THE HOLY FATHER ON GAY AND POOR. CLARIFICATION OF THE FATHERS OF THE ISLAND OF PATMOS

.

"It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the object of violent malice in speech or actions. Such treatment deserves condemnation of the shepherds of the Church, wherever they occur. They reveal a lack of respect for others, endangers the most fundamental principles on which a healthy society. Their dignity of each person must always be respected in word, in action and in law. However, the proper reaction to crimes committed against homosexual persons can not lead in any way claim that the homosexual condition is not disordered " [Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 1October 1986. Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons, n. 10. See full text WHO]

.

.

.

.

.

After bubbling point with which the Bishop of Laodicea Combusta has asked the Metro Mayor province of Konya in Anatolia to prevent the parade of gay pride before the ruins of his cathedral church [cf. WHO], the island of Patmos Fathers identified the words of the Supreme Pontiff, with which he wanted to "apologize" to gays, including them among "the poor".

.
We understand that in many cases homosexuals They not dealt, and sometimes they are still not treated with the respect due to their human dignity and should therefore be repaired.

,

With all due respect to the Vicar of Christ, However, we believe that the Holy Father, in the same circumstances, He would do well to remember together, beyond the subjective mitigating, the objective gravity of the sin of sodomy, avoiding in this way to give rise to any misinterpretation. All this also to avoid the noisy exploitation of his words, that followed, and there was to imagine followed by lobby gay, who wanted to play and then present dishonestly those words as a approvazione and a moral legitimacy of their conduct which remains, for the doctrine and Catholic morality, "Intrinsically disordered" [CF. Catechism of the Catholic Church NN. 2357-2359].

.

.

.

We report in the appendix to an interview by John Cavalcoli, ON to the online magazine Faith Daily [WHO]

.

.

Father Cavalcoli, the Pope says that the Church must also ask for forgiveness from gays, agree?

.

No, I don't see why. The problem is complex. The Pope is the Vicar of Christ on earth for Catholics, progressives and conservatives, It must be respected. But, with equal frankness I say that is losing shots, It has outputs, like this about gays, little explainable, that disturb or at least rattle.

.

So what?

.

I think that the Pope wanted to say something else, to warn against the risk of a pipeline even verbal too hard and without mercy toward gay and this is right, sometimes it happened. But it should and could associate with that statement a second part in which he remembered the moral gravity of the sin of sodomy, namely achieving the speech. I think that he is deficient in the virtue of prudence, often ambiguous in its statements that can be interpreted in various ways, talks too much and arm, especially bad for someone who is not a master of another language. In some cases it is rude.

Why unwise?

.

Because when he speaks he is challenging, his statements do not belong to the 'man in the street or country priest. At certain levels it is good to avoid the superficiality, Because sensitive topics are not addressed in five minutes on 'plane conference that is not the Magisterium and is therefore open to criticism. I would not be in the shoes of the poor Father Lombardi. I worked in the Secretariat of State, and is an asset to be in contact with the Pope. I say that John Paul II was reviewing speeches, was humble and prudent. Bergoglio wants to do everything himself, often he speaks off the cuff makes and breaks as it wants and creates problems, besides the difficulty of interpretation. Humility is needed.

.

And the media success?

.

Here, too, it's complicated and bad in many ways. If atheists, the Communists and the Freemasons will praise, while many Catholics, progressives and not, have doubts, something is not working, by me, Bergoglio, it shall be understood not to. Many Catholics are worried, There is disorientation. And here there is no bold comparison that he often makes Jesus eating with sinners, Jesus spoke clearly and said yes when yes, not when it is no. Undoubtedly we can not take away from the good that this Pope has, especially in the social ministry, and I do not agree with the accusations of heresy, But there are things that do not go and I think the language, the recklessness and carelessness also theological in some circumstances. He should not speak off the cuff and too, creates mess.

.

Sodomy is a sin?

.

It is. St. Paul is clear. It is a mortal sin, Catechism stuff and who is in mortal sin if he dies without repentance, go to hell, it is good that even priests and bishops if they put him in the lead and we priests must say what the cost.

.

Luther was truly medicine for the Catholic Church?

.

Here, too, the same holds true. he could risparmiarsela, I say it with filial devotion and affection.

.

He apologizes to gays?

.

Because May?

Bruno Volpe

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

CAN A CHIHUAHUA WITH THE COMPLEX OF THE FATHER MASTINO VOCALIZE ARIEL, THAT GOD IS A LION?

.

I never imagined that an act of evangelical fraternal correction did I arrive, for the first time in my life, a poorly written letter in which you intimate me to take off an article, only to be sued for libel. Obviously, in addition to not remove the item, since there are no criminal consequences for such an offense, I put the island of Patmos Readers aware than I was received at the same time I answer also to the person concerned.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

.

To understand this bauble you need to read my previous article WHO

.

.

Egr. Don Levi Ariel Gualdo,

I write this message in the name and on behalf of Dr.. Antonio Margheriti, protagonist of his article published on the Isle of Patmos [Ed. WHO]. I inform you that the content of the text is highly defamatory and offensive and therefore formally invite you to want to remove from the network immediately and without further reminders. I inform you that anyway, my customer, it reserves the right to take appropriate action, in order to protect the integrity and reputation seriously tarnished by you.

So much I owed by mandate conferred.

With best regards.

lawyer. Riccardo Rondelli

.

.

.

Eminent lawyer.

His professionalism leaves me thrilled. I understand you may not know to turn to a former student of criminal sciences; and having said that I do not go further, certain things concerning my previous life, dead and buried. This is to say that the criminal and forensic ethics law, perhaps I know better than her, who has permission to send the message to Facebook reproduced above, without indicating address, Contact details of his study and the place from which sends all. This is unfortunate for a lawyer who would have to send me a registered letter, or certified mail, or ask me with a message to deliver me which address a letter. In any case I've identified its extremes, so that he can report his ethical behavior to the Lecce Bar Association [cf. WHO]. If indeed, as it seems, she did his legal studies in Florence, probably know the popular saying that those parts reads: "God makes them and couples them Christ '. Or as they said once the lawyers of old school and experienced: "Every lawyer has customers it deserves".

.

Moreover, What further serious, She turns to me in a somewhat threatening tone by defining so bold to say the least my writing as "highly defamatory and offensive". This leads me to ask: dear son, but what is its relationship with judicial discipline about the objective matter and substance of the crime? In law faculties, The more we study the philosophy of law, the institutions of Roman law and the history of Italian law, to have precisely, first of all, a clear idea about the matter, the substance and the form of the offense?

.

Allow me to remind which I've Active 7 specialized books published and cataloged in several of the most accredited universities in the world - including the pontifical universities - and several hundred articles published in Italian and foreign magazines and never, in 52 years of life, I had received a message like his, even because, accustomed to offend, and so also a serious, not me but her customer, which opened at the time the old blog Papal Papal with an attempt to scoop Opus Dei. And he sure had to immediately remove the one written, because since there really, in the form and substance, the case of the former libel art. 595 C.P, He was threatened by the most serious legal adviser Opus Dei of a lawsuit by unpleasant consequences. Also it seems that if someone, youngster, It has already had to deal with defamation, this was not me, but his Client who delights in narrating in his writings that when an Apulian public administrator asked for his apologies, he refused to present them and preferred to pay a fine of 2.000 Euro, he considered more honorable than those excuses that, the so-called “Mastino”, perhaps he would never even present Jesus Christ to Our Lord. All this always being faithful to what his Client has repeatedly narrated and written in public.

.

