The joy of love, “healthy self-criticism”
- Corner of the Confreres guests of the’Patmos Island –
JOY OF LOVE, "HEALTHY SELF-CRITICISM"
.
It is possible that, gradually the years pass, the post-synodal apostolic exhortations become increasingly lengthy? It is possible that it will not be possible to summarize the results of the Fathers' discussions in a few propositions? la cut, generally, goes well with effectiveness and incisiveness: when you go beyond what is necessary to convey a certain message, most of the time it meant the ideas weren't very clear.
.
.

John Scalese, CRSP *
.
.
.

Eros and psyche, work by Antonio Canova
I have been asked for an intervention on the apostolic exhortation The joy of love. The readers who follow me from the beginning [cf. WHO] they know that I don't really like commenting on pontifical documents. I wrote on another occasion: «The sentences are not discussed, apply ". In this circumstance, therefore, instead of going into the merits of the exhortation, I would prefer to focus mainly on some procedural aspects, even if it will be inevitable to make references to the contents.
.
The document invites us to be humble and realistic and to make a "healthy self-criticism" [n.36]. I believe that this attitude should not be directed only towards the Church of the past and its pastoral practice, ma, to be authentic, should extend to 360 ° and therefore also to the Church today. I would therefore like to ask a few questions, not with a polemical spirit, but as a simple invitation to reflection.
.

the post-synodal exhortation love joy
It is correct to return to questions which had already been addressed relatively recently (the previous Synod on the family dates back to 1980), without the situation having radically changed in the meantime? It is true that in these thirty-five years there have been quite a few new things, which had not been addressed at the time (p. it is., assisted fertilization, surrogate motherhood, the theory of gender, homosexual unions, the stepchild adoption, etc.); but it is equally true that these issues have not been at the center of the work of the last Synods and are touched upon only partially and in passing in the apostolic exhortation. The attention seemed to be focused exclusively on a question that had already been widely debated and defined: access to the sacraments by the divorced and civilly remarried. The question had been authoritatively resolved in the apostolic exhortation Family member company (n. 84); his teaching was then resumed from atechism of the Catholic Church (n. 1650) and confirmed by the Letter of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of 14 September 1994 and the Declaration of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts of 24 June 2000. I fully realize that The joy of love escapes this doctrinal-juridical logic, to place oneself on an exquisitely pastoral level; I just ask: it is correct to question a teaching which is now practically definitive?
.

the Holy Father Francis with Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, today Archbishop Emeritus of Bologna, considered one of the greatest experts on family problems
The procedure followed is correct to address this issue? First the Extraordinary Consistory in February 2014; then the extraordinary assembly of the Synod of Bishops in October of the same year; subsequently, the emanation of the two motu proprio on the causes of matrimonial nullity in August 2015; then the ordinary assembly of the Synod of Bishops in the immediately following October; finally, the just published post-synodal apostolic exhortation. Never before has such a procedure been seen: a single synodal assembly was not enough, duly prepared? This two-year "hammering" was really necessary? Which fine? Not to mention the anomalies recorded along the way: the secrecy of the report to the consistory and of the synodal debate; the relationship after the discussion of the Synod 2014, which did not reflect the results of the debate; the final report of the same Synod, which took up themes that had not been approved by the Fathers; the confidential letter of the thirteen cardinals at the beginning of the Synod 2015, publicly denounced as a "conspiracy"; etc.: these are normal things?
.

a session of the Synod of Bishops on the family
It is correct to suggest certain pastoral solutions, which had not been accepted by the Synod Fathers (and therefore could not be included in the text of the exhortation), in the document notes? It is correct to question the teaching of a previous document in a magisterium document with the following formula: "Many ... detect" [note 329)] "Many" who? They "detect" in what capacity? Moreover, what kind of membership the note requires 351, which admits a possibility in open contrast with the teaching and uninterrupted practice of the Church, based on arguments that had already been taken into consideration and deemed insufficient to justify an exception to that teaching and practice [cf. the Letter of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of 14 September 1994, in particular n.5: «This practice of not admitting divorced and remarried people to the Eucharist], presented [it gives Family member company] as binding, it cannot be changed according to different situations "]?
.

assembly of the faithful
You shouldn't worry, when publishing a document, what will come to the faithful? In the gospel of joy stood, rightly, the problem of communicating the Gospel message [n.41)] in The joy of love warns against "avoiding the serious risk of wrong messages" [n.300]. The fact that conflicting comments were published in the days following the release of the exhortation should not make us think? It will not be that the language used was not clear enough? It is possible that on the same document there are those who say that nothing changes and those who consider it revolutionary? If a statement was clear, it should not be possible to give two opposite interpretations at the same time. The confusion caused should not be a wake-up call? In The joy of love the problem is not ignored: "I understand those who prefer a more rigid pastoral care that does not give rise to any confusion" [n.308], but then, with the gospel of joy [n.45)], the answer is that a Church that “does not renounce the possible good is preferable, although it runs the risk of getting dirty with mud of the road ". It is even tempting to think that confusion is intentionally sought, because in it the Spirit would act and in it God is to be sought. Personally I prefer to believe, with Saint Paul, that “God is not a God of disorder, but of peace " [1 Color 14:33].
.

the old ones, love and beautiful bookshelves …
It is possible that, gradually the years pass, the post-synodal apostolic exhortations become increasingly lengthy? It is possible that it will not be possible to summarize the results of the Fathers' discussions in a few propositions? la cut, generally, goes well with effectiveness and incisiveness: when you go beyond what is necessary to convey a certain message, most of the time it meant the ideas weren't very clear. Not to mention that, processing excessively long documents, there is the risk of discouraging even the most willing to undertake the reading and forcing them to settle for summaries, usually partial and biased, what the media do.
.

