From decadence to the grotesque farce: Enzo Bianchi, a secular heretic who with the approval of the bishops preach a retreat for priests on the universal patron of priests tomb
Latest posts by Drafting (see all)
- The Archabbot emeritus of Montecassino Pietro Vittorelli has died: pity can erase the sad truth? - 14 October 2023
- “miss Universe”. The island of Patmos deals with beauty because it is a manifest expression of God and his gifts in human history - 10 July 2023
- New destination and ministry for our editor Father Ivano Liguori - 12 June 2023
If the Holy Spirit did not proceed simultaneously from the Father and the Son, God would not be Trino.
Accountant Enzo Bianchi manages a farm, you claim ? However, Need to recognize that in the collective imagination and every one of us that went to catechism to children, there is a rather severe Father God, stronger and more demanding of our father, which is quite natural to rebel a bit '. E’ all wrong, but to say venitecelo. Effectively, mica only for Adam, but for each of us it is always lurking temptation: You will be like God, and why him and not me ? The theoretical answer to the temptation lies in Thomistic philosophy, but it is not for everyone; the prayerful answer lies in the theology, but it is not for everyone; the vital answer lies in Grace, which it is available to everyone, and especially the lowly and the humble who it has revealed what is hidden from the wise. But since ignorance left to itself remains ignorance, it is up to the scholars to place themselves humbly at the service of the lowly and the humble, from which they will learn a lot.
As long as you keep away from the farm.
Rev.do father Levi Gualdo,
the texts cited the prior of Bose, stands for the number and importance of anniversaries, the idea that Jesus would be the authentic narration of the Father. The thing itself is not some false, but certainly reductive. A narrator, however authentic, not necessarily consubstantial Son. The narrative is not the Revelation (“revealed”, so the CEI translates the key word of John 1, 18), the less is the saving and definitive Theophany, which is that of Jesus in his true body. Like this, even if the firm believed prior to the Nicene Creed, the terminology used so recurrently (so as to make a sort of paradigm) nilly likely to unnerve least exposure of the truth of what I think. Mistake?
Caro Lycopodium,
We rejoice with her and sincerely congratulate you on the way, a few words, a fact summed up with a really accurate “surgery”.
Rev. Dad,
Thank you for its further clarification in its several strands.
I suppose that, in front of your detailed exposé about the heresies of Bianchi, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith should take action to protect and restore the true Catholic doctrine. Already requested in the past, I am not ever replied in substance.
On the contrary it has been given additional space to Bianchi, as if the church can not do without his contributions homiletic and exegetical.
I have reason to fear that on this occasion hardly something will happen.
The custodians, proved so far blind, deaf and dumb, advise you with several highly placed eminences mostly cronies of Bianchi; and quibbling, take time; the rebound in the rebound, will once again dumb and eventually, I fear that there will not hesitate whatsoever.
Bad lending.
Dear Brother,
let me tell you you're wrong.
And here we need to establish, to those who read these comments are public, I know that not only you but also the wretched state in which your dioceses versa, one of many Italian to moral bankruptcy, doctrinal and partly asset.
No, Your Bishop – if I were a member of your presbytery – He would not do anything, because if he dared to tell me what he said to you, I replied that I would have one of his close collaborators of the Curia, 35 years of age, It divides his apartment not with a trusted partner like myself, in the undeniable health heterosexual regime, but he divides it with a Brazilian model shooting of palestrato 24 years he is working as a “picture man” in nightclubs and posing for various photo shoots.
Having said that I would have added: «… and if Your Excellency dare reproach me again why I refused to come to listen to the wisdom of a heretic, This is Enzo Bianchi, at the next general meeting of the clergy publicly I will ask you to do a waiver to the chair, because a bishop who is held in the curia a fag priest who lives in the light of the sun with a Brazilian prostitute, or is he just as fennel, or is blind, one of two things ".
Therefore, please stop whining – He said with deep fraternal affection – and begin to tell these characters: "You must take off the back, because you are a ruinous scandal and we do not want you!».
That's why to me, Your Bishop, He has done nothing, but neither he would dare reproach me for not having gone to listen to Enzo Bianchi who preached to priests of the diocese, because he would have prevailed … the survival instinct!
