post sessantottino sinks deeper and deeper, between ignorance of the sheep and the bleak poverty of the doctrine and spirit.

.

The members of this "court of miracles" clerical Sixty style, formed as I wrote several times and repeated by authentic delinquents, that with the proposal of certain episcopal appointments induce the Roman Pontiff to sign the blank checks without over them it is not even mentioned the figure for putting the collection, a person like me found them like smoke to the eyes, even worse: They consider more dangerous radiation of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor.

.

As for the matter of blank checks, It is first of all clear that certain relationships are not unilateral and bilateral. Indeed, When the Bishop that full and perfect communion with the Bishop of Rome has ordained me a priest, I promised obedience and filial respect to him and to all his successors, in a sense, I signed a blank check with notebook Checks drawn by the Bank of Faith, at which there are no spending limits, because the Bank of Faith coverage is unlimited. but be careful, because the Bishop in full and perfect communion with the Bishop of Rome, for its part has not signed, nor ever I put in my hands a blank check with no number and date for collection, why am I that I vowed to him, not he who had vowed to me. Unfortunately today, what's happening, It is a dangerous alteration and inversion of all the economic and commercial criteria: enough that present themselves to the Pope offenders in the "court of miracles" that the flatter and circuiscono, telling him that such and such a priest wrote a pamphlet on the poor and poverty to the highest socio-political trappings of Bologna School, or who hath been busy that other poor migrants and considers it soli juice more important than how much they are not the gloomy doctrines on the great Christological dogma, that these puts to sign burst hazardous blank checks of episcopal appointments, without indicating in them neither the figure nor the date. It goes without saying that, because at the Bank of Faith, for this kind of checks there is neither liquidity nor coverage, having left the Founder of the Church any kind of a guarantee fund for similar nefarious expenses, soon it will happen one after another, these checks, eventually protested. Because this offenders in the "court of miracles" we are conducting: to bankruptcy. In the end, all'improvvido signatory, the Divine Director of the bank will withdraw the checkbook, and little will be worth that he is going in and pawing claiming to be the only, valid, lawful and legitimate holder of the current account, because at that point, Director Divine, It will remind you that the wealth entrusted to him would have to manage it and make it bear fruit with the highest criteria of the economy Christological all of which are summarized in the famous Parabola faithful and wise administrator [cf. LC 12, 39-48]. Those who later suffered and suffered damage due to this large sale of bad checks, the Divine Judge of the Supreme Court - which is merciful, because first of all it is right -, ask it opened the company's bankruptcy proceedings Catholic Church and that we proceed immediately with the kidnappings to try to recover and also only partly credits. And maybe, the first real estate will be impounded, both the credit protection is to avoid further future damage, it will be the Sistine Chapel ...

.

... in this climate of receivership that is a prelude to bankruptcy proceedings, to achieve my goal I have taken literally the admonition of Christ God who calls us: "There: I send you as sheep among wolves; so be wise as serpents and harmless as doves " [Mt 10, 16], mindful of the fact that "the children of this world, indeed, towards their peers are wiser than the children of light " [LC 16, 8].

.

I HAVE TRIED TO LEARN FROM THE SERVANTS AND FALSE Hypocrites, THAT AS SUCH ARE pimps and infidels TO THE MASTER, AND ACTING LIKE THEM I HAD ME TOO MY BLANK CHECK WITHOUT COVER ...

.

Now I reveal publicly what I did to achieve my goal: first of all I removed the Roman cassock off, I burned the Saturn beaver who sometimes wear during the winter as the wind blows, I went into a church clothing store and I bought one of those hideous synthetic shirts with white removable Francobollino below the neck, which of course I left half undone; I put a couple of jeans under shirt, taking care of arrotolarmi up their sleeves to the elbow, I wore a pair of sneakers and I let the beard for three days. I then corrected my walk trying to bend your back, if anything appear too straight; I prudently refrained from proceeding with an elegant gait and took to walk dangling so. Finally, I showed up at the Vatican to Domus Sanctae Martha I was saying in the lodge prodigandomi for the protection of a Sinti gypsy ethnicity, who was subjected to severe discrimination because he had defended legitimately by questions from an annoying and insistent journalist, breaking his nose and slaughtering of its barrel cameraman [cf. video clips WHO, WHO, WHO]. And so hyear referred to the Supreme Pontiff in hall the hotel was a priest very pecoreccio who demanded to speak to the Supreme Pontiff for a matter arising from the poor discriminated against Gypsies. Well, maybe you will not believe, but he came in person in hall to receive me.

.

When I saw a tick away and then come back to me the Roman Pontiff, with the help of God's grace I corrected my instincts incorrigible imprinted in my DNA of priest, following which I bent my head, I would put on their knees to kiss the hand and, getting up, I would not open his mouth except to answer, because before the Roman Pontiff not start any speech, It heads down waiting for him to give a speech at the beginning; do not ask, It is liable only if he asks you, although today it is used that the Roman Pontiff will face even interviewed by journalists who have spent their lives to despise the most basic foundations of the deposit of the Catholic faith. I repeat, with the help of the grace of God I did not fall in this series of errors that would be lethal, and as soon as I saw it from a distance I started to sbracciare as a perfect lout calling out: "Father Francis!». And I rushed toward him, without bending the right knee before his Augusta person let alone kissing his hand, but hugging him tight. Then, clapping him on the shoulder, I told him: "Dad, I thank you for seeing me, because only you, in this increasingly discriminatory, you can help me do justice to a group of Gypsies discriminated against members of the family Sword. It is actually a really good for family clan, thanks to which is safeguarded and protected the great culture of these gypsies, that they are all people who live honest work [cf. WHO]. And I, Dear Francis, I can testify to the goodness, honesty and great working spirit of these people, because when I fell in Via Merulana my wallet, two Gypsy, one of them seriously injured, invalid with permanent and severe mobility problems - both incidentally belonging to around beggars organized in Rome by the Clan of Casamonica [cf. see movie WHO] ‒, He stood up from the ground from the corner where she was begging, running up after another together with the crutch, also invalid because with a mutilated arm, both shouting behind: "Man, the wallet, the wallet! man, the fell of his wallet!». E, told all, precisely to the Roman Pontiff: «Sai, Father Francis, They called in a gentle "Lord" because they knew I was a priest. Why me, being a priest for people, with the people and in the people - because this really means in terms mystagogical for Christ, with Christ and in Christ ―, always traveling in civilian clothes. Or maybe we want to go back to scare people with our long black robes sad crows and, if anything, even putting this ridiculous Saturn head that some diehards consider elegant?».

.

The eyes of the Holy Father have become bright e, see him I confess, at that moment is realized writing: "Then Jesus, looking upon, I love" [MC 10. 21].

.

MY POOR MOTHER who cleaned SCALE OF BUILDINGS TO LIGHT OF DAWN AND MY FATHER which collected PIECES GOOD CAST FOR ERROR BETWEEN THE WASTE OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

.

If the heart of the reigning Pope is a safe full of great spiritual treasures, I used to open the right combination: “Poor & poverty". So I did not go to him empty-handed, but like all the worst burglars I took four years behind the "combination of aperture", or rather my study entitled "The poor and poverty are the Mystical Body face of Christ". And when the Pope asked me what relationship I had with the poor and poverty, family and social level, first of all I replied telling him that my family was so poor, but so poor, that when mice entered the pantry of our cuisine, not finding anything inside it came out with tears in his eyes. Neither I felt humiliated to tell him that our house was so poor that we did not even swim, as we used the toilet cat litter box. Then I talked about the enormous sacrifices of my mother, at that time already a widow at a young age, having lost her husband to just 48 year old. And though torn by grief, five in the morning was already working curved to clean the buildings stairs before the sun ancòra sorger, to pay to the son of the courses in the United States of America, cost of which they were at the time 18.000 U.S.. $. So I explained in detail that this poor woman, in my travel expenses, the cost of the studies and stay, He had to clean the stairs of the buildings to the tune of approximately 25.000 U.S.. $, all in years when a dollar was equivalent to our old coinage 1.500/1.600 Italian Lire, roughly thirty million old lire. So much so that my mother began to anticipate the cleaning stairs work, and instead of beginning at five o'clock in the morning, beginning at four. The Pope was very moved and said: "Ah, what they are capable to do, poor mothers, for their children. You are truly the son of a saint!».

.

Then I narrated the misunderstandings suffered by my poor parents by the old church, one run by the Prince Bishops without love and mercy; an old church where a priest-Pharisee threatened my grandparents would not have baptized their son, that my father, just because they wanted to call it Palmiro, in honor of the leader of the Italian communist Palmiro Togliatti. Harsh from early childhood was the life of my father, that because of malnutrition fell ill from tuberculosis child, because his parents could not cure him and feed him, why grew stunted, and being bad later had major problems to marry. The still married my mother, partly to charity, partly because, because she too bad because of the after-effects of a childhood polio and then had a chicken pox in adults that left the whole skin pocked, He ended with my father to form an allied and united couple.

.

All his life my father worked to collect the discarded vegetables from greengrocers the general market of fruits and vegetables, and then sell a few money good pieces that could recover in the discard pile. But despite all this pain and this humiliation suffered by my poor family, there are even gossips Pharisees and sad Christians who dare to deny these truths making me the object of vile calumnies, just to cut my legs for appointment as bishop, for example telling around that I come from a wealthy family and that my father was as good as a Hollywood actor. But these are lies, pure and shameful slander circulated falsely on me to keep me from being able to be promoted to the episcopate. Suffice it to say that my brother, who is a paraplegic and that only the right part of the body is able to articulate, whereas in the lower Maremma, between Tuscany and Lazio, He makes his living as a guardian of a herd of breeding boars, in free time, with the use of only one hand, He is carving a pastoral made with olive wood, who wants to be a symbol of peace, Love and poverty.

