THE GAYSTAPO NOW IS LAUNCHED THE ATTACK OF THE PRIESTHOOD. WELL CONFIRMED: NEITHER ARE NOT VALID LEGITIMATE ORDERING PRIESTS OF PERSONS WITH HOMOSEXUAL TENDENCIES STRUCTURALLY ROOTED

.

You can not make peace in the consciousness merely public and severe proclamations, when in fact gay priests increased in proportion to the presence of bishops who reason with a latent homosexual psychology. Or to put it raw: some seminarians between the seventies and the eighties capeggiavano inside of the seminars Gay pious confraternity, Today they are bishops, and just become such, first they are surrounded by related parties, placed more and rigor in all the key posts in the diocese, traineeships. And these subjects, that protects and reproduce each other, they ended up creating a powerful lobby of power within the Church. The question which now arises concerns thus the validity of sacred ordination of subjects in whom appear increasingly absent the minimum requirements for the validity of the sacrament of Holy Orders, from the faith and the correct perception of the Catholic priesthood.

.

.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p. – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

It's been aberrant laws on marriage between same-sex couples, They have passed laws on adoption devilish data babies to gay and lesbian, which in many countries it is given chance to fabricate and buy creatures wombs for rent. All under the banner of “rights” and an unnamed “love“. Now, in the name of “rights” and such “love“, If the tip “right” the priesthood for gay people. At this rate, as the outlawing of that dangerous homophobe of the Blessed Apostolo Paolo and the deletion from the sacred texts of his words mixed with the supreme tenets of the LGBT lobby, especially where he warns: "Make no mistake: neither fornicators, born idolatry, nor adulterers, ne prostitutes, born sodomiti […] they will inherit the kingdom of God "? [The Cor 6, 9-10].

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos

.

.

… the priesthood is not a claimable right from LGBT groups

The Fathers ofPatmos Island They published in July 2016 Two short essays in the section Theologica, facing a complex and sensitive issue on the theological and legal: about the effective validity of the priestly ordinations of subjects lacking the correct perception of the Catholic priesthood and about the effective validity of the priestly ordinations of candidates for sacred orders with structurally rooted homosexual tendencies.

.

Not to mention the multiplication, not only in parishes, but even at the same seminar, Group Study and meeting place for gay Catholics. And these meetings - always to be honest and clear -, often they reduced to hard attacks to the Supreme Magisterium of the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II and Pope Benedict XVI Venerable, while the priest was foolish and improvident left by his bishop to sow the worst poisons, of calms their movements the gay audience and lesbians rincuorandoli: "Today, things have changed", because "the Church has come out of the dark and finally become welcoming and inclusive to everyone and everything". Including perhaps mortal sin?

.

… the priesthood is not a claimable right from LGBT groups

The now ubiquitous and powerful gay lobby, with a pompous language and infused with unacceptable mercies e of love, trying for some time to launch an attack at the heart of the Church: the legitimization of homosexual tendencies in relation to the sacred priesthood. And this to the point of anticipating “directives” in the form of “lovable proposals” the next Synod of Bishops which will take place on: "Young people, faith and vocational discernment " [see article WHO].

.

As sometimes it happens regarding certain burning issues, many of our readers have written to us to seek guidance. In all respond proposing two of our writings on this subject published ten months ago [cf. WHO, WHO], in which we believe we have analyzed the problem in all its serious depth …

.

To open items click below

.

07.07.2016 Ariel S. Levi Gualdo - DOUBTS ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF ORDERS OF HOMOSEXUAL PRIESTLY

.

07.07.2016 Giovanni Cavalcoli, OP — THE QUESTION OF THE VALIDITY OF PRIESTLY ORDINATIONS TODAY

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

THE POPE CLEMENT XV CORRECTING THE 'JOY OF LOVE"WITH HIS MOTU PROPRIO «When great sadness », CONFIRMING THE DISCIPLINE OF JOHN PAUL II IN THE MATTER OF DIVORCED REMARRIED

.

Apostolic Letter in the form of motu proprio
With great sadness

.

To Our Venerable Brethren the Patriarchs,
RECEIVE, ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS
And other Ordinaries
IN PEACE AND COMMUNION
With the Apostolic See:
THE PROBLEM OF ADMISSION TO THE DIVORCED EUCHARIST REMARRIED

.

PP CLEMENTE. XV

Bishop of the Catholic Church

Servant of the Servants of God

.

.

With great sadness but with great apostolic concern, Sum of Our Authority we state that the Apostolic Exhortation love joy It should be read and placed in a complex historical context of decay characterized by a profound loss doctrinal and pastoral, because if isolated from this humus, you will not understand nor his lexical style nor the laudable effort in its preparation. Of this document they remain unquestioned and the good intentions that have animated, all he aimed to address and resolve issues related to the family and marriage in relation to the many and varied contemporary societies of the world, that since the seventies of the twentieth century have gone to meet progressive disintegration, in a society that tends now to deny the eternal becoming, the immutable and absolute unbreakable. A serious problem, the latter, resulting from the loss of metaphysical language within the Holy Church of Christ, and especially in theological speculation and in the transmission of the truths of faith. The abandonment of this language, largely solidified and inherent to the mission and the very nature of the Church, has often been replaced with styles and forms of expression that idiomatic, on the doctrine of the Holy transmission plan, They have created problems and sometimes even disastrous consequences.

.

