the Bishop of Springfield denies Communion to politicians who voted for the abortion law, Why? Simple: because it followed two and two to make four.
Latest posts by Father Gabriele (see all)
- From financial wolves to accumulators and rich in grace: “Poverty is lacking many things, all avarice - 31 July 2022
- Solemnity of Corpus Domini - The Eucharistic Mystery is the real sign and presence of Jesus, nourishment of joy for the Christian - 18 June 2022
- With “The heart elsewhere” towards a path of obedience to the Father, to be truly disciples of Christ - 14 May 2022
Dear Father Gabriel, thank you.
One thing that has always struck me is the power of language manipulation, in which they are masters in the United States. There the camps on the subject of abortion are divided between “pro-life” e “pro-choice” these, with a constant methodology, the pro-life is strongly stigmatized while the pro-choice is magnified or at least not stigmatized or even perceived as neutral. These are adverse sides, But, up to now no one has had the courage to call those who appeal to champions of alleged and fundamental rights of women with the name that the rules of the current language allow us or “pro-death”. Language has its power in meaningful coherence, or in the correspondence between what I think, I say, I write and do, whose consequence is also the answer (skillful) that others expect from me. In Italy, they did well to adopt the wording pro-life and not pro-life, so it was not possible to replicate the deception. In fact, in Italian pro-choice is too brazen, everyone would understand. Fighiting Necroculture, in final, it is obtained by calling them from now on for what they are: PRO-DEATH! PRO-DEATH!
Yes could also add to the list those who operate the fraud of the wages of the workers ?