THE PENIS OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, THE UNRELIABILITY OF WIKIPEDIA FREE ENCYCLOPEDIA, THE SUFFERING DUE TO PENIAL DYSMORPHOBIA OF THE FALLOCENTRIC MAN OF THE THIRD MILLENNIUM

The pseudo sexual liberation it has generated all immorality except freedom. Sex everything now, even in the most unregulated and extreme forms consumed from a young age, in the following decades it has produced generations of spineless people unable to develop the value of waiting, of the inner struggle and the ability to resist, structuring one's character on a personality also supported by that self-discipline that leads to the conquest of self-control and true inner freedom.

- Actuality -

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

.

… what is written by the Wikipedia scientists is all true?

Before the sentence: «… but I read it on Wikipedia!», if in front of me I have a simple person, I wrap myself in a good mood and answer with an ironic joke, if with the same sentence I am hit by a person who gives himself the airs of a scholar and intellectual, in that case I could also react badly.

.

Wikipedia starts from the wrong assumption that history and scientific knowledge in the various fields of knowledge can be democratic and subject to the discussions and judgments of unspecified Wikipedians, among whom are also teeming failed intellectuals and frustrated university researchers. Historically Wikipedia is a miscellany of inaccuracies. And since everyone can offer their own democratic contribution, when someone has dared to correct gross inaccuracies it has often happened that the democratic committee of various wikipedians, of strictly anonymous practices, has quickly deleted the exact data and left the obviously incorrect one, or more simply ideological.

.

I am telling you an experience: years ago I decided to insert an entry on the Italian Wikipedia page, he was a distinguished theologian, a notable figure who participated as an expert in the Second Vatican Council and who was a close collaborator of three Supreme Pontiffs. Shortly after the wikipedian on duty ordered the cancellation of the page on the grounds that "it lacked encyclopedicity" and that the person on whom that biography was built was not a "figure of encyclopedic value". Not satisfied with this he accused me of wanting to "advertise a stranger". I tried to argue with this anonymous democrat based on the principles of rationality and rigor dictated by the facts. So I took the pages of Wikipedia in German and English, showing that not only on this person there were two respective biographies, but that the one written by me on the page in Italian had the exact same data. Having done this, I asked on the basis of what criteria an Italian theologian could be encyclopedic on the pages of Wikipedia in Germany and in English-speaking countries, but not in Italy, where, however, he has always lived and worked. Other Wikipedian scientists intervened in the discussion, perhaps professorship assistants for years waiting for the qualification competition who had been mistreated by the full day professor and for this in need of vent, who gave a hand to their companion, advocating "non-encyclopedicity" against any clear and proven evidence.

.

In front of people who deny the facts, there are two solutions: either the discussion ends or they make fun of themselves. In that circumstance I opted for the second choice demonstrating to that unusual "court of judgment" what Wikipedia actually means by "encyclopedic truth". On this free encyclopedia that has subjected historical facts and knowledge to the democratic union of anonymous characters without face and identity, there is the strictly encyclopedic voice of the famous Italian porn actor Rocco Siffredi, about which it was written in 2015 with impeccable encyclopedicity, therefore as an irrefutable fact: "Penis size 23 centimeters". I took this encyclopedic datum and invited the anonymous judges of the Wikipedian court to take a yardstick and measure a length of 23 inches. Then, after consulting with the best urology specialists, wondering if a penis of that size can remain partially erect for only a few minutes. Then I invited them to ask themselves a second question: a gentleman who works with his penis as a porn actor, can afford erectile problems? Or better: can afford an erection of very short duration? Because this would be equivalent to an athlete with chronic asthma problems and shortness of breath who had to do a speed race with show jumping.

.

I went on explaining to the Wikipedian scientist democrats that a penis of that size would make the poor man pathologically ill who unfortunately found it between his legs. This desirable pathology for any male is indicated in the clinical setting as macrophalosomy. A penis that exceeds i 20 centimeters in length is a problematic penis for men and women who should be penetrated during sexual intercourse. Macrophalosomy can affect a healthy sex life, generating the related individual and couple psychological discomforts. To all this is added the physiological problem of very partial erections, a limited maintenance of the erectile state and the inevitable propensity to premature ejaculation. The penile cavernous tissues need the necessary blood supply both to achieve an erectile state and to maintain it. A huge penis means more tissue to swell, therefore a much greater blood flow in the genital area. No male body can withstand such an effort. As a result, erections of a macro penis are not satisfactory, with all the problems that come with it.

