"I'M GAY". THE COMING-OUT MONSIGNOR KRZYSZTOF CHARAMSA, BETWEEN THE PHARISEES AND THE SLOTH SUICIDE CLERICAL

 

Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa, theologian whom I respect and cherish great memories of which, He's gone with his "boyfriend”, the others are instead left to their places and soon become bishops and Cardinals in the Church of Christ emptied of faith and they reduced to a lobby straight pornocratici policy mafia blackmail and conspiracy of silence.

.

.

.

Unlike many others or most of the preface certain Catholic blog, I think I can speak of Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa with some knowledge, because I met him; in fact, he was my teacher at the time I was attending specialist license courses in dogmatic theology. In those years I had “the honor” to have as a teacher also Father Thomas Williams, who, by a hilarious irony of fate, was a professor of moral theology [see WHO, WHO]. I say "hilarious" because Williams — had a dispensation from the priesthood and dismissal from the clerical State — is married to the daughter of former u.s. Ambassador to the Holy See, from which had already had two sons in secret [cf. WHO]. And while this pious Legionnaire of Christ if messed up "Vatican diplomats thalami " [cf. WHO]; While her children were growing up healthy and beautiful, from his chair at the upright Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum - of which he was dean of theology in his early thirties - he thundered towards sins against sexual morality. Williams was indeed a hard and pure moralist, ready to throw lightning bolts and moral and bioethical thunderbolts on a condom and to threaten the poor young religious of the Legion, forced to have him so coercive as confessor, roasting in the fire of hell; because that would be their end, in case you were near misses the virile member prey on juvenile hormone also storms and only in a State of semi-consciousness during sleep. With some priests and religious, former unfortunate penitents obliged by this zealous former Legionary of Christ, I had to work a few years in foro interno and in foro outside, praying and hoping that God's grace, even through a donkey like me, sanasse the deep wounds are going to their souls by this evil being, inhumane and above all hypocritical structurally, worthy of the evil rotten trunk branch decayed by Marcial Maciel Degollado [cf. WHO].

I hope that similar events Prof. Roberto de Mattei - and with him all those who in recent days have treated Charamsa with extreme harshness in Corrispondenza Romana and elsewhere - have not lost my memory, including conferences he held together the moral integrity and bioethicist Thomas Williams [see WHO]. For my part I have no problem to say instead of having always considered Williams a mediocre inept put by inept legionaries of Christ teaching theology without first had included the foundations of the Catechism of the Catholic Church; and have highly esteemed theologian to Charamsa instead of that value was and who nevertheless remains. Well wonder: what he has to say to this de Mattei for Williams and Charamsa, apart from its invocation for the second of the mythical and … current Free Gomorrhianus published at the beginning of the 11th century [see WHO]?

And if the blog Forward People to the Rescue quickly echoes like a trumpet in the rag of clothing [see WHO, WHO, WHO] I prefer to proceed with the tenderness of affection towards a brother who made a mistake made by his grave further theological formation, in the face of which it is impossible to invoke ignorance and even less unavoidable ignorance. And my fondness stems from those pages of the Gospel in which the word of God invites the rich young man to give up his riches to follow him [MC 10, 17-27]. Now, Anyone who thinks that Christ was referring to material goods is wrong, showing in this sense that I understand this Gospel passage, because the true riches which limit the adverse sequela Christi and of which we must get rid of are those summarized in the Seven Deadly Sins. The sentence of this story is striking: "Then Jesus stared at him and loved him […]». This is tenderness: Let the penetrating gaze of God that one day, everyone, We are called to look face to face, also to submit to his judgment, that will be merciful even though his verdict was our condemnation to eternal damnation.

This is why It is good to clarify from which pulpit preface farisee are the rags of dress on the case of Archbishop Charamsa. Analysing his gesture, the painful and provocative question that I will ask later will be the following: with this coming-out gave scandal or avoided continuing to live in scandal? I believe none of the many laiconi I immediately ran to shoot in bursts of what they regularly show they do not know, He managed to make a correct analysis, because in addition to not having the necessary elements to evaluate a case in itself and in itself very serious, do not have another precondition: the priestly soul. A priest's soul can be understood and, with God's grace penetrated, only from the soul of another priest moved from an awareness that touches not instead certain laiconi the party boat: Kryzstof Charamsa received divine sacrament an indelible character and eternal and as such will be a priest forever according to the order of Melchisedech, regardless of his choices and his life. I am aware that my brother made a gesture that betrays the profane and the sacred order of priests, but for this very reason I will never stop praying and hoping for his return, that the father can kill the fatted calf and sightseeing|. And that no one else dare you brother no objection before the acceptance of the merciful Father [cf. Parable of the prodigal son: LC 15, 23].

Saying in retrospect "I thought so" ... it could almost taste like saccenza, but it is not so, because of the dear and esteemed Kryzstof Charamsa I remember the shiny look but at the same time sad and not clear, typical of the person who tries to hide the discomfort of that suffering about which he has written and spoken so much in his lessons, to be referred to as theologian of suffering, to which he has repeatedly dedicated learned seminars and scientific works [see WHO]. Thus I formed the idea that this very competent and lovable young theologian hid his own discomfort and the secret of his suffering in the mystery of human suffering. An inconvenience and a secret suffering that instinctively emotional sphere ricollegai-affective, because unlike this brother of mine who just became a priest 24 year old, I entered a seminary at a young age, and I got to develop some instinct before becoming adult presbìtero, safe and immune to the "false freedom" that pervades the seminars, where apparently it comes around, but where the repressive and self-repressive spirit is today far worse in many respects than that which prevailed in most of the pre-conciliar seminaries, from which you want by repression you want by careful selection, men came out and not women. And if you come back, in Diocesan presbitèri, There was some problem or some scandal broke out, This was due to the fact that some presbìtero fled with her lover, but with the female lover. I defy anyone to carry only one single case of a priest fled with the boyfriend before 1970s.

The modern Pharisees who invoke the Free Gomorrhianus from above Empyrean of true&Temple traditio, however, they fail to give the public opinion correct information on Monsignor Charamsa, because if they did they would risk shooting themselves in the foot. It should be pointed out that, in fact, before his coming-out he has always been a theologian of orthodox doctrine trained according to the best criteria of classical scholasticism, end of Aquinas and refined scholar metaphysician; no coincidence that one of his main works is published by Edizioni Studio Domenicano [see WHO]. Students who had the opportunity to follow courses in the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum always remember with which accuracy and reliability have warned over the years future theologians from the old heresies, which, like viruses, transform over time while maintaining their dangerous substance intact. And also remember, his former students, how precise and decisive he was in the criticism addressed to the exponents of the New Theology; remember how in his lectures he emphasized the errors and dangers inherent in the thought of Karl Rahner. So precious he sent anti-modernist teachings and anti-rahneriani. A true theologian model belonging to the world of sound Catholic tradition, not an affiliate to the modernists or the so-called “Progressives”, quite the opposite: their sworn enemy.

The editor of Roman Correspondence, who has also been attending the large campus of the Legionaries of Christ for many years, where the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum and the European University of Rome are located, he cannot pretend not to have known this theologian of sound and orthodox doctrine, and he cannot pretend not to have known the moralist hard and pure Thomas Williams, also of traditionalist setting, But if it was in secret with the daughters of ambassadors from such as churning out children and with whom I had a public discussion in 2008, When faced with his infuriating statement about masturbation I said that its rigor did not correspond at all to what is reasonable and humane was written with common sense and scientific in the Catechism of the Catholic Church [CF. n. 2352, WHO]. Up to arouse his scandal for this my affirmation text: "If a teenager is not St. Aloysius Gonzaga blessed by God with special thanks had never resorted to masturbation, If I was informed I would urge parents to take it as soon as possible by the neurologist, probably because there is in him something seriously wrong that does not work. If instead a young adult, od an adult, to live their sexuality through masturbation, in addition to putting myself at his disposal as a spiritual director, I would invite him to have a chat with a good psychotherapist, because this indicate that he, on an emotional and affective level, but especially at the level of human maturity, There is something not working right» …

… then, the legionaries of Christ, to build this large campus in the Aurelia area of ​​Rome they paid 18 bribes to corrupt officials, This is an entirely different matter morally, because what only matters is not to masturbate and do not use condoms.

