- ecclesial news -

HERE'S WHAT FATHER WROTE TWO YEARS AGO ARIEL SCREAMING TO DESERT SANDS:

"PEDOPHILIA: IF THE SPOTLIGHT IS AN EXCELLENT APPEARANCE OF PLAGUE film CLERICAL omerta "

.

“The case of Spotlight"It is a film that deserves appreciation for the way in which the director and the actors have been the heart of this painful problem, It consists of clerical quell'omertà that has always characterized and wraps both the worst cases of child abuse and the various sexual disorders experienced by many members of our secular and regular clergy. And now I'll explain I lived on my life and on my skin, what it means for a priest violate the clerical conspiracy of silence, since the prices I paid them all, one by one …

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

The article here is repeated in the Archives of The Island of Patmos: WHO

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the movie poster

A devoted reader He pointed me to two articles in the New Daily Compass, one signed by Massimo Introvigne [cf. WHO] and one by Stefano Magni [cf. WHO]. The object of these two items is the film "IIf the Spotlight”, award-winning film-complaint on cases of child abuse that shook the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston and the Catholic Church in several corners of the world [cf. Italian trailer, WHO].

The two authors on Compass Daily They signed their articles, treat the problem with that journalistic propriety that at times can lead to fall in the partial and superficial. Or Massimo Introvigne, which shows a very complex problem through its known sociological preparation; nor Stefano Magni, who in his excellent article could in my opinion avoid defining the work as "ideological film", are not even touched by the partial and prevailing superficiality today appears the main protagonist.

I that certain problems I have touched them with his hand and there I found myself embroiled finally paying a heavy price, I say that this film, far from “ideological”, It is above all free from any "strong scene" stretched to touch the feelings of the audience to arouse in them contempt for the Catholic Church; otherwise feelings aroused by many other films, for instance “Primal Fear” [USA, 1996, WHO], “rebellious angels” [Ireland, 2003, WHO], “Magdalene” [2002, UK, WHO], etc ..

“The case of Spotlight”, despite some inaccuracies due to the vast complexity and severity of a theme not easy to treat, It deserves appreciation for the way in which the director and the actors have been the heart of this painful problem, It consists of clerical quell'omertà that has always characterized and wraps both the worst cases of child abuse and the various sexual disorders experienced by many members of our secular and regular clergy.

And now I'll explain I lived on my life and on my skin, what it means for a priest violate the clerical conspiracy of silence, precisely because the prices I paid them all, one by one …

The limit for years reflected in many who "presumed" to be able to talk about certain topics that touch and shake at times our entire ecclesiastical system, It is given by the reluctance often shown by more or less authoritative representatives of the Catholic world to take the bull by the horns, because we all know that you can run the risk of being impaled, so better to stay on the stands of the arena to scream for the bullfighter or the bull. Or rather: if you have the best bullfighter, he shouts "Long live the bullfighter!”, if you have the better the bull, he cries, "Long live the bull!”.

He does not always win the bullfighter

In the years I deepened the complex problem of the gaysmo within the Church and in doing so I never looked at anyone, paying until now the consequences. What they have not however ever paid certain committed lay Catholics and militants, I am taken to shout seconded the wind pulling the arena for "the bullfighter" or "the bull". These committed Catholics and militants, although notified in detail, well they looked from raising time low voice in my defense, When I was within my church passed into the meat grinder from the worst ecclesiastical conspiratorial for daring to utter the truth and to have complained to the Ecclesiastical Authority certain intolerable situations. Something proven by the fact that for two years, in the diocese of the Bishop of Rome - which is not governed by the Bishop of Rome but his Vicar General - he celebrated the Holy Mass in the Catacombs of Priscilla [2011-2013], assisted by my precious student and collaborator, only person. While in, those who could say a few words in my defense, I do not say they were fugitives, They were simply engaged in political correctness, all we are taken to pay their respects to their masters for whom they were committed to leading as the devotees owner-operators vans-goods made available to them.

On certain topics I think I can speak with sufficient authority why sigh sigh behind, everything I have said and all complaints at the time presented to the Vicariate of Rome, the Congregation for the Clergy and the Secretariat of State, I paid beating behind beating, nastiness nastiness behind, ostracism ostracism behind.

loneliness, often a companion of the priest …

I do not know how many lay Catholics that every evening they return home with no one erodes them, I can speak with my knowledge of the facts, at the end of the day instead I remained in my house, which is the church understood as the ecclesiastical world, enveloped by gloom of that silence the clerical ruling whose evil results are now detailed in the written judgment given by several courts scattered around the world. Judgments anything but unfair and far from being moved by anti-Catholic sentiments, enough to consider that on the words of those judgments was then celebrated the painful liturgy of the MEA culpa by those same clerics who until shortly before had rebuked, threatened and ostracized the few priests who courageously had reported facts, situations and, above all, those high-risk individuals protected by entire roped powerful prelates. And certain people, in this case the homosexual clergy on the one hand, pedophiles on the other hand, They have always had, inside the church world, protectors armies, but above all the diligent and often powerful "copertori".

And whoever pays the price I paid, as it is beaten to a pulp, however, Leisure, and being free I have no debts to pay, because the "secret" of the Christological freedom that really known if will make us free [cf. GV 8, 32] It is based on the lack of any aspiration of career and ecclesiastical benefice; despite claims by certain careerists, not potendomi define "free man", if anything, they have called me ... "dangerous man”, or "loose cannon” (!?). This is also why I have no creditors dressed in red who knock on my door to introduce bills due to be paid, or that remind me of the loans obtained, or if anything donations or gifts bestowed to me in the form of accommodation, prebends and ecclesiastical privileges, I saw that I have donated only copious slaps; and slap - as we all know - we are always free, get the grace to the soul that receives and often lead to Hell that of those who grants it free or calculated nastiness, in supreme contempt for the evangelical truth that will set us free.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. And Satan came Trino. Relativism, indivdualismo, disobedience. Analysis on the Third Millennium Church. Published in 2011 and shortly in print

In 2011, in my book currently in print, I analyzed in depth the problem of omosessualizzazione of the Church and the number of gay priests always higher, stating the reasons, triggers the origins and also the possible remedies, even if with these results: not a single bishop and cardinal, those who later approached me, gave me wrong for what I had written and for the clear way in which I had written the. Far from it, collezionai compliments sometimes even embarrassing, inside the closed private rooms of the various sacred buildings. It made only except for an elderly owner archbishop, who welcomed me at the end of 2011 taking care of my father's lifelong training for the priesthood, None, these prelates in private laudatori, middle finger moves for me, while an army of mediocre monsignorini incattiviti tried to attack me like a pack of hyenas angry.

Facts are facts and these remain, but especially documented. And the Ecclesiastical Authority, from Roman, You know this, in what way I am accustomed to document the facts; and also how do they never speak without proof.

Preaching in the desert sands and reeds in the wind I needlessly spoke a omosessualista coup inside the church [see WHO]. In vain I explained that the gay lobby does not just aim high, because a long time is now arrived at the top. In fact years that gay clergy and their gay friendly affect the episcopal appointments of more or less candidates belonging to the gay "pious confraternity”, and once they become bishops begin first to place their faithful friends in key positions in the dioceses, in many of them more or less overt gay reign in all of them the so-called the nerve center, with immediate access to activation buttons of the launch of the ground-to-air missiles on the good priests, or on the few that survive in some dioceses where, those who have the misfortune to participate in them at a meeting of the clergy, It may sometimes have the impression of being finished by mistake in a branch of the Gay village.

new insight into the religious style, before which St. Pio of Pietrelcina would surely jump for joy …

How is all this never happened? The problem is upstream in the early seventies, when in the post-conciliar season it ran from the previous penalty, perhaps excessive, responsive to lax. And so, in a society undergoing rapid transformation and with the so-called "sexual liberation" now prevailing, seminars you went emptying, more still novitiates and student halls of religious families and the same historical orders. It was then that many bishops and superiors of religious orders opened wide the doors and allowed access to training for the priesthood and religious life in people who never, earlier, They would be admitted to a seminary or a novitiate. And when you create nests of vipers, it happens that the vipers reproduce with each other and the occurrence all together good bite and attempt to poison anyone looking for some way to hit them.

If forty years ago it was reasonable to say that the problem was born upstream from the formation of future new priests and religious, today, Fully occurred degeneration, it is rather reasonable to say - but unfortunately no one tells him - that the problem is all the episcopate. For as I explained in my book that the 2011: "Those who in the seventies capeggiavano inside of the seminars gay fraternity, Today we find them bishops, and just become such, first they have placed in all important positions and carried on in the hierarchy or in the so-called ecclesiastical career of related matters to them ". This is the dramatic root of that problem pointing to for years, but unfortunately to no avail, because no one in the church wanted to pay even hear my words, especially when the evidence of the facts gave me full reason.

I also explain, always in that my work, that physical homosexuality, that actually practiced, It is only the tip of a now radicalized that homosexuality itself is much worse and harmful: that psychological homosexuality She is gone now in power and in virtue of which the Church was finally omosessualizzata. And today we are not infrequently before priests, but especially before bishops and "men" in delicate positions of authority who sometimes think with the anger of women's psychologies living with their typical disorder, which it is hysteria, word the meaning of which says it all, since the greek etymology of this lemma [afterbirth, hysteron] It means uterus.

the palace of the Vicariate of Rome

But let's rigorously documented facts, given that certain documents and reports the handed in my own risk following the Ecclesiastical Authority: the then Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Rome S.It is the center of the field. Mons. Ernest Mandara, man I will keep the memory alive and lovable; the then Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, at the hands of then my Bishop. It's still: to Cardinal Giuseppe Bertello, former apostolic nuncio in Italy, office at the time vacant, appointed Governor of Vatican City, which went to deliver my text in its new office at the Holy See with a prayer to have that my relationship to the then Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, because at stake it was the image of the Diocese of Rome, ie the particular Church of the Supreme Pontiff that on certain issues and problems had already been expressed in a decisive and severe expressions and through more documents, Therefore it was necessary to prevent precisely in his Diocese, without his knowledge and because of the bad people's government, certain burst scandals.

In my two different reports drawn up at the beginning 2011 They were referred to various cases, from that of the rector of a prestigious and ancient Roman basilica which for years maintained a round of young prostitute, What, however, that for years everyone knew: He knew Cardinal Agostino Vallini, he knew his predecessor to the Vicariate of Rome Cardinal Camillo Ruini, He knew the Prelate Secretary of the period at the Vicariate, Mons. Mauro Parmeggiani, later promoted Bishop of Tivoli; He knew the then Archbishop Angelo Bagnasco castrense, later promoted Archbishop of Genoa and President of the Italian Episcopal Conference, who attended the official business for several years that basilica during his apostolic ministry to the Armed Forces, to follow with so many other silent prelates, all variously masters of that sum “prudence” leading sometimes to see and at the same time not to act. What was, indeed, the reaction of Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, at the time when the then Bishop handed him my hand that my relationship? He took note of it and said that the unfortunate situation of the basilica had long been known to them. And shortly after, The bearer bishop of my report - which with all its strengths and weaknesses, however, has always been a true believer and above all a man of moral and ethical sense that the extent of its possibilities tried to protect me from that grave injustice -, He came out of the Sacred Congregation for the Clergy, saying: "Let's go well, We informed them of what they already knew!». And he added: "But what's worse is that nothing do '.