.

Instead of answering me on the merits about the encyclopedicity regarding the genital organ of Mr. Rocco Siffredi, the Wikipedian Supreme Court of Cassation closed the discussion by calling me a heckler. After a few years I went back to opening the Wikipedia page of the famous porn actor while I was writing this article, discovering an encyclopedic update that left me stunned: between 2015 and the 2022 the length of the member of Mr. Rocco Siffredi has in fact passed from 23 a 24 inches. All the result of an indisputable and democratic encyclopedicity, of course! Switch by 23 centimeters of the 2015 when the porn actor had 50 years of age, to the extent of 24 centimeters in 2022 when it is years old 58, as an encyclopedic miracle it is extraordinary. With equally indisputable encyclopedic rigor, its height has also been increased, indicated equal to one meter e 85 inches, although Mr. Rocco Siffredi is one meter tall 75 inches. Issues of democratic encyclopedicity, which as democratic is indisputable.

.

I would like this story would serve those who, starting from middle school up to research for the drafting of degree theses, take all approximations as a reliable source, the inaccuracies and partial and ideological tainted historical information presented by Wikipedia, using them as safe sources to write their own works, often doing actual copy and paste. Unfortunately, the Free Encyclopedia Wikipedia, in concrete facts it is the triumph of digital illiteracy cloaked in knowledge and unspecified democracy, in the total neglect that knowledge and sciences are not democratic but objective.

.

penile dysmorphophobia it is a male psychological disorder that often causes serious problems for some men. Those affected find their penis to be small in size, with the relative discomfort that follows, especially on a psychological and behavioral level. In most cases, everything is only the result of the wrong perception of their sex, not due to the pathology of congenital micropenis. And so, very wrongly and not rightly at all, a young man told me: "I have a big problem". Then he tried to play down by adding: "A problem that concerns something small". And he told me about his inner drama, tied to a penis of unsatisfactory size. Another told me that at the end of an argument his partner had mocked him by referring to the size of his penis, something for which he had felt so humiliated that he had begun to suffer from depression. Years ago I had a good-looking young man in spiritual direction, of excellent character, brilliant in intelligence and gifted in his studies, but very insecure in temperament. One day he took courage and decided to confide in me that since he was a teenager he had begun to suffer because he believed he had a small penis. After his outburst I understood where his insecurity came from, helping him in this sense with results that turned out to be excellent, thank God. I could go on with other more or less similar examples, but here I stop.

.

The beauty of the priestly ministry of the confessor or spiritual director is given by the fact that when men - but also women - establish a relationship of authentic and profound trust, they do not hesitate to open the most intimate and delicate spheres of their being to the priest chosen as a secret confidant, overcoming the discomfort and the sense of shame that certain things can bring. Those who think they understand the Church, as well as Catholic doctrine and theology, or that from the top of their chairs erected on social media they presume that they can not only criticize us - which is always legitimate within the limits of the law - but even teach us how to be shepherds in the care of souls, they cannot even imagine in which spheres of the human heart we must move and with what existential problems we come into contact in the total secrecy of the internal and external forums. Sexuality, or what pertains to human sexuality, it is one of these spheres, in some respects the most delicate to treat, because it affects aspects of the human body and psyche that are all more complex than the other.

.

Man's sexuality is external, contrary to that of the woman who is internal. For this reason, man tends to externalize sexuality, while the woman tends to internalize it. We could say that the man is sexually extroverted and the woman is sexually introverted. Inevitably, men tend to have an external relationship with their penis that a woman would never dream of having with her vagina. The way in which men and women reach orgasm is also completely different. Several times several women have expressed discomfort to me in this regard, unjustly accusing themselves of frigidity, because in this the woman tends to blame herself, while it is often all the fault of the man who does not know how to deal with and relate to the woman's body. If the woman welcomes when she wants to welcome and what she wants to welcome, man is instead taken by the need to exhibit, plagued by an indomitable spirit of sexual competition, usually referred to as "performance anxiety" or more simply as narcissism. All this develops from a very specific and sad root: an objective lack of knowledge of women and female sexuality. If a woman wants a man and is deeply in love with him, it is not even the slightest touch by the size of his penis. To a woman in general, to a sweetheart in particular, half a little finger is enough to reach orgasm. Not only: a so-called excessive tool can only annoy her, as well as causing harm, causing anything but pleasure.

.

