Actuality – Page 24 – EDIZIONI L'ISOLA DI PATMOS

Father Ariel on trial: “I have often been ahead of my time with books and articles, today I risk being the forerunner of “Zan design” before it becomes law of the Republic. Catholics who say they respect me, they will be willing to put their hands in their pockets and support me for the court costs?»

3 July 2021/in Actuality/by Jorge Facio Lynx

- Church news -

FATHER ARIEL UNDER TRIAL: «I have often been ahead of the times with books and articles, TODAY RISK OF BEING AN ANTICIPATOR OF THE ZAN DESIGN BEFORE IT BECOMES LAW OF THE REPUBLIC. THE CATHOLICS WHO SAY THEY ESTIMATE ME, THEY WILL BE WILLING TO PUT THEIR HANDS IN THE POCKETS AND TO SUPPORT ME FOR THE PROCESS EXPENSES?»

In front of a gay who represents Jesus Christ as an outcast from Cage aux Folles (verbatim: the cage of madmen) bringing it in a mocking procession to the last Gay Pride from Milan, no Catholic has the right to feel offended, because they are just playful expressions of the rainbow gaiety that anything can afford, except to sue anyone who dares to reply to these public insults, raising severe questions proportionate to the extreme gravity of the offense.

Author:
Jorge Facio Lynx
President of Editions The island of Patmos

PDF print format article

Si can claim respect and insult others at the same time, except to sue them if they react to serious offenses? Apparently some think they can

The paradigm of the society of the Third Millennium finds its synthesis in this reflection by Gilbert Keith Chesterton:

“The great march of intellectual destruction will continue. Everything will be denied and it will become a creed. It is a reasonable position to deny the stones of the street; will become a religious dogma to reaffirm. It is a rational argument that it takes all immersed in a dream; will be a sensible form of mysticism say that we are all awake. Fires will be stoked to witness that two plus two equals four. Swords will be drawn to show that the leaves are green in summer. We will find ourselves defending not only the incredible virtues and the incredible sense of human life, but something even more incredible, this immense, impossible universe staring at us in the face. We will fight for visible wonders as if they were invisible. We will look at the grass and the skies impossible with a strange courage. We will be among those who have seen and yet have believed " (from the work Heretics).

In circumstances such as the one we will now narrate you risk two different things: or bitterness, or pleasant surprises. But let's get to the story, to be introduced with a necessary premise: as a criminal case is underway, it is advisable to avoid going into details and limiting oneself to the narration of the fact. Otherwise you run the risk of doing like those defendants assisted by lawyers superstar who go to discuss their processes in the various talk show while the first trial phase has just begun in court.

Here's the story: years ago Father Ariel took the public defense of an elderly priest, teologist and academic, mocked on social media, then in the national press, for half a sentence cut from one of his answers given in a biblical-exegetical context. With that extrapolated sentence he was made to say what he had never said, that "earthquakes are a punishment from God".

You can claim respect and insult others at the same time, except to sue them if they react to serious offenses? Apparently some think they can …

To launch the news he was a young journalist belonging to the most radical branch in the world LGBT. father ariel, acting a defense of the elderly theologian in an articulated polemical context, he used some ironic expressions in interrogative form, which the interested party, however, considered defamatory, for this he sued him.

Father Ariel never knew than in 2017 had been sued under dell’art. 595 of the Criminal Code and that he was being investigated. Only three and a half months ago, summoned to the local Police Headquarters of the place where the court seised is located, where he presented himself 45 minutes after being contacted by phone, he learned that he had been sued.

Got to know everything a ITER now started, he first proceeded to appoint a trusted criminal lawyer as a defender.

You can claim respect and insult others at the same time, except to sue them if they react to serious offenses? Apparently some think they can …

This is the story in broad strokes, without going into details. Not because it can't be done, but why not, it would be inappropriate and unfair. These columns are not the right place to expose the defensive reasons, to be presented in an appropriate forum before the judicial body. The trials are neither in the newspapers nor in the social media, because both of them can neither condemn nor absolve, nor should they ever, even if they often pretend to do so by putting people or entire institutions to public derision.

It is singular to be brought to trial from a subject that promotes the gay world more radical and which has always supported, for example with articles and various public interventions, certain parades of the Gay Pride, in which swarm all the worst desecrations aimed at the figures and symbols most dear to Christianity, from the sneers towards Jesus Christ to those towards the Blessed Virgin Mary, considered by some to be fully legitimate. However, it is not tolerated that questions of any kind can be raised about the promoters of ideology LGBT. It seems in fact that promote jeers towards Jesus Christ in the parody of a gay in high heels carrying a cross on which instead of the Latin inscription I.N.R.I (Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews) there is a stylized cock, cannot constitute an insult to the sensitivity of Catholics, because this is granted. Not only, it even claims that a special law is passed on the pretext of condemning that homophobia - which we all condemn without the need for laws that change the world LGBT in “protected category” [see Father Ariel's latest television talk on this issue, by the minute 1:38 following —, with the serious risk of turning adverse opinions into a crime, where on the one hand the right to blasphemous insult is claimed, on the other hand, they do not hesitate to border complaints for every legitimate sigh aimed at defending their moral values and religious symbols.

You can claim respect and insult others at the same time, except to sue them if they react to serious offenses? Apparently some think they can …

(D)in front of a gay who represents Jesus Christ like a leaked from Cage aux Folles (verbatim: the crazy cage) bringing it in a mocking procession to the last Gay Pride from Milan, no Catholic has the right to feel offended, because they are just playful expressions of the rainbow gaiety that anything can afford, except to sue anyone who dares to reply to these public insults, raising severe questions proportionate to the gravity of the offense inflicted on what is most sacred and dear to Christianity.

And to say that that of the Honorable Alessandro Zan it is for now only a drawingor by law. If it passed as they wrote it, with all the ambiguity contained in the text to the articles 1, 4, 7, what would happen? We will perhaps be overwhelmed with complaints starting the next day, if anything, for having explained the Book of Genesis in the part in which it is said that God male and female created them, or for having explained that a family is made up of a father and a mother and that only they can have a child, so that two rich gays who make a baby by paying the womb for a poor woman from a developing country, they do something inhumane? We are not talking about certain letters of the Blessed Apostle Paul in which words of condemnation are expressed towards the practice of sodomy. [See. The Cor 6, 9-11]. Tomorrow, sorry quarrel, they will perhaps prevent us from reading and explaining certain sacred texts, post that anyway, of always, Catholic morality condemns sin but not the sinner, rejecting the first and always welcoming the second with mercy and without discriminating against anyone? They will bring the priests to court after they have read certain passages in the churches during the Holy Mass, asking for the immediate withdrawal from the trade of copies of the Gospels, if those sentences are not cut, if anything, with a lot of apologies addressed to the members of the most susceptible and aggressive groups LGBT?

You can claim respect and insult others at the same time, except to sue them if they react to serious offenses? Apparently some think they can …

Simply said,: certain priests affected by the widespread complex Of Don Abbondio they should not be censored, they will self-censor themselves. They will say that Genesis is an ancient text, that the Apostle Paul was exalted, maybe even a little’ homophobic when he condemned same-sex sexual relations. If the Zan Bill is not reformulated, saving the freedom of opinion and teaching of parents and Catholic schools, the groups LGBT they will end up imposing the gender forced under the pretext of condemning homotransphobia.

Facing a criminal trial it means spending money that we don't have, nor can we go into debt to do so. This is why we launch a request that could lead us to have unexpected satisfactions or sorrows greater than the lawsuit we have told you about.. This is a simple request: help us pay for Father Ariel's court costs. We ask those who send us messages of appreciation for our articles, books and for the televised speeches of Father Ariel. We ask for it, above all, to those Catholics you are on social media they tear their clothes on the "danger" of the Zan Bill as it is formulated in the draft. In fact, let it be clear that with the emotional rag of clothing or with the outbursts of certain Catholics Keyboard lions nobody is protected. Instead, put your hands in your pockets and send a contribution to The Island of Patmos for the expense fund necessary for the trial defense of Father Ariel it will instead be of much use. Indeed, as far as the lawyer intends to limit the costs as much as possible, it will take many thousands of euros, because processes cost money. It should also be borne in mind - again with regard to court costs - that on the other hand there is not a simple single, but the most radical segment of the world LGBT, who has already filed a civil party through an Association. And they have no problem facing legal fees and running trials for all three courts, they have money, lenders and law firms who work especially for them, for this they spared no expense.

You can claim respect and insult others at the same time, except to sue them if they react to serious offenses? Apparently some think they can …

To you the choice: you can amaze the Fathers de The Island of Patmos or embitter them. In both cases the Fathers will not cease to work for the truth and the People of God, even when the people chat and do not throw out a penny in the face of the emergency of true necessity. But he tells us good, it magnifies the courage of others and the way in which the genuine lions of God stand up for the truth. All free compliments with which, however, the costs of a trial are not paid, especially if on the other hand there is a fierce and ideological group that does not want to bring Father Ariel on trial, but the Catholic Church. And with this we have made it clear that the compliments of committed Roman Catholics and militants accustomed to acting let's arm ourselves and ... go, they are of no practical use. Therefore, do not send us flattering comments or expressions of encouraging solidarity, send us money!

