THE EXCOMMUNICATED PRIEST ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA AROUND THE WORLD HUNTING FOR SOULS AS A FISHERMAN DEMON AND THE LETTER OF FATHER ARIEL TO THE APOSTOLIC NUNZES IN LATIN AMERICA

On the Minutella there is little to giggle with amused clerical spirit, much to cry instead, because behind this Luciferian barker who seems to be born of an unnatural relationship between Wanna Marchi and the Magician Otelma there is the ruin of souls and the pain of many desperate families.

VERSION IN SPANISH LANGUAGE HERE

.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

The excommunicated priest Alessandro Minutella, reached on 18 November 2021 by the extreme and rare decree of dismissal from the clerical state issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he is currently on a business trip to various Latin American countries. The 16 February landed in Brazil, from where it will reach Uruguay and Argentina, as announced by him.

.

To use an idiom which is part of the historical lexicon of Sicily, glorious land to which he belongs and in which he became presbyter of the primatial archdiocese of Palermo, the Minutella is a forge of minchiate produced on an industrial scale and spread through the canals social Of Facebook e YouTube. Unfortunately, the mistake that some of our Bishops and we priests sometimes make, is to laugh with fun at the absurdities beyond any logical criterion, philosophical, theological, ecclesiological and juridical that he vomits in a violent and hateful way in a continuous jet. Unforgivable mistake on our part, because behind its absurdities there is the drama of ruined souls and entire families suffering from one or more of their members who have followed this villain.

.

Among his various statements of unprecedented gravity, in addition to his battle horse about the illegitimate and invalid election of the reigning Pontiff, there is the terrifying assertion that the Holy Masses celebrated by priests "in communion with the false usurper pope Bergoglio emissary of the Antichrist are invalid". In the same way, all the Sacraments administered by us are invalid. In his numerous neuro-video-delusions, Minutella has come to argue that we priests do not celebrate Holy Masses but "Satanic Masses during which the faithful are nourished not with the Body of Christ but with the body of the Antichrist".

.

The people he drags along I'm, mostly, fragile subjects lacking in logic and critical sense. Yet it would be enough for the followers to ask themselves this simple question: currently the priests working in the world are about 450.000. It is possible that the only Holy Masses and the only valid Sacraments are those celebrated by Minutella and that other priest “ran away from home” who followed him? A mind endowed with elementary sense, can really believe that right now, all over the world, the only valid Holy Masses and Sacraments are those administered by two excommunicated and schismatic priests, while the others 449.998 priests around the world celebrate Masses and administer fake sacraments?

.

His followers another question should also be asked: al Minutella, who has been traveling the world for three years, regardless of living expenses and more, who is the one who provides the money to move with them and camp out from one five-star hotel to another? Three years ago the Minutella traveled all over Europe by car, then he began to make intercontinental trips to various countries of Latin America. We all know how much it costs to travel for a group of people and how much the living expenses cost. Someone really thinks it is funded by the simple and modest people who at the end of his rants live on Facebook they call him to ask questions or to praise him, struggling to express a sentence in correct Italian? Who finances it, perhaps the poor widow over seventy that she sends every month 10 euro bid, convinced that this priest is a true prophet "sent by Our Lady" and an authentic martyr persecuted "by the false Church of the false pope"? Behind the Minutella phenomenon there are lenders who move very different amounts of money, it is clear. So the question is a must: who is comfortable with this crazy priest, excommunicated and discharged from the clerical state, that like a loose cannon sows daily hatred and contempt towards "the false Church" of the "Accursed Bergoglio heretic and apostate"? Who is comfortable with Minutella outside the Church, but above all within the Church? His followers ask, if he has only two neurons left in his head capable of giving birth to a logical and critical reasoning.

.

Yet there are those who believe and follow this false prophet, so much so that for some years we have been committed to assisting suffering families who come to us because children and family members have left the elderly and the sick to die without the comfort of the Sacraments and without funeral services, or cases of desperate husbands or wives, because the other spouse refused to baptize the child except at the structure erected in the province of Palermo where Minutella operates.

.

(C)therefore open that there is little to giggle with amused clerical spirit, much to cry instead, because behind this Luciferian barker who seems to have been born from an unnatural relationship between Wanna Brands and the Magician Otelma there is the ruin of souls and the pain of many desperate families.

.

As soon as the Minutella made a video public in which he greeted his “faithful people” from Brasil, announcing that he would soon go to Paraguay and Argentina, I proceeded to send a letter to the Apostolic Nuncios of the countries in question, auntil the Pastors of the Dioceses concerned are informed and can inform their priests, preventing the Minutella from sneaking into Marian shrines and religious institutions, to shoot videos inside them and then launch his hate-possessed challenges who create hatred and instigate hatred.

.

the Island of Patmos, 20 February 2022

.

.

