- ecclesial news -

BY THE DECLINE farce GROTESQUE: ENZO BIANCHI, A Heretic THAT LAY WITH THE APPROVAL OF BISHOPS PRIESTS TO PREACH THE SPIRITUAL EXERCISES ON UNIVERSAL TOMB OF THE PATRON OF PRIESTS

.

Who today still shocked that Enzo Bianchi will preach the world retreat for priests, He has no reason to take it either with the reigning Pope or with the prefect of the congregation for the clergy who will attend this global event known as a notary may be present in a house where a room is the corpse of the dead, the other heirs attending the opening of a will by which, with immense astonishment, will find out soon, from its public reading, who did not inherit a penny, but only a deluge of debt to pay. Exactly those debts finally presented to the Pope Francis I by John Paul II and Benedict XVI, Enzo Bianchi even.

.

Authors
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
Jorge Facio Lynx

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

Enzo Bianchi, an overt heretic in the chair to preach the world retreats to the clergy on the tomb of the Patron of Priests of the Universal Church, The Holy Curé of Ars

When we analyze Birth and development certain intra-ecclesial monsters, we must always try to go to the source of the problem. Often, the nature of the problem, It consists precisely the same issue that was not taken, analyzed, isolated and solved in time. So that, to those before the heretic unbowed and unrepentant Enzo Bianchi, false prophet, bad teacher, pernicious poisoner of the deposit of the Catholic faith, Today they point to the Pope Francis I, we should remember, first of all for honesty, then historical fact, that the real responsible for the development of bianchiano cancer within the Church were the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger Prefect for two decades of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, later the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, under whose pontificate Enzo Bianchi, public speaker Christological heresies, pneumatological, ecclesiological and esegetiche, He was invited to the Synod on the New Evangelization.

.

We understand that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith presided over by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, over the years they reached many complaints, together with numerous requests from several bishops who diplomatically asking for opinions to the competent department on doctrinal orthodoxy of books and public lectures by Enzo Bianchi; and this since the late eighties early nineties of the twentieth century. To someone, it is no accident that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger has taken some measures?

.

If the story of Enzo Bianchi - the name of which today is one of the Fathers of the next Synod on the young -, it wasn't, as it is, placed in our ecclesial sad tragedy and contemporary ecclesiastical, It could be a real factor in grotesque comedy, why invite a heretic to the Synod for the New Evangelization under the pontificate of Pope Theologian, It is paradoxical than it would be to invite a famous porno star to speak at the Confederation of Superiors of the Poor Clare Nuns, together to determine the best way to propose to young aspiring religious virtue of chastity in the Third Millennium. but yet, Benedict XVI, he did it. E, could not he does not know who he was Enzo Bianchi, we can only conclude by saying: while Francis I, the contradictions of the manifest and, as they say, slams you in the face, Benedict XVI, over time, a good son of German Romanticism tried instead to merge harmoniously water and fire, opposites and antonyms, as if everyone had the right to have a say, even Enzo Bianchi. So included heresy, call to coexist harmoniously and so pluralistic and conciliatory with the theological orthodoxy.

.

For painful duty of intellectual honesty must then add: is Enzo Bianchi, under the pontificate of Giovanni Paolo II, He had touched on two key issues, these were the condoms and family, It would be done off instantly, just as they were held back and rightly repudiated the proponents of Liberation Theology marxisteggiante. But unfortunately, during this pontificate so attentive and sensitive to condoms, to the family and to Marxist tendencies, at the same time not seen and no one cared that in the same Brazil, large tank of Theology of Liberation incubated in that country with the thought and especially with the money of the Germans, They were taking life priests who now present themselves to the altar dressed and made up as if they were Drag Queens that rise on the stage of a gay disco. The Whites therefore had the cunning, under that long pontificate, embarking upon his entire sowing heresies, But covering behind the great meaculpism inaugurated by John Paul II, without ever touching the barbed wire high voltage of condoms and family.

.

With identical cunning acted well Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez, founders of the Neocatechumenal Way, who havoc liturgy and Holy Eucharist until forms of real sacrilege, But, to Giovanni Paolo II, They showed a movement made up of regular couples who had seven or eight children each and they considered contraception one of the sins which cry before God. E, under the pontificate, who had many children and was opposed to contraception, He could also write catechisms parallel to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, He could also decide when their followers could recite the Nicene-Constantinopolitan symbol of faith, but above could reduce the Eucharistic Sacrifice to a middle way between a The Pesach Seder [dinner of Passover] celebrated on Saturday evening at 21, Dinner and a Calvinist in remembrance of Jesus Christ. It should not be touched, But, the high-voltage barbed wire of condoms and bioethics. This is to reiterate what Enzo Bianchi is neither guilt nor responsibility of the Pope Francis I.

.

Who today still shocked that Enzo Bianchi will preach the world retreat for priests in Ars, where the remains of the saint are preserved universal patron of priests, He has no reason to take it either with the reigning Pope or with the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, His Eminence Cardinal Beniamino Stella, who will attend this global event known as a notary may be present in a house where a room is the corpse of the dead, the other heirs attending the opening of a will by which, with immense astonishment, will find out soon, from its public reading, who did not inherit a penny, but only a deluge of debt to pay. Exactly those debts finally presented to the Pope Francis I by John Paul II and Benedict XVI, Enzo Bianchi even.

.

Enzo Bianchi called to preach to priests, Is it something to be taken seriously? In this bitter reality you can only react with the capture of around, just as with the grotesque case in point a while ago about the image of the porno star and nuns who try to learn from her the right language to proclaim the value of virginity aspiring nuns of the Third Millennium.

.

Among Satanists and Enzo Bianchi there is this tremendous difference: and Satanists, just as such, are real believers; few as they believe it deeply - to give just one example -, the real presence of Christ living and true God, in body soul and divinity in the Holy Eucharistic Species. Enzo Bianchi is rather an atheist, one that has decisively ateizzato the entire Mystery of Revelation. Words undoubtedly heavy these our, but witnessed by hours and hours of public speeches given by this character, in fact atheist and ateizzante.

.

We come to our work, and strictly based only on evidence; a work carried out for over a year by the young philosopher and theologian Jorge Facio Lince, collaborator of Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo. The work was conducted by the diligent researcher in this way: were collected and stored a very large number of films in which Enzo Bianchi, shot and recorded, He kept their heretical rants, mainly at church structures, if not, really, from the pulpits of many churches Italian cathedrals, with as many numerous diocesan bishops seated in the front row to drink smiling, them first, its enormous heresies. And when a bishop invites a heretic of this kind to utter heterodox thoughts from the pulpit of his cathedral church filled with the faithful, It is obvious that we are dealing with an unworthy pastor who instead guard the portion of the People of God entrusted to it [cf. GV 21, 15-19], directly invites the wolf in the sheepfold. The pastor inviting the wolf into the sheepfold is a lot worse than the pastor before the wolf flees for fear, and the wolf snatches them and scatters the sheep [cf. GV 10, 12]. Indeed, Fear is a human emotion, Also we must also remember that no one is obliged to be a hero. Of course, who by nature has no courage, should avoid accepting, even if one attempted to impose it upon, Episcopal appointment.

.

There were diocesan bishops who sent generations of seminarians at the Monastery of Bose exotic doing retreats before their sacred ordinations. There were diocesan bishops who have secured the presence of Enzo Bianchi at its seminars, affinch'egli could give with his lessons of wisdom to future priests. E, said this, It would be futile, at least in normal times, state that a bishop who poisons thus their future priests, or that invites this Mr. Lay to preach retreats to the members of his presbyterate, It should not be allowed to Bishop. In fact, it is necessary to clarify that a bishop who lived in the episcopal palace with a harem concubines, but in the exercise of his sacred ministry he was - beyond its immoral private life and sin -, a defender of the faith and of the doctrinal integrity of its priests, committing a less serious sin, only because that kind of sin of lust would be poison for the soul. Instead, a bishop who favors the spread of heresy among his priests and their faithful diocesan subjects, It accomplishes the greatest sin that can carry a high priest whose task is to hold, in the sacramental fullness of his apostolic priesthood, all living members of the Body of Christ which is the Church.