.

After this story I had to stretch a tissue to wipe tears from his eyes to the Roman Pontiff, because now he was deeply moved. Having recovered from the emotion then after those poignant tales, he sighed, he beat his hand on my shoulder and told me: "Do not get angry, because to say certain falsehoods about you may be only those who I call the "bats Christians", those who seek evil everywhere ".

.

Later, when the Roman Pontiff told me that he saw in me a priest from the Episcopal profile, by virtue of my sensitivity to the poor, I hastened to reply: "Father Francis, I can also accept the appointment as bishop, But as long as I'll be given a full Diocese of existential suburbs and allow me to put, on the shield of my episcopal coat of arms, the image of the Little Match Girl " [Old fairy tale H.C. Andersen, readable text WHO]. The Roman Pontiff asked me what, among many, among too many Italian dioceses would be to me the most suitable to carry my good news to the poor, and me, unhesitatingly, I answered: "Father Francis, I think I'm born to be a bishop of Naples ". And I set: 'Note, Father Francis, I just said: Bishop. Mica I said Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, oldest and largest archbishopric, with twelve suffragan dioceses, traditionally the seat of cardinals, with a clergy more than a thousand priests and so to follow. No, none of this, because I would just be the bishop of the poor; and if it does not fit to the rich, They may go to look for a bishop-prince model old-feudal or Bourbon. And I'll tell you more, Father Francis: taking possession of the chair, I will not say trivial and obvious things, type I propose to bring the gospel again and sound Catholic doctrine in a pagan land that now more Christian, This is all Italy, but especially our South now reduced to a faith-pagan folklore. None of this, I announce clearly that the purpose of my episcopate will be to defeat the Camorra and the Camorra and, as a guiding compass of my episcopate, I take as a model the documents of the National Antimafia Commission. Because where governments have failed both Royalists and Republicans of the last hundred and fifty years, I shall succeed me with the power of an episcopal excommunication. And all the thousands and thousands of poor to whom the Camorra pays houses, salaries, pensions and insurance, entire families of keeping sentenced to prison for mafia crimes - because the Camorra is a veritable state within a state, with its own "law" and especially with its rich economy -, they shall come and rigor on my side, ready to rise en masse against the power of the Camorra, because I will be their social Bishop, their revolutionary Bishop ».

.

Dear Letters of The Island of Patmos, is with trepidation and joy that I so glad tidings: I was chosen as Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, and at the stroke of the 75th birthday of His Eminence Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe Rev.ma, I will take his place on the episcopal chair of San Gennaro. Since this ad, Now I intend to publish my meditation through which, the Roman Pontiff, for friends "Father Francesco", She saw in me the ideal candidate and decided: "You will be the Bishop of existential outskirts of Naples". It is a meditation that will be the pastoral orientation and doctrinal compass of my episcopate.

.

.

HERE IS THE TEXT OF MEDITATION Theological Pastoral REWARDED WITH EPISCOPATE

.

.

BY VIRTUE OF THIS MEDITATION Theological-Pastoral: "THE POOR AND POVERTY ARE THE FACE OF THE MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST" FATHER ARIEL S. LEVI DI GUALDO HAS BEEN APPOINTED ARCHBISHOP OF NAPLES METROPOLITAN, IN HIS ARMS ARCHBISHOP'S IMAGE OF THE LITTLE MATCH GIRL WITH THE MOTTO "HERE IS THE FLAME OF THE POOR"

.

.

When the Roman Pontiff recognized in me a priest from the Episcopal profile and he asked what any diocese I would have liked to play the holy apostolic ministry, I replied that in my capacity as a member of our great multinational humanizing religious experiences, known for centuries as the Roman Catholic Church, I considered myself suited to coordinate the social activities of the old and glorious city of Naples and I thought of being a worthy representative and speaker of the truth of faith "poor Church for the poor". Especially if then coated in red, but it is clear: not the red is understood according to the stereotypes of the old church that it considered this fidelity until the martyrdom of blood, but it is seen as a red blood that must be paid to finally get the proletarian revolution of mercy.

.

It was indeed necessary - as I explained privately to the Pope - a charismatic person, at the same time he was like me also a showman, to organize and then manage the two mass events which in my opinion can be used to a greater combination of the Neapolitan population: The traditional devotion to the blood of San Gennaro and the football matches of Napoli. This is why one of my first pastoral duties, after fulfilling the main, that is my solemn declaration of excommunication against the Camorra and the Camorra, It will be to give life to inter-football partnership between the football teams and their supporters of Napoli with the Argentine team San Lorenzo and Boca Juniors. We can not forget that in Naples lived more than thirty years ago the man of God by Diego Armando Maradona, that good Argentina, as well as belonging to the species of resurrected lice [1], It left a lasting impression, especially among the poor and needy of the ancient Partenope, which today still tell him when, aboard his Ferrari, accompanied by an army of maids, It went to serve hot meals to the homeless.

.

My pastoral mission, in my capacity as teacher and guardian of the faith, It will focus on the reformulation Pauline concept of the Mystical Body [cf. With the 1,18], whose real meaning is the testimony of God among us through the poor man who is her face and the refugee who is his body according to the writings of Acts and the Pauline letters, up to 'Apocalypse of Blessed Apostolo Giovanni, which he tells of how the companions of Jesus brought in the most abandoned areas of domination by the Roman power, such as Africa and Asia, until the Iberian Peninsula, the manifesto of this new unified class and unified under the concept of "kingdom", which it is neither birth, nor race, or the skin, much less capital to determine the subject, but this equal dignity, upper and in conflict with the spirit and oppressive slave aristocracy royal and imperial Rome. The same testimonies written by Blessed Apostolo Pietro in Rome [cf. Pt Iᵃ e IIᵃ] tell us how this fellow revolutionary vanguard egalitarian, Jesus the Nazarene, poor among the poor, He led the mission only among the lower classes and among the marginalized, these were the slaves, prostitutes and refugees. May, Jesus attended the houses of the rich, He never took meals with them, It never was anointed by them with precious oils, much less is left coated with fine garments. Modern archeology has also shown that he, alla his death, He was not buried in a fine tomb provided by the ricco Giuseppe of Arimathea [cf. MC 15, 42-46; Mt 27, 57-60; LC 23, 50-53; GV 19, 38-42], because his body ended along with that of all the poor in a mass grave from which, as I will tell later, Then take life the great spiritual resurrection metaphor. This whole series of stories, Finished mostly in the Synoptic Gospels, are incorrect transcriptions that editors of the canonical Gospels were taken from untrusted text of the apocryphal gospels, imbued with many romantic and surreal tales. News therefore false and superimposed on the picture of the poor Jesus that very soon will be purged, thanks to improved scientific exegesis that four years is now at work through a special commission to study funded by a group of German theologians, able to pay these long and expensive studies, since the Church of Germany, great supporter of the concept of the poor Jesus for the poor, It can benefit from the Federal Republic of Germany of an annual contribution of about ten billion Euros deriving from tax revenue. And as, before long, the German bishops will have more Euro crammed into the coffers of their dioceses rather than faithful seated among the deserted benches of their churches, They may well employ more capital at their disposal to finish destroying what remains of the venerable old pre-merciful Church, or to finance the great ideological latest idea being: married priests in the Amazon region of Brazil.

.

Through their lives human companions Jesus of Nazareth They were the first great propagandists of this epochal revolutionary change. Indeed, most of them, after the destruction of Jerusalem were refugees [Mt 24:4-28], suffering as such non reception and, as we read in the various stories contained in Acts: the first Christian communities were to serve all, and within them there was the primitive holy communism, because they did not exist in that huge theft that was private property, because the goods were in common and personal possession was banned.

.

HISTORY OF THE FIRST EVANGELICAL-Proletarian Revolution: THE OLD CHURCH ONLY MERELY TO WELCOME THE SINNER, NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THE TRUE GOD'S MERCY, CI PUSHING TO WELCOME, TOGETHER WITH THE SINNER, EVEN THE WEALTH OF SIN

.

After the first revolution brought by the man Jesus of Nazareth, for which it was necessary to live outside of the slavery of human ideologies spread by upright religions of priestly castes - remember that Jesus was not a member of the caste of priests and Levites, But to the tribe of Benjamin and David, who was a warrior which led to the liberation of the people from the power of the external rulers -, for obvious consequence, centuries after, inevitably he had to reach the French Revolution, followed by liberalism and communism still below, which together with the great Martin Lutero reforms represent the biggest grace gifts bestowed by the Holy Spirit to mankind.

.

The man Jesus of Nazareth had no precise political projects, he has launched those seeds that in the centuries to come would then germinate thanks to his initial idea that aimed to transform individual and social ethics supported on the exaltation of the highest values ​​of humanity, in structural elements targeted to sustain the company on the principles of generosity, compassion and hospitality. And mind you: not only and not so much on the reception of the sinner, as a long time, badly mistaken, He is believed and taught, but on the reception of the same sin, which it is a great single and collective human wealth. Herein lies the real revolution of the new church, contrary to what has instead made the gloomy old church, which for centuries it has been stubborn to accept the sinner, if anything, even making him feel guilty for his sin and then pushing him to repentance, but proving unable to accept at the same time also with the sinner sin, because it is in this that consists the great ecclesial and ecclesiastical revolution of our time supported the concept of God's mercy: receive, together with the sinner, Also the great and inestimable wealth of sin.

.

