THE NEW ONES FALSE PROPHETS AND THE LIES OF ENZO BIANCHI

.

A similar arrogant effrontery in Bianchi can be explained only because, in this tragic and unmanageable situation, who is living today the Church, It is backed by powerful anti-Christic forces, so that, as the dark times of the tenth century, Marozia and powerful Roman families lorded over the Pope, so today the lord far more astute Modernist, now present in the Holy See and among the "collaborators" of the Pope, you do not understand on what grounds if it keeps them or hire them, or perhaps because he hopes to hold them off or because it is not capable of around cavarseli […]

.

.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

«The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales ".

[Blessed Apostolo Paolo II's Letter to Timothy, 4, 3-4]

.

.

.

The famous monaco Enzo Bianchi recently he held a conference in Turin on "Christian Ethics and Health Insurance" at the XX National Congress FADOI [Federation of Associations Executives Italian Hospital]. In it Bianchi would put forward Christian ethics on the subject of pain, of evil and death, instead of the fact exposes a purely philanthropic vision, if not atheist, that best reflects the rationalistic Enlightenment or ethics of Freemasonry and has nothing to do with Christian ethics.

.

Da who unbelieve impudenza Bianchi with which falsifies the Christian ethic. Instead, the true Christian ethics, the redemptive suffering, It is mocked by him as repulsive and exceeded what. Speak not a monaco cristiano, but how they would talk about Nietzsche o Marx. Therefore, that Luther which Bianchi boasts of being party, It would be shocked and with his typical phrase book Blood and complexion would give him the fool and the blasphemer. Bianchi fact seems rather welcome the humanistic approach and solidarity of Christianity, with the duty to care for the health and fight disease and suffering, but then everything is revealed by a red herring, because Bianchi completely fails in presenting the appearance own and therefore also human Christian ethics, as we shall see from his statements, Here I carry with my rebuttal contained under the title “reply”.

.

To check forgery his thesis simply compare the teaching of Catechism of the Catholic Church. But evidently subjects as the Whites do not care Catechism, Why, the example of Luther, they know Christianity better than the Pope and the Catholic Church.

.

A similar arrogant cockiness in Bianchi you can be explained only because, in this tragic and unmanageable situation, who is living today the Church, It is backed by powerful anti-Christic forces, so that, as the dark times of the tenth century, Marozia and powerful Roman families lorded over the Pope, so today the lord far more astute Modernist, now present in the Holy See and among the "collaborators" of the Pope, you do not understand on what grounds if it keeps them neighbors or hire them; perhaps because he hopes to hold them off or because it is not capable of around cavarseli, probably too much indulgence or appeasement and insufficient energy, or for fear of reprisals or because they threatened or circumvented? While the stronger, brave and insightful Benedict XVI was instead forced to relinquish the sacred throne, but our thoughts also anxious about what happened to poor Giovanni Paolo I …

.

… I have always been used heretics, when the plots fail and ambitions remain unfulfilled, to resort to crime, just to realize, defend or hide their wicked plans. Not having theological and legal arguments to support their thesis, easily, if they have power, They resort to intimidation or violence. The question we ask is why does not appear any higher authority to stop this impostor, seducer of believers and unbelievers puppet. No one who defends the Vicar of Christ or give him some good advice? Only some few brave, as for example the illustrious theologian Antonio Livi, They are helping to clarify to prevent it disgraces the Catholic name and help those who are misled - or want to be deceived - by Bianchi obscenities … [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, etc..]

… but now we see the White thesis. We indentation in his italicized statements and in my answers.

.

.

Christian ethics

Ethics is a way to become a man or woman. Christian ethics has suffered and undergoes changes. On this point no illusion: it is not given once and for all, It is not crystallized into dogmatic formulas.

.

Reply

Becoming a man or woman is the subject of genetics and not of morality. Ethics is not about the genesis of man, but the question of human action and choice between good and evil. It certainly educates man to reach the psychological and moral maturity and spiritual perfection, but supposes the man already formed, responsible for their actions, and it intends to address it to achieve its ultimate goal, who is God, through the observance of the divine commandments. If anything, the Christian ethics aim is to become a child of God. Men are born children of Adam sinner, but Christ makes us, with baptism, children of God.

The ethics rules, of reason (natural law, natural right, natural ethics) or of faith (moral dogmas, divine right, Christian ethics) they are universal and immutable, as immutable is human nature, the same in all individuals from beginning to end of the story, beyond the historical evolution and different cultures. If not, It would open space to all forms of discrimination between man and man and all forms of oppression of man by man.

There are in fact different levels and forms of moral conduct, different legal codes and customs, linked to different individuals, peoples and societies, with strengths and weaknesses. But the basic standards, dictated by natural reason, I'm the same for every man, educated or uneducated, not as it is this or that man, ma as it is man. All men - and they know it - they must answer to God for their actions.

Showing up for an opportunity, and this may be the 'approaching death, we must not be afraid to talk about God to atheists, because they also know that their God exists, although they pretend not to know or maybe do not want it. How many people, duly and charitably assisted, convert on his deathbed by a life spent in the sin!

Moral norms therefore require absolute duties and require fidelity and constancy, at the cost of sacrifice, the commitments made before God and men. Undoubtedly, moral standards can and should be better known and applied with the progress of science and morals.

Mutable and on the other hand, and subject to exceptions, are the positive rules established by law and by the civil and ecclesiastical power, in 'application of the moral law in the various situations and circumstances.

.

.

The problem of evil

Christian ethics does not give any explanation to the problem of evil, disease and death. It proposed an imaginary like a story which claimed to explain the origin of evil: the myth that evil, illness and death arising from a fault of the first humans. We no longer accept that our suffering "resulting" from the guilt of someone who has gone before us and, Consequently, There has been given for an inheritance.

.

Reply

.

The Genesis story of the origin of evil by the angel's sin [1] and torque of our ancestors, with its consequences, It is in no way an "imaginary" nor a "myth", but it's Truth historical object of faith (cf. Cat. NN. 385-409) [2]. This story makes us realize that humanity, following original sin, It has fallen into a state of misery and tendency to sin, condition from which man can not recover by their own efforts.

The Scripture tells us how the Father took pity on us and gave us for our salvation and the forgiveness of sins His Son Jesus Christ, who, as the Council of Trent says, "With his most holy passion on the wood of the cross we merited for us justification and made satisfaction for us to the Father" (cf. Denz.1529) [3]. If you understand what is not original sin and what are its consequences, It does not even understand the meaning of Christ's saving work, who asked us to join his cross for the salvation of the world.

One of the greatest merits and virtues of Christianity is to explain what is evil, from where it originated and how you can win. Christianity teaches that God essentially infinite goodness does not want evil, but it allows it to show his omnipotence, his mercy and goodness.

Omnipotence means that God, with its beneficial creative power, merciful and providential, certainly punish the wrongdoer, but in view of obtaining the same punishment or calamity, and then in general from evil, the greater good, such as forgiveness, greater good than we would have been if it were not evil: For he, in his mercy, forgiving in Christ yl peccato, leading man, by grace, the son of God was, moved by the Holy Spirit, state that is superior to the state of innocence before sin of our first parents.

