THE PENIS OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, THE UNRELIABILITY OF WIKIPEDIA FREE ENCYCLOPEDIA, THE SUFFERING DUE TO PENIAL DYSMORPHOBIA OF THE FALLOCENTRIC MAN OF THE THIRD MILLENNIUM

The pseudo sexual liberation it has generated all immorality except freedom. Sex everything now, even in the most unregulated and extreme forms consumed from a young age, in the following decades it has produced generations of spineless people unable to develop the value of waiting, of the inner struggle and the ability to resist, structuring one's character on a personality also supported by that self-discipline that leads to the conquest of self-control and true inner freedom.

- Actuality -

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

.

… what is written by the Wikipedia scientists is all true?

Before the sentence: «… but I read it on Wikipedia!», if in front of me I have a simple person, I wrap myself in a good mood and answer with an ironic joke, if with the same sentence I am hit by a person who gives himself the airs of a scholar and intellectual, in that case I could also react badly.

.

Wikipedia starts from the wrong assumption that history and scientific knowledge in the various fields of knowledge can be democratic and subject to the discussions and judgments of unspecified Wikipedians, among whom are also teeming failed intellectuals and frustrated university researchers. Historically Wikipedia is a miscellany of inaccuracies. And since everyone can offer their own democratic contribution, when someone has dared to correct gross inaccuracies it has often happened that the democratic committee of various wikipedians, of strictly anonymous practices, has quickly deleted the exact data and left the obviously incorrect one, or more simply ideological.

.

I am telling you an experience: years ago I decided to insert an entry on the Italian Wikipedia page, he was a distinguished theologian, a notable figure who participated as an expert in the Second Vatican Council and who was a close collaborator of three Supreme Pontiffs. Shortly after the wikipedian on duty ordered the cancellation of the page on the grounds that "it lacked encyclopedicity" and that the person on whom that biography was built was not a "figure of encyclopedic value". Not satisfied with this he accused me of wanting to "advertise a stranger". I tried to argue with this anonymous democrat based on the principles of rationality and rigor dictated by the facts. So I took the pages of Wikipedia in German and English, showing that not only on this person there were two respective biographies, but that the one written by me on the page in Italian had the exact same data. Having done this, I asked on the basis of what criteria an Italian theologian could be encyclopedic on the pages of Wikipedia in Germany and in English-speaking countries, but not in Italy, where, however, he has always lived and worked. Other Wikipedian scientists intervened in the discussion, perhaps professorship assistants for years waiting for the qualification competition who had been mistreated by the full day professor and for this in need of vent, who gave a hand to their companion, advocating "non-encyclopedicity" against any clear and proven evidence.

.

In front of people who deny the facts, there are two solutions: either the discussion ends or they make fun of themselves. In that circumstance I opted for the second choice demonstrating to that unusual "court of judgment" what Wikipedia actually means by "encyclopedic truth". On this free encyclopedia that has subjected historical facts and knowledge to the democratic union of anonymous characters without face and identity, there is the strictly encyclopedic voice of the famous Italian porn actor Rocco Siffredi, about which it was written in 2015 with impeccable encyclopedicity, therefore as an irrefutable fact: "Penis size 23 centimeters". I took this encyclopedic datum and invited the anonymous judges of the Wikipedian court to take a yardstick and measure a length of 23 inches. Then, after consulting with the best urology specialists, wondering if a penis of that size can remain partially erect for only a few minutes. Then I invited them to ask themselves a second question: a gentleman who works with his penis as a porn actor, can afford erectile problems? Or better: can afford an erection of very short duration? Because this would be equivalent to an athlete with chronic asthma problems and shortness of breath who had to do a speed race with show jumping.

.