Over the past few years, within the Church began to blow more strongly than ever a new wind, especially in the areas of theology and exegesis. This wind has led to the rediscovery of the true message of Jesus of Nazareth which for many centuries has been overshadowed by the dominant class of the Christian ideology that, since the bankruptcy mechanisms that were their rulers of the Roman Empire, They had transformed the free post gesuana Church in a pyramidal structure of castes, based on bureaucracy and legalism legal, away from the people and for what alien from teaching of universal love. This pyramid-shaped ecclesiastical caste that for centuries has supported the bureaucracy and legalism, He went so far as to express, on the ancient Roman Law model, the authentic anti-evangelical and anti-libertarian aberration that is the Code of Canon Law, thus limiting so terrible human and spiritual creativity, for one is the true law for the Christian: Law is true and authentic that I think, what I feel, so what I want.

.

The clearest statement of man Jesus of Nazareth against the power totalitarian is enclosed in its expression, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's" [Mt 22,21; MC 12,17; LC 20,12]. An expression that contains a very precise message, although for many centuries never correctly interpreted, that means: the power can not accumulate all the authority, whether it is effective or even only symbolic and, of a single human being, because those in power must be limited and subject to the same voice and the will of the sovereign people, because sovereignty belongs to the people and is exercised through the democratic mechanism of the Synod of Bishops, that soon they will return to be elected by the people themselves.

.

JESUS ​​OF NAZARETH, THE GREAT REVOLUTIONARY DE THE PEOPLE UNITED IN A CHURCH "CHRISTIANS ANONYMOUS"

.

Jesus of Nazareth was, first of all, a great revolutionary, very sensitive to that class struggle of which he throws the first fundamental pillars. To truly understand the revolutionary impact of his message, enough to understand the true meaning of his words when he says he did not come to bring peace but war and, or even among siblings within the same family would be put against each other, if either party had not accepted this change needed [Mt 10, 34-36], he that is not with him is against him [Mt 12,30].

.

The history of mankind is full of "anonymous Christians", as we learn from the great theologian of all time, the German Jesuit Karl Rahner, I hope is soon proclaimed a Doctor of the Church and a prophetic voice. Among the many "anonymous Christians" in history, Just think, for example, the Chinese Mao Zedong, that just inspired by this passage from the Gospel - without knowing it, he being an anonymous Christian "" -, during his glorious revolution imprinted on already experienced Soviet model, Also invited children, properly trained, to denounce their own parents; or the brothers necessary to denounce their brothers and sisters who also showed a faint sign of disagreement with this big rise Sol dell'Avvenire. And in doing this, if necessary get in each other, They were rightly convinced that in the end the proletarian revolution would be completed, because as it is written: not everybody, but only some of those who have been part of the revolution, not taste of death, till they see his kingdom, because this is the true meaning of this famous passage of the Gospel [cf. Mt 16,28]. At this point, the radical change wrought by recent steps taken by this revolution that gave birth to the new and true Church of Peace, of love and mercy, finally able to welcome the sinner together also sin, It has reached its climax, because this is the true meaning of the warning given by the man Jesus of Nazareth when he says: "Not before this generation that this should happen". [Mt 24,34].

.

The preaching of the Nazarene was centered on equality, as when he says that there are no masters, palesandosi well against bourgeois capitalism represented at that time by the temple merchants, , or by the ancient speculators Wall Street, they were rather the money changers [cf. MC 11, 7-19; Mt 21, 8-19; LC 19, 35-48; GV 2, 12-25]

.

The only time that the man Jesus of Nazareth looked at him ― «e I love watching ", as it is written in the Gospel - he was when he pointed to the rich young man the only thing he lacked to make: "We ', sell what you have and give to the poor " [cf. MC 10,21]. He is in fact very clear in saying that perfection can be achieved only when you sell all our possessions to give to the poor [Mt 19, 21]. Jesus of Nazareth, often blames the rich, especially when he says: woe to you rich! for ye have received your consolation [LC 6,24]. Unfortunately, for many centuries, the theologians of the old Church explained - of course gravely mistaken - that the term "wealth" is used by the man Jesus of Nazareth as a synonym for selfishness, lack of altruism, of attachment to the purely material dimension of life and being. Understandable the reason why the old church has supported this, because unfortunately she - and what we must never end up asking for forgiveness to the world proletariat -, He was in league with the rich, with the exploiters of the people. While in reality the wealth, for the man Jesus of Nazareth, it was just a dishonest means to earn protectors in difficult times [cf. LC 16, 9]. In fact, he affirms: «Well, I tell you: make friends for yourselves with dishonest wealth, Why, when it fails, they may receive you ". And it was so much his hatred of wealth, who later went on to launch invectives against the Pharisees who, They are attached to money, They heard all these things and you did insult him. As long as Jesus said to them,: "You are those who believe the righteous before men, but God knows your hearts: what is exalted among men, before God is an abomination " [LC 16, 14.15].

.

Allegory THE ORIGINAL SIN: THE TRUE ORIGINAL SIN IS BORN FOR THE LACK OF CARE FOR THE POOR

.

For centuries we have believed and taught that the allegory of original sin - because it is well established that original sin is not a fact, but only an allegory from which comes the traditional baptism just as allegorical and symbolic -, It was due to an act of rebellion against God the Creator through man's pride. Well, apart from the fact that another great "anonymous Christian", Sigmund Freud, Genesis tells us that the biblical passage is nothing but an allegory of the son who in childhood is legitimately rebels against his father's domain, if we really want to talk about original sin, this is not to recognize the healthy and legitimate rebellion against the parent domain, which it is in fact part of the human evolutionary dimension, but necessarily it arises in the lack of care for the poor and in the attachment to money. This is why, the metaphorical Garden of Eden, the man fell into the metaphorical original sin.

.

The mission of man Jesus of Nazareth was not the one to found a religion or caste, or a parallel power to dominate with ritualisms, ceremonies and brainwash the poor and oppressed, but to bring the good news to the poor, to proclaim release to the captives and to set at liberty those who are oppressed [cf. LC 4, 18], giving as the only bond of friendship, because the prospect of salvation and holiness that He offers us, It is to become his "friends" [GV 15,15]. Moreover, He is not only a great revolutionary, but it is a real radical revolutionary, it clarifies the same: «Who is not with me, it's against me " [cf. Mt 12,30]. And in the long line of several "anonymous Christians", many have followed this teaching of his radicalism, without even knowing what they were really and radically Christians to act in a certain way. For instance, between different contemporary, limited to only the twentieth century, suffice it to recall that great "man anonymous faith" that it was Stalin, This Gospel radicalism that brought him to the maximum fulfillment, so that thanks to his work, about twenty million Russians could reach Heaven in a few years.

.

The man Jesus of Nazareth then called to Himself those whom he wanted, and they came to him. So he appointed twelve to be with him and he could send them to preach, and they had the power to heal sicknesses and to cast out demons [cf. MC 3, 13-15]. Needless to say, the Demons, I am the allegory of the capital-imperialist bourgeois temptations that seek to corrupt the people. Therefore, The casting out demons, It is to be understood as a hunt capitalist ideology that corruption tends to possess the people. Unfortunately, the old church full of gifts to her attitudes arising from that great alters the Christianity that was the Roman emperor Constantine, he never realized that these Twelve were a collective based on the concepts of proletarian democracy, because the man Jesus of Nazareth summoned the Comrades from the fields and workshops [cf. WHO] to revolutionize the world; a revolution that passes through the transformation of the individual.

.

When the man Jesus of Nazareth, to Pontius Pilate, that represents the maximum charge representative of the Roman regime, dice: "My kingdom is not of this world", He refers to himself instead as a man in the front row as a victim oppressed, It called to be the symbol of dissociation from the realm of bondage and domination, of oppression and authoritarianism, poverty and war, widows and orphans, refugees and the poor for higher taxes and the continuous appropriation of land and capital. He did so, and proclaims the imminent social change propaganda began living with his conviction and execution as leader revolutionary that, failing to defeat the ideas contrary to the discussion, He has left that they express, because he knew that you can not defeat the misconceptions by force, because that would stop the free development, indeed, misconceptions, They must always be left free to develop to the maximum.

.

When the man Jesus of Nazareth told his companions not to greet the family and not bury the dead, what is intended to convey an invitation to never go back even to take a run, Also it costs falling into the abyss that lies between one bank and another.

.

When in the Gospel refers to Simon called the Zealot [cf. LC 6 14-16], which means guerrilla or partisan, what is meant is to say that the positive characteristic of warfare consists in the fact that each individual is willing to die not to defend an ideal abstractly, but for it to become reality, so that the imagination may come to power, because it is the imagination that comes the real, although this has never been understood by the old church, which for centuries has been stubborn to support their own theological thought on outdated and unrealistic criteria of Aristotelian logic, carried out so anachronistic by St. Thomas Aquinas, on which rests the great responsibility that it had restricted the great theological speculation until - thank goodness! ‒, the beginning of the twentieth century came to life that Modernism is now the point of reference and of doctrinal and pastoral action of most contemporary episcopate.

.

In Matthew we read that the man Jesus of Nazareth told his companions: ' Verily I say, hardly a rich man to enter the kingdom " [cf. Mt 19, 23-30]. This is enough to understand that he wanted to become poor and offer itself as a cornerstone of that great epoch-making revolution against bourgeois capitalism, only true great destruction of humanity. Unfortunately it took many centuries to come to understand that God can not be Catholic, but to everyone, because he knows everyone and it is for everyone, especially those who deny it and refuse. This is the reason why the Nazarene, in art the Son of God, preached during his earthly existence the clear distinction between the oppressed and the oppressors, thus laying the big bridge over the river of what would later be the poor Church for the poor.

.

ALLEGORICAL OF MIRACLES, THE TRUE MEANING OF THE EUCHARIST, THE DEATH OF JESUS ​​THE LIBERATOR AND HIS RESURRECTION

.