Who will want to support us for the payment of the court costs of Father Ariel can send their free donation to the current account of Editions The island of Patmos or through the convenient and safe system PayPal, all the details can be found at the bottom of this page. Please write in the description “court costs of Father Ariel” and also to send us an e-mail with your name and e-mail address, so that we can send you a message of thanks for your concrete and valuable contribution.

the Island of Patmos, 3 July 2021

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure system PayPal:

The Zan Bill and the importance of the presence in the media of competent priests and religious who are also able to give a voice to the Church and Catholics in a country that wants to be truly secular and ready for dialogue

27 June 2021/8 Comments/in Actuality/by Straight Anna Monia

Author
Editors of The Island of Patmos

No introductions would be needed, that we do just for the record — Sister Anna Monia Alfieri, nun of the Congregation of the Marcelline Sisters, jurist and economist, is a face known to the general public for her participation as a columnist and expert on school and training problems in the Mediaset program Fourth Republic, conducted by Nicola Porro. With our Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, columnist from the end of 2019 all program Straight and Reverse and subsequently to White area, both have dealt with it multiple times, in the various television programs, the problem of the Zan Bill, that if launched as it was drafted it could undermine the freedom of opinion guaranteed by the Constitutional Charter and put a gag on teaching in Catholic schools. Sister Monia spoke on 3 June 2021 at the IInd Commission of the Senate of the Republic on behalf of USMI (Conferences of the Italian Major Superiors of Religious Orders and Congregations) and of CISM (Italian Conference of Major Superiors of Religious Orders and Congregations). The 24 June, Sister Monia and Father Ariel also replied to the rapper Fedez that to defend this bill has made a false and inappropriate attack on the Vatican for non-payment of taxes on properties owned on Italian territory (!?). The President of theAPSA (Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See) S. AND. Mons. Nunzio Galantine, that further denied unfounded reports made to reach millions of his own by this "well-known intellectual" followers. This should already be enough to make some doubters understand the delicacy of certain themes and the vital importance of the presence of doctrinally and juridically trained priests and religious., able to communicate through television media. Otherwise, there is a risk of being locked in the ghetto of our sacristies and our Catholic peer schools, pretending not to see - if anything even with a dangerous spirit of careless superiority - that a large slice of the hostile world around us does not tolerate our very existence. Sister Monia and Father Ariel have never shown opposition to this Bill, how it has never been shown by the Italian Episcopal Conference and the Holy See, of which they became spokespersons in the media, clarifying that it is necessary to revise this text so that the crime of opinion does not end up being prosecuted [see last post of 24 June, by the minute 01.38]. Below is the text of the videoconference hearings with the intervention of Sister Monia in the context of the examination of the bills of law no.. 2005 e 2205 on combating discrimination or violence based on sex, gender or disability.

________________________

- Church news -

THE DRAWING OF THE ZAN LAW AND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PRESENCE ON THE MEDIA OF COMPETENT PRIESTS AND RELIGIOUS RELIGIOUS ABLE TO GIVE A VOICE ALSO TO THE CHURCH AND CATHOLICS IN A COUNTRY THAT WANTS TO BE TRULY LAY AND READY TO DIALOGUE

The risks of resorting to "mass culture" and "punishment" to create a single thought are the two main limits that require us at least one revision of the Zan Bill, so that it is truly aimed at combating discrimination and not at exacerbating it with new figures. However, if the Bill recovers a harmonious development, then it can, perhaps, be a positive law, aimed at building bridges of integration; otherwise there remains the reasonable doubt that the interests that move the legislator are other

Anna Monia Alfieri, I.M.

PDF print format article

Anna Monia Alfieri in Mediaset studies on the program Fourth Republic conducted by Nicola Porro

Subject of great discussions and debates these days is the Zan Bill, whose content, in all honesty, walking to the bottom, does not seem convincing. Certainly it is a duty to combat any form of discrimination, respecting human dignity and the principle of equality, to oversee which there is certainly no lack of adequate legal protections in our legal system, also criminal. I believe, however, that this Design goes in the opposite direction. Are, in the understanding of the legislator, there was only the protection of the person, it would be enough (I add dutiful) apply the existing legislation established by the Constitution of the Italian Republic in art. 3, therefore in art. 604 to e 61 of the Criminal Code.

Does not exist, therefore, a regulatory gap to fill, as our legal system already protects life, the honor, the safety of people, without distinction of sex, religion, language, race and so on. Not the least, the aggravating circumstance is foreseen for having acted for abject and futile reasons. There is therefore the feeling that, since it is complicated to intervene with the certainty of the sentence and impunity, as on the training of young people in non-discrimination, there is a tendency to multiply the legislation and the consequent confusion. The legislation, not having to fill any void, necessarily creates confusion, given by a useless proliferation of the types of crime to be prosecuted, which will be clarified by the judiciary. This situation increases in an abnormal way the range of action of the judiciary and investigating power. We are all aware of the need to review the justice reform precisely in the light of the latest news events.

Anna Monia Alfieri in Mediaset studies on the program Fourth Republic conducted by Nicola Porro

Evidently it is in the folds of detail discrimination creeps in. Indeed, when the law specifies with excess protection, it actually discriminates, introducing categories. I myself feel a certain discomfort in the face of a law that protects me because of the dress I'm wearing: anyone who discriminates against a religious, as such, is punished with an aggravating circumstance. I wonder: because of my choice of life, I must be included in a sort of "protected category"? Those who are proud of their diversity live it in the ordinary, in normality. No law can ever take the place of respect, integration, to the capacity of proximity. To impose respect means the failure of civilization. Here in summary described the first two reasons that see me against.

I come to the third reason which reveals the true understanding of the law. The bill, creating a "protected category", opens the way to a new anthropological vision of a person raised to an anonymous system. Confusion is covered up with the law and the dominant thought is spread throughout the schools: any regurgitation of common sense is transformed into a crime.

Anna Monia Alfieri in Mediaset studies on the program Fourth Republic conducted by Nicola Porro

Gender identity - let's be clear - it is far from being connected with the shared condemnation of homophobia, it is quite another chapter that does not rhyme with guarantee, protection, but with indoctrination, single thought, probably to ensure certain and widespread gains for some circuits. And this is where the three major rights opposed and mortified by the Zan Bill come in, which as it is written actually limits the freedom of thought and expression. Why protect a freedom (cf.. art. 4 Zan draft law) putting it in conflict with the "freedom of thought" recognized in art 21 the Constitution, evidently it is not just a legislative error, but a very dangerous step for the constitutional order of the secular and legal state. In fact, Art. 4 of this Design regarding the "Pluralism of ideas and freedom of choices":

«For the purposes of this law, the free expression of beliefs or opinions as well as legitimate conduct attributable to the pluralism of ideas or the freedom of choices are reserved, provided that they are not suitable for determining the concrete danger of committing discriminatory or violent acts ".

And here it is not clear how "legitimate conduct" can lead to "discriminatory acts". Of the two one: or the conduct is not legitimate, or the acts are not discriminatory. It is clear that art 4 goes in the opposite direction to freedom of expression and thus voids art. 21 of the Constitution it states:

«Everyone has the right to freely express their thoughts with words, writing and any other means of dissemination ".

Anna Monia Alfieri in Mediaset studies on the program Fourth Republic conducted by Nicola Porro

A second order of problems always on this step is: what and who defines the concrete danger? A modality of expression so vague and contradictory that it evidently creates not only a void but opens a legislative chasm and therefore of orientation for the individual. In crimes involving concrete danger, the danger is a constitutive element of the law and belongs to the investigating magistrate, to the prosecutors to concretely ascertain whether the protected legal property has been endangered. Therefore, the judge's discretion widens in a dangerous way and opens up the disturbing season of reporting as an easy tool to oppose a different thought about man.

A law is not enough to not discriminate, because there will never be a law that can fill not the regulatory vacuum - which, however, does not exist - but that of thought that sometimes turns out to be a chasm. Gender equality requires the use of the right that exists, of the judiciary that must function and above all of a culture that is quite different from indoctrination and mass training.

All’art 7 the Zan Bill limits the parents' freedom of educational choice provided for in art. 30 the Constitution. And here we remember that the education of children is the primary responsibility of parents and that no one, the school, the church, the state can take their place. Introduce strongly divisive themes into the school, ideological and moreover related to the sphere of sexual identity and education to affectivity certainly has negative effects. First of all, that of dividing. Then, if we add to this the consideration that the Zan Bill envisages conduct that is not clearly defined (cf.. also use of unclear terms that can be criminally sanctioned), the fear increases.

Anna Monia Alfieri during the collection of the Ambrogino d'Oro award, Civic Merit Medal, for her civic commitment in favor of the freedom of educational choice and scholastic pluralism conferred on her the 7 December 2020

This art. 7 limits the freedom of teaching of teachers recognized in art. 33 the Constitution. Freedom of teaching would be emptied of its essential contents, that is, the didactic autonomy and the free cultural expression of the teacher. A freedom guaranteed by art 33 the Constitution: "Art and science are free and their teaching is free". Ratio: the freedom of teaching is functional to the development of the critical sense necessary for the achievement of the objectives of integral education of minors.

Educational freedom of parents and teaching of teachers, as well as freedom of expression, are strongly questioned, even more with an art. 2 (incitement to discrimination) and an art. 4 so vague that it opens up to the crime of opinion without any orientation. Simply said,: what can be said and not said? No if its, then it will be better to keep quiet. The passage to the single thought, to monopoly, it would thus become an obligatory direction for the country.

It is clear that in the combined provisions of art. 2, art. 4, so vague, and art 7 it is to be found the limit of the text of the Bill Zan che, as it is written, the gap of discrimination increases, feeds it, creates new legal figures of crime, it mortifies freedom of expression, parental education and teaching, it directs society towards a real ideological indoctrination.

