THE QUESTION OF "A CUM». IN COMMUNION WITH THOSE WHO CELEBRATE THE HOLY MASS BENEDICT XVI? THERE IS WITNESS THIS AMONG THE MANY A CARDINAL AND A PRIEST: «A CUM FAMOUS YOUR POPE OUR FRANCISCO»

Simone Pifizzi presbyter of the Archdiocese of Florence, he informed us that he concelebrated with Benedict XVI and Cardinal Ernst Simoni on 11 February 2017. During the sacred celebration, made with the Roman Missal of Saint Paul VI, arrived at the point in the canon where the Supreme Pontiff is mentioned, Benedict XVI spoke these clear and precise words: una cum fámulo your Pope our Francisco …».

- Actuality -

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Vatican CITY 11 February 2017, Monastero Mother of the Church: iThe Holy Father Benedict XVI with Cardinal Ernst Simoni and the Florentine presbyter Simone Pifizzi in the sacristy before Holy Mass.

February 11 2013 the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, 265° Successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter, with a formal act formalizes its own declaration of renunciation of the government of the Church. The canon 331 §2 of the Code of Canon Law states:

.

«In the event that the Roman Pontiff renounces his office, it is required for validity that the renunciation be made freely and duly manifested, instead it is not required that someone accept it " [cf.. WHO].

.

Throughout history the resignation of the Roman Pontiff of the Church occurred very rarely, to be precise solo 9 times in two millennia of history. It is a very personal act that concerns the most intimate and unquestionable conscience of the renouncer. Also for this reason the canon specifies: "It is not believed that anyone accepts it".

.

It would be an alteration of the real data omitting to say that Benedict XVI has chosen to make his own free, unquestionable and valid waiver by adopting methods that have left the most distinguished canonists bewildered - S. AND. Mons. Giuseppe Sciacca, the Jesuit Gianfranco Ghirlanda, the Dominican Bruno Esposito ―, we priests and theologians, to follow up with the Catholic faithful. Giving up he would have to go back to his status preceding the election to the sacred throne, farewell il Vescovo Joseph Luigi Ratzinger. Not even a cardinal, the cardinalate being a pure honorary title that the Roman Pontiff loses when he is elected, while the episcopate, which is a sacrament by which the fullness of the apostolic priesthood is transmitted to the consecrated person, it remains indelible for eternity.

.

Benedict XVI, or who for him, has created confusion by adopting a method that we could technically define "extravagant", as the most expert canonists have politely defined it, but also a scholar of the Cardinal's caliber Walter Brandmuller, considered the greatest ecclesiologist and historian of the Church at the present time. In fact, when the name "pope emeritus" came out, we were all blown away. Then, that this gimmick of which at the moment it is not known who was the real creator, was deemed unhappy, there is no proof that nine years later it never crossed anyone's mind to establish the institution of the "pope emeritus" in the body of ecclesiastical laws and to insert it with a special canon in the Code of Canon Law. All this proves this monster he is destined to die with Benedict XVI and never to be exhumed again, especially considering what has caused confusion in many fragile faithful, not to mention the off-balance subjects plunged into the most vulgar conspiracy.

.

the Holy Father Benedict XVI with the Florentine presbyter Simone Pifizzi who exhibits him a volume of art

To better understood we will give as an example two extreme cases that fall within those that some psychiatrist friends of the Biomedical Campus of Rome have indicated and classified as serious psychosis due to the total alteration of the cognitive abilities of characters not adhering to reality, afflicted with severe schizophrenia and hypertrophic narcissism of a violent and destructive type.

.

The first of these two subjects is a Sicilian presbyter who has been supporting ridiculous and absurd fictional theological theses for some years and for this reason it is right not to take seriously: "Benedict XVI was forced by violence to make an act of renunciation and his successor is a heretical and apostate antipope". the “irrefutable evidence” brought by this subject evidently suffering from cerebral disconnection syndrome are the following: "The renouncing pontiff continued to wear white", "To sign with the pontifical initials", but above all because «in the Latin text of his declaration there are several Latin syntax errors that would make the waiver completely invalid ". When I decided to publicly deny it, or to mock him, as it is right to do with those who affirm nonsense to which it is not possible to give any seriousness, i used my page Facebook, avoiding advertising on the de columns The Island of Patmos, magazine visited by millions of readers, considering that our average is approximately 1.800.000 / 2.000.000 visits per month for a total of over twenty million visits per year.

.

Not being able to argue on the merits of the questions raised with scientific theological and juridical rigor as a solemn denial of his foolishness, this gentleman reacted like a squawking duck, accusing me of being jealous of his extraordinary charisma, of which, according to him, I would be lacking, enough to be a candidate - I add - for liver cancer because of the envy that gnaws at me. And so, convinced like all compulsive narcissists that others are mortally wounded if their qualities are questioned by those with intellectual qualities, logical and speculative are lacking, he pointed to me as an ignorant subject in the theological sciences who abuses the title of theologian without being one. Next he pointed to me as a guy picked up on the street by a bishop, made a priest by mistake and today a wandering cleric ... and other amenities that made me laugh, my Bishop - without whose approval I have never moved a step - and all those who know me in both the ecclesiastical and civil fields.

