THE DEATH OF SEXUALITY AND FAITH IN THE CATHOLIC SEDICENTS FROM SOCIAL MEDIA WHO HATE IN THE NAME OF A “CHRISTIAN LOVE” MADE OF CRISTI ANDROGINI E MADONNNINE LANGUIDE, OF NEEDED AGGRESSIVE AND VIOLENT

.

… and having said this I informed the pinzochera that the Word of God, true God and true man, he had a psycho-physical sex and sexuality, precisely because he was God incarnate in a real man. This is the textual answer: “You are a blasphemer, a priest's shame, a son of the devil, convert ... blasphemer!». I replied: “I will also be a blasphemer, however, I just can't imagine Our Lord Jesus Christ pissing holy water from his ears because he lacks an unseemly attribute like the male sex which is needed when needed, on a purely and naturally physiological level, also to urinate ".

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

.

.

“The guillotine of the tribunal of social media“, cover of the book of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos on the theme of the pandemic, made by the Roman painter Anna Boschini (the book is available for purchase WHO)

This magazine of ours it is a place where historical arguments are addressed, philosophical and theological that we undertake to make accessible also to the general public eager to deepen the mysteries of the faith through the articles of a group of priest-theologians invested by the Holy Church of Christ with the mandate to teach, sanctify and guide i believers of Christ. And the gift priestly, O three gifts of the Church: the task of teaching, the task of sanctifying, office of government. Quite clear elements in that toxic sewer to which i are reduced social media, where an army of pinzochere rages who have confused faith with psychological terrorism, the Word of God made man with a sexless Jesus Christ photoshopped, the Virgin Mary with a Cassandra announcing catastrophes and imminent ends of the world. Each of their speeches is seasoned with rancid sauces pulled out of the great container of returning neo-paganism, if not worse by the more degenerate Pelagianism. Talk to these people, whose profiles social abound in stabbed Madonnine, unfortunately it is a waste of time. Because any priest who dared to point out their errors in matters of doctrine and faith, hence the way for an authentic journey of Christian life, well that goes you will hear an answer: «Be ashamed, you are not worthy of being called a priest!». And although he has written it and explained it several times, I go back to repeat it again: today, we priests and theologians, as absurd as it may seem, we are considered religious guides and scholars of sacred sciences - and as such also respected - by ultra secularists and non-believers, which obviously have a completely different feeling and lifestyle, while for every trifle we are badly attacked and publicly offended by lay Catholics, or self-styled, which they believe to be banners of truth, pure and authentic Christianity. These are the facts that lead me to say how right the Professor Enrico Medi, stating in the early seventies that he was not so scared of air pollution, for the atomic bomb or the danger of any new wars, but instead of being so because of the collective madness towards which humanity was falling. And of this madness, today, i social media they are model and paradigm.

.

In this jungle without rules, where with a fantasy identity you can attack and insult anyone in the worst way, some souls cloaked in modesty have accused me of making frequent indirect references, or sometimes direct, to human sexuality, declaring themselves authentic Catholics scandalized by certain jokes made by a priest. Well I will tell you that for some time I have been convinced that this kind of people are the ones who gave inspiration to the lamentation Anna Marchesini, because it is likely that she was inspired by them, when he did his hilarious sketch comedians in the role of Merope Generosa, specialist in sexology.

.

These unspecified Catholics it gives social media they are characterized by three elements all in radical contrast with faith: sexophobia, the pessimistic catastrophism, hatred that feeds on hatred and that seeks fetishes as an outlet.

.

Let's start with the first element: sexophobic, because they tend above all to identify the center of sin in human sexuality, or rather the sin of sins. If you dare to correct them and remind them that original sin does not come to life because Adam and Eve committed a sin of lust but pride - which of the seven deadly sins is the most serious of all, enough to be placed in the first place as queen and charioteer driving all the deadly sins -, their reaction will be this: «Modernist heretic slave to the perversions of the world!». But what does modernist mean to them? Above all, what do they know about this movement of thought condemned by the Holy Pontiff Pius X with the Encyclical Feeding of Dominic's Sheep? Nothing they know, it is just a word with which they try to attack and silence the interlocutors, ignoring how and why this current of thought was born and developed within the Church, not least also due to a closure and a rigor that was sometimes obsessive. Just like those who, having no arguments, try to silence the interlocutor by yelling at him "fascist!"Or" communist!”, except, however, not being able to explain how these two different socio-political currents come to life and develop. Or like when a woman who wanted to give herself a certain tone published the photograph of a designer's collection stating: "It's a collection of metaphysically inspired clothes". I asked her: "Excuse me, he explains to me what metaphysics is?». A few seconds later a handful of insults came in response, simply because by asking her that "innocent" question, I had implicitly given her an ignoramus who used words inappropriately without knowing their meaning. And I repeat sexophobic because these are not better specified Catholics, but above all Catholic, they have a love life, sentimental and sexual so disastrous, to the point of changing sex and human sexuality into absolute evil. And precisely by negativizing sexuality in this way they forget some fundamental elements of faith: the Word of God became man, and he was a man, Jesus Christ, with all the sexual and manly attributes of the case. So I once reminded a pinzochera by pointing out to her that Joseph and Mary presented Jesus to the Temple to have him circumcised on the eighth day of life in compliance with the Mosaic Law [cf.. LC 2, 22-39]. I explained to her that this ancient rite is called Circumcision‎ (Brit Milah, verbatim: Pact of the Alliance) and it is performed by a pious Jewish religious who performs the function of circumciser. Then I specified that with circumcision the foreskin is removed from the male virile member leaving the glans completely uncovered. This was the circumcision of the little infant Jesus, just in case someone thought he was introduced to the Temple by a blonde Swede with blue eyes, such is Mary depicted, accompanied by a limping 80-year-old who escaped from a geriatrics ward, such is represented Joseph. For this the infant Jesus was presented to the Temple, to remove the foreskin from the divin pea, certainly not to style the blond curls with which he is depicted in the iconographic holy cards, as if instead of in the Middle East he was born in Stockholm. And having said this I informed the pinzochera that the Word of God, true God and true man, he had a psycho-physical sex and sexuality, precisely because he was God incarnate in a real man. This was the textual answer: “You are a blasphemer, a priest's shame, a son of the devil, convert ... blasphemer!». I replied: “I will also be a blasphemer, however, I just can't imagine Our Lord Jesus Christ pissing holy water from his ears because he lacks an unseemly attribute like the male sex which is needed when needed, on a purely and naturally physiological level, also to urinate ".

.