Given the very serious statement Just done, I get my hands on and to avoid unnecessary lawsuits which plaintiffs against ritorcerebbero improvvidi, accurate to claim the payment of 18 bribes to corrupt officials was one of the leaders of the Legion of Christ, the small and foolish father Javier Garcia, than in 2009, before a 27 priests, during a lunch in the Priestly House of Castel di Guido, Turning to me and to each other in that Italian International said before an entire audience of witnesses these very clear words about the devilish level that can reach the immorality of certain moralists: "In Italy you have a weird system. From us, in Mexico, It is not so, just pay one person that will fix everything; whereas, in Italy, you have to pay the various officials one by one, because each wants its slice of cake».

After stating this, not in private but public columns in a magazine that exceeded in just one year 1.500.000 of visits, I'd be tempted to hope for a lawsuit from people who on the one hand they corrupted public officials with the payment of bribes, on the other were sleeping teens of their minor seminary in the dorms with the dim lights turned on, your hands outside the blankets and trainers who in turn controlled them strolling through the night, in order to avoid that they touched where resides the entire moral mystery of evil, that is born and grows everything from condoms and masturbation, certainly not through corruption of public officials through the payment of 18 tangents. The whole, goes without saying, while their priests impregnated the daughters of the ambassadors in private and then tore their clothes in public for a pre-marital sexual intercourse consummated by those who - even if wrong - had never solemnly promised to remain celibate and chaste. And having said that I avoid entering into the merit of the intense bond had by the legionaries of Christ with another them beniamino: the former Bank of Italy Governor Antonio Fazio, whose legal proceedings are well known to the public. If anything, about Fazio's ties with the Legionaries of Christ campus we could try to ask Prof.. Roberto de Mattei that teaches structure since its founding and where he still is the Coordinator of the graduate program in historical sciences, If that is not too busy to promote Press Agency At the legendary Roman Free Gomorrhianus, what the latter may take a grueling commitment, up to induce him to overlook understandably out of other things, Perhaps morally less relevant?

Besides, we're talking about Catholics by Soviet regime, comparable in all respects to the ideologues of the old European communist parties, When tanks overran in August 1968 the city of Prague, were silent. As with Soviet ideology, affiliates have recently been silent "lodges" of the "Traditionalists" strong and pure before another undeniable fact: the Roman Catholic Diocese of hardcore Italian homosexual priests and scandals related to them, was governed by the darling of Italian traditionalist world: S. AND. Mons. Mario Oliveri, whose pontificals in Albenga cathedral were all full of jeweled pins mitrie, baroque vestments, of the Latins and ... many priests and seminarians sculettanti around him as languorous maidens captured by torpori of the first menstruation.

Gentlemen, as Hamlet said: "Something rotten in Denmark!». Implied: throughout. And those who think that Holiness and morality reside only where there is apparent rigor, the Latin liturgy and Gregorian chant, bel canto, did not understand anything; but it gets worse: he just doesn't want to understand anything, because the ideology that prevents her blinds. And ideology, whatever it is, it has always been the worst enemy of faith.

Recently I was scolded by one of my critics for having treated so "theologically incoherent"Prof. de Mattei in one of my articles focused on family and the Synod of bishops currently underway [see WHO]. Too bad that even in this case, to tear the clothes on my spirit "theologically incoherentWas a subject who spent his life harassing female students in a pontifical university; all healthy girls and women, well and with good memory. However, the inappropriate I would that, in the exercise of my priestly functions, I've never harassed a woman, neither inside nor outside my functions. And when, if anything, someone tried to harass me, I replied politely that if I wanted to accept certain pleasing "harassment" didn't have to do anything other than stay where I was, without any need to become a priest ...

... but back to the case Charamsa, a brother to whom I will never cease - today more than ever - to love. In a relevant way and perhaps beyond reproach you could say that the Act of Archbishop Charamsa was an act dictated by Satan himself. In what other way could define an educated theologian, orthodox, competent and refined that addressed accusations to the Holy Church and the bride of Christ showing off in his verve a phrasebook criticism that rivals the worst ideologues of gender and omosessualismo? The worst heretical theologians, Hans Küng creature worthy of Karl Rahner, or the more Marxist theologians of liberation, they have never claimed anything like this; and they were and are, theologically speaking, obvious and manifest heretics, In addition to dangerous; While Monsignor Charamsa, theologically and doctrinally speaking, It was not and is not, because it is a serious problem mostly moral. And undoubtedly immoral - as well as detrimental to the dignity of all of us members of the Sacred Priestly Order - it was to see our brother dressed as a priest on the television channels of the world groping his "boyfriend", that clung to him and that he tilted his head on his chest as if it were the young apostle John with the Lord Jesus.

For my in-depth knowledge of certain Ecclesiastical Affairs and the complex relationships that I have for years as a confessor and spiritual director with numerous priests, often even in serious difficulties, using this my humble made his time training to enable the Ministry to Exorcist, I believe I can say that Monsignor Charamsa was not a direct victim of Satan but an indirect victim of his great acolytes. And his greatest acolytes are those who run major Diocese as bishops of the world; they are many senior prelates of the Roman curia and not a few members of the College of Cardinals. Msgr. Charamsa is just the result of what in a book of 2011 [And Satan came Trino, in other publishing company reprint], pointed to as the tragedy of the omosessualizzazione of the Church. And screaming in the deserts like a cheap little John the Baptist, such am I, I needlessly explained and repeated that a growing army of gay took office in all key posts in the Church, holding entire dioceses through the worst weapons of blackmail; holding their respective bishops hostage, often reduced to Snowmen with their beautiful miter on their heads and their shining crooks in their hands, but not able to govern many churches lost, because totally frocessed as a result of what in an ironic but relevant I define in my book as a universal nubifrossing broke out on the poor Church of Christ.

 

The powerful lobby gay that rages within the Church he has repeatedly forced Benedict XVI to appoint bishops of subjects that he would never have nominated; to raise to the dignity of Cardinal certain subjects like soubrette that elderly men; people who are not inspired by the memory of the Princes of the Church which is required as a first condition not only a natural maleness anatomical, but above all an adequate psychological masculinity.

The powerful lobby gay lava the worst "criminal records " of priests in career or on the run to the episcopate known for their immoral conduct since they were seminarians; reports will disappear with the ecclesiastical authorities from the few priests who have left a glimmer of courage, so coercive threat who view dissent towards their gossip. The lobby gay prevents healthy and motivated men are ordained priests, because today the majority of Italian seminaries are filled by embarrassing with shrill little voices effeminate and bloodless movements, in particular in Southern Italy, where if a gay is not handsome, then cannot fly to Rome, Bologna and Milan where he would find a rich homosexual fifty immediately that would keep him with all the, as an alternative in comes in seminar, becomes a priest and looking for a career. It is no coincidence that gays entering seminaries are always ugly and physically not attractive, because otherwise they would take other roads and taken all other careers. In all my years of priestly ministry and those of my previous training for the priesthood, the only gay athletic and personable that I knew, in the midst of a growing army of homosexual priests, it was only and uniquely Monsignor Charamsa. Maybe there will be other, but despite having lived mostly in Rome in international ecclesiastical and priestly circles, homosexuals I knew only him attractive.