.

The long work of Jorge Facio Lince search finally it resulted in the accumulation of more than three hundred pages of materials, which I am nothing more than the exact words spoken in many different public occasions by Enzo Bianchi in lectures and conferences, all it documented with no possible penalty denied, because - it is good to repeat it again -, not about deductions, or interpretations, it comes to this heretic, this atheist who ateizza the listener, filmed and recorded while speaking before the audience in the course of hundreds of hours of recordings, not infrequently in the presence of various Italian bishops.

.

So, of two things one excludes the other: or the bishops who invited him, that host it, and that they do speak directly into their cathedrals, are such and such to him, or we must realize that a large chunk of the episcopate has proceeded in concrete facts to make public apostasy from the Catholic faith.

.

Is in one that in the other case - and both are very serious cases -, this kind of bishops that fact untied their priests and their faithful diocesan subjects from each branch must respect and obedience towards the bishop. Indeed, to exception of people with inevitable and invincible ignorance, therefore unable to come to similar conclusions and analysis, denying the legitimate authority, but above all obedience to a bishop who has a heretic as a model in his cathedral church to its priests and to the faithful diocesan subjects, It is a must, because a bishop like you should just never obey. And you should not obey imperative of conscience, as well as the duty of Catholic faith. Otherwise instead, a bishop who holds a service in your episcopal palace concubines a team, but despite their immoral private life, defends publicly and protecting the deposit of the Catholic faith, Despite some of its serious human frailties we owe respect and obedience, although it could seriously risk going all’Inferno to burn forever in what Dante indicates as the circle of the lustful.

.

From about six hundred hours of film recordings in which Enzo Bianchi offers the best of the worst of his heretical thoughts, we chose not limited to a few passages in which he openly denied some of the main foundations of the faith. For instance: the correct figure of God Father reduced to analysis imprinted on Freudian matrix patterns; the denial of the procession of the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, namely the fact that an article of faith the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son; to follow with a Christology that embodies the true characteristics of blasphemy, followed by the wildest theological and religious relativism presented as ecumenism and interreligious dialogue as. All things that utters Bianchi and seeding for decades, especially in cathedral churches and seminaries; all things that, the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, seems, at least put to the test, that you have never noticed.

.

Request: but is it possible that for half a century in this part He lives in a Church in which many poor and ignorant Popes were betrayed and deceived everyone, then beatified and canonized? Just so. Why then, when certain evidences are no longer in any way deniable, and especially when it comes to precisely Blessed and Santi Pontefici, at that point it is now customary to use to announce: "The Supreme Pontiff has been betrayed and deceived!».

.

Some might ask: Why, all these materials do not present them to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith? Simple answer: first of all, to know that White is a heretic, we had not hardly wait, in this church where the heresy is no longer such but it is only considered a "free different opinion". Then, to what purpose do, if that department, today, would be able only to condemn as a major heresy that someone dares to question the Church and ecclesiastical task of a cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church should not be to, and species of these times, to bring the hot coffee in the evenings to the homeless in the colonnade of St. Peter? [chronicle: WHO, WHO]. And even if it did, it would not be appropriate to do so without pulling back an army of journalists, Photograph and cameraman? Today, task of a Cardinal, with the doctrinal foundation of the house trembling under the high-magnitude earthquakes, It is to bring ice cream to immigrants in Rocca di Papa, if anything running after them with ice cream in hand while these, just arrived in the reception center available to them out of spite policy with the Italian government in place by the Italian Episcopal Conference, They had already fled? [chronicle, WHO]. And behind them Cardinal, that chased them with ice cream in hand …

.

… there, say these things so, which it is heresy, little denial, how does the Bianchi, the article of faith that says, "The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son"? Or that original sin is an invention of which he said "There is no trace on the Book of Genesis" [citation and movie follow later]. In conclusion, These Bianchi, They are "different opinions". Instead, to fall into heresy, Today we must deny alms to a gypsy, do not make the collection of waste, or pollute the environment with conditioners. All things that soon will be enclosed by the new theology in the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, for which there is no forgiveness and pardon [cf. MC 3, 29].

.

Enzo Bianchi, lay not in the sense of Christi faithful but in the sense of secular, focused his say and write about the importance of dialogue as the best way for a "humanization" for man. So this collection of texts was made by taking one hand the message contained in the spoken or written word in recent years by Enzo Bianchi around the whole Italy; and the Message of Jesus Christ, the one entrusted to the Catholic Church, sum Mater et Magistra. The Enzo Bianchi message is impossible to be misinterpreted because they are all claims made or written by him; while on the other side of the dialogue, ie on the side of Jesus' message, of the Church and of the same story, It will be put in a simple and concise form, so that each reader can draw their own conclusions.

.

Sociology FROM POLITICS TO THE "SOCIAL THEOLOGY": THE STORY ABOUT GOD

.

So let's start from the beginning, first clarifying what he thinks and what transmits Enzo Bianchi on the mystery of creation. If in fact the Catholic Church claims that:

"Holy Church, our mother, holds and teaches that God, beginning and end of all things, It can be known with certainty by the natural light of human reason, starting from created things” [First Vatican Council: Denz. -beautiful, 3004; cf 3026; Conc. ecum. Vat. (II), Of the]. Without this capability, the man can not accept the revelation of God. Man has this capacity because he is created “in God's image” [Cf Gen 1,27]» [1].

.

Enzo Bianchi, inspired by writers critical towards religion and the figure of God as Father, and clearly influenced by the thought of Sigmund Freud, It presents us with the figure of the Creator as a pattern or historical and socio-political superstructure:

.

full video, to open click on the picture

«[…] we must confess that Paul Ricœur [2] was right when he said that especially religious institutions had created the Phantom Father, God the Father often shaping the experience of human fatherhood that men had done. Watch, if there is a terrible mistake that retraced the history of the Church it is to have thought you could say that God is father beginning of human fatherhood. While in reality it would have to be that divine fatherhood told by Jesus that was to inspire, that was to shape the paternity of our parents. It's exactly the opposite occurred. But this has meant that God really took on the face of the father-master. that face, let me say, Of perverse god […] that image of God that especially in the last centuries, They were more because of their atheism than they have been movements and ideologies; we accused of being harbingers of atheism. I am convinced and I often say: has created more atheists the reigning father image in the Church in the last century and the first half of this century, than did the Marxist ideology, industrial society or the secularization. And we must have the courage to say this. Because really the father image of God was delivered to a father-patron, sometimes a perverse father. Especially in his relationship with Jesus. That Father had wanted to sacrifice his son to satisfy his anger and wrath, because in the name of punitive justice, someone had to serve out the sin that marked the history. By the grace we now get out of this season with great difficulty […] Also we make it difficult to recognize God as Father. At some point in our lives, we hear God as a demanding presence,. We feel his will as something that strikes against our. We feel the presence of God as the One who tells us: there is a limit for yourself, because there are others your brothers. That's where God reveals himself Father. Then, through the commandments, There also says there is a law for you to experience love with others. And when God shows us the limits and the law, we feel that the relationship with Him is like a prison. Tempted by evil, we hear God as an enemy. We feel the Christian life as a prison. Hearing his voice is like an oppression. Here is our need to move away. I would say that if each of us were really honest should say that sometimes he felt the need to kill God. Even forgetting God to do without Him […] then, above all, watch: There is a thought that grows in us. especially in adolescence then. We believe that God is God is good, God is love. But this God who loves us if we are good; otherwise we punish, He does not love us more. Priests, nuns, devote mamme; all ready to tell us one day for a good purpose: "look, that if you're good Jesus loves you, God loves you. But if you make the villain not love you anymore ". How many times we have heard this word. It's the only one, when we hear the word, It says the heart: It gave, forgive them, they know not what they say. That is how gradually his face Deform. This is how we hear God as father-patron […] here is the simultaneity: from our sin, enmity and wickedness; by God's love reconciliation, pardon […] visceral love where there is no trace of retributive justice. God's retributive justice does not know. This is coming from the philosophy of Roman law and has crept into the Church, its institutions and in its theology. But it is not the God of the Bible […]. What face you reveal God to men, to the others. Tell me the face of God that you and tell you what kind of man you are. He said Theophilus of Antioch. Show me your God and I will tell you that man you are; but it is also contrary show that humanity you and tell you the God that you have "[cf. video WHO] [3].

