Comments are closed.
The website of this magazine and the editions take name from the Aegean island in which the Blessed Apostle John wrote the Book of the Apocalypse, isola also known as «the place of the last revelation»
«God revealed the secrets of others ALTIUS»
(in higher than the others, John has left the Church, the arcane mysteries of God)
The bezel used as the cover of our home page is a 16th century fresco by Correggio. preserved in the Church of San Giovanni Evangelista in Parma
creator of the website of this magazine:
MANUELA LUZZARDI
This I read is too beautiful, In today's time, so as not to share it:
“Judas was also from the company of Jesus”
Apart from the jokes on some “Merenderi” e “companions of snacks”, No real Catholic should ever overlook to recite at least one pater-ave-groria every day for the Supreme Pontiff.
Dear Ettore,
Thank you so much for the report, It was a editorial error of beating, Which we are sorry first of all for the talented and we always highly appreciate cartoonist Alfio Krancic.
Rev. Dad,
I would like to point out that this response must be inserted among the comments to Father Ivano's article relating to “nihilism”. Here and as a fuor fish of water.
The so -called Father Ariel has to do only one thing: be ashamed!
That said by a true priest to a bogus priest, that puts its name without problem.
Gualdo's Levi simply belongs to a church that does not exist.
Point.
Dear Reader,
from this message written on June 1st and published only today, I removed the name to be free to answer them and to give it a severe warning: Not even the worst of the priests of this world would express themselves in this way towards a confrere. In fact, we all know that not even an excommunicated priest and then discharged by the clerical state can be defined “so-called”, because he will always remain a priest; and it will be forever.
If she wants to insult me, feel free to do it, But you never dare to sign up with the name of a priest with a lot of indication of his diocese of belonging.
In the diocese she indicated there is a priest with the name with which she signed up, But he never sent any message e, When I contacted him and I shot his comment, He was very impressed by the fact that a person allowed himself to appropriate his name to write an insulting message to another priest on a page that may be – and that is usually read – by thousands and thousands of readers.
The email address from which you sent the message is not active, This means that it was created specifically and then canceled.
On behalf of my confrere of mine, presbyter of an Apulian diocese, official this communication to you: If on any other page of magazines, Blog or Siti, She will use the name of this priest to sign up, He will immediately report everything to the postal police.
On the other hand, thank you because I met – albeit only by telephone – This dear confrere of Puglia, who told me he reads The Island of Patmos from the 2016 is that, Despite the unfortunate episode you created, He was very happy to feel and talk to me in person.
So try to take his time better.
Thanks Don Ariel, I would only add that St. Peter made a barbine figure in front of the Christian community when he was taken up by St. Paul for the fact of taking food with the kind converted. And there was no one to threaten him of death! As for Pope Francis, I must say that the passage in the interview was more bad for me where the fact of Mons Viganò's condemnation for the cause with his brother priest takes out in a subtle. I quote from the interview: The Pope says: “I was very careful not to say things that were not there but then he said them, three or four months later, A judge in Milan when he condemned him.” “The question of his family, intends? (Asks the journalist) “Of course. I kept silent, because I should have thrown mud. That journalists find out. And you discovered it ..”