The man's greatest miracles Jesus of Nazareth They were not those of Lazarus' awakening from a clear state of apparent death, undiagnosed at that time for lack of scientific knowledge; let alone the signs worked by him on the sick. The real great miracle was to feed the proletarian masses in different occasions [cf. Mt 14, 13-21. 15, 32-39; MC 6, 30-44. 8,1-10; LC 9,10-17]. And here we perceive how deep the concern of Jesus of Nazareth for the hunger of the masses of the underclass, so much so that the last supper, before being sentenced to death by the imperial-capitalist power of that time, Jesus gave the job to his companions to feed the people with bread proletarian liberation [Mt 26, 20-30; MC 14, 17-26; LC 22,14-39; GV 13, 1-20], and for this purpose he used a great metaphor allegorical: "Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me and I in him" [GV 6, 56].

.

The man Jesus of Nazareth walked finally to Jerusalem with its companions because he knew that the time was ready for revolution, because the revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe, but it should be 'dropped. From this moment onwards he follows the so-called Gospel of the Passion, focused for centuries, in interpretations of the Old Church, in the bloody dimension of sacrifice, through which the man Jesus of Nazareth, equated to the Lamb of God, would wash the sin. It is, however,, also in this case, a misreading, very Tridentine and pre-conciliar, Two evangelical sentences: "Here is the Lamb of God, which takes away the sin of the world!» [GV 1,29], and again, "he looked at Jesus as he walked, he said: "Here is the lamb of God!”». The biggest misconception from which the misinterpretation born, It is linked to the very concept of sin, with whom for a long time the old Church has terrorized his faithful. The Gospels are indeed the writings merely allegorical, to interpret the categories of modern theology. And the term "sin" is a metaphor that must be interpreted in a broad sense not bloody and sacrificial, but in a social sense: the man Jesus of Nazareth, with all the gentleness of the non-violence that centuries later end up in a figure like Gandhi - lamb metaphor here -, lava from the world the great sin of social injustice and the oppression of the poor. To this, as I said earlier, relates that other great metaphor which is the Eucharist, whose real and true meaning is not to sacrifice, but to be the bread of Social Justice, the party of companions who gather around the table for the banquet of joy, of peace, of love and mercy, dancing around the altar to the rhythm of bongos.

.

Our faith is based on the large allegorical event of the resurrection of the Nazarene, for centuries considered the old church as a historical fact, as well as a physical fact, while we know that it is a spiritual event, an allegory interpreted as earthly experience conclusion of the man Jesus of Nazareth, in art the Son of God. For when in the Apostolic Letters states: "But if Christ has not been raised, then empty is our preaching is in vain and your faith " [cf. The Cor 15.14], It meant to say that the allegorical symbol of the Resurrection is the redemption of the poor and the oppressed people, is proved by the fact that in another passage states that we have already risen with Christ [cf. With the 3,1]. And who is it, who it was raised with the man Jesus of Nazareth, not the rich, Perhaps the bourgeois, or perhaps worse than the capitalists? Of course not, with the man Jesus of Nazareth, the great allegory of his resurrection are partakers poor, the marginalized, refugees; to rise with this really great revolutionary, It packs so that the law is approved on soli juice. The allegory of man Jesus of Nazareth who rises from the grave where his body was thrown together with that of the Underclass condemned by the imperial-capitalist power, is the image of Sol dell'Avvenire rising. It is not by chance, several famous "anonymous Christians" in history, as already mentioned Stalin and Mao Zedong, although unaware of expressing thus their belief in the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, I did just use the allegorical iconography Sol dell'Avvenire, thus showing extraordinary "anonymous Christians".

.

The other two events of our faith are allegories of the ascension to Darling man Jesus of Nazareth and the Holy Spirit Pentecost. The fact that after the resurrection, He has continued to appear and to be present among the democratic-proletarian disciples' collective, as told by one of the most famous allegorical tales - that of the two companions on a journey along the Way to Emmaus [cf. LC 20, 30-31] ‒, It indicates the fact that no real father of the revolution has never left the people, before the people was ripe. That's why this allegory joins the second allegory, the Holy Spirit Pentecost. With this second event, fellow fighting man Jesus of Nazareth become true Christian adults; Thus Pentecost holds that sublime metaphor for the great "anonymous Christian" Sigmund Freud defined as the son's emancipation from the dependence of the father. With Pentecost, We then the final overcoming of the Oedipus complex.

.

IN ORDER FOR THE DIALOGUE MAY LEAD TO syncretistic UNION it IS NECESSARY TO PUT BY THE FIGURE BULKY THE BLESSED VERGINE MARIA

.

Among these lines, I deliberately avoided talking about the mother figure, which is that of Mary the mother of the man Jesus of Nazareth. It is in fact a figure that may constitute an obstacle to dialogue with our brothers of different Christian Churches, even if still today, written in the Creed at Nicea and then perfected in Constantinople, resents unfortunately the exclusive and excluding spirit that the Fathers of these two councils acquired at the time by the romano Costantino. In this text we in fact reads: "I think the Church one, santa, catholic and apostolic ". This holiness and apostolic, however, it can not be the exclusive property of the Catholic Church, because it belongs to all the various Christian churches. Although over the centuries, the concept of unity, who flirted a real limiting obsession, He prevented us from welcoming the richness of diversity, to say the least: the old church has come to call heresy even the rupture of unity, unable to see and to grasp what an enormous wealth could arise from that diversity which often involves breaking of this great fetish unit, so that it can give space to the great preciousness of diversity. Among the many examples of this, think of the extraordinary figure of Martin Lutero.

.

Well, the figure of Mary is an obstacle reception of the various diversities and the great riches of the brothers of other Christian Churches, anch'esse apostolic and holy, that the Catholics of real forms repeatedly accused of Mariolatry, making it clear that this woman, in his own way too cumbersome, It was a serious obstacle to dialogue. Therefore, for the sake of dialogue and to achieve the common neighborhood, if it is necessary it must be sacrificed in the figure of this cumbersome mother. Both therefore blessed the work of those holy men of God Pentecostal pastors who recently, in Mexico, in Ecuador, Peru and so on, They have ventured into a sport as educational: crush and then wipe off the ground, in public, the statues of Beata Vergine of Guadalupe [see WHO, WHO, etc …]. Also because, if Pentecostals which has always enjoyed the special sympathy of the reigning Pontiff, they do this, they do it because no doubt inspired by the Holy Spirit.

.

It is in this that consists the true wealth of Mary: the ability to step aside, to leave aside and ensure that the Pentecostals to the conquest of Latin America do apart his effigy. Of all this, Mary is happy, so as not to obstruct the path of dialogue and closeness to the brothers of the other numerous and authentic Christian Churches. That's what makes me truly holy Maria, and it is in this new perspective that should be studied Mariology, avoiding the aptly be reprimanded by the brothers of the other true and authentic Christian Churches Mariolatry.

.

As though capita, this is a separate discussion that we face in following. Also because, As far I wrote and expressed, It was enough for my promotion to the episcopacy, exactly as Nunzio Galantino, who recently he called Martin Lutero and his great reform as a gift of the Holy Spirit [cf. WHO], his happy this statement was sufficient to keep the post of Secretary General of the Italian Episcopal Conference. If not, by relating instead to faith with the schemes of the old church, all it structured on gloomy oppressive doctrines and dogmas, through which some would hinder the triumph of mercy and love, not only, It does not become bishops, but it is likely to be pushed and relegated to the sound of beatings in the most forgotten and desert extremes of existential suburbs. But all of them are beaten - mind you -, fruit of the greatest mercy, of that mercy that arises from deeper than a holy shepherd carrying imprinted on it the smell of sheep.

.

.

C O N C L U S I O N E

.

.

that brief and memorable Talk 2013 with Cardinale Francis George, Metropolitan Archbishop of Chicago [1937-2015]

This writing, sull'ironico constructed and apparent paradox game, but devoid of any form of irreverence towards chicchessia, He speaks for itself. He speaks because it is a dramatically wrote seriously, I would dare to say, so humble and subdued, which is one written to his prophetic way. However, the line I chose to take a bit 'of time now, It was explained in a separate article in which I made clear to be taken where certain subjects and situations ... [see article WHO].

.

A few days after the conclave 2013, before he could return to the United States of America, I got to know at the North American College in Rome man of God Cardinal Francis George, Metropolitan Archbishop of Chicago [1937-2015], with whom I spoke in private for half an hour, sufficient time to grasp what I had to grasp. First of all, I declared myself struck by his statement dating back about a year ago, when he declared his understandable contrarierà bishop of the law on civil unions, and then continue to assert that the powerful and increasingly aggressive lobby gay, was turning through the Gay Pride in a "Ku Klux Klan manifesting in the streets against Catholicism". The statement struck me, But that was not addressed to the increasingly evident aggressive spirit of sodomites proud to anything that even vaguely reminiscent of the Catholic Church, it hit me by this man already seriously ill with cancer, It was the phrase: "I will die in my bed, my successor will die in prison, his successor will die a martyr '. Meditating on this sentence, I had the feeling that maybe, one day, bishop I would become really. And I could really become in my old age, together with a few other survivors Catholic priests to what the worst is yet to come, because in the not far at all, the Catholic Church will be reduced to a shapeless heap of ruins.

.