I went on explaining to the Wikipedian scientist democrats that a penis of that size would make the poor man pathologically ill who unfortunately found it between his legs. This desirable pathology for any male is indicated in the clinical setting as macrophalosomy. A penis that exceeds i 20 centimeters in length is a problematic penis for men and women who should be penetrated during sexual intercourse. Macrophalosomy can affect a healthy sex life, generating the related individual and couple psychological discomforts. To all this is added the physiological problem of very partial erections, a limited maintenance of the erectile state and the inevitable propensity to premature ejaculation. The penile cavernous tissues need the necessary blood supply both to achieve an erectile state and to maintain it. A huge penis means more tissue to swell, therefore a much greater blood flow in the genital area. No male body can withstand such an effort. As a result, erections of a macro penis are not satisfactory, with all the problems that come with it.

.

Instead of answering me on the merits about the encyclopedicity regarding the genital organ of Mr. Rocco Siffredi, the Wikipedian Supreme Court of Cassation closed the discussion by calling me a heckler. After a few years I went back to opening the Wikipedia page of the famous porn actor while I was writing this article, discovering an encyclopedic update that left me stunned: between 2015 and the 2022 the length of the member of Mr. Rocco Siffredi has in fact passed from 23 a 24 inches. All the result of an indisputable and democratic encyclopedicity, of course! Switch by 23 centimeters of the 2015 when the porn actor had 50 years of age, to the extent of 24 centimeters in 2022 when it is years old 58, as an encyclopedic miracle it is extraordinary. With equally indisputable encyclopedic rigor, its height has also been increased, indicated equal to one meter e 85 inches, although Mr. Rocco Siffredi is one meter tall 75 inches. Issues of democratic encyclopedicity, which as democratic is indisputable.

.

I would like this story would serve those who, starting from middle school up to research for the drafting of degree theses, take all approximations as a reliable source, the inaccuracies and partial and ideological tainted historical information presented by Wikipedia, using them as safe sources to write their own works, often doing actual copy and paste. Unfortunately, the Free Encyclopedia Wikipedia, in concrete facts it is the triumph of digital illiteracy cloaked in knowledge and unspecified democracy, in the total neglect that knowledge and sciences are not democratic but objective.

.

penile dysmorphophobia it is a male psychological disorder that often causes serious problems for some men. Those affected find their penis to be small in size, with the relative discomfort that follows, especially on a psychological and behavioral level. In most cases, everything is only the result of the wrong perception of their sex, not due to the pathology of congenital micropenis. And so, very wrongly and not rightly at all, a young man told me: "I have a big problem". Then he tried to play down by adding: "A problem that concerns something small". And he told me about his inner drama, tied to a penis of unsatisfactory size. Another told me that at the end of an argument his partner had mocked him by referring to the size of his penis, something for which he had felt so humiliated that he had begun to suffer from depression. Years ago I had a good-looking young man in spiritual direction, of excellent character, brilliant in intelligence and gifted in his studies, but very insecure in temperament. One day he took courage and decided to confide in me that since he was a teenager he had begun to suffer because he believed he had a small penis. After his outburst I understood where his insecurity came from, helping him in this sense with results that turned out to be excellent, thank God. I could go on with other more or less similar examples, but here I stop.

.

The beauty of the priestly ministry of the confessor or spiritual director is given by the fact that when men - but also women - establish a relationship of authentic and profound trust, they do not hesitate to open the most intimate and delicate spheres of their being to the priest chosen as a secret confidant, overcoming the discomfort and the sense of shame that certain things can bring. Those who think they understand the Church, as well as Catholic doctrine and theology, or that from the top of their chairs erected on social media they presume that they can not only criticize us - which is always legitimate within the limits of the law - but even teach us how to be shepherds in the care of souls, they cannot even imagine in which spheres of the human heart we must move and with what existential problems we come into contact in the total secrecy of the internal and external forums. Sexuality, or what pertains to human sexuality, it is one of these spheres, in some respects the most delicate to treat, because it affects aspects of the human body and psyche that are all more complex than the other.

.