All this shows God's goodness that fills exceedingly simple natural happiness needs, a goodness superior to that which he would have shown, if he had not high man in Christ to the supernatural condition of the son of God. The father, But, while, as it is apparent from the dogma of the Redemption, It wanted to be compensated for the offense done him from Adam and his descendants, and therefore it wanted that man to justice would fix his guilt herself to the sacrifice of the cross, with which Christ merited our justification. In this way man can win for Justice, with good works, through the merits of Christ, that same salvation that is given to him by Christ for free, for mercy.

.

.

The Christian faith

The Christian faith does not solve the problem of the origin of evil, of suffering, does not explain! Faith, It does not suppress the absurd, Nor it gives meaning to the disease.

.

Reply

.

One of the main strengths of Christian revelation (Scripture and Tradition) It is to illuminate with the light of faith humanity about the mystery of evil [4]. The Word of God tells us what is the true nature and ultimate evil, the origin and the total and definitive harm than good; but it does not give us a reason or explanation or proof necessary or logical (as Hegel believed) to know Why God has allowed evil. This is an impenetrable mystery, known only to God, However mystery, the purpose of our salvation, you do not need to know.

But if we did not know what evil, which it is the origin and what causes, we may not know the means to get rid of it and salvation would be impossible. Christianity teaches us that the true evil, more than grief, you do wrong, It is sin, because it is a consequence of sin. Doing good is to promote life; consequently do evil is to take away life. Life is the fruit of justice. Death is the consequence of sin. So as not to do evil, It is therefore better to suffer evil, as St. Domenico Savio: "the death, rather than sin ». Suffering is bad. But if to do good and avoid sin, must suffer, so be suffering.

If God had willed, He could ensure that evil does not exist. God is not at all needed to allow the existence of evil, but he did so freely. We can only make guesses on the reasons of convenience or because of the existence of evil, but not producing tutorial topics. We are we to believe with firm faith that it is so well, although we can not scrutinize why.

We have to say, in the light of faith, it is good that there is evil, certainly not to do it or approve it or accept it, but to fight it and destroy it. Fighting evil is good. So the presence of evil gives opportunity to do good. Only evil the just penalty, for example hell [5], is an absolute good sense, because it is an expression of divine justice.

Already the natural reason, thanks to the philosophy, He realizes that evil exists, it is not necessary but contingent, He knows what is, He knows its harmfulness, There is a sense and a meaning intelligible, however repugnant to the will. He knows that it is worse the blame evil to punishment; controls the fight against evil and sin, He knows that it is a cause of suffering and which is caused by a free agent, finished and peccable, so not from God, which it is infinite goodness and that can overcome evil. But the fragile and sinful man, without the help of grace, can not get rid of evil and suffering.

So then Revelation is' additional light, final, encouraging and consoling the mystery of evil, thanks to the teaching and example of Christ, mediated by the Magisterium of the Church. The main contribution of Christianity is teaching man that evil (sin as an offense against God and his punishment) It is even more serious than the only reason might suspect, but nevertheless Christ, with his sacrifice "expiatory vicar" [6], which continues in Mass, frees us fully and definitely from wrong and teaches us how to turn evil into good.

Faith rejects the absurd, because faith is reasonable homage to truth sovrarazionali, but relatable to reason and that harmonize with reason. The content of faith is not absurd, it is not unreasonable, it's not impossible, It is not inconsistent, but it is sublime truth, infinity, immutable and mysterious.

God does not change, does not contradict, We do not deceive us, and not denied, but it implies, It is loyal and reliable, always identical to itself and faithful. Faith transforms the disease in a time of penance, repair, of redemption. Re-d-emo: I buy again. "We have been bought with a price!» (The Cor 6,20).

.

.

The suffering.

Christianity has always fought suffering, considering it a redemptive road and meritorious. If Christian ethics asks that death is not removed, nor denied, it is not an assumption of pain or in view of the "redemption". The disease was for our salvation, It was atoning, Therefore it was necessary to offer to God. The illness, suffering no use for our redemption. On the contrary, we can say that the pain does not make sense. Suffering is not pleasing to God, otherwise he would be sadistic.

.

Reply

.

Suffering is certainly a bad thing, as such, It must be removed or at least alleviated. Sedatives thus play a positive role. Nevertheless, they should remove the cause of the pain, but they must not destroy the healthy forces. If suffering can not be removed, It must be born. Although the pain is unbearable, not be mitigated or removed causing the death of the patient. However, suffering can be an asset, then espiativa and redeeming.

God does not like or want or suffering as such, but he likes or wants the redemptive suffering. The suffering is redemptive suffering of Christ, which offers expiation or reparation to the Father for the forgiveness of our sins. So the redemptive suffering is a good thing, that meets or compensates the Father for sin, purifies and atones for the sins, and prepares the cancellation of suffering in later life.

.

.

Conscience

Consciousness is never a voice that reminds us of a law already made. We must recognize consciousness as a fundamental instance of choices, in life and facing death. The conscience says to each of us, man or woman, believer or non-believer in God: "Become conform to what you are".

.

Reply

.

This is not the concept of consciousness that we are taught by the Second Vatican Council [7], which instead says: "In the depths of his conscience, man detects a law which has not laid upon himself, but which he must obey, and whose voice ever calling him to love and to do good and avoid evil, when you need, He says clearly to his heart: 'do this, shun that. The man actually has a law written by God in his heart: To obey it is the very dignity of man, according to it he will be judged. Conscience is the most secret core and sanctuary of a man, There he is alone with God, whose voice echoes in his depths ".

In these few lines, the Council also mentions three times the divine law as the law that we find in our consciousness, we are bound by what law, which we must obey, and in relation to which we must and we will have to answer to God of our work.

Of everything in Bianchi not a word, rather, quite the opposite, because it is clear that the benchmark and the rule of conscience for him is not God, but the man himself ('Compliant become who you are'). He speaks a perfect atheist.

.

Sedation pain

The global personal care contributes to "une apaisée death", to a "better to die than you can". We must practice deep sedation and continues, till death; necessary, indeed, avoid all suffering. Palliative care is an absolute must, because death is part of life and should be softened to make the tame death and acceptable.

.

Reply

.

Care needs to live as much as possible, must never let die. He must accompany the patient to death, soothe the pain as much as possible. But we do not possess drugs that are able to totally remove all pain, without compromising or suppress the patient's life. The other part, a product that removes the pain by killing the sufferer, It is not a drug, or a sedative, but a poison, even when it used under the pretext of pain sedation. The some pain is bad, but worst evil to take away life. You can not suppress bad (pain) causing a greater evil (the killing of the sick).

The other part, It is necessary to avoid overtreatment, which is to keep the patient alive by technical means, so that vital functions emerge more from their subject's resources, but they are mechanically induced from outside, as it causes the motion of a machine. The patient is therefore practically dead.

Its movements depend solely by the action or mechanical power coming from the outside, so that, suspending this action, stop the movements of the subject, But not in the sense that his life be extinguished, but since the subject proves to be already dead, and who previously had only one life related, like that of a robot, which seems to be a living, and instead is a machine.

