- ecclesial news -

HOW TO REMEDY THE excommunication TO HERESY

.

The belong or not to belong to the Church, the stay or leave the Church are not such simple things. Of course, there may be forms of separation and total, such as loss of faith with apostasy. But usually there are different degrees of separation and therefore of excommunication. We must also see that idea one gets of the Church and of belonging to the Church or ecclesial communion. One can be convinced to fully belong to the Church, and instead is yours only partially, as for example the Protestants or modernists.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Alinari photo 1950 – the Dominican Friars, during the Fiorita Festival in Florence, lay a tribute to the place where he was hanged and burned Girolamo Savonarola

St. Paul the Apostle warns: "If any man preach a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be anathema!» [Gal 1,9].

.

In every community the president has the power and duty to protect with appropriate remedial measures or coercive community members that it causes harm or endanger the good order and peace. This principle of justice also applies to the Church, as stated in the Code of Canon Law: "The Church has an innate and proper right to coerce criminal penalties the faithful who have committed crimes" [can. 1311].

.

From the earliest days of the Church the apostles, taking up the tradition of the synagogue, expelling unruly, troublemakers and apostates, exercised judicial power against serious crimes, as evidenced by the story of Ananias and Sapphira [cf. At 5, 1-11]. So St. Paul expels from the incestuous community [cf. The Cor 5,8]. To condemn the erring, he uses a greek word: anàthema, corresponding to Hebrew dear, which means "cursed" and therefore "excommunicated". So he warns: "If any man love not the Lord, is anàthema!» [The Cor 16,22]. E: "If anyone preaches any other gospel, is anàthema» [Gal 1.8]. Jesus himself repeatedly launches curses. And indeed, since the first centuries the Councils declare anàthema, ie excommunicated those who support the errors condemned.

.

St. Thomas Aquinas explains l'Origin of the concept of anàthema and then of excommunication. L'says Aquinas: « anàthema It is a Greek word composed of he went, which means 'above' and thesis, which means 'position', so to call 'anatema'' What-you-place-in-high ', because when it was captured prey like something you did not want to use by men, it was suspended in the temple, so far it has become a habit that those things which are separated from common men, They were "anathema" calls, as we see in the Book of Genesis: "Whether this city accursed [1] and is devoted to the Lord all that is in it " [GS 6,17]» [2].

.

From here, in Ecumenical Councils, the much used formula let him be, that will appear for the last time in the First Vatican Council, while it is absent in the Second Vatican Council, This clearly does not mean that the Council did not condemn the errors, claiming which it incurs excommunication. Today's excommunication is what the Church once called anatema, that curse: a verdict of an error or an errant, pronounced authority with the imposition of a penalty and the expulsion or removal of the dissident or criminal from the community.

.

"Curse" in this biblical context means "to say the least-bad", but not in the sense of slander, but in the sense of declaring in court that someone has spoken ill or hurt and therefore it deserves to be punished, It deserves a bad penalty. In this regard the Bible says that God curses the wicked and Christ at the Last Judgment when away from the reprobate [cf. Mt 25,41]. The curse can strike the evil deed, but it can also affect the person who has done this deed. It is true that both the Gospel [cf. LC 6,28], As St. Paul advised not to curse [cf. RM 12,14]. But these prohibitions affect those who curse the innocent, as it is forbidden to kill the innocent, but not criminal. Otherwise, the Church would not anathematized for centuries and millennia heretics and schismatics. And if today we hear or read the Popes curse the heretics, we can not ignore that only recently the Church has abandoned this language, that the Commission used safely for a long time, but that today, the current climate of ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue, indeed there embarrass. Today it seems to us that the curse has aroused hatred. But it is not necessarily so. Understood in the legal sense, it is an act of justice. And if the word has been abandoned by the Magisterium of the Church, It remains the equivalent term of "excommunication". Now, communion, the unit, the pace, mutual love and harmony in the Church born from the common acceptance by all the faithful of the same truths of faith and the same discipline taught by the Magisterium of the Church under the guidance of the Supreme Pontiff. So we understand that the heretic deserves to be excommunicated. The Church is a community united, coordinated and concordant in mutual by the Holy Spirit, who argues the Pope in the task to found the fellowship with God and the truth of God's word all acceptation. However, with God's permission, within the Church on earth, He works the Devil, with his retinue of "children of the devil" [The Gv 3, 10]. This means that the Church arise and spread heresies, that the ecclesiastical authority is obliged to intervene to warn the faithful and stop the error diffusion. So it happened, for instance, with the phenomenon of modernism at the time of St. Pius X and some theologians, as for example Ernesto Buonaiuti, Alfred Loisy, George Tyrrell, Romolo Murri and other.

.

Fact, it happens occasionally that the devil persuades and push cunningly and wickedly some brothers imprudent, ambitious and unwary, which can also be shepherds, to distort the concept of the Church and to work to divide, desecrate and destroy, acting so insidious and covered, with vain and specious pretexts of reform or conservation, to avoid being discovered and seduced more easily.

.

These false Catholics, seduced by Satan, openly reveal their perverse and subversive plans, for example masonic or atheists, only to those tawny or unfortunate that, after they were told they thoroughly, perhaps with petty man or glittering promises, They know they have become allies or punch in the work undertaken satanic, while they are keeping the secret or know well before the true believers masquerade. In this sense, the Canon Law warns against 'associations which plot against the Church " [can. 1374].

.

After having spun their plots, heretics and schismatics suddenly emerge from the darkness and strike by surprise, as the Psalm says: "Whet their tongue like a sword, hurled bitter words like arrows to hit the innocent in secret; hit him by surprise and have no fear. They persist in doing evil; agree to laying snares " [Shall 64 3-6]. "The poor succumbs to the pride of the wicked, and falls into the pitfalls tramate" [Shall 9, 23]. This can be for power and pressure groups hidden within the Church and of the same class of bishops or cardinals, which apparently they seem respectful of papal authority. But the expert eye, as to what the good doctor, Take a few signs or symptoms for a glimpse of the rot that lies beneath the beautiful appearance, how those whited sepulchres of which the Lord speaks. It is the "enemy" [Mt 13, 25-36], of which the Gospel speaks, that hidden in the wheat field has sown the tares. To about, Jesus recommends to let it grow with wheat and weeds, lest, removing this, be taken even that. You must wait, He says, the Lord's Day, when He unveiling the secrets of hearts, He shall judge. Now, it is clear that here Jesus refers to God's judgment at the end of the world, final judgment and unappealable, determining the ultimate destiny of all of us. But that does not stop at all to Jesus to entrust a judicial power to the pastors of the Church, in the first place to Peter, when orders him to tend his sheep. It 'also clear that this power, limited and fallible, It refers only to the outer hole and does not purport to scrutinize the intimate of conscience, only God knows. However, this power, functional to the maintenance of good order of peace in the Church, is assigned by Christ the right and duty to fix all the conditions and the degrees of membership in the Church, why he is not prohibited, in appropriate circumstances and for valid reasons, excluded from ecclesial communion - that's excommunication - those jumping off it unworthy or to their false ideas or for their misconduct.

.

THE excommunication EXCLUDED FROM CHURCH COMMUNION

.

Excommunication is a decree authority, Pope or Bishop, with which the prelate, in order to correct - medicines penis O censure, title IV, Chapter I - or protect the community - expiatory penalties, Chapter II -, impose penalties in various ways that isolate him excommunicated from the community and limit the possibility of having relations with it or influence it, because such activity is considered to be dangerous or otherwise objectionable. Such penalties may be, mo 'example: or transfer to another residence, the exile, or discharge from an office or prohibition to leave the place of residence or prohibition of journalism or the administration or reception of the sacraments, until the reduction to the lay state for clerics or expulsion from the Institute for religious.

.

The schism and heresy in itself are mortal sins. They are punished according to canon law. It is possible that these criminals escape justice of the Church, but they do not escape the judgment of God. Every believer should be able to recognize a schismatic and heretical, without waiting for the judgment of the Church, because he has to defend against these evil temptations. For this Scripture gives several warnings.

.

In condemnation for heresy the Church is infallible and no exceptions. Instead excommunicate in the Church can make mistakes or may lift the excommunication. This is because the question of heresy there is a game the truth of faith, that does not change in this field, and the Supreme Pontiff has received express promise by Christ not to err. Instead excommunication can be linked to the conduct of the excommunicated, which can correct itself, for which it can be removed. It remains, however, that the effect of the excommunication, which can also be unjust, illegal or invalid, It does not touch at all the state of one of the excommunicated before God, state that may be of mortal sin - and in itself the schism and heresy are mortal sin -, but it could also be a state of grace, because it is excommunicated unfairly blamed. Because of this, ecclesiastical power, as he said proudly Girolamo Savonarola to his executioner going to the gallows, It may exclude from the earthly Church, but not from the heavenly.

.

It must be said that membership in the Church and consequently the ecclesial communion and the exclusion from it - namely the excommunication - is not a simple act of will, with which it can accept or refuse in toto a proposal or an injunction that is done, as it would be to stay in one room, or to get out of it.

.

The belong or not to belong to the Church, the stay or leave the Church are not such simple things. Of course, there may be forms of separation and total, such as loss of faith with apostasy. But usually there are different degrees of separation and therefore of excommunication. We must also see that idea one gets of the Church and of belonging to the Church or ecclesial communion. One can be convinced to fully belong to the Church, and instead is yours only partially, as for example the Protestants or modernists. Because of this, usually there are degrees of membership and degrees of exclusion or separation. Because of this, excommunications are not all of the same weight or level. The branch can be periclitante at various levels. It can be separated from certain values, but not by others. Conversely, ecclesial communion is the belonging summit that starts from a minimum degree to climb to the maximum. Here we are aided by the Gospel image of the vine and the branches. A branch can be partially detached from the vine, but still he receives its sap. Thus the separated brethren enjoy a certain communion with the Catholic Church, even though this communion is not full.

.

Every believer must know how to distinguish the wheat from the chaff, must be able to judge for themselves if another brother, was theologian, bishop or cardinal, It is or is not in communion with the Church, and consequently attend, if it is in communion; stay away, if it is not in communion. Here then are the directives of the New Testament: "Stay away from every brother who is in idleness" [Ii Ts 3,6]. "If anyone does not obey what we say by letter, take note of him and discontinue relations » [v. 14]. "Stay away heretic [airetikòn]» [Tt 3,10]. "If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house nor greet, for he who greets him shares his evil deeds " [II Jn 10-11]. These are obviously cases in which dialogue is impossible or inconvenient or dangerous or useless for the following reasons: or because the heretic does not accept the correction or because he tries to seduce us or because they treat us with contempt.

.

In order to preserve and promote the theoretical and moral values on which rests the fabric of the church a, santa, catholic and apostolic, therefore, care must be the sum of all the faithful, but especially pastors and theologians under the supervision and direction of the Pope, take care that the sound doctrine of the Gospel is rightly interpreted by all, accepted, shared, widespread and defense against heresies, which they are precisely the rejection or the deformation of the truth of faith. The prelate, so, in the Church, and first of the Supreme Pontiff, supreme custodian of the unity of the Church and advocate of ecclesial communion, They have the right to expel from the Church, ie scomunicare, those faithful, which, or their attitude schismatic or heretical or scandalous for their ideas, falsify the doctrine, disobey the Supreme Pontiff or create divisions in the Church.

.

There are believers who in fact or for their ideas or their conduct, outside the Church and the Church, yet they want to remain there to change it with their errors. It happens in these cases that the naive or complicit prelate excommunicating them, but let them do or even support them, or, Invite them to preach to the faithful in churches. Conversely there are bishops, priests and faithful into full communion with the Church, which may expose evils and scandals, which, however, the fact of opposing pastors or theologians heretics or schismatics, They are treated by them as if they were excommunicated. There is therefore a difference between the official excommunication and be made out of the ecclesiastical apparatus.

.

Whatever Christian can be a heretic, schismatic and excommunicated, besides the Pope, who by divine assistance it is the supreme guardian of the truth of the Gospel and ecclesial communion. In fact, it is excommunicated involves breaking with a higher ecclesiastical or with the Pope. But the Pope evidently has no top soil to which he may rebel, except Jesus Christ. And also it should be noted that a Pope can be a bad pastor of the Church, but you can not teach heresy. Because of this, Code has among "crimes against religion and the unity of the Church" [part II, title I], «L'apostasia, heresy and schism " [can. 1364], and the publication and dissemination of "blasphemy, offense to good morals, of insults, excitement hatred or contempt against religion or the Church [can. 1369] and teachings or doctrines condemned by the Roman Pontiff or an ecumenical council " [can. 1371], which is equivalent to the refusal or misrepresentation or falsification of the teachings of the Pope and councils. This is why the offense of heresy deserves excommunication [cann. 1364, 1331].

.

The excommunication can be automatic O sententiae penalties. The first is triggered automatically upon the completion by the crime, for example strike the person of the Pope or embrace heresy to what is already provided for excommunication. automatic it means that the judgment has already ruled. sentence rather it means that we need a process, after which the court renders its judgment, for example to determine whether a person is or is not heretical.

.

EXAMPLES OF SIGNIFICANT excommunication

.

A recent example, It is one of the four bishops Lefebvre, which, At first excommunicated, They were then subsequently released by Benedict XVI. But those who support the Mass the old order - which also it is in itself lawful - but refuses, as did Lefebvre, the Mass new world order charges of pro-Lutheranism, it is excommunicated. The Mass new world order It is in fact the greatest moment of ecclesial communion. Rejecting the Mass means so separate from ecclesial communion, and for this we are struck by excommunication.

.

It was the famous mutual lifting of the excommunication of the Blessed Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras. There is, however, question what sense he had the excommunication of the Pope by the Patriarch Michael Cerularius in 1054. The Pope can excommunicate, but it can not be excommunicated, because it has no land no top from which it can be separated. The Pope is in fact the principle of ecclesiastical communion, while the faithful is what comes from this principle. Now the principiato may separate from the principle, but the principle can not separate himself from himself. So the Patriarch of Constantinople, excommunicating the Pope, He has done nothing but separate from the Church. Paul VI made a magnanimous gesture by revoking the excommunication to Athenagoras, but the Patriarch, beyond his friendship with Paul VI, He made a gesture objectively and legally null and void, as nothing had been his excommunication. It should also be noted that the Church can remove the excommunication of heretics who are heretics, as are our Orthodox brothers, because with them it was not yet resolved their dispute over And the son. It is clear then that this reintegration involves a very imperfect communion, given the permanence of doctrinal deficiencies.

.

Throughout history there have been excommunications who not only they have not had the desired effect of inducing or stimulating the excommunicated to repentance, but which have had the effect of provoking even more hatred against the Pope and the Church, as happened to Luther with excommunication by Pope Leo X and Pius V against Queen Elizabeth of England. If the excommunicated already he has a big following, he is proud of what he does and strong, that the excommunication it rears up and tightens more. They are the saints, for example, a St. Pio of Pietrelcina, who obey even unjust censure. But heretics, powerful and troublemakers who are excommunicated, easily do worse. Because of this, especially now that the modernists are very powerful, Popes renounce excommunicate.

.

In respect of the excommunication to those who profess the doctrine of communism Marxist atheist, imposed by Pius XII, it has never been abolished, although the Church since then she has done more nod. However, such excommunication keeps in fact its value, since it is obviously impossible that an atheist sharers in ecclesial communion.

.

How Much to membership freemasonry, a decree of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith 1984 It warns that those who are affiliated with Freemasonry is in mortal sin and may not receive Communion. Also in this case the reason for the excommunication is evident: Freemasonry does not recognize the dogma of the Communion of Saints.

.

As for the excommunication associated with the mafia, it is motivated by the fact that it is conspiracy to theft and extortion to murder with the application and the private vengeance, It is evident that a member of this association may not qualify for the ecclesial communion. The same is true for the modernists, which, They have a concept of the Church incompatible with the right of the Catholic Church.