Since then his customer a character as they say, "loses his hair but not the vice», In the 2014 tried another of his own scoop on his blog Papal Papal. And from playful teen which, this time he went heavily to hit Cardinal Beniamino Stella, Our Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy [see WHO]. And I can assure you that the sarcastic and aggressive tones, made insulting the total falsity of the content and the tavern vulgar language used in respect of a Prince of the Church, many people regretted. That article was later deleted after a few days as usual and customary cowards who throw the stone and withdraw your hand, so as not to apologize to the victim after admitting his mistake. The damage, however, there was, is something proved by the fact that the article was taken, translated and published by several blogs around the world, in which it is still available, for example, you can read it in the Portuguese language translation of a Brazilian blog [cf. WHO, WHO], in Spanish on a blog of the Latin America [cf. WHO, WHO], in English translation, and so on … It said this to inform you that at the time, after having reprimanded in private, below the redarguii in public [cf. WHO, WHO], begging him first to let that article on his blog, adding to it a note of profound apology and declaring “surface victim” false and poisonous information given to him by a young man full of hatred priest, previously discharged from the Pontifical Ecclesiastical Academy - an institution that trains priests selected for the diplomatic service of the Holy See -, by the will of Archbishop Beniamino Stella, which at the time he was president and, firing the person in question, acted so highly meritorious. then wants his client to have consistency to admit, least she, how vain I prayed - when I heard that attendance -, not to take at face value the words of that young priest of my sad knowledge, because it was one person injured, false and poisonous from which he would only collect trouble. And so it was, the proof of facts not subject to refutation, just as demonstrated by the story of this latest and “glorioso” scoop.

.

The ability to say “excuse me”, “I was wrong”, it differs a mature man by capricious and arrogant child, that means: this differs from a Mastino by a spocchioso Chihuahua lacking the sense of proportions. And once cleared everything, Now she responds to my question: in what capacity, the objective defamation and actually practiced as a real sport in many of his writings - said in effect right-romanistic –virgin vilified, It should be instead a kind of sacred prerogative Chihuahua camouflaged by Mastiff, But ready to scream behind any grown man - should read “with manly attributes” - That at some point it takes and pedagogical bestows two slaps in the way I did?

.

His Client, who, through its legal is revealed now as a virgin vilified, a few years ago, making improper and improvident leader of the Catholic world, publicly insulted a young woman in such obscene pornographic tones that even the famous porn actor Rocco Siffredi would have been stunned. The young woman responded by answering through his video message posted on You Tube. The damage done to the true Catholic world - which is certainly not that vulgar-insulting his customer - it was really serious, because this young woman, who is not a Catholic and a believer, It considered to have thereby confirming what "not reliable and are especially aggressive Catholics", as she expresses their voice in the public video.

.

In my text [cf. WHO] I used the regret and sternness that the pedagogical occurrence are their those good spiritual directors and confessors that his Client, notorious “bogus Catholic”, He has never had, he being the self embodied in the closing petty mental and spiritual. Is it so insulting and defamatory define its customer as a 'superb'? My good lawyer, but if we were to adopt a similar dream-meter legal measure, she understands that the outcome would send to jail more than half the preachers and confessors? But perhaps it is good that I also enlighten you in this regard on yours virgin vilified. Over the last three years, to its customer we were given the opportunity to collaborate in testing with various magazines and Catholic newspapers: The New Compass Daily, The Rudder, The cross … and all was promptly thrown out for the following reasons: «… is one snooty unbearably smug ". Possibly, if not just my word, may seek guidance to Riccardo Cascioli, director de The compass, Giampaolo Barra, director of Helm, Mario Adinolfi, director de The cross ... and if anyone thought that Catholic journals are made and operated by wicked and cruel people who vilify the illibate, then I lit up which was just thrown out even by some secular newspapers, come The key e Free, without ever being able to do something serious, from registration as professional journalists, or at least of publicists. Or it is perhaps, to the test, the opposite?

.

If a pastor in charge of souls, Addressing a Catholic made as such “alleged” from his blatant closing the grace of God and to every kind of listening, She scolded him and reminds him that in actual fact he is a -nothing maintained by Dad to make unspecified “intellectual” in Rome, addicted to running around the electronic network … she, in legal knowledge and belief, the whole, rather sad fact real, I call it "highly defamatory and offensive text»? And it is perhaps "highly defamatory" remind this Peter Pan that Italy is full of people that at his age maintain their wives and children for years with hard sacrifices, working to make the best in their professions and trades? It is perhaps "highly defamatory" to remind this subject psychologically withdrawn into his own iocentrism, that he had natural talent, united with all the necessary financial means, thanks to which, if he had his humility and train to be guided by good teachers and professionals, this could have been an authoritative signature of Corriere della Sera, instead wasters internetico nothing part that the evidence shows is? Or is it the other way, always test the facts?

.

But if she whereabouts - What really unlikely - a judge upholding and not archiviasse its possible lawsuit, and prepare, in court, to hear the testimonies of some of the most famous Italian journalists, including an authoritative internationally renowned journalist, after vulgar tavern insults from his customer to Cardinal Beniamino Stella, he communicated to the editorship of the Catholic monthly The Rudder - on which at the time his client published on trial some little article -, that if after that article false and insulting directed to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy published on the blog Papal Papal [cf. WHO], They had been allowed to continue to write the columns of the Catholic magazine, he would have withdrawn his signature from the names of the founding members. It intends to sue perhaps even this reporter, guilty of having threatened to withdraw his name from a founding member of Catholic monthly on which the test had begun to write something her customer?

.

Then I fear that his customer has concealed the the evangelical manner, pedagogical and paternal with which I acted towards him, What also easily demonstrated, or: First I wrote to him, last year and then again a few days ago, to reproach him about certain writings, including the latest, scolding him in private that the article-interview was blasphemous to the Holy Spirit [cf. WHO e WHO]. Then I proceeded to repeat to him the whole front of a wise and respected elder, even asking the latter's help, if anything had been able to help me convince the customer of its own mistakes. Having received no response from him, so he is used to not confront the real but only with the virtual, only then I corrected taking it in the public square, also because me, as a priest and theologian, I have to protect the dogma of the Trinity by the stupidities written by her customer, because the Divine Person in a blasphemous and impious way his collegiate customer has pretended to interview reducing dogmatic in burletta, It is my precious “Employer”, and Employer Thanks [incidentally: stoltezza, blasphemy, impiety … They are all technical terms of the theological lexicon, in case he wanted to configure them erroneously as defamatory remarks].

.

To convey to a person like me who behaved in this way, and to which his customer fearful never answered, a peremptory message sent for Facebook by a legal consultant - again for the series "God makes them and Christ couples them" - risks qualifying him and also qualifying those who should assist him, place it at the base of the best forensic art exercise is that prudence - as taught by the old and criminal essays - which should always lead to not take what the client says to gold ever poured conditioned by their moods, or in this specific case from its dissociation from reality and from the inability to hold a fatherly rebuke that perhaps, to his misfortune sum, he has never been addressed in his life, that's why today is what it is.

.

Would invitation to be studied fine art discipline. 595 C.P. on libel, because it expresses the truth, with regret and gracefully, along with a touch of irony not insulting - why insult has accustomed her customer, increasingly in tones tavern, certainly not I -, not only is not a crime, but it is a right protected by the Basic Law of the State: the Constitution of the Italian Republic. Unless your customer wants to fall, in the case of a very unlikely acceptance of the lawsuit by the court, in the crime of defamation against me.

.

That said, as a lawyer of the Magna Grecia that appeals to me in these tones and in these forms he does not deserve to be taken seriously, but it took politely around with his customer, I beg to inform the latter that the Holy See - in this case being the Holy Spirit of God the true person maligned - is seriously pondering to deposit she, a burden to his customer, a lawsuit for defamation protection of divine integrity of the Third Person of the Holy Trinity. In the event to, We Fathers island of Patmos, There costituiremmo civil party in the case based, having the Holy Spirit, very dear to us, inspired the Blessed John the Apostle, that just on the Island of Patmos wrote the Apocalypse, text recently wickedly and brutally mistreated in its customer blog by one of its columnists, who, along with his customer, He puts up with that wrote a real “Associative competition in ignorance” [cf. WHO]. In addition, the advance that I, being in special relations with the Holy Spirit, having received and above all put to good use all the gifts of grace, I prove in court that the Third Person of the Holy Trinity has deviated from that interview, declaring it false. It will therefore be put on record and become material for the formulation of a judgment in proceedings based, the fact that the Holy Spirit, in truth, He was never interviewed by her customer, He'll run into so in various offenses, from the false to the vaunted journalistic credit. She then, first ahead of everyone, will touch the burden in court to question a White Dove made the subject of this judgment, given that usually the Holy Spirit comes to this way.