Underground the church of Santa Teresa in Rome

In one of those two reports Also I pointed to the delicate problem of the Carmelites of the Parish of Santa Teresa, from which year after a scandal erupted from hell implications [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO]. But as soon as I named the Carmelites, the prelate my interlocutor's face darkened and he said: "Molla suddenly the piece! The Carmelites are in the good graces of Cardinal Agostino Vallini who wanted to promote one, His notorious protege, also like him canonist, prior to the post of auxiliary bishop Napoli, then to that of the Bishop of Sora-Aquino-Pontecorvo. And I'll tell: He is trying to take him to the Vicariate as archbishop vicegerent ". And so, effectively, occurred shortly after the 2012, when the Carmelite S.It is. Mons. Filippo Iannone was elected to that position, so that “l'Organic executive” the Vicariate was complete in its framework of fearful and obsequious “secretaries” e “subalterns“, certainly not the brother bishops are called to collaborate in perfect communion for the good of the diocese of the Bishop of Rome with his Vicar General. It is known that certain ringleaders want around itself of subalterns, not the brother bishops, much less of the minds who reason; and they want those in the proportion in which they are subconsciously aware of being mediocre sensational that must precisely why try to shine in every way and by every means in its own light.

After a time as private as dramatic interview had with two senior officials of the Digos of Rome in the early 2012, I was made aware of the "wild life" conducted by the then Archabbot of Montecassino, Dom Pietro Vittorelli, whose blatant gayezza he would have seen and perceived even a blind man, except the good Ecclesiastical Authority, literally falling from the clouds when it was finally made public that this unworthy successor Luciferian of St. Benedict of Nursia was an unrepentant addict and equally unapologetic gay that it still good life and the services of its expensive prostitutes gay with the money withdrawn from the Caritas of the Diocese of him entrusted. Needless to mention today - although to have to remember though - what brought all these cases I reported years in advance, thanks to the inaction of the well informed Ecclesiastical Authority, that if you put in front of some of their responsibilities for action, before certain nasty business is mutassero in public scandals, it is not uncommon that irritate against those who warn certain things, if anything, making her pay dearly to the victim, just as it did to the undersigned.

this great soul rest …

Apart from certain information related to me in a confidential way by various members of the police who frequented the Roman basilica in which at the time was serving, before proceeding further I must incidentally clarify how I became aware of certain facts …

… from a few weeks after my priestly ordination I began to be a confessor and spiritual director of a growing number of priests, religious, secular and religious seminarians in formation, which several times, in the internal forum and external forum, prostrate in a deep inner pain conditions or real shock told me the very serious situation that they found themselves living and appropriate to incur. Because not all are born lions or eagles, several of these brothers and several seminarians and religious, not knowing how to act or simply as contact their superiors and remain unharmed, They freed inviolable sacramental seal of confession and after having me they provided free transfer details, evidence and documents, authorizing me to report cases and to talk to the competent ecclesiastical authority. Think, between the various documents I delivered a playful figure even complete photo collection in which, seminarians of a prestigious Roman College, had found nothing better to do than celebrate Christmas itself as "whores" in a bacchanal of Bacchus and Ceres, then devising a photo shoot in which you were mounted on photo-images of naked and half-naked female paired with their trainers, of women with shapely figures and so to follow. This institution obviously has a name, however, even prestigious, It called Almo Collegio Capranica, breeding ground of many bishops and cardinals Italian, of different species of our worst current, which all together, as a sort of "lOggia secret”, if necessary protect this almo College, within which happened at all and more, with dismay of the same Secretary of State to which he belongs and from which its jurisdiction, in addition to the dismay facts long known, we would expect these measures are still far from coming; from the organic unless the Secretary of State should not proceed before you fire the affiliates to seletta “lOggia secret” the Capranica [cf. Correspondence Romana, WHO].

Here then explained why for which, those responsible, He was always treated with caution, knowing that when I talk or say certain things, I never do nonsense, neither hearsay nor the devastating "seems ... seems ... it says ... 'that emerges instead punctual on the lips of those clerics who wish wholeheartedly impallinare anyway someone. I speak for always habit and only on the basis of evidence tested and documented.

a little uplifting glimpse of video taken by the service “The good nights of gay priests”

In what has been narrated Also join a precedent dating from the late 2009, at the time that I lived in an international priestly house of Aventine Hill. At that time it happened that from that hill I became aware of what was happening "downstream", ie to Testaccio, where an alarming number of priests attended plainclothes various gay clubs. Something quite understandable that these gay priests would pass unnoticed, because it seems that the monsignorini the Vicariate were too busy making jokes on me when I dared to present myself on several occasions in their offices with the dress I wear cassock, transposed as though that my ecclesiastical vestment represented some kind of contempt of others injured clerical majesty; or rather the majesty of those who, instead of laughing on my cassock - that the practices I wear, and I always carry every day -, perhaps they should be cured of many priests who jeans e t-shirt They went to "palpate the bird" in between the legs to the Cubists dancing half-naked in the Testaccio gay clubs.

When I signaled the coming and going of priests in these gay clubs, in tones flush with the threat the Mafia was clearly made me realize that if I wanted to live well in Rome, I had to learn to mind my own business; and in that sense I was invited to do mine and to live the clerical pernicious silence so well depicted by the director and the actors of "The case of Spotlight”. Spent less than a year, while in the summer of 2010 I was in Germany for in-depth studies, I was joined by telephone by a family member who told me: "You can get the weekly Panorama?». And he explained to me: "From the cover on, you will find written there all that you have reported on time but to no avail to the Ecclesiastical Authority". And the title on the cover was as follows: "The good nights of gay priests' [see WHO]. the service center were reports, accompanied by videos of the gay revels in the Testaccio local to which participated many priests, one of them even dared to celebrate the morning Mass in the apartment's living room in which he had given to sodomitic bacchanalia with his friend occasional, This is also the sacred celebration [watch movies WHO].

the sad cover of the weekly Panorama in July 2010 He published by Carmelo Abbate service then accompanied by video footage still visible on the net

Faced with such evidence, think that the Ecclesiastical Authority has summoned me and said: "... We note that you were right, and that in advance we had shown the true, pointing out people and situations scabrous, but unfortunately we have not acted "? Never! And it was precisely because I was right, because I had seen it right, that have been subjected to harassment by repeatedly ringleaders army of conspiratorial who judged me guilty of conspiracy of silence denied clerical. Because as you can well understand, the important thing is that the Church ask forgiveness from the Jews, to Muslims, to the Lutherans, I pentecostali, the natives ... well: to everyone, unless its priests devotees, which in serious danger if necessary they have risked all and for all, just to find some way to defend it.

Besides, let's be clear, Why, especially in this climate of stifling mediocrity ecclesiastical, if I had accepted the omertose rules of the game and all that it entails, not only I would have already become the holder of a professorship in a pontifical university, not only I would have had a very different kind of accommodation, not only I would have been entered in the ambits of the so-called most prestigious ecclesiastical career … more still: perhaps, after a short period of years, I would even find themselves “strut me” with the miter on his head and the pastoral in his hand in the midst of an army of bishops who see but do not see, who they know but pretend not to know, who bow their heads before the bullies who beat up and the weak, which often punish the victims and defend the executioners. And I was - I always -, the right choice, because I have never pointed the immediate present, but to eternity, namely the salvation of my soul that aspires to attain the beatific vision in the Trinitarian mystery of the Father, of the Son and the Holy Spirit, to which I intend to also drive many more believers of Christ as a pastor in the care of souls. And to point LORD must choose to need the cross, without which there is no resurrection.

when in 2009 I said to a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that the young Bishop. Krzysztof Charamsa, amiable and good person dogmatic theologian, It was clearly gay [cf. WHO]; when I explained that in his studies on the "theology" of "human suffering" [cf. WHO] I had found hidden behind the lines discomfort coming upstream from its definitely due to his sexuality was human-affective inner, behold, in response, This respected member, meeting following the then my Bishop, He complained that I saw homosexuals everywhere and I was obsessed by homosexuals in the Church. Even in that case, the then my Bishop, instead of reproach he said: "The problem, It is not that homosexuals see them you, the problem is that instead he did not see them!».

retrospectively demand nothing short of lawful: after the public coming-out Mons. Charamsa, He arrived at a young age to the prestigious post of assistant secretary of the International Theological Commission, what you should tell me, today, this time a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, promoted later also bishop for his "vision" estrospettiva?

I find really impressive that these prelates e prelates, although aware of a mistake, have criticized in the past only one who was right because he said, and pointed to them the true; that although aware of the fact that I had been right while they in fact no, for no reason at all they never admit they were wrong, even at the cost of denying the obvious facts. Or maybe because they are too busy in the painful "liturgy"Presented the apology and directed by the Holy Mother Church to the Jews, to Muslims, to the Lutherans, I pentecostali, the natives ... well: to all - as I said - unless its priests devotees?

image of the main character of the young in the film adaptation of Tdazio Death in Venice Luchino Visconti, accentuating in a masterly way ephebophilia contained in the pages of Thomas Mann

And I close this long "litany" with the last in the series of order: months ago, upon direct knowledge of the person, the situation and the facts, I informed a Tuscan bishop that a young man was kept at a distance prudently from contact with adolescents in parish areas, because affected by proven instincts efebofili. I addressed at a respectable priest of that diocese, with psychological experience, a teacher of my acquaintance to accompany with him one of the former teenage palpeggiati in the past by this character, moved by a report to be defined with the faith and the Church, both lived in a sort of aesthetic dimension decadent flavor of "Death in Venice" by Thomas Mann. Of course I wrote a detailed report at this Bishop, who, when in May 2015 I crossed at the plenary of the Italian Episcopal Conference - where I had gone to greet some prelates and meet others who wanted to talk to me -, in response to my letter-report he said that he was not a magistrate and that if I had something to report I had to turn not to him but to the judiciary. And a few months later, this bishop, he found something better to do than to demonstrate its maximum villainy admitting this efebofilo, lover of the beautiful and liturgical-musical aesthetics, in his seminar.

Needless to say: if that person became a priest for our great misfortune, and once a priest palpeggiasse a teenager, I immediately take my report sent to his time, Witnesses sent to make private testimony to that bishop and, without any hesitation, I will turn to the judiciary, but not to denounce the efebofilo caught in the act, but the bishop. And in my exposed make clear that not only he did not acknowledge listen when I warned him in time with a wealth of evidence, but after being informed at all points on the subject of very high concern, He deemed it right and good to admit it in your workshop. And we'll see, especially with the times they live today, with what face this bishop will say to the judges who knew nothing; or in what spirit will dare argue before the courts that he is not a judge and therefore, not being such, He had no duty and obligation to oversee the diocese entrusted to him, to the point of admitting no problem a fox into the chicken coop, although this had been warned to advance and with all the details of the case.

Archpriest of the Papal Basilica of Saint Peter, Cardinal Angelo Comastri, It imposes the ashes on the head of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI

That the Church has issued documents on the subject it is not in doubt, as there is no doubt the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI wrote a memorable Pastoral Letter to the Catholics of Ireland [cf. WHO], I considered one of the most important acts of his apostolic ministry to and for this several times stated in my paper referenced above. Document which, The Holy Father then reigning, He explained how and to what extent dangerous many bishops have not taken into account, and how seguitino to ignore those exhortations, continuing undeterred to admit in their increasingly empty seminars veritable armies of asexual - best hypothesis -, if not worse than the people who reveal a clear lack of male hormone testosterone and are looking for aesthetic apparatus, and aesthetic-liturgical or aesthetic-clerical species, their point of refuge, vent and, unfortunately, secure career, that practices and rigor make, because if on the one hand aim to redeem, the other aim to exercise power over others through roles of great importance.