.

THE REASONS AND PURPOSES OF excommunication

.

It deserves to be excommunicated those who shed the heresies, turbo, injures, offends or disorganize the community, creates scandal and divisions among the faithful, disobey authority. Unfortunately, however, today macroscopically - except not to see it blocked by fear or human respect or because the chariot of the modernists or because a party or closed because in their own narrow interests or because suffering allocchismo doctrinal [3] - these characters are multiplying, They are honored and go up to high places, while those who are truly in communion with the Church are beaten, humiliated or marginalized. So scomunicabili are not excommunicated, and it happens that those who are in communion is excommunicated or at least is treated as if it were one excommunicated. A beautiful mess and Injustice, where someone who enjoys it is the devil, obscurantism master that leads to destruction.

.

On the question of excommunication species, to ask three basic questions: a first question is to distinguish the right from unjust excommunication or lawful or unlawful; a second is to distinguish the valid excommunication from that invalidates or nothing; and third is to distinguish him excommunicated stated or official from the actual or de facto.

.

Excommunication is right, when the prelate spoke out of a concern to safeguard the truth of the faith, ecclesial communion and call of the rebel obedience. About the unjust excommunication, instead, St. Thomas Aquinas says that the excommunication can be unjust or by the scomunicante or by the excommunicated. In the first case it has effect, that is, the subject is officially excommunicated by public decree, even though you do not deserve this measure and, if anything, he would have deserved a decree of praise. So the excommunication can be unjust, as motivated not by respect for higher authority, as would be the Magisterium of the Church, or the fear of God or love for the truth or for the Church, but ignorance, hatred or envy for the excommunicated; or it can be unfair because no foundation or legal or doctrinal reason, and indeed it based on false accusations and reasons or pretexts heretical [4]. The first is valid but illicit; the second is null and void.

.

The prelate should be very careful to understand and evaluate the reasons that guide the thinking and actions of the supposed dissident or heretic, especially if it has a large following, not to confuse a prophet with a rebel, as happened with Savonarola or vice versa as not to confuse a rebel with a reformer, as happened to some German bishops against Luther, which, instead of condemning the so-called "Reformer", They went over to Luther. The prelate is not hasty in judging, do not let yourself influenced by the passionate and partisan climate that usually creates around these events, be cautious assess allegations from the environment to the supposed guilty and prefers to listen and consult directly. If it is the case, establishing a process, to avoid the risk of condemning an innocent or acquit a guilty.

.

It can also happen that an unjust excommunication It is imposed by a heretic priest, which can not be officially excommunicated, so it is not substantially and actually in communion with the Church, while the subject officially excommunicated, as Orthodox, in fact it remains in communion with the Church.

.

It is clear that a prelate who excommunicate based on a false concept of the Church or of obedience or without him first to be subjected to the major superior or to the Roman Pontiff or the Word of God, excommunication invalidly, for which per se, this excommunication, It is null and should not have effect. However, de facto, the action of an authoritarian prelate, influences, bossy, supported by his peers or by the worldly powers to an honest person but helpless can still produce a damaging social effect, exercising violence on excommunicated and his disciples, defames him in the community and harms the community itself so deceived by the false excommunication.

.

St. Thomas Aquinas teaches that in these cases the excommunicated may have recourse to the major superiors. Of course, if it is the Pope who excommunicated unjustly, You must have patience, avoiding taking vengeful or resentful attitudes, that certainly would put him excommunicated, if he was right, the wrong. If then, as was the case with Luther, the rebel is rightly excommunicated, it is clear that any objection by the excommunicated, further aggravate his guilt.

.

The fact that an excommunication has no vices form - for example, it is issued by legitimate authority or explicit about - does not necessarily mean that it is right, appropriate, beneficial, lawful. It may be originated by arrogance or gross negligence in the scomunicante, as was the excommunication of Savonarola by Alexander VI. And if the excommunication is also infected by formal defects, for example, be the result of an abuse of authority or, as observed by St. Thomas Aquinas, be "not due or because the sentence is contrary to law" [5], besides being unjust in the content and grounds, it is absolutely nothing.

.

Such cases are common today the fact that modernism has spread among the bishops, so not only is it rare that a bishop excommunicating a heretic, it even happens that Orthodox believers are excommunicated by heretical bishops. It is clear that an excommunication motivated by a cause heretical, It is contrary to the rules of faith and law, It is nothing, for which the excommunicated in principle may not be taken into account. However, But, it is possible that in this case the prelate inflicts even more, why the excommunicated should resign. Under this St. Thomas Aquinas point of view it observes that an excommunication can be unjust and yet Sorting the punitive effect [6], to which the excommunicated, in the hypothesis, It has no means of escape or get rid, as he had the good fortune to be able to do St. John of the Cross, fleeing from the monastery prison.

.

Excommunication is twofold: first, to be an exemplary punishment and healthy; exemplary, to discourage others to imitate him excommunicated; to greet, ie such as to induce him to excommunicated resipiscence, to repentance and penance, that it may correct itself and to be reintegrated into the ecclesial communion. Because of this, must be neither excessive, nor too mild, but with the size of the damage caused to himself and to the Church from the schismatic or heretic, and the quality and quantity of its moral strength and reputation in the Church, as well as of the Ascendant, of fame and following that he has in it. Not too must isolate it from the community, so it does not worsen his hostility to it and does not have the temptation to leave it entirely, but it is maintained in a certain degree of esteem and consideration. It happens indeed that the dissident is subject to unfair and exaggerated hostility by certain overzealous believers or enemies, malignant or short intellect, that the prelate has to defend and protect the dissident also they.

.

Excommunication does not even have to leave the excommunicated too much freedom of action and movement, nor should leave too much part of the community, because that would enable him to continue to spread his heresies and to foment rebellion against the Church. The excommunications too lenient, and purely formal, that does not bother him that much excommunicated, lose their deterrent effect and educational, He is derided by him and his followers and are slow to no effect, if not to create a martyr in the eyes of the followers. This will probably be the excommunication of mobsters and such, Unfortunately, It was the excommunication of the Communists.

.

According to the excommunication order It is to shed light in the sense of helping to discern who belongs to the Church and who's out, It is thus to free the Church from a dangerous agent discouraging the faithful from wanting to follow. It may happen that the Church in these interventions is too severe, as it seems to have happened in the cases of Peter Waldo in the twelfth century, Albigensian in the thirteenth century, of Jan Hus in the fifteenth century and Luther. They did not lack any good ideas to propose a reform of the Church, though certainly their heresies were condemned. However, they counted among their ranks also people in good faith, whereby, if he had had more confidence in the dialogue, perhaps it would be avoided painful division that continues after centuries.

.

RECONSTRUCTION OF COMMUNION

.

Paradigmatic is the parable of the prodigal son [LC 15, 11-32]. The excommunicated is not so much one that is driven, but it is one that goes away. The decree of excommunication is very often nothing more than the taking of sorrowful act and the public sad news that his brother has left us, and we became the enemy. In the excommunication there is so much outrage, but rather the pain and the hope that the lost child is found. It's him that if he wanted to go. And if a brother is hunted, because it is already practically was not in communion and communion disturbed. So what is expected excommunication? The return of his brother, his repentance, his repentance. Why are so rare phenomena of conversion? Perhaps the Church has so far not done enough to recover these brothers, these lost sheep. It is used too severely and too little mercy. So at least he thought St. John XXIII in will and in proclaiming the Second Vatican Council. It wanted to retain the prodigal son with the force, without groped to convince him of what would face leaving the parental home. But, we must also recognize that in many cases frankly honesty and humility of which the prodigal son gives evidence in Luke's parable, noticing the bad business that made leaving the parental home, They have always been rare virtue. Almost always heretics seem to do well in eating the husks the swine, and they have, indorandole of specious tinsel, as if they were a sign of freedom and wisdom, and even invite others to follow and others follow.

.

What the Church can do in these cases? With the Second Vatican Council it decided to take a new path, that minimizes the use of severity, and then the excommunication and feared let him be. Some theologians have interpreted the choice to reconcile in the sense that the Council would assume that all men, at least subconsciously, They seek God and have grace; that the proclamation of the Gospel should not be proposed in categorical terms and threatening a aut-aut: as the only way of salvation, refusing which opens the hell chasm: or do you believe or you do not save; but simply as a proclamation of mercy, which already all people of good will are being, perhaps unconsciously, whatever the religion to which they belong. In this visual optimistic, because everyone is saved, everyone is free to follow their religion. The doctrinal differences would not matter. The determining factor would be that all of them are the subject of the divine will of salvation. All so, perhaps unconsciously, belong to the Church, which embraces all religions, no one excluded.

.

For the modernists we can not say, so, the Lutheran, Jew or Muslim: you are wrong. In fact, he can always tell us: wrong they are to you, but not in my religion. It can therefore understand how in this relativistic loses visual sense or the excommunication interest. It is clear that a church that does not believe in possession of absolute truth, how to conceive the modernists, It does not distinguish more clearly and definitely the dogma heresy, so the idea of ​​excommunication not for her has no meaning. It is therefore opposed to the Church of the past, said by them pre-conciliar, it now appears taxation and illiberal, disrespectful of pluralism, and freedom of conscience.

.

others say: the severity and threat of Hell is not served. But then it will not be that in the end God's mercy reaches all accounts, and all are saved? We respect diversity, we focus on dialogue and on what unites us: the common interests of peace and justice. All right. However, There are some truths that touch God or salvation, They do not like the separated brethren. So we do? Some, my idea is that it is good tacerle and only admit those truths in which we all agree. The other let them optional for individual confessions. But this is not the command of Christ. And in fact, the Council proposes the Gospel to all mankind.

.

The Council, But, unlike previous, aware with the irreversible human tendency to sin, proper to fallen nature, therefore mainly dedicated to the fight against the world and the condemnation of errors and vices, with its punishments sentenced to disobedient, It seems animated by the confidence that we can build on this earth the general harmony of mankind around Christ [cf. Pacem in Terris], the confidence to make the cooperation of the Church with the world, We can build a humanity right, united and peaceful, in which the Church and the world get along. The world is seen as essentially available for the Gospel, and the Church seems confident of being able to conquer the world, because the whole world waiting for Christ. So the Council seems to minimize the tendency of men to wickedness and sin - hence the need for coercion and discipline -, following on original sin and believe that education, the testimony and preaching of the Gospel are sufficient to create a humanity finally right down here, happy and harmonious.

.

but yet, the Apocalypse, provides that the clash of the Church with the world - the Woman and the Dragon - will last until the Parousia, so the end of the story will not be the symbiosis of the Church with the world and the general unification of humanity in harmony and peace, but rather the victory of Christ over the powers of evil and the final separation of the wheat from the chaff, with the salvation of the elect and the damnation of the reprobate.

.

Another thing to note: until Vatican II the Church has always held to clarify its identity and oppose the world. Hence the ease with which it contended with the world, He is condemning the errors of the world, and excommunicated those who yielded to the seductions of the world, especially in the modern world. It had great care for her children, There he was kept protected from the snares of the world and from the mistakes of other religions, including non-Catholic Christians, while it was severe towards the world, in whom he saw almost only dangers and corruption. If it contacted the world, The purpose was to convert to the Gospel, according to the command of Christ.

.

The Vatican II addressed the Church greater openness to the world and values ​​of other religions. This led to an enrichment and a costume improved, of theology and Catholic culture, but at the same time it decreased the care to preserve the Church from penetration into it of erroneous or dangerous doctrines. So it happened that, if on the one hand, the Church has taken a more conciliatory attitude toward the world, other conflicts have arisen and corruption inside because of the penetration of errors and bad customs of the world, penetration is not sufficiently prevented by the shepherds, which they have greatly diminished the use of excommunication.

.

What now has to be is a greater care in pastors, starting with the Pope, the good education of the faithful and of the pastors themselves, in pacifying the minds bitterly divided by a wretched and embittered opposition between Lefebvre and modernists, you drag from fifty, in defending the Church against the penetration of false ideas or heterodox and then in the moderate recovery of a wise and prudent use of the institute's excommunication, not at all giving up on what the Council has produced in the relationship of the Church with the modern world. It is clear that we need to continue the work of evangelization; but do not be under the illusion that in the distant future or close mankind will gather around the church. Nor it is there to hope for a worldwide peaceful coexistence between religions, as some believe, or hope.

.

On Christianity, at the behest of Christ, it world domination. Religions must be submitted to the Catholic Christian religion. Christianity does not fit, by its nature, to be a religion on a par with other, as if it were a political party in a world parliament. We do not confuse civil relations among religions with the United Nations. Are not these things planned apocalyptic eschatology. Christianity will continue to expand, but always fighting against the forces of Satan. Always, in the Church, They will mix the wheat and the tares, always it must be purified from sin and expel from its midst the unworthy, always it will be opposed by enemies and always will be persecuted. Always advance and will be renewed in history, and convert the hearts to Christ, always welcome new children, and generate new saints, until, in a known now only to God, the Church will appear and defeat the great apostasy, expected from Sao Paulo, but it will precede the triumphant return of Christ in glory.

.

Varazze 24 September 2018

.

.

______________________

NOTE

[1] "Utterly destroyed" (eb. cherem), Inviting. of the CEI.

[2] Commentary on the Letters of St. Paul, c.9, 3, lect.I, n.739, Marietti editions,Turin-Roma 1953, p.134.

[3] spiritual defect attributable to opportunism, the flattery and cowardice, now spread among bishops, for which they, for crass ignorance or human respect or attachment to the bishop's throne, They do not even notice to be led by the nose by heretics. Not only they flee before the wolf came into the fold, but they do not even notice its presence by entrusting important ecclesiastical offices to people who should be excommunicated.

[4] QUESTION, Suppl., q. 21, a. 4.

[5] Ibid.

[6] QUESTION, Suppl., q. 21, a. 4.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

- ecclesial news -

STORAGE AND PROGRESS

.

To resolve the current intra-ecclesial conflict between modernists and Lefebvre have to give each other these two essential factors of the ecclesial dynamism: preservation and progress.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

.

Rereading some texts of the morning meditations the Holy Father in the chapel of Domus Sanctae Martha, the 31 October 2017 - as reported the columnist de The Osservatore Romano the 1 next November -, Pope asks, against the other: The Christians' really believe in the Holy Spirit "that is in them? And have the courage to "sow the seeds", to get involved, or take refuge in a "pastoral conservation ', that does not leave that "the Kingdom of God will grow"? And he answers: "So many times we see that you prefer a pastoral preservation" rather than "let the United grow".

.

We would like some comments. It must be distinguished from conservation conservatism. Keep diligently and, jealously and the sacred deposit of divine Revelation, no compromises, without adding and without taking [cf Gal 3,15; AP 22,19] and be faithful to the cost of living is the absolute duty of every Catholic, in the first place the bishops and the Pope.

.

conservatism, instead, which probably alludes to the Pope, It is a foolish and useless conservation. It is the store that is no longer needed, It is the cling or nearsightedness or laziness or fear or interest in ideas, costumes, mores, habits, traditions outdated or abandoned by the Church, is the exchange just progress for modernism, get stuck on a historic day phase of the Church's journey towards the Kingdom, is close the eye of the fields are already white for harvest " [GV 4,35]; is close ear to the voice of the Spirit, who "renews the face of the earth", that "renew our minds" [RM 12,2] and day by day renews our inner man [cf. II Cor 4,16]. The Holy Spirit urges the Church to ensure progress, but in the sense indicated by these words of the Lord, He serves to remind us [GV 14,26]and then encourage us to make money.

.

