- The presbyter and theologian Hans Küng died. This chasm ran between him and his age Joseph Ratzinger: Küng was gifted with genius, Ratzinger absolutely not! - 7 April 2021
- Some are scandalized when they learn on Good Friday that "dying with Christ" requires means ranging from faith to economic resources? - 2 April 2021
- The Church's solemn no to the blessing of the “weddings” gay. I've been telling the gay rainbows for years: don't invent a Jorge Mario Bergoglio man who never existed, because you will be deeply disappointed - 17 March 2021
CHRISTOLOGY THE LIGHT MASS
AND DARK totalitarianism POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS
… it may happen that the blindness of Marxism and the blindness of certain expressions of religious life they meet, despite battling hard, united by materialism homocentric and Pelagian heresy
[…] certain theological currents and religious have modulated their movements faith and thought drawing unknowingly just by the enemy and was designed to combat: that Marxism applied in the communist regimes where the individual was emptied and turned into a gear that personality mass called State, a kind of perfect entity or so to say pseudo-divine that together with its leaders Charismatic could not be questioned. One should not overlook that Marxism is a "religion" atheist and that his structural system "dogmatic" is built on the patterns of their religious absolutism.
On the philosophical before theological, be depersonalized gear of a Marxist system is something antithetical to being members of the Mystical Body. As well as being impersonal gears of current theological thinking and religious systems modulated but not on the absolute theological ideology over absolutism is an antithesis to being members of the Mystical Body of the Church which is Christ, but worse, because while Marxism attacked the Church from outside these currents have struck from inside with the dryness of his thoughts de-structuring and confounding. And the leader of the twentieth century this de-structuring is confusing Karl Rahner.
On the structural currents Marxist totalitarian religious thread flourished in parallel in the history of the Church of the twentieth century who felt right to direct and control the human reason to “Christian” order that they would not fall reasoning in sins of pride, that restricted his freedom as a child of God to spare the potential risk of falling from liberty to licentiousness, who judged the critical sense a sort of attack of lese majesty of God to cure readily with the panacea of blind obedience … andbene, these religious totalitarianism plant pseudo neoscolastico based on the school's decadent late eighteenth century instead of the great heritage school whose recovery was hoped Encyclical Eternal Father, showed their historical closure spiritual and theological grace, their way of thinking-not stagnate, to act in confined spaces and limited to prevent any act independently in order to avoid some kind of pitfalls, the desire to close any question of doubt because they had an answer for everything metaphysical ready. And all this has marked several bursts of Pelagianism modern religious, if anything, even as the propagators of these thoughts were busy teaching Nature and Grace St. Augustine in the deepest deference to formal schemes of the best Catholic orthodoxy.
Their approach of thought practice of rigid, sometimes ruthless in his conceptual formalism exasperated and exasperating ricalcava often - unconsciously - the psychology of Pelagius: the belief that they can attain perfection through the rigor, self-discipline, the lack of any failure of any doubts or concerns; that expressed in more modern terms equivalent to Superman and Will to Power Frederic Nietzsche modulated version religious. Some of these schools of thought in the late nineteenth and twentieth century have opened the season of religious quell'ateismo of one who closes his heart to the grace of God in the certainty of being able to achieve holiness with the rigor of the discipline within and without, we find precisely depicted in the diagrams Nietzschean de The Will to Power.
Today we speak theologically with great ease of the theme Faith and Reason; argument certainly not new in the history and economy of salvation if we consider that was debated by the great Fathers of the Church: it was by the Cappadocian Fathers, by Anselm of Canterbury, by Thomas Aquinas, until reaching the Pope Pius IX who did write to the Vatican Council these words:
[…] although faith is above reason, there can never be any real discrepancy between faith and reason. The same God, indeed, who reveals mysteries and infuses faith, has also deposed the light of reason in the human […] not only faith and reason can never be in conflict with each other, but there may be a mutual help. The right reason, indeed, demonstrates the fundamentals of the faith, illuminated by its light can cultivate the science of divine things; faith liberates protects reason from errors and enhanced by multiple cognitions. For this, The Church, is far from opposing to the study of the arts and human disciplines, anything but the favors and promotes in every way.
[..] what is the relationship between faith, reason and freedom within the religious orders and certain new religious congregations that in the season of Vatican II rewrite them all their constitutions to bring them to the theological thinking and pastoral reconcile, for example by deleting any reference to vague obsolete forms of blind obedience did not admit that human reason, prior to setting and tradition at the same Council of Trent, as well as in direct contradiction with the theological thought of the great Fathers of the Church?
