THE BISHOP OF SPRINGFIELD DENY COMMUNION TO POLITICIANS WHO VOTED FOR THE ABORTION LAW, WHY? SIMPLE: WHY DUE MORE TWO FOLLOWED TO MAKE FOUR.

.

The fee n. 915 recital: "Excommunicated and interdict after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others who obstinately persevere in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion".

.

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

.

the "great social achievement of abortion" explained by the godmother of the law 194 [click on image to open the movie]

In the United States of America, Catholic Illinois pulls out the attributes, to put it in a clear and concise. I realize this may seem absurd, but some whites and blacks have to put them, in color shades. I invite you to read the press of Bishop, published in today's day [readable text WHO].

.

State serene. Despite your voices squinternato [cf. WHO], 2 + 2 continues to be increasingly 4, while the sky at this time, as I write, Rome center is serene; it's 19:10 and the leaves are green in summer:

.

… the reality of the "great social achievement ' [click on image to open the video]

"The great march of intellectual destruction continue. Everything will be denied. Everything will become a creed. It is a reasonable position to deny the stones of the street; will become a religious dogma to reaffirm. It is a rational argument that it takes all immersed in a dream; will be a sensible form of mysticism say that we are all awake. Fires will be stoked to witness that two plus two equals four. Swords will be drawn to show that the leaves are green in summer. We will find ourselves defending not only the incredible virtues and the incredible sense of human life, but something even more incredible, this immense, impossible universe staring at us in the face. We will fight for visible wonders as if they were invisible. We will look at the grass and the skies impossible with a strange courage. We will be among those who have seen and yet have believed " [G.K. Chesterton, in Relativism, reality and dogma, 1905].

.
Fighiting Necroculture to say farewell abortion [to fight the culture of death we must say goodbye to abortion].

.

.

Rome 6 June 2019

.

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

.

- ecclesial news -

THE SUPREME PONTIFF HAS LIED? AND, He LIED AND IS A LIAR. BUT NOT NASTY: SIMON PETER SAID, CHOSEN BY CHRIST HIMSELF AND NOT BY A CONCLAVE OF CARDINALS, WAS MORE OF HIM A LIAR.

.

all those who are enjoying their ten minutes of power and glory today, know that this pontificate will not be eternal. So let them start thinking over which of the floating garbage islands they will want to retreat to, why tomorrow, for them — the great destroyers and defacers of the Church —, there will be no place, even if it cost having to celebrate a conclave made with stab wounds among the Cardinal Fathers, who will be careful not to let some element such as the evil dwarf, who lives on wickedness, revenge and cruelty, while finding nothing better to do than go around the world to proclaim the new blesseds, because these are the subjects to whom, man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, it opened the doors of the next conclave, with its fantastic "epochal turning points".

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the papinochio [the vignettes of Dorothy Lancel, 2019]

Several Readers aficionados asked me where my «sharp and ironic vein» had gone. I have replied several times by saying that there is little irony in the face of a dying person hospitalized in the terminally ill ward. Today I can answer this question with even more seriousness: what is there to ironize inside a morgue, where the poor visible Church lies dead on the marble table, waiting to be composed inside the coffin by those of the funeral home?

.

Since our very beginnings in October of 2014, I have always commented on certain facts concerning the Supreme Pontiff late, respect to others, including experienced journalists. Prudence on our part is de rigueur. What a priest expresses and writes has a completely different kind of value and weight, compared to what information professionals can write in an excellent and precise way. Indeed, a grave responsibility weighs upon us: the hands with which we write and the mouths with which we express ourselves are the same with which we celebrate the sacred mysteries, starting from the Eucharistic Sacrifice.

.

In man Jorge Mario Bergoglio I have noticed a characteristic that has emerged over time in my relationships with various and illustrious members of the Society of Jesus, of those placed at the highest levels: the propensity to lie. In saying this I do not mean that the Jesuits are lying as such, I mean but claim to have had long relationships with the Jesuits, placed in various leadership roles in the Society of Jesus, that if necessary They lied shamelessly, feeling not only with a clear conscience, but also irritated if someone did not take seriously and true their lies. In its time, an eminent Jesuit, He even created problems of giving me a negative rating to the Ecclesiastical Authority, just because I refused to take at face value his blatant lies and leave with them manipulate. The Ecclesiastical Authority including so much good to say to me: "The problem with the Jesuits had finally been avoided, as long as the holy man of the Pope Pius VII - badly wrong - refounded in 1814 the Society of Jesus [cf. When the kindly solicitude for all the churches, 1814].

.

