Quake as a "punishment from God for civil unions"? John responds Cavalcoli: "I have been misunderstood or perhaps I expressed myself badly". Ariel S. Levi Gualdo wrote to the Cardinals Pietro Parolin and Gehrard Muller: "Show us the face of God's Mercy, not the false man mercy, that it is not interested "
– Theologica –
EARTHQUAKE AS "PUNISHMENT OF GOD?”. JOHN Cavalcoli RESPONDS: "I was misunderstood OR MAYBE I HAVE EXPRESS MALE '. ARIEL S. LEVI of GUALDO WRITES TO CARDINALS AND PETER PAROLIN GERHALD MÜLLER: "Show us THE FACE OF GOD'S MERCY, NOT FAKE THE MERCY OF MAN, THAT it is not interested "
.
The statement made by S.It is. Mons. Angelo Dirt, Substitute of the Secretariat of State of His Holiness, we first of all reveals how far away are the days when, in that same State Secretariat, They are moving the giants of faith and Catholic doctrine as Rafael Merry del Val, faithful servant of the Holy Pontiff Pius X, which by the way of the modernists and their pernicious heresies, He accused how these vipers were skillful "in speaking, writing and preaching a charity without faith, very tender for the unbelievers, which opens to all, unfortunately, the way to eternal ruin ". Today, the modernists, after their blow inside the church, censor and persecute the few Orthodox priests and theologians who survived.
.
.
Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
.
"I have been misunderstood or perhaps I expressed myself badly. I was not referring to the law in the strict sense on "civil unions", but to some vices and sinful conduct and unruly as sodomy. God sends the punishment to the one who sins realizing what he does, knowing that deliberately goes against the law of God "
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON
.
Audio full transcript WHO
.
.
Eminence Cardinal
PIETRO PAROLIN
Secretary of State of His Holiness
.
Eminence Cardinal
GERHARD LUDWIG MULLER
Prefect of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith
.
Rev.mo the father
Fr. BRUNO CADORÈ, ON
Master General of the Order of Preachers
.
.
.
.
Dear Readers,
John Cavalcoli in the choir of his monastery
The Island of Patmos He certainly could not just leave her in the storm founding father John Cavalcoli ON.
.
Father John was accused to argue that "the earthquake was a punishment for civil unions". This is false, because the Dominican theologian did not speak at all of "civil unions", but only of "sodomy", hinting at the famous Sodom punishment. It is entirely different things. Sodomy is a moral category of Scripture. "Civil Union" is a civil law, made for non-Catholics, which may also be in good faith. Now God punishes only those who sin to sin knowing.
.
You can read and spread the letter-report I addressed publicly to the Secretary of State of His Holiness, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, to the Master General of the Order of Preachers, our Island of Patmos, site of the last revelation, where the Blessed Apostle John wrote the Book of Revelation.
.
I thank the readers who sent hundreds of emails of solidarity and moral support to the Dominican theologian, we are trying to answer all these days.
.
the pontifical academic John Cavalcoli during a conference
By messages that have come, we realized how much the feeling of God's People, his feelings and instances, little or no interest to the clergy increasingly mondanizzati, who are interested however the feeling of our worst enemies ever, those who today pretend to be friends of the Church. And as soon as these clothes wolves from lambs utter only half a sigh, shoot a ecclesiastical race in the unseemly rush to their feet with ashes on his head.
.
Remember, People of God, you, for the “church” from the mercy without justice and for the “church” from the Love without truth, nothing accounts. Know though, beloved people to whom we have consecrated the Sacred Order of Priests life in the Church of Christ, that you will always be, sino alla Russia, that divine set of living members of the most holy Body of which Christ is the head [cf. With the 1,18].
.
And for a lifetime we will serve for Christ, with Christ and in Christ, at any price, for the salvation of believers of Christ and for the salvation of our souls of believers.
.
.
To open and read the text in defense of John Cavalcoli ON, written by Ariel S. Levi Gualdo for the competent Ecclesiastical Authority and Religious, click
.
.
.
.
.
.
I saw around the web a lot of mud thrown at Father Cavalcoli: this causes me a lot of indignation.
I don't judge who did it but the gesture: to smear so gratuitously is diabolical!
I remember you in my prayers.
In this reference to the Pauline passage on “hearty food” I think I've found one of the keys (not the only, nor the most important) of this story. Now certain terms may be used only as a harmless ornaments harmless liturgical chants pending update. I realized trying to argue here and there on the web of falsehoods sea that has invested p. Horses. You can use all the pedagogical tact as you want, but also for the reader of Christian Family may become a fanatic Pharisee (ie for Vendeen a revolutionary party of mercy). After a moment of bewilderment and indignation, I have to say, But, It had begun to feel a sense of relief, as though drafts of fresh breeze had entered into a place unbreathable, or as if a small knife he had begun to affect a painful abscess. Providence often acts in a very discreet way, even when he begins to move mountains.
More than anything there it smells Masonic retaliation: since the island has proposed numerous articles against the homosexual lobby (in the Church), here is that one of the Fathers is sued by LGBT groups.
… more than anything else, I just want to see what the magistrate of the Italian Republic, We'll discuss the strictly theological matters, or related to Catholic morality; and I want to see what Italian legislature, censurerà St. Paul and with appropriate law will declare it unlawful and forbidden reading in public churches …
While our blog republished at the request of this online publication this wonderful article by Don Ariel, we came to know of the complaint lodged by an association LGBTISX against Father Cavalcoli. We embrace you with a prayer in my heart: what a god, with us as instruments, learn to turn this evil into good! Already I smile at the idea that a judge will be called to account against a theological problem that so far has ignored the existence, as well as tasteful laugh to think of arrows that almost surely Don Ariel hurl in court against these associations evidently longer trust strillati headlines that the true words from which everything was born.
