Prayer of liberation and healing. Which insurmountable border separates theology and pastoral with the danger of falling into magical practices? – Prayer of liberation and healing. What imprescable boundary separates theology and pastoral care from the daner of falling into magical practices? –

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

Prayer of liberation and healing. Which insurmountable border separates theology and pastoral with the danger of falling into magical practices?

«Using the magical offices of certain charismatic shamans, Not only will the deceased of the whole family tree of applicants be freed, But also those who must always come to the world. Indeed, thanks to the power of the peregrifying liberator from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, Why, Once the imposition of the hands is received by a electrocuted in the brain, they will be born directly without original sin "

— Pastoral current events —

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

 

 

PDF Article in print format

 

PDF Article print format

PDF ARTICLE TO PRAY

.

.

In the face of my last two articles on the possible drifts of a method of understanding exorcism, combined with the conception that sees the devil as a marketing and profitless product (you see WHO e WHO), I believed it appropriate to write a third that will have as its object the prayer of liberation.

I want to clarify that my little contributions are nothing Compared to the most complete and exhaustive works of demonologists such as Mons. Renzo Lavatori or Father José Antonio Fortea.

How can we forget particularly expert exorcists like the Father Moreno Fiori o.p. and the Father Raffaele Talmelli S.P., Both left a flourishing bibliography on demonopathies. We cannot forget, against the other, All the other exorcist priests who carry out their ministry in fatigue and who are reliable masters in which to find a guide. Considering that some of them have written several books and articles on these issues, I invite the reader to a targeted bibliographic research with which it is possible to increase the knowledge of these topics. In the face of this, My article constitutes only a small tribute and thanksgiving.

Before defineing precisely the prayer of liberation, First of all, the boundaries and areas of competence must be established. First of all, This prayer is not an exorcism but it is a prayer of intercession with which we turn to God, to the Madonna or the Saints to ask for the liberation of a suffering person due to the evils caused by the influence of the evil one. With this definition we immediately exclude the conclaimed cases of real diabolical possession, that exist but they are very rare, and the cases of diabolical influences such as the obsessions and harassments that must require a particular care by the exorcist priest, joined to a multidisciplinary approach of the case.

To be even more precise We summarize how much the sacred congregation for the doctrine of the faith has established since 29 September 1985 in Letter to ordinary regarding the rules on exorcisms (cf.. WHO) And we apply what has been said to the liberation prayer:

– In the prayer of liberation it is never allowed, even when they do not deal with diabolical possession, contact the devil directly.

– Only the exorcist can be addressed directly to the devil, intimandogles, In the name of the Church, to leave.

– Lays cannot, even if they are prayers of liberation, Use the formulas of exorcism, Including the one published by Pope Leo XIII, nor use part of said prayer.

– Exorcism can only be exercised by a priest specially authorized by the local ordinary (cf.. Code of Canon Law, 1166; 1172).

Defining even better the prayers of liberation It is necessary to specify that they can be recited by anyone who intends to ask the Lord for themselves or for others healing and liberation from evil, On the basis of the invocation already contained in the prayer of the Our Father who recites "free of us from evil", that is, free us from the evil one.

Ask God to defend us from the evil one it means affirming a double truth: The defense against sin that is the main work of the evil one and the defense against the consequences of sin, whose fruits are represented by the countless infirmities and spiritual and bodily fragility of which man has had experiences already after his creation. Theologically it is more correct to see liberation and healing as aspects of the same reality of fighting to sin, on which Jesus, The Son of man, has full power (cf.. MC 2,1-12).

In the document entitled Education about prayers to get healing from God, The sacred congregation for the doctrine of faith, In the disciplinary provisions it establishes:

«To every faithful it is legitimate to raise prayers to God to obtain healing. However, when these take place in church or another sacred place, It is convenient that they are guided by an ordered minister " (cf.. art. 1).

Based on a correct theological vision of understanding of sin and its consequences, Each faithful has the opportunity to invoke God for liberation and healing from his evils, as well as ask the prayers brothers for this intention. Whether these evils have affected the spirit or body, with a wise assignment to Christ Celeste doctor, The faithful use all the remedies that grace and human science make available to be able to soothe as much as possible such suffering. As a result, in discernment between the different evils and the possible treatments, the faithful will be able to resort to the priest, to the doctor or other specialist based on his real situation of infirmity, without excluding that all these figures can work in communion to reach a happy resolution of the problem. We remember, about that, One of the cornerstones of health pastoral care that says that where it is not possible to heal it is always possible and duty to cure.

The prayers of liberation and healing They should be properly formulated in a context of full loyalty to the filing of the faith of the Catholic Church, in communion with the Magisterium, In obedience to the sacred shepherds and with their firm attention to never slip towards deviated and ambiguous forms that could generate misunderstandings or misunderstandings, As the last document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith already mentioned indicates.

Only by inserting liberation into a sacramental journey We can then ask ourselves about when it is appropriate to resort to the so -called liberation prayers. I have already had the opportunity to explain that the path of liberation and fight against the devil is very complex and begins with the sacrament of baptism, In that daily path of conversion and change of mentality that constitutes the solid basis of a new life in the Holy Spirit, in which in the image of the child, The Holy Spirit is pushed in our soul and the voice of the Father recognizes us as loved children (cf.. Mt 3,17; MC 1,11; LC 3,22). Risorti as new creatures from the waters of baptism, We too are conducted in the desert to face the face to face to be against the spirit of evil. In Christ we already have the victory, His divine humanity strengthens our humanity; His divine Spirit and the same spirit of ours has been given to us and with whom we can say every time we are tempted: «Go Satan!» (cf.. Mt 4,10).

From the sacrament of baptism we move on to the sacrament of confession with which the Holy Spirit speaks to us as to the prodigal Son and invites us to return to the paternal house to be covered with that branch dignity that we have lost with sin (cf.. LC 15,17-20). It is precisely of sin, indeed, push man to the removal from God, Up to convince him that his father is the obstacle element for full happiness and a freeding realization. When the man with his concrete historical acts and with his current sins voluntarily opens the door of his heart to the ordinary action of the evil one, here the sin is consumed. And sin drags to sin, With the repetition of the same documents it generates the vice, from which the perverse inclinations then derive from it, which obtaining consciousness by altering it and leading man to an inability to evaluate and choice between good and evil (cf.. Catechism of the Catholic Church n. 1865).

Certain current sins with the consequent derivative vices, They involve a clear personal responsibility of the man - the divine question due to the fault of the progenitors and for the murder of Abel is quite eloquent: "What did you do?» (cf.. GN 3,13; 4,10) - An obvious fault, which can be recovered only and only when it is dissolved with the power of the keys that Jesus gave to Pietro (cf. Mt 16,18-19) and that in the sacramental forum is represented by the acquittal. If we are careful, we are faced with the celebration of a real exorcism, to the supreme act of liberation of man, which is not only an invoked liberation, but objectively realized in reality.

The sacramental path that leads from baptism to confession culminates with the Eucharist and Holy Mass. Indeed, The path of liberation does not stop but continues in a very special way in the Eucharist, In that divine banquet of the Holy Mass where the real presence is made, real and substantial of our Redeemer. In his true body, In his true blood, In his true soul and in his divinity he continues to defeat the power of the evil one-sin and death-and with his own person he wins the one who is the very incarnation of the "non-person" and leads the man towards a human and divine depersonalization[1].

I think it is useful to know that the new Roman Missal In the section "Masses and prayers for various needs" includes several specific formulars for the celebration of the Holy Mass which have as its object the sick and the dying (NN. 45-46) To then move on to all those spiritual situations of various needs that could be a consequence of the intervention of the spirit of evil and the rooted and hardened sin (n. 48 sez. A-B-C).

Keeping this sacramental vision of liberation well in mind that embraces the first three sacraments of the septenary, Allow me to borrow a thought of Cardinal Mauro Piacenza:

«The sacraments continually educate the struggle: especially the repetable sacraments, those who do not impress character and that can be celebrated many times in life, mean and indicate, full way, The "competitive" dimension - of agone - of the fight against evil ".

This is the focal point of the question that we set ourselves at the beginning of this paragraph: how decisive it is immediately to resort to liberation prayers if you are not constantly inserted within a sacramental path? Without a attitude preventive sacramental it is necessary to avoid prayers of liberation, especially if the actual utility is not warned, without a certain preparation by those who intercept on the person and without a prior and robust preparation of those who receive them.

It is necessary to clarify how the effectiveness of the sacramental (Exorcism or prayer of liberation) In the faithful it depends on their sacramental life. These are the sacraments that imprint the freeding and re -analyzed force to the sacramental, who are part of that affected and lived faith in daily by the faithful. Has no case in the Holy Mass, in the rites of communion, The priest before the exchange of peace says:

«Lord Jesus Christ, that you told your apostles: “I leave you peace, I give you my peace ", Don't look at our sins, But to the faith of your Church, and donale unity and peace according to your will. You who live and reign over the centuries of the centuries. Amen».

It is the faith that the Lord seeks from us, that faith received in baptism, strengthened in the recognition of our sins and the exercise of mutual charity, Nourished and increased by the body and blood of Christ. Without faith or in the absence of it there is no type of liberation or healing, Only superstitious palliative that often cause more damage than benefits from the soul and body. And in this superstitious vision we can also drop the holy things, like the use of sacramental and devotion to the saints.

When we talk about prayers of liberation We risk getting lost within a variety of truly diversified forms and content, It is therefore completely consequential to ask: which prayers of liberation to do? The collections of these prayers would impose an order that is above all of a theological nature. Indeed, The structure of these prayers is very varied and it is often difficult to go back to the exact origin: they range from apparently Catholic ones, to those with a devotional flavor related to some mystical or holy, to those with an oriental style that wink at the Greek world up to the prayers of some reformed Christian communities (Suffice it to mention the practice of liberation, of purification and healing of the genealogical tree of Kenneth Mcall) To finish then to Formulari with a clearly esoteric flavor.

The absence of a canon never transcribed constitutes the most evident problem from which the lack of an approved canonical collection to be drawn. This is perhaps one of the things that most promotes the possibility of resorting to wild improvisation. Certainly priests have the opportunity to resort to the blessing that it gives countless ideas, But the field of the fight against the devil and its influences is so specific that it would require some more attention, So as to avoid the morbid research of the averting and the most decisive invocation also at the cost of crossing the border from orthodoxy and garden.

The prayer of liberation is outlined as an invocative prayer which concerns the context of the Sacramentals. This requires having to verify at least two criteria in it:

– that is approved by the competent ecclesiastical authority;

– that has a very precise dogmatic and liturgical construction in its composition that it does not leave margins of confusion or misunderstanding.

In the directory on popular and liturgy piety, The congregation for divine cult and the discipline of the sacraments establishes:

«Although drawn up with language, as it were, Less rigorous than the prayers of the liturgy, The texts of prayers and formulas of devotion must draw inspiration from the pages of Sacred Scripture, of the liturgy, of the fathers and the magisterium, agree with the faith of the Church. The stable and public texts of prayers and acts of pity must approve the local ordinary " (cf.. full document WHO).

The prayer of liberation needs to be a prayer approved by the Church precisely because of the delicacy of the matter treated, containing of necessity inside that corpus of faith believed and professed that well summarizes that theological principle for which the the law of prayer And law of belief and vice versa. Although the prayers of liberation are not real liturgical prayers, which consist of a specific celebratory and liturgical area, This does not exempt from a less accurate composition of the texts and content.

But let's get to the specific. In my two previous articles, I have already had the opportunity to argue on the prayer of the Our Father that the Lord himself taught to his disciples (cf.. Mt 6,9-13; LC 11,1-4) and as such, It prefigures not only as the first prayer of liberation but first of all as prayers par excellence. Excluding this, We know that in the new exorcism ritual it is contained, In 2 appendage (NN. 1-10), A section of prayers for private use of the faithful who find themselves having to fight against the power of darkness. This list can well be considered as an official list and approved of prayers to be done privately and who affect all those who experience an action of the devil that goes beyond ordinary action. It is legitimate to think, so, that the ratio Inspiring of these prayers does not concern only those who are already subjected to greater exorcism but above all those who find themselves experimenting with a particular direct assault of the evil one.

Wanting us to unbalance in the interpretation, We can assume that the mens Of these prayers in the ritual it does not only concern the single faithful but also that largest community that is to travel the streets of this world of ours marked by the wound of sin and the fomite of the concupiscence. Useful in this sense it is to draw up an essential case that could suggest the use of a prayer of liberation, Just as the Church has always done in many litanic prayers that end with the invocation: Deliver us O. Let's think for example:

1) to frequent and repeated blasphemy;

2) to feelings of hatred, rancor, of destruction and despair;

3) to the inducement in severe sin and rooting to perform evil;

4) To the conflicts torn to families;

5) to situations of natural and epidemiological wars and disasters;

6) to those situations of widespread immorality, of desecration and scandals that also concern the public life of a country or a nation;

7) to the malicious and defacent management of human relationships and between peoples;

8) to persecutions against the Church and Christians because of faith in Christ;

9) to the attack on the integrity of weak and defenseless human life.

The case studies could also be much more diversified, But the use of a precise and mature discernment accompanied by the Church becomes the best choice to learn to distinguish the origin from the cause[2]. Because, If it is true that certain situations do not always have the devil as a direct cause it is also true that at the origin of these evils there is always its deceived and corrupted action.

Listing the prayers of official and approved liberation prayers, For argumentative completeness I believe is noteworthy the universal prayer that the Church elevates to God on Good Friday. The tenth intention, dedicated to all tributes, reads like this:

"We pray, Dear brothers, God the Almighty Father, because the world free from any disorder: remove diseases, Scacci hunger, Make prisoners freedom, justice to the oppressed, grant safety to those traveling, The return to the distant from home, Health to the sick, to the dying eternal salvation.
Almighty and eternal God, comfort of the afflicted, Support of Tribolates, Listen to the cry of suffering humanity, Because everyone rejoiced to have received the rescue of your mercy in their needs. For Christ our Lord " (Previous x, For tributes).

This high plea on the day when the Church recalls the passion of the Lord, has a clear value of liberation prayer. Indeed, God is asked that all evils and situations of fragility and danger for men come to be removed, To achieve the victory against the one who at the origin of all evil and sin. While being part of the official liturgy of Good Friday, Nothing prohibits a faithful to recite it privately and to ask God for himself and for others the help in the various situations of tribulation.

Finally, here we come to the problem of pastoral abuses in the prayers of liberation. In education about prayers to get healing from God, The congregation requires that these prayers take place preferably in church or another sacred place and that they are guided by an ordered minister. Unlike the exorcism which compulsorily requires the presence of a presbyter, The prayers of liberation, Just as we understood them in this article, they can also be guided by a deacon. But I immediately advance that this choice requires a certain prudence and guarantees for the reasons that I will explain later.

The presence of the ordered minister It is not simply important but just essential to guide prayer by updating that mandate that Christ has given those who sent two by two to free and heal (cf.. LC 10,1-20). Therefore, Public prayers guided by lay faithful cannot be promoted, who will have to look at each other from imposing their hands or make gestures reserved for ordered ministers, remaining within the limits and in the terms provided for by the precise provisions dictated by the Church (cf.. the, Blessings, Rome, 1992, 18).

Healing and liberation are united in the same theological gaze, As the sacred congregation for the doctrine of faith clarifies and how it is our priestly and pastoral duty to remember, Because it is only the Lord "the one who frees from all evil" (cf.. Sap 16,8) And in this action of grace the suffering that accompany the disease are also the subject of the profound desire of man of a total liberation that affects not only the corporal component but also the psychic and spiritual component (cf.. art. 1).

The Congregation has a regulatory will referred to those circumstances of public prayer, Leaving aside the sphere of life of private prayer of the faithful, Knowing that each baptized is asked to pray to God for the living and for the deceased and for their own and others conversion. As for the choice of the place, The sacred context strengthens the will to remain united to the Church and its shepherds, It also makes what the Lord recommends in the parable of the good Samaritan (cf.. LC 10,25-37) in which the unfortunate wayfarer is housed in the hospital-hospital represents the church. The image of the brigands is strongly symbolic and has a spiritual sense that has been described by the Fathers of the Church, who have been able to see the work of the devil and his angels who undress the man of the guise of immortality and strike him to death with the weapon of sin until he deprive him of the life of grace.

All other public places that are not a church, A chapel or an oratory are in themselves unsuitable, it should be superfluous to reiterate it, But it is good to do it in the light of the clear and precise discipline of the Church, certainly not of their personal opinions. Just as some channels and communication routes such as phones are unsuitable, cell phones, webcam I like. Unfortunately, cases have occurred, and continue to occur, in which exorcisms were made on the phone, Prayers of liberation on the radio or with the use of the various means of communication, Not to mention the exorcistic and liberating tours organized around Italian hotels on weekends with lots of promotional packages that offer liberations, healing, conversions or, As some confreres as well as sailed as it would now be disenchanted:

«Using the magical offices of certain charismatic shamans, Not only will the deceased of the whole family tree of applicants be freed, But also those who must always come to the world. Indeed, thanks to the power of the peregrifying liberator from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, Why, Once the imposition of the hands is received by a electrocuted in the brain, they will be born directly without original sin ".

A pastoral situation that deserves attention it is that relating to those who are really prey to the spirit of evil but whose situation of possession, obsession or harassment has not yet clearly revealed. The case in which, Following the healing or liberation prayer meetings, The evil spirit can manifest itself suddenly, as forced by the power of prayer combined with the faith of the Orante Assembly. Often there is not even the need for a particular liberation prayer but the simple prayer of praise or an invocation of the Holy Spirit is enough to find itself in a situation similar to that happened to Jesus in the Synagogue of Capernaum (cf.. MC 1, 21-28; LC 4, 31-37).

Management similar manifestations involves prudence and soul fortress, combined with faith in Christ and obedience to the Church. We must be seriously wondering if for these public prayer meetings there must be no preventive presence of a formally appointed and authorized exorcist, which has the name of Christ and the Church can lawfully intervene. We remember that facing the evil spirit without being exorcist, without being an orderly minister and with his own condition of fragility it is decidedly not very wise. Man has no power on demons and disproportion is the one between an angelic creature and a human creature. It is true that the history of the Church recalls men who have been able to make exorcisms and liberations, But this reality is determined by their particular holiness of life and by a special assistance of divine providence, I like to remember Sant'Antonio Abate, St. Benedict of Nursia, St. Francis of Assisi, Santa Chiara d'Assisi, San Salvatore da Horta. All of them were not priests and had not received the appointment of exorcist but their life shone with that holiness to which no devil could resist. Same speech can be done for San Pio da Pietrelcina, who fought his whole life against the devil, Although he has never received the authorization from the Ministry of Exorcist from the Diocesan Bishop and his Provincial Minister and his Provincial Minister.

To conclude: is the cure of the Church protecting the privacy of those who live spiritual manifestations of evil influence with a prompt accompaniment and free from indebted spectacularizations. All those protective situations for these suffering brothers must be taken into account so that their liberation takes place within a reserved context. For this reason, you avoid bringing these brothers suffering in the various tour liberation, exposing them to the public to make testimonies that often have the flavor of advertising campaigns aimed at increasing the "fame" and the self -centeredness of the charismatic healer or liberator, instead of seeking stability through a priest who starts accompaniment. To this it is useful to combine a group of prayer that can help in the spiritual battle elevating fervent intercessions to God. Just as happens in some practices of psychotherapy, The path of liberation and healing must aim to make man again autonomous and master of himself. The therapist does not have to tie the patient to his person, Thus the priest does not have to tie to his person or his charisma the faithful by forcing him to an infinite path of liberation prayers. If after a congruous period of time there are no tangible improvements, If you have not acquired a serious sacramental habitus, If there is no particular evidence, Then it is better to interrupt these prayers and start a more in -depth human and spiritual discernment.

In any case, the problem remains the same over the centuries, without ever having lost topicality, He clearly put him clearly the blessed Apostle Paul by writing to his disciple Timoteo:

«The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales. But you shall carefully, endure suffering, do the work of the gospel proclaimer, fulfill your ministry " (II Tm 4, 1-5).

Sanluri, 25 March 2025

NOTE

[1] For a greater study of what has been said in this paragraph, please refer to the intervention of Cardinal Mauro Piacenza: Exorcism and sacraments, On the occasion of the XI basic course on exorcism by the National Gris in collaboration with the Pontifical University Regina Apostolorum in Rome and the International Esorcisti Association. 4 April 2016 Thursday 15 September 2016.

[2] To this list is added how much William Bleiziffer says in his contribution: Exorcism and exorcist in the canonical discipline of the Church, in Studia Universitas Babeş-Bolyai, Demonology today: Theological foundations and practical aspects, 2019, p.154 Note 42.

.

_________________________________

PRAYER OF LIBERATION AND HEALING. WHAT IMPRESCABLE BOUNDARY SEPARATES THEOLOGY AND PASTORAL CARE FROM THE DANGER OF FALLING INTO MAGICAL PRACTICES?

«By using the magical offices of certain charismatic shamans, not only will the deceased of the entire family tree of the applicants be liberated, but also those who must always come into the world. In fact, thanks to the power of the liberator wandering from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, because, once they have received the imposition of hands from a lightning-struck person in the brain, they will be born directly without original sin».

— Pastoral actuality —

 

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

PDF Article print format

.

In light of my last two articles on the possible consequences of a way of understanding exorcism, combined with the concept that sees the Devil as a product of marketing and profit (see WHO, WHO), I thought it appropriate to write a third that will have as its subject the Prayer of Liberation.

I would like to clarify that my small contributions are nothing compared to the much more complete and exhaustive works of learned demonologists such as Mgr. Renzo Lavatori or Father José Antonio Fortea.

How can we not remember particularly expert exorcists such as the italians Father Moreno Fiori o.p. and Father Raffaele Talmelli S.P., both of whom have left a flourishing bibliography on demonopathies. We cannot forget, among other things, all the other exorcist priests who carry out their ministry in hardship and who are reliable teachers in whom to find guidance. Considering that some of them have written several books and articles on these topics, I invite the reader to do a targeted bibliographical research with which it is possible to increase the knowledge of these topics. In light of this, my article is only a small tribute and a thank you.

Before precisely defining the Prayer of Liberation, we must first establish its boundaries and areas of competence. First of all, this prayer is not an exorcism but a prayer of intercession with which one turns to God, the Madonna or the Saints to ask for the liberation of a person suffering from the evils caused by the influence of the evil one. With this definition we immediately exclude the clear cases of real diabolical possession, which exist but are very rare; and the cases of diabolical influences such as obsessions and vexations that must require special care on the part of the exorcist priest, combined with a multidisciplinary approach to the case. To be even more precise, let us summarize what the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has established since September 29, 1985 in the Letter to Ordinaries regarding the norms on exorcisms (see HERE) and let us apply what has been said to the Prayer of Liberation:

– In the Prayer of Liberation, it is never permitted, even when it is not a question of diabolical possession, to address the Demon directly.

– Only the exorcist can address the Demon directly, ordering him, in the name of the Church, to leave.

– Lay people cannot, even when it is a question of Prayers of Liberation, use the formulas of exorcism, including that published by Pope Leo XIII, nor use part of said prayer.

– Exorcism can only be practiced by a priest specifically authorized by the Ordinary of the place (cf. Code of Canon Law, 1166; 1172).

– In further defining the Prayers of Liberation, it is necessary to specify that they can be recited by anyone who intends to ask the Lord for healing and deliverance from evil for themselves or for others, on the basis of the invocation already contained in the prayer of the Our Father which says «deliver us from evil», or deliver us from the Evil One.

Asking God to defend us from the Evil One means affirming a twofold truth: the defense from sin, which is the principal work of the Evil One, and the defense from the consequences of sin, the fruits of which are represented by the innumerable spiritual and physical infirmities and frailties that man has experienced since after his creation. Theologically, it is more correct to see liberation and healing as aspects of the same reality of the fight against sin, over which Jesus, the Son of Man, has full power (cf. Mk 2, 1-12).

In the document entitled Instruction on prayers to obtain healing from God, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in the disciplinary provisions establishes:

«”People are called to joy. Nevertheless each day they experience many forms of suffering and pain”. Therefore, the Lord, in his promises of redemption, announces the joy of the heart that comes from liberation from sufferings (cf. Is 30:29; 35:10; Bar 4:29). Indeed, he is the one «who delivers from every Evil» (Wis 16:8). Among the different forms of suffering, those which accompany illness are continually present in human history. They are also the object of man’s deep desire to be delivered from every Evil» (Official document SEE).

The Prayer of Liberation needs to be a prayer approved by the Church precisely because of the delicacy of the subject matter, necessarily containing within itself that corpus of faith believed and professed that well summarizes that theological principle for which the the law of prayer is law of belief. Although the Prayers of Liberation are not liturgical prayers in the true sense, consisting of a specific celebratory and liturgical context, this does not exempt from a less accurate composition of the texts and contents.

But let’s get to the specifics. In my two previous articles, I have already had the opportunity to argue about the prayer of the Our Father that the Lord himself taught to his disciples (cf. Mt 6,9-13; Page 11,1-4) and as such, it is prefigured not only as the first Prayer of Liberation but above all as prayers par excellence. Excluding this, we know that in the new Ritual of Exorcisms there is contained, in Appendix II (NN. 1-10), a section of prayers for the private use of the faithful who find themselves having to fight against the power of darkness. This list can well be considered as an official and approved list of prayers to be said privately and which concern all those who experience an action of the devil that goes beyond ordinary action. It is legitimate to think, therefore, that the inspiring ratio of these prayers does not concern only those who are already subjected to major exorcism but above all those who find themselves experiencing a particular direct assault of the Evil one.

If we want to enter into interpretation, we can assume that the mens of such prayers in the ritual does not only concern the individual believer but also that wider community that finds itself walking the paths of this world of ours marked by the wound of sin and the fomite of concupiscence. It is useful in this sense to draw up an essential case study that could suggest the use of a Prayer of Liberation, as the Church has always done in many litanic prayers that end with the invocation: Deliver us O. Let us think for example:

1) frequent and repeated blasphemy;
2) feelings of hatred, resentment, destruction and despair;
3) hardening in grave sin and in the rootedness to do evil;
4) tearing conflicts in families;
5) situations of war and natural and epidemiological disasters;
6) to those situations of widespread immorality, profanation and scandals that also affect the public life of a country or a nation;
7) to the malevolent and disfiguring management of human relations and between peoples;
8) to persecutions against the Church and Christians because of their faith in Christ;
9) to attacks on the integrity of weak and defenseless human life.

The casistic could also be much more diversified, but the use of a precise and mature discernment accompanied by the Church becomes the best choice to learn to distinguish the origin from the cause. Because, if it is true that certain situations do not always have the Devil as a direct cause, it is also true that at the origin of such evils there is always his deceptive and corrupting action.

