The fall: those ugly stories of the Vatican II that nobody tells to not damage the superdogma …
− Theologica −
THE FALL OF: THOSE BAD STORIES OF VATICAN II THAT NO ONE TELLS SO AS NOT TO DAMAGE THE SUPERDOGMA …
.
We are "Fall of " and in a few years the Catholic Church as we have known and understood it up to now will no longer exist; exist "other". Our ecclesial and ecclesiastical system has already smashed from the inside, and is currently in progress a disturbing transformation. Unfortunately, both in the College of Bishops in both the Priestly College we do not have even a minimum number of elements able to cope with this progressive decay.
.
.
Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
.
"If we do not want to hide anything, we are certainly tempted to say that the Church is neither holy, neither Catholic: the Second Vatican Council could even speak not only of the Holy Church, but the sinful Church; though here, Member was reprimanded something, It is mostly that he was still too shy, We are so deep in the consciousness of all of us feel the sinfulness of the Church ".
Joseph Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity, 1968
.
.
.
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, the Theater d'Art … very dramatic
To facilitate the modernists in their deadly attack diabolic, It was mainly the fact that we were totally unprepared to an internal attack, because they are accustomed from a couple of centuries, straddling the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, to having to defend against external attacks. Therefore we were not ready, or perhaps it is just never thought about the possibility of such an internal attack, because even in the presence of divisions, sometimes even stronger - that within the Church there have always been -, at the time that the body of the Church was attacked, the bishops, the priests and believers of Christ They were united in defending, then returning only after, in danger waned, their struggles and internal divisions. Today instead, before the desolation and fear doctrinal tendencies that are overcoming the crisis itself Arian heresy, in response we devour each other, because the 'omocentrismo egocentric, not only it took hold in the modernist, but perhaps, more and worse, well in conservatories and in the same traditionalists, that with their quarrelsome, and sometimes phobic Division, show to be the fiercest defenders of their own "I"Instead of the truth of God faith. Try to put them together in a compact and dangerous battle against the common enemy, disheartening to see instantly the results that they will, claiming over each other to have the most right ideas and the most Catholic of them all, unhealthily attached with tooth and nail to the microcosm of their small garden, unable to move beyond their devastating, "but I think", "I feel", so it is true and right only what I think and feel. Because the mutated faith in a subjective emotion type ego-omocentric, It is much stronger in the fringes of so-called traditionalists than in those of the modernists, not least because these latter are now in power for half a century. On socio-political emotion and the sentimental, the modernists we played fifty, sixty years ago, Today they do not have any need. Indeed, the modernist heretics, today no longer give emotional impulses, give orders mandatory, impose the appointment of bishops doctrinally deficient and often heterodox, which can continue to multiply and form a clergy doctrinally deficient and unorthodox, burdened as a result of all these serious moral problems arising from the dogma of the crisis generated by it, because as in the past I have written: the moral crisis was created and developed by a doctrinal crisis [It follows the full article …]
.
To open the ’ article click below:
..
.
.
Dear Readers,
every now and remember to support our apostolic and theological work with your valuable offerings.
Thank you!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
In the photo with glasses and elegant coat he is a great first fashion godfather .. obviously it's a nice joke. But lately thanks to Father Ariel I follow the Catholic life more and hearing certain words, well I really lack the strength to have a vision of the future church, like an open church, a church that has cleared itself of inadequate attitudes and in keeping with the religious environment, sure that all the vicissitudes of gay pedophile priests, of former priests etc.… not good at all. But I really appreciate Father Ariel, he is not afraid to say what he thinks.. I would see him well as the new pope….
On the Second Vatican Council I think in a similar way to Monsignor Gherardini; I always think of her as Gherardini on the New Rite of Paul VI; that is, it fulfills the festive precept (I understand that in this the aforementioned Monsignor was in disagreement with the SSPX).
As a traditionalist Catholic, I do not accept the innovations introduced by Vatican II and the New Mass.
Reverend Don Ariel,
I read articles and I appreciate your time. However, I disagree whenever you say that, given the present situation and dramatic ecclesial, it is good to dissuade young people to enter the seminaries, or at least it is appropriate to postpone the entry. In my opinion, felt the vocation, received the approval of his spiritual director, and there being welcome by the diocesan bishop, the young should be encouraged to get into it more than anything else. In seminar, even for the difficult situation today, the young will "bones".
In the parish where I was before, I am a priest, I left a seminarian, It is now at the gates of ordination. I know that in recent years, Also because of new trainers, this young man has seen it all colors, in particular by the rector. At this guy, who I love like a son, for sure the experience will have forged. What has developed in response to the suffering experienced there, certainly it will help him much in his next ministry and, in general, in life.
E’ important, But, not just leave these seminarians. The spiritual director must be constantly at their side. Time ago, He confided this seminarian: “Had it not been for my spiritual director, long I would have escaped”.
I hope that these proven vocation guys go ahead, and are the future of the Church. Why deprive the Church of people called by God? there, This is my contribution. I take this opportunity to warmly greet.
don Angelo
I note some’ too pessimistic in that article…
«… if these were silent, grideranno the pietre ".
command of the Church, They are still launched at full speed toward the ravine, and took with them a large part of the people. You see, who, in detail
https://lafilosofiadellatav.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/convegno-ecclesiale-nazionale-disinquinare-il-nuovo-umanesimo/
the stubbornness crowds of the vertices of the Italian Church intends to propose unpresentable figures such as don Lorenzo Milani and the statist Giorgio La Pira, near the Dossettian “school of Bologna”, come “witnesses of the Italian Church in the new millennium”.
We been precisely sought…
Very interesting, father ariel, you did a great job!… Very explaining the pre-conciliar phase report, stories where the infiltration mechanism of young theologians heretic-German modernists among the ranks of the new cardinals come from New Evangelization lands, and not enough trained.
In a certain way, I would say that this is the man History, and that therefore, for mysterious reasons providentially, so he had to go.
Dramatic, Certain, your conclusion, that this phase of the crisis of the Church is irreversible, and you have to hit rock bottom, to go up – we do not know in what terms. It will take two hundred years to recover, you say? Difficult to make the timing assumptions, but on the other hand, after all, because dell'inorgoglirsi man, that for its increased power begins to be god himself, the Christian idea taken as a whole lost since the Renaissance, so now I'm already 700 years and passes.
Some high-ranking clergyman asked you how should we do to avoid falling into the abyss? And thank goodness, I say, although it's too late. But, I note that the majority of those who are in positions of church leadership, They are still launched at full speed toward the ravine, and took with them a large part of the people. You see, who, in detail
https://lafilosofiadellatav.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/convegno-ecclesiale-nazionale-disinquinare-il-nuovo-umanesimo/
the stubbornness crowds of the vertices of the Italian Church intends to propose unpresentable figures such as don Lorenzo Milani and the statist Giorgio La Pira, Dossettian near the "school of Bologna", as "witnesses of the Italian Church in the new millennium".
We been precisely sought ...