Ariel Caro,
as you know my bishop and other priests publicly rebuked me for not going to preach a spiritual retreat made by His Beatitude Patriarch Enzo Bianchi in our diocese. And we said … “this time I lose it, But if it happens again …”. Leaving the sentence suspended.
I think if you had been a priest of our sanctuary, for this article you excommunicated …
Dear Iginio,
… how exhausting, raise the whole arm, it would be enough just to lift a finger: the average!
certain characters, once it becomes known public figures, They think they can really give everything.
I remember at university a professor who began to hold forth as a guest of honor in the Great Hall at the presentation of a book, also making people understand the brain short that not even know what that book spoke.
That professor, however, was able to slam badly out examination students after asking them, on a book consisting of three volumes text for a total of 1500 illegible pages written by five different hands by his assistants, a little note at bottom of page.
there, I confirm that Giovanni Maria Vian is the same race, and is a highly protected race, like all endangered species, but unfortunately not endangered.
Sure he made his debut under other pontificates, who have given space more or less to his services, overestimating the capabilities and underestimating the ambitions. It is not from the seed – good or bad – but it is from the shaft – Periodically cared-that we recognize the fruit quality.
But from the initial mess, He has with tenacity and cunning managed to create and cultivate the vegetable garden, by building appropriate relations, approaching to people who counted and counted in the church and in the world of media.
Despite the early warning and repeated warnings of eminent theologians and concerned, as the fruits became increasingly bad way, who could, He has done nothing to circumscribe the action, rather it is the turn of the theologians also suffer retaliation mocking ..
A growing uninterrupted. E’ bitter ascertain how dangerously grown, how powerful this alleged master: honored and revered by prefects, Cardinals and Bishops, pampered and protected by patrons and sponsors, even a candidate for the purple ...
E’ now reached the top: his books are texts in Italian seminars, super busy agenda, The Osservatore Romano articles ... But Hypatia monitors.
And what about the letter "To the Priests," published on the website of the Congregation of the Clergy:
http://www.clerus.va/content/clerus/it/notizie/new82.html
The full letter can be downloaded in pdf at the same link
Dear Ettore,
the problem is not that Mr. Lay Enzo Bianchi talk to us in this letter been consecrated clergy Sacramento indelible and everlasting grace, with words:
"Dear priests, while I turn to you, to you my brothers in the ministry […]».
The problem is that it does so with a letter published on the official website of the Congregation for the Clergy.
Therefore I take note, with sorrow for me, but especially for the individual concerned, that our Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy would need to revise thoroughly the basic elements of dogmatic sacramental.
The Whites can not turn to us as equals, because he, baptized as, participates in “the common priesthood of the baptized”, we – and we just -, come ministers of the sacred, through the Sacrament of Orders, We participate instead to the ministerial priesthood of Christ, to which, instead, Bianchi, does not participate at all.
I hope someone will explain to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy.
Dear Ettore,
I wish to take this opportunity to clarify that for us, have indicated the objective responsibility of John Paul II and Benedict XVI regarding the development of the Bianchi Phenomenon, was really, especially and profoundly painful.
I was born in August 1963, a month and a half after the death of John XXIII, and I was a teenager when Paul VI died in 1978, I grew so under Pope John Paul II and became a priest under Pope Benedict XVI, in whose diocese, Rome, I was among others ordered.
My co-worker, Jorge Facio Lynx, which instead he was born in 1983, He was born and grew up knowing the age of twenty-two one pope: John Paul II.
If we had not turned to these two revered Pontiffs, one of whom Santo, dutiful critical in our analysis, we moved, would be such and such, if you do a lot worse, of all those who today, before the human error, or the pastoral decisions are not always happy with the reigning Pope Francis I, I argue that whatever he says or does is always, absolutely and unquestionably right. And with that I add: for us, informed of the facts – and I say facts, do not talk – it is sad to note that the shameless flattery of certain subjects moved not least by economic interest due to their professions or lavish subsidies they perceive the benefit of their sites. For charity, No one expects others to be heroes, but even that become apparent ancòra worst of the merchants of the Temple of Jerusalem. In conclusion, there is still, in the absence of heroic spirit, the dignity of both the silence, both dell'esprimersi in a diplomatic way, or so to say aseptic, merely to bring the only news stories.
