PRIESTS TRENDY ? PIGLIATELI NOT SERIOUSLY, PIGLIATELI the piss, IS AN ACT OF EXTREME PERFECT CHRISTIAN CHARITY. AND NOW VI EXPLAIN WHAT REALLY COUCH …

.

Today, before certain priests, on the one hand, we just have to cry, on the other hand, we just have to take the piss, because it raised the issue in these terms, the jack ass It will be the extreme act, most perfect and loving Christian charity, He says one sees it pretaccio scurrilous, He remains intimately too worried about not swallow camel of heresy [cf. Mt 23,24], to worry about the harmless midge a healthy swearword.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

Dear Father Ariel,

I'm not a nostalgic old, I just task 24 year old, and at my age I tell you today as a priest don Camillo, He born from the imagination of my fellow emiliano Giovannino Guareschi, fill churches, especially of young people. While the priests in robes casual, everyone ecology, peace and love, Immigrants who come there's room for everyone and singing away to follow, the churches have emptied. Within the churches today were those who had them in twenty years 1970, They are now on their way to the seventy, but they are always there, to strum with chitarrine. He knows that I tell, maybe my language is vulgar and ask him for forgiveness, but don Camillo once were men with balls that inspired respect even those who did not believe. Today, many priests trendy they just want to take for a ride, especially by those who still believe, because a priest can forgive all, but it became a priest because it totally devoid of balls […]

Edoardo M. (Modena)

.

.

… the ways necessary polite and persuasive Don Camillo …

The young player Modena of which I quoted the first part of his letter, He was the inspiration for this new article in which, pulled to the edges of my garment, I return to face the problem of priest robe, although it is understood, as will be explained later, philosophically, theological, Mystical and moral. In this topic I have already addressed in a written published last year, placing in relation to the priests in the historic cradle of Christianity are camouflaged in civilian clothes, while Muslims flaunt all the marks of their tribal or religious affiliation, in a Europe now it becomes their former Christian easily conquered [see previous article WHO]. Spontaneous then the question arises: because you return to this topic? But most of all: How come, before more serious events, as the former Christian Europe to the total collapse, talk about "trifles" as the dress of the priest? Maybe so you do not run the risk of worrying about the daisies wilting from the heat produced by the fire, while the house completely enveloped in flames is burning? In an ecclesial situation like ours, that in many ways it has no historical precedents, there are perhaps far more serious things to think about? [see my previous article WHO]. An example of something far more serious is constituted by not a few priests that when they get to the altar show so clearly does not believe in what they do, after having forgotten that the day of their ordination as deacons received the Holy Gospel with these precise words:

.

"Receive the Gospel of Christ whose herald you have become: always believe what proclamations, teach what you have learned in faith, practice what you teach ".

.

then receiving priestly ordination, The priest knelt before the Bishop received the chalice and paten which contain the Body and Blood of Christ living God; and he received them with precise words that should be remembered for a lifetime. And if one day the priest was also affected by senile dementia or Alzheimer's disease, to the point of not even find the toilet door in the hallway of his house, anyhow, while not remembering his date of birth and your same name, however, remember these words:

.

"Receive the oblation of the holy people for the Eucharistic sacrifice. Understand what you will do, imitate what you celebrate. Conform your life to the mystery of the cross of Christ the Lord ".

.

… how we were: two farmers kneel to the pastor passageway to the Most Holy Eucharist to a sick

Faced with priests increasingly ill-formed, deformed or worse for years inside those devastating pretify to which now the seminaries have been reduced, is the case of open discourse on a seemingly marginal element as the dress of the priest, when many priests, celebrating the Eucharistic Sacrifice, demonstrate not believe that under the appearances of bread and wine, After transubstantiation [1], Christ the Lord is truly and really present, completely, in soul, body and divinity? And when referring to the Most Holy Eucharist, this kind of priests that we conventionally defined priests trendy, everything except speak of sacrifice alive and holy, that is their bad habit instead to call in various other manner: feast of love, joyful table, Dinner brothers, feast of joy ... in short,: Giovanni Calvino pure !

.

In fact ..., Christ gave, After giving us the mystery of His Body and His Blood [2], after sweating in Gethsemane [3], after being betrayed [4], then he abandoned by his disciples [5], unjustly prosecuted, insulted, whipped and crowned with thorns [6], eventually it came to Calvary with a heavy wood loaded on the shoulders singing one of those songs demenzial-pop that our poor ears must hear in many churches ...

.

"Unleash the joy, Today the feast is, dai, sing with us, the party here we are " [see WHO].

.

… how we were: a priest who takes the Most Holy Eucharist to a sick, accompanied by a child that precedes it carrying a lighted lamp el'acquasanta

... with the priest saved with the purple color of strong penitential time clapping his hands with beota air and that reassures all about the fact that he, the "feast of joy", what today it is no longer called the sacred liturgy and holy living memorial, much less Eucharistic Sacrifice, the center puts their own: four young nerds that if they were beautiful and stalwart not scatenerebbero joy dancing before the altar, but it would give the revelry in completely different places, for example dancing on cubes of discotheques.

And who thought that the center of the sacred liturgy, you culmen background of Christian life, Christ with the bloodless sacrifice of the cross that is renewed, wrong. And in addition to err it is old and anachronistic; and besides being old and anachronistic it is a "dull dogmatic", a "pre-Trent Council», a "haunted by the doctrine" …

.

It goes without saying that dogma e dogmatic They are not scurrilous profanity, although now reduced to such rank, because the dogma - starting with the Christological and Trinitarian dogmas -, are the columns that hold the implant of the faith and the whole of Revelation Mystery [7]. Trent term, o Council of Trent, now it used as the spoiled children used in Sessantotto the term "fascist" and "bourgeois", It is nothing untoward, because without the great Council of Trent, celebrated in a time of great crisis and moral decay and political and social Church, it would have been impossible even to imagine, five centuries later, the Second Vatican Council, preceded by short but equally great Vatican Council. Therefore, lifestyle and try to live their lives according to the Catholic doctrine and morals, It is not at all inconvenient, quite the opposite! It is the only system always known by which to live the Christian life that will lead us to the salvation of our souls, through forgiveness of our sins that preserves us from the fires of hell, bringing in all souls to heaven, especially those most in need of God's mercy, as he taught the Our Vergine Maria of Fatima to the shepherd children in a prayer atoning later became a prayer of the universal Church.

.

For years I have written about spiritual drifts, doctrinal and moral clergy, that if well analyzed would understand right away that in itself and by itself the Luciferian; because only the devil can bring souls consecrated to certain levels of human and moral degradation. All with a single result: give me a reason - place and given that on certain things and in certain of my analysis I have always wished and prayed to have entirely wrong -, They were in private a small army of bishops and cardinals, and a number of good priests unfortunately always lower, that in this debacle they continue to exist, although segregated rigor as plague victims in the most peripheral and marginal seats, so that with their being authentic models of faith and priestly virtues, do not disrupt the much larger number of bad priests, or priests who are real shame of the sacred priestly order, always placed penalty by their bishops in all the key posts in the diocese, starting with the largest and wealthiest parishes.

