Theology of hope: «After the Synod, the Pope will return to wearing the red shoes?»
THEOLOGY OF HOPE: «AFTER THE SYNOD, THE POPE WILL RETURN TO WEARING THE RED SHOES?». REREADING TODAY WHAT THREE YEARS AGO THE FATHER WROTE ARIEL ...
.
[…] The Holy Father Francis can then like it or not, thing entirely legitimate, but by divine will and divine institution remains the keybearer, object and subject as such to our faith and our hope: "Tu sei Pietro», then our authentic and unfailing devotion to the mystery that he embodies.
.
.
.
Author
George A.. Faccio Lince
.
.
.
.
.
Three years ago, Ariel S. Levi Gualdo published an article in which he spoke well in advance of today's events in which, what it is emerging on the horizon, They seem to rise from the ashes old poisons mixed with poisons new, all according tragic scripts already lived between 2012 and the 2013 by the Holy Father Benedict XVI, not to go back again, in the turbulent season of Blessed Pope Paul VI during the seventies of the twentieth century.
.
Unfortunately it seems that today, for the Holy Father Francis, They're fabricating again red shoes, but for what they mean: the martyrdom of St. Peter, who was taken with bleeding feet on Vatican Hill to be crucified upside down.
.
As loath, Father Ariel had to give to democratic imperative its editorial staff who wanted to republish this article in its old. A spirit reluctant based on a principle he often enunciated: "When I hypothesize certain things or express it in a more or less near future there may be certain situations, I never want to be right, indeed I pray and hope always to be wrong, and thus have the great pleasure to deny myself and admit that I was wrong in doing certain analyzes ".
.
.
.
To open the ’ article click below
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
For those who were lost, I point out the interview with the Benedictine theologian and monk Elmar Salmann, “If this is a pope”, published on “the sheet” the 22 April 2013, then just over a month after the settlement of Pope Francis on the papal throne:
http://www.ilfoglio.it/articoli/2013/04/22/news/se-questo-e-un-papa-56613/
Some observations seem interesting to me, Especially because Salmann, while advancing criticism, Identify some positive elements of this pontificate, that, made the necessary adjustments, It seems more suitable than ever suitable to respond to a new situation in which the church is located in the last decade. Even if the interview is rather dated because it refers to the dawn of the pontificate of Pope Francis and may therefore seem completely anachronistic to propose it today, I believe it can be useful to reflect and to help us understand the value and meaning of this pontificate over the last thousand years of the history of the Church.
quoto from the page 9 of the article by Father Ariel:
“When the Holy Father can no longer move so vague, When it is not
as much as possible to have a full wine barrel and the drunk wife, he will find himself before
to a crossroads that will involve the obligation to say clearly and unequivocally
It's right and what is wrong, while the divine will affect him serious and solemn
warning: "Let your speech when it is yes and no when no, because the most comes
from the evil one "
well…never prediction has been more lacking!
Because although the words of Father Ariel have actually been prophetic, This aforementioned was fully denied. And right in the key document of the last three years, starting from the year of publication of the article of P. Ariel, that language remained yes = no and no = yes.
And on this, Unfortunately, There is no doubt.
I share how P. Ariel states that the Pope, to date “until today, saint
Father Francis […] Nothing has never come that was obliging or binding for all Catholics,
which would somehow contrast with the Catholic tradition.” (on page 6 of the article). Contrast no…but tons of ambiguity yes!