These questions, if they are never certain places "traditionalists" ideological diligent hunters heresies - including alleged heresies papal - before starting the attack with pathos liberal and democratic spirit referendum, then with a "petition", after the legitimate authority of the Church had decided to intervene on a young congregation within which were also emerging problems ecclesial theology, of proper discipline and adequate training? And in many respects the ecclesiastical authority has done well, why not healthy nor Catholic turn back the clock and to establish new criteria for religious training of models of late nineteenth century early twentieth century. But since this religious family celebrated with the old order of Mass, before the Latin reduced by certain “Traditionalists” a fetish Pelagian, here you are immediately shown so concerned about the mote not see the beam, namely that proclaim “de facto” the dogma of Mary Co and determine its theology and worship internally and massive campaign of external diffusion, is much worse than the de-construction of the dogma of implementation from the worst abuses of the New Theology; because "proclaim" or "give to the existing" a Marian dogma that to date, the Church has never meant to proclaim - something that personally I'm happy - it's much worse than the de-construct and destroy the dogmas of faith proclaimed by the Church. All to sing it in an honest and truthful to certain ideologues “tradition” which for months have unnecessarily repeated in numerous private interviews that the problem was not the Missal of St. Pius V, that therefore stop using those poor friars for ideologize a missal and to legitimize themselves. How many of these people have explained in tone hugging the supplication that I myself had ceased to make references in my articles in the affairs of this congregation, after having a trial and error that the problems were others and not the Mass according to the old rite? On the results - or better: not on the results - overflight bitterly, I believe, however, that anyone would seriously question the instrumental way in which these friars were damaged by “Traditionalists” d'assault, able to bring everything, even the art of pastry napolenata, to a matter of The old order is posted … unable to understand, although it had been explained to them, which is not always "Paris is worth a Mass", When he had to say that cynical Huguenot Henry IV of Bourbon. And with that I avoid going into all that theological obstinate closure to the grace of God typical of those who are uncertain about the Truth and be unique and faithful propagators, even against the Authority of the Church …
Judge always pernicious theology of Karl Rahner, but the honest intellectual and my Catholic faith requires me to state that rightly and legitimately criticize this German theologian, to reach through it to affect, if not worse to invalidate the authority of the Second Vatican Council, is much worse than giving life to confused, equivocal and ambiguous theory “anonymous Christians”. This thing that our venerable and wise fellow of the caliber of Brunero Gherardini should teach us all, in old age, rather than lend to certain misunderstandings that revolve around the theory of that Council “Pastoral only” who for years sends sollucchero the best of the worst of a certain “traditionalism”, that on the concept of “pastoral council”, ergo undogmatic, ended up sentencing: … “namely that counts for nothing”; abusing and spending in support of such aberrant argument the name of this illustrious theologian who never would support similar things, simply because he has not ever think, being a man of God devoted to the Authority of the Church and a true master of theology.
Overflight total lack of consistency on the part of these ideologues of "tradition" who for years have taken to pull Brunero Gherardini to the edges of the garment. Subjects which on one hand are capable - and they did, written and published several times - to enhance the encyclical Mirari Vos Gregory XVI, in which they are expressed in the distant 1832, or in a completely different world, society and political contexts, Also words of condemnation towards the freedom of thought and press, or towards the concept of separation of church and state ... And finally calling it the application salutary in the Church today. Without this, enhance and put into practice, however, forms of liberal democracy referendum against the ecclesiastical authority in the Church (!?). I wonder: I lost something, I'm being inconsistent, or maybe these ideologues “tradition” to have serious problems in their relationship with the alleged insane traditio catholica, the ecclesiology and above the legitimate authority of the Church?
This Congregation to which an army of praeficae "Traditionalist" fasts of theology and ecclesiology have ended sadly with the situation worse by using it for their own ideological purposes, maybe I will devote a separate written, if I have time; it is said, however, that time and he has to do it, wanting to take care of the most interesting things in the course of decades of life that separate me from my death, fixed roughly around 120 years of age, as He has entrusted the Blessed Person of the Holy Spirit the apostolic mission to gnaw different livers.
TO READ THE ENTIRE SCRIPT THEOLOGICAL WHICH WAS TAKEN AND DEVELOPED THIS ARTICLE CLICK BELOW