Listing the official and approved Liberation Prayers, for completeness of argument I believe that the Universal Prayer that the Church raises to God on Good Friday is worthy of note. The tenth intention, dedicated to all the troubled, reads as follows:

Let us pray, dearest brothers, to God the Father almighty, that he may free the world from every disorder: that he may remove disease, banish hunger, give freedom to prisoners, justice to the oppressed, grant safety to those who travel, the return of those far from home, health to the sick, eternal salvation to the dying. Almighty and eternal God, comfort of the afflicted, support of the troubled, hear the cry of suffering humanity, that all may rejoice in having received in their needs the help of your mercy. Through Christ our Lord (Prayer X, For the troubled).

This supplication, raised on the day in which the Church remembers the Passion of the Lord, has a clear value of a Prayer of Liberation. In fact, it asks God that all evils and situations of fragility and danger for men be removed, to achieve victory against the one who is at the origin of all evil and sin. Although it is part of the official liturgy of Good Friday, nothing prevents a believer from reciting it privately and asking God for help for himself and for others in various situations of tribulation.

Here we finally come to the problem of pastoral abuses in the Prayers of Liberation. In the instruction on prayers to obtain healing from God, the Congregation requires that such prayers preferably take place in a church or another sacred place and that they be led by an ordained minister. Unlike exorcism, which requires the mandatory presence of a priest, the Prayers of Liberation, as we have understood them in this article, can also be led by a deacon. But I must immediately point out that this choice requires a certain amount of caution and guarantees for reasons I will explain later.

The presence of the ordained minister is not simply important but absolutely essential to guide prayer by actualizing that mandate that Christ conferred to those he sent two by two to free and heal (cf. Luke 10, 1-20). Therefore, public prayers led by lay faithful cannot be promoted, who must be careful not to lay on hands or perform gestures reserved for ordained ministers, remaining within the limits and terms established by the precise provisions dictated by the Church (Benedictional, Rome, 1992, 18).

Healing and liberation are united in the same theological vision, as the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith clarifies and as it is our priestly and pastoral duty to remember, because it is only the Lord «who frees from every Evil» (cf. Wis 16, 8) and in this act of grace the sufferings that accompany illness are also the object of man’s profound desire for a total liberation that concerns not only the physical component but also the psychic and spiritual one (cf. art. 1).

The Congregation has a normative will referring to those circumstances of public prayer, leaving aside the sphere of the private prayer life of the faithful, knowing that every baptized person is asked to pray to God for the living and the dead and for their own and others’ conversion. As regards the choice of place, the sacred context strengthens the will to remain united to the Church and its pastors, and also pastorally realizes what the Lord recommends in the parable of the Good Samaritan (see Page 10:25-37) in which the unfortunate traveler is lodged in the inn-hospital that represents the Church. The image of the robbers is strongly symbolic and has a spiritual meaning that has been described by the Fathers of the Church, who were able to discern the work of the Devil and his Angels who strip man of the garment of immortality and strike him to death with the weapon of sin until they deprive him of the life of grace.

All other public places that are not a church, a chapel or an oratory are in themselves unsuitable, it should be superfluous to repeat it, but it is good to do so in light of the clear and precise discipline of the Church, certainly not of one’s personal opinions. Just as some channels and means of communication are unsuitable such as telephones, cell phones, webcams and the like. Unfortunately, cases have occurred, and continue to occur, in which exorcisms have been performed over the telephone, Liberation Prayers on the radio or with the use of various means of communication, not to mention the exorcism and liberation tours organized around hotels on weekends with promotional packages offering liberation, healing, conversion, or, as some experienced but now disenchanted confrere would say:

«By making use of the magical services of certain charismatic shamans, not only will the deceased of the entire family tree of the applicants be liberated, but also those who must always come into the world. In fact, thanks to the power of the liberator wandering from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, because, once they have received the imposition of hands by charismatic layman struck by lightning in the brain, they will be born directly without original sin».

A pastoral situation that deserves attention is that of those who are truly prey to the Spirit of Evil but whose situation of possession, obsession or harassment has not yet clearly revealed itself. It is not uncommon for the case in which, following prayer meetings for healing or liberation, the Evil Spirit can suddenly manifest itself, as forced by the power of prayer united with the faith of the praying assembly. Often there is not even the need for a particular Prayer of Liberation but a simple Prayer of Praise or an invocation of the Holy Spirit is enough to find oneself in a situation similar to that which happened to Jesus in the synagogue of Capernaum (see Mk 1:21-28; Page 4:31-37).

The management of such manifestations requires prudence and fortitude, combined with faith in Christ and obedience to the Church. We must seriously ask ourselves whether such public prayer meetings should not require the prior presence of a formally appointed and authorized exorcist, who has the name of Christ and the Church and can lawfully intervene. Let us remember that facing the Evil Spirit without being exorcists, without being an ordained minister and with one’s own condition of fragility is decidedly unwise. Man has no power over demons and the disproportion is that which exists between an angelic creature and a human creature. It is true that the history of the Church remembers men who were able to perform exorcisms and liberations, but this reality is determined by their particular holiness of life and by a special assistance of divine providence, I like to remember Saint Anthony the Abbot, Saint Benedict of Norcia, Saint Francis of Assisi, Saint Clare of Assisi, Saint Savior of Horta. All of these were not priests and had not received the appointment of exorcist but their lives shone with that sanctity that no demon could resist. The same can be said for Saint Pio of Pietrelcina, who fought all his life against the Devil, despite never having received authorization for the ministry of exorcist from the diocesan Bishop and his Provincial Minister.

In conclusion: it is the Church’s duty to protect the privacy of those who experience spiritual manifestations of evil influence with prompt accompaniment free from undue sensationalism. All those situations of protection for these suffering brothers must be taken into due consideration so that their liberation occurs within a private context. For this reason, one should avoid taking these suffering brothers on various liberation tours, exposing them to the public to give testimonies that often have the flavor of advertising campaigns aimed at increasing the “fame” and egocentrism of the charismatic healer or liberator, rather than seeking stability through a priest who begins the accompaniment. It is useful to combine this with a prayer group that can help in the spiritual battle by raising fervent intercessions to God. As happens in some practices of psychotherapy, the path of liberation and healing must aim to make man autonomous and master of himself again. The therapist must not bind the patient to his person, just as the priest must not bind the faithful to his person or his charisma by forcing them to an endless path of Liberation Prayers. If after a suitable period of time there are no tangible improvements, if one has not acquired a serious sacramental habitus, if there is no particular evidence, then it is better to interrupt these prayers and begin a more in-depth human and spiritual discernment.

In any case, the problem has remained the same throughout the centuries, without ever having lost its relevance, as was clearly highlighted in his time by the Blessed Apostle Paul when he wrote to his disciple Timothy:

«For the time will come when people will not tolerate sound doctrine but, following their own desires and insatiable curiosity, will accumulate teachers and will stop listening to the truth and will be diverted to myths. But you, be self-possessed in all circumstances; put up with hardship; perform the work of an evangelist; fulfill your ministry» (II Three 4, 3-4).

Sanluri, 25 March 2025

.

___________________________________

PRAYER FOR DELIVERANCE AND HEALING. WHAT IS THE INVALIDABLE LIMIT THAT SEPARATES THEOLOGY AND PASTORAL CARE FROM THE DANGER OF FALLING INTO MAGICAL PRACTICES??

«By making use of the magical offices of certain charismatic shamans, Not only will the deceased be freed from the entire family tree, but also those who must come into the world. In fact, thanks to the power of the liberator who wanders from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, why, once they have received this imposition from the hands of someone struck in the brain, "They will be born directly without original sin.".

— Pastoral news —

 

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

PDF ARTICLE TO PRAY

.

Considering my last two articles on the possible drifts of a way of understanding exorcism, combined with the concept that sees the Devil as a marketing and profit product (watch ON HERE and ON HERE), I have thought it appropriate to write a third that will have as its object the Prayer of Liberation. I want to clarify that my small contributions are nothing compared to the much more complete and exhaustive works of demonological scholars such as Italians like Monsignor Renzo Lavatori or from the father José Antonio Fortea.

How can we not remember especially expert exorcists like the father Moreno Fiori o.p. and the father Raffaele Talmelli S.P., both have left a very rich bibliography on demonopathies. we can't forget, among other things, all the other exorcist priests who carry out their ministry with difficulty and who are reliable teachers in whom to find guidance. Considering that some of them have written several books and articles on these topics, I invite the reader to carry out a bibliographic search with which it is possible to increase knowledge on these topics. In view of this, my article is just a small tribute and a thank you.

Before precisely defining the Liberation Prayer, we must establish its limits and areas of competence. First of all, This prayer is not an exorcism but a prayer of intercession with which God is addressed., to the Virgin or the Saints to ask for the liberation of a person who suffers evils caused by the influence of the Evil One. With this definition we immediately exclude cases of real diabolical possession, They exist but are very rare, and cases of diabolical influences such as obsessions and ailments that must require special care from the exorcist priest, combined with a multidisciplinary evaluation for each case.

To be even more precise, Let us summarize what the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has established on 29 September of 1985 in The Letter to the Ordinaries on the rules regarding exorcisms (watch HERE) and let's apply it to the Prayer of Liberation:

– In the Prayer of Liberation it is never allowed, even when it is not diabolical possession, go directly to the Devil.
– Only the exorcist can directly address the Devil, ordering him, in the name of the Church, let it go.
– The laity cannot, even if they are Prayers of Liberation, use exorcism formulas, including that made by Pope Leo XIII, nor use part of said sentence.
– Exorcism can only be performed by a priest specifically authorized by the local Ordinary. (watch Code of Canon Law, cann. 1166; 1172).

To further define the Liberation Prayers, It is necessary to specify that they can be recited by any person who intends to ask the Lord for healing and deliverance from evil for themselves or for others., based on the invocation already contained in the prayer of the Lord's Prayer that says "deliver us from evil", or deliver us from the Evil One.

Ask God to defend us from the Evil One means affirming a double truth: the defense of sin, which is the main work of the Evil One, and the defense of the consequences of sin, whose fruits are represented by the innumerable spiritual and physical illnesses and weaknesses that man has already experienced since his creation.. Theologically it is more correct to see liberation and healing as aspects of the same reality of fighting against sin., about which Jesus, the Son of Man, has full power (cf. MC 2,1-12).

In the document titled Instruction on prayers to obtain healing from Dios, The Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith establishes in its disciplinary provisions:

«Each of the faithful is free to raise prayers to God to obtain healing. When these are carried out in the Church or in another sacred place, It is advisable that they be guided by a priest or a deacon. (cf. ON HERE)

Starting from a correct theological vision understanding of sin and its consequences, Every believer has the possibility of calling on God for liberation and healing from their ills., as well as ask your brothers for prayers for this intention. Whether these evils have affected the spirit or the body, with wise trust in Christ the heavenly physician, The faithful must use all the remedies that grace and human science make available in order to alleviate such suffering as much as possible.. Consequently, when discerning between different ailments and their possible cures, the faithful may turn to a priest, to a doctor or other specialist based on your current illness situation, without excluding that all these figures can work in communion to reach a happy resolution of the problem.. In this sense, Let us remember one of the cornerstones of health pastoral care that says that where it is not possible to heal, it is always possible and necessary to cure.

Prayers for deliverance and healing must be adequately formulated in a context of full fidelity to the deposit of faith of the Catholic Church, in communion with the Magisterium, in obedience to the sacred shepherds and with firm attention not to fall into deviant and ambiguous ways that could generate misunderstandings or misunderstandings, as indicated in the latest document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith already cited.

Only including liberation in a sacramental way We can then proceed to ask ourselves when it is appropriate to resort to the so-called Prayers of Liberation. I have already had the opportunity to explain that the path of liberation and fight against the Devil is very complex and begins with the Sacrament of baptism., in that daily path of conversion and change of mentality that constitutes the solid foundation of a new life in the Holy Spirit, in which in the image of the Son, the Holy Spirit is poured into our soul and the voice of the Father recognizes us as beloved children (cf. Mt 3,17; MC 1,11; LC 3,22). Resurrected as new creatures in the waters of baptism, we are likewise led into the desert to face in battle face to face, to the spirit of evil. In Christ we already have victory, His divine humanity strengthens our humanity; His divine Spirit is the same spirit that has been given to us and with which we can say every time we are tempted: «¡Yourself, Satan!» (cf. Mt 4,10).

From the Sacrament of Baptism let us move on to the Sacrament of Confession. in which the Holy Spirit speaks to us like the prodigal son and invites us to return to our father's home to clothe ourselves with that filial dignity that we have lost through sin (watch LC 15,17-20). In fact, It is precisely sin that distances man from God, to the point of convincing him that the Father is an obstacle to full happiness and liberating plenitude. At the moment when the man, with their concrete historical acts and with their current sins, voluntarily opens the door of his heart to the ordinary action of the evil one, the sin is consummated. And sin drags sin, the repetition of the same acts generates vice, from which perverse inclinations derive that darken the conscience, They alter it and lead man to the inability to evaluate and choose between good and evil. (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1865).

The sacramental path that leads from baptism to confession culminates with the Eucharist and the Holy Mass. In fact, the path of liberation does not stop but continues in a very special way in the Eucharist, in that divine banquet of the Holy Mass in which the true presence is realized, real and substantial of our Redeemer. In his true Body, in his true Blood, In his true soul and in his divinity he continues to defeat the power of the evil one - sin and death - and with his own person he defeats the one who is the very incarnation of the “not person” and leads man towards a human and divine depersonalization.

Certain current sins, with the consequent vices, They entail a clear personal responsibility of man - the divine interrogation for the guilt of the parents and for the murder of Abel is very eloquent.: «What have you done?» (cf. GN 3,13; 4,10) ―, an obvious fault, that can only be recovered the moment it is unleashed with the power of the keys that Jesus gave to Peter (cf. Mt 16,18-19) and that in the sacramental forum is represented with absolution. If we pay attention, we are facing the celebration of a true exorcism, the supreme act of liberation of man, which is not just an invoked release, but objectively realized in reality.

I think it is useful to know that the new Roman Missal in the section “Mass and prayers for various needs” includes several specific forms for celebrating the Holy Mass that are intended for the sick and dying (n. 45-46) and then it moves on to all those spiritual situations of diverse needs that could be a consequence of the intervention of the spirit of evil and rooted and hardened sin. (n. 48 section A-B-C).

Bearing in mind this sacramental vision of liberation which covers the first three sacraments of the septenary, Allow me to borrow a thought from Cardinal Mauro Piacenza:

«The Sacraments continually educate the fight: especially the repeatable Sacraments, those that do not imprint character and that can be celebrated many times in life, They fully signify and indicate the “agonistic” – agonal – dimension of the fight against evil..

This is precisely the focal point of the question we asked ourselves at the beginning of this paragraph: How decisive is it to immediately resort to the Prayers of Liberation if it is not a consistent part of a sacramental path?? Without a preventive sacramental habitus it is necessary to avoid Liberation Prayers, especially if its real usefulness is not felt, without a certain preparation on the part of the person who intercedes for the person and without preventive and robust preparation on the part of the person who receives them.

It is necessary to clarify how the effectiveness of sacramentals (Exorcism or Prayer of Liberation) in the faithful it depends on their sacramental life. It is the Sacraments that impart the liberating and healing force to the sacramentals, that are inserted in that faith affirmed and lived daily by the faithful. It is no coincidence that in the Holy Mass, in the Communion Rite, the priest before the exchange of peace says:

«Lord Jesus Christ, What did you say to your apostles?: “Peace I leave you, “I give you my peace”, don't look at our sins, but the faith of your Church, and according to your word, grant him peace and unity. You who live and reign forever and ever. Amen”.

It is the faith that the Lord seeks in us, that faith received in baptism, strengthened in the recognition of our sins and in the exercise of mutual charity, nourished and increased by the Body and Blood of Christ. Without faith or lack thereof there is no type of liberation or healing, only superstitious palliatives that often cause more harm than good to soul and body. And in this superstitious vision we can also include holy things, such as the use of sacramentals and devotion to saints.

When we talk about Prayers of Liberation we run the risk of getting lost in a variety of truly diverse forms and contents, so it is completely consistent to ask ourselves: What Liberation Prayers to do? Collections of such prayers would impose an order that is primarily theological in nature.. In fact, The structure of these sentences is extremely varied and it is often difficult to trace their exact origin.: They range from those apparently Catholic, passing through those with a devotional flavor linked to some mystic or saint, or those of oriental style that wink at the Greek world and include the prayers of some reformed Christian communities (just mention the liberation practice, purification and healing of Kenneth McAll's family tree) to put an end to formulas with a clearly esoteric flavor.

The absence of a transcribed canon is the most obvious problem, and from this derives the absence of an approved canonical collection on which to base. This is one of the things that most favors the possibility of resorting to wild improvisation. Certainly priests have the possibility of turning to the Book of Blessings which offers innumerable indications, but the field of struggle against the devil and his influences is so specific that it requires greater attention in order to avoid the morbid search for supplication and the more decisive invocation, even at the cost of crossing the border between orthodoxy and orthopraxy.

The Prayer of Liberation It is outlined as an invoking prayer that belongs to the sphere of sacramentals.. This makes it necessary to verify at least two criteria in it:

– that is approved by the competent ecclesiastical authority;
– that has in its composition a very precise dogmatic and liturgical construction that leaves no room for confusion or misunderstandings.

In it Directory on Popular and Liturgical Pietya, The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments establishes:

«Although written with a language, so to speak, less rigorous than for the prayers of the Liturgy, The texts of the prayers and formulas of devotion must find their inspiration in the pages of Holy Scripture, in the Liturgy, of the Fathers and the Magisterium, and be in agreement with the faith of the Church. The stable and public texts of prayers and acts of piety must bear the approval of the local Ordinary. (Comprehensive document ON HERE: Introduction, 16).

The Prayer of Deliverance needs to be a prayer approved by the Church precisely because of the delicacy of the subject, which necessarily encompasses in itself that corpus of faith believed and professed that well summarizes that theological principle according to which “the law of prayer” is “law of belief” and vice versa. Although Prayers of Liberation They are not liturgical prayers per se., because it belongs to a specific celebratory and liturgical context, This does not exempt them from a less precise composition in the texts and contents..

But let's get to the point. In my two previous articles I already had the opportunity to discuss the Our Father prayer that the Lord himself taught his disciples. (cf. Mt 6,9-13; LC 11,1-4) and as such, It is prefigured not only as the first Prayer of Liberation but above all as prayers par excellence. Apart from this, We know that the new Ritual of Exorcisms contains, in Annex II (numbers. 1-10), a section of prayers for the private use of the faithful who are forced to fight against the power of darkness. This list may well be considered as an official and approved list of prayers to be said in private and which concern all those who experience an action of the Devil that goes beyond ordinary action.. It is reasonable to think, therefore, that the inspiring ratio of these prayers does not concern only those who are already subjected to major exorcism, but above all to those who are experiencing a particular direct attack from the Evil One.

Wanting to unbalance ourselves in the interpretation, We can assume that the mens of such prayers in ritual concerns not only the individual believer but also that larger community that finds itself traveling the paths of this world of ours marked by the wound of sin and the fuel of concupiscence.. In this sense, It is useful to trace an essential casuistry that can suggest recourse to a Prayer of Liberation, as the Church has always done in many litany prayers that conclude with the invocation: deliver us, Lord. Let's think for example:

1) to frequent and repeated blasphemy;
2) to feelings of hate, resentment, destruction and despair;
3) to hardening in serious sin and radicalization rooted in doing evil;
4) to devastating conflicts in families;
5) to war situations and natural and epidemiological disasters;
6) to those situations of generalized immorality, desecration and scandals that also affect the public life of a country or nation;
7) to the malevolent and disfiguring management of human relations and between peoples;
8) to the persecutions against the Church and Christians because of their faith in Christ;
9) to the attack on the integrity of weak and defenseless human life.

The casuistry could also be much more diversified, but the use of precise and mature discernment accompanied by the Church becomes the best option to learn to distinguish the origin from the cause.. Why, If it is true that certain situations do not always have the Devil as a direct cause, It is also true that at the origin of such evils there is always their deceptive and corrupting action..

Listing the official and approved Prayers of Deliverance, for the sake of argumentative integrity, I believe that the Universal Prayer that the Church raises to God on Good Friday is worthy of mention. The tenth intention, dedicated to all those who are troubled, says the following:

«Let us pray, dear brothers, to God the Father almighty, to free the world from all its errors, keep away diseases, feed the hungry, free the imprisoned and bring justice to the oppressed, provides security to those who travel, a good return to those who are far from home, health to the sick and salvation to the dying.

Almighty and eternal God, comfort to the afflicted and strength to the suffering, Listen to those who call on you in their tribulation, so that everyone may experience the joy of your mercy in their needs.. For Jesus Christ, our lord. Through Christ our Lord" (Prayer, For the troubled).

This supplication raised on the day when the Church remembers the Passion of the Lord It has a clear value as a Prayer of Liberation. In fact, We ask God to eliminate all evils and situations of fragility and danger for men., to achieve victory against the one who is at the origin of all evil and sin. Although it is part of the official Good Friday liturgy, nothing prevents a believer from reciting it privately and asking God for help in various situations of tribulation for himself and others.

Finally, we finally come to the problem of pastoral abuse in the Prayers of Deliverance. In the instruction on prayers to obtain healing from God, The Congregation requires that such prayers be preferably performed in church or another sacred place and that they be led by an ordained minister.. Unlike exorcism, which requires the presence of a priest., Prayers of Liberation, as we have understood them in this article, They can also be led by a deacon. But I immediately anticipate that this choice imposes a certain prudence and guarantees for the reasons that I will explain later..

The presence of the ordained minister It is not simply important but precisely indispensable to direct prayer, carrying out the command that Christ gave to those whom he sent two by two to deliver and heal (cf. LC 10,1-20). So, public prayers led by lay faithful cannot be promoted, who must be careful not to lay hands or make gestures reserved for ordained ministers, staying within the limits and deadlines established by the precise provisions dictated by the Church (cf. Blessings, Rome, 1992, 18).

Healing and liberation are united in the same theological perspective, as the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith clarifies and how it is our priestly and pastoral duty to remember, because it is only the Lord "who delivers from all evil" (cf. Sab 16,8) and in this action of grace the sufferings that accompany illness are also the object of man's deep desire for a total liberation that affects not only the bodily component but also the psychological and spiritual component. (cf. art. 1).

The Congregation has a normative will referring to those circumstances of public prayer, leaving out the scope of the private prayer life of the faithful, knowing that every baptized person is called to pray to God for the living and the dead and for the conversion of oneself and others. Regarding the choice of place, the sacred context reinforces the desire to remain united to the Church and its pastors, also implements pastorally what the Lord recommends in the parable of the good Samaritan (cf. LC 10,25-37), in which the unfortunate traveler is accommodated in the inn-hospital that represents the Church. The image of the bandits is highly symbolic and has a spiritual meaning that was described by the Fathers of the Church, who could see the work of the Devil and his Angels who strip man of the mantle of immortality and beat him with the weapon of sin until depriving him of the life of grace.

All other public places other than a church, a chapel or an oratory are in themselves inadequate; It would be superfluous to reiterate it, but it is good to do it in the light of the clear and precise discipline of the Church, and certainly not from personal opinions. As well as some channels and means of communication such as telephones, mobiles, webcams and similar are not suitable. Unfortunately, There have been and continue to be cases in which exorcisms have been carried out by telephone, Prayers of Liberation on the radio or through the use of various means of communication, not to mention the exorcism and liberation tours organized in Italian hotels on weekends with promotional packages offering liberation, the healing, the conversion or, as an experienced and now very disenchanted confrere would say:

«By making use of the magical offices of certain charismatic shamans, Not only will the deceased be freed from the entire family tree, but also those who must come into the world. In fact, thanks to the power of the liberator who wanders from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, why, once they have received the laying on of hands from someone hit on the brain, "They will be born directly without original sin.".

A pastoral situation that deserves attention is that relating to those who are truly prey to the Spirit of Evil but whose possession situation, obsession or vexation that has not yet manifested itself. It is not strange that, after prayer meetings for healing or deliverance, the Evil Spirit can suddenly manifest itself, being forced by the power of prayer combined with the faith of the praying assembly. Often a specific prayer of deliverance is not even necessary, But a simple prayer of praise or an invocation of the Holy Spirit is enough to find yourself in a situation similar to what happened to Jesus in the synagogue of Capernaum. (cf. MC 1, 21-28; LC 4, 31-37).

Managing similar events requires prudence and strength, combined with faith in Christ and obedience to the Church. We must seriously ask ourselves whether at such public prayer meetings there should not be the preventive presence of a formally designated and authorized exorcist., that in the name of Christ and the Church I can legally intervene. Let us remember that facing the Spirit of Evil without being an exorcist, without being an ordained minister and with one's own fragile condition, it is decidedly imprudent. Man has no power over demons and the disproportion is that between an angelic creature and a human creature.. It is true that the history of the Church remembers men who knew how to perform exorcisms and liberations, but this reality is determined by his particular sanctity of life and by a special assistance of divine providence.; I like to remember San Antonio Abad, to Saint Benedict of Nursia, in San Francisco of Assisi, in Santa Clara of Assisi, to San Salvador de Horta. All of them were not priests and had not received the appointment of exorcists, but their lives shone with that holiness that no demon could resist.. The same can be said of Saint Pio of Pietrelcina, who fought against the devil all his life, despite never having received authorization for the ministry of exorcist from the diocesan bishop and his provincial minister.

To conclude: It is the responsibility of the Church to protect the privacy of those who experience spiritual manifestations of evil influence with prompt accompaniment free of undue spectacularization.. All situations of protection of these suffering brothers must be taken into account so that their release occurs in a confidential context.. For this reason, we must avoid taking these suffering brothers on various liberation tours, exposing them to the public to give testimonies that often have the flavor of advertising campaigns aimed at increasing the “fama” and the egocentrism of the charismatic healer or liberator, instead of seeking stability through a priest who initiates accompaniment. For this it is useful to join a prayer group that can help in the spiritual battle by raising fervent intercessions to God.. As happens in some psychotherapy practices, The path of liberation and healing must aim to make man autonomous and master of himself again.. The therapist should not tie the patient to his person, just as the priest should not tie the believer to his person or his charisma., forcing him to travel an infinite path of Prayers of Liberation. If after an adequate period of time no tangible improvements are observed, if a serious sacramental habitus has not been acquired, if there is no particular evidence, then it is better to interrupt these prayers and begin a deeper human and spiritual discernment.

In any case, the problem remains the same throughout the centuries, without ever having lost its relevance, as the blessed apostle Paul clearly highlighted in his time writing to his disciple Timothy:

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but having itchy ears, teachers will be gathered according to their own lusts; and they will turn away their ears from the truth and turn to fables. but you, be sober in everything endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry (2 Tim 4, 1-5).

