- ecclesial news -

STORAGE AND PROGRESS

.

To resolve the current intra-ecclesial conflict between modernists and Lefebvre have to give each other these two essential factors of the ecclesial dynamism: preservation and progress.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

.

Rereading some texts of the morning meditations the Holy Father in the chapel of Domus Sanctae Martha, the 31 October 2017 - as reported the columnist de The Osservatore Romano the 1 next November -, Pope asks, against the other: The Christians' really believe in the Holy Spirit "that is in them? And have the courage to "sow the seeds", to get involved, or take refuge in a "pastoral conservation ', that does not leave that "the Kingdom of God will grow"? And he answers: "So many times we see that you prefer a pastoral preservation" rather than "let the United grow".

.

We would like some comments. It must be distinguished from conservation conservatism. Keep diligently and, jealously and the sacred deposit of divine Revelation, no compromises, without adding and without taking [cf Gal 3,15; AP 22,19] and be faithful to the cost of living is the absolute duty of every Catholic, in the first place the bishops and the Pope.

.

conservatism, instead, which probably alludes to the Pope, It is a foolish and useless conservation. It is the store that is no longer needed, It is the cling or nearsightedness or laziness or fear or interest in ideas, costumes, mores, habits, traditions outdated or abandoned by the Church, is the exchange just progress for modernism, get stuck on a historic day phase of the Church's journey towards the Kingdom, is close the eye of the fields are already white for harvest " [GV 4,35]; is close ear to the voice of the Spirit, who "renews the face of the earth", that "renew our minds" [RM 12,2] and day by day renews our inner man [cf. II Cor 4,16]. The Holy Spirit urges the Church to ensure progress, but in the sense indicated by these words of the Lord, He serves to remind us [GV 14,26]and then encourage us to make money.

.

Granted - I want to believe - the Pope to speak of conservatism and not of legitimate conservation, does not seem to correspond to truth, It seems like Pope Francis wants to insinuate, that there is a wide spread of conservatism, that nevertheless exists in Lefebvrians; but what now afflicts more and disturbs the Church have a much wider spread of modernism or a false progress and or a false interpretation of the renewal promoted by the Council. And these evils the Pope never speaks, all it is taken from exaggerated and biased polemic against traditionalism, which he is likely to make a bundle of all herbs, Also blaming that healthy conservatism that, along with a healthy conservation, are essential factors of the structure and progress of the Church.

.

If Francis wants to be a reformer of the Holy See So begin with the ward or false stop those employees who are infected with Modernism and rahnerismo, and take very loyal employees and loyal to the papal Magisterium and enemies not only of lefebvrismo, but also of modernism, both open while the good sides of one and the other.

.

However, there is a certain stubborn, short-sighted and presumptuous conservatism that, under the pretext of fidelity to Sacred Tradition, accused the Popes after the Council to disown, and he would like to return to the doctrinal climate and pre-conciliar pastoral, as if Vatican II did not take place, forgetting that, When a council makes a doctrinal progress, as is almost always the case, the church, more enlightened by the Gospel and overcome certain mistakes, On the infallibility of his doctrine, never comes back, while it may happen that a new Council corrects a defective pastoral practice initiated by a preceding Council, or restore or recover certain pastoral practices abandoned by that Council, because of this plan, for the changing historical contingencies or the fallibility of the churchmen themselves, it may mutate or wrong and therefore can be corrected, after experiencing the adverse effects caused by the error.

.

Thus the Council, going to meet a need of the time in which it was celebrated, He insists on the pastoral renewal and gives about many directives, that touch all aspects of church life. But after fifty years of application of these directives, many observers and impartial pastors and lovers of the Church we have conducted for years now to make clear the fact that the pastoral reconcile, for some aspects, It needs a course correction, that perhaps only a new council or a great reformer Pope will implement.

.

This in no way means that we should go back in toto to the pre-council pastoral, it means keeping the pastoral achievements of the post-council - for example a healthy ecumenism and interreligious dialogue -, purifying them from certain buonistici excesses and too optimistic towards the modern world, so that today, for lack of vigilance of the bishops, we see an impressive return of modernism, much worse and more insidious than that of St. Pius X times, even because, while this had taken root only in the lower clergy and among theologians and exegetes, that infects the same body Bishops especially in Smart thin to form the rahnerismo.

.

All good Catholics, faithful and shepherds, You have now realized this enormous scam, except, I wonder why, the same modernist, which either fall from the clouds, or pretend they do not know or are deaf to appeals and warnings or contemptuously ignore the charges against them or reject them or disdained, poor slandered victims, from superfine hypocrites, persecute the courageous few who discover their plots.

.

The great pastoral problem today, It is no longer what it was imposed fifty years ago, as he commanded the Council, to abandon a pastoral too conservative, anachronistic, static, repetitive, too defensive, suspicious, fearful, suspicious and aggressive towards the modern world, indeed poorly known and sometimes misunderstood, for a renewed approach to benign modernity, open, fair, healthily critical, certainly prudent as the serpent, but also simple as the dove, knowing that the world reserves pitfalls, but also that the world created by God offers several values ​​to be recognized, to save, and to lead to Christ.

.

On the path of renewal, of becoming, of change, the rejuvenation, development and progress has insisted, and it has gone very far in the past fifty years, and certainly true progress never end; but it has not always advanced in the right way, and more than advance, in many cases, You are deflected or one has strayed from the right path and fidelity to the real teachings of the Council; There is not always a moved with the necessary resourcefulness, moderation, caution and wisdom, in obedience to the guide of the Pontiffs or the doctrine of Catechism of the Catholic Church, indeed often falling into modernism Network, which it is a misleading approach to modernity, in which it is necessary to distinguish the wheat from the chaff, and instead the modernists have confused with one another.

.

What then today we must above all do to promote healthy, effective and balanced ministry, It suits this need of the hour, different and in some respects opposed to the historical situation, he had to face and solve the council, It is not so reproach conservatism, although then it may still exist, but it is that the Pope decides, finally, with boldness and courage, heedless of any quacking of modernists, to denounce the rampant modernism, far more dangerous and harmful than lefebvrismo or conservatism, considering the extensive damage that modernism has done in recent 50 year old. and he is making, under the pretext of conciliar renewal, in the Church and in society. And here I note that since 1966 Maritain denounced the danger of modernism. It is not that Maritain was precisely a conservative. We should not insist unilaterally on developing leaving quietly preserving the deposit of faith. It is the opposite that needs to be done, after fifty years of progressive rhetoric, who ended up degenerating into partisan polemics against modernism and preservation.

.

The real future of the Church and of humanity

.

It must plant it once and for all with a relativism and historicism of Hegel's origin, reported several times by Pope Benedict XVI in the wake of the conviction modernist evolutionism made by St. Pius X. Becoming supposed to be. Its only makes sense in relation to the Absolute, and the story has an end only in the Lord report. Instead, we must find the principles and the absolute values ​​of reason and faith, now largely forgotten, neglected, misunderstood, incompression, e skin disprezzat, among the very people who should keep them and insegnarceli, including bishops. Values ​​that instead have always been taught and always will be taught for the salvation of mankind, by sound philosophy, as rational, and from the Church, as values ​​of faith. We must know for sure what these values ​​of reason and of faith, We need to know why are these and not others, It is necessary to distinguish them from the subjective views and deciduous. We must distinguish dogmatism and fundamentalism by the certainty of faith and rational certainty.

.

We should be able to distinguish the immutable values, immortal and incorruptible from those that mutate and become corrupt. Necessary to distinguish the immutable truth and supra-temporal and temporal those mutable, what is true today, it is true always and will always be true - philosophical truths, moral theological - what is true today and will be tomorrow under certain conditions or historical or legal institutions or political or ecclesial realities.

.

It is with reason and faith that we know what is right and what is faith. At this point we do not underfoot quicksand, but the rock on which to build the house, the firm ground on which to rest and walk. We know what are the values ​​that will never fail. We know what is the meaning of existence and of life. We know who we are, where we come from and where we can, we want and need to go. We know that God exists. We know who to trust. We know why the good and evil. We know that there is no middle way between yes and no. We know our vocation and our duty. We see our eternal destiny and we can pursue it with hope, perseverance and courage, knowing they will not be disappointed. We know that we can do it. We know what are the values ​​and goods, for which it is worth sacrificing our lives, we know what are the values ​​on which we can not give in, even at the cost of living. We know what is martyrdom. We know we can sell everything, negotiate on everything, fiddling around, outside of our soul. So we buy all. We know it is impossible to salvation without these values, so these are the values ​​that guarantee the salvation. If we abandon delivery that was given to us by Christ, considering it outdated or aged or no longer valid or no longer relevant, for future invented by us in the idea that it is the Holy Spirit, we are not innovators, we make no real progress, but we are traitors, deserters and faithless; we are no longer under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, Demon ma.

.