The second element is pessimistic catastrophism, typical of people unable to grasp God's love and his actions of grace on us even in the most tragic and painful situations. Suffice it to mention among the many St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe so hungry for Christ that he agreed to starve in storage of Auschwitz to save the life of a family man who was his fellow prisoner. In these self-styled Catholics, but above all Catholic, catastrophism and pessimism take on morbid features and connotations, to the point of becoming unable to see that supreme good summed up in the theological virtues of faith, hope and charity. It is precisely the virtue of hope, which is in the middle and which binds faith and charity together - the latter indicated as the most important by the Blessed Apostle Paul [cf.. The Cor 13] - they just don't know where you live. Like this, to unleash their dark and destructive pessimism through images of a catastrophic future, they usually use the Blessed Virgin Mary, making havoc of apparitions and messages that are not recognized as authentic by the Church in practice and rigor. When they then take the apparitions and messages that have instead been recognized as authentic as pretexts to support their peregrine ideas, first of all they manipulate them, then they accuse the Church, for example in the case of Our Lady of Fatima, of having concealed and censored the texts, which obviously, needless to say, they would be terrifying. Soon said: in the name of “purity” their faith and theirs “truth” all of it neurotic-subjective, they do not hesitate to change the Church, who is mother and teacher, in a lying mother. On several occasions I have tried to explain to the fanatical pinzochere of the catastrophic Mariology they have changed into pagan mariolatry, than the messages of Our Lady of Fatima, like those of the Madonna della Salette, of Amsterdam and so on to follow, they do not constitute elements of the deposit of faith and that in I believe of the Catholic Church, also called the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, we do not profess to believe in the secrets of Our Lady of Fatima and in the revelations given by herself to that or that seer, including those recognized as authentic by the Church. Having said this, I went on to explain that a Catholic could also be completely indifferent to certain Marian apparitions, because he is not obliged to be devoted either to Our Lady of Lourdes or to that of Fatima or to others, on which his faith and even the health of his soul cannot depend. What a Catholic cannot do is deny the authenticity of what the Church has recognized as authentic, or worse still, to declare instead authentic for one's own emotionality and personal stinginess, what the Church has never recognized as such, for instance The Gospa of the liars. In short, as an explanation, that date, it had to be clear. But no, at least according to the angry response of the pinzochera that on social media he yelled at me: "Heretic! She is worse than Luther. Shame, a priest who hates Our Lady and who thinks worse than a Protestant ... get converted, because Our Lady's judgment on her will be terrible ". I reply to the possessed pinzochera, avoiding asking for what reason he allowed himself to point out a presbyter to the public contempt as a hater of the Blessed Virgin, so I go to the point and clarify: "You see, when we profess in I believe “one day he will return to glory to judge the living and the dead” we refer to Christ the divine judge, not to Our Lady, who will judge no one at all, neither the living nor the dead, because it's not his job. And if there is an extraordinary creature who has always known how to stay in her own place and in the role entrusted to her by God in the mystery of the economy of salvation, this is precisely the Blessed Virgin Mary ".

.

The third element is hatred, typical of people who do not feel loved, or that have not been loved, made for them various reasons and existential problems completely incapable of loving, until reaching a process of spiritual inversion which in itself is more serious than all the worst sexual perversions put together: use love and the concept of Christian love to vent their hatred. I social media are full of self-styled Catholics and crazy pinzochere that in the name of a “love of god” and a “love for faith” completely emptied of its deepest essence, they hate fiercely. Then, if a priest dares to call them to that effect, their reactions always tend to be violent and aggressive, especially destructive towards the priest, who will end up attacked by people who will first of all question his human and spiritual virtues, its doctrinal orthodoxy, his theological preparation and his pastoral experience. The concept of “love” of these people is comparable to the bloodthirsty crowds during the terror period of the French Revolution, who in the name of an unspecified freedom cut off the heads on the guillotines, then, after having hoisted them on poles, they carried them triumphantly around the streets of Paris like hideous trophies. The whole, I repeat, in the name of an unspecified freedom, which is equivalent to the concept of “love” of certain self-styled Catholics who go crazy on social media. For this we Fathers de The Island of Patmos, when we put our book to the press The Church and the coronavirus, where we also address the issue of the great experts who swarm on social media, we made our friend realize, the teacher Anna Boschini, Roman painter, a cover depicting the three of us climbing the stairs towards the guillotine, while under the stage the judges of the social media.

.

Let's go back to sexuality again, key element to analyze and understand the mental perversions of certain self-styled Catholics from social media. The modest white souls, ready to scream at the scandal from above of their unspecified catholicity, they usually ignore a fundamental element: the first thing any young or old has to deal with, if he thinks he is called to the priesthood, it is precisely his sexuality. And when the word sex and sexuality is overlooked in seminars, or we are tinged with blush like the legendary Merope Generosa played by Anna Marchesini, then it happens that at best monsters are brought out, not to mention worse: subjects with unbalanced sexuality and morally disordered. The priest does not have to repress his sexuality at all, your own libido and your own erotic dimension, it must transform the whole into something else, that is, in a different way of loving and living one's sexual virility.

.

As a priest I have a human sex and sexuality, unless someone wants to deny - also in this case with the aura of the comic modesty of the legendary Merope Generosa - that the first and essential requirement is, in the absence of which the others could not possibly exist, is that the candidate for the sacred priestly order must be a male. If we wish, we can also add that the Church has never allowed access to the priesthood to men suffering from deformities such as to prevent the performance of regular sexual activity, always forbidding priestly consecration, the penalty of nullity, of subjects who had been emasculated by accident or by the criminal will of others. Being male, as known, it means to have, anatomically, a very specific genital organ in the middle of the legs that has a not slight impact on the psyche as well, in the same way that the uterus affects the psychology of women.

.

I can calmly and sadly affirm, from priestly and pastoral experience, that problematic priests are those who have not come to terms with their sexuality upstream, or what to become ministry bosomes they have always chosen the wrong way: that of repressing one's sexuality, precious and essential gift of God that leads us to such an impulse of love to the point of making us eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven:

.

"" There are in fact eunuchs who were born in this way from the womb of the mother; there are some who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are others who have become eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven. Who can understand, understand "" [Mt 19, 12].

.

A priest who has matured and transformed his sexuality into something else, becoming a eunuch out of love for the Kingdom of Heaven, naturally he will have a very virile and masculine human and spiritual attitude and approach. If that's missing, it would be good to ask some very serious questions. Because virile is certainly not the libertine who jumps from one bed to another, imprisoned over fifty in a bleak adolescent dimension. Manly seriously, if anything it is the elderly priest who, despite never having known a woman in his life, because he entered the seminary a 14 years and lived in perfect continence for his whole life, when he confronts you and looks you in the face, however, all that masculine and spiritual testosterone oozes that the unrepentant libertine does not even know where to lodge. Incidentally, a personal note, but perhaps necessary to make certain concepts better understood: up to now I have had two bishops, one who died recently, the other in the chair in the full exercise of his / her duties. Two totally different personalities, in many respects even opposite. One thing, But, in their diversity it united them: two truly and profoundly virile men in faith and in the practice of faith, hence in their male psychology. But so were all the formators to the priesthood that God gave me the grace to have, including the senior bishop who for years has taken care of my ongoing formation in the priesthood, that he would be able to make even a powerful head of state tremble with a single glance.