Man's sexuality is external, contrary to that of the woman who is internal. For this reason, man tends to externalize sexuality, while the woman tends to internalize it. We could say that the man is sexually extroverted and the woman is sexually introverted. Inevitably, men tend to have an external relationship with their penis that a woman would never dream of having with her vagina. The way in which men and women reach orgasm is also completely different. Several times several women have expressed discomfort to me in this regard, unjustly accusing themselves of frigidity, because in this the woman tends to blame herself, while it is often all the fault of the man who does not know how to deal with and relate to the woman's body. If the woman welcomes when she wants to welcome and what she wants to welcome, man is instead taken by the need to exhibit, plagued by an indomitable spirit of sexual competition, usually referred to as "performance anxiety" or more simply as narcissism. All this develops from a very specific and sad root: an objective lack of knowledge of women and female sexuality. If a woman wants a man and is deeply in love with him, it is not even the slightest touch by the size of his penis. To a woman in general, to a sweetheart in particular, half a little finger is enough to reach orgasm. Not only: a so-called excessive tool can only annoy her, as well as causing harm, causing anything but pleasure.

.

The more or less vulgar idiom, but very realistic, referring to the various types of men who "think with the cock", it has a very profound meaning. Man often tends to act and interact using the penis as a yardstick instead of reason, the logic and the speculative sense. Several times I happened to remind different men about it, pointing out how much they were affected by chronic phallocentrism. All of this can be linked to the relative rate of that male hormone known as testosterone, the excess or deficiency of which can produce problems of various kinds. A high testosterone level is not necessarily a cure-all. Excessive testosterone can make men not only hyperactive and sexually efficient but also very aggressive and not always able to control their aggression. Several times it has happened that in the course of certain criminal trials related to various forms of violence, the defendant's defender presented expert reports and clinical tests attesting to the excessive production of testosterone. Sometimes it has also happened that the judge took this into account by reducing the guilt linked to will or premeditated willful misconduct. For inverse, a low testosterone, it can give rise to insecurity, anxiety and depressive states.

.

Phallocentric reasoning and acting of man is none other than that dimension that mirrors the woman who acts and interacts in a uterocentric way, more or less taken by hysteria. It is no coincidence that the term derives from the Greek root of ύστερα (ystera) which means uterus, hence the term ysterikòs. The bodies of men and women are very complex machines, while the mind of both remains largely a mystery to be known and explored. The priest who lives in contact with human material must also deal with certain complex realities, from which problems often emerge that cannot be solved by prescribing the therapeutic recitation of one Ave Maria waiting for the "definitive triumph of his immaculate heart", how do those nice magical-dream Catholics always ready to teach us how to properly carry out our sacred ministry, despite never having touched with hand, but not even touched from a distance, certain complex dramas of human existence. Let us then overlook the rigorous and merciless spirit with which these same magical-dream Catholics treat sex and human sexuality, focusing on the essence of the entire mystery of evil, as if sex were the sin of sins. These are topics on which I have written several times and in detail.

.

We live in a society sick with sex mania, we are invaded by a pornography that conveys sexual patterns and modes of sexual intercourse that are surreal to say the least, presented partly as a reality and partly as goals to be achieved. This pornographic market has had the effect of giving the very young a distorted idea of ​​sex, of sexual relations and intercourse. Never before have urologists and andrologists found themselves in front of very young patients with problems that are all psychological and not physical, least of all clinical-pathological. The problems of young people raised on bread and pornography can range from a completely altered view of human sexuality, sexual relations and their dynamics, with related erection deficiencies and premature ejaculation problems as never seen before and which for this reason have been the subject of numerous international conferences by the Society of Urologists and Andrologists.

.

