- Church news -

THE NO OF POPE FRANCIS I ADMISSION OF HOMOSEXUAL IN SEMINARS? THE TRAGEDY OF MORAL DECLINE OF CLERGY IS BORN THE LACK OF ADEQUATE TRAINING, It IS SO THEN that we end up finding ourselves COL WITH AN ARMY CHECKS E CHECCHINE, DIVE E DIVINE INSIDE THE BODY ECCLESIASTICUS

.

The recommended not to admit a gay seminary, as recently did the Pope Francis I, it is only the end of an at present impossible job to do, without first going to hit with iron and fire certain cardinal bishops and powerful. contrarily, say to the bishops of Italy gathered in plenary session that we must not admit to the seminary and also people who are just suspected of homosexual tendencies, would be like going to scratch with a teaspoon the tip of the iceberg.

.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format

.

.

… Tuscan and Roman, in the mystery of the Redemption they are subject to a very special treatment, indeed, regardless of their good works, simply because Tuscan and why Roman, that is, as marked by a stain that is added to the original sin, They must be strictly two thousand years of purgatory [in the picture: poster of the famous satirical newspaper Tuscan The Vernacoliere Livorno]

In the distant year 1935, Pope Pius XI issued a farsighted encyclical on Catholic Priesthood [Back to the Catholic Priesthood, see text WHO], which he warns of those forms of devastating shallowness and lack of accountability on the part of bishops and trainers. In this regard it indicates how we should shy away "the false mercy that would become real cruelty to the Church", and "about the young man himself". For this purpose, in the section devoted to "The choice of candidates', writes the Pope:

.

"But all this magnificent effort for the education of pupils of the sanctuary would benefit little if it was not the choice of the candidates accurate, for which they are built and administered Seminars. In this choice all must work together, those in charge of training the clergy: Superiors, the spiritual directors, the Confessors, each in the manner and within their limits of his office, as with every effort must cultivate divine vocation and corroborate, so with no less zeal must divert and remove for a time via, that is not their, those young people who are seen lacking the necessary ability and are therefore expected not able to bear worthily and decently priestly ministry. And although it is much better that this elimination will face from the beginning, because in these things the wait and wait is both a serious mistake and a serious damage, But whatever the cause of the delay, you must correct the error when it warns, no human consideration, without the false mercy that would become a real cruelty, not only for the Church, which would give a minister or inept or unworthy, but also to the young man himself who, pushed so above a false way, It could be exposed to be a stumbling block to himself and others, with the danger of eternal ruin. Neither it will be difficult watchful and expert eye of the person chairing the Seminar, of those who follow and lovingly studied one by one the young people entrusted to him and their inclinations, not be difficult, we say, check whether someone is or is not a true priestly vocation " [supra, text of the Encyclical, WHO].

.

The facts scandalous rise in several countries of the world of which more and more is news, about sins committed by clerics devoted to the practice of homosexuality, or to sexual harassment ranging from ephebophilia until horrendous crime of pedophilia, They encourage us to ask ourselves what are the causes of such an abhorrent phenomenon against nature.

.

The existence of concubinage among the clergy It is a phenomenon that runs through the whole history of the Church, up to the present day, but in this case, however, we speak of an act In addition to nature. A problem, that's double life and more or less occasional reports or sometimes even stable with women, that hit the church hierarchy up to the highest levels. Known best historical level is the case of a Supreme Pontiff concubinage, Alexander VI, aka Rodrigo Borgia. But, as we said just now, In this case, however, it is at stake what is sexual intercourse natural physiologically, undoubtedly sinful, ma In addition to nature. Concerning Alexander VI's good to clarify that in addition to black legends created first by the Lutherans in the sixteenth century, later those designed around a table and then spread by the anti-clerical affiliated to the nascent Freemasonry in the eighteenth century, are also many extraordinary documents, because beyond his undeniable personal moral conduct, This Pope was necessary a true defender of the deposit of credit, not by chance, the bubble How in principio the 1499 and the bubble Eternal Shepherd the 1500 with which proclaimed the Holy Year, giving them precise instructions to penitentiaries to purchase the jubilee indulgence, They should be read on his knees and with tears in his eyes.

.

However, what is hard to understand it may occur as the commission of a sin as serious as that of sodomy, against that clerical celibacy or chastity that is supposed to have been desired, wanted, and finally decided promised solemnly and publicly with the commitment of compliance to the death, all freely and knowingly by psychologically healthy people who have received a healthy and regular priestly and religious formation, after being carefully screened and tested by superiors responsible for training.