The feed suspension or stimulation, but it is justified only when it is determined that the patient's body has lost all their energies, which would be the only sign that he is no longer alive, and then authorizes the suspension of care, which at this point would not make sense. From these considerations it understands the error of doctors Eluana Englaro, which they have suspended the power supply to an organism still capable of feeding and therefore practically have killed.

The ideological background of such intervention was not the desire not to hurt the poor Eluana, because she did not suffer, but it was a materialist view of life, for which a human subject is prevented or incapable of discernment is not a "person" and therefore does not deserve to be left to live.

So you understand what terrible consequences it might lead, if this horrible principle were applied, in addition to the embryos and fetuses, as it is already done on a large scale, to other broad categories of people, such as newborns, the children, people in a coma, the elderly and demented or those who, based on the wrong criteria, They would be judged dementii or are not considered human beings. In the face of mercy.

Undoubtedly, there are situations, in which the patient is no longer able to bear the pain, so rather die, rather than go forward with so much suffering. And on the other hand, it happens that a family member who assists him helpless, heartbroken at the sight of so much pain of a loved one, and moved in a certain way by compassion, He would rather see him dead than see him suffer so much.

but yet, reasonable person, non-believer, He knows it is not permissible to obtain or cause death to stop or avoid pain, however great, However, it should understand, forgive and have compassion for these unfortunate, which, overwhelmed by grief and by 'anguish, maybe victims of depression, without seeing a future that is not the worsening situation, They lose their heads and kill, especially if deprived of a Christian education, which could help them to resign, to endure misfortune and hope in divine.

The temptation to suicide by the intensity of pain can also occur in the saints, as he happened to St. Therese of the Child Jesus, which, in recent times of his illness, She asked that she be moved away from the table a certain drug, not to be led into temptation. But God, confidently invoked, It does not fail to give the force of endurance, as it is shown by countless examples of pious people who are entrusted to Him.

The doctor - although the civil law were to allow it to him - must not be content in consciousness the patient requesting euthanasia, the so-called "deep sedation", hypocritical expression to hide the crime, It can please him if he asks for a poison and should do as a nurse or firefighter, which it intervenes to withhold that is about to throw himself off the roof of a house.

On the sufferer, the doctor, in the absence of other persons, He must be able to say, he is able, a good word of comfort or hope, not necessarily based on the Christian faith, but simply humanitarian, if the patient is not a raving atheist or a blasphemer and a prey to the fury against God or fate, in which case it is enough to pray, without satisfy him in his insane cravings, although somewhat understandable.

The good death is not euthanasia, but to die in peace of conscience, despite suffering, quietly endured in complete abandonment in God's hands, uniting ourselves to Christ's sacrifice, forgiving chi ci ha offeso, trusting that God will take account of our good works, forgive our sins and will receive us in heaven.

If you understand, against the other, As these ideas of Bianchi on "deep sedation" and especially its ideological assumptions inhuman and anti-Christian may favor the practice of suicide, without waiting to go to the hospital to get to euthanasia, as it is already happening, for example people in emotional or unable to care, they have learned to be with cancer.

Undoubtedly, it is necessary that the assistant of the patient or doctor knows wisely find and adapt the words to the psychological situation of the patient, not to provoke counter-reactions. If the sick person is a believer, not to Bianchi, but according to the Gospel, and warmly welcome the call of the Cross all'amabilità.

But if it is not a believer, You will need to be careful not to scandalize, because Christian love for the suffering could be mistaken for masochism. It is wrong to consider instead Bianchi "dolorism" the conception Christian redemptive suffering. If anything is to be rejected dolorism Bruno Forte and Karl Rahner, who admit the suffering in the divine nature.

About this, we realize how precious and useful both, where it is possible or granted, the proximity to the patient's bedside, especially if the believer, pious people or well prepared priest. The seduction is exerting on many today, the prospect of euthanasia is inversely proportional to the decline in priestly ministry, which should be one of the main tasks of the priestly ministry, especially the pastor, e, more root, this situation was affected by the decline of the Christian vision of life, under the influence of a mundane conception and secularistic, forget the end of this worldly life, and necessity and the duty to orient to it all earthly life.

This conference Enzo Bianchi, person of great success for years in the Catholic world, It gives us the extent of squalor, and the collapse of the impressive decline of Catholic thinking on an issue as important as that of pain, of evil and death, with being dropped to a level of such lowness, Christian where nothing remains, if not a vague philanthropy, that can not be distinguished for anything from visual masonic or illuministica. We are faced with a corrupt Christianity and dying, for who would really want to practice euthanasia, to liberate the souls from this rotten and poisonous food and open them to the respect of human dignity.

If tomorrow you were in the hospital dying, I would look good from calling at my bedside a priest on the model of "monaco" Enzo Bianchi and being able to do, I rivolgerei to a true priest, rimettesse that my sins, He comforts her through the sacraments and the Word of God, so as to open up the path to eternal life.

.

Varazze, 19 June 2016

________________________

NOTE

[1] Cf C.Journet, J.Maritain, Philippe of the Trinity, The angel's sin. Peccabilitas, unborn and surnture, Beauchesne, Paris 1961.

[2] See also the encyclical of Pius XII The human race the 1950.

[3] G. Cavalcoli, The mystery of the Redemption, ESD Bologna 2004; C.V.Heris, The mystery of Christ, Morcelliana, Brescia 1938; E.Hugon, The mystery of the Incarnation, Who are you, Paris 1940.

[4] Cf C.Journet, Evil, Tassel,Torino 1963; J.Maritain, God and the permission of evil, Desclee de Brouwer, Paris 1963.

[5] Cf my book Hell esiste. The truth denied, Editions Faith&Culture, Verona 2010.

[6] Satisfaction for us, as the Council of Trent says, Denz.1529.

[7]The joy and hope, n.16.

.

__________________________________________________

.

Note the avoidance of doubt

.

Some years ago, legal counsel, distrusted Dr.. Paolo Deotto, director of the online magazine Levied Christian from making use of images of Dr.. Enzo Bianchi. At the time,, before I took this magazine carried Lefebvrist, on its columns they were publishing articles also present the two Fathers of’Patmos Island. At that distrusts, Ariel S. Levi Gualdo responded with an article in which he explained that since then to follow, to talk about Enzo Bianchi, he would use the images of the beautiful Italian actress Monica Bellucci [cf. WHO]. Given this precedent, the drafting of the’Patmos Island note that the photos included in this article are public images available to anyone on magazines on-line and on the search engines and that some of the do not constitute violation Privacy Act. Recall also that the accusations made by the Fathers of’Patmos Island to Enzo Bianchi, such as for example “bad teacher“, “false prophet“, “heretic” etc.. all fall in the theological lexicon. Therefore, any magistrate of the Italian Republic would be no serious difficulties, but just unable to establish with a judgment and a judgment what is and what is heretical heterodox. For if certain bosiani consultants do not know the law, as in the past they have already shown, nell'Island of Patmos the right hand is known, respected and practiced. Therefore, the false prophet e bad teacher Enzo Bianchi, It takes of theologically’heretic and avoid to also deliver letters to us by clumsy jurists.