Mr. Twenty-Four Centimeters strictly encyclopedic-wikipediani boasts and credits itself with having cleared sex with its films and its porn academies, while in truth it made it surreal and violent, inducing some generations of young and very young people to have a completely altered vision of it, with what is dangerous at the individual and social level. In short, let me go down even, because if we play with modest scientific euphemisms and Latinisms we will not understand each other and above all we will not be able to focus on the problem. Collective madness - as the Servant of God indicated it in a prophetic way Enrico Medi in the seventies of the twentieth century - has now reached these levels: if a goliardic fan give a pat on the ass to a commentator who is conducting a live broadcast outside the stadium, a chorus of scandalized people rise up screaming at sexual violence and even invoking the conviction for rape of the sudden and inappropriate bad boy, that he didn't have to do what he did, but he certainly didn't rape a girl, he jokingly disrespected her as in any case it should not be done. But, the same chorus of scandalized deranged people, is silent and does not utter a moan if in one of the many porn films a woman surrounded by one gang of four men is penetrated by two at a time in the vagina and anal orifice, slapped on the buttocks and violently pulled by the hair during oral intercourse. Similar and other worse images are available and visible to any teenager holding one Smartphone. Faced with these descriptions, now the usual out of tune choir will rise, boring and inevitable, of the Puritans Catholics by chance ready to sentence «a priest does not express himself that way: shame!». Instead, refuse to see problems in all their gravity, describe them and throw them in the face of those who do not want to see them because they are determined to live in his world of madonnine languide e cristi androgini photoshoppati, is certainly the best way to solve them, especially to try to protect our very young from the snares of the Devil. So ask yourself: a society that invokes the conviction for rape of an emeritus idiot with an inappropriate student spirit is to be considered balanced, but who is silent in the face of a prevailing violent and aggressive pornography in which the sexual relations of couples or groups very often simulate rape? This was what the Servant of God Enrico Medi meant when mocked by all intellectuals chic he claimed not to fear pollution or even the possibility of nuclear war, but rather to fear the collective madness towards which humanity was falling. And in which finally, humanity, today it has fallen.

.

If we dare to speak to young people about purity and chastity, we end up accused instantly of a retrograde and sexophobic spirit, as happened to the Supreme Pontiff a few days ago, promptly cannoned by all the press on the left radical chic. In fact, to speak of purity and chastity, the least that can happen to us is to be looked upon by those directly involved as extraterrestrials landed on planet Earth. Following, mommy in the head, if anything, even adult and committed Catholics, variously cat-communists or even catechists, they will take care to tell their children not to listen to a ridiculous priest who lives in who knows what hyperuranium and who does not realize that times have changed. After that, the loving mommy, a wise seal will add: "The only thing that matters is love", without, however, explaining to the children what love is and what it entails, especially in sacrifices and renunciations. We are sure that caring and loving parents can solve the problem of the correct sexual education of their children by recommending the use of condoms to adolescents and having their 14-year-old daughter prescribe the birth control pill? I who am a gentleman about to accomplish shortly 59 years I can testify that my father and my mother did not shirk the delicate and burdensome obligation to educate me in sexuality, teaching me prudence and continence, explaining to me that you cannot have everything immediately and that the exercise of sexuality also involves risks and responsibilities which then, damage done to, they certainly cannot be resolved with the abomination of abortion. And their burdensome responsibilities as educators my parents have never delegated or unloaded on a condom and a pill, as do many committed and militant adult Catholic loving mothers, sometimes even catechists, when mocking us in front of their sons and daughters they invite them not to listen to the nonsense that they say would be the result of minds out of time and from the world of us priests.

.

The pseudo sexual liberation it has generated all immorality except freedom. Sex everything now, even in the most unregulated and extreme forms consumed from a young age, in the following decades it has produced generations of spineless people unable to develop the value of waiting, of the inner struggle and the ability to resist, structuring one's character on a personality also supported by that self-discipline that leads to the conquest of self-control and true inner freedom. If any parents have teenage daughters who roam the streets half naked and act like real bitches in heat, the serious problem cannot be solved by saying "this is how it is today", or "that's how they dress on television", or worse "times have changed", because a parent worthy of the name, in addition to being a careful educator, he must know how to protect adolescent daughters from all the wrong and highly immoral tendencies that are propagated to the very young, in a decisive and, if necessary, also severe way. To demonstrate what I say is that young and very young are no longer able to hold a no, to overcome a defeat. If someone dares to tell them that it is not true that everything is due and that on the contrary everything must be deserved and conquered at a high price., that there are no immediate successes resulting from magical outcomes, here they fall into depressive states. At that point they are seized with suicidal instincts, they become violent, they often group in flocks in which violence is vented in groups, exercising gratuitous violence to the detriment of the weak, frail and disabled up to sexual violence against women.

.