The more or less vulgar idiom, but very realistic, referring to the various types of men who "think with the cock", it has a very profound meaning. Man often tends to act and interact using the penis as a yardstick instead of reason, the logic and the speculative sense. Several times I happened to remind different men about it, pointing out how much they were affected by chronic phallocentrism. All of this can be linked to the relative rate of that male hormone known as testosterone, the excess or deficiency of which can produce problems of various kinds. A high testosterone level is not necessarily a cure-all. Excessive testosterone can make men not only hyperactive and sexually efficient but also very aggressive and not always able to control their aggression. Several times it has happened that in the course of certain criminal trials related to various forms of violence, the defendant's defender presented expert reports and clinical tests attesting to the excessive production of testosterone. Sometimes it has also happened that the judge took this into account by reducing the guilt linked to will or premeditated willful misconduct. For inverse, a low testosterone, it can give rise to insecurity, anxiety and depressive states.

.

Phallocentric reasoning and acting of man is none other than that dimension that mirrors the woman who acts and interacts in a uterocentric way, more or less taken by hysteria. It is no coincidence that the term derives from the Greek root of ύστερα (ystera) which means uterus, hence the term ysterikòs. The bodies of men and women are very complex machines, while the mind of both remains largely a mystery to be known and explored. The priest who lives in contact with human material must also deal with certain complex realities, from which problems often emerge that cannot be solved by prescribing the therapeutic recitation of one Ave Maria waiting for the "definitive triumph of his immaculate heart", how do those nice magical-dream Catholics always ready to teach us how to properly carry out our sacred ministry, despite never having touched with hand, but not even touched from a distance, certain complex dramas of human existence. Let us then overlook the rigorous and merciless spirit with which these same magical-dream Catholics treat sex and human sexuality, focusing on the essence of the entire mystery of evil, as if sex were the sin of sins. These are topics on which I have written several times and in detail.

.

We live in a society sick with sex mania, we are invaded by a pornography that conveys sexual patterns and modes of sexual intercourse that are surreal to say the least, presented partly as a reality and partly as goals to be achieved. This pornographic market has had the effect of giving the very young a distorted idea of ​​sex, of sexual relations and intercourse. Never before have urologists and andrologists found themselves in front of very young patients with problems that are all psychological and not physical, least of all clinical-pathological. The problems of young people raised on bread and pornography can range from a completely altered view of human sexuality, sexual relations and their dynamics, with related erection deficiencies and premature ejaculation problems as never seen before and which for this reason have been the subject of numerous international conferences by the Society of Urologists and Andrologists.

.

Mr. Twenty-Four Centimeters strictly encyclopedic-wikipediani boasts and credits itself with having cleared sex with its films and its porn academies, while in truth it made it surreal and violent, inducing some generations of young and very young people to have a completely altered vision of it, with what is dangerous at the individual and social level. In short, let me go down even, because if we play with modest scientific euphemisms and Latinisms we will not understand each other and above all we will not be able to focus on the problem. Collective madness - as the Servant of God indicated it in a prophetic way Enrico Medi in the seventies of the twentieth century - has now reached these levels: if a goliardic fan give a pat on the ass to a commentator who is conducting a live broadcast outside the stadium, a chorus of scandalized people rise up screaming at sexual violence and even invoking the conviction for rape of the sudden and inappropriate bad boy, that he didn't have to do what he did, but he certainly didn't rape a girl, he jokingly disrespected her as in any case it should not be done. But, the same chorus of scandalized deranged people, is silent and does not utter a moan if in one of the many porn films a woman surrounded by one gang of four men is penetrated by two at a time in the vagina and anal orifice, slapped on the buttocks and violently pulled by the hair during oral intercourse. Similar and other worse images are available and visible to any teenager holding one Smartphone. Faced with these descriptions, now the usual out of tune choir will rise, boring and inevitable, of the Puritans Catholics by chance ready to sentence «a priest does not express himself that way: shame!». Instead, refuse to see problems in all their gravity, describe them and throw them in the face of those who do not want to see them because they are determined to live in his world of madonnine languide e cristi androgini photoshoppati, is certainly the best way to solve them, especially to try to protect our very young from the snares of the Devil. So ask yourself: a society that invokes the conviction for rape of an emeritus idiot with an inappropriate student spirit is to be considered balanced, but who is silent in the face of a prevailing violent and aggressive pornography in which the sexual relations of couples or groups very often simulate rape? This was what the Servant of God Enrico Medi meant when mocked by all intellectuals chic he claimed not to fear pollution or even the possibility of nuclear war, but rather to fear the collective madness towards which humanity was falling. And in which finally, humanity, today it has fallen.

