The reasons of don Alessandro Minutella must remain in the communion of the Church and to serve the Church in obedience to the Church

REASONS FOR DON ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA SHOULD REMAIN IN THE COMMUNION OF THE CHURCH AND IN THE SERVICE OF THE CHURCH IN OBEDIENCE TO THE CHURCH

.

Today, some thinkers, and unfortunately many clergymen, They have passed the same Luther, which in comparison - it goes without saying it is a paradox -, ends up be more orthodox of them. From these cases then we see that there is more contrast between modernists and Catholic, than between Lutherans and Catholics. Catholics are more united with Luther that the modernist. The main problem of unity among Christians, today, It is not so much that of the union with the Lutherans - there's also this, obviously -, but rather that of 'unity among Catholics.

.

.

Author John Cavalcoli OP
Author
John Cavalcoli, OP

.

.

Dear Brother Priest

InLESSANDRO MINUTELLA

Priest of the Church of Palermo

.

.

PDF format Print article

.

.

Minutella homily
it Presbítero Alessandro Minutella, sermon "The embarrassment of the false church» [to open the video click on the image]

the news of the decree of your Bishop He was surprised and saddened, because recently I heard some of your homilies in which you earnestly denounced the spread of many heresies in the Church type modernistic, declaring at the same time, in critical tone towards the Lefebvrians, your respect for the decrees of the Second Vatican Council and complaining about their performance in the modernist sense.

.

These your words coincide with what I am arguing publicly for many years, so I suffered unjust measures by the authorities. How you claim you, Today in the Church the modernist trend has become so established, which it is also widespread among Bishops, so that they favor the modernists and punish anti-modernists. And how can you determine, We Fathers de The island of Patmos We are writing for some years about these serious problems, Just browse our store to find dozens of writings on this specific topic.

.

I know that your Bishop has motivated the decree citing you, while it is free from heretical infections, break the ecclesial communion. You, instead, from your hand, you feel unjustly punished and you quoted the authority of St. Thomas about. I state that I do not have enough information to form an opinion, but I offer you some criteria derived from Angelic Doctor.

.

Minutella appeal to Francis
Alessandro Minutella appeal to the Supreme Pontiff Francis [to open the video click on the image]

First of all must be for you a great satisfaction the fact he had been assured by your Bishop was not a heretic, considered, as I said before, the current widespread heresy even between the hierarchy and the theologians. At the same time I am amazed inconsistency of your bishop but allows a heretic as Enzo Bianchi to make a public lecture in his cathedral church [cf. recent article by Ariel S. Levi Gualdo, WHO]. Indeed, Enzo Bianchi, There are authoritative rebuttals, like that of our dear and esteemed brother Antonio Livi, while on this online magazine of the Fathers The island of Patmos I have refuted several times and severely; is also one document in preparation study to which Dr.. Jorge Facio Lince has been working for months [some of our other articles on Enzo Bianchi heresies are still readable WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc ..]

.

As for the teaching of Aquinas in terms of criminal decrees, he distinguishes an undue Decree [excommunication due;] because of the contempt of the law by the authority [the opinion of law being observed]. "So, if part of the judgment that there is an error, to render void the judgment, it has no effect ». So those affected can not take this into account.

.

"If the ruling is right, it is to be punished and must obey humbly, and it will be his merit; or it must ask the Superior the annulment of the decree; or recourse must be had to a higher level. If he showed contempt for the decree, thereby sinning mortally " [Sum. Theol., Suppl., q. 21, a. 4]. I am unable to advise you on which path to take. You stand, in consciousness, before God, make the decision. I can cite my own case, who has found the following solution. Following my broadcast on Radio Maria, the 30 October, in which I talked about divine punishment, my Superior I partially suspended peep the 5 following November, by publishing a statement against me infected by heresy, that denies the original sin [in these articles is my defense: WHO, WHO, in this next trilogy Instead it shows that my case was mounted by environment-related lobby gay, WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

lorefice vigil 1
daily news on “If Alessandro Minutella” [to open the video click on the image]