.

… a creativity totally different from that of the priests who improvise liturgies socks to the sound of bongo drums and dancing: American priest who established the portable confessional.

My analysis made in deference to the truth and straight on doctrinal bases, canonical and dogmatic sacramentarie, They never scratched these subjects? When I thundered that today's dogma crisis stems from a terrible moral crisis of clergy, because a moral crisis consequently generates a doctrinal crisis [see my previous article WHO], someone is probably ran for cover? My analyzes are written and published, surely I will do that in the future other, but omitting to practice, from now on, the road perhaps more effective: the irony, or if you prefer the so-called jack ass. Because some subjects, which they are insensitive to the truth of the Holy Catholic faith and morals in the same way that a surgeon is indifferent to human blood and scalpel cuts made on patients' meat, poorly tolerate being sfottuti; poorly tolerate that their malvezzi are turned into the subject of public mockery. Or to put it better with an example: If a tall one meter and sixty centimeters per hundred pounds of weight is believed to be a champion football ; if a girl one meter high and half poor on which are distributed ninety pounds of weight, He is so determined to get miniskirts and high heels because it is believed to be a supermodel, nothing worth getting them a deep psychological discourse aimed to recall the matter of objective fact, with related calls to the existential danger that entails for a man and for a woman the complete dissociation from reality, so that these people will step forward undeterred to feel more than ever: the first, a sample of football, the second one fotomodella. Otherwise, if one or the other, after showing in every way a determined refusal to face reality, They will instead be exposed to public ridicule, in one way or another they will be forced to understand. And all those who were convinced that even a woman can eighty, as a woman, participate in the contest Miss Italy, or that a ninety man suffering from rheumatoid arthritis can, for when man, participate in a race with show jumping, no longer believe in such "potential" tall tales, because the lack of logic will be clear and brought to light along with all its intrinsic element ridiculous.

.

During my happy and painful years of priestly ministry sacred I have repeatedly and unnecessarily called back - and God knows how sincere affection -, many brother priests to shy away sloppiness, to be treated in appearance and dignified in dress, because the outward appearance is not mere formality, but it reveals the inner aspect, the moral and spiritual sense of the person. A little’ such as facial expressions and eyes, which if properly observed reveal to the soul of the person. Or perhaps we forget that our soul is enclosed in a body that contains it and at the same time reveals it for what it really is?

.

… how we were: who has known priests in the youth of this genre, it always brings alive the memory and especially the model

Repeatedly, entering the summer in my cassock in some parish church, I happened to find myself before a brother with bermuda flowers, the t-shirt colorful flip flops and sandals; and at this sight I felt the spear of Longinus on the side of Christ. So I have not failed to take from this brother, explaining face to face how painful it was for me that spear. Faced with similar scenes and events, in practice it happened that the brother has variously derided me, combining its sloppiness and its lack of priestly decorum classic joke mocking: "Ah, I understand! You are one of those who has not heard about that in the Church there was a council '. At that point I said - wrongly -, that in truth, in the Church, of councils there were a total of twenty-one, and that from the fourth Lateran Council celebrated in 1215 until the four decades following the Second Vatican Council held between 1962 and the 1965, the Church and its Popes have in all ways emphasized the mandatory use apparel cassock, Recalling that the role of the priest's cassock and that in case of need, not common practice, It can be used clergyman. In vain I lost time to explain to many of these subjects the deeply spiritual and mystical element of the ecclesiastical, its being a sign of sobriety and moral detachment from the world, but especially testimony and necessary element of recognizability of the Priest. And while I was talking to the passion of faith and deep love I have for the Church of Christ and his ministers, they looked at me as you look at a poor demented, if anything, saying the end, as they say the crazy not to contradict them in vain ... "Okay ... okay, you are right!». All this with the tone of someone who agrees to a mentally ill that you have just broke my balls with his talk but you, person over the sanity, for this reason you do not want to irritate.

.

On this last line was written my sentence by clerics in shorts, Colorful shirt and flip flops sandals, because a priest can not dare, let alone write exegesis regarding the various breaking their priestly balls. And these clerical, be clear, are the modern whitewashed tombs "in full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness" [8], ready at any time, yesterday as today, to be vulgar to say that they were not. Vulgar, as well as aggressive in the language, it was Jesus Christ with some of his insulting expressions, enough to see each other again saddled with even the title of blasphemer. So vulgar is not a theologian steeped modernist heresy of the worst as Andrea Grillo, you can mock the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI and with him the holy man of God Cardinal Robert Sarah, after having already taken to teasing the Cardinal Carlo Caffarra and Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller. Vulgar is therefore not him, but I am if I dare say that these heretics in power, which on one side stick with arrogance the few good cardinal that there remain, and at the same time they remain in the chair in the pontifical universities to teach sacramental theology, I create such a light-balls that if they should put me into the water at the port of Ostia Antica would arrive in fifteen minutes in the port of Naples, where I was greeted with great fanfare by Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe, that would declare that my journey by sea carried out in record time for turning the balls as turbine propellers, a greater miracle of San Gennaro miracle [Andrea Grillo to see the last article of Giovanni Cavalcoli, WHO].

.

… how we were: City of Avezzano Abruzzo. A parish priest celebrates Mass in the open space of the church reduced to rubble after the bombings during World War II.

So I began to adopt another system, doing irritate many priests, several of which, as virgins vilified or as adolescents taken by the upheavals of the first menstruation, classes are by their bishops squawking like chickens referring excited that I would be vulgar and I dare even say bad words. Because, as I said earlier, the vernacular is me, guilty of calling great piece of shit a priest in slippers and shorts chatted inside the parish church with the faithful with their backs toward the Tabernacle. Vulgar, be clear, It is not this priest with his back to the tabernacle in slippers and short trousers that makes living in the presbytery, but I who called with a title that the poor did not deserve. And several of these poor people found themselves repeatedly in the face of a bishop, despite being one of the architects of the worst post-conciliar drifts, Bishops in its role has been forced, once seised to issue final judgment of condemnation toward me, not to process the request and to respond to the priest:

.

"Surely, the concentration of colorful language Tuscan-Roman is what it is! But, if he has mocked you because he found you in the parish church to speak to the faithful with their backs toward the Tabernacle, in shorts and slippers at the foot, a point at the bottom does not have them. Of course, as you say, a priest must not turn to another priest calling great piece of shit. But remember: that language as a longshoreman he used it because I found in the parish church in that state, if he had been kneeling with his breviary in his hand before the tabernacle, I doubt I would have called you great piece of shit, perhaps he would be kneeling to pray with you ".

