A piece of news: Alberto Melloni announces the extinction of the Priesthood

defend the Pope from false friends

.

A NEWS HISTORY: ALBERTO MELLONI ANNOUNCES TERMINATION OF PRIESTHOOD

.

At absurd and dangerous claims of the head of the School of Bologna, is a must reply that the priest did not invent the Council of Trent, as he falsely claims, but our Lord Jesus Christ, however different the priesthood is the time of Christ, to those of Trent, to ours.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Melloni and Francesco

the Pope Francis I and the head of the School of Bologna Alberto Melloni [© The Osservatore Romano]

In the rubric defend the Pope from false friends, we offer this time to the readers Feedback.Article the historian Alberto Melloni, that some years was planning to propose to the Pope an equal share of the leadership of the Church with the Orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople, while recently he extolled Pope Francis for making peace, after a thousand years, with the Orthodox Patriarchate of that city, ending the doctrinal controversy.

.

We refer article titled "The Mass is ended. So after five centuries it sets the figure of the priest " [cf. WHO], appeared on The Republic on Wednesday 22 last March in signing Alberto Melloni, which strives for a quick picture of the priest figure promoted by the Council of Trent, hinting at certain psychological aspects, behavioral, cultural and pastoral - the so-called "clericalism" -, They actually have characterized some priestly style spread until Vatican II, and to which the Council and the post-conciliar Magisterium have remedied. Although he completely neglects to mention the merits dogmatic and anti-heretical Council of Trent, for example the priest as a guide of souls, man of the sacred and doctrinal firmness; and at the same time analyzing certain pastoral limits of the reform of Vatican II, for example, the secularizing trend, gooder and peace activist, all elements further aggravated by the resurgence of modernism, which Alberto Melloni, leader of the School of Bologna, It is one of the best known leaders in the field of church history.

.

The most serious shortcoming of this short article is biased misconception evil with which Alberto Melloni plays unfairly between the refusal of the Tridentine model of the priest - something about which you might even agree, not for nothing that the Vatican has proposed a reform, although partially questionable -, and the rejection of the priest as such, or the Sacrament of Orders, on Luther's footsteps, as it is clear from the title of the article.

.

Let us now review the pearls of this beautiful melloniana necklace. For every assertion of Alberto Melloni will now follow my answer.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni Muted is a great cycle is exhausted: that of the priest. That formidable sixteenth invention that has shaped the culture and politics, psychology and inner life, art and theology of the West and its former colonies was not extinguished (are approximately 420.000 the priests in the world), But for over a century it is in crisis: in Italy we passed by 15 thousand to approximately ninety 2.700 seminarians.

.

Answer from such purpose that the author begins with the recall the Tridentine reform. The priest, according to its interpretation of the Tridentine, He not established Jesus Christ, but it is an invention of the papacy, it is the fourth century, how they think Schillebeeckx and Rahner or the Middle Ages, as Luther believes, or with the Council of Trent, how do you think Melloni, does not matter. The fact is that, according to them, Here Christ has nothing to do, but the thirst for power of the papacy.

.

The growth of priestly vocations is not in crisis because the Church is still harks back to the Tridentine dogmatic about the Sacrament of Orders and directives of Vatican II; the crisis of vocations depends on whether the modernists have put about a false idea of ​​the priesthood, which it is a rejection of the Tridentine dogmatic and false interpretation of Vatican II directives. The major responsible for this massive fraud is Karl Rahner[1], while Alberto Melloni is one of the corporals of this army of modernists.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni Counts in this historical phase the reverb on the clergy of the fall of the intellectual qualities of the ruling classes to which they belong and those who choose the priesthood that he who gives it to him.

.

I repeat in this regard that this is a false history. Whatever seminarian who studies the history of the Church - not by Melloni, but with a normal historical -, knows that the Tridentine reform of the studies and the training of clergy, to which we have precisely the birth of Seminars, powerfully he revived the emaciated scholastic theology, marred by neo-paganism humanistic Renaissance, and dall'occamismo which is at the origin of Luther's theology, and he resurrected a new fruitful season of scholastic theology, and then of priestly formation, especially at the hands of the Dominicans and the Jesuits, which, as is known, the late sixteenth century, until the dawn of the following, They challenged in a noble contest, that fielded the best samples of the two parts.

.

Famous remained the Dominican Domingo Bañez against the Jesuit Luigi Molina, initiator of the dispute, in an attempt to clarify the relationship between the action of grace and the free will, a very serious, subtle and fascinating question raised by the Lutheran problematic.

.

The noble tournament was well 164 sessions, in which the great theologians disputed passionately or turn to the presence of the Pope. The Dominicans emphasized the power of grace, using the metaphysical category of causality, the so-called "physical premozione"; the Jesuits, instead, They emphasized the power of the human will, using the biblical category of "covenant". There is no doubt that this dispute, although between ducts, He did not fail to powerfully revitalize the intellectual culture of the bishops and priests, making them experts in the mystical world of grace and freedom, and therefore more capable of guiding souls on the way of salvation and holiness.

.

Moreover, everyone knows how the Tridentine Reform began a training of clergy animated by a strong missionary spirit. The recent discovery of new continents made conscious European Christianity do not run out, as he believed the Middle Ages, the whole inhabited world. So the Church began to expand rapidly in the immense new lands and continued the evangelization of Asia and Africa.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni But the question is wedged deeper into history. This “Trent prête” It seems to cross the turning point of modernity without damage: indeed the birth of new orders and nineteenth priests companies, and zeal in making large seminars as factories, appear to ensure that its function remains intact within the same institutional and theological shell. But it's not true: the church which is perched in defense of their own fence makes an official whose inner profile wear in social control.

.

Answer from such purpose that the birth of many religious institutes and clerical nineteenth testimony of a Church attentive to the signs of the times and the great social needs: the poorest, the suffering and the marginalized, education of children and young people, to their preparation for work, the good of families, the dignity of women, the Catholic culture, the political commitment of the laity, missions.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni The poll of consciousness of a humanity which has no experience weakens compassion.

.

Answer from such purpose that human experience of the priest does not need to apply their own horizon of the secular - economy, finance, militia, policy, family, technology, industry and commerce -, because it focuses on human values ​​that are at the root and the purpose of existence, more relevant to the meaning of life and history, to the problem of suffering, of sin and salvation, the need for truth, of justice, of peace, of freedom and happiness, to moral values, Religious and Spiritual, the relationship with God.

.

In the Sacrament of Penance, the confessor, who knows the dignity and the fragility of consciousness, familiar with the resources and the weaknesses of man, and knows that he too a forgiven sinner, enters so gently and respectfully in the conscience of the penitent and judges it, competently, prudence and charity, like a surgeon who operates on the heart, but only because the same penitent, in faith knowing the invaluable help he can give the priest in the life of grace, he needs it, She wishes him and asks him, and then opens it to him, to be evaluated, analyzed, included, healed, pardoned, purified, illuminated, guided, set free, comforted, consulate, encouraged, pacified.

.

lay, man or woman, the priest who tries, It does not expect to find him or find a similar worldly experience, secular or lay, which may have far too much, but what he wants is the man of God, the man of truth and love, which it has the analogical knowledge and wisdom of God, He knows how to talk to him about, unable to raise his spirit and brought to holiness (anagogia), He knows how to introduce it in his mystery (mystagogia), and let them experience in prayer, in worship and liturgy, in ecclesial communion with the Supreme Pontiff.

.

The believer knows well, as saith the prophet Malachi, that "the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and from his mouth trying Education, for he is the messenger of the LORD Almighty " (Ml 2,7). The faithful know that the priest is "appointed to offer gifts and sacrifices" (EB 8,3). At Mass, he, in the person of Christ, It is offering to the Father, in the Holy Spirit, the redemptive sacrifice of Christ and atoning for the remission of sins. He is the "pope" who, in Christ and through Christ, "Builds a bridge between God and man".

.

It is man who, like Christ, deep knowledge of the man (GV 2,25; Mt 9,4), problems, the values ​​and universal human feelings, of the doubt, of certainty, of passion, of love, dell'odio, of joy, of pain, of pleasure, anguish, of fear, of hope, of repentance, of forgiveness. It is man who, in the relationship with his neighbor, It aims first of all to the salvation of souls, according to the saying of St. Giovanni Bosco: «Give me the people;, The rest take» [dami the anime, and take everything else], which, evidently, in no way precludes the priest takes action, according to his powers and skills, Also for the physical well-being of men, especially the poor and suffering. It remains, however, that for the good shepherd always applies the law of St. Gregorio Magno: "Salus animarum suprema lex esto" [the health of souls is the supreme law].

.

The priest must be a doctor culture, without the need to become an anthropologist, a sociologist or a psychologist. They, without being a politician or a social worker, But everyone knows stimulate human solidarity, without bias or partisanship, obedient to the authorities, especially with the Pope, but without flattery, careerism or flattery, and without being servant of rulers. The priest opens the hearts of the faithful to all human values ​​and needs of brotherly love with the heart of Christ, communicates to him, in the sacraments, God's forgiveness and the life of grace. Sa show the treasures of human dignity, to make them participate and at the same time the man's miseries, to heal them in mercy and justice. According to biblical Revelation, Tradition and the Church's doctrine, It introduced him of future realities and makes informed of the origin and end of the story.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni Its ancient science compared to transmission of knowledge ever more sophisticated, makes an under-educated.

.

Answer from such purpose that the priest knows that culture, truly valuable, essential and most important is not the technological or scientific, but the moral, religious and spiritual. Because of this, if a St. Giovanni Maria Vianney, a St. Pio of Pietrelcina or San Leopoldo Mandić had lived today, they would not be taken care of "transmission of knowledge ever more sophisticated", aware that they were playing a far more important service.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni The ecclesiastic zeal in condemning everything to which you can attach the suffix “Ismo”, It impoverishes the readings and makes it foreign to “its”, who become suddenly “distant”.

.

Answer from such purpose that Melloni, man "carnal" as, that "does not understand the things of the Spirit of God" (The Cor 2,14), He understands nothing of priestly discernment, in which the minister of Christ, thanks to the wisdom of the Holy Spirit gift, is that ' "spiritual man, that judges everything, without being judged by anyone" (v.15), if not from God himself (The Cor 4,4).

.

Writes Alberto Melloni The loss of role and’ emotional neglect exposes the worst: until the soppy exaltation of celibacy, that traps sexuality in search of sublimation and attracts the priesthood unresolved or even sick people.

.

Answer from such purpose with that wicked and slanderous insinuation, Melloni seems to extend to the generality of the clergy the ideas and the vicious behavior of some priests unworthy, although you have to actually recognize that among moralists meander heretical ideas, o o rigorous lassiste, about sexual ethics value and, consequently, of priestly celibacy, as it reflected by the Magisterium of the Church, that indeed is to be feared that the corruption of the clergy on this point is larger than it looks.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni And in recent European history the priest's job is contracted out, as marginal tasks, to import clerics, elected caretakers of abandoned communities.

.

I repeat in this regard that this further, wicked and obtuse misunderstanding, it is now that of charity, of mutual aid, solidarity, of generosity and Priestly availability and between priests, to serve the Church and our neighbor, charity exemplary, which today give evidence many priests and religious, ready to leave their homeland, maybe very far, to aid needy dioceses or offering possibilities for ministry or other institution of their communities in areas with shortage of vocations.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni Even the discussion on the woman-priest - forgetting that the “priesthood” that is received in baptism women have already, and that is no small thing -, It mixes dangerously to the whole male logic which grants the other typically become obsolete crafts.

.

Answer from such purpose that the Church does not forget at all that a Christian woman is baptized; rather it is that Melloni - endorsed heresy Schillebeeckx - forget that the Church, by the will of Christ, does not allow the woman to enter the ministerial priesthood.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni The Vatican II merely groped to remove the priest that semi-monastic tone that had. Not the papacy which simply pack a priest of the poetic. Do not talk about the bishops who package the communities in what are called in Italy “pastoral unit”, and condemn the priests to become breathless officials, overwhelmed by a Community polygamy where nobody wants them well and they fail to love, at the risk of becoming saints or shipwrecked on the rocks erotic not always candid.

.