The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a subject that in a manner similar to certain of his brothers mind knowing lie. Then, by his faithful killers, He does not hesitate to make you impallinare the hard way if you do not take good for his lies and if not lavish you to protect them and spread them as truth. Here's the reason why, one of the characteristics of this pontificate is the fact that this man has surrounded himself with mediocre people, bad, and above all immoral blackmail. Because he knows from first to last all their iniquities, why can handle them with the worst weapon: the blackmail. Instead, how he could handle men of faith from public life and private immaculate as Cardinal Carlo Caffara, or as the Cardinal Gerhard Müller? It is not by chance: the first, She died of a broken heart after being denied for over a year an application for a private audience, all while the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio received the worst furious of this world. For his part, Cardinal Gerhard Müller, as he himself has told, at the stroke of the five year term of office it was liquidated in the course of a minute and a half and replaced at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith by a gay friendly. What I wrote the latter with knowledge of the facts and evidence in 2017, without ever having been neither denied nor any recalled title order [cf. WHO]. Or more simply: the individual concerned could call me or call me at his department and asked that account and reason for my writing. But he did not, because my answer would have been: "Why do you call me to ask me aware of what you know and what you have actually done, favoring in any way subject to very high risk, especially one that ended up giving then a worldwide scandal of enormous proportions?» [cf. WHO e WHO]. And everyone who has to escape the confrontation, these days and under this pontificate so wonderful, indeed "epochal", or rather "revolutionary", before the truth that instead of unspoken, They are only able to react affondandoti a knife in the back. And someone even called the "Church of mercy" (!?). In short … ‘ridatece Said Alexander VI Borgia. At least, under his pontificate, before proceeding to a conviction it was made a regular process ensuring best especially every right to defense of the accused, not like the present, ridiculous Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, where if you have received one of the worst injustices by a cardinal or a curial through abuse of authority that violates all the fundamental canon law, if unfortunately you turn to them, these before the powerful bully are scared to the point force you to run to the pharmacy to buy him - for good heart and Christian charity - a supply of absorbent for menstruation, as sudden it would reach the timeout cycle to that gang of …

.

The good Marco Tosatti, the 29 May reports in his blog disturbing interview [cf. WHO]. In short: interviewed by journalist Valentina Alazraki, the Pope responds to a question by saying that the story about the serial sex offender and long unpunished, Cardinal Theodor McKarrick:

.

«[…] I knew nothing, naturally, nothing. I've said it several times, I knew nothing, I had no idea".

.

The Italian journalist, in reporting the shocking news comments between the lines postillando rightly:

.

"This statement borders on immodesty. "Several times"? To who? When? Dove? He never said anything to the public, or even private later recorded in public. Such a statement is either pure lie, or it is the result of a disequlibrio ».

.

I repeat to Marco Tosatti that this response with the serious statement contained in it, It is the result of one and the other thing: of man's propensity to lie and Jorge Mario Bergoglio of his obvious psychological imbalance.

.

To own it is not clear I remember that the Church was not even precipitated the worst forms of Latin American dictatorships, but just in the typical forms of the dictatorship of young Korean dictator Kim Jong [the science WHO and recognize the popular methods today in Church of Mercy]. Suffice it to note how they reacted and acted journalists of modern Soviet Pravda Vatican: bringing the interview have deleted this phrase, as pointed out more and Marco Tosatti, only to reinstate later, after he reported in his blog a stylus assembly both the original text is the official text of the Holy See in which, this serious statement, however this was not [cf. WHO]. After that, of the capocomici justice Vaticana They have tried to believe that the phrase in question had escaped from the translation from Spanish into Italian.

.

These poor people, convinced that the People of God is really made up of a cluster of Obtuse, it is worth remembering that they, acting in this way, They are like such and such a shopkeeper who sometimes, when customers they saw that the rest given to them was wrong, He was justified by saying: «Oh, excuse me, I was wrong!». Well I tell you and I show why these executives justice Vaticana I totally disingenuous like this shopkeeper: because the shopkeeper, to give change, coincidentally it is always wrong to your advantage, always giving less, ever more. Just as the leaders of justice Vaticana: among the many phrases that interview by mistake could blow, coincidentally they have jumped right one in which the Supreme Pontiff lied. In this unusual forgetfulness then we add that we are not talking of a translation from Chinese to Italian, but a translation from Spanish to Italian. From this we can deduce that the liars are among them as the hands that wash, the lava the other and both are washed together. All this with all due respect of affections from the complex of cunning, certain and sure to let us all those fools.

.

This censorship, and the reintegration of the contested sentence, leads first to the fact itself much worse. Who has removed that phrase, She is mistaken as a dishonest merchant who always makes the mistake of giving less money and ever more, He did not take into account the slightest warning given by Christ the Lord in a passage of the Holy Gospel more and more into disuse in the Church of the "epoch-making revolution", but above all the "mercy":

.