The text needs to be revised precisely in these aspects who tend to create a unique thought through blanket training that is no longer information, it does not provide the tools for children to learn to orient themselves… but it indoctrinates them. Practically discrimination and violence in reverse.

the smile of a woman who reassures and honors the female Catholic religious world

The risks of resorting to "mass culture" and to the "punishment" to create a single thought are the two main limits that require us at least a review of the Zan Bill, so that it is truly aimed at combating discrimination and not at exacerbating it with new figures. However, if the Bill recovers a harmonious development, then it can, perhaps, be a positive law, aimed at building bridges of integration; otherwise there remains the reasonable doubt that the interests that move the legislator and that they are are other:

1. divide and rule to spread a unique thought. Monopoly is always dangerous and is preparatory to the regime;

2. of a commercial nature e marketing.

Then I turn to the boys: have the courage to know, to delve deeper, so as not to be influenced by me, nor by any puppeteer. Know how to orient yourself. So, if indeed to the legislator, as well as all those who have rediscovered themselves as champions of Art. 3 the Constitution, it is really about the defense of a right, they do so by dispelling any reasonable doubt of third-party interest.

From the Senate of the Republic, 3 June 2021

_________________________________________________________

27 JUNE 2021 FESTIVAL OF “EIGHTY MILLION”

WE THANK OUR READERS AND PLEASE DO NOT MISS YOUR SUPPORT, ESSENTIAL TO BE ABLE TO CONTINUE WITH OUR APOSTOLIC WORK

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

About the note from the Holy See on the Zan-Scalfarotto bill: tomorrow evening Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo will be a guest at the Dritto e Rovescio program on Rete4 to discuss the topic

23 June 2021/in Actuality/by Drafting

ABOUT THE NOTE OF THE HOLY SEE ON THE DRAFT OF THE ZAN-SCALFAROTTO LAW: TOMORROW EVENING FATHER ARIEL S. LEVI di GUALDO WILL BE A GUEST AT THE PROGRAM STRAIGHT AND REVERSE ON NETWORK4 TO DEBATE ON THE TOPIC

Author
Editors of The Island of Patmos

The 17 June a "verbal note" was delivered to the Italian Ambassador accredited to the Holy See in which the concern that the Zan-Scalfarotto bill could harm the freedom of opinion guaranteed by the Concordat stipulated in the 1929 and then revised in 1984.

Thursday 24 June Father Ariel will return as a guest in the Mediaset studios on the program Straight and Reverse conducted by Paolo Del Debbio to take part in the debate on this issue. The block in which it will participate will be broadcast in the late evening at 23.30 circa.

The Roman Pontiff is against the Church and her Holy Predecessors who according to the mantra of the Neocatechumenals "approved us … they approved us!»

15 June 2021/33 Comments/in Actuality/by father ariel

- Church news -

THE ROMAN PONTIFF IS AGAINST THE CHURCH AND ITS HOLY PREDECESSORS WHO ACCORDING TO THE MANTRA OF THE NEOCATECHUMENALS "HAVE APPROVED US ... THEY APPROVED US!».

To understand the danger of this sect you need to know a bird and his way of acting, the cuckoo, belonging to the birds referred to as “parasites”. This bird species does not feed its young, that do not build their nest and prefer to lay their eggs secretly inside the nests of other birds. If the other birds recognize the foreign egg laid in their nest and eliminate it, may face what humans are known as "severe retaliation".

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

PDF print format article

On the Neocatechumenal Way, founded by bohemien Kiko Argüello supported by that concentration of arrogance and crass ignorance of the late Carmen Hernandez, assisted by Father Mario Pezzi who with rare shamelessness humiliated the sacredness of the priesthood by reducing himself to servant valet to two lay practitioners of the doctrine do it yourself and with proven gaps in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, I have long formed a critical judgment based on facts and deeds, but above all on the dangerous omissions of the Supreme Pontiffs and Ecclesiastical Authorities, that acting over the years with condescension and weakness have allowed the development of metastases of this cancer within the Church of Christ.

After careful research I gave it to the press in 2019 a critical essay on this para-Catholic movement: The sect Neocatechumenal. Before me, severe criticisms on the doctrinal and ecclesiological level were made by two Roman priests: In the 1983 by the Venerable Servant of God Pier Carlo Lad It is in the 1991 by the Passionist theologian Enrico Zoffoli. This latter was the victim of the anger of that dry velvet-covered bone of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, because thanks to him, then to his successor Agostino Vallini, the Neocatechumenals filled the palace of the Vicariate of Rome with their lay adepts and priests. These are the results: today, of the 332 parishes of the Diocese of Rome, the Neocatechumenals have some in hand 91. The few truly Roman parish priests who survive among what is called Roman clergy - made up mostly of Polish refugees, African, Indians, Latin Americans and so on - suffers the bullying of the Neocatechumenals in silence and a spirit of omission, except to find otherwise with monsignorotto on duty placed in the chancellery, or other similar placed in the various diocesan offices, than with the honeyed voice and the poisonous eye, from behind their beard in perfect condition Kiko Arguello cut they address a two-way sermon on humility. Obviously none of these threatens kiki has never invited that concentration of impudence of Carmen Hernandez to humility, that during an official meeting in the courtyard of San Damaso in the Vatican interrupted and corrected the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II while he was speaking. The prelates present commented that not even Napoleon Bonaparte, who also had the Supreme Pontiff Pius VII captured and translated prisoner, he never dared anything like that. And this applies to the various monsignorotti of the Vicariate who smiling behind them barbetta kika, to anyone who is hostile to the Neocatechumenal sect they preach on ... humility (!?). However, the whole is equivalent to a killer of the Camorra who invites us not to kill or a militant of the LGBT lobby who calls for chastity. Then everything else follows in acts of empire and arbitrary injustices towards anyone who has dared to disagree. For this reason, no one in Rome dares to speak out against the Neocatechumenal sect, especially in this historical moment of heroic priests defenders of the faith and sound Catholic doctrine.

To understand the danger of this sect you need to know a bird and his way of acting, the cuckoo, belonging to birds referred to as “parasites” [cf.. to my aforementioned work pag. 135 and the following]. This bird species does not feed their young or build their nest, they prefer to lay their eggs secretly inside the nests of other birds. If the other birds recognize the foreign egg laid in their nest and eliminate it, may face what humans are known as "severe retaliation". In fact, the researchers explain: the cuckoo, in addition to being a parasite, he is also what in the human species is referred to as "mafia", a real Camorrista. If he returns to where he left the eggs and does not find them, he takes revenge by devastating the nest of others where he laid them, destroying its entire brood. At that point the other bird, understanding that if it touches the eggs laid by the cuckoo inside its nest it will suffer the devastation of its entire brood, it will begin to accept its eggs. Situation that over time will give birth to a new kind of balance: on the one hand parasites will increase and on the other the birds that unconditionally accept foreign eggs, knowing that otherwise they would face severe punishment. This is how parasitic birds destroy thehabitat natural of other birds, laying as many eggs as possible in their nests. The Neocatechumenals adopt the cuckoo technique, almost always succeeding in the undertaking they aim for, from the invasion of the parishes of Rome to the placement of their laity and faithful monsignorotti serventi in the Vicariate.

My long discussion ends with these words: "I would like to be called tomorrow to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and to be told that I am wrong on the theological and ecclesiological level. I would be the happiest man and priest in this world. God only knows, in certain analyzes and the resulting judgments, how I wish I was wrong. The extreme apex of my joy would not be being told that I am right, but that I was wrong and that I am wrong ".

Nobody called me to ask me for anything, nor for my severe criticisms of John Paul II, to whom the responsibility of having allowed lay movements to dominate the Church is historically attributable, or worse, to create real churches within the Church, all this took place after the ground was prepared and prepared in this sense by Paul VI.

Since its publication, my book The sect Neocatechumenal it has had good feedback and diffusion in Italy and in Spanish-speaking countries. For now, I have only received an avalanche of insults from praetorians of the sect, while several deformed and deforming figures of the Catholic priesthood manufactured in the Seminaries mother of The Redeemer still continue to respond to the sectarians who ask for light on my work built with scientific rigor on evidence and documents: “Don't listen to that priest, It is a hater, it is necessary to pray for his conversion! We have the cards. Yup, we have the papers and we are approved… approved! Whoever is against us and our Initiators is against the Church and the Supreme Pontiffs who approved us… approved!».

In an introductory note added in the second reissue released in February 2021, I launched another question, perhaps destined to remain unanswered too: what generous rewards have been lavished on Cardinal Stanisław Dziwisz, at the time private secretary of the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, for having introduced Kiko Argüello and Carmen Hernández to the Vatican with a frequency and familiarity never granted in twenty-six years of pontificate to all the other founders and foundresses of the various lay movements? Or perhaps it appears to some that Chiara Lubich or Luigi Giussani had free access to John Paul II whenever they wished., or that they dined frequently with him, with Carmen who then boasted in all Neocatechumenal circles that she was the only woman who was allowed to smoke cigarettes in front of the Supreme Pontiff?

When before the Neocatechumenals and to all their staff the reigning Pontiff Francis I began by affirming:

«[…] confirm your call, I support your mission and bless your charisma. I do this not because he (Ed. Indicates with the hand Kiko Argüello) He paid me, no! I do it because I want to do ' [6 March 2015, text of the official speech fragment video].

He was perhaps in the mood for jokes, or rather it sent a precise and severe message, knowing what the Neocatechumenals are capable of and how they bought priests, bishops, cardinals and entire dioceses then ended up totally devastated during their five decades of savage piracy? I am waiting for an answer. In the absence of which I will feel entitled to apply the legal principle of silence assent, typical of those who have nothing to argue in the face of truth and clear evidence of the facts.