Answer from such purpose who is seriously insulting to the papal magisterium of the past and present state that it "simply pack a priest of the poetic". Likewise, the historian Melloni forget the world and national synods of bishops dedicated to the priesthood. The mocking tone in which mention the pastoral units, It is totally undesirable and denotes the presumption of those handling sensitive topics, where it has no jurisdiction.

.

Reckless and offensive of the priestly class, sign of partisanship and not of historical objectivity, It is the unwarranted generalization, extending to all the clergy dysfunction and maybe existing anomalies, but isolated and accidental. As to the "risk of becoming holy", Melloni not worry, tea, with these slanders, exaggerations and falsehoods, He certainly did not run.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni What is so bad that not even speak Pope Francis.

.

Answer from such purpose that this is not true, although of course the Pope can not echo the falsity of Melloni. The Holy Father has intervened several times to condemn the vices of the clergy and the defects of the same Roman Curia, and to indicate to the priests of holiness through their faith (cf. Light of Faith) and the best way to proclaim the Gospel (cf. The gospel of joy), shepherding the flock entrusted to them in some difficult circumstances (cf. love joy), plus all the times in which he spoke of vocations, of the works of mercy, the ministry of confession, of prayer, of the liturgy, forcing himself to be an example for priests.

.

If anything, we would like to ask the Pope to better promote the sacredness of the liturgy, remembering the sacrificial character of the Mass. The ecumenical concern to converge with Protestant brothers in memory of the Lord's Supper, It is certainly good and in line with the Council; but we have to wait in prayer and ecumenical dialogue, in mutual charity, then blessed, hidden in the plans of the Lord, but also related to the goodwill of all, in which the separated brethren recognize the sacrament of priestly ministry, the mystery of transubstantiation and the Mass as a sacrifice, in order to finally celebrate the Eucharist together. This is not to give in to lefebvrismo, but rather to take the reform of the reform, who initiated Papa Benedetto.

.

Writes Alberto Melloni So would touch to the bishops and the Bishops' Conferences to raise an issue on which it plays the lives of their churches: but laziness prevails, encouraged by the hope that the reform tomorrow to have the same courage that “He invented the priest”.

.

Answer from such purpose that the priest did not invent the Council of Trent, but our Lord Jesus Christ, however different the priesthood is the time of Christ, to those of Trent, to ours. The episcopate problem is not indolence - some are too active -, but the fact of the spread between the bishops of modernism, whereby, people suffering from this disease, prefer listening Alberto Melloni and other ringleaders and modernists rahneriani, rather than the Pope, Scripture and Tradition.

.

Varazze, 21 April 2017

between the Octave of Easter

.

______________________________

Notes:

[1] CF. my study The concept of the priesthood in Rahner, in The Ministerial Priesthood, “The love of the Heart of Jesus”, edited S.Lanzetta and S.Manelli, Mariana Publishing House, Frigento-Naples 2010, pp.183-229.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

He descended into hell. Are there really heaven and hell ?

- Holy Week -

JESUS ​​CAME DOWN INTO HELL. THERE REALLY HELL AND PARADISE ?

.

"This descent of the soul of Jesus should not be imagined as a geographical journey, locale, from one continent to another. It is a journey of the soul […] This word of the Lord of the descent into Hell mainly means to say that the past is achieved by Jesus, that the effectiveness of the Redemption does not begin in the year zero or thirty, but it also goes to the past, embraces the past, all men of all times " [S.S. Benedict XVI, Questions about Jesus, program In His Image, 22 April 2011]

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF interview print format

.

MAURIZIO GASPARA - Hell many do not believe, others argue that it can not be eternal and others that it is empty. The same is true of the Angel fell and sin. For many it is the Catholic Church and still many inventions live as if God did not exist, and Heaven and Hell would be just illusions. To try to explain how can a good God allow such as the Christian revolt of the angels, the spread of evil, the existence of Hell and Paradise, father Giovanni Cavalcoli, of the Dominican Order, he wrote and published the book: Hell exists. The truth denied [cf. WHO]. Father Giovanni Cavalcoli is Metaphysical teacher at the Studio of Bologna Dominican Philosophical and Systematic Theology at the Theological Faculty of Emilia-Romagna. Official of the Secretariat of State 1982 al 1990, Academic is the Papal 1992. Author of numerous books and essays, It carries out an intense work of formation.

ZENIT, 29 March 2010

.

.

For the secular world and even some believers Hell does not exist. This would be an invention. What is your opinion on it?

.

Tintoretto descent into hell

Tintoretto, Descent of Christ into Hell

The secular world has lost faith in the Hereafter, Whether it's heaven or hell it. And a certain measure of secularism unfortunately has crept even among some believers, which, What they say is an afterlife, This is only the Paradise. This is the so-called mentality feel-good, so it is not surprising that, according to these trends, Hell is an invention. In reality, as I have shown in my book, Hell is not an invention, but it is a truth of faith taught by our Lord Jesus Christ, the New Testament, by Sacred Tradition and some councils. So it's a matter of divine revelation, that the Church has the task of guarding and teaching.

.

Based on what topics it claims that Hell exists?

.

The doctrine of hell is a theological doctrine. Now, the arguments of theology are not empirical, but they are the Words of Jesus Christ, which you can only be accepted on the basis of faith in Jesus Christ and in the Church that we mean the Words of Christ.

.

Are there really heaven and hell?

.

From this point of view, the topics are many. I will here mention only one [cf. pag. 33 my book about hell], which I think is particularly effective, because it is found in the Second Vatican Council [The light, n. 48] and in the Catechism of the Catholic Church [n. 1034]. This is the step Matteo [cf. 25, 31-46] where Jesus Christ is not merely announces the mere possibility of damnation, but simply it provides for the fact of the existence of the damned.

.

Where and when was born Hell?

.

To answer this question, we must consider what exactly is Hell. It, regarding men, It consists of irrevocable rejection of the mercy offered to us by the Father through Jesus Christ, Son of God. In this sense, we can say that the infernal damnation came into existence with the coming of Christ. Instead, if we consider the sin of the beginning of creation, angels, Hell exists for them since that time [cf. Mt 25,41; 2 PT 2,4].

.

Where was born Hell?

.

As for the sinners angels, as they were before in heaven, We can say he was born in heaven, from which were precipitated [AP 12,8]. As for men, Hell is born into this world when Jesus was rejected.

.

There afterlife or is present on Earth?

.

According to one theory of Christianity secularist-gooder, if one can speak of "Inferno", This only exists on this earth, in the sense that the punishment for the wicked there's only down here, and then there is the paradise for all. There is also another argument, totally pagan, according to which Hell would be that condition of suffering which also affects the innocent oppressed by overbearing. While in this second case the word "hell" is used in an improper way, in the first case there is some truth, as the state of mortal sin is already in a sense Hell. But this argument overlooks the fact that the irrevocable fullness of hellish condition for humans is only after death. However, every man, You may repent before death, It can regain the status of the grace of Christ, whereby, if it continues in this state until death, can avoid Hell.

.

What Scripture says about?

.

The most authoritative voice is that of Our Lord Jesus Christ. In it we find an echo in the other books of the New Testament, and in particular in the Revelation, in which we have a great vision of the ultimate triumph of Christ over all the powers of evil, which it will be put in a position of no more harm to the elect.

.

The Hell's admirable description of the Divine Comedy is credible?

.

Certainly in its substance it is credible, Why, as you know, Dante was not only a Catholic, He had acquired a remarkable theological culture of Thomistic mold attending the Dominican convent of Santa Maria Novella in Florence. While, Dante, the great poet who was, It has allowed the so-called poetic license, for which he created environments, events and characters that clearly beyond those we are taught by the Christian Revelation, although at the same time, all in all, not oppose. A curious thing that we might note in this regard and that it is not a matter of Christian faith, is the condition of so-called "cowardous», who lived "without fame and without praise"And therefore they are placed by Dante in the Inferno, but in a place by itself.

.

Admitting the existence of Hell presupposes fear the Devil. How the fallen angel and Hell lie in the divine plan?

.

The Christian must have a certain fear of the Devil, as well as we can have a reasonable fear to take a disease or falling into some sin. Hence the duty of the Christian to guard against moral dangers that can come from evil temptations, avoiding excessive safety attitudes. Said this, however, the Christian basically not afraid of the Devil, because the Christian who lives in Christ enjoys the same power of Christ, who conquered Satan. On the contrary, from this point of view, We can say it is the devil who is afraid of the Christian. As it says St. Caterina da Siena, we are defeated by the Devil if we want, loving or committing sin. The Devil and Hell lie in the divine plan as it is a deterrent that helps us to avoid sin. In second place, as far as the devil, also it is seen as an instrument of divine Providence for two purposes: to strengthen us in virtue and to call paternally when we commit evil. The devil in itself would just our bad, only that Divine Providence uses it according to his very wise designs for our good.

.

Why does God allow the angel to rebel?

.

Because it has a great respect for the free will of the creature. Now, precisely, the Rebel Angel is a creature endowed with free. Then, at this point, we can say that God, in order to comply with this free will, She agrees to be rejected by that creature that really could only find in him his full happiness. This analogy holds true also for the human story. Also it can say that God allowed the Angel disobedience, because from eternity he had planned the Incarnation of the Word, thanks to which humanity, saved by Christ, He would in Christ defeated Satan and reached a condition of life - that of the children of God - higher than we would have been if the angel had not sinned.

.

What is the relationship between evil and Hell?

.

We can say that Hell is a victory over the moral evil, or on sin, although it remains the evil of punishment, that is, the suffering of the damned. Here, however, it is a just penalty, whereby, From this point of view we can say that it is good that there is this evil, so we see that, dal punto di vista scatological, everything is resolved in well. It should also be pointed out very clearly that it would be blasphemous to blame God for this evil, which instead he is responsible only for the angelic creature, or human, while on the other hand the existence of evil it just manifests divine justice, which, moreover, it is always mitigated by mercy.

.

What should people do to escape Hell and gaining Heaven?

.

Practically it comes to putting in place all the precepts of the Christian life, starting with hatred for sin, by the knowledge of its consequences, to move to the duty to obey with all our strength to the commands of the Lord, to live in grace, the continued practice of conversion and Christian life, in unlimited confidence in divine mercy, frequenting the sacraments in communion with the Church, in devotion to the saints and especially to the Blessed Virgin Mary, cultivating a strong desire of Heaven and holiness and courageously fighting daily against the wiles of the tempter, under the protection of St. Michele Arcangelo. In exceptional cases of aggression on the part of the devil, there exists the practice of exorcism. These recommendations apply of course for Catholics, But as all men are called to salvation and therefore they are called to avoid Hell and gaining Heaven, their duty is to follow their correct conscience, to the extent that they know the needs of the property and cultivating, with the help of grace, an at least implicit faith in God as the rewarder of the good and the wicked Judge.

.

[ © Innovative Media, Inc. Services by Agency ZENIT ]

.

.

.

Dear Readers ,

we invite you to support The Island of Patmos that always carries their apostolic work only thanks to your offers that you can send using the convenient and safe system PayPal or our WERE GOING, which you can find on the right of home-page. We pray those who use the code WERE GOING send us an email [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ], so that we can send a message of thanks. If you bid by PayPal, we get the notification with the email address of the Donor, If you do use the code WERE GOING, in that case the banking system there does not report your email and in that case it would not be possible to answer and thank you.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Ancient and new lies about the resurrection: He faces the imprint of Christ the veil of Veronica

- Holy Week -

OLD AND NEW LIES ON THE RESURRECTION: The ’ IMPRINT of the FACE of CHRIST in the VEIL of VERONICA

 

Veronica does not appear in the Chronicles of the Gospel and its figure is part of many centuries of piety and popular traditions. Guidance on this female figure we find in some of the many apocryphal Gospels, to be exact the The 7th chapter of the acts of Pilate. But what problems can arise from certain texts, such as the apocryphal Gospels, If placed in the hands of certain scholars or suspected such, more or less intellectually honest?

.

.

Author Father Ariel

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Veronica

Veronica in pious exercise of Way of the cross

Wipe the face of the Lord who offers for our redemption means "to our" that his precious blood, behind which and on which there is the mystery of our salvation to creatures created in the image and likeness of God, calls to contemplate forever and forever the glory of his face [Shall 27-29].

.

.

