– Theologica –

POPE FRANCIS AND IDEALISM

.

.

Today it has become clear and common ground, after the powerful and decisive words of Pope Francis, that there is no room in the Church for the idealism, just as there is no room for those philosophical doctrines, that, for different reasons, prevent, they destroy or falsify the knowledge of faith and therefore the truth of faith. The idealist, so, can no longer be, as it was believed for a long time, pedantic companion with a realist on the Gospel and in communion with the Church, ma, as the conductor Jorge Mario Bergoglio made us understand, is an abusive traveler, without ticket, who is cornered: you pay the ticket or realist, and then you can travel with me and passengers on the train of faith and salvation; or take another train, where do you hope to get to Christ maybe more surely and more quickly of the realist.

.

To read the article click below

Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON – POPE FRANCIS AND IDEALISM

 

— Theologica —

MARRIAGE, CONCUBINAGE AND VIRGINITY

[…] from the Bible the pleasure is sensitive compared to spiritual pleasure, even to the same Divine joy, God's pure spirit, that obviously has no sex. It is important to, because of this, have an analogical concept of pleasure, connecting the sensitive one to the spiritual one. This is the way to avoid both rigorism and laxity, both Origen and Pannella.

 

 

 

 

To open the ’ article click below

JOHN Cavalcoli, ON - MARRIAGE, CONCUBINAGE AND VIRGINITY

 

 

 

— Theologica —

LO GNOSTICISM JOSEPH BARZAGHI

 

The Giuseppe Barzaghi system It can be classified as a form of Gnosticism pantheistic monist not of type historicist, like the Hegelian one, but as eternalista type to Severino.

 

 

To open the ’ article click below

Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON – LO GNOSTICISM JOSEPH BARZAGHI

— Theologica —

REFLECTIONS ON LUTHER, ALLE PORTE DELL’ANNIVERSARIO DELLA SUA PSEUDO “REFORM”, FOR WHICH NOTHING, THE CATHOLICS, THEY WOULD HAVE TO CELEBRATE

.

"We Catholics have no reason to celebrate 31 October 1517, the date considered the beginning of the Reform that led to the Schism of Western Christianity "

[Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller¹]

.

.

.

.

As they approach the celebration of pseudo-reform heresiarch Martin Luther, the fathers of’Patmos Island propose to the two short essays Readers: the first, drawn these days by John Cavalcoli ON, The second one, It is the revival of a written text and published over a year ago by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo.

.

.

Luther wanted an internal reform of the Church, I wanted the purification and renewal, He wished that many believers were released by forms of mere popular superstition; and both of purification both of renewal is liberation from mere forms of popular superstition, the Church had deep need. The movement away from him and that after him came to life any reform but only a never break soon became schism has not yet generated; it more for interest and for political self-interest for the requirements and ideals of faith. This is the reason why I do not like to use the popular term - unfortunately, even in Catholic circles, indeed even repeatedly mentioned on The Osservatore Romano - The "Reformation". I believe that Luther would want a reform. His followers and those who have collected and appropriated his voice instead have combined to create a dramatic break in virtue of which the Catholic Church, soon led to a bath of healthy and perhaps even deserved realism, It was forced to react with internal reform: the Council of Trent, called in my opinion in a completely improper under the name of counter-reform also - unfortunately! - As part of what should be the most educated and highest theological and historical-theological studies promoted within our ecclesiastical academic institutions.

The Church reacted to the painful laceration through the means, language and effective ways and relevant adopted by the Council Fathers at that time their historical. But since the term "Tridentine" has become a sort of synonymous derogatory, unfortunately also for "theological" Catholic, you may lose the extraordinary significance of that great Council that the facts did the reform that Luther wanted, but that in part to his guilt, in part because of his blind and deaf Roman interlocutors, but above all because of the political and personal interests of many rulers, He could not pass.

.

.

____________________

[1] From the book interview with the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Report on hope, 2016

.

.

To open the ’ article click below

21.04.2015 Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo - REFLECTIONS ON LUTHER AT THE GATES OF THE ANNIVERSARY OF HIS PSEUDO “REFORM”

.

.

.

.

.