.

The Catholic Church has been invaded in recent times by unspecified faithful that transform the extraordinary comedy of Merope Generosa into a tragedy that then, in practice, it ends up falling on us priests, often with painful and even painful implications. E, always pastorally speaking, I can say that i social media they are an extensive and complex field of study which on the scientific and pastoral level is truly extraordinary. Of course I will limit myself to Catholics, or rather to those who feel they are, especially to women.

.

The unspecified Catholics, on social media they reach levels of offense against those priests who at times talk to them, how come a man would get there. It is not a hypothesis, but a statistic. Ready to weigh every syllable, to cry out to scandal, worse: to heresy. Women who from the top of their chair of dogmatics and ecclesiology erected on social media the Supreme Pontiff in the lead is accused of apostasy from the faith, the Bishops and all of us presbyters to follow. Women who ignore the fundamentals of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, who confuse the Virgin Mary with the Fata Morgana or who think that the action of the Holy Spirit is that of Merlin the magician ... but who are ready to overwhelm you with insults, if in a paternal and calm way you dare to call them back and correct them.

.

At this point one might ask: and, there are many personality disorders, then there is the great planet of hysteria, which not by chance derives from the Greek root of ὕστερον (hysteron), which means uterus, purely female disorder. Indeed, when in spoken language someone has indicated a man to me as “hysterical”, I replied that in the colloquial context this term, which is not correct in itself, can also pass, but that on a scientific level a man cannot be affected by such a disorder, at least as science has defined it. Man is in fact deprived of the raw material: the uterus. So a man can be suffering from hysteria, understood in a classical clinical way, in the same way that a woman can be prone to inflammation of the prostate. In the world of neurological and psychiatric sciences there have been over time scholars who have tried to locate forms of “male hysteria”, starting with the Viennese neurologist Sigmund Freud, but without obtaining particular successes and credits in the international scientific community.

.

Why all this my attention to sexuality? I am perhaps a sex addict, as someone accused me of being? Soon said: for years I have discovered, ascertained and repeatedly experienced that behind this army of pinzochere who play intransigent Catholics on social media, hiding behind the image of a spiked Madonna and behind a name of pure fantasy, there are women who live situations that are sometimes on the verge of frustration on a human level, sexual and sentimental. For instance, one such - closely followed by several others - called me a heretic and, obviously, of the shame of a priest, simply for having written and explained that on a moral level, an abortion performed by one woman can be completely different from that practiced by another. In some particular cases an abortion, while being in and of itself an abomination, it can even be reduced to a venial sin. Incidentally: the digital illiterate is the one who is not really able to understand what he reads, then cut three words, it fossilizes on them and then leaves with a burst of insults. And this pinzochera, from all my explanation understandable and not liable to be misunderstood, given the extreme delicacy of the subject dealt with, he cut off two words inappropriately, accusing me of having affirmed that today abortion is only a venial sin. Yet in that articulate and precise speech of mine - or as they say foolproof -, I had explained and clarified everything well, also making use of the case of an immature young woman of 18 year old, very simple, devoid of culture and elementary knowledge, who got pregnant was led to have an abortion in the absolute certainty that in this way she would do the right thing, for his sake and for the creature itself that it was not opportune to give birth. However, the advice was given to her by the elderly family doctor, venerated as the seat of wisdom by all his relatives. Not only, also another, a big doctor of the city hospital where she was taken from her village, he had told her the same. And if two great scholars explain to an immature girl, simple and fragile, what it should do and how it should do it, she puts the advice into practice, if anything, even thanking those who gave it to him, caring for his good in this way. And here it should be remembered that conscience is needed to commit crimes and sins, will and deliberate consent. In such a case, how can one speak of a vile mortal sin? Of course, when grown up, matured and left his provincial family farmer environment, he came now twenty-five in tears to me to explain what he had done years ago, first of all I consoled her, then in simple words I explained to her what I have explained so far, absolving her and above all begging her not to consume herself in useless feelings of guilt. The sense of guilt for the forgiven sin, it is not good, quite the opposite: it is a challenge to the mystery of love of God's grace and forgiveness.

.

At this point the pinzochera on duty enters the scene, self-styled Catholic self-proclaimed Doctor of Moral Theology sui social media, strictly hidden behind a fantasy name and with a Madonna stuck in her profile instead of her photo, that unleashed Hell on me. The two milder accusations - which is saying a lot - were those of "heretic, apostate and antichristic priest ". Then he wrote a long rant to disprove me and affirm that «the sense of guilt, after committing certain sins, he must never abandon us, even if one has been acquitted ". What to say: the great master of Catholic morality Alfonso Maria de ’Liguori, Bishop and Holy Doctor of the Church, in the face of so much theological science he would surely have pale and sunk into inferiority complexes. Shortly after I was contacted by a priest brother who, struck by that avalanche of insults, explained to me who this woman really was., expelled several times by the parish priests of various parishes, to one of whom he even interrupted his Sunday homily by starting to invoke him: «You don't know the Gospel, converted: modernist!». So much so that the parish priest, under of the article 405 of the Criminal Code denounced her for disturbing the exercise of a public religious function within a place of worship. But that's who this woman was: a poor unhappy mischief left by her husband, a trader who made money and came close to sixty years of age dumped her in the throes of her menopause to go and live with a thirty-year-old Slavic girl - after having cheated her for a lifetime -, as well as the mother of a daughter known throughout the district, because starting from the age of 13 years he jumped relentlessly from one boy to another, to the point that not only the mothers of little girls, but even those of the boys did not want their children to attend her. At the age of just 16, on a Sunday morning, perhaps while his mother was in who knows which parish church pissing off some poor priest, she arrived at the city emergency room with her friend from raids to ask for the “morning after pill”, to avoid problems after the stunts on Saturday night.

.

Behind certain fantasy profiles, on which photoshopped androgynous Christs and languid Madonnines stand out, I really discovered everything and more, because with the good offices of some dear friends I have come to the true identity of several pinzochere, so today I am able to do not only analyzes but even statistics. For instance, the one who yelled at me and wrote me all in capital letters: «Be ashamed, shame on you, shame on you!», for having posted on a page social my photo with the trans Vlady Guadagno, my friend, known to the general public with the artistic name of Luxuria, while we were smiling together in the Mediaset studios in Cologno Monzese, she was the mother of a boy who was not only outspoken gay, but who was living with his partner with whom he had gone to get married in the Canaries. Then, the hubby amorous left him for another boy. A quel point, the poor consort betrayed and abandoned, attempted suicide. Yet she was the very mother of this hubby betrayed that hidden behind a fake name and a photo of San Pio da Pietrelcina put in place of his face, covered me with insults calling me the "bad priest" and the "priest without morals". And you know what my being a priest without morals consisted of? It consisted in having explained and then reduced the masturbation of adolescents to a small sin, in that speech of mine scrupulously adhering to what is written and explained in the Catechism of the Catholic Church which it recites:

.