Anne Bancroft

the great and unforgettable Italian Anna Maria, aka Anne Bancroft [1931-2005], in the film role of Mary Magdalene

Among the various female characters who lived in contact with the word of God made man, the figure of Veronica, that is how deep the centuries offers food for thought. This pious woman known as she who along the via dolorosa, in seeing Jesus carrying the cross with his face covered in blood because of the crown of thorns, the wiped with a linen cloth on which was printed the ’ imprint of the face of the Lord, the so-called veil of Veronica.

.

The apocryphal Gospels 3

apocryphal Gospel fragment

Veronica does not appear in the Chronicles of the Gospel and her figure is part of many centuries of piety and popular traditions. Guidance on this female figure we find in some of the many apocryphal Gospels, to be exact the The 7th chapter of the acts of Pilate.

.

The apocryphal Gospels 1

an apocryphal Gospel lyrics

It is good to point out that the apocryphal Gospels, which also contain interesting historical and contemporary costume, are not recognized by the Church and often do not even have any links with the mystery of revelation; Although some biblical scholars want to give them a recognition of historical character but can not stand upright, with free peace of what they teach some lecturers at the Pontifical biblical Institute and Pontifical Lateran University, We lay on the Gregorian not even the classic “veil”, but their heavy wool quilt. Separate the true from likely and the genuine from the fake ’ in the texts of the apocryphal Gospels, is like looking for a needle in a haystack; noble enterprise which cannot and must not be prevented, as long as those who do some research this is fully aware, then take action and especially teach with cautious consequence.

.

The apocryphal Gospels 2

The apocryphal Gospels

Different but similar applies to certain scholars secularists as Umberto Eco, that was a true scholar; or like Corrado Augias, that is a fake scholar. Not to mention a novelist from tiny but rich as Dan Brown box, that in his best-selling translated into 20 languages and sold millions of copies with "sensational revelations" on news “withheld from the Church”, for example peregrine theories on the Lord Jesus and Magdalene, for which are offered as authentic evidence sources written unrecognized precisely because spurious untrustworthy. This is why the apocryphal Gospels are not accepted, Why not say or contain "uncomfortable truths", but why they collect patently inaccurate news and studiously often false.

.

Corrado Augias investigation of jesus

one of the texts by Corrado Augias which follows the book Investigation on Mary

Who then as Corrado Augias assumed instead of knowing what in fact does not know, Turning to millions of viewers with powerful means for feed the canard of the four canonical Gospels ' chosen at the Council of Nicaea by order of the Emperor Constantine, who needed to give a unitary religion Empire», should be at least aware "he will also be pure Pike a connoisseur of Judaism" that exist even apocryphal Gospels created by Jewish circles deeply hostile to Christianity. And just taking cues from certain false news the same Gospels claim: «So this rumor was spread among the Jews until today» [Mt 28, 15]. Rumors put before writing and spread, so much so that between the 4th and the 6th century principieranno to circulate within the Jewish History of Jesus [Toledot Yeshu], a satirical and irreverent collection on the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth, indicated in the other ’ as bastard [verbatim bastard] the illegitimate son born from forbidden Union of his mother with a Roman soldier; all news then found in the Babylonian Talmud between the 7th and 8th centuries what “he tries” the great Christian lie, and still teaching the subject in rabbinical schools of the ultra-Orthodox and more, as I will explain later. But on the whole this Corrado Augias fly, being part of an epic historical materials in complex ignoramus and theology that would presume treat and partly because intellectually dishonest.

.

Lubavitch

the Jewish sect of Gnostic-esoteric matrix of Hasidim of Lubavitch, one of the most powerful and successful within the Jewish world, in particular in the United States of America

Not to mention interfaith dialogue It did not in truth but in political correctness, which from our side, many eminent and distinguished scholars of the Catholic world, do not hesitate to sacrifice half a century even some of the basics of our faith. And they fly over “wisely” on a given determined and blatant historical: several so-called apocryphal Gospels were born in the Jewish world during the first apostolic age and are sensational forgeries studied at the table - or rather at the tables of the Synagogues -, then disseminated in order to put in bad light the first Judeo-Christian movement and the same Christ, on which we offer news and stories embarrassing to say the least. And the more the figure of Christ, in some of these texts, It is presented as that of a subject iracondo, violent and even immoral, is more evident and obvious the matrix of certain rabbinical schools of. But unfortunately, in the dialogue to “good blood volume“, These study topics are not addressed. On the contrary, It looks from point out that these false texts are still presented as incontrovertible truth of Jewish orthodoxy in many environments, in particular within the Meetings [rabbinical schools] of various sects so-called ultra-Orthodox from the world of the various Hasidic movements. And from the Hebrew, these falsehoods are hereafter passed to poison the world Masonic esotericism, and the Masons have given large spread them blowing the trumpets to all breathless. But, as I mentioned just above, in the authentic Gospels that tell the mystery of the Resurrection of Christ, a clarification of everything is written, :

.

“Some guards came to the city and announced everything that had happened to the chief priests. These are then assembled with the elders and, after consultation, They gave a good sum of money to the soldiers, saying: “thus shall ye say: His disciples came by night and stole him, while we slept. And if ever he came to the ear of the governor, we will satisfy him and keep you out of concern”. So they took the money and did as instructed. So this story has been reported among the Jews until this day " [cf. Mt 28, 11-15].

.

That is pace of interfaith dialogue, at least until the Church will continue to teach that the Santi Vangeli contain both truths of faith both facts and historical truths, beyond the well unedifying bultmaniane acrobatics of Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi which over time has repeated several times their element unhistorical but instead allegorical from then interpret with the categories of theology …

.

archal flowers

Jesus. The invention of the Christian God ’

The theory that the Church would fear the "uncomfortable truth" contained in these texts are not trusted and often false, or that some irreverent insults go instead taken as "historical records" final, Let it say and write to Paolo Flores d'arcais, who in his book Jesus. The invention of the Christian God ’ [Add Publisher, 2011] public propina theses and theories denials already before the year 1000 from studies of the greatest fathers of the Church, only to be denied by anthropologists and historians to anything but Christian or far however from practicing Catholics. These arguments and theories, the result of rumors often libelous masses standing after being studied at the table, Finally fell into oblivion for many centuries; an Oblivion from which were exhumed in the eighteenth century by the enlightenment, in the early 1800s following the aggressive anti-Catholic Masonic currents, finally put to use in the first decade of the new millennium by Communist old Paolo Flores d'arcais, not having yet developed appropriate psychoanalytic seat in the trauma of bereavement resulting from the fall of the Berlin wall, through a veritable boom unleashed its unsurpassed discomfort resulting from the dissolution of its Marxist Belief pigliandosela with the fathers of the Church gathered in the first Ecumenical Council at Nicaea in the year 325, where in his opinion would have invented the the Christian God and sketched the Symbol of Faith, the I believe Roman Apostolic Catholic Church, then perfected later in the ’ Assembly of the Council of Constantinople.

.

flores arcais back cover

fold: “He never proclaimed Messiah. He was a Jewish apocalyptic itinerant Prophet announcing in the villages of the Galilee, the upcoming end of the world

Paolo Flores d'arcais is free to write what he wants, as I am of deny it. I would have rather a lot to debate on the right to freedom of our theologians and exegetes — very sympathetic to the left radical chic — to quote him in certain academic areas of our ecclesiastics, to suggest even in homes where they form the future priests reading of certain “interesting” texts published in the journal Micromega. And I said this must extend warmest congratulations to the Congregation for the clergy now in charge of the supervision of seminars, the Congregation for Catholic education in charge of our academic training centres, and finally to the Italian episcopate; all of them deserve the warmest thanks to the commendable manner in which they exercise their apostolic obligation to monitor our formation houses and on those theological studies in which sometimes seems to get around, except that which is Catholic.

.

veronica paul la roche

Veronica, in a painting of the 19th century. by Paul de la Roche

The name Veronica comes from the Greek Φερενικη [pherenike] and consists of φερω [phero, which leads] it's a win [Nike, victory], that means: the one that brings victory. This name, transposed then in Latin – Veronica – takes on the meaning of the passage with Vera icon, what does it mean “true icon ", "true image”, thereby lending itself as an iconographic image in the overall framework of passion, that from the second Middle Ages began to illustrate this pious woman wipes the face of the Lord. Figure, that of Veronica, cautiously extrapolated by the stories often confused, often just as untrue and not consistent with the story that emerge from numerous apocryphal Gospels, some of which are undoubted interest charge d ’, If taken with all due caution and with whom you should try to take out a needle from a haystack of true false.

.

veronica Byzantine icon

Veronica in Byzantine iconography

From the 15th century Veronica is venerated as one of the pious women that followed along the Via Dolorosa to Calvary, the crucifixion of Jesus, and is mentioned in VI° of the pious exercise of station Way of the cross. According to some traditions Santa Veronica is the same woman who would have dried the face of Christ, but on this there is no historical documentation and feedback. According to these ancient traditions Veronica consecrated his life in spreading the Gospel, traveling to various cities in Europe, leaving Rome the precious linen with which wiped the face of the Lord and from there continue towards Gaul, the current France, where he died dedicating himself to the conversion of the Gauls in Christianity.

.

Christ Pantocrator Cathedral cefalù

the Christ Pantocrator in the Cathedral of Cefalù

In the mystery of the Holy Passion of our Lord Veronica invites us to contemplate the face of Christ, a face that goes far beyond the actual physical face in and of itself, to come to the contemplation of which there is very useful one of the Psalms of David: «Listen, man, my voice. I cry: have mercy on me! Answer me. You said my heart: "Seek his face"; your face, man, I seek. Don't hide your face, don't dismiss your servant with anger. Are you my help, Don't leave me, do not forsake me, God of my salvation " [Shall 26].

.

face of Christ piacenza

Cristian Pastorelli. Face of Christ, 2007. Private Collection. Caritas of Piacenza

The true face of the Lord that we seek and we need to look for is the mystery of his constant presence in the history of mankind and humanity ’; that Christ Allus, as define Sant'Agostino, that is the beginning, the Centre and the ultimate goal of our entire humanism. World history is the history of God's presence, from the garden of Eden in which the "face of God" creates man in his own image and likeness, until the inverted stone of the tomb of the risen Christ, where the "face of God", After being offered as a slain lamb, resplendent in glory and in the fullness of his divinity, bringing in your glorious body indelible signs of passion [LC 24,40; GV 20,20.27].

.

veronica Brescia

18th century Venetian school, The Veronica wipes the face of Jesus

Wipe the face of the Lord who offers for our redemption, means "to our" that his precious blood, behind which and on which is engraved the mystery of our salvation to creatures created in the image and likeness of God, calls to contemplate forever and forever the glory of his face; the face of the risen Christ who is the mystery of our faith indicated by ’ author of the Epistle to the Hebrews as "Foundation of things you hope and try those not seen» [EB 11,1]. As says the Apostle Paul: … If Christ had not risen, in vain would our faith, vain hope [The Cor 15, 14]. A hope that together with the psalmist must stimulate us to seek that Face that has impressed itself with the signs of his passion in our history and in the mystery of the salvation of the man who seeks him with faith and with a sincere heart.

.

.

_________________________________________________

.

Cathedral of ’ City, execution of the ’ hymn Anima Christi at the end of a Pontifical mass of the Supreme Pontiff Francesco

.

.

Dear Readers,

we invite you to support The Island of Patmos that always carries their apostolic work only thanks to your offers that you can send using the convenient and safe system PayPal or our WERE GOING, which you can find on the right of home-page. We pray those who use the code WERE GOING send us an email [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ], so that we can send a message of thanks. If you bid by PayPal, There comes a notification with the email address of the donor, If you do use the code WERE GOING, in that case the banking system does not signal us your email and in that case there would be no possible answer and thank you.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The reasons of don Alessandro Minutella must remain in the communion of the Church and to serve the Church in obedience to the Church

REASONS FOR DON ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA SHOULD REMAIN IN THE COMMUNION OF THE CHURCH AND IN THE SERVICE OF THE CHURCH IN OBEDIENCE TO THE CHURCH

.