.

The next day I will get a phone call from the bishop: I barely have time to respond "ready?»That he attacks me with exact words now mean as they are integrally:

.

"Senti un po ', great dickhead, how dare you, yesterday, to give the great piece of shit to a priest? Do you realize how much you asshole and vulgar? there, I called you for the joy of sending to hell I personally, and to tell you I have to be ashamed of your bad language, rather: thanks God if you do not suspend peep !».

.

After I sipped all that claptrap, I ask:

.

"Excellence, I understand all that he said, or I missed some passage between an aspiration and other?».

.

A quel point, the bishop, he laughs and says,:

.

"To be honest, I called you to tell you that you are on the side, But as long as you tell him around, because they see, the sloppiness of these priests I Have filled balls. However, if I dare to tell them anything, if they fail to devour then you just get me the hell. So you were right to tell him what he deserved, but unfortunately I can not tell you. He said that now to go see to do 'n ass, because I have to do, then I salute you, very great face of shit !».

.

… how we were: a Roman presbyter on a bridge over the Tiber. We are quite sure that young people, and threatens, They do not want them in this way?

I've never told anyone this pleasant conversation now a retired bishop, and now that I did I kept myself from also making a vague reference to people and places. From this vulgar subject I am but I can add another example, always linked to this bishop and what was at the time his diocese. Once he entered the dining room Episcopate, where a young priest of thirty, sitting with his legs on a chair, He was watching television. The Bishop will appeal to a young priest to information that remains sbracato the chair legs apart; and in that pose answers to the bishop who he is rather standing before him. After Bishop was left, I took the poor peasant, who also it had more than ten years of training in Blessed seminar, between minor and major seminar seminar, telling him amiably that when it enters the bishop remains seated, moreover legs apart, but we get up to his feet, He mentions the bowed his head and listen to what he says, responding to what he asks. Well, the first all hell broke loose against me for that totally private call, but he reportedly offended by the poor peasant, It was the vicar general everlastingly of that diocese, this indicated because it covers its role by three bishops who have succeeded in almost two decades at that venue (!?). But, like repeat, I am a vulgar priest. And because they are vulgar necessary I dare say even bad words, But always I kneel to kiss the hand especially to the worst bishops of this world, in the figures of which I shall never cease to see and venerate the mystery of Christ and the mystery of the Church. And if my father came out of the grave and suddenly I saw the front next to the bishop, First I would make tribute to Bishop, Then my father saluterei. But I, as they say certain priests trendy provincial when not know where to stick … "He can not understand, because he has not made the seminar, why he lives in a Church that has never existed ". Affirmation before which at the time I said: … Yes, blessing the grace of God I did not do Blessed seminar ! Also because the good Christian education and social family received from my parents and then cultivated by the santi vescovi and priests who later formed me to the priesthood, It would never be in any way even extirpated from most of satanic holy seminars of this world; from those many seminars where, also recently, They were discovered in the computer memories thousands and thousands of porn pics and gay porn movie. And to that end, please seek guidance to the Congregation for the Clergy and its efficient Prefect, Cardinal Beniamino Stella, canonically responsible for these seminars that nobody has yet decided to clean up, primarily by virtue of bad trainers that several of them have always relied. And if in these lines had given false and undocumented, so slanderous, that then the Prefect Eminence proceed with the due denials and related canonical penalties against me … I doubt - unfortunately! —, He raised a single sigh of what I said, if we consider that the cases with which the Holy See must struggle are more or less these … [open the attachment, WHO].

.

The thing that should worry today many bishops fugitives and omissions, is that the practice, These immense shame of the sacred priestly order, when they come to the pulpit to make the homily on the Gospel, repeated continuously: "As said Pope Francis ... as said Pope Francis ...". Taking the Holy Father not only of marginal discourses, or more or less happy beats or more or less appropriate, but above all, taking speeches dubious phrases drawn from interviews or reported by journalists, often far from Catholics and especially at all versed in our fundamental truths of faith. And I say that it should disturb the bishops because these same priests, Years ago, going up on the same pulpits, They are always very careful not to say: "As he wrote and said the Supreme Pontiff Giovanni Paolo II ... as he wrote and said the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI ...". E, mind you, not what these two Popes claimed Augusti in their talk of this and that the arm, to which both were not quite accustomed, but what they have written and said in important encyclicals and as many important acts of their supreme magisterium. For years, between the sacristies, the canonical and church halls, we heard and how, these priests changed today in large Phrasers of statements made entirely marginal and irrelevant by Pope Francis I, to quote the predecessors of the reigning Pontiff, but they cited them to say in a tone more or less rabid things like that:

.

"The" Polish "has made his new shot on family and sexual morality. But it is haunted! Have not you realize that the world has changed and that we need to meet the new needs of the people?».

.

And in their logic, they are right, because the theological principle that they now apply - the school of Cardinal Walter Kasper and the retinue of his - is in practice the following: “fottete, fottete so that God forgives all ".

.

Or:

.

"The" German Shepherd "made a pre-Tridentine speech on the" uniqueness of the Catholic Church ". What a shame! In one fell swoop has deleted Vatican Council II and ecumenism us back to the times when, the "old" Church, He claimed a monopoly of truth and salvation ".

.

… how we were: we are sure that young people, and threatens, They do not want them in this way?

And in their logic, Also they are right, because when we recite the profession of faith "I think the Church one, santa, catholic and apostolic ", this is not a fundamental truth and absolute, but only a saying that dates back to the times in which we were the sole agents obtuse. Indeed, Christ has not established on earth only one Church entrusted to Peter, but gave rise to a multiplicity of churches, including among many that the Catholic Church is waiting for the miracle required by practices established canonical order to proceed to the beatification of the Martin Lutero, unless the Cardinal Kasper does not intervene with a scholarly theological debate to argue that the real miracle of this heresiarch was his so-called "reform”, which has ... "anticipated and inspired the Second Vatican Council". He explains between the lines the Shepherd Waldensian Paolo Ricca directly from the columns of galantino official organ of the Italian Bishops' Conference, Future [cf. WHO], stating, by virtue of its subjective and wrong idea of ​​Vatican II, that with it he would "fall on charges of heresy 'within the Lutherans (!?). Well, I take this opportunity to inform the Reverend Pastor, He invited for years to teach courses in several of our pontifical universities, from Protestant St. Anselm Pontifical University, than for us, Lutheranism, It is always a dangerous heresy and Luther, pace of personal Congregation for the Causes of Saints established the his motu Cardinal Kasper, nor is it a simple and ordinary heretic, but it is a heretic. Besides the fact that, Lutheran doctrines, including teaching and transmitting the Reverend Pastor, They were yesterday and perhaps worse still a dangerous now concentrate of the worst heresies and deviations from the Apostolic Faith. If we consider that the original core Protestantism are in time multiplied heresies heresy, in this way we can reach the new heresies of third and fourth generation: Mormons Pentecostals. Not to mention the additional streams, for example, the Witnesses, that I am a prime example of a heresy heresy a heresy that arises always upstream from Protestantism, certainly not by a split from the Catholic nucleus or the nucleus of Orthodox Christians.