Instead it is necessary that we always keep before the eyes del'intelletto and heart the values ​​and the absolute property, perennial and unchanging, God's Word does not pass - The word of God remains forever - that illuminates our path, It shows us our duties, us to experience the divine law, inflames the heart, It pushes us to holiness - the love of Christ compels us —, correcting our mistakes, forgives our sins, It leads to real progress, founded on divine truth always known better in the same sense and the same meaning.

.

The appeal to "tradition" to know what is faith and what is not, in itself is not enough, and it is even illegal and wicked, if you claim to appeal directly and subjectively to Tradition, to contest or contradict or "fix" the doctrinal teaching of a Pope or a Council, as they often are the guardians and interpreters supreme and definitive Tradition.

.

The error then worsens, whether between the content of Tradition does not discern which ones are truly permanent, inviolable and insuperable, and which it is old and outdated content. Tradition is not a matter of time duration, but the intrinsic value of truth, over the time, the content of the Tradition. We must be able to distinguish in the Tradition that is related to time and historical contingencies passing, what belongs essentially the Eternal and the Absolute, ie the institutional will of Christ ("Divine right") - for example the sacraments - which can never be, It never will be changed or abandoned by the Church.

.

Thus it is not sufficient in every case to say: "gives 2000 years' - provided that you know for certain - "has always been thought or done so", because instead it is said that we should continue to do so forever. There is a past that is now past dead and buried. It would make sense to remove a corpse from the grave like the restoration of the values ​​of the past. What is rightly passed, it is good that remains of the past, otherwise it would be like trying to bring back those "things past" [II Cor 5,19], of which St. Paul speaks. Better still an ancient truth that a new error.

.

There are indeed compared to Tradition firsts, never before existed. If, however, the Church establishes new things unknown to the previous Tradition, such as women's ministries or The new order of Mass, this is not a break with Tradition, but simply it means that those things were contained implicitly in Tradition.

.

These are the lines of true "breakthrough prophetic", the real reform we expect of Pope Francis. Of course he should not listen to extollers time acti, and it does well to arguirli, but above all do not listen to flatterers and false friends, but those who really loves, who urges him to join teaching and pastoral, conservation and development, continuity and progress, loyalty and inventiveness, even if the true friend can have the tone of the warning or reprimand. The "revolution" populist, reckless and low-priced to let dittatorelli ambitious, bellied and demagogues Africa and Latin America, without lowering its sacred dignity of Vicar of Christ.

.

If the Pope wants to be father of the poor, as it is clear from its intentions, imitate his Lord Jesus Christ and the countless Holy Fathers of the poor and let stand the Don Lorenzo Milani, i Fidel Castro Helder Câmara gli. The oppressed are not only immigrants. We invite the Holy Father to exercise his mercy with the crushed by the modernists, do not have too much confidence with the modernist oppressors.

.

It is true that the lefevriani also speak of "modernists", but they distort the meaning of the concept, when they accuse of "modernism" the Papacy post-conciliar and doctrines of the Council, confuse progress with modernism or Maritain with Rahner or confuse Mass new world order Dinner with Lutheran. Continues below the journalist: "Reality, indeed, It is that "wheat" - words of the Pope - "has the power within, the yeast has the power inside ", and also "the power of the Kingdom of God comes from within; the strength comes from within, the growth comes from within ' ".

.

There is no doubt about the truth of what the Pope says here. Only the Gospel image of the wheat grain is not the only image that Christ offers to His Word. No doubt it throughout history, always comes better known by the Church in the same sense and the same meaning, as St. Vincent of Lerins, with the development of the Church's dogmatic.

.

To clarify the issue of the conservative function of pastoral and avoid the conservatism, necessary to refer to statements or comparisons of Christ, in which emerges the durability, stability, the immutabilità, incorruptibility, eternity of God's Word, like when, for instance, it is compared to a. "treasure" [cf. ], to a "precious pearl" [cf. ], a "drachma" [cf. ] or a "rock" [cf. ]. It is a word that "does not pass" [cf. ]. It is a word of "eternal life" [cf. ]. The precious things are carefully preserved and jealously. It is a principle of good sense, that everyone understands. And how much more so it must be kept intact and undamaged, at any cost, without change, without corrections, without adding and without taking, although with continuous explanations, the divine message of salvation, who assures us and promises us eternal life.

.

Of course, the Gospel message is not like a perishable food, which is corrupt, if it is not well guarded and preserved. In fact, it is not afraid of the wear of time or corrosive agents. It is made of corruptible matter, but it is pure immortal spirit. It is a treasure that, though well guarded, "the thief can not steal and moths can not break '. Who can be corrupted is the possessor, who is unfaithful, negligent and neglected in the store and keep it, and then he can lose. Here apostasy. It can conceive evil and can travisarlo. That's heresy. It can hurt administer. Here human respect, sloth and negligence of the pastors.

.

He continues the columnist: "Similarly, said Francis, "If we want to preserve for us the grain, It will be only a grain. If we do not mix with life, with flour of life, the yeast, It will remain only the yeast "". Here the Pope touches an aspect of conservatism. He obviously does not deny that needs store grain: otherwise, if you come to donate? We give what we have carefully preserved. Ma, If values ​​are to be donated, and this is precisely the case of God's Word, although it must donate. They are the very words of Jesus: "If the grain of wheat does not die, it remains only; but if it dies, it produces much fruit » [LC 12,24].

.

How to tune preservation and progress

.

It can advance the living being that has its own stable identity. In fact the real progress is to improve the conditions of the subject. The course assumes that the preservation of the subject. It is true that life is movement, it is becoming, it is changing. But why is life indeed be development or explanation in the right direction of the existing entity. The progress of the movement must be healthy, that is orderly and well-guided and non-pathological, disorganized or incoherent. Even a madman is full of movement, but no one envies his condition.

.

The subject that divides or changes by denying their identity namely by ceasing to keep himself, start a movement that does not involve progress, but dissolution or disintegration. It is the process that leads to death. It is true that the dead no longer exercises the vital activities. However, the stiffness of death does not exclude at all in becoming a corpse which is its dissolution. So the sheer becoming, the simple change or mutate is not a good in itself. All becoming has a direction.

.

Not to be trusted to a becoming confused and contradictory. To test whether this is progress, not corruption, We have to see where tents. If it tends to better progress; it tends to worse setback. It should be short, it is becoming, the development or enhancement or improvement of a subject who is supposed to be maintained in its own identity. Otherwise, becoming is not life, my dead, it is not progress, but retrogression, not evolution but involution, but no progress relegation, not decay.

.

The concern to preserve their healthy alleged identity, It is a very legitimate concern and dutiful, that has nothing to do with conservatism do not know what "closing another". It lacks in masochists subjects and d It corresponds to what in the animal kingdom is self-preservation, without which that animal would soon be destroyed by adverse agents.

.

It is necessary that the Pope, which supreme guardian, advocate, guarantor and moderator, concord and peace in the Church, to assume its responsibilities. It must ask yourself in the position it deserves fair trial, centering on the universal principles of the Church, so that both sides conflict - lefevriani and modernists - can recognize themselves as Catholic.

.

It should be, secondly, that recognizes the part of truth and justice - mentioned in this article -, present and carried forward by both parties. The two sides, side by side relationship, fit perfectly, as the two halves of a sphere broken, because God created them just because, unite, do one thing, which it is the same reality of the Church.

.

The Pope must make every effort so that the two sides meet each other and approached, overcoming old grudges, ODĪ. and mistrust. It must abandon its current propensity for modernists, otherwise it can not be expected to elicit the confidence of Lefebvre and the modernists remain confirmed in their errors and take on an arrogant attitude, which will not lead to any result. The Pope must make sure that Lefebvre feel understood and appreciated in their good reasons, What the Pope has so far not done, indeed falling into contempt and nell'insulto. They, But, from them, They must strive to accommodate confidently all the doctrines of the Council, as he urged them repeatedly Pope Benedict XVI and, consequently, the following papal teaching until Papa Francesco.

.

As for the modernists, the Pope must follow the same method applied to Lefebvre: recognize the good sides and correct defects. Good side of the modernists, that has escaped the Lefebvrians, who misunderstood, is the attention to modern thinking and a willingness to modernization and progress of the Church. But if the Church is relatively easy to correct the errors of Lefebvre, after all few in number and fairly compact, a fact of doctrines and morals, gigantic undertaking, and above the forces of the Church it appears the work of correction of errors of the modernists, and because they are scattered throughout the Church, among pastors and the faithful, and because mistakes are very varied and touch on all the dogmas of the faith. Wanting to make a comparison drawn from garbage, cleaning up the Lefebvrian camp is about cleaning up the modernist camp, as well as to clean up in a Swiss city is to treat the Naples garbage.

.