"To form an equitable judgment about the subjects' moral responsibility and to guide pastoral action, It will take into account the affective immaturity, force of acquired habit, conditions of anxiety, or other psychological or social factors that may mitigate, if not minimize, moral culpability " [see n. 2352].

.

From time to time I deal with the themes of human sexuality on a theological and ecclesiological level certainly not devoid of smug amusement, knowing how certain subjects immediately jump out into the open in an aggressive and violent way on social media. This is how people who do not feel loved or do not have the ability to love themselves react and come out into the open, they sink into reactive hatred, finding in certain social media a portentous relief valve, which, however, risks worsening their human and psychological conditions, dragging many other people into the mechanism of hatred who then contribute to creating a hateful-quarrelsome environment.

.

To understand the levels of hatred and violence which can reach psychologically unstable subjects, especially those who are affected - indiscriminately men, but alas mostly women - from delusional aggressive narcissism, I will tell you about an episode in which I found myself involved a couple of years ago. I am only telling you this because it is a cross section, indeed a paradigm of the world of social in which anyone can affirm and write without any filter and control what they want, especially falls of nonsense stronger than those of Niagara.

.

Here's the story: one day I received a page update social of a self-styled Neapolitan. And here I open a long section: I say “self-styled” because being Neapolitan understandably does a lot chic. I would like to see the opposite: Naples was one of the largest capitals in Europe. Many of the capitals that are so celebrated today, for example Vienna, Paris, Berlin, but also our own Milan, compared to Naples in the sixteenth-nineteenth century they were little more than towns. Not to mention the historical assets, artistic and monumental. Naples, and together with it the other capital of the Bourbon Kingdom, Palermo, they were not only two great European capitals, but above all places of art and culture without equal in our ancient continent.

.

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - to take just one among many purely by way of example - going to Italy he was not impressed by Milan and its Ducal Theater, but he literally went into ecstasy when he arrived in the great Naples in May of 1770, where he was fascinated by that city and its great theater, especially from art, from the culture and musical school of the Partonepe people.

.

This is to clarify what to say "I'm Neapolitan" undoubtedly gives a certain tone to the person. Like when I boast my Roman family roots, although to be honest I must specify that I was born in the lower Tuscan Maremma, a few kilometers from the border with Lazio, from a paternal family of old Roman origin and from a Tuscan maternal family. Therefore, to those who ask me about my birthplace, I have to answer that I am Tuscan-Roman. Then, if the son of two immigrants from lower Calabria who was born in Rome, in a light-hearted tone he tells me ... «Ah, roman you?», at that point it will be up to me to reiterate that the Roman origins of my ancestors are lost far back in time, contrary to yours. And here I am reminded of a young woman from an old Roman family who cannot be older, to be exact, belonging to a cadet branch of the Torlonia, born in the United States of a Roman father and an American mother. When a cheerful pischello, trying to approach her - she was a beautiful girl - he asked her where she came from, in response he retorted: "I come from a Roman family". The boarder laughed amused: "Already, Roman with this American accent?». Impassively she asks: "I can know what your last name is?». he responds: «Mancuso, why do you ask me that?». The beautiful girl smiles slyly: "You see, my surname is Torlonia. I will also have an American accent, since I was born in the United States of America, but I am certainly Roman from a Roman family much more than a Mancuso ". Last name, to clarify to the reader, widespread in the Calabrian area of ​​Catanzaro, ancient and noble city of ancient Magna Graecia.

.

Before this dutiful incident I was narrating that one day I received a page update social of a self-styled Neapolitan. And I say self-styled because the “noblewoman” in question lived in a suburb of Caserta, which as we know is not exactly the Vomero, Capodimonte or the Spanish Quarters. The poor wretch, putting together a jumble of black legends today denied even by liberal scholars and Protestant historians, with a clumsy copy and paste he had written a celebratory post on the figure of “great” ed “heroic” Giordano Bruno from Nola, burned at the stake in Campo dei Fiori in 1600 from the bad Church of the time. Having a new phone that I didn't know how to use well yet, reading that post I leave without wanting to and noticing it emoticon of a smiling face. I was aware of this when another notice came to me with this delicate message: “What the fuck are you laughing at?». After some perplexity, I said to myself: "No, it is not possible that it is Donna Fiammetta Caracciolo Carafa, that I met in his time with his noble consort Don Oderisio de’ Sangro di Fondi. Not just because, at this point, they are both dead, but why would a Neapolitan noble of such ancient lineage and princely lineage never address a priest on a public page in this way? social».

.

… when some ladies approached me as a priest in this tone, after which they even protested to my Bishop

A quel point with pastoral amiability, as well as fulfilling my duty as a scholar, I replied that the emoticon with the laughing face I had left without my even noticing and therefore it was to be considered involuntary. Having clarified everything, I wrote her a post of about twenty lines, specifying that it was not serious to launch publicly into such complex historical and juridical topics., given, among other things, that the judges of the Inquisition Tribunal did their utmost and even impossible to save Giordano Bruno. His trial lasted 15 long years, was canceled twice for laughable defects of form and in the meantime everything was done to induce him to repent of his very serious heresies. Because, that Giordano Bruno was a heretic, there is very little to discuss about this. And I concluded by inviting this lady - always with great kindness - not to throw herself into trades on a historical level, juridical and theological which were not really his professions. Shortly after the noblewoman “very Neapolitan”, resident however in the suburbs of Caserta, throws me a string of insults to make a prostitute leaning against the lamppost turn pale, cursing on a rainy night for lack of customers. A quel point, always without ever leaving the lines, after being inundated with vulgar sexual insults, after being attacked by his wives in the lower-Caserta washhouse who called me "half a priest" wearing a "shit tunic", jokingly e, I repeat, never ever offensive, I reply saying: «In front of a woman like you, I thank and bless God for the great gift of celibacy and chastity ". And shortly after, in a dialect from the slums of Caserta comes a public reply which I offer you translated directly into Italian. The noblewoman, I speak publicly with another of his mates from the slums, he writes verbatim about me: “If he hadn't taken the vow (of chastity) he would only have done the saws, with the cock that a woman like us gave it to an asshole like Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo ". A very short note: looking at the photographs of this Lady and her Wives published on their page social, anyone would have instantly understood how in front of such beauties the whole Addams family, even it uncle Fester.

.

delicacies on the part of quarrelsome ladies unleashed on social media

I hope the politically correct don't accuse me of inciting violence against women, if in the face of such vulgarities I affirm in a hilarious tone: if such women do not have fathers or husbands who, after reading certain public messages, do not give up two pedagogical slaps, or if they have no children that similar mothers do not say they feel ashamed for them, it is evident that if husbands and children are not worse, at least they are as they are to mothers. A quel point, always in an ironic and never offensive way, I reply: “Be a civilized woman, she and her friends who wrote these comments, because you are proving to be worse than needed to the wash house ". I confess that the word in the shed I learned it from my brother priest of the Order of Capuchin Friars Minor Ivano Liguori, which is half Campanian for the paternal branch and half Sardinian for the maternal branch. Let's clarify: this term of the Neapolitan dialect means, in an etymological sense, “the edge” O “domestica”. Later it became synonymous with a woman of low social extraction characterized by coarse attitudes, vulgar and quarrelsome. And so it was that the noblewomen, after insulting me from head to toe, after showering me with vulgar insults, finally feeling defined needed, they started screaming at the lese majesty attack. Then, totally distorting reality, they turned me into an offender by presenting themselves as poor vilified victims.

