The Holy Father Francis rectified with a sewn patch on an old dress

THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ADJUSTED WITH A PIECE ON A DRESS SEWN OLD

.

"No one sews a piece of new cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch again takes away something to the old cloth, and the tear becomes worse ' [MC 2, 18-22]

.

.

Author Father Ariel
Author
Ariel S. Levi Gualdo

.

.

PDF format Print article

.

.

 

Pope and Lombards
the Supreme Pontiff Francesco with the director of the Vatican Press Office Federico Lombardi, S.J.

I was asked a question about the Pope's conversation at the Rome Diocese Convention. After the Third question, The Pope, in the answer given "off the cuff" on the "culture of the provisional", he said orally: «for this reason a great majority of our sacramental marriages are null " (so it appears from the recording), while the text published by the Press Office today reports: «some of our sacramental marriages are void ". Why this change? It is a manipulation of the Pope's thought? The answer is that, when the Pope speaks spontaneously "off the cuff", the transcribed text is always subject to revision by those responsible for the care of the Pope's texts, to review the language or any inaccuracies or particular points that it is right to specify. When topics of some importance are touched upon, the revised text is always submitted to the Pope himself. This is what happened in this case, therefore the published text was expressly approved by the Pope [text is available WHO].

Federico Lombardi, S.J.

.

.

.

I read with interest the press release in which fulfilling his role as official spokesman and director of the Holy See Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi S.J. specifies that the Holiness of Our Lord the Supreme Pontiff Francis, "Speaking off the cuff he said orally" a sentence then retouched in the written text. To justify the retouching of a sentence destined to create confusion around the world [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc..], he specifies at the end of the statement that "the published text" - that is, the corrected one - "was expressly approved by the Pope".

.

I would like to understand better: this perhaps means that I, in an off-the-cuff meditation while preaching the spiritual exercises to the clergy, may express an inaccuracy on the procession of the Divine Persons, then retouching the text later in the editorial office, when that meditation is to be published in a book, all with my prior posthumous approval?

.

papa and vallini 2
the Bishop of Rome (in white on the right) with his diocesan Vicar General (in black and red on the left)

Well I wonder: maybe it happened that In this A.D 2016, the Jesuits, they suddenly changed into the holy virgins and martyrs Agata, Lucia, Agnese, Cecilia, Anastasia … or maybe they assume none, including presbyters and theologians, know the Gospel more, more and more replaced with emotional substitutes of a national-popular matrix? And I say this because on the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God made man is expressed in these terms:

.

"No one sews a piece of new cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch again takes away something to the old cloth, and the tear becomes worse ' [MC 2, 18-22].

.

The posthumous piece sewn makes the tear worse, because the August Pontiff continued undaunted to express himself off the cuff only one embarrassing limitations, which are not just lack of language properties, his lack of doctrinal knowledge is often at stake, historical-ecclesial and pastoral, and the whole could also be read as a lack of prudence.

.

Papa and Vallini 3
the Bishop of Rome (in white on the left) and his diocesan Vicar General (in black and red on the right)

A Roman Pontiff he does not speak in clichés and does not give public vent to his own emotions. This is due to the simple fact that he is no longer Simon, but Peter, the rock on which Christ built his Church [cf. Mt 13, 16-20]. Peter is the one who "when he has repented" is called to a precise mission entrusted to him by Christ God: "Strengthen your brethren".

.

«Simone, Simone, behold Satan has demanded to sift you like wheat; But I have prayed for you, that thy faith fail not:; and you, turned again, strengthen thy brethren ". And Peter said to him: "Lord, with you I am ready to go to prison and to death ". He answered: «Pietro, I'm telling you: the cock shall not crow before you thrice deny that you know " [cf. LC 22, 31-34].

.