I'm not suffering from sessuocentrismo nor is it one that fits the individual through situations and sessuocentrici schemes of Sigmund Freud, but as a man who never denied that he had lived in his previous life a dimension too sentimental and sexual, and that he had known the disorder of licentiousness and living with women, I can't evade the fundamental element of that human sexuality which was incidentally one of the main elements that helped the decline of Roman society. When it was lost virility, gradually took the field and homosexualism spread to the highest levels of social and political. Finally came down from the North of Europe, which barbarians were males and all-round … and to put it in a real way and without modest clerical euphemisms: the barbarians arrived with virile member erected and the sharp sword in hand plucking of the sorpresa “males” Romans plunged into the abyss of the worst frocismi and who made up by women were in orgies with young people at in alcove …

… and so the barbarians put in what remained of the knee decadent Roman Empire, with their erect member and their sharp sword.

Right now it's happening to ecclesial level the same thing in worse shape and with a difference: the barbarians converted to Christianity, and also thanks to their Christianity was saved and spread among the same barbarians. And from what the barbarians were hit? What drove them to conversion? Soon said: their conversion is linked to extraordinary figures of bishops, priests and monks, which barbarians recognized manly hardening, courage, authority, then the authorities. Well let's imagine the barbarians today: What would reactions before bishops figures hybrids and androgyny, who speak in a low voice but do not speak, they don't tell you and not say no, but above all more and more surrounded by sculettanti priests who speak with falsetto voices? Just imagine the reaction of the barbarians …

… who could now, as in the 452, to stop Attila said “the scourge of God“, armed with only their own great authority, as was the Holy Pontiff Leo the Great? Perhaps Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi ordering the King of the Huns: "Dear brother, don't get mad, rather, come be my guest at the The Court of the Gentiles, talk together». Maybe Attila, After a laugh he would respond: «Sweetness, do you think being on set of the Canale5 television studios? See that I am real, But if you do not understand then know that I kill seriously!».

Years ago already I was talking of the homosexualization of the Church with all that goes with it, in-depth theme with the psychologist to whom Bonginkosi Macala complained a real omosessualista coup in progress [cf. WHO]. God knows how I suffer to see some ridiculous falls, Why just attend a meeting of the clergy in any Diocese to realize how low is, If not sometimes non-existent, the level of testosterone that runs between presbyters and bishops, until you reach real grotesque figures of priests; or to clergy assemblies that seem like real gatherings promoted by the Gay Village.

Maybe they were unleashed new persecution against the Church, because the blood of martyrs has always cleansed and revitalized, what they have learned over time our enemies, the devil in my head all that, treasured the lesson, If it looks good by making us a good service, in fact, his service is quite different: making use of the worst deeds of men of the Church often reduced to figures poised between caricature and grotesque, is spilling out of the ridiculous, even the contempt, but the ridiculous.

Today, the Church attacked from within was first of all emptied; powerful consortiums of half men have been created and placed in the most important places, made weak by their congenital smidollatezza and manageable through their ricattabilità. And these men in turn select the most “means” yet they are as such weak and intimidate, then intruppabili. "Blood of the martyrs"!

Ask us a question, or rather if the Italian bishops or what remains of the Italian episcopate address it: because from Naples downwards the Social Doctrine of the Church does not find application; because it was not developed culture of speakers and of the great Catholic aggregations? And Catholic aggregation means that four of the neocatechumenals means exalted disruption or Charismatic, but something else kind of aggregating aggregates. Because everything tends instead to be limited to a pagan faith made up of popular traditions, processions and celebrations of saints and saints that are reminiscent of the Greek bacchanals, which in his time ended with the great orgy between rivers of wine, while today they end with fireworks, as a simulated depiction of orgiastic orgasms? Because no one will care that the appalling scandal of the feast of St. Agatha in Catania is totally in the hands of the powerful mafia catanese [see WHO]? Well I'll tell you the meaning of it all: because in southern Italy — without prejudice to the individual exceptions of good priests, they are getting less and increasingly harassed by a corrupt church system and corrupting — there is morally more outrageous clergy, poor, and lazy white collar of our country. Indeed, Mafia associations: Camorra, ' Ndrangheta, Sacra Corona Unita and Cosa Nostra, not wanting to disturb their territory. Therefore they do not like the presence and work of antagonists capable of snatching the young laborers from them, educating young people to a non-mafia culture, what this would require the temperament and virility of priests who are first of all men determined and capable as such of inspiring respect and sacred fear. Here then is that the mafias have also insinuated a mafia system within the local Churches, where many bishops actually behave as if they were clan captain, surrounded by priests often caricatured and blackmailed. Inevitable therefore that certain local churches are first and foremost filled with homosexual priests, into the wardrobes of which is in fucking everything and more. This makes the particular Churches of southern Italy weak and subject to organised crime, exercising great power on the Bishops of blackmail, because if they were not in their place as the mafia want, these would bring out such serious moral and patrimonial scandals in front of which one would end up having to admit that the objective reality of certain bishops, priests and Diocese exceeds human imagination really.

Over the years, in Rome, How many petitions were received, with all the most serious and detailed explanations of the case, about the urgency to appoint as diocesan bishops from Naples down priests without any bond of birth, parental and social with the place; that you are not trained in seminaries and theological studies locations? For all answer, not only Roma has been deaf, much worse: some of the most blackmailable priests-miss they were promoted to the episcopate and elected bishops of several of these particular churches, within which they have continued to increase and protect the ecclesiastical frocismo.

The Church will survive as it is written in the deposit of our faith, but this survival cannot be separated from the clear warning: "When the son of man will come back, will he find faith on the earth?» [cf. LC. 18,8]. The Son of Man could also find the shell of a Church totally devoid of faith, with small nuclei and persecuted outcasts inside, who tried to keep the faith of the Apostles intact at an immeasurable personal price.

We are in irreversible free fall, being advanced with a crumbling of the faithful as he had never seen before in certain continents. And because as a Christian and priest are called to realism and not idealism German array — place that Christ died and rose again realistically, idealistically not something I — to be sure, even if in this case it is not appropriate to talk about "certainties": in not many years, the Church as we have conceived it for centuries at the ecclesiastical level will no longer exist [cf. My previous article, WHO]. The Church will survive and will continue to live until the end of time, but it will become "other”, because they are now fifty years that Christ's Church is turning into "other”; and this is not an opinion but a fact which I accept, while others do not, beginning with the members of the College of Bishops, because the best of the worst larded certain twentieth-century teologismi devastating idealist German array, which makes them sick of that idealism that leads them not to understand that realism all based on the flesh of the Risen One who ascended to heaven with the indelible signs of passion imprinted on his glorious body.

Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa It came out in the open, but contrary to what many people think, I believe it caused a minor scandal compared to those who reduced the Church to a sort of gynoecium for castrated capons, ready to destroy in the male group if they can't have, to possess, manage and reduce to their toy. And if they can't destroy that are not easily controlled, which is the male, then totally marginalize, so that clergy can triumph queers e checchine dive e divine thirsty for Red ties, of places in the sun and of prebends, subjects ready to be subjected to the powerful as gods geishe and arrogant beyond measure with the weak and the helpless. These are the true acolytes of Satan, Monsignor Charamsa not.

Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa It came out in the open Why is a male young and good looking, with a physique athlete and swimmer, beautiful and bright blue eyes. A man whose life, for better or for worse unfortunately, may grant all that could not grant the full army of gay priests unsightly in appearance and body, with devilish cunning but not of intelligence nor culture and skilled for this dissimulatori that, like all very mediocre people, or like all gay people angry, can a career only within the Church in our time of decadent implosion. Careers that ecclesiastical authority continues to concede their villain, nominandoli to high academic positions, making them bishops, inserting them in the Roman Curia, in the diplomatic service of the Holy See and so forth, because as I said years ago to the psychologist Roberto Marchesini: "They have made a coup!» [see WHO]. And I add today: «And the abdication at the sacred threshold of Benedict XVI is the tragic epilogue». Or maybe someone thought that the terrible and heavy bundles of investigation carried out on behalf of the Reigning Pontiff's predecessor and entrusted to four elderly Cardinals, It was dissolved into thin air? No, those folders are heavier today, and they contain facts and episodes before which Satan would be able to admit that he, even with all his hatred towards Christ, He could rub the Church as they slashed some Cardinals, bishops and priests.

The theologian Kryzstof Charamsa it was one of our best items, and is out the door so striking to leave home for the worst that followed albergarvi in; a great item that no trainer and no confessor — to which who knows how many times will have spoken of their sexual urges towards your same sex — ever said: "Be pure yourself, but please, don't become a priest ". This sentence I have repeated several times, until a few weeks ago, several candidates for Holy orders, except watch them then order over time by their respective bishops, heedless of the enormous damage that with those sacred orders would have gone to the Church.

This is our irreversible situation: Incapacitated bishops that cannot be removed because it protected by powerful cardinalone their former partner at the clique of the Almo Collegio Capranica, or why become bishops at the behest of some powerful that can not be mistaken in the choice, not even after death. Incapable bishops who in turn make perfect incapable of directing their seminaries, within which gay aggregations are formed, several of them then fly just priests for the offices of the Italian Episcopal Conference, the dicasteries of the Holy See, the Pontifical Ecclesiastical Academy ... and as the vipers continue to breed and protect each other at the highest levels, digging the ditch around anyone who opposes and call them by their name.

Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa was wrong, has betrayed the sacred priestly promises and embarrassed the increasingly small group of his healthy brothers; but he had the courage to tell everyone in the face that he was the product of this ecclesiastical homosexualization that has favored him in a fast and dazzling career since his young age, without anyone, during his formative years, realize the obvious before it was consecrated priest.

How many other gay of the powerful consortium of Polish homosexuals, apparent to the eye but at the same time hidden, remain in service to the Holy See, under the protection of the always powerful Cardinal Stanisław Dziwisz, also known as "the great gay washer”, He often provided such guarantees to do envy the candor of Santa Maria Goretti, Virgin and martyr?

How many members of the consortium of Polish gay they were promoted to the episcopal dignity? Because if I'm not mistaken, the first apostolic nuncio accused and found guilty of pedophilia in the entire history of the diplomatic service of the Holy See was just a Pole [see WHO, WHO]; Supposing that was in thanks of Cardinal Stanisław Dziwisz, always to talk about this poor Church where everyone knows responsible, instigators and executors but where nobody cut their heads, to promote boundary in different position, or heedless of the damage they can do is leave the Episcopal Chair or at its offices until the age limit occurred. Or: everyone knows that that auxiliary bishop is a problematic subject? And what's the problem: Let's see which diocese is vacant and nominiamolo for that bishopric, so it can be removed on one side to continue doing much worse damage elsewhere.

Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa showed us to be the result and product of true acolytes of Satan, those who are defacing the Holy bride of Christ, hiding behind always reasons and rigor over good pastoral policy and high ecclesiastical diplomacy; reasons in the face of what they consider legitimate sacrifice even Christ and all Saints. And while all of them will end up in hell greeted triumphantly by Satan himself, Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa will end up instead in purgatory to serve his well-deserved punishment, that will be no eternal damnation. To eternal damnation they condemned those who have transformed the Church of Christ in a branch of the Church of Satan, including the rectors of seminar, Spiritual Directors and confessors all those unable to exercise with their own conscience and wisdom ministries, I have never read and feel the character of young Kryzstof Charamsa saying he: "Don't become a priest, because if you will not be able to be free, You can't be yourself, then you will devote yourself to useless suffering ". And not by chance, many years later, Bishop Charamsa was known within specialized theological as a young master of the Theology of suffering.

A Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa, also in serious mistake and lacerating injury went to the Church, It should be recognized a "merit": at one point it was no longer in this game, he publicly betrayed the priesthood, she hugged her "boyfriend" at a press conference and left on a "honeymoon" for the Basque Country, While all other, far more dangerous than him, instead they remain in their places to profane the Sacred Priestly Order in a much worse way, decide that the able-bodied men cannot become priests and priests worse morally worse and continue to be promoted to episcopal dignity for protection of political reasons-diplomatic and ecclesiastical-that were created within the now “System-mafioso-Catholic Church”; a system to which everything is expendable, including the mystical body of Christ.

Monsignor Kryzstof Charamsa is gone with her "boyfriend", others — much worse ones — are instead left to their places and soon become bishops and Cardinals in the Church of Christ emptied of faith and they reduced to a lobby straight pornocratici policy mafia structured on diabolical dynamics of blackmail and conspiracy of silence.

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

— Letters from the readers of’Patmos Island -

SAINTS OBNOXIOUS, PONTIFFS INCLUDING…

 

[…] if the Holy Father Benedict, doctrine man and refined theologian, he had a tendentially mild and weak character, to the point of being subjected to a real dripping during the last year of his pontificate; the Holy Father Francis, who knows the doctrine and who by his own and repeated admission is not a theologian, far from having a mild and weak character has the spirit of the leader, of General and, between a media smile and the other, his authority knows exercise and enforce, and how! At this delicate moment in history at Christ Church maybe needed this: a Pontiff that impose its authority knew and know to cry if the proud and arrogant rather than go away crying before the arrogance of the proud and arrogant.

 

 

Caro Father. I've been reading your articles for a while and I have to tell you: on something I agree on other somewhat less. We witnessed a very painful renunciation from part of a great Pope that stinks more than blatant exclusion on the part of those who have always hated. She defines a thing for me was the spearhead of the Holy Pope John Paul II and now impresses me the strength with which bears his cross. Frankly it saddens me to compare his meekness and determination the arrogance of his successor who seem to be debunked a Paladin of so-called progressive that a representative of the East India Company as she called his order [cf. WHO] imbued with powerful. I know that the Holy Spirit is at work but does not force then it is not that we have closed the door on making us owners of what is not ours? I'm not a traditionalist I am just a Catholic Christian a little saddened and bewildered. Thank you for your attention and for your possible reply.

Ermanno

Dear Ermanno.

The vocation follows the dynamics of falling in love. When as a teenager I used to fall — something that happened every two weeks media —, my age seemed to me as a beautiful goddess, what am I saying: perfect! A quel point, by man “adult” ed “expert” such an ero a 13 year old, got to sing and dance "Ramaya Ramaya Bokuko abantu Ramaya Miranda Tumbala» [see WHO], I went to get my grandfather's advice, who had the ability to take me even seriously - perhaps because it was called Giordano Bruno? —, remaining unmoved in the face of my shoot, type: "I fell in love with Silva, the daughter of pharmacist». And he, Serio: "But I didn't realize that Silvia was the daughter of the bakery». And I: "And, you got it right, because even the Baker's daughter is called Silvia, but that was two girl cooked does». And after the first euphoria the girl began to appear no longer a dèa, and rather than see her perfection I began to see the flaws.

How many times I happen to smile to myself, When for the sacramental or the liturgical assistance I wear the crush bianca, Today I am happy groom of the Church.