.

If you think that any judge of the Italian Republic is willing to quibble with Trinitarian dogma - as the actual defamed is precisely the Holy Spirit of God - in this case as well sit down and face his work, But however you try to do it very well, because the legal matter in question is somewhat thorny, and above all avoid having the judge say that … "God makes them and couples them Christ '.

.

She is aware that just to have defined "highly defamatory and offensive" my writing and for giving notice to remove it without that it contains nothing except the sacred truth, under the gauntlet of Article. 595 C.P. You could finish us an angry Chihuahua with the Mastiff complex and certainly not a Lion of God like me? [1] She is aware, Lawyer, what it would mean, find themselves in a place of judgment, having to interrogate and listen to a person like me? How many of his colleagues, more adults and especially much more experienced than she, seek to avert such a possibility in every way, especially then if I asked the judge to be able to make use of the power accorded to defend myself? Or maybe you think me, my life, spent it wasting time on the internet, waiting to figure out what to grow up? Or maybe she, as its customer, is itself devoid of common sense of proportion? Because he sees: If you then move from the virtual to the real that has always been my bread and butter … «‘so c…i amari », would say that nice holy man of the Marchese del Grillo.

My treats.

.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

presbyter

.

.

[1] Ariel Hebrew Ariel, it means Lion of God, name chosen for the priesthood from Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, whose baptismal name given by parents is Stefano.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

– They say the island of Patmos Fathers –

THE HUMAN SEXUAL DISORDERS, SEXUALITY AND HAPPY FAULT

.

Masturbation is less natural dell'adulterio, because here's the man-woman relationship, and then complete the sexual act. Instead, from the point of view of guilt, masturbation is less severe, because it involves only the single, while adultery, as well as being sin in himself as the illegitimate union, It is also injustice to the legitimate spouse.

.

.

.

.

.

Dear Father Giovanni.

... But I understand that masturbation could be more serious adultery? To me at first glance it would seem the opposite. In my case: I masturbate da quando avevo 11 year old. At one time I was doing it, but I felt very grave guilt. For many years I have tried in every way to stop, never succeed at anything, if not to delay the act of an hour or two. Eventually, towards the 50 year old, I realized that my attempts were not to do it again doomed to failure, I agreed and metabolized that masturbation is an integral part of my life; since then every time I feel like I do it immediately without thinking about it. Currently I 61 years and since so far the instincts I have not diminished, I do it on average 3 times a day. At this point I would like to know if I should consider myself definitely in mortal sin or if, given the failure of my many previous attempts to not do it again, the severity of the fault may be attenuated. I forgot, I'm single not having found a soul mate, so no chance to satisfy some of my instincts by lawful sexual relations.

Sandro

.

.

Dear Sandro.

Voluntary masturbation - unless where it is justified by the medical checks on sperm - is a sexual organ that frustrates use its natural procreative purposes and can not express the love for his wife, since assuming she is absent.

Now, sin is a conscious and voluntary act contrary to the natural moral law given by God to man as the rule of his actions. And then it acts contrary to God's Legislator of human conduct. LMasturbation is a voluntary act that frustrates the achievement of the end use of the sexual organ. Therefore disobedience to the moral law, so it is disobedience to God's will, so it is sin.

Masturbation is less natural dell'adulterio, because here's the man-woman relationship, and then complete the sexual act. Instead, from the point of view of guilt, masturbation is less severe, because it involves only the single, while adultery, as well as being sin in himself as the illegitimate union, It is also injustice to the legitimate spouse.

The matter of masturbation itself is serious, because it involves the omission, albeit unintentional, yet objective, of that vital principle - sperm - which allows conception of man. In fact it is certainly not the suppression of already constituted human life (the zygote forward, where the matter is even more serious), but of a biological principle essentially ordered to the generation.

It is a mortal sin that threatens the human life and at what is to it immediately and essentially ordered. But masturbation has this feature. So in it it is found the matter of mortal sin. However, the sin, in its moral completeness - blame - it is not made up only of matter, but also by the form, which implies full warning (I know it is sin) and deliberate consent (I want do it).

If one does not know that that particular act is a sin; or you know, but it has precedents, that already has the habit, not tried it, do not you put it on the occasion, but the pulse is by itself, the subject is won or overwhelmed by the passion or lust or is unable to control himself or restrain himself, blame from deadly drops to venial.

Who does not have a spouse (celibate, Vedova, young, religious) he must, with discipline and the help of grace, You can also check, because marriage is not made for those who can not control themselves. Pauline theory of marriage as remedy for concupiscence, as I wrote in a recent article on these columns of 'Patmos Island [cf. WHO], It has been overtaken by the current Magisterium of the Church. He does not marry those who can not restrain himself, but rather those who know so well restrain, who knows how to turn a free act of love the impulse of passion. Everyone must exert self-control, married or unmarried.

Sperm production It is physiologically abundant. For this occasionally, during sleep, the sexual organ enters orgasm itself and emits excessive sperm. Since this is not an act willfully caused, but physiological, there is no sin in that.

In a situation such as his, according to the principles set out, she of extenuating. In my view, But, she must, while accettandosi in his weakness, make a greater effort of self-control, even if the phenomena remain. The moderate effort, steady and methodical, sustained by the grace, strengthens the will. But we should try to dispel these phenomena. Three times a day is too. Try to get to once a week, hoping to further thin out. It seems to me that you take it too lightly and we do not put all the will. For now she is at the level of venial. But if we do not put more effort, the mortal danger.

There are many means, methods and traditional ascetic gimmicks, very experienced and effective - the also I speak from my personal experience - for self-control, too numerous to list here. Inform yourself in a good treaty of ascetic and put them in place with perseverance. We must know how to wait for the results and not be in a hurry. God still satisfied if we are on the move and we are not resting either resign ourselves.

However, very briefly, these are:

1. fleeing occasions;

2. keep busy;

3. frequent ejaculations, especially when there is the temptation;

4. Confession and frequent Communion;

5. Holy Rosary;

6. control of the senses and the imagination;

7. after the fall, get up immediately, obtaining God's forgiveness with personal penitential acts. No need to go to confession every time.

Keep in mind that if you let yourself go to the impulses, it becomes even more susceptible to the passion, as Christ says: «Who commits sin, It is a slave of sin " [GV 3,34].

.

the Island of Patmos, 22 June 2016

.

.

.

SEXUALITY AND HAPPY FAULT

.

[…] chastity is therefore not bargain for missing men but a privilege for strong and balanced male, comforted by divine grace and always in search of divine grace, Based and straight on a form of exclusive love that God gives the call to the priesthood and religious life. If not, instead of being left with motivated and balanced men in body and spirit, you run the risk of changing the Holy Mother Church in a sad refugium hybridorum

.

.

.

.

.

Dear Father Ariel.