THE INSOLENT CHALLENGES OF MINUTELLA TO THE "FALSE CHURCH" OF THE "FALSE POPE": THROW PUTRID MUD DIRECTLY FROM INSIDE THE SANCTUARY OF OUR LADY OF APARECIDA AND THEN SPREAD IT IN PUBLIC VIDEOS

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

- Church news -

THE SENSE OF THE FAITHFUL AND THOSE CATHOLIC ALABARDIERS GUARDIANS OF THE TRUE FAITH WHO ARE IN FACT LUTHERANS AND MODERNISTS WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING THAT THEY ARE

The outlandish theories of the Catholic halberdiers reach terrible practical and pastoral conclusions, but above all they end up being, in concrete facts and in their approach to faith, of the perfect Lutherans, without realizing it is, unaware that many of their critical reasons are the same as Martin Luther's. Certain subjects fall into Lutheranism in one way, in modernism on the other hand, except to feel and believe the only ones, alone and authentic guardians of the true faith and the authentic Catholic tradition.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

.

Lately I've been reading several theological proclamations around the net. A little’ it's my fault, because I'm a cyber preacher friar, so cyber teologo who surfs the net and often comes across rather strange theological theories. I tend to let it go, because they are funny theories and I read them with the aim of laughing a little’ after a day of preaching or academic research.

.

Recently some bizarre theories of the “legions of misunderstood only bearers of the true Catholic faith, apostolic, romana ”have raised doubts even in the most devoted and balanced lay faithful. Therefore I thank these halberdiers who are the only holders of the Catholic faith, because they provided me with a assist to make a brief review of ecclesiology and to provide genuine reflections on a theme that perhaps has escaped a bit’ out of hand; precisely for this reason it can be proposed to those who perhaps want to deepen it for the first time. The theme in question is the sense of the faithful.

.

With this Latin meaning, translatable into "the sense of the faithful", it means the feeling of all the faithful, that is, their subjective faith and therefore their reaction on the arguments of the faith proposed by the bishops or by the pope or by a council that are expressed in the Magisterium. Now, according to the halberdiers of the authentic faith, I would be a liar and an ignoramus on this issue. But it gets worse: I would lie not knowing that I lie. So it was necessary that these super masters, a great day, the sleeves had to be rolled up, get on the chair of their personal blog, take their virtual chalk and write on the smart-saccenza blackboard to explain to me that the sense of the faithful has an almost genuine role in the interpretation of the Magisterium and its development. This consideration is the foundation for one of the halberdiers to be able to claim that, in all this genuineness, his sense of the faithful it almost played a fundamental decisive role also in the evaluation of the acts of the ordinary magisterium of Pope Francis, such that rejecting them all together would be - listen, hear! - a prudential act, because all those who obey the Pope would do nothing but align themselves with anti-Catholic positions.

.

These sentences thus written they can mean everything and the opposite of everything. Also the reference to the magisterium of the Second Vatican Council, cited several times both in this case and in various telematic exchanges, it is so labile that it seems non-existent. In short, the basic ambiguity of the cybernetic theologians halberdiers of the true faith consists precisely in avoiding defining precisely what the sense of the faithful. Subsequently, this non-concept is filled with subjective interpretations e, at least for what I read on the net, charged with a certain feeling of defiance and distrust towards the ecclesiastical authorities when they exercise the authentic or ordinary magisterium. Therefore the cat-space halberdiers venture into theological and liturgical interpretations vitiated by fallacies and basic prejudices, gives real anti-dogmas. The basic theory, in conclusion, it seems to be the one for which a group of faithful is enough, also conspicuous, that strong in their being fully faithful to the Church and exercising a correct one sense of the faithful, only for this reason should they be able to correctly offer the correct analysis of the Magisterium documents, even to establish in a definitive and no longer questionable form, which document of the Roman Pontiff is of the ordinary Magisterium, extraordinary and authentic and which is not.

.

Theologians still debate these issues today, trying to understand the value of a certain papal and conciliar document, ma, net of a few exasperations, they would hardly proclaim their personal views as absolutely true and authentic, and starting from these to proclaim oneself i Catholics, apostolic, Romans than their opponents who would be incompetent, of heretics who understand nothing. In short, without the halberdiers even noticing: we are in the liberal democratic system of the parliamentary republic, complete with majority elections and proactive and abrogative referendums. Only the solemn formula is missing: "In the Church, sovereignty belongs to the People who delegate it to the Supreme Pastor and to the bishops".

.

I also add that clearly, in today's world where freedom comes before any other right, everyone thinks and says what they want, nonsense and falsehoods included. The right to say and think nonsense about the Catholic faith is one of those inalienable rights approved and even encouraged by the secularist and atheist culture. Halberdiers too, on this liquid and secular line, they say and think what they want. I take the liberty of asking him: for case, on your sites, you are organizing the fair and the supercazzole contest and you are competing for the first place? This is just to clarify, because I would gladly leave it there without any doubt.

.

