- And now I'll explain why journalists' onanist narcissism is causing more victims than the war in Ukraine to the point of generating greater destruction - 7 May 2022
- The Russian-Ukrainian conflict. A people can be deluded by an influencer and ask Europe to participate in a suicide? - 21 April 2022
- Aristophanes, this great unknown. The Russian-Ukrainian war and the cartoonist Vauro accused of anti-Semitism between politically correct and limitations on the right to satire - 14 April 2022
NUNZIO GALANTINO IS THE PARADIGM OF AN EPISCOPATE ON THE BRIDGE OF THE TITANIC’ICEBERG
Bringing characters such as Nunzio Galantino to the episcopate, entrust their particular churches and then name them in such delicate roles at the top of the Italian Episcopal Conference, is equivalent to continuing undeterred to dance to the notes of the orchestra in the party room of the Titanic which is sinking after hitting theiceberg.
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
The lack of prudence manifested several times by the Secretary General of the Italian Episcopal Conference H.E. Mons. Nunzio Galantino leads to that lack of touch typical of persons instead of practicing the roads of the social doctrine of the Church — that part in 1891 from the magisterium of the Supreme Pontiff Leo XIII through the Encyclical Of the new things [cf. WHO] and culminates in 1991 with the Centennial year [cf. WHO] of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II - can lead on the way of those theologians from which it finally sinks into the smoke of the political sociologisms, stimmatizzati repeatedly with theological rigor among the columns of our Telematics Journal.
An erroneous theological thought that of Bishop G, in which Christ – in fact – is not start, the Center and the top end of our entire eschatological humanism [cf. Lord Jesus, WHO], but an accessory; of undoubted importance, of fundamental importance, but some accessory. And on the latter's theme Christ accessory will publish soon a special and specific theological analysis.
Nell’Patmos Island you do theology and at the right time is our imperative of conscience say objectively what is Orthodox and what is objectively unorthodox in the light of revealed truth of the Incarnate Word and the Church's Magisterium. Even before the most stubborn error we ever hit people who should always be our respect, starting first Ecclesistiche authorities. Hit though misconceptions, and in particular those carried out so very dangerous by certain Church authorities, It is a duty to which we cannot and must not shirk, why defend truth from error is the Foundation of Christian charity, based on truth, not on doing good aerostato. Our pastoral and theological task is then explain and disseminate the revealed truth of the Incarnate Word and the Magisterium of the Church. For the rest there is a wide range of Catholic journals who rejoice in shooting the ladle in the cauldron of politics; which is, however, completely legitimate, because Catholics are an integral and living part of the life of this country, as well as its citizens with the right to vote, as I recently pointed out by analyzing the inappropriate television appearances of s. and. Mons. Domenico Sigalini Bishop of the Suburbicarian Diocese of Palestrina [cf. WHO].
No "Galantino" of the modern episcopate ― or rather wire-modernist "grew up in the 1970s to the cry of" more collegiality, more dialogue, more democracy in the Church ", can therefore inhibit priests and theologians in the exercise of the freedom of God's children and the subsequent exercise of critical sense in the context of theological speculation. Exactly what the Code of Canon Law has always allowed ministers of the sacred and to the living members of the People of God. The canon 212 he asks in fact, one part, the obedience of the faithful to the Pastors, on the other, recognizes their right to express reservations on what concerns the good of the Church ". Based in monte on a fact documented: in Antioch the Apostle Paul makes severe criticisms of the Apostle Peter on issues of a pastoral nature [Gal 2,11]. Today, unfortunately,, in the modern Antakya, Peter errors could be even more serious as proportionate to very sad times and a Western society to complete collapse, but unfortunately it seems that there is not even a shadow of a Paul in whole Apostolic College.
Ignore these assumptions may result in the fall in two different errors: idolatry revolt with pandering to powerful spirit supine on the crest of a wave; the rebellion against the authority of the Church of Christ on the other hand. In both cases, at the base of it all is the immaturity of the faith, but above all trying to remove speculative minds the freedom of God's children, in the name of the post-council spot: «More collegiality, more dialogue, more democracy in the Church ", which ended up bringing to power the worst dictators, exactly who in the late 1960s and 1970s the concept of the authority have destroyed. As always though dictators known do not admit never sane discussions, Why don't you compare and do not accept the public debate, they are self-referential and destructive to any opinion other than their own; and from the ashes of the authorities themselves had destroyed their own authoritarianism based on their wild and Moody will.
The criticism, with the most devout grace of chance it can also be lawfully addressed to the Roman Pontiff, When he does not express itself in matters of doctrine as one who, «again», is called to the divine mandate to "strengthen his brethren in faith» [cf. LC 22, 31-34]. Imagine for this if it is not legitimate to criticize the nebulae political sociologisms theological and pastoral pseudo pseudo Bishop Nunzio Galantino.