Today, some thinkers, and unfortunately many clergymen, They have passed the same Luther, which in comparison - it goes without saying it is a paradox -, ends up be more orthodox of them. From these cases then we see that there is more contrast between modernists and Catholic, than between Lutherans and Catholics. Catholics are more united with Luther that the modernist. The main problem of unity among Christians, today, It is not so much that of the union with the Lutherans - there's also this, obviously -, but rather that of 'unity among Catholics.

.

.

Author John Cavalcoli OP

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON

.

.

Dear Brother Priest

ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA

Priest of the Church of Palermo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Minutella homily

it Presbítero Alessandro Minutella, sermon "The embarrassment of the false church» [to open the video click on the image]

the news of the decree of your Bishop He was surprised and saddened, because recently I heard some of your homilies in which you earnestly denounced the spread of many heresies in the Church type modernistic, declaring at the same time, in critical tone towards the Lefebvrians, your respect for the decrees of the Second Vatican Council and complaining about their performance in the modernist sense.

.

These your words coincide with what I am arguing publicly for many years, so I suffered unjust measures by the authorities. How you claim you, Today in the Church the modernist trend has become so established, which it is also widespread among Bishops, so that they favor the modernists and punish anti-modernists. And how can you determine, we Fathers de The Island of Patmos We are writing for some years about these serious problems, Just browse our store to find dozens of writings on this specific topic.

.

I know that your Bishop has motivated the decree citing you, while it is free from heretical infections, break the ecclesial communion. You, instead, from your hand, you feel unjustly punished and you quoted the authority of St. Thomas about. I state that I do not have enough information to form an opinion, but I offer you some criteria derived from Angelic Doctor.

.

Minutella appeal to Francis

Alessandro Minutella appeal to the Supreme Pontiff Francis [to open the video click on the image]

First of all must be for you a great satisfaction the fact he had been assured by your Bishop was not a heretic, considered, as I said earlier, the current widespread heresy even between the hierarchy and the theologians. At the same time I am amazed inconsistency of your bishop but allows a heretic as Enzo Bianchi to make a public lecture in his cathedral church [cf. recent article by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. Indeed, by Enzo Bianchi, There are authoritative rebuttals, like that of our dear and esteemed brother Antonio Livi, while on this online magazine of the Fathers The Island of Patmos I have refuted several times and severely; is also one document in preparation study to which Dr.. Jorge Facio Lince has been working for months [some of our other articles on Enzo Bianchi heresies are still readable WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc ..]

.

As for the teaching of Aquinas in terms of criminal decrees, he distinguishes an undue Decree [excommunication due;] because of the contempt of the law by the authority [the opinion of law being observed]. "So, if part of the judgment that there is an error, to render void the judgment, it has no effect ». So those affected can not take this into account.

.

"If the ruling is right, it is to be punished and must obey humbly, and it will be his merit; or it must ask the Superior the annulment of the decree; or recourse must be had to a higher level. If he showed contempt for the decree, thereby sinning mortally " [Sum. Theol., Suppl., q. 21, a. 4]. I am unable to advise you on which path to take. You stand, in conscience, before God, make the decision. I can cite my own case, who has found the following solution. Following my broadcast on Radio Maria, the 30 last October, in which I talked about divine punishments, my Superior I partially suspended peep the 5 following November, by publishing a statement against me infected by heresy, that denies the original sin [in these articles is my defense: WHO, WHO, in this next trilogy Instead it shows that my case was mounted by environment-related lobby gay, WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

lorefice vigil 1

daily news on “If Alessandro Minutella” [to open the video click on the image]

Judgment obviously unjust that against me, to which I I adeguai in obedience, without failing to explain in detail my reasons to the Superior. But there was nothing to be done. He did not answer me either. Then, in late January, I appeal to higher court, getting satisfaction. Two days after the Superior reinstated me in the fullness of my priestly functions. But the question, very serious, of the divine punishments, It remains open in the field of contemporary theology. The same Pontiff, in his speech to the earthquake victims during his visit to the Carpi 2 last April, he mentioned the consequences of original sin in the following words: "Our soul, created for life, He suffers hearing that his thirst for eternal good is oppressed by an ancient and evil dark ' [cf. video, WHO, WHO].

.

The Church teaches the priest He must see the Bishop as his immediate superior, which, however, it represents the Pope, to whom, ultimately goes obedience to supreme level on this earth. The communion with the bishop and the local Church is subject to communion with the Supreme Pontiff.

.

Today we are in an ecclesial situation in which there are modernists Bishops or Lefebvrians, who are not in full communion with the Vicar of Christ or pretend to be; rather, while the former, careerists and bullies, flatter him and pressed on him with a style that looks like the mafia, seconds, on the basis of an incorrect reference to Tradition, reject the teachings of Vatican II and the Mass new world order, and disobey the Pope openly [cf. article in the 2015 at Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO].

.

lorefice vigil 2

about three thousand faithful packed the Cathedral of Palermo to huddle in prayer around their Bishop [to open the video click on the image]

The unity of the local Church He must always take - priests and Bishop together - making the head unit of the Church Universal Roman, drawing inspiration from it and submitting it. This loyalty and obedience to the Pope and the Magisterium of the Church is the only treasure that we Catholics possess among all non-Catholic Christian brothers. These supreme values ​​I could deepen thanks to the experience that I have done since 1982 al 1990 as the official Secretary of State of John Paul II. Near the Pope and as collaborators of the Pope can make a beautiful and most fruitful experience of the universal Church, which does not detract at all, indeed does better understand the dignity and autonomy of the local church.

.

This wide and universal outlook, this bond with the Pope not to mention the immediate superior, but right through him, And, as it were, In the DNA the spirituality of us Dominicans, we make our profession of obedience to our Provincial Superior, Certainly, but beyond him and beyond him, our total profess obedience to the Supreme Pontiff.

.

Today the papacy has more than ever need to be helped, He warned in his ministry and defended by all the people of God, especially by the true prophets and the anime-victim, and because never before has he tried, threatened and besieged by Satanic forces who pretend to be friends, and instead they want to bring it down, and because unfortunately - something that never happened in the entire history of the Church - a crisis of faith has crept within the same episcopate and of the College of Cardinals and, consequently, They have arisen in the Church bitterly opposed factions and divisions [cf. Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO] - case in point the opposition between Lefebvre and modernists - right on the issue of the truths of faith.

.

lorefice vigil 3

S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

There is more contrast between Rahner and St. Thomas Aquinas than between Luther and St. Thomas Aquinas. For Luther God is creator, for Teilhard de Chardin God is organizer of matter. For Luther the atheist is in error, Rahner instead for the atheist is an unwitting believer. For Luther God is omnipotent, David Maria Turoldo is weak. For Luther God is a You in front of 'the, Marco Vannini l 'the It is the "absolute subject". Luther admitted the immutability of dogma, Walter Kasper la Nega. Luther condemned atheism, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini said that in the consciousness of the believer there is always an atheist. For Luther, faith is knowing the truth - that is, the Word of God -, many Catholic theologians is a "athematic and existential encounter" with Christ …

.

… for Luther Christianity is at the top of other religions, for Dupuis is one religion among others, Pair of other. For Luther the true religion is Christianity, however for Schillebeeckx it is the global federation of all religions [cf. my articles WHO, WHO]. For Luther the Christian only has the gift of the Spirit, however Raimundo Panikkar, the Indian mystic is the same as Christian. For Luther Muslims are enemies of the gospel, Instead Rahner are "anonymous Christians" [cf. my article WHO]. Luther believed in the next world; Gutiérrez said that the only world is this world. Luther thought that Adam and Eve were really existed; Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi said that the account of man's creation is an etiological myth [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo WHO]. Luther admits the Biblical account of man's creation, while Teilhard de Chardin says that man comes from monkeys.

.

Luther distinguishes the body from the spirit; Teilhard de Chardin says that evolution matter becomes spirit [cf. my article WHO]. Luther believed in the immortality of the soul, Vito Mancuso denies. Luther believed in the resurrection of the dead at the end of the world, per Rahner, instead, the resurrection takes place immediately after death. Luther believed in the divine punishment, Raniero Cantalamessa and Hermes Ronchi do not believe [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. Luther believed in hell, von Balthasar says that "exists" but that "is empty". Luther believed in the existence of the devil, many Catholic exegetes do not believe.

.

lorefice vigil 4

S.It is prayer. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

For Luther Trinity Three Persons, Rahner are three ways to be God. Luther recognized the And the son, for Melloni, which instead is wire-orthodox, if you can do without. Luther was quite certain of what Christ said, Father Arturo Sosa S.J. He says that we are not sure [cf. article by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. For Luther was a heretic Arius, Arius was right for Bianchi, as it seems to have said recently in your church cathedral [cf. texts lessons by Enzo Bianchi, WHO, WHO]. Luther acknowledged the deity of Christ, Schillebeeckx believes Christ alone il "eschatological prophet". For Luther believe that Christ is the Redeemer, It is an absolute truth, Instead Marcello Bordoni, Christ can freely interpret, choice, or as a redeemer or "martyr prophet", as one prefers. For Luther Christ is the only Savior, Giuseppe Dossetti Jews are also saved without Christ.

.

Luther accepted the Christological dogma of Chalcedon, Bruno Forte interprets the Incarnation in the Hegelian sense [cf. my article, WHO]. For Luther Christ is the God of Truth, while de la Potterie simply Christ teaches us the Gospel. As for Luther the atoning sacrifice of Christ is the truth of faith, for Cardinal Robert Zollitsch the idea of ​​atonement is medieval image exceeded. For Luther Christ's sacrifice was wanted by the Father for our salvation, Schillebeeckx for the death of Christ was not a sin offering, but only a crime caused by human malice.

.

Luther distinguished thought from reality: duty of thinking is adapted to the real. Instead, for Rahner, the real is identified with the thought, so my idea is reality: the self is always right. Luther recognized that we have to obey the Ten Commandments, Rahner while everyone is free to decide for themselves of their identity. For Luther consciousness is submitted to the word of God, while Cardinal Walter Kasper is the source of truth [the cogito of Descartes] and for the Father Arturo Sosa excels on everything [cf. my article, WHO, Our answers to the Readers WHO, etc ..]. Luther knows that sin is a tremendous evil, which it is only removed from the Cross of Christ, per Teilhard de Chardin, instead, sin is simply a negligible hiccup in the unstoppable path Evolution [Kasper see my articles WHO, WHO]

.

lorefice vigil 5

S.It is prayer. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

Luther was against Pelagio, for which grace was the prize to the works, instead, per Rahner, the grace is the vertex human self-transcendence. Luther said that it is only justified those who believe, who does not believe, it is condemned, instead, per Rahner, all are justified, because all have faith, least "implied, preconscious and athematic ". Luther believed in original sin, Nunzio Galantino does not believe [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo WHO]. Luther condemned sodomy, Bianchi approves. Vincenzo Paglia does great things about Pannella, approving the confusion between the sexes [cf. my article WHO], Luther recognized the distinction between men and women and he condemned as immoral Pannella. Luther judges modernity according to the Gospel, modernists judge the Gospel according to modernity.

.

Today, some thinkers, and unfortunately many clergymen, They have passed the same Luther, which in comparison - it goes without saying it is a paradox -, ends up be more orthodox of them. From these cases then we see that there is more contrast between modernists and Catholic, than between Lutherans and Catholics. Catholics are more united with Luther that the modernist. The main problem of unity among Christians, today, It is not so much that of the union with the Lutherans - there's also this, obviously -, but rather that of 'unity among Catholics. The modernists, who boast of dialogue with the Lutherans, They end up absorbing the heresies of Luther, giving them a Catholic painting and despising actually Luther, by them as a fundamentalist overcome by the "historical-critical exegesis".

.

Dear Don Alessandro, your battle against modernism is more legitimate than ever, necessary and appropriate. The modernists have come to a very high directional seats, among the collaborators of the Pope or presenting themselves as friends of the Pope, while the crafty sycophants and Judah, that would impose, as mobsters, their shady plans Masonic subservience of the Church to the powers of the world [cf. article in the 2015 at Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO] . We must do everything possible to free the Holy Father from this deadly embrace and these occult powers, who put the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI in the position of having to give freely to the Petrine ministry.