Judgment obviously unjust that against me, to which I I adeguai in obedience, without failing to explain in detail my reasons to the Superior. But there was nothing to be done. He did not answer me either. Then, in late January, I appeal to higher court, getting satisfaction. Two days after the Superior reinstated me in the fullness of my priestly functions. But the question, serious, of divine punishment, It remains open in the field of contemporary theology. The same Pontiff, in his speech to the earthquake victims during his visit to the Carpi 2 last April, he mentioned the consequences of original sin in the following words: "Our soul, created for life, He suffers hearing that his thirst for eternal good is oppressed by an ancient and evil dark ' [cf. video, WHO, WHO].

.

The Church teaches the priest He must see the Bishop as his immediate superior, which, however, it represents the Pope, to which, ultimately goes obedience to supreme level on this earth. The communion with the bishop and the local Church is subject to communion with the Supreme Pontiff.

.

Today we are in an ecclesial situation in which there are modernists Bishops or Lefebvrians, who are not in full communion with the Vicar of Christ or pretend to be; on the contrary, while the first, careerists and bullies, flatter him and pressed on him with a style that looks like the mafia, seconds, on the basis of an incorrect reference to Tradition, reject the teachings of Vatican II and the Mass new world order, and disobey the Pope openly [cf. article in the 2015 Ariel S. Levi Gualdo, WHO].

.

lorefice vigil 2
about three thousand faithful packed the Cathedral of Palermo to huddle in prayer around their Bishop [to open the video click on the image]

The unity of the local Church He must always take - priests and Bishop together - making the head unit of the Church Universal Roman, drawing inspiration from it and submitting it. This loyalty and obedience to the Pope and the Magisterium of the Church is the only treasure that we Catholics possess among all non-Catholic Christian brothers. These supreme values ​​I could deepen thanks to the experience that I have done since 1982 to the 1990 as the official Secretary of State of John Paul II. Near the Pope and as collaborators of the Pope can make a beautiful and most fruitful experience of the universal Church, which does not detract at all, indeed does better understand the dignity and autonomy of the local church.

.

This wide and universal outlook, this bond with the Pope not to mention the immediate superior, but right through him, is, as it were, in DNA the spirituality of us Dominicans, we make our profession of obedience to our Provincial Superior, of course, but beyond him and beyond him, our total profess obedience to the Supreme Pontiff.

.

Today the papacy has more than ever need to be helped, He warned in his ministry and defended by all the people of God, especially by the true prophets and the anime-victim, and because never before has he tried, threatened and besieged by Satanic forces who pretend to be friends, and instead they want to bring it down, and because unfortunately - something that never happened in the entire history of the Church - a crisis of faith has crept within the same episcopate and of the College of Cardinals and, consequently, They have arisen in the Church bitterly opposed factions and divisions [cf. Ariel S. Levi Gualdo, WHO] - case in point the opposition between Lefebvre and modernists - right on the issue of the truths of faith.

.

lorefice vigil 3
S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

There is more contrast between Rahner and St. Thomas Aquinas than between Luther and St. Thomas Aquinas. For Luther God is creator, for Teilhard de Chardin God is organizer of matter. For Luther the atheist is in error, Rahner instead for the atheist is an unwitting believer. For Luther God is omnipotent, David Maria Turoldo is weak. For Luther God is a You in front of 'I, Marco Vannini l 'I It is the "absolute subject". Luther admitted the immutability of dogma, Walter Kasper la Nega. Luther condemned atheism, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini said that in the consciousness of the believer there is always an atheist. For Luther, faith is knowing the truth - that is, the Word of God -, many Catholic theologians is a "athematic and existential encounter" with Christ …

.

… Luther Christianity is at the top of other religions, for Dupuis is one religion among others, Pair of other. For Luther the true religion is Christianity, however for Schillebeeckx it is the global federation of all religions [cf. my articles WHO, WHO]. For Luther the Christian only has the gift of the Spirit, however Raimundo Panikkar, the Indian mystic is the same as Christian. For Luther Muslims are enemies of the gospel, Instead Rahner are "anonymous Christians" [cf. my article WHO]. Luther believed in the next world; Gutiérrez said that the only world is this world. Luther thought that Adam and Eve were really existed; Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi said that the account of man's creation is an etiological myth [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi Gualdo WHO]. Luther admits the Biblical account of man's creation, while Teilhard de Chardin says that man comes from monkeys.