Over the past few years It was not missing on some serious issues or the foresight of the Popes nor the documents that give clear guidance, like the one in which he urges the non-admission in the seminaries of people with homosexual tendencies [cf. WHO]. The problem is that when a "government" system is found to be infected from these now over people inserted in key leadership roles, this may be the result: I end up for two years to celebrate Mass without people Catacombs witnessed by my pupil and assistant, while many "Bishops-Madame"Acting with the typical moodiness of menopausal women, they do not find something better to do than to take one of your favorite gay and naming it directly rector of the seminary, ... nothing but non-admission in the seminaries of people with homosexual tendencies! Unfortunately, in many religious seminaries and novitiates, the first gay were found to be precisely the trainers. And if you do not want to believe me, then you believe that the judgments given by criminal courts in various European countries, including Italy, based on facts and evidence of a shame and squalor that disfigure the poor Church of Christ with the launch of the worst organic substances on his face.

What I pointed solutions, in the pages of that my study? First, the obvious solution: with authority, severity and courage, vipers was severed head. I wrote this in 2011, except see several of these vipers becoming one behind the other bishops in later years.

asexual worldwide: unite!

Why not wrong but devastating judge, that today there are clergy who continue to think that if one has homosexual tendencies, what matters it is that physically does not exercise his homosexuality? I consider this wrong because, Catholic morality, too long it is only focused on the physical-sexual dimension and little of the psychological, forgetting that sex and sexuality is above all a mental thing, an attitude. And as I have stated in the past, Following today to reiterate that the repressed homosexual, he who does not give any kind of physical outlet for their sexual urges, It is always more dangerous than what at least is unleashed in sex with other men. The repressed, by me also defined as "homosexual psychic”, is more dangerous because he lives in a captive dimension and increasing incattivimento that is mainly found vent in three things: the perverse pleasure he derived from bear harm to others, the lust for power and the rampant careerism, in attachment to money and material goods. These people are also blackmailed, easily manipulated by their "benefactors", ready to betray and to violate the secrecy, if they thereby give thanks or benefit from their godfathers, or simply protect one of their members gay fraternity. For this repeat: the "psychic homosexuals" who are self-repressed are worse, so why vent their worst repression in the Church and often give good priests is healthy, that have always been their favorite victims, under the eyes of more and more powerless and bishops of the ecclesiastical authorities.

after midnight when teenagers dancing half-naked on the cubes of gay nightclubs, in this case it is not legitimate to speak of either adolescents nor pedophiles, indeed we must proclaim “sacred dogma” Of “faith” that Gay is Beautiful. But if a priest groped a young hustler Of 17 years and eleven months, it is rather a dangerous pedophile.

In our society schizophrenic dominated by the ideology of gender, the Church is showing a distressing weakness and inadequacy. For instance: How come, whenever newspapers, sites and powerful blog Gay lobby They are thrown in your face the inevitable "pedophile priests", no one has the courage to reply that most of the alleged pedophile priests, far from being such, in truth they are homosexual priests, as such deserving of the best protections and safeguards as part of the all-powerful socio-political and economic mother known as Gay lobby?

.

When it comes to us priests, it happens by magic that gays suffering from “puri” and "wonderful" homosexual instincts, as such deserving of protection and if not of homophobia shouted accusations against anyone who dares to dissent, putacaso become pedophiles. a arcano, this, now I will explain, as the trembling ecclesiastical authority has not yet explained, while having available a deluge of Catholic magazines, Press agencies and offices for social communications. however Rasserenatevi, dear Catholics, because thanks to God there The Island of Patmos, John's last place of revelation, with its aggressive Fathers who do not have godparents e masters other than our Lord Jesus Christ.

Montecassino, the historic West abbey founded by St. Benedict of Nursia in the seventh century.

The truth is that priests They decry in two main ways, or better with the two notorious "they": sex and money. Of course: as clergy, in recent years we have given the worst of ourselves in balance sheet scandals and sexual. Just return to the paradigm Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, that to the best so far ascertained arrived to spend on whims, and especially in the vagaries of a sexual nature, 36.000 euro in a single month. But before we continue I open sore parentheses the Ecclesiastical Authority hath looked from opening: what kind of relationship "ill"Passed between the previous Archabbot of Montecassino, Dom Bernardo D’Onorio [1983-2007], later promoted Archbishop of Gaeta [2007], and his successor Dom Pietro Vittorelli [2007-2013]? Why will the first Vittorelli responsible for training monks as novice master and vocational animator - always to return to the speech of the fox guarding the chicken coops placed - hereafter as his personal secretary, it was the then Arch-Abbot Bernardo D'Onorio. Therefore I ask: it is legitimate to ask where ever had eyes and with them the wisdom and Christian prudence, quell’asexually psychic Arch-Abbot Bernardo D'Onorio, when he brings up such delicate roles a person from apparent disordered sexuality like Pietro Vittorelli? And while a asexual He passed their own to a ministry sexed messy, in such matters they were bustling the authorities of the Holy See, to whom belong the acceptance and then the confirmation of the appointment by Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino? Because, as you can see, certain tragedies stem from an evil chain that no one has yet taken care of interrupting, because to do so would have to go against entire roped parties of friends of friends of friends … And who has reasonable grounds to deny them, who denies me, if necessary also with strokes of complaints, I can not wait to receive at least one! And if some Ecclesiastical Authority raised a sigh of what has been said by me, if anything, accusing me of "disrespect" and "inappropriateness", my defense will call a team of urologists experts, andrology e Psicologi. And after they have appraised the D'onorio, father giving birth the monster Vittorelli, oozes really manly male hormone testosterone from all the pores of the skin, I genufletterò to publicly ask forgiveness, I will retire to private life and not even write more article, indeed I not write more I miss my name. And if I will be forced to sign it will be with an "X" to stop so as not to write, proof that a real man and a real priest - if you really do not want and can not be conspiratorial - then it is good that not even write, because it must be deaf, blind, dumb and even illiterate.

Nichi Vendola with fellow Ed Head testimonial of the twentieth edition of the Gay Pride Roman [cf. WHO]

On the ultra-secularist newspapers, on sites and the powerful blog Gay Lobby, anyone can read the written words of fire sull'Arciabate of Monte Cassino Pietro Vittorelli, about who, the ultra liberals, omosessualisti to the gender and the ideologues who have pointed to the public pillory, However it lacks a critical step that disingenuous ignore: the Vittorelli was neither a pedophile nor a dangerous bankrupt, but simply an unrepentant homosexual, that in a government role, or if you prefer to power, used means and money to have a good time around the world with young men paid so much per centimeter, based on the length and the circumference of their virile member. Just as they always most of the gays, having money available, whims can afford paying them with necessary travel, with designer clothes, with stays in hotels with five stars ... all so much per centimeter, calculated for both the length and the circumference of the male member of their lover on duty. If in the end the turns, some gay also take a womb for rent, pay a woman in need, and if anything, they manufacture a toy boy for the consumption of their unbridled egotism satanic. And frankly, per me, do this and promote it all as "right”, is much worse than what the steal - as did the Vittorelli - money to Caritas to pay the marchettari, pace of new father-gay Nichi Vendola just returned to the doors of the sixty years since an American factory children with her partner, which in turn could be his son. Because before this people, I do not say I'd be willing to rehabilitate the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, but surely to consider, in due proportion, As his guilt is less. Ben is in fact more to blame for a Gianna Nannini, of Elton John and a Nichi Vendola that manufacture children to their own use. Indeed, while the hustler adult is free and consenting in their mercimoni with prelates and priests just as consenting adults, a child or a child in similar places inhumane conditions, are neither free nor consenting to choose similar aberrations destined to score all their lives in a negative way and deeply traumatic.

Hyenas Of One Italian, now specialized in hunt priest

Request: if this and more is permissible at all moneyed homosexuals that the poignant music of Sir Elton John clamoring "Gay is beautiful”, Why should it not be the same for the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino? I wonder then that the very Gay lobby they have not protected, or who have written that all in all it was a great to have a good time as he could, exactly as they are accustomed to the rich gay lobbyists.

Rather than have them protected as homosexuals on the basis of genderista "dogma” Of “faith" that "Gay is beautiful”, just gay lobbyists have rather literally massacred over time various ecclesiastical, often using the armed wing of the Hyenas of Italy One, who went to film them and hunt them down one by one on the sly. And are those same Hyenas at the same time protect the culture of gender, marriages between same-sex couples and their "right" to adopt or buy fabricate and children.

Well I challenge anyone to see a member of the scientific community, the specialized field of neurology, neuropsychology, of psychiatry and clinical psychology, willing to support that an adult who has today a sexual relationship with a willing guy 16/17 year old, which if anything is a prostitute for three or four years and that 10/11 old was full of porn films collected files in his computer and his cell phone, is a dangerous pedophile. I believe that no member of the scientific community never assert such a thing, especially knowing what levels of knowledge and sexual degeneration have already reached many of our young people at the age of 13/14 year old.

Lecco, lush city in the Alps

A Rome is a hospital that treats infectious diseases Also related sexual apparatus. Now I invite anyone to chat to the specialists of this hospital, which is the San Gallicano, because it will be their eagerness to explain how teenagers of both sexes in the age group between 14 ed i 16 years come with serious infections for practicing pleasant little things that, as known and known, ... it is just "typical" of the "early adolescence", for example the so-called anal intercourse, the so-called oral reports, the so-called relations group where only one person is infected to transmit the infection to all, or the contact of the mouth and tongue with the vagina and the anal orifice and so on ... …

To save me from disapproving of those few individuals ready to manifest scandal before certain details related to the sexual sphere provided by a priest, clarify and precise that wanting to be understood by everyone in some of my writings, addressed to the general public and not only to theologians or specialists, put me to flaunt clinical latinisms, you know well, to indicate the existence of precise reality, it would not be appropriate, if hugging the ridiculous and especially the prudish spirit that should never be confused with the human value, social and Christian modesty. If in fact the boys and girls of 14 years end up with serious infections at the San Gallicano because an already sailed girl sent an infection of the mouth of a peer who has hunted the language in the vagina and the anal orifice, you understand well that it is useless to use euphemisms. And if this happens, I think it is urgent to ask themselves a serious question, especially then if one of these teenagers will gladly let you groped by a priest in back of the Ipad change, We are wishing that we can and should also call perverse and perverted, we must isolate, condemn and suspend from the exercise of the sacred ministry, but always pointing with his real name, which it is to "homosexual", not to "pedophile", at best we can mark it as efebofilo. And as homosexual, or as efebofilo, this priest, according to contemporary trends, It should also be safeguarded and protected if attacked with an outcry by the Gay Lobby shouting "homophobe, homophobe!"Directed at anyone who dares to question its legitimate sexual tastes.