I read two of his books, and for some years I read his articles, and I think I have understood that before you become a priest you have been man of the world, we say … navigated. Watching videos of his lectures, emerges a virile attitude, in cassock wearing, stands out even more (I have said three women to me very close). This is to explain why I turn to her for an important decision. Because the seminary where I am, virility unsatisfactory, trainers in the first place, all smiles, argentinian vocet, dreamy eyes … I do not exaggerate in saying that, more than half of the seminarians, They have obvious issues of sexual identity. For this I ask, she, He had among the seminarians hands that are put in play if Gabriel Garko was more beautiful before or after cosmetic surgery, how to react? And how to react in front of the vice-rector of the seminary, that taking part in the discussion says "to me Garko always liked because it has a particular face of the woman who has a bit 'of man's beauty and a bit' of beauty"?. Easy to criticize others, but even I have my flaws, one such frequent recourse to masturbation. Since a year I should be ordained deacon, it is good to ask me if one who can not control himself, You can become a good priest. I do not want to justify myself, and I am conscious of the seriousness of the whole, but I would say that in the fall frequently in this sin, at least I think women, not to Gabriel Garko.

Letter Signed

 

 

Dear son.

I start from the end of your letter to tell you from the beginning of my answer that you do well to think of women, so that the priest must be a man attracted to women, to which experience all the natural sexual urges. If in fact there is no man's cloth, including natural attraction to the opposite sex, It lacks the basic requirement for sewing with good fabric l 'attitude of the good priest.

In one of my books, I explain which way to turn to free choice and for a higher spiritual purpose to chastity, it means to be the exact opposite of what in fact is a mental castrated or a repressed psychophysical never released from pre-adolescence, which as such has never meditated on the mystery of the true God and true Man.

The priest or religious, voted for his choice motivated and conscious chastity, It must be a spirit and a male who has successfully brought forward, dell'accoglimento the day of his vocation until the end of theological education and the contribution of the Holy Order, a balanced process “translation” of her sexual libido. The presbyter, seized all the wealth from the erotic dimension, the changes in sexual passion of becoming a spiritual being, of his love for Christ, with Christ and in Christ. The priest does not free from the love of one's body because disreputable ties, but why to love and to give himself to all can not be tied to a particular woman, nor have responsibilities of fatherhood, as it is called to be faithful spouse of his Church and responsible caring father of all. And so the Church assumes for the priest anointed as old christ the image of the mystical bride and the People of God becomes the people of his children.

Chastity is thus not bargain for missing men but a privilege for strong and balanced male, comforted by divine grace and always in search of divine grace, Based and straight on a form of exclusive love that God gives the call to the priesthood and religious life. If not, instead of being left with motivated and balanced men in body and spirit, you run the risk of changing the Holy Mother Church in a sad refugium hybridorum stormed by people, not having physical numbers, psychological and financial resources to groped other kinds of careers in, plunge fish on laces of cooked and on the heady aroma of incense smoke, from the lowest to the highest levels, aesthetising emptily faith, omosessualizzando the Church and making sad rigor great ecclesiastical careers.

It is spiritually formative educate young seminarians in artificial size where sex is often removed with tacit fear? If in a delicate age group bound to affect the entire existence of a young man she will not be brought up by mature masters, It will go the way of the man who was raised in a hyperbaric chamber fueled by pure oxygen; just put out his body proved unfit to withstand the climatic environment and not having developed common antibodies was attacked immediately by all the diseases of this world. Because of this, happen with sad frequency of young priests abandon the Sacred Order even a few months after his priestly ordination; Why, catapulted from the dream world of the seminar to the real world, suddenly discover that being, the existence and relate to the next in the flesh, It is something quite different from what they thought, or that they were made to think and believe.

If a man passes from the seminary to the priesthood through a surreal celibacy built on virtue as beautiful as fictitious, can get out of a priest peaceful able to share the fate of his brothers floundering in a world that stimulates all except the exaltation of evangelical love life and sex experienced as an extraordinary gift of God? Who is responsible for sexually educating future priests, perhaps some young rectors and spiritual directors of seminaries, which sometimes has the merit of transferring the disciples their unresolved problems and the worst psychological and sexual distortions of their own minds? You can not create a priest, without first having created a man and a balanced male in body and spirit. But to create a real man-priest, It must be a real man-Bishop, a real man-rector-of-workshop and a real man-manager-spiritual, not subject to them when they grow up in this sad fish production in tank.

How many beautiful vocations, of healthy men in the body of the balance and spirit, running into some trainers frustrated with a thousand hidden complexes, instead of becoming priests, they took the door and they left? And when the beautiful vocation of real men as God flee, what kind of damaged goods remains, fill the seminars and to swell the ranks of the soft voices? That's why we should never lose sight of the wonderful nature of man, for groped to pull out of the big fish tank for a priest not to be in heaven or on earth.

Said this, you understand well that your question with respect to finding myself what I would do in certain situations, in contact with certain subjects so to speak ambiguous, is a question entirely rhetorical. Indeed, knowing upstream as I would have acted in such situations, I can guarantee that no bishop has never crossed my mind to invite me to play the role of trainer in one of those seminars I held up several times the public pillory as the pretify ; because they know very well that certain seminars, already half-empty, I would have emptied them almost entirely.

Father John Carlson ON, in his previous answer, He has addressed the issue on the theological and moral level, providing explanations and clarifications also apply to you, that's why I articulated my answer in any other way, to avoid stating in other words the same underlying substance already expressed by my venerable fellow priest and theologian teacher. I limit myself only to suggest the reading of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, where at the end of n. 2352 you can find these enlightening words:

.

"To form an equitable judgment about the subjects' moral responsibility and to guide pastoral action, It will take into account the affective immaturity, force of acquired habit, conditions of anxiety, or other psychological or social factors that may mitigate, if not minimize, moral culpability ".

.

In light of this dictation of the Catechism, Now let's try to read the sentence in which you express:

.

«[…] the seminary where I am, virility unsatisfactory, trainers in the first place, all smiles, argentinian vocet, dreamy eyes … I do not exaggerate in saying that, more than half of the seminarians, They have obvious issues of sexual identity».

.

From this your sentence is first of all understand that the state of anguish and test to which you are subjected is remarkable, with all the psychological implications of the case. Therefore, if faced with a pleasant disquisition on the beauty of Gabriel Garko - to which the same vice-rector of the seminary participates declaring her admirer as synthesis of the beauty of the woman and the man's beauty -, for human reaction you were out of seminary and we were rushed into the arms of the disturbing Svetlana Porkova, arriving the next day, after a night of unbridled sex, my confession, I would have listened to you, comforted and acquitted. Obviously after she remembered what you'd first been aware, that is to say that you had not done well, trattandoti but with all the paternal delicacy with which a sinner called to the mystery of grace to administer the mercy and forgiveness of God, He must always treat other sinners [cf. My article "When you sleep where you keep your hands ?», WHO]. So I would have explained why, also by virtue of the night of unbridled sex with that Svetlana Porkova, Instead you had the necessary requirements to become a good priest.

In the state where you are and not happy in the environment in which you are forced to live and I formed, your sin - as taught by Catholic wisdom our Catechism - is very attenuated, if not minimized; and with it the moral culpability.

Always remember that man is not born to be chaste and that chastity, in the evangelical of "making ourselves eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven ' [cf. Mt 19, 12-13], It is a gift of grace, and through the grace it becomes in time and over time a human and spiritual conquest lowered into the natural attitude structured on freedom, certainly not on the self-repression of the castrati psichichi out by our fabbrichette clericals pretesche, or as any pretify.

Let it be so comforting the Holy Father of the Church Bishop Augustine of Hippo, that was not lacking virility, of excess testosterone and especially of great attraction to feminine beauty. Divided in your mind for a long time, St. Augustine in fact came to pray so: "Man, chaste rendimi, ma… not now!».

Not born chaste, in the same way that one is not born saints; chaste and holy one becomes, often after a lifetime of hard and strenuous work. And saints, always and rigor, It was proclaimed after death, never in this life.