In the increasingly deserted confessionals, in some churches even removed from under the aisles to leave room for socio-psychological conversations between confessor and penitent sitting on the benches like two friends on the bench in the public park, today no one accuses himself of having sex with the little friend he met the month before at the tender age of 14 year old, no young person asks God for forgiveness because he lives with a woman or a man without being married, no woman confesses to having done unbelievable to persuade her lover to abandon his wife and children and go live with her, because what matters only is love. A completely false and falsifying love from which every element has been removed, supported above all on the ability to give up what one cannot and must not have. Unfortunately it can happen, as I have repeatedly explained to several women, to even fall in love with a married man who has a wife and children. However, the human being is endowed with reason and a critical sense, it is not true that love is blind and that he commands, it is we who command and choose. But most of all, the love, it cannot be hidden behind false pretexts of pure selfishness. Therefore, if you were truly in love with that man who is not free and who has a wife and children, because of the love you have for him you should go away, instead of expecting for an unspecified love that he leaves his family to come and live with you, because this is not love, but destructive selfishness. And if we talk about that selfishness that goes as far as the destruction of marriages and families, it must be admitted that no man can exercise the malice of which a stubborn woman is capable of having a man at all costs and whatever it costs. As for my personal experience I can say that the lovers in question have never listened to my words, if anything, they listened to those of friends and above all of the expert mothers who even took care to instruct them on how to induce their lover to leave his wife and children. But they call it love.

.

What else could we expect from a company in which, with rigorous and indisputable "encyclopedicity", is presented as an aspiration and as a model a penis of 24 inches, in the unawareness and utter ignorance that a man with such a member would not be a wonderful stallion at all, but only a poor sick man?

.

the Island of Patmos, 29 June 2022

.

Dear Readers,

please read this article [WHO vedere] and to be as sensitive and thoughtful as you can

Thank you

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

COVID PREVENTED US FROM PUTTING WATER IN THE STOUP BUT THE CLERICALLY CORRECT US “ALLOWS” TO BLESS GAY COUPLES AFTER THEIR CIVIL UNION IN THE TOWN HALL

The presbyter who staged and presided over everything was quick to justify that only two people were blessed. E, if after Eucharistic Communion the two "loving newlyweds" went up to the altar to receive an apron, symbol of the service they provided to this group of LGBT Catholics on the move, this "was not a liturgical gesture", It stated, even if everything happened within the sacred liturgy and not in the smoking room of the bar not far from the parish church, because when certain types of priests think they can make fun of others by believing they are more cunning in practice, they end up losing both the sense of the ridiculous and that of human decency.

- Actuality -

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

.

To delve deeper into the topic we suggest reading this book written by Fathers Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo and Ivano Liguori (to go to the shop click on the image)

It is neither paradox nor oxymoron but simple reality: by order of the Italian Episcopal Conference, it was forbidden for two years to put lustral water inside the holy water fonts of churches to avoid spreading and contagion from Covid-19, only in recent days has its use been reinstated. A wise and prudent choice already adopted in past centuries during the great plagues. Similar caution was not applied to other cases linked to more serious epidemics. And so, directly in the diocese governed by the President of the Assembly of Italian Bishops, two proudly practicing homosexuals who shortly before sealed their "civil union" in the nearby municipal building of Budrio in the province of Bologna were welcomed into the church and blessed.

.

We "old priests" born under the pontificate of the Holy Pontiff Paul VI and raised under the long pontificate of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, we were used to the idea that the worst virus was sin, forge of all the worst pandemics. Today I must acknowledge that we were wrong. In truth, it was only the holy water piles, to be potential vehicles for viral infections and pandemic development.

.

In the light of ecclesial and ecclesiastical logic I would like to point out that I doubt he was adequately informed on Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi, by the priest-comedians of this sacrilegious drama, because it is a sacrilegious act, there is little to go around it. If he had been informed, I doubt he would have consented, above all knowing what media hype certain gay antics have always aroused, expanded, in the specific case, from the delicate role covered by the Metropolitan Archbishop of Bologna, which is President of the Italian Episcopal Conference. For this I believe a priori in the total innocence of Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi, who was certainly the first victim of this drama, which I dispatch for him, because he is a good man, fair and always very welcoming and caring towards priests, ever since he was auxiliary bishop in Rome.