I found this step to say the least shameful. Apart from the fact that the dispute with his brother must be known in all its aspects, Not only those who are convenient for Bergoglio Press Gang. But what does it have to do with the fact if he knew McCarrick or not? It hurts to hear a pope speak like this. This does not mean that I pray for the pope every day, but what…
Good evening Father Ariel,
I can no longer understand how a pontiff who possibly is not a good master of faith, which feeds divisions in the episcopate and therefore damages the same unit of the Church, It continues to perform the function of rock on which the sacred building rests is as this foundation wanted by our Lord must be seen and revered by the real Catholics. Since my confusion increases more and more, Please to illuminate me with one of his word. I sincerely thank you
Dear Vincenzo there is nothing to understand we live in a confusion era and at the moment there are no solutions when the good God will want, will free us from this state, regards
dear fabio,
Thank you for answering me but unfortunately my question addressed to Father Ariel was written in an unbelieved way and therefore easily misunderstood. That in the current situation only an extraordinary intervention of the sky will be decisive, I have been convinced of it for some time too. Now, According to the straight line Catholic faith ever, (if I'm not mistaken) A legitimately elected pontiff succeeding San Pietro becomes stone and foundation of the Church according to the promises of Our Lord, independently if it is a holy or not holy ... when any pontiff voluntarily or in good faith does not exercise a firm magisterium, favors doctrinal confusion, It tends to divide the episcopate and therefore also seriously damage the unity of the church all, how mysterious though mysterious, I wonder, It also represents the famous stone desired by Christ himself that from unity and stability to the whole ecclesial community. This is the dark point that escapes me and I can't understand. I hope his father Ariel will have some time and a little patience to answer me too.
Thanks for everything you do.
He had written much previously, but never as today. For the future, Let's not delude ourselves that it is enough to trust in the registry office. They have all the cards in hand, and they continue to churn out rigged decks. This game can win only one capable of overturning the bench, As he did two millennia ago towards those galanduomomins of changevalues and cattle merchants. Yesterday we commemorated San Giustino, Author of the first apology: red vestments, obviously martyr. it illudiamoci: Always all the real witnesses of the truth all the defenders of true faith were and will be witnesses with the blood, martyrs.
Dear Reader,
His comments are always very interesting and very deep.
If as I imagine you follow my articles, Maybe he will remember that several times – Just to always scream to desert sands – I spoke and explained that the forfeiture, When it exceeds the “point of no return”, proceeds unstoppable and inevitable, regardless of our will; Because exceeding that limit, back we no longer return.
To those who replied that I did not take into account the action of the Holy Spirit, I replied that the third person of the Holy Trinity is not Magician Merlino and that the Holy Spirit does not go’ neither against the will of man nor against the principles of physics.
In this regard, I brought these two examples:
1. Adam and Eve, to whom God did not prevent the original sin. Wanting, he could have limited their freedom and their free will, At least at that juncture. And not for them, but for future humanity, To prevent us all, Because of them and not for ours, we inherited a nature corrupt from sin. But God, Free created them and free them I leave them. So it is peaceful that God, against man's freedom, you don't get there, With all due respect to those who believe that pneumatology is the Magermerlineria.
2. The example I reported several times by the Paratrooper who launches himself from the Parachie -free plane. Even if once launched, While falling, wanted to go back, back on the plane, wear a parachute and jump again, This is not possible. Then, in the face of such a physical fact, to say … will’ well, has launched without parachute, but have faith and not despair, Now the Holy Spirit will take care of bringing it back to the plane, to allow him to wear the parachute and then throw himself again … Thinking this is pure idiocy, The Holy Spirit does not challenge the laws of physics after man has exercised his freedom.
You are sacrosanct right when she says:
«This game can win only one capable of overturning the bench, As he did two millennia ago towards those galanduominians of changevalues and cattle merchants ".
In the situation we have fallen, With our forces only we cannot make it to reverse this route and this state of affairs, We must beg for some extraordinary intervention of the grace of God, If he considers to welcome our plea in this sense and to intervene.
And the grace of God will perhaps intervene, But only if whoever prays it will be more industrious than ever, With all due respect to the Pavidi army, cowardly and irresponsible who tell you with a smile they tell you … "Ah, but don't worry, The Church is of Christ, he'll take care of it!».
Superb!
This means then that we priests, at the Last Supper, by the Risen Christ, from the Christ ascended to heaven and by the Holy Spirit sent by him in the Upper Supper, We have never received any responsibility and mandate?
Christ, perhaps he told us, In these different and particular circumstances: “Throw yourself in a deck chair in the Caribbean, Drink a nice exotic drink that so much, to the Church and everything else, Then I think about it!”.