Cardinal Agostino Vallini, taken from a fragment of the interview movie SIR

From the playful speech the openings and infectious diseases the most experienced lower than they were half a century the fifties ago, I would like to conclude by switching to a reply given by the vicar general of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome, Cardinal Agostino Vallini, about which I refer to video in which he responds, in his capacity as President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, about the exploits of the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, and as such was for several years a member of the Italian Episcopal Conference and then the local Episcopal Conference of Lazio. Cardinal Vallini, also known as the greatest canonist of the world, before the exploits of Vittorelli, making use of a language typical of the politicians and not the shepherds in charge of souls, referring only to the capital illicit said that if the judiciary will experience the elements to proceed with a conviction, in this case the Church of Cassino is a civil party through an action for damages (!?) [cf. movie with interview WHO]. In short: were years that the Vittorelli led a life not in keeping, who attended the most discussed Roman salons, that was absent when and how he wanted the abbey, that made luxury holidays; but mainly it was obvious to anyone that his poses and his way of porgersi were more similar to the movements of a Princess capricious instead of a man trained in the rigors of the monastic cloister, but above all to a man. And despite all this, someone wants us to believe that no one knew … that no one had ever noticed anything?

i whatsapp messages exchanged by Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino with its marchettari: «I do everything what I want» … «I'm going to look’ cocks». But this dissolute life no one knew anything …

I also have another question to ask how many now tear their clothes because they say They knew nothing. This is the question: the agents of the anti-narcotics team, How long before the scandal broke, They did leak out discreetly to the Ecclesiastical Authority this Princess-priest used drugs? Because in a totally informal and secretive, with me some insiders of the anti-narcotics, They consulted at the beginning of 2012, lying to treat the delicate case of this prelate somewhat in view that, inter alia, acquired illegally and equally illegally held drugs such as ecstasy, Cocaine and crack. And besides doing nothing, What did the Ecclesiastical Authority, albeit informed? Perhaps he began to prepare the ritual of cloth robes and dell'addolorato “we did not know”, to use in the day when the inevitable public scandal would erupt, as evidence the video reproduced here from which radiates all the terrible sufferings of the President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, first ahead of all in … I know nothing? [cf. movie with interview WHO]

Sincerely, in terms of Catholic morality and Canon Law, the appropriation and squandering money, in this case just described is just the consequence of much more serious disorders and everyone summarized in the dissolute life of Vittorelli, that with such attitudes and expressions of disgust even the irreverent Marchese de Sade, in phone calls and intercepted numerous messages through which communicated with marchettari Gay his more or less strong providers of sexual services, used to define drugs, sex and vice as "Paradise". Of course, no other Italian court will condemn the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino to have practiced extensively homosexuality, or for the personal use of drugs, nor to have had around him a court of young men, nor to have sought sites in gay young consenting adults who were particularly gifted in between the legs, because none of this is pursued and is punishable by the Criminal Law Code.

image of the Papal Basilica of St. Peter surrounded by an unusual fog

So here's my question accurate and in no way nebula facing the greatest canonist of the world: it is not by chance, pending the ruling of the Italian criminal court, the ecclesiastical Tribunal, in the hole of its powers, He would have already had to act and proceed from time through strict canonical penalties paid to load this unworthy ecclesiastical finished for the entire sum disfavor catholicity head and guide of the historic Abbey West mother? And once paid these canonical penalties, it would not be appropriate to give public notice, to clarify how and when necessary with what severity the Church falls dark mercy of some of his sons unworthy and harbingers of enormous public scandals? None of this has happened, however,, because the Cardinal Vallini, which apparently it seems to be the emblem of hyper-legal guarantor and that perhaps has run out of more liberal sudden Cavour, most partisan of Garibaldi and Mazzini Republican, completely forgotten that he was for years also the Chairman of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, declares and states that it is awaiting the … judgment of the Criminal Court of the State so that it is then assessed how to act (!?).

there, I hope that no one, in high political and administrative spheres of the Italian Republic, discover that in our home we have a canonist of this kind, because they could “rubarcelo” to name the first President of the Supreme Court and then afterward a senator for life.

Having said that now you see, dear readers of The Island of Patmos, to who we are in hand for years and years? We are in the hands of the bicycles that are put on the racing track of Monza in the sure belief that they could run like the Ferrari. We are in the hands of people enveloped by the most appalling mediocrity yet convinced that the People of God is made up of villagers from the countryside Obtuse unable to understand and grasp the immense gravity of their turns of phrase, just as the greatest canonist of the world that claims to await the judgment of condemnation of the State - regarding offenses asset background - only to see eventually how to proceed against a prelate who managed their lives as S'Essa had been a brothel ancient Pompeii; a living proof that, however,, if it is not declared as such by the State Court, no one can the ecclesiastical Tribunal?

Ten girls, Old cover a 45 rounds of Lucio Battisti

Given these premises, I could safely take and implement the song by Lucio Battisti's wit "Ten girls for me, Possoni enough " [cf. WHO]. And no one could tell me anything and least of sanzionarmi canonically, because if before the Vittorelli who has rehearsed young men far and wide, Vicar General of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome, President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, as well as the largest in the world canon lawyer and former President of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, He declares to wait to know the judgment of the Italian criminal court if there are figures of exquisitely asset relief offense to eventually act, flying on a life marked on a immorality that really the satanic; That said you know well that I can enjoy myself without any moral problem with ten girls, that as the Baptists 'Possoni said enough'. All without any ecclesiastical law pursues me canonically, unless the Italian criminal court determines that for a priest, have a good time with ten girls, it is a crime; I do not think we'll ever establish, if anything, could you give me a certificate of merit and perhaps the honorary citizenship of the place where the crime has unfolded, if it can prove to them straight and brightened all of them.

Mindful that some ringleaders no case Spotlight He teaches nothing and still they claim to continue to rend their garments to the false cry of sorrow “we did not know”, I hope in the Jubilee Year to the greatest canonist of the world be able to complete as soon as their mandate as Vicar General of His Holiness, devoting the time of life that the grace of God will decide to grant him, to ask for forgiveness from Christ for the damage he went to the Church, in particular the Church of the Bishop of Rome, which maybe someone, from its powerful Secretary of State, would do well to print and take my writing, because right when the Vallini and their flattering scagnozzi Career will allow you to beat the priests like me, damage which consequently will accrue to the Church will be increasingly incalculable and irreversible.

.

the Island of Patmos, 3 March 2016

.

.

Author
Drafting
of the island of Patmos

.

.

Appendix posthumously [7 March 2016]

We report PLEASURE WITH AN ARTICLE APPEARED ON SIR (RELIGIOUS SERVICE INFORMATION) A FEW DAYS AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF THIS OUR S ARIEL ARTICLE. LEVI of GUALDO

click to open WHO

..

.

Appendix posthumously [4 March 2016]

In the picture: Federico Lombardi, S.J. Official spokesman of the Press Office of the Holy See

.

We point A NOTE OF VERY INTERESTING 4 March BY

FEDERICO LOMBARDI, S.J.

OFFICIAL SPOKESMAN OF THE HOLY SEE PRESS OFFICE

.

To open click WHO

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

- ecclesial news -

THE VIGANÒ CASE AND 'WHO AM I TO RESPOND?». PAEDOPHILIA, EFEBOFILIA, BUT ABOVE ALL TOO MUCH HOMOSEXUALITY IN WIDESPREAD CLERGY. CHURCH PIACIONA is FINALLY FALL UNDER THE SHOTS OF DEADLY PIACIONERIA.

.

On the return trip from Ireland, a reporter turned to the Supreme Pontiff a question about so-called Viganò Caso, no but no one, what I read so far, We have analyzed the date dall'Augusto response interviewed. Indeed, the Holy Father, before the issues raised by an elderly bishop made his debut in the facts with a "Who am I to answer"? Yet the question to answer is very simple: S. AND. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò, He tells the truth or he lies?

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

disinterestedness and gratuity …

In previous articles to which reference [cf. WHO, WHO], I believe I have distinguished the difference between pedophilia with sufficient scientific rigor, ephebophilia and widespread cases of homosexuality in the clergy. Or in the words of a man of God, Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, with whom I had several times to talk about the problem now out of control priests and gay clergy at the highest levels of our church hierarchy: "We are dealing with a problem of epidemic proportions now!», answered with pained distress the cardinal.

.

In one of these my latest articles I turn to some experts journalists chores Vatican precise question that I know will remain unanswered, that is, if they believe that the reigning Pope is by faith, doctrine, science and pastoral gifts in excess of Gregory I the Great. So I ask, for surely ironic but appropriate tone, if they are really convinced that the Father and the Son may be wrong to proceed to the Holy Spirit, but the reigning Pontiff can not however no wrong, anything you say or do. I find it disturbing that they do not even pose the question that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, as we all are born with the stain of original sin, is an imperfect because too corrupt as all humans from this spot, that here was certainly not committed, but which we have been transmitted by our progenitors responsible for the Poisoned nature [Catechism of the Catholic Church, NN. 385-412].

.

To these staunch defenders, for which perhaps the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, after the Word of God and the Blessed Virgin Mary she is considered the third born without the stain of original sin in the history of all humanity, counterpoise subjects but otherwise similarly dangerous: the haters of the reigning Pontiff, ready to attack him and irriderlo so insolent to whatever he says or does, including quite a few right things he said and done by him in the course of his pontificate, but above all forgetting that he, however imperfect, limited and defeasible is the legitimate successor of Peter. Therefore, we can not appreciate it as a person, or as so-called private doctor, but we must respect and obey him especially when he expresses himself in matters of doctrine and faith [cf. Mt 16, 13-20].

.

We consecrated with the Sacred Order of Priests - and it is good that I remember certain kinds of secular journalists -, the bishop who ordered reciting it over us the prayer of consecration, imposing on their hands and ungendoci with sacred chrism, we promised respect and devout obedience, implied: to him and to the Bishop of Rome, because it is in communion with the Bishop of the Diocese and with the Bishop of Rome Father of the universal Church that we celebrate and we can lawfully and validly celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice. We however never promised that the consecrating Bishop, then the Bishop of Rome, There would have been nice and that we would have estimated. We promised that we would have respected and obeyed. In fact we are consecrated priests with Holy Orders, Vatican experts are not certain who appear to have rather solemnly promise sympathy and unconditional esteem Jorge Mario Bergoglio, of course, all free the amor Dei, as we will explain later ...

.

One thing that unites these two extremes, that as of the railway tracks are far from each other, that do not touch but which, however, allow the transit of the same identical train, is that their act, whether favorable or contrary to the bitter end to the bitter end to this pontificate, It is not free, because behind each other and there is money and lenders; there are free offers the combined Readers offerings for Masses for the repose of the deceased that the undersigned has always been at the full disposal of the costs of The Island of Patmos, with much public register in which is recorded to a hundredth until the last offer received [to better understood, see WHO]. I then came to a conclusion: both love blindly and uncritically, hate is equally blind and uncritical, certe people to Rende; and makes it clear that both in money and in various kinds of benefits.

.

S. AND. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò, He has decided to make public the facts and circumstances known to be always within the Church; and these facts that have in themselves the luciferino are also known to all Vaticanists by increasingly introduced into the so-called sacred palaces, in which it is to determine what the time really sacred survives [cf. Memorial S.It is. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò, WHO].

.