However, a point of agreement between the Pope, Lefebvre and the modernists you might find around the problem Rahner. Indeed, while the modernists consider Rahner their greatest theologian, Lefebvre have sharply Rahner identified in the greatest danger for the Church today. At this point the Pope - it's about time - should decide with courage, come what may, to condemn the errors Rahner, giving a just satisfaction to Lefebvre and to all lovers of truth and of the Church. However, things are not so simple, because really Rahner gave a contribution to the doctrines of the Council. It is at this point that Lefebvre pass from the wrong and so must the Pope correct them, because they consider it as a modernist's contribution to the Council rahneriano. From here their rejection of such doctrines regarded as moderniste, which is false, because Lefebvre interpret those doctrines of modernism in the sense rahneriano; and instead there Rahner gave a positive contribution, otherwise it would not have been approved by Council. If the Pope will be able to show to Lefebvre and the modernists the points on which they meet each other and if one more he will accept the papal corrections, Peace will be made.

.

The Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary sustain the Pope in its leadership in the Church's mission in the truth, in the unit, in holiness, in a healthy pluralism and harmony, in a renewed evangelization, that enlarges the boundaries of the visible Church, vinca forces hostile to it, religions convert to Christ, reacquaint the separated brethren to the Holy Mother Church, showing the world the face of just God vindicates the humble, merciful comforter of the afflicted, liberator of the oppressed, conqueror of sin and death.

.

Varazze, 14 September 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

- ecclesial news -

BEFORE A CHURCH VISIBLE FROM A SLICE AND MORAL DECLINE Doctrinal IRREVERSIBLE, YOU MUST OPEN THE FIRST BANK OF SEED

Right now we should treasure of the words of Cardinal Charles Journet [1891-1975] than in his work Church of the Incarnate Word explains: "The axiom “where the Pope there is the Church”, so where the Pope acts as Pope and Head of the Church; if not, neither the Church is in him, neither he is in the Church " .

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Rembrandt, Christ with the Apostles in the boat in a storm

The problem is disastrous, we start diluting the air with a little’ of humor …

… responding to a Cardinal who wanted to cheer him up by reminding him that according to the promise of Jesus Christ Peter's boat would not be prey to the storm and that the end would come in port, Blessed Pope Pius IX answered: "It's true, but the Lord has spoken and given warranties with respect to the boat, not regarding the crew ' [cf. G. Cionchi, The Pius IX hidden, Ed. Kshlom, 2000. WHO]. And with this joke of Blessed Pope Pius IX, who in private it was endowed with a spirit of humor at times hilarious, pass mystagogical aspect is that tragic. It is so true that Christ himself has promised that the Church will survive until his return at the end of time, but the Word of God also gives us a clear question to ponder:

.

But the Son of Man, when will, find faith on earth? [cf. LC 18, 8]

.

With great clarity the Blessed Apostle Paul wrote to the people of Thessalonica making use of language and dramatic images:

.

Please, siblings, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our communion with him not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed neither by spirit, or by word, or by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand, so that no man deceive you in any way. Before that day will be the apostate and must be revealed the man of lawlessness, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship up to sit in the temple of God, ostentandosi as God. Do not remember, while I was still with you, These things were? And now you know what prevents its manifestation that takes place at the time. The mystery of lawlessness is already in place. Meanwhile, those who now holds it holds it, until the middle of bait and then it will be revealed the wicked and the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the light of his coming, because the presence of the wicked will occur in the power of Satan with all sorts of portents, signs and wonders of falsehood and every kind of wicked deception for those who are lost, because they received not the love of the truth and so be saved. Therefore, God will send them a justification of error that they may believe the lie and so are judged all who have not believed the truth, but they consented to the iniquity [2Ts 2,1-3.13-17]

.

Then turning to his disciple Timothy, the Blessed Apostle continues to write:

.

I charge you before God and Christ Jesus who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season, do warn, reproaches, exhorts with all magnanimity and doctrine. The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales. But you shall carefully, endure suffering, do the work of the gospel proclaimer, fulfil your Ministry [II Tm 4,1-8].

.

When the Blessed Apostle John He wrote the text of the Apocalypse on the Island of Patmos, in verse in which he tells ...

.

"Fell, fallen is Babylon the great, one that has made all the nations with the wine of her fornication of fury " [AP 13, 8].

.

... using an image of the Old Testament It caters to the Roman Empire, then Rome hidden behind "Babylon the Great", all for reasons that anyone can understand. Reasons related in part to security and partly to the spread of the text, in order to prevent their destruction by the Romans at the time about a strong suspicion towards gesuano movement and its spread of his message.

.

After two thousand years now, it comes from saying that never as today has that reference to ancient Rome hidden behind the image of Babylon current, place that has long Roma "has made all nations drink of the wrath of her fornication with wine" [refer to the latest articles: WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO, WHO].

.

I do not mean not even touch the world of private revelations, those recognized by the Church, where it comes from several centuries of the great apostasy. With all due respect to the private revelations approved by the Church, I remember that these are not enclosed in store the Catholic faith, where they are enclosed the Holy Gospels, the Apostolic Letters and the Book of Revelation that speak of the Prince of this world [cf. John John 12, 31; 14, 30; 16, 11], antichrist [The Gv 2, 18; 2, 22; 4,3; AP 1, 13-18] and the great apostasy [cf. Ii Ts 2, 1-12]. In the Old Testament the prophet Zechariah foretells the coming of the foolish shepherd:

.

"I will raise up the land a shepherd who will not care for the sheep who perish, will not seek the scattered, will not heal the wounds, nor feed those who stand, but he will eat the flesh of the fat and tear their nails even » [Zc 11,16].

.

But above all is the Word of God to ask the tragic question: "But the Son of Man, when will, find faith on earth? [cf. LC 18, 8]». This is the reason why for years, although unnecessarily, I keep repeating that the day of his return: "How come again in glory to judge the living and the dead", Christ might even find the shell of a completely emptied Church of the Divine Word and filled with another. And this process of emptying and filling has been ongoing for over half a century, and today is now at an advanced stage, but mostly irreversible.

.

The COUNTRY COUSINS

.

pop quartet de The Country Cousins

I feel tender affection for all theologians and lay people who set himself to defend the purity of doctrine before this terrible debacle, they continue to battle in vain against Modernism and the theology of Karl Rahner, almost as if doing it for forty years they remained fossilized on this, without realizing that the one, Modernism, the other, the so-called rahnerismo, They are no longer the problem. Sometimes it seems to have to do with the complex pop from The Country Cousins, that even if aged, but always dressed in the same fashion clothes in the early seventies of the twentieth century and with the wedges from twenty centimeters to feet, they continue to sing: "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls' [cf. WHO, WHO]. I am sure that, finally, the sing for the last time in a geriatric department and then inside an oncology center for the terminally ill, because all their lives they sang that reason and until the end of life will step forward to sing the dressing of the late seventies and fashionable dresses with wedges from twenty centimeters to feet; clothing with which they will eventually be deposited in the coffin, while outside it the members of their fan club sing in chorus: "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls'.

.

Perhaps, i Countryside cousins some of our theology, think that if one day a Pope ordered the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to disavow new Modernism and declare heterodox theology of Karl Rahner, the problem would be really solved? To think or hope in this is to be not only beyond reason, but just beyond the boundaries of reality. And those who can not perceive reality because fossilized committed to live in the reality that has been created, It does not say hurt the Church, but certainly not helping to solve their problems and make them good.

.

With respect to those who followed to waste time both Modernists and with the theology of Karl Rahner - because that made all life and this must continue to make -, what we must instead take note it is that the first and second were the first believers. Just so: Modernists and Karl Rahner were believers as were the great heretics of Arius and Pelagius history. We know how their faith was corrupted by error, but none of them has ever acted to bring harm to the Church, quite the opposite: They were convinced of the good of the Church and especially of being right and therefore felt the duty of conscience to save. Or is someone that the Council of Nicaea to Ario, later St. Augustine debating against Pelagio, They have directed their accusations to be people without faith? Just then cite the case of Joachim of Fiore, whose heretical thought was sentenced in 1215 by the Fourth Lateran Council, but he never doubted either his faith or his personal holiness of life. Joachim of Fiore, who also was a man of deep piety and holiness of life, He was never beatified because speculating on the mystery of the Trinity had fallen - so surely unintended -, in a precise form of heresy that will then take the name of joachimism O millenarianism. But it was another era, In fact today that times have changed, There is instead preparing to beatify the Apulian Bishop Tonino Bello, whose heroic virtues are constituted by the fact that it was a great engaged in social, without taking into account that this effort was built on demagoguery, on populism and pauperism, as well as on a totally uncritical split and sentimental pacifism morality and Catholic doctrine. In truth, the Fair is an authentic heresies receptacle for the most part written, published, filmed and recorded, ie documented; and diffuser of a Christology that begins with Christ to come to himself and focus on man, an ecclesiology that euphemistically could be called daring and Mariology to be confused him with romantic poems. But he spoke of the poor and poverty and was a great involved in social; and perhaps what makes him a true Blessed? And Joachim of Fiore, At that time, when we beatify?