.

To this picture disheartening It has to add the question that arises, and even more dramatic on the quality of trainers, teachers and educators of these people, in the first place of the bishops, the superiors and vigilant about the good education of their priests, as well as the competence and virtue of teachers and educators responsible for their education.

.

It must be held, as we have repeatedly found on our Patmos Island, that the deep roots of these sexual sins can not be derived from having received a bad education and bad, not based on the directives of the Magisterium of the Church and the true masters, but of heretical ideas, or otherwise of ideas condemned by the Church, which they include the objectives a false concept of God, of man, of faith, of grace, of the law, of sin, of the Redemption, of the church, of the Sacraments, priesthood and episcopacy, as it happens for example in the theology of Karl Rahner.

.

Another disturbing fact, in this affair, It is the inappropriate or reckless attitude of the bishops, or reluctant or minimize or cover the misdeeds or take ineffective measures. But it gets worse: when a body is flooded with metastases and "oncologists" - ie the bishops and trainers to the priestly and religious life -, instead bombard cancer cells with chemotherapy protect diseased cells to damage healthy ones, It ends with the emergence in the upright minds that imperative of conscience under which you are forced to advise aspirants to the priesthood and religious life does not enter at all in many seminaries and novitiates. And of this we are witnesses, in our own way also protagonists in our capacity as confessors and spiritual directors. Indeed, precisely in the exercise of these delicate ministries, we were repeatedly forced to advise young people profoundly healthy and animated by genuine vocations not to enter certain institutions, many of them reduced to authentic havens for homosexuals; or by homosexuals themselves managed directly or indirectly affected, therefore protected on the outside by the large, devastating and powerful lobby of clerics influenced by homosexual tendencies or a homosexual psychology - the so-called gay friendly —, on account of which we are witnessing an ever-expanding omosessualizzazione the Catholic clergy.

.

To about, seem blatant and dictated by severe light the collective resignation of the entire Chilean episcopate as a result of yet another scandal in Chile. Commendable was the letter in which the bishops expressed repentance, willingness to correct and thanks to Pope Francis I for the paternal attention he has given to the story. However, though it should be noted that a bishop can give up the bishop's throne because aware of serious faults or because he feels sure their supervening inability to continue to conveniently carry out his office. The same Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, with this in mind, He has made a waiver to the Chair of Peter. But, that an entire episcopacy formed by 34 bishops - although they felt their involvement in the widespread scandal which lasted for many years -, comes the unprecedented serious decision to resign as, with a compactness that knows what forced, as it might be in union protests or in a factory committee, more than witnessing an act of repentance, It gives evidence of a damaging wave of his episcopal dignity, to draw to itself the world's attention. To solve the problem, in fact quite different from similar fanfare. The real and more serious charge should have come forward, not hiding in the pile of resigning, and take responsibility.

.

The real educational solution is that the bishop, before admitting a candidate to training for the priesthood, truly and seriously verify that it is available in a generous dose of the male hormone testosterone with its male psychology that goes with it, because the man - or if you prefer the healthy male -, It is the first and basic prerequisite to begin to form a candidate ahead of the ministerial priesthood. Eliminations all, the bishop should give serious training and carry out a diligent supervision of the seminary and the priesthood, in order for the candidate to Holy Orders is protected and defended from the unhealthy ideas and cultivated sound doctrine, clarifies well the very high value of the priestly and episcopal vocation and they fall in love with all your heart, with ardent desire for perfection and holiness and to be totally at the service of souls and of the Church. The priest truly convinced and in love with his vocation and mission is all and only took the things above, not those of this land. It is moved by the Spirit, It has no time to meet the desires of the flesh.

.

The true pastoral solution It involves the education of the will and emotions, and the strengthening of attachment to the good, the stimulation of hatred for sin, the will to reform and correct itself. If the Blessed Apostle Paul says that love "bears" [The Cor 13,7], He is referring to the delicacy of the father who does not throw his son fed to ridicule, I do not want to humiliate, but at the same time it wants to correct. Because a father who knows if necessary recall, reprove, threaten and punish, exercising in this way true love. If not, it falls into that dangerous false mercy stigmatized by Pius XI in his encyclical dedicated to the priesthood and formation for the priesthood.

.