If for some, to Galantino it is a political problem, for us it is therefore a theological problem connected to a drama that is reviling the Church: the wrong people put to do damage in the most delicate places. We are undoubtedly the first to recognize that never before have relations between the Government of the Italian Republic and the Holy See been so tense as today, with notable peaks of embarrassment on both sides, just for the shoot of the Bishop improvvide verbal Nunzio Galantino [cf. WHO]. Indeed, us cattolici italiani, we owe undoubted gratitude to all successive governments since the war, including socialist governments and later governments formed by members of the post-communist liberal left; because everyone has always had a great eye for the Italian Catholic Church, This thing that should not be forgotten and if necessary also explained to the Secretary General of the CEI. Unless he wants to spit on the plate where the Italian episcopate “it eats” roughly over 1.5 billion euros per year from the revenue of the Eight per thousand. And with this money is kept too many useless parasites with salaries from civil servants in the central offices of the CEI, most of which have the sole merit of being relatives, grandchildren or friends of friends of some monsignorotto, among other things, not always heterosexual, given the widespread homosexualism that sometimes seems to reign in Church, with all the well-known and obvious consequences. This is to say that before you point the finger on’adolescent acne politicians should think about ours ancient crusts from lepers, in this species the liturgical year in which, during the sacred liturgy, you are reading the Gospel of Matthew where Jesus thunders fiery words against the hypocrites [cf. Mt 6,1-6.16-18; Mt 7,1-28]. Now, the BAM is verbal Galantino misplaced, It is common ground, but I repeat: the problem for us is not political but theological, upstream of a wrong and demagogic-populist pastoral care. And again, that the issue is theological because from pseudo-Galantino theology understand all his improvvidi political attacks masquerading behind pastoral pretexts do not stand and that they are not standing, except in the light of the recklessness and in some respects even the subtle lack of true Christian charity, which first of all requires wisdom.
To understand where the proceeds speak nebulous Galantino you have to go to the roots of his philosophical and theological formation, first place – despite the "sacred titles ”Achieved - philosophically speaking it is almost non-existent. The second is confusing, as we will explain in detail in brief. If there were sufficient titles in perfect rule issued by ecclesiastical or civil institutions to be authentic speculative minds, of philosophers or theologians, or the natural candidates for the episcopate, in this case, the world would be so much full of doctors of the Church would have serious difficulties in placing them somehow in life and then below the roll of dead Saints.
If G is philosopher before a metaphysical philosopher, would not know even where to start the talk and perhaps seek to escape the pens touring words on ... dialectical synthesis of ideological alternation according to the paradigm of thinking platform thought so unthinkable within a nucleus para-logical and rational fiction but partly objective according to the parameters of socio-political contexts of Dietrich Bonhöffer ... because this is in fact the post sixtyeight Galantino, a sort of socio-political scientist who in the 1970s he graduated in philosophy at the University of Bari civil with a thesis on Bonhöffer anthropology as a premise to its political commitment.
From bad to worse his theological studies, through which he received all those "Most Holy cards"under which too many think that this is enough to be dogmatic theologians outside of any possible discussion. Galantino in fact obtained a specialist license in dogmatic theology at one of the various disastrous theological studies of the post-'68, that of Southern Italy, known as one of the worst in our country, Since it was sent to teach at the level of the Jesuits who were embarrassing even theological the Pontifical Gregorian University in the 1970s, which is all to say. If in fact in Rome, for the presence of the Apostolic See, at the time there was at least a weak attempt to control the pontifical universities and professorships, peripheral theological studies, starting from Naples, they were instead forge and uncontrolled spread of the worst polo heretical thoughts. A bit like the Camorra, which plays and exercises its shady dealings in areas of the province of Caserta and surroundings, avoid giving too much in the eye in the central areas of Naples on which law enforcement agencies seek to exercise any control.
As thesis studio Galantino presents a perfect duplicate of his philosophical thesis: Bonhöffer between theology and political commitment. And here it would be interesting to subject Galantino to a debate with real dogmatic theologians to ascertain what it is, but above all how deep is his knowledge of the complex and intricate history of dogma, starting from the early councils of the Church, but above all when his knowledge of those Doctors of the Church is profound thanks to whom today we can speak of dogmatic theology: Sant'Anselmo d'Aosta, San Tommaso Aquino, Saint Bonaventure of Bagnoregio.