The introductory irony phase is over (which I took from reading the splendid Adverse Heresies of Sant’Ireneo, neo-doctor of the Church), I pass a bit’ to clarify to the faithful Catholic faithful what is meant by sense of the faithful which they too have and offer to the Church as a service and path in truth.

.

Già San John Henry Newman he had dedicated a theological essay on this subject entitled «On the consultation of the faithful in matters of doctrine». The English saint and theologian, careful student of the fathers and of the history of the ancient Church, shows some heroic examples of faithful groups who in their sense of faith transmitted and preached the correct faith; this especially in the very first centuries, these faithful, resisting Arianism, until martyrdom, they rebelled against bishops and priests opposed to the Nicene doctrine. And here is already that the aforementioned halberdiers will be there to rub their hands, grinning in front of the screen and saying “Ah! You see I was right?”.

.

Obviously the meaning of Newman's study - converted to Catholicism in 1843 - was that of a Catholic theologian who wanted to provide dignity to the conscience and coherent profession of the entire body of the faithful, and therefore also of the laity. Why in fact write an essay of controversy towards the Roman Church, see Newman yes 16 years he was an attentive apologist and scholar of the sources of the faith, in an Anglican environment always ready to criticize him and hopeful to see him return Anglican again to prove the absurdity of Roman Catholicism?[1] And above all, why never offer arguments contrary to priestly authority and its teaching within the Roman see, even if Newman himself after his conversion had been validly consecrated a Catholic priest 12 years before that essay? The answer must obviously be sought in the words of the author himself, when it states: "There is no doubt that in this case they were not asked for advice, opinions and judgments, but we only wanted to ascertain a factual situation, that is, their beliefs were used as a testimony of that apostolic tradition on which alone any doctrinal definition can be based "[2]. What Newman then points out is that:

.

«By saying this, so, I am certainly not denying that most bishops were Orthodox in their internal beliefs; nor that there was a certain number of clergy who stood alongside the laity and acted as their centers and guides; nor that the laity actually received their faith, in the first instance, by bishops and clergy; nor that some portions of the laity were ignorant and other portions eventually corrupted by the Aryan masters, who took possession of the seats and ordained a heretical clergy; but I still want to say that in that time of immense confusion the divine dogma of our Lord's divinity was proclaimed, applied, maintained and (humanly speaking) preserved, much more from the Church of the learned that from church docent; that the body of the episcopate was unfaithful to his office, while the body of the laity was faithful to his baptism; that the Pope, sometimes, the patriarch, the metropolitan and other large offices, sometimes the general councils, they said what they shouldn't have said, or they did what obscured and compromised the revealed truth; while, other parte, it was the Christian people who, under Providence, it was the ecclesiastical strength of Athanasius, Ilario, Eusebio di Vercelli and other great solitary confessors, that without them they would have failed "[3].

.

I still imagine halberdiers rubbing hands again, squeak louder than before “Ah! I am still right so now I will make the act of faith to fill in the social and all my speeches of insults and rude responses against those post-council pretexts!" What to say: a person who can be said to be sufficiently familiar with the basis of the history of the Church knows very well that over the centuries there have also been popes, bishops and cardinals who have not always behaved in the odor of sanctity, rather, not a few have had reprehensible moral conduct. Sometimes even at the level of exercising their role as pastors they have not been perfect, or to be honest: they were real disasters as far as making concrete decisions e, in some cases, also in the ways of communicating some important dogmas of our faith, what this of which the Supreme Pontiff Honorius I and the Monothelite question of 634 it was a classic example.

.

All these examples in no way can they be adduced as evidence of a certain superiority of the sense of the faithful with respect to the ordinary Magisterium. Indeed, those that Newman quotes and that I take back, they are pastoral choices and ways of life that are absolutely deplorable; but the English theologian acknowledges that, beyond these reprehensible actions, the faithful are formed in the faith by the overwhelming majority of priests, bishops and popes who are wholly orthodox to the correct doctrine of dual nature. Because in their consecration the bishops received the character of the fullness of the apostolic priesthood, hence the state grace that allows him to express himself, under certain conditions, places and times, as authentic and certain teachers of the faith. The imposition of hands that the sacred order confers does not confer an aura of holiness and preservation from future very serious sins, it was not even a sort of sacramental space shield that parried any kind of moral and spiritual imperfection. Therefore these teachers of the faith need at the same time to consult the faithful, because clergy and faithful together contribute to the development and knowledge of Catholic dogma and doctrine. Newman himself - in spite of the exploitation that the indomitable halberdier can still make of him - explicitly writes:

.

“I certainly think the Church teaching he is happier when he has such enthusiastic partisans around him as those represented here, that when he cuts the faithful out of the study of his divine doctrines and the sympathy of his divine contemplations, and demands from them one fides implied in his word, that in the educated classes will end up in indifference, and in the poorest in superstition ".

.