The power of the keys, the certainty and clarity

.

love joy is a long text dealing with a wide variety of topics mostly sociological, ending with be ambiguous in some important steps and we proved weak, why not always clear on some fundamental elements in which it is not wise or prudent to leave room for vagueness and the free interpretations of the individual Bishops' Conferences, individual priests or the various theological schools of thought, that need to be guided and directed with more clear and precise words. Indeed, Christ the Lord, giving the Blessed Apostolo Pietro the power of the keys [cf. Mt 16, 18-19], He commanded him to confirm his brothers in faith: «Simone, Simone, behold Satan has demanded to sift you like wheat; but I prayed for you, that thy faith fail not:; and you, turned again, confirm your brothers " [LC 22, 31-32]. This heavy-duty power service, by Blessed Apostolo Pietro was transmitted to all his successors, up to Us, we profess we devoted servant of the servants of God.

.

Our fundamental premise of the Petrine ministry is so sure, clarity and escape from any vagueness, as he remembered the Blessed Apostolo Paolo to the Blessed Apostle Peter during the reproach he moved to Antioch to the Head of the College of the Apostles, with all due respect to his undisputed authority [Gal 2,1-2.7-14].

.

The interpretations that can be derived from different pages of love joy They can be opposed and both consistent on the basis of what it can be deduced speculative and interpretative level, which leads us to reiterate that the doctrinal language must be clear, unique and not subject to conflicting interpretations, place that our speech should be "You, and, no, no» [cf. Mt 5, 37]. Therefore, before any question of moral doctrine, it is not contemplated that any suggestion that the answer could be "yes", but also wanting to "no", if anything, a bit '' yes 'and a little' 'no'.

.

As the Supreme Guardian of the deposit of faith is upon us an obligation and duty to ensure that the sull'ovile Divine Shepherd has entrusted us, preventing the small seed but dangerous ambiguity, shoots up to undermine and circumvent the doctrine of the Holy Church of Christ through pastoral practice, why allow such germination does not amount to meet the modern needs of today's society, but disregard a rule laid down by the Word of God concerning sacramental marriage: "For what man does not separate what God has joined" [Mt 19,3-12].

.

The man is conformed to Christ, and Christ is not conformed to man.

.

This is why we reiterate that it is the Holy Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God made man, died, resurrected and ascended to heaven, He must transform man and human societies; He is the man who must conform to Christ, It can not be the man to transform the Holy Gospel nor can they be human societies to bring Christ to their needs of the moment. The commands given by Christ the Lord are immutable and eternal and can be neither dismissed nor evaded through ambivalent words from which to draw legitimacy for new pastoral practices related to the administration of the Holy Eucharist, which it is the center and summit of the Church's unity. Therefore, the right medicine and the right encouragement for those who have failed to commitments through the sacrament of marriage and living a new union outside the sacramental sphere, It may not be the Eucharist, well because others are appropriate medicines to be administered, from the reception of such children Our, to follow with their prompt and careful spiritual care.

.

The no Eucharist to divorced and remarried is an ecclesiastical discipline, not a dogmatic truth.

.

The prudent choice not to grant the Most Holy Eucharist to divorced and remarried is not a dogmatic element of the Catholic faith, but a discipline rules adopted by the Magisterium of the Church in fidelity to the moral taught and transmitted by the Holy Catholic tradition. So, for the power conferred to us by Christ the Lord, of Our authorities we could amend that legislation governing, but we do not intend to reform neither direct nor leaving creative autonomy the particular Churches and some national episcopates, because from what life would take a new pastoral practice in so-called non-homogeneous diffuse patchy, while the Church disciplines are unique and universal, as is his pastoral mission.

.

The decision not to grant the Most Holy Eucharist to divorced and remarried, and especially today in this history when marriage is weakened, It is also based on the conservative belief that this concession would end up further weaken the sacramental institution of marriage and the inescapable foundation and not be reformed its indissolubility [cf. Mt 19,3-12].

.

This is what we fear, and that clearly express to Our Brother Bishops: founded fear that through the Holy Eucharist can end up making even weaker than it already is, unfortunately, the indissolubility of the foundation of the sacrament of marriage to which, Unfortunately, nowadays no longer believe even many of our Catholic faithful. In this case, the Holy Eucharist would become more to that for which it was established, ceasing to be the heart of the communion and unity of the Church through the sacramental grace. And it must remember here that the sacraments are not a right or have acquired, but a free act of divine grace, that touches us and fills us with goods "not because of our merits but for the richness of Your forgiveness" [cf. S. Mass, Can. Rom.].

.

Never bothering to please the world: the discipline of “Family member company”.

.

Therefore, the total negligence of internal and public critical failures that could fall on Us, Mindful that the Roman Pontiff must aim to please Christ the Lord in doing His will, sanctifying himself and with his sanctifying the task of teaching and his works the believers of Christ; also mindful that we can not cure us of pleasure in the world, pleasing that we might run the risk of conducting blind guides as many members of the flock entrusted to us to fall into the ditch [cf. Mt 15,14], Our Brother Bishops to reaffirm that with regard to the pastoral care of divorced and remarried Catholics should be applied with care and zeal as indicated by our Holy Predecessor Giovanni Paolo II in his Apostolic Exhortation Family member company, with particular reference to the n. 84, reaffirming the non-permissibility, hence the impossibility of their access to the Holy Eucharist, both for reasons linked to pastoral prudence, both linked to the wise institute protection of sacramental marriage, already far too hard hit and debased in the last decades of the history of mankind.