.

If we dare to speak to young people about purity and chastity, we end up accused instantly of a retrograde and sexophobic spirit, as happened to the Supreme Pontiff a few days ago, promptly cannoned by all the press on the left radical chic. In fact, to speak of purity and chastity, the least that can happen to us is to be looked upon by those directly involved as extraterrestrials landed on planet Earth. Following, mommy in the head, if anything, even adult and committed Catholics, variously cat-communists or even catechists, they will take care to tell their children not to listen to a ridiculous priest who lives in who knows what hyperuranium and who does not realize that times have changed. After that, the loving mommy, a wise seal will add: "The only thing that matters is love", without, however, explaining to the children what love is and what it entails, especially in sacrifices and renunciations. We are sure that caring and loving parents can solve the problem of the correct sexual education of their children by recommending the use of condoms to adolescents and having their 14-year-old daughter prescribe the birth control pill? I who am a gentleman about to accomplish shortly 59 years I can testify that my father and my mother did not shirk the delicate and burdensome obligation to educate me in sexuality, teaching me prudence and continence, explaining to me that you cannot have everything immediately and that the exercise of sexuality also involves risks and responsibilities which then, damage done to, they certainly cannot be resolved with the abomination of abortion. And their burdensome responsibilities as educators my parents have never delegated or unloaded on a condom and a pill, as do many committed and militant adult Catholic loving mothers, sometimes even catechists, when mocking us in front of their sons and daughters they invite them not to listen to the nonsense that they say would be the result of minds out of time and from the world of us priests.

.

The pseudo sexual liberation it has generated all immorality except freedom. Sex everything now, even in the most unregulated and extreme forms consumed from a young age, in the following decades it has produced generations of spineless people unable to develop the value of waiting, of the inner struggle and the ability to resist, structuring one's character on a personality also supported by that self-discipline that leads to the conquest of self-control and true inner freedom. If any parents have teenage daughters who roam the streets half naked and act like real bitches in heat, the serious problem cannot be solved by saying "this is how it is today", or "that's how they dress on television", or worse "times have changed", because a parent worthy of the name, in addition to being a careful educator, he must know how to protect adolescent daughters from all the wrong and highly immoral tendencies that are propagated to the very young, in a decisive and, if necessary, also severe way. To demonstrate what I say is that young and very young are no longer able to hold a no, to overcome a defeat. If someone dares to tell them that it is not true that everything is due and that on the contrary everything must be deserved and conquered at a high price., that there are no immediate successes resulting from magical outcomes, here they fall into depressive states. At that point they are seized with suicidal instincts, they become violent, they often group in flocks in which violence is vented in groups, exercising gratuitous violence to the detriment of the weak, frail and disabled up to sexual violence against women.

.

In the increasingly deserted confessionals, in some churches even removed from under the aisles to leave room for socio-psychological conversations between confessor and penitent sitting on the benches like two friends on the bench in the public park, today no one accuses himself of having sex with the little friend he met the month before at the tender age of 14 year old, no young person asks God for forgiveness because he lives with a woman or a man without being married, no woman confesses to having done unbelievable to persuade her lover to abandon his wife and children and go live with her, because what matters only is love. A completely false and falsifying love from which every element has been removed, supported above all on the ability to give up what one cannot and must not have. Unfortunately it can happen, as I have repeatedly explained to several women, to even fall in love with a married man who has a wife and children. However, the human being is endowed with reason and a critical sense, it is not true that love is blind and that he commands, it is we who command and choose. But most of all, the love, it cannot be hidden behind false pretexts of pure selfishness. Therefore, if you were truly in love with that man who is not free and who has a wife and children, because of the love you have for him you should go away, instead of expecting for an unspecified love that he leaves his family to come and live with you, because this is not love, but destructive selfishness. And if we talk about that selfishness that goes as far as the destruction of marriages and families, it must be admitted that no man can exercise the malice of which a stubborn woman is capable of having a man at all costs and whatever it costs. As for my personal experience I can say that the lovers in question have never listened to my words, if anything, they listened to those of friends and above all of the expert mothers who even took care to instruct them on how to induce their lover to leave his wife and children. But they call it love.

.