As the invitation to confirm the brothers is preceded by the warning "once you have repented", but above all followed by the prophetic anticipation «Peter, I'm telling you: the cock shall not crow before you thrice deny that you know ", I honestly ask myself: Jorge Mario Bergoglio, has truly ceased to be Simon, and once he "repented" and became Peter, he initiated his own Christological mission, which is to confirm the brothers in the faith, certainly not lead them to that confusion resulting from ambiguous and inaccurate expressions? Because it is on the level of exegesis, both on the theological level, to this sentence we must pay close attention, given that at the beginning of it we speak of "repentance" and at the end of "betrayal", at the center of the speech is exhorted "confirm the brothers", but this central phrase remains precisely in the middle, between "repentance" and "betrayal". Or perhaps someone intends to manipulate it to make the Word of God say what it did not actually say, extrapolating only "confirm the brothers"?

.

Papa and Vallini 4
the Bishop of Rome (in white on the right) and his diocesan Vicar General (in black and red on the left)

The Holy See, as well as the Fire Brigade, of which Federico Lombardi S.J. he has now become commander, it has dicasteries, pontifical councils and secretariats; in philosophy, theology, canonists, historians, ecclesiologists and specialists in various sectors. And all these servants of Peter and of the Apostolic See have always worked on the texts and texts of the Supreme Pontiffs, or at least of all those Supreme Predecessors of the Reigning Pontiff who had the humility to get help, what this made them, as well as loved and venerated, also saints and models of heroic virtue for the entire universal Church. Or maybe someone remembers a sensational one gaffe of St. John XXIII, of Blessed Pope Paul VI, of the Servant of God John Paul I or of Saint John Paul II? Someone wanted to point out how gaffe the famous speech of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI in Regensburg, but today, years later, that speech turned out to be a lucid prophecy [cf. WHO].

.

If the Holy Father, whose authority is beyond any Catholic discussion, think about continuing this way, in addition to the gradual emptying of the churches, he runs the risk of being whistled in public by Catholics, which will then be criticized and criticized by the ultra-secularists, by the communists Radical-chic and by the Freemasons who for some years have been praising the wonders of this pontificate, with the flirtatious Catholic-Lutheran feminist theologian Marinella Perroni and with Alberto Melloni, undisputed leader of Bologna School, guests of honor at the Grand Orient of Italy [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO the. 6], and the whole, will’ I know da, a supreme insult of the Catholic world, which, these two wicked, they presented themselves in the Lodge as theological and historical exponents of high lineage.

.

Papa and Vallini 5
the Bishop of Rome (in white on the left) and his diocesan Vicar General (in black and red on the right)

Rome has outlived the individual Popes for the simple fact that Rome is the Church, that Rome is Peter. It is therefore urgent to explain to the Holy Father that the Roman squares are not managed with furberie argentine and with those effect blows perhaps suggested by that clumsy communications expert Antonio Spadaro S.J. The squares of Rome have brought their popes in triumph, if necessary, the Romans let themselves be slaughtered to allow the safe escape of their Pontiff in a moment of riot or during the invasion of a foreign army. The crowded squares of Rome really and sincerely shouted "long live the Pope", but … caution: the squares of Rome were also angry with some Popes, several corpses of which ended up thrown into the Tiber, not buried in the Vatican caves surrounded by the devotion of the Christi fideles.

.

Rome and Roman times, which for twenty centuries has been a sign of Catholic universality, it must be understood and known, but also loved and respected, otherwise you run big risks, especially by a Supreme Pontiff applauded more and more by all that is not Catholic and which has always been historically and socially adverse to our Catholic world.

.

Benedetto and Vallini
… change the music, change conductor, but … the players are always the same.