.

.

.

.

.

.

THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ADJUSTED WITH A PIECE ON A DRESS SEWN OLD

.

"No one sews a piece of new cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch again takes away something to the old cloth, and the tear becomes worse ' [MC 2, 18-22]

.

.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

 

I was asked a question about the Pope's conversation at the Rome Diocese Convention. After the Third question, dad, in the answer given "off the cuff" on the "culture of the provisional", he said orally: «for this reason a great majority of our sacramental marriages are null " (so it appears from the recording), while the text published by the Press Office today reports: «some of our sacramental marriages are void ". Why this change? It is a manipulation of the Pope's thought? The answer is that, when the Pope speaks spontaneously "off the cuff", the transcribed text is always subject to revision by those responsible for the care of the Pope's texts, to review the language or any inaccuracies or particular points that it is right to specify. When topics of some importance are touched upon, the revised text is always submitted to the Pope himself. This is what happened in this case, therefore the published text was expressly approved by the Pope [text is available WHO].

.

.

.

I read with interest the press release in which fulfilling his role as official spokesman and director of the Holy See Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi S.J. specifies that the Holiness of Our Lord the Supreme Pontiff Francis, "Speaking off the cuff he said orally" a sentence then retouched in the written text. To justify the retouching of a sentence destined to create confusion around the world [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc..], he specifies at the end of the statement that "the published text" - that is, the corrected one - "was expressly approved by the Pope".

.

I would like to understand better: this perhaps means that I, in an off-the-cuff meditation while preaching the spiritual exercises to the clergy, may express an inaccuracy on the procession of the Divine Persons, then retouching the text later in the editorial office, when that meditation is to be published in a book, all with my prior posthumous approval?

.

Well I wonder: maybe it happened that In this A.D 2016, the Jesuits, they suddenly changed into the holy virgins and martyrs Agata, Lucia, Agnese, Cecilia, Anastasia … or maybe they assume none, including presbyters and theologians, know the Gospel more, more and more replaced with emotional substitutes of a national-popular matrix? And I say this because on the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God made man is expressed in these terms:

.

"No one sews a piece of new cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch again takes away something to the old cloth, and the tear becomes worse ' [MC 2, 18-22].

.

The posthumous piece sewn makes the tear worse, because the August Pontiff continued undaunted to express himself off the cuff only one embarrassing limitations, which are not just lack of language properties, his lack of doctrinal knowledge is often at stake, historical-ecclesial and pastoral, and the whole could also be read as a lack of prudence.

.

A Roman Pontiff he does not speak in clichés and does not give public vent to his own emotions. This is due to the simple fact that he is no longer Simon, but Peter, the rock on which Christ built his Church [cf. Mt 13, 16-20]. Peter is the one who "when he has repented" is called to a precise mission entrusted to him by Christ God: "Strengthen your brethren".

.

«Simone, Simone, behold Satan has demanded to sift you like wheat; but I prayed for you, that thy faith fail not:; and you, turned again, confirm your brothers ". And Peter said to him: "Man, with you I am ready to go to prison and to death ". She answered him: «Pietro, I'm telling you: the cock shall not crow before you thrice deny that you know " [cf. LC 22, 31-34].

.

As the invitation to confirm the brothers is preceded by the warning "once you have repented", but above all followed by the prophetic anticipation «Peter, I'm telling you: the cock shall not crow before you thrice deny that you know ", I honestly ask myself: Jorge Mario Bergoglio, has truly ceased to be Simon, and once he "repented" and became Peter, he initiated his own Christological mission, which is to confirm the brothers in the faith, certainly not lead them to that confusion resulting from ambiguous and inaccurate expressions? Because it is on the level of exegesis, both on the theological level, to this sentence we must pay close attention, given that at the beginning of it we speak of "repentance" and at the end of "betrayal", at the center of the speech is exhorted "confirm the brothers", but this central phrase remains precisely in the middle, between "repentance" and "betrayal". Or perhaps someone intends to manipulate it to make the Word of God say what it did not actually say, extrapolating only "confirm the brothers"?

.

The Holy See, as well as the Fire Brigade, of which Federico Lombardi S.J. he has now become commander, it has dicasteries, pontifical councils and secretariats; in philosophy, theology, canonists, historians, ecclesiologists and specialists in various sectors. And all these servants of Peter and of the Apostolic See have always worked on the texts and texts of the Supreme Pontiffs, or at least of all those Supreme Predecessors of the Reigning Pontiff who had the humility to get help, what this made them, as well as loved and venerated, also saints and models of heroic virtue for the entire universal Church. Or maybe someone remembers a sensational one gaffe of St. John XXIII, of Blessed Paul VI, of the Servant of God John Paul I or of Saint John Paul II? Someone wanted to point out how gaffe the famous speech of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI in Regensburg, but today, years later, that speech turned out to be a lucid prophecy [cf. WHO].

.

If the Holy Father, whose authority is beyond any Catholic discussion, think about continuing this way, in addition to the gradual emptying of the churches, he runs the risk of being whistled in public by Catholics, which will then be criticized and criticized by the ultra-secularists, by the communists Radical-chic and by the Freemasons who for some years have been praising the wonders of this pontificate, with the flirtatious Catholic-Lutheran feminist theologian Marinella Perroni and with Alberto Melloni, undisputed leader of Bologna School, guests of honor at the Grand Orient of Italy [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO pag. 6], and the whole, will’ I know da, a supreme insult of the Catholic world, of which, these two wicked, they presented themselves in the Lodge as theological and historical exponents of high lineage.

.

Rome has outlived the individual Popes for the simple fact that Rome is the Church, that Rome is Peter. It is therefore urgent to explain to the Holy Father that the Roman squares are not managed with furberie argentine and with those effect blows perhaps suggested by that clumsy communications expert Antonio Spadaro S.J. The squares of Rome have brought their popes in triumph, if necessary, the Romans let themselves be slaughtered to allow the safe escape of their Pontiff in a moment of riot or during the invasion of a foreign army. The crowded squares of Rome really and sincerely shouted "long live the Pope", ma … Attention: the squares of Rome were also angry with some Popes, several corpses of which ended up thrown into the Tiber, not buried in the Vatican caves surrounded by the devotion of the believers of Christ.

.

Rome and Roman times, which for twenty centuries has been a sign of Catholic universality, it must be understood and known, but also loved and respected, otherwise you run big risks, especially by a Supreme Pontiff applauded more and more by all that is not Catholic and which has always been historically and socially adverse to our Catholic world.

.

In conscience I feel like saying that the epilogue of this pontificate risks being the whistles in the square. And when that happens, as I wrote [cf. WHO], we will be devoted children to defend the Holy Father Francis, those that he delighted in slapping several times to please the world of applauding ultra-secularists and pimp modernists who have now invaded the sacred palaces. And they, that after pleasing him they grabbed "the egg, the chicken and the hot ass', when the square screams against the Holy Father Francis, they will be safe and sheltered elsewhere, thereby resounding the terrifying phrase of the Gospel: «Then all the disciples, forsook him, fled» [cf. Mt 26,56]. And when at the end of the storm they will return, if anything, occupying positions even more prestigious than those they had managed to grab, from above the chariot of the new leader they will say that after all, They, the Holy Father Francis did not approve it that way; and if they approved it it was only because they had to do it for the homage due to the Supreme Pontiff, for the duty attached to their high ecclesiastical office.