By treating the Neocatechumenal Way with decisive severity and to follow other lay movements, I lacked in the analysis? How long to stop at, because June 11 2021, the Dicastery for the Laity, the Family and Life The associations of the faithful that govern the exercise of government in international associations of the faithful, private and public bodies and in other entities with legal personality subject to the direct supervision of the same Dicastery, it seems to have taken into account, from first to last, of all the problems expressed by me and contained in this book. With a special Decree which I invite you to read, the competent dicastery tries to close the stables - I fear in vain - after the oxen have fled and run today in the wild producing the damage of the wild boar that devastates the vineyard of the Lord. All thanks to the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II, the undoubted holiness of which, however, did not exempt them from committing errors of evaluation and pastoral errors, sometimes serious. With all due respect to the neocatechumenal sectarians, convinced that, with the canonizations of Paul VI and John Paul II who “approved us… approved us!», their confused Path was not simply canonized, because it was absurd for them to think that their confused Way would have been really dogmatized.

The Pope Francis I, through this Decree, however, he says the opposite, or better: to the test of facts it says exactly what I wrote two years ago. Now, i neocatecumenali, they intend to shout their painful mantra at him: "Whoever is against us is against the Church that approved us through two Supreme Pontiffs who are Saints today"?

Your Welcome, I urge it, their mantra, to the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, known for smiling in front of the cameras and on the public square, but at the same time capable of breaking the backs of rebellious opponents with sticks inside the closed rooms. Sit down, take a seat ...

the Island of Patmos, 15 June 2021

The Neocatechumenal model is a manipulator so devoid of critical sense and receptive spirit that from a speech like this one pronounced by the Supreme Pontiff Francis, which is all a reproach from start to finish, isolates and captures only six words: «[…] grateful for your good fruits ", all the remarks contained in this speech do not exist, they are in no way perceived and received, by people who, as Giovannino Guareschi said: "They threw the brain in a pile".

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

Two weeks of silence and an eye saved by Grazia Pertile at the Sacred Heart of Negrar, while as theologian I meditated: what a lack of humility can cause in men of science?

4 June 2021/19 Comments/in Actuality, Pastoral Care/by father ariel

- pastoral care of health -

TWO WEEKS OF SILENCE AND AN EYE SAVED BY PERTILE GRACE TO THE SACRED HEART OF NEGRAR, WHILE I MEDITATED AS THEOLOGIST: WHAT CAN CAUSE THE LACK OF HUMILITY IN THE MEN OF SCIENCE?

For this I thank God as a man of faith, priest and theologian: making me experience directly on my skin how high the virtue of Christian humility truly is. I understood this while I was memorizing the Roman Missal in Italian and Latin, scared that, even if a similar pathology had arisen in the healthy eye, the two beloved cats of Jorge Facio Lince and mine, Hypatia and Bruno, who live in the house with us, they should have learned to live with a German shepherd, who would wear a headband with a red cross, carrying me around the street with a white cane.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

PDF print format article

Father Ariel S.. Levi di Gualdo at the entrance to the Sacred Heart Hospital of Negrar in front of the mosaic depicting San Giovanni Calabria, founder of the work

This article I could have owned it: Reflections on my skin. Basically the best, because it is one thing to contemplate with surreal fideism a beautiful ivory crucifix that makes art and useless emotional tenderness, an account to end up participating, even to a small extent, to the crucifixion of Christ, the only way to live the true faith, which is not emotional sentimentality, it would be enough to understand the words of the Divine Master who teaches: "If anyone wants to come after me, disown yourself, take up his cross every day and follow me " (LC 9, 23).

In the last two years I was active on all fronts: I have written many articles on The Island of Patmos, published new books (cf.. WHO), video-conferencing product, teacher's lessons (cf.. WHO), participated in television programs on the Mediaset networks. Last in series order White area the 19 May led by Giuseppe Brindisi (see WHO by the minute 01:35 following), where I will be a guest again on 9 June. but yet, behind all this hyper activity, there was something serious, to the point of inducing me to think that I had to produce as much as possible, because maybe one day I would no longer be able to do certain jobs. I even memorized the entire Roman Missal in two languages, Italian and Latin, in case one day I wasn't able to read anymore ...

What happened? This: in July of 2019 an injury to the retina of my right eye appears. It would have been necessary to intervene with an immediate "cerclage", but believing they were doing me good they practiced a mending with laser. After a month there is a total detachment of the retina and the eye remains completely blind. The retina is then surgically reattached, after the recommended and chosen surgeon informed me: «On a risk scale from zero to ten, she is at risk eleven "..

the surgeon and retinal researcher Grazia Pertile, director of the ophthalmology department of the Sacred Heart Hospital in Negrar, San Giovanni Calabria Foundation

The intervention is successful, even if performed - which I will discover a year later - with an outdated technique, but not for this ineffective. Even today I am grateful to the surgeon who glued my retina back on. Of course, despite having done it privately using my health insurance policy, I was operated on a kind of "chair" with local anesthesia practiced through a puncture in the eye that I do not wish even for a smuggler who transports human beings from Africa to the Italian coasts with serious risk to the lives of women and children. So I thought it worked, to the point that I didn't bother to ask: … But in this splendid five-star hotel-style private clinic, you don't even have a shred of anesthetist? Money, you spend them all in the interior furnishings to throw smoke in the eyes of the Ladies and Gentlemen of the beautiful society who come to get the cosmetic surgery touch-ups?

The fact is illustrated in broad lines, it is useless to detail the clinical procedure, because I intend to talk about something else. I only specify that everything was aggravated by a haemorrhage in the eye that occurred due to natural causes during the operating session, which caused the damage to the photoreceptors, ie the cells of the retina that allow focusing. With the right eye, with which I saw only crooked shadows, I couldn't read and write. All made worse by an "extensive membrane" that formed a few months later on the retina.

The surgeon who operated on me and reattached the retina, undoubtedly saving my eye from total blindness, he took care not to expose my state, which for nearly two years I ignored, after being liquidated with a verdict on which I had made a good reason: "More than this the eye will not be able to recover".

the surgeon and retinal researcher Grazia Pertile, director of the ophthalmology department of the Sacred Heart Hospital in Negrar, San Giovanni Calabria Foundation

A very dear friend, one of several Roman clinicians with whom they are in close friendship, man of great science and experience, he himself accompanied me to an authentic international authority in the field of retinal surgery. After a series of in-depth examinations, the eminent clinician examined my eye with the manual lens for about half an hour and calmly and mercilessly gave me the whole story: from the mending laser to be avoided until the intervention is carried out well, the haemorrhage that had been silenced and so on. Concluded the great expert in retinal surgery: "Personally, in this already very treated eye, I would not put my hand to it, because the less you touch the better, But …".

Needless to say: an eminent scholar of the retina and a great leader, he could tell me in front of a couple of his student surgeons that someone else might be able to do what they would not have dared to do out of understandable prudence? That simple "but ..." was enough to let me indirectly understand what cannot always be said directly. However, I am also a student of a long-time diplomat in the service of the Holy See, who in the field of diplomacy has educated me properly in long years of filial relationship.

Time ago my dentist's husband had spoken to me in tones of wonder about Doctor Grazia Pertile, director of the ophthalmology department of the Sacred Heart Hospital in Negrar, San Giovanni Calabria Foundation, in the province of Verona (cf.. WHO). This distinguished specialist and well-known researcher of European fame, had saved his eye later 7 surgery performed in a disastrous way by renowned surgeons, or at least of fame on the cards… political. And the damage that was caused to him was such that from evening to morning he operated on it urgently, while the eye was now about to go into necrosis. My decision, jump in the car and in June of 2020 I go to Negrar where I pay a visit with Doctor Mauro Sartore, who reveals himself to me as an angel of God and who after all the necessary tests tells me that the damage to the photoreceptors is currently irreversible, but by removing the extensive retinal membrane and correcting the previous surgery, vision can significantly improve. In October, I am visited by Doctor Grazia Pertile who reaffirms the diagnosis of her collaborator and offers me the intervention, also because otherwise, the eye, it would have been doomed to total blindness within a few years or more..

Mauro Sartore, retinal surgeon of the staff of Grazia Pertile, ophthalmology department of the Sacred Heart Hospital of Negrar, San Giovanni Calabria Foundation

The 24 May I made the pre-admission, the 25 I was operated on and the 26 resigned. I then went to Lake Maggiore with my friends de The Island of Patmos Enrico and Liliana, who gave me days of splendid convalescence in their villa. I write this article today, in my hotel room in Valpolicella, after having carried out the post-operative check-up this morning with Doctor Mauro Sartore..

When I walked into the operating room to Negrar, before my eyes one appeared team fully composed of several people, with all due respect to the no-roast smoke of a private clinic that in the outer frame looked like a five-star hotel, where, however, they shot me a puncture in the eye to give me a local anesthesia. A completely different story at the Sacred Heart of Negrar, where lying on the cot, not on some kind of armchair, no one approached me wild pointer, but the anesthetist who gave me total anesthesia, during which I was also intubated. I remember falling asleep while acting: I thank God Almighty and you, brothers, because I have sinned exceedingly in thought, verb, works, and omissions … (I confess to almighty God and to you brothers, that I have sinned much in thoughts, words, works and omissions ...) and that I woke up saying "Jesus Christ be praised» (Praised be Jesus Christ). And a few days later I fully understood how much I had to praise Jesus Christ..

A few days after surgery, with the eye still clouded, I already see all the perfectly straight lines and outlines. I distinguish and read the characters of the large letters, those of the billboards, signs and book covers, that before I did not see or read..