… Unless the Ecc.mo Prelate does not intend to, as another of the intellectual Magna Greece, he Prof. Don Giuseppe Ruggieri, claiming that "St. Thomas Aquinas is passed», and once established this “cultured” foolishness began the cycle of lessons at the Studio Teologico San Paolo in Catania basing its "theology" on Hegelian parameters, in the silence of the bishops Sicilians who left him for three decades to poison their brains future priests, with all visible and undeniable disastrous consequences of this, starting from the latest distressing Episcopal levers, with the exception of the current Bishop of Trapani s. and. Mons. Pietro Maria Femi, that despite having inherited a very difficult situation see determined grace and wisdom of good Shepherd.
In the end, the philosopher and theologian Nunzio Galantino, the inevitable result is that in Naples, where he received — as indeed in Rome where the doctorates are pulled behind like confetti at a Carnival, including to subjects with serious gaps not on theology but on the Catechism of the Catholic Church - it is a courtesy that, like a coffee, is not denied to anyone for a good clerical heart. Obvious and granted the title of the thesis: The historicity as fidelity to land in Bonhöffer.
To dispel any potential misunderstanding It is not only the right thing but even necessary and valuable that theologians make studies of authors filled of the worst heresies, but in order to refute their errors. Suffice it to say my brother priest and teacher, the Dominican John Carlson, with which we send out the pastoral and theological experience of this magazine. The famous papal theologian has spent three decades of his life to the study of complex and articulated theologians at Karl Rahner, indicating the poisonousness of their plant and explaining and demonstrating how and why this famous German theologian is an authentic factory of heresies. Entirely different speculative speech Galantino, who has not rebutted the doctrinal errors and heresies of Bohnöffer, but he joyfully married and spread them, and today we find ourselves as number two in charge at the Italian Bishops ' Conference.
His current view “uselessness” perhaps the building of the former Holy Office could be changed, today Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in a hostel to house the poor who will soon flock to Rome for the Jubilee of Mercy, Since the poor are the "true faith”, are the "flesh of Christ"before which"kneel adoring”, not kneel before the Most Holy Eucharist, do not mention it! Everything else is so unnecessary surplus, indeed it is just a reminiscence of the curial Rome of the past, that instead of worrying about sell showers for the homeless under Bernini's Colonnade, drew at that dicastery various theologians who were leaving for the tangent spreading non-Catholic doctrines within the Catholic Church. Therefore, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller now Prefect of the Congregation, he could become the new Prefect of the Congregation for Muslim Refugees, always assuming that it is not supplanted by the Archbishop of Agrigento Francesco Montenegro, Cardinal of the title of San Prophet Muhammad in Lampedusa at the gates of Europe Bashed.
At this point I will just summarize only some of the various heresies which structure of the heretic Lutheran thought Dietrich Bonhöffer, indicated as such and never refuted by G in any publication and publish Conference:
1. Bonhöffer denied the divine inspiration of the Old Testament books, judging their testimonies that become the word of God at the time that she speaks to an individual; otherwise it is only the word of man .
2. Bonhöffer Denied the biblical God because according to him the concept of God as Supreme Being, in absolute power and goodness, is a false conception of transcendence and the idea of God as a working hypothesis in the moral, politics and science should be abandoned, or, as far as possible, eliminated .
3. Bonhöffer questioned the virginal birth of Christ .
4. Bonhöffer supports that "Jesus Christ today is not a real person or a real being, but a corporate presence», therefore he effectively denied the divinity of the Incarnate Word .
5. Bonhöffer says that the resurrection of Christ must be read in the context of "mythological aspects», with clear reference to the heresies of Rudolf Bultmann, then that Christianity "is to be interpreted so as not to make religion a pre-condition of faith», then he denied the physical resurrection of Christ. And always influence on Bultmann says that miracles and ascension of Christ were "mythological conceptions" .
6. Bonhöffer believes that Christ is not the only way to God, thus opening the doors to relativism and syncretism and thereby nullifying the entire mystery of Revelation .
7. Bonhöffer was an evolutionist  and believed that the book of Genesis is a childish and as such full of myths  that need to be properly de-mythologized.
8. Bonhöffer joined to neo-Orthodox theology concerning salvation , It was a sacramentalista , believed that infant baptism regenerated , like that of adults , equiparò membership in the Church for salvation  and he decisively denied the idea of personal / individual salvation .
Today we have bishops and Cardinals formed with poisonous ideas of Rahner, Schillebeeckx's, Teilhard de Chardin, by Cox, by Heidegger, of Schleiermacher, of Kierkegaard, by Barth, by Bonhöffer, to Bultmann, Moltmann's, of Cullmann, of Luther, by Loisy, of Descartes, Kant's, of Hegel, Freud's, Nice …
Our bishops are charged the shortsighted lethargy of the previous generation of their confreres formed in the immediate post-council period. And all of them Bishop Nunzio Galantino is paradigm and as such was made Secretary-General of the Italian Bishops.