Granted - I want to believe - the Pope to speak of conservatism and not of legitimate conservation, does not seem to correspond to truth, It seems like Pope Francis wants to insinuate, that there is a wide spread of conservatism, that nevertheless exists in Lefebvrians; but what now afflicts more and disturbs the Church have a much wider spread of modernism or a false progress and or a false interpretation of the renewal promoted by the Council. And these evils the Pope never speaks, all it is taken from exaggerated and biased polemic against traditionalism, which he is likely to make a bundle of all herbs, Also blaming that healthy conservatism that, along with a healthy conservation, are essential factors of the structure and progress of the Church.

.

If Francis wants to be a reformer of the Holy See So begin with the ward or false stop those employees who are infected with Modernism and rahnerismo, and take very loyal employees and loyal to the papal Magisterium and enemies not only of lefebvrismo, but also of modernism, both open while the good sides of one and the other.

.

However, there is a certain stubborn, short-sighted and presumptuous conservatism that, under the pretext of fidelity to Sacred Tradition, accused the Popes after the Council to disown, and he would like to return to the doctrinal climate and pre-conciliar pastoral, as if Vatican II did not take place, forgetting that, When a council makes a doctrinal progress, as is almost always the case, the church, more enlightened by the Gospel and overcome certain mistakes, On the infallibility of his doctrine, never comes back, while it may happen that a new Council corrects a defective pastoral practice initiated by a preceding Council, or restore or recover certain pastoral practices abandoned by that Council, because of this plan, for the changing historical contingencies or the fallibility of the churchmen themselves, it may mutate or wrong and therefore can be corrected, after experiencing the adverse effects caused by the error.

.

Thus the Council, going to meet a need of the time in which it was celebrated, He insists on the pastoral renewal and gives about many directives, that touch all aspects of church life. But after fifty years of application of these directives, many observers and impartial pastors and lovers of the Church we have conducted for years now to make clear the fact that the pastoral reconcile, for some aspects, It needs a course correction, that perhaps only a new council or a great reformer Pope will implement.

.

This in no way means that we should go back in toto to the pre-council pastoral, it means keeping the pastoral achievements of the post-council - for example a healthy ecumenism and interreligious dialogue -, purifying them from certain buonistici excesses and too optimistic towards the modern world, so that today, for lack of vigilance of the bishops, we see an impressive return of modernism, much worse and more insidious than that of St. Pius X times, even because, while this had taken root only in the lower clergy and among theologians and exegetes, that infects the same body Bishops especially in Smart thin to form the rahnerismo.

.

All good Catholics, faithful and shepherds, You have now realized this enormous scam, except, I wonder why, the same modernist, which either fall from the clouds, or pretend they do not know or are deaf to appeals and warnings or contemptuously ignore the charges against them or reject them or disdained, poor slandered victims, from superfine hypocrites, persecute the courageous few who discover their plots.

.

The great pastoral problem today, It is no longer what it was imposed fifty years ago, as he commanded the Council, to abandon a pastoral too conservative, anachronistic, static, repetitive, too defensive, suspicious, fearful, suspicious and aggressive towards the modern world, indeed poorly known and sometimes misunderstood, for a renewed approach to benign modernity, open, fair, healthily critical, certainly prudent as the serpent, but also simple as the dove, knowing that the world reserves pitfalls, but also that the world created by God offers several values ​​to be recognized, to save, and to lead to Christ.

.

On the path of renewal, of becoming, of change, the rejuvenation, development and progress has insisted, and it has gone very far in the past fifty years, and certainly true progress never end; but it has not always advanced in the right way, and more than advance, in many cases, You are deflected or one has strayed from the right path and fidelity to the real teachings of the Council; There is not always a moved with the necessary resourcefulness, moderation, caution and wisdom, in obedience to the guide of the Pontiffs or the doctrine of Catechism of the Catholic Church, indeed often falling into modernism Network, which it is a misleading approach to modernity, in which it is necessary to distinguish the wheat from the chaff, and instead the modernists have confused with one another.

.

What then today we must above all do to promote healthy, effective and balanced ministry, It suits this need of the hour, different and in some respects opposed to the historical situation, he had to face and solve the council, It is not so reproach conservatism, although then it may still exist, but it is that the Pope decides, finally, with boldness and courage, heedless of any quacking of modernists, to denounce the rampant modernism, far more dangerous and harmful than lefebvrismo or conservatism, considering the extensive damage that modernism has done in recent 50 year old. and he is making, under the pretext of conciliar renewal, in the Church and in society. And here I note that since 1966 Maritain denounced the danger of modernism. It is not that Maritain was precisely a conservative. We should not insist unilaterally on developing leaving quietly preserving the deposit of faith. It is the opposite that needs to be done, after fifty years of progressive rhetoric, who ended up degenerating into partisan polemics against modernism and preservation.

.

The real future of the Church and of humanity

.

It must plant it once and for all with a relativism and historicism of Hegel's origin, reported several times by Pope Benedict XVI in the wake of the conviction modernist evolutionism made by St. Pius X. Becoming supposed to be. Its only makes sense in relation to the Absolute, and the story has an end only in the Lord report. Instead, we must find the principles and the absolute values ​​of reason and faith, now largely forgotten, neglected, misunderstood, incompression, e skin disprezzat, among the very people who should keep them and insegnarceli, including bishops. Values ​​that instead have always been taught and always will be taught for the salvation of mankind, by sound philosophy, as rational, and from the Church, as values ​​of faith. We must know for sure what these values ​​of reason and of faith, We need to know why are these and not others, It is necessary to distinguish them from the subjective views and deciduous. We must distinguish dogmatism and fundamentalism by the certainty of faith and rational certainty.

.

We should be able to distinguish the immutable values, immortal and incorruptible from those that mutate and become corrupt. Necessary to distinguish the immutable truth and supra-temporal and temporal those mutable, what is true today, it is true always and will always be true - philosophical truths, moral theological - what is true today and will be tomorrow under certain conditions or historical or legal institutions or political or ecclesial realities.

.

It is with reason and faith that we know what is right and what is faith. At this point we do not underfoot quicksand, but the rock on which to build the house, the firm ground on which to rest and walk. We know what are the values ​​that will never fail. We know what is the meaning of existence and of life. We know who we are, where we come from and where we can, we want and need to go. We know that God exists. We know who to trust. We know why the good and evil. We know that there is no middle way between yes and no. We know our vocation and our duty. We see our eternal destiny and we can pursue it with hope, perseverance and courage, knowing they will not be disappointed. We know that we can do it. We know what are the values ​​and goods, for which it is worth sacrificing our lives, we know what are the values ​​on which we can not give in, even at the cost of living. We know what is martyrdom. We know we can sell everything, negotiate on everything, fiddling around, outside of our soul. So we buy all. We know it is impossible to salvation without these values, so these are the values ​​that guarantee the salvation. If we abandon delivery that was given to us by Christ, considering it outdated or aged or no longer valid or no longer relevant, for future invented by us in the idea that it is the Holy Spirit, we are not innovators, we make no real progress, but we are traitors, deserters and faithless; we are no longer under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, Demon ma.

.

Instead it is necessary that we always keep before the eyes del'intelletto and heart the values ​​and the absolute property, perennial and unchanging, God's Word does not pass - The word of God remains forever - that illuminates our path, It shows us our duties, us to experience the divine law, inflames the heart, It pushes us to holiness - the love of Christ compels us —, correcting our mistakes, forgives our sins, It leads to real progress, founded on divine truth always known better in the same sense and the same meaning.

.

The appeal to "tradition" to know what is faith and what is not, in itself is not enough, and it is even illegal and wicked, if you claim to appeal directly and subjectively to Tradition, to contest or contradict or "fix" the doctrinal teaching of a Pope or a Council, as they often are the guardians and interpreters supreme and definitive Tradition.

.

The error then worsens, whether between the content of Tradition does not discern which ones are truly permanent, inviolable and insuperable, and which it is old and outdated content. Tradition is not a matter of time duration, but the intrinsic value of truth, over the time, the content of the Tradition. We must be able to distinguish in the Tradition that is related to time and historical contingencies passing, what belongs essentially the Eternal and the Absolute, ie the institutional will of Christ ("Divine right") - for example the sacraments - which can never be, It never will be changed or abandoned by the Church.

.

Thus it is not sufficient in every case to say: "gives 2000 years' - provided that you know for certain - "has always been thought or done so", because instead it is said that we should continue to do so forever. There is a past that is now past dead and buried. It would make sense to remove a corpse from the grave like the restoration of the values ​​of the past. What is rightly passed, it is good that remains of the past, otherwise it would be like trying to bring back those "things past" [II Cor 5,19], of which St. Paul speaks. Better still an ancient truth that a new error.

.

There are indeed compared to Tradition firsts, never before existed. If, however, the Church establishes new things unknown to the previous Tradition, such as women's ministries or The new order of Mass, this is not a break with Tradition, but simply it means that those things were contained implicitly in Tradition.

.

These are the lines of true "breakthrough prophetic", the real reform we expect of Pope Francis. Of course he should not listen to extollers time acti, and it does well to arguirli, but above all do not listen to flatterers and false friends, but those who really loves, who urges him to join teaching and pastoral, conservation and development, continuity and progress, loyalty and inventiveness, even if the true friend can have the tone of the warning or reprimand. The "revolution" populist, reckless and low-priced to let dittatorelli ambitious, bellied and demagogues Africa and Latin America, without lowering its sacred dignity of Vicar of Christ.

.

If the Pope wants to be father of the poor, as it is clear from its intentions, imitate his Lord Jesus Christ and the countless Holy Fathers of the poor and let stand the Don Lorenzo Milani, i Fidel Castro Helder Câmara gli. The oppressed are not only immigrants. We invite the Holy Father to exercise his mercy with the crushed by the modernists, do not have too much confidence with the modernist oppressors.

.

It is true that the lefevriani also speak of "modernists", but they distort the meaning of the concept, when they accuse of "modernism" the Papacy post-conciliar and doctrines of the Council, confuse progress with modernism or Maritain with Rahner or confuse Mass new world order Dinner with Lutheran. Continues below the journalist: "Reality, indeed, It is that "wheat" - words of the Pope - "has the power within, the yeast has the power inside ", and also "the power of the Kingdom of God comes from within; the strength comes from within, the growth comes from within ' ".

.

There is no doubt about the truth of what the Pope says here. Only the Gospel image of the wheat grain is not the only image that Christ offers to His Word. No doubt it throughout history, always comes better known by the Church in the same sense and the same meaning, as St. Vincent of Lerins, with the development of the Church's dogmatic.

.

To clarify the issue of the conservative function of pastoral and avoid the conservatism, necessary to refer to statements or comparisons of Christ, in which emerges the durability, stability, the immutabilità, incorruptibility, eternity of God's Word, like when, for instance, it is compared to a. "treasure" [cf. ], to a "precious pearl" [cf. ], a "drachma" [cf. ] or a "rock" [cf. ]. It is a word that "does not pass" [cf. ]. It is a word of "eternal life" [cf. ]. The precious things are carefully preserved and jealously. It is a principle of good sense, that everyone understands. And how much more so it must be kept intact and undamaged, at any cost, without change, without corrections, without adding and without taking, although with continuous explanations, the divine message of salvation, who assures us and promises us eternal life.

.

Of course, the Gospel message is not like a perishable food, which is corrupt, if it is not well guarded and preserved. In fact, it is not afraid of the wear of time or corrosive agents. It is made of corruptible matter, but it is pure immortal spirit. It is a treasure that, though well guarded, "the thief can not steal and moths can not break '. Who can be corrupted is the possessor, who is unfaithful, negligent and neglected in the store and keep it, and then he can lose. Here apostasy. It can conceive evil and can travisarlo. That's heresy. It can hurt administer. Here human respect, sloth and negligence of the pastors.

.

He continues the columnist: "Similarly, said Francis, "If we want to preserve for us the grain, It will be only a grain. If we do not mix with life, with flour of life, the yeast, It will remain only the yeast "". Here the Pope touches an aspect of conservatism. He obviously does not deny that needs store grain: otherwise, if you come to donate? We give what we have carefully preserved. Ma, If values ​​are to be donated, and this is precisely the case of God's Word, although it must donate. They are the very words of Jesus: "If the grain of wheat does not die, it remains only; but if it dies, it produces much fruit » [LC 12,24].

.

How to tune preservation and progress

.

It can advance the living being that has its own stable identity. In fact the real progress is to improve the conditions of the subject. The course assumes that the preservation of the subject. It is true that life is movement, it is becoming, it is changing. But why is life indeed be development or explanation in the right direction of the existing entity. The progress of the movement must be healthy, that is orderly and well-guided and non-pathological, disorganized or incoherent. Even a madman is full of movement, but no one envies his condition.

.

The subject that divides or changes by denying their identity namely by ceasing to keep himself, start a movement that does not involve progress, but dissolution or disintegration. It is the process that leads to death. It is true that the dead no longer exercises the vital activities. However, the stiffness of death does not exclude at all in becoming a corpse which is its dissolution. So the sheer becoming, the simple change or mutate is not a good in itself. All becoming has a direction.

.

Not to be trusted to a becoming confused and contradictory. To test whether this is progress, not corruption, We have to see where tents. If it tends to better progress; it tends to worse setback. It should be short, it is becoming, the development or enhancement or improvement of a subject who is supposed to be maintained in its own identity. Otherwise, becoming is not life, my dead, it is not progress, but retrogression, not evolution but involution, but no progress relegation, not decay.

.

The concern to preserve their healthy alleged identity, It is a very legitimate concern and dutiful, that has nothing to do with conservatism do not know what "closing another". It lacks in masochists subjects and d It corresponds to what in the animal kingdom is self-preservation, without which that animal would soon be destroyed by adverse agents.

.

It is necessary that the Pope, which supreme guardian, advocate, guarantor and moderator, concord and peace in the Church, to assume its responsibilities. It must ask yourself in the position it deserves fair trial, centering on the universal principles of the Church, so that both sides conflict - lefevriani and modernists - can recognize themselves as Catholic.

.

It should be, secondly, that recognizes the part of truth and justice - mentioned in this article -, present and carried forward by both parties. The two sides, side by side relationship, fit perfectly, as the two halves of a sphere broken, because God created them just because, unite, do one thing, which it is the same reality of the Church.

.

The Pope must make every effort so that the two sides meet each other and approached, overcoming old grudges, ODĪ. and mistrust. It must abandon its current propensity for modernists, otherwise it can not be expected to elicit the confidence of Lefebvre and the modernists remain confirmed in their errors and take on an arrogant attitude, which will not lead to any result. The Pope must make sure that Lefebvre feel understood and appreciated in their good reasons, What the Pope has so far not done, indeed falling into contempt and nell'insulto. They, But, from them, They must strive to accommodate confidently all the doctrines of the Council, as he urged them repeatedly Pope Benedict XVI and, consequently, the following papal teaching until Papa Francesco.

.

As for the modernists, the Pope must follow the same method applied to Lefebvre: recognize the good sides and correct defects. Good side of the modernists, that has escaped the Lefebvrians, who misunderstood, is the attention to modern thinking and a willingness to modernization and progress of the Church. But if the Church is relatively easy to correct the errors of Lefebvre, after all few in number and fairly compact, a fact of doctrines and morals, gigantic undertaking, and above the forces of the Church it appears the work of correction of errors of the modernists, and because they are scattered throughout the Church, among pastors and the faithful, and because mistakes are very varied and touch on all the dogmas of the faith. Wanting to make a comparison drawn from garbage, cleaning up the Lefebvrian camp is about cleaning up the modernist camp, as well as to clean up in a Swiss city is to treat the Naples garbage.

.