.

Simply said,: this God, in the figure of Father, Enzo Bianchi is the psychoanalytic event and socio-linguistics of the first fears that the man lived and that still has within himself about the human person as manifestations of his animal instincts. As instead it regards the correct concept of 'retributive justice', the bosiano should do is read the major encyclicals on the social doctrine of the Church, starting from Of the new things of Pope Leo XIII [text WHO], up to Annus the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II [text, WHO], to find adequate explanations to their states of confusion, such as those that follow below:

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"Fear of God, that according to the Bible was the first fear that man has experienced you remember the story of Genesis? To the question of God: where are you man? The man responded by confessing I heard thy voice in the garden, God and I was afraid Genesis [3, 10]. Fear of a God who we called in antiquity; but do not think that what we have experienced in antiquity sian not experienced in other forms today. We called in ancient times did, destiny, need. The ananke Greek gods. Master father, stern judge, omnipotent legislator. All forged projections from human to think of God as a necessity or as the case. As fate or incomprehensible game of a world without reason. Jacques Monod said well [4] for my generation when in 1969 He titled his book The Chance and Necessity. From biologist, observer had placed the issue on which you actually play our freedom and our capacity for love. Paul VI said that the presence of atheists, of non-believers, those who deny God militantly, should first and foremost not to scandalize. Do not become therefore a goal opponent but we Christians should question. It should prompt us to ask ourselves: but as images of God we have built and we transmit to others? Because most of the men who say they do not believe in God, do not deny God, they deny the God that Christians show them, we tell them. We pervertiamo the face of God. We ourselves have taken the fear of God and we transmit this fear to others. I'm just a small example: just say that a Christian, feel normal and common statement, in the Christian space. As long as a man say that love of God is deserved and that is the image of God perverse, that leaves no hope. We Christians humbly, but also with pride we should just go back to listen to the scriptures and the heart to the Gospel that is Jesus Christ, and Jesus Christ is the Gospel. The Gospel, I hope you will understand my statement. He testifies that Jesus preached God. Not in the sense that Jesus went to preach the good news of God. But in the sense that Jesus was able to make God's gospel, good news. Because often the God that was preached even pages of the Old Testament can be transposed by men like bad news, not as a source of hope and fullness of life. The Prologue of John ends: God no one has ever seen, None, but his son Jesus, Exeghésato, Greek word for [that Jesus] any exegesis did the narration authentic story. Here then is the Christian hope resonates with those words of Pasquale cry: Do not be afraid. Do not be afraid. Because Jesus of Nazareth, the Crucified is risen. This is the outcome of all the gospels that we want to tell Jesus […] and how it can decline to non-Christians until intrigarli? Just tell them that when we Christians say Resurrection, we especially want to say in terms of not theological but very human that every man can understand, that believer or not that love conquers death. Why write that announces a duel with death, which it is not a duel of life against La More; but love duel lived, not an abstract love, no idea; but a love lived flesh and bones in a person who is worthy of fighting against death and to win it. Faith in Jesus man like us but a child of God does, then we believe and separate with the hope of hope. And if love lived by Jesus who he has conquered death, then we understand that at the end of the New Testament there is the statement never done before in all the scriptures, last statement and definitive after which there will be another, When, in the First Letter of John: God is love. No fate but freedom. Not the case but love can enlighten our life give way by shutting down all fear of the fact, the need, of death. Fear that enslave us and alienate us. It is grasping Jesus Christ as the man who narrated God as the God who gives meaning to our poor human life. This everyday life is a craft. What are so difficult to revel. But if illuminated by hope, which always arises from hoping together, from solidarity, from communion. It can give our days actually make sense '[cf. video WHO] [5].

.

After this show, let's see what the Church teaches through the Catechism:

.

"In many religions he invokes God as" Father ". The deity is often considered the "father of gods and men". At Israel, God is called the Father as Creator of the world [Dt 32,6; Ml 2,10]. Even more, God is Father because of the covenant and the gift of the Law to Israel, His "firstborn son" [Is 4,22]. It is also called the Father of the king of Israel [2Sam 7,14]. Most especially he is "the Father of the poor", the orphan, widow, who are under his loving protection [Shall 68,6]. By calling God as "Father", the language of faith indicates two main things: that God is the first origin of everything and transcendent authority, is that, at the same time, goodness and loving care for all his children. God's parental tenderness can also be expressed by the image of motherhood, [Is 66,13; 239; Shall 131,2] which emphasizes God's immanence, the intimacy between Creator and creature. The language of faith thus draws on the human experience of parents who, somehow, They are to man the first representatives of God. Such an experience, But, also it shows that human parents are fallible and can disfigure the face of fatherhood and motherhood. We ought therefore to recall that God transcends the human distinction between the sexes. He is neither man nor woman, he is God. Therefore it transcends human fatherhood and motherhood, [Shall 27,10] although it is their origin and model: [Ef 3,14; Is 49,15] no one is a father as much as God " [6].

.

The figure of God the Father is then reduced in the story of Enzo Bianchi a product of subjectivity, this is the animality, both in the sphere of fears both as historical and social superstructure. On the other hand the story of Enzo Bianchi sends in a clear and unequivocal that only in the narration of another man, Jesus called this time, it reveals the face, the meaning and the source of what the end might instead be called the God's "love”. A beautiful speech but still not immune to the criticism of a sweetened form of agnosticism or historicist and atheist immanentism [7]. These statements are also affected heresy Marcionite, but in the most pejorative sense of the term, because not only the Whites out the God-father harsh taskmaster and punisher of the Old Testament by God's good love essence of the New Testament, because contrary to the heretical bishop Marcion [Synopsis 80 - Rome 160], bosiano in love and goodness are not referring to Christ God, in transcendental or metaphysical way, but only to Jesus man. Therefore, Bianchi, enhances and expands the same heresy of Marcion demonstrating in words documented, publicly expressed and filmed, As his thought heretical is a real and dangerous cluster of old heresies return, similar in substance, but much worse in their shape.

.

Continues Enzo Bianchi …

.

full video, to open click on the picture

“God, in order to have something that was not divine, withdrew to make room for the world, the world in its depth. The world is not divine, the world is a creature, the world's otherness, the world is really a partner before God who can say no to God, It is not obligated to tell you. That's the size that we want to tell these stories of God. God created an autonomous world from Him. We men can say to God, "thou hast not created, we do not believe in you ". You're nothing for us. We deny. And he who created us cannot help but accept our rejection of otherness, this is the extraordinary " [8].

.