But in the midst of the storm, there's not us, then I stop laughing, because no matter how ridiculous the dictatorship of the single thought is still fearful. And it fell in the war.
While Chesterton's prophecy is getting closer…
https://pellegrininellaverita.com/2016/11/08/in-gioco-ce-lintegrita-della-fede-isola-di-patmos-chiama-croce-via-risponde/
In the theological aspects of the question raised by Cavalcoli Father statements I will not go. And because I really know little of theology, and because I believe that after all this theology has nothing to do at all. So let outstanding stock of the theological correctness of what he would have said the Dominican (I do not determine what were precisely his statements), rather, to simplify and better argue, I admit well (without grant, because I do not intend going into) that Father Cavalcoli is wrong.
there, Also it was so, my overall opinion would not change: I would estimate unfair behavior of Church leaders. Yup, because the Church reproaches and even censor, excommunicate, drive out from its ranks those who express heterodox opinions, I think natural (moreover all and not only the Catholic Church act like that ... or do you believe that there remain lascerebebro, eg, within SEL, PD, Radical Party, Juventus, AC Milan, Fiat etc.. etc.. if you endured sharply opposing positions to the party line or the company in question? Cases of purges "secular" are infinite ...), rather, I would find the positive thing, sign of courage, logical and firm will to enforce its principles and values.
But then when I reflect on the fact that for decades the Church is giving space inside unflinchingly (between academic chairs, signatures on its media, authors in its publishing houses, priests protesters and cortilate of various kind ...) to the best of heresy, l'eterodossia, atheism, secularism, anticlericalism and even open anti-Catholicism produce ... or when I think of his incessant activity of "bridge-builder" ... one way (ie on which the kneeling Catholics go to others making countless concessions and never vice versa) to approach representatives of all sorts of religions (that is, to people who have opinions about God definitely much less falling in the Catholic doctrine of those who would have been able to express his father Cavalcoli)well ..., I have the absolute certainty that what theology (was also an abstruse and renewed Catholic theology) is just an excuse.
In short: the question is not at all theological doctrine but essentially ideological. Nor it founded on an ideology developed by the Church itself, but the perennial and moldy secularist ideology "Jacobin" (in its most recent version) in front of which (a little 'fear, ma, especially since much of the hierarchy has adopted) the Church has now kneeling.
There is no longer a Holy Office which reacts independently and directly to suppress any deviation, every heresy, any impropriety ... Nowadays, Vatican are dumb and silent, always, everything (including the most ferocious and terrible) It is done or said against the faith and the faithful, except that the "Revolutionary Court" permanent controlling and monitoring - more than we want to admit it or than we can notice it - our lives (creating the single constant fear of being singled out as reprobate, left to feed to the public as the enemy of the people, the progressive, common sense, accused of bigotry, racism, obscurantism, fascism, homophobia etc.. etc .. and as such condemned social ostracism ... that does not mean just general condemnation - which is already tremendous penalty - but, concretely, the risk of losing their jobs, undergoing court sentences, losing rights etc.. etc.), triggers the alarm. Then, just so many guardians of the revolution (Republic, Rai 3, Rai2, Rai 1, La7, The Courier, The fact, The Print, radio Radicale, The ANPI, UN, l'UE, Emergency, Amnesty International, Trade Unions, Universities ... and gradually the infinite number of control centers, production and dissemination of the Jacobin verb) begin to growl, the gelatinous ecclesiastical Galaxy, awakens and, tremebonda and genuflessa (when not as bavosamente snarly), It is queued and condemns and punishes itself.
Because let's face it, real or unless it is heresy contained in the words of the Dominican Father, if they had not bothered the "Public Health Committee" - that is, they had not contravened any of the secular dogma - like that of "love is love", that of the universal gooders, god natured and helpless, but even more, in the specific case, that of holiness of homosexual relationships ..., (I bet, indeed, that if the religion had said the quake was punishment sent by God to the imperfect reception of migrants ... nobody would have no objection) the Vatican never would have dared to condemn his own free; he would quietly pocketed or even enhanced as it has had to make do with words and deeds (yes certainly those terrible and anti-Catholic) Fo, Pannella, Bonino's, Don Gallo ... or as he did recently with those of Luther, how will a few days meeting with leoncavallini worldwide!
In short, if we are still discussing the matter discuss it, but never mind theology ... not scomodiamo the Bible, the Gospels, do not let us to learn Sanskrit or ancient Hebrew ... with the new church all these things have nothing to do.
[ adapted from: http://www.arbitercohortis.eu/2016/11/06/p-cavalcoli-e-il-tribunale-rivoluzionario/ ]
I admit that my trust in Father John Cavalcoli prompted me to defend him in the last days even though I had not heard his incriminating statements. This was possible because, obviously, even those who judged him did not know his words. But now that I have read I am really upset by the reactions, by excessive measures and especially from the statements of those prelates you mentioned! Also upset that the transmission of Radio Maria has been suspended, because what he said Cavalcoli father not only did not feel the scandalous, But even cautious! Prudence which was absolutely not taken into account by those who should be above all an example of virtues, especially when the stakes are the honor and dignity of a man. I'm really shocked by this hypocrisy that really is nothing more than an act of flattery towards the world in defiance of what is Christian.
I renew my closeness to you all hoping that those responsible know backtrack.
Mattia.
Thank you, simply because, this is what a man of God!
Hector