However, a point of agreement between the Pope, Lefebvre and the modernists you might find around the problem Rahner. Indeed, while the modernists consider Rahner their greatest theologian, Lefebvre have sharply Rahner identified in the greatest danger for the Church today. At this point the Pope - it's about time - should decide with courage, come what may, to condemn the errors Rahner, giving a just satisfaction to Lefebvre and to all lovers of truth and of the Church. However, things are not so simple, because really Rahner gave a contribution to the doctrines of the Council. It is at this point that Lefebvre pass from the wrong and so must the Pope correct them, because they consider it as a modernist's contribution to the Council rahneriano. From here their rejection of such doctrines regarded as moderniste, which is false, because Lefebvre interpret those doctrines of modernism in the sense rahneriano; and instead there Rahner gave a positive contribution, otherwise it would not have been approved by Council. If the Pope will be able to show to Lefebvre and the modernists the points on which they meet each other and if one more he will accept the papal corrections, Peace will be made.

.

The Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary sustain the Pope in its leadership in the Church's mission in the truth, in the unit, in holiness, in a healthy pluralism and harmony, in a renewed evangelization, that enlarges the boundaries of the visible Church, vinca forces hostile to it, religions convert to Christ, reacquaint the separated brethren to the Holy Mother Church, showing the world the face of just God vindicates the humble, merciful comforter of the afflicted, liberator of the oppressed, conqueror of sin and death.

.

Varazze, 14 September 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

- ecclesial news -

BEFORE A CHURCH VISIBLE FROM A SLICE AND MORAL DECLINE Doctrinal IRREVERSIBLE, YOU MUST OPEN THE FIRST BANK OF SEED

Right now we should treasure of the words of Cardinal Charles Journet [1891-1975] than in his work Church of the Incarnate Word explains: "The axiom “where the Pope there is the Church”, so where the Pope acts as Pope and Head of the Church; if not, neither the Church is in him, neither he is in the Church " .

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Rembrandt, Christ with the Apostles in the boat in a storm

The problem is disastrous, we start diluting the air with a little’ of humor …

… responding to a Cardinal who wanted to cheer him up by reminding him that according to the promise of Jesus Christ Peter's boat would not be prey to the storm and that the end would come in port, Blessed Pope Pius IX answered: "It's true, but the Lord has spoken and given warranties with respect to the boat, not regarding the crew ' [cf. G. Cionchi, The Pius IX hidden, Ed. Kshlom, 2000. WHO]. And with this joke of Blessed Pope Pius IX, who in private it was endowed with a spirit of humor at times hilarious, pass mystagogical aspect is that tragic. It is so true that Christ himself has promised that the Church will survive until his return at the end of time, but the Word of God also gives us a clear question to ponder:

.

But the Son of Man, when will, find faith on earth? [cf. LC 18, 8]

.

With great clarity the Blessed Apostle Paul wrote to the people of Thessalonica making use of language and dramatic images:

.

Please, siblings, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our communion with him not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed neither by spirit, or by word, or by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand, so that no man deceive you in any way. Before that day will be the apostate and must be revealed the man of lawlessness, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship up to sit in the temple of God, ostentandosi as God. Do not remember, while I was still with you, These things were? And now you know what prevents its manifestation that takes place at the time. The mystery of lawlessness is already in place. Meanwhile, those who now holds it holds it, until the middle of bait and then it will be revealed the wicked and the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the light of his coming, because the presence of the wicked will occur in the power of Satan with all sorts of portents, signs and wonders of falsehood and every kind of wicked deception for those who are lost, because they received not the love of the truth and so be saved. Therefore, God will send them a justification of error that they may believe the lie and so are judged all who have not believed the truth, but they consented to the iniquity [2Ts 2,1-3.13-17]

.

Then turning to his disciple Timothy, the Blessed Apostle continues to write:

.

I charge you before God and Christ Jesus who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season, do warn, reproaches, exhorts with all magnanimity and doctrine. The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales. But you shall carefully, endure suffering, do the work of the gospel proclaimer, fulfil your Ministry [II Tm 4,1-8].

.

When the Blessed Apostle John He wrote the text of the Apocalypse on the Island of Patmos, in verse in which he tells ...

.

"Fell, fallen is Babylon the great, one that has made all the nations with the wine of her fornication of fury " [AP 13, 8].

.

... using an image of the Old Testament It caters to the Roman Empire, then Rome hidden behind "Babylon the Great", all for reasons that anyone can understand. Reasons related in part to security and partly to the spread of the text, in order to prevent their destruction by the Romans at the time about a strong suspicion towards gesuano movement and its spread of his message.

.

After two thousand years now, it comes from saying that never as today has that reference to ancient Rome hidden behind the image of Babylon current, place that has long Roma "has made all nations drink of the wrath of her fornication with wine" [refer to the latest articles: WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

I do not mean not even touch the world of private revelations, those recognized by the Church, where it comes from several centuries of the great apostasy. With all due respect to the private revelations approved by the Church, I remember that these are not enclosed in store the Catholic faith, where they are enclosed the Holy Gospels, the Apostolic Letters and the Book of Revelation that speak of the Prince of this world [cf. John John 12, 31; 14, 30; 16, 11], antichrist [The Gv 2, 18; 2, 22; 4,3; AP 1, 13-18] and the great apostasy [cf. Ii Ts 2, 1-12]. In the Old Testament the prophet Zechariah foretells the coming of the foolish shepherd:

.

"I will raise up the land a shepherd who will not care for the sheep who perish, will not seek the scattered, will not heal the wounds, nor feed those who stand, but he will eat the flesh of the fat and tear their nails even » [Zc 11,16].

.

But above all is the Word of God to ask the tragic question: "But the Son of Man, when will, find faith on earth? [cf. LC 18, 8]». This is the reason why for years, although unnecessarily, I keep repeating that the day of his return: "How come again in glory to judge the living and the dead", Christ might even find the shell of a completely emptied Church of the Divine Word and filled with another. And this process of emptying and filling has been ongoing for over half a century, and today is now at an advanced stage, but mostly irreversible.

.

The COUNTRY COUSINS

.

pop quartet de The Country Cousins

I feel tender affection for all theologians and lay people who set himself to defend the purity of doctrine before this terrible debacle, they continue to battle in vain against Modernism and the theology of Karl Rahner, almost as if doing it for forty years they remained fossilized on this, without realizing that the one, Modernism, the other, the so-called rahnerismo, They are no longer the problem. Sometimes it seems to have to do with the complex pop from The Country Cousins, that even if aged, but always dressed in the same fashion clothes in the early seventies of the twentieth century and with the wedges from twenty centimeters to feet, they continue to sing: "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls' [cf. WHO, WHO]. I am sure that, finally, the sing for the last time in a geriatric department and then inside an oncology center for the terminally ill, because all their lives they sang that reason and until the end of life will step forward to sing the dressing of the late seventies and fashionable dresses with wedges from twenty centimeters to feet; clothing with which they will eventually be deposited in the coffin, while outside it the members of their fan club sing in chorus: "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls'.

.

Perhaps, i Countryside cousins some of our theology, think that if one day a Pope ordered the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to disavow new Modernism and declare heterodox theology of Karl Rahner, the problem would be really solved? To think or hope in this is to be not only beyond reason, but just beyond the boundaries of reality. And those who can not perceive reality because fossilized committed to live in the reality that has been created, It does not say hurt the Church, but certainly not helping to solve their problems and make them good.

.

With respect to those who followed to waste time both Modernists and with the theology of Karl Rahner - because that made all life and this must continue to make -, what we must instead take note it is that the first and second were the first believers. Just so: Modernists and Karl Rahner were believers as were the great heretics of Arius and Pelagius history. We know how their faith was corrupted by error, but none of them has ever acted to bring harm to the Church, quite the opposite: They were convinced of the good of the Church and especially of being right and therefore felt the duty of conscience to save. Or is someone that the Council of Nicaea to Ario, later St. Augustine debating against Pelagio, They have directed their accusations to be people without faith? Just then cite the case of Joachim of Fiore, whose heretical thought was sentenced in 1215 by the Fourth Lateran Council, but he never doubted either his faith or his personal holiness of life. Joachim of Fiore, who also was a man of deep piety and holiness of life, He was never beatified because speculating on the mystery of the Trinity had fallen - so surely unintended -, in a precise form of heresy that will then take the name of joachimism O millenarianism. But it was another era, In fact today that times have changed, There is instead preparing to beatify the Apulian Bishop Tonino Bello, whose heroic virtues are constituted by the fact that it was a great engaged in social, without taking into account that this effort was built on demagoguery, on populism and pauperism, as well as on a totally uncritical split and sentimental pacifism morality and Catholic doctrine. In truth, the Fair is an authentic heresies receptacle for the most part written, published, filmed and recorded, ie documented; and diffuser of a Christology that begins with Christ to come to himself and focus on man, an ecclesiology that euphemistically could be called daring and Mariology to be confused him with romantic poems. But he spoke of the poor and poverty and was a great involved in social; and perhaps what makes him a true Blessed? And Joachim of Fiore, At that time, when we beatify?

.

Wanting there is more and worse: if for the first time in its history the Church proceeded to the beatification and then the next canonization of first bishop heterodox, the great pundits of Aristotelian logic and metaphysics, what ingenious interpretive artifices think of resorting, whereas canonization, unlike a beatification, It implies a verdict of infallible teaching? Why these, Unfortunately, are the questions that for the first time in Church history we are now forced to answer; and find some answers is not easy and not at all easy, from a strictly theological and dogmatic point of view. but yet, sooner or later, you will have to respond to this as to other questions, although I expect that someone will not hesitate to affirm, in the name of that logic able to go beyond all logic, that takes over if a verdict of infallible teaching - I am referring to the hypothetical canonization of Tonino Bello -, This pronouncement will cancel and erase retroactively any overt heresy and shows the canonized, because who has delivered its opinion can not err, foolproof, therefore it enjoys a very special way of the Holy Spirit … perhaps up to be above the order established by God and therefore of God himself?

.

The question is therefore logical to say the least: faced with a situation like, what good would it do battle against the errors of Joachim of Fiore, born and lived between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries? It would take just as much as today, and can serve to battle against the Modernists and Karl Rahner. Because for certain theologians and thinkers, the underlying problem is not what Karl Rahner was wrong from a doctrinal point of view. The problem, but above all the goal to reach, and more: I am right and they are right to say from a life that Karl Rahner's wrong and wrong. In short: I am right that for forty-four years later to sing in many different ways: "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls'.

.

Having said that I continue saying: The older theologians are free to continue to thunder against the Modernists and against Karl Rahner. And as, of certain subjects, I know is stubbornness is the extent to which they ended up falling in love both of their good battles both of their idea of ​​truth, I avoid losing unnecessary time to explain to them that the problem today of the Church are neither heresies of the Modernists or dangerous heterodoxies Karl Rahner, because something else is the problem that they do not want to identify and see.

.

Today, inside of the Church live the self-destructive tragedy a disintegration of the deposit of faith and dogma deriving from the swarm of a very large number of bishops and presbyters which are in fact the perfect atheists, of non-believers. Before the objective fact and incontrovertible of this atheism, I would certainly not lose my precious time squirming between modernism and rahnerismo, paralyzed in disputes that today are useless, Whereas the life God gave it to me to use it and not to waste it uncritically and stubborn to the end. Of course, The Stakeholders can say that we came to this thanks to modernism and to rahnerismo. Good, but continue to repeat this, in which realistic and objective logical solution can lead, if not ... "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls' ?

.

EXCEEDING THE POINT OF NO RETURN CREATES IRREVERSIBILITY

.

in large forfeitures there is always a threshold that marks the point of no return

These wrestlers Against Modernism and Karl Rahner what they want: disavowal of that Modernism already disavowed by the Holy Pontiff Pius X and his two successors, then the repudiation of Karl Rahner, or simply that it recognized the rightness of their theological positions as opposed to those critical of Karl Rahner? Possible that some pundits of logic and metaphysics, lost in their dream world and convinced that they live in it maximum grip with the real human and ecclesial, fail to understand what leads to a gangrenous and irreversible situation like the one we are experiencing? Can not reach to understand that when the decadence that invests regularly the civil and religious company passed the so-called safety limit, no going back, because at that point the irreversible and unstoppable process proceeds regardless of the will more or less good of the people themselves or the little good that remains inside a small church in structure of sin, which it produces an internal sin and who then spreads outside? Someone has never raised the issue of what the Church today can be seen to have lost sanctifying grace because of a diabolical mechanism rejection developed in-house? And do not come to me to tell improperly that the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ, of which he is head and we are living members [cf. With the 1, 18], because I know. And since I know, I take this opportunity to remind you that the Mystical Body is the union of the faithful, It constituted the cornerstone of which is the Word of God, guided through the centuries by the Roman Pontiff, It remembers the question successor of Blessed Peter the Apostle, not the successor of Christ, of which it is Vicar on earth, no successor on earth. The Mystical Body is not only a moral union formed by the common purpose, as in an earthly society would be what in legal language is referred to as "legal person", it is a collection of souls, joined by a living bond and vital which is the life of God, associate to each of them by means of the Sacraments. So this is not a headless union, or guided by the hierarchy, which are the bishops united to the Roman Pontiff, but a reality that dominates our every human expectation, of which Jesus Christ is the Head of this Body, while the faithful united with Him in the bond of divine grace, are members. This is how a real body, spiritual, which has its basis in Jesus Christ and in sanctifying grace, whose limbs or are already united in the glory of the heavenly Jerusalem, or they are in the certainty of faith of Paradise. However, if the head of this visible body of Christ is excluded and if the visible body is not sanctifying grace, If someone intends to wonder what will become of this visible body? And please, do not tell me that the visible Church can not lose sanctifying grace because of Christ and is assisted by the Holy Spirit, because with all respect I would find myself compelled to reply that I am a priest and a theologian and as such, and as such I can not reason with the illogic of the wizards who read the bottoms of coffee cups. Or is it perhaps the case already happened that Adam and Eve have altered after the creation of the perfect harmony of all creation, after having denied and rejected the action of sanctifying grace of God upon them? [cf. Gen 3, 15]. Said this, anyone thinks for real, in the name of his surreal dogmatic, that the visible Church can not reject and exclude sanctifying grace because being the Church of Christ and being governed by the Holy Spirit, God the Father would never allow? To think, reassure and reassure the people of God transmitting things like that is really abhorrent, in the etymological sense of the term aberration. As we can only speculate that the visible Church would never vacated by God to refuse his sanctifying grace, if Adam and Eve were left free to rebel against the Creator? And if we deny this, then we can easily pass for real from dogmatic theology at the magic of reading coffee cups funds!

.

AND NOW THAT IS ANSWERED TO MY PARADIGM OF THE PARATROOPER

.

if the aircraft is without a parachute it is physically impossible to stop, back on the plane, wear a parachute and jump again …

Certain subjects they would not hesitate to revolutionize the laws of physics in the name of their subjective truth and their equally subjective logic, but the question that they should ask themselves is very practical and very simple background: for a dreadful error which may also have competition both modernists both rahneriani, or for a negligent to say the least absurd, it happened that a parachutist would have stepped off the plane without having donned the parachute. And this is the current situation of the Church: launch a plane without a parachute. Well, the great masters of Aristotelian logic, the school and metaphysics, at this point should bring the best arguments to explain that this paratrooper, precipitating towards the ground by two thousand meters of height, It can still stop, go back, provide for wear and parachuted launch again. And if these pundits metaphysical answer that he has launched without a parachute because of the Modernists and Karl Rahner, I will say that this, It was also true, now it is irrelevant, because the cause was found and destroyed before he will branch out. If then, even worse, before the paratrooper who rushes without a parachute, those who can never be free of a "logical" answer for everything, They are attacked to say that is the Holy Spirit, at that point, I will say that the Holy Spirit is not Merlin, then invite them to explain how the Third Person of the Holy Trinity, before a free individual or collective act of the will which involves precise consequences, He will cancel its freedom and its free will to bring it back on the plane, let him wear the parachute and then let it run again, after meanwhile he disavowed the modernists and rahneriani, on account of which he has launched without a parachute. Or in other words: it would be as if God the Father had annulled in Adam and Eve freedom and free will to prevent them from rebelling against the Creator and thus committing the original sin. For God did not do it? All in all then it would have avoided trasmettessero to all mankind a corrupt nature due to a sin that their descendants have not committed, but because of them, however, they have contract. What would have cost to God to intervene, suspend for a few minutes their freedom and their agency? Well, ask ourselves why God did not do it, if we really want to be men of faith and logic, men instead of fideism and illogic cloaked behind the highest speculations of scholastic and metaphysics.