.

I stop at this point in the narrative, because I think it will be enough. Now I go on to tell the absurd consequences of social schizophrenia, always to clarify what levels the freaks who go crazy on certain platforms can reach ... and so these women, in the head the ferocious administrator of that page, all ’ today, after more than two years, they continue to pour out the worst kind of wickedness and vulgarity on me, attributing to me what I have never written and affirmed. From time to time they take two and three lines from some of my articles, they cut them, make one screen-shot and they attribute to me what I never even thought. As the article itself demonstrates from which that cut of two or three lines was made, in which I affirm just the opposite of what is attributed to me.

.

Before proceeding further it is important to clarify with a concrete example this last delicate and above all fundamental step, illustrating in detail the technique with which haters make mud bombs to detonate on social media to damage the image, reputation or scientific credibility, intellectual, ecclesiastical or theological of the person they have decided to strike. So here is the concrete example served: in a previous passage of this narration of mine, within a very serious speech in which I speak of the incarnation of the Word of God and of Christ true God and true man, making use of a rhetorical hyperbole I affirm: «[…] I just can't imagine Our Lord Jesus Christ pissing holy water from his ears because he lacks an unseemly attribute like the male sex ". Soon said: to cut these two lines from a very serious context, everything related to the fundamental mystery of faith of the incarnation of the Word of God, it would be so dishonest as to cross every limit of human decency. But this is precisely the dishonesty on which they have always played needed certainly not used as single and poor people but only as a paradigm, able to cut a sentence of this kind from a writing, make one screen-shot and then spread it on social media pointing me to public contempt as an infamous priest who even dares to satire on Jesus Christ (!?). "A priest to whom one does not understand at all" - the thunders vajasse-paradigm in their comments - "how can they leave the cassock on". Obviously, and always practice, at the screen-shot the link where anyone could open the article, read it in full, then ascertain that the Author indicated to the public contempt wrote the exact opposite, all in an articulated and precise speech. A quel point, under the post in which that was reported screen-shot of two lines, the ferocious and offensive comments of various other wives begin to multiply, far from going to look for the article in question and ascertain what this "unworthy priest" really wrote, they begin to issue ferocious sentences on those two lines, without knowing either the Author and least of all his writing. Obviously this is all true, not discussed, there is proof: there he is screen-shot! You understand well that we are far beyond the problem of digital illiteracy of those who - far from reading an article from top to bottom -, read the title and subtitle and in a few seconds sifted through a text that, if anything, deals with historical topics, philosophical, very complex theological and socio-pastoral, in the end they decide to understand what they want to understand. In the case just illustrated we are instead faced with bad faith with connotations of authentic wickedness. Exactly that bad faith that arises from the typical malice of people who lie knowing they are lying, just like these vajasse-paradigm animated by the irrepressible need to unload hatred on a person who for reasons or psychological discomfort of their own decide to use as target practice, forming a group and conditioning each other through hatred that generates hatred, telling lies to each other, then convincing one another that those falsehoods are truths beyond any possible doubt. I could be an object of hatred in the same way that the Prime Minister of the Italian Republic in office today could be, or what was before him, or virologists accused of incompetence and ignorance by people who, if asked about it, would not be able to explain even in an elementary way what a virus is, to follow with us priests guilty in various ways of betraying the authentic message of Jesus Christ, all affirmed with severity and violence by people of an unspecified Christian spirit who in their previous comments have just declared themselves in favor of abortion, all’eutanasia, to marriage between same-sex couples and so on, all justified by the fact that they say "… but Jesus is love!». It doesn't matter what the object is, because it can be the most disparate, from the basketball player to the cancer surgeon, the important, for these people, is to focus on a subject, to target it and transform it into a fetishist object on which to unload hatred in the worst way.

.

Having clarified everything I consider useless, at least now, to open another complex discourse on the great masters of the social media, that on this round of hate that generates hatred they make money, except to trigger the censorship if one dares to post the image of Venus of Botticelli, read by their absurd algorithms as a pornographic image. In short, certi social media they are not the realm of science, of art and culture, but the ideal universe where they live and go crazy vajasse-paradigm liars, violent and quarrelsome.

.

Reading invectives of this kind addressed to Father Ariel sui social media , one of his Chinese confreres who had lived in Rome for many years commented on this: “During the Mao revolution the priests were captured and at best jailed in hideous prisons, but no Maoist Communist has ever addressed them and poured out such vulgar verbal violence on them ". That is all to say …

After having violently insulted a priest, the vajasse-paradigm they contact my Bishop, thus committing one crime after another. A, presenting himself as a lawyer about to sue me and ask for me, roughly, the same sentence a 25 years of imprisonment imposed ad Ali Agca for having made an attempt on the life of the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II. Another asked for a telephone conversation with my Bishop to inform him - listen, hear! - that if he had imposed on me the "due" and severe canonical penalties they would have desisted, granting me … clemency. And here we fall into various types of offenses related to the abuse of a professional qualification - that of a lawyer which requires registration in a professional register and a qualification to practice the profession - put in place, moreover, with the representative of a body governed by public law, such is the bishop of a diocese according to the law, from the vajassa-paradigm on duty fully qualified to exercise the legal profession. After this they sent to my Bishop only the screen-shOt in which in an amused and ironic tone I responded - without insulting any of them - to attacks of unspeakable vulgarity and truly unprecedented violence. Obviously, I immediately proceeded to send the Bishop what these ladies had written and thrown at me. Needless to say, she was very ill both for the violence and for the vulgar tones with which the commoners in the washhouse of the slums of the village had allowed themselves to turn to one of her priests in the way in which she would never have dared to become a professional prostitute. And I, that in Rome I dedicated part of my apostolate to prostitutes who worked on the stretch of the Via Aurelia that goes from the capital to Castel di Guido, I am well aware of the courtesy these women had towards the priest, always using respect and affection towards him.

.

the trophy exhibited on social media give her needed: the return receipt of the registered letter sent to the Supreme Pontiff with a request - or rather with the order given by them - to proceed as soon as possible to "expose" Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

Since the Bishop he didn't give them credit, they sent a letter to the Supreme Pontiff, then publishing the return receipt of the registered letter in their profiles, as if it were a cross between a trophy and a bull of excommunication. In that letter they asked approximately “spretizzarmi”. Then they got angry with my Bishop, they say guilty of not having carried out directives and commands given to them. Because, as is well known, a Bishop would be required, indeed forced to take directives from vulgar and quarrelsome washerwomen who spend most of their time on social media to insolent in the worst way those who decide to target, following the orders that they gave after having insolent a priest in the worst way possible. Otherwise, if it doesn't do this, what kind of bishop he is?