.

lorefice keeps watch 6

running commentary, Eucharistic Adoration in the Cathedral presided by S.It is. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

I think this is a purifying and sanctifying mission, Our Lady entrusted you, along with your service to the noble and ancient Church Palermo, that today suffer in you, suffering in Bishop, He suffers in good faithful, He suffers for the sins of all, but while this Palermo do not miss the mercy of the Father and the Holy Spirit consolation, That all summons to penance, to reconciliation, to communion and peace, under the guidance of legitimate Shepherd, not without human weakness, Yet Servant of your souls in the name and by mandate of Christ. Therefore listen, help and follow your bishop !

.

Take yourself, dear Don Alessandro, a long period of pause and reflection hermitical, I listen to the voice of the Lord, like the prophet Elijah: "Go out and stand on the mountain before the Lord's presence" [I Re 19, 11] and wait "a light wind murmuring" [v.12]. It is the wind of the Holy Spirit. Accept orders, win the temptations. China head before the divine Majesty. Beseech mercy for your sins and those of sinners. Abandoned in the hands of the God of mercy. In the words of St. Caterina da Siena: "Rest on the Cross". Soon you will be rebuilt in the fullness of your priestly functions and increasing its fully the gifts God gave you.

.

New and great tasks await, new achievements for your sanctification, to that of the Pope, for the good of the universal Church, for the Church of Palermo, for Italy, for world evangelization, for the salvation of souls, for the kingdom of Christ, for the triumph of Mary, for the defeat of Satan.

.

lorefice appeal to the united

S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily, call for unity of the Church [to open the video click on the image]

Very moving and a harbinger of celestial favors was the recent and happy collective eucharistic adoration cathedral with four thousand people and the Bishop meekly on his knees before the Blessed Sacrament, to plead with songs and tears light, pace, pardon, love, harmony and unity for the Church Palermo. I feel for you all, dear brothers in faith, admiration, compassion and tenderness. I remember in prayer. Pray for me.

.

Confirm the blood pact with Christ: He gives you his blood; you give Him your. The sin is washed with blood, the blood of the New Covenant. We Romagna - not to mention the Tuscan! ―, Sicilians like you have the hot blood: we may sometimes verbally violent, but always generous.

.

Madonna vera, flesh and blood, is merciful and tender with the humble, but it is terrible with the proud; is the Madonna at Fatima showed the little shepherds the damned in hell; Madonna is the one that glorifies the Lord because he has "scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts" [LC 1,51]. that Madonna, Seat of Wisdom, which he is winner of Satan and of all heresies.

.

Cathedral of Palermo

the splendid cathedral primatial Metro Palermo, dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary assumed into heaven

She will protect you and defend all, beginning with your Bishop; She is, or Palermitani, the heavenly Presidio of your Diocese and the wiles of the enemy infiltration and support you in the good fight.

.

Fight against principalities, against powers! [Ef 6, 12]. By Caterina da Siena, confidate, generous Palermitani, that soon you will be a sign for the Italian Church and cry with Catherine: "Fire! Fire! Fire!». Soon they will come down abundant graces upon you all and Italy will be inflamed.

.

With esteem and affection in the Lord.

Varazze, 7 April 2017

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

[video] – Catholic Moral and gambling: the problem of compulsive gambling

- the island of Patmos video -

CATHOLIC MORAL AND GAMBLING: THE PROBLEM OF gambling addiction

.

For Catholic morality, gambling is not always considered a sin, but may assume that when gambling is offensive to justice and charity, exposing us to vice structured on the addiction that comes from our own free choice.

.

Author Father Ariel

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

gambling addiction island

the conference on compulsive gambling promoted by Lions Club, at which he gave a talk Ariel S. Levi Gualdo on the relationship between Catholic morality and gambling

Reducing people slaves irrational-emotional feelings, of illusion and dreams, It is not the worst form of slavery?

Modern slavery It is worse than that of the ancient Romans, it was a legal institution of civil law; an institution that provided for the emancipation, the slave liberation. And once it becomes Liberto, the former slave, species in the imperial era, He could make even brilliant careers. Instead of modern slavery, not codified in any law, because the democratic systems that promuono psychological slavery are those who condemn slavery firmly, but then made the same resulting in exercising massive controls on masses of slaves, for which it is not expected that legal possibility of emancipation already planned rather than two millennia ago in the Roman civil law.

.

Lions Club 31.03.2017 ok

he teacher. dr. Franco Cirillo (to the left), the father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo (To the right) during the conference

About Gambling, The Catechism of the Catholic Church uses a much stronger end of the term "addiction", uses the term "slavery". And here I would point out that not all addictions are in itself and of itself bad, sometimes they are not even harmful. Indeed, addiction", It can arise from our own glossy initial choice which can then escape our control, until enslaving, but nevertheless it starting from an initial act of our free will. There are in fact two different forms of slavery: We can be enslaved by a violent total deprivation of liberty, or we can be enslaved by various forms of psychological dependence, almost without realizing it [follows the conference video]

.

To open the video of the conference click on the image below:

a1 frame

.

you tube

You Tube Channel de The Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Alessandro Minutella is not a priestly piety model that Catholics should follow

ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA NOT A MODEL OF MERCY CATHOLIC PRIESTS SHOULD FOLLOW THAT THE FAITHFUL

.

When you were ordained priest promised obedience to the Bishop and all his successors. This we should remember that we are called to obedience in faith, no obedience into sentimentality and emotion. Therefore, The true and faithful priest, obey not only the Bishop who he likes, that he He considered worthy O which estimates, but it obeys to the Bishop as such, as High Priest and member of the Apostolic College.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PDF print format article

.

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos They remained bitter about the case of the priest Palermo Alessandro Minutella [see WHO], so they decided to dedicate two different writings: Giovanni Cavalcoli, an indirect reflection but to him valuable due to the fact that all that is modern is not modernism; Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, more directly, also he considered it in the consciousness of having to recall the duties of his priestly vows.

.

.

At the venerable brother in Christ

ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA

Presbyter of the Church of Palermo

.

.

don-Alessandro-Minutella

the priest Alessandro Palermo Minutella

At our online magazine The Island of Patmos We received messages from readers asking onlookers about your preaching and catechesis in the video spread online network. I replied trying to "fix" the scandal shot towards which you were plummeting.

.

Then I was contacted from journalists covering of church and ecclesiastical affairs, including two of the foreign press, they asked me theological opinion and canon. At that point it was no longer possible to "tune the message", and in priestly consciousness, in theological science and in compliance with the laws of the Church, I had to respond fairly and accurately.

.

Video image Minutella

to open the video file click on this

Your video plays here, It contains serious defects of substance and form. In it you from start to your speech reporting the cases of two of your brother priests of the ancient and noble Church panormitana that demean the dignity of the Sacred Order of Priests. Of these two names do not [see video-homily WHO], But while hinting that it is Fabrizio Fiorentino [see WHO] and Cosimo Scordato [see WHO]. Between the two the most harmful is certainly Cosimo Scordato, which he should not be allowed to teach sacramental theology at the Pontifical Theological Faculty of Palermo, for its obvious and documented unorthodox tendencies related to both the ecclesiology is the dogmatic sacramental.

.

fabrizio fiorentino 2

the priest Palermo Fabrizio Fiorentino, Public photos taken from his public profile Facebook

Use two figures of questionable priests the pastoral and theological level, should you cause for pain, no reason to build the thesis that ... the other is worse, thus presenting yourself before the people of God as an innocent victim because of priestly virtues model. Indeed, your cassock - the same that I always wear every day -, Pastoral lose all meaning and sense of visible witness of your renunciation of the world, if it does not dwell in a soul able to recognize mystery of grace for the indelible mark of the priesthood even in a confrere who carelessly spread their pictures in a bathing suit on the computer network. Indeed, if your priestly cassock is also intimately experienced with Christian piety to visible defects of others, It will become a lot worse than the swimsuit flaunted by your brother in the photographs of him published in the electronic network. Is this, in deep consciousness, I tell you in my capacity as confessor to many Priests.

.

Fabrizio Fiorentino 1

the priest Palermo Fabrizio Fiorentino, Public photos taken from his public profile Facebook

None of the Disciples Christ God has ever accused of having accepted into the College of the Apostles Judas Iscariot, who then betrayed him. Nor has anyone ever denied the authority of Peter reminding him of having denied Christ three times and that he had taken flight as many times. Far from it, the Blessed Apostle Paul, which also severely scolded in Antioch [cf. Gal 2, 1-11], He never doubted the authority of Peter, knowing that the command to feed his flock [cf. GV 21, 1-19] and of strengthening his brethren in faith [cf. LC 22, 31-34], at that weak pescatore galileo, undignified and culturally limited, He was transferred to the mystery of grace by Christ, God himself [cf. Mt 16, 13-20].

.

That said I'll note as follows :

.

1. from videos of your homilies and catechesis, It reveals a flawed theological training and structured in the style of preachers of certain evangelical sects, up to slip into heterodoxy in an attempt to preserve the orthodoxy of the deposit of the Catholic faith ;

2. your calls to the theologian Hans Urs von Balthasars are bold and arbitrary and they can deduce that your knowledge of the work of this scholar of the twentieth century is approximate, quindi falsifying, because having read and studied does not mean to have understood, and especially highly complex arguments such as those of this Author, to sift them not just a smattering of decadent neoscolastic, It is required a solid education and metaphysical Aristotelian-Thomist ;

3. Your transcends forms of Mariology Mariolatry, however, in a Latin-Mediterranean context in which the shepherds in the care of souls have the obligation and duty to correct certain deviant forms of popular piety linked to conventionally popular cults of the Blessed Virgin and the saints.

.

fabrizio fiorentino 4-001

the priest palerminato Fabrizio Fiorentino, Public photos taken from his public profile Facebook

I stop to these brief theological aspects to invite you to reflect on the way you have gone scandal in the People of God, attacking your bishop during a liturgical action from inside the parish church entrusted to you, because through such rants have shown:

.

  1. to use other people's shortcomings, then the same reasons and the same aggressive emotion through which Martin Lutero attacked the Ecclesiastical Authority and the Rome already the German heretic called before you, "the great whore", term to which you have added to your: 'Multinational forgery' [cf. WHO] ;
  1. similarly to Luther, denouncing the immorality, the corruption and moral decadence of the church world - all that really exist and as such to be frowned upon, then as now -, you believe that the solution lies in your "ego" and break with ecclesial communion ;
  1. you have grossly disrespectful to the Pope implicitly accusing him of heresy, often also with delirious speeches, and you also missed badly of respect apostolic authority of your Bishop, claiming to act in the name of the "defense of truth" which in fact, however, represent only your personal idea of ​​truth, place the custody of the truth is not entrusted to you, much less to your subjectivity imbued with a sentimentality that denotes an emotion that you can not control and.

.

fabrizio fiorentino 3

the priest Palermo Fabrizio Fiorentino, Public photos taken from his public profile Facebook

I think I can express so with authority and credibility because I have often criticized the private doctor Corrado Lorefice, of which I disagree with the theological approach geared to that of Bologna School I judge always pernicious, all within the freedom of the children of God and the legitimate theological dispute has always recognized and promoted by the Church, provided that done in wisdom and especially with charity [you can see in this regard my Lectio last year, WHO]. I have not even hesitated to show discomfort for the appointment of Italian Bishops belonging all the penalty to a specific school of thought and taken to the episcopate by those who claim the "plurality of ideas within the Church", but at the same time impose a de facto single thought, this thing that is called in other languages blow. That said I could continue a long time in painting the unique thought, deficiencies and above the mediocrity of the Bishops of last appointment, but never put in question their minimum apostolic authority, well it was the worst Bishops of Church history, to which we must obey, regardless of their intelligence and their human qualities, theological and moral; and that as long as they do not would end up falling into heresy. In this second case, to pass sentence on the heterodoxy of a Bishop, It can proceed only the Roman Pontiff through the relevant departments of the Apostolic. We have to report to the Authority of the Church any cases of heterodox bishops, But we can not condemn them, because our position is less sacramental, so we can not erigerci courts of those possessed of the supreme sacramental degree of fullness of the Apostolic Priesthood.