.

While we know well the problems caused by Modernism and Karl Rahner, beyond which we are now long gone, but also better we understand the shortsightedness of some people who pretend to quickly change a logical answer for everything, up to drown into the glass of water of illogical, it cost as well stick to real shots of magic of the Holy Spirit, thus ignoring the two foundations that are in support of the mystery of man's creation: freedom and free will.

.

THE SYPHILIS AND AIDS DISEASE ARE TWO LISTS: UNA NOT AT ALL THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE OTHER

.

between syphilis and AIDS there is no connection, diseases are two separate and distinct from one another

Let's go then cautious, Although I myself have partly done, affirming that Modernism and Karl Rahner are the result of the launch of skydiver without a parachute, because the thing is not at all logical and consequential. Or to put it another example: we put that in the United States bursts a real epidemic AIDS. In the event to, while those infected will die without the possibility of cures and effective vaccines against this disease, what would benefit persist in speaking of the Spanish in the sixteenth century prostitutes infected with syphilis sailors of Christopher Columbus, which then spread to the New America among people who never had to know certain diseases before they arrive? But I can guarantee that serves no purpose to explain to these people that the objective problem of modernity is not syphilis but l 'AIDS. Even less will serve to explain to them that between syphilis and l 'AIDS there is no scientific link clinical, there is no connection, because the latter disease is not born as a result of degenerative previous, but it develops in a completely autonomous. Lost time! They will step forward undeterred to cite the cases of Christopher Columbus sailors in the sixteenth century spread syphilis in New Americas, because what they studied, written and explained all my life, so this wish to continue undeterred to write and explain: Syphilis. Or if you prefer better: "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls'. And if you really must acknowledge that today, the real and serious problem, It is not syphilis but people who die from AIDS, at that point, regardless of falling in scientific illogic, just to continue to talk about their beloved and indispensable theories of syphilis, They affirm without ridiculous sentence that 'AIDS It is the logical consequence of syphilis. But if anyone, before certain expressions laugh behind the illogical, they will feel more than ever confirmed in their ideas and in response replicate: inevitably he laughs, because it is a dangerous syphilitic and as such has been heard out and stung.

.

AGAIN TODAY BY LOGIC ARISTOTELIAN, BY EDUCATION AND FROM SAN THOMAS AQUINAS? You think irrationality PURE

.

welcome to the world of the irrational …

In a visible Church in which the humoral and emotional have taken the place of the objective and rational, where the law is despised leading to accusations of "self-righteous legalism" addressed to those who call upon the application of the canonical norms, where you ride declaring with urticaria before the rigors of the "old doctrine", where even bishops and priests have taken the habit of using the words "dogma" and "dogmatic" in a negative term for people with these entries closed and obtuse, I do my best wishes to all those who today, before a visible Church in which arrogance was elected to the law in a climate of total anarchy, presume to be able to apply Aristotelian logic and criteria of the old and glorious school. I think these people deserve the best compliments, as anyone who deserves them assume with certainty and serious belief that they can read the original texts in Hebrew from the Book of Genesis and the texts of the Holy Gospels in the original greek to an arrogant illiterate in a government role, that far from being aware of his illiteracy feels the opposite person of high culture and as such entitled to despise the knowledge of others, exercising the worst coercion all the authority of which is covered. But how can you think only a joke to start from Aristotle, by the school and by Aquinas, when to impose their study should be arrogant and contemptuous of illiterates who do not know the Catechism of the Catholic Church and who now occupy all the top key roles in the Church and ecclesiastical power?

.

Losing then deliberate and unnecessary time, certain theologians insist on explaining that we must start from the Aristotelian logic and by St. Thomas Aquinas, as recommended certain Popes and certain documents of the magisterium, ignoring the recommendations of those Popes have fallen on deaf ears and that those of magisterial documents have been completely set aside. And to waste time I do not feel, especially considering that the use of the life that was given to me I will have to answer to God, I do not particularly love is the unnecessary loss of time or waste of the talents bestowed by Him [cf. Mt 25, 14-30; LC 19, 12-27]. So I leave willingly discuss these subjects dream of an audience of arrogant illiterate under the ruins of the house that falls apart stating with absolute certainty that we must start from the Aristotelian logic, by the school and by St. Thomas Aquinas, as several Popes lived decades and decades ago they have recommended through various documents giving their teaching. And here I wonder: these wise scholastic and Thomist, They have perhaps realized that to better allocate and destroy these magisterial documents, has even come up with the unusual and original ploy to beatify and canonize the Popes their authors, However, at the same time destroying their teaching? And if this is not evil, I honestly do not really know what it is. To then he had doubts in this regard, just ask to reflect on what remains today of the Encyclical Faith and Reason or of the Apostolic Exhortation Familiar Consortium of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, who it was canonized just as the other side you were literally in pieces these documents to him especially dear. To follow with the upcoming Holy Pontiff Paul VI, which on one hand will be canonized and the other will be given a short new reading and interpretation of his encyclical Human life, all taking advantage of people like S.It is. Mons. Vincenzo Paglia …

.

… anyway, in this climate of irreversible collapse just start from the Aristotelian logic, by the school and by St. Thomas Aquinas, all adding to the Mass celebrated with the Missal of St. Pius V, so that the free fall without a parachute is finally interrupted, the paratrooper who is falling to the ground can be stopped in the air, reported on the plane by the Holy Spirit fell in the role of Merlin, so wear the parachute and then launch again reciting: « introibo altar to the Gods, to God who giveth joy to my youth ». When then after this operation it will finally come safely to earth, First we will offer you a cup of coffee, then, after he drank, we can also switch to a metaphysical reading of the bottom of the cup.

.

THAT SUPER COUNCIL VATICAN NATO WITH SYNDROME PROGERIE BUT ON WHICH CAN NOT BE DISCUSSED, IN A CHURCH IN WHICH DISCUSS SOME TIME EVEN ON THE FAITH DOGMAS

.

pictured the American teenager Samuel Berns, suffering from the syndrome Progerie [disease of the “born old”], in a photo taken at the age of 17 year old, just before he died [It comes from The Corriere della Sera, WHO]

After a process incubazione which starts from the late nineteenth early twentieth century, in the late fifties of the twentieth century came to life a radical mutation of the Church, initially hidden under pretexts of reform and update. And here lies another problem: the inability of many Catholic scholars distinguish Vatican II from the post-conciliar, which does not mean to deny that certain very optimistic facility documents, cast for more with a whole new language which are affected by the German Romantic style decadent, Then we have favored the confusion that has developed in the post-conciliar [see my previous article, WHO]. If we want to look at those who are certain objective limits of the Second Vatican Council, We can just say that his documents were born suffering from the syndrome Progerie, the so-called disease “born old”. And these are because they do not speak to the future, but the man of a mind that was already dying. Quite different was instead the Council of Trent, It wrote in the sixteenth century, proponent of reforms and not revolutions, who had the ability to speak plain language to men the next five centuries of church history. And who that thinks it can deny, which denies it well, but do it in logical rigor, not subjective-emotional-ideological rigor, in this miserable and devastated church visible in the Tridentine which the term - referring to the Council of Trent - is now commonly used by bishops, Priests and theologians in highly negative sense, mainly to show people retrograde and obtuse.

.

Even this last speech is useless to this, because by the time we now quite beyond the same problems of the post-conciliar, how long we are now quite beyond most of the same documents of Vatican Council II, that having been cloaked in ideology touted for ecclesiology, make it impossible for anyone to open serene scientific debates aimed to demonstrate and clarify what now certain documents, written for a man of fifty does that already was dying at the time when they were drawn up, today they are nothing more than the old texts, no topical and poorly effective to speak to the man of the third millennium. And after this council dei council the Church was finally embalmed in subjective ideologies based on the idea of ​​a super council that theological schools, groups of people or individuals, They are finally cut out according to their own interests and pleasures, each giving rise to their staff Council egomenico.

.

For case, there was something that did not work? Definitely. And all just starting from the style of the language adopted by the Second Vatican Council, documents which, starting from Holy Council, give guidelines but no clear indications, indicating if anything, even the penalties for offenders, then open the doors to postume interpretations for the implementation of reforms. And although for many all is well and everything went well, if we take instead of the first reforms, which it was the liturgical, the evidence shows this is today's reality: if today we enter one of our churches, to this increasingly empty, we will find ten priests who celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice in ten different ways. To this we also add the lay movements that have created their own liturgies that are teeming with all kinds of liturgical abuses. If then in 2004, forty years on from the great liturgical reform, Asked to have enacted the Education Sacramentum [cf. WHO] in which they remember the foundations of the Holy Eucharist, it is evident that something, or perhaps many things, They did not go so well in the right direction.

.

This something that did not work well and the right way, between the various names has one in particular that embodies the serious and devastating problem: hermeneutic of discontinuity or of the break up, which as we know are powerful advocates the theologians of the School of Bologna, Today large piazzatori of bishops and cardinals under this pontificate Augusto, from Europe to the Philippines. And what are the consequences of this discontinuity O break up? Very simple: in a few days an overt heretic, that Enzo Bianchi, World preach a retreat to the clergy at the Sanctuary of Ars, where the remains of the saint patron of priests are preserved, Also present at the big event, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy. And when the priests together with the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy flock to hear the pearls of wisdom of a person who sows five decades blatant heresies, there is very little to add, except that the phrase soon resound: "Everything is done" [GV 19, 30].

.

CATHOLICS WE PROUD THAT WE WANTED TO LEARN THE LESSONS OF HISTORY

.

those signs that we are no longer able to read and interpret: on the day that the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI has made withdrawal from the holy throne, three lightning struck in succession by a cross on the ball dell'Arcibasilica dome of St. Peter, the third of which was photographed and taken in video [click on image to open the video]

The real problem is that of a pyramid structure someone moved the stones of the base, causing the progressive collapse of the pyramid from the base to the tip. And while this collapse is underway, someone is seriously debating the urgent need to declare how false the god Anubis, whose frescoes in honor of his cult are found in one of the inner rooms of the pyramid. In short: We disown the Modernists and Karl Rahner while the whole pyramid is collapsing, why then, with their condemnation, at that point the pyramid is rimonterà from itself from the base up to the tip, because the pyramid is of Christ and is governed by the Holy Spirit, then the Son and the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, will provide to this. E, how to understand, before those who think in this way and to whom has the similar approaches with Pneumatology, we really metaphysics transformed into magic.

.

With an arrogance that eventually would inevitably be punished, Catholics we refused to learn from the solemn lessons of history. All the great ancient civilizations, from the Sumerians to the Assyrian-Babylonians, by the Egyptians to the Greeks until the fall of the great Roman Empire, They triggered at some point of irreversible decay processes. And as I explained with the parachute paradigm, the decline is irreversible when it exceeds the point of no return, when the aircraft is exited without a parachute; a fact born of an act of more or less free choice before which no one, even the Holy Spirit, It can intervene subverting all the laws of physics to the rescue of man free and endowed with free.

.

In a short time, within twenty years at most, the Catholic Church as we have known will not exist. There will small groups around the world who have saved the foundations of the deposit of faith. The great ecclesiastical structures will be converted into stable intended for completely different uses, the glorious and ancient monumental churches are museums, concert halls, Art exhibition centers, or brought into various kinds of secular activities. If the reigning Pontiff will be succeeded another two or three similar or worse setting, at present the Holy See will eventually find natural home, the Union of Christian Spiritual Churches Partner, purpose of which will be to continue social mundane activities, charitable and philanthropic, all with the blessing of the Company of the United Nations. School children will receive some meager news of one Jesus Christ as now receive news about the Egyptian pharaohs or the first king of Rome, with the speech entirely focused on her humanity and not his divinity. But most of all, of what was the Catholic Church, It will be handed down to posterity the best of the worst of black legends that it will resemble one of the largest associations of criminals existed over the last two thousand years of history, as long as she does not cleansed from all its ancient ugliness conforming to the world and following the rules of the world, Church becoming the man for the man who has finally put the man at its center.

.

Some might say that today should be a new Gregory or a new Leo the Great. Anyone who thinks this, to use the image of the so-called transfert freudiano, It transfers the image of Merlin which was often reduced the Holy Spirit, with the image of a Supreme Pontiff who is himself a Merlin. Indeed, in a situation of complete and unstoppable decline ecclesial, morale, spiritual and doctrinal, what could ever make a Gregory or Leo the Great revived? Perhaps it could govern the Church with the squalid and immoral characters who swarm a number of priests, among bishops and among the cardinals? Or maybe he could control it and purify it with an army of bishops and priests who by tall disturbing number are practicing homosexuals, as demonstrated irrefutably the facts, hardly the malevolent suppositions? Simply said,: the best scenarios, potential or Leo the Great Gregory would soon end the Pope Celestine V.

.

But for holy charity: we want to realize that throughout the entire ecclesiastical structure and hierarchy is now totally infected from the queue until the head?

.

We must therefore give a reason to all those who in the wake of the new course excited yell "no going back!». They are right, Unfortunately. I myself I have to agree with them: 'No turning back'. But if, however, a courageous Pope who do not know the hat of magician who could be pulled out, condemned Modernism and Karl Rahner, ripristinasse studies of good schooling, of metaphysics and of Thomism, all it would be resolved by magic spell. Again to return to the parachute paradigm ...

.

BANK OF SEED

.

those signs that nobody reads and interprets more: Angelus on Saint Peter's Square, His Holiness is launching two children two doves, who moments later they are attacked and killed by a crow and a seagull, as the Holy Father said goodbye and wished the crowd "good lunch" rather than dismiss us with a "Praised be Jesus Christ" [click on image to open the video]

While this is coming true, and before the realization of the disaster there are those who can find nothing better to do than to invoke condemnations of Modernist and Karl Rahner, waiting for the Holy Spirit, not in the form of a dove or tongues of fire, but precisely in the form of Merlin, systems all with a stroke of magic, I think more and more to the island of Norway where the institution that preserves 84.000 samples belonging to more than 60 genres and 600 species of cultivated plants and wild species which are endangered by “genetic erosion” or extinction.

.

This is our task: save the seeds of the Gospel Jesus Christ the incarnate Word of God, died, resurrected and ascended to heaven. If in fact the building of a church to take fire, The priest what he must do immediately? Remove the Blessed Sacrament from the tabernacle and get to safety with the most precious treasure. And if in a library of sacred texts outbreak of a fire and those texts were destined to be lost forever, what is the first text that runs to save: The Holy Gospel, or the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle and the Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas? What are we to make of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas without the Holy Gospel?

.

The church, even if it reduced to a minimum and a small minority of silent people scattered around the world, lathes to sprout in all its purity, who knows how many centuries between. And maybe then you will, that Christ will return in glory to judge the living and the dead: at the time of rebirth. Instead, if Christ returned in glory to judge the living and the dead in this time of total disintegration and decadent, His judgment would be really terrible, just as he himself told us:

.

' Verily I say, the day of judgment the land of Sodom and Gomorrah shall be more tolerable fate of that city ' [Mt 10, 15]. "Guai a te, Chorazin, Guai a te, Bethsaida! For if in Tire and Sidon had been done the miracles done in you, some time would be converted dressing the bag and covering of ash. Thus, in the judgment Tire and Sidon will be treated less severely than you. And you, capernao, Will you be exalted to heaven? No, up you will be precipitated into hell!» [LC 10, 13-15].