The Doctor Grazia Pertile she is a very reserved woman, pronounces a few words. His is a job that is not done with words, useful and indispensable for other kinds of scientific practices. It's a job, his, of pure action, an authentic operating room monster with a more unique than rare dexterity. It is I who have always been in close contact with the most delicate spheres of the human being, I immediately understood the kind of blue-eyed angel I was in front of. So I just played on his name, pulling out of theAve Maria only two but incisive words: «Full of Grace» (full of grace). Yup, I greet you Woman full of grace, able to truly put to good use the extraordinary grace that God has placed in your hands..

Entrance to the Sacred Heart Hospital of Negrar with the statue of San Giovanni Calabria

Lours Patmos Island hasn't published any articles in the last few weeks because it coincides with me, our Capuchin editor Father Ivano Liguori also had health problems that led to fifteen days of hospitalization. A month and a half ago he suffered from right migraine pain with ipsilateral tingling paresthesias and ptosis in the right eye, who required hospitalization in neurology for thorough investigations, having been a patient with two autoimmune diseases for about four years, one to the kidneys (an interstitial nephritis) and one to the liver (a primary biliary cholangitis). Like this, Father Ivano and me, from one end of Italy to the other we have been absorbed by health events. Meanwhile, Father Ivano continued neurological tests for days to keep ptosis in his right eye under control, improved but not fully resolved yet, I was about to carry out surgery on the retina of my right eye, occurred through a hospitalization of only two and a half days, which, however, involved preparation and convalescence. This has been our situation for the past few weeks, we make it public today to clarify our silence, adding to the whole a very positive fact: in the month of May dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary, eighty million visits to our magazine were exceeded during the last four years of publishing and publishing activity. Even more so, do not think that the Devil had to somehow put a hand in it?.

Telling this story of mine it almost involved a violence exerted on myself. Each of us has the right to their own privacy. However, this story of mine is the paradigm of a very ancient human drama that we all have to deal with ever since Adam and Eve committed original sin., which I remember was a sin of pride, so serious as to alter the perfect balance of the world created by God, but above all of man himself, made in the image and likeness of the Divine Creator, who previously did not know about physical decay, the illness, pain, old age and death, all consequences of that great sin of rebellion, of that pride of which the lack of humility has always been the favorite daughter..

research on the artificial retina conducted by Grazia Pertile

From bricklayer to designer, from the plumber to the carpenter, from the manager at the chef and go on to follow, when man is faced with something he is unable to do, often begins by saying: "It is not possible, It can not be done". I do not say almost always or of practice, but often those who respond in this way know very well that certain things are possible to do. But for no reason would he admit that others are capable of doing what he is unable to do. Of course, however serious they may be, the damages or incapacities of certain craftsmen and technicians are almost always limited. However, when attitudes of similar pride generating blind lack of humility are put in place by an oncologist or a surgeon, what can happen? Our Capuchin editor Father Ivano Liguori, specialist in health pastoral care, who for years served as a chaplain in a large hospital, our young Dominican editor Father Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, great scholar on the theological and ecclesiological level of the problem of disabilities, how many cases that resulted in the disaster have they known? I'll take it too, who as a priest have always been close to and dedicated to assisting the terminally ill and disabled, reiterating at every turn that we priests who have tried their hand at research studies and high theological speculations must have more to do with human material than ever, except to otherwise generate monsters of inhumanity that live in the hyperuranium of ecclesiastical universities, drowned in the world of the unreal and in the spasmodic search for career successes and self-affirmation..

When we talk about the virtue of Christian humility, we priests and theologians certainly do not mean the beguine or the wrong-necked dream Catholic who pretends not to feel worthy or up to par. Humility is quite another: it is the virtue of the great. Only adults can confront their human limitations every day, thus fleeing the most harmful forms of inhumanity, those who carry their egocentrism or their hypertrophic narcissism above the very value of human life. Here then is the heart surgeon who, despite knowing perfectly the existence of a particularly good colleague who has specialized for years in that specific heart malformation, prefers to say "you can't do anything else ... you can't do more than this ... get over it ...", not to say that the patient could be saved by other hands. The same is true for certain oncologists, or for certain retinal surgery specialists and so on..

the ophthalmology staff of Grazia Pertile, Sacred Heart Hospital of Negrar

And we want to talk of clinical barons which usually surround themselves with half notches, having to shine with its own light? Or forget as many half notches placed as assistants to distinguished clinicians at the suggestion of companies and banks that finance foundations and research institutes? What happens next, to the sick attracted by the mirage of the great luminary, when they go to his ward where they end up being operated on by some of his mediocre assistants? The world of the clinic is quite different, of the surgery and research of Doctor Grazia Pertile, who does not fear shadows on the star that she is but who has formed a staff of surgeons who are all very good. Another world, in the midst of so many clinical things from the other world that often take you away from the life of this earthly world decades in advance..

On my path, between so much scientific and omissive arrogance and pride, but I have known mine Ave Maria, the Woman full of grace, the Doctor and researcher on retinal surgery Grazia Pertile. And I fully understood the theological and salvific value of Christian humility, the one that makes you great and that saves your soul from eternal damnation.

from Negrar in Valpolicella, 3 June 2021

THANKS PERTILE EXPLAINS THE AVANT-GARDE TREATMENTS FOR RETINA PATHOLOGIES

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

Father Ariel S.. Levi di Gualdo will be a guest tomorrow evening in the Mediaset studios at the Zona Bianca program

18 May 2021/5 Comments/in Actuality/by Drafting

FATHER ARIEL S. LEVI di GUALDO WILL BE A GUEST TOMORROW EVENING IN THE MEDIASET STUDIES IN THE ZONA BIANCA PROGRAM

The editorial staff of the Zona Bianca program led by Giuseppe Brindisi invited Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo on Wednesday's episode 19 May.

Author
Editors of The Island of Patmos

During this episode, Father Ariel will participate in the last block broadcast at hours 23,15 circa, dedicated to the Zan bill. He has already debated on this issue, also speaking with the Hon. Alessandro Zan in the 8 October episode of Straight and Reverse, program conducted by Paolo Del Debbio.

or you can use our bank account:
.

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118

CODICE SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

Of the two one: or the Supreme Pontiff has confused the person, or he wanted to mock Prince Philip of Edinburgh, one of the greatest whoremongers and swindlers of the twentieth century

29 April 2021/12 Comments/in Actuality/by Hypatia

Time is wasted in washing the donkey's head, water and soap. The Catholic Action of Castel di Lucio and Tusa cries out in scandal like a vilified virgin not realizing that she has fallen into sin against the Holy Spirit

26 April 2021/5 Comments/in Actuality/by Father Ivano

- ecclesial news -

WASHING THE DONKEY'S HEAD WASTE TIME, WATER AND SOAP. THE CATHOLIC ACTION OF CASTEL DI LUCIO AND TUSA SCREAMS AT THE SCANDAL LIKE A VIRGIN VILIPESA NOT NOTING THAT HE HAS FALLEN IN SIN AGAINST THE HOLY SPIRIT.

Too bad that these offspring of Catholic Action have exchanged the Church for a Hippy Commune and Jesus Christ for a forerunner of Guccini and Fedez. Indeed, their defense of the gay bill immediately found a solid front of resistance, not only by those Catholics who are still believers and faithful but above all by some intellectuals far from the Church.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

PDF print format article

Now the fuss it has gone far beyond the borders of beautiful and sunny Sicily. In the land of the leopards, winds of protest have been blowing for a few days and have shattered the city Diocese of Patti. The Church and its Magisterium are put into constant discussion, indeed considered homophobic and discriminating, from a group of jump ditches of Catholic Action, so much so that H.E. Mons. Guglielmo Giombanco and his presbytery seem condemned to the impossibility of taming these new ones Sicilian Vespers.

Our episcopate, which unfortunately appears increasingly weakened, maybe you don't realize that by now, of the terribly destructive forces that have long since entered the walls like soldiers hidden inside the belly of the Trojan horse, they are attacking us directly from within. And in the internal attacks we are undergoing, those in the LGBT lobby are the most aggressive and dangerous. A theme, that of the gay lobby inside the Church, of which our Father Ariel already spoke ten years ago with the analysis that later revealed the prophecies, all of them contained in his book And Satan became triune, first published in February 2011 and today distributed by ours Editions The island of Patmos.

But let's go in order: the sections of Catholic Action of Castel di Lucio and Tusa in recent days have wanted to be blatantly in solidarity with the ZAN Ddl which, according to them, would constitute the fifth essence of the evangelical spirit e of love Catholic.

We Fathers de The Island of Patmos, between the serious and the facetious, with two articles [see WHO e WHO] we have presented the question by pointing out its errors, increasingly convinced that the greatest work of mercy consists in admonishing sinners and those who willfully and knowingly persist in error. Like this, the Presidency of Catholic Action of the Diocese of Patti issued on Saturday 24 April a press release distancing himself from his members and reaffirming loyalty to the Pontiff, to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and to the Magisterium on matters of morals and customs. Well, those Garibaldini boys responded on their official Facebook page by deleting the offending post as it was for the case of Tusa, while Castel di Lucio preferred to delete the entire page of the local section of Catholic Action. Perhaps they understood the mistake they made? Not at all, on the contrary, they joined together, answering the rhymes. With bullying and haughty arrogance they reaffirmed their conscious and voluntary adherence to the Zan Bill by manifesting de facto their inability to make communion with the Catholic Church and with the Gospel, now seen as obstacles to tolerance and far more miserable and useless than a parliamentary bill [texts of press releases, WHO].