Here then is cooperation and collaboration in consulting the faithful it is the focal point of Newman's entire essay. There is no Church docent without a church docta: the development of correct faith therefore always takes place as a path of ecclesial unity, without creating schisms, false dilemmas and who knows what other devilry, in order to babble nonsense about the primacy of common sense against the "heretical" magisterium of the Supreme Pontiff Francis, of which some brain-disconnected subjects come to maintain that his own election to the sacred throne is invalid. Yes, because the halberdiers continually write against the magisterium, establishing with factual and concrete arguments that the sense of the faithful it is superior even to the details offered by it. That is, in their odd theory it seems to me that I can clearly infer that the sense of the faithful it is a kind of epistemological force that, linked to baptismal grace, it can also come to affirm authentically and indisputably which document can be called authentic magisterium and must therefore be obeyed, and at the same time which document is instead the pure opinion of the pope or the bishops and which can be disregarded if not indeed attacked on social.

.

In tal modo, perhaps not realizing it, they fall into the Protestant error of free examination: only while Protestants apply this theory to Holy Scripture, these free defenders of Catholicism and of the one faith with a spatial halberd, they apply it to Tradition and to the Magisterium texts. If these are all hoaxes in what way, At that time, the faithful walk with the teaching Church (who teaches the truths of faith) without falling into the extremisms seen so far? Let's see in synthesis precisely how the Second Vatican Council defines the meaning of the faithful. In particular he talks about it in the The light in the part dedicated to The sense of faith and the charisms in the people of God:

.

"The holy people of God also participate in Christ's prophetic office by spreading his living testimony everywhere, above all through a life of faith and charity, and by offering God a sacrifice of praise, that is, the fruit of lips acclaiming to his name (cf.. EB 13,15). The totality of the faithful, having the anointing that comes from the Saint, (cf.. 1 GV 2,20 e 27), cannot be mistaken in believing, and he manifests this property of his through the supernatural sense of the faith of all the people, when "from the bishops to the last lay faithful" shows his universal consent in matters of faith and morals. And indeed, for that sense of faith, which is aroused and sustained by the Spirit of truth, and under the guidance of the sacred magisterium, which allows, if he is faithfully obeyed, to no longer receive a human word, but truly the word of God (cf.. 1 Ts 2,13), God's people unfailingly adhere to the faith transmitted to the saints once and for all (cf.. Gdc 3), with right judgment penetrates it deeper and more fully applying it to life " (LG. N. 12).

.

Starting from this text, let's try to clarify the gross errors mentioned above. The first mistake made in the aforementioned "ecclesiological theory" was that of distinguishing the bishops, the cardinals, dad, in short, all the clergy from the simple lay faithful. An error that was not even committed by Newman as we have seen. In short, the lay faithful do not have a different sense of faith than that of the clergy, which would be more genuine or more true, even if the clergy, in its totality, continually complied with actions contrary to Catholic morality. And here is how I anticipated, the beauty of Catholic doctrine which, in terms of receiving the Truth from the Holy Spirit, places the entire ecclesial body on the same level.

.

The second mistake it consists of contrasting the Magisterium and the Sense of the Faithful: this is outside Catholic logic and theology precisely because of the sole origin of the revealed data: the Trinitarian God in his ad extra missions. God does not offer the truth in pieces, crumbling it according to the people, of times and needs, from which it would follow that God offers, to the Holy Father Francis, the whole Catholic truth about the dual nature of Christ, while to Mr. Rossi of the parish of Tor Lupara he teaches that Jesus is only God or that he is only man, so Mr. Rossi can oppose his personal sense of faith against the Pope's Magisterium. The council teaches precisely that the sense of the faithful comes from listening to the sacred magisterium, which offers guidance on Sacred Scripture and Tradition. Hence Catholic doctrine as regards the authentic teaching of the faith and the interpretation of biblical texts, precisely for the task entrusted by Jesus himself to the apostles and for the power of the keys offered to Peter and his successors, it places the bishops as the first teachers of the faith, and not on the same level as the lay faithful. Which obviously will be able to rightly be formed, study books on exegesis and theology, but they will never be able to assume definitive and authentic interpreters of these texts: it is not the task assigned to them by God.

.

Finally, here is a practical consideration and daily to propose. The penetration of the whole Church to the divine mysteries, as the council writes, clergy and lay faithful who are guided by the Magisterium, it has no military or, on the contrary, only organizational value: in fact, following the Magisterium is what is needed to transform the Word of God into a lived word. To pass from professed faith to lived faith and therefore to active Charity.

.

Follow the Magisterium therefore it does not consist in the act of mimicking the words of others, like puppets or Sicilian puppets, but listen with devout reverence and a critical filial spirit to the word of Jesus to be incarnated today to give the face of Christ to the suffering and those who are far away. For this that once again a sense of the faithful who stood as the definitive interpreter of everything, it would create a fragmentation and fragmentation of the same data of faith, generating as much confusion and chaotic vision of charity. Indeed, again Mr. Rossi might believe that since Jesus has only divine nature and is not really risen because God cannot die, then it would do well to act accordingly and then stop believing in the resurrection of bodies. As a result, also to stop taking care of his body and hurting himself, because if he believes that the body does not rise again, Mr. Rossi can also mutilate himself.