After disbanding neurotic Dell’falling vocations one of my trainers — also became a priest in adulthood —, He turned me a warning that I immediately treasured and which today is the subject of exhortation for me: «Do not idealize the people, because you can create idealizing of idols, then ending up disappointed and not rarely angry with a tight knife between the teeth ".

To avoid falling into such disarray and at the same time clarifying certain doubts legittimi altogether, should be clear, first of all, what is Holiness. Saints are those figures to which all we do cheer but well we look by look, in particular to the holy martyrs. What are the soubrette and the actors of dementive movies who love to declare themselves devotees of San Pio da Pietrelcina around the televisions or on the columns of the pink rotocalchi, to whom is never crossed my mind to make the slightest effort to imitate the model in their lives of faith and Christian virtues of this extraordinary santo?

There are major figures in the history of the Church that no one has ever canonized and that inspire my deepest sympathy, that is a human element subjective. There are several saints, Some also doctors of the Church, that make me instead dislike, some deep well; and the antipathy, as the sympathy, is a human element subjective and as such if necessary to control, because from it you should not be affected when you are called to formulate evaluations and especially to make choices regarding the Church's life or the lives of individuals.

The recognized holiness instead relies on an element objective rectum on a solemn pronouncement of the highest Mastership: the Church has canonized that man or that woman — I can be obnoxious — recognizing objectively the heroicity of their virtues and thus raising them as an example for the people of God. This element of objectivity is a given for me that I have never denied, quite the opposite: I recognize it, I respect that, I follow it and send to the people of God. Moreover, the Church does not requires me to ask you to intercede for me with God in those saints who subjectively I think “obnoxious”. And if on the one hand I do not deny myself much closer to the spirituality of San Domenico di Guzman and his Dominican friars, on the other hand I don't have any problem to declare indifferent to the figure of Saint Francis of Assisi and distant from his Franciscan friars. I have sympathy for St. Philip Neri and devotion to Saint Ignatius of Loyola, Despite being free to express that the current Jesuits — to me epitetati Company of the Indies —, have little to do now with the society of Jesus designed by their founder, because if they came back to be what they were, instead of spreading poisons of Karl Rahner like Thomas Aquinas novel of the 20th century, would the novitiates and student full, instead populated by some African shaman or by young Indians who often manifest themselves most clearly that Buddhist Christians. And we pass on the kind of training through which came to the priesthood a pious past and Jesuit on what you come today certain methods and certain Buddhist shamans means.

The whole thing is just Chronicle of a death foretold, why the 23 October 1972 A Jesuit distinguished, Cardinal Jean Danielou, So he responded to an interviewer of the Vatican radio on the crisis of religious life, in particular of the Company of Jesus:

«The unique and urgent solution is to stop the false guidelines taken in a number of institutes. For this it is necessary to stop all experiments and all decisions contrary to the directives of the Council; warn against books, the magazines, conventions that are put into circulation these misconceptions; restore in their integrity the practice of the constitutions with the adaptations requested by the Council. Where this appears impossible, It seems to me that you can not refuse to the religious who want to be faithful to the constitutions of their order and directives of Vatican II to form distinct communities. Religious superiors are required to respect this desire. These communities must be allowed to have houses of formation. Experience will show if vocations are more numerous in case of strict observance or observance homes mitigated. In the event that superiors oppose these legitimate requests, An appeal to the Supreme Pontiff is certainly authorized " [text of interview, WHO].

… And on the ashes of the company of Jesus St Ignatius Loyola, He was born to father Pedro Arrupe new Company of the Indies directed today by Father Adolfo Nicolás.

Another item to clarify is the fact that the Holy perfection is not required. Not only, indeed, There were saints who walked the capital sins far and wide, because along with the sins they committed all manner of errors, before that conversion that led them to becoming authentic models of virtue. A separate topic deserve those saints who were Matti like racing horses, to name one among many: St. John of God, also as former soldier Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the Fatebenefratelli order meritorious, It takes its name from the habit of this man of God who often, between the laughter of the people, began to rant and to gesture the squares and markets screaming: «Do good good, do well, siblings, to yourself!». Implying that doing good to the next, and in particular to the sick, It was also good to yourself, to one's soul.

The last Popes canonized and beatified, were far from perfect: I will refer to St.Jevanni 21st XXIII, Blessed Paul VI and John Paul II San …
… certain naivety of John XXIII are known facts, as is the fact that if the withdrawn Paul VI, instead of whining, He had used his authority to invoke Apostolic and nipping their legs to certain theologians who spread dangerous heresies, today their children and theirs grandkids they would not have played the whole church of heterodox thoughts. Nor can we evade the fact that in the last decade of pontificate of Saint John Paul II, with Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, prefect of the Congregation for bishops have risen to some of the worst Episcopal bishops ever had by the Church over the past two hundred years of history; and this statement is a fact supported by the convictions of various courts of the world, from various more or less silent dismissals, by so many painful promoted to be removed, etc ...

This wants to say who were canonized and beatified of men who did not deserve it? Or men without the fundamental virtue required of a Saint, which is prudence?

Place without stain of original sin was born only the Blessed Virgin Mary and that only the word of God made man has never known SIN, These Popes have been canonized and beatified because in spite of their imperfection, in the face of an appeal before which Apostolic, the first to be inadequate in its way it was personally chosen by Christ God, were models of heroic virtue. Similarly to San Pietro also these recent successors have experienced an exemplary life in social and political contexts sometimes very difficult, sometimes impossible to manage, Blessed Paul VI in particular. And as we know Peter, After running out impaurized [cf. Mt. 26, 47-56], After denying the Lord three times [cf. 26, 69-75], After having been rightly reproached by Paolo in Antiochia [cf. Gal. 2,1-2.7-14], He died by pouring his blood for Christ and for his Church; a blood that makes him heroic in faith but certainly not perfect in some of its incorrect opinions, in certain of his life conduct and in certain of his choices.

This logical Christian It is therefore also applicable to Benedict XVI, None of us can reasonably change nor in a roaring lion or a warrior, right in a idolo, even with all the affection and reverence that I for one I cherish towards him.

That Benedict XVI showed profound weakness and sometimes a total lack of Church Government, is a fact that nothing takes away the virtues, His Holiness of life and beautiful theology according to which, Apostolic authority together with its, He could order the diffusion of heretical thoughts of many theologians — starting from Karl Rahner — and to prohibit their thoughts were used as teaching incorrect even required under her window to pull up papal of future priests who do not have a clear idea at the outset on the ministerial priesthood, Precisely because they full of serious Rahnerian heresies regarding the conception of the sacred order [reference on the subject to the splendid article by John Carlson, see WHO].

From refined what was theologian could have avoided, then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, to consecrate a Bishop with his bare hands a topic from questionable to say the least Christology as Bruno Forte; could have avoided by the Roman Pontiff to consecrate a bishop and then create a subject like Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, that embodies the denial not only of healthy living theology of Benedict XVI but the orthodoxy of Catholic doctrine; he could have prevented many wicked Italian bishops from sending their seminarians to make spiritual retreats before the sacred ordinations at the false prophet e bad teacher Enzo Bianchi, because all this is authentic impiety … These and more are the devastating works that took place under the eyes of Benedict XVI, fully informed and aware of all. Objectives “flaws” that invalidated but his Holiness of life, to his high theology and his splendid papal magisterium.