That's why I say we are madly, with furious crazy and with dangerous “Card makeups” all placed in the buttons rooms.
And with our forces only, Unfortunately, the current state, we cannot go out. What this you painted with three jokes.
dear father Ariel
She gives me the example of the unworthy but still parent father but the comparison with the Pope does not hold because in the first case (unless the child is adoptive) It is the nature that guarantees us while here we know that Bergoglio's election was orchestrated before the conclave and there are doubts also about the renunciation of Benedict XVI who dresses as if it were in charge and is a continuous scandal.
Then the famous escape of St. Peter during the persecution is obtained from an apocryphal text or there is some other text?
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atti_di_Pietro
Thank you
Tradition tells that Pietro, After fleeing from prison, He headed towards the Via Appia, which was one of the entrance and exit roads from Rome. The famous Pia legend known as "Quo vadis, Dominated?"He has been telling for immemorial times that he met Christ the Lord on the Via Appia who invited him to return to Rome to die of martyr. This tale, or pious legend, It is neither in the acts of the apostles nor in the apostolic letters, Less than ever in holy gospels, However, we know that it has been handed down since the first centuries of Roman Christianity. What we know from the Roman chronicles is that Pietro was captured by Roman soldiers near Via Appia; And she understands well that, If he wasn't entering Rome, Certainly from Rome he was fleeing during the persecutions of Nero, There are not many other possible interpretations. His crucifixion, and the particular way in which he was crucified each other, It is told by Girolamo, Tertullian, Eusebio and Origen.
That Pietro then never set foot in Rome and that he has never been executed and then buried on the Vatican Colle, where under the altar of the confession is its tomb, They say of the seven heretics of Christian matrix, But this has been widely denied by archeology, who found authentic, Thanks both to writing and vintage artifacts the place of burial.
For some time I have understood that she has "problems" with the alleged legitimacy of the Supreme Pontiff Francesco and several times on this issue I replied, However, she has repeated the question in other forms, however, and I replied the same.
The reasons you wear are irrelevant and inconsistent, if you let it say, always admitted wants to give more credibility to a lord of 56 years that the history of the Church has studied it far and wide and that precisely because it studied it can only tell her that as far as I am concerned, In years and years of study, I only learned something, But really and just a little little thing ...
This should make me – rigorous – more credible than the army of anonymous that on pages equally anonymous shoot mortar shots to end, having no name, nor identity or responsibility for what they write, But unfortunately they have people who drink for good what they are absurd to support, Until the point that when we try to explain what is true and what is false, Instead of taking the answers of theologians and scholars for good, they reply by bringing the reasons spread by these do-it-yourself interior practices.
These catastrophic-scandalistic blogs, On the election of the Supreme Pontiff Francesco tell of everything and more, between conspiracy, prophecies, catastrophisms and so on. To follow with the abuse of the private revelations of some saints and blessed used for the sole purpose of demolishing this pontificate in all ways.
So if he wants to give me the benefit of having studied some history of the Church, I will first tell you that things have happened far worse than you bring like a sort of irrefutable invalidating proof, as the election to the sacred throne of the then cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio would have been orchestrated, As the great interior guru tell, who know more of us theologians, Church historians and scholars of canon law.
Well, so that they were even things: so?
But she, It has the faintest idea of what happened, and especially in certain centuries, in the papacy, the papacy and the papacy?
I'll briefly summarize: made elections not for pre-conclave agreements, but because of simony, elections to the sacred throne purchased a barrel of money and political compromises, imposed by external powers elections, pontiffs who have even sold the charge of his office, pontiffs elected after pressing threats exerted by political powers on the cardinal electors, imposing on them a candidate they liked and chosen by themselves ...
And all this is strictly and historically proven, admits, The Church itself declares it and documents it without fear and without being ashamed for certain sad and real facts of the past.
Mi tip: he understands by chance to declare nulle, today, in the aftermath, The elections of several dozen popes that took place in this way?