Enzo Bianchi, with these statements that define confused would only say the least, dangerously confuses freedom and free will of man with God's indifference, claiming that the main theses of the exponents of the "theology of the death of God", But hidden behind his words. Almost as if God had withdrawn indifferent to original sin, as if the experience in the Old Testament had not repeatedly re-established its alliance with the People of Israel. And before the image of this indifferent God who withdraws from a "world not divine ', Bianchi how will read the incarnation of the Divine Word who became the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world [cf. GV 1, 29-36]? The truth, de facto, is that Enzo Bianchi, adopting criteria purely socio-political post-Enlightenment, It presents the figure of a sort of secular god that seems to come out right from Voltaire's pen.

.

AN ESSAY ABOUT IS THE WHITE Heretic "Bible scholar", PROVIDING THAT AN ATHEIST READING-Marxist-AFFIRMS FREUDIAN: "IN THE BIBLE THERE IS NO ORIGINAL SIN"

.

This says Enzo Bianchi …

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"The Bible can affect all. Because I would almost turn over what you normally think: everyone thinks that the Bible is a book about God. No. However, the Bible is a book about man. He tells us what God thinks of man. It is not so much a book about God, but it means the vision God's thought about Man and when one makes the journey to seek God I asked God actually looking for the man this must be said clearly why and in this sense that the Bible serves as the believer a path as a path to follow […] the path is to a humanization. There is wisdom in the Bible, a distilled wisdom of a thousand years. Few realize it, but the Bible, especially for us Christians, It is a library, because it contains seventy books written on the arch of a thousand years time at least. if not a thousand percent. Anyway, the story, which tells the stories, I am more than a millennium. It was written in three languages: Jewish, Aramaic Greek. It was written in an area, in a region extending from Babylon, the current Iraq, to Rome. So it is truly a crossroads of experiences of people search and this is to say that the Bible contains human wisdom, these are all reasons why it is worth, in my opinion, to read it, to scrutinize, to think, to meditate, because it is half of our quality of life and our humanization, especially for us in the West " [cf. video WHO] [9].

.

For the evaluation scheme of Enzo Bianchi about what is true and false, good and bad, right and not fair, It imposes the supremacy of culture or production written and spoken man, then the Bible does not possess and can not possess in itself no other value than that of the testimony of centuries of liturgical and moral traditions of different civilizations that lived in the Middle East. In the words of the White sounds funny but dangerous turn of phrase in a story of culture yddib nineteenth: "Man created God who created man, so then, either, they were happy ". An expression that recalls the statement of one of the very different authors cited by Bianchi, German Ludwig Feuerbach, disciple of Friedrich Hegel, which states: "It is not God who created man, but the man who created God " [10]. In conclusion, if we think about, the White satanicità consists precisely in this: sow behind the words apparently bogged down and always mingled practice of lovingness, the most poisonous thoughts of these authors. And these are facts, processes are not the intentions of the heretic Enzo Bianchi.

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"The Bible contains, like a mirror in which we can have glimpses of truth but the truth is beyond the script, is beyond the text can never be reduced to a formula it will to a concept that as far as telling the truth is a cultural concept expressed in human words, expressed in human language expressed in human images. The truth always transcends this "[cf. video WHO] [11].

.

… and continues:

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"Attention in the Bible there is no original sin. You know that, This is part of theology, in the Bible there is no original sin. There are different sins in the third chapter and the tenth chapter. several sins. They want answers to questions that men did and that men do. The first question you know that we do when we begin to have some awareness of being in the world the first thing we see and that our parents quarrel among themselves, his father and mother quarrel among themselves. And we begin to understand that there is a bump that there is a difficulty between man and woman, and we wonder why? […] and how can the life of a brother come out through pain and screams of the mother as well? Because giving birth in pain? And then the father who goes to work back tired, any work tired and because the work is so alienating degrading? Here were the first questions. And to answer the first questions you begin to say,, in conclusion, men when they tried to get in touch with things han done now to make bad choices. Everything is a mythical language. Warning you understand well, we are on the texts of four millennia ago maybe with some even older roots certainly were not the historical sciences there was not even the human sciences much less the possibility of a psychological reading of things. The Greeks later they did not know it, the problem that every boy and his father and his mother did not know mica say, as Freud says; but Freud had to say that the Oedipus complex was still possibly a myth of the Greeks, a tale with which the Greeks said that they were not able to say at the scientific level. So what, you see, we have this story from God that all the trees of this place man, everyone, All food, think millions of trees, and though he says: look. one not. That puts a limit. Think about it well. It is a very simple thing: the one which is called original sin, do not go find many stories like those who do not want to read it in its truth, and they do not read it […]. Because you Adam the limit that is I'll put a woman. And for you women the limit is that there is a man near you. And from the day that you are two the world is no longer totally your. If Adam was alone, if the woman was alone the whole world was his […] But the man in himself in his eagerness to live, Survive at all costs wants everything at once. Then you hear this limit of a tree on millions like frustration and, Simply putting in relationship with food; that food, do not go in thinking that apple was who knows what. We were having fun all to think what it was that apple ... Simply the relationship with food, there to eat, but if there is another, I can not eat everything. But here that at that time there is a disturbance of the relationship between man and woman […] And they started arguing. And from that moment here then, in the form of decrees of God, it is said that God said to the woman: here you will try to fight your husband. but your husband will subdue. because the result of the time was the patriarchy. If at that time there was matriarchy. one would have said to Adam: Your instinct is to your wife. but she will subdue. They are the fruits of time these here, neither more nor less. Then it is said that God has cursed the land with sweat […] in conclusion, all bad, It is the first response. Another problem in chapter four: but how is it that you arrive between brothers to suicide? Celebrities, the first report that each of us has with the parent is the first report that we discover. But then, whether manually, we find out if we have the brothers straight away and we see that we fight with them. The problem of Abel and Cain. At one point Cain kills Abel. You get to hate among brothers […] it is clear that all things are read on a social level: there is a Cain is a farmer and Abel a shepherd who is; probably we are in a time when the shepherds class is supplanted by the farmer class. You know, then, farmers will be completely supplanted by the workers and the workers are now supplanted by those in the service sector ... it continues. nothing new: classes are always downgraded the other one o'clock […]. After that is narrated an attempt also to God. With strange mythical language is said that the children of God and the children of men mated, that is, an attempt to put God in the man's hand. these divine beings, these rites, with every sexual likely, avvivano that in antiquity, as you know, to forms of sacred prostitution, which abounded throughout the Middle East and who they were still practiced in Rome; They were still under the empire. In short, there were couplings inside the temple between men and women with priests and it was said that they were couplings with God […]. Here comes the flood. that man has produced the evil produced a deadly condition. In short it means. certain subcategories of a divine punishment time. but simply that if the man calls the road of death finds. Who makes the death if found on him is not to say more. Try to decode this ancient language a bit ' neif a bit 'naive. but that reflected what was happening in the family existentially […] And here at one point almost a new beginning a new humanity. With us, after the flood. And from that moment then the split of this humanity in many lands, An attempt of this humanity to stand against the sky in Babel, make a tower that is a challenge to God, Perhaps a name, create a totalitarian power. A humanity, one nation, a single power, one king, one capital. It gave, Certainly, the text says, disperses, because God does not want totalitarianism, He wants the difference. This too I venture to say it is hard to understand why we, instead, especially we Catholics, We always thought that when everything is equal, everything is much better ... uh no! There is no unity within the Bible, if not through the plurality. The unit, to be good, must be plural, God wants a different humanity, with different languages, with different cultures, we would say with men, ethnicities and different races. This is what it means, He does not want the totalitarian dream of a uniform units because that impoverishes humanity. »[cf. video WHO] [12].

.