What else could we expect from a company in which, with rigorous and indisputable "encyclopedicity", is presented as an aspiration and as a model a penis of 24 inches, in the unawareness and utter ignorance that a man with such a member would not be a wonderful stallion at all, but only a poor sick man?

.

the Island of Patmos, 29 June 2022

.

Dear Readers,

please read this article [WHO vedere] and to be as sensitive and thoughtful as you can

Thank you

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

IL COVID CI IMPEDIVA DI METTERE L’ACQUA NELLE ACQUESANTIERE MA IL CLERICAMENTE CORRETTO CI “ALLOWS” DI BENEDIRE LE COPPIE DI GAY DOPO LA LORO UNIONE CIVILE IN MUNICIPIO

Il presbitero che ha inscenato e presieduto il tutto si è affrettato a giustificare che sono state solo benedette due persone. E, se dopo la Comunione Eucaristica i due “sposini amorosi” sono saliti all’altare per ricevere un grembiule, simbolo del servizio da loro prestato a questo gruppo di cattolici LGBT in cammino, ciò «non è stato un gesto liturgico», It stated, pure se il tutto è avvenuto nell’ambito della sacra liturgia e non nella sala da fumo del bar poco distante dalla chiesa parrocchiale, perché quando certi tipi di preti pensano di poter prendere in giro gli altri credendosi di prassi più scaltri, finiscono col perdere sia il senso del ridicolo che quello della umana decenza.

- Actuality -

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Per approfondire il tema vi suggeriamo la lettura di questo libro scritto dai Padri Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo and Ivano Liguori (per andare al negozio cliccate sopra l’immagine)

Non è paradosso né ossimoro ma semplice realtà: per disposizione della Conferenza Episcopale Italiana è stato proibito per due anni di mettere l’acqua lustrale dentro le acquasantiere delle chiese per evitare di veicolare la diffusione e il contagio da Covid-19, solo in questi giorni ne è stato ripristinato l’uso. A wise and prudent choice already adopted in past centuries during the great plagues. Similar caution was not applied to other cases linked to more serious epidemics. And so, directly in the diocese governed by the President of the Assembly of Italian Bishops, two proudly practicing homosexuals who shortly before sealed their "civil union" in the nearby municipal building of Budrio in the province of Bologna were welcomed into the church and blessed.

.

We "old priests" born under the pontificate of the Holy Pontiff Paul VI and raised under the long pontificate of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, we were used to the idea that the worst virus was sin, forge of all the worst pandemics. Today I must acknowledge that we were wrong. In truth, it was only the holy water piles, to be potential vehicles for viral infections and pandemic development.

.

In the light of ecclesial and ecclesiastical logic I would like to point out that I doubt he was adequately informed on Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi, by the priest-comedians of this sacrilegious drama, because it is a sacrilegious act, there is little to go around it. If he had been informed, I doubt he would have consented, above all knowing what media hype certain gay antics have always aroused, expanded, in the specific case, from the delicate role covered by the Metropolitan Archbishop of Bologna, which is President of the Italian Episcopal Conference. For this I believe a priori in the total innocence of Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi, who was certainly the first victim of this drama, which I dispatch for him, because he is a good man, fair and always very welcoming and caring towards priests, ever since he was auxiliary bishop in Rome.

.

Let's summarize the news and then move on to comment on a word and a concept that has now become taboo: sin. On 11 June it happened that two young men made their "civil union" official in the Municipality of Budrio in the province of Bologna. The time to cross the square to reach the parish church of San Lorenzo, dove erano attesi da una folla festante e da 14 concelebrating priests, verosimilmente tutti clerical gay friendly. A presiedere la sacra liturgia è stato Gabriele Davalli, Diocesan manager - unbelievable, hear! ― della pastorale della famiglia e arciprete di una parrocchia limitrofa, che aveva seguito i due “sposini amorosi” durante il loro cammino nel gruppo di Cattolici LGBT.

.

Alcuni confratelli di quel presbiterio hanno contattato la nostra redazione precisando:

.

«Casomai il responsabile della sceneggiata volesse correggere il tiro a danno ormai compiuto, saying he only blessed two people, know that all the annexes and connected typical of wedding ceremonies were present, give flowers to the photographer to shoot the two in the front row under the presbytery " [cf.. WHO].

.