Sanluri, 25 of March 2025

 

 

.

The books of Ivano Liguori, to access the book shop click on the cover

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

 

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

 

.





Benedict XVI and Dario Argento. The Holy Father Francesco remains on the chair of Pietro and avoid another trauma-Benedict XVI and the Film-Sirector Dario Argento. May the Holy Father Francis avoid us another trauma

(Italian, English)

 

Benedict XVI and Dario Argento. The Holy Father Francis remains on the chair of Peter and avoid another trauma

If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority - not existing in the Church and in the world of authority higher than his - he should decide to acknowledge renunciation, would aggravate our trauma and give life to a disastrous custom: The papacy as a product with expiry date.

- Church news -

.

PDF print format article – PDF article print format

.

It is always important to explain the meaning of words, even when it might appear superfluous.

In current language, spoken and written, certain terms have lost not only their original etymology, they are even used in negative meaning. This that happens even within the Church, where more often it happens to hear ecclesiastical to affirm that we need "less dogmas and more basic church", complaining "forms of excessive attachment to the doctrine", or exposing to the public to the public a priest or theologian defined with a "Tridentine" contempt.

Regarding the concept "less dogmas plus basic church", It is necessary to clarify that, if so, The first to make mistakes would have been the fathers of the Council of Nicea del 325, followed a few decades later by the Council of Constantinople of 381. Their obsession with the dogmas was in fact so strong to give life to the symbol of faith known as Niceno-Costantinopolitan, A concentrate of Christological and trinitarian dogmas that we persist in reciting every Sunday in the creed, through which, In addition to not understanding the "basic church", even pluralism and religious relativism is rejected by arrogantly affirming: "I think the Church one, holy catholic and apostolic. I professed only one baptism for the forgiveness of sins ". A real exclusivity not incident that he shouts revenge on the sky!

Our, Far from the "basic" Esser, However, it is the exact opposite: a church of summit by its foundative nature. Christ himself put Simone called Pietro at his summit, from which everything proceeds with a waterfall effect, from top to bottom (cf.. Mt 16, 13-20).

Use the term "tridentino" as an insult, denotes a lack of worrying Catholic culture, It would be enough to know the rudiments of history to know in what conditions of decline the church between the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries had sunk and what moral degradation afflicted the clergy, together with ignorance. The work of this great council was extraordinary in all doctrinal aspects, legal, pastoral, training, disciplinary and moral.

In the pudibonda society of the politically correct there are various terms emptied of one's own meaning and filled with other things, To then be used in a derogatory and offensive meaning. But here is a truly striking example. If using Office365 we type the word "Jesuit" and seek synonyms, The writing program indicates the following synonymous: "hypocritical, Pharisee, farisea, simulator, simulatrice». Instead, If we type the word "Jew" and seek synonyms, The same program will indicate these synonymous: "Jewish, Jewish". And here it should be remembered that in the German dictionaries of the 1930s, as synonyms of the word "Jew" these terms were indicated: «hypocritical, Pharisee, Simulator» (hypocritical, Pharisee, simulator). And with this we must take note that the modern Nazi of the 21st century have transferred their old hateful synonymies to other objects: by the Jews, that as such are children of a greater God, now untouchable, The same terminologies have been transferred to the Jesuits that, being children of a very minor God, they can be touched and can be insulted in the same way that the Nazis of the 1930s insult the Jews.

To communicate a language is needed, principal that can sound almost obvious but that is not at all at all, There are many people who, while speaking the same language, words give a completely different meaning. This obliges us to clarify and explain the meaning of the words that are intended to use. Example: To the word "punishment" I give a theological meaning linked to its correct etymology deriving from the Latin terms chaste e hint from which the word chastise was born, which means "to make pure" or "purify". Nothing to do with punitive or vindictive actions, In the biblical and theological lexicon, punishment is an action of grace of divine mercy, that is, an act of love, Why, as it is written in the book of Tobia:

«Benedict God who lives forever
His kingdom lasts for all centuries;
He chastise and uses mercy,
It drops into the abysses of the earth,
traces from the great perdition
And nothing escapes his hand " (Tb 13, 2).

The word Tràuma, deriving from the Greek wound (-this), which in the letter means "wound", begins to be used in medical literature around the 1650, in the psychological one starting from 1889 Thanks mainly to the research of the Viennese neuropathologist Sigmund Freud. There are several forms of trauma understood in its more adherent meaning of "wound". Of course, the most serious forms, they are not linked to physical injuries, but to the psychological ones, to the spiritual ones. And we were amazed expansions by the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI who made us spectators and protagonists of a historical event that the Church has known very rarely: The renunciation of a Roman Pontiff.

Through incorrect uses of words The act of renunciation of the pontificate soon took the improper and misleading name of "resignation". Since this was not enough, Benedict XVI cheered the dose by launching the tragically unhappy expression of "Pope emeritus". The unusual way, in many respects extravagant, through which this legitimate act of renunciation has been made and made official, He gave jobs scattered throughout the terracqueo orbe, fomenting the crazy theories of some poor priests out of balance and some little successful lyrical singer who started playing Dan Brown of noartri By printing an unlikely Ratzinx coder, promptly renamed by the undersigned Codice Katzinger.

The Supreme Pontiff Francis, Admitted to the Roman Polyclinic Agostino Gemelli, He has found himself several times between life and death over the past four weeks. He currently seems to be out of danger and after a month about the specialists have melted the prognosis. If the Holy Father comes out and returns to his residence in the Vatican, He will be a very fragile and deeply weakened elderly man, With walking problems and difficulties in breathing and talking, inclined to fatigue themselves to minimal physical effort, need to be monitored and cared for constantly.

To govern the Church it may be enough that a Roman pontiff is simply alive, even if unable to move and say a few words in a low voice, to appear in public and to receive people. To bring trauma instead it may be enough to implement what Benedict XVI brought to the scene of our history in February of 2013, not so much with its legitimate and valid act of renunciation, but in the manner chosen, resulting to the proof of the facts: unhappy, misleading and imprudent.

The detractors of the Supreme Pontiff Francesco The clothes for the effigy of the infamous Pachamama made the Vatican in August of the Vatican 2020 During the Synod on the Amazon. Perhaps it would be more appropriate and coherent to regret the eccentricity of Benedict XVI who in the Vatican had the director Dario Argento entered, By giving us a horror film entitled not by chance Trauma, With a screenplay entirely built on delusional thoughts that went from the "resignation" to the "emeritus popes", from the "active papacy and contemplative papacy" to the "extended papacy" (!?) ... Moreover, everyone torture, Sgozza and spreads blood on your cinematographic set as it can best can. Then, If the perverse psychology of decadent German romanticism comes into play, At that point the limits are lost and the inhibitory brakes as well. With the difference, But, that that of the silver master is fiction, that of Benedict XVI was our tragic ecclesial reality.

If with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority - not existing in the Church and in the world of authority higher than his - the Holy Father Francesco had to decide to acknowledge renunciation, would aggravate our trauma and give life to a disastrous custom: The papacy as a product with expiry date. I pray and I hope this does not happen and that it remains on the chair of the blessed apostle Pietro up to death, because the Dario Argento brought to the scene by Benedict XVI, It was enough for us and advanced for the next five hundred years.

From the island of Patmos, 19 March 2025

.

____________________

BENEDICT XVI AND THE FILM-DIRECTOR DARIO ARGENTO. MAY THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS AVOID US ANOTHER TRAUMA

If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority – there being no authority superior to his in the Church and world – were to decide to make free and unquestionable act of renunciation, he would aggravate our trauma and give rise to a disastrous custom: the papacy as one product with expiration date.

— Ecclesial actuality —

.

PDF article print format

 

.

It is always important to explain the meaning of words, even when it might seem superfluous.

In current language, spoken and written, certain terms have lost not only their original etymology, but are used in a negative sense. This is that happens even within the Church, where often we hear ecclesiastics affirm that we need «less dogmas and more basic Church», lamenting «excessive attachment to doctrine», or exposing to ridicule a priest or a theologian scornfully defined as «Tridentine».

Regarding the concept of «less dogmas, more church of basic», it is necessary to clarify that, if this were the case, the first to err were the Fathers of the Council of Nicaea in the year 325, followed a few decades later by the Council of Constantinople in the year 381. Their obsession with dogma was in fact so strong that it gave birth to the Symbol of Faith known as the Nicene-Constantinopolitan, a concentration of Christological and Trinitarian dogmas that we insist on reciting every Sunday in the Creed, through which, in addition to not understanding the «church of basic», we even reject pluralism and religious relativism by arrogantly stating: «I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. I profess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins». Horror! A true non-inclusive exclusivism that cries out to heaven for vengeance!

Ours Church, is’nt “of basic”, is the opposite: for very nature foundative is Church of vertex. Christ himself placed at its vertex Simon called Peter, from whom everything proceeds with a cascade effect, from the top to the bottom (Mt 16, 13-20).

Using the term “Tridentine” as an insult, denotes lack of Catholic culture, it would be enough to know the rudiments of history to know into what conditions of decadence the Church had sunk between the 15th and 16th centuries and what moral degradation afflicted the clergy, together with ignorance. The work of this great council was extraordinary in all doctrinal, juridical, pastoral, formative, disciplinary and moral aspects.

In the prudish society of political correctness, there are various terms emptied of their meaning and filled with something else, used in a derogatory and offensive sense. But here is a example. If we use Office365 to type the word “Jesuit” and look for synonyms, the writing program indicates the following synonyms: «hypocrite, Pharisee, simulator». Instead, if we type the word “Jew” and look for synonyms, the program indicate these synonyms: «Jewish, Judaic». And here it should be remembered that in the German dictionaries of the 1930s, the following terms were used as synonyms of the word “Jew”: «hypocritical, Pharisee, Simulator» (hypocrite, Pharisee, simulator). The modern Nazis of the 21st century have transferred their old hateful synonyms to other subjects: from the Jews, who as such are children of a greater God, today untouchable, the same terminologies have been transferred to the Jesuits who, being children of a much lesser God, are touchable and can be insulted in the same way in which the Nazis of the 1930s insulted the Jews.

To communicate, you need a language, a principle that may sound almost obvious but is not at all, many people, even though they speak the same language, give words a completely different meaning. This forces us to explain the meaning of the words that are intended to be used. For example: to the word “punishment” I give a theological meaning linked to its correct etymology deriving from the Latin terms “chaste” and “hint” from which the word castigare comes, which means “to make pure” or “to purify”. Nothing to do with or vengeful actions, in the biblical and theological lexicon punishment is an act of grace of divine mercy, an act of love, because, as it is written in the Book of Tobit:

«For he afflicts and shows mercy,
casts down to the depths of Hades,
brings up from the great abyss.
Give thanks to him, you Israelites,
in the presence of the nations,
for though he has scattered you among them,
even there recount his greatness» (Tb 13, 2).

The word tràuma, derived from the Greek τραῦμα (-this), which means “wound”, began to be used in medical literature around 1650, in psychological literature starting in 1889, thanks mainly to the research of the Viennese neuropathologist Sigmund Freud. There are different forms of trauma understood in its most adherent meaning of “wound”. Certainly, the most serious forms are not linked to physical wounds, but to psychological, spiritual ones. We have been extensively traumatized by the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI who made us spectators and protagonists of a historical event that the Church has very rarely known: the renunce of a Roman Pontiff.

Through incorrect uses of words, the act of renunce from the pontificate soon took the improper and misleading name of «dimissions». Since this was not enough, Benedict XVI doubled the dose by launching the unfortunate expression of «pope emeritus». The unusual, and in many ways bizarre, way in which this legitimate act of renunciation occurred has given work to conspiracy theorists all over the globe, fomenting the crazy theories of some poor, unbalanced priests and some fantasists who have started playing at being the Dan Brown of the situation.

The Supreme Pontiff Francis, hospitalized at the Agostino Gemelli Polyclinic in Rome, has found himself between life and death several times over the last four weeks. In the present time appears to be out of danger and after about a month the specialists have loose the prognosis. If the Holy Father leaves and returns to his residence in the Vatican, he will be and profoundly weakened elderly man, with walking problems and difficulty breathing and speaking, prone to fatigue at the slightest physical effort, in need of constant monitoring and care.

To govern the Church, it may be enough for a Roman Pontiff simply to be alive, even if unable to move and say a few words in a whisper, to appear in public and receive people. To cause trauma, however, it may be enough to implement what Benedict XVI brought to the stage of our history in February 2013, not so much with his legitimate and valid act of renunciation, but with the methods chosen, which proved to be unfortunate, misleading and imprudent when put to the test.

The detractors of the Supreme Pontiff Francis are still tearing their clothes over the effigy of the Pachamama brought into the Vatican in August 2020 during the Synod on the Amazon. Perhaps it would be more appropriate and coherent cry tears for the eccentricity by Benedict XVI who brought the famous Italian director Dario Argento into the Vatican, giving us a horror film not coincidentally entitled Trauma, with a screenplay entirely built on delusional thoughts that ranged from «resignations» to «popes emeritus», from the «active papacy and contemplative papacy» to the «extended papacy» (!?) … After all, everyone tortures, slaughters and sheds blood on their own film set as best they can. Then, if the perverse psychology of decadent German romanticism comes into play, at that point the limits are lost and so are the inhibitions. With the difference: that of film-director Dario Argento is fiction by horror films, that of Benedict XVI was our tragic ecclesial reality.

If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority – there being no authority superior to his in the Church and world – were to decide to make free and unquestionable act of renunciation, he would aggravate our trauma and give rise to a disastrous custom: the papacy as one product with expiration date. I pray and hope that this does not happen and that he remains on the chair of the Blessed Apostle Peter until his death, because the Dario Argento brought to the scene by Benedict XVI has been more than enough for the next five hundred years.

From The Island of Patmos, March 19, 2025

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

And if simonia was back in vogue to vogue? – What if the simony return again at the next conclave?

(English text after the Italian)

And if simonia was back in vogue to vogue?

At present, the poor so exalted in this pontificate were left hostage of the whims of the rich as they had never been before, After giving life to a college of cardinal voters who do not represent the various items, The most diverse opinions and positions that have always enriched the church inside, but an univocal voice, monocorde.

- Church news -

.

PDF print format article – PDF article print format

.

Everyone has their own style, single or collective. In the first, as in the second case, It can be spontaneous, or studied at the table. The Fathers of the Island of Patmos, During their ten years of publicity activity, Starting from October 2014, several times for opportunities, Others for virtue of prudence, have given up on dealing with certain emerging issues related to the Church and the Papacy, Being first of all presbyters; editors and publicists to follow, But forward at all presbyters. Certain themes may require not to be silent, or worse hidden, but treated when you have more cognitive elements that can lead to a truthful, fair judgment.

Because you don't write anything about the health of the Holy Father, They asked us for more readers? Yup, In fact, the Supreme Pontiff Francesco has been hospitalized at the Polyclinic Agostino Gemelli and his health and his state of health have not emitted from these colors of our columns. And on the basis of what we should have done it, Perhaps based on daily medical bulletins, giving to follow breath to the trumpets of interpretations and hypotheses, including the most absurd, which however arouse that unhealthy itching that for the social media It is like yeast in croissants?

When a supreme pontiff is seriously ill, Talking about the succession is inevitable. Who does it with competence and delicacy, who instead with incompetence and lack of respect for his Augusta person. To these seconds it would only be enough to ask who the new Roman Pontiff is successor, If of the one who died before him, or of the blessed apostle Pietro, thus grasping the level of their preparation. Someone complained that talking about conclave is lack of respect and regard towards a supreme pontiff mildly defined by medical bulletins in now "serious" conditions now "stationary", all alternating with various small improvements or worsening. The truth is that the Supreme Pontiff is a terminal patient who is concluding his life and the reserved prognosis will be dissolved after Cardinal Camerlengo will recite the solemn sentence: «The Pope is really dead», Then he will turn to his corpse by calling him with his name of baptism: Jorge Mario. This means that the papacy, being an office and not the extreme degree of the sacrament of the order, once acquired legally, certainly not for the sacramental way, With death ceases. Contrary to the priesthood, acquired sacramentally, which makes us priests for eternity: «You are a priest forever» (Shall 110,4).

At the time he died back in August 1990, My father had 34 less years of the current reigning pontiff. Today, in Italy, The average age of the Italian male is equal to 84 year old; in Argentina, that of the Argentine male, is equal to 74 year old. Dying at the age that is anything but tender 88 years old, After having already exceeded the Italian average and fourteen average of the Argentine one, It could be said very serenely that the Holy Father will certainly not have been cruelly torn by the amorous arms of the nurse. I fell on an engraved with the premature death of my parent who took place within a year for a metastatized tumor not diagnosed in time and therefore impossible to cure, To narrate that while he was in the terminal state I have never wished him to continue living, but I praised the mercy of God who took it as soon as possible. Today, under certain circumstances, even without wishing anyone death, I continue to pray to God so that certain suffering are brought soon to the house of the divine Father, without ever forgetting the salvific value of human suffering, of which the Holy Pope John Paul II spoke in his magisterium in his apostolic letter saving Passion, which opens with the words of the blessed apostle Paul:

«Complete in my flesh what is missing from Christ's sufferings, in favor of his body which is the Church "" (With the 1, 14).

Those who declare that they pray for the health and healing of the Holy Father, inviting to do the same, either they live in the world of the Irreale or think that in front of a dying elderly, all the more a Roman pontiff, Galateo rules are applied to pathetic, if not perhaps ridiculous. You have to pray yes, But so that God grant the Holy Father the grace of a peaceful death, limiting his physical suffering, human and spiritual. With the complex and serious pathological state that afflicts it, including a total absence of immune defenses, its public exhibition would be impossible, Equally problematic to receive people who could be a vehicle for transmission of micro bacteria. If he stayed alive for other months, would return to Martha House Sancthae in conditions of this physical debilitation for which it would be necessary to set up a space-like space at that residence with the constant control of a team of specialists present day and night. All of this, It is perhaps wishable to a man like the reigning pontiff for whom isolation and lack of free contact with people would be something unbearable and unsustainable? This is to respond to all those romantics who pray for the now lost health of the Holy Father and for his impossible healing.

Think right now about a next conclave, It has not fallen in style but simple obviousness. And when the doors of the Sistine Chapel will close, The church will have to deal with the various problems left inheritance by this pontificate, which remains judged overall only by history, perhaps even in many years. The Supreme Pontiff Francesco was elected after an act of renunciation by his predecessor, Rare event result for all of us traumatic, especially for the unhappy ways chosen at the time by Benedict XVI, complete with an extravagant invention of the "Emeritus Papacy", or of sviant terms as "extended papacy", "Active papacy and contemplative papacy" ...

That of the Holy Father Francis It is a pontificate that is placed in a social and geopolitical context of great decadence on a planetary level, With a sceristianization of Europe that has already reached irreversible levels for twenty years. Elsewhere, an bleeding of faithful was consumed in what were once the two lungs with which Catholicism breathed: Latin America and Africa. Francesco's was a pontificate full of problematicities, made of ambiguity and lack of clarity, There are no lack of forms of despotism put in place in the total contempt of ecclesiastical laws and rules. Deny that this pontiff will leave a confused church, divided and quarrelsome due to open processes on all fronts, based on the unusual principle that "the important thing is to open the processes" without however concluding and bringing them to full fulfillment, It means denying the most clear evidence of the facts. But, Those who tell us that in several years will not have to be made thanks to Francesco's pontificate for having preserved and saved the Church by problems and damage that without his action, not understandable on the spot, they would have been greater, or even irreparable? Francesco is a complicated man who fits as such in a very complicated historical moment, any judgment given to the present on him and his pontificate could be completely wrong tomorrow. Certain expressions or decisions judged as eccentric - and in fact they are -, how completely different could appear tomorrow? It wouldn't be the first time that certain men, not included at the moment in their action, they were subsequently celebrated as a personality that were on decades compared to the present time in which they lived. That's why sometimes, just when you are perplexed, disoriented and suffering for certain ambiguous attitudes and not easy even to decipher, while exercising the legitimate critical sense it deserves prudentially suspend the judgment.

One of the serious problems that this pontificate will leave to the next conclave it is given by the fact that the cardinal voters do not know each other among them. The last secret consistory took place in 2015. Let's clarify: The Consistor is the assembly of the cardinals convened by the Roman Pontiff and can be secret, public, semi-public (see WHO). The one in which only the cardinals gathered to discuss in private form are called "secret", i.e. secret, with the Supreme Pontiff, Regarding the various problems of the Church and its government. Today, to the serious problem of cardinals who do not know each other among them, Another unknown to the secularists of the international left who magnify the poor church for the poor adds it, so much poverty excites them in the houses and on the skin of others, praising this pontificate that would have appointed dozens of cardinals "from the suburbs of the world" and "from the poorest countries". We fly over the scarce doctrinal and theological formation by several of these sant'Uomini from those privileged situations for which today a cardinal purple can be deserved: "The suburbs" ... "poor countries"… Several of these cardinals are bishops of countries where the presence of Catholics cannot be called even a small minority: on the island of Tonga, whose bishop Cardinal Soane Patita Paini Mafi is, The baptized Catholics are about 10.000. Cardinal was created in the 2020, at the age of just 46 year old, Giorgio Marengo, Apostolic Vicar of Mongolia, where Catholics count 1.200 baptized on 3.300.000 inhabitants. These cardinal voters, Emblem of the "poor church for the poor" of the various "existential suburbs", they govern local churches that can survive and live in contexts of great discomfort and authentic poverty thanks to the donations that come to them as rich local churches, or by large foundations dependent or related to them. To be understood: A single Austrian parish, German, Australian, Canoeing About, North American … It can maintain an entire diocese in certain poor countries of Latin America, of Asia and Africa, where the relationship between the euro and the dollar and their national currency is totally disproportionate in purchase value.

Tomorrow, in the Sistine Chapel, a group of cardinals from these countries, rigorously chosen among the exponents of the so -called more advanced progressiveness, With delicate ease they will make people understand that the cords of the bag hold them, leaving dozens of "poor-peripheral-existential" cardinals the obligatory choice played on the survival of local churches that can live only thanks to external aid. Of course, once this was called simonia, Today it is called instead "poor church for the poor".

At present, the poor so exalted in this pontificate they were left hostage of the whims of the rich as never before, After giving life to a college of cardinal voters who do not represent the various items, The most diverse opinions and positions that have always enriched the church inside, but an univocal voice, monocorde. And among the various damage perpetrated, This will perhaps be the worst, because weighs as a heavy mortgage like lead on the next conclave. This with all due respect to the poor Church, that inside the Sistine chapel will beat the poor with the cords of the bag of the most progressive and more ideologized rich.

From the island of Patmos, 2 March 2025

.

____________________

WHAT IF THE SIMONY RETURN AGAIN AT THE NEXT CONCLAVE?

At present the poor so exalted in this pontificate have been left hostage to the whims of the rich as they had never been before, after having given life to a College of cardinal electors who do not represent the various and noumerous voices, opinions and positions that have always enriched the Church internally, but a single, monotonous voice.

— Ecclesial actuality —

.

Everyone has their own style, individual or collective. In the first, as in the second case, it can be spontaneous, or studied on the table. The Fathers of this magazine The Island of Patmos , during ten years of journalistic activity, starting from October 2014, several times due to opportunity, other times due to the virtue of prudence, have renounced dealing with emerging themes linked to the Church and the Papacy, being first and foremost presbyters ; editors and publicists to follow, but presbyters ahead of everything. Certain topics may require to be dealt with when there is greater knowledge that can lead to a truthful, fair and balanced judgement.

Why don’t you write anything about the health of the Holy Father, several readers have asked us? Yes, in fact the Supreme Pontiff Francis has been hospitalized at the Agostino Gemelli Polyclinic for two weeks now and we have not uttered a sigh about him and his state of health in these columns of ours. And on the basis of what should we have done it, perhaps based on the daily medical bulletins, followed by interpretations and hypotheses, including the most absurd ones, which however arouse that unhealthy itch which for social media is like yeast in croissants?

When a Supreme Pontiff is seriously ill, talking about succession is inevitable. Some do it with competence and delicacy, some with incompetence and lack of respect for his August Person. These latter it would be enough ask, whose successor’s the new Roman Pontiff is: of the one who died before him, or of the Blessed Apostle Peter? Thus grasping the level of their preparation. Someone has complained that talking about a conclave is a lack of respect towards a Supreme Pontiff blandly defined by medical bulletins as being in sometimes “serious” and sometimes “stationary” conditions, all alternating with various small improvements or worsening. The truth is that the Supreme Pontiff is a terminally ill patient who is ending his life and the reserved prognosis will be dissolved after the cardinal chamberlain recites the solemn phrase: «The Pope is really dead» (The Pope is truly dead), then he will address his corpse by calling it by his baptismal name: Jorge Mario. This because the papacy, being an office, not the extreme degree of the Sacrament of Orders, once acquired by juridical means, not by sacramental means, ceases with death. Contrary to the priesthood, acquired through the Sacrament, which makes us priests for eternity: «You are a priest forever» (you are a priest forever) (Ps 110,4).

Way back in August 1990 my father died, he was 34 years younger than the current reigning Pontiff. Today, in Italy, the average age of the Italian male is 84 years; in Argentina, that of the Argentine male, is 74 years. Dying at the age of 88, after having already exceeded the Italian average by four years and the Argentine average by fourteen, one could say very serenely that the Holy Father will not be cruelly torn from the loving arms of the nanny. I mentioned the premature death of my parent which occurred within a year due to a metastasized tumor that was not diagnosed in time and therefore impossible to cure, to narrate that while he was in a terminal state I did not wish him to continue living, but I prayed to God’s mercy that he would take him as soon as possible. Today, in certain circumstances, without wishing death on anyone, I continue to pray to God that certain sufferers may be brought quickly to the House of the Divine Father, without ever forgetting the salvific value of human suffering, which the Holy Pontiff John Paul II spoke about in his magisterium in his Apostolic Letter Salvifici Pain, which opens with the words of the Blessed Apostle Paul:

«In my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the Church» (With the 1, 14).

Those who invite prayer for the health and healing of the Holy Father live in the world of the unreal. We must pray, yes, but so that God grants the Holy Father the grace of a peaceful death, limiting his physical, human and spiritual suffering. With the complex and serious pathological state that afflicts him, including a now total absence of immune defenses, his public exposure would be impossible, and it would be equally problematic to welcome people who could be a vehicle for the transmission of micro bacteria. If he remains alive for a few more months and returns to the Vatican, to the Martha House Sancthae, his conditions of physical debilitation will be so serious that it will be necessary to set up a hospital-type space in that residence with the constant presence of a team of specialists present day and night. Is all this perhaps desirable for a man like the reigning Pontiff for whom isolation and the lack of free contact with people would be something absolutely unbearable and unsustainable? This is to respond to all those romantics who pray for the now lost health of the Holy Father and for his impossible recovery.