He knows that in the history of the Church they are well 18 The cardinal granddaughters of popes that have in turn became popes shortly after the death of the popes popes, With influences exercised on cardinals both by the uncle Pontiff before his death and then after his death from the consortium of their supporters, who have not spared to cardinal voters or threats or offers of money and benefits?
He knows that there were some popes who after their election emptied the papal state coffers to pay the “debt” election to the cardinals who had supported them, to their families and political potentates who supported them?
Some of these popes, elected not to advance arrangements, by Simon MA, behind blackmail, behind political influences and so on, They have even opened, chaired and closed the councils, condemned heretics – that these were beyond any possible doubt -, They have issued important documents and enshrined certain fundamental doctrines. Well tell me, what are we going to do, we invent a sort of beautiful Mafia St. Gallen subsequently and we declare null and void all their acts, including ecumenical councils and condemnation for heresy by them decreed?
In the end, on the resignation of Benedict XVI there is no doubt, Did I already wrote it responded in the past, But I see that I must repeat it to him because she returns to ask the usual question about the alleged disability of the election of the reigning pontiff: Benedict XVI himself said, clarified and repeated the full freedom of his act of renunciation without any influence and less than ever constraint.
I can also understand that the Supreme Pontiff Francesco may not be particularly nice to her, but think it really is worth it, give the liar to Benedict XVI, In order to find every possible escapade to say that the reigning pontiff is not the legitimate successor of Pietro ?
Of faith, She intends to accept only what she likes or that she is nice to her?
Not even me the Supreme Pontiff Francesco is particularly nice, But I will never cease to see and venerate in him the legitimate successor of the blessed apostle Pietro.
This is the difference that runs between a man of faith that acts on the basis of faith, and an emotional man who acts on the basis of the likes, I do not like, It is nice to me, it is unpleasant to me.
Dear Father Ariel,
As for the historical judgment I believe nobody is more competent than her to pronounce on the validity of the current pope.
Nevertheless, I would like to reassure you that, by common woman and without notions of theology, Recognizing in the bishop of Rome the legitimate successor of the apostle Pietro is almost impossible not so much for an emotional/instinctive refusal of a person who does not result to define unpleasant. It is our reason that clashes with the many attitudes, words, guests, speeches “doctrinal” of him. That saying everything and the opposite of everything, Instead of confirming and enriching our faith makes us trample. I believe that none of his predecessors, although they climbed to the papal throne through intrallazzi, Purchase or Simonie has created such a disorder, spoken of the Holy Trinity, or of the Mother of God or of our Savior in tones and accents that to define soils is an understatement.
Treat with simplicity the mysteries of faith to bring the simple closer is a holy work, simplify and trivialize the things of the sky to make them attractive to the most distant, And receiving the applause of the atheists is quite another thing.
With respect and esteem, sincerely yours…
Dear Ornella,
There are dozens and dozens of my detailed writings in which I reproach in hard tones, Always and penalty at my risk, the highest ecclesiastical authorities, first of all accusing them of living out of reality, After creating yourself – If anything, even and only to please the “master” – an idea of a dreamlike people who do not exist in reality; And I guarantee them that for this prices I paid high and with substantial interests.
During this pontificate he particularly abused the concept of “people” and the concept of “mercy”. Probably, That late Holy Man of God of Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, It was not part of the people – at least of that elected – And perhaps he was not even worthy of mercy, If we think for over a year, This devoted servant of the Church, He asked for a private hearing, alone, To the Holy Father, without ever being received. But, The Augustus Pope of the people and Mercy, He had time to receive and to speak with Eugenio Scalfari and above all with Emma Bonino.
Then the other nice effect was also brought out: "field hospital church".