.

Purely rhetorical question: one who shoots lies in bursts, may think of destroying the interlocutor or hurting his "intellectual pride", after this subject has been judged by the Holy Church to such an extent lacking in balance and credibility as to end up first excommunicated then discharged from the clerical state? Let's also admit that I am the worst presbyter in Italy and that in addition to not being a theologian I am half illiterate in the context of Catholic doctrine. Let's take it all for real. But then we must ask ourselves: the church, who suspended a divine? Who declared excommunicated for schism and heresy? In the end, with a measure as rare as it is serious, who is it who has resigned from the clerical state? Me, or this sublime doctor who accuses me of being a wandering cleric who abuses the title of theologian? Because I am in communion with the Bishop who gave me and never revoked the mandate to celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice of the Holy Mass, to preach and administer confessions, ie to exercise i three gifts priestly: the task of sanctifying (the power to sanctify), the task of teaching (the power to teach), governing office O governor (the power to rule / governing the People of God). Indeed, the the priestly power, they are not acquired with the useless academic papers obtained and today pulled after anyone in decadent and expired ecclesiastical universities, but with priestly consecration. And in the Catholic Church there is no title superior to that deriving from priestly consecration, least of all the title of doctor of sacred theology, through which the gifts of grace of the Holy Spirit have never been conferred and i three gifts.

.

Having clarified these foundations of sacramental dogmatics, fanatics following this brain disconnected should ask themselves: but to this Lord, who has conferred a similar mandate to exercise i three gifts priestly, recognizing him at the same time as an eminent theologian for high merits of heresy and schism? This one, with those who are in communion, who gave him the mandate to exercise the sacred ministry? Because I - pointed out as a wandering cleric -, I am in communion and in obedience to my Bishop. His, with those in communion of obedience? One thing is beyond doubt: to this Lord, the church, the mandate has totally revoked it after having suspended it a divine In the 2017, having notified him of the excommunication automatic for heresy and schism in 2018, until you hit it in the 2022 with the most extreme measure: dismissal from the clerical state. So what is obvious: an excommunicated for heresy and schism to which the Church has revoked the faculty to exercise the sacred priestly ministry and who finally has discharged and expelled from the Catholic clergy, which despite, from the height of his dismissal from the clerical state, dispenses to priests in communion and in obedience to the Church licenses of theologians or non-theologians, is equivalent to the most hilarious and hilarious theater of the burlesque. Or to put it with a realistic example: it is equivalent to the owner of a brothel in Amsterdam who starts to review the chaste virtues of the Poor Clares of the strict observance of the Monastery of Santa Chiara in Assisi.

.

the Holy Father Benedict XVI during the celebration of the Holy Mass in the chapel of the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery

This priest resigned from the clerical state for years he has been addressing the Supreme Pontiff Francis and us priests, guilty, according to him, of being "in communion with the false pope usurper and apostate acolyte of the antichrist", with such ferocious violence and hatred as to make the most antipapist Luther pale. The hysterical duck has come to give birth to such absurdities in front of which we priests and we theologians would laugh for days, if he had not gathered around him a small following of unfortunates - in the etymological sense of the term: outside the grace of God - who in turn have become serial haters active in spreading hatred towards the Supreme Pontiff and "the false anthichristic church", going crazy on social media where they repeat like trained parrots the identical nonsense of their poor disconnected deranged.

.

In support of the "invalid resignation of Benedict XVI" the hysterical duck brings reasons worthy of a comic film of the various grotesque series of the seventies. Given therefore that the resignation of Benedict XVI would be, according to him, invalid, consequently the Successor would be an antipope, with the aggravating circumstance of being an "apostate heretic" who "as a perfect acolyte of the Arian heresy does not believe in the divinity of Christ", as well as guilty of having "demolished the Marian dogmas" and "replaced the cult of the Virgin Mary with that of Pachamama", which moreover he is neither an idol nor a pagan deity, just to clarify. From this it would follow that all of us priests who "celebrate Masses in communion with the false heretical and apostate pope", to say of this sublime theologian we celebrate "Invalid Masses" and administer to the faithful "Invalid Sacraments". Get ready this video you can hear this subject's delusions of hatred with your ears, evaluating what, but above all who we are talking about.

.