.

Now you understand well the true sense apparel with which I began this speech; but perhaps, people of faith and intelligent people, those with the grace of God Faith and Reason, have also realized that what really raunchy, and at the same time those who are my games rhetorical impact, structured both on the hyperbole is on what the Greeks called τόπος.

.

… an image of Saint Giovanni Bosco during the confessions of young people

The apparel loss which for years complaining unnecessarily, It is not the sale of the old cassock, but decided apparel inner rejection, of which the outer is only visible sign. In this paper, Seasoned with the rhetoric of science outlets ass e dizziness balls, I have joked, despite having given occasion to various heretics who demand not understand, to be able to stick to the fact that the undersigned pretaccio - that I boast of being -, says even swear words. Well yes, I say bad words more or less like saying the Word of God made man the Scribes and the Pharisees, just enough that certain exegetes of new theology the whole mercies and emotional little hearts irrational throbbing, They understood the severe extent and also very offensive to certain of its invective [9]. Ma, as known, Yesterday Pharisees and Sadducees, Today heretics and modernists flirting both with "Dear brothers Masons' [see WHO], are ready more than ever to avoid the scandalized midge the word colorful then swallow in one gulp the camel the terrible heresy [10]. Because the logic of clerical hypocrites of yesterday and today remains the same: deeply vulgar, is not that the Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi apron newspaper of Confindustria The sun 24 Ore directs a love letter to "Dear brothers Masons', Vulgar is me, that before a conceited Cardinal throwing the Holy Bride of Christ on the sidewalk like a whore by two lire, I could even react blurting: now stop, This "blind driving" [11] such is the Ravasi, we really broke my balls, at least to us who, thank God, we've got them!

.

Therefore, hyperbolic outlets ass Besides, I conclude by recalling that the dress, far from being a black rag that might in itself and by itself leave things as they are, It has a deep philosophical meaning, theological and mystical. The dress comes from the Latin word attitude, and is nothing but a translation of the greek term ἕξις [hexis]. In his deep philosophical meaning, dress means habit, and is a wholly erect habit on character [from greek ἔθος]; that new permanent and eternal character that we have marked us forever through the grace of the Sacrament of Holy Orders.

.

The dress is therefore a way of being [in greek ουτός ἐkείν] which manifests being and above all behave in a precise way, conform to what was and what is preached doctrinally and morally.

.

For Aristotle the dress It is "something similar to nature" [12], because through the practice of precise behavior it leads to highlight in us, through the natural characteristics that we possess in power, the changing characteristics in their clothes and constant, almost in a "second nature", that is an acquired nature [13], in our case through the sacramental grace that makes us priests forever after the order of Melchizedek [14].

.

… how we were: a group of priests

Think about it well: who is it, that between the late sixties and early eighties, on false pretexts modernity, Of abatement of distances and of divisions, but mostly based on the pretext of being and of being closer to the young, It destroyed the very concept, robe of the priest? But there is much worse: suffice to say that those who were so eager to strip the priests, They were the leaders of the radical left and the Masons. The Masons themselves that, in cahoots with the modernists, They planned in early twentieth century who had come to give Holy Communion to the faithful standing and holding. We ask: from what was dictated this interest, if not by a desire to attack the Church to the heart through the de-sanctification of the Holy Eucharist changed into a cross between a metaphor and a Social feast of joy ? But it is not appropriate to open a speech in the speech, therefore refer you to the Most Holy Eucharist when he expressed in his keynote Cardinal Robert Sarah [see articles, WHO] …

.

This article was inspired, as explained at the beginning, the letter addressed to me by a young Catholic Modena. Some people think that he is the only? I wrote days ago Melania, young Neapolitan mom 27 year old:

.

"Take away the guitars and bongos churches, put in line charismatics swinging and faint and Neocatechumenals dancing around the altars, filled the aisles with organ sounds and spread the classical liturgical songs, put back in the knee assemblies during Mass, place it at the center of the altar Christ crucified instead of the priest show-man, returned to speak in homilies of the mysteries of faith instead of social and ecological problems, because your mission is the salvation of souls, not the salvation of the animal species in danger of extinction. And you will see how quickly you return to have churches full of young '.

.

… to wear a cassock we were in a few: Don Matteo, but is an actor in a television series, along with a few other priests, who are not actors but real priests. Has anyone ever wondered why, filmmakers, in their fiction, priests that depict positive figures or even funny, They present them to the public more and rigor everyone with “old woman” speaker?

Is not it, but false, that young Catholics craved their priests in canvas trousers and sneakers; as it is not true that no child has ever longed to see his father move about the house among the guests dressed in a pair of underpants falling. It was the devastating psychologists e sociologists Seventies, grown Pane&Marx, who launched the pretext of liberation fashionable costumes and body, for the overthrow of the "bourgeois ideology", under which the parents had to flaunt nudity with their children and vice versa; they were to indicate how good and educational thing going together in the bathtub; they were to launch the "myth" of the "friend-accomplice Mom" ​​and "papà amicone '. It is however, Unfortunately, nobody takes care to go and see what were the subsequent outcomes of many of my peers in the mid seventies composed poignant in elementary schools supply telling her father and mother were their best friends. No one takes care to go and see what were the subsequent results of many of my peers teenagers, at the end of the seventies went clubbing together with their Moms-vamp in appearance of their friends and accomplices, that instead of making the mothers were the bricks, in all directions, reliable, and secure it with birth control pills and a box of condoms placed in a backpack of their small little dog in bloom, everything was in place, imparted sex education and sexual liberation perfectly processed …

.

… the author of this article with always wearing his “old rag anachronistic“

The same principle, iNo different but similar way, It has been applied as it is to the priests, the only difference being that they did not have to do with the father and mother, "my best friends", but with seminary rectors and bishops in the backpacks of these small heretics in bloom they put other kinds of birth control pills and boxes of condoms, Finally, to make totally barren seed of Christ, forget, except perhaps unaware, that God's grace perfects nature there, but it does not replace, and can not make the nature of the priest that there has never been and that therefore there can never be [15], even if the non-priest in soul and body was made years and years of Blessed seminar.

.