.

corrado lorefice

S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily

When he was ordained priest promised obedience to the Bishop and all his successors. This we should remember that we are called to obedience in faith, no obedience into sentimentality and emotion. Therefore, The true and faithful priest, obey not only the Bishop who he likes, that he He considered worthy O which estimates, but it obeys to the Bishop as such, as High Priest and member of the Apostolic College. And in his particular Church, the Bishop personifies Christ holding and unites all living members of the body which is the Church. Therefore, S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily, is the bishop to whom you have respect and filial obedience, because the Priesthood, to you as to us all, It was given in "free loan", not "possess". And you are called to exercise the sacred priestly ministry in communion with your Bishop in the ways and forms established by him.. The validity of Masses you celebrate, do not depend on your “magical power“, but from the Eucharist celebrated by the High Priest of the Church of Palermo, who has given you permission to celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice, administer confessions and preaching. And as these faculties you gave them according to the canonical laws of the Church, these faculties can revocartele on reasonable grounds, yes it is true that we are all priests marked with an indelible and everlasting character, but it is equally true that the priesthood is not ours, It is not our possession, It is a service to which we are called; and how to serve the Church through the Priesthood, it is established by the Bishop of the particular Church in communion with the Bishop of Rome and Supreme Pontiff of the universal Church, certainly you can not determine this by asking you before the faithful above the authority of the High Priest of the Church panormitana, because your action is wicked, reprehensible and outrageous before the People of God.

.

corrado lorefice delivery pallium

S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, the day he received the pallium from Pope metropolitan Francis I

In your public speech you have stated clearly and implicitly not to recognize the authority of your Bishop, which does not fail to make hoax. And of egocentrism filling state that can not be interested in anything any suspension from the exercise of the ministry and so on, so that you will continue your work in a way that best reputerai right and proper.

.

Know that before you, Martin Lutero, He acted in the same way before the decree of the Supreme Pontiff, which he responded by calling the Successor of Peter: "ass", "Satan", "Lots of dung". And like you this heretic "set fire" to the papal decree, he physically, you with words.

.

corrado lorefice with pastoral

S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Archbishop of Palermo

I believe that the Archbishop of Palermo was patient and prudent, compassionate and merciful. Had I been your bishop - is obviously an example academic -, I would have been too patient, prudent, compassionate and merciful, but by that time I would have taken steps to revoke the right to celebrate Mass in public, administer confessions and to preach. And once she summoned and locked in a room with me, I made you repent of your sins, If that room you had not gone out after she kissed the hand with the knee flexed recognizing my apostolic authority, rinnovandomi obedience and declaring that would have acted in the manner indicated by me and controlled by virtue of the grace of state given to me, place the grace of your state does not exist and above all can not operate and produce fruit without the top grace of the bishop was.

.

Of different, between your bishop and me, But there's one thing: after I rebuked you'd also lost his license to teach theology to a dangerous brain poisoner as Cosimo Scordato and I would never want to Fabrizio Fiorentino to go around the world dressed as a trendy carefree bachelor to be selfie to be published on the electronic network. This is the substantial difference that exists between me and a poor person aequitas and a sense of proportion as Corrado Lorefice, that by the grace of God and the Holy See will is the rightful Pastor of the local Church in Palermo.

.

I suggest fraternally first publicly ask forgiveness to your Bishop, apologizing for having stuck with the faithful during the celebration of Holy Mass. After that would be appropriate for you to retire for a period of two years in a monastery, making you follow a good spiritual director for the care of your soul and an elderly theologian specialist who can heal the severe deformation of your theological thinking steeped in adulteration and serious errors.

.

corrado lorefice in the chair

S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Metropolitan Archbishop of Palermo

If foresight, mature and humble not do this, the future that awaits you is likely to be that of the "shepherd" of a Christian sect dress outside by Catholic priest, surrounded by the aura of the beloved Holy Spirit and animated by a catastrophic vision that constitutes the very negation of our Holy Faith, certainly not the great message of hope contained in the Apocalypse of the Blessed Apostle John. a catastrophism, your, based on pessimism that is negation of our Holy Faith, which is based on the theological virtue of hope that no accident is placed in the middle between the other two theological virtues, right to join together with faith and charity.

.

Do not wait until no further ado to ask so docile and humble forgiveness of your Bishop, to which you are not required to pay tribute estimate, because you never gave it to him promise, as none of us has ever promised to estimate the proper Bishop, But obedience yes, him that you, because gliel'hai solemnly promise.

.

I bless you with priestly fraternity and I guarantee you my remembrance in prayer for your conversion and your renewed communion with the Bishop of the ancient and noble Church of Palermo.

.

the Island of Patmos, 02 April 2017

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

All that is modern is not modernism. Reflections on modernism: modernists and traditionalists

ALL THAT IS NOT MODERN MODERNISM. REFLECTIONS ON traditionalism: Modernists and traditionalists

.

The most urgent and important dialogue that today we need to promote is not the dialogue with Protestants, with the Orthodox, with Jews, with Muslims or with non-believers, and all useful things to do; what is urgent is the intra-ecclesial dialogue, the dialogue between Catholics, because there are in us and among us of the doctrinal and moral divisions very serious and intolerable.

.

.

Author John Cavalcoli OP

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON

.

PDF print format article

.

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos They remained bitter about the case of the priest Palermo Alessandro Minutella [see WHO], so they decided to dedicate two different writings: Giovanni Cavalcoli, an indirect reflection but to him valuable due to the fact that all that is modern is not modernism; Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, more directly, also he considered it in the consciousness of having to recall the duties of his priestly vows.

.

.

Video image Minutella

by poor theology and spiritual formation for the priesthood, It can rise to the idea totally wrong that what is modern is in itself Modernist. the priest Alessandro Palermo Minutella has unfortunately given test. To open the video click on the image

The most urgent dialogue and important that today we need to promote is not the dialogue with Protestants, with the Orthodox, with Jews, with Muslims or with non-believers, and all useful things to do; what is urgent is the intra-ecclesial dialogue, the dialogue between Catholics, because there are in us and among us of the doctrinal and moral divisions very serious and intolerable.

.

It no longer knows what it means to be Catholic, because everyone puts this title what he pleases, and then the strangest ideas, extraneous and contradictory. You go to the supermarket of religions, you choose what you prefer, It passes by the bishop to the cashier to pay, and then home, with purchased products, it organizes the menu of the week and invite friends.

.

It is therefore urgent that we all gather around the Pope, Teacher of the Faith and supreme guardian and promoter in the ground unit, reconciliation and peace in the Church, all attentive and faithful to the fundamental lines of his pastoral service, without bothering to argue for some of its contingent choices, occasionally they are and remain questionable with filial freedom of thought, but giving up at the same time every foolish adulation and criticism malevolent.

.

.

To read the entire article click below:

02.04.2017 Giovanni Cavalcoli, OP - EVERYTHING THAT IS NOT MODERN MODERNISM. REFLECTIONS ON traditionalism: Modernists and traditionalists

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Responding to the Cardinals dubia? The Pope will respond through the schismatics Lefebvre …

RESPONSE DUBIA CARDINALS? THE POPE RESPOND THROUGH schismatics Lefebvre …

.

The lack of law, replaced with the emotionality, sentimentality and the single arbitrariness, in addition to the lack of common sense, and sometimes also to the lack of common sense of the ridiculous, it is the best, but in some respects even worse response, that the four cardinals authors of dubia unfortunately likely to receive.

.

Ariel Bishop of Laodicea

S. AND. Mons. Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo Titular Bishop of Laodicea Combusta

.

PDF print format article

.

Laodicea Combusta

the ruins of Laodicea Combusta cathedral church, Suffragan of the Diocese of Antioch

To all of you, Readers of this Johannine Patmos Island, site of the last revelation, where the Blessed Apostle wrote the Book of Revelation, my blessing and greetings of peace and grace from our Lord Jesus Christ.

.

In our Anatolian highlands the climate is mild enough, and among the four stones of the ruins of my old cathedral church is experiencing a rich spiritual fruits of Lent to the Easter Sunday.

.

Turkmeno 2

Alcohol, Pastor tukmeno devoted to the Bishop of Laodicea Combusta with a group of sheep which he guided the Way of the cross directed by Bishop Laodicean

Friday I directed the Way of the cross, which they were attended by a large group of mountain sheep, me conducted by Arak, a Central Asian Turkmen pastor who is very devoted and which today protects by archeologists German poaching the ruins of my cathedral church burned many centuries ago, from this named my titular: Laodicea Combusta, or Laodicea the burnt.

.

After the Way of the cross the sheep I have kissed my hand one by one getting my Apostolic Blessing, after that, the Turkmen shepherd Arak, He has given built and sanctified by this pious exercise at their fold, while I immersed myself in my Apostolic loneliness, among the ruins visible of my church, to reflect on what is happening today in ancient Rome, increasingly reduced to ruin Invisible.

.

anatolia Sheep

devout sheep on Way of the cross near the ruins of the Church of Laodicea Combusta

During my meditations solinghe Four of my Brother Bishops came to mind, the Cardinals Walter Brandmüller, Leo Burke, Carlo Caffarra and Joachim Meisner, I've always respected authentic men of God, and to whom I wish to donate my reflections about their Lenten Dubia [cf. WHO].

.

I want anzitutto to note Leading to my four brothers who as Bishop of Laodicea Combusta very much alive I keep a memory linked to the first apostolic times, because my office holder is a suffragan of the ancient Archdiocese of Antioch [cf. WHO], where is that, as told by the Blessed Apostolo Paolo in his Apostolic Letter to the Galatians [Gal 2,1-2.7-14], he proceeded to admonish and resume publicly Pietro, which he never questioned the authority, quite the opposite: a maximum protection of his apostolic authority considered right and good to show him the error and ambiguity in which he had fallen.

.

anatolia of sheep

the Turkmen shepherd Arak, along with his gentle wife Shakira, Sheep in the company who meditate on the comments Way of the cross Bishop of Laodicea ignited

With these memories alive that are part of the ancient history of this land where the headquarters of my diocese, I especially prayed for this my brother bishops, to whom the Roman Pontiff can respond in various ways, more or less direct or indirect. In the particular case I think you are preparing to give them an indirect response, but no less comprehensive, thus resolving in a definitive way the problem generated by some ambiguity contained in the post-synodal document love joy.

.

Everybody knows the story not a little painful than fringe of schismatics Catholics and for this technically and canonically heretics, such are the followers of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre. This eminent prelate saw fit, to protect the deposit of the Catholic faith, rejecting the last Ecumenical Council of the Church. Of course, regarding this Council could discuss both on the properties of certain languages ​​it is of some vagueness or ambiguity. But always clear that it is one thing to discuss the obedience of faith, animated by the purpose that the Church - the one and only entitled to do - correct or supplement certain expressions, moreover, a pastoral council; Another car-elect account newly Atanasio di Alessandria and deny the authority of the Church. He said this is good to note, to all those who over time have compared Marcel Lefebvre to this Holy Father of the Church, that the Bishop of Alexandria never denied the Authority of the Church, but the defenses of heresy Arian bishops, certainly he did not fight against the Church; he accused of heresy bishops Arians, He not accused of heresy the Church's Magisterium.

.

anatolia sheep 2

the return of the sheep in their fold after having participated in the devotion of the Way of the Cross led by Bishop Laodicean

The great mistake of Lefebvre and all their followers, you believe and teach that the Second Vatican Council, having been pastoral, It is not binding. And if that's not enough, They found them and show well filled with heterodoxies, I am saying for decades ch'esso is steeped in modernist heresies. In tal modo, Lefebvre and their followers, They rise on the one hand to the judges of the purity of the faith, on the other hand to sole custodians of the one and true faith. All forget proudly at times disheartening, that the custody of the deposit of faith was not entrusted by Christ the Lord to them, but to the Church governed by the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles. I repeat, therefore, that Lefebvre, the current state, are schismatics and heretics, because anyone accuse me of heresy up the Magisterium of the Church, it is only for this heretic and outside the Catholic communion.

.

lefebvre consecration

the schismatic act of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre: episcopal consecration of four bishops without a mandate of the Holy See. To open the video click on the image

Il Holy Pontiff John Paul II and later the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI, It was very clear in pointing out that Lefebvre had to accept the teaching authority of the council and its texts without reservations. Following Benedict XVI did point out the special commission Ecclesia Dei, that the Lefebvre was not required to accept the interpretation of the Council - intended for the post-council - but the documents of his solemn magisterium. And with merciful mood, he went back to the four bishops consecrated by Marcel Lefebvre without papal mandate excommunication in which they were incurred, but pointing out that at the time, these bishops, and the Priests they consecrated, they had no role in the Catholic Church [cf. WHO]; nor could it, not being de facto in communion with the Catholic Church.