Just so: "In the Bible there is no original sin". In practice there is only one story, as it were: mythical. A story that tells how man, created the most perfect of angels, rebels against God, using their own freedom and their own free will, thus breaking the whole harmony of creation, and by bringing into the world the pain and death. But, you pay attention well … "In the Bible there is no original sin" (!?). Why is this original sin will come to life not by how light narrates the Book of Genesis, but born, according to the heretic Enzo Bianchi, as well as theological categories.

.

Really surprising that the audience of listeners no one has stood to ask: "And the theology, where he brings out the original sin, place "In the Bible there is no original sin"?”. What does, the theology, he invents, I deduced, or simply take note of what the Book of Genesis really tells?

.

It continues …

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"Let's say that the New Testament canon, it seems impossible, but he has not had a synod as the Synod of Public around ninety made by the rabbis after the destruction of Rome by the Romans, who have made a list. We, to tell the truth, to have a real list of New Testament books say so magisterial level, we even get to the Council of Trent. For us Catholics, in reality, we in the middle of the second century the canon Muratori which is a document found precisely from Mason who from a list which is that of the New Testament that we possess, but it is not a list with authority, let's say so, The tradition has welcomed, but also with times varying. The Apocalypse of John, in the Catholic Church, the largest church in the east has had to wait until the fourth century before it was read in the liturgy and really considered part of the New Testament. So there has been some fluctuation and precisely for this reason, at a certain point, the reform made by Luther did not challenge the canon, but almost he was tempted to do a fee in the traditional canon, and it is them that the Council of Trent responded to the Protestant Reformation by making a list of twenty-seven books that we still have, and all the churches now accept as the New Testament "[cf. video WHO] [13].

.

We bless Luther and therefore one that Enzo Bianchi - and not only - they do not call "heresy" and "schism", but "Reform". Indeed, without the major reform the equally Great Reformer Luther, the Catholic Church, that for centuries the Bible has kept hidden and indeed has even prohibited the reading to the faithful - as they teach and say Bianchi and the like -, he would not even have made "the list of twenty-seven books that we still have and that today all the Churches accept as New Testament". Because among other things, according to the lexicon of bosiano, the last of heretical sects born in the United States in the late nineteenth century by the split of the split of the split from the original nucleus heretical Lutheran, rightfully deserves the title of "Church". In fact today, the term "Church", It is no longer connected to Pauline theology [cf. With the 1, 12-20] or to John's Principle unit [cf. GV 17, 20-26], it's just nothing but a purely technical term for different ways to feel and to live the same message, or text. Always in fact, deconstruction of faith, part from the emptying of the words from their true philosophical meaning, theological and ecclesiological. And of this, Bianchi, It is a diabolical master [please refer to Article Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo: Babel and the Newspeak, text WHO; and its conference: The problem of doctrinal language and neolinga new theologians, WHO].

.

THE IDEA OF SOCIAL CHRISTIANITY IN ENZO BIANCHI

.

In his lectures and writings Enzo Bianchi - as a "child of his time", that is as old man who has lived his youth between the wars and after them in old age - narrates and reveals the wickedness to which arrived the same men; fruit of more than a sorrowful memory screaming tirelessly on the unanswered question of how can God, if there is evil? [14].

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"Everything changes in Christianity, you understand that there, really, we open something that does not belong to the world of religions. I have great respect for religions, but I must tell you all those who fear religions frighten me, who fear competition of the Book. They are people who have no faith, if they had a bit 'of faith, We can not fear competition from the only faith that speaks of man and all the other, which is fine if we speak of a transcendent God who is in heaven and that we must make efforts to make this good news. It is not possible, It is not possible. If one has faith and there has, the Christian faith, Jesus Christ is exegetical, as I always say that I love. It is he who has told us God, What we can know about God we know only through Jesus Christ and what Jesus Christ did not live as a man of God we do not know, and if someone says something that Jesus did not say and did, I am not absolutely bound to believe. This is Christianity, otherwise we are in this sea of ​​religion when religion prevails over faith " [cf. video WHO] [15].

.

For Enzo Bianchi the message of Christianity He should lose its form of tragedy with eternal presence dominatrix and bad for something or someone who was appointed by the concepts or God or Father; to turn into a romantic comedy, or more truthfully in a monologue that he could also recite the same Narciso love with himself ...

.

Bianchi said a: CHRISTIANITY "IS NOT A MONOTHEISM DEEP, IS THE EXPERIENCE OF JESUS ​​CHRIST THAT GOD HAS TOLD "

.

He says Enzo Bianchi …

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"My belief is that a true Christian must speak less, much less of God, It is to understand that the word of God is a terribly ambiguous word. In the first and second centuries AD, when Christianity was spreading and was not Christianity, those who were not yet the Fathers of the Church, but they were the ones who were trying to make people understand Christianity to the pagan world greek roman; and they said they had the courage to say these words. Caution, Fathers are, Sant'Ippolito have to speak, they said: God is an ambiguous word, or God is a word that is empty because everyone in God is a projection of what he wants, what he wants. there, you think as in Christianity instead, For centuries, with Christianity first place was due to God, and teaching the transmission of faith was God. I dare to say that even I was a child I received an inheritance, a faith in God completely, not in Jesus Christ. The Gospel was absolutely not teach someone: perhaps it is allowed to read the gospel? […] Now, Christianity is built to become deism and Pascal ... you know, but Pascal has never enjoyed a good reputation in Catholicism. And Pascal said most likely the best atheists who do not theists, that is, those who always speak of God and pray for God. there, I am convinced that the word God is an ambiguous word, an empty word, a word used today to mean the competition between the three monotheistic religions. While on the other hand, Christianity is not monotheism, ultimately in depth. It does not need any competition, nor Judaism nor Islam. Because Christianity is nothing other than Jesus Christ, who hath declared God. That's enough on exegesis Giovanni 1, 18. God remains as we have ever seen. Christ. No one better than the Torah. And each of us, when you think of God, think again: It is the projection. So every so often we hear but the God of Islam's not the Christian God. And, nominally he says if; because Mohammed was referring to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. To the God of Jesus Christ. But the word is so empty. So in God you can put any content and I believe that even the great attention, the great battle atheism was very wrong. The early Christians had the courage, you know that, not to fear, not to be ashamed if they were called atheists. The pagans called the atheists. We have all the testimony of the fathers apologetic and said they. Because we are without God, we are no Ara, the altar there and we have no temple. This has its own truth. God is an ambiguous word less we talk about it the better. And for us Christians, I believe in deeply religious level, It should be worth more than the word of Jesus: no one can come to God except through me. That is the claim of a mad man but say: I, with my humanity, my humanity nothing but my humanity. I have given you of the tracks to move on the trail of God. Not so much ask the identity of God not so much ask God's face look how I lived. In my experience that is love; In fact, because it has come to mean that God is agape and said he was only after Jesus Christ has had the courage to say that apostle that we do not know if John, but no matter; but it has come to this expression God is agape, what ever you find it in the Bible before, but because Jesus told the love to the end, anything else that, and he said that is the face of the divine. Whereby, in commenting on these four parables actually is telling the love of men and women, It is to tell the love of a man, Jesus of Nazareth, But for me it is the only traces to go to God. So much so that I say: After Jesus' commandment that he called new, but want you all know that in greek new means final and definite, it does not mean new as opposed to something that was there before. The commandment that sums up everything you love one another to each other […] But Jesus says: As I loved you, He does not say you love. This makes him tell his ministers. But as I have loved you, you must love one another. The commandment is not really geared lover to be loved in return, but well-loved by all other. This in my opinion is really a revolution […] All this is so from hearing the Gospel but from everything I've heard from men and women who have told me just how hard the business of living, nothing else […] This is the eclipse of God that I am working but not to deny it, not to say it is dead, but to say that there is another way to go to him who is our full humanity, specific. Our senses, because everything we live spiritually must pass through our senses. To touch, see, feel, enjoy, smell. If you do not go through these senses there is no spirituality, there is no search for God is an imaginative and alienating imaginary " [cf. video WHO] [16].