… the author of this article: "in summer, in areas where it is really hot, has always existed for priests an alternative to black robe, and the white robe, but certainly not the shorts on the presbytery of the church …»

I reiterate that these priests trendy, in some respects almost irredeemable and sunk in their airtight every action of God's grace, They should not be taken seriously or reprimanded; because they reproach it is useless. These priests trendy They are only taken for a ride. Trust a pretaccio saying bad words and follow my advice: to the cousin priest trendy which comes before you with jeans tight low-rise pants and with the horse in the new models is suspended from above, rimproveratelo not to get thrown to the winds his mystical attitude, ridendovi because that will react in the face and giving you the anachronistic. Or rather telling: "... but you do not know, that in the Church there was a council '? Then you close combat with this way: "Reverend, but what I wear trial was put? With the shooting ass undone by a widow who finds, this pant gives not just; but especially, for the lack of merchandise that she has between her legs, these pants with narrow suspension in high horse, It does not show what is, But just what is lacking in her dramatically, because grace perfects nature there, but it enhances certain that there is no. And she, Rev., for lack of grace He does not own the balls. there, in his place, since she does not have a physical swimmer, I would cover with a Roman toga ". And if anything,, this speech, or a different but similar speech, do not let it do by a man or men, but worse: let it do to women. There is not the worst thing for a man, more or less true, or even one man by birth and, to be told by women: «You have just the balls !»

.

Then these subjects s'they will piss off quite a lot of, because you put them in ridiculous. And maybe, in extremis, although it is not said, learn anything, thanks to a healthy and very charitable jack ass. Because today, before certain priests, on the one hand, we just have to cry, on the other hand, we just have to take the piss, because it raised the issue in these terms, the jack ass It will be the extreme act, most perfect and loving Christian charity, He says one sees it pretaccio scurrilous, He remains intimately too worried about not swallow camel heresy and widespread immorality, to heal the harmless midge a healthy swearword.

.

the Island of Patmos, 12 June 2017

.

.

PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN 2017: «A CHURCH FOR EMPTY EMPTY »

.

Venerable Brother Bishops and Priests,

definitely want a "empty church for empty»? Then seguitate to invite to speak in your diocese and your priests these churches social-ecologists, everyone justice-social e sociologisms the thirty-year and experienced fallimentarità, in glory accompanied by their retinue of hippies of the left radical chic. Without this, you will see how the churches will be emptied definitely young, to finally be "empty for empty ', since almost no one now thinks the ecology of souls to be redeemed and to be saved from pollution of sin, It is the most urgent and politically correct to fight pollution from air conditioners.

Amen!

.

__________________

NOTE

[1] The text reads fee: « If someone says, sacrosanto the sacrament of the Eucharist, the substance of bread and wine as the body and blood of Christ, and denieth that wonderful and singular conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the body and of the whole substance of the wine into the blood,, unchanged only the bread and wine;, How to change the Catholic Church most aptly calls Transubstantiation ». Trad. "As, then, Christ, our redeemer, He said that it was truly his body that gave under the species of bread (216), so it was always persuasive, in the church of God, – and now declares again this sacred council – that by the consecration of the bread and wine effects the change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ, our lord, and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This transformation, so, appropriately and right it is called the holy Catholic Church transubstantiation " [Council of Trent, Sex. XIII, 15 October 1551, cap. IX transustanziazione].

[2] CF. synoptic Gospels: Mt 26, 20-20; MC 14, 17-26; LC 22, 14-39. The Gospel of St. John: 13, 1-20.

[3] CF. LC 22, 39-46.

[4] CF. Mt 26, 36-46; MC 14, 32-42; LC 22, 39-46; GV 18,1.

[5] CF. Mt 26, 47-56.

[6] CF. GV 19, 1-16.

[7] CF. Council of Nicaea (325), Council of Constantinople (381), Council of Ephesus (431), Concilio of Chalcedon (451), Second Council of Costantinopoli (553), Third Council of Constantinople (680-681), Second Council of Nicaea (787).

[8] CF. Mt 23, 27.

[9] CF. Mt 23, 1-39.

[10] CF. Mt 23, 24.

[11] CF. supra.

[12] Aristotle, in Rhetoric I 11, 1370° 7-8

[13] Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics (II) 1, 1103a 20 – 1103b 25

[14] CF. EB 7,17.

[15] «Grace does not destroy nature, but finish, The natural system must be subordinated faith, As the natural bent swirling ministers to charity», San Tommaso Aquino: S. Th. I, q.1 a 8, ad 2. Trad. Grace does not replace nature that there is no, but perfects nature which subsists …

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

― We help the Holy Father with childlike clarity ―

NOTE ABOUT SOME clarifying AMBIGUOUS WORDS OF THE HOLY FATHER: MAN OF GOD NEED, BUT GOD HAS NO NEED OF MAN

.

We simply can not even suspect that the Holy Father has heard such things, although his way of expressing himself was not the happiest, and would have required, in our opinion, at least some clarification. Moreover, the Holy Father would not hurt to warn against the risk of an interpretation which leads to pantheism and to atheism, very widespread today.

.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli o.p. – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

If you were hungry, you would not say it [Shall 50,12]

Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? [Gb 38,4]

To whom did he consult, because I instruct? [Is 40,14]

.

.

Hearing of 7 June 2017 – to open the video click on the image

In the general audience of 7 June, the Holy Father pronounced the following words:

.

«[…] the gospel of Jesus Christ reveals to us that God can not be without us: He will never be a God "no man"; it is he who can not stay without us, and this is a great mystery! God can not be God without man: great mystery is this! And this certainty is the source of our hope, that we kept in all invocations Our father» [Official text WHO].

.

These words You could at first make us to mind the famous thesis of Hegel: "God without the world is not God". If it really was, it would be very serious statement, fraught with disastrous consequences on the theological and on the moral level, since it is clear that God is completely sufficient in Himself and can well exist without man. And indeed, They, there was already perfect, Blessed and completely alone and the Self, from eternity, before He created the world. He is supreme perfection, infinite and absolute. The Nothing can be added. Nothing Short of. The Nothing you can donate. What The gifts we give are the ones who gave us. Since nothing its essence can be completed, even the most sublime creatures. God is Absolutely Necessary, while the man is contingent creature. He is all for Himself; the creatures are nothing in themselves and, all that the creature is, it is from God.

.

He certainly is Love by essence, He gave his Son for our salvation, but always it remains that could have very well not to exercise this love to the world, Why, If she wanted to, It might not create it.

.

God created the world out of pure love and an act of perfectly free advice - utmost freedom ―, as the Vatican Council says, it created for pure and selfless love, without being absolutely necessitated by the structure of its essence, as well as instead they operate physical agents subhuman.

.

To think that God, to exist, needs the active contribution or ideal man, Why he can't do it alone, He leads man to believe they can be essential to God and to shape the essence of God, that God becomes an idol, "Work of human hands' [Shall 135, 15], product of human thought, come in idealism. Hence the temptation of believing man or a god to identify with God or take God. Or to put it in other words: if man were not there, God would not.

.