.

It is a bitter prophecy which I entrust to the readers of the island of Patmos, we'll see then if the time, as has happened several times in various other past situations, will prove me right, assuming that I hope and pray that I am wrong, wishing I would never see my Supreme Pontiff whistled by Catholics, and at the same time defended by that atheist, anticlerical and communist radical chic by Eugenio Scalfari, defended by the Masonic Lodges that today, for incomprehensible mystery, they found themselves more loyal to the Roman Pontiff than the Swiss Guard; but if that happened, it is only because they delude themselves that they can destroy the Church from within, to the esoteric glory of the Great Architect of the Universe …

.

So pray with me so that I am wrong, totally wrong; so that tomorrow, for these words of mine written today, should make amends and publicly ask forgiveness with his head bowed and with ashes on his head.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

HAPPY RAMADAN IN MEMORY OF THE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF BLESSED TERESA OF CALCUTTA brutally ASSASSINATED BY ISLAMISTS

.

With a message of Bishop Ambrogio Spreafico, responsible for ecumenism and for the inter-religious dialogue of the Italian Episcopal Conference, were addressed to about one million seven hundred the most devout Muslims living in Italy wishes for a happy Ramadan rich in spiritual fruits [cf. WHO].

.

.

.

.

.

On a purely personal capacity, I would like to inform readers of’Patmos Island that tomorrow will celebrate a Holy Mass for the repose of the souls of four certainly already holy martyrs: the Little Sisters of the Poor of Beata Teresa of Calcutta, brutally murdered in Yemen 4 March 2016 by a group of Islamists [1], with them were killed volunteer contributors and elderly from their clients [cf. WHO].

.

Our good bishops, Ambrogio Spreafico head, responsible for ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue of the Italian Episcopal Conference, greetings certainly not turn to them fundamentalist Islamists, but the magical and dreamlike Moderate Islam, And I came or to write an article to which I refer: our bishops are appealing to the largest of aspirin’Moderate Islam [cf WHO], while their brothers bishops living in those regions, direct unnecessarily to all of them - as the Metropolitan Archbishop of Mosul, S. AND. Mons. Amel Nona - words of this kind:

.

"I lost my diocese. The physical location of my ministry has been occupied by Islamic radicals who want converted or dead […] you think that men are all the same, but it is not true. Islam does not say that men are all the same. Your values ​​are not their values. If you do not understand in time, become victims of the enemy that you welcomed into your home » [cf. WHO].

.

While with provocative elegance, His Beatitude the Patriarch of Antioch of the Maronites, Cardinal Bechara Pierre Raï, he asked:

.

"What say “moderate Islamists ” living in the West for what happens to our Christians in Mosul?» [cf. WHO]

.

L’Moderate Islam It is a figure of Islam that does not exist, invented by Europeans to exorcise their fears, deny the reality of the progressive Islamization of old Europe and escape the obvious fact: Islam is a structurally full of aggressive violence culture, encoded in its texts “sacred” and sealed in many Arab countries through the total lack of separation between political and religious power. Therefore, “the moderate Islamic“, It is comparable to any subject you proclaim “Catholic non-believer” O “Catholic atheist“, that is to say on the spot would cease to be Catholic, just like “the moderate Islamic“, which as such it would cease on the spot to be Muslim.

.

___________________

[1] With the term Islam It means a set of ideologies, including violent ideologies, they consider that Islam should guide social and political as well as personal life of all citizens. It is an essentially political conception of Islam, theocratic, which if necessary also legitimizes the persecution of other people's religious beliefs, the killing of “infidels” and the forced conversion.

.

Lectio magistralis the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI in Regensburg

[text in Italian, WHO]

 

..

 

.

In memory of the sisters of the murdered Poor

 

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

IT HAPPENED THAT THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS HAS MADE ITS AN ENCYCLICAL WRITTEN AND PUBLISHED BY A POPE OF THE FUTURE IN THE YEAR 2023 …

.

The encyclical of Benedict XVIII came to his time in the copy-tribute to several senior members of the Roman Curia. Well: Today the pleasant suspicion may arise in my mind that someone has actually read it?

.

.

.

.

The Supreme Pontiff Francis He has modified the canon n. 579 the Code of Canon Law regarding the consecrated life of diocesan institutes. According to an edict signed by the Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, His Holiness has decided to erect new institutions diocesan right necessary "to prior consultation of the Holy See as a necessary the validity». Otherwise, "it incurs the nullity of the decree establishing the institution itself ' [cf. WHO].

.

Cardinal Pietro Parolin He explained in the replies that "it is necessary in order to prevent them from being erected at the diocesan level of new institutions without sufficient discernment which verifies the originality of the charism, defining the specific traits that they will have the consecration through the profession of the evangelical counsels, and that the real possibilities of developing individuals'.

.

A year earlier abdication of Pope Benedict XVI, I was delighted to write a book that was published in January 2013. This text, more than a book, It was in the form of an encyclical motu proprio given at St. Peter's 28 May 2023 the Solemnity of Pentecost the Holy Spirit by Pope Benedict XVIII. Encyclical that this future Pontiff had titrated How much care in cordibus nostris.

.

So let me smile that more than three years ago, in a very structured text 206 pages, my imaginative Benedict XVIII devoted their entire Part Four of the change of this fee; of so called: «On withdrawing the diocesan bishops of the faculty of recognizing new religious congregations and ecclesial realities. Change fees 579 of the Code of Canon Law».

.

As I explained recently to readers in an article [see WHO] my books are currently out of print, but the sooner will once again be reprinted everyone, including the encyclical of this Pontiff of the future. In the meantime, you can still revel in reading the part in which was determined the change of this fee, precisely to prevent many bishops superficial and lacking at times of basic prudence, They would give credit and recognition to a proliferating army founders e founders, often with the most serious consequential damages for both the diocese and for the universal Church.

.

But there's more … in the fifth part of his encyclical, the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVIII of the future is the theme of "A first essential reform of the Roman Curia». Listen to what he writes, among other things, our Pontiff of the future about certain honorific title:

.

11. On title honorary Of monsignor awarded a priests - The honorary title of monsignor should be reserved only for those priests who have distinguished themselves in service to the Apostolic See and the dioceses. This means that it is quite unlikely that this award will be given to young priests. For this we determine that this honorary title, as to give particularly mature and distinct priests, It is given very sparingly and mostly never before 50 years old, better yet late grateful and valuable service provided selflessly to the universal Church and the particular Churches […].

.

Unbelievable but true! Just what that years later will the Holy Father Francis [cf. WHO, WHO] which however, while the Pontiff of the future He wrote this encyclical and dictated these provisions, He was still Archbishop of Buenos Aires.

.

In part that is «on bishops, their sacred ministry and their apostolic dignity», between the various sections there is another that deserves to be reported:

.