.

With an ironic joke now let's try to summarize it all, to fix with a pertinent image at what levels of delirium and dissociation from reality certain people can live in concrete facts. Let's say that I, while I was in Mediaset's offices in Milan for the various programs in which I participated, I had told Paolo Del Debbio: "I felt, my friend, I need to speak to Silvio Berlusconi urgently ". Obviously he would have laughed thinking about a joke of mine, knowing full well that I am an intelligent and rational mind, not an idiot. Said this, I insist. At that point he asks me the reason for my urgent need. To which I reply: «Because in my house, Rete4 sometimes doesn't see well, for this I demand that Silvio Berlusconi arrange the reception of my television antenna for me in the way in which I will show him to do ". Something like that said by me to Paolo Del Debbio, it would have made him die laughing, then, soon after, he would go around the entire editorial office making all the editors laugh, that knowing how much I am an intelligent and rational mind, they would have said that Father Ariel has a hilarious sense of humor. In the case of vajasse-paradigm true Neapolitan aspirants, emblem of violence, of manipulation, of the barbarians cut and sew made by certain people on social media and the psychophysical need to hate, you have to laugh on the other hand. Indeed, these noblewomen, after declaring their regret for my Bishop who had not taken off my cassock and publicly condemned, they were further embittered because the Holy Father to whom they had written twice - as declared by them and with a receipt of the registered letter presented -, he had never taken any action on me, thus giving executions to the orders given by the violent and quarrelsome washerwomen not only to my Bishop, but even to the Roman Pontiff, which at least should have requested Castel Sant’Angelo on loan for use from the Municipality of Rome to lock me up in its internal prisons and then throw the key to the cell into the waters of the Tiber. So they just couldn't get over it, to the point of continuing to write: “How can they not severely punish such a priest, after all we wrote to Pope Francis?». In short, they demanded that Silvio Berlusconi, behind subtle threat to do as they wanted and the way they wanted, arranged to fix the television antenna, otherwise they would have reported it to the European Community, what am I saying, directly to the United Nations League, otherwise requesting the immediate intervention of the UN peacekeepers. to besiege the citadel of Mediaset in Cologno Monzese.

.

A former classmate of mine, today Attorney of the Republic in a regional capital, in an entirely amused tone, but very irritated, told me some time ago that the Public Prosecutors, day after day they file absurd complaints presented for the craziest and most irrational reasons by people who, more and more, they truly believe that the Law can be applied - and strictly speaking even with absolute severity - to do the utmost justice to the irrepressible hyper-susceptibility and hypertrophic narcissism of certain subjects who live in the surreal planet of social media rather than in the real world. He confided to me that one of his Prosecutors made him read a lawsuit one day in which a woman had sued a man because under the photo she posted on her public page social, with her portrayed in a bathing suit, had posted a emoticon with a laughing face that made a tongue out.

.

With this example the magistrate friend summed up the drama of the vajasse-paradigm tested narrates and various similar. All these people also have another characteristic in common, or rather the habit of using the terms medieval and medieval as insulting words with which to brand those who have changed into fetishes on which download hate, roughly like a sorcerer voodoo practice the macumba planting pins on a rag doll. And try to explain it to this army of digital illiterates and violent brawls that the Middle Ages is that Benedictine monasticism that gave life to the concept and to the very word of Europe and that has passed on to us centuries and centuries of knowledge., that without the circuit of Benedictine monasteries it would have been lost forever. Or that the Middle Ages are Anselmo d’Aosta and Tommaso d’Aquino, to follow with Dante Alighieri, Francesco Petrarca and Giovanni Boccaccio. And then try to explain that the Middle Ages, divided into three distinct eras over a span of nearly ten centuries, it was a flourishing of arts and sciences everywhere. What they understand as the Middle Ages - but which never existed in the true Middle Ages - is what exists today in the world of social media, through which man, under false pretexts of progress and freedom, he has lost all kinds of continence, modesty and measure, up to regress to the stones and the slingshot of prehistory, to the point of giving the worst of himself as he had never done before. For this reason, Umberto Eco was right in affirming:

.

«I social media they give the right to speak to legions of idiots who previously only spoke at the bar after a glass of wine, without damaging the community. They were immediately silenced, while now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It is the invasion of imbeciles ".

.

Maybe today's man had a speculative mind, the creative flair and critical sense that the bass man had, middle and late Middle Ages, maybe! And unfortunately, from this great and uncontrollable sewer, many self-styled Catholics and variously frustrated and unhappy women hidden behind fluid Christs and languid little Madonnas also come to the surface, which constitute the worst negation of the Christianitas.

.

inside i social media I enter, I write and debate with the spirit of the good shepherd who does not hesitate to enter, if necessary, even in a brothel in the worst slums, in the knowledge that he will never be able to get all the prostitutes who work there out of the loop, But, one or two, it may even be that it manages to induce a change of life. The good shepherd does not hesitate to go to a circle of drug addicts, or criminals, aware that very few will be those who will be able to wrest from drug addiction or the circles of organized crime, but we know how much for God even one soul is very precious.

.

Dad, because every now and then on social media say bad words? It's true, every now and then I use colorful language. But I ask you: someone really thinks he does it by accident, or worse for verbal incontinence? Well I confess it to you: within the social media I have led more people to reason with a dirty word than with one Ave Maria. Each business requires precise techniques of action, each area requires its own expressive language: one does not speak of metaphysics to an illiterate and at the same time one should not treat a metaphysician as if he were a perfect illiterate. At a gala dinner at an embassy, ​​shrimps are shelled with a knife and fork, the peel is also removed from the fruit, while in a fishermen's tavern you peel the shrimps with your hands and peel the fruit with a knife, holding it tightly in your hands. You don't use your hands in some contexts and in others it would be offensive for everyone present to use a knife and fork instead. All this is called simply and nothing but common sense.

.

These are today, in the very happy world we live in, the great and difficult pastoral challenges that we priests have to face, if necessary with a knife and fork, in other contexts by greasing his fingers with shrimp shells. And believe me if from experience as a priest, pastor in the care of souls and theologian I tell you very clearly: as an enterprise it is by no means a small thing, in the modern world of the man of stone and the slingshot that today rages on social media, except ironically with all his crass ignorance about the open mind, creative and speculative that the man of the Middle Ages had instead.

.

the Island of Patmos, 14 January 2022

.

.

I social media they work like this: believe that you have the right to offend anyone without limits and without filters, But, if the offended person responds in kind, at that point, who offended you, immediately state that he has been offended by you (!?). Then, if the offender is a woman, in that case, who was offended and dared to argue, is gravely guilty of having “offended a woman”. This is the “logic” of the social media.