.

The mercy of God is manifested in this way, and mercy is a different from the mercy of our days, emptied of God and filled with the worst worldly man's whims. Just as the Gospel, to which we all say, just to hide what he says, thanks to a visible Church which now shows the world to be ashamed of the true contents of the Holy Gospel, begging forgiveness in the world for light content, precise and strict contained in the Holy Gospel and the Apostolic Letters. We must therefore point to the sperm bank, for the Church that one day people will, perhaps just before the return of Christ the Lord to the end of time. And if we'll save the seeds of the Holy Gospel, then one day, maybe in a few centuries, also flourish the great literature of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church.

.

CAN A Roman Pontiff LEGALLY ELECTED AND LEGITIMATE SUCCESSOR OF BLESSED APOSTLE PETER BE FREE OF STATE OF GRACE ?

.

.

Right now we should treasure of the words of Cardinal Charles Journet [1891-1975] than in his work Church of the Incarnate Word explains: "The axiom “where the Pope there is the Church”, so where the Pope acts as Pope and Head of the Church; if not, or The Church is in him, neither he is in the Church " .

.

Even in this case I'm tired of debating unnecessarily with those who decisively and absolutely deny taking only into vague consideration the hypothesis that a Supreme Pontiff can be closed to the actions of grace of the Holy Spirit, poured on him with undoubted abundance, but that in him and through him can operate only if he accepts the gifts of grace and puts them to good use. Here, then, that these subjects scrambles their total rejection, and they react to this problem as confirming and supporting of juke box coin the chant ... 'It, But the Pope can never err when judges in the matter of doctrine and faith, it is dogma, dogma, dogma!».

.

Question asked to the great pundits of metaphysics and dogmatic: but it is the grace of God that speaks and acts through him, or it is instead he acts irrespective of grace, since it is magically not defeasible in matters of doctrine and faith, It can speak infallibly although closed to the grace and out of the sanctifying grace of God? Because if we are neither before the metaphysical or before the dogmatic, But before the magic. It is in fact the magic that in itself and in itself is totally irrational, while the dogma and dogma are not irrational, They are built on rational principles, for as sure as that the Word became flesh, It has not done thinking vaporous.

.

Faced with these closed forms of reasoning which are the consequence of escape from reality by all those who pretend to always have a strong logical answer for everything, unless retreat into four protective formulas when the answers to be given when there are none, I repeat that we are not within either of metaphysics nor in that of the dogmatic, But part of the magic, if not worse Gnosticism. For how can the Holy Spirit, through its thanksgivings, cancel the will or no will of man, that is, his freedom and his free will, for sdoppiarlo to your liking and make it totally necessary unfailing, if its nature was not freely open to God's grace? Because if that happens, in that case God would be in contradiction with the mystery of creation and thus with himself through the Holy Spirit, and in this case our God is a magical God, a Gnostic god. Everything always to return to the great speculative minds that face problems until a few years previously unimaginable, but unfortunately real today, instead of really they close themselves up mirror in the cage of their four dogmatic formulas reiterating firm and immovable before the tragic evidence of the facts: "... it is unfailing, cannot err, it is dogma, dogma, dogma!». And here it is worth remembering that the dogmas are not cages men claiming at one point the right not to reason, but they are as deeply reasoned heart of the mystery of faith, at least according to a great teacher of school, Sant'Anselmo d'Aosta, which he states the extent to which "faith requires the intellect and understanding the faith" [Faith seeking understanding. In Prosl., Foreword], and again: "I think to understand, I understand to believe » [I believe in order to understand, I understand that you can trust]. And these two are the main foundations of scholastic philosophy, which never, at its foundation, He has placed the magic.

.

Well, I confess that I am tired of these people. I'm tired of those who before a fire in a library of sacred texts destined to be lost forever, They will rush to save the text Iota Romano Amerio and the Holy Gospel burns. Like the rest are a bit 'tired in general, much to ask with some frequency: deserves continue to speculate, analyze and write, or would it be better to shut themselves up for life I have left in a Carthusian monastery with absolute silence vote, dedicating myself to prayer and penance until death? In August, a few days after the completion of my 55th birthday, as time passes, I proposed more than ever to work to good use throughout the life of this time that separates me from death, I intend to waste it or to defend the indefensible or to save the unsalvageable, least of all to expose my human and priestly dignity to public ridicule just to look in the documents of the Supreme Pontiff Francis I that he has never said and written, pulling out all the costs they have the good that just is not there, through interpretative devices that have indeed pathetic, because you can not put your mouth on the good things he did not say after doing the process to its deepest intentions. Before all'indifendibile solutions are three: reproaches and complaints of St. John the Baptist, which as we know lost his head; the speculative analysis of the situation for what it is, however not for what we would like it; the complete withdrawal from the world and total silence vote for life. There are three different ways, but all effective to operate at its best in this disastrous situation and irreversible. For now I have chosen the first solution, the model Giovanni Battista, but I could also decide to choose the third, with perhaps even more effectively.

.

The problem, It is not in fact slight: how can we, we, interpret the one who should be the guardian and authentic interpreter of the faith? Or just hurts a lot to some minds have to accept and admit that the keeper of the "magical infallibility", for five years now he has shown with its deliberate and unintentional ambiguity about nothing, It blew up in the Church, the theological and moral relativism, together with the confusion and division, as never before he had been seen in the visible Church? Is it possible that among the pundits of the great theology, not only there is one that poses a question, if anything, likely to remain unanswered, namely this: there may be a case in which a Pope, closed to the actions of the sanctifying grace of the Holy Spirit, ends up be deprived of the grace of state that is typical of his high office, if anything, with all the consequences that today we have before, all regardless of his legitimate election and the role he equally legitimately busy?

.

And with this it is obvious, loved ones and many readers, that on this question, you might as well play the very survival of The Island of Patmos, place that I will never mock you, because "God has entrusted you to me ', and a father can not and should never make fun of the children who demand comfort, help and support in trial, so as not to face the ghosts of the Demons that there circling around, and that scare us a lot in this dark night.

.

Right now our salvation is contained in the theological virtue of hope, on which I wrote abundantly in 2014 [see WHO]. Hope is the great virtue median that binds together faith and charity. And since I have been set up in the service of the People of God and entered the priesthood in the universal fatherhood, this Holy People intend to offer the way of hope, but never the way of illusion, because I am a priest of Christ, not a drug dealer of hallucinogens acids, but mainly because I consider that a Holy People of God, not a people ox which give a pat and aspirin while a terminal cancer corrodes by the time our ecclesial and ecclesiastical body, while the visible Church is already in the antechamber of a morgue reduced for the occasion to a circus of clowns, dancers and dwarfs.

.

dal'Isola Patmos, 9 September 2018

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

- ecclesial news -

HERE'S WHAT FATHER WROTE TWO YEARS AGO ARIEL SCREAMING TO DESERT SANDS:

"PEDOPHILIA: IF THE SPOTLIGHT IS AN EXCELLENT APPEARANCE OF PLAGUE film CLERICAL omerta "

.

“The case of Spotlight"It is a film that deserves appreciation for the way in which the director and the actors have been the heart of this painful problem, It consists of clerical quell'omertà that has always characterized and wraps both the worst cases of child abuse and the various sexual disorders experienced by many members of our secular and regular clergy. And now I'll explain I lived on my life and on my skin, what it means for a priest violate the clerical conspiracy of silence, since the prices I paid them all, one by one …

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

The article here is repeated in the Archives of The Island of Patmos: WHO

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the movie poster

A devoted reader He pointed me to two articles in the New Daily Compass, one signed by Massimo Introvigne [cf. WHO] and one by Stefano Magni [cf. WHO]. The object of these two items is the film "IIf the Spotlight”, award-winning film-complaint on cases of child abuse that shook the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston and the Catholic Church in several corners of the world [cf. Italian trailer, WHO].

The two authors on Compass Daily They signed their articles, treat the problem with that journalistic propriety that at times can lead to fall in the partial and superficial. Or Massimo Introvigne, which shows a very complex problem through its known sociological preparation; nor Stefano Magni, who in his excellent article could in my opinion avoid defining the work as "ideological film", are not even touched by the partial and prevailing superficiality today appears the main protagonist.

I that certain problems I have touched them with his hand and there I found myself embroiled finally paying a heavy price, I say that this film, far from “ideological”, It is above all free from any "strong scene" stretched to touch the feelings of the audience to arouse in them contempt for the Catholic Church; otherwise feelings aroused by many other films, for instance “Primal Fear” [USA, 1996, WHO], “rebellious angels” [Ireland, 2003, WHO], “Magdalene” [2002, UK, WHO], etc ..

“The case of Spotlight”, despite some inaccuracies due to the vast complexity and severity of a theme not easy to treat, It deserves appreciation for the way in which the director and the actors have been the heart of this painful problem, It consists of clerical quell'omertà that has always characterized and wraps both the worst cases of child abuse and the various sexual disorders experienced by many members of our secular and regular clergy.

And now I'll explain I lived on my life and on my skin, what it means for a priest violate the clerical conspiracy of silence, precisely because the prices I paid them all, one by one …

The limit for years reflected in many who "presumed" to be able to talk about certain topics that touch and shake at times our entire ecclesiastical system, It is given by the reluctance often shown by more or less authoritative representatives of the Catholic world to take the bull by the horns, because we all know that you can run the risk of being impaled, so better to stay on the stands of the arena to scream for the bullfighter or the bull. Or rather: if you have the best bullfighter, he shouts "Long live the bullfighter!”, if you have the better the bull, he cries, "Long live the bull!”.

He does not always win the bullfighter

In the years I deepened the complex problem of the gaysmo within the Church and in doing so I never looked at anyone, paying until now the consequences. What they have not however ever paid certain committed lay Catholics and militants, I am taken to shout seconded the wind pulling the arena for "the bullfighter" or "the bull". These committed Catholics and militants, although notified in detail, well they looked from raising time low voice in my defense, When I was within my church passed into the meat grinder from the worst ecclesiastical conspiratorial for daring to utter the truth and to have complained to the Ecclesiastical Authority certain intolerable situations. Something proven by the fact that for two years, in the diocese of the Bishop of Rome - which is not governed by the Bishop of Rome but his Vicar General - he celebrated the Holy Mass in the Catacombs of Priscilla [2011-2013], assisted by my precious student and collaborator, only person. While in, those who could say a few words in my defense, I do not say they were fugitives, They were simply engaged in political correctness, all we are taken to pay their respects to their masters for whom they were committed to leading as the devotees owner-operators vans-goods made available to them.

On certain topics I think I can speak with sufficient authority why sigh sigh behind, everything I have said and all complaints at the time presented to the Vicariate of Rome, the Congregation for the Clergy and the Secretariat of State, I paid beating behind beating, nastiness nastiness behind, ostracism ostracism behind.

loneliness, often a companion of the priest …

I do not know how many lay Catholics that every evening they return home with no one erodes them, I can speak with my knowledge of the facts, at the end of the day instead I remained in my house, which is the church understood as the ecclesiastical world, enveloped by gloom of that silence the clerical ruling whose evil results are now detailed in the written judgment given by several courts scattered around the world. Judgments anything but unfair and far from being moved by anti-Catholic sentiments, enough to consider that on the words of those judgments was then celebrated the painful liturgy of the MEA culpa by those same clerics who until shortly before had rebuked, threatened and ostracized the few priests who courageously had reported facts, situations and, above all, those high-risk individuals protected by entire roped powerful prelates. And certain people, in this case the homosexual clergy on the one hand, pedophiles on the other hand, They have always had, inside the church world, protectors armies, but above all the diligent and often powerful "copertori".

And whoever pays the price I paid, as it is beaten to a pulp, however, Leisure, and being free I have no debts to pay, because the "secret" of the Christological freedom that really known if will make us free [cf. GV 8, 32] It is based on the lack of any aspiration of career and ecclesiastical benefice; despite claims by certain careerists, not potendomi define "free man", if anything, they have called me ... "dangerous man”, or "loose cannon” (!?). This is also why I have no creditors dressed in red who knock on my door to introduce bills due to be paid, or that remind me of the loans obtained, or if anything donations or gifts bestowed to me in the form of accommodation, prebends and ecclesiastical privileges, I saw that I have donated only copious slaps; and slap - as we all know - we are always free, get the grace to the soul that receives and often lead to Hell that of those who grants it free or calculated nastiness, in supreme contempt for the evangelical truth that will set us free.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. And Satan came Trino. Relativism, indivdualismo, disobedience. Analysis on the Third Millennium Church. Published in 2011 and shortly in print

In 2011, in my book currently in print, I analyzed in depth the problem of omosessualizzazione of the Church and the number of gay priests always higher, stating the reasons, triggers the origins and also the possible remedies, even if with these results: not a single bishop and cardinal, those who later approached me, gave me wrong for what I had written and for the clear way in which I had written the. Far from it, collezionai compliments sometimes even embarrassing, inside the closed private rooms of the various sacred buildings. It made only except for an elderly owner archbishop, who welcomed me at the end of 2011 taking care of my father's lifelong training for the priesthood, None, these prelates in private laudatori, middle finger moves for me, while an army of mediocre monsignorini incattiviti tried to attack me like a pack of hyenas angry.

Facts are facts and these remain, but especially documented. And the Ecclesiastical Authority, from Roman, You know this, in what way I am accustomed to document the facts; and also how do they never speak without proof.

Preaching in the desert sands and reeds in the wind I needlessly spoke a omosessualista coup inside the church [see WHO]. In vain I explained that the gay lobby does not just aim high, because a long time is now arrived at the top. In fact years that gay clergy and their gay friendly affect the episcopal appointments of more or less candidates belonging to the gay "pious confraternity”, and once they become bishops begin first to place their faithful friends in key positions in the dioceses, in many of them more or less overt gay reign in all of them the so-called the nerve center, with immediate access to activation buttons of the launch of the ground-to-air missiles on the good priests, or on the few that survive in some dioceses where, those who have the misfortune to participate in them at a meeting of the clergy, It may sometimes have the impression of being finished by mistake in a branch of the Gay village.

new insight into the religious style, before which St. Pio of Pietrelcina would surely jump for joy …

How is all this never happened? The problem is upstream in the early seventies, when in the post-conciliar season it ran from the previous penalty, perhaps excessive, responsive to lax. And so, in a society undergoing rapid transformation and with the so-called "sexual liberation" now prevailing, seminars you went emptying, more still novitiates and student halls of religious families and the same historical orders. It was then that many bishops and superiors of religious orders opened wide the doors and allowed access to training for the priesthood and religious life in people who never, earlier, They would be admitted to a seminary or a novitiate. And when you create nests of vipers, it happens that the vipers reproduce with each other and the occurrence all together good bite and attempt to poison anyone looking for some way to hit them.

If forty years ago it was reasonable to say that the problem was born upstream from the formation of future new priests and religious, today, Fully occurred degeneration, it is rather reasonable to say - but unfortunately no one tells him - that the problem is all the episcopate. For as I explained in my book that the 2011: "Those who in the seventies capeggiavano inside of the seminars gay fraternity, Today we find them bishops, and just become such, first they have placed in all important positions and carried on in the hierarchy or in the so-called ecclesiastical career of related matters to them ". This is the dramatic root of that problem pointing to for years, but unfortunately to no avail, because no one in the church wanted to pay even hear my words, especially when the evidence of the facts gave me full reason.