For three years now, the Dominican pontifical academician Giovanni Cavalcoli and myself, well known to the public as the Fathers de The Island of Patmos, ribattiamo tirelessly that the Church of Christ is not a static body to mummify stagnant water stops, but it is an evolving body, because in itself, a body, It is always growing, even at the stage of old age. If in fact the old marks on the one hand the physical decay, the other often marks the culmination of the spiritual and intellectual maturity. If it had not been, everything would be solved in the year 325 with the first great council held in Nicaea. But if the Church, of concilî, two millennia of life has celebrated it in total twenty-one, There must be a reason, or not? Hence the concept of The Church must always be reformed, provided that this need of the Church to always be reformed, does not end up being confused with the fact that the Church should end instead turned into another, instead reformed, ie purified. Is this, Unfortunately, It is what is happening today: a powerful and warlike group of criminals, They are trying to accomplish just this nefarious and diabolical project: transform the Church in another. And the transformation into another, It has nothing to do with the great reforms of some great Councils, from Trent to Vatican II.

.

That's why I go to as many years writing and stating that all this will lead the Church to be totally emptied of Christ, then be filled with another. In such a situation not far from being realized, be bishops will mean taking the risk of living a life of martyrs. Therefore the Blessed Apostolo Paolo, called not by chance at the beginning of my writing, stated that "If a man desire the episcopate, He desires a noble task " [The Cor 12, 31]. He claimed that because at the time, becoming bishops, He acted almost always die martyrs, shows us how the Roman martyrology and the Byzantine sinassario of the first centuries of Christianity.

.

Naturally, when we speak of martyrdom, we all have in mind the so-called martyrdom of blood. But this will not be, the slow and painful martyrdom that awaits us tomorrow, because our future will not be marked by a bloody martyrdom, but from a long white martyrdom that will last for generations.

.

What little remains of Catholicism and Catholics, It will end up being totally incompatible with the civil society, but especially with the laws that govern; they shall be of the radically anti-Christian laws. No One, He will belong to the small group of survivors Catholics scattered around in small groups in prison, nor anyone condemn them to death. O, as I said in the interview with Cardinale Francis George: "Do I believe that the successor of the successor of Your Eminence will die a martyr, but through a new form of martyrdom today, we, we can not possibly even imagine, because this new form of martyrdom will be the total indifference. Therefore, the power that will govern the way the States and civil society, will use towards us the exact same indifference that today, men of power of our decadent Church, they are using to all prophetic voices who continue to live and speak in that market '. And with that precisai: "The devil, intelligence being in a pure state, It is not a fool. Over the last twenty centuries of history very well the lesson learned, so he knows very well that the blood of martyrs has always cleansed, revitalized and thus sanctified the Church. And he certainly can not allow that the Church of Christ be purified, revitalized and especially sanctified. So what did he do, this authentic intelligence that essence is the Devil? Before, It seeded and favored the development of the utmost indifference among our increasingly miserable church authorities, then he reduced them to live and act in a spirit of total sloth omission, so this destructive indifference could hit us first from the inside, then from the outside ".

.

Perhaps, to illustrate all, It may be useful to the application of other examples clarifiers: I am going to read some of my writings, happen to be found in several of them real complaints built on circumstantial accusations, based on serious events not subject to denial. harsh and severe Words that I penned black on white certainly not inspired by the moods of myself, but the style of the ancient prophets and the style of the precursor San Giovanni Battista. Numerous writings in which I have often indicated that such people highly problematic, since burdened very serious moral and doctrinal problems and embarrassing for the Church and ecclesiastical society, They were even in spite places - thanks to the protection of persons in authority themselves burdened with moral and doctrinal issues - in roles of dangerous relief, with all that this may result in levels of bad management of ecclesiastical and pastoral structures, and public scandals level. Well, before written so severe, the least we would have to happen would be my ready convocation by the competent ecclesiastical authority. I am not in fact neither a journalist nor a opinion-maker, I am a priest and a theologian subject in all respects to the Ecclesiastical Authority. And this authority are not subject to "fixed-term employment contract of indefinite duration", but for the grace of Sacramento, as well as obedience. And a priest who in a public document explains that the current Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has been a promoter and protector of that young lord who reached the top of that delicate ministry was later declared gay and now lives happily married Spain with his beloved companion, at least it is called and, in tone, if anything too severe, he is asked: "How you dare you throw this accusation to the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith?» [see article WHO]. E, once this is done, if anything, it is called again asking: "How you dare you, to write your article in another fire, that the current vicar general of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome, has placed in one of the historic downtown parishes a priest in an ancient and prestigious Roman basilica was already known to all Church authorities because foraggiava barrel of money around a young prostitute Romanians? [see article WHO]. In short, if the Authorities, even in front of a known fact and acclarato, They have decided to turn a blind eye, You want to raise their issues, that you are nothing and nobody?». And if those in my statements, undoubtedly serious, indeed very serious, there had been even one and minimum distortion of the reality of the facts, here is that in that case, Authority Ecclesiastica, He was supposed to make me truly repent of all my sins through the most severe canonical sanctions.

.

Some church so-called expert, these my rhetorical questions answered and said again: "Forget, them to do anything like that, because it would give importance to what you write, which they will never do, because for them, the more you will cry "disaster" and the more accuse them of destroying the Church, the more you ignore, why not deserve any attention to them ».

.

Well, provided that in the Church of obsessive-compulsive mercy I don't want any attention, nor do I want anyone to give me consideration, Perhaps at this point it should first clarify that I am not a priest incattivito writing on a blog read by the sacristan, by two or three ladies that evening recite the Holy Rosary Church and the bartender at the bar located in the square in front of the house canonical. Because the pundits of the Holy See responsible for social communications, may determine at any time that the online magazine The Island of Patmos It is much followed, and has a number of far much higher visits instead of how many do not have the Italian edition of The Osservatore Romano, the newspaper of the Italian Episcopal Conference Future, the weekly Christian family and so to follow. Therefore, the principle of clerical-slothful "Do not give it importance", not hold their. And we do not talk about how much and how often, not only in Italy but also around the world, theologians and prelates have endorsed and elaborated certain analyzes made by the Fathers de The Island of Patmos, that far from having made a home blogs - given that ours is a magazine -, enjoy in the facts of all the authority of which however do not enjoy, the eyes of believers of Christ, certi cardinaloni e bishops forefront; the whole, obviously, but, as the facts, strictly provable and documentable. Therefore, the reality and the truth, it is quite another: let's say that someone scolding me, saying for example that my way of expressing myself, for its hardness and its complaint spirit, it is not acceptable. A quel point, Authority Ecclesiastica, You would feel to respond to me: "Given that I ask forgiveness on the spot for form, over the hard spirit, for the spirit of complaint; and also being said that in the manner and form that you booking me, I will extend this request for forgiveness in public, so that it is read by tens of thousands of readers in one day, once clarified, however, the shape, for what it concerns the substance, what you say to me? Or better understood: it is true that the current Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has carried on in his career and has protected a subject that has ended up giving in the Church one of the most sensational scandals of the last century? Why is this fact, I do not hypothesize, see the document. E, said this, proseguirei I am saying: to form part, for which I apologize not once but a thousand times, but the vicar general of His Holiness, that the square in one of the most prestigious parishes of central Rome a priest psychologically unstable photographing paid naked boys in the shower at the house of elders of an ancient Roman basilica, then collecting these photo shoots "artistic" ... Well, to form part, for what it concerns the concrete substance, what you say to me? Because apart from my recriminata form, the fact remains that the current vicar general of His Holiness, the bravado of this priest, It was fully aware, as they were and as they are all monsignorini conspiratorial who still work at the Vicariate of Rome and who by their sheer cowardice, allow the perpetration of certain abominations, because no mouse got inside the cheese form, He likes to be kicked out of it ".

.

The truth, I am not ignoring me, but they are simply afraid, because any eventual recall, involve the private first comparison, then, if it was subjected to any kind of arbitrary injustice - in this church at the height of Stalin's mercy in which a logical consequence the right no longer exists -, the private confrontation by what was possibly born a strictly arbitrary injustice would be made public, always provided that reading me are not the sacristan, the three old ladies who recite the Rosary in the church and the bartender at the bar across from the canonical.

.

While I am writing this long text, I traced the history of one of the bloodiest dictators in the modern era, which is not Adolf Hitler, as everyone thinks, but Stalin. The dead, They are in fact measured in numbers, place the numbers of murder victims are always many, They are always too many. So there are no numbers that weigh more, such as Jews slaughtered by the Nazi regime, which amount to about five million, compared with more than twenty million Russians murdered by Stalin, that the horrors of the historical scale can hardly weigh less for the simple fact that they were not Jews. The slain dead weigh in fact everyone equally, and their blood shed cries too "vengeance before God", to use this ancient biblical expression, whether they are Israelites or are former subjects of the Great Tsar of Russia came under the jaws of the Great Stalin Butcher.

.

By writing this article I thought about Stalin because they never ever, twenty years ago, I imagined that the destiny of the Church would end with risultar similar to those of the old Soviet regime. In fact, if we analyze well the facts historical, we will discover that the inexorable decay of the Soviet Union begins to come to life around 1954/1955, one two years after the death of the great and murderous dictator. It is wrong to say that Soviet Communism fell suddenly in 1989, because his fall had actually begun decades before. Just as the Catholic Church, that is not falling today, suddenly, because the gestation of this Chronicle of a Death Foretold, It began forty years ago, in the post-conciliar season, following all the typical patterns of those passionate and romantic revolutions from which the worst dictatorships are always born, since the French Revolution with its period of terror from which comes the season then inaugurated by the great warmonger Napoleon Bonaparte. And as the young protesters shouted Sixty-eight of the "Peace and Love" with iron bars in hand, throwing stones at police and bombs molotov between a cry of love and the other, Today in the Church, dictators were born in the post-conciliar season, menano locked knees and break your legs to anyone who dissents to the Grand Revolution of Mercy.

.

The fact that the term "revolution" and "revolutionary" is completely incompatible with the very essence of Christianity, or define the Word of God, Christ the Lord, as a "revolutionary", indeed borders on blasphemy, I will explain this in detail in a high subsequent written, because now I can not open a theme into the theme, especially in a final conclusion.