.

Wanting there is more and worse: if for the first time in its history the Church proceeded to the beatification and then the next canonization of first bishop heterodox, the great pundits of Aristotelian logic and metaphysics, what ingenious interpretive artifices think of resorting, whereas canonization, unlike a beatification, It implies a verdict of infallible teaching? Why these, Unfortunately, are the questions that for the first time in Church history we are now forced to answer; and find some answers is not easy and not at all easy, from a strictly theological and dogmatic point of view. but yet, sooner or later, you will have to respond to this as to other questions, although I expect that someone will not hesitate to affirm, in the name of that logic able to go beyond all logic, that takes over if a verdict of infallible teaching - I am referring to the hypothetical canonization of Tonino Bello -, This pronouncement will cancel and erase retroactively any overt heresy and shows the canonized, because who has delivered its opinion can not err, foolproof, therefore it enjoys a very special way of the Holy Spirit … perhaps up to be above the order established by God and therefore of God himself?

.

The question is therefore logical to say the least: faced with a situation like, what good would it do battle against the errors of Joachim of Fiore, born and lived between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries? It would take just as much as today, and can serve to battle against the Modernists and Karl Rahner. Because for certain theologians and thinkers, the underlying problem is not what Karl Rahner was wrong from a doctrinal point of view. The problem, but above all the goal to reach, and more: I am right and they are right to say from a life that Karl Rahner's wrong and wrong. In short: I am right that for forty-four years later to sing in many different ways: "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls'.

.

Having said that I continue saying: The older theologians are free to continue to thunder against the Modernists and against Karl Rahner. And as, of certain subjects, I know is stubbornness is the extent to which they ended up falling in love both of their good battles both of their idea of ​​truth, I avoid losing unnecessary time to explain to them that the problem today of the Church are neither heresies of the Modernists or dangerous heterodoxies Karl Rahner, because something else is the problem that they do not want to identify and see.

.

Today, inside of the Church live the self-destructive tragedy a disintegration of the deposit of faith and dogma deriving from the swarm of a very large number of bishops and presbyters which are in fact the perfect atheists, of non-believers. Before the objective fact and incontrovertible of this atheism, I would certainly not lose my precious time squirming between modernism and rahnerismo, paralyzed in disputes that today are useless, Whereas the life God gave it to me to use it and not to waste it uncritically and stubborn to the end. Of course, The Stakeholders can say that we came to this thanks to modernism and to rahnerismo. Good, but continue to repeat this, in which realistic and objective logical solution can lead, if not ... "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls' ?

.

EXCEEDING THE POINT OF NO RETURN CREATES IRREVERSIBILITY

.

in large forfeitures there is always a threshold that marks the point of no return

These wrestlers Against Modernism and Karl Rahner what they want: disavowal of that Modernism already disavowed by the Holy Pontiff Pius X and his two successors, then the repudiation of Karl Rahner, or simply that it recognized the rightness of their theological positions as opposed to those critical of Karl Rahner? Possible that some pundits of logic and metaphysics, lost in their dream world and convinced that they live in it maximum grip with the real human and ecclesial, fail to understand what leads to a gangrenous and irreversible situation like the one we are experiencing? Can not reach to understand that when the decadence that invests regularly the civil and religious company passed the so-called safety limit, no going back, because at that point the irreversible and unstoppable process proceeds regardless of the will more or less good of the people themselves or the little good that remains inside a small church in structure of sin, which it produces an internal sin and who then spreads outside? Someone has never raised the issue of what the Church today can be seen to have lost sanctifying grace because of a diabolical mechanism rejection developed in-house? And do not come to me to tell improperly that the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ, of which he is head and we are living members [cf. With the 1, 18], because I know. And since I know, I take this opportunity to remind you that the Mystical Body is the union of the faithful, It constituted the cornerstone of which is the Word of God, guided through the centuries by the Roman Pontiff, It remembers the question successor of Blessed Peter the Apostle, not the successor of Christ, of which it is Vicar on earth, no successor on earth. The Mystical Body is not only a moral union formed by the common purpose, as in an earthly society would be what in legal language is referred to as "legal person", it is a collection of souls, joined by a living bond and vital which is the life of God, associate to each of them by means of the Sacraments. So this is not a headless union, or guided by the hierarchy, which are the bishops united to the Roman Pontiff, but a reality that dominates our every human expectation, of which Jesus Christ is the Head of this Body, while the faithful united with Him in the bond of divine grace, are members. This is how a real body, spiritual, which has its basis in Jesus Christ and in sanctifying grace, whose limbs or are already united in the glory of the heavenly Jerusalem, or they are in the certainty of faith of Paradise. However, if the head of this visible body of Christ is excluded and if the visible body is not sanctifying grace, If someone intends to wonder what will become of this visible body? And please, do not tell me that the visible Church can not lose sanctifying grace because of Christ and is assisted by the Holy Spirit, because with all respect I would find myself compelled to reply that I am a priest and a theologian and as such, and as such I can not reason with the illogic of the wizards who read the bottoms of coffee cups. Or is it perhaps the case already happened that Adam and Eve have altered after the creation of the perfect harmony of all creation, after having denied and rejected the action of sanctifying grace of God upon them? [cf. Gen 3, 15]. Said this, anyone thinks for real, in the name of his surreal dogmatic, that the visible Church can not reject and exclude sanctifying grace because being the Church of Christ and being governed by the Holy Spirit, God the Father would never allow? To think, reassure and reassure the people of God transmitting things like that is really abhorrent, in the etymological sense of the term aberration. As we can only speculate that the visible Church would never vacated by God to refuse his sanctifying grace, if Adam and Eve were left free to rebel against the Creator? And if we deny this, then we can easily pass for real from dogmatic theology at the magic of reading coffee cups funds!

.

AND NOW THAT IS ANSWERED TO MY PARADIGM OF THE PARATROOPER

.

if the aircraft is without a parachute it is physically impossible to stop, back on the plane, wear a parachute and jump again …

Certain subjects they would not hesitate to revolutionize the laws of physics in the name of their subjective truth and their equally subjective logic, but the question that they should ask themselves is very practical and very simple background: for a dreadful error which may also have competition both modernists both rahneriani, or for a negligent to say the least absurd, it happened that a parachutist would have stepped off the plane without having donned the parachute. And this is the current situation of the Church: launch a plane without a parachute. Well, the great masters of Aristotelian logic, the school and metaphysics, at this point should bring the best arguments to explain that this paratrooper, precipitating towards the ground by two thousand meters of height, It can still stop, go back, provide for wear and parachuted launch again. And if these pundits metaphysical answer that he has launched without a parachute because of the Modernists and Karl Rahner, I will say that this, It was also true, now it is irrelevant, because the cause was found and destroyed before he will branch out. If then, even worse, before the paratrooper who rushes without a parachute, those who can never be free of a "logical" answer for everything, They are attacked to say that is the Holy Spirit, at that point, I will say that the Holy Spirit is not Merlin, then invite them to explain how the Third Person of the Holy Trinity, before a free individual or collective act of the will which involves precise consequences, He will cancel its freedom and its free will to bring it back on the plane, let him wear the parachute and then let it run again, after meanwhile he disavowed the modernists and rahneriani, on account of which he has launched without a parachute. Or in other words: it would be as if God the Father had annulled in Adam and Eve freedom and free will to prevent them from rebelling against the Creator and thus committing the original sin. For God did not do it? All in all then it would have avoided trasmettessero to all mankind a corrupt nature due to a sin that their descendants have not committed, but because of them, however, they have contract. What would have cost to God to intervene, suspend for a few minutes their freedom and their agency? Well, ask ourselves why God did not do it, if we really want to be men of faith and logic, men instead of fideism and illogic cloaked behind the highest speculations of scholastic and metaphysics.

.

While we know well the problems caused by Modernism and Karl Rahner, beyond which we are now long gone, but also better we understand the shortsightedness of some people who pretend to quickly change a logical answer for everything, up to drown into the glass of water of illogical, it cost as well stick to real shots of magic of the Holy Spirit, thus ignoring the two foundations that are in support of the mystery of man's creation: freedom and free will.

.