Thinking at this moment about an upcoming conclave is not a fall in style but simple obviousness. And when the doors of the Sistine Chapel close, the Church will have to deal with the various problems left as a legacy by this pontificate, which remains judgeable, overall, only by history, perhaps even many years from now. The Supreme Pontiff Francis was elected after an act of renunciation by his predecessor, a rare event and a traumatic for all of us, especially due to the unfortunate methods chosen at the time by Benedict XVI, complete with the extravagant invention of the «emeritus papacy», or misleading terms such as «enlarged papacy», «active papacy and contemplative papacy» (!?)…

That of the Holy Father Francis is a pontificate that takes place in a social and geopolitical context of great decadence on a global level, with a de-Christianization of Europe that has already reached irreversible levels for twenty years. Elsewhere a hemorrhage of faithful has taken place in what were once the two lungs with which Catholicism breathed: Latin America and Africa.

Francis’ pontificate was full of problems, ambiguities and lack of clarity, there were also forms of despotism in total contempt of ecclesiastical laws and rules. To deny that this Pontiff will leave a confused, divided and quarrelsome Church due to trials open on all fronts, based on the unusual principle that «the important thing is to open the trials», without however concluding them and bringing them to full completion, is to deny the clearest evidence of the facts. However, who tells us that in several years we will not have to thank the pontificate of Francis for having preserved and saved the Church from problems and damage which without his actions, not understandable at the time, would have been greater, or even irreparable? Francis is a complicated man who fits into a very complicated historical moment, any judgment given in the present about him and his pontificate, could be completely wrong tomorrow.

It would not be the first time that certain men, not understood at the time in their actions, were later celebrated as extraordinary personalities who were decades ahead of the present time in which they lived. This is why sometimes, precisely when one is perplexed, disoriented and grieve for certain ambiguous attitudes and not even easy to decipher, despite exercising legitimate critical sense, is necessary and prudently suspending judgement..

One of the serious problems this pontificate will leave for the next conclave is this: tthe cardinal electors do not know each other. The last secret consistory took place in 2015. Let’s clarify: the consistory is the assembly of cardinals convened by the Roman Pontiff and can be secret, public, semi-public. What is called “secret” is that in which only the cardinals gathered to discuss in a private, i.e. secret, form with the Supreme Pontiff participate, regarding the various problems of the Church and its government. Today, to the serious problem of the cardinals who do not know each other, there is another one unknown to the secularists of the international left who glorify «the poor Church for the poor», so much does poverty in the homes and on the lives of others excites them, praising this pontificate which has appointed dozens of cardinals «coming from the peripheries of the world» and «from the poorest countries».

Let us not dwell the poor doctrinal and theological training of several of these holy men coming from those privileged situations for which today they can deserve a cardinal’s purple: «the suburbs» … «the poor countries». Several of these cardinals are bishops of countries where the presence of Catholics cannot be defined as even a small minority: on the island of Tonga, of which Cardinal Soane Patita Paini Mafi is bishop, there are around 10,000 baptized Catholics. Giorgio Marengo, apostolic vicar of Mongolia, where Catholics number 1,200 baptized out of 3,300,000 inhabitants, was created cardinal in 2020, at the age of just 46. These cardinal electors, emblem of the «poor Church for the poor» of the various «existential peripheries», govern local churches that can survive and live in contexts of great hardship and authentic poverty thanks to the donations that come to them from rich local churches, or from large foundations on linked to them. To be clear: a single Austrian, German, Australian, Canadian or North American parish can maintain an entire diocese in certain poor countries in Latin America, Asia and Africa, where the relationship between the Euro and the Dollar and their national currency is totally disproportionate in terms of purchase value.

Tomorrow, in the Sistine Chapel, a group of cardinals from these countries, rigorously chosen by Holy Father among the exponents of the so-called most advanced progressivism, will with delicate ease make it clear that they hold the purse strings, leaving dozens of “poor-peripheral-existential” cardinals the forced choice based on the survival of their local churches that can only live thanks to external aid. Of course, once this was called simony, today it is instead called «poor church for the poor».

At present the poor so exalted in this pontificate have been left hostage to the whims of the rich as they had never been before, after having given life to a College of cardinal electors who do not represent the various and noumerous voices, opinions and positions that have always enriched the Church internally, but a single, monotonous voice. And among the various damages perpetrated, this will perhaps be the worst, because it weighs like a lead-heavy mortgage on the next conclave. With all due respect to the poor Church, which inside the Sistine Chapel will strangle the poor, with the purse strings by rich most progressive and ideologicalized.

From The Island of Patmos, March 2, 2025

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Rediscover the beauty of the life of grace through the work of Blessed Angelico

REDISCOVERING THE BEAUTY OF GRAZIA'S LIFE THROUGH THE WORK OF BEATO ANGELICO

The feast of Beato Angelico remembers that every man, illuminated by grace, Although called to walk on steep paths, continually rediscover one's nature as a divine masterpiece. Creation, although disfigured by sin and the difficulties of life, it is always the place where the chiaroscuro of human existence intertwines with true and profound love.

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Fra Angelico, born Giovanni da Fiesole, he was a Dominican friar who lived his religious life between torment and ecstasy. Through this writing I would like to share some thoughts on this Dominican brother famous throughout the world for his art and his faith.

To illustrate life, Angelico's works and pictorial style I made use of the precious advice of the Dominican brothers Sister Paola Gobbo and Brother Manuel Russo. So let's start from life: Giovanni da Fiesole was born in the last years of the 14th century, between 1395 and the beginning of 1400, in Vicchio, a town in Mugello, today in the province of Florence. Since I was young, one of his most obvious gifts was painting. To follow this talent, he decided to leave his home. It is known with certainty that he moved to Florence for his apprenticeship. Experts maintain that his teacher was Lorenzo Monaco, a Camaldolese from the Florentine abbey of Santa Maria degli Angeli. His stay at Monaco lasted until 1417. As was typical of the shops of the time, in his early years Giovanni learned the art of miniature painting, of the panel and the fresco, depending on the master's commissions. The master took care of the most important parts of the works, leaving the secondary ones to his boys, who also had the task of preparing the materials and grinding the pigments. In this way, the disciples learned the trade by observing and practicing.

During the apprenticeship period, the composition of the works followed rigorous rules established by the iconographic tradition of Byzantine origin. The hierarchy established the size of the characters in proportion to their dignity, with the central place reserved for Christ. Even the scenic environment, the number and role of the characters, their attitudes were all set. The artists used traditional patterns, as if they had a ready-to-use manual that indicated the methods and subjects to paint. Even the color, fundamental for its expressive and iconographic value, was subject to significant limitations. For example, the gold background of the panels prevented a naturalistic setting and the colors of the clothes were fixed: yellow indicated Pietro, red and blue indicated Mary, blue and red indicated Christ.

In this context, artistic genius was expressed through rigid legislation, but with full creative freedom. The risk was high, since the works could be rejected by clients not ready for such innovations, or they could bring fame, precisely because novelty attracted and fascinated. This was the most important lesson that Giovanni learned in the Monk's workshop. The latter had drawn from the masters of the past, like Duccio da Buoninsegna, Simone Martini, the Lorenzetti brothers, Cimabue and Giotto. Giovanni Monaco's art took place in the transition between Gothic and Renaissance Humanism, learning from the greats of the past to "go beyond" tradition and studying the innovations of his time.

The first document concerning Fra Angelico it is dated 1417 and concerns his enrollment in the Company of San Nicolò, at the Carmine church in Florence, sign of a spiritual journey undertaken. In this document he is recognized as a «painter”. On that date, thanks to a posthumous gloss that reports the wording: «Fecesi friar of Saint Domenicho», we know he was still secular. He entered the reformed Dominican convent of Fiesole between 1420 and the 1422, by joining the Order of Preachers. We'll see you again, a few years later, also his brother Benedetto, miniaturist.

There were two Dominican convents in Florence: Santa Maria Novella and San Domenico in Fiesole. Of the first it is written that the priesthood was not granted to artists because they were considered servile workers. Beato Angelico instead fully entered the Fiesole convent. Religious education had a decisive impact on Fra Giovanni's life and art. To religious profession, he found himself at a crossroads: become a lay brother, today we would call him a lay brother, which would have ensured him greater freedom in his work, or friar cleric. He chose, with his superiors, the second street, probably because they judged him capable of being an authentic friar, priest and preacher through art. For this we must thank Saint Antoninus of Florence, who glimpsed the genius of Angelico and allowed it to develop and bear fruit.

In his works we find these themes predominant: the centrality of Christ, knowledge of the Holy Scripture, the magisterium of the Church, adherence to Thomistic theology, the exemplary nature of the saints and the attention to the requests and expectations of the people, and finally the simplicity of his creations. Among the numerous commissions that Angelico received, there was that of his prior Sant'Antonino, who wanted to create a series of wall paintings in the convent of the observants of San Marco. Work began in 1437 e, between 1439 and the 1445, Beato Angelico painted in fresco 54 compositions with over 320 figure umane.

Inside a convent they were legal, indeed requests, sacred images accompanying the common rooms, of the dormitory and cells. Non-sacred images were prohibited and precious materials were excluded. For this reason Fra Giovanni chose the fresco technique, whose compositional materials are simple, lowly, natural: lime, sand, terre. The beauty of these wall paintings is that they are found in the places intended by the artist. This is an advantage for us because we can grasp Angelico's thought, who created them in those precise places according to a project and a message that was very clear in his mind. For example, outside the entrance to the guesthouse of the convent he painted Christ the pilgrim welcomed by two friars. In the novitiate the figures of the crucified Christ stand out, support for those who entered religious life and an invitation to recognize and unite with love. Everything was designed to recall the minds of the friars to the divine, the divine that inhabits the human. It was a sort of help to maintain that climate of contemplation and deep listening that inhabited Dominican homes.

Let's look briefly at Angelico's pictorial work. It is transmitted to us by Vasari that he:

«He would never have put his hand to the brushes without first praying. He never made a crucifix that didn't wet his cheeks with tears.".

This tells us how mystical the soul of Beato Angelico was and how much his art came from deep contemplation, from an experience that becomes a message. Some authors tell us that he painted in a state of ecstasy. Obviously it's not the ecstasy we think it is, but something similar to a "kidnapping"; that is, being totally immersed, in what you are doing and thinking, with utmost dedication, placing all our faculties at that service. Angelico was immersed in the Mystery that he intended to celebrate with his art where he found that vital center where God lives and speaks to the heart.

Paola Mancinelli writes: «Artistic creation is always an event of truth and generosity as well as the possibility of humbly giving shape to the mystery of being after having received the call as a thirst for beauty» (cf.. The amazement of beauty, Oristampa, Florence, 2008). It's a wait, conceive and give birth to an intuition, an image that almost suddenly generates in our mind, before our eyes. Certain that what we produce will only be a reflection of that Beauty that flashed in our spirit.

As for the other aspect of tears that he indicates to us, he was reminiscent of Vasari, they are an expression of love, of pain, of involvement so Angelico was moved to the deepest fibers of his soul. If it is true that "the tongue speaks of the abundance of the heart", this also applies to artistic expression, through which Fra Giovanni showed his entire interior world. We cannot separate the man from the artist, the man from the consecrated, this unity which is not separable.

Il Beato Angelico seppe to touche dalla "gracias gracias facens" (the grace that makes us welcome), a gift that illuminates the path of humanity, guiding her through the challenges and darknesses of life. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches:

«Our justification comes from the grace of God. Grace is favor, the free help that God gives us because we respond to his invitation: become children of God, adopted children, participate in the divine nature, of eternal life. Grace is a participation in the life of God; introduces us into the intimacy of Trinitarian life. Through Baptism the Christian participates in the grace of Christ, Head of his body. As an “adopted son”, he can now call God “Father”, in union with the only begotten Son. He receives the life of the Spirit which instills charity in him and forms the Church. This vocation to eternal life is supernatural. It depends entirely on the free initiative of God, since he alone can reveal himself and give himself. It surpasses the capabilities of man's intelligence and willpower, as of every creature" (cf.. CCC 1996, 1997, 1998).

Jesus Christ, with his sacrifice, he gave us "grace upon grace" (GV 1,16), a continuous flow of love and redemption that manifests divine glory. This is why Fra Angelico, with his art, continues to speak to our hearts, offering a path of beauty and light that shines in the darkest moments. His party, today, takes on an even deeper meaning, especially in an era marked by war, the division and isolation produced even by social media, when instead spiritual rebirth and beauty, including the artistic one, they are essential for all humanity.

God's grace is both a concept and a reality which truly expresses and represents the unconditional love and divine favor that is offered to us without merit. This grace makes the glory of God present, visible through the works of Christ and his followers.

Fra Angelico, with his art, he was able to capture this glory, transferring divine grace into his works with representations that speak directly to the soul. His works, such as «The Annunciation» and «The Last Judgment», they are visual testimonies of that grace, and they call us inviting us to reflect on our relationship with the divine.

In times of crisis like ours, beauty plays a fundamental role for our spiritual and moral rebirth, that of the rediscovery of the Good of Beauty. Scriveva Hans Urs Von Balthasar:

«In a world without beauty, in a world that is perhaps not without them, but he is no longer able to see her, to deal with it, even good has lost its attractive force, the evidence of its must-be-fulfilled; and man remains perplexed by it and wonders why he shouldn't rather prefer evil" (cf.. Gloria 1 – Perception of Form, Jaca Book, Milan, 2012, 18).

Fra Angelico, with his being an artist, he showed how beauty can be a vehicle of grace and redemption. Even the light that illuminates his paintings is a symbol of the divine light that guides our steps, even in the darkest moments.

The feast of Beato Angelico remembers that every man, illuminated by grace, Although called to walk on steep paths, continually rediscover one's nature as a divine masterpiece. Creation, although disfigured by sin and the difficulties of life, it is always the place where the chiaroscuro of human existence intertwines with true and profound love. Fra Angelico, with his art, invites us to see beyond appearances, to discover the beauty hidden in every corner of our lives.

The artists, like Fra Angelico, they have the gift of dragging us beyond immanence, beyond the paths of pure rationality and theoresis. Their art takes us between torment and ecstasy, making us live experiences that go beyond simply seeing. Beauty, in this sense, it becomes a way of knowing and experiencing the divine. It is a path that invites us to let ourselves be transformed by grace, to see the world with new eyes, illuminated by the light of faith.

In conclusion, the path of light through grace is a journey we are all called to take. Fra Angelico, offers us invaluable guidance on this journey, showing us how beauty and light can illuminate our darkest paths. His party, today, invites us to rediscover our nature as divine masterpieces, to let ourselves be transformed by grace and to walk with confidence towards glory. This celebration can be a time of rebirth for all of us, especially for artists who, with their work, continue to bring light and hope to the world.

The hope, which is also the guiding theme of this jubilee, as Holy Scripture reminds us, when it comes from God it is always founded and does not confuse. Hope, like art and the beauty that is its necessary corollary, is harmonious, integral and proportionate. So that we all become beautiful and hopeful, let's rediscover the art of Beato Angelico who depicted the beauty and uniqueness of Christ for us.

 

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 18 February 2025

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The ancient intelligent animal and the new artificial intelligence

THE ANCIENT INTELLIGENT ANIMAL AND THE NEW ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

These are the occasions in which man has demonstrated his intelligence, certainly not imposing itself as the strongest animal, or fast, or skilled, but showing himself capable of managing a superior instrument with his adaptable intelligence, exercising his ability with which he has always been able to adapt to those numerous historical changes which today are called technological changes.

- Actuality -

Author:
Jorge Facio Lynx
President of Editions The island of Patmos

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

In these days one of the most present topics in the news and in social media it is focusing on AI (Artificial Intelligences) and its positive implications, but above all negative, especially with the summit that is being celebrated in Paris: AI Action Summit.

It is appropriate to start from two important premises: each of these systems is ultimately an instrument in the hands of man and for this reason reflects with an unimaginable enhancement nowadays the same research and way of thinking and acting of man. Therefore it is man himself who can direct the instrument to help and improve progress, science and human life itself, how can he use this tool for the worst nightmares ever experienced in history.

The very concept of Intelligence must be clarified: Due to their power and speed, the systems can achieve calculations and operations that human beings individually or in groups would not be able to easily achieve, but so far they are sectoral and specific operations; while the singularity of human Intelligence is characterized by creativity and simultaneity in operating multiple functions and themes. The fear is not so much about where artificial intelligence systems can arrive as tools, but to what point is laziness reaching, the reluctance, the ignorance and inactivity that people are reaching in everyday life, favoring leisure in an increasingly vain and superficial world, rather than trying to best develop one's qualities, gifts and abilities.

Today life itself is structured to be lived passively, in zombie or “amoeba” mode, despite having access to unlimited information at our fingertips and with such a vast range of technical tools and technologists with which we could work wonders.

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming society and the world of work, so much so that its development and diffusion raise important ethical questions, social and economic. While Europe pursues as a strategy a theoretical framework of a regulatory and human-centered approach, especially the protection of fundamental rights, the United States and Asia, especially China, they instead chose a pragmatic and economic approach where they left carte blanche for innovation and competition. There has been a massive investment in AI research and development by governments with the sole goal of achieving the leadership worldwide in the sector.

One of the main concerns about AI is its potential impact on the world of work: the automation of production processes would lead to an increase in unemployment and social inequality, especially in the manufacturing sectors, agricultural, of trade and services.

The other important issue is the ecological impact, AI models are complex and require enormous amounts of energy, with a consequent significant impact on the environment. The widespread use of smart devices and the production of large amounts of data also raise concerns about natural resource consumption and e-waste management. Exists, along with the two concerns just indicated, also the danger of losing control over AI and the consequent fear of developing capabilities that can surpass human control and generate unpredictable consequences for society. Equal fear generates the danger of the improper use of AI for harmful purposes, such as the creation of autonomous weapons or the manipulation of public opinion.

AIs have an immediate and devastating impact in different generations of society, especially the older ones, who are much more vulnerable, as well as defenseless and often unable to grasp the danger when they find themselves involved in scams , thefts and deceptions for which they are not prepared, not having received adequate information from anyone, today more pressing than ever, about the dangers that may arise.

If AI as a powerful technology offers great opportunities, at the same time it also raises big questions. On the one hand, an open dialogue that takes into account the potential benefits as well as the risks for workers and the environment appears essential, so that its development and use is ethical and sustainable and aimed at the good of humanity. But, as you know, when money is involved it is difficult to have a solid guarantee on the operation of the project, and everything could remain within the ideal scope of beautiful words.

Workplace AI will not lead to the abolition of human work if we accept the profound transformation of the labor market that is already taking place, It is therefore essential to invest in education and training to prepare workers to coexist with AI as humans did in the past with the arrival of the steam engine or the automobile.; because these are the occasions in which man has demonstrated his intelligence, certainly not imposing itself as the strongest animal, or fast, or skilled, but showing himself capable of managing a superior instrument with his adaptable intelligence, exercising his ability with which he has always been able to adapt to those numerous historical changes which today are called technological changes, reinventing new activities and developing new skills.

 

the Island of Patmos, 15 February 2025

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

When the devil puts his tail, between exorcisms and narcissisms … – When the Devil puts his tail on us, between exorcisms and narcissisms …

(English text after the Italian)

 

When the devil puts his tail, BETWEEN EXORCISMS AND NARCISSISMS…

Major exorcism is the therapy of choice to fight the Evil One? It's still: the action of the Evil One is always and only the extraordinary one or the ordinary action is not much more subtle and insidious? To answer these questions we make some further clarifications …

— Pastoral current events —

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

PDF print format article

PDF article print format

.

Perhaps a clarification is due, because as expected, my article from 7 last February (see WHO) caused some readers to turn up their noses, so much so that they came to interpret my writing as an attack (personal?) to all those beautiful souls who daily fight against the Devil.

In short, all we were missing was the killjoy Capuchin friar to hinder the army of those warriors of light who with Captain Jesus - who is not up there but down here with the flag in his hand - catch the devils red-handed as the good Angelo Branduardi sang (you see WHO).

I consider my writing extremely clear so much so that it acts as a corollary to the beautiful note from the International Association of Exorcists (you see WHO) who certainly cannot be blamed for being a group of partisans and exalted troublemakers. And of demonology and the related sacramental of exorcism, two Fathers of this island of Patmos of ours perhaps know something about it. Both myself and Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo we both underwent training for this delicate ministry, in the usual year 2009 and at the same academic-ecclesiastical institution. Certain alarms must also be given, we must warn the Christian faithful against certain deviations as the prophets in ancient Israel used to do with the stiff-necked people: «Whether they listen or not – because they are a bunch of rebels – they will at least know that a prophet is among them» (cf. This 2,2-5). Some things just have to be said.

I believe that the priest today must rediscover his role as prophet, of the one who speaks in the name of God, something that is increasingly rare in an ecclesial community where clerical-religious personalism has become hypertrophic. Being a prophet involves inevitable hardships, of misunderstandings, an inconvenience that is difficult to accept but necessary, until proclaiming – from the rooftops (cf. LC 12,3) – even what most people don't want to hear. And all this without veils of rash judgments but with that prophetic parrhesia that we find within the folds of the pastoral responsibility that we owe to the people of God entrusted to us with sacred ordination.

Having said this, I would like to return further to some well-known issues, so well known, which are routinely ignored, disregarded and needlessly cunningly manipulated.

1. What is an exorcism?

It is the invocation of the name of God made in order to ward off the devil from a person, from an animal, from a place or thing. When it is done in the name of the Church, by a legitimately appointed minister and according to the rites foreseen in the approved liturgical books, exorcism is called public and has the value of sacramentals. If not, this is a private practice. Public exorcisms are divided into simple and solemn or major. In this article I will not stop to analyze the simple exorcisms that were part of some blessing rites included in chapter IX of the old Roman ritual or those inherent to specific paths and stages of the catechumenate journey and the baptism of children and especially adults.

Clarified this, the public exorcisms foreseen for cases of obsession or diabolical possession are called solemn or major, or in cases where the devil, operating from the outside, permanently prevents the individual's actions or in cases where Satan works through the individual's organism by acting from within the body of the possessed person, exercising more or less full dominion.

The prayer of exorcism more sought after by certain demonopathic believers, needless to say, the solemn exorcism. The need is so strong that even some alleged prayers for liberation have the structure of real solemn exorcisms, complete with an accusative and imperative formula. As I have said many times, We are looking for the strongest exorcist or the most talented charismatic person who has the most effective command formula against the devil to definitively solve all problems. We have to smile bitterly because in everyday jargon we often hear about the skill or otherwise of an exorcist or a charismatic person.. This lexical distinction has no reason to exist from a theological-spiritual point of view, it's not about using the skill typical of a cleric fantasy di D&D but everything starts from the authority of Christ who acts in the person of the exorcist and who God the Father welcomes and grants in view of the ultimate good of the soul.

At this point in the discussion a question is de rigueur: major exorcism is the therapy of choice to fight the Evil One? It's still: the action of the Evil One is always and only the extraordinary one or the ordinary action is not much more subtle and insidious? To answer these questions we make some further clarifications, already mentioned in my previous article of 7 February.

2. Baptism and Confession to fight the Devil

We should first of all remember that the first form of fight against the Devil is baptismal life, that new life in the Spirit which is nourished by a radical change of mentality or Metanoia (dal greco repent – of methane), from which the Italian term conversion derives. The Metanoia it marks a passage from the mentality subject to sin and concupiscence - of which Satan is the prince and creator; origin and cause (cf. GV 12,31; Ef 2,2; 2Color 4,4; 1GV 5,19) – to that of the Holy Spirit in which the risen Lord reigns (cf. With the 1,13; RM 6,14; 8,2). This change of register - of mind and heart - is already in itself a powerful path of liberation as Christ has freed us so that we remain free (cf. Gal 5,1). In the catechumenate path, this joyful freedom that Christ has gained for us is contrasted with the slavery of sin that the devil never stops arousing in man with his plots in contempt of God (cf. Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults n. 78; 113; 156; 164; 171; 178; 255; 339; 372; 377; 379; 381 these are the different prayers that we define as simple exorcisms. Their analysis from both a liturgical and sacramental point of view would be useful to highlight the tension towards metanoia and the new life that the catechumen obtains with immersion in Christ's Easter).

Always remaining on the baptismal theme, how can we fail to include the Our Father prayer which was solemnly given to us in baptism and which asks God for liberation from the evil one. The Our Father is the prayer of children but it also constitutes the first simple supplicatory formula for liberation from the power of the evil one. The prayer of the Our Father is liturgically placed as the final culmination of the rite of Baptism (cf. Rite of Baptism of children n. 76 and Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults nos. 188-189), and this is to express the tension towards a daily conversion in which every day the baptized believer asks God to be freed from the evil one in order to be able to participate as worthily as possible in that sonship of a son in the Son.

Another necessary clarification. The fight against the Devil takes place with good sacramental practice in which confession constitutes the most effective and eloquent weapon of choice than any other exorcism prayer. Recognizing and renouncing the works of the devil in my personal life becomes essential to ward off Satan. If I can do this, I recognize the vital action of the Holy Spirit who acts and convinces me about sin, righteousness and judgment (cf. GV 16,8-9). In the majority of cases, a good priest confessor is enough to resolve what could take much longer due to negligence, with the not remote risk of opening the door to the extraordinary action of the devil, according to what the teaching of the Catechism of the Catholic Church already provides: «sin leads to sin; With the repetition of the same documents it generates the vice. The result is perverse inclinations that darken the conscience and alter the concrete evaluation of good and evil." (cf. n. 1865 and on the reality of sin cf. in nn. 1846-1876).

Frequently reiterate this teaching of the Church It absolutely doesn't mean throwing the baby out with the bathwater, demonizing exorcism. On the contrary, in doing so we intend to give a right place to a sacramental, contextualising it within a journey of mature and realistic faith that we are all called to follow, even with difficulty. Giving up Satan has never been an easy and immediate task.

3. The exorcist is not one Guest star

Another major clarification on exorcism concerns the one who is its minister par excellence. The canon 1172 of the Code of Canon Law declares that no one can legitimately perform exorcisms on the possessed if he has not obtained a special and express license from the local Ordinary (§ 1). This license must be granted by the local Ordinary only to a priest distinguished for piety, science, prudence and integrity of life (§ 2). The same things are reiterated by the "Letter to the Ordinaries concerning the norms on exorcisms" of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of 29 September 1985 (you see WHO) and from the ritual of the "Rite of Exorcisms and Prayers for particular circumstances", effective from 31 March 2002.