I also explain, always in that my work, that physical homosexuality, that actually practiced, It is only the tip of a now radicalized that homosexuality itself is much worse and harmful: that psychological homosexuality She is gone now in power and in virtue of which the Church was finally omosessualizzata. And today we are not infrequently before priests, but especially before bishops and "men" in delicate positions of authority who sometimes think with the anger of women's psychologies living with their typical disorder, which it is hysteria, word the meaning of which says it all, since the greek etymology of this lemma [afterbirth, hysteron] It means uterus.

the palace of the Vicariate of Rome

But let's rigorously documented facts, given that certain documents and reports the handed in my own risk following the Ecclesiastical Authority: the then Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Rome S.It is the center of the field. Mons. Ernest Mandara, man I will keep the memory alive and lovable; the then Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, at the hands of then my Bishop. It's still: to Cardinal Giuseppe Bertello, former apostolic nuncio in Italy, office at the time vacant, appointed Governor of Vatican City, which went to deliver my text in its new office at the Holy See with a prayer to have that my relationship to the then Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, because at stake it was the image of the Diocese of Rome, ie the particular Church of the Supreme Pontiff that on certain issues and problems had already been expressed in a decisive and severe expressions and through more documents, Therefore it was necessary to prevent precisely in his Diocese, without his knowledge and because of the bad people's government, certain burst scandals.

In my two different reports drawn up at the beginning 2011 They were referred to various cases, from that of the rector of a prestigious and ancient Roman basilica which for years maintained a round of young prostitute, What, however, that for years everyone knew: He knew Cardinal Agostino Vallini, he knew his predecessor to the Vicariate of Rome Cardinal Camillo Ruini, He knew the Prelate Secretary of the period at the Vicariate, Mons. Mauro Parmeggiani, later promoted Bishop of Tivoli; He knew the then Archbishop Angelo Bagnasco castrense, later promoted Archbishop of Genoa and President of the Italian Episcopal Conference, who attended the official business for several years that basilica during his apostolic ministry to the Armed Forces, to follow with so many other silent prelates, all variously masters of that sum “prudence” leading sometimes to see and at the same time not to act. What was, indeed, the reaction of Cardinal Mauro Piacenza, at the time when the then Bishop handed him my hand that my relationship? He took note of it and said that the unfortunate situation of the basilica had long been known to them. And shortly after, The bearer bishop of my report - which with all its strengths and weaknesses, however, has always been a true believer and above all a man of moral and ethical sense that the extent of its possibilities tried to protect me from that grave injustice -, He came out of the Sacred Congregation for the Clergy, saying: "Let's go well, We informed them of what they already knew!». And he added: "But what's worse is that nothing do '.

Underground the church of Santa Teresa in Rome

In one of those two reports Also I pointed to the delicate problem of the Carmelites of the Parish of Santa Teresa, from which year after a scandal erupted from hell implications [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO]. But as soon as I named the Carmelites, the prelate my interlocutor's face darkened and he said: "Molla suddenly the piece! The Carmelites are in the good graces of Cardinal Agostino Vallini who wanted to promote one, His notorious protege, also like him canonist, prior to the post of auxiliary bishop Napoli, then to that of the Bishop of Sora-Aquino-Pontecorvo. And I'll tell: He is trying to take him to the Vicariate as archbishop vicegerent ". And so, effectively, occurred shortly after the 2012, when the Carmelite S.It is. Mons. Filippo Iannone was elected to that position, so that “l'Organic executive” the Vicariate was complete in its framework of fearful and obsequious “secretaries” e “subalterns“, certainly not the brother bishops are called to collaborate in perfect communion for the good of the diocese of the Bishop of Rome with his Vicar General. It is known that certain ringleaders want around itself of subalterns, not the brother bishops, much less of the minds who reason; and they want those in the proportion in which they are subconsciously aware of being mediocre sensational that must precisely why try to shine in every way and by every means in its own light.

After a time as private as dramatic interview had with two senior officials of the Digos of Rome in the early 2012, I was made aware of the "wild life" conducted by the then Archabbot of Montecassino, Dom Pietro Vittorelli, whose blatant gayezza he would have seen and perceived even a blind man, except the good Ecclesiastical Authority, literally falling from the clouds when it was finally made public that this unworthy successor Luciferian of St. Benedict of Nursia was an unrepentant addict and equally unapologetic gay that it still good life and the services of its expensive prostitutes gay with the money withdrawn from the Caritas of the Diocese of him entrusted. Needless to mention today - although to have to remember though - what brought all these cases I reported years in advance, thanks to the inaction of the well informed Ecclesiastical Authority, that if you put in front of some of their responsibilities for action, before certain nasty business is mutassero in public scandals, it is not uncommon that irritate against those who warn certain things, if anything, making her pay dearly to the victim, just as it did to the undersigned.

this great soul rest …

Apart from certain information related to me in a confidential way by various members of the police who frequented the Roman basilica in which at the time was serving, before proceeding further I must incidentally clarify how I became aware of certain facts …

… from a few weeks after my priestly ordination I began to be a confessor and spiritual director of a growing number of priests, religious, secular and religious seminarians in formation, which several times, in the internal forum and external forum, prostrate in a deep inner pain conditions or real shock told me the very serious situation that they found themselves living and appropriate to incur. Because not all are born lions or eagles, several of these brothers and several seminarians and religious, not knowing how to act or simply as contact their superiors and remain unharmed, They freed inviolable sacramental seal of confession and after having me they provided free transfer details, evidence and documents, authorizing me to report cases and to talk to the competent ecclesiastical authority. Think, between the various documents I delivered a playful figure even complete photo collection in which, seminarians of a prestigious Roman College, had found nothing better to do than celebrate Christmas itself as "whores" in a bacchanal of Bacchus and Ceres, then devising a photo shoot in which you were mounted on photo-images of naked and half-naked female paired with their trainers, of women with shapely figures and so to follow. This institution obviously has a name, however, even prestigious, It called Almo Collegio Capranica, breeding ground of many bishops and cardinals Italian, of different species of our worst current, which all together, as a sort of "lOggia secret”, if necessary protect this almo College, within which happened at all and more, with dismay of the same Secretary of State to which he belongs and from which its jurisdiction, in addition to the dismay facts long known, we would expect these measures are still far from coming; from the organic unless the Secretary of State should not proceed before you fire the affiliates to seletta “lOggia secret” the Capranica [cf. Correspondence Romana, WHO].

Here then explained why for which, those responsible, He was always treated with caution, knowing that when I talk or say certain things, I never do nonsense, neither hearsay nor the devastating "seems ... seems ... it says ... 'that emerges instead punctual on the lips of those clerics who wish wholeheartedly impallinare anyway someone. I speak for always habit and only on the basis of evidence tested and documented.

a little uplifting glimpse of video taken by the service “The good nights of gay priests”

In what has been narrated Also join a precedent dating from the late 2009, at the time that I lived in an international priestly house of Aventine Hill. At that time it happened that from that hill I became aware of what was happening "downstream", ie to Testaccio, where an alarming number of priests attended plainclothes various gay clubs. Something quite understandable that these gay priests would pass unnoticed, because it seems that the monsignorini the Vicariate were too busy making jokes on me when I dared to present myself on several occasions in their offices with the dress I wear cassock, transposed as though that my ecclesiastical vestment represented some kind of contempt of others injured clerical majesty; or rather the majesty of those who, instead of laughing on my cassock - that the practices I wear, and I always carry every day -, perhaps they should be cured of many priests who jeans e t-shirt They went to "palpate the bird" in between the legs to the Cubists dancing half-naked in the Testaccio gay clubs.

When I signaled the coming and going of priests in these gay clubs, in tones flush with the threat the Mafia was clearly made me realize that if I wanted to live well in Rome, I had to learn to mind my own business; and in that sense I was invited to do mine and to live the clerical pernicious silence so well depicted by the director and the actors of "The case of Spotlight”. Spent less than a year, while in the summer of 2010 I was in Germany for in-depth studies, I was joined by telephone by a family member who told me: "You can get the weekly Panorama?». And he explained to me: "From the cover on, you will find written there all that you have reported on time but to no avail to the Ecclesiastical Authority". And the title on the cover was as follows: "The good nights of gay priests' [see WHO]. the service center were reports, accompanied by videos of the gay revels in the Testaccio local to which participated many priests, one of them even dared to celebrate the morning Mass in the apartment's living room in which he had given to sodomitic bacchanalia with his friend occasional, This is also the sacred celebration [watch movies WHO].

the sad cover of the weekly Panorama in July 2010 He published by Carmelo Abbate service then accompanied by video footage still visible on the net

Faced with such evidence, think that the Ecclesiastical Authority has summoned me and said: "... We note that you were right, and that in advance we had shown the true, pointing out people and situations scabrous, but unfortunately we have not acted "? Never! And it was precisely because I was right, because I had seen it right, that have been subjected to harassment by repeatedly ringleaders army of conspiratorial who judged me guilty of conspiracy of silence denied clerical. Because as you can well understand, the important thing is that the Church ask forgiveness from the Jews, to Muslims, to the Lutherans, I pentecostali, the natives ... well: to everyone, unless its priests devotees, which in serious danger if necessary they have risked all and for all, just to find some way to defend it.

Besides, let's be clear, Why, especially in this climate of stifling mediocrity ecclesiastical, if I had accepted the omertose rules of the game and all that it entails, not only I would have already become the holder of a professorship in a pontifical university, not only I would have had a very different kind of accommodation, not only I would have been entered in the ambits of the so-called most prestigious ecclesiastical career … more still: perhaps, after a short period of years, I would even find themselves “strut me” with the miter on his head and the pastoral in his hand in the midst of an army of bishops who see but do not see, who they know but pretend not to know, who bow their heads before the bullies who beat up and the weak, which often punish the victims and defend the executioners. And I was - I always -, the right choice, because I have never pointed the immediate present, but to eternity, namely the salvation of my soul that aspires to attain the beatific vision in the Trinitarian mystery of the Father, of the Son and the Holy Spirit, to which I intend to also drive many more believers of Christ as a pastor in the care of souls. And to point LORD must choose to need the cross, without which there is no resurrection.

when in 2009 I said to a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that the young Bishop. Krzysztof Charamsa, amiable and good person dogmatic theologian, It was clearly gay [cf. WHO]; when I explained that in his studies on the "theology" of "human suffering" [cf. WHO] I had found hidden behind the lines discomfort coming upstream from its definitely due to his sexuality was human-affective inner, behold, in response, This respected member, meeting following the then my Bishop, He complained that I saw homosexuals everywhere and I was obsessed by homosexuals in the Church. Even in that case, the then my Bishop, instead of reproach he said: "The problem, It is not that homosexuals see them you, the problem is that instead he did not see them!».

retrospectively demand nothing short of lawful: after the public coming-out Mons. Charamsa, He arrived at a young age to the prestigious post of assistant secretary of the International Theological Commission, what you should tell me, today, this time a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, promoted later also bishop for his "vision" estrospettiva?

I find really impressive that these prelates e prelates, although aware of a mistake, have criticized in the past only one who was right because he said, and pointed to them the true; that although aware of the fact that I had been right while they in fact no, for no reason at all they never admit they were wrong, even at the cost of denying the obvious facts. Or maybe because they are too busy in the painful "liturgy"Presented the apology and directed by the Holy Mother Church to the Jews, to Muslims, to the Lutherans, I pentecostali, the natives ... well: to all - as I said - unless its priests devotees?

image of the main character of the young in the film adaptation of Tdazio Death in Venice Luchino Visconti, accentuating in a masterly way ephebophilia contained in the pages of Thomas Mann

And I close this long "litany" with the last in the series of order: months ago, upon direct knowledge of the person, the situation and the facts, I informed a Tuscan bishop that a young man was kept at a distance prudently from contact with adolescents in parish areas, because affected by proven instincts efebofili. I addressed at a respectable priest of that diocese, with psychological experience, a teacher of my acquaintance to accompany with him one of the former teenage palpeggiati in the past by this character, moved by a report to be defined with the faith and the Church, both lived in a sort of aesthetic dimension decadent flavor of "Death in Venice" by Thomas Mann. Of course I wrote a detailed report at this Bishop, who, when in May 2015 I crossed at the plenary of the Italian Episcopal Conference - where I had gone to greet some prelates and meet others who wanted to talk to me -, in response to my letter-report he said that he was not a magistrate and that if I had something to report I had to turn not to him but to the judiciary. And a few months later, this bishop, he found something better to do than to demonstrate its maximum villainy admitting this efebofilo, lover of the beautiful and liturgical-musical aesthetics, in his seminar.

Needless to say: if that person became a priest for our great misfortune, and once a priest palpeggiasse a teenager, I immediately take my report sent to his time, Witnesses sent to make private testimony to that bishop and, without any hesitation, I will turn to the judiciary, but not to denounce the efebofilo caught in the act, but the bishop. And in my exposed make clear that not only he did not acknowledge listen when I warned him in time with a wealth of evidence, but after being informed at all points on the subject of very high concern, He deemed it right and good to admit it in your workshop. And we'll see, especially with the times they live today, with what face this bishop will say to the judges who knew nothing; or in what spirit will dare argue before the courts that he is not a judge and therefore, not being such, He had no duty and obligation to oversee the diocese entrusted to him, to the point of admitting no problem a fox into the chicken coop, although this had been warned to advance and with all the details of the case.

Archpriest of the Papal Basilica of Saint Peter, Cardinal Angelo Comastri, It imposes the ashes on the head of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI

That the Church has issued documents on the subject it is not in doubt, as there is no doubt the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI wrote a memorable Pastoral Letter to the Catholics of Ireland [cf. WHO], I considered one of the most important acts of his apostolic ministry to and for this several times stated in my paper referenced above. Document which, The Holy Father then reigning, He explained how and to what extent dangerous many bishops have not taken into account, and how seguitino to ignore those exhortations, continuing undeterred to admit in their increasingly empty seminars veritable armies of asexual - best hypothesis -, if not worse than the people who reveal a clear lack of male hormone testosterone and are looking for aesthetic apparatus, and aesthetic-liturgical or aesthetic-clerical species, their point of refuge, vent and, unfortunately, secure career, that practices and rigor make, because if on the one hand aim to redeem, the other aim to exercise power over others through roles of great importance.

Over the past few years It was not missing on some serious issues or the foresight of the Popes nor the documents that give clear guidance, like the one in which he urges the non-admission in the seminaries of people with homosexual tendencies [cf. WHO]. The problem is that when a "government" system is found to be infected from these now over people inserted in key leadership roles, this may be the result: I end up for two years to celebrate Mass without people Catacombs witnessed by my pupil and assistant, while many "Bishops-Madame"Acting with the typical moodiness of menopausal women, they do not find something better to do than to take one of your favorite gay and naming it directly rector of the seminary, ... nothing but non-admission in the seminaries of people with homosexual tendencies! Unfortunately, in many religious seminaries and novitiates, the first gay were found to be precisely the trainers. And if you do not want to believe me, then you believe that the judgments given by criminal courts in various European countries, including Italy, based on facts and evidence of a shame and squalor that disfigure the poor Church of Christ with the launch of the worst organic substances on his face.

What I pointed solutions, in the pages of that my study? First, the obvious solution: with authority, severity and courage, vipers was severed head. I wrote this in 2011, except see several of these vipers becoming one behind the other bishops in later years.

asexual worldwide: unite!

Why not wrong but devastating judge, that today there are clergy who continue to think that if one has homosexual tendencies, what matters it is that physically does not exercise his homosexuality? I consider this wrong because, Catholic morality, too long it is only focused on the physical-sexual dimension and little of the psychological, forgetting that sex and sexuality is above all a mental thing, an attitude. And as I have stated in the past, Following today to reiterate that the repressed homosexual, he who does not give any kind of physical outlet for their sexual urges, It is always more dangerous than what at least is unleashed in sex with other men. The repressed, by me also defined as "homosexual psychic”, is more dangerous because he lives in a captive dimension and increasing incattivimento that is mainly found vent in three things: the perverse pleasure he derived from bear harm to others, the lust for power and the rampant careerism, in attachment to money and material goods. These people are also blackmailed, easily manipulated by their "benefactors", ready to betray and to violate the secrecy, if they thereby give thanks or benefit from their godfathers, or simply protect one of their members gay fraternity. For this repeat: the "psychic homosexuals" who are self-repressed are worse, so why vent their worst repression in the Church and often give good priests is healthy, that have always been their favorite victims, under the eyes of more and more powerless and bishops of the ecclesiastical authorities.

after midnight when teenagers dancing half-naked on the cubes of gay nightclubs, in this case it is not legitimate to speak of either adolescents nor pedophiles, indeed we must proclaim “sacred dogma” Of “faith” that Gay is Beautiful. But if a priest groped a young hustler Of 17 years and eleven months, it is rather a dangerous pedophile.