On the return trip from Ireland, a reporter turned to the Supreme Pontiff a question about so-called Viganò Caso, no but no one, what I read so far, We have analyzed the date dall'Augusto response interviewed. Indeed, Pope ready to run in Lampedusa, ready to devote logorrheic and detailed answers on the newest ship of migrants stopped in the port of Catania, ready as I have often reminded to wash and kiss the feet of the Muslims and prostitutes Mass of the Lord's Supper, in the day that we celebrate the institution of the Holy Eucharist and the ministerial priesthood, not the day of the refugee and the prostitute, before the issues raised by an elderly bishop made his debut in the facts with a ... "Who am I to answer"? [cf. minute 20,47 Video below]. While the newspaper of the Italian bishops dismissed this memorial as "a dossier poisoned ' [cf. WHO].

.

.

The secular press, the same one that for decades has publicly lynched Blessed Pope Paul VI, the Holy Father John Paul II and the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, was launched immediately to the defense of the reigning Pontiff downloading poison drops sull'Arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò, But without going into the substance of what he says in his memoir. Because the question is very simple: His Excellency, He tells the truth or he lies? And what I remember said that this kind of printing is made by the same journalists that when the time attacked the Supreme Pontiff Paul VI and then the Supreme Pontiff John Paul, stalwart young men were of the thick foliage, today are bald and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, but they remained the same in the soul whores ever. But mostly they are people to whom, today as forty years ago, if someone asked them to recite the first five words of the opening I believe, would dumb show, But magnify the ultra secularist this "revolutionary papacy Press" that gave birth to "turning points" from which "never come back" because "absolutely irreversible". there, the absoluteness of faith on which they wrote poison rivers to denigrate Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger when the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith promulgated the Declaration Lord Jesus [cf. WHO], they finally applied to the so-called Bergoglism. It's this one, like it or not like it, It is called idolatry, or if we prefer idolatry.

.

Therefore, we have learned from these journalists that Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò He would have had a succession case with his brother and sister, He would be moved away from the role that covered as Secretary General of the Governorate of Vatican City, it would then be a careerist disappointed, who aspired to become governor and then Cardinal ... well: the "poor" and "vicious" Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, He would finally avenged the tender age of seventy-seven years to those who he thought were the wrongs suffered [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc …].

.

I point out to the members of this congregation and journalistic blogghettara, including several vaticanologi defending a sword, obviously free the amor Dei the Reigning Pontiff, whatever he says or does, that the worst scandals of pedophilia, those that led up to the bankruptcy several American dioceses in the nineties of the twentieth century, have occurred precisely because of this reasoning mechanisms with which today, some whores vaticanologhe try to defend both defensible and above all the indefensible. Both therefore clear to all of them and also no easy worth denial, that American dioceses have suffered what I have suffered and paid what they paid, because before the complaints reacted exactly this way:

.

"It is all about the former seminarians dismissed from the seminary who want to take revenge … it is only a priest who has asked for his dismissal from the clerical state and who is now seeking revenge ... it is just a few priests who have had problems with that bishop and that cardinal and who now want to take revenge ... it is only Catholic lay people that they had problems with that parish priest because of the way he had decided to manage the parish and now they want to take revenge ... it is just groups of people instigated by American law firms in an attempt to extort sums of money in compensation for damages decades later by events all to be demonstrated …».

.

The worst scandals They broke out in virulent way with immense harm to the Church, because who would have to act and act decisively and immediately declared unreliable witnesses, but also those who denounced certain serious crimes. Exactly how recently did Cardinal Oscar Maradiaga, that living in the shadow of the living sun, from it being irradiated it is therefore sun vivo himself, for that too free of any kind of criticism and also born without the stain of original sin, up to the point of being able to assert before dozens of seminarians who have denounced rounds of homosexuality within its seminar arcivescovile, with the involvement in them of trainers, that it is just "murmurings" of "seminarians talkers" [cf. WHO]. All this just a short distance from the discharge of his auxiliary bishop, a gay blown to where ever that virgin Archbishop Oscar Maradiaga illibata had noticed, always for the fact that he too, born without stain of original sin, He can not have even the slightest ability to perceive and seize sinful situations.

.

Today, diverse whores vaticanologists, eluding the speech and informing us of the causes of succession Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò with family, or trying to present him as a careerist who has not been given the sop, reproduce the same identical patterns through which we then had the worst scandals; not least the fact that the powerful could not and should not be touched, if then they were touched, everything was likely to be resolved with a snappy ... "Who am I to answer?».

.

Of course, This kind of reactions to “who am I to respond?”, all of them are theological and Read the perspective of higher Mystagogy dogmatic, for in them it is contained and enclosed a great mystery: the mystery of humility. Exactly what perhaps makes the reigning Pontiff and others very close to him more humble ancòra of Christ himself that "although of divine nature, He did not consider it robbery to be equal with God; but he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in human likeness " [cf. In II 1, 6-7].

.

The truth is that the Church, over the past five years, tried to please and please the world in every way. And he has first put an army of people wrong in the most delicate and therefore wrong places. May, as during this pontificate Augusto, it happened that the clergy were dismissed, resigned or expelled without any canonical process, without knowing the charges of informers and without the opportunity to defend himself; all while at the same time, the promoters of the new church all mercy, tenderness and love for all that is not Catholic, They mocked the right, the law and those who "idolize the canonical norms". And here remember the canonical rules were written to guarantee justice and the maintenance of order within the Church, to avoid any form of free will and abuse of ecclesiastical authority. And it comes to basics, these, which they are used primarily to defend the poor, the weak and the faithful workers of the vineyard of the Lord by the atrocities of bullies, including those ecclesiastical bullies who deride the canonical norms and then impose dictatorships of their own free will; all subjects of which, the Reigning Pontiff, He never mentioned, but just never! [cf. WHO]. And all the while pace of whores vaticanologhe you do not realize it, and if they are made before these irrefutable evidence of the facts, then silent and flee, because for them the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is more perfect in his humanity of the Word of God made man. And with that the question is just a must: but to all of them, in various kinds of benefits, him what is, if they are willing to deny these levels until the blatant reality?

.

A Church that wants to please at any cost and at any cost, which highlights unsavory figures like the Jesuit James Martin, unpunished and shameless proponent of such a theory and dell'omosessualismo, in a proliferation of the priests and especially bishops who flirt with powerful lobby gay or so-called LGBT, how can you dare to mention the grave, dangerous and now devastating problem of homosexuality in the clergy, coupling from time to the maximum ecclesiastical positions vertices? The reigning pontiff raised the problem "we are full of homosexuals', talking behind closed doors to the Bishops of Italy gathered in plenary session [cf. WHO], but the problem is far, not only from resolved, because it has not even begun to treat it. This with the result that lobby gay They have now imposed and placed their own men in the Episcopal College and with that experienced the facts even in the College of Cardinals, with all the gay proliferation is something achieved in this our poor Church increasingly visible omosessualizzata and affected by discharges of authentic nubifrossing universal.

.

S. AND. Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò, It raised this question, he did so as a senior bishop and as a former apostolic nuncio in the United States of America. None of us affect his family inheritance issues or its succession causes, We are not interested in the process to his intentions about the fact that he would have felt betrayed in his career expectations. This poison pills to feed the public, by certain whores vaticanologhe is the worst damage that can be done to the Church, because in this way have been for years covered the pedophile priests and with them the bishops who covered them, while all the accusers were accused of being prejudiced only the resentful who sought only revenge.

.

The moral problem is not represented in the Church pedophilia, I repeat that touched, albeit with devastating effects, a very very small number of priests around the world; the problem of the Church is the widespread homosexuality in the clergy. There are already dioceses in which, find a heterosexual priest, is an enterprise that borders on the impossible; and those few heterosexual priests who will survive, are ostracized and massacred both by their gay brothers that of the now numerous bishops gay friendly.

.

The modern Church welcoming and inclusive, all mercy and tenderness, nonjudgmental and enhances the supreme tribunal of the subjective consciousness, no longer dare to say what is moral or immoral, what is lawful and what is sin. The only one immorality seems in fact to be established by the rejection of illegal immigrants who have paid 5.000 Dollars a trip on a boat, When an airline ticket low cost to reach Italy would cost him 300 O 400 Euro. And this kind of worldly Church and mondanizzante certainly can not express negative views on homosexual culture and practice of homosexuality. So that, the only remains abominable sin pedophilia, to the point of yelling "pedophile!"As a priest, simply and homosexual giosamente, He has had a sexual relationship with a minor seventeen consenting and eleven months.

.

But the Italian Church, how certain whores vaticanologists, Is it really inclined to defend free the amor Dei certain cause, including those of real or alleged refugees? Because I am reminded of a doubt that launch at the end between the lines, not being part of the subject matter: it seems that the money allocated by the government to various charities and charitable institutions for the care of the real or alleged refugees, both in the last year it amounted to a higher amount to the same revenue of the Eight per thousand to the Catholic Church, ie more than one billion euros. And all this raises a doubt in me: in various parts of Italy, and in a very special way from Naples down, It has been a proliferation of Onlus founded by priests who have perceived and they perceive that purpose disbursements of funds for the assistance of refugees. Characteristic of these Onlus especially common in Southern Italy, which as we know there are three different Mafias, to which there is also the ecclesiastical mafia certain priests, It is to never submit budgets. If we then go to the Chambers of Commerce to see the statutes and check who they are formed, find that these Onlus They are made by the brother of the priest together with the priest's sister and the grandchildren of the priest ... who obviously share out the cake free the amor Dei!

.

When this great love for refugees, I repeat that it is entirely free the amor Dei, jump out: nothing but scandal of pedophile priests! After all this is the real scourge of the evil clericalism indicated and badly explained by the Pope in his Letter to the Holy People of God [cf. WHO], namely the clerical assumption that we are smart, while all others are poor ignorant of that unfortunately, just as it was once the popular wisdom of the Holy People of God: "Without money there is no singing Mass!».

.

And the Mother of God Blessed Virgin Mary Mother of the Church, intercede for us, admitted that manages ancòra long to hold the arm of her Divine Son, that does not unleash his wrath upon us, avendoci also clearly explained and informed that: "Tire and Sidon at the judgment will have a fate than for you" [Mt 11, 22]. It's still: "Truly I tell you that the land of Sodom and Gomorrah, on the day of judgment, It will be treated than for that city " [Mt 10, 15].

.

It will then be those who are most merciful and tender of Jesus Christ, dispute his judgment and his punishment accusing him of not being merciful.

.

the Island of Patmos, 27 August 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

- ecclesial news -

IF THE RESERVOIR homosexuality HAS EVEN THE BOARD OF BISHOPS, INSTEAD OF WRITING LETTERS TO THE HOLY PEOPLE OF GOD he SHOULD BE STUCK ON THE MOTHER CHURCH OF ROME: "TOTAL CLEARANCE FOR BANKRUPTCY!».

.

In his Letter to the Holy People of God the Supreme Pontiff Francis I it looks good from clarifying that cases of widespread pedophilia among the clergy, each of which is intended to create devastating media effects, as well as damage to the victim atrocious, are real cases and found, but rare, because most of those listed as cases of pedophilia, in truth they are only cases of ephebophilia, ie routine practice of homosexuality by priests exercising that pure, simple, beautiful and protected exercise homosexual sexuality recognized as a genuine right from the Law itself.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

demand respect and rights insulting way in debunking Christianity and its most sacred symbols is now costume LGBT lobby. In the picture: Gay Pride From Rome, He started from the square outside the Cathedral of St. John Lateran episcopal see of the Bishop of Rome, and finally arrived at the Republic Square, formerly Piazza Exedra, where the ancient basilica of Saint Mary of the Angels and Martyrs, built on the ancient baths of Diocletian in memory of the martyrs killed in hatred of the faith during the persecutions of the third century [watch movies WHO e WHO]

Someone may have noticed that the clergy have a homosexual problem now escaped out of control? I forgive me if I repeat myself returning to state, a few days later, this situation I had predicted in detail ten years ago in a number of published texts and always paid a high price [cf. WHO]. Especially precise feel no satisfaction in reiterating this, place when I pointed out certain problems and did some analysis, I wished that time would give me wrong, certainly not reason.