.

Enzo Bianchi, leaning back in a twisted reading of texts of the Fathers of the Church, unable to accept all that is related directly or indirectly with God, confusing the criticism of the thinker Blaise Pascal towards the rationalization made to God by theism and natural religion developed in post-Renaissance Europe, He wants to convey - and perhaps to become - who reads and listens, a revolutionary follower of a movement born on the testimony of Jesus, a simple man who spent his life doing good for others. So, the Christian, He should stop depositing his confidence and his belief in "empty" concepts or tangibly demonstrable as are God, religion, dogmas ... to configure his confidence, their belief, their own sense of morality and spirituality, in brotherly love storytelling, that is the true meaning of life, death and testimony left by Jesus.

.

The love and the man then become the basic elements of the story of Enzo Bianchi. Two concepts that were unveiled and revealed the true essence of the enigma that was pronounced and described the eminent figure of God. Now, in our present time, This story becomes, It is created and lives, and it is a "way" - as I like to say to Enzo Bianchi - experienced in research and in the understanding of man with himself in what will be the humanization ...

.

... for so alleviate the tragic and severe heaviness of these texts, we could cite the film My friends, now incorporated in the history of Italian cinema, when Count Mascetti speaks of the "supercazzola prematurata with scappellamento right ' [cf. WHO].

.

DIALOGUE ON THE HOLY SPIRIT FIRST PLACE THAT DO NOT PROCEED FROM THE FATHER AND THE SON, READS AS THE ARTICLE OF FAITH

.

From a past event, This was the life of a single man, there is another decisive event for understanding the narrative made by Enzo Bianchi: the Second Vatican Council. The first event was a lonely man, Jesus Christ, This second event of man in common. This community event is renewed and incorporated concepts and aspects that were forgotten, as in the case of the Holy Spirit, on which the Bianchi gives us these genuine pearls, but they require a premise. Before giving voice to the pneumatology of bosiano, let's see what the Church teaches about the Holy Spirit:

.

"The apostolic faith concerning the Spirit was confessed by the second ecumenical council 381 in Constantinople: "We believe in the Holy Spirit, who is Lord and gives life; who proceeds from the Father " [Denz.-Schönm., 150]. So the Church recognizes the Father as "the source and origin of the whole divinity" [Council of Toledo VI (638): Denz.-Schönm., 490]. The eternal origin of the Holy Spirit, however, is not unconnected with the Son: "The Holy Spirit, which it is the Third Person of the Trinity, and me, one and equal with the Father and the Son, of the same substance and also of the same nature… However, It does not say that He is only the Spirit of the Father, but that is, at a time, the Spirit of the Father and of the Son " [Council of Toledo XI (675): Denz. -beautiful, 527]. The Creed of the Council of the Church of Constantinople confesses: "With the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified" [Denz.-Schönm., 150] The Latin tradition of the Creed confesses that the Spirit "proceeds from the Father and the Son [And the son] ”. The Council of Florence, In the 1439, explicit: "The Holy Spirit has its essence and its subsistence at once from the Father and the Son proceeds eternally from the One and the Other as from one principle and through one spiration. And since all that is of the Father, the same Father gave him to his only-begotten Son, with the exception of his being Father, even that of the Holy Spirit proceed from the Son receives from his Father from eternity that generated the Son himself " [Council of Florence: Denz.-Schönm., 1300-1301]» [17].

.

That said let's see now how Enzo Bianchi, beyond and above the Catechism of the Catholic Church, He speaks of pneumatology:

.

full video, to open click on the picture

"... but after the Council [Vatican II] We can not say that the Holy Spirit is absent or unknown in the Catholic Church. Because in reality, I believe that our faith has taken an opening to this great theme, He certainly has not known in the past. At the level of catechetical preaching dare I say now the Holy Spirit has a presence. In the Christian spiritual life, I feel however that there is not enough attention paid to this operation that takes place in us, and that is essential both in our effort to conformity to Christ, both in our round effort towards God the Father. The Holy Spirit is the great protagonist of this. And we are not often very conscious. Certainly it is a grace for me is not a criticism, Western Christianity focuses on Christ, with a central role for me is really extraordinary and I tell you right away because: because to the extent that focuses on Christ, This Christ is the gospel. And with a formula I say and repeat it obsessively lately. For me Jesus Christ is the Gospel and the Gospel is Jesus Christ. There is another Christ […] we must never separate the Spirit of the Word. Look at all the diseases in the history of the Church, They have occurred to those who have separated or has removed this balance of Spirit and the Word. That especially the East has preserved […] They are an inseparable reality. If you disgiungete Christ and the Spirit you have two results: Christ alone is the fundamentalism, It is really at some point prevail in the end, the institutions, anything else. If you put the emphasis only on the Spirit you drift lit. Caution, It has nothing to do with the Enlightenment. I'm thinking of all comes in the Protestant churches of the enlightened [Ed. two names are mentioned in the video recording incomprehensible] … and the others. If you want a drift already mentioned in the west alas with Gioacchino da Fiore. If you end up saying for example that the Spirit is the one that now prevails and that this is the hour of the Spirit taking away that the time of the Spirit is the Spirit of Christ. Not another Spirit […] The Spirit is the Spirit of Christ and in this sense the Catholic Church in my opinion, He has reason when he talks about the Spirit who proceeds from the Father and the Son. Beware when the Church did this in a thousand, he did it without a council. He did so under pressure of the German emperors. It was a disaster. Because you can not change the Creed without a council with the Church of the East. And the Church of the East also why he broke away. Of course the reasons are more political, historical, cultural. It is separated from us. But beyond the procession then today is distinct, between that which is the ontological procession from procession instead of economic history. The Catholic Church still had a concern: He is saying that the Holy Spirit proceeds also from the Son. What was that saying: it is however also the Son. It is independent from the Son. It is the Spirit of Christ. Although undoubtedly we have to say: proceeds from the Father. It is not true that proceeds from the Son. The Son to send it in the story he asked the Father: I will ask the Father who will be the consoler. The Christ did epiclesi. But it was his spirit that led to the Church. Not a Spirit independent from him […] The Holy Spirit tells us God can not be represented. We can imagine a figure of the Father and of the Son as happened. Of the Holy Spirit, no. That the Holy Spirit we can not retain or, or grab. It does not have a defined icon '[cf. video WHO] [18].

.

In this talk torrential, Enzo Bianchi proves to be, plus a non-biblical scholar and a non-theologian, a subject infused with crass ignorance in the history of the Church and ecclesiology. But most of all, Once again, It provides the socio-political explanations that are simply not debatable, but completely false and falsanti.

.

We understand the friendship of Bianchi with some autocephalous Orthodox Churches, but above all we understand that with all the trickster spirit that is his own - as is Andrea Riccardi, founder of the Community of Sant'Egidio -, they periodically meet bishops of autocephalous Orthodox Churches, then announce, or rather vaunted throughout Catholic world to pursue a fruitful dialogue with the orthodox. And since when, the Orthodox are a unitary phenomenon that responds to a common authority and to a central structure, place that are a thousand years, Orthodox bishops are engaged in the ancient sport excommunicated constantly with each other? [cf. WHO] So, with such the talk these deceivers, and braggarts, Whereas the bishops of the Orthodox Church are the quintessence of contentiousness, to the point that in a thousand years have failed to celebrate a pan Orthodox council? Indeed, not having the Orthodox a central authority equipped with the prerogatives of the Roman Pontiff, nothing can approve a sacred council that is binding in matters of doctrine and morals throughout the orthodoxy if there is complete unanimity [chronicle, WHO].