.

Luther distinguishes the body from the spirit; Teilhard de Chardin says that evolution matter becomes spirit [cf. my article WHO]. Luther believed in the immortality of the soul, Vito Mancuso denies. Luther believed in the resurrection of the dead at the end of the world, per Rahner, instead, the resurrection takes place immediately after death. Luther believed in the divine punishment, Raniero Cantalamessa and Hermes Ronchi do not believe [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi Gualdo, WHO]. Luther believed in hell, von Balthasar says that "exists" but that "is empty". Luther believed in the existence of the devil, many Catholic exegetes do not believe.

.

lorefice vigil 4
S.It is prayer. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

For Luther Trinity Three Persons, Rahner are three ways to be God. Luther recognized the Filioque, for Melloni, which instead is wire-orthodox, if you can do without. Luther was quite certain of what Christ said, Father Arturo Sosa S.J. He says that we are not sure [cf. article by Ariel S. Levi Gualdo, WHO]. For Luther was a heretic Arius, Arius was right for Bianchi, as it seems to have said recently in your church cathedral [cf. texts lectiones Enzo Bianchi, WHO, WHO]. Luther acknowledged the deity of Christ, Schillebeeckx believes Christ alone il "eschatological prophet". For Luther believe that Christ is the Redeemer, It is an absolute truth, Instead Marcello Bordoni, Christ can freely interpret, choice, or as a redeemer or "martyr prophet", as one prefers. For Luther Christ is the only Savior, Giuseppe Dossetti Jews are also saved without Christ.

.

Luther accepted the Christological dogma of Chalcedon, Bruno Forte interprets the Incarnation in the Hegelian sense [cf. my article, WHO]. For Luther Christ is the God of Truth, while de la Potterie simply Christ teaches us the Gospel. As for Luther the atoning sacrifice of Christ is the truth of faith, for Cardinal Robert Zollitsch the idea of ​​atonement is medieval image exceeded. For Luther Christ's sacrifice was wanted by the Father for our salvation, Schillebeeckx for the death of Christ was not a sin offering, but only a crime caused by human malice.

.

Luther distinguished thought from reality: duty of thinking is adapted to the real. Instead, for Rahner, the real is identified with the thought, so my idea is reality: the self is always right. Luther recognized that we have to obey the Ten Commandments, Rahner while everyone is free to decide for themselves of their identity. For Luther consciousness is submitted to the word of God, while Cardinal Walter Kasper is the source of truth [the cogito of Descartes] and for the Father Arturo Sosa excels on everything [cf. my article, WHO, Our answers to the Readers WHO, etc ..]. Luther knows that sin is a tremendous evil, which it is only removed from the Cross of Christ, per Teilhard de Chardin, instead, sin is simply a negligible hiccup in the unstoppable path Evolution [Kasper see my articles WHO, WHO]

.

lorefice vigil 5
S.It is prayer. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

Luther was against Pelagio, for which grace was the prize to the works, instead, per Rahner, the grace is the vertex human self-transcendence. Luther said that it is only justified those who believe, who does not believe, it is condemned, instead, per Rahner, all are justified, because all have faith, least "implied, preconscious and athematic ". Luther believed in original sin, Nunzio Galantino does not believe [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi Gualdo WHO]. Luther condemned sodomy, Bianchi approves. Vincenzo Paglia does great things about Pannella, approving the confusion between the sexes [cf. my article WHO], Luther recognized the distinction between men and women and he condemned as immoral Pannella. Luther judges modernity according to the Gospel, modernists judge the Gospel according to modernity.

.