And as they predicted it went just like that: the presbyter who staged and presided over everything was quick to justify that only two people were blessed. E, se dopo la Comunione Eucaristica i due “sposini amorosi” sono saliti all’altare per ricevere un grembiule, simbolo del servizio da loro prestato a questo gruppo di cattolici LGBT in cammino, ciò «non è stato un gesto liturgico», It stated, pure se il tutto è avvenuto nell’ambito della sacra liturgia e non nella sala da fumo del bar poco distante dalla chiesa parrocchiale, perché quando certi tipi di preti pensano di poter prendere in giro gli altri credendosi di prassi più scaltri, finiscono col perdere sia il senso del ridicolo che quello della umana decenza. What else to add: every comment to such a lot of hypocrisy clerical chic it would be superfluous, so we conclude with a question destined to remain unanswered, and then move on to more serious things. I don't know who formed the presbyter Gabriele Davalli in fundamental theology and Catholic morality. But, since it was definitely me who was badly formed, that among my precious formators I also had the Cardinal Carlo Caffara, in a calm way, indeed in a timid way, with the blush that burns my cheeks, because as you know I'm a shy country boy, in a subdued way I dare to ask: Gabriele Davalli, after having admitted to Eucharistic Communion two gays declared fresh "newlyweds" and after having given them the apron, symbol of the service provided before the end of the Holy Mass, were you aware or not that in the evening, the two, they will surely have celebrated by hugging each other, with a lot of ceremony and blessing received in the morning during the Holy Mass? Or do you think maybe, dear gabriele davalli, that in the evening they went to bed reciting the Holy Rosary to the Blessed Virgin Mary asking for her intercession to have the support and strength necessary not to fall into shameful sin? This, it would be what I would ask Gabriele Davalli if I were his bishop, which obviously, by his grace and by my grace, are not.

.

The sad truth is that one diocesan responsible for pastoral care for the family and thirteen other priests gay friendly who concelebrated by turning the Eucharist into a sacrilegious theater, they actually blessed sin and publicly confirmed two people in mortal sin. And if anyone is able to prove me wrong - at the head of all the Metropolitan Archbishop of Bologna, which as I repeat I consider completely not guilty, as well as a good and just man - come forward and show me otherwise. Above all I wish that, bishops in the lead, tell me publicly - not with the classic regretted private letter - that the Catholic theology and morality with which I was trained I can safely throw them down the toilet and then flush the drain. But above all I would like them to explain to me that everything that until yesterday was an ugly mortal sin, today it has become love to be welcomed and blessed. After they explain this to me, publicly, the next day I will return my mandate to the exercise of the sacred priestly ministry in the hands of the bishop who gave it to me and I will retire to private life.

.

In civil society being homosexual and practicing homosexuality is not a crime. I add: and it never could be, I would be the first to take to the streets to protest, if anyone tried to prosecute homosexuals as such in any capacity. Homosexuality is not a disease, at the limit it can be a more or less serious psychological disorder or discomfort in those who live it badly or in those who do not accept it and who therefore suffer from it. As a Catholic priest and as a theologian I have always recognized people the right to live the sexuality they want and not to be discriminated in any way for their sexual choices and practices., the Catechism of the Catholic Church also says so, which incidentally it is good to remember:

.

2357 ― «L’omosessualità designa le relazioni tra uomini o donne che provano un’attrattiva sessuale, esclusiva o predominante, verso persone del medesimo sesso. Si manifesta in forme molto varie lungo i secoli e nelle differenti culture. La sua genesi psichica rimane in gran parte inspiegabile. Appoggiandosi sulla Sacra Scrittura, che presenta le relazioni omosessuali come gravi depravazioni (cf.. GN 19,1-29; RM 1,24-27; 1 Color 6,9-10; 1 TM 1,10) la Tradizione ha sempre dichiarato che “gli atti di omosessualità sono intrinsecamente disordinati” (cf.. Human person, n. 8). Sono contrari alla legge naturale. Precludono all’atto sessuale il dono della vita. Non sono il frutto di una vera complementarità affettiva e sessuale. In nessun caso possono essere approvati».

2358 ― «Un numero non trascurabile di uomini e di donne presenta tendenze omosessuali profondamente radicate. Questa inclinazione, oggettivamente disordinata, costituisce per la maggior parte di loro una prova. Perciò devono essere accolti con rispetto, compassion, delicacy. A loro riguardo si eviterà ogni marchio di ingiusta discriminazione. Such people are called to carry out God's will in their life, e, if they are Christian, to unite the difficulties they may encounter as a result of their condition to the sacrifice of the Lord's cross ".

.