.

We fly so knowing, obvious and painful, Whites and Riccardi that the day of reckoning eventually talk only about themselves and believe doing dialogue with the orthodox. however, we can not gloss over the fact that Bianchi implicitly denies that and openly, while Rome wanted at all costs the unity, the Eastern Church was looking for any excuse division. History, on the contrary, shows that while the Church of Rome was trying in every way to not be subject to the moods and especially to the domineering interference of political powers, the Church of the East, presented in various forms from Bianchi as Virgin pure, pure!, from political power, and also from the worst political powers, instead he wanted to be totally dependent. Or maybe forget, Bianchi, that all the first great church councils, albeit only formally, They were summoned and chaired by the Emperors of the East, the last in order of time by the Empress Irene? Or by chance, for his monk's sake orthodoxy and its much vaunted 'back to basics', Bianchi would be able to invoke a new ecumenical council convened, albeit only formally, then presided, albeit only formally, President of the European Union? Why the "return to the true origins' has price tags, although Bianchi, ignorant of church history at levels of real embarrassment, prefer to ignore the past and create the fanciful origins him most own terms, but which are, however, never existed. Because not everything was to the ancient origins it was good needs, otherwise the Church today would be just a stale pond, not certain earthly pilgrimage.

.

This discourse in itself and by itself would be very complex, It may be closed with the statement of denial made available publicly by Bianchi which precisely denies the so-called And the son inserted in the Latin version Symbol of Nicea-Constantinople where it says faith: «, And to the Holy Spirit, The main and zῳopoion, The emanating from the Father» [And in the Holy, Lord and Giver of Life:who proceeds from the Father and the Son].

.

The Bianchi said in a heretical way: "It is not true that proceeds from the Son. The Son to send it in the story he asked the Father: "I will ask the Father, the comforter who will" ». So cites in confirmation of his rant heretical sentence of Christ the Lord is from the Gospel of John [cf. 13, 16]. It's here, Bianchi, not a fundamental question: Who is speaking, who and where? Well, this is what the Divine Master who caters to their disciples, while it is with them on this earth. And with this it has shown that White has a hard time distinguishing, obviously the same person hypostatic, the pre-Easter Jesus and the Christ after Easter resurrected and ascended to heaven; unless for him, resurrection and ascension, are not only two beautiful metaphors to interpret the categories of theology.

.

So not only is a dangerous heretic Bianchi, but also a very ignorant heretic, because the doctrine that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son is not a stroke of political hand, as he states, played by secular forces for the sake of dividing the Church of the West from the East, It is part of the Latin tradition from the early third century. In this regard it would be enough that the ignorant bosiano read the comments of Tertullian [Carthage 160 - Carthage 220], Novatian [Phrygia 200 - Rome 258] Hilary of Poitiers [Poitiers 315 – Poitiers 465], Sant'Ambrogio [Trier 338 – Mediolanum 397], San Girolamo [stride 347 - Bethlehem 420], St. Augustine [You will return 354 - Ippona 430]. Because all these, well before the year 1054, supporting the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son. For all of them, who are authors of various works and action on the Trinitarian mystery and the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son, we use the comprehensive commentary of St. Augustine:

.

"One who can understand the timeless generation of the Son from the Father, intending the timeless procession of the Holy Spirit by both. And who can understand by these words of the Son: As the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son to have life in himself that the Father has given life to the Son, not as a being that already existed without life, but that generated outside of time so that the life that the Father gave the Son is co-eternal begetting the life of the Father given it to him; these include, I say, that as the Father has in himself also the property of being the beginning of the procession of the Holy Spirit, He gave also to the Son to be the beginning of the same Holy Spirit Procession, Procession out of in one time and in the other case, and understands that it has been said that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father because it is intended that the Son also be the principle of the Holy Spirit procession, He comes to the Son of the Father. If in fact all that the Son has, He receives from the Father, he also receives from the Father that he too is the principle from which the Holy Spirit proceeds " [cf. The Trinity, XV, 26,47].

.

Incidentally: the And the son was added to "patchy" well before the year 1054, to be exact almost five hundred years before, from the Council of Toledo 587. We reiterate therefore that Bianchi is a dangerous snake oil salesman and consequential thoughts smoky, a person who plays with words, hiding behind them its deep and crass ignorance on patrology, church history and dogmatic Trinitarian. And despite this, This ignorant large intestine, He made the rounds of many cathedrals of Italy, where invited by several members of the Italian Episcopal Conference has offered these pearls of wisdom to believers of Christ. And in the face of all this, one wonders if they are more harmful for the people of God certain contemporary bishops, or the ancient bishops who followed the heresy of Arius.

.

ENZO BIANCHI: THE MADONNA You VIRGIN, AND, BUT …

.

Roman cat Hypatia, particularly devoted to the Blessed Virgin Mary Gattara (also known as Madonna dei Gatti), He suggested to seriously consider whether to practice the greatest exorcism Enzo Bianchi

We conclude this excerpt of pearls, which as we said is a filmed lectures and transcribed material in over three hundred pages, to see not so much, What Enzo Bianchi thinks of the Immaculate Conception, but the sneaky way in which the newspaper of the left radical chic he presents the Blessed Virgin Mary:

.

«[…] the theme of "Virgin Mother" is not only present in the Christian: echoed throughout the Mediterranean to the point that many have wondered if the veneration of Mary, Mother and Virgin, He has not absorbed the worship of pagan goddesses mothers and virgins. Think of Astarte, Assyrian and Babylonian goddess worshiped in Canaan, goddess of love and fertility who knew the hostility of the biblical prophets; Artemis, the eternally virgin goddess who at Ephesus had its grand sanctuary, stigmatized by Paul; Rea-Cybele, great Mother, venerated in Phrygia and Greece; even in the late fourth century, Augustine testifies to a cult in honor of the heavenly Virgin and Mother of the Gods in Carthage. It is true that the archetype of the female fed the symbolic world of the pagan religions as well as Christianity; one can affirm that with Philippe Borgeaud, beyond the similarities and mutual influences, the figures of the virgin goddesses and mothers and that of the Virgin Mary "remain absolutely distinct". At the same time, It should not be forgotten that the apologists of the second century Christians had a tendency to assume complex without the echo of mythological conceptions […]» [full text WHO].

.

What does it consist of, the luciferino element of bosiano? Caution: they, lecturing dottamente, does not question the dogma of the Immaculate Conception. We must therefore understand that in that case you should touch, not so much dogmatic theology, matter that the reckoning concerns the very tight group of theologians; in this case you should touch the most susceptible of devotion and popular faith ropes. And White, that the Christian People I must conquer in order to be able to lead astray, It is not a fool, precisely because of the people's applause, he needs. Here then the Bianchi, without question the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, It offers in historical order, chronological and metaphorical, all the pre-Christian beliefs related to the figures of the various virgin dee or the various virgin mothers.

.

Enzo Bianchi says that children need to shoot with firearms, It is limited only to explain, on a purely technical level, how they work and how to use firearms. And so, when children are then put to fire, Enzo Bianchi will come out, as it were, completely clean.

.

Tomorrow Enzo Bianchi will preach at Ars, on the grave of the universal patron of priests, St. John Mary Vianney, revered as the Holy Curé of Ars, The world retreats to the clergy. We reiterate that this heretic in the chair did not have it put the Pope Francis I, have it made and then maintained the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Pope Benedict XVI. And among all these, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, He was in truth the most honest of all, because he has always shown for what he really is. Indeed, to the proven proof of the facts, It does not appear that ever, the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, one side has fought the Liberation Theology and condoms, the other has allowed people like Enzo Bianchi to come up to get in the chair before the priests at the shrine where the saint's remains are preserved Patron of Priests of Catholic world; that they have allowed its Supreme predecessors John Paul II and Benedict XVI.