Today, some thinkers, and unfortunately many clergymen, They have passed the same Luther, which in comparison - it goes without saying it is a paradox -, ends up be more orthodox of them. From these cases then we see that there is more contrast between modernists and Catholic, than between Lutherans and Catholics. Catholics are more united with Luther that the modernist. The main problem of unity among Christians, today, It is not so much that of the union with the Lutherans - there's also this, obviously -, but rather that of 'unity among Catholics. Modernists, who boast of dialogue with the Lutherans, They end up absorbing the heresies of Luther, giving them a Catholic painting and despising actually Luther, by them as a fundamentalist overcome by the "historical-critical exegesis".

.

Dear Don Alessandro, your battle against modernism is more legitimate than ever, necessary and appropriate. The modernists have come to a very high directional seats, among the collaborators of the Pope or presenting themselves as friends of the Pope, while the crafty sycophants and Judah, that would impose, as mobsters, their shady plans Masonic subservience of the Church to the powers of the world [cf. article in the 2015 Ariel S. Levi Gualdo, WHO] . We must do everything possible to free the Holy Father from this deadly embrace and these occult powers, who put the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI in the position of having to give freely to the Petrine ministry.

.

lorefice vigil 6
running commentary, Eucharistic Adoration in the Cathedral presided by S.It is. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily [to open the video click on the image]

I think this is a purifying and sanctifying mission, Our Lady entrusted you, along with your service to the noble and ancient Church Palermo, that today suffer in you, suffering in Bishop, He suffers in good faithful, He suffers for the sins of all, but while this Palermo do not miss the mercy of the Father and the Holy Spirit consolation, That all summons to penance, to reconciliation, to communion and peace, under the guidance of legitimate Shepherd, not without human weakness, Yet Servant of your souls in the name and by mandate of Christ. Therefore listen, help and follow your bishop !

.

Take yourself, dear Don Alessandro, a long period of pause and reflection hermitical, I listen to the voice of the Lord, like the prophet Elijah: "Go out and stand on the mountain before the Lord's presence" [I Re 19, 11] and wait "a light wind murmuring" [v.12]. It is the wind of the Holy Spirit. Accept orders, win the temptations. China head before the divine Majesty. Beseech mercy for your sins and those of sinners. Abandoned in the hands of the God of mercy. In the words of St. Caterina da Siena: "Rest on the Cross". Soon you will be rebuilt in the fullness of your priestly functions and increasing its fully the gifts God gave you.

.

New and great tasks await, new achievements for your sanctification, to that of the Pope, for the good of the universal Church, for the Church of Palermo, for Italy, for world evangelization, for the salvation of souls, for the kingdom of Christ, for the triumph of Mary, for the defeat of Satan.

.

lorefice appeal to the united
S. AND. Rev.ma Mons. Corrado Lorefice, Primate Archbishop of Palermo and Sicily, call for unity of the Church [to open the video click on the image]

Very moving and a harbinger of celestial favors was the recent and happy collective eucharistic adoration cathedral with four thousand people and the Bishop meekly on his knees before the Blessed Sacrament, to plead with songs and tears light, pace, pardon, love, harmony and unity for the Church Palermo. I feel for you all, dear brothers in faith, admiration, compassion and tenderness. I remember in prayer. Pray for me.

.

Confirm the blood pact with Christ: He gives you his blood; you give Him your. The sin is washed with blood, the blood of the New Covenant. We Romagna - not to mention the Tuscan! ―, Sicilians like you have the hot blood: we may sometimes verbally violent, but always generous.

.

Madonna vera, flesh and blood, is merciful and tender with the humble, but it is terrible with the proud; is the Madonna at Fatima showed the little shepherds the damned in hell; Madonna is the one that glorifies the Lord because he has "scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts" [LC 1,51]. that Madonna, Seat of Wisdom, which he is winner of Satan and of all heresies.

.

Cathedral of Palermo
the splendid cathedral primatial Metro Palermo, dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary assumed into heaven

She will protect you and defend all, beginning with your Bishop; She is, or Palermitani, the heavenly Presidio of your Diocese and the wiles of the enemy infiltration and support you in the good fight.

.