.

According to weeks when it is declared, it seems that the reigning Pontiff has passed the great rock of acceptance of the Magisterium of the Council, perhaps claiming to motu proprio after breakfast, talking to a reporter in the presence of a caretaker of Domus Sanctae Martha, that in each case, the so-called Lefebvrians, they are Catholic. And a few months you are talking to establish for them a personal prelature, with full recognition of the Holy See, without this I pose their conditions of any kind, from the unconditional acceptance of the high teaching of the Second Vatican Council.

.

Bernard fellay video ok

schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay in a long interview in which he talks agreement unconditionally with the Holy See. To open the video click on the image

Once the Church had its own codified law. Since it hath gotten rid of this annoying smell of legalism, replaced in part by 'smell of sheep, in part by a mercy to be clarified, place one or the other thing can not give life or to the right do it yourself, nor to a right second-as-I-beat-the-little heart.

.

The Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X, Bishop Bernard Fellay, He has repeatedly stated in various interviews that now official, the agreement with Roma, it is in practice almost done and now "just missing the stamp" [see video interview WHO]. Well it is only right to point out - in case the stamp came seriously -, that this bishop is a heretic that fact as schismatic, but it is because it follows and transmits never disproved theories of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre who has always accused the council of liberal tendencies, illuministic and indifferentistiche, in conclusion: an authentic modernism receptacle. And here we remember that modernism, It was defined by Pope Pius X as the mother of all heresies through his Encyclical Feeding of Dominic's Sheep. That's what makes a heretic Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, Bishop Bernard Fellay, and their priests, well trained and ordained, undeterred by accusing the church of heresy, and they have remained heretics, then priests Valid ma illegal, when no role in the Catholic Church.

.

It seems that Lefebvre, declared motu proprio Catholic one morning after breakfast at the presence of the porter Domus Sanctae Martha, It will be granted a prelature, and thus legitimized by the Holy See to deny the Church's Magisterium, because apart from it, are, however, Catholic (!?).

.

Image

the Messa Kika [“cohabitation“], one created by Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez in blatant defiance of the Eucharistic Sacrifice alive and saint of the Holy Catholic Mass, with preparation of restaurant table with bread and wine Copponi, from which then the Neocatechumenal receive the Eucharist sitting on chairs. You can see the Rito kikiano offertory clicking on the video.

The Reigning Pontiff, perhaps it aims to bring together, as in a vegetable soup that takes a single name - in this case the name of Catholic church instead of minestrone - all kinds of vegetable, including fennel, ingredients crucial to any kind of vegetable broth ecclesiastical. So what is obvious: soon we will find ourselves in a Church in which will have to live under the same roof: on the one hand the hotheads of Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez celebrating undeterred methodical Eucharist profanation with their celebrations Sui generis, the other no less rowdy Lefebvre ready to question the transubstantiation of the Eucharistic species for an involuntary formal error of the celebrant.

.

Messa cardinal Rylko neucatecumenale

a Messa Kika presided at the center of house of Galilee (Israel) His Beatitude Patriarca Fouad Boutros Ibrahim Twal who breaks a Eucharistic loaf, then follows the breakage of bread while Kiko Arguello, advocate with its companion Carmen Hernadez similar abominations, sings. in front of these images, the question is simple: Who is so the Eucharist, really he believes in the real presence of Christ in the sacred Eucharistic species? To open the video click on the image.

On one hand, kikiani dancing to the sound of bongos around canteen staged on Saturday nights in any room to make cheerful Eucharist, the other to the Gregorian chants of Lefebvre with folded hands in unison. And inside the same soup contained in the one pot, Lefebvre will give sacrosanct right of heretics to kikiani, while i kikiani It will mothball the fragrant pre-conciliar to Lefebvre, but without having any reason for their part, Why …

.

… because it is undeniable, as well as commendable, that Lefebvre celebrate with sacred devotion Mass understood as Eucharistic Sacrifice, not as Feast of Friends around the table. On the contrary, a well-deserved honor of Lefebvre, I can add that continuing at this rate, within ten years, for the memory of how it was once the Catholic Mass, necessarily have to go to attend the celebrations made by the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, while in places of worship New Church merciful open to everything and everyone, especially to everything that is not Catholic, It will be all sorts of abomination, give her Eucaristie kikiane to the inter-denominational celebrations with heretics schismatics Lutherans and Anglicans.

.

Bernard Fellay predica

schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay during a sacred celebration. It is unquestionable that Lefebvre is the authentic teaching of the Sacred Liturgy, animated certainly not as a mere formality, but as genuine and commendable devotion to the Eucharist. To open the video click on the image.

If the Lefebvrians, as they are and think, It will be granted a personal prelature, so the maximum canonical recognition by the Holy See, everything will be an indirect but clear response to my four bishops Brothers, that following the ancient apostolic tradition they have addressed the questions in the form of dubia, which could be followed by the fraternal correction that the Blessed Apostolo Paolo spoke to the Blessed Apostolo Pietro here in Antioch.

.

None of this will, however, need, there explain the reason: legitimating in this way and in this way the Lefebvrians, any individual bishop and every priest is free to accept or reject in an entirely legitimate parts of the Magisterium of the Church, he does not like.

.

Mass of St. Pius V

the celebration of the Mass made by a priest of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. To open the video click on the image.

Simply said,: the problem of dubia, in this way it will decay before a response implicitly. If fact Lefebvre, who do not accept a full council of the Church, are Catholic, and may have their role and their status legal within the Church, what you want it to be, in their confrontation, refusing a simple post-synodal exhortation that hovers in some points of ambiguity?

.

.

For several decades it is disputed - although it should not be - what sanctions the Blessed Paul VI in his encyclical Human life. But even in this case the problem is solved, because basically it is just a single encyclical that contains very specific moral disciplines, Some will accept, others refuse. Where is the problem? In conclusion, the Humane Life, It contains only the moral disciplines binding, enshrines's not a dogma of faith! But most of all, which ecclesiastical authorities could ever recall Bishops, Individual priests or theologians? Because even in this case the answer is both simple and consistent: you have legitimized and given one status legal to Lefebvre who reject entirely the last council of the Church, in what capacity we recalled, instead not only we accept certain documents that we do not like, absolutely without putting into question any dogma of faith, as of the infallibility of the solemn magisterium of the Church?

.

Mass Neocatechumenal napoli

celebration of Messa kika, usual set table, Wine Copponi, fraction of the loaves of bread often without any attention to the Eucharistic fragments … and all the appurtenances of “special rite” the Neocatechumenal conceived by Kiko and Carmen, including received Communion to sit in their seats. etc … To open the video click on the image.

Therefore, My dear Brother Bishops and Cardinals, wait with me, Please Anatolia that from these heights for you, that the Roman Pontiff really put this announced missing stamp the Lefebvrians. Then all doubts will fall, and any direct response from His Holiness will not be needed. And whoever it deems appropriate in conscience, will reject in toto or partly love joy, together with that encyclical that seems written to the delight of the ecologist left, the Laudato si, without any ecclesiastical authority, as Supreme Authority of the Church, I can say nothing to those who reject only some document, after it has been given full legitimacy and status legal to those who refuse and judges rather unorthodox and undermined the modernist heresies an entire council of the Church, and calls upon for decades to consider this, that means: one pastoral council and devoid of authority that contains within itself grave errors.

.

Non compliance with the law, replaced with the emotionality, sentimentality and the single arbitrariness, in addition to the lack of common sense, and sometimes also to the lack of common sense of the ridiculous, It is the best and in some respects even the worst response, Risk that you unfortunately receive.

.

bernard fellay The communion

schismatic Bishop Bernard Fellay distributes Holy Communion to the faithful during a sacred celebration. To open the video click on the image.

Finally a clarification, because even if certain things you tend to take it for granted, it's good - especially these days -, do not take anything for granted common knowledge. For this precise that the definition of schismatic and as a logical consequence heretic given to Bishop Bernard Fellay, far from being a lack of respect towards him, is a statement that is part of the lexicon of ordinary theological disputes is both canonical. However, what will never be accused by these columns to this bishop and his priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, It is to be men without faith. Because they, in addition to being equipped with faith, They are also equipped with authentic, profound and commendable priestly piety, as indeed was the Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, which it was first model of human virtues and missionary bishop model.

.

Neocatechumenal Eucharistic Prayer

Messa kika, Eucharistic Prayer. To open the video click on the image.

We can not however say the same with respect to whom the Holy Eucharist is the way document the videos between the texts of this article. Even more so it is stressed as mentioned earlier: continuing at this rate, the maximum within ten years, for the memory of how it was once the Catholic Mass, We should go to need to attend the celebrations made by the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, while in places of worship New Church merciful open to all and to all, especially to everything that is not Catholic, It will be all kinds of liturgical abomination.

.

.

from the ruins of the Church of Laodicea Combusta Cathedral

27 March 2017

.

.

In our priestly hearts, It remains the indelible memory of the Holy Mass celebrated by the Saints, who throughout his life have loved, served and obeyed the Church …

.

 

Padre Pio celebrated mass

St. Pio of Pietrelcina, celebration of the Holy Mass. To open the video click on the image.

.

… instead, on this, really spread a veil.

.

Neocatechumenal dances

Tribal dances Easter liturgy kika. To open the video click on the image.

.

.

On valuable suggestion of a priest reader, posthumously to the publication of this, insert, PDF study done by the Father Enrico Zoffoli the Neocatechumenal Way and published in 1991. You can read it by clicking below:

.

Enrico Zoffoli - "THE HERESIES OF THE NEOCATECHUMENAL WAY"

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The fall: those ugly stories of the Vatican II that nobody tells to not damage the superdogma …

Theologica

THE FALL OF: THOSE BAD STORIES OF VATICAN II THAT NO ONE TELLS SO AS NOT TO DAMAGE THE SUPERDOGMA

.

We are "Fall of " and in a few years the Catholic Church as we have known and understood it up to now will no longer exist; exist "other". Our ecclesial and ecclesiastical system has already smashed from the inside, and is currently in progress a disturbing transformation. Unfortunately, both in the College of Bishops in both the Priestly College we do not have even a minimum number of elements able to cope with this progressive decay.

.

.

Author Father Ariel

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

"If we do not want to hide anything, we are certainly tempted to say that the Church is neither holy, neither Catholic: the Second Vatican Council could even speak not only of the Holy Church, but the sinful Church; though here, Member was reprimanded something, It is mostly that he was still too shy, We are so deep in the consciousness of all of us feel the sinfulness of the Church ".

Joseph Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity, 1968

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Ariel theater

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, the Theater d'Art … very dramatic

To facilitate the modernists in their deadly attack diabolic, It was mainly the fact that we were totally unprepared to an internal attack, because they are accustomed from a couple of centuries, straddling the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, to having to defend against external attacks. Therefore we were not ready, or perhaps it is just never thought about the possibility of such an internal attack, because even in the presence of divisions, sometimes even stronger - that within the Church there have always been -, at the time that the body of the Church was attacked, the bishops, the priests and believers of Christ They were united in defending, then returning only after, in danger waned, their struggles and internal divisions. Today instead, before the desolation and fear doctrinal tendencies that are overcoming the crisis itself Arian heresy, in response we devour each other, because the 'omocentrismo egocentric, not only it took hold in the modernist, but perhaps, more and worse, well in conservatories and in the same traditionalists, that with their quarrelsome, and sometimes phobic Division, show to be the fiercest defenders of their own "I"Instead of the truth of God faith. Try to put them together in a compact and dangerous battle against the common enemy, disheartening to see instantly the results that they will, claiming over each other to have the most right ideas and the most Catholic of them all, unhealthily attached with tooth and nail to the microcosm of their small garden, unable to move beyond their devastating, "but I think", "I feel", so it is true and right only what I think and feel. Because the mutated faith in a subjective emotion type ego-omocentric, It is much stronger in the fringes of so-called traditionalists than in those of the modernists, not least because these latter are now in power for half a century. On socio-political emotion and the sentimental, the modernists we played fifty, sixty years ago, Today they do not have any need. Indeed, the modernist heretics, today no longer give emotional impulses, give orders mandatory, impose the appointment of bishops doctrinally deficient and often heterodox, which can continue to multiply and form a clergy doctrinally deficient and unorthodox, burdened as a result of all these serious moral problems arising from the dogma of the crisis generated by it, because as in the past I have written: the moral crisis was created and developed by a doctrinal crisis [It follows the full article …]

.