What to say? We are in full sin against the Holy Spirit. Why deny and reject the truths of faith, who have certainly had the opportunity to learn in the parish and in Catholic Action and to fight them by considering them erroneous means closing one's eyes to the works that the Holy Spirit accomplishes through the action of the Church. Typical hardening of Pharisaic malice that accommodating the Law to human desires, considers the work of Christ as the work of Beelzebul.

It is useful to report an authoritative commentary on the Jerusalem Bible [ed. 1998] to the passage concerning the sin against the Holy Spirit [Mt 12,31-32] that explains:

"Man is excusable if he deceives himself about the divine dignity of Jesus, veiled by the humble appearances of the Son of man, but he is not if he closes his eyes and heart to the evident works of the Spirit. Denying them, he rejects the supreme proposal that God makes to him and puts himself out of salvation ".

Unnecessary, annoying and out of place are the recriminations and the regret for having suffered attacks, anathemas and insults. Nobody insulted anyone, they just told you that you don't know Christ, the Church and the Gospel and this only for your good and to make you grow with a minimum of humility. You have been told that using the Catholic Action mask as a pedestal to engage in LGBT activism is not evangelizing since you have been disavowed by your own diocesan presidency. They told you no because this means loving each other and teaching you to recognize the error, that recognition which then leads us to say before the confessor: «[…] I propose with your holy help never to be offended again and to flee the next occasions of sin. Lord mercy, forgive me".

Boys, this means to be Christian adults with attributes, something you should know from the day of your confirmation. Ma, Alas, you have preferred to the Holy Spirit demonstrating the guilt of the world regarding sin, righteousness and judgment [cf. GV 16,8], the Spirit of the world that levels everything, normalizes and justifies. What else can be said? Too much has already been said. I hope and pray for your sincere repentance, because maybe it would have been necessary to give you a few more kicks, just as parents used to do once with rebellious children. You are so chained in ideology and intolerant of all paternal authority, heralds of a violent and intolerant democracy that turns to devour those who have served as pastors and guides there.

That would perhaps be asking too much to expect an official position from H.E. Mons. Guglielmo Giombanco? It would be too much to see a bishop who, following the example of the meek John Paul I, have the courage to dissolve these two offices of Catholic Action present in your diocese, just as Bishop Albino Luciani opposed the Catholic associations that were in favor of divorce and dissolved them by denying him spiritual assistance?

Laconi, 26 April 2021

Dear Readers,

take a look at this appeal and help us, we need it very much, in these difficult moments

In the living room of the biased Fabio Fazio, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia confirms himself as Don Abbondio's idiot brother

25 April 2021/5 Comments/in Actuality/by father ariel

- ecclesial news -

IN THE LIVING ROOM OF FABIO FAZIO, ARCHBISHOP VINCENZO PAGLIA CONFIRMS HIS IDIOT BROTHER OF DON ABBONDIO

The Holy Father Francis really said the phrase "who am I to judge a gay" in the way that Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia intends it, speaking not like the President of the Pontifical Academy of Life, but like any Nichi Vendola?

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

PDF print format article

satirical representation of The Betrothed

He Prof. Luigi Manconi and S.E.. Mons. Vincenzo Paglia they put the book to the press The meaning of life. Dialogue between a religious and a little believer. The 18 April the two authors were guests in the living room of the biased Fabio Fazio, excellent war machine of the left radical chic.

Fabio Fazio is really tender when he smiles naively, pretending embarrassments and blushes worthy of a girl in her first menstruation, while Luciana Littizzetto, ferocious as a hungry hyena, it tears apart the Catholic Church and Christian sentiment with mockery. Both - needless to say - take shelter behind the finger of the right to satire: shy girl and hungry hyena.

Dialogue with non-believing scholars it can be very important and constructive. Initially, Vincenzo Paglia, does not start badly, however, he begins to get lost after the first few bars, and then quickly get lost, completely. From this bleak television host, a subject emerges who tries to meet the interlocutor in a truly disheartening way, showing in concrete facts that they are afraid to say the very things that should be said. Example: before an objection such as "In the event of a serious illness, the last decision, whether to die or live, it must be mine ", the Archbishop President from the Pontifical Academy for Life, cannot answer: "The important thing is that the patient is not left alone". It is a statement worthy of a romantic nun who is convinced that she can solve the tragedies of life and death by stroking the hand of the dying person. Something else would have been the question to be made, but Vincenzo Paglia evaded it without answering a fundamental question: a patient can ask the state to be killed, without anyone being able to give him any kind of hope just because he has decided so?

The reality of the facts is that Vincenzo Paglia is a limited little man not able to handle dialogue of this kind, all the more to a live television broadcast. Its serious flaw is that it tends excessively to distort the essence of Catholic faith and morality in order to meet those who claim the right not to take Catholic faith and morals into the least consideration. We can, indeed we must dialogue with everyone, but always keeping firm points, because if in some cases it is good to stand out in others we are required to distance ourselves and divide ourselves from certain interlocutors who try to impose ideas on life, ethics and morals which are totally unacceptable for Catholic faith and sentiment.

I try to clarify everything better with an example: In the 2000, when he came out there Declaration Dominus Iesus in which the exclusive concept of the salvific uniqueness of Christ God is reaffirmed, at a Door to door directed on the First Rai Channel by Bruno Vespa, the Dominican theologian Daniel Ols was invited. The then president of the Italian Jewish Communities was present in the studio, Tullia Zevi, who already knew little and badly about Jewish culture and theology, let alone the Catholic one. Despite his controversy, he claimed that that declaration marked in his opinion "a great step back in time after the Second Vatican Council" (!?). The Dominican theologian became animated and graciously told her in a dry and decisive way: "Lady, i'm sorry, but I can't sell off and debase the foundations of my faith to please her ".

The style of this Dominican master, French by birth and family but in fact more Roman than the Romans, he was an illuminating model for me when years later I found myself, as a presbyter and theologian, to speak on issues that are not particularly easy to deal with in a parterre television during a live broadcast, with very short response times and the presence of specialized interlocutors to divert the discourse to prevent speaking to those who dared to raise issues deemed unacceptable by the dictatorship of the politically correct.

At a certain point Fabio Fazio throws this appetizing question to Luigi Manconi:

«[…] there is also the individual choice of the sphere of sexuality, it is a theme that is dealt with very clearly. Also here, I don't think sexual orientation really agrees with you ".

The scholar responds promptly:

«[…] It must be said that the Catholic Church, ecclesial pastoral care, thanks also to Pope Francis, he has made enormous progress. And yet the Catechism of the Catholic Church still bears the affirmation that homosexuality is an expression of sexual disorder. Then, the great openness of the Church towards homosexuals essentially risks perfecting a serious misunderstanding, that is, basically I welcome homosexuals as long as they do not act homosexual, that is, I welcome homosexuals only if they perform chastity ... that is, what emerges is not just a legal question. Same-sex marriage, to understand each other, it is a matter of substance and concerns the very concept of love and pleasure, this is the very fascinating knot ... ".

Pay close attention: a few words Luigi Manconi carries out a work of total destructive devastation that separates morality from pastoral care and the Church from the Supreme Pontiff. On the one hand he praises and exalts the Reigning Pontiff, on the other hand he attacks the Catechism which he presents as unthinkable in actuality. Fabio Fazio does not linger and intervenes with a series of statements disguised as questions:

"Real distances, however not surmountable, I think, from any point of view. And it could only be so. Let's say that the paths that are taken to shorten these distances are paths that mark, to put it right, the tremor of fear, in the sense that there are no easy choices in any way and there are no easy positions in any way. But, Monsignor, I think I can say that the issue of self-determination is fundamental, that is, the positions diverge when it comes to talking about issues such as euthanasia, sexual orientations, abortion, in which precisely what we call self-determination comes into play ".

At this point Vincenzo Paglia manifests the best of its limitation, proving that he was not even able to grasp the destructive splits made by Luigi Manconi, while the interviewer took care to pack him a poison puff that the President of the Pontifical Academy for Life swallows without even chewing, through this response:

«I would be careful to reflect on this issue of self-determination, which is a word also linked to freedom. there, here the crux is: but we, we are truly free in an absolute sense? We are disconnected from others? For me it is not like that, we are all united. Our every gesture is always a social gesture, always requires a relationship with the other and the covid showed us this in a dramatic way: we put on the masks, we have a distance, not only to defend ourselves but to defend others as well. In this sense I said, in our dialogue with Luigi, that self-determination to freedom is obvious that it is a founding value, but freedom must always be linked to fraternity and equality, if we want to resume the triad of the French Revolution. And in this the line of charity, solidarity, or Pope Francis would say "of universal brotherhood", I think it is a line that we must fully resume on all fronts ".

Such an answer is worse than raising the white flag from the trenches, because in war, the deed of surrender, it has its own deep dignity, while the prostitution of those who indulge in all the worst whims of the customer without feeling pleasure and without being paid, he has no dignity, since he does not even do it for pleasure or for money, but only out of pure and gratuitous servility aimed at the satisfaction of others. To understand this unsuccessful dialogue that arises from the incapacities and limitations of Vincenzo Paglia, it would be enough to think of the square of opposti, or logical, by Michele Psello: the opposite propositions will meet each other if desired, but the contradictory ones are not. This is why Vincenzo Paglia proved unable to carry on a dialogue of this type, not failing to arouse embarrassment in all of us, Catholic priests and theologians, through the use of categories worthy of the most seasoned Freemason, instead of shepherds taking care of souls. Here then is that the dialectic is dragged once again into the political struggle and the annihilation of the adversary, something very clear to Professor Luigi Manconi, unknown instead to Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia who launches into a continuous gurgling of clichés and third-rate pastoralisms, ignoring even the foundations of those philosophical and theological categories which should support a Christian thought.