.

Let's summarize the news and then move on to comment on a word and a concept that has now become taboo: sin. On 11 June it happened that two young men made their "civil union" official in the Municipality of Budrio in the province of Bologna. The time to cross the square to reach the parish church of San Lorenzo, where they were awaited by a cheering crowd and by 14 concelebrating priests, probably everyone clerical gay friendly. Presiding over the sacred liturgy was Gabriele Davalli, Diocesan manager - unbelievable, hear! - from the pastoral care of the family and archpriest of one neighboring parish, who had followed the two "loving newlyweds" during their journey in the LGBT Catholic group.

.

Some brothers of that presbytery they contacted our editorial staff with clarification:

.

«In case the person responsible for the drama wanted to correct the situation once the damage had already been done, saying he only blessed two people, know that all the annexes and connected typical of wedding ceremonies were present, give flowers to the photographer to shoot the two in the front row under the presbytery " [cf.. WHO].

.

And as they predicted it went just like that: the presbyter who staged and presided over everything was quick to justify that only two people were blessed. E, if after Eucharistic Communion the two "loving newlyweds" went up to the altar to receive an apron, symbol of the service they provided to this group of LGBT Catholics on the move, this "was not a liturgical gesture", It stated, even if everything happened within the sacred liturgy and not in the smoking room of the bar not far from the parish church, because when certain types of priests think they can make fun of others by believing they are more cunning in practice, they end up losing both the sense of the ridiculous and that of human decency. What else to add: every comment to such a lot of hypocrisy clerical chic it would be superfluous, so we conclude with a question destined to remain unanswered, and then move on to more serious things. I don't know who formed the presbyter Gabriele Davalli in fundamental theology and Catholic morality. But, since it was definitely me who was badly formed, that among my precious formators I also had the Cardinal Carlo Caffara, in a calm way, indeed in a timid way, with the blush that burns my cheeks, because as you know I'm a shy country boy, in a subdued way I dare to ask: Gabriele Davalli, after having admitted to Eucharistic Communion two gays declared fresh "newlyweds" and after having given them the apron, symbol of the service provided before the end of the Holy Mass, were you aware or not that in the evening, the two, they will surely have celebrated by hugging each other, with a lot of ceremony and blessing received in the morning during the Holy Mass? Or do you think maybe, dear gabriele davalli, that in the evening they went to bed reciting the Holy Rosary to the Blessed Virgin Mary asking for her intercession to have the support and strength necessary not to fall into shameful sin? This, it would be what I would ask Gabriele Davalli if I were his bishop, which obviously, by his grace and by my grace, are not.

.

The sad truth is that one diocesan responsible for pastoral care for the family and thirteen other priests gay friendly who concelebrated by turning the Eucharist into a sacrilegious theater, they actually blessed sin and publicly confirmed two people in mortal sin. And if anyone is able to prove me wrong - at the head of all the Metropolitan Archbishop of Bologna, which as I repeat I consider completely not guilty, as well as a good and just man - come forward and show me otherwise. Above all I wish that, bishops in the lead, tell me publicly - not with the classic regretted private letter - that the Catholic theology and morality with which I was trained I can safely throw them down the toilet and then flush the drain. But above all I would like them to explain to me that everything that until yesterday was an ugly mortal sin, today it has become love to be welcomed and blessed. After they explain this to me, publicly, the next day I will return my mandate to the exercise of the sacred priestly ministry in the hands of the bishop who gave it to me and I will retire to private life.

.

In civil society being homosexual and practicing homosexuality is not a crime. I add: and it never could be, I would be the first to take to the streets to protest, if anyone tried to prosecute homosexuals as such in any capacity. Homosexuality is not a disease, at the limit it can be a more or less serious psychological disorder or discomfort in those who live it badly or in those who do not accept it and who therefore suffer from it. As a Catholic priest and as a theologian I have always recognized people the right to live the sexuality they want and not to be discriminated in any way for their sexual choices and practices., the Catechism of the Catholic Church also says so, which incidentally it is good to remember:

.