Certain Your falls are not an impediment to the Sacred priestly order. Largest impediment would be if you, your age, I had no natural sexual impulses towards women, preferring to quibble if anything put on male beauty mingled with feminine of an actor, with so much of the vice-rector of the seminary participation in this discussion from little women in the washroom, not to mention even worse. But if I were to say worse, in times like these and with the Cardinals put today to the public pillory for “crimes of opinion” [cf. WHO, WHO, etc.] I would at least accused of homophobia by all the left radical chic, it gives The Republic and yes Micromega, trusting yelling "Long live Pope Francis, the revolutionary, The Punisher !», increasingly blurring the Successor of Peter with Comrade Ernesto Guevara said Che.

Also I invite you to meditate on the praise of the candle sung in the Easter Proclamation, also born from Doctor Thanks St. Augustine: «or felix blame, , which gained for us so great a Redeemer» ["Blessed is the blame, he did deserve such a we and so great a Redeemer "]. This Augustinian expression was so commented by Angelic Doctor San Tommaso Aquino: "Nothing is opposed to the fact that human nature's being raised up to something greater, even after sin. God permits, indeed, that there are evils to draw forth some greater good. Hence the saying of St. Paul: “Where sin increased, abounded grace” [RM 5,20]. For this reason, in praise of blessing of the Paschal candle, and sing: “O happy fault, which gained for us so great a Redeemer!”» [CF. QUESTION, III, q.1, a.3, ad3].

And the blame can "bless" only when the fault was first aware, when you have the innate sense of the measure of good and evil, sure that God - and God only - can mutate to the mystery of grace evil into good, if it meets our openness to his action of redeeming grace. And once you understand that and fell in this Christological dimension, There will be much clearer the profound mystery contained in the phrase: "Blessed are those invited to the Lord's Supper, here is the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world ".

.

.

.

__________________________________

Note

given that in these lines has been named by way of example, the Italian actor Gabriel Garko, it should be pointed out that the individual concerned denied at the time that they have never resorted to cosmetic surgery and have had thyroid problems that had caused swelling of the face [cf. QUI].

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

THE NEW ONES FALSE PROPHETS AND THE LIES OF ENZO BIANCHI

.

A similar arrogant effrontery in Bianchi can be explained only because, in this tragic and unmanageable situation, who is living today the Church, It is backed by powerful anti-Christic forces, so that, as the dark times of the tenth century, Marozia and powerful Roman families lorded over the Pope, so today the lord far more astute Modernist, now present in the Holy See and among the "collaborators" of the Pope, you do not understand on what grounds if it keeps them or hire them, or perhaps because he hopes to hold them off or because it is not capable of around cavarseli […]

.

.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

«The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales ".

[Blessed Apostolo Paolo II's Letter to Timothy, 4, 3-4]

.

.

.

The famous monaco Enzo Bianchi recently he held a conference in Turin on "Christian Ethics and Health Insurance" at the XX National Congress FADOI [Federation of Associations Executives Italian Hospital]. In it Bianchi would put forward Christian ethics on the subject of pain, of evil and death, instead of the fact exposes a purely philanthropic vision, if not atheist, that best reflects the rationalistic Enlightenment or ethics of Freemasonry and has nothing to do with Christian ethics.

.

Da who unbelieve impudenza Bianchi with which falsifies the Christian ethic. Instead, the true Christian ethics, the redemptive suffering, It is mocked by him as repulsive and exceeded what. Speak not a monaco cristiano, but how they would talk about Nietzsche o Marx. Therefore, that Luther which Bianchi boasts of being party, It would be shocked and with his typical phrase book Blood and complexion would give him the fool and the blasphemer. Bianchi fact seems rather welcome the humanistic approach and solidarity of Christianity, with the duty to care for the health and fight disease and suffering, but then everything is revealed by a red herring, because Bianchi completely fails in presenting the appearance own and therefore also human Christian ethics, as we shall see from his statements, Here I carry with my rebuttal contained under the title “reply”.

.

To check forgery his thesis simply compare the teaching of Catechism of the Catholic Church. But evidently subjects as the Whites do not care Catechism, Why, the example of Luther, they know Christianity better than the Pope and the Catholic Church.

.

A similar arrogant cockiness in Bianchi you can be explained only because, in this tragic and unmanageable situation, who is living today the Church, It is backed by powerful anti-Christic forces, so that, as the dark times of the tenth century, Marozia and powerful Roman families lorded over the Pope, so today the lord far more astute Modernist, now present in the Holy See and among the "collaborators" of the Pope, you do not understand on what grounds if it keeps them neighbors or hire them; perhaps because he hopes to hold them off or because it is not capable of around cavarseli, probably too much indulgence or appeasement and insufficient energy, or for fear of reprisals or because they threatened or circumvented? While the stronger, brave and insightful Benedict XVI was instead forced to relinquish the sacred throne, but our thoughts also anxious about what happened to poor Giovanni Paolo I …

.

… I have always been used heretics, when the plots fail and ambitions remain unfulfilled, to resort to crime, just to realize, defend or hide their wicked plans. Not having theological and legal arguments to support their thesis, easily, if they have power, They resort to intimidation or violence. The question we ask is why does not appear any higher authority to stop this impostor, seducer of believers and unbelievers puppet. No one who defends the Vicar of Christ or give him some good advice? Only some few brave, as for example the illustrious theologian Antonio Livi, They are helping to clarify to prevent it disgraces the Catholic name and help those who are misled - or want to be deceived - by Bianchi obscenities … [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, etc..]

… but now we see the White thesis. We indentation in his italicized statements and in my answers.

.

.

Christian ethics

Ethics is a way to become a man or woman. Christian ethics has suffered and undergoes changes. On this point no illusion: it is not given once and for all, It is not crystallized into dogmatic formulas.

.

Reply

Becoming a man or woman is the subject of genetics and not of morality. Ethics is not about the genesis of man, but the question of human action and choice between good and evil. It certainly educates man to reach the psychological and moral maturity and spiritual perfection, but supposes the man already formed, responsible for their actions, and it intends to address it to achieve its ultimate goal, who is God, through the observance of the divine commandments. If anything, the Christian ethics aim is to become a child of God. Men are born children of Adam sinner, but Christ makes us, with baptism, children of God.

The ethics rules, of reason (natural law, natural right, natural ethics) or of faith (moral dogmas, divine right, Christian ethics) they are universal and immutable, as immutable is human nature, the same in all individuals from beginning to end of the story, beyond the historical evolution and different cultures. If not, It would open space to all forms of discrimination between man and man and all forms of oppression of man by man.

There are in fact different levels and forms of moral conduct, different legal codes and customs, linked to different individuals, peoples and societies, with strengths and weaknesses. But the basic standards, dictated by natural reason, I'm the same for every man, educated or uneducated, not as it is this or that man, ma as it is man. All men - and they know it - they must answer to God for their actions.

Showing up for an opportunity, and this may be the 'approaching death, we must not be afraid to talk about God to atheists, because they also know that their God exists, although they pretend not to know or maybe do not want it. How many people, duly and charitably assisted, convert on his deathbed by a life spent in the sin!

Moral norms therefore require absolute duties and require fidelity and constancy, at the cost of sacrifice, the commitments made before God and men. Undoubtedly, moral standards can and should be better known and applied with the progress of science and morals.

Mutable and on the other hand, and subject to exceptions, are the positive rules established by law and by the civil and ecclesiastical power, in 'application of the moral law in the various situations and circumstances.

.

.

The problem of evil

Christian ethics does not give any explanation to the problem of evil, disease and death. It proposed an imaginary like a story which claimed to explain the origin of evil: the myth that evil, illness and death arising from a fault of the first humans. We no longer accept that our suffering "resulting" from the guilt of someone who has gone before us and, Consequently, There has been given for an inheritance.

.

Reply

.

The Genesis story of the origin of evil by the angel's sin [1] and torque of our ancestors, with its consequences, It is in no way an "imaginary" nor a "myth", but it's Truth historical object of faith (cf. Cat. NN. 385-409) [2]. This story makes us realize that humanity, following original sin, It has fallen into a state of misery and tendency to sin, condition from which man can not recover by their own efforts.