.

In my writing I referred also to the criminals, obviously in a purely figurative sense, not criminal and penal sense, referring several times to the great criminals who are killing the little that remains now of the Catholic Church. I can not conclude without having done this for at least the name of one of the most famous criminals figured, always insisting that the lemma "criminal" and "crime" is to be understood solely as a synonym for intellectual dishonesty. The intellectual thug in question is the increasingly powerful Alberto Melloni, great leader the School of Bologna and large direct or indirect placer of disastrous bishops. To understand the subject such intellectual delinquenzialità, apart from its symposia at the Masonic Lodges and various amenities [cf. WHO, pag. 6-9], one need only read, from the columns of Corriere della Sera, how contemptuous and aggressive way he says the prophecy, I dare say almost obvious, made by Cardinale Francis George in 2012 [read article WHO], up to accuse of homophobia. And homophobia, unlike my recriminata intellectual delinquency, which it is a pure figure of speech, it is instead considered a real offense under the criminal laws of different countries of the world.

.

there, Alberto Melloni, among the intellectual delinquents that hover around the Roman Pontiff like vultures on the carcass of the Church, It is one of the most quoted. And with this, I said and concluded all, both with regard to the vultures, it is about who, undaunted, if it keeps them around, in this self-destructive Church of obsessive-compulsive mercy, now reduced to a pantomime of the proletariat paradise of Stalin.

.

Maybe someday, when I am close to eighty years, modest dress in civilian clothes, because anything that reminds old religious symbols, Also in the same clothing, will not be allowed on the streets of a society now fully multi-ethnic, multi racial, but above all freed from the image and memory of God, accompanied by a few heroic candidates for holy orders, I personally follow, because there will no longer certain ecclesiastical structures, including seminars, strolling through Rome will indicate their large and prestigious hotels, offices of large companies, museums, Art exhibition centers, concert halls, theaters and so to follow, that once were our great religious structures. And I will tell them that, in my young age, I have also known and visited many of those environments. He went past the stable of what were the major pontifical universities, where you will find the offices of academic facilities where they will study the hermeneutics of the old religions, sponsored by the great center of world religious culture financed and dependent on a special department of the United Nations, I will tell them that in those stable, once, They taught our most "great" theologians, those to whom we owe this great 'the fall' [see previous article, WHO]. And if the two candidates heroic will turn to me, their old bishop, telling me: "Paternity, They must have been, those, some really good times'. I will answer them: "No, dear children, they were not just bad times, but terrible, in which a decaying church hierarchy was reduced to living on power for power, divorced from the real, paralyzed in everything at once, incapable of any future eschatological perspective ". And I will tell them: "Those who are living now, are the really good times, because it is the times of a slow, long and painful rebirth ".

.

It is in this situation, We can accomplish that which urges us the Blessed Apostolo Paolo: «[…] if one aspires episcopate, He desires a noble task " [The Tm 1, 2-3]. It will be a "noble work" when the episcopate, emptied of all worldly power and prestige, It can be experienced only and exclusively to the praise and glory of God. It will be in this little future, marginalized and dispersed Church that maybe, in my old age, Bishop become really, so that the dramatic question "But when the Son of man returns he will still find faith on earth?» [LC 18, 1-8], a small group of Christians can respond: Yes, our Lord and our God, we kept alight the lamp of faith until Your return, without ever having lost the conscious hope that to you is simply a small flame. And based on this knowledge,, They remain always on our faith and charity.

.

From the island of Patmos, 15 November 2017

Sant'Alberto Magno, Bishop and Doctor of the Church

.

.

.

DEAR READERS, PLEASE TAKE OUR VISION OF THIS ARTICLE, WHO

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

love joy: we thought it was love, instead it is a dramatic split within the Church. Strong doubts canonist Yorker Gerald Murray

THE JOY OF LOVE : We thought it was LOVE, INSTEAD IS A DRAMATIC SPLIT IN THE CHURCH. STRONG DOUBTS THE NEW YORK canonist GERALD MURRAY

.

" The love joy it had already been formulated by Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio at the time when he was archbishop of Buenos Aires. If at the time he had sent to Rome, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, after having examined, he would answer: “This text does not conform to the authentic magisterium taught by Canon Law, by John Paul II and Benedict XVI ' "

.

Author
Preparation of ’ island of Patmos

.

.

"I thought it was love, instead it was a gig »

Massimo Troisi [Naples 1953 – Rome 1994]

.

.

.

the late Massimo Troisi

After the statement by Father Thomas G. Weinandy, eminent theologian cappuccino Washington [see previous article WHO], these days more precise and detailed statements were made at a later American television program by our American brethren, canonist Gerald Murray, priest of the Archdiocese of New York and a distinguished scholar.

.

A report the video was a priest of the Archdiocese of New York that for some years he lived in Rome in contact with the Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, at the time when this American priest resided at the North American College during his specialized studies in a Roman pontifical universities.

.

Those who live in their subjective reality, which in itself it seems really more and more divorced from the real ecclesial and pastoral, with one now hovering spirit of sloth and indifference omission, They can also pretend that all is well, while we should take note that the ambiguity of the reigning Pontiff has nothing to do with reforms. Neither has nothing to do with the fact that throughout history the Church, many important reforms have generated over the centuries discussions and discontent to no end, before being accepted.

.

The obvious dramatic break today in the Church, It is due to the fact that the problems created by ambiguous expressions, ambivalent and two-way interpretative, such as providing answers were words even more ambiguous and confusing. Is this, to those to whom it was not yet clear, remember that is generating the chaos get in ed Extras ecclesial.

.

We could not translate from the video reported by New York priest but we can summarize that in it, the distinguished canonist interviewed, precise and remember:

.

"The love joy it had already been formulated by Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio at the time when he was Archbishop of Buenos Aires. If at the time he had sent to Rome, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, after having examined, he would answer: “This text does not conform to the authentic magisterium taught by Canon Law, by John Paul II and Benedict XVI " […] Today, however, we find ourselves faced with something defined by the Pope as his authentic magisterium, but which would never have been recognized as such in harmony with Catholic teaching, if he had it spread as archbishop of Buenos Aires […] Doctrine and discipline proceed together in an inseparable way, that's why this is worrying […] I therefore believe that the Cardinals who presented their dubia are right. If the moral teaching of the Church is not proposed and presented in a decisive and accurate, then we fall into chaos ".

.

We refer to the video viewing in which Father Gerald Murray exposes and explains the great and dangerous problem we are experiencing today.

.

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.

Giovanni Cavalcoli
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Giovanni

Some grieving objections to Father Timothy Radcliffe, which should be expressed as the former Master General of the Dominican Order, not as the master of a Masonic lodge

SOME OBJECTIONS TO FATHER grieving TIMOTHY RADCLIFFE, WHO SHOULD EXPRESS AS THE FORMER MASTER GENERAL OF THE DOMINICAN ORDER, NOT AS THE MASTER OF A MASONIC LODGE

.

I wonder in a Dominican this language imprecision, which suggests a relativistic vision of religion and indifferentist. He seems to confuse faith with the view. Opinions may be many, Also in contrast to their, and this is normal. But faith in God is one, as well as the truth is only one, because it is objective truth, certain, absolute and universal.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

former Master General of the Order of Friars Preachers, Father Timothy Radcliff, o.p.

Having remained perplexed by various answers, sent me a text the reader an interview done by Alain Elkann to Father Timothy Radcliffe, former Master General of the Order of Preachers, to which I belong, asking me for an opinion in this regard [cf. interview on The Print, WHO].

.

I liked some things he said, as the importance of love for the truth and for silence, the beauty of faith in its relationship with reason, fraternal Dominican life, that every man is made to reach God and then called to salvation and the peaceful coexistence of the faithful of the various religions. I do not feel instead of sharing some of his statements, I quote here with my observations about. Do a number of the words of Father Timothy Radcliffe, and below I put my comments.

.

  1. Asked interviewer: "You think all religions are means to achieve the same place?"Father Timothy Radcliffe responds: "I'd be happy to say, but it is beyond our comprehension ".

.

I would have responded stating that all religions are more or less imperfect human means to reach God. But only the Catholic Christian religion is the highest among all, because it was founded by the Son of God, Jesus Christ, Unique and perfect Mediator, That tells us that God is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

.

  1. "The wars are part of human history and war using every means to win, much nationalism as religion. It is not correct to say that religion is the source of war. I would say that humans have cultivated violence using religion to impose it or to justify it ".

.

I observe that Father Timothy Radcliffe It makes a false generalization. The war may have a right end: for instance, homeland defense, the liberation of an oppressed people, the felling of a tyrannical regime, the recapture of territory occupied by the enemy, liberation from oppression of Christians by Islamic or communist.

.

Do not confuse violence with the proper use of force. Violence is wrong and is being punished by civil and military code; the proper use of force is an act of fortitude that can reach heroism and is the principle of military valor, worthy of the greatest honor. Contempt or indiscriminate condemnation of war as such, without distinguishing the right one from that unjust, It is a sign of mood petty, falsamente peace at the last e-hearted?, which eventually leads to tolerate the arrogant oppress the weak and leave them defenseless. The defense of religion can justify a war, as it happened, for example, at the Battle of Lepanto or wars narrated in the Old Testament Israel, although it is true that religion can be a pretext concealing greed for power or desire to dominate, as was the war of princes against the Lutheran Church to take possession of Church property.

.

Is not it, therefore, Karl Marx thought come, that wars are always made for material interests, and that those ideals serve only to cover the first. This idea is a sign of narrow-minded soul and barbaric, who does not understand that man is not a beast, but he holds the honor, to justice and the right.