Having said that I add: If those who by waiving the sacred throne continue to try theories from yellow book, Instead they tried to penetrate the mystery of the Church — which requires the assumption of humility and listening — understand that Pope Benedict has done voluntarily, spontaneously and freely by the why can't handle a situation of paralysis that has developed as a tumor with disseminated metastases in the last half-century of the Church's life, starting from John XXIII, How the accusers of the Vatican Council II blame, because the triggering conditions already there were everyone in the last part of the pontificate of Pius XII, which saw fit not to appoint a Secretary of State; But having said that why can't I gotta sit open a complex topic in the theme. I will only say that the many, too many Agatha Christie entering as tanks in the factory of Murano crystals of the contemporary church history, should assess the damage and the bewilderment that produce the good people of God, often ready to take them seriously as “Seri” e “Devotees” Catholic historians or journalists. One “Serio” e “devotee” Catholic journalist, however, does not sell off the poor and defaced Christ of Christ for one scoop, impersonating the sensationalism for irrefutable truth; a “Serio” e “devotee” historian does not predict their subjective ideologies by truth, as such all debatable.

If we do priests catechesis, If we explained to our faithful the fundamentals of doctrine, of Ecclesiology, the sacramentary, Church history and Canon law — but the assumption though is the knowledge transmission — we would avoid leaving them in meal daily Twaddle who write many vaticanologists loaded by their owner-operators or as any from small serpents hidden in the anonymity of the Roman curia; journalists that many of our faithful - having no adequate answers from us priests - take as a word of God with everything that follows.

And to respond strictly in relation a relevant question: We admit that the Holy Father Francis, as our dear reader is an «arrogant». Admitted and that the grace of the Holy Spirit is able to pull out the virtue even the habit, I ask: After a gentle man was devoured by an open-air dump which gave rise within the Church to a dirt like no other traveling upstream from weakness of blessed Paul VI inherited almost unmanageable heritage from San Giovanni Paolo II, It wasn't that there was providential as a “marpione Jesuit” who smiles publicly in the square, remaining nice to everyone but who in private in Santa Marta cuts the heads? And those who were guillotined cannot manco complain, because if they did they would finish the square filled with lynched fans from … Er papa market He immediately declared that "from the other side of the world», unless you have the ability to make smart concrete facts in — and I mean that in the positive form — out of this world.

More than answers I gave food for thought, including the action of grace of the Holy Spirit through the Holy Father Francis, and as I said already two years ago in the third month of his pontificate: “It's enigmatic. One Pied Piper that is bringing all the mice in the open ' and that I hope will lead them one below the other to jump into the river for the Supreme good of the Church. I am more and more convinced, indeed, through the Synod on the family pulled them into a trap by placing them in a position to go all out in the open, which to the return of the accounts will lead to the uncovered finally he is too. E, as I wrote in the past, the Holy Father could run the risk of returning to wear the red shoes for what they really mean: the martyrdom of Peter that with bloody feet on Vatican Hill came to be crucified upside down [see WHO]. At that point we — which we devoutly criticized — we will defend it and we will watch the cross with the young John and the Blessed Virgin Mary, While "all the disciples, forsook him, fled» [cf. Mt. 26,56], because I am afraid this is the end, all in all very glorious, reserved for the Holy Father Francis, at the end of this honeymoon media that was too long and that even the most shrewd and cunning of the old Jesuits can pull over for a long time.

_________________________

THE ENIGMA OF FRANCIS – June interview 2013 ad Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS BRINGS "AN INJURY TO CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE»? COME on, LET'S TRY TO BE SERIOUS ...

 

During my preaching in the desert for years I have been saying that the source of the problem is the fact that sacramental marriage is granted by the bishops and their priests with a lightness that cries out for vengeance before God. Would not it be better to prevent, rather then try to cure later what is not always treatable?

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo 

 

.

PDF print format

.

.

Rarely happen read legal documents based on such deep on pastoral criteria. Managed to work wonders in the Apostolic Letter motu proprio of the Supreme Pontiff Francis, The gentle judge of the Lord Jesus on the reform of the canonical process for the causes of nullity of marriage [full original text, WHO]. Unfortunately in the hours we asstop to a different train of bad information and all’Patmos Island I have reached so many letters from readers who have asked explanations on "new procedures" about "marriage annulment" according to the "new rules of the Holy Father Francis». Except for the priests readers tend to base their questions on journalistic news of this kind: "Francis continues the revolution: “Canceling quick and free marriage " [see WHO].

We repeat to readers what we have repeatedly urged them: It should never rely on newspaper reports or extracts often misinterpreted by news agencies; you should always go to the source and read official documents, all available on the website of the Holy See.

.

The title earlier reported he is alone one among many in which there are two words misleading and incorrect: "revolution", lemma dear to the Argentine Passionaria Elisabetta Piqué [see WHO]; and the even more unfair to "undo". For as we will explain any Pontiff, including the Holy Father Francis, You can cancel a Sacramento. It was possible the Popes Clement VII and Paul III, who excommunicated Henry VIII, respectively, in 1533 It is in the 1538 for its double story and its claim to bend the Discipline of the Sacraments to his will, They would gladly spared the schism of the West with all the persecution that followed for the Catholic Church of England, for the clergy and the lay faithful in Rome, as demonstrated by the Thomas More's martyrdom and that of the Bishop and Cardinal John Fisher, both beheaded and later proclaimed holy martyrs.

.

Let's clarify the terms making use of correct words, why nobody, including the Roman Pontiff, can "cancel”, “delete”, “remove"A sacrament validly celebrated or administered. A Sacramento - in this specific case the marriage - can be null, which is different from the concept of aberrant "sacrament canceled”. For instance: I have received validly and lawfully the Sacrament of Orders whose validity requirements are minimal, as indeed they are for all of the Sacraments. But if it were true that I have not received the Holy Order freely but under threat and coercion, and that in truth it was not my intention to become a priest; if it were established that have come to the Sacred Order for wicked and perverse purposes, animated by contempt for the deposit of faith, the Magisterium of the Church and the truths of faith from it guarded and announced … ascertained everything would be said that the sacrament received from me is null. E, although consecrated priest, formally received the sacrament would not be valid to me, because the imposition of hands and the prayer of consecration recited by the bishop on me and the anointing of the palms of my hands with sacred chrism, then it may be only signs in themselves that they could not produce any sacramental effect on a person totally closed to the gifts of grace of the Holy Order.

.

The church may declare that a sacrament is null, What materially different from 'cancel a sacrament. The Church has no faculty to "cancel"A sacrament because they can not dispose of the substance of the Sacraments as the goods are unavailable and therefore non-alterable variables and not in their essence, being precisely the means and instruments of divine institution grace of which we ministry we are only the custodians and dispensers according to the different power of the sacrament of Holy Order; Sacraments do not have and they are not masters. All this is not a game of words and not even a matter of wool goats, quite the opposite: who affirms: "The ecclesiastical court has canceled the marriage of Tom and Caia, "says an enormous foolishness. The ecclesiastical court has just declared that the marriage is void after having ascertained the lack of one or more requirements to make it valid.

.

Now I will try to clarify the issue: years ago I was called by an ecclesiastical court with another person to give evidence for a judgment of nullity of marriage. The fact to which I bore my testimony concerned a story that happened years before I divenissi priest; In fact, as many know I became a priest in adulthood. The other person who testified with me was my ex-girlfriend. It happened in the past that during a dinner, the two that became husband and wife had before us an interview that it was a true pact exchanged our presence as condition not To marriage. He said his future wife: «I marry you on a specific condition: I know that I do not want children, and that I will use every precaution not to have. I am happy to live my life with you, but no children. So if you want to have children it is better not to marry ". I replied to her friend - which by the way was also a lawyer - which in my opinion was not one of the best conditions to get married. Two years after we lost touch and after a further 12 years I was called in ecclesiastical courts, deposited before which - together with what in another life It was my girlfriend - what we both heard one evening in 14 years ago.

.