She, Dear Ornella, It is one of the many members of the people of God who, addressing us priests – not to the unattainable ecclesiastical authorities who live in their world of the Irreale – ASSISTANCE QUESTION AND THEREFORE ABLEMS AT THE ERCONMANY OF THE CHURCH HOSPITAL OF THE RAME, where Father Antonio Spadaro does not provide service, too busy shooting nonsense on Twitter, affection now by irrepressible delirium of omnipotence, followed by wheel by that senile concentrate of acid with a false simpntor smile printed on the face, Tal is Father Bartolomeo rises, in front of which a zircon is truly an authentic diamond.
He has been years now, that I listen to the lament of the real people of God, who expresses disturbances and worries like those he expresses you, while the churches are increasingly empty; While Sat2000 has reduced to the shots from above so as not to show the pontifical celebrations in San Pietro or the hearings in the square the increasingly numerous empty spaces and places.
And nobody like me understands it, Dear Ornella, because with this people of God, lost and abandoned, I share the bitterness and the beating that day behind day we take.
It almost seems that the Holy Father started on purpose to go in Romania these days to ask for forgiveness from the Roma, To which, however, I do not understand, we Catholics, What we should ask for forgiveness; or perhaps we are the Nazis who sent them to the concentration camps?
But, despite being capable of starting for Romania to go to offer a request for forgiveness to the Roma, This immense concentrate of inconsistency would never be able to apologize to the various priests and the different saints bishops that without having done anything, if not of the great good to the Church and to its people, They found themselves having the existence afflicted and sometimes ruined for the work of the Sicars who move as snakes around the chair of Pietro and the Supreme Pontiffice, moved by jealousies, badness, envy and cruelty, drunk with power for power and convinced, Without glimmer any conscience, to be able to make people's lives what they want, in total contempt for the laws of God and men.
We must pray for the conversion and repentance of the Supreme Pontiff, so that he can first save his soul, and at the same time pray that the grace of God, When he wants, grant a holy pontiff to the universal church as soon as possible, hoping that the solemn lesson escaped from the conclave of 2013, be of severe warning not to repeat anything similar in the future.
Dearest father Ariel,
What infinite sadness.
In the next conclave, If there ever will be, The only hope is in a direct intervention of the Holy Spirit. The real one.
We also pray for this.
I don't know if it is unresolved to combine such serious topics with a catty greeting with the micia hipzia, but I do it.
Sometimes I hope that a spark of immortality has also been conferred on these of ours of ours.
With affection and esteem I wish you a peaceful day.
The true Christian never judges the sinner,but always has a moral obligation to condemn sin as unlawful and unjustifiable : This is especially true for the lie,if only not to contradict the words of our Lord Jesus Christ “the Truth will set you free”.However, It does not seem appropriate to compare the figure of Cardinal Bergoglio to that of St. Peter's:the latter lied in a situation “extraordinary”in a total loss of context in all those who had followed the Messiah(obviously excluding His Holy Mother);This lie was dictated by a fear, purely human,losing vita.Inoltre San Pietro like all the other apostles,STILL they had not received the Holy Spirit,THE COMFORTER, that would confirm them in faith and taken to different martirio.Ben I think the cardinal's position which over the past six years has repeatedly dimostrato.tra half-truths, ambiguous statements, alleged “merciful gestures”,to be at ease with the lie that, ONLY it seems to spring from a “fear” to see harm his media image!There was an apostle who was holding VERY his image:DOWN FROM…
… and explains why Peter, after seeing the glorious body of the risen Christ and after having received the Holy Spirit, in old age, in Rome, He was about to flee yet again, abandoning herself the Christian community, scared and so worried only about rescuing his own skin?
What should I infer, Following his logic to say theologically unscrupulous? Perhaps that the blessed apostle had not been quite dazzled by the appearance of the Risen and fairly filled with thanks by the Holy Spirit?
Please, is serious!
San Pietro was never in Rome, But we were brought to us his fatal remains. Nowhere in the writings is the presence of San Pietro in Rome. Tradition is one thing, The written text is another thing. I believe in the written text. If I will be allowed I will send you the studies made by a biblical artist and presented to a religious seminar of Upper Italy at the beginning of the existing month.