In the literature of spirituality of Ashkenazi Jews, some rabbanim [the LORD] They tell us that "God had such a need to be loved and honored, that at some point he decided to create man in his own image and likeness, so that man would love and honor him". It deals with, naturally, an expression of the whole poetic. Although as we know, in theology, and especially in the dogmatic theology, the poetic licenses, however beautiful, and sometimes also effective to make the idea, They may be non-hazardous infrequently, if not explained, but most if not explained well and as such, ie as poetic licenses.

.

Now, we can not even suspect that the Holy Father has heard such things, although his way of expressing himself was not the happiest, and would have required, in our opinion, at least some clarification. Moreover, the Holy Father, it would not hurt to warn against the risk of an interpretation which leads to pantheism and to atheism, Today both very popular.

.

The Holy Father's words They can then be understood in a mystical-affective-operational sense and also as referring to the mystery, in three ways:

.

first, in a mystical-affective sense: It is like the language of lovers, as when the lover says to his beloved "without you I can not stand '. Or as when one says all'altra or viceversa: "I adore you". Word that makes the idea of ​​what it means to expression of deep emotional level, but in theological language has a meaning and above all a "application" very precise, because only God can be the object of adoration, unless otherwise run the serious risk of falling in idolatry.

.

Second, in Christ God has in some way to be in need of man. It shows Christ who asks for a drink to the Samaritan [cf. GV 4, 1-26], and even more it shows its request for cooperation all’opera of salvation, although then our free response is a gift of his mercy.

.

Third, the words of the Holy Father must be understood as referring to the mystery of the Incarnation: God has united Himself in Christ forever to man, and nothing will ever separate this union. The union therefore of God with man in Christ, however, is a necessity in fact, not in law. If the concepissimo as a fusion of the two human and divine natures, we would fall in heresy Christological contrary to the dogma of the distinction of the two natures of the Council of Chalcedon.

.

This awareness, the Holy Father tells us, God in Christ it is forever linked to man, It is certain for us the source of great confidence in the Father, consolation and hope, which, however, must not exceed in a false certainty to save in each case and without conditions, canceling a holy fear of God, because it always remains in each of us the responsibility to pay or not to so much love, Why, if there sottraessimo with sin, the work of redemption would be of no use to us. Recall the famous words of St. Augustine: « He who created you without you, he doesn't save you without you ».

.

it gives The Island of Patmos, 8 June 2017

.

.

.

__________________________________________

Dear Readers,

.

announced after the brackets we will inform the 19 May [see note WHO], we went back to work on The Island of Patmos. During their stay at the Convent of Padre Giovanni Cavalcoli we recorded several video lessons currently being assembled, they will soon be published for all of you on our channel.

.

Fathers de The Island of Patmos at work during the video shooting carried out in the San Domenico Convent in Varazze (Savona)

.

.

.

.

.

FATHERS DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS THESE DAYS I AM TOGETHER WORKING FOR YOU. We resume PUBLICATIONS AT THE BEGINNING JUNE.

.

.

Author
George A.. Faccio Lince

.

.

Dear Readers,

Convent of San Domenico of Varazze (Savona)

Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo reach tomorrow with me the Father Giovanni Cavalcoli in her convent of Varazze, a beautiful resort located at the Cinque Terre in Liguria.

.

The Fathers of L'Island of Patmos, as well as talk about various publishing projects, a few days will work together for our Readers. They will in fact made of HD video footage of different theological lessons of Father Giovanni Cavalcoli, then we publish on Canal The Island of Patmos.

.

The Father Ariel and I then we will be traveling to different parts of Italy over the next ten days, Therefore, we caution you that we will take the publications at the beginning of June.

.

A prayer insured for all of our readers to the Blessed Vergine Maria of the Rosary.

.

.

NOTE OF 21 MAGGIO

Dear readers,

as you can see, Fathers de The Island of Patmos, They are already at work for you …

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

THE GAYSTAPO NOW IS LAUNCHED THE ATTACK OF THE PRIESTHOOD. WELL CONFIRMED: NEITHER ARE NOT VALID LEGITIMATE ORDERING PRIESTS OF PERSONS WITH HOMOSEXUAL TENDENCIES STRUCTURALLY ROOTED

.

You can not make peace in the consciousness merely public and severe proclamations, when in fact gay priests increased in proportion to the presence of bishops who reason with a latent homosexual psychology. Or to put it raw: some seminarians between the seventies and the eighties capeggiavano inside of the seminars Gay pious confraternity, Today they are bishops, and just become such, first they are surrounded by related parties, placed more and rigor in all the key posts in the diocese, traineeships. And these subjects, that protects and reproduce each other, they ended up creating a powerful lobby of power within the Church. The question which now arises concerns thus the validity of sacred ordination of subjects in whom appear increasingly absent the minimum requirements for the validity of the sacrament of Holy Orders, from the faith and the correct perception of the Catholic priesthood.

.

.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p. – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

It's been aberrant laws on marriage between same-sex couples, They have passed laws on adoption devilish data babies to gay and lesbian, which in many countries it is given chance to fabricate and buy creatures wombs for rent. All under the banner of “rights” and an unnamed “love“. Now, in the name of “rights” and such “love“, If the tip “right” the priesthood for gay people. At this rate, as the outlawing of that dangerous homophobe of the Blessed Apostolo Paolo and the deletion from the sacred texts of his words mixed with the supreme tenets of the LGBT lobby, especially where he warns: "Make no mistake: neither fornicators, born idolatry, nor adulterers, ne prostitutes, born sodomiti […] they will inherit the kingdom of God "? [The Cor 6, 9-10].

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos

.

.

… the priesthood is not a claimable right from LGBT groups

The Fathers ofPatmos Island They published in July 2016 Two short essays in the section Theologica, facing a complex and sensitive issue on the theological and legal: about the effective validity of the priestly ordinations of subjects lacking the correct perception of the Catholic priesthood and about the effective validity of the priestly ordinations of candidates for sacred orders with structurally rooted homosexual tendencies.

.

Not to mention the multiplication, not only in parishes, but even at the same seminar, Group Study and meeting place for gay Catholics. And these meetings - always to be honest and clear -, often they reduced to hard attacks to the Supreme Magisterium of the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II and Pope Benedict XVI Venerable, while the priest was foolish and improvident left by his bishop to sow the worst poisons, of calms their movements the gay audience and lesbians rincuorandoli: "Today, things have changed", because "the Church has come out of the dark and finally become welcoming and inclusive to everyone and everything". Including perhaps mortal sin?

.

… the priesthood is not a claimable right from LGBT groups

The now ubiquitous and powerful gay lobby, with a pompous language and infused with unacceptable mercies e of love, trying for some time to launch an attack at the heart of the Church: the legitimization of homosexual tendencies in relation to the sacred priesthood. And this to the point of anticipating “directives” in the form of “lovable proposals” the next Synod of Bishops which will take place on: "Young people, faith and vocational discernment " [see article WHO].