THE SYPHILIS AND AIDS DISEASE ARE TWO LISTS: UNA NOT AT ALL THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE OTHER

.

between syphilis and AIDS there is no connection, diseases are two separate and distinct from one another

Let's go then cautious, Although I myself have partly done, affirming that Modernism and Karl Rahner are the result of the launch of skydiver without a parachute, because the thing is not at all logical and consequential. Or to put it another example: we put that in the United States bursts a real epidemic AIDS. In the event to, while those infected will die without the possibility of cures and effective vaccines against this disease, what would benefit persist in speaking of the Spanish in the sixteenth century prostitutes infected with syphilis sailors of Christopher Columbus, which then spread to the New America among people who never had to know certain diseases before they arrive? But I can guarantee that serves no purpose to explain to these people that the objective problem of modernity is not syphilis but l 'AIDS. Even less will serve to explain to them that between syphilis and l 'AIDS there is no scientific link clinical, there is no connection, because the latter disease is not born as a result of degenerative previous, but it develops in a completely autonomous. Lost time! They will step forward undeterred to cite the cases of Christopher Columbus sailors in the sixteenth century spread syphilis in New Americas, because what they studied, written and explained all my life, so this wish to continue undeterred to write and explain: Syphilis. Or if you prefer better: "My soul, back to your home, I'll be waiting I had to hate these walls'. And if you really must acknowledge that today, the real and serious problem, It is not syphilis but people who die from AIDS, at that point, regardless of falling in scientific illogic, just to continue to talk about their beloved and indispensable theories of syphilis, They affirm without ridiculous sentence that 'AIDS It is the logical consequence of syphilis. But if anyone, before certain expressions laugh behind the illogical, they will feel more than ever confirmed in their ideas and in response replicate: inevitably he laughs, because it is a dangerous syphilitic and as such has been heard out and stung.

.

AGAIN TODAY BY LOGIC ARISTOTELIAN, BY EDUCATION AND FROM SAN THOMAS AQUINAS? You think irrationality PURE

.

welcome to the world of the irrational …

In a visible Church in which the humoral and emotional have taken the place of the objective and rational, where the law is despised leading to accusations of "self-righteous legalism" addressed to those who call upon the application of the canonical norms, where you ride declaring with urticaria before the rigors of the "old doctrine", where even bishops and priests have taken the habit of using the words "dogma" and "dogmatic" in a negative term for people with these entries closed and obtuse, I do my best wishes to all those who today, before a visible Church in which arrogance was elected to the law in a climate of total anarchy, presume to be able to apply Aristotelian logic and criteria of the old and glorious school. I think these people deserve the best compliments, as anyone who deserves them assume with certainty and serious belief that they can read the original texts in Hebrew from the Book of Genesis and the texts of the Holy Gospels in the original greek to an arrogant illiterate in a government role, that far from being aware of his illiteracy feels the opposite person of high culture and as such entitled to despise the knowledge of others, exercising the worst coercion all the authority of which is covered. But how can you think only a joke to start from Aristotle, by the school and by Aquinas, when to impose their study should be arrogant and contemptuous of illiterates who do not know the Catechism of the Catholic Church and who now occupy all the top key roles in the Church and ecclesiastical power?

.

Losing then deliberate and unnecessary time, certain theologians insist on explaining that we must start from the Aristotelian logic and by St. Thomas Aquinas, as recommended certain Popes and certain documents of the magisterium, ignoring the recommendations of those Popes have fallen on deaf ears and that those of magisterial documents have been completely set aside. And to waste time I do not feel, especially considering that the use of the life that was given to me I will have to answer to God, I do not particularly love is the unnecessary loss of time or waste of the talents bestowed by Him [cf. Mt 25, 14-30; LC 19, 12-27]. So I leave willingly discuss these subjects dream of an audience of arrogant illiterate under the ruins of the house that falls apart stating with absolute certainty that we must start from the Aristotelian logic, by the school and by St. Thomas Aquinas, as several Popes lived decades and decades ago they have recommended through various documents giving their teaching. And here I wonder: these wise scholastic and Thomist, They have perhaps realized that to better allocate and destroy these magisterial documents, has even come up with the unusual and original ploy to beatify and canonize the Popes their authors, However, at the same time destroying their teaching? And if this is not evil, I honestly do not really know what it is. To then he had doubts in this regard, just ask to reflect on what remains today of the Encyclical Faith and Reason or of the Apostolic Exhortation Familiar Consortium of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, who it was canonized just as the other side you were literally in pieces these documents to him especially dear. To follow with the upcoming Holy Pontiff Paul VI, which on one hand will be canonized and the other will be given a short new reading and interpretation of his encyclical Human life, all taking advantage of people like S.It is. Mons. Vincenzo Paglia …

.

… anyway, in this climate of irreversible collapse just start from the Aristotelian logic, by the school and by St. Thomas Aquinas, all adding to the Mass celebrated with the Missal of St. Pius V, so that the free fall without a parachute is finally interrupted, the paratrooper who is falling to the ground can be stopped in the air, reported on the plane by the Holy Spirit fell in the role of Merlin, so wear the parachute and then launch again reciting: « introibo altar to the Gods, to God who giveth joy to my youth ». When then after this operation it will finally come safely to earth, First we will offer you a cup of coffee, then, after he drank, we can also switch to a metaphysical reading of the bottom of the cup.

.

THAT SUPER COUNCIL VATICAN NATO WITH SYNDROME PROGERIE BUT ON WHICH CAN NOT BE DISCUSSED, IN A CHURCH IN WHICH DISCUSS SOME TIME EVEN ON THE FAITH DOGMAS

.

pictured the American teenager Samuel Berns, suffering from the syndrome Progerie [disease of the “born old”], in a photo taken at the age of 17 year old, just before he died [It comes from The Corriere della Sera, WHO]

After a process incubazione which starts from the late nineteenth early twentieth century, in the late fifties of the twentieth century came to life a radical mutation of the Church, initially hidden under pretexts of reform and update. And here lies another problem: the inability of many Catholic scholars distinguish Vatican II from the post-conciliar, which does not mean to deny that certain very optimistic facility documents, cast for more with a whole new language which are affected by the German Romantic style decadent, Then we have favored the confusion that has developed in the post-conciliar [see my previous article, WHO]. If we want to look at those who are certain objective limits of the Second Vatican Council, We can just say that his documents were born suffering from the syndrome Progerie, the so-called disease “born old”. And these are because they do not speak to the future, but the man of a mind that was already dying. Quite different was instead the Council of Trent, It wrote in the sixteenth century, proponent of reforms and not revolutions, who had the ability to speak plain language to men the next five centuries of church history. And who that thinks it can deny, which denies it well, but do it in logical rigor, not subjective-emotional-ideological rigor, in this miserable and devastated church visible in the Tridentine which the term - referring to the Council of Trent - is now commonly used by bishops, Priests and theologians in highly negative sense, mainly to show people retrograde and obtuse.

.

Even this last speech is useless to this, because by the time we now quite beyond the same problems of the post-conciliar, how long we are now quite beyond most of the same documents of Vatican Council II, that having been cloaked in ideology touted for ecclesiology, make it impossible for anyone to open serene scientific debates aimed to demonstrate and clarify what now certain documents, written for a man of fifty does that already was dying at the time when they were drawn up, today they are nothing more than the old texts, no topical and poorly effective to speak to the man of the third millennium. And after this council dei council the Church was finally embalmed in subjective ideologies based on the idea of ​​a super council that theological schools, groups of people or individuals, They are finally cut out according to their own interests and pleasures, each giving rise to their staff Council egomenico.

.

For case, there was something that did not work? Definitely. And all just starting from the style of the language adopted by the Second Vatican Council, documents which, starting from Holy Council, give guidelines but no clear indications, indicating if anything, even the penalties for offenders, then open the doors to postume interpretations for the implementation of reforms. And although for many all is well and everything went well, if we take instead of the first reforms, which it was the liturgical, the evidence shows this is today's reality: if today we enter one of our churches, to this increasingly empty, we will find ten priests who celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice in ten different ways. To this we also add the lay movements that have created their own liturgies that are teeming with all kinds of liturgical abuses. If then in 2004, forty years on from the great liturgical reform, Asked to have enacted the Education Sacramentum [cf. WHO] in which they remember the foundations of the Holy Eucharist, it is evident that something, or perhaps many things, They did not go so well in the right direction.

.

This something that did not work well and the right way, between the various names has one in particular that embodies the serious and devastating problem: hermeneutic of discontinuity or of the break up, which as we know are powerful advocates the theologians of the School of Bologna, Today large piazzatori of bishops and cardinals under this pontificate Augusto, from Europe to the Philippines. And what are the consequences of this discontinuity O break up? Very simple: in a few days an overt heretic, that Enzo Bianchi, World preach a retreat to the clergy at the Sanctuary of Ars, where the remains of the saint patron of priests are preserved, Also present at the big event, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy. And when the priests together with the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy flock to hear the pearls of wisdom of a person who sows five decades blatant heresies, there is very little to add, except that the phrase soon resound: "Everything is done" [GV 19, 30].

.

