“A touch of summer lightness” - Antonio Spadaro, I'm asking you for a friend: if lace and lace border on blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, the thighs of the Jesuits exhibited in front of the Supreme Pontiff instead fall within the fashion of the new course?

“A TOUCH OF SUMMER LIGHTNESS” - ANTONIO SPADARO, I ASK YOU FOR A FRIEND: IF LACE AND LACE REMAIN THE BLAST AGAINST THE HOLY SPIRIT, THE THIGHS OF THE JESUIT EXHIBITED IN FRONT OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF, INSTEAD IN THE FASHION OF THE NEW COURSE?

.

After the Supreme Pontiff Clemente XIII had suppressed the Society of Jesus in 1773 and the Superior General Lorenzo Ricci was imprisoned in Castel Sant’Angelo, to his death in 1775 the Master of the Order of Preachers commented: «Christ died crucified between two thieves, this is a dead thief between two crucifixes ".

- Actuality -

.

.

.

.

 

.

Beloved Brother Antonio Spadaro,

the Jesuit long thighs in audience with the Roman Pontiff, but the problem of great ecclesial and pastoral emergency are lace and lace …

I ask you, but I do it for a friend, since I am not interested in anything related to the Company of the Indies, which was in its time the Society of Jesus. If in fact God will grant me grace, I hope to live until the day that the Jesuits will be definitively suppressed by some Supreme Pontiff with previous experience as an oncology specialist, therefore used to treating degenerative tumors in the terminal phase.

.

Lately the Supreme Pontiff made a speech to a group of Sicilian priests, the last part of which recalled the song by Gino Paoli "We were four friends at the bar, who wanted to change the world ". The first part is very interesting, in the course of which he actually took issue with a mediocre and inadequate episcopate, made up of subjects all named strictly by him, or suggested to him by his closest trustees, who, if anything, took care to burn the candidacies of subjects of authentic value. But if, in some serious speeches, sarcastic jokes come in bursts, it is inevitable that the mass media will then focus only on those, reducing everything to the lashings directed at priests who would bivouac among lace and lace. While the speech in truth, or at least the entire first part of it, he was very serious. This is called the science or technique of communication, that you should know.

.

I don't know who to inform the Holy Father and above all that science fiction film script was told to him, because the Sicilian clergy, far from being a coven of lace-makers, if anything, embarrassed by his sloppiness. Finding priests in the summer who come to celebrate Holy Mass in flowered Bermuda shorts and flip-flops is something on the agenda, other than "grandmother's lace"! Most of them don't even wear chasubles or chasubles, only a shirt from which transpire under the shorts and a stole thrown over the shoulders. In short: its trustees, what plot of science fiction movies did they tell him to induce him to those "four friends at the bar" style jokes that diverted listeners and then commentators from everything very serious he had said just before?

.

It is not the first time that the Holy Father is expressed based on "they told me that ...", an expression that preludes the substratum of arguably reliable sources deriving from that clerical chatter that the Holiness of Our Lord has repeatedly pointed out and reproached with just reason. It may be that then there is a good chatter and a bad one? Or more simply: it may be that there are no longer people capable of responding? Because when a Bishop said to me «they told me that …», I said in reply: «They also told me so many things about her, but I take care not to call her to tell her ".

.

The 19 May 2022 you guided the editors of the European magazines of your Company of the Indies to an interview with the Supreme Pontiff, giving an account of it yourself with a article on La Civiltà Cattolica. In the photo that stands out in your article you can see a rather chubby woman covered in a tight skirt that leaves her legs uncovered 20 inches above the knees. Moreover we are talking about legs that are not exactly comparable to those of one top model, legs that should be covered and not exhibited.

.

Dear Antonio Spadaro, for consistency and spirit of truth I must declare that I have been a sinner in my life and unfortunately also a libertine. And women - I would lie if I denied it - I have known far and wide, especially beautiful. Then my conversion took place, my purification from the many sins of the flesh that I have committed and today I live in compliance with the sacred promises, without ever having failed in continence and chastity, by the grace of God. However, the sacred priestly order did not erase my memory, including the previous life of a sinful libertine. Because of this, meaning women certainly more than you, I take the liberty of giving you absolutely unsolicited advice: refer in my name to the Jesuit lady in question that she has neither legs nor body to wear such clothes and that the most suitable garment for her would have been a Roman toga, suitable for covering with dignified modesty what should not be shown at all, because completely inappropriate to show, especially in front of the Roman Pontiff.

.

I conclude with a question for a friend, long-time diplomat, born into a Protestant family but in fact agnostic. when in 2019 he went to the Supreme Pontiff in private audience with his beautiful wife, also not Catholic, the Lady had a skirt that covered her 20 inches below the knees, although summer had i sticky and the dress buttoned down to the neck, her arms covered up to the wrists and a black veil on her head. All this because she was a non-Catholic woman who was deeply respectful of the August Person of the Roman Pontiff, of the place where he was and of the ceremonial. Well, if this non-Catholic diplomat saw the photo of yours Jesuit lady shocked and asked me for guidance, you think you can answer him? Because for my part I could only reply that today, in the Catholic Church, the problem is only lace and lace which in concrete facts are equivalent to an authentic blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

.

After the Supreme Pontiff Clement XIII had suppressed the Society of Jesus in 1773 and the Superior General Lorenzo Ricci was imprisoned in Castel Sant’Angelo, to his death in 1775 the Master of the Order of Preachers commented: «Christ died crucified between two thieves, this is a dead thief between two crucifixes ".

.

Looking forward to your next and I hope near definitive suppression, I offer you a fraternal greeting.

the Island of Patmos, 17 June 2022

.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.