.

As superfluous, remember, however, that errors, sometimes coarse, do not affect the heroic virtues, as in the case of the Holy Father John Paul II, nor can lead to a negative judgment on the beautiful theology and on the precious reign of Venerable Pope Benedict XVI. And whoever wants to know more about this, just to read the latest article dedicated to holiness by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo: Dal Bello to Moro: holiness is not decayed Nobel Prize, canonizations are infallible teaching of acts from which then, back, you return [cf. WHO].

.

The apology of the heresies of Enzo Bianchi, It will be published as soon as possible in a rich documentation Book. This article will only be a small advance paid on the occasion of his preaching of world spiritual exercises to the clergy held in Ars, that sound precisely, as we said at the beginning, as an invitation of a porno star at the meeting of the top of the Poor Clare Nuns wishing to know how best language to propose the virtue of chastity to young aspiring nuns of the Third Millennium.

.

the Island of Patmos, 22 September 2018

.

_________________________________

NOTE

[1] Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 36.

[2] French Philosopher Paul Ricœu (Valence 1913 – Châtenay-Malabry 2005). Among the major witnesses and protagonists of the philosophical consciousness of the twentieth century. The high value of his original work and multiform, the result of a philosophical path that from phenomenology and existentialism, He turned to hermeneutics and psychoanalysis is evidenced by numerous awards and international awards conferred in the course of his career […] From the original interest in phenomenology and existentialism, to which he devoted the first studies, his interests were oriented toward a then connected to the reflection hermeneutic perspective on the concept of symbol, engaging in investigations into the language of myth, of religion and poetry, in which he considers prove categories (the sacred, blame, fallibility) that define man's situation in the world and his way of understanding and be. In this hermeneutic perspective also we place the interest of R. in psychoanalysis, that he sees as one of the major attempts to problematize the Cartesian notion of the subject in favor of human image that is revealed and comprises only through symbols. To remind his reflections on metaphor and narration, that, despite their inherently creative dimension, represent R. authentic forms of understanding and knowledge [cf. WHO].

[3] "Enzo Bianchi – What we lack a father,” YouTube video 58:30, posted by I roll my eyes 2 May 2015. Web, 3 September 2018, [03:24 – 06:25; 22:06 – 25:29; 43:08 – 43:56; 56:38 – 57:10]. Adapted from:

HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y983sxcSQ2Q

[4] Jacques Monod: French biologist (Paris 1910 – Cannes 1976). Assistant in the zoology laboratory of the Sorbonne, He went in 1936 with B. Ephrussi al California Institute of Technology, where he came into contact with the geneticist group T. H. Morgan. In 1941 He received his doctorate in science at the Sorbonne with a thesis on the growth of bacterial cultures in which he showed that bacterial growth obeyed simple quantitative laws. After the war, during which he played an important role in the Resistance, He came to’Pastor Institute (1945), as head of the laboratory in direct service from A. Lwoff and 1953 he was appointed director of the new cellular biochemistry Service. While continuing to carry out its research findings to’Pastor Institute, He held the chair of biochemistry in the Faculty of Science (from the 1957) in order to pass, In the 1967, to molecular biology chair at France secondary school. The inaugural lecture at Middle School It was an opportunity to submit its vision of science and life, later developed in the book Chance and necessity: essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology (1970; Trad.. en. 1970), which had considerable eco provoking lively debate and discussion. In 1965, in the meantime, It had been granted, along with F. Jacob e A. Lwoff, the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology. The scientific problem that affected M. was the synthesis of enzymes, controlled by genes and induced by a substrate, as a model system for the study of protein synthesis and relationships between genetic and cellular physiology. In 1957 M. He began collaboration with F. Jacob who worked on the lysogenic / lysogenic phenomenon, ie the induction of a bacterial virus. The pooling of the results of these two research areas both techniques led to the clarification of the mechanisms concerning the genetic regulation of protein synthesis, is the definition (1961) of the concept of RNA Messenger, and the operon notions (as units coordinated expression of multiple genes) and interaction between distinct sites of a macromolecule (allosteria). In 1971 M. He became general manager of’Pastor Institute, post he held until death.

CF. http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/jacques-monod/.

[5] "120524 inaugural Evening - Hope in the Scriptures,” YouTube video 02:01:19, Posted by "Telechiara Productions" 29 May 2012. Web, 3 September 2018, [51:38 – 01:00:45]. Adapted from

HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v = 12Fv15Lysmg.

[6] CF. Catechism of the Catholic Church, NN. 238-239.

[7] "I'm not the ethic that shakes the world today. It is not a doctrine. It's something existential is to occur in meat […] in the human body, in the hand. Eye against eye. Face against face. Not nell'astrattismo ideas. Not only are over ideologies, You have ended any architecture that does not occur in the thickness of human life in our bodies and our flesh ". CF. “FATHER ENZO BIANCHI IN NAPLES,” YouTube video 01:26:42, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 11 May 2013. Web, 3 September 2018, [28:10 – 30:04]. Adapted from:

[8] "Enzo Bianchi creation and origins of the world" YouTube Video 01:18: 54, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 5 June 2013. Web, 3 September 2018, [55:00 – 59:25]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBBZynXukfk.

[9] "Enzo Bianchi – Reading the Bible Introduction,” YouTube video 01:14:40, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 5 June 2014. Web, 3 September 2018, [16:10 – 18:30]. Adapted from:

HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v = pDcZCRk1vc0.

[10] In The essence of Christianity, 1841.

[11] "Reading the Bible Enzo The conflict of interpretations,” YouTube video 44:00, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 5 June 2014. Web, 3 September 2018, [22:50 – 24:50]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4WpIaXId28.

[12] "Enzo Bianchi – Encounters with God: Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Elia, Isaiah,” YouTube video 01:03:50, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 3 July 2013. Web, 3 September 2018, [22:40 – 33:37]. Adapted from:

HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v = -XrfSAxWOwE.

[13] "Enzo Bianchi – Reading the Bible from the Old to the New: the two Testaments,” YouTube video 43:24, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 5 June 2014. Web, 3 September 2018, [23:30 – 25:26]. Adapted from :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmz9pVeWVvU.

[14] "Then we must say that in the creation God made was present evil, This is reality. The Bible tells us not to God's will, He not the created God, but there was. He has led humanity to induce bad as each of us ".cf. "Enzo Bianchi Mystery and scandal of suffering,” YouTube video 01:29:31, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 30 October 206. Web, 3 September 2018, [53:15 – 57:15]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJlnEeXJ90w.

[15] "Enzo Bianchi the resurrection of Christ and our,” YouTube video 59:52, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 11 March 2016. Web, 3 September 2018, [01:13:42 – 01:14:55]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opwrLaDnqF4.

[16] "Jesus tells the love Enzo Bianchi in dialogue with Umberto Galimberti,” YouTube video 39:00, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 23 May 2015. Web, 3 September 2018, [11:20 – 20:06]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqkQkWh3B4&feature=youtu.be&t=679.

[17] Catechism of the Catholic Church, NN. 245-246.

[18] "Enzo Bianchi – The Holy Spirit in biblical revelation,” YouTube video 58:50, posted by “AlzogliOcchi” 15 August 2017. Web, 3 September 2018, [2:32 – 4:10; 32:26 – 34:00; 36:34 – 38:00; 50:04 – 50:32]. Adapted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yOfOdrzzBI.

.

.
.
«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.