.

The Bishops diligent care to always be loving and welcoming toward these Our faithful who are divorced and remarried for their irregular situations need to be made to feel even more vibrant part of the Holy Church, mindful that Christ did not fail to remind us: «It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. Go and learn what this means: I desire mercy, not sacrifice. For I came not to call the righteous, but sinners " [cf. Mt 9,13]. Nowhere in the Holy Gospel and at any time of His preaching, the Incarnate Word of God has ever said that to be welcoming and merciful to accomodate and legitimize the moral disorder, or that you have to be afraid to call and to indicate the moral disorder as such, moving on false pretexts of mercy and false acceptance. Our task is to accept and carry out the sinners from their sins, treating them in this way by the disease of sin; and a prerequisite for the remission of sins is the genuine repentance combined with the sincere intention and commitment not to fall into sin.

.

It promises the unfeasible and impractical to obtain a purpose.

.

To accept and treat, for pastors in the care of souls, however, it is very difficult to do and to practice, while it would be a lot easier to look for a solution to certain problems linked to the so-called irregular pairs granting them access to the Holy Eucharist, then declaring the non-existence of the serious problem constituted by the rupture of sacramental communion.

.

It has also advocated an "accompaniment" journey of these pairs of divorced and remarried, however, replacing the concept of spiritual direction with an unspecified "spiritual accompaniment". And here it would be good to note that "direct" and "accompanying" are not two simple ways to express the same thing, but to say and express two different things. It was then later clarified that this "accompaniment" was to "Custom" and as such need to be evaluated case by case, according to the needs of the single divorced and remarried couple. A perspective, this, before which it must first be a strong reminder to realism: the number of pairs of divorced and remarried is progressively increasing and the local Bishops Conferences come worrying statistical data which relate that in some regions of the world marriages that end with civil divorce are superior in percentage 50% of religious marriages celebrated. To these numbers it should be related then of necessity the current situation of the Catholic clergy. It is a fact that few bishops of the world during their visits at the threshold of the Apostles refer to the Roman Pontiff that the number of deceased priests is a lot higher than that of new priests ordained and that the average age of the clergy, in not a few dioceses, it is now also attested above seventy years of age. In Italy itself, ancient historic cradle of Catholicism and in whose territory is located two millennia Our Apostolic, the late nineteenth century, there were about eighty thousand priests for a population of about twenty-nine million inhabitants. At a distance of barely a century, at the end of the twentieth century, the priests present at the dawn of the new millennium were about thirty thousand for a population of around sixty million inhabitants. Today, in many dioceses of this country, There are eighty priests who celebrate Mass on Sunday in three different parishes, all now without a priest, while the age of priests is always higher and more numerous deaths of new ordinations. In many regions of the world there are priests who prior pardon of their Diocesan Ordinary celebrate at parties and days of obligation are seven, eight Masses a day. In many other regions of the Orbe catholica it is now impossible to guarantee in many communities even Mass on Sunday, because there is only one itinerant priest in charge of going in different pastoral areas now devoid of a priestly fixture, at which you can go only once a month, and only for the celebration of Holy Mass. In these cases, often, it is even impossible to administer the sacramental confessions of the individual faithful gathered in large numbers to the monthly celebration of Holy Mass, and the priest is thus forced to give general absolution for the purpose of the faithful to go to confession as soon as possible for them.

.

Illustrated as real and given that it is not our intention to establish the intentions of others processes, we must seriously ask ourselves: what is the relationship with the ecclesial reality, ecclesiastical and pastoral of those that in a situation such as the one above-illustrated, It even despite hypothesis and proposed that "accompanying", whereby follow with care every single couple in a long way "custom" of discernment and growth? Because the reality until summarized here could also lead to raise a serious and objective question: those who put forward proposals in itself is not likely to be realized and equally not possible to go, perhaps they do just to get the goal they have set, inwardly aware that no "accompanying", whereby follow with care every single couple in a long way "custom" of discernment and growth, It may even be minimally realized, in today's world in general, but particularly in those many of the world where the average statistics indicate the presence of a priest every 18.000/ 22.000 baptized? Or maybe put forward proposals in itself is not likely to be realized, and equally not possible to go, because totally it divorced from real and concrete ecclesial and pastoral reality?

.

Certainty of punishment for offenders.

.

We conclude that a given arrangement may produce its effects, if it not accompanied by adequate punishment for offenders. Therefore we determine that the diocesan bishops, which does not adhere to the norms dictated by Us, They are deprived of his episcopal chairs. The Presbyters, which preach and implement different disciplines, they are suspended for a period not less than one year from the exercise of the sacred priesthood. I theology, which in ecclesiastical universities, in theological training centers and houses of formation for priests, religious and laity, They teach a different doctrine than that which We confirmed, they are deprived of their license to teach Catholic theology. If this is not done in case of need, then the competent Ecclesiastical Authority will have to answer before God for having failed to apply a provision on the protection of the Catholic doctrine of the souls entrusted by God the Father to the care of the Holy Church of Christ, because "to whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " [LC 12, 48]. And every time that we all do the penitential rite, we ask God for forgiveness for having sinned not only in thoughts, in word and deed, but also omissions.

.

.

Given in Rome, at St. Peter's, the 13 May 2027, the 110th anniversary of the apparitions of Our Vergine Maria of Fatima, the first of Our Pontificate.