Therefore based on what has been established by the Church it is necessary for a person to perform solemn exorcisms in a legitimate way:

a) that it is only and exclusively a presbyter.

b) that such designated presbyter is licensed, conferred in a personal and direct way and expressed by the local Ordinary. The conferral of this faculty must therefore appear clearly from the bishop's decree. The license cannot be considered tacit or presumed. It can only be implied if connected to the office of exorcist.

(c)) in particular cases, for the exercise of the ministry of exorcism outside one's own diocese, the decision and judgment of the local Ordinary is necessary, who must be promptly informed by carrying out due discernment.

The ministerial action of the exorcist priest is meek and humble, he is the minus-ter is the smallest compared to Him who is Lord and Savior. No priest can undertake the fight against the demonic spirit alone, no layman or supposedly charismatic or psychic can have his own authority over demons. This authority was given by Christ to the apostles (cf. LC 9,1) and to the disciples who believe in him (cf. MC 16,17; LC 10,19) and who were established and sent by the Church as ministers of liberation and consolation.

4. Meetings and weekends of liberation and healing, all it takes is a little transparency

I have already explained in my previous article the danger posed by these parallel gatherings in the life of the Church, which look a lot like seditious gatherings. Gatherings managed by lay people without any authorization and competence which constitute a disorder for the faith journey of the faithful. What perhaps many still don't know is that stringent regulations have been issued in various dioceses of Italy regarding this type of demonstration and the like.. An example of this is the Sicilian Episcopal Conference (you see WHO), the Piedmontese Episcopal Conference (you see WHO); a note to this effect from the bishop of Trieste: «I saw Satan fall from heaven…» (you see WHO); and the excellent with a bailout of the diocese of Brescia which also includes various norms relating to the ministry of the exorcist (you see WHO).

I reiterate that prayer meetings and Christian formation must be carried out in ecclesial environments, except for those national convocations which involve thousands of people and which must guarantee very precise security and manageability criteria which are not always possible to have in official ecclesial contexts. It would be good practice, not of etiquette but of obedience to the Church, inform the diocesan bishop of these meetings. Inform the local Ordinary in good time with an official letter about the type of meeting, on the topic discussed, on the speakers who will speak and on the activities carried out at the same time. And only when approval has been received from him, together with his fatherly blessing we can proceed. Putting the bishops in front of a fait accompli, it is very reminiscent of the modus operandi of the fuitina of the past years with which rebellious parents were forced to agree to the marriage of their children. Personally I believe that everything must be documented to be transparent in view of the good that we want to bring to souls, knowing that the devil tends to hide and hide as much as possible. It would be appropriate to read the bishop's letter of approval in these assemblies to participate more fully in that ecclesial communion which has its center in the diocesan bishop. Unfortunately, the reality of the facts is of a very different kind and the bishops find themselves warning the clergy and the people of God against these meetings, enjoying the same success as the shouts against the bravos of Manzoni's memory. But there is more if the organizer of such meetings is from another diocese, it is enough to investigate a little to discover that these characters - both clerics and lay people - have been considered unmanageable since time immemorial and difficult to recover except with canonical sanctions and recourse to the competent departments.

5. Publishing about the devil: ecclesiastical approval still exists?

If we look around the most common Catholic bookstores, we often have to resign ourselves to not finding the requirement of catholicity, sometimes not even that of Christianity. But this would open a chapter that is better closed immediately. When dealing with the devil and exorcisms, it is now well established that this topic has found its perpetual youth in publishing, in other words we say that there is a good market. While we congratulate those who manage to live with these publications - you have to eat - I cannot help but offer constructive criticism. Dealing with specifically theological themes, the authors of these works of demonology, of pastoral care of exorcisms or prayers of liberation, they should obtain a permit from the competent ecclesiastical authority. What does this mean? What we are talking about is certainly not the permission to publish or not a book but the guarantee that what is published does not conflict with the faith, the moral, the magisterium and discipline of the Church. It means having the tranquility of mind to operate in continuity of intent with what the Church believes and lives regarding its teaching. Even in this area, editorial works on demonological topics approved by the competent ecclesiastical authority are very rare, Indeed, it is often enough to consider the single publishing house with which certain volumes are published to already have a more than satisfactory overview of the distance from any form of Catholicism and Christianity as well as a certain assonance with Christianized esotericism..

In conclusion I hope that this further article of mine be considered for what it really is, a heartfelt reflection on a very complex and delicate phenomenon such as exorcism and demonology. There is still so much to say and it is not excluded that he could return to the topic. For the moment, no one should feel attacked or compromised in their work but rather encouraged to live more and more in the light of the truth that makes everything clear., awaiting that definitive triumph of Christ over the devil at the end of time.

Sanluri, 11 February 2025

.

_________________________________

WHEN THE DEVIL PUTS HIS TAIL ON US, BETWEEN EXORCISMS AND NARCISSISMS…

Is major exorcism the therapy of choice to fight the Evil One? Is the action of the Evil One always and only the extraordinary one or isn’t the ordinary action much more subtle and insidious? To answer these questions let’s make some further clarifications…

— Pastoral actuality —

 

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

Perhaps a clarification is due, because as expected, my article of February 7th (see HERE) has raised doubts in some readers, so much so that they have come to interpret my writing as an attack on those beautiful souls who fight against the Devil on a daily basis.

All we needed was the Capuchin friar to hinder the army of those warriors of light who with Captain Jesus – who is not up there but down here with the flag in his hand – catch the devils red-handed as the Italian sing Angelo Branduardi sang (see HERE).

My writing extremely clear, and conform y to the optimal note from the International Association of Exorcists (see HERE) which certainly cannot be blamed for being a group of exalted partisans. Two Fathers of this island of Patmos know something about demonology and the related sacramental of exorcism. Father Ariel S. Levi of Gualdo and I both underwent training for this delicate ministry in the year 2009 at the same academic-ecclesiastical institution. Certain alarms must also be given, the Christian faithful must be warned against certain deviations as the prophets in ancient Israel: “Whether they listen or not – because they are a rebellious race – they will at least know that a prophet is among them” (cf. Ezekiel 2,2-5). Some things just have to be said.

I believe that the priest today must rediscover his role as a prophet who speaks in the name of God, which is increasingly rare in an ecclesial community where clerical-religious personalism has become hypertrophic. The prophetic mission involves inevitable hardships, misunderstandings, an inconvenience that is difficult to accept but necessary, to the point of proclaiming from the rooftops (cf. Luke 12, 3) even what most people would not like to hear. And all this without veils of rash judgments but with that prophetic parrhesia contained in the pastoral responsibilities that we must exercise towards the people that God has entrusted to us through sacred priestly ordination.

Having said this, I would like to return further to some issues that are so well known that they are regularly ignored or cunningly manipulated.

1. What is an exorcism?

It is the invocation of the name of God made to ward off the Devil from a person, an animal, a place or a thing. When it is carried out in the name of the Church, by an authorized minister according to the rites provided for in the approved liturgical books, the exorcism is called public and has the value of sacramentals. Otherwise is a private practice. Public exorcisms are divided into simple and solemn or major. I will not stop to analyze the simple exorcisms that were part of some blessing rites contained in chapter IX of the old Rituale Romanum or those inherent to specific paths and stages of the catechumenate journey and the baptism of children and especially of adults.

The public exorcisms foreseen for cases of obsession or diabolical possession are called solemn or major, or in cases in which the Devil, operating from the outside, permanently prevents the individual’s actions or in cases in which Satan operates through the individual’s organism, acting from within the body of the possessed person, exercising more or less full dominion.

The exorcism prayer most sought after by demonopathic issolemn exorcism. The need is so strong that even some alleged prayers of liberation have the structure of solemn exorcisms with an invocativ and imperative formula. Thas I have often had the opportunity to say, we are looking for the “strongest” exorcist or the charismatic person who possesses the most effective command formula against the Devil to definitively resolve all problems. We have to smile bitterly because in everyday jargon we often hear people talk about the skill or otherwise of an exorcist or a charismatic person. This distinction has no reason to exist from a theological-spiritual point of view, it is not a question of using the skills of a D&D fantasy cleric but everything starts from the authority of Christ who acts in the person of the exorcist and who God the Father welcomes and grants in view of the ultimate good of the soul.

At this point a question is necessary: is major exorcism the therapy of choice to fight the Evil One? Is the action of the Evil One always and only the extraordinary one or isn’t the ordinary action much more subtle and insidious? To answer these questions we make some further clarifications, already mentioned in my previous article of February 7th.

2. Baptism and Confession to fight the Devil

It should be remembered that the first form of fight against the Devil is baptismal life, that new life in the Spirit which is nourished by a radical change of mentality or metanoia (from the Greek μετανοεῖν – of methane), from which the term “conversion” derives. The Metanoia marks a transition from a mentality subject to sin and concupiscence – of which Satan is the prince and creator; origin and cause (cf. Jn 12.31; Eph 2.2; 2Color 4.4; 1Jn 5.19) – to that of the Holy Spirit in whom the risen Lord reigns (cf. With the 1.13; RM 6.14; 8.2). This change of register – of mind and heart – is already in itself a powerful path of liberation as Christ has freed us so that we remain free (cf. Gal 5.1). In the catechumenate path, this joyful freedom in Christ contrast with the slavery of sin that the Devil never ceases to arouse in man with his plots in contempt of God (cf. Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults nos. 78; 113; 156; 164; 171; 178; 255; 339; 372; 377; 379; 381 these are the different prayers that we define as simple exorcisms. Their analysis from both a liturgical and sacramental point of view would be useful to highlight the tension towards boredom and new life that the catechumen obtains with immersion in Christ’s Easter).

Still remaining on the baptismal theme, how can we not include the prayer of the “Our Father” which was solemnly given to us in baptism and which asks God for liberation from the Evil one. It is the prayer of the sons which also constitutes the first simple dedicatory formula for liberation from the power of theEvil one. The prayer of the Our Father is liturgically placed as the final culmination of the rite of Baptism (cf. Rite of the Baptism of children n. 76 and Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults n. 188-189), and this to express the tension towards a daily conversion in which every day the baptized believer asks God to be freed from the Evil One in order to be able to participate as worthily as possible in that sonship in the Divin Son.

Another necessary clarification. The fight against the Devil takes place with good sacramental practice in which confession constitutes the most effective and eloquent weapon of choice than any other exorcism prayer. Recognizing and renouncing the works of the Devil in my personal life becomes fundamental to ward off Satan. If I manage to do this, I recognize the vital action of the Holy Spirit who acts and convinces me regarding sin, justice and judgment (cf. Jh 16.8-9). In the majority of cases, a good priest confessor is enough to resolve what could take much longer due to negligence, with the not remote risk of opening the door to the extraordinary action of the Devil, according to what the teaching of the Catechism of the Catholic Church already foresees: «sin leads to sin; with the repetition of the same acts it generates vice. The result is perverse inclinations that darken the conscience and alter the concrete evaluation of good and evil” (cf. n. 1865 and on the reality of sin cf. n. 1846-1876).

Frequently reiterating this teaching of the Church absolutely does not mean debasing exorcism. On the contrary, we intend to give a right place to a sacramental, contextualising it within a journey of mature and realistic faith that we are all called to undertake, even with difficulty. Giving up Satan has never been an easy and immediate task.

3. The Exorcist is not a Guest Star

Another major clarification on exorcism concerns the one who is its minister par excellence. Canon 1172 of the Code of Canon Law declares that no one can legitimately perform exorcisms on the possessed if he has not obtained a special and express license from the local Ordinary (§ 1). This license must be granted by the local Ordinary only to a priest distinguished for piety, knowledge, prudence and integrity of life (§ 2). The same things are reiterated by the “Letter to the Ordinaries regarding the rules on exorcisms” of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of 29 September 1985 (see HERE) and by the ritual of the Rite of Exorcisms and Prayers for particular circumstances, in force since 31 March 2002.

Therefore, according to what has been established by the Church, for a person to be able to perform solemn exorcisms in a legitimate way it is necessary:

a) only and exclusively a presbyter.

b) that this designated presbyter has the license conferred by the local Ordinary. The conferral of this faculty must therefore appear clearly from the bishop’s decree. The license cannot be considered tacit or presumed. It can only be implied if connected to the office of exorcist.

(c)) in particular cases, for the exercise of the ministry of exorcism outside one’s own diocese, the decision and judgment of the local Ordinary is necessary, who must be promptly informed by carrying out due discernment.

The ministerial action of the exorcist priest is meek and humble, he is the smallest compared to He who is Lord and Savior. No priest can undertake the fight against the demonic spirit alone, no layman or supposedly charismatic or sensitive person can have his own authority over demons. This authority was conferred by Christ on the Apostles (cf. Luke 9.1) and on the disciples who believe in him (cf. Mk 16.17; Page 10.19) and who were established and sent by the Church as ministers of liberation and consolation.

4. Meetings and weekends of liberation and healing, all it takes is a little transparency

I have already explained in my previous article the danger posed by these parallel gatherings in the life of the Church, which look so much like seditious gatherings. Gatherings managed by lay people without any authorization and competence which constitute a disorder for the faith journey of the faithful. What perhaps many still don’t know is that stringent regulations regarding this type of demonstration have been issued in various dioceses of our nation. An example of this is the Sicilian Episcopal Conference (see HERE), the Piedmont Episcopal Conference (see HERE); a note to this effect from the bishop of Trieste: «I saw Satan fall from heaven…» (see HERE); and the excellent handbook of the diocese of Brescia which also includes various regulations on the ministry of the exorcist (see HERE).

5. Publishing about the devil: does ecclesiastical approval still exist?

In Catholic bookstores we often no longer the Catholicity, sometimes not even Christianity. But this would open a chapter that is better closed immediately. When dealing with the Devil and exorcisms this topic in publishing has been able to find its perpetual youth, in other words let’s say that there is a good market. While we congratulate those who manage to survivewith these publications – you have to eat – I cannot help but offer constructive criticism. Dealing with specifically theological themes, the authors of these works of demonology, pastoral care of exorcisms or liberation prayers should obtain authorization from the competent ecclesiastical authority. What does this mean? What we are talking about is certainly not the permission to publish or not a book but the guarantee that what is published does not conflict with the faith, morality, magisterium and discipline of the Church. It means having the tranquility of mind to operate in continuity of intent with what the Church believes and lives regarding its teaching. Even in this area, editorial works on a demonological theme approved by the competent ecclesiastical authority are very rare; indeed, it is often enough to consider the single publishing house with which certain volumes are published to already have a more than satisfactory overview of the distance from any form of Catholicity and Christianity, but rather a certain assonance with Christianized esotericism.

In conclusion, I hope that this second article of mine is considered for what it really is: a serious reflection on a complex and delicate phenomenon such as exorcism and demonology. There is much more to say and it is not excluded that he could return to the topic. For the moment, no one should feel attacked in their work but encouraged to live more and more in the light of the truth that makes everything clear, awaiting that definitive triumph of Christ over the Devil at the end of time.

Sanluri, 11 February 2025

.

.

.

The books of Ivano Liguori, to access the book shop click on the cover

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

 

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

 

.





The devil is said to be the pots but not the lids: For some it is undoubtedly a guarantee of gain and narcissistic visibility – It is said that the Devil makes the pans but not the lids: for some it is definitely a guarantee of earnings and narcissistic visibility – It is said that the devil makes the pot but not the lid: For some it is economic guarantee and narcissistic visibility

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

 

The devil is said to be the pots but not the lids: For some it is undoubtedly a guarantee of gain and narcissistic visibility

On the devil it is better and prudent to talk little about it and with precise references to the Word of God, to revelation and the magisterium. And you know why? Because our faith has never been founded - and it will never be - on the devil but on Christ and on his resurrection that wins the works of the devil: sin and death. If you understand at least this would no longer be the anguish of demonopathy with the feeling of being gripped by the devil.

— Pastoral current events —

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

.

PDF Article in print format

PDF Article print format

PDF Article

.

The 6 January of the year just started, In the solemnity of the Lord's epiphany, The International Association of Exorcists (A.I.E.) He published a note that I invite all our readers to read carefully (WHO), whose title is quite clear: "Note on some aspects of the Ministry of Exorcisms".

The note has no intention of reiterating the obvious on exorcisms and ecclesial discipline in this sense, But its objectives are others and concern only a few particular aspects. We say add:

"With this note we intend to offer the necessary clarifications in order to operate well in the erart of the Divine Mercy through the Ministry of Exarcism. The criteria to establish the conditions of implementation of the greater exorcism nor the guidelines of this delicate ministry will not be re -presented here [6], but they will simply offer observations on some pastoral practices which, Instead of making a service to the planted body of Christ, increase their suffering and cause disorientation, observations that the faithful (clerics, consecrated and lay people) It is desirable they can know in order to avoid attitudes and methods not responding to the authentic operating of the Christ the Lord, model for anyone who exercises the Ministry of Liberation from the extraordinary action of the evil one [7]».

Exorcism is a pastoral ministry of mercy and consolation, This is the basic reference to be able to understand it. Although it is a sacramental and not of a sacrament - given the particular personal subject faced -, it must not be considered lightly but also with great seriousness, human and Christian consciousness and maturity, both by the shepherds and from the lay faithful.

I talked about seriousness, of consciousness and maturity To emphasize that with the devil you don't play and do not joke but you can even exploit it for your ends: For example, to encourage economic performance or to obtain a certain gain and visibility at a social and ecclesial level. Said this, I focus only on some points that I want to reiterate and that the note of the A.I.E. clarifies and expresses in a very punctual way of what I will be able to do in these lines.

1. Obedience to the Church and the diocesan ordinary

The belief of being prey to the devil often pushes people to go to the spasmodic research of those who are in fact exorcists or those who have autonomized such on the field. In his wisdom, the Church first asks for serious discernment and this normally passes through his parish priest, one's confessor or a priest of reference to which he belongs to make a first diagnosis and then collect all the useful elements to be able to, in case, send to the appointed exorcist or suggest a serious conversion path to the person, combined with a serious sacramental practice with concrete and effective works of charity.

I am allowed the health comparison, It is like when the general practitioner sends his client by the specialist for subsequent insights. Only when there is the founded suspicion of a pathology that must be faced differently by a colleague who specializes in that matter, The specialist visit is required, otherwise it is lost time and the solutions must focus on other analyzes and fields. If this is true in the practice of physical care, The more this speech becomes true in the care of the soul and the baptismal path.

In this case It is only the Church that appoints and discerns on priests suitable for operating this great ministry, as well as on the specific case of the person who asks for spiritual help in this sense. You never improvise and never propose exorcists, Healers and liberators. Another fundamental thing is that there are no lay people (Not even the transe and permanent deacons can) authorized by the Church to perform exorcisms. Even the so -called prayers of liberation or healing must be made with wisdom and opportunity under the accompaniment of a prepared priest and following the rules that the Church has already established. EXitting out outside of these criteria means putting himself on the ground of disobedience to the Church to which the devil always pushes man, Just as our progenitors pushed to disobedience towards God (cf.. GN 3).

2. Superstition and reiteration of formulas

Often the desire to drive away the devil makes you fall into the sin of superstition which also insinuates itself into the Catholic world, both on the side of the lay people and consecrated. For example, You put yourself in search of the most "powerful" exorcist (even outside its diocese or region) Just as if it were a virtue of its own and not of the work of the Holy Spirit who acts in the Minister ordered on behalf of the Church. They compulsively collect sacramentals that should more effectively remove the malignant influences as crucifixes, medals, candles, images or salt, water and oil.

The prayers of liberation multiply who have not had any ecclesiastical approval and which are often borrowed from extra Catholic environments or packaged on the moment by the "psychic" or by the alleged secular charismatic on duty. Or compulsively also reiterate the official prayers and formulas approved with the hope that the simple acts continued over time enough to operate the benefit. And we often find ourselves in front of the trend of the stock exchange indices in reference to the novels and the most suitable plea against the devil: the Madonna that melts the knots is fine, San Pio da Pietrelcina is the strongest, Santa Rita is not bad, Sant’Editito sometimes fails while San Vicinio works only if you are Emiliano or Romagna. Even in approaching the holy masses there is the risk of falling into superstition with a succession of desecrating exploitation to ask for liberation. It is thought that it is enough to command only the priest to officiate a mass without the need to participate in the first person and we are linked to the number of commanded celebrations, As if the quantity was the pre -eminent criterion for liberation. A similar mechanism, tied to the masses, It is found in some devotional books with reference to the souls of Purgatory, But this is another matter.

3. "Meeting and consent of Liberation" in the hotel

For some years, the use of the alleged "sensory" and secular charismatic of organizing prayer meetings in secular locations has been invaded, such as star hotels (at least 4 stars). Already this should make the nose tank a lot to the healthy Catholic faithful of mind that are seen diverting out of ecclesial contexts without the slightest motivation. It is one thing to organize an event for millions and millions of people, Just as it happens for jubilation and national events, It is one thing to organize for fifty or one hundred people. Instead of the hotels you could not opt ​​for a large parish hall or a religious house - which today are increasingly empty and deserted - so as to remain inside the enclosure of ecclesial normality? But the alleged "sensory" and charismatic knows very well that in doing so it remains far from the eyes and ears of the shepherds and can say and do with freedom everything he wants. In doing so, the package is advertised all inclusive that with 80 O 100 Euro per day, plus enrollment in the course and pass, By combining the single room, Full board and starred cuisine is a guarantee of being a little freed from the evil one and to be purified in your genealogical tree. In short, before we went to the spa now the weekend exorcistic.

4. Sale of books and manuals of dubious orthodoxy

Today the devil continues to be a product of marketing, from the afar 1973 When the film came out the exorcist by William Friedkin based on the novel of the same name by William Peter Blatty, The devil has not known practically moments of crisis. We can say that with the devil he lives ... and he also lives fairly well. And if once the devil was private property of Freemasonry, of the Satanists and the hermetic occult circles, For more than thirty years it has become a pop product that I can all use or abuse according to need. Indeed they are the lay people, not always Christians, To find in the "devil product" a mine from which fame and affirmation draws. The television was the first to know how to make on the topic: Not just movies, but special, documentaries, Investigations that cross with the news and with politics, In short, the devil is like salt and pepper in a recipe, The "enough" is sufficient to make that touch more of pleasantness to the dish to arouse the compliments. But it is perhaps in publishing that the theme of the devil has been able to find a new and perpetual youth. The bibliography in this regard is very boundless and among the authors you can really find everything. It starts from the Medjugorjana converted, to the former adept of a sect, To then move on to the priest Praticone who without ever having been appointed exorcist holds conferences on the devil, Finally with what the demonologist's qualification is attributed without having the minimum academic or practical-pastoral skills of the case. Then the evergreen cannot be missing, The alleged sensory or charismatic that are questioning on the devil and pack recipes to free themselves from the influences of evil, Obviously you have to buy their books. Very dangerous are those who feel invested by the spiritual legacy of some well -known exorcist now deceased - I recommend that it is deceased! - To boast of a whole series of spiritual inheritance and transmigrations of Carismi with annexed the canon of the perfect liberator.

When I was a child, in the 1980s, Of devil in Italy he heard only about Father Gabriele Amorth and Mons. Corrado Balducci, The latter said demonologist but who in his life never saw a true exorcism and that in his book the devil also reported some theological inaccuracies. But at least with them we had to do with honest priests who had their role well in mind and were obedient to the Church. Today everyone is good at writing on the devil, especially those who should do without it.

In conclusion, It is always true that on the devil it is better and prudent to speak little and with precise references to the Word of God, to revelation and the magisterium. And you know why? Because our faith has never been founded - and it will never be - on the devil but on Christ and on his resurrection that wins the works of the devil: sin and death. If you understand at least this would no longer be the anguish of demonopathy with the feeling of being gripped by the devil. Much more important and tiring is to create a profound consciousness that you want to live constantly in the presence of Christ and its Spirit. But this is what already the blessed apostle Giacomo tells us in his letter. He asks us to be submitted to God: This is what allows you to resist the devil and to escape from his works and pitfalls. Surely there are few exorcists in today's church, Certainly many of our bishops are often not inclined to appoint them and prefer instead to appoint presidents of diocesan Caritas and to use resources for social and welfare policies, Except then finding yourself a few kilometers from your diocesan curia the exorcistic weekend at one hundred euros per day of the alleged exorcist, charismatic or sensitive cry and not to make a sigh minimally. And yes, because even in the event that the diocesan bishop was also aware of the thing he would not give him the right weight: eye does not see, pastoral heart does not hurt. Unfortunately, the devil certain things also lets us do and when they ever do everything he comes to the closer, Just as it happens for certain things old as the world that are done but they do not say and how he loved to sing a well -known Italian musical quartet

«It is done, but it is not said, you do, but it is not said and who did it silent, He denies it and makes the mendace and never tells you the truth ".

Sanluri, 07 February 2025

.

_______________________

IT IS SAID THAT THE DEVIL MAKES THE PANS BUT NOT THE LIDS: FOR SOME IT IS DEFINITELY A GUARANTEE OF EARNINGS AND NARCISSISTIC VISIBILITY

— Pastoral actuality —

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

 

On January 6 of the year that has just begun, on the solemnity of the Epiphany of the Lord, the International Association of Exorcists (A.I.E.) published a note that I invite all our readers to read carefully (HERE), the title of which is quite clear: «Note on some aspects of the ministry of exorcisms».

The note has no intention of reiterating the obvious regarding exorcisms and ecclesial discipline in this sense, but its objectives are different and concern only some particular aspects. It reads:

«With this note we intend to offer the necessary clarifications in order to operate well in the provision of divine Mercy through the Ministry of Exorcism. The criteria for establishing the conditions of implementation of the Major Exorcism nor the Guidelines of this delicate Ministry [6] will not be presented here again, but observations will simply be offered on some pastoral practices which, instead of rendering a service to the wounded body of Christ, increase its suffering and cause disorientation, observations that the faithful (clerics, consecrated and lay people) should be able to know in order to avoid attitudes and methods that do not correspond to the authentic working of the Lord Christ, model for anyone who exercises the ministry of liberation from the extraordinary action of the Evil One [7]».

Exorcism is a pastoral ministry of mercy and consolation, this is the basic reference for being able to correctly understand it. Although it is a sacramental and not a sacrament – given the particular personal subject addressed –, it must not be considered lightly but also with great seriousness, conscience and human and Christian maturity, both by pastors and lay faithful.

I spoke of seriousness, conscience and maturity to underline that one cannot play or joke with the devil, but neither can one exploit him for one’s own ends: for example to favor an economic return or to obtain a certain gain and visibility on a social and ecclesial level. Having said this, I will only focus on some points that I would like to reiterate and that the A.I.E. note. clarifies and expresses in a very punctual way what I will be able to do in these lines.