The Scripture tells us how the Father took pity on us and gave us for our salvation and the forgiveness of sins His Son Jesus Christ, who, as the Council of Trent says, "With his most holy passion on the wood of the cross we merited for us justification and made satisfaction for us to the Father" (cf. Denz.1529) [3]. If you understand what is not original sin and what are its consequences, It does not even understand the meaning of Christ's saving work, who asked us to join his cross for the salvation of the world.

One of the greatest merits and virtues of Christianity is to explain what is evil, from where it originated and how you can win. Christianity teaches that God essentially infinite goodness does not want evil, but it allows it to show his omnipotence, his mercy and goodness.

Omnipotence means that God, with its beneficial creative power, merciful and providential, certainly punish the wrongdoer, but in view of obtaining the same punishment or calamity, and then in general from evil, the greater good, such as forgiveness, greater good than we would have been if it were not evil: For he, in his mercy, forgiving in Christ yl peccato, leading man, by grace, the son of God was, moved by the Holy Spirit, state that is superior to the state of innocence before sin of our first parents.

All this shows God's goodness that fills exceedingly simple natural happiness needs, a goodness superior to that which he would have shown, if he had not high man in Christ to the supernatural condition of the son of God. The father, But, while, as it is apparent from the dogma of the Redemption, It wanted to be compensated for the offense done him from Adam and his descendants, and therefore it wanted that man to justice would fix his guilt herself to the sacrifice of the cross, with which Christ merited our justification. In this way man can win for Justice, with good works, through the merits of Christ, that same salvation that is given to him by Christ for free, for mercy.

.

.

The Christian faith

The Christian faith does not solve the problem of the origin of evil, of suffering, does not explain! Faith, It does not suppress the absurd, Nor it gives meaning to the disease.

.

Reply

.

One of the main strengths of Christian revelation (Scripture and Tradition) It is to illuminate with the light of faith humanity about the mystery of evil [4]. The Word of God tells us what is the true nature and ultimate evil, the origin and the total and definitive harm than good; but it does not give us a reason or explanation or proof necessary or logical (as Hegel believed) to know Why God has allowed evil. This is an impenetrable mystery, known only to God, However mystery, the purpose of our salvation, you do not need to know.

But if we did not know what evil, which it is the origin and what causes, we may not know the means to get rid of it and salvation would be impossible. Christianity teaches us that the true evil, more than grief, you do wrong, It is sin, because it is a consequence of sin. Doing good is to promote life; consequently do evil is to take away life. Life is the fruit of justice. Death is the consequence of sin. So as not to do evil, It is therefore better to suffer evil, as St. Domenico Savio: "the death, rather than sin ». Suffering is bad. But if to do good and avoid sin, must suffer, so be suffering.

If God had willed, He could ensure that evil does not exist. God is not at all needed to allow the existence of evil, but he did so freely. We can only make guesses on the reasons of convenience or because of the existence of evil, but not producing tutorial topics. We are we to believe with firm faith that it is so well, although we can not scrutinize why.

We have to say, in the light of faith, it is good that there is evil, certainly not to do it or approve it or accept it, but to fight it and destroy it. Fighting evil is good. So the presence of evil gives opportunity to do good. Only evil the just penalty, for example hell [5], is an absolute good sense, because it is an expression of divine justice.

Already the natural reason, thanks to the philosophy, He realizes that evil exists, it is not necessary but contingent, He knows what is, He knows its harmfulness, There is a sense and a meaning intelligible, however repugnant to the will. He knows that it is worse the blame evil to punishment; controls the fight against evil and sin, He knows that it is a cause of suffering and which is caused by a free agent, finished and peccable, so not from God, which it is infinite goodness and that can overcome evil. But the fragile and sinful man, without the help of grace, can not get rid of evil and suffering.

So then Revelation is' additional light, final, encouraging and consoling the mystery of evil, thanks to the teaching and example of Christ, mediated by the Magisterium of the Church. The main contribution of Christianity is teaching man that evil (sin as an offense against God and his punishment) It is even more serious than the only reason might suspect, but nevertheless Christ, with his sacrifice "expiatory vicar" [6], which continues in Mass, frees us fully and definitely from wrong and teaches us how to turn evil into good.

Faith rejects the absurd, because faith is reasonable homage to truth sovrarazionali, but relatable to reason and that harmonize with reason. The content of faith is not absurd, it is not unreasonable, it's not impossible, It is not inconsistent, but it is sublime truth, infinity, immutable and mysterious.

God does not change, does not contradict, We do not deceive us, and not denied, but it implies, It is loyal and reliable, always identical to itself and faithful. Faith transforms the disease in a time of penance, repair, of redemption. Re-d-emo: I buy again. "We have been bought with a price!» (The Cor 6,20).

.

.

The suffering.

Christianity has always fought suffering, considering it a redemptive road and meritorious. If Christian ethics asks that death is not removed, nor denied, it is not an assumption of pain or in view of the "redemption". The disease was for our salvation, It was atoning, Therefore it was necessary to offer to God. The illness, suffering no use for our redemption. On the contrary, we can say that the pain does not make sense. Suffering is not pleasing to God, otherwise he would be sadistic.

.

Reply

.

Suffering is certainly a bad thing, as such, It must be removed or at least alleviated. Sedatives thus play a positive role. Nevertheless, they should remove the cause of the pain, but they must not destroy the healthy forces. If suffering can not be removed, It must be born. Although the pain is unbearable, not be mitigated or removed causing the death of the patient. However, suffering can be an asset, then espiativa and redeeming.

God does not like or want or suffering as such, but he likes or wants the redemptive suffering. The suffering is redemptive suffering of Christ, which offers expiation or reparation to the Father for the forgiveness of our sins. So the redemptive suffering is a good thing, that meets or compensates the Father for sin, purifies and atones for the sins, and prepares the cancellation of suffering in later life.

.

.

Conscience

Consciousness is never a voice that reminds us of a law already made. We must recognize consciousness as a fundamental instance of choices, in life and facing death. The conscience says to each of us, man or woman, believer or non-believer in God: "Become conform to what you are".

.

Reply

.

This is not the concept of consciousness that we are taught by the Second Vatican Council [7], which instead says: "In the depths of his conscience, man detects a law which has not laid upon himself, but which he must obey, and whose voice ever calling him to love and to do good and avoid evil, when you need, He says clearly to his heart: 'do this, shun that. The man actually has a law written by God in his heart: To obey it is the very dignity of man, according to it he will be judged. Conscience is the most secret core and sanctuary of a man, There he is alone with God, whose voice echoes in his depths ".

In these few lines, the Council also mentions three times the divine law as the law that we find in our consciousness, we are bound by what law, which we must obey, and in relation to which we must and we will have to answer to God of our work.

Of everything in Bianchi not a word, rather, quite the opposite, because it is clear that the benchmark and the rule of conscience for him is not God, but the man himself ('Compliant become who you are'). He speaks a perfect atheist.

.

Sedation pain

The global personal care contributes to "une apaisée death", to a "better to die than you can". We must practice deep sedation and continues, till death; necessary, indeed, avoid all suffering. Palliative care is an absolute must, because death is part of life and should be softened to make the tame death and acceptable.

.

Reply

.

Care needs to live as much as possible, must never let die. He must accompany the patient to death, soothe the pain as much as possible. But we do not possess drugs that are able to totally remove all pain, without compromising or suppress the patient's life. The other part, a product that removes the pain by killing the sufferer, It is not a drug, or a sedative, but a poison, even when it used under the pretext of pain sedation. The some pain is bad, but worst evil to take away life. You can not suppress bad (pain) causing a greater evil (the killing of the sick).