12 Abolitions of the locations archbishop with right cardinal — He was promoted to the rank of Cardinal for "right home" but for special merits, After long and deep donation operates the Church and the People of God. Without exception for national primatial locations, it shall revoke the cardinal's title to all the archbishop's offices in the world that currently benefit. The Roman Pontiff will choose the number of cardinals needed to form the college of cardinals, mainly between diocesan bishops and bishops among some owners. It may therefore happen that instead of the Metropolitan Archbishop of larger premises which until earlier had benefited by historical right title, He is promoted to the rank of Cardinal Bishop of a diocese suffragan of the same metropolitan see […]».

.

Unbelievable but true! Just what that years later will the Holy Father Francis [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, etc. ..] which however, while the Pontiff of the future He wrote this encyclical and dictated these provisions, He was still Archbishop of Buenos Aires.

.

… always in this part devoted to the Bishops, heard what writes Pontiff of the future about the Italian dioceses:

.

14 On number excessive Of diocese Italiane - In Italy will have to be revised too many dioceses, several of which grouping in less number of inhabitants of the faithful to a single parish of the large metropolitan areas of the world. It should be also revised the number of metropolitan archbishoprics locations and locations of archbishoprics, particularly in areas where for historical reasons has been given the title of Archbishop's residence or in a metropolitan reality that today have no reason to exist. According to the spatial extent and the number of baptized, in Italy there is a Metropolitan every three million baptized, two over five million baptized, three more than ten million baptized. In regions with a number of baptized less than three million it is nevertheless established a metropolia, provided that there are at least five suffragan dioceses, if not, the dioceses of that region, They are distributed between the ecclesiastical provinces of neighboring regions. Unless real and compelling pastoral needs arranging for the suppression or the regrouping of all the lower number to the diocese 100.000 baptized.

.

Unbelievable but true! Just what years later he complains about the Holy Father Francis: the excessive number of Italian Diocese [cf. WHO, WHO, etc.] which however, while the Pontiff of the future He wrote this encyclical and dictated these provisions, He was still Archbishop of Buenos Aires.

.

Where the futurist Pontiff deals with The third part "Sui priests in particular on the liturgy and the Sacraments», heard what he wrote Benedict XVIII, which invokes new criteria about the exam and marriage annulment judgments by the ecclesiastical courts:

.

23 On the celebration the Sacramento the Wedding - All 'occurrence would have to act with responsibility and courage, cautiously saying no to the wedding celebration advanced request from young or suffering from blatant immaturity, moved by surface infatuation, tine conscious conviction and, above all, from basic Christian faith. Some problems should be noticed in fact prevented with caution. It is gross negligence of the bishop and the parish priest, waived regardless of certain cases of clear immaturity and equally preside over the celebration of the Sacrament, only to remember later, rather than before, that marriage is indissoluble, when all the conditions for its validity. In this regard we invite the ecclesiastical courts to consider carefully, the purpose of an eventual judgment of nullity, cases of non-sacramental perception and awareness on the part of the spouses do not adequately encouraged to acquire the true and deep sense of the nature of religious marriage, However, taking in this case, and always practice, Also the necessary canonical measures against those priests who have performed at the celebration of a sacrament in all those cases where it was clear that no opportunity to proceed in his administration.

.

Unbelievable but true! Just what that years later will the Holy Father Francis with his Pope's own motion on the reform of the canonical process for the nullity of marriage causes [cf. WHO], which however, while the Pontiff of the future He wrote this encyclical and dictated these provisions, He was still Archbishop of Buenos Aires.

.

The Pontiff of the future, always at the third dedicated to priests, the liturgy and the sacraments, It does not fail to address the issue of sacramental confession, giving precise instructions to confessors, of the type …

.

22 On the celebration of the Sacrament of Penance - "Receive the Holy Spirit; If you forgive the sins to those who do not forgive they will not be forgiven ". Always bear in mind this initial warning: "Receive the Holy Spirit", because through his work, the confessor is called to act as a tool in the hands of God's grace. The Fathers of the Church gathered in Council declared that it is necessary "by divine decree to confess each and every mortal sin". Administering this delicate sacrament, the confessor, who it is called to be a judge but especially medical, It is first of all always merciful, largendo forgiveness that proceeds from the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit, because Christ is divine mercy incarnate who embodies the human-divine dimension. Always Avoid being pushy, It comply with what he says the penitent, not investigate, They do not dare ever ask for names of places or people linked to the facts narrated, especially if particularly serious, also making the exact opposite: If the penitent wanted to report them answer that to give comfort, advice and above all forgiveness of sins, it is not necessary to report specific places and especially identity of the persons, but only the facts itself, except for very special and extraordinary cases, the evaluation of which is left whole to the best wisdom of the confessor and especially in light of the Holy Spirit who illuminates the. Both very measured in addressing any questions and does so only if it really necessary, indeed only if unavoidable, for example in case he had not understood how exposed by the penitent, but above all it always adheres to a strict merit of what he was told. Do not do interviews and never open arguments on issues that the penitent has not addressed. In particular, do not dare to come into direct or indirect way in speeches related to his sexual intimacy, If the penitent does not open in free conscience arguments on certain issues or if you will not put questions to that effect expressed. They are in fact always known cases of the faithful who because of a bad confessor, or to the investigation or the questions inappropriate and for various reasons not due addressed by a confessor, They have moved away for years, sometimes even for decades by the Church, after they felt violated in their deepest feelings and human intimacy.

.

What comes to mind the Holy Father Francis that years after the publication of this encyclical by the Pontiff of the future, will debut several times, addressed to confessors, with expressions of this kind: "The confessional should not be a torture chamber» [cf. WHO], "The confessor should be merciful" [cf. WHO], "Penitents not be abused" [cf. WHO] …

.

The encyclical of Benedict XVIII He came to his time in the copy-tribute to several senior members of the Roman Curia. Well: Today the pleasant suspicion may arise in my mind that someone has actually read it? Gradually others which will be taken by the encyclical of my ideas Futurist Pontiff, I will be happy to inform our loyal readers. Then, if the Holy Father wanted to use me as a consultant or advisor, in which case the guarantee would I, unlike Cardinal Walter Kasper & C., I not ever suggest going to Stockholm in 2017, During the centenary of the apparitions B.V. Maria Fatima, to celebrate the five hundredth anniversary of the so-called “Reform” Lutheran, which was far from being such, namely reform, It remains and was instead only the celebration of painful heresy of Martin Lutero who broke communion with the Church one, santa, catholic and apostolic. And before the heresy - as recently he has wisely reminded us of the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller [cf. WHO] - we, we do not have anything to celebrate, much less celebrate.

.

.

To read the encyclical in the form of motu proprio the Pontiff of the future in the section dealing with can reform. 579 click below

How much care in our – fourth part

.

.

Front and back of the book cover

.

.

.

.

Or in PDF format by opening

WHO

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

 

 

DEFEND ITALIAN BISHOPS. C.E.I TO THE HOLY FATHER CALLS TO "POVERTY". FATHER ARIEL SPORTS SELL HIS PORSCHE AND WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST FORGIVENESS FOR CARDINAL ANGELO BAGNASCO

.