1. Obedience to the Church and the Diocesan Ordinary

The belief of being prey to the Devil often pushes people to go in frantic search for those who are in fact exorcists or those who have self-appointed themselves as such in the field. The Church in its wisdom first of all asks for serious discernment and this normally passes through one’s parish priest, one’s confessor or a reference priest who is responsible for making an initial diagnosis and then gathering all the useful elements to be able, if necessary, to send to the appointed exorcist or to suggest to the person a serious path of conversion, combined with a serious sacramental practice with concrete and effective works of charity.

Allow me to make a healthcare comparison, it’s like when a general practitioner sends his patient to a specialist for further in-depth analysis. Only when there is a well-founded suspicion of a pathology that must be addressed differently from a colleague who specializes in that subject is a specialist visit required, otherwise it is a waste of time and the solutions must focus on other analyzes and fields. If this is true in the practice of physical care, how much more true does this discourse become in the care of the soul and the baptismal walking.

2. Superstition and reiteration of formulas

Often the desire to banish the Devil leads one to fall into the sin of superstition which also creeps into the Catholic world, both among lay people and consecrated people. For example, we start looking for the most “powerful” exorcist (even outside our own diocese or region) as if it were a specific virtue and not the work of the Holy Spirit who acts in the ordained minister on behalf of the Church. Sacramentals are compulsively collected which should ward off evil influences such as crucifixes, medals, candles, images or salt, water and oil more effectively than others.

Prayers for liberation are multiplying which have not had any ecclesiastical approval and which are often borrowed from non-Catholic environments or packaged on the spot by the “sensitive” or the presumed charismatic lay person on duty. Or even official prayers and approved formulas are compulsively reiterated with the hope that the simple recitation over time is enough to bring about the benefit. And we often find ourselves faced with the trend of stock market indices in reference to the most suitable novenas and supplications against the Devil: the Madonna who unties knots is good, San Pio da Pietrelcina is the strongest, Santa Rita is not bad, Sant’Espedito sometimes fails while San Vicinio only works if you are from Emilia Romagna Region. Even when approaching Holy Masses there is the risk of falling into superstition with a succession of desecrating exploitations to ask for liberation. It is thought that it is enough to command the priest alone to officiate a mass without the need to participate personally and it is linked to the number of celebrations commanded, as if quantity were the pre-eminent criterion for liberation. A similar mechanism, linked to masses, is found in some devotional books in reference to the souls in Purgatory, but that is another matter.

3. “Liberations Meetings and Conventions” in the hotel

For some years now, the practice of supposedly “sensitive” and charismatic lay people to organize prayer meetings in secular locations, such as starred hotels (at least 4 stars) has become widespread. This alone should make sane Catholic faithful turn up their noses a lot as they see themselves diverted away from ecclesial contexts without the slightest motivation. It’s one thing to organize an event for millions and millions of people, as happens with jubilee and national events, but it’s another thing to organize it for fifty or a hundred people. Instead of hotels, couldn’t we opt for a large parish hall or a religious house – which nowadays are increasingly empty and deserted – so as to remain within the confines of ecclesial normality? But the supposedly “sensitive” and charismatic person knows very well that by doing so he stays away from the eyes and ears of the shepherds and can freely say and do whatever he wants. In doing so, the all-inclusive package is advertised which with 80 or 100 euros per day, plus course registration and the pass, combining the single room, full board and starred cuisine you have the guarantee of being somewhat freed from the Evil one and of being purified in your family tree. In short, before people went to the spa, now exorcism weekends are in fashion.

4. Sale of books and manuals of dubious orthodoxy

Today the Devil continues to be a marketing product, ever since 1973 when the film “The Exorcist” by William Friedkin based on the novel of the same name by William Peter Blatty was released, the Devil has experienced practically no moments of crisis. We can say that you can live with the Devil… and you can even live reasonably well. And if once the Devil was the private property of Freemasonry, Satanists and hermetic occultist circles, for more than thirty years it has become a pop product that everyone can use or abuse as needed. Indeed, it is precisely the lay people, not always Christians, who find in the “devil product” a mine from which to draw notoriety and affirmation. Television was the first to know how to make money on the topic: not only films, but specials, documentaries, investigations that intersect with crime news and politics, in short, the Devil is like salt and pepper in a recipe, “just enough” is enough to give that extra touch of pleasantness to the dish to elicit compliments. But it is perhaps in publishing that the theme of the Devil has found a new and perpetual youth. The bibliography in this regard is extremely boundless and among the authors you can truly find everything. We start from the Medjugorjan convert, to the former follower of a sect, and then move on to the priest who without ever having been appointed an exorcist holds conferences on the devil, ending with the one who attributes himself the qualification of demonologist without having the minimum academic or practical-pastoral skills of the case. Then there are the evergreens, the alleged sensitives or charismatics who question the Devil and prepare recipes to free oneself from the influences of evil, obviously you have to buy their books. Very dangerous are those who feel invested by the spiritual legacy of some well-known exorcist now deceased! – I recommend that he is deceased! – to then boast a whole series of spiritual legacies and transmigrations of charisms with the attached canon of the perfect liberator.

When I was a child, in the 1980s, in Italy we only heard about the Devil from Father Gabriele Amorth and Monsignor Corrado Balducci, the latter known as a demonologist but who in his life never saw a real exorcism and who also reported some theological inaccuracies in his book “The Devil”. But at least with them we were dealing with honest priests who were well aware of their role and were obedient to the Church. Today everyone is good at writing about the Devil, especially those who should do without it.

In conclusion, the fact remains true that it is better and prudent to talk little about the Devil and with precise references to the Word of God, to Revelation and to the Church’s Magisterium. And do you know why? Because our faith has never been founded – and never will be – on the Devil but on Christ and his resurrection which overcomes the works of the Devil: sin and death. If we understood at least this we would no longer have the anguish of demonopathy with the sensation of being gripped by the Devil. Much more important and tiring is creating a deep conscience that desires to live constantly in the presence of Christ and his Spirit. But this is what the blessed apostle James already tells us in his letter. He asks us to be submissive to God: this is what allows us to resist the Devil and escape from his works and snares. Surely there are few exorcists in the Church today, certainly many of our bishops are not often inclined to appoint any and prefer instead to appoint presidents of diocesan Caritas and to use resources for social and welfare policies, only to then find themselves a few kilometers from their diocesan curia on the weekend exorcism at one hundred euros a day of the alleged exorcist, charismatic or the famous sensitive and not even heave a sigh. And yes, because even if the diocesan bishop were aware of the matter, he would not give it the right weight: the eye does not see, the pastoral heart does not grieve.

Unfortunately, the Devil even lets us do certain things and when they are done everything comes out in the open, just as happens with certain things as old as the world that are done but not said and as a well-known Italian musical quartet loved to sing:

«It is done, but it is not said, it is done, but it is not said and whoever did it remains silent, denies it and is a liar and never tells you the truth».

Sanluri, 07 February 2025

.

___________________________

It is said that the devil makes the pot but not the lid: For some it is economic guarantee and narcissistic visibility

It is still true that it is better and prudent to speak little of the devil and with precise references to the Word of God, to revelation and teaching. And you know why? Because our faith has never been based - nor will it ever be - in the devil but in Christ and his resurrection that expires the works of the devil: Sin and death. If at least we understood this we would no longer have the anguish of demonopathy with the feeling of being tormented by the devil.

- Pastoral news -

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

.

In the solemnity of the Lord's epiphany, The International Exorcist Association (A.I.E.) He published a note that I invite you to read all our readers carefully (here), And whose title is quite clear: «Note on some aspects of the Ministry of Exorcisms».

The note does not intend to reiterate the obvious about exorcisms and ecclesial discipline, Its objectives are different and refer only to some particular aspects. Read:

«With this note we intend to offer the necessary clarifications to operate the donation of divine mercy through the Ministry of Exorcism. The criteria to establish the necessary conditions for the realization of the major exorcism will not be presented again, nor the guidelines for this delicate ministry[6]; but observations will simply be offered on some pastoral practices that, Instead of helping Christ's plague, increase their suffering and cause disorientation. Observations that the faithful (clergy, consecrated and laity) They must know to avoid attitudes and methods that do not correspond to the authentic work of Christ Lord, Model for anyone who exercises the Ministry of Liberation of Extraordinary Action of Malignant [7]”.

Exorcism is a pastoral ministry of mercy and consolation, This is the basilar reference to be able to understand it correctly. Yes ok, It is a sacramental and not a sacrament - given the particular personal subject that is addressed -, It should not be considered lightly but seriously, human and Christian conscience and maturity, both by the shepherds and the lay faithful.

I have talked about seriousness, of conscience and maturity to underline that the devil is not played or joined, nor can it be instrumentalized for their own benefits: favor an economic benefit or to obtain a certain gain and visibility at the social and ecclesial level. That being said, I will only focus on some points that I want to reiterate and that the A.I.E note. Clarify and express more punctually than it could do so in these lines.

1. Obedience to the church and the ordinary diocesan

The conviction of being presided by the demon, It often drives people to frantically seek who are by appointment exorcists or those who have self -proclaimed as such. The Church in his wisdom asks first of all, a serious discernment that normally passes through the pastor himself, of the confessor or a reference priest, who is concerned to make an initial diagnosis and gather all the useful elements to be able to, If this is the case, refer to the designated exorcist or suggest a serious way of conversion attached to the sacramental practice of concrete and effective charity works.

I am allowed to make a comparison with the healthcare system: It is equivalent to when a general practitioner sends the patient to a specialist to perform more specific analyzes. Only when there is a suspicion of a pathology must be faced differently by a specialized colleague, otherwise it is a loss of time and solutions must focus on other analysis and fields. If this is true regarding physical health care, How much more should the speech on the care of the soul and the baptismal path be.

In this case, It is only the church that names and discerns over the suitable priests to perform this great ministry, as well as on the specific case of the person who asks for spiritual help in this regard. It is never improvised or proposed as exorcists, healers and liberators. Another fundamental thing is that there are no laity (Not even temporary or permanent deacons) Authorized by the Church to perform exorcisms. Even the so -called liberation or healing sentences, They must be done with wisdom and opportunity under the accompaniment of a trained priest and following the norms that the Church has already established. Leaving these criteria means being in the field of disobedience to the Church, to which the demon always pushes man as in the past pushed our parents to disobedience to God (See Genesis 3).

2. Superstition and formula reiteration

Often the desire to scare away the demon leads to fall into the sin of superstition and also insinuates in the Catholic world, Between laity as consecrated. For example: The more exorcist search begins “powerful” (even outside the diocese or region) As if it were a personal virtue and not the work of the Holy Spirit that acts in the minister ordered in the name of the Church. They are compulsively sacramental that should more effectively move bad influences, as crucifixes, medallas, candle, images, sal, Water and oil.

Liberation sentences multiply that they have not obtained any ecclesiastical approval and that often, mutades of non -Catholic environments come; or are made during the function by the “sensible” or for the alleged charismatic layman on duty. Or even, Official sentences and approved formulas are reiterated compulsively with the hope that simple recitation over time will be sufficient to achieve benefit. And they are frequently chosen as if they were trends in stock indices the most appropriate novenas and plea against the demon: The Virgin who unleashes the knots is good, San Pio da Pietrelcina is the strongest, Santa Rita is not bad, San Esperito sometimes fails while San Vicinio only works if you are from the Emilia-Romaña region. Even, In relation to the holy masses there is a risk of falling into superstition due to continuous desecrating instrumentalization in asking for liberation. It is thought that it is enough to send the priest to officiate the Mass without the need to participate personally, It is believed to be the number of celebrations in charge, As if the amount were the preeminent criterion for liberation. A similar mechanism on the amount of masses is found in some devotional books in referee to the souls ofthe purgatory, But that's another issue.

3. "Meeting and Liberation Convention" in Hotels

For some years it has been generalized that assumptions “sensitive” and charismatic laity organize prayer encounters in lay locations such as hotels with stars (at least 4). This should generate disapproval in the faithful Catholics of healthy judgment that are deviated from ecclesial contexts without any motivation. It is one thing to organize an event for millions and millions of people as in Jubilees and National Events, Another thing is to organize for fifty or one hundred people. Instead of hotels, Couldn't you opt for a spacious parish hall or a religious house - that every day is more empty and deserted - thus remaining within the limits of ecclesial normality? But the alleged “sensible” or the charismatic know very well that in doing so they remain away from the eyes and ears of the shepherds and can freely say what he wants. In this way, The all inclusive package is announced with 80 O 100 euros a day: Registration to the course, function pass, Individual room, food included with Michelin kitchen, And you have the guarantee of being a little released from the evil one and being purified in the family tree. Ultimately before people went to the spa, Now for weekends with exorcism that are fashionable.

4. Sale of books and manuals of doubtful orthodoxy

Still today, The devil is still a marketing product since in 1973 The film was released by William Friedkin's exorcist based on William Peter Blatty's homonymous novel; The devil has practically not experienced moments of crisis. We can say that you can win using the devil… and you can even win reasonably well.

And if the devil was ever private property of Freemasonry, of the satanists and the occult circles; For more than thirty years it has become a pop product that everyone can use or abuse according to the need itself. Indeed, They are precisely the laity, Not always Christians, to find in the “devil product” a mine from which to get notoriety and affirmation. Television was the first to know how to profit from the subject: Not only with films, but also with specials, Documentaries, investigations that cross the crime and policy news; In short, The devil is like salt and pepper in a recipe, "Just enough" to give that extra touch to the plate and cause praise. Perhaps it is in the editorial where the theme of the devil has found a new and perpetual youth. The bibliography in this regard is extremely unlimited and among the authors you can really find everything: It begins with the convert of medjugorje, to the former follower of a sect, going through the priest who without having been appointed exorcista celebrates conferences about the demon, ending with which the title of demonologist is attributed without having the minimum academic or practical-pastoral competences of the case. You can not miss the psychic or charismatic assumptions that deal with the devil and prepare recipes to release the influences of evil, Obviously it is necessary to buy your books. Very dangerous are those who feel invested by spiritual legacy of a famous defective exorcist - it is recommended if he died in "smell" of holiness! - and then presume spiritual legacies and carism transmigrations attached to the title of perfect liberator.

When I was a child in the years 1980, In Italy we only heard about the devil by Boca del Father Gabriele Amorth and Monsignor Corrado Balducci, The latter known as the demonist but who in his life never saw a real exorcism and that related some theological inaccuracies in his book Il Diavolo. At least they were honest priests, aware of his role and obedient to the Church. Today everyone knows how to write about the devil, especially those who should not write anything.

In conclusion, It is still true that it is better and prudent to speak little of the devil and with precise references to the Word of God, to revelation and teaching. And you know why? Because our faith has never been based - nor will it ever be - In the devil but in Christ and his resurrection that expires the works of the devil: Sin and death. If at least we understood this we would no longer have the anguish of demonopathy with the feeling of being tormented by the devil. Much more important and exhausting is to create a deep conscience that you want to live constantly before the presence of Christ and his spirit. This is what the blessed apostle Santiago tells us in his letter. Asks us to be submissive to God: This is what allows us to resist the devil and escape his works and traps. Surely there are few exorcists in the church today, Surely many of our bishops are not willing to appoint them and prefer to appoint presidents of the Diocesan Caritas, Use resources for social and well -being policies, But then you can find a few kilometers from the diocesan curia with the exorcistical weekend one hundred euros a day of the alleged exorcist, charismatic or seer famous without even releasing a sigh. And although the diocesan bishop was aware of the event, I would not give it the right weight: EYE WHO DOES NOT SEE, Pastoral heart that does not feel. Unfortunately the devil certain things let them do, And when he ever does it, Everything comes to light, As with certain things as ancient as the world that are done but they do not say and how they loved to sing them to a well -known Italian musical quartet:

«It is done, But it is not said, It is done, But it is not said and who made it silent, He denies it and is a liar and never tells you the truth ».

Sanluri, 07 February 2025

.

.

The books of Ivano Liguori, to access the book shop click on the cover

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

 

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

 

.





Dirt in public places between sex and theology of the underwear – Dirty in public places between sex and theology of the underpant – Dirt in public places between sex and the theology of Calaconcillo

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

DIRT IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND UNDERPANT THEOLOGY

We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, free the amor Dei, without even asking for the Marchetta. This is why I usually say, in a serious and not at all joking way, indeed with a coherent theological spirit, that, if I hadn't been a priest, I definitely would have been a whore. However, I chose to do one or the other: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

- Church news -

.

PDF Article in print format – Article print format – Printable article

.

.

The State Police responsible for checking the laboratories of public places where food is packaged, a couple of weeks ago it sealed a well-known pastry shop in the heart of the historic center of Catania.

The video documenting the state of the premises is only an archetype necessary to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs and whatever the cost, ready to affirm this:

"… it's true, this video was filmed by the State Police in the center of Catania, in the parlor of the city, but something like this could also happen in the North!».

I open parentheses with an aside: the "could have been" theory reminds me of certain militants of the Left radical chic Italian people who live in the name of politically correct more dreamlike. Those, to be understood, with penthouses in Parioli and villas in Capalbio, that when faced with a girl raped by a gang of illegal North African immigrants they are quick to explain, around the various talk show televisions, that she could also have been raped by a group of Italians. Definitely, to the victim of rape which is almost always destined to leave indelible traumatic marks with all the most complex reactive implications on a psychological and behavioral level, the idea that her rapists could also have been Italians, it will be of great comfort to you, but above all of precious usefulness to overcome a traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I close the aside and return to the topic in question.

This video portrays the laboratory of a historic bar from the center of Catania and not from the center of Bolzano or Belluno, where hygiene and health standards are much higher and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily, it is an incontrovertible fact, regardless of the justifying theory “it could have happened elsewhere”.

Let's move from the hygienic-sanitary question to the doctrinal-moral one, because it was we priests who have obsessed teenagers for generations, as if the whole mystery of evil went strictly and exclusively from the waist down. Who has ever bothered to teach that a laboratory like the one represented here is a much more exaltation of mortal sin than the masturbation of an adolescent in the throes of hormonal storms?? And they don't arise, certain secular bigots, as has already happened several times, to teach the undersigned priest that they are two different things, thus demonstrating that he does not know how serious those sins against charity can be, which according to them, however, would be something else, compared to the deadly sin of adolescent autoeroticism and various falls in the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by five others and then followed by four others, although they are not of interest to these people who appear to be rigorous only in everything relating to the sphere of sexuality.

That we have exaggerated beyond measure on human sexuality, I already wrote it fifteen years ago (see WHO), the rigorous morality of John Paul II prevails, when the Holy Father Francis was still far from coming. Today, the things I stated almost twenty years ago, the Holy Father tells her, often even in ironic tones, lie to me, at the time, the great youthful Paulist moralophobia is in force, it was sung in clear notes: «Take it easy with this talk, or you risk not becoming a priest". I replied: "Sure, because the theology of the underpants always comes before everything and above everything else, vero?».

Five kilometers away from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “holy immediately!”, had the enormous human and moral disaster of the pastry shop of the Legionaries of Christ, presented well on the outside like the windows of this pastry shop in the historic center of Catania, except to hide inside all the worst rubbish of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his faithful accomplices. Being though, the Holy Father and his followers, too busy with the theology of the underpants, certain laboratories were not inspected, even though everyone knew its existence and internal filth.

When in record time, with an imprudence that we will soon pay in the face of history at a certainly very high price, John Paul II was beatified and then canonized, just as the pastry laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered between beatification and canonization, those who had decided to have the saint at all costs immediately declared: «The Holy Father had not been informed, in fact he was deceived". Regardless of the fact that he was informed several times and even in the most dangerous and scandalous details, as a document in one of my books (see WHO), even assuming he had not been informed and indeed deceived, even more so it remains to be clarified: who did not inform him, but above all who would have deceived him? Why deception - except in cases of self-deception -, necessarily involves the existence of a deceiver. So who, deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer.

These are our ecclesial and ecclesiastical pastry workshops, while, without shame and restraint we had nothing better to do than discuss the theology of underwear, beginning and center of the internal mystery of evil. And today, around the social media, we must read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, bigots beyond all limits of human decency, who affirm without penalty of ridicule that the Virgin Mary, a Fatima, to little Giacinta Marto, revealed that many souls were damned for the sins of lust, making her see the damned souls of the lustful in hell.

God deliver us from committed and militant Catholic bigots, because only their perversion and their sexual obsessions can come to believe and then spread as truth and certainty the absurd rumor that the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, started talking about lust and lustful people to an illiterate nine-year-old girl born and raised in one of the most isolated provinces, poor and retrograde of Portugal at the beginning of the twentieth century.

Priests have never liked pant theology always lived in contact with human material, aware of being sinners who by an ineffable mystery of grace have received a mandate from Christ God to absolve sinners from sins according to the ministry of the Church:

«Receive the Holy Spirit; to whom you forgive sins they will be forgiven and to whom you will not forgive them, they will not be remitted " (GV 20, 22-23)

The theology of the underpants is terribly liked by certain lay Catholics social media, behind which often hide frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage nieces who travel with the mattress tied firmly to their backs to be ready for use. But on the other hand it is an old, well-known and well-known story: all of them whores, but only and strictly other people's daughters, certainly not their own.

I see and experience certain things differently: we priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, gratis and love Dei, without even asking for the Marchetta. This is why I usually say, in a serious and not at all joking way, indeed with a coherent theological spirit, that, if I hadn't been a priest, I definitely would have been a whore. However, I chose to do one or the other: the priest and the whore.

From the island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

.

_____________________

DIRTY IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND THEOLOGY OF THE UNDERPANT

We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service offered. This is why I said, seriously and not at all jokingly, but rather with a coherent theological spirit, that if I hadn’t become a priest, I would have become a whore. But I chose to do both: the priest and the whore, for love of God.

- Church news -

.

The Italian State Police in charge of controlling the laboratories of public places where food is packaged, a couple of weeks ago sealed a well-known pastry shop in the heart of Catania’s historic center.

The video documenting the state of the premises is just a necessary archetype to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs, ready to justifier:

«… it’s true, this video was shot by the State Police in the very center of Catania, in the city’s good living room of this sicylian city, but such a thing could have happened also in North Italy!»

I open with a digression: the “it could have been” theory reminds me of certain militants of the Italian radical chic left who live in the name of the most dreamlike political correctness. Those, to be precise, with super-apartments in the rich residential neighborhoods of Rome and villas in the most exclusive areas of Tuscany, who, faced with a girl raped by a gang of illegal North African immigrants, are quick to explain in various television talk shows that the girl could have ended up raped even by a group of Italians. Surely, for the victim of a rape always destined to leave indelible traumatic marks with complex psychological and behavioral implications, the idea that her rapists could also have been Italians will be of great comfort, but more than anything else of precious usefulness to overcome a traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I’ll close this parentheses and get back to the topic at hand.

That this video portrays the laboratory of a historic bar in the center of Catania and not in the center of Bolzano or Belluno, where hygiene and health standards are far superior and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily, is an incontrovertible fact, regardless of the justifying theory “it could have happened elsewhere”.

Let’s move from the hygienic-health issue to the doctrinal-moral one, because it was we priests who for generations have obsessed adolescents, as if the whole mystery of evil went strictly and exclusively from the waist down. Who has ever bothered to teach that a workshop like the one represented in this video is a much more glorification of mortal sin than the masturbation of a teenager in the throes of hormonal storms? And let not these secular bigots rise up, as has already happened several times, to teach the undersigned priest that they are two different things, thus demonstrating that they do not know how serious those sins against charity can be, which to them however would be something different, compared to the the very mortal sin of adolescent autoeroticism and various falls in the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by five others and then followed by four others, although they are not of interest to these people rigorous only in everyhing that concerns the sexuality sphere.

That we have exaggerated beyond measure on human sexuality, I already wrote fifteen years ago (see HERE), when John Paul II’s strict morality prevailed, when the Holy Father Francis very far from reaching Rome. Today, the things I was saying almost twenty years ago are said by the Holy Father, often even in ironic tones, while I, at the time, with the great moralphobia in force under the pontificate of John Paul II, was told in clear terms: «Go easy with these speeches, or you risk not becoming a priest». I replied: «Sure, because before everything and above everything goes the theology of the underpant».

In Rome, five kilometers away from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “saint immediately!”, had the immense human and moral disaster of the Legionaries of Christ’s “pastry”, which looked as good on the outside as the shop windows of this pastry in the old city centre of Catania, except that it hid inside all the worst rubbish of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his faithful accomplices. Being us, however, too busy with the theology of the underpant, certain workshops were not inspected, even though everyone knew of their existence and their dirty interior.

When in record time, with an imprudence that we will soon pay dearly before history, John Paul II was beatified and then canonized, between his beatification and his canonization the confectionery laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered. Those who had decided to have John Paul II declared a saint at all costs, immediately justified this fact by saying: «The Holy Father had not been informed, is was deceived». In reality, the Holy Father was informed several times and even in the most dangerous and scandalous details, as documented in one of my books (see HERE). However, if he really had not been informed and had been deceived, this would be one more reason to clarify: who did not inform him, but above all who deceived him? Because deception – except in cases of self-deception – necessarily implies the existence of a deceiver. So who deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer.

These are our laboratories of ecclesial and ecclesiastical pastry, while, without shame or restraint, we had nothing better to do than discuss the underpant theology, the principle and center of the entire mystery of evil. And today, in the sea of social media, we must read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, bigots beyond all limits of human decency, who affirm without penalty of ridicule that the Virgin Mary, in Fatima, to little Jacinta Marto, baby of only nine-year-old, said that many souls were damned for the sins of lust, making her see damned souls of the lustful in hell.

God deliver us from committed and militant Catholic bigots! Only people obsessed with human sexuality can believe and spread the absurd rumor according to which the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, talking about lust and lustfuls to a little girl born and raised in one of the most isolated, poor and retrograde of Portugal by beginning of the 20th century.

The underpant theology has never pleased priests who have always lived in contact with human matter, aware of being sinners who by an ineffable mystery of grace have received from Christ God the mandate to absolve sinners from their sins according to the ministry of Church:

«When He had said this, He breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you withhold forgiveness from anyone, it is withheld”» (John 20, 22-23)

The underpant theology is terribly widespreadwith some lay Catholics on social media, behind which often hide frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage grandchildren who travel with the mattress tied firmly to their backs to be ready for use. But then again it’s an old and well-known story: all whores, but only other people’s daughters, not their own.

I see and experience certain things differently: we priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service offered. This is why I said, seriously and not at all jokingly, but rather with a coherent theological spirit, that if I hadn’t become a priest, I would have become a whore. But I chose to do both: the priest and the whore, for love of God.

From the Island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

.

____________________

DIRT IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND THE THEOLOGY OF UNDERPANTS

We priests must necessarily be all whores who try to give ourselves to everyone freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service. That's why I usually say seriously and not jokingly, even with a coherent theological spirit, that if I had not been a priest, I would have been a whore. However, I chose to be both: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

- Church news -

.