.

PDF Apostolic Letter print format

.

_____________________________________

.

.

The author of the text of the pseudo Clemente XV And, obviously, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. However, Who else could be? After it self-appointed Titular Bishop of Laodicea in the past Combusta via telecommunications lines, Now self-candidate with a chance at the next conclave, animated by the certainty that, worse than what has been done in recent years on the doctrinal and pastoral plan, It will be very difficult to pass, although it is customary to say that the worst, Unfortunately, there is no end.

.

From the island of Patmos, 1° May 2017 – Feast of St. Joseph the Worker

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

- Holy Week -

JESUS ​​CAME DOWN INTO HELL. THERE REALLY HELL AND PARADISE ?

.

"This descent of the soul of Jesus should not be imagined as a geographical journey, locale, from one continent to another. It is a journey of the soul […] This word of the Lord of the descent into Hell mainly means to say that the past is achieved by Jesus, that the effectiveness of the Redemption does not begin in the year zero or thirty, but it also goes to the past, embraces the past, all men of all times " [S.S. Benedict XVI, Questions about Jesus, program In His Image, 22 April 2011]

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF interview print format

.

MAURIZIO GASPARA - Hell many do not believe, others argue that it can not be eternal and others that it is empty. The same is true of the Angel fell and sin. For many it is the Catholic Church and still many inventions live as if God did not exist, and Heaven and Hell would be just illusions. To try to explain how can a good God allow such as the Christian revolt of the angels, the spread of evil, the existence of Hell and Paradise, father Giovanni Cavalcoli, of the Dominican Order, he wrote and published the book: Hell exists. The truth denied [cf. WHO]. Father Giovanni Cavalcoli is Metaphysical teacher at the Studio of Bologna Dominican Philosophical and Systematic Theology at the Theological Faculty of Emilia-Romagna. Official of the Secretariat of State 1982 al 1990, Academic is the Papal 1992. Author of numerous books and essays, It carries out an intense work of formation.

ZENIT, 29 March 2010

.

.

For the secular world and even some believers Hell does not exist. This would be an invention. What is your opinion on it?

.

Tintoretto, Descent of Christ into Hell

The secular world has lost faith in the Hereafter, Whether it's heaven or hell it. And a certain measure of secularism unfortunately has crept even among some believers, which, What they say is an afterlife, This is only the Paradise. This is the so-called mentality feel-good, so it is not surprising that, according to these trends, Hell is an invention. In reality, as I have shown in my book, Hell is not an invention, but it is a truth of faith taught by our Lord Jesus Christ, the New Testament, by Sacred Tradition and some councils. So it's a matter of divine revelation, that the Church has the task of guarding and teaching.

.

Based on what topics it claims that Hell exists?

.

The doctrine of hell is a theological doctrine. Now, the arguments of theology are not empirical, but they are the Words of Jesus Christ, which you can only be accepted on the basis of faith in Jesus Christ and in the Church that we mean the Words of Christ.

.

Are there really heaven and hell?

.

From this point of view, the topics are many. I will here mention only one [cf. pag. 33 my book about hell], which I think is particularly effective, because it is found in the Second Vatican Council [The light, n. 48] and in the Catechism of the Catholic Church [n. 1034]. This is the step Matteo [cf. 25, 31-46] where Jesus Christ is not merely announces the mere possibility of damnation, but simply it provides for the fact of the existence of the damned.

.

Where and when was born Hell?

.

To answer this question, we must consider what exactly is Hell. It, regarding men, It consists of irrevocable rejection of the mercy offered to us by the Father through Jesus Christ, Son of God. In this sense, we can say that the infernal damnation came into existence with the coming of Christ. Instead, if we consider the sin of the beginning of creation, angels, Hell exists for them since that time [cf. Mt 25,41; 2 PT 2,4].

.

Where was born Hell?

.

As for the sinners angels, as they were before in heaven, We can say he was born in heaven, from which were precipitated [AP 12,8]. As for men, Hell is born into this world when Jesus was rejected.

.

There afterlife or is present on Earth?

.

According to one theory of Christianity secularist-gooder, if one can speak of "Inferno", This only exists on this earth, in the sense that the punishment for the wicked there's only down here, and then there is the paradise for all. There is also another argument, totally pagan, according to which Hell would be that condition of suffering which also affects the innocent oppressed by overbearing. While in this second case the word "hell" is used in an improper way, in the first case there is some truth, as the state of mortal sin is already in a sense Hell. But this argument overlooks the fact that the irrevocable fullness of hellish condition for humans is only after death. However, every man, You may repent before death, It can regain the status of the grace of Christ, whereby, if it continues in this state until death, can avoid Hell.

.

What Scripture says about?

.

The most authoritative voice is that of Our Lord Jesus Christ. In it we find an echo in the other books of the New Testament, and in particular in the Revelation, in which we have a great vision of the ultimate triumph of Christ over all the powers of evil, which it will be put in a position of no more harm to the elect.

.

The Hell's admirable description of the Divine Comedy is credible?

.

Certainly in its substance it is credible, Why, as you know, Dante was not only a Catholic, He had acquired a remarkable theological culture of Thomistic mold attending the Dominican convent of Santa Maria Novella in Florence. While, Dante, the great poet who was, It has allowed the so-called poetic license, for which he created environments, events and characters that clearly beyond those we are taught by the Christian Revelation, although at the same time, all in all, not oppose. A curious thing that we might note in this regard and that it is not a matter of Christian faith, is the condition of so-called "cowardous», who lived "without fame and without praise"And therefore they are placed by Dante in the Inferno, but in a place by itself.