2357 ― «Homosexuality refers to relationships between men or women who experience sexual attraction, exclusive or predominant, towards people of the same sex. It manifests itself in very varied forms over the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychic genesis remains largely unexplained. Relying on the Holy Scripture, which presents homosexual relationships as serious depravities (cf.. GN 19,1-29; RM 1,24-27; 1 Color 6,9-10; 1 TM 1,10) Tradition has always declared that "acts of homosexuality are intrinsically disordered" (cf.. Human person, n. 8). They are against natural law. They preclude the gift of life from the sexual act. They are not the fruit of true emotional and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.".

2358 ― «A non-negligible number of men and women have deeply rooted homosexual tendencies. This inclination, objectively disordered, constitutes a test for most of them. Therefore they must be welcomed with respect, compassion, delicacy. In their regard, any sign of unfair discrimination will be avoided. Such people are called to carry out God's will in their life, e, if they are Christian, to unite the difficulties they may encounter as a result of their condition to the sacrifice of the Lord's cross ".

.

For me the question is entirely theological, since I am a priest and not a theologian master chef. If God did not prevent Adam and Eve from committing original sin, we can perhaps prevent us, to men, to commit sins? Because, whether some of my worldly brothers like it or not gay friendly, ready if necessary to disguise a farcical "marriage" between two men as a blessing that as such is not denied to anyone, in any case, the fact remains that for Catholic morality and the law of God in which it is rooted "acts of homosexuality are intrinsically disordered". Once the act has been condemned, that is sin, regarding single homosexuals instead, that is, the sinners, Catholic morality clarifies: «[…] they must be received with respect, compassion, delicacy. In their regard, any mark of unjust discrimination will be avoided ". All this always repeating, as it regards the sin, that certain acts "are not the fruit of a true emotional and sexual complementarity" and that "in no case can they be approved".

.

Sodomy is a grave sin against nature created and ordained by God. So if certain priests knew and practiced the basic elements of Catholic theology and morality, if they simply knew the Catechism, rather than disguising the "sham marriage" of two men as a "blessing", they should be aware that sin is part of the exercise of man's full freedom and free will, but that sin disfigures the soul of the sinner and causes scandal to the community of believers. Therefore, the sin, yes, it is part of the full exercise of human freedom, but it is not, however, a right and no one, especially within the Church, can claim it as such, not even the couples of homosexual "loving newlyweds".

.

Several times in my public writings, but also during my private conversations with those confreres who use me as a spiritual director or as a confessor, I found myself explaining the substantial difference between sin and sinner, especially to young priests who have come out of set of that science fiction film to which our seminars all peace are now reduced, joy and love. We priests, as sanctifiers, teachers and guides of the People of God we not only have the duty to reject sin, because on our priestly consciences there is the imperative and the obligation to fight it. The sinner's speech is different, which is ours where it is our duty to welcome, assist and love, especially those who commit the gravest sins, because above all for them Christ shed his redemptive blood on the cross. So, if instead of welcoming the sinner we reject him as such, we would betray and profane in the worst way the holy mission that Christ God has entrusted to us through the institution of the ministerial priesthood.

.