.

This chaotic vision which at the same time would not help to actualize and concretize even the spiritual works of mercy, including that of advising the doubters. In fact, if the Magisterium is no longer an authoritative source of Truth, Mr. Bianchi in his staff sense of the faithful he could also consider it a duty to invite his best friend to carry out a schism and a distancing of the Church and to distance himself from Jesus, when faced with a doubt, for example, about the Trinitarian nature or even about a single and daily moral action.

.

The bizarre theories of the Catholic halberdiers - for which I pray a lot that they convert and soon return to full personal compliance with the doctrine - they reach terrible practical and pastoral conclusions, but above all they end up being, in concrete facts and in their approach to faith, of the perfect Lutherans, without realizing it is, unaware that many of their critical reasons are the same as Martin Luther's. This is why I wanted to dedicate an article to him, to try to avoid a form of the "dictatorship of relativism" disguised as a more genuine expression of the Catholic faith, to prevent certain subjects from falling into Lutheranism on one side, in modernism on the other hand, except to feel and believe the only ones, alone and authentic guardians of the true faith and the authentic Catholic tradition.

Rome, 17 February 2022

.

.

[1] I write it in a note as if it were said in a whisper. Now a doubt arises after these considerations: indeed the praetorians of the faith know the figure and the historical context of Newman? Or they confuse him with the best known actor and performer of The Spaccone? To me honestly the doubt remains.

[2] John Henry Newman, On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine., [Rambler, July 1859.], EEook Edition, paragraph 1.

[3] Paragraph 3.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

- Actuality -

WHEN A TRAGIC PONTIFICATE ENDS IN SATIRA: THE ROMAN PONTIFF GUEST AT TALK SHOW OF THE LEFT FRICCHETTONA BY FABIO FAZIO WHO FOR YEARS TAKEN CATHOLIC DOCTRINE AND MORALITY BY THE ASS THROUGH THE ARMED ARM OF LUCIANA LITTIZZETTO

How can you go, or how you can be present even and only with an external connection of a few minutes ― we do not know if it will be in the studio or if it will be connected ― in a living room where the poisonous Luciana Littizzetto has been throwing shit on the Catholic Church and the clergy for years, mocking doctrine at every turn, Catholic morality and the pastoral care of the Italian Bishops?

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

.

I will turn to the Holy Father Francis calling him Jorge Mario Bergoglio for an entirely ecclesiological logic that it is good to explain. In my writings and speeches, in my homilies and conferences I have always addressed the Successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter calling him: Supreme Pontiff, Roman Pontiff, or Holy Father, because such is Francis I at the moment in the fullness of his legitimate and indisputable apostolic authority. And it is for that grace of God, often intelligible in our eyes as Catholics that we have experienced many moments of this pontificate as an authentic misfortune. It will take many years, maybe decades to be able to read and then understand how God has filled us with grace through this unhappy and sad pontificate, especially today in its last and desperate swings of the tail. Often, throughout history, God's mercy has bestowed the best graces through misfortunes. An example: after the great plague of 1348, referred to by historians as black Death O big black plague, arrived in Europe from China - for a change! - which exterminated half the population of our continent, it came to life a century after the great Renaissance period.

.

So if I say Jorge Mario Bergoglio it is because I intend to make a clear distinction between man and the office of the Roman Pontiff, perfectly aware that the office is conferred on man and that the fullness of the Petrine ministry exists in the man who is clothed with it. This is something that we priests and theologians are aware of, knowing full well that Simon son of Jonah (cf. Mt 15, 17) he ceased to be such to become Peter, the stone placed on the cornerstone which is Christ (cf. At 4, 11; Ef 2, 20) on which the Incarnate Word of God built his Church (cf. Mt 16, 18-19).

.

If the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio was also one of the worst, or even the worst pontiff in the entire history of the Papacy, all of us priests and faithful owe him devoted respect and filial obedience, always and regardless. Worthy or unworthy he is the legitimate successor of the Blessed Apostle Peter, who received his mandate from Christ himself, transferring it to all his Successors, of which the reigning Pontiff is the holder in legitimate line of apostolic succession. The Roman Pontiff, when it expresses itself in matters of doctrine and faith, he enjoys the special assistance of the Holy Spirit to the point of pronouncing himself infallibly. But when he acts as a man or as private doctor he can take actions or indulge in those inappropriate expressions, unhappy and misleading to which Jorge Mario Bergoglio has by now accustomed us for nine years now. In this case, like everyone else, he is subject to criticism and reproaches, because neither some of his repeated zibaldoni pronounced on the plane at high altitude nor his unhappy chats with Eugenio Scalfari can be elements of supreme magisterium for us, much less binding. In fact, as the Holy Bishop and Doctor of the Church Ambrose of Milan said at the time:

.