I remember with sadness, during my adolescence, the figure of the Blessed and the next Holy Pontiff Paul VI, outraged in every way by the then young intellectuals of more or less radical left today, aged and suffering from arthritis, if not worse from arteriosclerosis, they are able, Angle of the chairs of their atheism, to do even the little lesson to us theologians, reminding us that … "The Pope is infallible, but certain theologians do not remember him and criticize him ".
And frankly, us later, after Paul VI, then we have seen time and again “massacre” John Paul II and Benedict XVI as whole teams of journalists and theologians who signed against them critical signs, more so we feel contempt for these holy Christian today … to lick, would Catullo, or said in the most trivial Italian: unworthy leccaculo.
May John Paul II before, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and then Benedict XVI, we were wrong not to curb Bianchi Phenomenon and to prevent them even became a sort of guru for much of the Italian episcopate, He does not compromise neither the sanctity of the first, nor high theological and even the sanctity of life of the second.
We would like things were in other words, but you have to take them for what they are in fact: John Paul II and Benedict XVI are objectively responsible for the development of monster Bianchi.
Hello Father Ariel,
I would understand that the point of this article denouncing against Mr. Enzo Bianchi, then when the hierarchy to which she lends obedience, He does nothing against his accusations of heresy, indeed it exalts him, sending him to Ars to preach a retreat for priests?
A layman how can you trust a hierarchy that betrays the Gospel, and catechism, and even with the complicity of popes, I am dismayed and confused as millions of Catholics facing the many reports of child abuse,the omoeresia and not wanting to answer the charges and covering up the scandals which were also covered under the pontificate of the Polish saint, What became the visible church?
Thank you
Fabius' flesh,
the point of this article is simple: who wrote it, He will answer to God for having sinned in thought, word and deed … but not in omissions! And who does not fail to tell the truth and serve the truth, It ends up making even more muted their sins of thought, word and deed.
In the times we are living now seems to fulfillment of all those elements which speak to us the Holy Scriptures and the Apostolic Letters, including the great apostasy.
And in these moments we must particularly cherish and protect, as far as you can manage to do, the Church of Christ; it remains clear that the Church is his, is not that, or the Pontiff that the model in your personal image, given that he is the Church's first servant and guardian.
Unlike these people, that as I have often written live for the immediate and are entirely focused on “everything and immediately”, we must have a future perspective, an eschatological perspective.
At the moment, we can not even imagine what highly positive, tomorrow, You will come out of this debacle.
Definitely, the rats in the hold, or the great poisoners, that under the pontificates of John Paul II and Benedict XVI moved cautiously, working mainly behind the scenes, Today they are all jumped into the open, with all their heresy and their apostasy from the faith. And this is great, because at least we know who those enemies who until yesterday were hiding in the shadows to work.
It must have only the patience of faith, yes because we are talking about people who wreaks huge damage, yet even people who have already lost, how he lost, since the dawn of time, their powerful Master of the World, which it was always the big loser.
Of course, we men have the problem of time, but God does not, and the grace of God even, They do not have time problems.
I was at a meeting with Rod Dreher, the author of the book on Option Benedict. He was very good. Unfortunately the two other commentators were not up. They were Giuliano Ferrara and Giovanni Maria Vian: the latter is a university professor of the history of Christianity is the director of L'Osservatore Romano. And Vian made a painful surgery, from which it was clear, against the other, that the book had just peeled and culturally not only ignores the Anglo-Saxon culture but remained on the myths of decades ago “say things to people today” etc. But he reached the climax of the grotesque when he suggested at Dreher go to visit another recent monastic experience. Guess what’ which? Bose!
I was tempted to raise his right arm in a gesture that popularly tells you “give me a break…”!
To supplement this large extract Vs.. Work on Enzo Bianchi, I would like to point you out – even for me to advertising, is intende – I wrote a short article on the Supreme satirical few years wickedly throwing light on a particular aspect of his personality, and that perhaps we snatch a smile.
https://zamax.wordpress.com/2014/12/30/un-uomo-di-straordinario-successo-mondano-enzo-bianchi/