.

.

Some pearls of wisdom of the vajasse-paradigm who spend their days on social media to give history lessons, philosophy, medicine, policy, quantum physics, theology, art and so on and so forth … and who attack and insult without filters and limits anyone who dares to contradict the expressions of theirs “high wisdom”, in those social media now reduced to a planet "invaded by legions of imbeciles who have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner", as Umberto Eco complained several years ago.

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

"AT CHRISTMAS YOU CAN": THE DERIVATIVES OF SUPER CATHOLICS SEEM LESS SERIOUS THAN THOSE OF CERTAIN BISHOPS

.

It seems superfluous to remember, however in times of functional illiteracy it is good to reiterate this. The intervention of the Bishop of Pistoia cannot and must not be included within the eternal diatribe of logic between pro-wax versus no-vax. It informs a pastoral sensitivity that is becoming more and more opaque, so much so that it is assimilated to that pale way of doing politics that ends up being distant from the people.

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

.

.

.

.

.

«At christmas you can…» who does not remember the famous song that entered the homes of Italians like jingle advertising of a well-known confectionery product? Certainly many. Well, today I feel like dedicating this jingle a S. AND. Mons. Fausto Tardelli bishop of Pistoia, that this Christmas he could - the conditional is a must - have the smell of his flock on him, of that too no-vax, but who preferred to use the stick of politics rather than that of the pastor to create a in paliaton highly respectable to be addressed to the Pistoia faithful who are reluctant to use the serum.

.

The harsh stance of the Prelate of Pistoia on the faithful no-vax it appeared in the diocesan weekly Life in the address book At the tip of the pen [you see WHO e WHO] but which from today it would be more appropriate to rename On the foil tip, given the Bishop's pastoral jab at those faithful who were reluctant to get vaccinated.

.

«At Christmas you can…» make a good impression, but this is not the case of the Bishop in question who - poor soul - prefers to appear stunned, amazed and even embarrassed for those Christians who take such positions - read no-vax - and who regularly attend his diocesan church.

.

I can't think of a more unbalanced position and crazy about this one, which perhaps risks appearing even worse than that assumed by the Bishop of Tempio-Ampurias, S. AND. Mons. Sebastiano Sanguinetti, who asked for compulsory vaccination for the clergy and faithful of the Gallura diocese [you see WHO].

.

It seems superfluous to remember, however in times of functional illiteracy it is good to reiterate this. The intervention of the Bishop of Pistoia cannot and must not be included within the eternal diatribe of logic between pro-wax versus no-vax. It informs a pastoral sensitivity that is becoming more and more opaque, so much so that it is assimilated to that pale way of doing politics that ends up being distant from the people. For this reason I am convinced that it is necessary to delve deeper than what appears from a simple reprimand in a diocesan newspaper.. It would be at least wise and reasonable that at least we Christians should avoid similar dialectical drifts that select and contrast the good against the bad and that in the long run tire, creating social instability., people's uprising and distrust of institutions, all things that we are unfortunately getting used to and that have not allowed us to become better, more good or extremely tolerant.

.

In my opinion it is necessary to emphasize and resume the pastoral attitude of a bishop who cannot afford to fuck the faithful for free. They in fact, albeit in blatant wrong, however, they are free to express legitimate reservations even if expressed in carnival tones or sometimes even close to science fiction, even if they were inspired by self-styled spiritual guides who from overseas discuss about plots and imminent apocalypses. We are still possessors of a baptismal freedom that God has given us and that He is the first to respect even in the face of our sin? It is evident that these faithful are confused and perhaps doctrinally unprepared and conditioned, but for this very reason they would not need to see their bishop as a father and not a stepfather? It would not be better for the bishop to act as a sure guide who watches from above, thus respecting the etymology of its name, instead of following the opportunist logic of politics that lives on the contradiction between opposites, waiting for the defeat of the opposing factions? Because, dear readers, even if division and faction break out in the Church of Christ, it is impossible to get along and give the Holy Spirit a way to act and create communion, even when we believe deep down that we have acted as mature and responsible people.

.

About this I want to take up the words of the blessed apostle Paul who admonishes the Christians of Corinth:

.

"Unfortunately, some of Cloe's family let me know that there are arguments between you. Let me explain: one of you says: “I am Paolo's”; another: “I of Apollo”; a third supports: “I am from Pietro”; and a quarter say: “I belong to Christ”. But Christ cannot be divided!» [See. 1 Color 1, 11-13].

.

Even in our dioceses, in our parishes, in our ecclesial groups there are arguments due to vaccines and the approach to the presbytery is subordinated to the number of doses inoculated. Today Christ is torn between a health responsibility and a social emergency without his adorable person truly being the beginning and occasion for an authentic conversion to the Father, This is perhaps not the ultimate goal of any baptized person? Instead we are here arguing among ourselves and looking for the guilty, accusing everyone of irresponsibility and, if necessary, of little adherence to the Gospel, something that we detect in others but which is also hidden under the good carpets of our home. For you see, the fact that you point out a wrong does not automatically imply that you are right. Se i rigidi no-vax they are wrong this does not mean that i pro-wax are right or free from any well-founded objection.

.

I am a priest of the Order of Friars Minor Capuchin, with years of ministry spent as a chaplain in a large hospital facility, today I exercise the ministry of parish priest of a parish entrusted by the local Bishop to one of our community of Friars, I'm vaccinated, as are my brothers, but I would never allow myself to label the faithful of my parish as from the pulpit self-styled Catholics (sic!) to watch out for, as the pastoral heart of the Bishop of Pistoia did using the official organ of the diocese [you see WHO]. If these self-styled Catholics instead of no-vax belonged to a different category, we don't think that maybe, in the space of just twenty-four hours, the prelate would be invited to resign and make way for someone more capable? We all know the answer, without needing to add anything else. I can only refer you to reading the book that I have just published together with Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo: From Prozan to Prozac, in which we made an analysis of the inevitable failure of the Zan bill sanctioned a few weeks ago by the Senate of the Republic.

.

When certain ills they come to touch those who have been appointed to be leaders of the people of God, the faithful are lost, they fall into distrust and every possibility of dialogue and every pastoral affection that should be at the pinnacle of the intentions of every wise bishop is compromised. And in this entire emergency situation linked to the pandemic it is now clear that people are more than exasperated. The coercive methodology that was imposed on people on different fronts to achieve quick and painless salvation has not produced the desired results, not only has it not acted as a glue but it is creating fractures that we will bear the consequences of for a long time. So let's ask ourselves: we're sure it's still worth it? Whose profits? And if the Church and its pastors are also involved in this exasperated situation, we are at a loss, falling into the reasoned calculation of those seeking immediate profit and advantage instead of the salvation of souls.

.

