REASONS FOR DON ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA SHOULD REMAIN IN THE COMMUNION OF THE CHURCH AND IN THE SERVICE OF THE CHURCH IN OBEDIENCE TO THE CHURCH

.

Today, some thinkers, and unfortunately many clergymen, They have passed the same Luther, which in comparison - it goes without saying it is a paradox -, ends up be more orthodox of them. From these cases then we see that there is more contrast between modernists and Catholic, than between Lutherans and Catholics. Catholics are more united with Luther that the modernist. The main problem of unity among Christians, today, It is not so much that of the union with the Lutherans - there's also this, obviously -, but rather that of 'unity among Catholics.

.

.

.

.

Dear Brother Priest

ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA

Priest of the Church of Palermo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the news of the decree of your Bishop He was surprised and saddened, because recently I heard some of your homilies in which you earnestly denounced the spread of many heresies in the Church type modernistic, declaring at the same time, in critical tone towards the Lefebvrians, your respect for the decrees of the Second Vatican Council and complaining about their performance in the modernist sense.

.

These your words coincide with what I am arguing publicly for many years, so I suffered unjust measures by the authorities. How you claim you, Today in the Church the modernist trend has become so established, which it is also widespread among Bishops, so that they favor the modernists and punish anti-modernists. And how can you determine, we Fathers de The Island of Patmos We are writing for some years about these serious problems, Just browse our store to find dozens of writings on this specific topic.

.

I know that your Bishop has motivated the decree citing you, while it is free from heretical infections, break the ecclesial communion. You, instead, from your hand, you feel unjustly punished and you quoted the authority of St. Thomas about. I state that I do not have enough information to form an opinion, but I offer you some criteria derived from Angelic Doctor.

.

First of all must be for you a great satisfaction the fact he had been assured by your Bishop was not a heretic, considered, as I said earlier, the current widespread heresy even between the hierarchy and the theologians. At the same time I am amazed inconsistency of your bishop but allows a heretic as Enzo Bianchi to make a public lecture in his cathedral church [cf. recent article by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. Indeed, by Enzo Bianchi, There are authoritative rebuttals, like that of our dear and esteemed brother Antonio Livi, while on this online magazine of the Fathers The Island of Patmos I have refuted several times and severely; is also one document in preparation study to which Dr.. Jorge Facio Lince has been working for months [some of our other articles on Enzo Bianchi heresies are still readable WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, etc ..]

.

As for the teaching of Aquinas in terms of criminal decrees, he distinguishes an undue Decree [excommunication due;] because of the contempt of the law by the authority [the opinion of law being observed]. "So, if part of the judgment that there is an error, to render void the judgment, it has no effect ». So those affected can not take this into account.

.

"If the ruling is right, it is to be punished and must obey humbly, and it will be his merit; or it must ask the Superior the annulment of the decree; or recourse must be had to a higher level. If he showed contempt for the decree, thereby sinning mortally " [Sum. Theol., Suppl., q. 21, a. 4]. I am unable to advise you on which path to take. You stand, in conscience, before God, make the decision. I can cite my own case, who has found the following solution. Following my broadcast on Radio Maria, the 30 last October, in which I talked about divine punishments, my Superior I partially suspended peep the 5 following November, by publishing a statement against me infected by heresy, that denies the original sin [in these articles is my defense: WHO, WHO, in this next trilogy Instead it shows that my case was mounted by environment-related lobby gay, WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

Judgment obviously unjust that against me, to which I I adeguai in obedience, without failing to explain in detail my reasons to the Superior. But there was nothing to be done. He did not answer me either. Then, in late January, I appeal to higher court, getting satisfaction. Two days after the Superior reinstated me in the fullness of my priestly functions. But the question, very serious, of the divine punishments, It remains open in the field of contemporary theology. The same Pontiff, in his speech to the earthquake victims during his visit to the Carpi 2 last April, he mentioned the consequences of original sin in the following words: "Our soul, created for life, He suffers hearing that his thirst for eternal good is oppressed by an ancient and evil dark ' [cf. video, WHO, WHO].

.

The Church teaches the priest He must see the Bishop as his immediate superior, which, however, it represents the Pope, to whom, ultimately goes obedience to supreme level on this earth. The communion with the bishop and the local Church is subject to communion with the Supreme Pontiff.

.

Today we are in an ecclesial situation in which there are modernists Bishops or Lefebvrians, who are not in full communion with the Vicar of Christ or pretend to be; rather, while the former, careerists and bullies, flatter him and pressed on him with a style that looks like the mafia, seconds, on the basis of an incorrect reference to Tradition, reject the teachings of Vatican II and the Mass new world order, and disobey the Pope openly [cf. article in the 2015 at Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO].

.