.

A decade ago, before the very serious problem today, albeit not yet exploded with today's scope, only two priests treated the problem in Europe: one in Poland and one in Italy. The Polish priest is Darius Oko, the Italian Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. Several important was then the scientific work of Polish director Andrzej Kobyliński priest who has made a very valuable contribution to the analysis of the problem [cf. see one of his scientific works WHO].

.

The Father and I Darius Oko we have traded in the past many opinions on the subject, agree among ourselves on a specific point: the problem of this "gay lobby influences the Church" [cf. His interview 2013 WHO] and inside it has made a "coup homosexual» [cf. My interview 2013 WHO], It would become an irreversible problem when this universal nubifrossing He had touched its peak sweeping the College of Bishops.

.

Unnecessarily years it laid stress: the bishops that villain so promote and protect gay priests, They are a dangerous scourge, but when gay priests become bishops, we will be faced with a catastrophic disaster before which two forces will help us to raise ourselves from such desolation, albeit with the use of a long time and much effort: the Holy Spirit and the Holy People of God [cf. WHO].

.

My numerous writings pubbicati his The Island of Patmos testify that many times, talking of the Petrine ministry and the reigning Pontiff explained, and I have repeatedly stated:

.

"That poor imprudent man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, that of all the previous decades of damage done is only the first victim, or as I wrote in the recent past using an allegorical [cf. WHO]: he is only the last of the customers come in the restaurant and that crossing the threshold was attacked by waiters who demanded from him payment of the accounts of all those before him had had lunch and dinner without pay, but leaving fine suspended accounts [cf. WHO]».

.

This My concept, It was allegedly taken by my dear friend Andrea Tornielli in his last press articles about the agency Vatican Insider, which rightly draws between its rows the fact that certain problems do not arise under this pontificate [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO]. So far, all of us with rational minds tending more to the logical that all'umorale, We fully agree. What is known, however, in the articles of my dear friend, I have often successfully defended when it came under sniper fire for merely exercising their right to report [cf. WHO], or when someone has released the first statement and then if you rimangiate [cf. WHO], is that he does not seem to pose the question of whether the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, in their government, he made mistakes, or whether it is burdened with defects and limitatezze that characterize all our imperfect humanity marked by corruption of original sin. Of human imperfections, defects and limitatezze was burdened even the Pope Gregory I, universally known as St. Gregory the Great, that perhaps the doctrinal quality, pastoral and government had one or two more of the Pope Francis I, but it is clear: only one or two, anything that!

.

It is so true - and I for the first as I have said and repeatedly repeated - that the Supreme Pontiff Francis I can not pay the very high bill of a doctrinal crisis which has finally generated a great moral crisis in the clergy [cf. My article on Theologica, WHO], because this crisis begins to take shape in the sixties and spreads dramatically since the early seventies of the twentieth century. In those years the reigning Supreme Pontiff had not yet been consecrated priest, because his ordination took place in Argentina at the end of 1969, to be exact 13 December.

.

The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio It has its serious responsibilities, then if these objective responsibility does not want to see, then you run the serious risk of falling into one of the worst quirks of our politicians, that after carrying out the campaign promises made by skimming the scripts of science fiction movies, once elected and catapulted into real problems and especially difficult in the country solution, They begin to defend themselves by saying that it's all because of previous governments. Therefore, if on one hand I think the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio are due responsibilities of several poor choices made by its Supreme Predecessors, Blessed Saints and Popes included, they, for its part, which however has not yet been either beatified or canonized, lying in front of certain serious problems not easily solved put us in a lot of his, for example in imprudent spirit, throwing arm with speeches on slippery topics, making poor choices and resorting to ambiguous expressions in which it is difficult to grasp the spirit of the involuntary good faith, especially when these ambiguities are then generated in the visible Church quarrels and divisions as they had never before seen. And although repeatedly begged by cardinals, bishops, priests and lay faithful to offer words of clarification [cf. WHO], He has refused to respond with a spirit that denotes touchiness and haughtiness. But, soon after, sported media humility by washing and kissing your feet Mass of the Lord's Supper the Muslim's prostitute, to the delight of journalists ultra secularists and the loss of us astonished priests in that holy day we celebrate the institution of the Holy Eucharist and the ministerial priesthood, We not celebrate the World Day of the fugitive or the redemption of prostitutes [cf. WHO].

.

It is true that the captain of a ship He must rely on sailors who have at their disposal, but it is also true that man Jorge Mario Bergoglio seems that most of the wrong men, often went hunting almost. And the thing that hurts is that the reigning Pontiff, paying no heed to many prelates of great experience in service to the Holy See even decades, He has persistently repeatedly to approve episcopal appointments of persons who had been repeatedly excluded from the so-called backhoe burdened because of large doctrinal and moral issues, led into this by people who enjoy his confidence and so he followed to say the least dangerous to keep around. In other words, or better understood, it comes to that issue that I have called court of miracles [cf. WHO, WHO] and that the Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller has called instead magic circle:

.

"I have the impression that the Pope's magic circle there are those who bother to spy on suspected opponents, thereby preventing an open discussion and balanced. Sort all Catholics in the categories of "friend" or "enemy" of the Pope, It is the most serious damage they cause to the Church " [cf. WHO].

.

That's why in 2015 I began with two articles in which I stated sadly ironic title since what was the heart of the dramatic problem: "Bishops, fashions and advice for new careerists: be poor, peripheral existential and sloppy " [cf. WHO], "They're buggerando the Holy Father: We protect Peter! The worst ocelots are coming in pauperism episcopate glory " [cf. WHO].

.

Like it or not like it, but if the facts are incontrovertible unfortunately not only the fatuous vague and debatable opinions, in those three years of my articles there is the picture of what might be called the episcopate bergogliano. Then I will provide some examples to explain without going into details, but the premise that if the Ecclesiastical Authority summon me to give you their names and surnames of the persons in question, although unnecessarily, because they know very well both individuals and above all their deeds. And the examples are these: in Italy I have become bishops, two priests in their fifties who were a happy fact coppietta, that note and recognized since the time of the seminar, and today, on their mouths, unfortunately used for anything but to pray, It is all and only a constant hive of poor, poverty, refugees, existential suburbs and so on. He became bishop a person to whom the youngsters who at the time if the were with him when he was a young priest, Today delight in telling about his tastes from passive gay submissive to dominant male. He became bishop, afterward he awarded the dignity of cardinal, a subject that has covered and protected for years the most filthy crap priests who frequented marchettari a fee and they imboscavano in gay saunas. He became bishop a priest from which an entire presbytery remember exactly which and how many other seminarians, then with what and how many young priests below if he made her, so that his diocesan ordinary, to prevent this follow suit fox in the henhouse to wreak damage, gravely mistaken removed it from the diocese and from contact with young priests, sending him to Rome to study. Not to mention the young priests, removed in the same way by the dioceses under the guise of specialized studies, that once finished their courses in the Roman ecclesiastical universities, through the good offices of senior prelates gay or gay friendly then they entered as officials in the various departments of the Holy See. And just to clarify: during the month of September I will go up for the second time the steps of the State Secretariat for going to confer with the proper authorities but also to hand over a dossier of evidence and documents I drafted and signed before which the stories about Sodom and Gomorrah are a childish tale by the boarders, all so that staved off the dazzling career of another person at very high risk.

.

All of this nubifrossing which it is much worse than those tsunami that ravaged entire nations, Is it the fault of the previous government members? The Pope Francis I, in certain dangerous appointments we have not been deceived, quite the opposite: when it was put on notice of the nature and deeds of certain persons previously rejected as candidates for the episcopate, It's handsomely tricked and promoted them bishops, some even Cardinal.

.

The Pope Francis I It is not a man you love being challenged, nor he loves to hear from serious and honest collaborators that certain pastoral choices and Government could be very wrong, or that certain appointments should be avoided, therefore, acting in accordance with the typical patterns of the mediocre, He has surrounded himself with dangerous dwarves, then they have the best of the worst of the career-change, what they are now all poor, poverty and refugees. But if tomorrow the wind to change and a new giungesse Pope King, overnight we would see them enter their cathedrals with seven meters magna hood, the episcopal gloves on the hands and mitres damask decorated with precious gems on the head.

.

And here you could call me to order, because in the previous lines I dared to give the poor the August Pontiff Ruling. Having said that I clarify to anyone who considers the Supreme Pontiff Reigning the third person in human history free from any stain of sin after the Word of God made man and after the Great Mother of God Blessed Virgin Mary, that define man Jorge Mario Bergoglio balanced, with solid doctrine and the ability to govern, would like to magnify the gorgeous gowns that certain king narrated by celebrated fairy tale, but the truth is naked. It rasserenino therefore all papolatri, because at the beginning of the twentieth century we had a Pope who was a mediocre man, and in some respects even limited, It was called Pius X, Today loved and revered Holy Pontiff of the Church. It was not the only, the Holy Pontiff Pius X, to be a mediocre and limited man, I have been many other saints now highly revered by the people of God, from the Patron Saint of Priests, St. John Mary Vianney. What it was therefore the heroic nature of the virtues that made a man mediocre and too limited as the Supreme Pontiff Pius X a great successor of Peter and then a Saint? St. Pius X had a virtue that the man's personality Jorge Mario Bergoglio seems currently unknown: Pope Pius X had the extraordinary gift of grace of that humility that made him great, but above all able to surround himself with men of the highest talent and intellect, from the Servant of God Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val, that was the big hand of the memorable Encyclical Sheep feeding Domici. And a Saint, as in the case of the Saint Pius X, He surrounds himself with holy men of God, as opposed to subjects like the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio who tend instead to surround themselves - if I pass the end very little Roman church - de pore half-saws.

.

From a pastoral point of view and ecclesiological, before the current irreversible nubifrossing which now also he flooded the College of Bishops, I can not rejoice before the Letter to the Holy People of God of Pope Francis I [cf. WHO], before which there is little to rejoice, because it is the so-called bergogliano yet another text in which it tries to say everything in order not to say anything about what you should say instead, so especially clear and precise. A really poor text, when compared to a memorable text, but unfortunately it forgot from short memory minds, like the one written just eight years ago by Venerable Pope Benedict XVI and titrated: "Pastoral Letter to the Catholics of Ireland" [cf. WHO].

.

The letter of Pope Benedict XVI It has a pastoral structure, theological and socio-ecclesial that starts first of all a great sense of humanity. In it indicates the problem, By analyzing and envisage all solutions. The letter of Pope Francis seems to flaunt humanity contrived in an attempt to show human sensitivity to the world, but most importantly it is devoid of a pastoral structure, theological and socio-ecclesial.

.