The charity and mercy, I am definitely ready to cover it where it is possible, useful, lawful and proper; where there is excusable or patience, but certainly not in the sense of covering or hiding the sin that may not be corrected and punished. True love and true mercy must not cover up the evil, but reveal to the proper authorities and to the sinner himself. God does not cover the sins of those leaving, as he thought Martin Luther, but it covers them for mercy waiting to remove.

.

Mercy does not suppose the reduction of the blame on pain. There is not only the wounded soul, but there is also that feritrice; there is not only the sinner to be treated with due Mercy, because even the person seriously tarnished by sin deserves at least the same dose of mercy given to the sinner offender. You have to have compassion for those who can not make it, But not for those who do not want to commit because no way seeks to make it. This is prompted to correct themselves and commit, otherwise mercy, after being emptied of its true meaning mystagogical, becomes connivance and complicity, if not worse: with the false mercy covers the sinner and punishes those who have shown the dangerous offensive and Infectious his sin, reaching up to hit the healthy cell to protect the tumor cells and enter the bloodstream body of the Church and ecclesiastical.

.

In our considerations on this issue scabrous, we must add that on the basis of the analyzes and observations that we are doing and now regularly publishing for some years, both regarding the conduct is wrong and dangerous ideas about some of the clergy and bishops, in front of all these facts it is inevitably arisen in us a terrible suspicion, certainly not without theological and legal basis, though not always accompanied by specific tests, so we concluded that in many cases the sacred orders of these priests and these bishops, based on a false idea of ​​the priesthood and falsante, are not only illegal but also invalid. In this regard, we published two studies in the past for our page Theologica which can be found in the archive of The Island of Patmos [see WHO e WHO]. Two studies which incidentally put at the disposal of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and the Congregation for the Clergy, so those responsible to examine certain questions, would sift.

.

The moral loss, giving rise to the phenomenon of widespread sexual disorder among priests until reaching even to the crime of pedophilia, It is in turn caused by the concept of human action rahneriano, that is not based on the acceptance of the essential purposes of human nature, because he does not accept either the idea of ​​a fixed and objective human nature, whose happiness depends on obedience to an immutable and inviolable natural law established by the Creator; but according to him, man and each of us, It is free to determine how he likes the concrete contours and then the act of his own nature and existence. From this it follows that in the sexual field the individual subject is free to choose their orientation is not based on a purpose of sexual activity inherent in the nature, regardless of the subject, but based on the research of sexual pleasure, obtained by means created by the subject itself, variables such as from subject to subject and they all lawful, They enjoy them as long as the subject. Thus there is no longer a universal rule to distinguish a good deed from sin. So I can not say that this commits a sin of sodomy, of ephebophilia or worse than pedophilia, but that his act is simply different from mine, an act that I must not convict, but understand and respect. All this has led to a concept abhorrent and evil of so-called Church “cozy” e “includente” that internally it houses all the so-called “diversity”, after having diminished sin and changed the name to sin, calling it just "diversity" to be accepted and to be valued, be it as a heresy of the sexual disorders.

.

When it gives space to a similar moral, The jeremiads for widespread homosexuality among the clergy are of little value, to follow along with the cases of ephebophilia and pedophilia among priests registered. It is indeed, almost entirely, of scandals that could have been avoided. And their inevitable explosion were then profuse crocodile tears from those who up till then had covered and protected the proponents of certain conduct, but now they tear their clothes in public, sobbing, "do not know" or "we would never have imagined". Needless to say, doing so is just gross hypocrisy, yield further serious by the fact that not infrequently, this army of episcopal and priestly mourners, often it did not even limited to cover in a determined and stubborn certain immoral, because they often have done worse: repeatedly hit, ostracized and marginalized the few priests who with determination and courage have denounced certain situations before the outbreak of the public scandal. In this regard the Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo would have much to say to the church authorities, which repeatedly, always at your own risk, reported situations that should have been taken to cut short time and so decided, rather than leaving them to ferment and then explode, with the resulting public crying of the same ecclesiastical authorities who despite having been informed well and on time, far from making something subsequently responded to various interviewers: "we did not know", "I never could have imagined", "Ecclesiastical authority, or a diocesan bishop, can not have it all under control ' …

.