In his opening speech at the 69th Plenary Assembly of the Bishops of Italy, The Holy Father said the right things and true, but communicated incorrectly, with a hint of bitterness and especially without a cautious sense of universal proportions, doing so yet another joy of our eternal enemies and humbling at the same time a full seated bishops so humiliating us priests who venerate them and obey them as our Pastors.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

If the world hates you, know that it hated me before. If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you from the world, therefore the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you: A servant is not greater than his master. If they persecuted me, persecute you; If they kept my word, they will keep yours. But all this will do to you because of my name, because they know not him that sent me.

[G 15, 18-21]

.

.

The Holy Father Francis, most of his Supreme Predecessor John Paul II is a man who plays watch mass-media, but with a difference: Saint John Paul II by mass-media It was done in pieces for long years. Indeed, in this world he is suffering from great shortage of historical memory, everyone remembers the oldie with the body now deformed and with support staff to move a few steps. Everyone remembers the delicacy of the television networks that moved the shot during the sacred celebrations when the lips of the Holy Father laid low by illness surfaced a drool, as he struggled to articulate words in an understandable way. Here then touched hearts, men and women softened, young people weeping ... but towards the end of his life!

.

The ailing old man It was in fact only the latest John Paul II, not the first, nor the second. If we did historical memory we should remember that this Holy Pontiff, from 1978 - Year in which the writer had 15 years - has been opposed and reviled for years by the liberal press that now sings "Viva Francesco!». In St. John Paul II we must acknowledge that in deference to the truth of mass-media he is served at a high price to announce in his long pontificate what the world did not want to hear. Perhaps Eugenio Scalfari, director of the Osservatore Romano parallel, lost memory, but we remember well there him, when the columns of The Republic, today official organ of the Holy See, mocked John Paul II - he accused of being opposed to abortion - inviting him to be studied a treaty-based histology. John Paul II did not like the secular world, He not even liked a good slice of the Catholic world, at some theological and ecclesiastical world, He did not like the Communists, He did not like the Masons, He did not like the liberal-capitalist; and for years, his supreme magisterium has been spread by mass-media through controversy and attacks often more virulent; all because John Paul II has never cared to do and say what he liked in the world [cf. GV 15, 18-21], and it is precisely this which rests the heroic nature of his virtues. Of Pope Francis, the third year of his pontificate Augustus we can say rather the exact opposite: he expressed what the world, and in particular the ultra liberals wanted to hear, also and especially in critical tones, sometimes raging against the Church, of its bishops and clergy. Among the many paradigms remains for me symptomatic that of Freemasonry: when ever in the course of its history, the birth of this pernicious sect gnostic-esoteric, with not indifferent to Satanism tips, They had never heard the Freemasons and their most senior leaders praise a Supreme Pontiff and his pontificate? Because there are two possibilities, and I doubt that there is a third: If Masons praise and exalt a Pontiff and his pontificate, as repeatedly they did and how they are doing, or they have converted, or is there anything that does not work; and this something we should worry a lot.

.

With his opening speech the 69th Plenary Assembly of the Bishops of Italy, The Holy Father said the right things and true, but communicated in the wrong way and without a cautious sense of universal proportions, doing so yet another joy of our eternal enemies and humbling at the same time a full seated bishops, so humiliating us priests who venerate them and obey them as our Pastors [full text of the speech, WHO].

.

But let's start from images, since today we live conditioned and slaves of the world image. We all have He saw the Holy Father smiling with his mouth full before real or alleged refugees, to prisoners, to Muslim women, a Lutheran heretics, Pentecostals and Anglicans. We saw him smiling in photos as "one of us" or as "er papa de noartri”, while after having served the self-service of the Domus Sanctae Martae table he sat with his tray to a table to eat his meal with five workers employed at the Holy See ... But when you start talking about bishops or priests, his face becomes serious, almost gloomy, his talk is accompanied by signs written all over his face. And these are photographs and film, not personal opinions.

.

The bottom substance the speech is impeccable and the defects and vices of the clergy and episcopate that the Holy Father has set out are the same that I too have repeatedly shown over time, already years before the start of his pontificate; and in brighter tones and severe. Well why, none of the currents of secularism structurally and increasingly anti-clerical and anti-Catholic, He never emphasized those writings and those publications in which a priest wrote, precisely as such, from the inside and on an informed basis, on the serious evils that afflicted the Church and its clergy? I explain right away why: because they could not strumentalizzarmi. Because higher were my highest critical tones are perceived my devotion to the Church. Harsher were my most critical was confirmed that even the most mediocre bishops and scandalous, even those spree modernist heresies and doctrinal errors, was due filial obedience and respect. And these things, to the mass-media secularists, anticlerical Freemasons and that today cry out "Long live Francesco!», they don't care.

..

The Holy Father has humiliated the Bishops of Italy on the lines and behind the lines of this latest rebuke even bringing them as episcopal model under a character to say the least ambiguous as the Brazilian Bishop Hélder Câmara, that I personally never would dream of bringing as an example, and especially then as an example of doctrine and pastoral. A bishop for whom today, to invoke his beatification, and the gotha of Liberation Theology, led by heretics and renegade priests as Leonard Boff and Giovanni Franzoni, as Hans Küng and so. And to quote such a small character as a model for the bishops of a country that has given the Church a heavenly army of truly holy and enlightened pastors, It is offensive and demeaning, If we think of the kind of stature and holiness of life which have come in time many models of our Italian episcopate. And you already understand that this single quote has touched his heart like an arrow of the cupid mass-media secularists and those of the left Radical-chic, the anticlerical Freemasons and that today cry out all together: "Living Francesco … The Punisher !». Of course, you could say that the Holy Father also said some other things, but the fact remains that the newspapers all over the world, the message that is passed, He was yet another rebuke to Italian bishops and priests. And here it is questionable: misses the communicator to communicate or the media to report what they only pleases? Anyhow, there is the risk of a … “competition guilty”.

.

In its approach with the Bishops of Italy unfortunately it is known that the Pope lacks the sense of proportion, in addition to being burdened, as I wrote and explained several times, the typical anti-Roman prejudices that are differently but similarly own a certain German clergy and Latin American. And a sense of proportion, together with the objective reality, would require to assess and recognize the fact that the Italian one - albeit burdened with many problems, defects and congenital defects - remains and is still the best in the world episcopate, especially from a pastoral and doctrinal point of view.

.

It's true that in the course of our history, in very complex social periods we have had questionable power figures as the Cardinals Orsini families, Farnese, Borghese, Column, Chigi, from’ Doctors ... but it is true that if the Church has survived and if Rome did not the end of Constantinople became Istanbul with its great cathedral converted into a mosque, we owe it to great men like Pope Alexander VI, whose life in general and in particular his private was all a program; but that does not prevent him to be a defender of the faith and doctrine. And if today in Buenos Aires and if there is an archdiocese in Argentina there is a Catholic Church, what it should not be certainly the Indians nor to the poor villas miseries but it must also and above all to the questionable power figures as the Cardinals Orsini families, Farnese, Borghese, Column, Chigi, from’ Doctors ... the subjects perhaps less "political" than it is showing instead of being the Holy Father Francis, and why I'll explain it ...