The other part, It is necessary to avoid overtreatment, which is to keep the patient alive by technical means, so that vital functions emerge more from their subject's resources, but they are mechanically induced from outside, as it causes the motion of a machine. The patient is therefore practically dead.

Its movements depend solely by the action or mechanical power coming from the outside, so that, suspending this action, stop the movements of the subject, But not in the sense that his life be extinguished, but since the subject proves to be already dead, and who previously had only one life related, like that of a robot, which seems to be a living, and instead is a machine.

The feed suspension or stimulation, but it is justified only when it is determined that the patient's body has lost all their energies, which would be the only sign that he is no longer alive, and then authorizes the suspension of care, which at this point would not make sense. From these considerations it understands the error of doctors Eluana Englaro, which they have suspended the power supply to an organism still capable of feeding and therefore practically have killed.

The ideological background of such intervention was not the desire not to hurt the poor Eluana, because she did not suffer, but it was a materialist view of life, for which a human subject is prevented or incapable of discernment is not a "person" and therefore does not deserve to be left to live.

So you understand what terrible consequences it might lead, if this horrible principle were applied, in addition to the embryos and fetuses, as it is already done on a large scale, to other broad categories of people, such as newborns, the children, people in a coma, the elderly and demented or those who, based on the wrong criteria, They would be judged dementii or are not considered human beings. In the face of mercy.

Undoubtedly, there are situations, in which the patient is no longer able to bear the pain, so rather die, rather than go forward with so much suffering. And on the other hand, it happens that a family member who assists him helpless, heartbroken at the sight of so much pain of a loved one, and moved in a certain way by compassion, He would rather see him dead than see him suffer so much.

but yet, reasonable person, non-believer, He knows it is not permissible to obtain or cause death to stop or avoid pain, however great, However, it should understand, forgive and have compassion for these unfortunate, which, overwhelmed by grief and by 'anguish, maybe victims of depression, without seeing a future that is not the worsening situation, They lose their heads and kill, especially if deprived of a Christian education, which could help them to resign, to endure misfortune and hope in divine.

The temptation to suicide by the intensity of pain can also occur in the saints, as he happened to St. Therese of the Child Jesus, which, in recent times of his illness, She asked that she be moved away from the table a certain drug, not to be led into temptation. But God, confidently invoked, It does not fail to give the force of endurance, as it is shown by countless examples of pious people who are entrusted to Him.

The doctor - although the civil law were to allow it to him - must not be content in consciousness the patient requesting euthanasia, the so-called "deep sedation", hypocritical expression to hide the crime, It can please him if he asks for a poison and should do as a nurse or firefighter, which it intervenes to withhold that is about to throw himself off the roof of a house.

On the sufferer, the doctor, in the absence of other persons, He must be able to say, he is able, a good word of comfort or hope, not necessarily based on the Christian faith, but simply humanitarian, if the patient is not a raving atheist or a blasphemer and a prey to the fury against God or fate, in which case it is enough to pray, without satisfy him in his insane cravings, although somewhat understandable.

The good death is not euthanasia, but to die in peace of conscience, despite suffering, quietly endured in complete abandonment in God's hands, uniting ourselves to Christ's sacrifice, forgiving chi ci ha offeso, trusting that God will take account of our good works, forgive our sins and will receive us in heaven.

If you understand, against the other, As these ideas of Bianchi on "deep sedation" and especially its ideological assumptions inhuman and anti-Christian may favor the practice of suicide, without waiting to go to the hospital to get to euthanasia, as it is already happening, for example people in emotional or unable to care, they have learned to be with cancer.

Undoubtedly, it is necessary that the assistant of the patient or doctor knows wisely find and adapt the words to the psychological situation of the patient, not to provoke counter-reactions. If the sick person is a believer, not to Bianchi, but according to the Gospel, and warmly welcome the call of the Cross all'amabilità.

But if it is not a believer, You will need to be careful not to scandalize, because Christian love for the suffering could be mistaken for masochism. It is wrong to consider instead Bianchi "dolorism" the conception Christian redemptive suffering. If anything is to be rejected dolorism Bruno Forte and Karl Rahner, who admit the suffering in the divine nature.

About this, we realize how precious and useful both, where it is possible or granted, the proximity to the patient's bedside, especially if the believer, pious people or well prepared priest. The seduction is exerting on many today, the prospect of euthanasia is inversely proportional to the decline in priestly ministry, which should be one of the main tasks of the priestly ministry, especially the pastor, e, more root, this situation was affected by the decline of the Christian vision of life, under the influence of a mundane conception and secularistic, forget the end of this worldly life, and necessity and the duty to orient to it all earthly life.

This conference Enzo Bianchi, person of great success for years in the Catholic world, It gives us the extent of squalor, and the collapse of the impressive decline of Catholic thinking on an issue as important as that of pain, of evil and death, with being dropped to a level of such lowness, Christian where nothing remains, if not a vague philanthropy, that can not be distinguished for anything from visual masonic or illuministica. We are faced with a corrupt Christianity and dying, for who would really want to practice euthanasia, to liberate the souls from this rotten and poisonous food and open them to the respect of human dignity.

If tomorrow you were in the hospital dying, I would look good from calling at my bedside a priest on the model of "monaco" Enzo Bianchi and being able to do, I rivolgerei to a true priest, rimettesse that my sins, He comforts her through the sacraments and the Word of God, so as to open up the path to eternal life.

.

Varazze, 19 June 2016

________________________

NOTE

[1] Cf C.Journet, J.Maritain, Philippe of the Trinity, The angel's sin. Peccabilitas, unborn and surnture, Beauchesne, Paris 1961.

[2] See also the encyclical of Pius XII The human race the 1950.

[3] G. Cavalcoli, The mystery of the Redemption, ESD Bologna 2004; C.V.Heris, The mystery of Christ, Morcelliana, Brescia 1938; E.Hugon, The mystery of the Incarnation, Who are you, Paris 1940.

[4] Cf C.Journet, Evil, Tassel,Torino 1963; J.Maritain, God and the permission of evil, Desclee de Brouwer, Paris 1963.

[5] Cf my book Hell esiste. The truth denied, Editions Faith&Culture, Verona 2010.

[6] Satisfaction for us, as the Council of Trent says, Denz.1529.

[7]The joy and hope, n.16.

.

__________________________________________________

.

Note the avoidance of doubt

.

Some years ago, legal counsel, distrusted Dr.. Paolo Deotto, director of the online magazine Levied Christian from making use of images of Dr.. Enzo Bianchi. At the time,, before I took this magazine carried Lefebvrist, on its columns they were publishing articles also present the two Fathers of’Patmos Island. At that distrusts, Ariel S. Levi Gualdo responded with an article in which he explained that since then to follow, to talk about Enzo Bianchi, he would use the images of the beautiful Italian actress Monica Bellucci [cf. WHO]. Given this precedent, the drafting of the’Patmos Island note that the photos included in this article are public images available to anyone on magazines on-line and on the search engines and that some of the do not constitute violation Privacy Act. Recall also that the accusations made by the Fathers of’Patmos Island to Enzo Bianchi, such as for example “bad teacher“, “false prophet“, “heretic” etc.. all fall in the theological lexicon. Therefore, any magistrate of the Italian Republic would be no serious difficulties, but just unable to establish with a judgment and a judgment what is and what is heretical heterodox. For if certain bosiani consultants do not know the law, as in the past they have already shown, nell'Island of Patmos the right hand is known, respected and practiced. Therefore, the false prophet e bad teacher Enzo Bianchi, It takes of theologically’heretic and avoid to also deliver letters to us by clumsy jurists.

.

.

.

.

.

.

THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ADJUSTED WITH A PIECE ON A DRESS SEWN OLD

.

"No one sews a piece of new cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch again takes away something to the old cloth, and the tear becomes worse ' [MC 2, 18-22]

.