Fight against principalities, against powers! [If the 6, 12]. By Caterina da Siena, confidate, generous Palermitani, that soon you will be a sign for the Italian Church and cry with Catherine: "Fire! Fire! Fire!». Soon they will come down abundant graces upon you all and Italy will be inflamed.

.

With esteem and affection in the Lord.

Varazze, 7 April 2017

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

About isoladipatmos

9 thoughts on "The reasons of don Alessandro Minutella must remain in the communion of the Church and to serve the Church in obedience to the Church

  1. Do not go into the merits of what don Minutella goes though preaching, if he's right, the best way which would have the devil to get rid of him and have both hands free to damage the inside, as unfortunately he is doing, The Church, It is to convince him to leave the Church: from outside will only succeed to divide, never heal.

  2. Reverend father,

    She has written many fine words but lots, But as always he covers his eyes to harsh reality. She studied a lot while I am ignorant, but in my ignorance I wondered: “It is true that there are modernist bishops, but who chose these bishops? Who has replaced the bishops faithful to the sound doctrine with modernist bishops? What is The Authority approving this?”.

    Maybe I think it would be better to remain silent and not to judge who has understood.

    A bishop should be punished disobedient as with a priest and this is not done for years and then it is plausible that “who keeps silent consents”.

    1. Cara Anna,

      modernist bishops, rather than being chosen, They have been imposed by itself, with inflexible determination, elegant cunning, and endless stables and deception, at the height of a progressive increase of their influence, over the past fifty years, during which the modernists, initially simple theologians or priests, systematically they gave rise to power, without that authority it is able to arrest them, or has noticed, because they always have enjoyed more or less overt protection of other unworthy authorities. So the modernist bishops today are children of modernist bishops yesterday, which in turn they were formed by other modernists: "Blind guides blind", Christ would say.

      It all started with the Blessed Paul VI, at the time of which the phenomenon was quite content. But Paul VI, although acute intelligence and critical sense, not warned enough danger. He had too much respect for certain foxes, especially rahneriani; He believed that they were in good faith. He was thinking to solve everything through dialogue and courtesy, but he never wanted to punish them.
      He was aware of the errors, but it did not provide sufficiently to a formation of the clergy, that kept him away from the influence modernist. So the weed was able to grow, until you get to the size of today. The priests, become bishops, They ordered in turn modernist priests and the species began to breed.

      Now modernism, after reaching the episcopate, tip of the College of Cardinals and the Roman Curia itself: of course, the dream of a Melloni, a Kasper or from a Fort or White would be to see a modernist Pope, and that they present to the gullible crowds.

      From here a false worldwide success of the current Pope. They believe they are now just steps dall'agognata goal, but they will have a bitter disappointment, why did the Vicar of Christ will yield to heresy. But to many people, the rest, modernism, with its comfortable and fashionable life, do not mind at all.

      The Pope now has to make a bad game good face and content of the elements that may have available. Some if it keeps them neighbors probably hoping to recover them or they do not do much damage. The rest, also they have good qualities, that can be used.

      He could get good employees, but these are intimidated by the atmosphere of fear established by modernist power, which prevents them to open up the way to the Pope, so that these hard to track them and to contact them, being few, marginalized and vilified in the eyes of the Pope by modernist entourage.

      What the Church needs today, is that from the inside of the episcopate and of the College of Cardinals will emerge men of God, welcome to the Holy Father and at the same zealous for sound doctrine and the good of the Church, that, animated by prudence and apostolic fortitude, help the pope to free the Church from modernism, separating therein the chaff from the grain and thus stimulating a good time the Church on the path of real implementation of the Council.

  3. Dear fathers John and Ariel,

    I am writing from a mission country very far from Italy, where I follow with interest your writings and spiritual fruits. I have no questions to ask, I would tell (almost can serve), my story to don Alessandro Minutella, if by chance you read ...

    I am an Italian priest 52 year old, I entered the minor seminar in 11 years and 24 I was ordained. And here it should open a long speech on ... "Children priests", but I go further.