"No one tears a piece from a new cloak to attack an old one; otherwise he will rend the new, and the patch from the new will not match the old " [LC 5, 36].

.

In truth, I confess that I do not know whether to get angry whether to laugh or fearful army of opportunists who are put - as they themselves say - "in a prudent waiting». And when they abuse this way the concept of prudence, that according to the wise definition of St. Thomas Aquinas is the charioteer virtues, I feel dismay and disgust. Because they, s of waiting patients, are assured that, as they say the Neapolitans: «He braces' night».

.

Undoubtedly, the night will go, But, when it passed, such damage and such debris remain? And who, repair the damage, or who, will rebuild on the ruins? Perhaps the timid cowards always hopeful careers that await, or maybe they really believe that the next Pope will give them the coveted episcopate, or the long-awaited cardinal's hat that had not given the current reigning Pope? That man Jorge Mario Bergoglio has manifested itself lacking in prudence and sanity I wrote in March 2018 [cf. WHO], without excluding the possibility that he may equally be an instrument of God's grace, indeed a tool even privileged. It is not by chance, the reigning Pontiff, It has a very great merit: He has invited all the hidden mice uncovered. And these mice infected and infectious, They are at this point discovered, shrouded as they are by megalomania, as to make them completely impossible any attempt to change suddenly flag and recycle tomorrow, while it is of extraordinary chameleons, but most shameless, restraint and dignity.

.

Currently, the real and serious problem, It is no longer the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, but those that cut the pieces from his careless answers, that mystify, doctor and who insist on brand as "haters" and "enemies of the new course of Pope Francis Church" all those who show concern anything but hateful and disrespectful; but above all forgetting that the Church is not "of Pope Francis" to be modeled as such in man's image Jorge Mario Bergoglio, but it is of Christ, to model, and as such conform to the mystery of the cross of Christ the Lord. In short: I became a priest to bring my life to Christ, I would never become a priest to waste my life trying to conform to man's Jorge Mario Bergoglio. During the rite of my priestly consecration, Bishop told me solemnly: "Understand what you do, imitate what you celebrate, conform your life to the mystery of the cross of Christ the Lord ". Have they changed the ritual without my knowledge replacing it with this new formula: «[…] mimics the whims of the Pope on migrants, conform your life to the new course of man's Church Jorge Mario Bergoglio "?

.

Because, the Secretary of State, it is repeatedly played face defending on several occasions the indefensible? Perhaps because it is a devoted servant? No, perhaps because it is only one that hopefully in the next conclave; and hopefully by himself, is intende. The true and faithful servants, were the Secretaries of State Rafael Merry del Val, or Pietro Gasparri, or Eugenio Pacelli, who without hesitation, in several delicate occasions, They have put their foot down and told the Popes, with all due reverence, that the decision that they wanted to take that speech or that they intended to pronounce, that would have been a grave mistake. Or perhaps he not said, Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, Blood Pius XI, that if at any given moment very delicate and critical, he really wanted to say the prepared speech against the Italian fascist regime, in this case she asked him to accept, first, his resignation as Secretary of State?

.

None of this is said and done, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, or in front of the sell-off of the Chinese martyrs who paid with a life of persecution their devout loyalty to Rome, or before the Cardinal electrician that with his improvident prank gave a million votes Catholics to Matteo Salvini [cf. WHO]. And nothing did, also, the Secretary of State, opposite the entrance of the unreal clergy and political correctness in about the last election campaign for the European elections, making in this way an interference before which no one has longed, by members of the radical left to the possessed Pannella brand&Bonino, who for decades have deafened with cries against "clerical meddling ', whenever John Paul II and Benedict XVI have spoken out on issues closely related to the life, to morality and bioethics. And if neither possessed nor radical leftists radical chic they shouted against "clerical meddling ', it is because of the pernicious subjects as Father Antonio Spadaro have turned directly to the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio in a leader of the international left.

.

Not only has Vatican diplomacy failed, because what was once a school of diplomacy looked up to with great respect even by the Moscow Soviet of the Stalin era, today it fell into ridicule, not least because of all the pretty vain ladies in careers from which it has been filled; a real army of little priests who, Of fennel shop in fennel shop, in the apostolic nunciatures of the world even the diplomats of the Banana Republic make people laugh about the Holy See.

.

The failure of Vatican diplomacy the president of that People's Republic of China with whom, the lascivious Secretariat of State, she literally prostituted herself by drawing up an agreement with the communist government that remains secret to this day (!?). I would note that the 21 March President Xi Jinping paid an official visit to Italy, however, being careful not to make even and only a private visit to the Supreme Pontiff.

.