.

Admitting the existence of Hell presupposes fear the Devil. How the fallen angel and Hell lie in the divine plan?

.

The Christian must have a certain fear of the Devil, as well as we can have a reasonable fear to take a disease or falling into some sin. Hence the duty of the Christian to guard against moral dangers that can come from evil temptations, avoiding excessive safety attitudes. Said this, however, the Christian basically not afraid of the Devil, because the Christian who lives in Christ enjoys the same power of Christ, who conquered Satan. On the contrary, from this point of view, We can say it is the devil who is afraid of the Christian. As it says St. Caterina da Siena, we are defeated by the Devil if we want, loving or committing sin. The Devil and Hell lie in the divine plan as it is a deterrent that helps us to avoid sin. In second place, as far as the devil, also it is seen as an instrument of divine Providence for two purposes: to strengthen us in virtue and to call paternally when we commit evil. The devil in itself would just our bad, only that Divine Providence uses it according to his very wise designs for our good.

.

Why does God allow the angel to rebel?

.

Because it has a great respect for the free will of the creature. Now, precisely, the Rebel Angel is a creature endowed with free. Then, at this point, we can say that God, in order to comply with this free will, She agrees to be rejected by that creature that really could only find in him his full happiness. This analogy holds true also for the human story. Also it can say that God allowed the Angel disobedience, because from eternity he had planned the Incarnation of the Word, thanks to which humanity, saved by Christ, He would in Christ defeated Satan and reached a condition of life - that of the children of God - higher than we would have been if the angel had not sinned.

.

What is the relationship between evil and Hell?

.

We can say that Hell is a victory over the moral evil, or on sin, although it remains the evil of punishment, that is, the suffering of the damned. Here, however, it is a just penalty, whereby, From this point of view we can say that it is good that there is this evil, so we see that, dal punto di vista scatological, everything is resolved in well. It should also be pointed out very clearly that it would be blasphemous to blame God for this evil, which instead he is responsible only for the angelic creature, or human, while on the other hand the existence of evil it just manifests divine justice, which, moreover, it is always mitigated by mercy.

.

What should people do to escape Hell and gaining Heaven?

.

Practically it comes to putting in place all the precepts of the Christian life, starting with hatred for sin, by the knowledge of its consequences, to move to the duty to obey with all our strength to the commands of the Lord, to live in grace, the continued practice of conversion and Christian life, in unlimited confidence in divine mercy, frequenting the sacraments in communion with the Church, in devotion to the saints and especially to the Blessed Virgin Mary, cultivating a strong desire of Heaven and holiness and courageously fighting daily against the wiles of the tempter, under the protection of St. Michele Arcangelo. In exceptional cases of aggression on the part of the devil, there exists the practice of exorcism. These recommendations apply of course for Catholics, But as all men are called to salvation and therefore they are called to avoid Hell and gaining Heaven, their duty is to follow their correct conscience, to the extent that they know the needs of the property and cultivating, with the help of grace, an at least implicit faith in God as the rewarder of the good and the wicked Judge.

.

[ © Innovative Media, Inc. Services by Agency ZENIT ]

.

.

.

Dear Readers ,

we invite you to support The Island of Patmos that always carries their apostolic work only thanks to your offers that you can send using the convenient and safe system PayPal or our WERE GOING, which you can find on the right of home-page. We pray those who use the code WERE GOING send us an email [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ], so that we can send a message of thanks. If you bid by PayPal, we get the notification with the email address of the Donor, If you do use the code WERE GOING, in that case the banking system there does not report your email and in that case it would not be possible to answer and thank you.

.

.

.

.

.

REASONS FOR DON ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA SHOULD REMAIN IN THE COMMUNION OF THE CHURCH AND IN THE SERVICE OF THE CHURCH IN OBEDIENCE TO THE CHURCH

.

Today, some thinkers, and unfortunately many clergymen, They have passed the same Luther, which in comparison - it goes without saying it is a paradox -, ends up be more orthodox of them. From these cases then we see that there is more contrast between modernists and Catholic, than between Lutherans and Catholics. Catholics are more united with Luther that the modernist. The main problem of unity among Christians, today, It is not so much that of the union with the Lutherans - there's also this, obviously -, but rather that of 'unity among Catholics.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON

.

.

Dear Brother Priest

ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA

Priest of the Church of Palermo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

it Presbítero Alessandro Minutella, sermon "The embarrassment of the false church» [to open the video click on the image]

the news of the decree of your Bishop He was surprised and saddened, because recently I heard some of your homilies in which you earnestly denounced the spread of many heresies in the Church type modernistic, declaring at the same time, in critical tone towards the Lefebvrians, your respect for the decrees of the Second Vatican Council and complaining about their performance in the modernist sense.

.

These your words coincide with what I am arguing publicly for many years, so I suffered unjust measures by the authorities. How you claim you, Today in the Church the modernist trend has become so established, which it is also widespread among Bishops, so that they favor the modernists and punish anti-modernists. And how can you determine, we Fathers de The Island of Patmos We are writing for some years about these serious problems, Just browse our store to find dozens of writings on this specific topic.

.