In its time several theologians intervened who produced and disseminated videos of denial for the sake of the health of souls. He did it with one of his videos the excellent Dominican theologian Francesco Maria Marino, I did it with my video and other theologians have done so with various writings and articles. He did it with one of his videos disclosure Dorotea Lancellotti, a woman of profound Catholic faith and a talented catechist for four decades. As usual, far from entering into the merits of the theological and juridical issues with which we have blatantly wronged him, the hysterical duck has always reacted with direct attacks on people, uttering colossal lies, giving false news about their lives, on their priesthood and mocking their theological formation. If, therefore, the undersigned has accused me of being a "wandering cleric" who "abuses the title of theologian", to the Dominican Francesco Maria Marino, who, as a learned Thomist theologian, denied it by explaining how seriously he abused the absurd of Aquinas theology, showing not to understand it and to manipulate its texts, instead of replying on the merits, he replied teasingly that when he spoke "he opened and rolled his eyes too much".

.

Following the hysterical duck then a journalist joined us to whom we have already dedicated a solemn denial, that to try to "go down in history" has come to give life to the saga pontifex-fantasy. Here then is Benedict XVI, in addition to having "invalidly renounced under the constraint of strong powers and international Freemasonry", he would even start talking in code. Obviously, the discoverer and translator of the so-called "Benedict Code", he is the scientist in question.

.

These are the levels to which such characters arrive without the pain of human ridicule: if the elderly Benedict XVI blinks his eyelids three times, it is not a natural movement of the face as many might believe, but of a Morse code with which he is speaking while he finds himself a prisoner of those who today govern "the false church of the heretical and apostate antipope". In association with the hysterical duck, this journalist who discovered and interpreter of the cryptic "Benedict Code" also claims the "invalidity of the Holy Masses and of the Sacraments celebrated by us in communion with the false pope". In short: a pair of scientists capable of recalling George & Mildred, famous television series of the eighties.

.

the concelebrants at the Holy Mass with the Holy Father Benedict XVI, on the right Cardinal Ernst Simone, on the left the Florentine presbyter Simone Pifizzi

For reasons of ministry and publishing activity, the editorial confreres and I are in contact with many priests, bishops, members of the Roman Curia. Our brother Simone Pifizzi presbyter of the Archdiocese of Florence, who met Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as a seminarian and was able to spend several days with him when as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith he was a guest at their seminary, he informed us that he had concelebrated with Benedict XVI and the Cardinal Ernest Simon 11 February 2017. During the sacred celebration, made with the Roman Missal of Saint Paul VI, arrived at the point in the canon where the Supreme Pontiff is mentioned, Benedict XVI spoke these clear and precise words:

.

«[…] in the first place, what we offer for your holy Catholic Church: how to make peace, to keep, to unite and govern the whole world: una cum fámulo your Pope our Francisco …»

.

With all the irony more shrewd typical of the Florentines, the confrere assured us that at that point of the Holy Mass there were not two henchmen placed on the side to the right and to the left with their respective revolvers aimed at the temples of Benedict XVI, nor was a drone flying into the chapel above the altar, ready to trigger the deadly command by the strong powers who, after the act of renunciation, have inserted a microchip subcutaneous to the Venerable Pontiff to cause him a cardiac arrest on command as soon as it became excessively uncomfortable. During the Holy Mass, Benedict XVI was calm, free, serene and taken by the sacredness of the Eucharistic celebration.

.

the Holy Father Benedict XVI at the end of the Holy Mass, to his left, Cardinal Ernst Simoni, on the right the Florentine presbyter Simone Pifizzi who takes his leave with a kiss in his hand

Perhaps it all could have been avoided wearing a black cassock, maintaining the indelible episcopal character and returning to being Bishop Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger. Because for the birth of certain monsters, from the heretical and schismatic priest resigned from the clerical state to the journalist who has been producing stories for two years pontifex-fantasy, we must also thank Benedict XVI, without detracting from his theology, to his teaching and holiness of life. On the other hand, it is he himself who clarifies:

.

«[…] the Twelve Apostles were not perfect men, chosen for their moral and religious irreproachability. They were believers, Yes, full of enthusiasm and zeal, but at the same time marked by their human limitations, sometimes even serious. So, Jesus did not call them because they were already saints, complete, perfect, but in order for it to become, that they might be transformed to turn so the story. Everything as for us " [Brindisi, 15 June 2008, full text].

.

And if we think about it, the Apostles made many and even more serious errors, starting with Peter who combined enough and from which the succession of Roman Pontiffs takes life, the last of which, by legitimate line of succession, is the reigning Pontiff Francis.

.

From the island of Patmos, 24 May 2022

.

.

The Fathers editors de The Island of Patmos they thank Cardinal Ernst Simoni and their dear and esteemed brother Simone Pifizzi, presbyter of the Archdiocese of Florence for their testimony, aware that since 2013 following are numerous cardinals, bishops and priests who can attest to the same after having participated or concelebrated with the Holy Father Benedict XVI in the chapel of his private residence in the Vatican. Among the numerous of these testimonies, we limited ourselves to taking one as an example among many similar ones.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.