.

You notice in the pacifist ideas of Father Timothy Radcliffe rationalist utopianism and naive and at the end, beyond the intentions, dangerous and warmongering, typical of Rousseau and the Enlightenment Masonic, which considers a "human nature" prepared at the table, taken abstractly and originally "good", regardless of its dramatic historical condition, subsequent to original sin, nature instead needs to be disciplined and braking, if necessary, even with severity. Indeed, revealed by experience, humanity with the sole force of reason and will not be able to correct deviations and to implement fully, through appropriate negotiations and policy actions, Justice and peace, moreover, in a purely earthly perspective, but it needs the help of grace, as the history of Christian civilization and the Church.

.

  1. "I'm a big fan of Pope Francis, It is making wonders advancing the Church in a more relaxed and less centralized. Of course, meets resistance, but there is driving toward freedom and spontaneity, managing to get in touch with each community ".

.

From the manner in which Father Timothy Radcliffe qualifying himself against the Roman Pontiff, - "Papa Francesco fans" - as if it were a movie star or a sports champion, it is understood that the visual evidence under which he places himself to consider and evaluate the performance of the Pope, It is totally inadequate and misleading, It is a gross superficiality and wonder a lot in a Dominican who was head of the Order for almost ten years.

.

For this reason the Father Timothy Radcliffe judgment on Pope It is completely false and clearly denotes that he comes from the deleterious modernist-liberal-Masonic environment, and with the greatest cunning and very heavy economic and media resources, for some time now exerts, towards the Successor of Peter, fine as dirty and shameless work of flattery and feigned devotion, which unfortunately does not fail to produce a certain effect on the masses of gullible believers and secularists, and the Pope himself, whose leadership of the church is extremely difficult both for the objective existence of fierce dramatic intra-ecclesial conflicts and because of the difficulty he has to give peace and concord, both for its own certain lack of impartiality and is even more due to inefficient staff and fake friends, that circuiscono him and shaped him.

.

Padre Timothy Radcliffe, with his statements, It gives shows to err in interpreting the Pope's action and did not understand at all - something heavy in a Dominican - or the true personality and apostolic mission, nor to understand the true, dramatic situation of the Church, repeatedly denounced by Benedict XVI, but also the Church in its true perspectives and hopes.

.

Padre Timothy Radcliffe, from what is expressed, It seems to live in a cozy and dreamy, made of naive youthful enthusiasm, absolutely no sense - now that people are talking about "discerning" - or the depth of the crisis, nor that the values ​​that are emerging, which are those of an authentic implementation of Vatican II, no interpretation modernist schillebexiana and Rahner, but according to the authentic teachings of the Popes of post-council, Blessed by Paul VI to this, not without being in continuity with Tradition supreme listening of the Word of God and what the "Spirit says to the Churches" [AP 2,7]. And when I say "tradition" I do not mean to The old rite of the Mass, but Sacred Tradition, ie to the custody, conservation and infallible apostolic oral transmission of the data revealed: in essence, the preaching of the Gospel.

.

Today the Pope does not need "fans » - these let them to football games, faith is a serious matter -, Nor acres accusers Pharisees, It does not need to be smoothed and pampered, It does not need to be 'correct' in the true faith, indeed he asks us to listen to him as teacher of the faith and infallible interpreter of Tradition and Scripture, and it needs to be helped and advised by loyal collaborators, wise and efficient, who do not give scandal to the people of God. It needs to be lit, comforted, consulate, encouraged and freed from the Judas, by schemers and the careerists, that surround him like bees around honey. Following the example of St. Catherine of Siena Pope it needs to be insistently urged frankly, love and respect to do his duty for the honor of Christ and the good of the Church.

.

Father Timothy Radcliffe imagines a promoter Pope of a Church "relaxed" as that, comfortably relaxed in an armchair, you will enjoy a TV show. His "decentralized" Church is a pitiful understatement but not too much, to conceal or ignore the confusional state in which the Church is today in a war of all against all cardinals, bishops, theology, priests and religious in matters of faith and morals.

.

According to Father Timothy Radcliffe Pope Francis He is guiding us toward a Church 'free and spontaneous'. But to achieve this end, there is no need for the Successor of Peter: just a good treatise on psychology. The Pope guides the Church far greater heights: listening to the Word of God, imitation of Christ, liberation from sin, the life of grace, the victory over the world and Satan, the communion of saints, the exercise of charity, for evangelical perfection, the availability to the Holy Spirit stresses, the conquest of the Kingdom of God, eternal happiness.

.

"The Pope is able to get in touch with each community"? Of course, he is the common father of all the children of God, He is sent by Christ to proclaim the Gospel to the whole world, It must understand the deeper needs of all, It must be able to appreciate the values ​​of all religions, must submit to Christ those who are "weary and oppressed" [Mt 11,28].

.

The Pope certainly demonstrates an extraordinary energy and attitude in contact with the crowds. Ma this, misled by a secularist interpretation of the action of the Pope by the great mass media, interpretation that the Pope himself does not seem sufficiently disprove, What then see the Pope? The cute propagandist of a moral "relaxed" or the man of God who calls us to look up? If the Pope 'meets resistance', should wonder what they mean. Of course there are the usual Lefebvre and Pharisees; but there is also those who love him and it's sincere friend and want to see him strive for holiness.

.

  1. We must pray for brotherhood between the faiths, not foment division.

.

I wonder in a Dominican this language imprecision, which suggests a relativistic vision of religion and indifferentist. He seems to confuse faith with the view. Opinions may be many, Also in contrast to their, and this is normal. But faith in God is one, as well as the truth is only one, because it is objective truth, certain, absolute and universal.

.

We must therefore promote brotherhood among the followers of different religions. It makes no sense instead speak of "brotherhood between the faiths", as it makes no sense brotherhood between true and false. It should not divide what should be united, but you have to divide what should be separated. The spirit of peace is not playing a double game or serve two masters. In this sense, Christ said he came to bring a 'sword' [Mt 10,34].

.

"Whoever is not with me ' - says the Lord [Mt 12,30] - "she is against me". If the Qur'an denies what Christ teaches, can not both be right Christ and the Koran. As a consequence, religions are not as parties in a parliament or the plurality of religious groups within the Catholic Church. In these cases the various formations are integrated and complement each other to represent the totality: or all the citizens of a nation or the entire ecclesial body.

.

Instead, the question of the relationship between religions is not just social order; It is not merely delegated to the State, in application of the right to religious freedom, for which the state must care for the peaceful coexistence of groups existing in it; not just to respect the differences among religions, but more deeply the question touches the problem of the truth of the doctrines of religions. And on this point, the Dominican should be particularly sensitive. To about, we must say that the Catholic Church recognizes the presence of saving values ​​in other religions, However, mixed with errors. Indeed, the fullness of the saving truth is exclusive patrimony of Catholic doctrine, as he still says the Second Vatican Council in the decree Reintegratio (II).

.

For this reason the Church also has the duty to reject or amend errors contained in other religions, that all men are called to be converted to Christ through the Church, As stated by the Council of Florence in 1442, although you can, as taught by the Second Vatican Council, belong to the Church unconsciously.

.

Father Timothy Radcliffe seems to share the theory of Edward Schillebeeckx, according to which the true religion is the sum of all religions, so that each of them would give his contribution to the building up of all, a little 'is like an encyclopedia from the contributions of collaborators. Indeed, secondo Schillebeeckx, "No particular religion exhaust the problem of truth"[1]. "Consequently, We can and we must say that there is more religious truth in all religions put together that every single religion "[2]. This is what it means? What the Koran adds saving truths that are not contained in the Gospel? That the Gospel can not afford to fix the Koran? Schillebeeckx does not realize that the saving truths were revealed by God through Christ and the Church in a number and harvested in the Apostles' Creed. Other religions do not add new truths, that are not already contained in the Christian creed, but rather they lack some. Because of this, the approach of Father Timothy Radcliffe, as a reflection of the ideas of Schillebeeckx, It is not at all conform to the doctrine of the faith, Unfortunately!

 

Varazze, 24 November 2017

.

__________________________

[1] Humanity, God's story, Queriniana 1992, p.215.

[2] Ibid., p.220.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

The largest church in Syracuse and the small local Masonry: story of a fake news

THE GREAT CHURCH OF SYRACUSE AND THE SMALL LOCAL Freemasonry: STORY OF A FAKE NEWS

.

For us Catholics, the memorable sentence launched by Pope Leo XIII in his encyclical The Human race the 1884, in condemning the philosophical and moral relativism of Freemasonry, remains, Today more than ever, topical.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

The inscription above the aisles of the cathedral of Syracuse: Syracuse is the daughter of the Church of St. Peter at Antioch after the first dedicated to Christ [the Church of Syracuse is the first daughter of the Apostle Saint Peter and the second one after the Church of Antioch]

Within in a matter not pertinent issues of our magazine, it does not deal with topical, but only of ecclesial theology and pastoral updating, even if the fact on which the comment relates spend a fact of ecclesiastical nature.

.

We start from a given: the title given does not convey the idea, because one of Syracuse is not only a great Church made so by his being old, Church is a glorious. Who enters his metropolitan cathedral was struck by the columns supporting the two aisles file, these are the columns of the ancient Doric temple dedicated to Athena, dating from the seventh century B.C.. Above the columns of these aisles dominated by the written: «Syracuse is in the Church of St. Peter at Antioch Christ after the daughter of the first dedicated ».

.