Having then magnified the cardboard idol of the French Revolution to please the ultra secularists at all costs, marked the apotheosis of Vincenzo Paglia's objective idiocy, unaware of the principles of freedom, equality and fraternity are the foundations of Christian ethics, not an invention of the Enlightenment and much less of the French Revolution, which was the largest and most violent bloodbath of modernity. These three gospel principles were then taken, twisted and transformed into anti-Christian elements, while the blood ran in rivers under the guillotines. In short, what history did Vincenzo Paglia study, if he has studied it? No one has ever told him that the French Revolution culminates with Robespierre's period of terror, with the innocent convicted and killed on the basis of simple accusations, but above all that the great fruit it produced was Napoleon Bonaparte? Just so: cut off the head of a king who came from at least a thousand-year-old lineage, the French placed the emperor's crown on a small Corsican corporal, who then put it in his head by himself, he was so arrogant. These, they are the historical fruits of the French Revolution, all the rest are false historians and legends created at the table during the nineteenth century by liberal enlighteners and Freemasons. Well I fear that poor Vincenzo Paglia ignores all this, in the same way that perhaps the person who has placed him in the delicate role he covers ignores him.

After having hit the mark, Fabio Fazio takes the reins to lead the donkey and finally tie it where the owner wants, continuing like this:

«Naturally I turn the question to Monsignor Paglia and I just extend it. He does not find that - what Professor Manconi was saying - can be summed up like this: there has always been an excess of attention, long since, by the Church, with respect to sexuality, that I distinguish this, which Manconi then summarized perfectly in this objection, is effectively surpassed by the reality of the facts and by human nature?»

Now tied like a donkey to the stake chosen for him, Vincenzo Paglia is now literally addicted to the desire to please at all costs and whatever it costs, until giving an answer that seems packaged and then came out of the mouth of Nichi Vendola:

«First of all, let's go in order, the theme of marriage has always been clear, marriage is between a man and a woman. Then, that there may be other cohabitations of another nature this is obvious and what Pope Francis said with great clarity is enough for me on the subject of homosexuality: “Who am I to judge him?”. So in this sense it is a dimension that must be recovered and certainly every homophobia must be fought decisively. As for the question she was asking, we know that the relationship between the Church and sexuality has never been linear, in fact it is true that at times there has been an identification between sexuality and sin and vice versa and this has brought a lot of damage […]»

The Pope Francis I, who, as I have written and explained several times, is not a polyglot like his Supreme Predecessor John Paul II was and who does not have a particularly good command of the Italian language, but how presumptuous and stubborn as few, he insists on talking to journalists off the cuff, in any case, he enunciated a profoundly and obviously Catholic concept. Let's go in order, first he began by saying: "If a person is gay and seeks the Lord and has good will" - this premise is of no small importance - "who am I" continues the Supreme Pontiff "to judge him?». Then he goes on stating: "The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that these people must not be discriminated against but welcomed". To those who then the message was not clear adds: “The problem is not having these tendencies, they are brothers, the problem is lobbying […]».

This is the whole sentence pronounced in response to the reporter from the Supreme Pontiff Francis during one of his return flights to Rome. It's been years that unfortunately, uselessly, in my articles, video-lessons and conferences, I explain what the Supreme Pontiff really said with that sentence: above all that welcoming the sinner who seeks God is the founding mission of the Church, that does not reject anyone, starting with homosexual people. Moreover, none of us, starting from the Successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter, he can read and judge the conscience of a man, that God alone can read and, above all, to judge. Hence the obvious statement consistently and theologically Catholic: "Who am I to judge?». To follow with the call to the lobbies which is equivalent to saying: the problem is not having these tendencies, but to pass them through the social and political activism of gay lobbies as well. Which is to say: the problem, for the Church which must always welcome the sinner, it is not having these tendencies; the problem is sin, or rather the lobbies that would demand acceptance and legitimation not of the sinner, but of sin. And the Church will never be able to sanctify sin, even if all the lobbies of this world claim it and demand it.

Unfortunately, the phrase "who am I to judge?"?» torn from its articulated context, ended up on the banners of Gay Pride between the cries of crazy queers masquerading as nuns in fishnet stockings and stilettos. So the Supreme Pontiff did not say this the same way he did, to quote another billboard from Gay Pride, when St. Augustine Bishop and Doctor of the Church says "love and do what you want", by no means does he mean that a boy can get on all fours with another boy who works behind him. This badly extrapolated Augustinian expression, it is inserted in a commentary on the First Letter of St. John, in which, amare, it means to conform, through human freedom, our will to God's will. This means "love and do what you want", to do fully the will of God, source of eternal love. It does not mean getting on all fours with a boy who works behind you and with everything Gay Pride praising "love and do what you want".

I refuse to comment on this confused anthology of Vincenzo Paglia, to the same extent that I would refuse to see and then comment on a porn movie. The latter is linked to an expression of the great philosopher and theologian of the twentieth century Cornelius the carpenter, which indicated certain subjects such as Porn-theologians from the Porn-theology. there, Vincenzo Paglia is a genuine pornocrat when he claims:

«[…] it is true that at times there has been an identification between sexuality and sin and vice versa and this has caused a lot of damage. In reality, however, a more serene relationship is emerging […]».

By stating this you are practically apologizing to the ultra-secularists if the Church, for a long time, has counted lust among the Seven Deadly Sins. Also for this I I refuse to comment on the stupid and reckless words of this little man, that for sure, a bishop and doctor of the Church such as Sant’Alfonso Maria de ’Liguori, considered the father of Catholic morality, he would have literally beaten him up. Why this, at the bottom of, Vincenzo Paglia deserves: to be beaten like the merchants in the temple.

Respect for the truth requires us to conclude by remembering to all affected by chronic anti-bergoglism that Vincenzo Paglia the Holy Father wanted him to be a bishop saint now John Paul II, with Cardinal Camillo Ruini that this appointment supported it by accepting the pious suggestions of the Community of Sant’Egidio. All this took place in the 2000, while the one that some have taken the habit to indicate as the greatest theologian of the twentieth century, he was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, then risen to the sacred throne. And under the pontificate of Benedict XVI, the good Vincenzo Paglia thrived for eight years, doing endless damage in the Diocese of Terni-Narni-Amelia, where by the way left a deficit for tens of millions of euros and a fresco in the cathedral church which seems to be the representation of an orgy in a gay club in Testaccio. Having said this, it is good to clarify that the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, who also gave wisdom to be extraordinary in choosing the wrong people, however, the responsibility for having chosen Vincenzo Paglia cannot be attributed. Because the fault lies entirely with the Holy Father saint now and of the greatest theologian of the twentieth century, Benedict XVI.

From the island of Patmos, 23 April 2021

TO OPEN THE VIDEO OF THE FULL INTERVIEW, CLICK HERE

Dear Readers,

we need you, read WHO

Thank you!

put

on the Facebook page of Edizioni L’Isola di Patmos, which you can open by clicking on the logo below:

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

The singer Zucchero was right that in 1987 sang "Only a healthy and conscious lust saves the young from stress and Catholic Action". Someone teach Christology to the young people of the Catholic Action of Castel Lucio

24 April 2021/10 Comments/in Actuality/by Father Ivano

- ecclesial news -

THE SINGER SUGAR WAS RIGHT THAT IN 1987 SINGING "ONLY A HEALTHY AND AWARENESS LIBIDINE SAVES THE YOUNG MAN FROM STRESS AND CATHOLIC ACTION". SOME TEACHES TO YOUNG PEOPLE OF CATHOLIC ACTION IN CASTEL DI LUCIO CHRISTOLOGY

With the typical arrogance of those who do not admit mistakes, but indeed it confirms it, young people have removed this post by replacing it with another in which they confirm the contents of the previous one. And if there is anything worse than committing understandable, sometimes inevitable and above all forgivable human errors, it is the obstinacy to support and confirm the error. What this leads us to the greatest and most serious of all deadly sins: the Superbia.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

PDF print format article

After the delusional ones and farcical propaganda approaches of starred VIPs in favor of the Scalfarotto-Zan bill, that following an interview made during the program Straight and Reverse the 22 April showed all their crass ignorance about the specifics and practical consequences of the bill, timidly they make their appearance on the scene of the Catholic correct i Catholic Boys of "who am I to judge". That's what happens, for less than twenty-four hours, in Castel di Lucio (Messina) in the Diocese of Patti, where seventeen young people from Catholic Action post a photo on their Facebook page in which they are portrayed with their hands stretched out in support of the law against transomophobia.

The need was felt, vero? So much to ask me: how much we still need to see on other Facebook pages - of the Franciscan Youth, of the various Third Orders, of Agesci and other Catholic realities - similar positions, praising and blessing a law that is clearly contrary to man and which certainly does not help people with a homosexual orientation?

It is necessary to reiterate, once and for all, that the manifestation of thought is free. Just as the decision to adhere to Catholic Christianity and to try to remain within it with a coherence of faith that includes above all obedience to the dogma and provisions of the Church in matters of morals and customs remains free., as recently reaffirmed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on same-sex unions.

It's true, I remain free to think differently from Revelation and the Church but in this case I will have the decency and the intelligence not to define myself as a Catholic Christian and not to take advantage of an ecclesial reality, such as Catholic Action, to advertise my personal and rambling positions of heterodirect thinking. Because if that were the case, the glorious Catholic Action, once a guarantee of catholicity for many faithful, would find herself being downgraded to public vespasian where her young offspring have already started peeing out of the pot, with the sole consequence of spreading not the good scent of Christ but that of urine as happens for any public bathroom. After that, as soon as their post began to circulate, but especially, after our Hypatia Gatta Romana wrote a short ironic article his The Island of Patmos, opened in just over an hour since almost 100.000 Visitors, it happened that, with the typical arrogance of those who do not admit error, but indeed it confirms it, young people have removed this post by replacing it with another in which they confirm the contents of the previous one. And if there is anything worse than committing understandable, sometimes inevitable and above all forgivable human errors, it is the obstinacy to support and confirm the error. What this leads us to the greatest and most serious of all deadly sins: the Superbia.