And after having reaped this success, after the Holy See was humiliated in this way by the Chinese government, with whom he had shortly before drawn up a very secret agreement, for case, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, he truly waits patiently for his well-deserved reward at the next conclave, after that …The night will be over?

.

We started by saying that the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a liar, I continue concluding: this shouldn't scare you that much, beyond the understandable displeasure of the devoted faithful. In fact, I inform you that even the man Simon son of Jonah was rebaptized by Christ Peter, he was a liar, and besides being such he was also a coward and a traitor. Indeed, if together with that of the Our father not even a corrected and updated version of the Holy Gospels has come out, on their lines we continue to read:

.

«While Peter was down in the courtyard, a servant of the high priest came and, seeing Peter who was warming himself up, he stared at him and told him: “You too were with the Nazarene, with Jesus». But he denied: "I don't know and I don't understand what you mean". He then went out of the courtyard and the rooster crowed. And the servant, seeing him, he began to tell those present again: “This is one of those”. But he denied again. After a while those present said again to Peter: “You are certain of those, because you are Galileo”. But he began to curse and swear: "I don't know the man you say". For the second time a rooster crowed […]» [cf. MC 14, 66-72].

.

Anyhow, man Jorge Mario Bergoglio he combined them less big than the man Simon called Peter, who was not chosen by a conclave of cardinals, but by Christ himself. And Peter - I remind those who only speak of migrants and no longer read the Holy Gospels -, besides being chosen by Christ, he was formed for three years by Christ and was able to see several times, in all its glory, the Body of Christ raised from the dead appeared to the Apostles. And if Peter was chosen, perhaps it was because Christ knew well that two thousand years later a better and more merciful vicar of his on earth than the Divine Master would arrive from Argentina, surrounded by pimps coryphaeus ready to scream, to his every unhappy sortie, how wonderful, but above all "epochal" and "revolutionary" this pontificate.

.

An unsolicited advice: all those who are enjoying their ten minutes of power and glory today, know that this pontificate is not eternal. So let them start thinking over which of the floating garbage islands they will want to retreat to [cf. WHO], why tomorrow, for them — the great destroyers and defacers of the Church —, there will be no place, even if it cost having to celebrate a conclave made with stab wounds among the Cardinal Fathers, who will be careful not to let some element such as the evil dwarf, who lives on wickedness, revenge and cruelty, while finding nothing better to do than go around the world to proclaim the new blesseds, because these are the people to whom the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio has opened the door of the next conclave, with its fantastic "epochal turning points".

Tell me if there's no crying …

.

From the island of Patmos, 31 May 2019

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

..

.

- ecclesial news -

Mignotte & PARACULI, CORRECT ETYMOLOGY OF WORDS. When did INSTEAD THE CORRECT WORDS BECOME INSULT? EXAMPLE: PROSELITHISM NOT AND A WORD, BUT AN ASSUMPTION OF EVANGELIZATION

.

[…] lemma whore, It comes from a popular Latin term disfigurement son of unknown mother, ie son of unknown mother. This is in fact called the babies born in hospitals and left there by their mothers, or more frequently left inside the churches or inside of of the wheels of the convents and monasteries of the cloistered nuns. In popular language, this Latin term was then crippled in stepmother, that below, further crippled, finally became whore.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

The masters of cinema and Italian theater: Alberto Sordi [Rome 1920 – Rome 2003] video WHO.

Let's try to imagine a group of three priests who find themselves together for a moment of fraternity and which are respectively: a dogmatic theologian sacramentary, a moral theologian and a canonist. When dinner, not yet late hour and wanting the three conclude with another moment of happy fraternity, they have this idea: "Why do not we go to women?», says the priest specializing in dogmatic theology, asking the opinion of the other two.

.

The specialist in moral theology, great devotee to the holy bishop and doctor of the Church of San'Alfonso Maria de 'Liguori, He thinks for a moment and replies: "Yup, it would be an idea, But I'm thinking about how we could do that without violating our sacred promises ".

.

By then he runs to the rescue the priest specializing in canon law, providing the solution: "Dear brothers, thinking about it, I do not think we would go to violate any sacred promise. In fact, when we received the sacred ordination, what the bishop asked of us? We asked if we promised to keep celibate, Mica asked us to promise to keep chaste. Well, are not we all three bachelors, so respectful of the promise made?».

.

Exulted the two priests Sacramental theology specialists in dogmatic and moral theology: "You are right. We're not religious who professed vows of poverty, chastity and obedience! We have just solemnly promised to keep celibate, no one asked the solemn promise to keep chaste ". And so poco after the three met three wonderful escort and head for a place to end the evening with a flourish.

.