Italian State Police, in charge of controlling the workshops and kitchens of public places where food is packaged, A renowned pastry shop in the historic center of the Sicilian city of Catania closed a couple of weeks ago..

The video that documents the state of the premises is just an archetype necessary to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs, at any price, and ready to say:

«…If it is true that this video was recorded by the State Police in the center of Catania, but something like this could also be found in Northern Italy!!»

I open a parenthesis to make a digression: the theory of “could have been” It reminds me of certain militants of the Italian radical-chic left who live in the name of the most dreamlike political correctness. Those who are obviously from the penthouses in the residential neighborhoods of Rome and the villas in the most exclusive areas of the Tuscany region. And those who, faced with a girl raped by a gang of North Africans, rush to explain in different television programs: that the girl could also have been raped by a gang of Italians. Without a doubt, The victim of a rape is almost always destined to retain indelible traumatic marks with very complex reactive implications on a psychological and behavioral level.. The idea that her rapists could also have been Italian would be of great comfort to her., above all, of precious usefulness to overcome the traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I close this parenthesis and return to the topic at hand..

Let the video show the laboratory of a historic bar in the city center of Catania, and not in the center of cities like Bolzano or Belluno where hygiene and health standards are much stricter and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily., It is an incontrovertible fact., apart from the justifying theory of: “It could also happen in other places”.

From the hygienic-sanitary issue let's move on to the doctrinal-moral, because we ourselves priests, who for generations have obsessed teenagers in their intimate movements with their hands; as if the entire mystery of evil were de rigueur and only from the waist down. Who has gone out of their way to teach that a laboratory like the one recorded by the video, It is an exaltation of mortal sin more than the masturbation of a teenager in the midst of his hormonal storms.? And the secular fanatics who do not rise up and reply as has already happened in the past, teaching the priest who writes, which are two totally different things; demonstrating with this, of not knowing how serious sins against charity can be. According to them, They would be something else compared to the super mortal sin of adolescent autoeroticism and falling into the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by another five and followed by four other commandments; although this does not interest these people who are only rigorous in everything that concerns the sphere of sexuality.

That regarding sexuality we have exaggerated beyond all limits, I wrote it fifteen years ago (watch HERE), when the rigorous morality of John Paul II prevailed and the Holy Father Francis was still a long way off. Today the things that I stated almost twenty years ago, The Holy Father says them and often in an ironic tone. While at that time, with the great moralophobia of John Paul II, they told me in clear tones: «Stop talking like that, or you run the risk of not being ordained a priest". I then replied saying: "It's true, because above all and before all is the theology of underpants..

Five kilometers from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “holy immediately!”, had the enormous human and moral disaster of “pastry laboratory” of the Legionaries of Christ, excellently presented on the outside like the pastry shop windows in the historic center of Catania, except hiding inside all the worst garbage of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his loyal accomplices. But the Holy Father and his collaborators were too busy with underpants theology, while certain laboratories were not inspected although everyone knew of their existence and their internal dirt..

When in record time and with a recklessness that we will soon pay in history with a very high price, John Paul II was beatified and later canonized. And during his beatification and canonization, the laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered.; for it, those who had decided to immediately obtain the saint at all costs declared: «The Holy Father had not been informed, On the contrary, he had been deceived.". Regardless of the fact that it was reported on several occasions and even with dangerous and lurid details as I have documented in one of my books (watch HERE) even, assuming that he had not been informed but on the contrary deceived, with all the more reason it should be clarified: Who wouldn't have reported it but above all, who would have deceived him? Because deception – except in cases of self-deception – necessarily implies the existence of a deceiver. Therefore, who deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer..

These are our ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical pastry workshops, while without shame or restraint we had nothing better to do than discuss the theology of underpants, beginning and center of all the mystery of evil. And today on social networks, we have to read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, fanatics beyond all the limits of human decency, who affirm without shame of ridicule: that the Virgin Mary in Fatima revealed to the little midwife Giacinta Marto that many souls were condemned for the sins of lust, showing the condemned souls of the lustful in hell.

God save us from committed and militant Catholic fanatics, because only their perversions and sexual obsessions can come to believe and spread the absurd rumor that the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, spoke of lust and lustful people to an illiterate nine-year-old girl born and raised in one of the most isolated provinces, poor and backward in Portugal at the beginning of the 20th century.

Underpants theology has never pleased priests who have always lived in close contact with human matter, conscious of being sinners and that by an ineffable mystery of grace, have received the command from Christ God to absolve sinners of their sins according to the ministry of the Church:

Receive the Holy Spirit. Whom you forgive the sins, they will be forgiven; and those who do not forgive, they will be left unforgiven. (Jn, 20,22-23)

The theology of underpants certain lay Catholics terribly like it on social networks, behind which they often hide, frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage nieces traveling with the mattress firmly strapped to their backs, ready for use. But on the other hand, It's an old and well-known story: all whores, but only other people's daughters and certainly not their own.

I see and experience some things differently.: We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service. That's why I usually say, seriously and not a joke, even with a coherent theological spirit, that if I had not been a priest, I would have been a whore. However, I chose to be both: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

From the Island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

The visible Church of the Patches passes in a wheelchair the Holy Door of irreversible decadence (Italian, english, español)

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

 

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY DOOR OF IRREVERSIBLE DECAY ON A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm shift: the Church of twenty-five years ago, even though she was already seriously ill, he tried to force himself to open, to open the doors to Christ; today's, patient in the department for terminally ill cancer patients, he tried to open, to open the doors to the world.

—Ecclesiastical current affairs—

.

 

PDF print format article

PDF article print format

PDF article for empriminr

.

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, if anything, we are increasingly incapable of reading the signs. And so, twenty-five years apart, two Supreme Pontiffs have opened the Door of the Holy Year, arriving before it with the weight of old age and their disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, the visible Church led by John Paul II arrived seriously ill before the Holy Door. This Pontiff debilitated by Parkinson's disease was a plastic paradigm of this, who was aided by a master of ceremonies dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical robe, he wanted to kneel anyway, albeit with obvious difficulty and great physical suffering. Never did he agree to waive the genuflections, especially before the Most Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion the Holy Father was dressed with a blanket which precedes the birth of the by centuries Christianitas. A wallpaper known in ancient times religion Roman pagan as downpipe, used by Pontifex Maximus to shelter from the rain, when from the top of Sublicio Bridge, located between the current Trastevere and Testaccio districts, at Porta Portese, he studied the movements of the waters and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of 2000 the Holy Father wore a cope on which much criticism was leveled. That save, packaged in Prato, it had been woven in very bright colors: rosso, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. Red tends to symbolize life and strength; blue is the union between sky and earth; yellow the divinity.

Reflecting on it in hindsight, that play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the dark gray that envelops us today and which cannot be attributed either to him or to the Supreme Pontiffs who have succeeded him since 2005 following, because the crisis of the Church begins from afar. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough - in this world that with memories only reaches yesterday, given that it doesn't even reach the day before yesterday - to understand that the seeds of the crisis giving rise to ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical decadence, boldly visible today, they were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius, between the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century.

If with John Paul II the disease was pressing at the door, with the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church has gone beyond it, entering a point of no return, pushed onto a wheelchair by the shadow of a gaunt priest clad in a pair of trousers, rather than with a dignified ecclesiastical dress. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church that has already been in crisis for decades, he always knelt before the Body and Blood of Christ, fighting against the unavoidable worsening of the disease. Francis's does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because she was now seriously ill and irreversibly ill. But he kneels down to wash and kiss the feet of convicts and prostitutes Mass of the Lord's Supper, despising the richness of our glorious places of worship, which are not the fruit of princely splendor, as some uneducated people might think, but of the faith of believers and the work of the greatest artists who with them wanted to honor God, offering the best and paying the maximum that could be paid to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. This is why the abbreviation D.O.M is carved on many ecclesiastical buildings., what does it mean: God is the Greatest. However, on the one hand there is contempt for what is not known, on the other hand there is no hesitation in glorifying prisons, in which one ends up having committed crimes, except in cases of innocent people unjustly convicted of judicial errors, or in the cases of the prisons of anti-democratic dictatorial regimes. Although some don't remember it, or they are not really aware of this incontrovertible reality, it is worth reminding them that criminals end up in prison.

How many are inside the prisons can be recovered from the company, after a re-education process, not exalted as if they were faithful devotees of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of bad society, guilty of not having fully understood them. If I'm in there someone, out, often more than one, sometimes even entire families, because of them they cried. It would therefore be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on the spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace which first forms and then transforms man through the expiation of what the laws of the State indicate as crimes, Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both as regards crimes and as regards sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church itself, they offer differently, but substantially similar, the possibility of atonement, which in itself implies that recovery which erases the guilt deriving from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is just surreal and harmful ideology, between foot rinses and "prisoner jubilees" of a Supreme Pontiff who arrives in front of the Holy Door in the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter being pushed in a wheelchair by an emaciated priest in trousers, because in that case he is unable to get up and walk. But he gets up and walks to pass the open Holy Door in the Rebibbia prison, comparing it to a basilica (cf.. video WHO). Someone wants to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs killed in hatred of faith and that the title basilica is not particularly suitable for a prison chapel? And right here the words of the Psalmist come to mind:

Until, man, you will continue to forget me?
Until you hide your face from me?
As long as I feel trouble in my soul,
sadness in my heart every moment?
Until the enemy triumphs over me?

Guard, answer me, Lord my God,
keep the light in my eyes,
so that the sleep of death does not surprise me,
so that my enemy does not say: «I won it!»
and let not my adversaries rejoice when I falter (Salmo 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called Holy Year, it has a great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. The heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and punishments for sins. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel. The official website of the Holy See provides a excursus history that I recommend reading (cf.. What is the Jubilee). It is so precise and well done that further explanation is unnecessary, because for my part I could only repeat what is contained and explained in it.

Now I would like to move from the spiritual sphere to the financial one, starting from the premise that I hope to be wrong in some of my personal beliefs and to have to make public amends for them in the following months. In fact, I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm shift: the Church of twenty-five years ago, even though she was already seriously ill, he tried to force himself to open, to open the doors to Christ (cf.. WHO); today's, patient in the department for terminally ill cancer patients, he tried to open, to open the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, the task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to counter it:

"If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you from the world, that's why the world hates you " (GV 15, 19).

Often images can summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For instance: what about the episcopessa Protestant sitting in the places of honor with the exponents of the various religions? But we are inclusive! Because of this, just to exclude everything that is Catholic, of necessity we must include everything that is not Catholic... of course, all expressed with due human respect for that Lady present in the grandstand as "bishop" in the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter, without any of the clerical leaders realizing that in this way we run the risk of letting a message of normalization and approval pass through, given that a woman cannot define herself as a "bishop" and that no one, on the Catholic side, can somehow recognize it as such, even if belonging to a non-Catholic Christian religion born from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, who we remember was a heretic, not a reformer.

Luther did not produce any reforms at all, that was done by the Fathers at the Council of Trent, he tore the Church of Christ apart with a terrible schism, which remains so today, with all due respect to bishop in the grandstand at the opening of the Holy Year above the tomb of the Apostle Peter in the total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

We were talking about the economic discussion... for the Jubilee of 2000 the law decree of 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing «Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000», then converted into the law of 23 December 1996, n. 651. Work began on that event years before, subject to the passing of specific laws, but above all an astronomical sum of money was allocated: 3.500 billions of old lire, corresponding in today's money to one billion eight hundred million euros. Also in this case I refer to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, where everything is documented and detailed (cf.. WHO). Having said this, it should be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops of the time was Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, with an army of bishops following him who were not yet today's caricatures who compete with each other to see who wears the humblest and poorest wooden cross around their neck, possibly made with the material of a boat sunk off the coast of Lampedusa on which human traffickers transported poor desperate illegal immigrants, often including women and children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of 2000 it was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate... but above all another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. But here is an exhaustive example that can clarify everything: at the time, in Italy, if before the administrative elections some diocesan bishop expressed discontent towards one or some particularly polemical or aggressive candidates, these took care of correcting the aim and lowering the tone during the electoral campaign. But there's more: when in June of 2005 there was a referendum in Italy on assisted procreation, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go to vote. Outcome: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a fiasco (cf.. WHO). The fact that you personally appreciate and recognize certain evident and undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, regretting that today, figures of his high stature, unfortunately we no longer have any, nothing takes away from the fact that I would never have hoped to have him as my diocesan bishop. In fact, I still continue to consider it today, on a human and spiritual level, like "a cold dry bone covered in velvet", I had to define it as such, much to his little joy, a few years ago, oblivious on my part to how notoriously touchy he is, as well as having no sense of humor.

With completely different men and a completely different kind of Church, on the occasion of the great jubilee event of 2000, Rome was made new again. This is in the interest of the State, who recovered what was invested with high income and both economic and image interests, but also of the Church, which, thanks to the huge funds allocated for that extraordinary event, was able to take advantage of it to renovate most of its structures, many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here it should be remembered that Rome, even then, it was teeming with religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See. Works mostly erected in the 1930s, in a real competition between the historical Orders and the various religious Congregations, male and female, to those who built the largest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic drop in birth rate that began at the end of the 1960s, certain Catholic schools, nursery schools and various care institutions, they no longer had any reason to exist, being mostly pharaonic structures. It should then be considered that in 1978 that great social achievement of the law on abortion was approved, thanks to which even the orphanages disappeared, which was no longer needed, given that children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous curiae and general houses of the various male and female Orders and Congregations, almost always with novitiates or theological student houses within them, that led them to have, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one hundred or two hundred religious, between those who had professed solemn vows and the young simply professed people in training.

In Rome at the beginning of the seventies it was impossible not to meet everywhere, along the courses of urban streets, priests and nuns, friars and nuns. Then there were the young seminarians and theology students from the various national and international Roman seminaries and colleges, who when they went for a walk formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. Soon said: the decline in birth rates and the inexorable crisis in vocations had reduced in the following decades, most of these large structures, to be inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred, but by six or seven elderly religious men or women, with the buildings now in a state of semi-dilapidation, with obsolete systems and outside of all safety regulations. Thus it was that on the occasion of the Jubilee of 2000, not only were most of these institutions renovated, because it was decided to make them an income in some way, reserving a small wing for religious men and women now numerically reduced to a minimum and changing the bulk of the buildings into shelters, in fact in hotels, because that is what most of these institutes are today. It was a farsighted operation, thanks to which the buildings of many institutes were saved and put in a position to produce the necessary money to support themselves.

Unfortunately priests, brothers and sisters, they are capable - and truly are like few others - of throwing money away on useless expenses, sometimes even in harmful works from which great losses then arise, without having the ability to realize that certain structures require great care and careful maintenance. And so, twenty-five years ago, after being taken out of very serious trouble, faced with problems related to their large buildings which they were unable to restore, nor to store it adequately, nor to comply with legal regulations regarding safety, they found nothing better to do than to let them return to a state of semi-dilapidation over the next twenty-five years, not everybody, but most of it yes. This is what I usually call “clerical patch psychology”. The meaning of this definition will soon be revealed: a structure requires routine maintenance? Why ever spend money, just let it go, if anything saying, with all the typical and at times unique cynicism of priests, brothers and sisters: «It's not worth getting bitter blood unnecessarily, those who come after will then take care of it". A quel point, all ordinary maintenance operations omitted over the years, will end up turning into serious extraordinary maintenance needs, but it costs a lot. A quel point, the well-known priest-friar-nun foresight begins to attach patches to the right and left, if anything, spending exorbitant amounts in the belief of saving money, because there are few like priests, friars and nuns are such idiots to get cheated out of money, if they have not been adequately trained in concrete practical life with their feet firmly planted on the ground. Said and done: the walls were last whitewashed twenty years ago? Internal and external fixtures, air conditioners and radiators, the sanitary fixtures installed at the end of the 1990s and so on, on which the necessary ordinary maintenance interventions have never been carried out, today they are falling apart? No worries, a patch is attached, if anything - needless to say! — having the work done by people who, to change simple filters on air conditioners, they make the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns pay more than what the latest generation low consumption and high energy saving systems would cost.

Since there would be many examples I'll limit myself to just one: last year I had the opportunity to find myself in a nuns' institute while some painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled entirely of toxic chemical substances, I asked: «What brand of eco-friendly paint are you using?». After that, walking around the corridors, I noticed a riot of smudges not only on the walls, but also on the fixtures, on skirting boards and even on fire extinguishers dirtied with paint flows. I took the foreman and told him: «If law, in my house, had done something like that, I didn't let her out the door but out the window, I'm careful not to give her a single penny". the sera, the mother superior, she confronted me irritably and told me not to disturb their workers anymore. I answered her: «Of the people who placed the water drains of the air conditioners inside the shower cubicles of the guest bedrooms and who, not satisfied, even eliminated the earthing from the electrical system, they don't deserve to be called workers but criminals, while you demonstrate that you are only poor people incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace of being able to benefit".

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers inaugurated what we could reasonably define as "The Jubilee of the Patch" placed on our irreversible spiritual and financial decadence, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. Or perhaps someone forgets that the 24 December 1999 St. Peter's Square wasn't just packed, because the crowd of people reached Castel Sant'Angelo and the Lungotevere? Someone wants to deal with the fact as evident as it is sad that the 24 December 2024, as shown in the photo accompanying this article, the square itself was completely empty in the center and in the four squares of chairs placed under the steps of the churchyard, many empty seats are visible?

The final question is of rigor: a devout Catholic, why he should leave from Australia or Peru to travel to Rome? Perhaps to hear an elderly Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, talks about the poor and migrants, of migrants and the poor, of the poor and migrants...? As if the Word of God had come into this world only to speak and care for the poor of slums and those of Villas miseries (Villages of poverty)? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, they are also children of God, oppure no? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? He would find the homeless camped under Bernini's colonnade; would find Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter's Square respectively, where early in the morning traders are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to remove the acidic smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils in a nauseating way. And where should the jubilant pilgrim stay? Perhaps by the nuns or friars who after the Jubilee of 2000, once they had their structures rebuilt for free by the "Uncle Scrooge" of the Italian Republic, they have never asked themselves the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the bathroom fixtures; to repaint the plaster and paint the walls; who for breakfast offer you freeze-dried milk and substitute powders that rival the products put on the market during the period in which the old fascist regime proclaimed autarky, following which it was no longer possible to use foreign imported products, starting with coffee? Let's overlook the terrible quality of the food, in these houses which also offer meal service. Above all, we ignore the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries and taken to the religious houses of Rome and placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun as laborers equal to service women., which must be addressed in English, because despite living in Italy for ten years I am unable to understand and speak Italian. Let's fly over and draw a compassionate veil over all this and everything even worse that is circulating in certain houses...

At the end, how can we not mention the exotic characters who increasingly happen to be found working in shelters, especially the nuns, ranging from girls with bare bellies to boys sporting three bells in their ears, the piercing and the tattoos in plain sight? Of the series: we want to host pilgrims in religious reception homes, or in unsuccessful branches of the famous Muccassassina gay club in Rome? How come to the Holy See, sometimes even attentive to futilities, it hasn't yet occurred to us to send inspectors around to check whether certain houses are run by religious men and women, or by their lay representatives, they truly have all the necessary requirements to provide so-called religious hospitality in a dignified way?

Having opened the Holy Door in Rebibbia prison it was timely and far-sighted in its own way, being the most suitable place where many of us should be, and even for a long time, after having made an attack on the mystical body of Christ which is the Church (cf.. With the 1,18), on which today patches are stuck on day by day, which, however, cannot stop, let alone cure, the malignant metastases that have been circulating in his body for decades and decades, without this pontificate being blamed for them, who is not responsible for it, despite having done his, without backing down to the damage that has already largely existed for several decades, he decided to add others, as original as they are serious.

"But the Son of Man, when will, find faith on earth?» (LC 18, 8)

 

the Island of Patmos, 31 December 2024

.

_________________________

.

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY DOOR OF IRREVERSIBLE DECADENCE ON A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door opened, not so much on what we are not longer, worse! On what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite al-ready being seriously ill, tried to open, to throw open the doors to Christ; the Church’s today, a patient in the ward for terminal-ly patients, has tried to open, to throw open the doors to the world.

 

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, if anything we are increasingly incapable of reading the signs. And so, twenty-five years apart from each other, two Supreme Pontiffs opened the Door of the Holy Year, both with the weight of their seniority and their disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, the visible Church led by John Paul II appeared seriously ill in front of the Holy Door. This Pontiff, debilitated by Parkinson’s disease, was a clear example of this: aided by a master of ceremonies, dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical robe, he still wanted to kneel, albeit with obvious difficulty and great physical suffering. The Holy Father never agreed to give up genuflections, especially before the Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion the Holy Father was dressed in a cloak that precedes the birth of Christianity by centuries. A cloak known in the ancient Roman pagan religion as a “pluvial”, used by the Pontifex Maximus, starting from the 6th century BC, to protect himself from the rain, when from the top of the Sublicio Bridge, located between the current Roman districts of Trastevere and Testaccio, to the height of Porta Portese, he studied the movements of water and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of 2000 the Holy Father wore a cope which received much criticism. That liturgical vestment, made in the italian city of Prato, was woven with very bright colors: red, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. The red tends to symbolize life and strength; the blue the union between sky and earth; the yellow the divinity.

If we reflect on it in the present, that play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the dark-gray that envelops us today and which cannot be attributed either to him or to the Supreme Pontiffs who succeeded him from 2005 onwards, because the crisis of the Church begins from afar. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough — in this world which with memories barely reaches yesterday, given that it doesn’t even reach the day before yesterday — to understand that the seeds of the crisis ecclesiasial and ecclesiastical decadence, visible today, were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius X, between the end nineteenth century and the beginning twentieth century.

If with John Paul II the disease pressed in front of the door, with the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church has gone beyond it, entering a point of no return, pushed on a wheelchair by the shadow of a gaunt priest dressed in a pair of trousers, rather than with a dignified ecclesiastical robe. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church in crisis for decades, always tried to kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, trying not to become irreversibly ill. Francis’s does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because she is now seriously and irreversibly ill. However, he kneels down to wash and kiss the feet of convicts and prostitutes at the Mass of the Lord's Supper (Mass of the Lord’s Supper), despising the richness of our glorious places of worship, which are not the fruit of princely splendor, as some uneducated people might think, but of faith of believers and of the work of the greatest artists who with wanted to honor God offering the best and the maximum that could be paid to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all visible and invisible things. This is why the abbreviation D.O.M, which means: God is the Greatest (to God we always offer the best and the maximum), carved on many ecclesiastical buildings. However, if on the one hand there is contempt for what is not known, on the other there is no hesitation in glorifying prisons, in which one ends up having committed crimes, except in cases of innocent people unjustly convicted due to judicial errors, or in the cases of the prisons of anti-democratic dictatorial regimes. Although some do not remember it, or are not aware of this incontrovertible reality, it is worth reminding them that criminals end up in prison.

Those inside prisons must be recovered, not exalted as if they were devoted builders of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of the bad society guilty of not having fully understood them. If one is in there, you need to remember that outside, someone, often more than one, sometimes even entire families, have cried of cause him. It would therefore be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on a spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace which first forms and then transforms the man through the expiation of those that human law indicates as crimes, Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both as regards crimes and as regards sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church for its part, offer the possibility of atoning in a different but essentially similar way, which it implies that healing which erases the guilt deriving from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is just surreal and harmful ideology, between eccentric foot-washing to prisoners and prostitutes in the Mass of the Lord's Supper, and the ‘prison jubilees’ of a Supreme Pontiff who arrives before the Holy Door of the Papal Archbasilica of St Peter’s in a wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers, because he cannot get up and walk; yet he gets up and walks two days later to cross the Holy Door opened in Rome’s Rebibbia prison, where he compares the prison chapel to a basilica (see video HERE). Does anyone want to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs killed in hatred of the faith (hatred of faith) and that, for this reason, the title of basilica is not appropriate for a prison chapel? And right here the words of the Psalmist come to mind:

How long must I take counsel in my soul and have sorrow in my heart all the day?
How long shall my enemy be exalted over me?

Consider and answer me, O Lord my God; light up my eyes,
lest I sleep the sleep of death,
lest my enemy say, “I have prevailed over him,”
lest my foes rejoice because I am shaken.

But I have trusted in your steadfast love;
my heart shall rejoice in your salvation (Psalm 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called the Holy Year, has a great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. Heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and cancellation of the sentence. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel. The official website of the Holy See provides a historical excursus that I recommend reading (see: What is the Jubilee). It is so precise and well done that further explanations are superfluous, because for my part I could only repeat what is contained and explained in it.

Now I would like to move from the spiritual to the financial sphere, starting from the assumption that I hope to be wrong in some of my personal beliefs, and to publicly ask for forgiveness for them in the following months. I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much on what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite already being seriously ill, tried to force itself to open, to throw open the doors to Christ (see HERE); the Church of today is in the ward for terminally ill cancer patients, because has tried to open, to throw open the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, the task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to oppose it:

«If you were of the world, you would be loved by the world: but because you are not of the world, but I have taken you out of the world, you are hated by the world» (John 15:19).

Often images can summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For example: the Protestant woman bishop in places of honor among the exponents of the various religions. But let’s be inclusive! In fact, to exclude everything that is Catholic, it is necessary to necessarily include everything that is not Catholic… All expressed with due human respect for that Lady present as “bishop” in the Pontifical Archbasilica of St. Peter. The leaders ecclesiastics don’t realize that in this way they risk transmitting a message of normalization and approval, given that a woman cannot define herself as a “bishop” and that no one on the Catholic side can in any way recognize her as such. It should not be forgotten that this Lady belongs to a non-Catholic Christian religion born in the 16th century from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, who we remember was a heretic, not a reformer.

Luther did not produce any reforms. The true and only reform was made by the Fathers of the Council of Trent. Luther tore apart the Church of Christ with a terrible schism, which remains so even today, with all due respect to the Protestant women-bishops welcomed into places of honor for the opening of the Holy Year on the tomb of the apostle Peter. All this in total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

But let’s get to the economic question. For the Jubilee of 2000, work in Rome had begun years earlier. Specific laws have also been approved: Legislative Decree 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing «Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000», later converted into law 23 December 1996, n. 651. Above all, an astronomical sum of money was allocated: 3,500 billion of the old lire, corresponding in today’s money to one billion and eight hundred million euros (approximately 1,878,000,000.00 USD). Also in this case I refer you to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport of the Italian Republic, where everything is documented and detailed (see HERE). Having said this, it should be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops of the time was His Eminence the Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, with an army of bishops following him who were not caricatures like today’s bishops, who compete between of them to those who carry on their chest the humblest and poorest wooden cross, made with the material of a sunken boat off the sicilian coast of Lampedusa isla on which human traffickers transported poor desperate illegal immigrants, including women and innocents children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of 2000 was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate… but above all another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. But here is an exhaustive example capable of clarifying everything: at the time, in Italy, if before the administrative elections some diocesan bishop expressed discontent towards a particularly polemical or aggressive candidate, immediately the candidate corrected his tone during the electoral campaign. But there’s more: when the referendum on assisted procreation was held in Italy in June 2005, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go and vote. Result: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a flop (see HERE). The fact that I appreciate and recognize certain undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, stating that today, unfortunately, we no longer have figures of his high level, does not take anything away from the fact that I would never have hoped to have him as my diocesan bishop. Even today, on a human and spiritual level, I continue to consider it “a cold and dry bone covered in velvet”. This is how I defined him, to his scant joy, a few years ago, without caring how notoriously touchy and humorless the Cardinal is.