.

As sometimes it happens regarding certain burning issues, many of our readers have written to us to seek guidance. In all respond proposing two of our writings on this subject published ten months ago [cf. WHO, WHO], in which we believe we have analyzed the problem in all its serious depth …

.

To open items click below

.

07.07.2016 Ariel S. Levi Gualdo - DOUBTS ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF ORDERS OF HOMOSEXUAL PRIESTLY

.

07.07.2016 Giovanni Cavalcoli, OP — THE QUESTION OF THE VALIDITY OF PRIESTLY ORDINATIONS TODAY

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

THE POPE CLEMENT XV CORRECTING THE 'JOY OF LOVE"WITH HIS MOTU PROPRIO «When great sadness », CONFIRMING THE DISCIPLINE OF JOHN PAUL II IN THE MATTER OF DIVORCED REMARRIED

.

Apostolic Letter in the form of motu proprio
With great sadness

.

To Our Venerable Brethren the Patriarchs,
RECEIVE, ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS
And other Ordinaries
IN PEACE AND COMMUNION
With the Apostolic See:
THE PROBLEM OF ADMISSION TO THE DIVORCED EUCHARIST REMARRIED

.

PP CLEMENTE. XV

Bishop of the Catholic Church

Servant of the Servants of God

.

.

With great sadness but with great apostolic concern, Sum of Our Authority we state that the Apostolic Exhortation love joy It should be read and placed in a complex historical context of decay characterized by a profound loss doctrinal and pastoral, because if isolated from this humus, you will not understand nor his lexical style nor the laudable effort in its preparation. Of this document they remain unquestioned and the good intentions that have animated, all he aimed to address and resolve issues related to the family and marriage in relation to the many and varied contemporary societies of the world, that since the seventies of the twentieth century have gone to meet progressive disintegration, in a society that tends now to deny the eternal becoming, the immutable and absolute unbreakable. A serious problem, the latter, resulting from the loss of metaphysical language within the Holy Church of Christ, and especially in theological speculation and in the transmission of the truths of faith. The abandonment of this language, largely solidified and inherent to the mission and the very nature of the Church, has often been replaced with styles and forms of expression that idiomatic, on the doctrine of the Holy transmission plan, They have created problems and sometimes even disastrous consequences.

.

The power of the keys, the certainty and clarity

.

love joy is a long text dealing with a wide variety of topics mostly sociological, ending with be ambiguous in some important steps and we proved weak, why not always clear on some fundamental elements in which it is not wise or prudent to leave room for vagueness and the free interpretations of the individual Bishops' Conferences, individual priests or the various theological schools of thought, that need to be guided and directed with more clear and precise words. Indeed, Christ the Lord, giving the Blessed Apostolo Pietro the power of the keys [cf. Mt 16, 18-19], He commanded him to confirm his brothers in faith: «Simone, Simone, behold Satan has demanded to sift you like wheat; but I prayed for you, that thy faith fail not:; and you, turned again, confirm your brothers " [LC 22, 31-32]. This heavy-duty power service, by Blessed Apostolo Pietro was transmitted to all his successors, up to Us, we profess we devoted servant of the servants of God.

.

Our fundamental premise of the Petrine ministry is so sure, clarity and escape from any vagueness, as he remembered the Blessed Apostolo Paolo to the Blessed Apostle Peter during the reproach he moved to Antioch to the Head of the College of the Apostles, with all due respect to his undisputed authority [Gal 2,1-2.7-14].

.

The interpretations that can be derived from different pages of love joy They can be opposed and both consistent on the basis of what it can be deduced speculative and interpretative level, which leads us to reiterate that the doctrinal language must be clear, unique and not subject to conflicting interpretations, place that our speech should be "You, and, no, no» [cf. Mt 5, 37]. Therefore, before any question of moral doctrine, it is not contemplated that any suggestion that the answer could be "yes", but also wanting to "no", if anything, a bit '' yes 'and a little' 'no'.

.

As the Supreme Guardian of the deposit of faith is upon us an obligation and duty to ensure that the sull'ovile Divine Shepherd has entrusted us, preventing the small seed but dangerous ambiguity, shoots up to undermine and circumvent the doctrine of the Holy Church of Christ through pastoral practice, why allow such germination does not amount to meet the modern needs of today's society, but disregard a rule laid down by the Word of God concerning sacramental marriage: "For what man does not separate what God has joined" [Mt 19,3-12].

.

The man is conformed to Christ, and Christ is not conformed to man.

.

This is why we reiterate that it is the Holy Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God made man, died, resurrected and ascended to heaven, He must transform man and human societies; He is the man who must conform to Christ, It can not be the man to transform the Holy Gospel nor can they be human societies to bring Christ to their needs of the moment. The commands given by Christ the Lord are immutable and eternal and can be neither dismissed nor evaded through ambivalent words from which to draw legitimacy for new pastoral practices related to the administration of the Holy Eucharist, which it is the center and summit of the Church's unity. Therefore, the right medicine and the right encouragement for those who have failed to commitments through the sacrament of marriage and living a new union outside the sacramental sphere, It may not be the Eucharist, well because others are appropriate medicines to be administered, from the reception of such children Our, to follow with their prompt and careful spiritual care.

.

The no Eucharist to divorced and remarried is an ecclesiastical discipline, not a dogmatic truth.

.

The prudent choice not to grant the Most Holy Eucharist to divorced and remarried is not a dogmatic element of the Catholic faith, but a discipline rules adopted by the Magisterium of the Church in fidelity to the moral taught and transmitted by the Holy Catholic tradition. So, for the power conferred to us by Christ the Lord, of Our authorities we could amend that legislation governing, but we do not intend to reform neither direct nor leaving creative autonomy the particular Churches and some national episcopates, because from what life would take a new pastoral practice in so-called non-homogeneous diffuse patchy, while the Church disciplines are unique and universal, as is his pastoral mission.

.

The decision not to grant the Most Holy Eucharist to divorced and remarried, and especially today in this history when marriage is weakened, It is also based on the conservative belief that this concession would end up further weaken the sacramental institution of marriage and the inescapable foundation and not be reformed its indissolubility [cf. Mt 19,3-12].

.

This is what we fear, and that clearly express to Our Brother Bishops: founded fear that through the Holy Eucharist can end up making even weaker than it already is, unfortunately, the indissolubility of the foundation of the sacrament of marriage to which, Unfortunately, nowadays no longer believe even many of our Catholic faithful. In this case, the Holy Eucharist would become more to that for which it was established, ceasing to be the heart of the communion and unity of the Church through the sacramental grace. And it must remember here that the sacraments are not a right or have acquired, but a free act of divine grace, that touches us and fills us with goods "not because of our merits but for the richness of Your forgiveness" [cf. S. Mass, Can. Rom.].

.

Never bothering to please the world: the discipline of “Family member company”.