«Tell the Bishop of Rome that after Jesus Christ he comes for us, that we venerate and respect him, but also tell him that we don't intend to use the head that God has given us just to put a hat on.".

.

After this clarification Let's get to the heart of the problem: to the proven test of facts, the reigning Pontiff has never ceased to be Jorge Mario Bergoglio to become Peter, that is, Francis, as he chose to call himself. Stubborn and undaunted, he continued to be Jorge Mario Bergoglio, an upstream Jesuit poorly trained on a theological and ecclesiological level between the end of the 1960s and the beginning of the 1970s, clearly contemptuous of Romanism and incapable of understanding that it is synonymous with Catholic universality, finally landed in Rome with all the worst anti-Roman prejudices fomented by the Germans in that Latin America they used as an incubator of all the worst theological and ecclesiological drifts. And so, for the first time, we found ourselves on the Chair of Peter a man steeped in contempt for Rome and Roman Catholic universality. And who denies this, the mind, or lives outside of reality, or more simply, it refuses reality in order not to come to terms with the horror of Leopardi's true memory.

.

Years ago I explained that the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio could not even be called a provincial, but a headquarters. The analysis is contained in an article of mine from 2017 to which I refer you and in which I explain that "quarterlyism" - a non-existent term in the dictionary because it was coined by me - "is worse than provincialism, why the headquarters is a person linked on a psycho-social level to the neighborhood of a specific city or metropolitan context". And now try to imagine a headquarters sitting on the chair from which Peter must govern the universal Church, certainly not playing the egocentric eccentric in a neighborhood of Buenos Aires.

.

The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio he immediately showed himself to be sick of originality, even in a very serious way. It's all part of his character structure, because that's how it's always been, structurally. He must do the opposite or the exact opposite of what all his other predecessors did, until it shows, perhaps completely unconsciously, of not even having the perception of the dignity with which he was invested. Dignity which, however, does not belong to him, but which was given to him only on loan for use and for which he will have to seriously and gravely answer to God according to the terrible warning of Jesus Christ:

.

"To whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " (LC 12, 48).

.

Speaking for the sinner I am, therefore as a person liable to fall and relapse into sin, I confess publicly, especially to you silent Bishops and Cardinals, that I would not want to be in the place of the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, because according to what the Holy Scriptures report, from Christ risks being told: “I did not entrust to you the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven so that «whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and everything you melt on earth will be melted in heaven " (Mt 16, 19), so that you would drag my Church into a theater of ridicule amidst the laughter of jugglers, of the dwarves and the dancers of the equestrian circus". Nor would I want to be in the place of the silent Bishops and Cardinals, who before the Holy Bride of Christ exposed to the shame of ridicule, they find nothing better to do than engage in that sin that seems to be the most popular among them: the sin of omission, combined with the destructive cynicism of those who slothfully wait for the wind to change, without having to lift a finger, without taking any initiative, without taking on a single responsibility, except jumping with a sprint like professional athletes onto the next leader's cart.

.

It's been two days that I am receiving phone calls from brothers scattered throughout the dioceses throughout Italy, shocked and lost after hearing the news that His Holiness he will be a guest on Sunday evening a What the weather is the known talk show conducted by the very sinister Fabio Fazio, who embodies the most politically correct bias of the left radical chic, that of hippies with super-penthouses in Parioli and villas in Capalbio, other than the poor, and migrants, the existential peripheries and the various warhorses of the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio to whom these leftists have always applauded every blow he inflicted on the dignity and credibility of the Church. And I carry out the ministry of confessor and spiritual director mainly with priests, I have the opportunity to feel the pulse of discomfort very well, especially of suffering, because as I have explained several times and as I am now repeating: in what Jorge Mario Bergoglio defined as «The Church field hospital», We are in the emergency room to welcome the injured, he isn't there, nor the ruffians busy flattering him in his court of miracles made up of ideological poor and dreamlike migrants, fruit of his obsessive-compulsive neurosis. And more and more frequently, the red crosses that arrive with sirens blaring in the real emergency room of our equally real one Church field hospital, from above the stretchers they unload priests and faithful in pieces, before which one often has to say: and now, where to start, to sew pieces together and close wounds?

.

How can you go, or how you can be present even and only with an external connection for a few minutes - in fact we don't know if it will be in the studio or if it will be connected - in a living room in which the poisonous Luciana Littizzetto has been throwing shit at the Catholic Church and the clergy for years, mocking doctrine at every turn, Catholic morality and the pastoral care of the Italian Bishops? How can you… how can you… this is the question asked to me in recent days by priests who have contacted me from all over Italy: how can the Supreme Pontiff fall so low and therefore drag us all down?