The unity of the local Church He must always take - priests and Bishop together - making the head unit of the Church Universal Roman, drawing inspiration from it and submitting it. This loyalty and obedience to the Pope and the Magisterium of the Church is the only treasure that we Catholics possess among all non-Catholic Christian brothers. These supreme values ​​I could deepen thanks to the experience that I have done since 1982 al 1990 as the official Secretary of State of John Paul II. Near the Pope and as collaborators of the Pope can make a beautiful and most fruitful experience of the universal Church, which does not detract at all, indeed does better understand the dignity and autonomy of the local church.

.

This wide and universal outlook, this bond with the Pope not to mention the immediate superior, but right through him, And, as it were, In the DNA the spirituality of us Dominicans, we make our profession of obedience to our Provincial Superior, Certainly, but beyond him and beyond him, our total profess obedience to the Supreme Pontiff.

.

Today the papacy has more than ever need to be helped, He warned in his ministry and defended by all the people of God, especially by the true prophets and the anime-victim, and because never before has he tried, threatened and besieged by Satanic forces who pretend to be friends, and instead they want to bring it down, and because unfortunately - something that never happened in the entire history of the Church - a crisis of faith has crept within the same episcopate and of the College of Cardinals and, consequently, They have arisen in the Church bitterly opposed factions and divisions [cf. Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO] - case in point the opposition between Lefebvre and modernists - right on the issue of the truths of faith.

.

There is more contrast between Rahner and St. Thomas Aquinas than between Luther and St. Thomas Aquinas. For Luther God is creator, for Teilhard de Chardin God is organizer of matter. For Luther the atheist is in error, Rahner instead for the atheist is an unwitting believer. For Luther God is omnipotent, David Maria Turoldo is weak. For Luther God is a You in front of 'the, Marco Vannini l 'the It is the "absolute subject". Luther admitted the immutability of dogma, Walter Kasper la Nega. Luther condemned atheism, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini said that in the consciousness of the believer there is always an atheist. For Luther, faith is knowing the truth - that is, the Word of God -, many Catholic theologians is a "athematic and existential encounter" with Christ …

.

… for Luther Christianity is at the top of other religions, for Dupuis is one religion among others, Pair of other. For Luther the true religion is Christianity, however for Schillebeeckx it is the global federation of all religions [cf. my articles WHO, WHO]. For Luther the Christian only has the gift of the Spirit, however Raimundo Panikkar, the Indian mystic is the same as Christian. For Luther Muslims are enemies of the gospel, Instead Rahner are "anonymous Christians" [cf. my article WHO]. Luther believed in the next world; Gutiérrez said that the only world is this world. Luther thought that Adam and Eve were really existed; Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi said that the account of man's creation is an etiological myth [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo WHO]. Luther admits the Biblical account of man's creation, while Teilhard de Chardin says that man comes from monkeys.

.

Luther distinguishes the body from the spirit; Teilhard de Chardin says that evolution matter becomes spirit [cf. my article WHO]. Luther believed in the immortality of the soul, Vito Mancuso denies. Luther believed in the resurrection of the dead at the end of the world, per Rahner, instead, the resurrection takes place immediately after death. Luther believed in the divine punishment, Raniero Cantalamessa and Hermes Ronchi do not believe [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. Luther believed in hell, von Balthasar says that "exists" but that "is empty". Luther believed in the existence of the devil, many Catholic exegetes do not believe.

.

For Luther Trinity Three Persons, Rahner are three ways to be God. Luther recognized the And the son, for Melloni, which instead is wire-orthodox, if you can do without. Luther was quite certain of what Christ said, Father Arturo Sosa S.J. He says that we are not sure [cf. article by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO]. For Luther was a heretic Arius, Arius was right for Bianchi, as it seems to have said recently in your church cathedral [cf. texts lessons by Enzo Bianchi, WHO, WHO]. Luther acknowledged the deity of Christ, Schillebeeckx believes Christ alone il "eschatological prophet". For Luther believe that Christ is the Redeemer, It is an absolute truth, Instead Marcello Bordoni, Christ can freely interpret, choice, or as a redeemer or "martyr prophet", as one prefers. For Luther Christ is the only Savior, Giuseppe Dossetti Jews are also saved without Christ.

.

Luther accepted the Christological dogma of Chalcedon, Bruno Forte interprets the Incarnation in the Hegelian sense [cf. my article, WHO]. For Luther Christ is the God of Truth, while de la Potterie simply Christ teaches us the Gospel. As for Luther the atoning sacrifice of Christ is the truth of faith, for Cardinal Robert Zollitsch the idea of ​​atonement is medieval image exceeded. For Luther Christ's sacrifice was wanted by the Father for our salvation, Schillebeeckx for the death of Christ was not a sin offering, but only a crime caused by human malice.

.

Luther distinguished thought from reality: duty of thinking is adapted to the real. Instead, for Rahner, the real is identified with the thought, so my idea is reality: the self is always right. Luther recognized that we have to obey the Ten Commandments, Rahner while everyone is free to decide for themselves of their identity. For Luther consciousness is submitted to the word of God, while Cardinal Walter Kasper is the source of truth [the cogito of Descartes] and for the Father Arturo Sosa excels on everything [cf. my article, WHO, Our answers to the Readers WHO, etc ..]. Luther knows that sin is a tremendous evil, which it is only removed from the Cross of Christ, per Teilhard de Chardin, instead, sin is simply a negligible hiccup in the unstoppable path Evolution [Kasper see my articles WHO, WHO]

.