The masters of cinema and Italian theater: Elena Fabrizi, aka Sora Lella [Rome 1915 – Rome 1993]: video WHO

No need to explain certain - but with the heads circulating free these days foot is good to do it -, that the priest, while not professing as the religious vows of poverty, chastity and obedience, expresses in each case two vows: remain unmarried, What this implicitly implies chastity; obey the Bishop and all his successors.

.

In the doctrinal field and pastoral, the problem of language is crucial, because if the words, in particular to the words-concept, we attribute different meanings, emptying them of their true meaning and filling other, as obvious and inevitable consequence we will create genuine chaos situations.

.

To explain this kind of problem, I have often used two typical terms of romanesco, which are respectively: whore e Paraculo. I always remember indelibly when now almost fifty years ago, by six seven year old child, I was brought occasionally walking by my grandfather and his sister in the Roman park of Villa Borghese. The highlight of the walk was made by visiting the monkeys in the zoo, which I enjoyed giving peanuts purchased in advance to stand a reseller. One day something happened fun: a lady somewhat commoner and for this particularly nice, He began to call the son, that as they say he did not care for the mother calls to tell him to go home. Call calling you, at one point the mother annoys and yelling at the child: «'Large fixed' na mignotta, I give you vόi sbrigà, dovemo who returns home?».

.

INo impeccable Italian this sentence will sound so: "Very son of a whore, You want to attend, we have to go home?». Of the two things, the one excludes the other: or this beautiful commoner said in front of everyone in the park of Villa Borghese she, mother of that son, It was a whore, or simply, the expression Fixed mignotta it has lost its etymology and is used both as an expression to intersperse in speech, both times to indicate 'A nice person and gajiarda.

.

The masters of cinema and Italian theater: Gigi Proietti [Rome 1940], video WHO

Let's move on to another example before the explanations that follow. Time ago, the parent of a young eighteen year old just told me that her son had purchased the branded sneakers, after that, saying that the color was not good with clothes, He asked his father if he wanted to buy, because he would have bought other more suitable color. His father gave him 120 euro with which the son, at a sporting goods store brand, He went to buy another pair of shoes. All with one small detail not exactly indifferent: the shoes sold her father were false, He had bought for 15 euro at Porta Portese, while him, with money from the sale made to his father, he went to acquire the originals. The father found out later and later, laughing with me told me the whole concluding: «… hai understood, my 'fixed, that which is grannissimo Paraculo?».

.

INo impeccable Italian this sentence will sound exactly like this: "… did you understand, my child, that homosexual who is great?»

.

No need for special explanation, you already know perfectly that today, the term whore and the term Paraculo, while having both a negative sense as etymological meaning, terms being born to indicate in a derogatory way certain people, facts or situations, in the current Romanesco lemmas they are used in sympathy tones, sometimes even to indicate a person, with its imaginative shrewdness, He gave it a resounding alone, ie rip-off, for it making you laugh and entertain.

.

The masters of cinema and Italian theater: Anna Magnani [Rome 1908 – Rome 1973], video WHO

In short: whore, It comes from a popular Latin term disfigurement son of unknown mother, ie son of unknown mother. So they were called and brought forth children left in hospitals by mothers, or more frequently in churches or inside the wheels of convents and monasteries of nuns. In popular language, the Latin term son of unknown mother It is crippled in stepmother, then it was further becoming whore, used as a popular synonym for whore, but lost this meaning given below, as we have shown with the mother who calls her son in the park of Villa Borghese.

.

In nineteenth-century papal Rome - where no one would ever think that in the future, the grotesque orgy of Gay Pride, He could slide through the town starting from the square of the Cathedral of the Bishop of Rome, St. John Lateran, to arrive in Piazza Esedra, Today the Republic Square, in front of the Basilica of St. Mary of the Angels and Martyrs, place where they were martyred by the Emperor Diocletian many Christians -, give of Paraculo a man, was an offense so grave and shameful, They could risk their lives in two different ways. If you said the Paraculo to populate a Trastevere, what you probably stabbed, then if anything, asking for help from a couple of friends from the nearby tavern, throwing your body into the Tiber; but if you gave the Paraculo an aristocrat, what he threw in the face glove and t'aspettava the morning to five outside Porta San Giovanni to challenge you to a duel, in the course of which, or the offended or the offender would inevitably dead.

.

Paraculo, as etymological meaning He has in itself little cute, because its etymology disparagingly shows a man para, that is, offering his rear to another man to be sodomized. Therefore, the dictionaries of the Italian language that today suggest this term as a synonym for cunning or entity that is able to turn the situation to his own advantage, dating its birth to the period of the sixties of the twentieth century and connecting it to the literature of Pier Paolo Pasolini and Aldo Palazzeschi, they are wrong. To prove it is a study of Dr.. Luca Lorenzetti, researcher at the University of Tuscia, that in Casanatense Library of Rome spotted at the end of the nineties the term in a poem by 150 sonnets dating back to 1830, and used in the prose to indicate with Paraculo il homosexuals Passive [cf. WHO].