CATHOLICS WE PROUD THAT WE WANTED TO LEARN THE LESSONS OF HISTORY

.

those signs that we are no longer able to read and interpret: on the day that the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI has made withdrawal from the holy throne, three lightning struck in succession by a cross on the ball dell'Arcibasilica dome of St. Peter, the third of which was photographed and taken in video [click on image to open the video]

The real problem is that of a pyramid structure someone moved the stones of the base, causing the progressive collapse of the pyramid from the base to the tip. And while this collapse is underway, someone is seriously debating the urgent need to declare how false the god Anubis, whose frescoes in honor of his cult are found in one of the inner rooms of the pyramid. In short: We disown the Modernists and Karl Rahner while the whole pyramid is collapsing, why then, with their condemnation, at that point the pyramid is rimonterà from itself from the base up to the tip, because the pyramid is of Christ and is governed by the Holy Spirit, then the Son and the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, will provide to this. E, how to understand, before those who think in this way and to whom has the similar approaches with Pneumatology, we really metaphysics transformed into magic.

.

With an arrogance that eventually would inevitably be punished, Catholics we refused to learn from the solemn lessons of history. All the great ancient civilizations, from the Sumerians to the Assyrian-Babylonians, by the Egyptians to the Greeks until the fall of the great Roman Empire, They triggered at some point of irreversible decay processes. And as I explained with the parachute paradigm, the decline is irreversible when it exceeds the point of no return, when the aircraft is exited without a parachute; a fact born of an act of more or less free choice before which no one, even the Holy Spirit, It can intervene subverting all the laws of physics to the rescue of man free and endowed with free.

.

In a short time, within twenty years at most, the Catholic Church as we have known will not exist. There will small groups around the world who have saved the foundations of the deposit of faith. The great ecclesiastical structures will be converted into stable intended for completely different uses, the glorious and ancient monumental churches are museums, concert halls, Art exhibition centers, or brought into various kinds of secular activities. If the reigning Pontiff will be succeeded another two or three similar or worse setting, at present the Holy See will eventually find natural home, the Union of Christian Spiritual Churches Partner, purpose of which will be to continue social mundane activities, charitable and philanthropic, all with the blessing of the Company of the United Nations. School children will receive some meager news of one Jesus Christ as now receive news about the Egyptian pharaohs or the first king of Rome, with the speech entirely focused on her humanity and not his divinity. But most of all, of what was the Catholic Church, It will be handed down to posterity the best of the worst of black legends that it will resemble one of the largest associations of criminals existed over the last two thousand years of history, as long as she does not cleansed from all its ancient ugliness conforming to the world and following the rules of the world, Church becoming the man for the man who has finally put the man at its center.

.

Some might say that today should be a new Gregory or a new Leo the Great. Anyone who thinks this, to use the image of the so-called transfert freudiano, It transfers the image of Merlin which was often reduced the Holy Spirit, with the image of a Supreme Pontiff who is himself a Merlin. Indeed, in a situation of complete and unstoppable decline ecclesial, morale, spiritual and doctrinal, what could ever make a Gregory or Leo the Great revived? Perhaps it could govern the Church with the squalid and immoral characters who swarm a number of priests, among bishops and among the cardinals? Or maybe he could control it and purify it with an army of bishops and priests who by tall disturbing number are practicing homosexuals, as demonstrated irrefutably the facts, hardly the malevolent suppositions? Simply said,: the best scenarios, potential or Leo the Great Gregory would soon end the Pope Celestine V.

.

But for holy charity: we want to realize that throughout the entire ecclesiastical structure and hierarchy is now totally infected from the queue until the head?

.

We must therefore give a reason to all those who in the wake of the new course excited yell "no going back!». They are right, Unfortunately. I myself I have to agree with them: 'No turning back'. But if, however, a courageous Pope who do not know the hat of magician who could be pulled out, condemned Modernism and Karl Rahner, ripristinasse studies of good schooling, of metaphysics and of Thomism, all it would be resolved by magic spell. Again to return to the parachute paradigm ...

.

BANK OF SEED

.

those signs that nobody reads and interprets more: Angelus on Saint Peter's Square, His Holiness is launching two children two doves, who moments later they are attacked and killed by a crow and a seagull, as the Holy Father said goodbye and wished the crowd "good lunch" rather than dismiss us with a "Praised be Jesus Christ" [click on image to open the video]

While this is coming true, and before the realization of the disaster there are those who can find nothing better to do than to invoke condemnations of Modernist and Karl Rahner, waiting for the Holy Spirit, not in the form of a dove or tongues of fire, but precisely in the form of Merlin, systems all with a stroke of magic, I think more and more to the island of Norway where the institution that preserves 84.000 samples belonging to more than 60 genres and 600 species of cultivated plants and wild species which are endangered by “genetic erosion” or extinction.

.

This is our task: save the seeds of the Gospel Jesus Christ the incarnate Word of God, died, resurrected and ascended to heaven. If in fact the building of a church to take fire, The priest what he must do immediately? Remove the Blessed Sacrament from the tabernacle and get to safety with the most precious treasure. And if in a library of sacred texts outbreak of a fire and those texts were destined to be lost forever, what is the first text that runs to save: The Holy Gospel, or the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle and the Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas? What are we to make of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas without the Holy Gospel?

.

The church, even if it reduced to a minimum and a small minority of silent people scattered around the world, lathes to sprout in all its purity, who knows how many centuries between. And maybe then you will, that Christ will return in glory to judge the living and the dead: at the time of rebirth. Instead, if Christ returned in glory to judge the living and the dead in this time of total disintegration and decadent, His judgment would be really terrible, just as he himself told us:

.

' Verily I say, the day of judgment the land of Sodom and Gomorrah shall be more tolerable fate of that city ' [Mt 10, 15]. "Guai a te, Chorazin, Guai a te, Bethsaida! For if in Tire and Sidon had been done the miracles done in you, some time would be converted dressing the bag and covering of ash. Thus, in the judgment Tire and Sidon will be treated less severely than you. And you, capernao, Will you be exalted to heaven? No, up you will be precipitated into hell!» [LC 10, 13-15].

.

The mercy of God is manifested in this way, and mercy is a different from the mercy of our days, emptied of God and filled with the worst worldly man's whims. Just as the Gospel, to which we all say, just to hide what he says, thanks to a visible Church which now shows the world to be ashamed of the true contents of the Holy Gospel, begging forgiveness in the world for light content, precise and strict contained in the Holy Gospel and the Apostolic Letters. We must therefore point to the sperm bank, for the Church that one day people will, perhaps just before the return of Christ the Lord to the end of time. And if we'll save the seeds of the Holy Gospel, then one day, maybe in a few centuries, also flourish the great literature of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church.

.

CAN A Roman Pontiff LEGALLY ELECTED AND LEGITIMATE SUCCESSOR OF BLESSED APOSTLE PETER BE FREE OF STATE OF GRACE ?

.

.

Right now we should treasure of the words of Cardinal Charles Journet [1891-1975] than in his work Church of the Incarnate Word explains: "The axiom “where the Pope there is the Church”, so where the Pope acts as Pope and Head of the Church; if not, or The Church is in him, neither he is in the Church " .

.

Even in this case I'm tired of debating unnecessarily with those who decisively and absolutely deny taking only into vague consideration the hypothesis that a Supreme Pontiff can be closed to the actions of grace of the Holy Spirit, poured on him with undoubted abundance, but that in him and through him can operate only if he accepts the gifts of grace and puts them to good use. Here, then, that these subjects scrambles their total rejection, and they react to this problem as confirming and supporting of juke box coin the chant ... 'It, But the Pope can never err when judges in the matter of doctrine and faith, it is dogma, dogma, dogma!».

.

Question asked to the great pundits of metaphysics and dogmatic: but it is the grace of God that speaks and acts through him, or it is instead he acts irrespective of grace, since it is magically not defeasible in matters of doctrine and faith, It can speak infallibly although closed to the grace and out of the sanctifying grace of God? Because if we are neither before the metaphysical or before the dogmatic, But before the magic. It is in fact the magic that in itself and in itself is totally irrational, while the dogma and dogma are not irrational, They are built on rational principles, for as sure as that the Word became flesh, It has not done thinking vaporous.

.

Faced with these closed forms of reasoning which are the consequence of escape from reality by all those who pretend to always have a strong logical answer for everything, unless retreat into four protective formulas when the answers to be given when there are none, I repeat that we are not within either of metaphysics nor in that of the dogmatic, But part of the magic, if not worse Gnosticism. For how can the Holy Spirit, through its thanksgivings, cancel the will or no will of man, that is, his freedom and his free will, for sdoppiarlo to your liking and make it totally necessary unfailing, if its nature was not freely open to God's grace? Because if that happens, in that case God would be in contradiction with the mystery of creation and thus with himself through the Holy Spirit, and in this case our God is a magical God, a Gnostic god. Everything always to return to the great speculative minds that face problems until a few years previously unimaginable, but unfortunately real today, instead of really they close themselves up mirror in the cage of their four dogmatic formulas reiterating firm and immovable before the tragic evidence of the facts: "... it is unfailing, cannot err, it is dogma, dogma, dogma!». And here it is worth remembering that the dogmas are not cages men claiming at one point the right not to reason, but they are as deeply reasoned heart of the mystery of faith, at least according to a great teacher of school, Sant'Anselmo d'Aosta, which he states the extent to which "faith requires the intellect and understanding the faith" [Faith seeking understanding. In Prosl., Foreword], and again: "I think to understand, I understand to believe » [I believe in order to understand, I understand that you can trust]. And these two are the main foundations of scholastic philosophy, which never, at its foundation, He has placed the magic.