In conscience I feel like saying that the epilogue of this pontificate risks being the whistles in the square. And when that happens, as I wrote [cf. WHO], we will be devoted children to defend the Holy Father Francis, those that he delighted in slapping several times to please the world of applauding ultra-secularists and pimp modernists who have now invaded the sacred palaces. And they, that after pleasing him they grabbed "the egg, the chicken and the hot ass', when the square screams against the Holy Father Francis, they will be safe and sheltered elsewhere, thereby resounding the terrifying phrase of the Gospel: «Then all the disciples, forsook him, fled» [cf. Mt 26,56]. And when at the end of the storm they will return, if anything, occupying positions even more prestigious than those they had managed to grab, from above the chariot of the new leader they will say that after all, their, the Holy Father Francis did not approve it that way; and if they approved it it was only because they had to do it for the homage due to the Supreme Pontiff, for the duty attached to their high ecclesiastical office.

.

It is a bitter prophecy which I entrust to the readers of the island of Patmos, we'll see then if the time, as has happened several times in various other past situations, will prove me right, assuming that I hope and pray that I am wrong, wishing I would never see my Supreme Pontiff whistled by Catholics, and at the same time defended by that atheist, anticlerical and communist Radical chic by Eugenio Scalfari, defended by the Masonic Lodges that today, for incomprehensible mystery, they found themselves more loyal to the Roman Pontiff than the Swiss Guard; but if that happened, it is only because they delude themselves that they can destroy the Church from within, to the esoteric glory of the Great Architect of the Universe …

.

So pray with me so that I am wrong, totally wrong; so that tomorrow, for these words of mine written today, should make amends and publicly ask forgiveness with his head bowed and with ashes on his head.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

About Padre Ariel

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo Presbitero e Teologo ( Click on the name to read all its articles )

5 thoughts on "The Holy Father Francis rectified with a sewn patch on an old dress

  1. Too much “humans” so many priests running for the machine gun, too many who aspire to the cardinalate, beware of relationships, more than faith! Maleficent effects of modernity!
    We poor faithful are too naive, remembering S. Paolo Rom 5, 1-5, we thought that, for the choice of the successors of the apostles, example was rewarded first of all, the witness!
    At one time the solemn formula of conferring the “galley” recited:

    To the praise of God and the Holy See's kit, Red cap to take, sign individual dignity of cardinal, which means that until the death and the shedding inclusive for the lifting of holy faith, pace et quiete populi christiani, growth and confirming the state of the Roman Church, You must present herself, in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

    Until the death and the shedding… You do herself exibere. How many are ready for martyrdom?
    Have mercy on us, Domine
    !

    Have mercy on us all… poor in faith more and more inclined to weakness, to vanity to please the world.

    ______________________

    Ed

    Translation: To the praise of Almighty God and adornment of the Holy See, receive the red galero, an outstanding sign of the dignity of cardinals, for which you must be clothed with courage until death and the shedding of your blood for the defense of the Holy Faith, for peace, the quiet of the Christian people, the spread and stability of the Holy Roman Church. In the Name of the Father, the son and the Holy Spirit, amen.

    But you look a bit, our dear Ettore makes me do the Latin translations as well, I just hope, having gone in a hurry, not to be wrong!
    I still thank Ettore, in fact I did not know this formula, not being used to going to get red hats, I use the presbyteral black color, which I will be honored to carry throughout my life.

    Ariel LdG

  2. A Pope loved by those who don't even set foot in church by mistake and tolerated by believers. In reality we ask ourselves what will become of faith within our own heart given that unfortunately since the resignation of Benedict XVI, me first, I keep asking myself who the Vicar of Christ is. Christ was clear and he never said there could be two people,I think. Then why two popes and not three? if three why not all? Mystery. - "But the Son of man, when will, find faith on earth? – We do not know but we know that his Vicar told us that Christ is not Catholic!!! he told us that "Everyone has his own idea of ​​Good and Evil and must choose to follow Good and fight Evil as he conceives them"!!. Then the prayers with religions .... You know the depth of Hinduism? When a person dies, the relatives carry a bowl of rice to the roof, if a crow comes and eats rice it means that the person is in heaven, if instead the crow does not arrive it means that it is still on earth. But you don't realize the ridiculousness? the Church resumes contemplating God rather than following the fashions of this place called Earth.