The faithful Catholic is well aware that his thought is enlightened by the grace of Christ who through Baptism and Confirmation was informed by the Holy Spirit so that Christ and the Church do not become the victims of the ideological liberalism that homologates right reason. For this dear children of Castel di Lucio, you have no excuses and even when they praise you - including priests - for your very respectable post, know that they are false praise and liars! Yup, I tell you false and liars on the basis of the same praises that Jesus fled because he was aware of the fact that human malice elects as sovereign whoever satisfies his own belly [cf.. GV 6,15] forgetting the soul in which God dwells.

But let's read directly from the official Facebook page of the Catholic Action of Castel di Lucio the comment, currently removed, in support of the propaganda photo of the Scalfarotto-Zan bill:

splendid specimen of capuchin monkey

“In the course of his public life, Jesus constantly took the side of those whom society excluded, of the most defenseless and of the “last” of the earth. He openly reproached the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, of those who in their moral precepts wanted to enclose man in sterile laws, preventing man from manifesting himself in his full freedom and in his true essence willed by God. You agree with the example of Christ, the Catholic Action of Castel di Lucio supports the approval of the Zan bill which provides for measures to prevent and combat discrimination and violence for reasons based on sex, on gender, on sexual orientation, on gender identity and disability. Misogyny, homotransphobia and ability are serious forms of sin that go totally against the precepts of the Gospel, and it is our task to take sides so that these events are countered as soon as possible ".

So formulated this statement is nothing short of embarrassing, because an average-trained seminarian in the third year of theology would be enough to highlight all the gross errors in both scriptural and moral matters. But let's go into detail:

This is patently false and malicious! Because Christ does not fit into the imagination of the South American revolutionary advocate of Liberation Theology or the Robin Hood who steals from the rich to give to the poor. The closeness of Christ for all men, therefore not only for the poor, it can be understood only by looking at the mystery of the Incarnation. And in a particular way, it is at the moment of his baptism in the Jordan that he - true God and true man - solidarizes and shares man's condition of weakness. He undergoes a baptism of conversion so that man understands that only with man God is it possible to free oneself from sin. We see the same thing on Easter evening when Jesus joins the disciples of Emmaus who, foolish and slow of heart to believe [cf.. LC 24,25], they had not yet fully understood and needed a journey together with the Risen One so that their eyes could see.

when a goliardic joke between teenage high school students becomes a national case thanks to the ideologies of adults with no sense of proportion and ridicule …

For Jesus the last are sinners, just as it was in the case of Matthew the Publican, of Zacchaeus, dell'Adultera, of the Paralytic, of the Canaanite woman, of the Good Thief. Indeed, he came to call not the righteous but sinners, and in the encounter with the sinner he gives an abundance of mercy together with the command not to sin anymore [cf.. GV 5,14; 8-11], the same that the priest confessor pronounces after sacramental absolution.

In the relationship with the scribes and the Pharisees it is true that we can read Jesus' open contrast to their hypocritical lifestyle but it is aimed above all at repentance. They too are in a sense called friends. As for Nicodemus, Jesus invites scribes, Pharisees and doctors of the Law to be reborn from above [cf.. GV 3,1-15] so that they can acquire the wisdom of the Holy Spirit and thus fulfill the role of teachers in communion with the will of God.

It goes without saying that such an attitude of Jesus does not invalidate the goodness of the Mosaic Law that, although it is insufficient for salvation as the apostle Paul will say in the letter to the Romans, it is not rejected:

“Practice and observe everything they tell you, but do not act according to their works, because they say and do not do " [cf.. Mt 23,1-7] […] "You do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish, but to fulfill " [cf.. Mt 5,17].

These are homophobic gay, or simply homosexual human beings with common sense?

Jesus knows the Law the A he interprets as the wisest and most refined exegete, rejecting those distorted connotations that try to adapt the Law to human miseries and wills, as is the case with repudiation and adultery:

«[…] the hardness of your heart he wrote this standard for you. But from the beginning of creation he made them male and female; for this the man will leave his father and his mother and will unite with his wife and the two will become one flesh. So they are no longer two, but only one flesh. So, man does not divide what God has joined " [cf.. MC 10,5-9].

The true essence of man, dear children of Catholic Action, it is discovered only in the encounter with God, in conforming through human freedom, my will to God's will not in doing what my belly tells me! But let's go on ...

"You agree with the example of Christ, the Catholic Action of Castel di Lucio supports the approval of the Zan bill which provides for measures to prevent and combat discrimination and violence for reasons based on sex, on gender, on sexual orientation, on gender identity and disability.

What example can you give in which Christ, throughout the Holy Gospel, approves and supports sin? Or are you going to make members of Christ, limbs of a prostitute? Furthermore…

The bronze sculpture known as Manneken Pis and preserved in the historical center of Brussels

«Misogyny, homotransphobia and ability are serious forms of sin that go totally against the precepts of the Gospel, and it is our task to take sides so that these events are countered as soon as possible ".

Dear boys, I recommend that you attend the Catechism again in preparation for Confirmation, because in that case you would come to discover that the gravest sin is the sin against the Holy Spirit, certainly not misogyny, homotransphobia and ability:

«[…] all will be forgiven the children of men, the sins and also all the blasphemies they will say; but whoever has blasphemed the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven forever: is guilty of eternal guilt " [cf.. MC 3,28-29]

If you want to take sides, be political activists, but first fight your ignorance which prevents you not only from reading a text and understanding it but which first of all deprives you of that necessary humility that leads you to question your spiritual assistants so that they avoid these miserable and miserable figures before the whole Church of God..

Laconi, 24 April 2021

Dear Readers,

take a look at this appeal and help us, we need it very much, in these difficult moments

NOTEBOOKS AND NOTEBOOKS

BUY NOW

€22,00

BUY NOW

THE WAY OF THE THREE KEYS

SECOND EDITION

€25,00

BUY NOW

FREEDOM DENIED

€25,00

BUY NOW

I BELIEVE TO UNDERSTAND

€28,00

BUY NOW

DIGRESSIONS OF A LIBERAL PRIEST

€18,00

BUY NOW

SATIRICAL CATTLEQUIRES

€22,00

BUY NOW

THE SADNESS OF LOVE

€18,00

BUY NOW

WAR AND IDEOLOGICAL PROPAGANDA

€28,00

SATAN AND BECAME TRINO

BUY NOW

€30,00

BITTER HERBS

BUY NOW

€18,00

ARIANISM

BUY NOW

€22,00

The aspirin of moderate Islam

BUY NOW

€22,00

THE CHURCH AND THE CORONAVIRUS

BUY NOW

€24,00

Nothing trouble you

BUY NOW

€18,00

PIUS XII AND THE SHOAH

BUY NOW

€25,00

Sect Neocatechumenal

BUY NOW

€18,50

THE SIGN OF CAIN

BUY NOW

€20,00

FROM PROZAN TO PROZAC

BUY NOW

€24,00

THE GOLPE OF THE POLITICALLY CORRECT

BUY NOW

Popular

Marco Perfetti, alias “I can not remain silent”: the...10 December 2025 - 16:07
«We in the Vatican, here in the Vatican…». Silerian donkeys ...11 May 2025 - 10:59
The Sacrament of Marriage by Father Gabriele Giordano...13 May 2023 - 12:26
It is being distributed “Sadness of Love”, ultima...30 August 2022 - 15:24
The anti-covid vaccines19. That moral and that Christian charity ...29 July 2021 - 22:08
ANNOUNCEMENTS! "The sect Neocatechumenal. Heresy became ....15 September 2019 - 20:09
from the large “Sabrina” played by Audrey ...15 October 2019 - 19:16
Once upon a time there were the Eucharist and the Priesthood ...28 March 2019 - 0:54
I Neocatecumenali, to conquer Asia thanks ...31 July 2019 - 22:31
The Motu Proprio of Benedict XVI on the Mass is abolished..7 May 2020 - 19:27
Eventually it was discovered. The ghost-writer of the Supreme Pontiff ...16 July 2021 - 15:28
"Fideism idiot in power" … God save us from the ...30 March 2020 - 14:53

Recent

Marco Perfetti, alias “I can not remain silent”: the...10 December 2025 - 16:07
«We in the Vatican, here in the Vatican…». Silerian donkeys ...11 May 2025 - 10:59
The Sacrament of Marriage by Father Gabriele Giordano...13 May 2023 - 12:26
It is being distributed “Sadness of Love”, ultima...30 August 2022 - 15:24
Magnificent Humanity. Not a metaphysics of Intelligence...25 May 2026 - 13:07
The desperation of not believing in God: a parallel between....6 May 2026 - 14:24
Estonia, a promised land, a different world … e...5 May 2026 - 14:35
The love, understood as a feeling, it doesn't have a connotation...3 May 2026 - 22:37
Outside of Christ there is no access to the Father –...3 May 2026 - 0:30
I can not remain silent: the day criminal law discovered....30 April 2026 - 18:27
Cur in hoc casu “I can be silent”?27 April 2026 - 18:33
Karl Rahner and Easter as a time of rediscovery of glory...27 April 2026 - 13:45

Comments

Donate

Dear Readers.

This magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome - Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.