… and this biblicalist, He ever studied anything, of the great archaeological research made under the Basilica of San Pietro?
As often happens, it does not listen. I said there are only the bones, Bring there to found the church in Rome, as it happened then. The churches and the remains of San Pietro were based on the relics, the mother church of Rome was founded. But she knows more and more of all, also of those who pass life on ancient texts and archaeological remains.
I don't listen?
In your comment she says with Sicumera:
«San Pietro was never in Rome, But they were brought to us his fatal remains "
It's not that I know more about everyone, as she says, Quite simply I know what those who do not know are presumed instead of knowing, and also in an arrogant way.
But she knows that Pietro was stopped by Roman soldiers along the Via Appia, who was crucified on the Vatican Colle, under the persecution of Nero, that everything is attested and documented by the historic Roman chronicles and handed down since the first century. D.C.. by the Roman Christian community?
That Pietro was crucified in Rome on the Vatican Colle, It is a documented historical fact.
http://www.vatican.va/various/basiliche/san_pietro/it/necropoli/tomba.htm
Not to mention all the research and archaeological studies done under the Basilica of San Pietro, The last of which wanted by Pius XII and carried out by international archaeologists and scholars.
He knows who is who denies that "Pietro was never in Rome"?
Jehovah's Witnesses, The Mormoni and the other seven of evangelical matrix.
Here is who denies it, in the face of historical documents.
dear father Ariel,
I would ask in the prophecies of La Salette is talk that Roma will become the seat of the Antichrist and also the visions of the Blessed Emmerich speak of two Popes and a false church, it is high time according to her? In fact they seem to have come true, Pope Bergoglio is now erring son six years who perseveres in error, too many doubts, She like the whole Church considers him legitimate but if only one cardinal questioned his election, this could declare itself disabled or not?
Thank you.
dear fabio,
I go by order of answer to the questions …
As for visions and messages recognized as authentic by the Church, We must always keep in mind that recognition does not imply that their content, however authentic, are elements of the revealed faith inserted as such in the filing of the the Catholic faith.
It should be an obvious thing, But unfortunately it is not always easy to make the faithful understand; this not because of the faithful, but of us priests who instead of making catechesis, Preach the Holy Gospel and transmit the magisterium of the Church, we often reduced to social workers who speak all that politically correct like the world.
And the world, instead, we should not like, Christ himself tells us [cf. GV 15, 18-21 text WHO]
If the time has come I do not know, nor do I know why, "But of that day and that hour, But, nobody knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father " [cf. Mt 24, 36].
In this passage of the Blessed Evangelist Matthew, You will find answers to many of his questions, and Christ is God Himself, to answer [see WHO].
That the Holy Father make mistakes, sometimes serious and sometimes embarrassing, they can deny it – and unfortunately they deny – only those who, squeezing this pontificate like a lemon and aiming to have around, immediately and as much as possible, They are seeking to capitalize on positions and sinecures all possible and better benefits. If someone exposes them or holds them in public, their aggressive reactions are not simply bad, because they are imbued with a satanic cruelty.
Serious errors or embarrassing, They do not compromise the office, neither legitimate power let alone the legitimate election.
In the end: the legitimate election can not reasonably be put into question.
The worst thing you can do some faithful, before a Pontiff who they do not like, It is to cling to assumptions about its illegitimacy. For as I have explained several times in the past: a son who for misfortune had a very bad father, or unworthy, It can not react by questioning the legitimacy of the parent:
The great decadence and "The Silence of the Lambs". When to protect the mother and family the children must pass the great test of faith: live and suffer as if the father did not exist, but never forget that he is still the legitimate father
pray for the Pope, if he wants, particularly, asking the intercession of Saints Gregory and Leo Magno.
I do not know if you're really a troll or a priest , but I do not understand how to talk so tough not you get trouble . I basically agree on the seriousness of the situation that leads many to break away from the Church . I do not share the comparison with Peter because betrayal and repentance followed after the descent of the Holy Spirit's testimony to the death . I do not see repentance or feelings
father ariel, is not ashamed?