To open the ’ article click below:

23.03.2017 Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo - THE FALL OF THE EMPIRE : THOSE BAD STORIES OF VATICAN II THAT NO ONE TELLS SO AS NOT TO DAMAGE THE SUPERDOGMA

..

.

.

Dear Readers,

every now and remember to support our apostolic and theological work with your valuable offerings.

Thank you!

.

.

.Ariel and OK shepherd

.

.

.

.

.

The Second Vatican Council Cardinal Walter Kasper, in an article that says it all

THE SECOND VATICAN CARDINAL WALTER KASPER, IN AN ARTICLE THAT IS ALL PROGRAM

.

We must recognize that some thesis doctrinal the council may appear ambiguous or have a certain modernist flavor, but this concern is dispelled by an appropriate interpretation, what it was the one made by post-conciliar Magisterium and authoritative theologians faithful to the Church.

.

.

Author John Cavalcoli OP

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Kasper

Cardinal Walter Kasper

In an article on The Osservatore Romano the 12 April 2013 under the title A council still journeying, [text WHO] Cardinal Walter Kasper, one month and just over the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and the election of the reigning Pontiff, says Paul VI, in an attempt to prevent formulations proposed by a progressive majority that worried him, 'Involved' traditionalist minority allowing them to introduce changes in the drafting, that attenuated or mingled sense of modernizing steps.

.

If the Supreme Pontiff He felt compelled to moderate the intervention of these so-called "progressive", making room for traditionalists, means that he, with the aim of which was equipped with intuition, and with the sense of responsibility of the Successor of Peter, was aware of the plot in place and that these so-called progressives and bandied about were actually the cryptomodernists, that with their maneuvers risked contaminating the purity of the doctrine reconcile.

.

PAUL VI Council

Blessed Paul VI in the chair during Vatican II

Paul VI was not a conservative and since when he was Archbishop of Milan showed appreciate a healthy modernization of the life of the Church and the Christian life, a need, this, intrinsic to Christianity itself, animated by the Holy Spirit who makes all things and leading the Church in history the fullness of truth. So if the "progressivism" of that most worried him, it means that it was a false promotion of the advancement of the faith and a reckless assumption of modernity.

.

Cardinal Walter Kasper It seems not to have grasped the wisdom and prudence of the Supreme Pontiff, today beatified, since it succeeds in asserting that with the intervention of the Pope, "he paid a price" with the "compromise formula, in which, often the majority of the positions are located immediately next to those of the minority, designed to delimit ". That means, if I understand the words of Cardinal, that the innovative thrust, According to him, It was held back by the Conservatives, so that it could not give everything he could give. But you have to wonder if these "conservatives" were not all the way in this circumstance the guardians of orthodoxy, Considering the importance given to them by Paul VI, who approved their amendments aimed at correcting the initiatives of the pro-modernist "progressives".

.

Paul VI with Cardinal Luciani

Paul VI in the apostolic visit to Venice, received by the Patriarch Albino Luciani, than in 1978 It will happen to the sacred throne with the name of Giovanni Paolo I

According to the author of this article that sounds almost like an implementation program for the immediate future, these "limitations", of which he speaks not modify the original texts of all "progressive", that is - let's say it frankly - modernist, but they left them intact, limiting a star beside them in incongruous and contradictory way, implying offensively against Paul VI's inability to reconcile the Council Fathers.

.

The article goes on to explain - and this follows logically from what the author has said - that, because of these "compromise formula", "The conciliar texts have in them an enormous potential for conflict; They open the door to a selective reception in either direction ».

.

In this article, Cardinal also declares that "not even the official reception has been stationary. Partly, It exceeded the Council ", as if to say, apparently, that the Council orthodox and modernist statements are next to each other, as if the reader could then choose the ones you prefer, unless it is put on a contradictory position giving a blow to the rim and a barrel.

.

Paul VI with Carinale Woytila

Paul VI with Cardinal Karol Woytila, than in 1978 He will succeed Giovanni Paolo I by the name of Giovanni Paolo II

In that consists This "way" of the council according to the author? It seems the path of a drunk who now hangs here now hangs beyond: interpretation totally disrespectful and tendentious, that one is surprised that it has been hosted in a prestigious newspaper like The Osservatore Romano, which by its nature should reflect in an objective and impartial way, the supremely papal teachings, clarifying or defending positions possibly, especially if it is a question of such an important event as the Second Vatican Council and the part that it was Blessed Pope Paul VI.

.

With all due respect this well-known and influential Cardinal, what is the Cardinal Walter Kasper, for twenty years he was head of the Department for Ecumenism and enjoys great reputation as a scholar Christology, I must say that I differ markedly from this interpretation that he gives the conciliar doctrines, interpretation that negates the evidence continuity with Tradition, thing that all the Popes, by John XXIII to Benedict XVI, They have insistently maintained, to limit ourselves only to remember the famous formula of Benedict XVI "progress in continuity", from which I drew the title of one of my in-depth study on the subject, I allow myself to alert the reader [1].

.

Paul VI cardinal's hat to Ratzinger

Paul VI requires the cardinal's hat to the Archbishop of Monaco of Bavaria Joseph Ratzinger, It will happen in 2005 to Giovanni Paolo II

Serious thing, in summary, It is that Cardinal Walter Kasper seems to insinuate that between the doctrines of the Council will still have infiltrated certain theses neomoderniste that Paul VI wanted to prevent, but to which you would be resigned to leaving juxtaposed to those Orthodox to "price" of "an enormous potential for conflict".

.

It is the same false reading which it calls made by Bishop Marcel Lefèbvre, because in hindsight extremes meet. All with a difference: while the Cardinal Walter Kasper welcomes it as a "progress" or "road", Bishop Marcel Lefebvre sorry it as a denial of Tradition. But the mistake of the two is common: see the Council a modernism that does not exist, rejecting the explanations put forward by all the popes of the post-conciliar.

.

Paul VI on gestatoria

Paul VI in his chair gestatoria, of which he used for the last time Giovanni Paolo I

It must be acknowledged that some thesis doctrinal the council may appear ambiguous or have a certain modernist flavor; but this concern is dispelled by an appropriate interpretation, what it was the one made by post-conciliar Magisterium and authoritative theologians faithful to the Church.

.

Insist, as some do, in the belief that the council contains steps modernist equivalent to think that a Council can be wrong when it comes to issues pertaining to faith and morals. Which for a Catholic does not make sense, although it is true that the Council does not contain new solemnly defined dogma. Questionable if anything could be some directions pastoral, where the Church certainly is not foolproof, but still worthy of high regard.

.

The thesis of Cardinal Walter Kasper, according to which the doctrines of the Council would lead to a simple juxtaposition undisguised or patched between opposing contradictory thesis, traditional and modernist, It is absolutely unsustainable, because it would be tantamount to accusing the council of heresy, given the heretical nature of modernism; and what would be the sign that Paul VI was unable to still prevent the presence of modernism in the Council, that much and rightly worried him, though he was not at all a notoriously conservative backwater.

.

Paul VI kids dining cribs contest winners 30 January 1966

Paul VI, It served lunch to the children winners of the competition for the most beautiful crib, 30 January 1966

If the council has a pastoral style and not a defining tone even in the dogmatic teachings, this does not authorize anyone to take them lightly, denying their infallibility, because in judging the authority of the Church's teaching you should not care so much come but he teaches what teaches.

.

The formal definition is a rare mode magisterial teaching, why you should not use the pretext of the fact that this style is lacking in the Council, for error accuse or modernism or rupture with Tradition. Even when Christ was teaching in a boat or sitting at the table with her and not in the temple, it was always the Word of God accepted in faith.

.

It is true that Paul VI, after Good Pope John XXIII, He allowed the Council the presence of Karl Rahner and others criptomodernisti. He was right? It hurt? It is difficult to judge. He's still the fact that, as it is clear from the studies that have been done on the contribution of these experts, they offered an innovator in the assembly reconcile contribution but substantially in the limits of orthodoxy. And how could it be otherwise?

.

Paul VI 7 December 1965 closing the council

Paul VI, 7 December 1965, closing act of Vatican II

It is after the Council that Rahner, with surprising boldness, unfortunately without being censored by the Ecclesiastical, He gave vent undisturbed and with great cunning to his modernist trends. But since he had already acquired a world-class, even among the bishops, even the Pope had to make the best of a bad situation.

.

We must point out that it is true that at the Council there was a clash between a reactionary traditionalism and modernism crypto, He paludava progressive appearance, to get a pass; but it must also say that this comparison - that in some circumstances took on a harsh tone, dramatic and deeply worried Paul VI -, He ended, thank God, Rated with final agreements to very wide majorities and certain tone progressive. The Council was a great innovation council, ma absolutely modernist, who feared the Pope, who he was known in the progressive line but maritainiana absolutely not at all favorable to modernism, which is notoriously a heresy condemned by St. Pius X.

.

Speaking therefore "enormous potential for conflict" It is very serious offense against the supernatural wisdom of the doctrines of the Council, we were almost in front of politicians pateracchi or conflicts of the Hegelian dialectic, and it is therefore completely misunderstand the balanced and consistent results of the conciliar debates, where is that, thanks to the assistance of the Holy Spirit, the fathers, come to a fraternal agreement, They were able to offer us a more advanced knowledge of the Word of God without any breakage or unthinkable contradiction with previous doctrinal heritage the Council.

.

Paul VI dove

Paul VI, receive for free a white dove

Find here the contradictions It means disregard the root of wisdom and nobility of these doctrines, true light for our times, signal indicators of the way that today should the Church do to confront the modern thought and increase the number of his children. So this is not to do any 'reception selective in either direction », but to take one direction, with obvious possibility of particular choices, resulting from the harmonious confluence of fidelity and progress: the one we just mentioned by the Council documents in their authentic interpretation, that the Popes of the post-conciliar do not get tired from fifty to propose to the whole Church for the good and progress of the Church and all people of good will.

.

Those who believe they have to choose in the Council between traditionalism and criptomodernismo he has understood nothing of the teaching of the Council and it is only a proponent of divisions within the Church.

.

Paul VI senior

Paul VI, image of seniority, year 1977

The official reception of the Council certainly he not remained stagnant and in some ways exceeded the Council, but not in the sense understood by Cardinal Walter Kasper, ie oscillating between two opposing thesis and leaving choose from time to time between the one and the other depending on the conveniences, but rather deepening this wise synthesis of modernity and tradition.

.

I do not know what this interpretation the council given by Cardinal Walter Kasper, that seems made to stoke the flames of controversy between opposing extremists, can serve for the dialogue between believers, which however he has devoted himself so zealously for so many years. Le dottrine dei Council, as it says the same word council: reconcile, have always had in the Church is an important pacifying and conciliatory function; and the last Council, if well interpreted and well understood, It is not called in this providential function.

.

There Paul beatification

19 October 2014, the tapestry found in the central loggia of the Papal Archbasilica St. Peter's for the beatification of Pope Paul VI

Of course, the Magisterium of the Church Today also is in motion, but not to deny the truth of faith previously taught, but rather to guide us in a motherly and infallibly to an ever deepening his elder in the tradition and with an eye to including more advanced on the path to the kingdom of God and the fullness of truth.

.

In some ways some indications of the Council they are overcome, But not to have been abandoned, but in the sense that they lived better and more devoutly according to the new situations that did not exist at the time of the Council, but of course always in continuity with the unchanging heritage of faith that Christ offered once for all to the Church to be transmitted intact to all mankind until the end of time.

.

Varazze, 22 March 2017

.

.

___________________________

[1] PROGRESS IN CONTINUITY. THE QUESTION OF THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL AND postcouncil, Faith&Culture, Verona 2011.

.

.

.

Dear Readers,

every now and remember to support our apostolic and theological work with your valuable offerings.

Thank you!

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.