"And BOMB BOMB OR NOT WE WILL ARRIVE IN ROME» NUNCIO GALANTINO CONVERSA ABOUT GOD WITH DARIO FO

.

The Fo speech is absurd and blasphemous, and I do not see that this would be "great religion" that Nunzio Galantino, with obvious flattery, He attributes to Fo.

.

.

.

.

S. AND. Mons. Nunzio Galantine, General Secretary of the C.E.I, He started in the newspaper Sole 24 Ore Sunday a column entitled Dwell in the words, which it aims to treat the meaning of some key words of modern culture on the I relationship with the world. He started with the word It gave referring to the thought of Dario Fo, the full article is legible WHO.

I extracted from the writings of Nunzio Galantino some statements, here shown in red, each of which would like to make a comment.

.

God is a word paradox. For some there is only the term and there is no corresponding subject, for others there is the subject, but has not be appointed and according to others the God of Moses could not bear to be represented.

.

And what do you think Galantino? It is not pronunciation.

.

God is the word of maximum creativity […] God is the main protagonist of visibility […] By the word God, and the reality to which it refers, we allow our minds to travel in large spaces and to experience extraordinarily loaded with life, both starting from the word and opening ourselves to the imagination, either starting from the image and then the words ricollegandoci.

.

I do not see what God has to do with the "creativity" and "visibility". They do not belong to theology, but to poetry, or literature or painting. He says he does not want to do theology. Ma, speaking of God, what does it want to do, At that time? St. Paul is very clear. Dice: "Since the creation of the world His perfections invisible They can be covered with the intellect by the things made him " [cf. RM 1,20]. God is not covered either by fantasy or imagination, but intellect. Otherwise, as the Scripture says, we have made an idol out of our hands.

.

A child would have difficulty following our discourse, because he knows that the word "mother" is a mom; But what's behind the word God? What to tell him? […] Explain to a child that can rain from invisible reality, but existing. With a child I would try to get along well.

.

Behind the word "God" is no God, because the mind of the child, as capable of thinking, You can know that God exists. Apart from the fact that in any case comes to us alone, We have to help him in the implementation of the principle of causality, as taught by the Book of Wisdom: "The Author is known by analogy from the beauty and grandeur of creatures" [cf. Sap 13,5].

.

Dice Fo: "God is not. Does not exist. I do not believe it ... But ... ". According to him God is a great forger who has invented for itself, a genius of History, because he was able to create his image. A skilled dealer. His anti-religious to me seemed very religious […] To God is never enough love of others, while Jesus founded his feelings on love to give and not to receive.

.

The Fo speech is absurd and blasphemous. God alone is infinite goodness and generosity, and the God of Jesus Christ. If Christ gives, and is not a selfish, this depends from the fact that it is God Himself. I do not see what would this "great religion", that Galantino, with obvious flattery, He attributes to Fo.

.

We humans need for transcendence and for us Christians the essence of human existence lies in coming to us, in going and feel projected beyond. What some call "self-transcendence" not only leads us towards God […] This situation also belongs to an atheist.

.

It is true that we need to transcendence, but we do not confusion. we distinguish first. It is one thing to come out of ourselves, which it is a sign of sociability, and a bill is the "feel projected beyond", which it is a psychological phenomenon, which may be normal as pathological. A bill is the metaphysical ulteriority, moral or theological, from which he feels attracted reasonable man, and an account is emotional ulteriority, irrational and fantastic, which attracts the mental alienated. It 'obvious that it is only the first type of ulteriority that stimulates the affirmation of God.

As all'autotrascendimento, even here we must distinguish. L'autotrascendimento, in general, It is a psychological act, with which the person intentionally and voluntarily surpasses himself or goes beyond himself. The spirit of salt, if it raises, It rises to a summit which is beyond its limit.

This elevation of the spirit, But, It is different in the case that the impulse is from below or above, that is, either by man or by God. Man can transcend or rise towards God or because they are attracted by Him, in submission to Him, and then we have the transcend yourself, of which St. Augustine speaks, or because it raises setting himself up against God, antagonistic to God. In the first case we have the humility, which bears fruit in religion; in the second case we pride, fruiting impiety and atheism. It is clear that only the first type of transcendence characterizes, not the Christian life as such, but the power or the power of his spirit, since the identity of being with the act is only in God.

The essence of human existence in the Christian view is not found in any "out to us, or in going and feel projected beyond "or what some call" self-transcendence ", but it is to be, as the Second Vatican Council says, 'Unity of soul and body "[1], created "in the image of God, capable of knowing and loving his Creator "[2] and not at all "in coming to us, in going and feel projected beyond. What someone called 'self-transcendence' '. If anything, these are powers or possible acts and not constitutive of human existence. I would like to know where Galantino has caught the definition of man. Certainly not in Scripture or in the Magisterium of the Church or St. Thomas.

.

Jesus asks, aims to, It loves hard, illogical, paradoxical.

.

Jesus' illogical does not claim any love », but perfectly consistent with reason. Love is illogical sinful, because it would conflict with our duty to act reasonably. Examples leading Galantino or are equivocal or you can easily fix, but here we do not have the space, then you can always consult any treatise on moral theology.

I only stop on the love for the enemy. There is nothing illogical in this love, of course, to understand it well, and not as if Christ command us to love the enmity of our enemies against us; which would be quite a shame on our part. It lies instead in this command profound wisdom, that gives comfort to the victim, It facilitates the reconciliation and the opponent has more merciful, making it willing to ask for forgiveness and be forgiven.

.

Varazze, 16 March 2016

.

.______________________

[1] The joy and hope, n. 14.

[2] Ibid., n. 12.

.

.

And BOMB BOMB OR NOT WE WILL ARRIVE IN ROME … AND UNFORTUNATELY WE HAVE ARRIVED !

.

.

.

___________________

 

.

.

.

The Editors of’Patmos Island, takes this opportunity to remind S.It is. Mons. Nunzio Galantino which has always been the “commendable” level of "religiosity" atheist Dario Fo: mock God, of Christ, the Gospel, and all the saints. We take note, however, that the farsighted Secretary General of the Italian Episcopal Conference, in all this still it sees "great religion". Request: the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is always open and operational, or was the first department of the Holy See to be abolished by the reform of the Roman Curia with a view to next “new church” Free at last from all “unnecessary dogmatism” that for too many centuries have “oppressed“?

.

.

.

.

THE GIULLARATA THE GOSPEL OF THE RESURRECTION OF LAZARUS

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.