How can criticism move to a person created as he is by God, whose character, Furthermore, He is also shaped by the febrist Esther Ballerstrino de Carega and by a Jewish psychoanalyst?
Oh Lord, if Catholics vote for the League because they are shocked by the provocative gesture of a cardinal it is precisely the same as the father Ariel readers blushing when he writes 'whores and Paraculo'.
father ariel,
the problem is not the lie itself, but the context.
There is talk of having hidden and protected a known homosexual predator who abused his role never mind the restrictions of Benedict XVI.
fairly serious.
Dear Lorenzo,
I take advantage of his commentary to remind all who read us that Pope Leo XIII, after a terrible vision, He wrote and then imposed in 1886 the recitation of the prayer to St. Michael the Archangel after all the Masses.
The full text of this prayer we find a terrifying passage in which it is written:
«Church, Spotless lamb Bride,
faverrimi enemies have filled with bitterness;, inebriated with wormwood;
impious hands on all her treasures;.
When the seat blessed Peter and the Chair of the peoples to the light of truth,
of his own there, a throne of their abominable impiety, and the;
Pastor struck the, they can disperse the flock.»
In Italian translation:
"The church, this spouse of the Immaculate Lamb,
It got is drunk from very cunning enemies that fill with bitterness
and they lay their sacrilegious hands on all her things most desirable.
Where is the seat of the Blessed Peter mail to the chair of truth to enlighten the people,
there have established the throne of their abominable impiety,
so hitting the shepherd, dispersing the flock ".
Leone XIII, We could have seen what we are experiencing today?
Therefore we have an obligation to pray for the Pope, everyday, invoking the help of the Blessed Virgin Mary mother Church and the intercession of St. Michael the Archangel.
About merely shows the errors and inconsistencies of the Supreme Pontiff and not to pray for him, It would do much better to be silent.
For the person and ministry of the reigning pontiff must offer unceasing prayers and even our private acts of personal penance.
If not, similarly to policy makers and the politicians, We risk reducing everything to a tussle between political parties arguing among themselves, ignoring the good of the country and the people, because what only counts, for certain, is arguing.
I confirm that I remember the Pontiff in the everyday Rosario. It was in fact a comment indictment or judgment on the person, but I would just mention the matter of the lie that, personally, I find disturbing.
Dear Lorenzo,
you are right.
And when the people of God remains unsettled, with the right reason, shepherds care of souls – that's us – can not and should not mean that all is well, unfortunately, because nothing is fine, also because of the crisis and decay, It has added a terrible element: When we fall into the ridiculous.
And for the children of the Holy Church – priests and laity – see our mother slammed on the street among the laughter of passers -by, is a wound for which, who caused it and followed to cause it, will have to respond to the very severe judgment of God.
For this we must pray for the conversion and repentance of these people, because three seconds after they are dead, There will be no more chance of asking and obtaining forgiveness and grace, because there will be the immediate judgment of God, At least for us who follow to believe in the foundations of the deposit of the Catholic faith.
In union of prayer.
Good day Father Ariel,
Given that the crisis of the Church with no precedent starts historically to the death of Pius XII, It is not written anywhere as many optimists think that at the end of the current pontificate a shepherd finally arrives who start to seriously remedy the disasters of over half a century, because a Francesco II etc etc could arrive……. Then, Since everything is possible, How to continue seeing in our church the real one of MT 16.18 especially for those who do not have the strong faith of the saints, since every passing year it goes from bad to worse?
Thank you
Unfortunately all true, but know ye holy priests that ordinary faithful , like me , They are suffering greatly from this situation.
I would compare our suffering to that of children whose parents argue openly in front of them and appear petty and evil in their eyes. The Pope and 'the Father, and see him lying hurts terribly. I ask you all holy priests to do everything possible because this situation does not continue, to show off the virtues not of prudence but of the courage and zeal for the salvation of souls.