I know that your Bishop has motivated the decree citing you, while it is free from heretical infections, break the ecclesial communion. You, instead, from your hand, you feel unjustly punished and you quoted the authority of St. Thomas about. I state that I do not have enough information to form an opinion, but I offer you some criteria derived from Angelic Doctor.

.

Alessandro Minutella appeal to the Supreme Pontiff Francis [to open the video click on the image]

First of all must be for you a great satisfaction the fact he had been assured by your Bishop was not a heretic, considered, as I said earlier, the current widespread heresy even between the hierarchy and the theologians. At the same time I am amazed inconsistency of your bishop but allows a heretic as Enzo Bianchi to make a public lecture in his cathedral church [cf. recent article by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. Indeed, by Enzo Bianchi, There are authoritative rebuttals, like that of our dear and esteemed brother Antonio Livi, while on this online magazine of the Fathers The Island of Patmos I have refuted several times and severely; is also one document in preparation study to which Dr.. Jorge Facio Lince has been working for months [some of our other articles on Enzo Bianchi heresies are still readable WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc ..]

.

As for the teaching of Aquinas in terms of criminal decrees, he distinguishes an undue Decree [excommunication due;] because of the contempt of the law by the authority [the opinion of law being observed]. "So, if part of the judgment that there is an error, to render void the judgment, it has no effect ». So those affected can not take this into account.

.

"If the ruling is right, it is to be punished and must obey humbly, and it will be his merit; or it must ask the Superior the annulment of the decree; or recourse must be had to a higher level. If he showed contempt for the decree, thereby sinning mortally " [Sum. Theol., Suppl., q. 21, a. 4]. I am unable to advise you on which path to take. You stand, in conscience, before God, make the decision. I can cite my own case, who has found the following solution. Following my broadcast on Radio Maria, the 30 last October, in which I talked about divine punishments, my Superior I partially suspended peep the 5 following November, by publishing a statement against me infected by heresy, that denies the original sin [in these articles is my defense: WHO, WHO, in this next trilogy Instead it shows that my case was mounted by environment-related lobby gay, WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

daily news on “If Alessandro Minutella” [to open the video click on the image]

Judgment obviously unjust that against me, to which I I adeguai in obedience, without failing to explain in detail my reasons to the Superior. But there was nothing to be done. He did not answer me either. Then, in late January, I appeal to higher court, getting satisfaction. Two days after the Superior reinstated me in the fullness of my priestly functions. But the question, very serious, of the divine punishments, It remains open in the field of contemporary theology. The same Pontiff, in his speech to the earthquake victims during his visit to the Carpi 2 last April, he mentioned the consequences of original sin in the following words: "Our soul, created for life, He suffers hearing that his thirst for eternal good is oppressed by an ancient and evil dark ' [cf. video, WHO, WHO].

.

The Church teaches the priest He must see the Bishop as his immediate superior, which, however, it represents the Pope, to whom, ultimately goes obedience to supreme level on this earth. The communion with the bishop and the local Church is subject to communion with the Supreme Pontiff.

.

Today we are in an ecclesial situation in which there are modernists Bishops or Lefebvrians, who are not in full communion with the Vicar of Christ or pretend to be; rather, while the former, careerists and bullies, flatter him and pressed on him with a style that looks like the mafia, seconds, on the basis of an incorrect reference to Tradition, reject the teachings of Vatican II and the Mass new world order, and disobey the Pope openly [cf. article in the 2015 at Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO].

.

about three thousand faithful packed the Cathedral of Palermo to huddle in prayer around their Bishop [to open the video click on the image]

The unity of the local Church He must always take - priests and Bishop together - making the head unit of the Church Universal Roman, drawing inspiration from it and submitting it. This loyalty and obedience to the Pope and the Magisterium of the Church is the only treasure that we Catholics possess among all non-Catholic Christian brothers. These supreme values ​​I could deepen thanks to the experience that I have done since 1982 al 1990 as the official Secretary of State of John Paul II. Near the Pope and as collaborators of the Pope can make a beautiful and most fruitful experience of the universal Church, which does not detract at all, indeed does better understand the dignity and autonomy of the local church.

.

This wide and universal outlook, this bond with the Pope not to mention the immediate superior, but right through him, And, as it were, In the DNA the spirituality of us Dominicans, we make our profession of obedience to our Provincial Superior, Certainly, but beyond him and beyond him, our total profess obedience to the Supreme Pontiff.

.

Today the papacy has more than ever need to be helped, He warned in his ministry and defended by all the people of God, especially by the true prophets and the anime-victim, and because never before has he tried, threatened and besieged by Satanic forces who pretend to be friends, and instead they want to bring it down, and because unfortunately - something that never happened in the entire history of the Church - a crisis of faith has crept within the same episcopate and of the College of Cardinals and, consequently, They have arisen in the Church bitterly opposed factions and divisions [cf. Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO] - case in point the opposition between Lefebvre and modernists - right on the issue of the truths of faith.

.

S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

There is more contrast between Rahner and St. Thomas Aquinas than between Luther and St. Thomas Aquinas. For Luther God is creator, for Teilhard de Chardin God is organizer of matter. For Luther the atheist is in error, Rahner instead for the atheist is an unwitting believer. For Luther God is omnipotent, David Maria Turoldo is weak. For Luther God is a You in front of 'the, Marco Vannini l 'the It is the "absolute subject". Luther admitted the immutability of dogma, Walter Kasper la Nega. Luther condemned atheism, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini said that in the consciousness of the believer there is always an atheist. For Luther, faith is knowing the truth - that is, the Word of God -, many Catholic theologians is a "athematic and existential encounter" with Christ …

.