For me the question is entirely theological, since I am a priest and not a theologian master chef. If God did not prevent Adam and Eve from committing original sin, we can perhaps prevent us, to men, to commit sins? Because, whether some of my worldly brothers like it or not gay friendly, ready if necessary to disguise a farcical "marriage" between two men as a blessing that as such is not denied to anyone, in any case, the fact remains that for Catholic morality and the law of God in which it is rooted "acts of homosexuality are intrinsically disordered". Once the act has been condemned, that is sin, regarding single homosexuals instead, that is, the sinners, Catholic morality clarifies: «[…] they must be received with respect, compassion, delicacy. In their regard, any mark of unjust discrimination will be avoided ". All this always repeating, as it regards the sin, that certain acts "are not the fruit of a true emotional and sexual complementarity" and that "in no case can they be approved".

.

Sodomy is a grave sin against nature created and ordained by God. So if certain priests knew and practiced the basic elements of Catholic theology and morality, if they simply knew the Catechism, rather than disguising the "sham marriage" of two men as a "blessing", they should be aware that sin is part of the exercise of man's full freedom and free will, but that sin disfigures the soul of the sinner and causes scandal to the community of believers. Therefore, the sin, yes, it is part of the full exercise of human freedom, but it is not, however, a right and no one, especially within the Church, can claim it as such, not even the couples of homosexual "loving newlyweds".

.

Several times in my public writings, but also during my private conversations with those confreres who use me as a spiritual director or as a confessor, I found myself explaining the substantial difference between sin and sinner, especially to young priests who have come out of set of that science fiction film to which our seminars all peace are now reduced, joy and love. We priests, as sanctifiers, teachers and guides of the People of God we not only have the duty to reject sin, because on our priestly consciences there is the imperative and the obligation to fight it. The sinner's speech is different, which is ours where it is our duty to welcome, assist and love, especially those who commit the gravest sins, because above all for them Christ shed his redemptive blood on the cross. So, if instead of welcoming the sinner we reject him as such, we would betray and profane in the worst way the holy mission that Christ God has entrusted to us through the institution of the ministerial priesthood.

.

The underlying problem is that an army of sixty-eight presbyters and sixty-eight grandchildren raised by them and raised to an overdose of unspecified peace, joy and love, they no longer know the difference between sin and sinner, which is a fundamental and substantial difference. Useless as it may be, perché nulla di ciò che è strutturalmente ideologico può essere scalfito, cerchiamo adesso di comprendere bene quel pericolo mortale costituito dal terrificante peccato propagato dai lobbisti LGBT, di cui lungamente ebbi a parlare nei miei lunghi colloqui privati con il Cardinale Carlo Caffarra. Questo pericolo ― che ripeto è mortale e terrificante ― è dato dal fatto che gruppi costituiti da sedicenti cattolici auto-denominatisi “Cattolici LGBT” si stanno facendo largo all’interno della Chiesa e delle comunità parrocchiali, infinocchiando in modo grandioso vescovi, preti e suorine stolte. E si stanno facendo largo non per essere seguiti e curati spiritualmente, non per curare le loro fragilità e ferite, non per cercare di sanare le loro anime dal virus epidemico del peccato, ma per essere legittimati e confermati nel peccato mortale. Trappola questa nella quale un esercito di vescovi, preti e suorine stolte stanno cadendo come pesci dentro la rete. La lobby LGBT è entrata ormai da un decennio dentro la Chiesa come un cavallo di troia per rivendicare e dimostrare che il primo a sbagliarsi è stato anzitutto Dio nel crearci maschio e femmina. In errore non sono loro, sempre ammantati di vittimismo e dolorismo, lo è la Chiesa che con la sua “retrive” e “cup” morale osa impedire a due gay o a due lesbiche di amarsi, negando a questo modo — a loro dire — l’essenza stessa del Santo Vangelo, che è amore e solo amore. Of course, che il Santo Vangelo è amore, basterebbe però chiedersi e comprendere quale vero amore diffonde, perché l’amore che annuncia finisce a sanguinare sulla croce con quattro chiodi piantati nella carne e con una corona di spine sulla testa, cosa del tutto diversa dai tripudi porcini e dissacranti the various gay pride, che anche di recente ci hanno regalato la Madonna sadomaso e Cristo sui tacchi a spillo. O forse il Santo Vangelo, in nome di un non meglio precisato “amore”, ci consente di benedire l’unione di due uomini, di festeggiarli in chiesa e di ammetterli alla Comunione Eucaristica, affinché possano rientrare la sera nella loro camera da letto, “benedetti” e “santificati”, a sodomizzarsi a vicenda in nome dell’amore? È forse questo l’amore annunciato dal Santo Vangelo?