.

To all these brothers I responded in various ways, for example by expressing that as priests we were ready, if necessary, also to anti-Catholic persecutions, even to die as martyrs for the faith, because our sacred ministry can also involve these possibilities, in their own way imprinted in our own DNA of priests. Of course, none of us were prepared to die in ridicule, thanks to a Supreme Pontiff who decided to play the jester in the sinister court of Fabio Fazio and Luciana Littizzetto.

.

From decline to decline in popularity into which this pontificate has long sunk, loved by all that is not Catholic but suffered with tears of blood by devout priests and faithful, what the original and eccentric has in store for us in the future headquarters Jorge Mario Bergoglio? He's already been to the optician to buy glasses, He recently went to the music store to buy a record. Needless to say, although it bears repeating: all with such casual spontaneity to the point of being followed by the personal photographer and awaited on site by as many photographers. And tomorrow, what will he do, to raise theauditel? He will be filmed by international television while sweeping the churchyard of the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter with the broom, or while washing the dishes in the kitchen Domus Sanctae Martha singing «One morning, I woke up, oh beautiful hello, hello beautiful …"? Or who knows, after the doctrinally confused and heterodox Bishop Tonino Bello, he will also have heroic virtues proclaimed super life, virtues and reputation of holiness by Ernesto Guevara known as el Che? Because from Jorge Mario Bergoglio, in case you didn't understand, O my Excellent Bishops and Eminent Cardinals, At the moment everything is to be expected, specie a 85 years of age. Maybe for the first time, in Church history, we have a Supreme Pontiff comparable in every way to an unpredictable and uncontrollable loose cannon.

.

In this article of mine I did that painful dirty work which certain members of the Roman Curia and the Italian episcopate do not have the courage to do, given the dramatic and meandering lack of virile attributes. Of course, we know perfectly well that throughout history we have had martyr Supreme Pontiffs, Holy Supreme Pontiffs, Political Supreme Pontiffs, Simoniac Supreme Pontiffs, Libertine Supreme Pontiffs, Supreme Theological Pontiffs, Supreme Pontiffs who knew little or badly about Catholic doctrine... we have had all kinds of them, but all of them legitimate successors of the Blessed Apostle Peter, up to and including Francis I. In the two thousand year old collection only the Supreme Pontiff was missing, a jester at the court of the politically correct left of Fabio Fazio and Luciana Littizzetto. Now we will have that too, while the words of the Venerable Bishop are of bitter consolation Fulton Sheen:

.

«When God wants to punish humanity he does not give the Pope he needs, but leave the Church the Pope it deserves" (cf. The priest is not his own, 1963).

.

I conclude by clarifying that Saint Bernard of Clairvaux and Saint Catherine of Siena would have used much more severe tones than mine. Of course, some poisonous clerical might reply that they were holy doctors of the Church, while I don't. It's true, but in this case it would be good to remember that when Saint Bernard wrote these words to Eugene III:

.

«You can show me only one who welcomed your election without having received money or without the hope of receiving it? And the more they have professed your servants, the more they want to dominate within the Church" (Treaty good for every Pope, written for Eugene III, born Bernardo de’ Paganelli)

.

or when Saint Catherine of Siena, to the Supreme Pontiff Gregory, because its stench had now reached his city too, well: neither one nor the other had yet been proclaimed Saints, least of all doctors of the Church. And with this I have said everything, to certain poisonous, susceptible clericals ready to look for the speck in my eye so as not to see the beam that Jorge Mario Bergoglio has stuck in his own eye (cf. LC 6, 41), at risk, I'm afraid it's getting more and more serious, of the eternal health of his soul:

.

"To whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " (LC 12, 48).

.

the Island of Patmos, 4 February 2022

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

- Actuality -

A PRECISE AND DECIDED NOTE FROM THE BISHOP OF VENTIMIGLIA-SAN REMO ON THE SONG FESTIVAL REDUCED TO A PORCINO EVENT

«The painful performance of the first singer once again he mocked and profaned the sacred signs of the Catholic faith by evoking the gesture of Baptism in a dull and desecrating context ".

.

Author
Drafting of
The Island of Patmos

.

.

 

S. AND. Mons. Antonio Suetta, Bishop of Ventimiglia-San Remo

S. AND. Mons. Antonio Suetta intervenes today on the Song Festival now reduced to a porcine event. We limit ourselves to introducing the text of the Bishop of Ventimiglia – San Remo with a question: if a comedian had done a satire on the world LGBT, what would happen from the next day to follow? Because these pseudo-artists don't make provocations, for example on the founder of Islam Mohammed represented in ambiguous poses with a camel? It would be hilarious, how hilarious the shots would be Kalashnikov that the following evening would hit the Ariston Theater with perfect aim … .

.

.

A sad opening of the Festival of the Italian Song 2022 unfortunately confirmed the ugly turn, that, for some time now, took this singing event and, in general, the world of entertainment, public service included.