.

... The most unabashedly rich Church, indeed opulent in its richness, not is Italian but the German one. And this wealth is so great and that parishes can afford to pay salaries even the members of the parish council and catechists.

.

Smell I received the sacred orders of the diaconate or priesthood only a few days away from my German colleague, dear friend and fellow student. A few months later, when after the summer he made his return to Rome from Germany and met again, I am talking about this and that I came to find out that my first salary received by Ente Livelihood Clergy stood at 740 Euro, her equal to 2.860. Along with this "first salary", German brother also felt all so-called "extra", because every pastoral service as well as the administration of certain Sacraments or the celebration of Holy Masses, behaved precise and mandatory fees. So my brother was receiving in total on 3.400 € per month approximately, no food expenses, accommodation, supplies payable, etc …

.

a pastor with 25 years of service, Germany arrives to take salary between 5.000 ed i 6.000 € per month, totally free of charges, fully covered by the parish.

.

In the seventies, a single German parish, thanks to report proportion that existed between the German mark and the currencies of other countries, He was able to maintain itself an entire missionary dioceses in Brazil. And having said that someone wonders why the Theology of Liberation was born in the North of Europe and was then incubated by German theologians between Brazil and many other countries of Latin America? Liberation Theology - and not only that - was incubated by the barrel of money Germans; the Germans themselves today, romanophobes more than ever, always they want to hit a barrel of money the Italian episcopate and the clergy.

.

Germany, below followed by the United States of America, It has always been the largest contributor to the Holy See; in recent times it has run added as a large taxpayer to the Korean Catholic Church, which is also very rich, having Catholicism developed in that country in the higher walks of life and rich. It is no coincidence that the country has received the apostolic visit of the last Popes, including the reigning Pontiff lover of the poor, refugees and existential suburbs, which I am not to have spent a sigh on living standards conducted by many Korean priests, most of whom come from the upper middle class of families, in particular those that, overflowing with money, They come to study in Rome.

.

What it is called IOR, the Institute of Religious Works, the so-called Vatican Bank, in fact a German bank, because the stores are located at a Frankfurt bank. So we can say that the Germans, in a sense, "Administer" also funds of the Holy See.

.

After seeing in the churches of Germany liturgical abuses of all sorts, arbitrary discipline of the Sacraments ... or worse "bishop"Lutheran Guests at the Mass were invited to do the homily on the Gospel ... rightly I wondered: "... But if you know everything in Rome, because they have never done anything?». And soon I realized that they had never done anything for the simple fact that the Germans reggon the strings of the bag. And as we know, unfortunately,, God is for some "one, Trine and penny ...“!

.

If the Holy Father to ask the reproaches, then here it is that only caters to Italian clergy. Perhaps because our bishops have not informed that in Italy, not a few pastors of indigent communities - which are by no means few - are forced to ask for help to the old retired parents to pay the electricity bill of the parish house. And if the Holy Father wants to possibly summon me, when I went to him with the accounts in hand I could explain to him that I could never survive 800 euro per month salary received Ente Livelihood Clergy, if I had not always been my mother and my brother who support me, so that their son and their brother priest to lead a life by what are the patterns of human dignity and serve well as more about the Church and the People of God; What the latter pressing much to my family, but that apparently does not press instead much to my Main.

.

we know well both the flaws of our bishops and those of our clergy, but we recognize them with due sense of proportion based on facts, that these are: our bishops and our priests, before the Bishops' Conferences of the world and their priests who are now completely lost in the concrete facts, It remains one of the best Bishops Conferences of the world.

.

hurts a lot that when it comes to wealth and administration of goods, the Holy Father uses the mace with the Italian episcopate and the clergy, but utters a sigh on the German clergy, whose wealth is truly opulent, time and how much it is that of the Italian Church, but most of his clergy.

.

Having said that it might be questioned: politically what unites Rodrigo Borgia, the Supreme Pontiff Alexander VI and Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the Supreme Pontiff Francis? Because it seems that both, after centuries from their election, one thing in common we have it: having treated with an eye focused their so-called voters .... From one of the worst-bishops theologians quoted in glory by the Holy Father Francis before the square broadcast worldwide within days of his election: Cardinal Walter Kasper, namely the presumed pious soul that maybe, together with other related disastrous, He suggested that he go to celebrate, In the 2017, not the centenary of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, my pseudo “reform” heresiarch Luther. And before the heresies spread by those who broke communion with the Church, which remains a mystery of faith for a, santa, catholic and apostolic, we do not then just nothing to celebrate, as he mentioned by the great man of Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in one of perhaps the most tragic moments of our ecclesial and church history [cf. WHO].

.

Already in the past I wrote in tones of regret and alarm that the Holy Father Francis is changing the "personality" of the Italian episcopate with the appointment of bishops who are his true clones, only able to speak - viepiù with nauseating flattery - of existential suburbs, Of refugees and of poor. What this leads me to express the particular words of esteem and deep and sincere priestly devotion towards Metropolitan Archbishop of Genoa, Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, President of the Italian Bishops:

.

"Eminence Father Cardinal, will not be long that we, with a heavy heart and tears in my eyes risogneremo recent times in which we as a reference point and pastoral equilibrium models extraordinary men like her. Tomorrow we will live in your memory and feel dramatically your lack. And those who, like myself, at times they have treated harshly, repent - but if that's why I'm already regretting - of having been strict with you and make your old age less suffering COMING to kiss his hand and telling you with deep devotion that in truth you were authentic Church Fathers; and we'll tell sincere and convinced after trying the worst of it on our skin of priests faithful to the Holy Church of Christ and his teaching is now preparing '.

.

Meantime, doing my new exhortation of the Holy Father, I decided to sell my Porsche sports. Perhaps they could buy the Franciscan Friars Minor, if the Swiss judiciary the unlocked accounts that had them frozen in a Swiss bank as a result of financial transactions not very clean. And all these financial embezzlements carried out in the name of Mona Poverty, They occurred just as Minister General of the Order, for nine years, was he who, as Franciscan and as poverello, the Holy Father wished Archbishop Secretary of the Congregation for Religious, always on the basis of the principle: the poor and poverty ahead of everything, so it's good to appoint certain offices poverty who know her well; and commendable poverty Holy Spirit showed contempt towards the Devil's dung, the money, why put a safe distance in Swiss banks.

.

We Italian priests are very jealous of our Bishops, as our Bishops have always been jealous of their priests, all in a deep and ancient bond of loyalty. It's this one holy jealousy It is the result of our twenty centuries of Christian history Italian, a wet history by the blood of martyrs and fortified by the genius of our saints. And all together, Bishops and Presbyters, we would be Holy Gelosi of the reigning pontiff, if not his favorite sport was to take slaps in the face, not to correct us, but only to please the world, to please everything that has always been non-Christian, to be applauded at every given his slap on our faces by an army of post-communist party animals, Masons and liberal capitalists …

.

from The Island of Patmos, 18 May 2016

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.