I will not forget He never told me what the elder brother hearer [ecclesiastical judge], then taking me by face to face. If I have to tell it all first made me this joke: «I notice that before becoming a priest you had good tastes …», referring thus to the beautiful young lady who testified with me, accompanied by his wife and out of the palace of the ecclesiastic tribunal embraced me and told me: "I am pleased to finally meet you in person since I have known through many accounts of my wife," And he asked me if I could baptize their second child on the way, which I did later with great pleasure …

… and after this joke aimed at breaking the ice, the confrere hearer [ecclesiastical judge] She passed with a smile far more serious jokes: "This procedure certainly will fail not because there's half a priest, but because there is half a priest who has faith, who really believe God's judgment and that this never proferirebbe false; What I sensed right away ». He went on to say: "You know how many advance request for recognition of the nullity of marriage basing their claims on the fact that they promised not to have children, who they were married under duress or that they were not able to have sex couples as sexually incompatible?». He concluded: "The reasons given are the most difficult to prove scientifically, why we often resort to the formulas of oath ". I replied: "Are you saying that many have compromised the health of soul uttering perjurers?». He smiled and answered no more, while I continued saying: «… but the priest who welcomed them, who he talked to them and they accepted the consensus that they exchanged, What kind of priest is ... how he knew them ... What has heard before they were united in marriage ... what perception has this priest of the sacraments of grace? Because upstream of these situations, if we want to be honest we always end up discovering the inevitable presence of a bad priest, or a surface priest to whom their bishop permits dangerous luxury Memo be a bad priest or a superficial priest ". It concluded: "This where I just laid are in fact the consequences of not applying the proper discipline of the sacraments on the part of the bishops responsible for the surveillance on their priests'.

Do not hesitate to call misleading from the title Article signed by historian Roberto de Mattei on the agency Correspondence Romana: "An injury to Christian marriage" [see WHO, WHO, WHO]. My fear is that the distinguished and myself always esteemed historian - with whom I share and I can share many concerns - has perhaps misunderstood the text, Why l’begins initial of this motu proprio It is the following:

.

«The Lord Jesus, judge clement, Shepherd of our souls, He entrusted to the Apostle Peter and his successors the power of the keys to accomplish in the Church the work of justice and truth; This supreme and universal power, to bind and to loose on earth, he claims, It strengthens and vindicates that of the Pastors of the particular Churches, under which they have the sacred right and the duty before the Lord to judge his subjects' [CF. WHO].

.

In that text does not speak Jorge Mario Bergoglio, ma Peter expressed in the highest exercise of that power that he has received from Christ, God himself, who gave him the power to "bind and loose" [cf. Mt. 16,13-20].

Sull 'Patmos Island anyone can read one of my recent articles in which I gave the Holy Father a caress branch with her hand covered with sandpaper [cf. WHO] as a matter relating to pastoral matters; a text accompanied by two other article in their own way have uproar [cf. QUI, WHO]. In my article I expressed my concerns to grant to priests Valid ma illegal the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X to administer confessions; and I repeat that in this, the Holy Father, in my opinion, perhaps it was inopportune pastorally. Then, if anything, one day emerge all highly appropriate reasons for his choice, and in this case I will be the first to ask for forgiveness for having formulated an opinion that in retrospect could be totally wrong, unhesitatingly admitting a mistake. Waiting for this seguiterò to dissent whenever the Holy Father, as a media Pope piacione or serving as tele-journalistic your Sympathy instead of his Holiness, He will debut as a private doctor extemporaneously, off the cuff or via private messages on issues and matters not related to issues strictly connected to the doctrine of faith and the discipline of the sacraments. Or better still clarify: I seguiterò to claim the freedom of the children of God and the legitimate exercise of always turned critical with great devotion even to the Supreme Pontiff, limited to what concerns all those issues in which do not satisfy the three different degrees of papal infallibility given in the Apostolic Letter To protect the faith prepared in the form of motu proprio by St. John Paul II [see WHO].

.

But if I read the heading of a papal document "motu proprio», ancòra first read the following in the text I have already accepted the contents without conditions and discussions, mindful that Peter received from Christ the power to "bind and loose"; and I paid devout and filial obedience to the Bishop who consecrated me in the sacred order of priesthood itself in full communion with the Bishop of Rome; I certainly did not pay obedience to my opinions or my way of seeing and hearing; I did not pay allegiance to my pride and my arrogance. It is in this way that as a priest of the secular clergy have been trained to act and rapportarmi towards Ecclesiastical Authority, starting first from the authority the Supreme Pastor of the Universal Church, the Successor of Peter and Vicar of Christ on earth, to which the Word of God has given power to "bind and loose".

.

you do not understand so where would come the mortal "wound in Christian marriage", if we consider that the motu proprio the Holy Father Francis begins with the premise of the indissolubility of marriage. In fact, the text reads:

.

"In the course of the centuries the Church in matrimonial matters, gaining a clearer sense of the words of Christ, He has understood and explained more fully the doctrine of the indissolubility of the sacred bond of marriage, It has developed a system of nullity of marriage consent and has regulated more adequately the judicial process in the area, so that ecclesiastical discipline was more consistent with the truths of faith professed ".

.

With this motu proprio the Holy Father tries to remedy uncontrolled and unfortunately uncontrollable drifts related to the discipline of the Sacraments. He may not be present in every diocese in the world to control what nefarious continue to do many priests under the indifferent eyes of many bishops, that with a lightness that ranges between sloth and spirit of the temple merchants allow weddings to anyone as if the sacrament had a "right" before which you can not say no. Because this is the real pastoral issue that we will now analyze; a serious problem, indeed primary, I hope will be analyzed in time and place by the bishops at the Synod Fathers on the family still in progress. If we do not admit with Christian honesty that many of the problems related to marriage fall under the direct responsibility of bishops and presbyters, namely that upstream it is generated just by us and our lack of, sometimes almost absent supervision, little worth talking about marriage and family in the Synods of Bishops.

Then, we are honest: how many times have I heard my brothers after the celebration of marriages make jokes of this kind in the sacristy: "I bet in a couple of years these get divorced". And when I, reproachfully, I replied: "E tu, Why, although aware that this marriage there are no Christian foundation, you accepted their consent?». Bell'O ready the priest's answer: "And what should I do?».

I ask then, the Synod Fathers: of these real problems, intend to speak to the Synod on the family, looking and healing first of all the problems and our faults, before you get lost in the discussion of the problems and especially in the most convenient and easy search of the others' faults, or better to say of those who then, divorced and remarried, claim remarriage “clean” and access to the sacraments as if the one and the other had a right rather than an action of grace?»

.

The pastoral problems not resolved attempting the impossible task of straightening of a crooked tree grew; It is trying to act behind preventing the tree planted on the river bank to grow crooked. So if you are diagnosed with cancer, you can not let that developments, then attempting unnecessary interventions before the widespread metastases, because at that point you can only intervene with palliative care to try to alleviate the pain the patient, but certainly not to save his life. Or you can take action by placing the sick person who refuses the illness and death in the face of reality and its heavy responsibility: the salvation of one's soul.

.

During my preaching in the desert for years I have been saying that the source of the problem is the fact that the sacramental marriage is granted by the bishops and their priests with a lightness that cries out vengeance before God. Therefore it would be necessary to prevent, instead find himself then to cure what is not always treatable, all to the superficiality with which to mount the priests administer certain sacraments.

During my years of sacred ministry, how many couples more or less young I addressed the prayer: "Do not marry in church, because they lack the minimum requirements to receive the Sacrament. Do not marry in church, because you are not interested in the Christian life, why not accept the fundamental principles of our profession of faith ". But the answers have always been: "And, I admit to not being a believer, but I do it for her ... it is true, we are in favor of abortion, all’eutanasia, to divorce, we support the culture of gender … But we have to get married in church to make parents happy, because they are keen to certain traditions ... ".