    In 32 years comes the crisis, aggravated by the solitude in which the priests often live, and in that situation comes the "Company" more wrong ... she 36 year old, divorced and the mother of a creature. After a period of hiding I came out into the open in the worst way, I declared my relationship, I attacked celibacy, I called the Reformed Church, I took it with the bishop, etc. .. etc. ..
    For several days the press talked me, There were those who even called me a hero, many took my parts, secularists shouted "victory!"...

    I realize, to 20 years away, that these scripts are all identical: stances in favor of the priest … defense of the priest … exaltation of the rebel priest “It took courage to …” …. which came into the open ... etc. .. etc. ..

    Final results: suspension a divinis and then defrocking.

    They light went out, supporters disappeared after a few days of tam-tam, and I found more than just me first and endless problems. And I can not, which, narrating years of life, years of darkness.

    In 2010 in Rome I met Father Ariel, andandomi to confess before Christmas, and starting the confession saying that I was a former priest. On the other side of the confessional grateful I am hit by a baritone voice that tells me: "A priest is never" ex ", the sacramental character received is permanent and eternal ". They followed days and days of talks, in a continuous and constant relationship.

    In 2012 I was re-admitted to "test" after 11 years to the exercise of the ministry, with the right to celebrate Mass in private (I celebrated in a house of elderly sisters), without being able to preach and confess. In 2013 I left fidei donum in a mission country, where after 6 months they were conferred all the powers of the bishop. After another year I was incardinated in the diocese where I am now.

    Alexander, as soon as I became aware of your case, I wrote to Father Ariel ... "why do not you try and help him?”. He told me that he tried to look for but to no avail.

    Dear Alexander, You can be a good speaker (and six), you can have a good theological training (e that the hai), you have every reason (and in several respects hast) ... but you need, this, if you do not listen to anyone other than yourself?

    From serious trouble, I I came out when I began to listen to others, not only myself and the reasons of myself.

    Believe me: your story, It is not different from mine in its bottom substance, you will do the end that I did 20 years ago, and you will understand what it means to be alone, then when the lights go out and the spectators return home at the end of the film after the end of the film, because these stories are repeated all the same, whether it be a slip for a woman, or whether it's other skid.

    Luca, Italian missionary priest

  4. Reverend P. John Cavalcoli,

    I carefully read your article, I make a proposal: We are launching a major campaign, by appeals and exhortations various signatures so that they free the reigning Pope, Prisoner of the modernists forced by these to every nefarious act of government, rendered totally incapable of acting. If the Pope was rescued surely it would soon be restored justice and truth in the Church. Poor Papa, pray for him so that he can regain the freedom and self-control.

    1. She takes on a tone of joke, and resumed my speech by making a picture of the current ecclesial situation purposely exaggerated and grotesque, waves have greater ease for his irony entirely inappropriate and derisive, and maybe to solve everything with a good laugh. This makes me realize that you do not make no account of the drama that is now experiencing the Church and with her the Holy Father.

      The fact is that unfortunately hard to find another explanation to this tragic situation, to which I alluded, It has long been known to observers, It never happened in the history of the Church, a Pope who uses employees heretics or schismatics, without of course exclude the presence of capable staff and faithful.

      The cases are in fact two: or the Pope is in a state of need or he is conniving. This second hypothesis is impossible, because there can not be a heretic Pope. The rest, Pope Francis, apart from some of its ambiguous expressions, liable to be interpreted In good part, avoids making his theses of those unworthy collaborators, indeed repeatedly he taught the opposite truth, as it should face a Pope, guardian of the faith and of sound doctrine. All that remains is the first hypothesis. And with that I fall into what I said in the previous answer, to which I refer.

      To her it seems paradoxical and perhaps even ridiculous to my analysis of the situation and the solution that I propose and hope. And yet, it is supported by forty years of teaching and research in the field of theology, scientific publications, and pastoral practice, in particular from the experience that I did collaborator of St. Giovanni Paolo II in the Secretariat of State from 1982 to the 1990.

      From what you say, I then understood clearly that you need to develop his ideas on what, in general, I am the figure and mission of the Pope as a person and as universal pastor of the Church.