So how much further do we have to go? in reaping the bitter fruits of rahnerismo? What is yet to happen because the Roman Pontiff will decide on a reform of priestly formation in accordance with the directives of Vatican II? The Council and its reforms do not in fact provide for the rahnerismo, but a wise return to St. Thomas Aquinas, as the same Council's Decree on Priestly Formation Oct:

.

"To fully illustrate how much more can the mysteries of salvation, the students may learn to deepen them by means of speculation, St. Thomas having to master " [n. 16, text WHO].

.

While the Declaration on Christian Education Education, he claims:

.

"By investigating very carefully the new questions posed by age and research that evolves, will seize more clearly how faith and reason meet each other in the only truth in the footsteps of the doctors of the Church, especially St. Thomas Aquinas " [n. 10, text WHO].

.

It is therefore necessary that the educator being educated to make available the means of grace, propose the example of Santi, give himself an example of virtue, educate him in the study of Scripture, to prayer, to intimate union with Christ the High Priest, to communion with the Church and with the Roman Pontiff, the works of fraternal charity and mercy.

.

We must honestly acknowledge that in these fifty years in which they should have been put in place these wise directives, the Council was mocked by their rahneriani that they consider sequencers, but in reality they have first given life to the para-council, then, in the post-conciliar season, to their council staff; but it's about, as we have repeatedly explained, a council never celebrated by the Church Fathers. So it happened that instead of the conciliar reform, It rose a modernism that is worse than the time of the Holy Pontiff Pius X.

.

We must therefore do it all again and return to the directives of Vatican II, otherwise things will get progressively worse and worse in this season irreversible decline. For as long ago wrote the Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo on our pages Theologica: "The moral crisis of clergy was established upstream from a deep doctrinal crisis, that this moral crisis was the Great Mother giving birth ' [see articles, WHO, WHO].

.

The Pope Francis I, talking behind closed doors to the Bishops of Italy meeting in plenary session in 21 al 23 May, He advised them not to accept candidates for the priesthood who show homosexual tendencies clear. Well, with all due respect and deep reverence for the Successor of Peter, we can not help but smile with loving pain of these words, that once again denote an inability to grasp the extent of the problem and then go to the root of the same serious problem. Indeed, the solution, It is not to avoid the army's admission of homosexuals that they continue to be allowed in seminaries and novitiates in spite of repeated warnings and various documents published by dicasteries of the Holy See over the past decade [please refer to this Instruction 2005, WHO, and to this article WHO]; the problem is solved by displacing the bishops belonging to lobby gay ecclesiastical which are in fact tireless patron of gay priests, as well as incubators of new gay priests.

.

The Supreme Pontiff, so talking, it is not perhaps realize that denying admission to the seminary a homosexual, it is only the final act, or so to say the tip of 'iceberg? To solve the problem must first be neutralized all those bishops and those members of the Roman Curia who belong to lobby gay and protect it in every way, especially to the detriment of good priests and good vocations.

.

To close this speech, in itself and in itself long and complex, leave the Holiness of Our Lord Pope Francis Augustus's a question on which to meditate, namely the following: Most Holy Father, but there're just never realized that in the Vatican City and its Departments, removed those healthy men, overtime and trust that are the members of the Pontifical Gendarmerie, and also those of the Pontifical Swiss Guard, among many lay employees, most of them worthy fathers and mothers, there is also a considerable number of young men employed directly in your home at different places of employment only because they are boys several of your prelates? How is it possible not to notice what? Because it is so obvious, in the space of this small sovereign state occupying just one square kilometer of land.

.

Therefore, The recommended not to admit a gay seminary, it is only the end of an at present impossible job to do, if first you do not go to strike with fire and sword certain cardinal bishops and powerful. contrarily, say to the bishops of Italy gathered at the meeting that we should not admit to the seminary and also people who are just suspected of homosexual tendencies, would be like going to scratch with a teaspoon the tip of the iceberg.

.

From the island of Patmos, 27 May 2018 – Holy Trinity

.

.

.

time ago, our Brother Priest sent us the video publicly put online by the likeable joker resumed in the video itself. These videos were accompanied by the following message: "I hope that it is a secular, because unfortunately it resembles a lot to many of our priests, so I would not want to be one of our, like … one more among many!».

penalty Question: many priests and faithful devotees, but especially, how many Ecclesiastical Authority can in good conscience say that he had never encountered in our secular and regular clergy of similar topic to this nice joker, which however, priests, unfortunately they are for real? However, if the tip is continuing undeterred to scratch with a teaspoon of a iceberg …

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.