The inscription above the aisles of the cathedral of Syracuse

Church of apostolic foundation, Syracuse is "the first daughter of the Blessed Apostle Peter and second after the Church of Antioch", as indicated by the venerable Latin inscription above the aisles. The Blessed Apostle will in fact sent the Martian bishop to erect and, a few years later, He was visited by the Blessed Apostolo Paolo during an apostolic journey documented in the Acts of the Apostles: "We landed in Syracuse, where we stayed three days' [At 28,13]. With the local Christian community the Blessed Apostle he entertained in the catacombs dedicated after St. Giovanni Evangelista, which incidentally is the oldest of the catacombs of Rome.

.

Syracuse, early Christian basilica of St. Peter, dating back to the early fourth century [see gallery, WHO]

Syracuse has given the Church a figure of particular importance, if we consider that the Beata martire Lucy of Syracuse, together with Agata, Agnese, Cecilia and Anastasia, are the great martyrs mentioned in the Roman Canon of the Mass. And while many of today's large diocese in the central and northern parts of our country were still far from being erected centuries, during the first councils and synods of the Church of Syracuse Bishop signature appears on documents shortly after that of the Bishop of Rome. Even today, in the heart of the ancient Greek city of Syracuse, which it is the island of Ortigia [cf. WHO], you can visit the early Christian basilica dedicated to St. Peter, one of the oldest churches in Europe, built before the Council held at Nicaea in the year 325 [see pictures and guide, WHO].

.

Syracuse, early Christian basilica of St. Peter, dating back to the early fourth century [see gallery, WHO]

I remember with tender emotion when in October 2010, While they were living in Rome for several meetings to the Holy See, I accompanied two American bishops visiting Syracuse, one of which is now a cardinal. In the eyes of these two places men driving two respective large dioceses, I caught several times a sense of fear and dread, or as he said one of the two: "In the United States we consider my oldest archdiocese founded in 1790, But before these ancient stones I feel really little more than a bishop-child ».

.

Syracuse, Catacombs of St. John, to encrypt del protovescovo Marziano [ Antioch, I sec. – Syracuse, early second century]

At Syracuse I wrote on the pages of a commemorative book of the Apostolic Nunciature in Italy, which collaborated for the part historical and theological; book then published in 2016 by Libreria Editrice Vaticana. And starting from the ancient Siracusa I treated the figure of the ancient apocrisari - the ancestors of the current apostolic nuncios - moving between East and West. But most of all I treated stories dating back to the ancient times of the fifth and eighth century linked to a particular ecclesiastical institute: The legation of Sicily, from the year 1098. I allowed this mention between the lines just because a book is a public act, and it is also reported my name contributor, but if it were "office jobs", I'd be careful not to do any kind of mention.

.

poster of the conference sponsored by the Grand Orient of Italy in Syracuse

Very it would be telling, this introduction, however, may suffice to give a well-deserved lesson to the so-called speakers fake news, or to those two lines or a single title write and they spread the news network with the stomach instead of her brain, if not worse giving irrevocable judgments.

.

It is indeed happened that as of this morning came to the editorial office The Island of Patmos numerous emails from Italy and abroad written by people who, shouting in much the scandal, wondering how it is that Freemasonry in Syracuse is promoted by the local Church.

.

S. AND. Mons. Salvatore Pappalardo, Archbishop of Syracuse, in a brief interview on the occasion of the feast of Saint Lucia [click on image to open the video]

The Church of Syracuse is governed by S.It is. Mons. Salvatore Pappalardo, 72 year old, man anything but naive, and behind all the experience necessary. After working as a young priest in a parish in Catania, his diocese of origin, He was chosen as the diocesan vicar general. Nine years later he was promoted to the bishopric of Nicosia, a small diocese in which today is still alive in people remember his amiable man of Mediterranean sunshine. On him I think I can express direct knowledge, because I know him for many years, appreciate those traits of Christian humility often unknown to some of his pretini trendy, that after going to Rome and caught a Litmus Test that PhD, begin to strut with flute Martini with olive, between a nocturnal conversation and the other in Jerusalem, looking good from learning from their bishop virtue of true shepherds of souls care, which it is precisely that of humility. As we know, however,, to abate humility have always been the poor who do not accept and respect on and off the surroundings of the tower around which is their fan club they are emeritus unknown in the canonical context, theological and biblical, pace of their litmus paper soaked in acid amount directly proportionate to their actual lack of knowledge and wisdom.

.

S. AND. Mons. Salvatore Pappalardo, Archbishop of Syracuse

A pastoral experience man, prudent and even humble like the current Metropolitan Archbishop of Syracuse, He never would fall into a similar trap, and in fact there fell. What really happened is simply this: those four freelancers and more or less trombones clinicians who make up one of the local Masonic lodges, They requested a comparison during a conference sponsored by the Grand Orient of Italy. Then, that the picciotti Freemasonry have printed in the event poster Christ with a compass, is a lack of good taste certainly not attributable to the Archdiocese, because on the poster there is neither the emblem of Archbishop Metropolitan or the words "With the auspices of the Archdiocese of Syracuse". Therefore, who asks a comparison, the Church has always comparing. And this confrontation will be held by a bishop and a priest, both theologians. To confront the esoteric Freemasons will indeed S.It is. Mons. Antonio Staglianò, Suffragan bishop of the diocese of Noto, that the occurrence will not occur with his guitar singing an adaptation of Edoardo Bennato: "Thank god, now there is the mason " [cf. original WHO], and the Rev. Prof. Maurizio Aliotta, Syracuse priest and Vicar General Emeritus of the Archdiocese.

.

a group of knights of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulcher of Jerusalem, one of the various orders of chivalry Catholics who enjoys extensive infiltration by adhering to masonic lodges

The one and the other definitely will put into light because, between the Church and Freemasonry, can there be a confrontation or exchange of divergent opinions, but that the membership of Freemasonry is something incompatible with belonging to the Catholic Church. And of this, either the bishop or the priest, in their capacity as theologians will explain some of the reasons. It will be a very useful and instructive, reiterate this. It will be useful and informative when the next religious holidays, the Knights of Malta and the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher - not a few of whom divide their evenings between the meetings at the Masonic Lodges and those at the headquarters of these ancient Catholic Equestrian Orders -, wallpaper will be presented with their cloaks in the processions of those Saints and those Sante on which the esoteric Freemasons laugh always on with ironic wit to Voltaire.

.

a group of knights of the Order of Malta, one of the orders of chivalry Catholic among the most infiltrated by members of masonic lodges

It will be up to the bishop of Noto, in his capacity as a theologian and especially as a member of the College of Bishops, explain to Freemasons that to try to use and abuse the figure of the Supreme Pontiff Francis I - as was done in the recent past in Rome before the historian Alberto Melloni and the flirtatious feminist theologian Marinella Perroni [cf. WHO, pag. 6-9] —, What is not possible or feasible, because in his approach to Freemasonry, the reigning Pope does not think differently from how they thought the Blessed Pope Pius IX and Pope Leo XIII, just take note of what he says about it [cf. WHO]. It is not by chance, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke asked clearly to clean up the Order of the Knights of Malta from Masonic infiltration and double membership of certain members of the Order and the Lodges, implicitly stressing that membership in the Masonic Lodges thing is incompatible with belonging to the Catholic Church.

.

the Blessed Pontiff Pius IX [Senigallia 1792-Rome 1878]

The reference made to the Blessed Pontiff Pius IX It is not random, because the freemasons and liberals, long before groped to exploit the Pope Francis I, They tried to exploit that his predecessor shouting: "Long live the Liberal Pope!». Just like today think they can cheat shouting "Long live Francesco" revolutionary "».

.

Faced with this meeting no need to be upset, just know it like it is, without stopping to two lines written on a poster. In conclusion, this latest stunt Masonic, takes place in the land of ocelots in which priests, with their two thousand years of history, among all ocelots are the finest, well most of those kids with apron playing with teams and compasses, born just three centuries ago and known as Freemasons. But the evidence shows the same as always, those who cried out to the Roman Pontiff Pius IX "Long live the Liberal Pope», those who today would like to shout "Long live Francesco" revolutionary "», talking pomposity of a history of the Church who do not know, a theology that ignore, a Second Vatican Council which have only read a few articles in the newspapers radical chic, but which they ignore the knowledge of essential documents. This is what I myself have been able to verify several times talking to the provincial non-Masons, as in the case in question, but with Masons at the highest levels of international Freemasonry. One thing is certain, for us Catholics the memorable sentence launched by Pope Leo XIII in his encyclical The Human race the 1884, against the philosophical and moral relativism of Freemasonry, today remains more than ever topical [see text, WHO].

.

the text of the encyclical The Human race the Supreme Pontiff Leo XIII is readable WHO

If there is a page of history that young Masons the province did not understand about the old Catholic Church, it's this one: when Napoleone Bonaparte in 1806 He carried away captive to France Pope Pius VII, with his typical arrogance he said to Cardinal Ercole Consalvi Secretary of State of His Holiness: "In few years, I have destroyed the Church!». But Cardinal, so very serene answered: "No, Majesty! we did not succeed we priests in seventeen centuries to destroy it, even she will not succeed ". And a few years later, Bonaparte, He was imprisoned at St. Helena, where his life ended, while the Pope Pius VII returned to Rome on 24 May of 1814 welcomed by the Roman people celebrating with cries of "Viva Maria alive Pius VII !»

.

They are too esoteric, these four young boys in career aspirants to hospital primary charge, the most professional firm in view of the City, in the political race ... but "high ideals Masonic"! We know well, which lobby of businessmen is always Freemasonry and what turns handles patronage. Even for this again: they are too esoteric, these four young boys, to learn from the history of the Church which is two thousand years old, but with whom they think every now and then you can play, without knowing if her uterus saint enclosed in his Mystical Body has horizontal or vertical opening ...

.

the Island of Patmos, 29 October 2017

.

.

.

The Catacombs of San Giovanni Evangelista in Syracuse

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.