… for Luther Christianity is at the top of other religions, for Dupuis is one religion among others, Pair of other. For Luther the true religion is Christianity, however for Schillebeeckx it is the global federation of all religions [cf. my articles WHO, WHO]. For Luther the Christian only has the gift of the Spirit, however Raimundo Panikkar, the Indian mystic is the same as Christian. For Luther Muslims are enemies of the gospel, Instead Rahner are "anonymous Christians" [cf. my article WHO]. Luther believed in the next world; Gutiérrez said that the only world is this world. Luther thought that Adam and Eve were really existed; Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi said that the account of man's creation is an etiological myth [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo WHO]. Luther admits the Biblical account of man's creation, while Teilhard de Chardin says that man comes from monkeys.

.

Luther distinguishes the body from the spirit; Teilhard de Chardin says that evolution matter becomes spirit [cf. my article WHO]. Luther believed in the immortality of the soul, Vito Mancuso denies. Luther believed in the resurrection of the dead at the end of the world, per Rahner, instead, the resurrection takes place immediately after death. Luther believed in the divine punishment, Raniero Cantalamessa and Hermes Ronchi do not believe [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. Luther believed in hell, von Balthasar says that "exists" but that "is empty". Luther believed in the existence of the devil, many Catholic exegetes do not believe.

.

S.It is prayer. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

For Luther Trinity Three Persons, Rahner are three ways to be God. Luther recognized the And the son, for Melloni, which instead is wire-orthodox, if you can do without. Luther was quite certain of what Christ said, Father Arturo Sosa S.J. He says that we are not sure [cf. article by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. For Luther was a heretic Arius, Arius was right for Bianchi, as it seems to have said recently in your church cathedral [cf. texts lessons by Enzo Bianchi, WHO, WHO]. Luther acknowledged the deity of Christ, Schillebeeckx believes Christ alone il "eschatological prophet". For Luther believe that Christ is the Redeemer, It is an absolute truth, Instead Marcello Bordoni, Christ can freely interpret, choice, or as a redeemer or "martyr prophet", as one prefers. For Luther Christ is the only Savior, Giuseppe Dossetti Jews are also saved without Christ.

.

Luther accepted the Christological dogma of Chalcedon, Bruno Forte interprets the Incarnation in the Hegelian sense [cf. my article, WHO]. For Luther Christ is the God of Truth, while de la Potterie simply Christ teaches us the Gospel. As for Luther the atoning sacrifice of Christ is the truth of faith, for Cardinal Robert Zollitsch the idea of ​​atonement is medieval image exceeded. For Luther Christ's sacrifice was wanted by the Father for our salvation, Schillebeeckx for the death of Christ was not a sin offering, but only a crime caused by human malice.

.

Luther distinguished thought from reality: duty of thinking is adapted to the real. Instead, for Rahner, the real is identified with the thought, so my idea is reality: the self is always right. Luther recognized that we have to obey the Ten Commandments, Rahner while everyone is free to decide for themselves of their identity. For Luther consciousness is submitted to the word of God, while Cardinal Walter Kasper is the source of truth [the cogito of Descartes] and for the Father Arturo Sosa excels on everything [cf. my article, WHO, Our answers to the Readers WHO, etc ..]. Luther knows that sin is a tremendous evil, which it is only removed from the Cross of Christ, per Teilhard de Chardin, instead, sin is simply a negligible hiccup in the unstoppable path Evolution [Kasper see my articles WHO, WHO]

.

S.It is prayer. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

Luther was against Pelagio, for which grace was the prize to the works, instead, per Rahner, the grace is the vertex human self-transcendence. Luther said that it is only justified those who believe, who does not believe, it is condemned, instead, per Rahner, all are justified, because all have faith, least "implied, preconscious and athematic ". Luther believed in original sin, Nunzio Galantino does not believe [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo WHO]. Luther condemned sodomy, Bianchi approves. Vincenzo Paglia does great things about Pannella, approving the confusion between the sexes [cf. my article WHO], Luther recognized the distinction between men and women and he condemned as immoral Pannella. Luther judges modernity according to the Gospel, modernists judge the Gospel according to modernity.

.

Today, some thinkers, and unfortunately many clergymen, They have passed the same Luther, which in comparison - it goes without saying it is a paradox -, ends up be more orthodox of them. From these cases then we see that there is more contrast between modernists and Catholic, than between Lutherans and Catholics. Catholics are more united with Luther that the modernist. The main problem of unity among Christians, today, It is not so much that of the union with the Lutherans - there's also this, obviously -, but rather that of 'unity among Catholics. The modernists, who boast of dialogue with the Lutherans, They end up absorbing the heresies of Luther, giving them a Catholic painting and despising actually Luther, by them as a fundamentalist overcome by the "historical-critical exegesis".

.

Dear Don Alessandro, your battle against modernism is more legitimate than ever, necessary and appropriate. The modernists have come to a very high directional seats, among the collaborators of the Pope or presenting themselves as friends of the Pope, while the crafty sycophants and Judah, that would impose, as mobsters, their shady plans Masonic subservience of the Church to the powers of the world [cf. article in the 2015 at Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO] . We must do everything possible to free the Holy Father from this deadly embrace and these occult powers, who put the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI in the position of having to give freely to the Petrine ministry.