.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

 

I was asked a question about the Pope's conversation at the Rome Diocese Convention. After the Third question, dad, in the answer given "off the cuff" on the "culture of the provisional", he said orally: «for this reason a great majority of our sacramental marriages are null " (so it appears from the recording), while the text published by the Press Office today reports: «some of our sacramental marriages are void ". Why this change? It is a manipulation of the Pope's thought? The answer is that, when the Pope speaks spontaneously "off the cuff", the transcribed text is always subject to revision by those responsible for the care of the Pope's texts, to review the language or any inaccuracies or particular points that it is right to specify. When topics of some importance are touched upon, the revised text is always submitted to the Pope himself. This is what happened in this case, therefore the published text was expressly approved by the Pope [text is available WHO].

.

.

.

I read with interest the press release in which fulfilling his role as official spokesman and director of the Holy See Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi S.J. specifies that the Holiness of Our Lord the Supreme Pontiff Francis, "Speaking off the cuff he said orally" a sentence then retouched in the written text. To justify the retouching of a sentence destined to create confusion around the world [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc..], he specifies at the end of the statement that "the published text" - that is, the corrected one - "was expressly approved by the Pope".

.

I would like to understand better: this perhaps means that I, in an off-the-cuff meditation while preaching the spiritual exercises to the clergy, may express an inaccuracy on the procession of the Divine Persons, then retouching the text later in the editorial office, when that meditation is to be published in a book, all with my prior posthumous approval?

.

Well I wonder: maybe it happened that In this A.D 2016, the Jesuits, they suddenly changed into the holy virgins and martyrs Agata, Lucia, Agnese, Cecilia, Anastasia … or maybe they assume none, including presbyters and theologians, know the Gospel more, more and more replaced with emotional substitutes of a national-popular matrix? And I say this because on the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God made man is expressed in these terms:

.

"No one sews a piece of new cloth on an old garment; otherwise, the patch again takes away something to the old cloth, and the tear becomes worse ' [MC 2, 18-22].

.

The posthumous piece sewn makes the tear worse, because the August Pontiff continued undaunted to express himself off the cuff only one embarrassing limitations, which are not just lack of language properties, his lack of doctrinal knowledge is often at stake, historical-ecclesial and pastoral, and the whole could also be read as a lack of prudence.

.

A Roman Pontiff he does not speak in clichés and does not give public vent to his own emotions. This is due to the simple fact that he is no longer Simon, but Peter, the rock on which Christ built his Church [cf. Mt 13, 16-20]. Peter is the one who "when he has repented" is called to a precise mission entrusted to him by Christ God: "Strengthen your brethren".

.

«Simone, Simone, behold Satan has demanded to sift you like wheat; but I prayed for you, that thy faith fail not:; and you, turned again, confirm your brothers ". And Peter said to him: "Man, with you I am ready to go to prison and to death ". She answered him: «Pietro, I'm telling you: the cock shall not crow before you thrice deny that you know " [cf. LC 22, 31-34].

.

As the invitation to confirm the brothers is preceded by the warning "once you have repented", but above all followed by the prophetic anticipation «Peter, I'm telling you: the cock shall not crow before you thrice deny that you know ", I honestly ask myself: Jorge Mario Bergoglio, has truly ceased to be Simon, and once he "repented" and became Peter, he initiated his own Christological mission, which is to confirm the brothers in the faith, certainly not lead them to that confusion resulting from ambiguous and inaccurate expressions? Because it is on the level of exegesis, both on the theological level, to this sentence we must pay close attention, given that at the beginning of it we speak of "repentance" and at the end of "betrayal", at the center of the speech is exhorted "confirm the brothers", but this central phrase remains precisely in the middle, between "repentance" and "betrayal". Or perhaps someone intends to manipulate it to make the Word of God say what it did not actually say, extrapolating only "confirm the brothers"?

.

The Holy See, as well as the Fire Brigade, of which Federico Lombardi S.J. he has now become commander, it has dicasteries, pontifical councils and secretariats; in philosophy, theology, canonists, historians, ecclesiologists and specialists in various sectors. And all these servants of Peter and of the Apostolic See have always worked on the texts and texts of the Supreme Pontiffs, or at least of all those Supreme Predecessors of the Reigning Pontiff who had the humility to get help, what this made them, as well as loved and venerated, also saints and models of heroic virtue for the entire universal Church. Or maybe someone remembers a sensational one gaffe of St. John XXIII, of Blessed Paul VI, of the Servant of God John Paul I or of Saint John Paul II? Someone wanted to point out how gaffe the famous speech of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI in Regensburg, but today, years later, that speech turned out to be a lucid prophecy [cf. WHO].

.

If the Holy Father, whose authority is beyond any Catholic discussion, think about continuing this way, in addition to the gradual emptying of the churches, he runs the risk of being whistled in public by Catholics, which will then be criticized and criticized by the ultra-secularists, by the communists Radical-chic and by the Freemasons who for some years have been praising the wonders of this pontificate, with the flirtatious Catholic-Lutheran feminist theologian Marinella Perroni and with Alberto Melloni, undisputed leader of Bologna School, guests of honor at the Grand Orient of Italy [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO pag. 6], and the whole, will’ I know da, a supreme insult of the Catholic world, of which, these two wicked, they presented themselves in the Lodge as theological and historical exponents of high lineage.

.

Rome has outlived the individual Popes for the simple fact that Rome is the Church, that Rome is Peter. It is therefore urgent to explain to the Holy Father that the Roman squares are not managed with furberie argentine and with those effect blows perhaps suggested by that clumsy communications expert Antonio Spadaro S.J. The squares of Rome have brought their popes in triumph, if necessary, the Romans let themselves be slaughtered to allow the safe escape of their Pontiff in a moment of riot or during the invasion of a foreign army. The crowded squares of Rome really and sincerely shouted "long live the Pope", ma … Attention: the squares of Rome were also angry with some Popes, several corpses of which ended up thrown into the Tiber, not buried in the Vatican caves surrounded by the devotion of the believers of Christ.

.

Rome and Roman times, which for twenty centuries has been a sign of Catholic universality, it must be understood and known, but also loved and respected, otherwise you run big risks, especially by a Supreme Pontiff applauded more and more by all that is not Catholic and which has always been historically and socially adverse to our Catholic world.

.

In conscience I feel like saying that the epilogue of this pontificate risks being the whistles in the square. And when that happens, as I wrote [cf. WHO], we will be devoted children to defend the Holy Father Francis, those that he delighted in slapping several times to please the world of applauding ultra-secularists and pimp modernists who have now invaded the sacred palaces. And they, that after pleasing him they grabbed "the egg, the chicken and the hot ass', when the square screams against the Holy Father Francis, they will be safe and sheltered elsewhere, thereby resounding the terrifying phrase of the Gospel: «Then all the disciples, forsook him, fled» [cf. Mt 26,56]. And when at the end of the storm they will return, if anything, occupying positions even more prestigious than those they had managed to grab, from above the chariot of the new leader they will say that after all, They, the Holy Father Francis did not approve it that way; and if they approved it it was only because they had to do it for the homage due to the Supreme Pontiff, for the duty attached to their high ecclesiastical office.

.

It is a bitter prophecy which I entrust to the readers of the island of Patmos, we'll see then if the time, as has happened several times in various other past situations, will prove me right, assuming that I hope and pray that I am wrong, wishing I would never see my Supreme Pontiff whistled by Catholics, and at the same time defended by that atheist, anticlerical and communist radical chic by Eugenio Scalfari, defended by the Masonic Lodges that today, for incomprehensible mystery, they found themselves more loyal to the Roman Pontiff than the Swiss Guard; but if that happened, it is only because they delude themselves that they can destroy the Church from within, to the esoteric glory of the Great Architect of the Universe …

.

So pray with me so that I am wrong, totally wrong; so that tomorrow, for these words of mine written today, should make amends and publicly ask forgiveness with his head bowed and with ashes on his head.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.