.

During the celebration of the Second Vatican Council, We had many problems that have developed in para ... media council and then lasted often with disastrous results in the post-conciliar season. All these problems are mostly born of purely lexical items. Indeed, just where we talk so pounding and obsessive traits of "unity of the Church", if we look, those who have compromised and compromising this unit, have been and are precisely those who sow confusion and disunity through the flawed and arbitrary use of the words.

.

The masters of cinema and Italian theater: Alberto Sordi:video WHO

The problem of the last council It is therefore in the language. For as I have repeatedly said over the years in these columns de The Island of Patmos, the fathers of the Church, for the first time they have abandoned the solid and precise metaphysical language born from speculation the real big school - not to be confused with the decadent neo-scholastic -, all expressed through specific terms and idioms of the Latin language. Soon after the Council Latin, but it remained the official language of the Church, it was abandoned, because even then, most of the extra European bishops, She did not know him most. But since the Second Vatican Council was literally monopolized by the German and North European trend, the expressive language style used is that of the decadent German Romanticism, that seeks first to unite the opposites and contraries, the thesis and the antithesis, the hot oil with cold water. E, you pay attention: we have fallen into this trap, involuntary and in good faith, Also all Orthodox theologians, including Popes John Paul II and, perhaps above all and most of all, Benedict XVI. It has been surreal and romantic spirit that the Church, instead of condemning the error, It began to converse with the error, all with this consequence: the error was not quite correct, fact finding to be the subject of dialogue has strengthened and rooted more, and in this way - convinced of being able to correct it with loving dialogue - it was instead made to penetrate inside the Church.

.

The first document approved, the Holy Council, one on the liturgical reform, permits and possibly approve the liturgical abuses that today we can see in churches? With Neocatechumenal dangerous as more scempiano the Most Holy Eucharist, more screaming like a mantra the rhyme: "We approved, we approved ... the Popes have approved ... we have approved!»? [see my recent study, WHO].

.

How can we, half a century of reform, find ourselves today in a state of total chaos that liturgical not infrequently borders on sacrilege of the Holy Eucharist? Simple answer: the Holy Council dictated the “romantic” general and very general lines, order to undertake a necessary liturgical reform; needed especially on the pastoral level, and of the new evangelization of peoples. but when, in certain very delicate materials, from the liturgy and from its Discipline of the Sacraments which rules, do not give strict instructions, mandatory, accurate and not subject to any different interpretation, will inevitably what today we can see: each has created his own liturgy, their Discipline of the Sacraments, its doctrine and, at last, their own laws. With that the Neocatechumenal, trumpeting a recognition of a purely administrative character granted to them by the Pontifical Council for the Laity [cf. WHO, WHO], certainly not by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith or from the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, do not hesitate to lie deliberately lying declaring its adherents and to anyone that "their” liturgies are fully approved by the Holy See. If we then say to these people that this is not true and that they have no right to use and abuse the sacred liturgy, that the sacraments are not available assets of their property and that of the doctrine are not free interpreters or worse makers, they respond by reiterating that "in the Church there was a council" and you, reasoning that way, six "a poor nostalgic Tridentine". And thereby, is obvious that today, in the Church of the romantic and ambiguous vagueness, that with the error dialogue rather than condemn, give a person the "Tridentine", It goes something like … daije er fixed mignotta so funny at all, but because of what the expression means etymologically, not in the amiable and playful way as the sympathetic popolana referred narravo before.

.

The masters of cinema and Italian theater: Alvaro Vitali [Rome 1950], video WHO

While the great Council of Trent, radically reformed the Church and that led her to an extraordinary missionary work, It is used today as a real insult, on the other hand, not the Second Vatican Council, but the para-council that perversion reaches its maximum in the post-conciliar, But it is considered and presented as a kind of dogma dogma by those who, paradoxically, de-construct half a century the whole dogmatic system of the Church (!?). And when the modern insult Fixed 'na mignotta, ie the "Tridentine", they also want to add insult to Paraculo, in the latter case they tell you: "You are an old dogmatist tied to obtuse and obsolete dogmatisms". So, if Tridentine equivalent today Fixed 'na mignotta, the term dogma and dogmatic, roughly equivalent to that of Paraculo.

.

Without repeating myself unnecessarily, I refer readers to my old article 2014: 'Babel and newspeak: a Church without vocabulary for half a century " [see WHO], This was followed in 2016 one of my keynote Available in video [see WHO].

.