      It should be borne in mind that in the Church the Pope, by the will of Christ, It plays an absolutely unique mission and to him Exclusive. If it seems paradoxical to you what I said, it is because the same figure of the Pope is paradoxical, Paradoxical as are all the mysteries of faith.

      The fact Pope joins in his person two elements together distantissimi, Facts to be joined, but which may come into conflict: one part, the Petrine mission as teacher of the faith and supreme pastor of the Church on earth; other, his humanity and his moral conduct, with its strengths and its flaws. Under the first aspect, the Pope must, in principle, heard and obeyed, especially when illustrating the mysteries of faith, It sanctifies us with the sacraments and unerringly pointing the way of the Gospel, with the assistance of the Holy Spirit. Instead, under the second aspect, The Pope is a loyal like all of us, able to act well as a wrongdoing, capable of possessing grace as to lose it, with its strengths and its weaknesses, subject to the same evangelical morality that he teaches. And if it can be foolproof to teach the language, in practice it is not flawless.

      For this, if Dad, with the word and the sacrament, enlightens, guides us, ci sanctifies, we gather, there corrects, It fortifies us and supports us in knowledge and experience of the mystery of Christ and in opening the way to salvation and heaven, freeing us from sin and defending ourselves from the satanic and worldly powers, as human creature, with their gifts and good inclinations, but also, as the daughter of Adam, fragile and sinful - and here she comes to understand the merits, the urgency and seriousness of my speech - may very well need, both as a Christian and as Pope, of our information, our tips, our warnings, our dissuasions, our references, our corrections, our forgiveness.

      Then you see that my speech is by no means among the clouds, nor it has the air of the joke, but it is an appeal to all Catholics to rally around the Pope, by Satan to defend one who defends us from the devil.

  5. It would be a good proposal since there is no way out. There are two likely, or the Pope is the head of the modernists and in this case we can not do anything because it is he who has command, or is a prisoner of the modernists and at this point we have to do something, we can not allow our dear Holy Father is treated like a puppet. But it was not too clear this hypothesis, but Enzo Bianchi who was called to the Vatican? Who authorized to hold a lecture at the Pontifical University Lateranenze? They say they have suspended all classes that day to hear his “Saints” speeches, poor students!!!!!

    1. Yes, cara Anna, poor students!

      Fortunately, there is the Holy Spirit, that provides to remedy the utterances of Bianchi. But it, of course, if available of the Holy Spirit there were more shepherds with true prophetic spirit and zealous in sound doctrine, and for the salvation of souls, in fidelity to the Magisterium of the Church, This would be to the benefit of God's people, pastors and the Pope himself, could proclaim the Word of God free from the exploitation of the modernists, and strengthened and comforted by the aid and by the good and generous board of loyal collaborators, Orthodox and faithful.

      The Pope is pressed, circuit, flattered and deceived by the crafty and powerful modernist. However, he is not without responsibility in this tragic situation. As repeatedly pointed out dell'isoladipatmos Fathers frankly branch, and they want their words to the Holy Father giungessero ears, overcoming the watchful supervision modernist, The Pope,in his attitude towards the modernists it should be clearer and more honest, because if they are exploiting the, in part it is because you let instrumentalize, whereby, when it misunderstood - which happens often -, instead of silence, It should correct the false interpretation of his words.

      Instead, silenting, It gives the world, maneuvered by the mass media in the hands of Freemasonry, the impression of approving. Thus, huge crowds, deceived by the modernists, take a picture of the Pope who is not the real one, that the Vicar of Christ, but that false, a modernist Pope, designed by the modernists.

      Maybe the Pope is under the illusion of having a great success, but you should realize that this success is very largely based on ambiguity. If he spoke more clearly, as did the Popes who preceded him, It would be less exploited and would have less success, but it would be more authentic.

  6. In the Church there is currently a lot of confusion, the very fact that there are two popes proves. However from the holy stories it can be deduced that obedience is a fundamental virtue: by the time the truth wins, but he who does not obey then falls, even if he had from his many reasons (see for example the case Milingo).

Leave a Reply