Said this: If the theologians on the one hand, Journalists on the other hand, both want to do the analysis in their various and respective competent, unfortunately we have to achieve this result: the Letter of Benedict XVI to the Catholics of Ireland says it all dramatically, pastoral and ecclesial; a letter of Francis to the Holy People of God does not say anything because it does not analyze the problem, It does not indicate with precision parties responsible and does not offer solutions, to the point of blaming an unspecified "clericalism", when in fact the Holiness of Our Lord the reigning Pontiff should know well that the dramatic problem is the high rate spread homosexuality in the clergy.

.

This is the difference that exists between a man mediocre and limited as the Supreme Pontiff Pius X, and a man mediocre and limited as the Supreme Pontiff Francis I. The whole premise that the Holy Spirit offers and filled as always with quite special the Successor of Peter, but if the Successor of Peter is not open to accommodate and exploit the abundant gifts and special grace poured on him, In this case, the Holy Spirit does not work. It does not work because God can not contradict or may contradict the mystery of creation: Man was created in the image and likeness of God, free and endowed with free. If anyone, before a Pope that can be partially or totally closed also from time to time or to the Holy Spirit grace Actions, he came out saying that out anyway, he being the Successor of Peter, in any case you can never err in matters of doctrine and faith, in which case it would come out by the founding principles and fundamentals the Catholic faith even to fall into fideism, but the real magic. Such as do long all those who now have specialized to look for in the pontifical documents that they do not contain, or to make him say what they do not tell, convinced through their interpretations Pindaric to defend and protect the papacy whose first defender to be the Successor of Peter, because if the papacy did not defend him, all our defense is likely to be useless and totally vain, and ridiculous.

.

In the Letter to the People of God, His Holiness Francis I he looks very well to indicate the great plague of homosexuality and dell'omosessualismo now spread even to the highest levels of the church hierarchy; quite the opposite, He is so determined to keep around as a consultant on a subject as dangerous gay friendly James Martin S.J. [cf. WHO].

.

The Supreme Pontiff Francis I it looks good by clarifying that cases of widespread pedophilia among the clergy, each of which is intended to create devastating media effects, as well as damage to the victim atrocious, are real cases and found, but rare, because most of those listed as cases of pedophilia, in truth they are only cases of ephebophilia, ie routine practice of homosexuality by priests exercising that pure, simple, beautiful and protected exercise homosexual sexuality recognized as a genuine right from the Law itself.

.

To understand how the cases of pedophilia in the clergy are rare, just do a simple numerical proportion analysis: in the world the secular Catholic clergy and adjust consists of about 450.000 priests [cf. WHO], if we compare this number with that of pedophile priests convicted by a final judgment, We find out what we're talking about really numerical proportion of very few priests, roughly in the order of 0,02% low. Since, however, the efebofilo falls into those that are the defects related to the practice of homosexuality, if it's priests screams instead "to pedophile!”, even when a commonly gay priest and certainly not pedophile, He has profaned the Sacred Order of Priests consuming a carnal sacrilege with a boy of seventeen years and eleven months, who he was rather addicted to sexual activity since he was thirteen, and that was a prostitute paid since he was fourteen.

.

Most of the priests referred to as pedophiles - I repeat, however, are not pedophiles but efebofili or simply giosamente and gay -, who they have had sex with teenagers in the absence of physical violence and psychological coercion, consumed alone and nothing but gay relationships. And that being said I repeat: if in the absence of proven psychological and physical violence, a sixteen year old with his family presentassero is assisted by an army of lawyers before the judges, for an order of priest pedophilia, they would literally be thrown out of any court in the world, if anything, even with the serious risk of being sued by their gay priest who has only had sex with a minor in post-pubertal age group, without subjecting it to any physical and psychological coercion, and what obviously consenting. And all this - I repeat it again without being wordy - it's called homosexuality and pedophilia does not.

.

This lack of clarity and distinction including very rare cases of pedophilia, cases of ephebophilia, cases of sexual relationships with young consenting gay priests and often handsomely rewarded for their services rendered quite often for a fee, therefore likely to create a big and dangerous misconception: if a gay adult has sexual intercourse with a consenting ultra sixteen teenager or with a fourteen already sailed and as such psychologically recognized, in this case and has had just nothing but a lawful sexual intercourse; if, however, to have had a sexual relationship with this same subject is a priest, in that case you scream "pedophile". The first very great hypocrites who cry out immediately "pedophile" are just the children of the powerful lobby LBGT, those teaching on sexuality understood as a genre of your choice or on the beauty of 'Gay love, I have already imposed in many countries around the world starting from elementary schools.

.

The reigning Supreme Pontiff, He was accidentally informed by his gay Jesuit James Martin consultant around the world, Many Catholic schools have had to close and then liquidate their unused now stable, because local governments had imposed their teachings incompatible with the faith and Catholic morality, such as the dell'omosessualismo exaltation and the theory of the genus, the obligation of education on contraception and abortion rights? Whether these cases are not documented by the branch radio Radicale which for some time it has reduced the newspaper of the Italian Bishops L'Avvenire, It does not mean they are not real cases and especially rising steadily, those in Catholic schools forced to close its doors and sell stable.

.

And this large and dangerous misconception that originates primarily from the lack of information and distinction between pedophilia, ephebophilia and homosexuality, with all its numerical statistics, the manager is the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, that is not the Holy Pope Gregory I the Great or the Holy Pontiff Pius X, who also had, like men, limitatezze of which they have not affected the achievement of their holiness, simply because they went beyond themselves to open up to the actions of the grace of God upon them.

.

Finally, I must give a reason to Professor Roberto de Mattei, I have often criticized amiably, without ever having questioned his preparation and especially his exemplary life and his being a genuine intellectual model, a husband and a Catholic father. My Christian and intellectual honesty requires me to say that Professor Roberto de Mattei has unfortunately right when he speaks of papolatri, because at this certain we have now reached: the Father and the Son may be wrong to proceed to the Holy Spirit, but the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio no, he can do no wrong and is never wrong, whatever you say or do.

.

.

Given these premises, the Major Basilica of St. John Lateran, Cathedral of Rome and Mother of all the Churches of the world, we can also put up the sign: total failure sellout, aware that in the future, from this terrible devastation wrought by his bishops and his priests, with long and painful effort visible the pilgrim Church on earth will recover and be relieved only by the Holy Spirit and the Holy People of God.

.

The 18 February 2013, a few days after the announcement of the act of renunciation given by the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, the news agency Vatican Insider He reported a deservedly forgotten text of the young theologian Joseph Ratzinger, from 1969 and contained in its cycle of radio lessons:

.

"From today's crisis it will emerge a Church that has lost much. It will become small and will have to start more or less from the beginning. No longer able to live many of the buildings he had built in prosperity. As the number of its faithful will decrease, gra also lose part of the social privileges […] But despite all these changes can be presumed, the Church will find again and with all the energy that is essential to it, what has always been its center: faith in the Triune God, in Jesus Christ, the Son of God made man, assistance of the Spirit, that will last until the end. Will start again in small groups, by movements and by a minority that transmit the faith and prayer at the center of the experience, and experience again the sacraments as a divine service and not as a liturgical structure problem. It will be a more spiritual Church, that does not arrogherà political office now flirting with the left and now with the right. It will do this with effort. The process in fact crystallization and clarification will make poor, The Church will become a small, the process will be long and tiring. But after testing of these divisions will come from an internalized Church and simplified a great force. Men who live in a totally planned world will experience an unspeakable loneliness. If they have completely lost the sense of God, hear all the horror of their poverty. They then discover the small community of believers as something totally new: they find out as a hope for themselves, the answer had always tried in secret […] To me it seems certain that they are preparing for the very difficult times Church. His real crisis has just begun. It has to deal with major upheavals. But I am also quite sure of what will be the end: not the Church of the political cult […] but the Church of faith. Of course it will not be the dominant social force insofar as it was until recently. But the Church will know a new flowering and will appear as the man's house, where to find life and hope beyond death " [cf. WHO].

.

These words painted the devastation wrought in our recent past, the situation of this disfiguring visible Church, and finally the future that awaits us, just do not be blind and not think that this moment of glory for some, for other aberrant confusion, together with this pontificate will never go, among cries of "epochal revolutions" and "irreversible processes". Screams of those typical Jacobean, not having a future perspective and eschatological, are capable of living only the everything and immediately of the present, looking like boarding pirates to grab at this present everything you can grab, almost as if … "There is no certainty in tomorrow ', then "who wants be happy", in the words of the father of Gnosticism Renaissance neo-pagan Lorenzo the Magnificent, it was in fact a father of neo-pagan Gnosticism, He was not a father of the Catholic faith.

.

the Island of Patmos, 24 August 2018

.

.
.
«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

- ecclesial news -

KILLING THE ENEMY: REFLECTIONS ON THE DEATH PENALTY AND ISSUES ANNESSE

.

One might also ask if it was the case that the question of the death penalty had entered the Catechism, whose job is not to provide a solution to practical problems quota, but to teach the unchanging truths of faith. Anyway, happily welcome the decision of the Holy Father, who, with this gesture, if he does not exercise his ministry as teacher of the faith, however, in the full exercise of his pastoral authority, and precisely the power of the keys

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the imaginative and questionable pseudo-historical film In the name of the Pope King, played by the great Nino Manfredi, Where does the story fictionalized terrorists Giuseppe Monti and Gaetano Tognetti

I join with my contribution the intervention of the Father Ariel [cf. WHO], on which are substantially agree, adding other topics and presenting some annexes.

.

There is a book that on the issue of the murder seems paradoxical. No book like this enhances the dignity, the inviolability and sanctity of human life. but yet, while, none like this admits the lawfulness of murder in the name of God: war, invasions, massacres, punishments, death sentences, law of retaliation, tyrannicides, killing unjust aggressors. And this book is the Bible. The biblical law boycott cherem was the total destruction of the enemy defeated that we can find news in the Book of Deuteronomy [cf. Dt 20, 10-20] and it is presented in the Bible as divine precept, so much so that Saul was punished by God for not doing the cherem [And Sam 15, 9] after God had ordered him to "kill the people of Amalek" and:

.

"Not give way to compassion for him, but slay both man and women, Children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys " [And Sam 15, 3].

.

It can be said that the ethics of the Bible is an ethics of life. The good is that which promotes life; evil and sin are what offends or off. Hence the precept not to kill:

.

"You have heard what was said to your ancestors: do not kill; and whoever kills will be liable to judgment " [Is 20, 13].

.

At the same time, however, there are degrees of life: from that infima, vegetable, to climb, through animal life, to the human, all white angelica, the divine life. But the command "Thou shalt not kill" is not worth the same for all grades of life. The intra-human life can be sacrificed to the human. Already in Eden God authorizes the first married couple to use plants and animals to obtain food.

.

As for the person's life, according to the Bible, his physical life, however valuable, It must be ordered to spiritual, for which Christ commands us to give up the physical life which can create hindrance to the spiritual life and the relationship with Him:

.

"If your hand causes you to sin, toglila » [cf. MC 9,43].

.

Photo Gallery de Alvariis – Rome, 1868: execution of the two terrorists Gaetano Monti and Giuseppe Tognetti

The physical life of the individual must be at the service of common good, that is, the life of the community, so if it happens that the individual, with his criminal conduct, endanger the good of society, this, according to Scripture, It can get rid of the death penalty from this dangerous element.

.

In the past, death penalty It served to protect society from the damage caused by criminals. Indeed, the divine commandment "Thou shalt not kill" means "do not kill the innocent", but they not necessarily forbid to kill the wicked, indeed his killing by the legitimate authority is seen as an act of justice, as it is evidenced by the examples of Scripture and the whole history of the Church.