.

Therefore, the total negligence of internal and public critical failures that could fall on Us, Mindful that the Roman Pontiff must aim to please Christ the Lord in doing His will, sanctifying himself and with his sanctifying the task of teaching and his works the believers of Christ; also mindful that we can not cure us of pleasure in the world, pleasing that we might run the risk of conducting blind guides as many members of the flock entrusted to us to fall into the ditch [cf. Mt 15,14], Our Brother Bishops to reaffirm that with regard to the pastoral care of divorced and remarried Catholics should be applied with care and zeal as indicated by our Holy Predecessor Giovanni Paolo II in his Apostolic Exhortation Family member company, with particular reference to the n. 84, reaffirming the non-permissibility, hence the impossibility of their access to the Holy Eucharist, both for reasons linked to pastoral prudence, both linked to the wise institute protection of sacramental marriage, already far too hard hit and debased in the last decades of the history of mankind.

.

The Bishops diligent care to always be loving and welcoming toward these Our faithful who are divorced and remarried for their irregular situations need to be made to feel even more vibrant part of the Holy Church, mindful that Christ did not fail to remind us: «It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. Go and learn what this means: I desire mercy, not sacrifice. For I came not to call the righteous, but sinners " [cf. Mt 9,13]. Nowhere in the Holy Gospel and at any time of His preaching, the Incarnate Word of God has ever said that to be welcoming and merciful to accomodate and legitimize the moral disorder, or that you have to be afraid to call and to indicate the moral disorder as such, moving on false pretexts of mercy and false acceptance. Our task is to accept and carry out the sinners from their sins, treating them in this way by the disease of sin; and a prerequisite for the remission of sins is the genuine repentance combined with the sincere intention and commitment not to fall into sin.

.

It promises the unfeasible and impractical to obtain a purpose.

.

To accept and treat, for pastors in the care of souls, however, it is very difficult to do and to practice, while it would be a lot easier to look for a solution to certain problems linked to the so-called irregular pairs granting them access to the Holy Eucharist, then declaring the non-existence of the serious problem constituted by the rupture of sacramental communion.

.

It has also advocated an "accompaniment" journey of these pairs of divorced and remarried, however, replacing the concept of spiritual direction with an unspecified "spiritual accompaniment". And here it would be good to note that "direct" and "accompanying" are not two simple ways to express the same thing, but to say and express two different things. It was then later clarified that this "accompaniment" was to "Custom" and as such need to be evaluated case by case, according to the needs of the single divorced and remarried couple. A perspective, this, before which it must first be a strong reminder to realism: the number of pairs of divorced and remarried is progressively increasing and the local Bishops Conferences come worrying statistical data which relate that in some regions of the world marriages that end with civil divorce are superior in percentage 50% of religious marriages celebrated. To these numbers it should be related then of necessity the current situation of the Catholic clergy. It is a fact that few bishops of the world during their visits at the threshold of the Apostles refer to the Roman Pontiff that the number of deceased priests is a lot higher than that of new priests ordained and that the average age of the clergy, in not a few dioceses, it is now also attested above seventy years of age. In Italy itself, ancient historic cradle of Catholicism and in whose territory is located two millennia Our Apostolic, the late nineteenth century, there were about eighty thousand priests for a population of about twenty-nine million inhabitants. At a distance of barely a century, at the end of the twentieth century, the priests present at the dawn of the new millennium were about thirty thousand for a population of around sixty million inhabitants. Today, in many dioceses of this country, There are eighty priests who celebrate Mass on Sunday in three different parishes, all now without a priest, while the age of priests is always higher and more numerous deaths of new ordinations. In many regions of the world there are priests who prior pardon of their Diocesan Ordinary celebrate at parties and days of obligation are seven, eight Masses a day. In many other regions of the Orbe catholica it is now impossible to guarantee in many communities even Mass on Sunday, because there is only one itinerant priest in charge of going in different pastoral areas now devoid of a priestly fixture, at which you can go only once a month, and only for the celebration of Holy Mass. In these cases, often, it is even impossible to administer the sacramental confessions of the individual faithful gathered in large numbers to the monthly celebration of Holy Mass, and the priest is thus forced to give general absolution for the purpose of the faithful to go to confession as soon as possible for them.

.

Illustrated as real and given that it is not our intention to establish the intentions of others processes, we must seriously ask ourselves: what is the relationship with the ecclesial reality, ecclesiastical and pastoral of those that in a situation such as the one above-illustrated, It even despite hypothesis and proposed that "accompanying", whereby follow with care every single couple in a long way "custom" of discernment and growth? Because the reality until summarized here could also lead to raise a serious and objective question: those who put forward proposals in itself is not likely to be realized and equally not possible to go, perhaps they do just to get the goal they have set, inwardly aware that no "accompanying", whereby follow with care every single couple in a long way "custom" of discernment and growth, It may even be minimally realized, in today's world in general, but particularly in those many of the world where the average statistics indicate the presence of a priest every 18.000/ 22.000 baptized? Or maybe put forward proposals in itself is not likely to be realized, and equally not possible to go, because totally it divorced from real and concrete ecclesial and pastoral reality?

.

Certainty of punishment for offenders.

.

We conclude that a given arrangement may produce its effects, if it not accompanied by adequate punishment for offenders. Therefore we determine that the diocesan bishops, which does not adhere to the norms dictated by Us, They are deprived of his episcopal chairs. The Presbyters, which preach and implement different disciplines, they are suspended for a period not less than one year from the exercise of the sacred priesthood. I theology, which in ecclesiastical universities, in theological training centers and houses of formation for priests, religious and laity, They teach a different doctrine than that which We confirmed, they are deprived of their license to teach Catholic theology. If this is not done in case of need, then the competent Ecclesiastical Authority will have to answer before God for having failed to apply a provision on the protection of the Catholic doctrine of the souls entrusted by God the Father to the care of the Holy Church of Christ, because "to whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " [LC 12, 48]. And every time that we all do the penitential rite, we ask God for forgiveness for having sinned not only in thoughts, in word and deed, but also omissions.

.

.

Given in Rome, at St. Peter's, the 13 May 2027, the 110th anniversary of the apparitions of Our Vergine Maria of Fatima, the first of Our Pontificate.

.

PDF Apostolic Letter print format

.

_____________________________________

.

.

The author of the text of the pseudo Clemente XV And, obviously, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. However, Who else could be? After it self-appointed Titular Bishop of Laodicea in the past Combusta via telecommunications lines, Now self-candidate with a chance at the next conclave, animated by the certainty that, worse than what has been done in recent years on the doctrinal and pastoral plan, It will be very difficult to pass, although it is customary to say that the worst, Unfortunately, there is no end.

.

From the island of Patmos, 1° May 2017 – Feast of St. Joseph the Worker

.

.

.

.

.

.

.