Not subject to denial is that Bishop Nunzio Galantino, which oozes more modernism that smiles, He trained and has developed his own "philosophical" and "theological" thinking on theses and theories of non-Catholic authors full of the worst heresies; and these authors are still its structural points of reference today, Bonhöffer in head. From this follows a truly dramatic problem for a Bishop placed in such a delicate role, that of not serving and not spreading the authentic Revealed Truth of the Incarnate Word but of serving and spreading the probable, namely those Fables of the Holy Apostle Paul: «The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales " [II Tm 4, 3-4].
Bring characters like G to the episcopate, entrust their particular churches and then name them in such delicate roles at the top of the Italian Episcopal Conference, is equivalent in all respects to continuing undeterred to dance to the notes of the orchestra in the party room of the Titanic which is sinking after hitting theiceberg. Let me be clear: No one puts in question the authority of the Bishop Galantino Nuncio that he comes to the sacrament of grace from the fullness of the priesthood. I'd be the first to give devoted and filial obedience if disgrace was the canonical Bishop having jurisdiction over me. The problem, in my humble opinion but firm, is that as individuals should not be made Galantino bishops; but once they have become, their apostolic authority is beyond question, While their authority or their lack of human authority, philosophical, on the other hand, theological and pastoral can be subject to many discussions, without taking anything away from what is due to them in respect and obedience on the part of priests and of the subjects of their particular churches. Or to put it in other words: «Obey You "— I would say to my Bishop G —" why obedience is due you and why I solemnly promise. Know, however, that does not respect you, Why won't my estimate is instead due, why I solemnly promise, why the Church has asked me and any priest of’Orbe catholica to promise solemnly bishops estimate. And I, in the exercise of the freedom of God's children, I don't consider you worthy of my esteem at all ".
The father John Carr and I are not even got off the Titanic, for the simple fact that there have never risen above. When the port of Liverpool heard how the man defied the creator stating "this ship is unsinkable because even God's wrath would never hit it!», we started screaming: "Do not climb above the ship, because pride leads to the inevitable ruin!». did what, we have turned away before being able to run as rescuers of victims who survived the great shipwreck that tomorrow will be allocated to the various Galantino, and all the little cicisbei in career chasing their little place in the Sun today that invite him to cut the tapes to various events around Italy, in the illusory certainty of having chosen the winning horse. And while in truth they flicker on a rickety tuk tuk pulled from a Pony, kidnapped by the interests of their living only the immediate that derives from not having understood what the Incarnation of the Word of God really means, therefore what the Church of Christ really is in an eschatological perspective, I even convinced to triumph over the King's carriage pulled by twelve Arab stallions, ox people knelt in the street unable to shout that the Emperor is naked, because this is politically incorrect; and such political incorrectness would never be allowed by the new atheistic ecclesiologists of everyday life The Republic and by the masons to enjoy themselves more than ever to the sheepfold of God in ruins at the hands of his own Pastors who accepted the wolves among the sheep. But sooner or later a little boy will scream the evident nakedness of the king and the will of God will thus be fulfilled, who has "scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts and exalted the humble", While the heel of the Blessed Virgin Mary will crush the head of the ancient snake, and even in the whole of his brood ruffian viperelle …
 CF. Testimony to Freedom, pp. 9, 104; The Communion of Saints, p. 161
 CF. Letters and Papers from Prison, S.C.M. Press edition, Great Britain: Fontana Books, 1953, pp. 122, 164, 360
 CF. The Cost of Discipleship, p. 215
 CF. Testimony to Freedom, pp. 75-76; Christ the Center, p. 58
 CF. Christ the Center, p. 112; Letters and Papers from Prison, S.C.M. Press edition, Great Britain: Fontana Books, 1953, pp. 93-94, 110
 CF. Testimony to Freedom, pp. 55-56
 CF. No Rusty Swords, p. 143
 CF. Creation and Fall: To Theological Interpretation of Genesis 1-3
 CF. Testimony to Freedom, p. 130
 CF. Life Together, p. 122; The Way to Freedom, pp. 115, 153
 CF. Letters and Papers from Prison, Macmillan, pp. 142-143
 CF. The Way to Freedom, p. 151
 CF. The Way to Freedom, p. 93
 CF. Letters and Papers from Prison, Macmillan, p. 156
FAITHFUL AND REALISTIC PORTRAYAL OF THE CHURCH AND OF THE ITALIAN EPISCOPATE IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2015 AND ITS MANY “NUNZIO GALANTINO “