Language is not a substantial element, but accidental. Example: celebrate Mass in local languages, it does not in any way affect the mystagogical substance of the Eucharistic Sacrifice. But, if you are doing external accidental use of the element, that language, are altered through incorrect translations the words that for two millennia and enclose the substance lindane, in that case we can say that, through the outer accidental element of the tongue, It is likely to strike and alter the substance seriously. Exactly as it is today: do not touch the substance of the doctrine, which remains as such, But it is trying to disregard the substantive precepts of the doctrine through a new pastoral practice.

.

These days anyone - I do not remember exactly who, nor remember the name, but that does not matter - has returned to speak of proselytism so harsh and derogatory, giving to this term a negative connotation, just like some give a negative connotation today "Tridentine" and "dogmatic".

.

Let's see what it means and as indicated by the vocabularies proselytizing term, starting greek dall'etimo composed to pros ed I am coming erchomai, which means "coming" or "going". The term literally means proselytizing: carry out an activity, in the case of evangelization Christianity, to convert and to win new faithful.

.

The masters of cinema and Italian theater: Tomas Milian [Havana 1933- Rome 2017] and Franco Lechner aka Balloon [1931-Roma Roma 1987], video WHO

The invitation to proselytize It does not arise from the "bad guys" of the sixteenth century Dominican, that according to sensational false historians They came with swords and crosses to exterminate the Aztecs of that delicate man of Montezuma and forcibly convert them to Christianity. The "bad guys" of the sixteenth century Dominican, arrived in Mexico were shocked by the fact that the great indigenous people of the Aztecs, however, in a state of total decay, He performed more human sacrifices, together with various forms of ritualistic cannibalism, which were prevented by the "cruel" colonizers. That with respect to those who today accuses, both of them, It had destroyed the ancient and glorious civilization in the sixteenth century, arrival of the Spaniards, Instead they poured in their state of the deepest decline and human and moral degradation.

.

A proselytizing, We invite us Our Lord Jesus Christ, turning to the Apostles a precise command, for more in the space-time that goes' from his resurrection to his ascension to heaven. It is the last command that Christ God turns to his disciples before returning to the Father's right hand:

.

"Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. And these signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons, speak with new tongues, they will take snakes in hand and, if they drink any deadly, it shall not hurt them harm, lay hands on the sick and they shall recover. The Lord Jesus, after talking with them, He was taken up into heaven and sat down at the right hand of God. And they went forth and preached everywhere, while the Lord worked with them and confirmed the word with the prodigies that accompanied it " [cf. MC 16, 1-20].

.

Christ is God who invites us to proselytize, because this is the purpose of and preaching: redemption. Needless to say, the mystery of redemption is very different from the concept of "one religion is the other ', or, "no matter who is Jesus Christ, Buddha or Mohammed ». For if this were the Redeemer, which is one, not many, It would place as element of uniqueness and absoluteness stating: «I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you know me, also you know my Father: from now on you know him and have seen him " [cf. GV 14, 6-7].

.

The masters of cinema and Italian theater: Nino Manfredi [Castro dei Volsci 1922 – Rome 2004], video, WHO

The proselytizing is not anything negative and frightening. Of course, Also most things good and holy, can be transformed into evil and harmful. Certain drugs or certain deadly poisons, when used in the right doses are essential ingredients for the preparation of certain medications - for example certain strong painkillers -, in the absence of which, affections from certain evils in the acute phase, They could be torn from physical pain. Similarly we can say for firearms, that if you give in use to soldiers fighting a just war of defense, are indispensable to defend from attack by a group of ferocious fundamentalist Islamists a village where women are collected, Children and the elderly are Christian and potential objects of their massacres. For those who do should be replicated in this example stating that there are no just wars, and that it is never licit to kill for no reason and motive, if anything, try asking: in many war zones did you come to live? Or: many bodies of children killed, mutilated, made in pieces or burnt, have you had occasion to see, O loving beautiful soul left radical chic dell'Europa pacifundist, where the last disastrous war ended seventy-four years ago, while residents of other regions and countries of the world are born, lived and reached the age of seventy years without ever having met in the course of their existence one day of peace, but going conflict in conflict, the dictator dictator, civil war into civil war? [cf. WHO].

.

The Holy Eucharist, if you received in state of grace, It supports and comfort for eternal life. The same Holy Eucharist, But if received by a person who does not live in a state of grace, It wants to live well and in fact claims full recognition of its right to live outside of grace, It is nourishment for eternal life, but instead becomes poison for the soul, She is explained to the Blessed Apostle Paul:

.

"Each, therefore, examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup; because whoever eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord, eating and drinking his own condemnation " [cf. The Cor 23, 28-29].

.