«… you begin to tell me about your childhood "
It is really necessary that the papal documents turn into psychology treatises, pedagogy, moral theology, pastoral, spirituality? This is the task of the Magisterium of the Church? First it is stated that “not all doctrinal discussions, moral or pastoral must be resolved with interventions of the magisterium " [n.3] then, de facto, we pronounce ourselves on every aspect and we even risk falling into that "unbearable casuistry", that as well, in words, it is said to deprecate [n.304]. The magisterium has the task of interpreting the word of God [God's word, # 10; Catechism of the Catholic Church, n.85], define the truths of the faith, keep and interpret the moral law, not just evangelical, but also natural [Human life, n.4]. The rest - the explanation, the in-depth study, practical applications, etc. - has always been left to theologians, confessors, to the masters of the spirit, to the well-formed conscience of the individual faithful. An apostolic exhortation, intended for all the faithful, He can not, in my opinion, become a manual for confessors.
.

the problem of abstractness …
It is right to insist on the abstractness of the doctrine [NN. 22; 36; 59; 201; 312], contrasting it with discernment and pastoral accompaniment, almost there was no possibility of coexistence between the two realities? That the doctrine is abstract, it does not take into account to underline it: it is by nature; like the practice, by itself, it is practical. But this does not mean that in human life there is no need for both: praxis always derives from a theory, just think that in The joy of love is repeated twice, nos. 3 e 261, a philosophical — and therefore abstract — principle that had already been stated in the gospel of joy nos. 222-225: "Time is greater than space". Which is why it is important that practice, to be good ("Orthopraxis"), is inspired by a true doctrine ("orthodoxy"); if not, an erroneous doctrine would inevitably generate bad practice. Disdaining the doctrine is of no use, it only serves to deprive praxis of its foundation, of the light that should guide it. You do not notice, Furthermore, that the talk of praxis is not identified with praxis itself, but it constitutes only one theory of practice? And the theory of praxis is still a theory, as abstract as the doctrine to which the praxis is to be opposed.
.

Bologna, Baraccano Church, 1950s [photo by Giuseppe Savini]
Describe the Church of the past as a Church exclusively interested in the purity of doctrine and indifferent to the real problems of the people, it is perhaps not a caricature that does not correspond in any way to historical reality? Getting to the point of using certain expressions [n. 49: “Instead of offering the healing power of grace and the light of the Gospel, some want to "indoctrinate" the Gospel, transform it into "dead stones to be thrown at others" "; n. 305: "A pastor cannot feel satisfied just by applying moral laws to those who live in" irregular "situations, as if they were stones thrown at people's lives. This is the case with closed hearts, who often hide even behind the teachings of the Church “to sit on the chair of Moses and judge, sometimes with superiority and superficiality, difficult cases and wounded families ""] it's not only offensive, but false and ungenerous towards what the Church has done and continues to do, despite a thousand contradictions and infidelities, for the salvation of souls. In the Church discernment and pastoral accompaniment, maybe called by different names and without making too many theorizing, they have always been there; only that until now everyone was doing his job: the magisterium taught the doctrine, theologians deepened it, confessors and spiritual directors applied it to individual cases. Today, however, it would seem that no one is able to distinguish the specificity of their role anymore.
.
Transforming the demands of the Christian life into "ideals" [NN. 34; 36; 38; 119; 157; 230; 292; 298; 303; 307; 308] it does not mean - really in this case - transforming Christianity into something abstract, worse, in a philosophy, if not even in an ideology? It does not mean forgetting that the word of God is alive and effective [EB 4:12], that revealed truth is a "truth that saves" [God's word, n. 7; The joy and hope, n. 28], that the gospel "is the power of God for the salvation of whoever believes" [RM 1:16], that "God does not command the impossible; ma, when he commands, admonishes you to do what you can and ask for what you can't, and helps you so that you can do it " [Council of Trent, Justification Decree, (c). 11; cf Augustine, Of nature and grace, 43, 50]?
.

pastoral care cannot be separated from doctrine and vice versa …
We are sure that "pastoral conversion" [the gospel of joy, n. 25], which is required of the Church today, be good for it? I have the impression that there is a basic misunderstanding behind this conversion, already present at the time of the announcement of the Second Vatican Council and has come down to our days: to think that it is no longer necessary for the Church to take care of doctrine today, it already being sufficiently clear, known and accepted by all, and that we should only be concerned with pastoral practice. But we are really sure that the doctrine is so clear today, which does not require further investigation and to be protected from erroneous interpretations? We are sure that everyone, today, know the Christian doctrine? It is not enough to answer these questions by saying that there is Catechism of the Catholic Church: first, because it is not taken for granted that everyone knows him; second, Why, even when it was known, not necessarily shared by all. If it is true that “mercy does not exclude justice and truth, but first of all we must say that mercy is the fullness of justice and the brightest manifestation of God's truth " [The joy of love, n. 311], it is equally true that “do not in any way diminish the salutary doctrine of Christ, it is an eminent form of charity towards souls " [Human life, n. 29; cf Family member company, n. 33;Reconciliation and Penance, n. 34; The splendor of truth, n. 95]. And the service that the magisterium must offer to the Church is, first of all, the service of truth [Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 890]; precisely by teaching the truth that saves the magisterium it assumes a pastoral and "merciful" attitude towards souls. Only when the magisterium has fulfilled its primary task, pastoral workers will be able, in turn, forming consciences, make a work of discernment and accompany souls on their journey of Christian life.
.
.
* John Scalese [Rome, 1955] he is a priest and theologian of the Order of Regular Clerics of St. Paul (Barnabite Fathers).
.
.
Free thoughts of a wandering Querciolino,
.
__________________________
graphics and photos by the editorial staff of’Pamos Island
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
























