    1. Dear Attilio.

      In a private message she invites me to feel free not to publish this comment, if I don't think it appropriate.
      Referring to this sentence of his, I do not in any way violate the contents of that private message, but on the contrary, I take this opportunity to reassure you by telling you that we priests, for several months now, we collect from CThe Peace sure expressions much more severe than his; and we have the difficult and delicate task of giving answers, seen that the explanations, the good faithful, they cannot ask the Supreme Pontiff for them, nor to Cardinal Walter Kasper, right all'Arcivescovo Bruno Forte, nor to Bishop Nunzio Galantino …
      And the severity of Catholics is increasing day by day, always according to objective reality, that is to say what I see and what I hear, I like many of my fellow priests.

      Just a clarification on the phrase "Christ is not Catholic", because the exact phrase was "God is not Catholic" and this phrase was expressed years ago by Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini.

      In the video archive of the island of Patmos, she can find one of mine Lectio where I deal with this topic: WHO.

      You have the right to express your bitterness, because if Mr. Enzo Bianchi can express colossal and dangerous heresies and be appointed consultor to a pontifical secretariat of the Holy See, you have the sacrosanct right to express what you have expressed, nothing else for the sense of proportion e, above all, on the basis of the principle of the freedom of the children of God recognized to her.

  3. In front of “linguistic and lexical limitations”, and consequently to some unhappy expressions that suggest presumed “doctrinal elasticities” of the man who is Cephas, we need to ask ourselves where Paul is, while recognizing its authority, dare to call him firmly? At least privately, if not publicly.
    «But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him openly because he was wrong » [Maybe 2,11].
    And’ the Cross of Peter is very heavy and perhaps Francis is fully aware of it. That this is the reason why he always asks to pray to his rescue?
    Also to protect Fr.. Federico Lombardi, held on thorns! Let us pray for them and for us like David in the psalms 15 and 16.

    Meanwhile, the philosopher Spaemann – friend of Pope Benedict XVI points out reasonably: "EVEN IN THE CHURCH THERE IS A LIMIT OF SUSTAINABILITY"
    http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2016/06/17/spaemann-anche-per-la-chiesa-c%E2%80%99e-un-limite-di-sopportabilita/

    1. Dear Ettore.

      I who am not easily accused of using random words, at least until not easy proof to the contrary, I begin for this very reason to fear really and seriously i whistles in the square, precisely because "Even in the Church there is a limit of endurability"; and I fear that this limit is really crossing.

      Since in the emergency room of the Church camp hospitalor we presbyters are there, living in direct contact with the so-called “pulse of the situation”, both I and many of my confreres are beginning to be truly and seriously worried, for a simple and objective reason: the faithful complain more and more and in increasingly harsh tones of this pontificate.

      This is the objective situation. And those who live in close contact with the Supreme Pontiff do not inform him of this, if anything for them to live quietly or if anything for the hope of being able to go from purple to red, they seriously harm the Church and the Supreme Pontiff.

      It is the thing that those faithful who were initially enthusiastic about this pontificate complain more and more frequently, is "confusion", the lack of "clear yes and clear no", in the place of which we tend to reply that «perhaps it could be yes, but maybe not …»

      I who live in the emergency room of the Church field hospital, I see this, everyday; therefore I cannot relate things other than what I see and hear.

      As for Paul, I can answer that the blessed Apostle, in Antioch, he confronted Pietro openly without problem, for the simple fact that he did not aspire to become a cardinal. And having said this, take another thing into account: if any Paul exists today – and these could be the proof of the facts Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller – unfortunately Pietro does not listen to him, being too busy taking at face value the dangerous theological and ecclesiological inaccuracies of the rector of the Argentine Catholic University, l’Arcivescovo Víctor Manuel Fernández, who is certainly not that great and noble golden eagle such was Cardinal George Marie Cottier, OP [25 April 1922 – 31 March 2016] theologian of the Pontifical House.

Comments are closed.