.

This is why in the past the Church has justified the death penalty and she made it her own use in the Papal States. In this regard, suffice it to recall that the death penalty was abolished by the Basic Law of the State of the Vatican City 12 February 2001, after Paul VI had made in 1967 ineffective, while without deleting. Only in 2001 It was totally erased by motu proprio of John Paul II.

.

Photo Gallery de Alvariis – Rome, 1868: execution of the two terrorists Gaetano Monti and Giuseppe Tognetti

In the old Papal States, from the 1796 al 1870 They were made about 516 death sentences. Presiding over the court of the Holy See were ecclesiastical judges, then of course the sentences were carried out by the laity, the so-called secular arm, they were certainly not priests, brothers and sisters to carry out the death sentences. In the State of the Church for the death penalty it was practiced until 1870. The death sentences could not be carried out without the authorization of the Roman Pontiff, who, he is wishing he could switch them to life imprisonment, in another sentence or even pardon. The first death sentence passed under the pontificate of Pius IX was in 1852 to Girolamo Simoncelli who had spotted a number of offenses: murder, attempt at insurrection, false and outrageous aggression against Giusto Recanati Bishop of Senigallia. Another resounding condemnation was that of Giuseppe Monti and Gaetano Tognetti performed in Rome in Via dei Cerchi the 24 November 1868. These two condemned today are celebrated as martyrs after being constructed such as to certain legends of the Risorgimento. In truth, the two young men were guilty of the crime of massacre by killing with a bomb attack on the Zuavi Barracks located in Palazzo Serristori, in the current Via della Conciliazione, Twenty-three soldiers and two civilians, seriously injuring other innocent civilians, two of whom died later life, for a total of twenty-seven victims [List of victims WHO]. Among the civilians killed Francesco Ferri and little daughter Rosa. The massacre could have been much worse, because of the three explosive charges placed in the drains of the barracks just exploded; if they were all exploded, the tragedy would have been greater. It would be even with the explosion of a single charge, if most of the Zouaves were not released for reasons of service to Porta San Paolo, In fact, the Zouaves died in the attack were almost all the members of the band.

.

Photo Gallery de Alvariis – Rome, 1868: execution of the two terrorists Gaetano Monti and Giuseppe Tognetti

A Pius IX was advanced pledge of grace, but he was forced to reject it not to irritate the families of many victims, but also not irritate the Roman population, which he had been deeply touched by the death of a child Rosa Ferri. The two terrorists, during a year-long process, not asked for mercy; and they not asked for the reasons narrated by legend, since they have decided to deny indomitable to come to terms with the "tyrant", but because they were so impressed by the effects of their actions and the deaths that were achieved, much to see in the scaffold a form of ransom for the gesture made by them [reference is made in this regard to the report published in 1868 the journal of the Jesuits La Civiltà Cattolica after their execution, WHO]. After 1870, with the unification of Italy attempted to transform these two terrorists in heroic figures of fighters against tyranny, dedicating their streets and monuments, in total disregard of the victims died as a result of the massacre perpetrated by them. The legend of two young proclaimed later "martyrs of the Italian law" moved from the late nineteenth-century literature also the contemporary filmography, especially in film In the name of the Pope King, played by the great Nino Manfredi, in which the two terrorists were raised to the rank of "martyrs of freedom" [cf. WHO].

.

The last executed under Pope Pius IX before the fall of the Papal States was Agatino Bellomo, convicted of brutal murder and guillotined in Palestrina in July 1870, two months before the fall of Rome.

.

In centuries long gone the same death penalty for heretics It was imposed by the so-called secular arm State after the convictions of ecclesiastical tribunals. The State, in these ancient times that can not be analyzed with contemporary socio-political criteria, He considered a heretic as destructive civil public order. In any case, the canonists and the Fathers of the Church - see, for example, St. Thomas Aquinas [QUESTION, II-II, q.11, a.3] - they believed that the heretic deserved the death penalty, as disturbing the faith of the Church, common good of the Church and the People of God.

.

The Church has the right to be at the forefront of the abolition of the death penalty, as is happening today with the Pope Francis. This clearly implies a negative judgment on past practice. This decision of the Church should not surprise, because it is based on a deeper understanding of the dignity of the person and of his own physical life.

.

Today the Church believes that the company can defend itself from the delinquent even without recourse to the death penalty. While incarceration may give hope to the prisoner to escape, it is also true that it can give you chance to repent. The death penalty can have a deterrent value, but experience teaches that not recede from their conduct certain criminals even knowing that risk of execution.

.

Photo Gallery de Alvariis – Rome, 1867: the barracks of Zouaves in Palazzo Serristori atentato after the bombing of the two terrorists Gaetano Monti and Giuseppe Tognetti

This change of judgment of the church about the death penalty is a better understanding of the absoluteness of the "do not kill" commandment, even if it was respected, although less perfectly, also from the previous conception. This judgment makes changing even better apply the evangelical commandment of love for the enemy, while in the past the Church was less willing to tolerate his enemies, and to consider its positive aspects and also it was easier to consider them guilty and more reluctant to admit extenuating circumstances or excuses the guilty. It was less feared mistrial, because unless we realized the complexity of the problem of having to judge a man when criminal law.

.

The noble example of the martyr that, in the footsteps of Christ, while it is able to defend, lets kill the pursuer, It can not be built in a common rule of conduct, but it constitutes the heroic witness of a special gift of the Holy Spirit, not at all granted. It would be to show an intolerable rigorism to pretend to lower to a common rule what is only a privilege of the Holy Spirit. Likewise, the heroism of the mother, who prefers to die to give birth to son, she in those tragic circumstances could have an abortion, It is not to be taken as a general rule without risking groped God.

.

We must however distinguish the legitimate punishment by the action of the criminal coercive aimed at neutralizing an unjust personal assault or collective. Precisely because human life is sacred, must be defended, if required, also with the use of force, with the opponent's suppression. So it is lawful to the jeweler threatened by an armed thug, kill him before he does fire. It is permissible for a guardian of the order to kill a terrorist caught in the act of terrorism and crime it is going to make a killing. It is lawful for a soldier to kill the enemy of the country.

.

Gaetano Tognetti Tombstone gravestone at the cemetery of Verano

Here is the solution apparent paradox of Scripture, which connects the command not to kill the murder legitimacy for cause, Whether self-defense or just war. As for the injustice aggressor, although it is a person, However, with its aggression it loses its right to existence, not as a person, but as harmful agent. The essential thing is to make it harmless. If to achieve this end, you can leave it in life, well; otherwise it must kill. In fact has reason for being the good life, not that evil. This is why in the Bible God destroys the wicked, thing to be understood not in the sense that God nullifies them, but in the sense that punish them eternally. The Bible, therefore, distinguishes murder from executed, just war by unjust war. Murder is a crime: suppress those who have a right to exist, for example, the abort; is executed act of justice, although it involves the removal of a man. Just War is one that defends the homeland and all its subsidiaries by the attacker. War is unjust aggression to another people. Consider unjust in itself every war is hypocritical fraud pacifists, who then they are the first to hate those who contradict them.

.

The Church in the past believed that the physical existence of the person is not an absolute right, but it is conditioned by his conduct. The criminal lost this right, He is its harmful to society life. The church, other parte, he cared especially the eternal salvation of the offender. For this to those sentenced to death he was assured religious assistance. The you could open the gates of heaven. Today the Church thinks differently. It gives more importance to the physical life of the offender and less importance to the damage he does to the society. Difficult to determine whether it was better before or is it better now. Anyhow, to be good Catholics, just stay with that.

.

The Church does not intend to impose on Member waiving the death penalty, as if it were an absolute or a natural law requirement, but as a precautionary measure that may allow exceptions in cases serious. After all, it is a positive legal ground, in which the state retains a legitimate autonomy, because it does not touch the universal human rights and duties inviolable, but the positive law of State responsibility. At this juncture the church may invite, it may urge; but can not prescribe.

.

Judith and her husband Giuseppe Tavani Arquati died in a clash with the Papal Zouaves 23 October 1867 during the raid on the premises where they were in the act of conspiracy plans with the armed forces of foreign armies and where an arsenal of guns and ammunition was stored. On the occasion of the celebrations of Italian unification it was placed this inscription. No stone has ever been placed on the barracks walls of Palazzo Serristori where twenty-seven people were killed as a result of the bombing of Giuseppe Monti and Gaetano Tognetti. Also to mark the 150th anniversary of Italy, It has confirmed the ideology meandering always in our country: there are righteous dead and unjust deaths, dead transformed into heroes, even though they were the bombers dead and doomed to eternal indifference. The Italian continues to be a people not yet able to bring down the historic peace on the winners and the losers, of those who fought a good clappers and over who induced, He forced or persuaded to be right, instead he fought an unjust battle. Italy is therefore a country where, to the test, the dead can not find peace, while the ideologues throw fuel on the fire.

Death penalty it's not a intrinsically evil such as abortion or murder innocent, my a that which was evil in the majority of, because in some very rare cases is the right punishment for serious crimes too, as was the death sentence of the Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg trial, about the execution of which it does not appear that either political, nor ecclesiastics, nor the more radical pacifists, We have never raised objections. The church, so, It does not impose the above waiver with the same force with which it imposes theoretical natural moral law or the rights inalienable and imprescriptible duties of the person, or absolute moral values, such as religious freedom, the dignity of marriage and the common good or the prohibition of abortion and stuff. Neither, as also said the Father Ariel, the Church's decision should be seen like a doctrinal pronouncement which had the status of infallibility, irrevocability and immutability. We are in fact on the ground of dogma, but of pastoral care and the law, a plane on which the Church, as merits our respect, It is not infallible.

.

It should therefore be noted that the prohibition does not belong to the natural law of death penalty, founded on divine right, immutable and binding, but of positive law, changeable and abrogabile, employee human authority, Civil and ecclesiastical. Because of this, Father Ariel rightly points out that, expected the current spread of corruption in society and in the Church, as well as considering - I add - the prophecies of the Apocalypse and of Saint Paul on the final apostasy, we can not be so sure that does not return a situation that requires the restoration of the death penalty, albeit limited to exceptional homes, if not unique.

.

The question of the death penalty is framed in the large issue of crime repression in state and Church. As for the latter, remember - just as an example - that the canon law still recognizes the existence of the crime of heresy and hits him with appropriate sanctions [can. 1364§ 1], although unfortunately often happens, for negligence and injustices authority, that heretics unpunished, whereas they are hit the faithful to the deposit of faith, Catholic doctrine and the magisterium of the Church. However, this in no way detracts common law of human justice, whose inevitable wrongs are then repaired by divine justice. The risk that we run today, as it is known to all, is not that of too severely, but it is to a misericordismo and a brand gooders roussoiana, that ignores the consequences of original sin, opens the door to increased crime and corruption and discourages those who work for justice.

.

One might also ask if it was the case that the question of the death penalty had entered, before and after, in the Catechism, whose job is not to provide a solution to practical problems quota, but to teach the unchanging truths of faith. Anyway, happily welcome the decision of the Holy Father, who, with this gesture, if he does not exercise his ministry as teacher of the faith, however, in the full exercise of his pastoral authority, and precisely the power of the keys, incarnating in history the perennial demands of the Gospel.

.

Varazze, 4 August 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.