With completely different men and a completely different kind of Church, on the occasion of the great Jubilee event of 2000, Rome was remade new. This was in the interest of the State, which recovered what it had invested with high revenues and both economic and image interests, but also of the Church, which thanks to the huge funds allocated for that extraordinary event was able to take advantage of renovate most of its structures, many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here it should be remembered that Rome, already at the time, was teeming with religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See (in 1929, after the fall of the Papal State and the conquest of Rome in September 1870, the Kingdom of Italy recognized the Vatican City as an independent sovereign state governed by the Roman Pontiff). Works mostly erected in the 1930s, in a real competition between the historical Orders and the various religious Congregations, male and female, to see who built the largest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic decline in the birth rate that began at the end of the 1960s, certain Catholic schools, nursery schools and various care institutions no longer had any reason to exist, as they were mostly pharaonic structures. It should also be considered that in 1978, in Italy, the “great social conquest” of the law on abortion was approved, thanks to which orphanages also disappeared, for which no longer any need, given that children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous general houses of the various male and female Orders and Congregations, with novitiates or theological school within them, which led them to have, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one hundred or two hundred religious, among those who had professed solemn vows and the young simply professed people in training.

In Rome, at the beginning of the seventies, it was impossible not to encounter priests, friars and nuns everywhere along the urban streets. Then there were the young seminarians and theology students from the various national and international Roman seminaries and colleges, who when they went for a walk formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. In simple words: the decline in the birth rate and the inexorable crisis of vocations had reduced the majority of these large structures in the following decades to being inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred, but by six or seven elderly men and women religious, residing in buildings which were now in semi-degraded state, with obsolete systems and outside of any legal regulations regarding safety. So it was that on the occasion of the Jubilee of 2000, not only were a large part of these institutes renovated, but it was decided to make them profitable in some way, reserving a small wing for men and women religious, now reduced to a few members, and all the rest used for holiday home, in fact in hotels, because this is what most of these institutions are today: low-cost hotels. It was a far-sighted operation, thanks to which the buildings of many institutions were saved and made capable of producing the money necessary for their maintenance.

Unfortunately, priests, friars and nuns are capable — and they really are like few others — of wasting money on useless expenses, sometimes even on harmful works which then lead to great losses, without having the ability to realize that certain structures require a lot of care and maintenance. And so, the well-known sapience of priests, friars and nuns begins to attach patches left and right, spending exorbitant amounts in the belief of saving money, because few like priests, friars and nuns are so idiotic as to let themselves be robbed, if they have not been adequately trained in concrete practical life with their feet firmly planted on the ground. All said and done: were the walls, last painted twenty years ago? The internal and external fixtures, the air conditioners and radiators, the sanitar elements dilapidated and broken today fixtures, on which the necessary routine maintenance, has never been carried out they were installed in the late 90s? No problem, just apply a patch, entrusting the repairs to people who, to change banal filters on air conditioners, make the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns pay more than what the new latest generation air conditioners with low consumption and high energy savings would cost.

Since there are many examples, I will limit myself to just one: last year I had the opportunity to find myself in a nuns institute while some painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water, and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled entirely of toxic chemical substances, I asked: “What brand of ecological paint are you using?”. Then, walking around the corridors, I noticed a riot of smudges not only on the walls, but also on the fixtures, on the skirting boards and even on the fire extinguishers dirtied with paint flows. I took the foreman and told him: “If you had done something like this in my house, I wouldn’t have let you out through the door but through the window, being careful not to give you a single penny.” In the evening, the mother superior confronted me irritably and told me not to disturb their workers anymore. I replied to her: «The people who placed the water drains from the air conditioners inside the shower cubicles of the guest bedrooms and who, not satisfied, even eliminated the earthing from the electrical system, do not deserve to be called workers but criminals, while you nuns demonstrate that you are womens incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace of being able to benefit”.

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers inaugurates what we might reasonably call “The Jubilee of patch” focused on our irreversible spiritual and economic decadence, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. On 24 December 1999, the square of St. Peter’s, was not only packed, because the crowd of people reached as far as Castel Sant’Angelo. Same way, it is equally evident that on December 24, 2024 (as shown in the photo accompanying this article), the same square was completely empty in the central part, and in the four squares of chairs placed under the churchyard, several empty seats are visible.

The last question is obligatory: why should a devout Catholic leave Australia or Peru to go to Rome? Perhaps for hear an elderly Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, speaks only of poor and migrants, of migrants and poor, of poor and migrants…? As if the Verb of God had come into this world only to speak and care for the poor of the “slums” and “Villas miseries” (Villages of misery)? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, are they also sons of God, or not? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? The clochards under Bernini’s colonnade; Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, respectively to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter’s Square, where early in the morning traders are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to remove the acidic smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils nauseatingly? And where should the jubilant pilgrim lodge? Perhaps by the nuns or friars who after the Jubilee of 2000, once they had their religiouse homes renovated free of charge by the “Uncle Scrooge” of the Italian Republic, never asked themselves the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the bathroom fixtures; restore the plaster and paint the walls; that they offer freeze-dried milk and substitute powders for breakfast that rival the products put on the market during the period in which the old fascist regime proclaimed autarky, following which it was no longer possible to use products imported, starting with coffee? Better not even to mention the very poor quality of the food they offer in these houses where they also serve meals. Better to ignore, for Christian charity’s sake, the problem of the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries and brought to the religious houses in Rome, placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun and used as serving women, who, despite living in Italy for ten years, are unable to understand and speak Italian. Let us overlook and draw a veil over all this and all the worst that circulates in certain homes…

Finally, how can we not mention the exotic characters that we working in this religious houses, especially in those of nuns, who vary from girls with bare bellies to boys who show off three earrings in their ears, piercings and tattoos view? But do we want to host pilgrims in religious homes, or in failed branches of a gay village? Why has it not yet occurred to the Holy See to send around inspectors to verify whether certain houses managed by men and women religious, or by their lay preposed, really have all the necessary requirements to do so-called religious reception in a dignified way?

Having opened the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia was appropriate and in its own way farsighted, being the most suitable place where many of us should be, and also for a long time, after having launched an attack on the mystical body of Christ which is the Church (Colossians 1,18), on which attached day after day patches that cannot stop, much less cure, the malignant metastases that have been circulating in his body for decades and decades. A state of affairs for which this pontificate is certainly not responsible, despite having done its part, without holding back when, to the damage that has already largely existed for several decades, it decided to add others, as original as they are serious.

«But when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?» (Luke 18, 8)

 

From the Island of Patmos, 28 December 2024

.

______________________________________

.

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY GATE OF IRREVERSIBLE DECADENCE IN A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure spiritually and economically, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite being seriously ill, tried to force himself to open, to open wide the doors to Christ; the Church of today, Lying like a patient in the oncology hospice, she has tried to open wide the doors to the world..

 

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, If perhaps we are increasingly incapable of reading certain signs. And so, twenty-five years apart, two Supreme Pontiffs opened the Door of the Holy Year, appearing before her with the weight of old age and her disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, The visible Church led by His Holiness John Paul II arrived seriously ill before the Holy Door. This Pontiff, weakened by Parkinson's disease, It was a plastic example of this.: assisted by a master of ceremonies dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical vestment, who wanted, in any case, kneel although with obvious difficulties and great physical suffering. He never agreed to make exceptions with genuflections, especially before the Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion, The Holy Father wore a mantum that precedes the birth of Christianitas by centuries. A cloak known in ancient Roman pagan religion as a “pluvial”, used by him Pontifex Maximus to shelter from the rain, when from the top of the Sublicio Bridge, located between the current neighborhoods of Trastevere and Testaccio, at the height of Porta Portese, He studied the movements of water and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of the year 2000, The Holy Father wore a cape about which much criticism was made. That garment, made in Prato, It had been woven in very bright colors: rojo, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. Red usually symbolizes life and strength.; the blue, the union of heaven and earth; the gold, divinity.

If we reflect on it in retrospect, That play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the gloomy grayness that surrounds us today.; and that it is not attributable to him, nor to the Supreme Pontiffs who succeeded him from 2005; because the crisis of the Church began a long time ago. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough — in this world with memories that barely reach back to yesterday, since we do not even reach the day before yesterday - to understand that the germs of the crisis that caused the ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical decline, blatantly visible today, They were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius, at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century.

If with John Paul II the illness pressed at the door, With the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church crossed a point of no return, pushed onto a wheelchair by the shadow of an emaciated priest dressed in a pair of pants, instead of a dignified ecclesiastical vestment. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church in crisis for decades, always tried to kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, trying not to get irreversibly sick. The Church of Francis does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because now she is seriously and irreversibly ill. However, He kneels to wash and kiss the feet of prisoners and prostitutes in the Mass of the Lord's Supper, despising the wealth of our glorious places of worship, that they are not the fruit of princely splendor — as some uncultured people might think — but of the faith of believers and the work of the greatest artists who wanted to honor God, offering the best, paying the highest homage that could be offered to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all visible and invisible things. That's why the abbreviation D.O.M, what does it mean: God is the Greatest, It is sculpted on many ecclesiastical buildings. If, on the one hand, what is not known is despised, on the other hand, there is no hesitation in exalting prisons, among those that end up having committed crimes, except the case of innocent people unjustly convicted due to judicial errors. Although some don't remember it, or are not really aware of this incontrovertible reality, It is worth reminding them that criminals end up in jail.

Those who are inside prisons must be recovered, not exalted as if they were faithful devotees of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of a bad society, guilty of not having fully understood them. If someone is in there, outside, often more than one, and sometimes even entire families, They have cried because of him. So, It would be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on the spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace that first forms and then transforms man through the atonement of those whom human law designates as crimes, and Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both in regard to crimes and sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church for its part, They offer differently, but substantially similar, the possibility of atonement, which implies in itself that recovery that erases the guilt derived from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is surreal and harmful ideology, between foot washing and “prisoners' jubilees” of a Supreme Pontiff arriving before the Holy Door of the Papal Archbasilica of Saint Peter pushed in a wheelchair by an emaciated priest in trousers, because in that case it is impossible to get up and walk. But he gets up and walks until he opens the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia, comparing it to a basilica (cf.. video WHO).

Does anyone want to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs cruelly murdered in hatred of faith (in hatred of the catholic faith) and that the title basilica is not particularly appropriate for a prison chapel? And this is where the words of the psalmist come to mind:

How long will I feel anguish in my soul and sadness in my heart, day after day? How long will my enemy triumph at my expense??
Señor, My God, look at me and answer me! Enlighten my eyes so that I don't sleep with the dead,
and let my enemy not say that he finished me, Nor will my adversaries rejoice to see me hesitate..
As for me, I trust in your goodness; I will know the joy of your salvation and I will sing to the Lord who has treated me well (Salmo 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called Holy Year, It has great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. The heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and the penalties for sins.. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel.. The official website of the Holy See offers a historical tour that I recommend reading (watch: What is the Jubilee?). It is a text so precise and well done that there are no more explanations, For my part I could only repeat what was contained and explained in it..

Now I would like to move from the spiritual sphere to the financial one., starting from the premise that I hope to be wrong in certain personal convictions and have to publicly correct them in the coming months. I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure spiritually and economically., because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm reversal: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite being seriously ill, tried to force himself to open, to open wide the doors to Christ (watch HERE); the Church of today, lying as a patient in the oncological hospice ward, has tried to open, to open wide the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, The task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to oppose him:

«If you were of the world, the world would love them as their own. But since they are not of the world, but I chose them and took them out of him, "the world hates them" (Juan 15,19).

Images can often summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For example: What to say about the Protestant episcopese sitting in the seats of honor along with representatives of different religions? But we are inclusive!! Therefore, to exclude everything that is Catholic, we must necessarily include everything that is not Catholic… of course, all obviously expressed with due human respect towards the Lady present on the podium as “obispo” in the Papal Archbishopric of St. Peter, without any of the clerical solons realizing that in this way we run the risk of letting through a message of normalization and approval, because a woman cannot define herself as “bishop” and nobody, on the catholic side, in no way can you recognize it as such, not even if it belongs to a non-Catholic Christian religion born from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, what we remember: He was a heretic and he was not a reformer.

Luther did not produce, in fact, some reform; the only true reform was carried out by the Fathers at the Council of Trent. Luther tore apart the Church of Christ with a terrible schism, which remains as is to this day, with due respect to the bishops on the platform of honor at the inauguration of the Holy Year, over the tomb of the apostle Peter, with the total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

We were talking about the economic discourse… for the Jubilee of 2000, The Decree Law of the 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing "Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000", later converted into law 23 December 1996, n. 651. Work for this event began years ago., after the approval of specific laws, but above all with the attribution of the astronomical sum of money: 3.500 billion of the old liras, which in current currency is equivalent to one thousand eight hundred million euros. Also in this case I refer to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, where everything is documented and detailed (watch HERE). That being said, It must be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops at that time was His Eminence Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, followed by an army of bishops who were not yet like the current caricatures, who compete with each other to see who carries the most humble and poor wooden cross on their chest, possibly made from material from a sunken ship off the coast of the Sicilian island Lampedusa; boats on which human traffickers transport poor illegal and desperate immigrants, among whom there are often women and children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of the 2000 It was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate… but above all, another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. Here is an exhaustive example capable of clarifying everything: in that period in Italy, if before the administrative elections any diocesan bishop expressed his dissatisfaction with one or more particularly controversial or aggressive candidates, They took measures to correct the objective and lower the tone during the course of their electoral campaigns.; but there is more: when in June 2005 There was a referendum in Italy on assisted procreation, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go to vote. Result: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a fiasco (watch HERE). The fact of personally appreciating and recognizing certain evident and undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, regretting that today figures of his high stature, unfortunately we no longer have, It takes nothing away from the fact that I would never have wanted to have him as a diocesan bishop.. In fact, I still consider it today., on a human and spiritual level, as “a cold, dry bone covered in velvet”, how I defined it, for your little joy, for a few years without repair, for my part, of anything he is notoriously susceptible to outside of lacking a sense of humor.

With all other types of men and all other types of Church completely different, on the occasion of the great jubilee event of the year 2000, Rome was made new. It was also the interest of the State, that he recovered everything he had invested with high income and interest, both economic and image, as the Church did, which thanks to the enormous funds allocated to that extraordinary event it was able to take advantage of to renovate most of its structures., many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here we must remember that Rome, Even then it was full of religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See (in it 1929, after the fall of the Papal State and the taking of Rome in September 1870; The Kingdom of Italy recognized Vatican City as an independent sovereign state governed by the Roman Pontiff). Works erected for the most part in the years 1930, in a true competition between the historical Orders and the different religious Congregations, male and female, to see who built the biggest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic decrease in the birth rate that began at the end of the years 1960, certain catholic schools, day care centers and various assistance institutions no longer had a reason to exist, since they were mostly pharaonic structures. It must also be considered that in the 1978 was approved in Italy “great social achievement” of the abortion law, thanks to which orphanages disappeared, no longer necessary, since children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous curias and general houses of the different male and female Orders and Congregations., almost always with novitiates or theology students inside, what led to having, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one or two hundred religious, between those who had professed solemn vows and the young simple professed in formation.

In Rome in the early seventies, it was impossible not to find priests, friars and nuns everywhere along the urban roads. There were also young seminarians and theology students from the different national and international seminaries and Roman schools., that when they went out for a walk they formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. In a nutshell: The decline in birth rates and the inexorable crisis of vocations had reduced, in the following decades, most of these large structures to being inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred., but by six or seven elderly men and women religious, with buildings that were now in a semi-ruinous state, with obsolete systems and outside of all legal regulations regarding security. So, on the occasion of the Jubilee of the year 2000, Not only were a large part of these institutes renovated, but it was decided to make them profitable in some way: reserving a small wing for religious men and women, now numerically reduced to a minimum and transforming the bulk of the buildings into hostels, actually in hotels, because that is what most of these institutions are today. It was a forward-thinking operation., Thanks to which the buildings of many institutes were saved and they were allowed to produce the money necessary to sustain themselves..

Unfortunately, priests, friars and nuns They are capable - and they really are like few others - of wasting money on useless expenses., sometimes even in harmful works that later cause great losses, without realizing that certain structures require a lot of care and careful maintenance. And so, twenty-five years ago after having been saved from very serious problems, related to their great buildings that they had not been able to restore, nor properly preserve, nor to adapt to legal standards regarding safety; They found nothing better to do than let them return to their semi-ruined state for the next twenty-five years., not all, but a good part of them do. This is what I usually call “clerical patch psychology.”. And it is easy to reveal the meaning of this definition: Does a structure require routine maintenance? Why spend money, just leave it like this, and just in case, say with all the cynicism typical and sometimes unique to priests, friars and nuns: “It's not worth the useless bitter blood, Those who will come later will take care of it”. At this point, all the ordinary maintenance interventions omitted over the years end up becoming serious needs for extraordinary maintenance, which however cost a lot. No problem, we will put a patch on it, entrusting the work to people who, to change the banal air conditioner filters, they will do that due to the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns are paid more than what they are paid in the latest generation systems, low consumption and high energy saving.

As there are many examples I will limit myself to just one: Last year I had the opportunity to find myself in an institute of nuns while painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled like toxic chemicals, I asked: “What brand of eco-friendly paint are you using??”. Then, as I walked through the hallways, I noticed an avalanche of stains not only on the walls, but also in furniture, on baseboards and even on fire extinguishers dirty with paint drips. I grabbed the foreman and told him: «If you had done something like that in my house, I wouldn't have let you out through the door but through the window., "taking care not to give you a cent". At night, The irritated Mother Superior told me not to bother the workers anymore.. I replied: «People who have placed water drains from air conditioners inside guest room showers and are not satisfied with that, They have even removed the outlets from the electrical system, They do not deserve to be called workers but criminals. While you nuns demonstrate that you are incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace to benefit.".

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated, pants-clad priest inaugurated what we could reasonably define as “Jubilee patch” focused on our irreversible spiritual and financial decline, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. Or maybe someone forgets that the 24 December 1999 St. Peter's Square was so full of people that the crowd of faithful reached the Castel Sant'Angelo and the Lungotevere? Someone wants to address the obvious and sad fact that the 24 December 2024, as shown in the photo accompanying this article, the same square was completely empty in the center and in the four squares of chairs placed under the steps of the basilica you can see so many empty seats.

One last question is essential.: Why would a devout Catholic leave Australia or Peru to travel to Rome?? To listen to an old Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, talks about poor and immigrants, of immigrants and poor, of poor and immigrants…? As if the Word of God had come to this world only to speak and care for the poor in the favelas and the Villas of misery?? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, They are also children of God, or not? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? I would find the vagabonds camped under Bernini's colonnade; would find Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, respectively to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter's Square, where early in the morning merchants are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to eliminate the sour smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils. in a nauseating way. And where should the jubilant pilgrim stay?? Perhaps where the nuns or friars who, after the Jubilee of the 2000, once he Uncle McDuck O Scrooge McDuck of the Italian Republic renewed its structures free of charge, They never considered the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the toilets.; restore the plaster and paint the walls; that offer freeze-dried milk and powdered substitutes for breakfast that rival the products marketed during the period in which the former fascist regime proclaimed autarky, after which it was no longer possible to use products imported from abroad, starting with coffee? Let's ignore the poor quality of the food that these houses offer as catering services.. Above all, Let us ignore the sad reality of the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries, taken to the religious houses of Rome and placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun as domestic servants, who should be addressed in English, because even if they have lived in Italy for ten years, they do not understand or speak Italian. Let us overlook and draw a compassionate veil over all this and all the worst that circulates in certain houses.…

And finally, How can we not mention the exotic characters that we increasingly find working in these religious reception houses?, especially in the nuns' houses, ranging from girls with bare bellies to boys who wear three earrings in their ears, piercings and tattoos in sight? From the series: Do we want to welcome pilgrims in religious houses of hospitality, Or do we want to transform religious houses into failed branches of a gay village?? How is it possible that the Holy See, sometimes even attentive to trivialities, It has not occurred to them to send inspectors to verify whether certain houses run by religious men and women, or by their lay supervisors, really meet all the necessary requirements for religious reception in a dignified manner?

Having opened the opening of the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia It was timely and farsighted in its own way., being the most appropriate place where many of us should be and even for a long time, after having attacked the mystical Body of Christ which is the Church (Colossians 1,18). A Holy Body on which today they are placed, day after day, patches that can't stop, much less cure, the malignant metastases that have been attacking him for decades. The metastases were not caused by this pontificate, who is not responsible for them, despite having done their part without stopping the damage that had already existed for several decades, decided instead to add others, so original, as equally serious.

"But, when the Son of man comes, Will you find faith on earth?» (Lucas 18,8)

 

From the Island of Patmos, 31 December 2024

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

We can have a Christmas without the birthday boy?

WE CAN HAVE A CHRISTMAS WITHOUT THE CELEBRATOR?

Christ Jesus our Lord, that on this day we remember embodied in our humanity and history, manifests the fundamental mystery of all the Christian mysteries that are related to our salvation.

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

 

PDF print format article

 

 

 

Christmas it is among the most loved and celebrated holidays in the world, because it is universally considered a moment of joy, of family reunion and sharing.

Cities in every part of the globe light up of glittering decorations, the Christmas markets are full of typical products of this period and the houses are filled with the scent of traditional dishes. But this Solemnity can be celebrated, specifically Christian, without mentioning the reason for the party? It is true that Christmas creates a magical atmosphere, but we can be satisfied with just this or let the commercial component prevail, without remembering the reason for this occasion, that is, without inviting to the party the One who is the reason and the reason for so much joy and peace desired and invoked?

We can have Christmas without the Celebrant, Christ Jesus our Lord, which on this very day we remember embodied in our humanity and history, thus manifesting the fundamental mystery of all the Christian mysteries that are related to our salvation? This is precisely the angelic message brought to the shepherds on the holy night of Christmas:

"Fear not:: there, you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people: today, the City of David, is born for you a Savior, who is Christ the Lord" (LC 2,10-11).

A merely "consumed" Christmas cannot be enough and satisfy us in the party or in the dishes, even if this is done with family or friends. Indeed, precisely the preparation of the latter, delicacies of all kinds that fill our Christmas tables, of panettone or pandoro, traditional Italian desserts of the period, that divide the sides of lovers of one or the other, they send us back to slowness, to that care that requires time and dedication, respect for tradition and patience.

So our faith also needs as much passion and care, especially when faced with the all-to-be-adored mystery of Jesus' birth. It cannot be overshadowed by the commercial aspect, from the frenzy of shopping Christmas looking for the perfect gift for the people dear to us. Nothing can obscure the message of love, hope and redemption that Christmas brings with it. Yet also the preparations, if done with love, with due attention to their meaning, they can help us keep alive this important aspect of the Christian faith which corresponds to the Incarnation of the divine Word.

Rediscover the authentic spirit of Christmas also through the things that are done in this period, in the family or in the Christian community, setting aside the purely worldly spirit of the celebration to live every occasion with deep faith and sincere love among ourselves and towards the Lord who was born in Bethlehem. Do simple things together, how to prepare the foods that will go on the table, take care of details to ensure that everyone feels welcomed and loved. Not forgetting sharing with those who are poorer or less fortunate, because precisely in this circumstance we can reevaluate and give significance to the virtue of charity, since it was precisely out of love that Christ was born for us. And then read Christmas stories, among all the Gospels of the Nativity, which make us understand the purpose and meaning of this mystery; and participate in the Christmas Mass to understand through liturgical action and prayer how much the Lord loved us by coming among us.

How precious it is, to this end, presence at home and obviously in Church, of a nativity scene. Widespread throughout the world, it was born right from us, thanks to the religious genius of Saint Francis who in 1223 he created the first living nativity scene in Greccio. Each figure of the nativity scene and the symbols hidden in it have a profound meaning of faith and culture: help tell the story of the birth of Baby Jesus.

It would be nice, as happens for example in religious Jewish families on the occasion of Passover, that also in Christian families, in front of the Nativity scene, the little ones were told the reason for those figures, of those poses and how the gift of the eternal Father was given to humanity, Baby Jesus light that brings salvation to the world, has passed through the availability of some people, particularly Joseph and the Virgin Mary.

Mary is the Mother that we perceive in the attitude of love and dedication: they recall his faith which abandoned itself to the divine will. St. Joseph, with his stick, it is the right silent and full of strength, placed to protect the family of Nazareth, figure of a Church to come. Immediately after the shepherds, which are located near Bethlehem, symbol of humility and simplicity. First to receive the announcement of the birth of Jesus and first to approach the mystery: they anticipate the future calling of the people, among which the humble and simple will stand out.

And how can we not mention the Magi, who arrive from afar guided by the star. They bring precious gifts: air, frankincense and myrrh, which help us meditate on kingship in advance, on the divinity and even on the future suffering of Jesus. Even the presence of the Magi in the nativity scene underlines the universality of the Christian message, which embraces every people and culture. Then the angels, which overlook the Nativity scene, they announce the good news of the birth of the Lord. They sing: «Glory to God in the highest and peace on earth to the men loved by the Lord», bringing a message of joy and hope. Finally, the star, who guides the Magi to the manger, symbol of divine light and grace that illuminates humanity's path towards salvation. Even the animals present in the nativity scene have their own spiritual relevance. The ox and the donkey, often depicted next to the manger, they represent patience and industriousness. According to tradition they warmed the Baby Jesus with their breath, thus indicating the simplicity and generosity of nature.

The nativity scene and every aspect linked to Holy Christmas, no matter how trivial it may be, It has its own meaning to which we can give the right value in order to help us understand Christmas today, although they have passed approx 2024 years from that Event. Even traditional things can marry with the innovations of modernity and what is apparently ancient in truth has a validity that never fades. Thus Christmas does not appear as a celebration of only consumption or lights, but it conveys a profound and beautiful message, full of hope for men and for the whole of creation, which never fades and which does not expire with the passage of time. God loves us and remains with us, this is why He sent His Son Jesus, born for us.

 

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 25 December 2024

Christmas Day

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.