.

Well, I confess that I am tired of these people. I'm tired of those who before a fire in a library of sacred texts destined to be lost forever, They will rush to save the text Iota Romano Amerio and the Holy Gospel burns. Like the rest are a bit 'tired in general, much to ask with some frequency: deserves continue to speculate, analyze and write, or would it be better to shut themselves up for life I have left in a Carthusian monastery with absolute silence vote, dedicating myself to prayer and penance until death? In August, a few days after the completion of my 55th birthday, as time passes, I proposed more than ever to work to good use throughout the life of this time that separates me from death, I intend to waste it or to defend the indefensible or to save the unsalvageable, least of all to expose my human and priestly dignity to public ridicule just to look in the documents of the Supreme Pontiff Francis I that he has never said and written, pulling out all the costs they have the good that just is not there, through interpretative devices that have indeed pathetic, because you can not put your mouth on the good things he did not say after doing the process to its deepest intentions. Before all'indifendibile solutions are three: reproaches and complaints of St. John the Baptist, which as we know lost his head; the speculative analysis of the situation for what it is, however not for what we would like it; the complete withdrawal from the world and total silence vote for life. There are three different ways, but all effective to operate at its best in this disastrous situation and irreversible. For now I have chosen the first solution, the model Giovanni Battista, but I could also decide to choose the third, with perhaps even more effectively.

.

The problem, It is not in fact slight: how can we, we, interpret the one who should be the guardian and authentic interpreter of the faith? Or just hurts a lot to some minds have to accept and admit that the keeper of the "magical infallibility", for five years now he has shown with its deliberate and unintentional ambiguity about nothing, It blew up in the Church, the theological and moral relativism, together with the confusion and division, as never before he had been seen in the visible Church? Is it possible that among the pundits of the great theology, not only there is one that poses a question, if anything, likely to remain unanswered, namely this: there may be a case in which a Pope, closed to the actions of the sanctifying grace of the Holy Spirit, ends up be deprived of the grace of state that is typical of his high office, if anything, with all the consequences that today we have before, all regardless of his legitimate election and the role he equally legitimately busy?

.

And with this it is obvious, loved ones and many readers, that on this question, you might as well play the very survival of The Island of Patmos, place that I will never mock you, because "God has entrusted you to me ', and a father can not and should never make fun of the children who demand comfort, help and support in trial, so as not to face the ghosts of the Demons that there circling around, and that scare us a lot in this dark night.

.

Right now our salvation is contained in the theological virtue of hope, on which I wrote abundantly in 2014 [see WHO]. Hope is the great virtue median that binds together faith and charity. And since I have been set up in the service of the People of God and entered the priesthood in the universal fatherhood, this Holy People intend to offer the way of hope, but never the way of illusion, because I am a priest of Christ, not a drug dealer of hallucinogens acids, but mainly because I consider that a Holy People of God, not a people ox which give a pat and aspirin while a terminal cancer corrodes by the time our ecclesial and ecclesiastical body, while the visible Church is already in the antechamber of a morgue reduced for the occasion to a circus of clowns, dancers and dwarfs.

.

dal'Isola Patmos, 9 September 2018

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

- ecclesial news -

PRAYER TO OUR LADY OF GOOD SUFFROCIO. PRAYERS OF THE NEW CHURCH RAINBOW RIDENTE: MERCIFUL, COZY is inclusive, IN WHICH THE SIN NO MORE SIN IS CALLED, BUT “PRECIOUS DIVERSITY”

.

we are seriously afraid that the Church welcoming and inclusive, in which sin it is no longer referred to as such, but called “precious diversity” to accept and welcome to our internal, modification of the feared Our father It can be much more radical than that heralded, with the serious risk of finding one day wrote on the text: "Give us this day our daily fines', to meet the groups LGBT Catholics who now are cutting out disturbing spaces in the diocese and the universal Church, while a large slice of the Catholic clergy is in fact composed of practicing homosexuals …

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the issue of the Jesuit James Martin, He is welcoming the repentant sinner, that the Church has always welcomed, but the reception of sin, and recognition of sin itself as “precious diversity”

The Church is not a struggle between liberals and conservatives, complete with issuing licenses to favor Catholics to "revolution" and those opposed to the "revolution", how are journalists writing ultra secularists and some Catholic journalists put on pay book of the Master. The very word '' revolution is not applicable to the Church a doctrinal level, ecclesiological and eschatological. Our task is not to revolutionize the world willing and his Master, but to redeem and save souls:

.

"Jesus said to them,: “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned”» [MC 16, 15-16].

.

… and the salvation of souls is now more urgent than ever, especially in the face of a Church that always speaks not of Jesus Christ, that dilutes and making sugary, forgetting that he invites us to be the "salt of the earth", no sugar land. Therefore, the least that could happen to us in the tragic, once you leave the salt and made overdose of sugar, He was to find ourselves in an inverted Church and omosessualizzata. For some time now this salt has lost flavor, while sounds more shocking today than ever the question of God's Word:

.

"If the salt loses its flavor, wherewith shall it be salted? Good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled by men " [Mt 5, 13].

.

In the church is a struggle between good and evil. And when the Church invaded, leavened and stifled by political correctness, waiver to fight against evil and flew over the worst deadly sins, in the name of a confused reception and includenza, we just have to make fun of the great destroyers, and together with them the Demon, which it is a concentrate of malefic permalosità, particularly when his plots are uncovered, highlighted and finally publicly mocked. So it is clear that these prayers are not an expression of blasphemy, on the contrary: I have an open struggle against the powerful lobby of blasphemy LGBT now entered with a straight leg, so overwhelming in the same Church of Christ, to corrode with metastasis of a terrible and dangerous deadly cancer.

.

It is written:

.

"If anyone says to you: here is Christ, O: is there, do not believe. For false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect. there, I have told you before. So if they say: there, It is in the desert, there you go; O: he is at home, do not believe. For as the lightning comes from the east and shines even unto the west, so he shall also the coming of the Son. Wherever the body, there the vultures will gather. Immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened,, the moon will not give its light, the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven shall be shaken. Then the sign of the Son of man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. He will send his angels with a loud trumpet to gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven " [Mt 24, 23-31] "Watch therefore, You do not know on what day your Lord is coming. This considered: if the householder had known at what time of night the thief, watched and would not have let his house be broken " [Mt 25, 42-43].

.

It must be the case for another word? Just seize the Holy Gospel as salt of the earth, not as honeyed rainbow sugar land …

.

the Island of Patmos, 5 September 2018

.

.

.

OUR FATHER

Why change one word of the Our Father? update it all …

.

you are gay? It belongs to the powerful lobby LBGT ? In this case you can afford everything, because I do not agree with the theory of gender Homophobia is a crime, while desecrating the hard way Christianity, It does fit in “sacred” ideological gay rights and their powerful lobby rainbow …

Gender Our Father, you're in the land of gay,

hallowed be thy name, the kingdom of Gay Pride,

Our gender will be done,

as in heaven so on earth,

Give us this day our daily pains,

forgive us our debts,

as we forgive the homophobes,

and do not forsake

the temptations of heterosexuality,

but deliver us from evil.

Amen!

.

PRAYER TO OUR LADY OF GOOD SUFFROCIO

.

Image of the Blessed Virgin Mary scarred the last parade Gay Pride Lecce from froce crazy screaming respect and rights for all diversity …

Mother Gender Venerata,

are targeting the look of love Lesbians, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender and grant them the gift of the rainbow joy.

Remember all the poor that not being gay rich and ricchioni nor young athletes, living situations of marginalization and abandonment by the powerful and racist lobby LBGT.

Remember our benefactors and friends who have political preferences with laws aimed at protecting pederastic sodomy, may they one day enjoy eternal joy in the Rainbow Paradise together with Blessed Marco Pannella.

O Venerata Gender Mother, for the name of your beloved Son who said,: scandalize anyone even just one of these little ones who belong to the world of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transsexual "it would be better for him to have hung around his neck a millstone and to be drowned in the depths of the sea", intercede with the Divine Majesty for all homophobes in the world that with their hardness of heart do not accept the natural joy of sodomy pederastic.

O Venerable Mother Gender, You who are the supreme patron holy family, grant that all families Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered the delight of children through the grace of a surrogate mother. And may our children live in a rainbow world, including gays and lesbians who hope in the heavenly Jerusalem, where they will live forever joyous glory of an eternal Gay Pride.