Luther was against Pelagio, for which grace was the prize to the works, instead, per Rahner, the grace is the vertex human self-transcendence. Luther said that it is only justified those who believe, who does not believe, it is condemned, instead, per Rahner, all are justified, because all have faith, least "implied, preconscious and athematic ". Luther believed in original sin, Nunzio Galantino does not believe [cf. my article WHO, Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo WHO]. Luther condemned sodomy, Bianchi approves. Vincenzo Paglia does great things about Pannella, approving the confusion between the sexes [cf. my article WHO], Luther recognized the distinction between men and women and he condemned as immoral Pannella. Luther judges modernity according to the Gospel, modernists judge the Gospel according to modernity.

.

Today, some thinkers, and unfortunately many clergymen, They have passed the same Luther, which in comparison - it goes without saying it is a paradox -, ends up be more orthodox of them. From these cases then we see that there is more contrast between modernists and Catholic, than between Lutherans and Catholics. Catholics are more united with Luther that the modernist. The main problem of unity among Christians, today, It is not so much that of the union with the Lutherans - there's also this, obviously -, but rather that of 'unity among Catholics. The modernists, who boast of dialogue with the Lutherans, They end up absorbing the heresies of Luther, giving them a Catholic painting and despising actually Luther, by them as a fundamentalist overcome by the "historical-critical exegesis".

.

Dear Don Alessandro, your battle against modernism is more legitimate than ever, necessary and appropriate. The modernists have come to a very high directional seats, among the collaborators of the Pope or presenting themselves as friends of the Pope, while the crafty sycophants and Judah, that would impose, as mobsters, their shady plans Masonic subservience of the Church to the powers of the world [cf. article in the 2015 at Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, WHO] . We must do everything possible to free the Holy Father from this deadly embrace and these occult powers, who put the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI in the position of having to give freely to the Petrine ministry.

.

I think this is a purifying and sanctifying mission, Our Lady entrusted you, along with your service to the noble and ancient Church Palermo, that today suffer in you, suffering in Bishop, He suffers in good faithful, He suffers for the sins of all, but while this Palermo do not miss the mercy of the Father and the Holy Spirit consolation, That all summons to penance, to reconciliation, to communion and peace, under the guidance of legitimate Shepherd, not without human weakness, Yet Servant of your souls in the name and by mandate of Christ. Therefore listen, help and follow your bishop !

.

Take yourself, dear Don Alessandro, a long period of pause and reflection hermitical, I listen to the voice of the Lord, like the prophet Elijah: "Go out and stand on the mountain before the Lord's presence" [I Re 19, 11] and wait "a light wind murmuring" [v.12]. It is the wind of the Holy Spirit. Accept orders, win the temptations. China head before the divine Majesty. Beseech mercy for your sins and those of sinners. Abandoned in the hands of the God of mercy. In the words of St. Caterina da Siena: "Rest on the Cross". Soon you will be rebuilt in the fullness of your priestly functions and increasing its fully the gifts God gave you.

.

New and great tasks await, new achievements for your sanctification, to that of the Pope, for the good of the universal Church, for the Church of Palermo, for Italy, for world evangelization, for the salvation of souls, for the kingdom of Christ, for the triumph of Mary, for the defeat of Satan.

.

Very moving and a harbinger of celestial favors was the recent and happy collective eucharistic adoration cathedral with four thousand people and the Bishop meekly on his knees before the Blessed Sacrament, to plead with songs and tears light, pace, pardon, love, harmony and unity for the Church Palermo. I feel for you all, dear brothers in faith, admiration, compassion and tenderness. I remember in prayer. Pray for me.

.

Confirm the blood pact with Christ: He gives you his blood; you give Him your. The sin is washed with blood, the blood of the New Covenant. We Romagna - not to mention the Tuscan! ―, Sicilians like you have the hot blood: we may sometimes verbally violent, but always generous.

.

Madonna vera, flesh and blood, is merciful and tender with the humble, but it is terrible with the proud; is the Madonna at Fatima showed the little shepherds the damned in hell; Madonna is the one that glorifies the Lord because he has "scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts" [LC 1,51]. that Madonna, Seat of Wisdom, which he is winner of Satan and of all heresies.

.

She will protect you and defend all, beginning with your Bishop; She is, or Palermitani, the heavenly Presidio of your Diocese and the wiles of the enemy infiltration and support you in the good fight.

.

Fight against principalities, against powers! [Ef 6, 12]. By Caterina da Siena, confidate, generous Palermitani, that soon you will be a sign for the Italian Church and cry with Catherine: "Fire! Fire! Fire!». Soon they will come down abundant graces upon you all and Italy will be inflamed.

.

With esteem and affection in the Lord.

Varazze, 7 April 2017

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.