.

Fu per questo motivo than in 2009, quel sapiente uomo di Dio del Cardinale Carlo Caffarra, pur ricoperto di tutte le peggiori contumelie, criticato e insultato su tutta la stampa gay friendly of the left radical chic, proibì a un coro composto da 25 omosessuali dichiarati di radunarsi nei locali della parrocchia bolognese di San Bartolomeo della Beverara. Perché un conto è accogliere il singolo omosessuale, che va accolto, respected, amato e accudito spiritualmente, always. Altra cosa permettere che direttamente all’interno delle strutture ecclesiali ed ecclesiastiche siano costituiti gruppi di non meglio precisati omosessuali cattolici, che come l’esperienza ci insegna e come di prassi è quasi sempre accaduto, pongono anzitutto in discussione la dottrina e la morale della Chiesa Cattolica. Perché è la Chiesa, che deve piegarsi al capriccio del loro peccato, accoglierlo e legittimarlo, infine benedirlo. Cosa questa che la Chiesa non potrà mai fare.

.

Ogni tanto qualche vescovo mi accusa di usare toni forti, others, molto più numerosi, mi pregano invece di dare pubblica voce a ciò che loro non sempre possono dire in toni forti. E come potrei non usare toni forti, di fronte a un esercito sempre più fitto di preti che non sono più in grado di distinguere neppure il peccato dal peccatore? Però il problema non sono loro, sono io che sono duro. E nella Chiesa visibile intrisa di un non meglio precisato amore la durezza non è ammessa, perché ormai non siamo più «il sale della terra» [Mt 5, 13] ma lo zucchero della terra. As a result, benedire in chiesa durante l’azione liturgica due omosessuali che la sera tornano a giocare alla cavallina, questa è cosa veramente buona e giusta, almeno per tutti coloro che hanno deciso di mutarsi in zucchero della terra.

.

Ogni stagione storica ha i suoi personaggi, ma in circostanze di questo genere sentiamo certamente la mancanza del Sommo Pontefice Giovanni Paolo II. Perché in casi più o meno analoghi, verificatisi ormai in numerose diocesi del mondo, non avrebbe esitato a chiamare dinanzi a sé i rispettivi vescovi. E per spirito di autentica carità cristiana gli assistenti di camera, prima del loro ingresso in udienza, avrebbero raccomandato: "Excellence, prima di recarsi dal Sommo Pontefice passi dalla Farmacia Vaticana, acquisti e indossi il pannolone di contenzione, perché sarebbe sicuramente imbarazzante, per lei come per chiunque, pisciarsi addosso dinanzi al Santo Padre». Oggi le cose sono cambiate, abbiamo il presbitero padovano Marco Pozza, for friends Don Spritz, that in jeans e scarpette da ginnastica slacciate va a intervistare il Santo Padre e che non avendo di meglio da fare pubblica un messaggio di auguri per una coppia di suoi amici gay in occasione del loro matrimonio, salvo correggere poco dopo il post cambiando la parola “marriage” with “unione civile”. Ciò che però solo importa è di non presentarsi dinanzi al Santo Padre con una talare romana addosso e un rispettoso ferraiolo sulle spalle, perché in quel caso si può correre il rischio di essere fulminati con uno sguardo. Ma tutto finirebbe con un’occhiata fulminea, perché per far pisciare addosso qualcuno occorrerebbe la tempra che all’occorrenza sapeva avere il Santo Pontefice Giovanni Paolo II, ma soprattutto sarebbe necessaria la sua santità, perché solo i Santi, when the case requires it, riescono anche a farti pisciare addosso per la salvezza della tua anima.

.

Mio amato e venerato Carlo Caffarra, provo santa invidia per te, che sei stato chiamato nel settembre 2017 alla Casa del Padre, dove vorrei essere anch’io, risparmiando così a me stesso l’abominio della desolazione che ci attende, why now, certi nostri pavidi e improvvidi vescovi, amorevoli verso il peccato ma stizzosi verso quei loro preti che il peccato osano sempre condannarlo, da tempo ci stanno facendo veramente aspirare la grande grazia della morte.

the Island of Patmos, 16 June 2022

.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.