Even proselytism, It can be turned into something negative, if to do so are certain aggressive and coercive evangelical and Pentecostal sects that are used to playing on the fears and human frailty, in respect of which, that person can not remember the name, I, however, never heard words of reproach and condemnation, least of all for the forced conversions made by Islam, under threat of death or deprivation of civil rights, although today even presented as a religion of peace and love, which is equivalent to present Messalina like it was the martyr of purity Santa Maria Goretti.

.

Giving proselytizing word a negative connotation, It is like giving a negative connotation to the word Eucharist. If anything, claiming that, the concept of transubstantiation and the real presence of Christ in the sacred species soul, body and divinity, could cause serious injury to the sensitivity of all members of the current heretical distaccatesi of the Catholic Christian nucleus, which consider the Eucharist only a purely symbolic memorial in remembrance of the Last Supper of Christ the Lord.

.

Many are therefore the concepts and words that could cause offense to others, for instance: Incarnation of God's Word, Jesus Christ, true God and true man, The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Resurrection of Christ, her assumption into heaven and so on. Per now, just to please the world and not to offend the world, we started from proselytizing and various other things as it were minor, all waiting for the best of the worst comes after everything ...

.

A prayer for our great Italian masters of the cinema and theater, for the dead and for the living: may God make merit for having built and supported by their deep seriousness.

.

the Island of Patmos, 22 May 2019

.

.

A WISE COMMENT ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

.

Dear Brother,

They do not usually comment on electronic sites, but this time your short essay, linguistically written with "the smell of the sheep" to boot township, He was quite intrigued and amused.

I welcome your approach: It is effective in capturing the interest of the player in the boater the vast sea the electronic network; It helps us not to give in to discouragement and gloom in considering the general confusion of St. Peter's ship and to react with Tuscan spirit, to St. Philip Blacks; It is an example of application preclaro aura maximum: "I do not take them seriously, take them for a ride " [N.d.R. see WHO] that I now practice in my small (while seeking to reject the temptation of complacency).

About "smell of the sheep": I think nothing but one of the many slogans, inconsistent and "imaginative" (in sessantottino sense), by which we are afflicted and led astray in this unfortunate ecclesial era. I know of no biblical and patristic basis for a pseudoteologia "cacosmetica" (κακὴ ὀσμή = stinks); even Jesus Christ, in chapter 10 the Gospel according to John, not even remotely dream of venturing into this language, given that the sheep - are enclosed when the fold - not exactly give off a pleasant smell; but apparently some "pastors" today have only seen the sheep odorless some Christmas crib. On the contrary, the blessed Apostle Paul writes: "For we are before God the aroma of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing; to one a fragrance from death to death and the other a fragrance from life to life " (2Color 2, 15 – 16). At this rate, certain "imaginative" bishops will the "updated" packaging sacred chrism is not a pleasant balm (according to tradition), but with "Water sheep - black sheep = Mutton smell - black sheep ", to have new bishops, new priests and confirmed more and more "goats".

Rather than concionar of "smell of the sheep", They should care for many fragrant pretini, who waste good money on perfume for his dapper personalino always expensively dressed to secular fashion and leave in their wake a strong odor of Paraculo (in the original sense of the term), how spiritual edification of the Catholic flock you can imagine.

With regard to proselytism, a way of warning cry, sketch an observation that should be more detailed. I think just the blessed Apostle Paul is one of the main victims of the prevailing modernism. The mere reading of Acts illustrates the fact that he was dedicated nothing more than to "make disciples", "to teach", "Preach" that Jesus is the Christ and the only Savior of all, according to the mission entrusted by the Risen Lord to his Church (CF. Mt 28, 19 – 20; 16, 15. 20; LC 24 46 – 48). Entered into a City, He not impiantava no cafeteria or hospital, not waiting for quiet that his philanthropic activities arouse questions in the other and then presented as a Christian, but at once he preached in the synagogues and in the streets, explicitly calling to faith and paying in person for persecution unleashed against the Jews. Today, the Church leaders censurerebbero, accusing it of proselytism deplorable and divisive action! But how is this reconciled with the dogma of apostolic character of the Holy Church?

The rest, among innumerable heretical nonsense hitherto heard, lately we have also the following annoverarne (He trumpeted shamelessly on the banks of the Po in Turin, with the complicity of the Archbishop Metropolitan competent): if he had known homo-affective couples (?!), St. Paul would not have written Rom 1, 24 – 32; which is equivalent to denying that the Apostle is a Doctor inspired by the Holy Spirit, but rather a poor fool not updated! Be careful and those parts, because the Apostle of the Gentiles has the iconographic attribute a sword in his hand; saw the temper that distinguished him, If you decide to use it, some head buggy-priestly episcopal fall ...

.

24 May 2019

John Zanchi - Sansepolcro (Arezzo)

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

..

.