The underlying problem is that an army of sixty-eight presbyters and sixty-eight grandchildren raised by them and raised to an overdose of unspecified peace, joy and love, they no longer know the difference between sin and sinner, which is a fundamental and substantial difference. Useless as it may be, because nothing that is structurally ideological can be scratched, Let us now try to understand well the mortal danger posed by the terrifying sin propagated by LGBT lobbyists, which I talked about at length in my long private conversations with Cardinal Carlo Caffarra. This danger - which I repeat is deadly and terrifying - is given by the fact that groups made up of self-described Catholics “LGBT Catholics” they are making their way within the Church and parish communities, by making a fool of bishops in a grandiose way, foolish priests and nuns. And they are making their way not to be followed and cared for spiritually, not to heal their fragility and wounds, not to try to heal their souls from the epidemic virus of sin, but to be legitimized and confirmed in mortal sin. This is a trap in which an army of bishops, foolish priests and nuns are falling like fish into the net. For a decade now the LGBT lobby has entered the Church like a Trojan horse to claim and demonstrate that the first to make a mistake was first and foremost God in creating us male and female. They are not at fault, always cloaked in victimhood and pain, it is the Church that with its “retrive” e “cup” morality dares to prevent two gays or two lesbians from loving each other, thus denying - in their opinion - the very essence of the Holy Gospel, which is love and only love. Of course, that the Holy Gospel is love, However, it would be enough to ask ourselves and understand what true love spreads, because the love he announces ends up bleeding on the cross with four nails planted in his flesh and with a crown of thorns on his head, something completely different with porcine and desecrating riots the various gay pride, who also recently gave us the sadomasochistic Madonna and Christ on stilettos. Or perhaps the Holy Gospel, in the name of an unspecified "love", it allows us to bless the union of two men, to celebrate them in church and to admit them to Eucharistic Communion, so that they can return to their bedroom in the evening, “blessed” and “sanctified”, to sodomize each other in the name of love? Perhaps this is the love announced by the Holy Gospel?

.

It was for this reason than in 2009, that wise man of God Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, despite being covered in all the worst insults, criticized and insulted throughout the press gay friendly of the left radical chic, he forbade a choir composed of 25 declared homosexuals to gather in the premises of the Bolognese parish of San Bartolomeo della Beverara. Because it is one thing to welcome the single homosexual, which must be accepted, respected, loved and cared for spiritually, always. Another thing is to allow groups of unspecified Catholic homosexuals to be established directly within ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical structures., which, as experience teaches us and as usual, has almost always happened, they first of all question the doctrine and morality of the Catholic Church. Because it is the Church, who must bend to the whim of their sin, welcome and legitimize it, finally bless him. This is something the Church will never be able to do.

.

Every now and then some bishop accuses me of using strong tones, others, much more numerous, instead they ask me to give public voice to what they cannot always say in strong tones. And how could I not use strong tones, in the face of an increasingly dense army of priests who are no longer able to distinguish even the sin from the sinner? But the problem isn't them, I'm the one who's tough. And in the visible Church imbued with an unspecified love, harshness is not permitted, because we are no longer "the salt of the earth" [Mt 5, 13] but the sugar of the earth. As a result, bless in the church during the liturgical action two homosexuals who return to play leapfrog in the evening, this is a truly good and right thing, at least for all those who have decided to become sugar of the earth.

.

Every historical season has its characters, but in circumstances of this kind we certainly miss the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II. Because in more or less similar cases, which have now occurred in numerous dioceses around the world, he would not have hesitated to call the respective bishops before him. And in a spirit of authentic Christian charity the room attendants, before their entry into the hearing, they would have recommended: "Excellence, before going to the Supreme Pontiff, pass by the Vatican Pharmacy, purchase and wear the diaper, because it would definitely be embarrassing, for her as for anyone, piss oneself in front of the Holy Father". Today things have changed, we have the Paduan presbyter Marco Pozza, for friends Don Spritz, that in jeans and untied sneakers goes to interview the Holy Father and having nothing better to do post a greeting message for a couple of his gay friends on the occasion of their wedding, only to correct the post shortly after by changing the word “marriage” with “civil union”. However, what only matters is not to appear before the Holy Father with a Roman cassock on and a respectful ferraiolo on the shoulders, because in that case you can run the risk of being electrocuted with a glance. But it would all end with a lightning glance, because to make someone piss on one would need the strength that the Holy Pontiff John Paul II knew he had when necessary, but above all his holiness would be necessary, because only the Saints, when the case requires it, they even manage to make you piss on yourself for the salvation of your soul.

.

My beloved and venerated Carlo Caffarra, I feel holy envy for you, that you were called in September 2017 to the Father's House, where I would like to be too, thus sparing myself the abomination of desolation that awaits us, why now, certain of our fearful and improvident bishops, loving towards sin but angry towards those of their priests who always dare to condemn sin, for some time they have been making us truly aspire to the great grace of death.

the Island of Patmos, 16 June 2022

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.