Santa Maria del suffrocio:

Pray for us.

.

.

SALVE GENDER REGINA

.

transsexual disguised as the Blessed Virgin Mary Gay Pride From Rome (2009)

Salve Gender Regina,

Lesbian Mother, of Gay, of Bisexual and Transgendered,

life our sweetness and our hope: salve!

We resort to you, exiled children of the great Eve who rebelled the archaic domain homophobic father,

We beseech thee, laughing and mocking in this valley of heterosexual tearful.

Come now therefore,, our advocate,

toward us thine eyes of mercy,

and after this our exile, the eternal rainbow,

the blessed fruit of all our perversions holy.

The gender clement, the gender pia, gender Maria.

.

.

GENDER GLORY TO THE FATHER

.

Gay masked by Christ at the Gay Pride parade in Rome (2009)

Glory to the one parent and two parent,

to the multisexual son and the Rainbow Spirit,

come LBGT It was in the beginning, Now and forever,

in the century of centuries:

amen!

.

.

.

Prayers inspired by

Father James Martin, S.J.

.

ecclesiastical Approval

+Vincenzo PAGLIA

Archbishop Emeritus of -Vescovo

Terni-Narni-Amelia

President of the Pontifical Theological Institute John Paul II

Science for the Marriage and Family

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.

— ecclesial topical —

WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS? THE REASONS OF A CONCERN IN A CLIMATE OF UNUSUAL CONFUSION

.

The Holy Father should not take offense for any critical is the uprising. Especially if he wants to rebuild as it seems for example of Christ, which he was criticized by the Pharisees; he too easily in what feels like Christ certainly considering Pharisees those who criticize him and reaches almost to boast of being criticized.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

some signs of ironic criticism appeared on the walls of the metropolitan center of Rome a year ago

The reasons of concern are simple and understandable: if a person that we value and love begins to show signs of infidelity against those values ​​for which the esteem and love, we obviously can not but worry, ask on what may depend on this decadence and what we can do to remedy it. Similar sentiments try us Catholics to the Holy Father, that with some growing, It gives worrying signs of not doing their duty to the supreme pastor of the Church.

.

Behaviors and Pope Francis ideas Today like large crowds, pastors and theologians attached to this world and to a self-styled progressive Catholicism, but in reality Modernist, as well as to non-Catholic circles.

.

Not that the Pope teach heresy, but nevertheless he walks on the edge of the ravine. But what happened to him? The answer is simple: Perhaps it is left to take the taste of power. Worldwide, so, It seems to have to depend on his word and his will. His fans They would like to convince him that there is no dogma, there is no sacrament, there is no tradition, there is no moral law, there is no institution of the Church and the state that he can not change his will, considering themselves increasingly under the influence of the Holy Spirit. It is undoubtedly a the event never happened before in the history of the Church.

.

But where is the keeper Roman Pontiff, interprete and defender of the faith deposit, supreme preacher of the Gospel, High Priest dispenser of the sacraments, zealous father, judge and physician of souls, guide in the ways of holiness to the kingdom of heaven, guarantor of order, the right, of justice, of freedom, of progress and peace in the Church, light of the nations and save the world?

.

In this respect it is conceivable that Pope Francis is currently tempted by the devil, master of that pride which leads to heresy. This could explain the frequent calls of the Pope to the fight against the devil, something quite unusual in the Popes, at least the last centuries, especially for concrete instructions that the Pope imparts, which suggests that he speaks from experience.

.

In fact I am convinced than ever in the history of the papacy Satan has launched against the papacy such a violent and insidious attack, and just about the most important office of the Pope, which it is the case of the doctrine of the faith. The attack on Pope Francis is the culmination of an action that Satan has instigated in the Church since the immediate post-conciliar, stir with a renewed modernism, especially in rahnerismo, under the pretext of conciliar renewal. While, from that moment, the power of darkness has deceived the episcopate instilling in it the illusory belief that it was no longer necessary to guard against heresies, and that the time of heresies and their relative sentence had ceased due to the climate of dialogue initiated by the Council and the implementation of the St John XXIII recommendation to seek what unites us and not what divides [see text, WHO]. Except that this profit warning, which serves to create peace and harmony, It was intended as an invitation to ignore the heresies, from which arise precisely divisions. The exhortation of the Holy Pontiff to not split was intended as an inducement not to take into account and therefore not to eliminate what divides.

.

Here, then, that in this way, the revived modernism, unrestrained in time by the bishops, in these fifty years it has increased constantly, to penetrate in the eighties of the twentieth century in the Pontifical Faculty and with Pope Benedict XVI in the Holy See. In this period of time the papacy has seen itself progressively eroded and weakened in the fight against modernism due to the lack of support from the bishops., among them began to penetrate the smart rahnerismo, fake supporter episcopate, when in fact it puts him against the Pope and to enslave him to the wishes of the laity. In tal modo, despite the valiant Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, personally critical of Rahner, the ministry directed by him never had the power to condemn. Only Saint John Paul II in 1993 in the encyclical The Splendor of Truth [NN. 65-67, text WHO] He managed to condemn his moral doctrine.

.

A Pontiff can be a sinner but not a heretic. It is therefore necessary to clarify that It can not occur with the fact of a heretic Pope. whatever Catholic, Secretary of State-down can be a heretic, besides the Pope. The existence and thus the essence of the Church, universal sacrament of salvation, in his own immutable and indestructible identity and desired holiness and guaranteed by Christ, Originally it depends ultimately dogmatic teaching of the Pope. For this reason the Council of Florence 1442 He teaches that whoever disobeys or rebels against the Pope goes to hell. was not wrong when Pope Boniface VIII in saying that the pope's authority is supreme among all those that exist in the land, including thunderstorms, under that of Christ "all power was given to me in heaven and on earth" [Mt 28,18].

.

But a Pope can sin of temporalism or attachment to power in two ways: or claim to politically steer down from his spiritual power temporal affairs, interfering in them and removing the political rulers their autonomy, or by setting the entire papal ministry on a timeline or merely political, or at most anthropological, leaving on one side the apostolic and spiritual ministry. Is this, Unfortunately, It seems to be the fault of Pope Francis. Never in fact in the history of the Church he happened to find himself in presence in it of heretics who remain unpunished and both the persecution of the faithful by these heretical currents occupying positions of power. Of course, heretics in the Church there have always been, but they were regularly expelled, or they themselves declared frankly not considered more Catholic.

.

The Holy Father should not take offense for any critical is the uprising. Especially if he wants to rebuild as it looks to the example of Christ, which he was criticized by the Pharisees; he too easily in what feels like Christ certainly considering Pharisees those who criticize him and reaches almost to boast of being criticized. Yup, Certain, there is a certain pharisaism in critical that some do, not to mention dell'astio and bad faith that animates many detractors, these pins that are instead critical lucid. However, he should be able to distinguish the adverse criticism preconceived, from those just and reasonable, of which should be taken into account, not to show proud and touchy.

.

Nevertheless grace, in this dramatic emergency, still it reaches everyone in the Church, including bishops and Pope, through the laity, simple faithful, journalists, intellectuals, politicians, writers, Philosophy, theology, prophets and mystics. There is no shortage of priests and religious. However, the Church is indestructible, despite the powers of hell are continually raging against it. If things continue, we have to hope for the conversion of the Pope and bishops, and thanks to the prayers of God's people. Given that all members of the earthly Church, including Pope, as long as they live here on earth, as sanctified in the Church, always run the risk of getting lost. They, to sanctify, They must be in communion with the Church, including Pope, because it is holy and source of sanctity, animated by the Holy Spirit. The Pope enjoys the holiness of the Church that he himself administers the sacraments to Christ's mandate. And the small army of prophetic lay people who will save the Church, It will also feed, obviously, to the sacraments, the administration of which the high priest is the Pope.

.

Communion with the Church, therefore, means communion with the Pope, although these may be in mortal sin and as such internally outside the Church. Yet the Pope, even under these conditions deprecabili, He remains as head of the Church, principle of ecclesial communion, minimum legal.

.

They are wrong, therefore, those who speak of a Pope "schismatic". You see they do not know what a schism. It is indeed the separation from church, but by that very fact the Pope. Now, the Pope evidently can not be separated from itself, nor can excommunicate himself. The Pope is the only Catholic who can not be excommunicated. Here, however, it is a legal fact of the external forum. Whyiò not however prevent a Pope is out of the Church in the internal forum, as in a state of mortal sin. If the Church is holy, who is not holy it can not belong to the Church in the soul, but rather only with the body. Or rather for a mere legal fact-functional. It can continue to do the Pope, but it certainly will not do good and will not do as it should.

.

"From the malignant enemy defend me»

[from prayer Anima Christi]

Varazze, 29 August 2018

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.