.

a thirty year old who she was allowed to enter in triumph into an ancient cathedral church dressed in tails along with a bride who seemed to Princess Diana in cascades of flowers, sounds of organ and violins, during a private meeting took place a few weeks before the presence of eleven people during a dinner in a private home, he told me not to believe in the divinity of Christ, much less in his physical resurrection; he considered it "childish" believe that the bread and wine could actually become the body and blood of Christ; who judged the Gospel a book of stories and legends that had been in his power would have locked up in jail, the President of the Italian Bishops' Conference - which at the time was Cardinal Camillo Ruini -, because he said stuck his nose in political matters that did not concern him or the Italian bishops. Obviously informed of all this, the bishop of that diocese, Also riferendogli that during this dinner the future wife had entered the abortion issue to support the full legitimacy of the woman to have an abortion, calling abortion a "great vested right" and a "social achievement", and to this end he had brought his own experience, having herself aborted 19 year old, age in which - he said - "I was neither ready nor was I inclined to have a child at the time ', and affirmed: "I could go back I would do the same". Informed of all, the bishop of that diocese sent me, through his presbytery elder, the invitation to be "less rigorous" because "applying your logic we would have maybe ten weddings a year across the diocese".

.

Today this bishop, in the light of its own motion The gentle judge of the Lord Jesus It must assume all its responsibilities even before such cases, because when later many of these invalid marriages upstream will founder, the good shepherd and his priests will be set before the undeniable evidence of their failures, and it will be up to them to remedy it, on pain of salvation or eternal damnation of their souls.

Atheism of many couples who marry under these or similar conditions should be added the very worst atheism of certain priests, especially those priests appointed as parish priests or rectors of historical and artistic prestigious churches that much pull for these "skit weddings”. In the Diocese of Rome the worst markets They are managed by priests belonging to various religious families. Many of these priests behave in fact as merchants on advanced collection of "parcel"No qualms to be the first to wreak havoc of Sacramento: brides admitted to church half-naked with bare shoulders and breasts media outside, photographers and cameramen who are the masters on the presbytery, assemblies consisting of friends and relatives totally disinterested in the sacred rite, it is not for them that space a sacred place and what takes place inside a Sacramento, but a charming theater in which we recite a scripted this is only for souvenir photos or the movie ... and in front of this many pii Religious silent and raking in as much money as they can for their religious provinces, often retaining evil historic churches, with often the sacristies inside of which are crammed synthetic vestments, yellowed and badly smelling gowns, tablecloths for altar worn, ornaments and sacred vessels ingiovabili and corroded inside, because the practice tends to be that of the “to take” and yet not invest a penny in “maintenance“.

.

These are the problems to be solved upstream on the basis that the sacraments are the actions of supernatural grace, not a right, not a market, not a mess profane and sacrilegious. Therefore inside the churches to join in marriage should only be accepted believers, aware that during the celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice, the couple will exchange the agreement before the priest and the assembly of the People of God; and that consensus is an eternal and indelible sacrament, unless tomorrow is not recognized that because of a major incidence on Sacramento, although formally celebrated, It lacked one or more requirements that make it valid actually.

These serious underlying problems, to which must be added the lack of preparation of the spouses, the marriage preparation courses reduced to two or three meetings made by some priests with people who did not enter the church from the day that they had received Confirmation, They are not solved only by proclaiming the streamlining of judicial canonical procedure, but really doing pastoral catechesis and above, reserving the sacraments of grace to believers and the disbelievers who use our historical churches like the studios for their dramatized. Certain problems are solved by saying: no, you can not marry in church, why you not have the requirements to do so, and you must have paid the full and unconditional acceptance of what is contained in the Profession of Faith Catholic and concrete demonstration of having a tense will at least try to live a Christian life.

Over time I happened to witness the most renowned in the Churches of Rome - just to take the Diocese of the Roman Pontiff - at weddings, during which the priest spoke to the altar was answered by himself; with the couple who could not even replicate "amen ”, who did not know how to respond during the offertory rite, who knew not even the Our father … All these problems are resolved with decisive and serious pastoral firmness by saying: no, you're getting married in church, because as far as baptized, despite having received the sacraments of Christian initiation, in concrete facts you are not a Christian, Why not Christian is your thinking and your life; and as such we bishops, we priests, we Church respect you as well, but do not come to the House of God to make fun of Christ and his saints because, all polished, next to you with your woman totally scollacciata and more like a Strumpet in dress dressed up to the nines at a Christian wedding, you have to make a photo album or a souvenir movie inside a suggestive 16th century church.

.

To solve these problems difficult to manage, the Holy Father has chosen the right way to recognize the bishops the exercise of their powers, so before some damage products then provvedano their pigs remedy; and to any remedy that will put in place, will somehow clear to them the failure of their pastoral, because they will have to solve the problem without the ability to download it on to others.

.

Dear de Mattei reports in his article an expression of Cardinal Raymond Burke who said Leonard:

« […] It exists in about a catastrophic experience. In The United States, Since July 1971 to November 1983, entered into force the so-called Provisional Norms which they eliminated de facto mandatory double conforming decisions. The result was that the bishops' conference did not deny one request for dispensation from the hundreds of thousands received and the common perception of the process began to be called "Catholic divorce" [Remain in the Truth of Christ. Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church, Cantagalli, Siena 2014, pp. 222-223]».

.

Cardinal Burke, as a former President of the Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura it should be informed of the fact that in those years came several instances the United States of America to the Roman Rota from people who had seen deny the nullity of marriage ruling by US diocesan tribunals; just make a thorough and serious research in the archives. Apart from this, before such true or partially true problem, It remains more than ever, standing as I previously stated: Bishops put in a position to assume all their responsibilities without the ability to do damage and download problems and solutions often difficult on him to others.

.

in fact the impossibility views to prevent bishops and priests to reduce marriage to a lucrative Street market de-sanctifying and often truly sacrilegious, who then proceeds to put them in a position to assume full responsibility for the damage which they have produced not allow him to continue in their bed pastoral bankruptcy.

For when the bishops They will have to solve certain problems judicially, at that point it will come out the lightness of their priests: catechesis in preparation for marriage often reduced to two or three meetings farcical during which many pastors are limited only to say how much money they pay to the church and at which florist and photographer should contact, for certain parish priests lucrino further percentage gabelle; the inability of ignorance or worse often in real intent through which, and threatens, prove unable to distinguish even the believers from nonbelievers. And the main problem, that is what non-believers who claim the "right" to Sacramento, It is often solved with several hundred euros left in offering to the priest for the celebration of marriage. But when tomorrow the Bishops of these priests should solve problems of unprecedented lightness unpleasant welcoming couple instances that a few months from the wedding demand recognition of the nullity of their marriage, will be forced to collect their own hands what nefarious also allowed it to be sown in the field of the Lord.

.

This motu proprio the Supreme Pontiff is an act aimed at empowering the bishops of a contemporary church in which everyone wants to become cardinal, but no one seems willing to take on even the slightest responsibility. Well, that the bishops are beginning to take responsibility for all of them own their apostolic office. What this for which we thank, with reverence and devotion, the Supreme Pontiff Francis, for putting them, juxtaposition, in a position to take their responsibilities.

.

.

«Pecunia non Oleta»*

GOD BLESS THE PRINCIPLES OF CHURCH AND FATHERS OF FAITH

 

 

.

.

* «money does not stink», Vespasian said in response to the members of the Roman senate when hurled the coins after he had set the fee sull'orina.

 

__________________________________

All images used in this article does not violate the privacy any person these are photographs taken from the internet, so public and as such available to anyone.

.

.

.

.

.