In our society schizophrenic dominated by the ideology of gender, the Church is showing a distressing weakness and inadequacy. For instance: How come, whenever newspapers, sites and powerful blog Gay lobby They are thrown in your face the inevitable "pedophile priests", no one has the courage to reply that most of the alleged pedophile priests, far from being such, in truth they are homosexual priests, as such deserving of the best protections and safeguards as part of the all-powerful socio-political and economic mother known as Gay lobby?

.

When it comes to us priests, it happens by magic that gays suffering from “puri” and "wonderful" homosexual instincts, as such deserving of protection and if not of homophobia shouted accusations against anyone who dares to dissent, putacaso become pedophiles. a arcano, this, now I will explain, as the trembling ecclesiastical authority has not yet explained, while having available a deluge of Catholic magazines, Press agencies and offices for social communications. however Rasserenatevi, dear Catholics, because thanks to God there The Island of Patmos, John's last place of revelation, with its aggressive Fathers who do not have godparents e masters other than our Lord Jesus Christ.

Montecassino, the historic West abbey founded by St. Benedict of Nursia in the seventh century.

The truth is that priests They decry in two main ways, or better with the two notorious "they": sex and money. Of course: as clergy, in recent years we have given the worst of ourselves in balance sheet scandals and sexual. Just return to the paradigm Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, that to the best so far ascertained arrived to spend on whims, and especially in the vagaries of a sexual nature, 36.000 euro in a single month. But before we continue I open sore parentheses the Ecclesiastical Authority hath looked from opening: what kind of relationship "ill"Passed between the previous Archabbot of Montecassino, Dom Bernardo D’Onorio [1983-2007], later promoted Archbishop of Gaeta [2007], and his successor Dom Pietro Vittorelli [2007-2013]? Why will the first Vittorelli responsible for training monks as novice master and vocational animator - always to return to the speech of the fox guarding the chicken coops placed - hereafter as his personal secretary, it was the then Arch-Abbot Bernardo D'Onorio. Therefore I ask: it is legitimate to ask where ever had eyes and with them the wisdom and Christian prudence, quell’asexually psychic Arch-Abbot Bernardo D'Onorio, when he brings up such delicate roles a person from apparent disordered sexuality like Pietro Vittorelli? And while a asexual He passed their own to a ministry sexed messy, in such matters they were bustling the authorities of the Holy See, to whom belong the acceptance and then the confirmation of the appointment by Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino? Because, as you can see, certain tragedies stem from an evil chain that no one has yet taken care of interrupting, because to do so would have to go against entire roped parties of friends of friends of friends … And who has reasonable grounds to deny them, who denies me, if necessary also with strokes of complaints, I can not wait to receive at least one! And if some Ecclesiastical Authority raised a sigh of what has been said by me, if anything, accusing me of "disrespect" and "inappropriateness", my defense will call a team of urologists experts, andrology e Psicologi. And after they have appraised the D'onorio, father giving birth the monster Vittorelli, oozes really manly male hormone testosterone from all the pores of the skin, I genufletterò to publicly ask forgiveness, I will retire to private life and not even write more article, indeed I not write more I miss my name. And if I will be forced to sign it will be with an "X" to stop so as not to write, proof that a real man and a real priest - if you really do not want and can not be conspiratorial - then it is good that not even write, because it must be deaf, blind, dumb and even illiterate.

Nichi Vendola with fellow Ed Head testimonial of the twentieth edition of the Gay Pride Roman [cf. WHO]

On the ultra-secularist newspapers, on sites and the powerful blog Gay Lobby, anyone can read the written words of fire sull'Arciabate of Monte Cassino Pietro Vittorelli, about who, the ultra liberals, omosessualisti to the gender and the ideologues who have pointed to the public pillory, However it lacks a critical step that disingenuous ignore: the Vittorelli was neither a pedophile nor a dangerous bankrupt, but simply an unrepentant homosexual, that in a government role, or if you prefer to power, used means and money to have a good time around the world with young men paid so much per centimeter, based on the length and the circumference of their virile member. Just as they always most of the gays, having money available, whims can afford paying them with necessary travel, with designer clothes, with stays in hotels with five stars ... all so much per centimeter, calculated for both the length and the circumference of the male member of their lover on duty. If in the end the turns, some gay also take a womb for rent, pay a woman in need, and if anything, they manufacture a toy boy for the consumption of their unbridled egotism satanic. And frankly, per me, do this and promote it all as "right”, is much worse than what the steal - as did the Vittorelli - money to Caritas to pay the marchettari, pace of new father-gay Nichi Vendola just returned to the doors of the sixty years since an American factory children with her partner, which in turn could be his son. Because before this people, I do not say I'd be willing to rehabilitate the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, but surely to consider, in due proportion, As his guilt is less. Ben is in fact more to blame for a Gianna Nannini, of Elton John and a Nichi Vendola that manufacture children to their own use. Indeed, while the hustler adult is free and consenting in their mercimoni with prelates and priests just as consenting adults, a child or a child in similar places inhumane conditions, are neither free nor consenting to choose similar aberrations destined to score all their lives in a negative way and deeply traumatic.

Hyenas Of One Italian, now specialized in hunt priest

Request: if this and more is permissible at all moneyed homosexuals that the poignant music of Sir Elton John clamoring "Gay is beautiful”, Why should it not be the same for the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino? I wonder then that the very Gay lobby they have not protected, or who have written that all in all it was a great to have a good time as he could, exactly as they are accustomed to the rich gay lobbyists.

Rather than have them protected as homosexuals on the basis of genderista "dogma” Of “faith" that "Gay is beautiful”, just gay lobbyists have rather literally massacred over time various ecclesiastical, often using the armed wing of the Hyenas of Italy One, who went to film them and hunt them down one by one on the sly. And are those same Hyenas at the same time protect the culture of gender, marriages between same-sex couples and their "right" to adopt or buy fabricate and children.

Well I challenge anyone to see a member of the scientific community, the specialized field of neurology, neuropsychology, of psychiatry and clinical psychology, willing to support that an adult who has today a sexual relationship with a willing guy 16/17 year old, which if anything is a prostitute for three or four years and that 10/11 old was full of porn films collected files in his computer and his cell phone, is a dangerous pedophile. I believe that no member of the scientific community never assert such a thing, especially knowing what levels of knowledge and sexual degeneration have already reached many of our young people at the age of 13/14 year old.

Lecco, lush city in the Alps

A Rome is a hospital that treats infectious diseases Also related sexual apparatus. Now I invite anyone to chat to the specialists of this hospital, which is the San Gallicano, because it will be their eagerness to explain how teenagers of both sexes in the age group between 14 ed i 16 years come with serious infections for practicing pleasant little things that, as known and known, ... it is just "typical" of the "early adolescence", for example the so-called anal intercourse, the so-called oral reports, the so-called relations group where only one person is infected to transmit the infection to all, or the contact of the mouth and tongue with the vagina and the anal orifice and so on ... …

To save me from disapproving of those few individuals ready to manifest scandal before certain details related to the sexual sphere provided by a priest, clarify and precise that wanting to be understood by everyone in some of my writings, addressed to the general public and not only to theologians or specialists, put me to flaunt clinical latinisms, you know well, to indicate the existence of precise reality, it would not be appropriate, if hugging the ridiculous and especially the prudish spirit that should never be confused with the human value, social and Christian modesty. If in fact the boys and girls of 14 years end up with serious infections at the San Gallicano because an already sailed girl sent an infection of the mouth of a peer who has hunted the language in the vagina and the anal orifice, you understand well that it is useless to use euphemisms. And if this happens, I think it is urgent to ask themselves a serious question, especially then if one of these teenagers will gladly let you groped by a priest in back of the Ipad change, We are wishing that we can and should also call perverse and perverted, we must isolate, condemn and suspend from the exercise of the sacred ministry, but always pointing with his real name, which it is to "homosexual", not to "pedophile", at best we can mark it as efebofilo. And as homosexual, or as efebofilo, this priest, according to contemporary trends, It should also be safeguarded and protected if attacked with an outcry by the Gay Lobby shouting "homophobe, homophobe!"Directed at anyone who dares to question its legitimate sexual tastes.

Cardinal Agostino Vallini, taken from a fragment of the interview movie SIR

From the playful speech the openings and infectious diseases the most experienced lower than they were half a century the fifties ago, I would like to conclude by switching to a reply given by the vicar general of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome, Cardinal Agostino Vallini, about which I refer to video in which he responds, in his capacity as President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, about the exploits of the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino, and as such was for several years a member of the Italian Episcopal Conference and then the local Episcopal Conference of Lazio. Cardinal Vallini, also known as the greatest canonist of the world, before the exploits of Vittorelli, making use of a language typical of the politicians and not the shepherds in charge of souls, referring only to the capital illicit said that if the judiciary will experience the elements to proceed with a conviction, in this case the Church of Cassino is a civil party through an action for damages (!?) [cf. movie with interview WHO]. In short: were years that the Vittorelli led a life not in keeping, who attended the most discussed Roman salons, that was absent when and how he wanted the abbey, that made luxury holidays; but mainly it was obvious to anyone that his poses and his way of porgersi were more similar to the movements of a Princess capricious instead of a man trained in the rigors of the monastic cloister, but above all to a man. And despite all this, someone wants us to believe that no one knew … that no one had ever noticed anything?

i whatsapp messages exchanged by Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino with its marchettari: «I do everything what I want» … «I'm going to look’ cocks». But this dissolute life no one knew anything …

I also have another question to ask how many now tear their clothes because they say They knew nothing. This is the question: the agents of the anti-narcotics team, How long before the scandal broke, They did leak out discreetly to the Ecclesiastical Authority this Princess-priest used drugs? Because in a totally informal and secretive, with me some insiders of the anti-narcotics, They consulted at the beginning of 2012, lying to treat the delicate case of this prelate somewhat in view that, inter alia, acquired illegally and equally illegally held drugs such as ecstasy, Cocaine and crack. And besides doing nothing, What did the Ecclesiastical Authority, albeit informed? Perhaps he began to prepare the ritual of cloth robes and dell'addolorato “we did not know”, to use in the day when the inevitable public scandal would erupt, as evidence the video reproduced here from which radiates all the terrible sufferings of the President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, first ahead of all in … I know nothing? [cf. movie with interview WHO]

Sincerely, in terms of Catholic morality and Canon Law, the appropriation and squandering money, in this case just described is just the consequence of much more serious disorders and everyone summarized in the dissolute life of Vittorelli, that with such attitudes and expressions of disgust even the irreverent Marchese de Sade, in phone calls and intercepted numerous messages through which communicated with marchettari Gay his more or less strong providers of sexual services, used to define drugs, sex and vice as "Paradise". Of course, no other Italian court will condemn the former Arch-Abbot of Monte Cassino to have practiced extensively homosexuality, or for the personal use of drugs, nor to have had around him a court of young men, nor to have sought sites in gay young consenting adults who were particularly gifted in between the legs, because none of this is pursued and is punishable by the Criminal Law Code.

image of the Papal Basilica of St. Peter surrounded by an unusual fog

So here's my question accurate and in no way nebula facing the greatest canonist of the world: it is not by chance, pending the ruling of the Italian criminal court, the ecclesiastical Tribunal, in the hole of its powers, He would have already had to act and proceed from time through strict canonical penalties paid to load this unworthy ecclesiastical finished for the entire sum disfavor catholicity head and guide of the historic Abbey West mother? And once paid these canonical penalties, it would not be appropriate to give public notice, to clarify how and when necessary with what severity the Church falls dark mercy of some of his sons unworthy and harbingers of enormous public scandals? None of this has happened, however,, because the Cardinal Vallini, which apparently it seems to be the emblem of hyper-legal guarantor and that perhaps has run out of more liberal sudden Cavour, most partisan of Garibaldi and Mazzini Republican, completely forgotten that he was for years also the Chairman of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, declares and states that it is awaiting the … judgment of the Criminal Court of the State so that it is then assessed how to act (!?).

there, I hope that no one, in high political and administrative spheres of the Italian Republic, discover that in our home we have a canonist of this kind, because they could “rubarcelo” to name the first President of the Supreme Court and then afterward a senator for life.

Having said that now you see, dear readers of The Island of Patmos, to who we are in hand for years and years? We are in the hands of the bicycles that are put on the racing track of Monza in the sure belief that they could run like the Ferrari. We are in the hands of people enveloped by the most appalling mediocrity yet convinced that the People of God is made up of villagers from the countryside Obtuse unable to understand and grasp the immense gravity of their turns of phrase, just as the greatest canonist of the world that claims to await the judgment of condemnation of the State - regarding offenses asset background - only to see eventually how to proceed against a prelate who managed their lives as S'Essa had been a brothel ancient Pompeii; a living proof that, however,, if it is not declared as such by the State Court, no one can the ecclesiastical Tribunal?

Ten girls, Old cover a 45 rounds of Lucio Battisti

Given these premises, I could safely take and implement the song by Lucio Battisti's wit "Ten girls for me, Possoni enough " [cf. WHO]. And no one could tell me anything and least of sanzionarmi canonically, because if before the Vittorelli who has rehearsed young men far and wide, Vicar General of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome, President of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, as well as the largest in the world canon lawyer and former President of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, He declares to wait to know the judgment of the Italian criminal court if there are figures of exquisitely asset relief offense to eventually act, flying on a life marked on a immorality that really the satanic; That said you know well that I can enjoy myself without any moral problem with ten girls, that as the Baptists 'Possoni said enough'. All without any ecclesiastical law pursues me canonically, unless the Italian criminal court determines that for a priest, have a good time with ten girls, it is a crime; I do not think we'll ever establish, if anything, could you give me a certificate of merit and perhaps the honorary citizenship of the place where the crime has unfolded, if it can prove to them straight and brightened all of them.

Mindful that some ringleaders no case Spotlight He teaches nothing and still they claim to continue to rend their garments to the false cry of sorrow “we did not know”, I hope in the Jubilee Year to the greatest canonist of the world be able to complete as soon as their mandate as Vicar General of His Holiness, devoting the time of life that the grace of God will decide to grant him, to ask for forgiveness from Christ for the damage he went to the Church, in particular the Church of the Bishop of Rome, which maybe someone, from its powerful Secretary of State, would do well to print and take my writing, because right when the Vallini and their flattering scagnozzi Career will allow you to beat the priests like me, damage which consequently will accrue to the Church will be increasingly incalculable and irreversible.

.

the Island of Patmos, 3 March 2016

.

.

Author
Drafting
of the island of Patmos

.

.

Appendix posthumously [7 March 2016]

We report PLEASURE WITH AN ARTICLE APPEARED ON SIR (RELIGIOUS SERVICE INFORMATION) A FEW DAYS AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF THIS OUR S ARIEL ARTICLE. LEVI of GUALDO

click to open WHO

..

.

Appendix posthumously [4 March 2016]

In the picture: Federico Lombardi, S.J. Official spokesman of the Press Office of the Holy See

.

We point A NOTE OF VERY INTERESTING 4 March BY

FEDERICO LOMBARDI, S.J.

OFFICIAL SPOKESMAN OF THE HOLY SEE PRESS OFFICE

.

To open click WHO

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.