.

running commentary, Eucharistic Adoration in the Cathedral presided by S.It is. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

I think this is a purifying and sanctifying mission, Our Lady entrusted you, along with your service to the noble and ancient Church Palermo, that today suffer in you, suffering in Bishop, He suffers in good faithful, He suffers for the sins of all, but while this Palermo do not miss the mercy of the Father and the Holy Spirit consolation, That all summons to penance, to reconciliation, to communion and peace, under the guidance of legitimate Shepherd, not without human weakness, Yet Servant of your souls in the name and by mandate of Christ. Therefore listen, help and follow your bishop !

.

Take yourself, dear Don Alessandro, a long period of pause and reflection hermitical, I listen to the voice of the Lord, like the prophet Elijah: "Go out and stand on the mountain before the Lord's presence" [I Re 19, 11] and wait "a light wind murmuring" [v.12]. It is the wind of the Holy Spirit. Accept orders, win the temptations. China head before the divine Majesty. Beseech mercy for your sins and those of sinners. Abandoned in the hands of the God of mercy. In the words of St. Caterina da Siena: "Rest on the Cross". Soon you will be rebuilt in the fullness of your priestly functions and increasing its fully the gifts God gave you.

.

New and great tasks await, new achievements for your sanctification, to that of the Pope, for the good of the universal Church, for the Church of Palermo, for Italy, for world evangelization, for the salvation of souls, for the kingdom of Christ, for the triumph of Mary, for the defeat of Satan.

.

S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily, call for unity of the Church [to open the video click on the image]

Very moving and a harbinger of celestial favors was the recent and happy collective eucharistic adoration cathedral with four thousand people and the Bishop meekly on his knees before the Blessed Sacrament, to plead with songs and tears light, pace, pardon, love, harmony and unity for the Church Palermo. I feel for you all, dear brothers in faith, admiration, compassion and tenderness. I remember in prayer. Pray for me.

.

Confirm the blood pact with Christ: He gives you his blood; you give Him your. The sin is washed with blood, the blood of the New Covenant. We Romagna - not to mention the Tuscan! ―, Sicilians like you have the hot blood: we may sometimes verbally violent, but always generous.

.

Madonna vera, flesh and blood, is merciful and tender with the humble, but it is terrible with the proud; is the Madonna at Fatima showed the little shepherds the damned in hell; Madonna is the one that glorifies the Lord because he has "scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts" [LC 1,51]. that Madonna, Seat of Wisdom, which he is winner of Satan and of all heresies.

.

the splendid cathedral primatial Metro Palermo, dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary assumed into heaven

She will protect you and defend all, beginning with your Bishop; She is, or Palermitani, the heavenly Presidio of your Diocese and the wiles of the enemy infiltration and support you in the good fight.

.

Fight against principalities, against powers! [Ef 6, 12]. By Caterina da Siena, confidate, generous Palermitani, that soon you will be a sign for the Italian Church and cry with Catherine: "Fire! Fire! Fire!». Soon they will come down abundant graces upon you all and Italy will be inflamed.

.

With esteem and affection in the Lord.

Varazze, 7 April 2017

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

ALL THAT IS NOT MODERN MODERNISM. REFLECTIONS ON traditionalism: Modernists and traditionalists

.

The most urgent and important dialogue that today we need to promote is not the dialogue with Protestants, with the Orthodox, with Jews, with Muslims or with non-believers, and all useful things to do; what is urgent is the intra-ecclesial dialogue, the dialogue between Catholics, because there are in us and among us of the doctrinal and moral divisions very serious and intolerable.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON

.

PDF print format article

.

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos They remained bitter about the case of the priest Palermo Alessandro Minutella [see WHO], so they decided to dedicate two different writings: Giovanni Cavalcoli, an indirect reflection but to him valuable due to the fact that all that is modern is not modernism; Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, more directly, also he considered it in the consciousness of having to recall the duties of his priestly vows.

.

.

by poor theology and spiritual formation for the priesthood, It can rise to the idea totally wrong that what is modern is in itself Modernist. the priest Alessandro Palermo Minutella has unfortunately given test. To open the video click on the image

The most urgent dialogue and important that today we need to promote is not the dialogue with Protestants, with the Orthodox, with Jews, with Muslims or with non-believers, and all useful things to do; what is urgent is the intra-ecclesial dialogue, the dialogue between Catholics, because there are in us and among us of the doctrinal and moral divisions very serious and intolerable.

.

It no longer knows what it means to be Catholic, because everyone puts this title what he pleases, and then the strangest ideas, extraneous and contradictory. You go to the supermarket of religions, you choose what you prefer, It passes by the bishop to the cashier to pay, and then home, with purchased products, it organizes the menu of the week and invite friends.

.

It is therefore urgent that we all gather around the Pope, Teacher of the Faith and supreme guardian and promoter in the ground unit, reconciliation and peace in the Church, all attentive and faithful to the fundamental lines of his pastoral service, without bothering to argue for some of its contingent choices, occasionally they are and remain questionable with filial freedom of thought, but giving up at the same time every foolish adulation and criticism malevolent.

.

.

To read the entire article click below:

02.04.2017 Giovanni Cavalcoli, OP - EVERYTHING THAT IS NOT MODERN MODERNISM. REFLECTIONS ON traditionalism: Modernists and traditionalists

.

.

.

.

.

.