The painful performance of the first singer once again he mocked and profaned the sacred signs of the Catholic faith by evoking the gesture of Baptism in a dull and desecrating context.

The piece presented, already in the title - Domenica - and in the context of a gospel choir, alluded to the day of the Lord, celebrated by Christians as a day of faith and resurrection, placing it in an environment of words, of attitude and gestures, not only offensive to religion, but above all for the dignity of man.

Not surprising moreover, that the dramatic artistic poverty constantly resorts to makeshift means to make people talk about the character and the event as a whole.

Undecided whether to intervene or not, at first I thought it was convenient not to give further evidence to such an indecent havoc, but then I felt that it is more necessary to give a voice to many believers, humble and good, offenses in the most cherished values ​​to protest against continuous and ignoble attacks on the faith; I felt it was my duty to denounce once again how the public service cannot and should not allow such situations, still hoping that, at the institutional level, someone intervene; I felt it was clear that one cannot declare oneself a believing Catholic and then endorse and organize similar exhibitions; Finally, I felt that it is important and urgent to stem the serious educational drift that threatens especially the youngest with the ostentation of inadequate models.

I am aware that my dispute it will find little echo in the media world dominated by single thinking, but I am even more certain that it will reach clean and courageous hearts, capable of reacting in everyday life to such rampant and poisonous aggressions. Above all, I am convinced that I have to fulfill my duty as a pastor so that the Christian people, also entrusted to my care, do not suffer scandal from a silence interpreted as indifference or, even worse, acquiescence.

True and, as the saying goes, that rdonkey garlic does not rise to heaven, but I think it opportune to urge consciences to seriously reflect and believers to the duty of reparation in prayer, in the good witness of life and in the courageous denunciation.

Sanremo, 2 February 2022

✠ Antonio Suetta

Bishop of Ventimiglia - San Remo

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» (GV 8,32),
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers by clicking on the secure system logo below PayPal:

or you can use our bank account:

Subsidiary n. 59 of Rome in the name of Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT74R0503403259000000301118

CODE SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ].

.

.

.

- Actuality -

THE MAGAZINE SITE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS REOPENS TODAY RENEWED AND WITH GOOD NEWS: JORGE FACIO LYNX, PRESIDENT OF OUR EDITIONS, IS AN ITALIAN CITIZEN

Without the closeness and the precious collaboration of this young man gifted with great human qualities, morals, spiritual and speculative, Fathers de The Island of Patmos they would never have been able to achieve what they have achieved together over the years.

 

Author
The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

Dear Readers,

25 January 2022, Jorge Facio Lynx, president of the Editions The Island of Patmos, signs the notification of the Decree of the President of the Republic granting Italian citizenship in the offices of the Prefecture

The Fathers thank the webmaster Manuela Luzzardi who after several weeks of work has renewed the site of this magazine opened on 20 October 2014. From 1 January 2017 al 30 December 2021 The Island of Patmos It exceeded 100 millions of visits. Our average is equal to 20 million visits a year for a flow of about 60.000 visits a day. In November 2018 the homonymous ones were born Editions The island of Patmos, founded by Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo and directed by Jorge Facio Lince. Behind the editorial results of our work there is also his creative ingenuity, his commitment and his great work.

 

Dr.. Jorge Facio Lynx, born in Medellin Antioquia (30.10.1983) from a paternal family of Italian origin and a maternal family of Spanish origin, is a consecrated lay student of Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, that he met in Rome in 2008 and with whom he has lived and collaborated together since May 2011. After the equivalent classical high school carried out in the Catholic school of the Archdiocese of Medellin, he obtained the master in classical literature at the University of Salamanca, a degree in philosophy in Rome with a specialization in the metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas and a degree in theology from the Pontifical Lateran University. Refined and cultured philosopher, theologian of profound and solid doctrine, he is also a scholar and expert in historical-artistic subjects for which he has been making his contribution to the activities of the art historian for years Licia Oddo, Student and collaborator of the art critic Paolo Levi, with which he edited several art catalogs for Mondadori Editions.

 

Without the precious collaboration of this young man endowed with great human qualities, morals, spiritual and speculative, Fathers de The Island of Patmos they would never have been able to achieve what they have achieved together over the years.

 

.

We make you participate that the 25 January Jorge was summoned to the Prefecture where he was notified of the decree of the President of the Republic conferring Italian citizenship. The 15 February will take the oath of rite, accompanied by all of us.

 

To Jorge we express gratitude deep for the great work done over the years, happy and honored to have acquired a fellow citizen like him, of which we know well and in depth the valuable qualities.

the Island of Patmos, 31 January 2021.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» (GV 8,32),
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers by clicking on the secure system logo below PayPal:

or you can use our bank account:

Subsidiary n. 59 of Rome in the name of Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT74R0503403259000000301118

CODE SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ].

.

.

.