And yes because listening to speeches similar to those of the bishop of Pistoia politicians intent on accumulating electoral support and popular favor in order to have or maintain a position come to mind. Indeed, when a politician supports battles from which he can gain something, he is careful what he says, but above all what "not to say". Instead, on other less favorable fronts we prefer to ignore even if we find ourselves faced with much more important and sacrosanct battles and all this for well-reasoned calculation.

.

Now I wonder and I ask this Prelate: in the diocese of Pistoia there are perhaps no people who, although Christian, attend Sunday mass (maybe daily) they did not support the ideas of Emma Bonino or Marco Cappato by stating that euthanasia is an act of love and mercy, perhaps by signing for the repeal referendum? In the diocese of Pistoia and among its clergy there are perhaps no supporters of Zan&Company complete with a little written and rainbow hand in support of the proposal for a liberticidal bill which aimed between the lines to prosecute and punish the crime of opinion, although illustrious gays have explained the opposite, by the lucid and cultured Senator Tommaso Cerno, former national president of Arcigay [you see WHO] up to our author Francesco Mangiacapra who recently published the illuminating critical essay with our editions The coup of the politically correct?

.

Perhaps in the diocese of Pistoia there are no members of ecclesial groups who are in defiance of the doctrinal note of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith [you see WHO] continue to militate in political parties that openly oppose the Church and support ideas contrary to the moral and social teaching of the Magisterium? Perhaps it would not be right and proper, at the tip of the pen and foil, also read about these things in the diocesan newspaper, waiting to hear the word uttered from the episcopal lips self-styled Catholics applied to some styles of Christianity that abound in curiae and parishes?

.

However, let's also admit the case that the diocese of Pistoia was a model of ecclesial virtue and fidelity to the Gospel and to the successor of the blessed apostle Peter, also in this case the Christians no-vax they would equally represent a pastoral challenge from which the bishop could not escape, even at the cost of shedding one's own blood which is more uncomfortable and demanding than shedding ink on the diocesan newspaper.

.

“Unity is essential, freedom in doubt, charity in all things", It is an ancient maxim which I see to be very dear to your Excellency. For this reason I also want to use it for the last underlining of this article. It is mistakenly attributed to Saint Augustine but he is not the author, over time it has been used to push towards a theological and religious liberalism that levels out uncomfortable thoughts and unravels embarrassing situations by trying to get everyone to agree. A political and populist method widely used today because it pays without the danger of overexposure.

.

Excellency, if you were a true liberal would grant the faculty to Catholics no-vax to do what they believe in, respecting that freedom that even God respects with the man who makes mistakes, while at the same time opening a paternal dialogue and trying to recover some brothers, but we both know that liberal bishops do not exist and this has been true since Pasquino's time:

.

I will not deceive you, Marforio, and let's talk frankly:

to say patriotic priest is to say white crow;

contradiction in terms, to which there is no equal,

being pope and being liberal at the same time".

.

For this reason in his speech to the diocesan newspaper I see nothing of that healthy enlightened liberalism that saves differences by integrating them but only populism in a red sauce that does not bind consciences but perhaps exasperates them.

.

Laconi, 9 December 2021

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

WERE GOING: IT 74R0503403259000000301118

CODICE SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

THEOLOGY AND CANON LAW OF FREE TOILET PAPER: TURKEYS AND CLAMOROUS IDIOCIES ABOUT THE INVALIDITY OF THE RENUNCIATION OF THE GREAT PONTIFF BENEDICT XVI

.

If an election even took place through simony, that is, through exchanges of money or other goods or benefits, those who have put it all in place will incur excommunication automatic, But, the election of the Roman Pontiff, even though it occurred through the perpetration of this very serious crime already condemned by several Church councils and by ecclesiastical laws, it will not be considered invalid but in any case legitimate. So it is written, without penalty of denial, in the apostolic constitution Dominic Flock of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

.

Let it be freely and properly disclosed …

If any Catholic was undecided whether to read The Manifesto, historic communist newspaper founded in 1971 by Rossana Rossanda and Lucio Magri, brilliant intellectuals and refined pens of Italian journalism, or the newspaper Free, founded by that nice gaga of Vittorio Feltri and directed today by that depressed gravedigger face of Alessandro Sallusti, read the first without hesitation and do not use the second even as a base for the waste separation basket. Indeed, this newspaper devoid of shame and a sense of ridicule has been giving ample space for months to a journalist who supports insane theses on the invalidity of the resignation from the sacred throne of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI. Having said that, it should be clarified that the right to think, word and expression cannot be confused with the right to manipulation, to the mystification and grave offense addressed to the Pontiff reigning today and to years and years of his pastoral government of the universal Church.

.

Qhis journalist grants visibility to characters out of balance, like the presbyter of the Archdiocese of Palermo who for years has been poisoning the simplest and most fragile Catholics with crazy theories through his daily videos-directed on Facebook. Before proceeding it is worth summing up, to then reply and deny, what this subject has been saying for four years now:

.

1. Benedict XVI's resignation is invalid because he was forced by force, therefore he continues to be the legitimate Supreme Pontiff;

2. What is called "Pope Francis" does not exist, he is an antipope, a usurper, an emissary of Satan, hence all its acts of government, his documents and appointments are invalid;

3. The election of the “false pope” Jorge Mario Bergoglio was orchestrated by a group of cardinals known as The St. Gallen mafia, who worked with the strong powers and international Freemasonry to dismiss Benedict XVI and elect him;

4. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a satanic destroyer of the Church and of Catholic doctrine, he is a heretic;

5. All priests who celebrate Holy Mass in communion with the “fake” usurper pope and heretic celebrate invalid Masses, indeed of the satanic masses;

6. The faithful who receive the Holy Eucharist from priests in communion with the false pope do not receive the Most Holy Body of Christ but the body of the Antichrist, in the same way all the sacraments administered by them are invalid;

7. When a conclave will be celebrated on the death of the usurper antipope, will in fact be invalid, because they will proceed with the election of the successor of the cardinals created by the antipope, then they will elect another antipope.

.

Even a child who has studied the catechism with dedication to prepare for the First Holy Communion would understand that it is genuine nonsense.

.

No One, including the conspiracy reporter of Free and the followers of this poor priest, he should be surprised if the author of such theses was first suspended peep, then excommunicated, at last, as a last extreme act, dismissed from the clerical state, given his obstinate persistence and the ferocious hatred he sows among the people, turning their followers into fanatics who in turn spread fanatic hatred towards the "false church", the "false pope" and the Priestly College composed, according to them, of "cowards who tremble before the usurper antipope".

.

With a question now let's close the discussion on the newspaper Free to move on to more serious dissertations: given that starting from the title of the newspaper the editors declare themselves free in their opinions, they would be willing to give space on the same columns to a reporter who similarly carried forward in a pounding way, for months and months, the most absurd destructive and offensive theories against Senator Matteo Salvini the Honorable Giorgia Meloni? Or, if only he tried to do it, he would be kicked out on the spot at the first attempt to publish something like this? And with this we have clarified how free this newspaper really is, directed by that depressed gravedigger face of Alessandro Sallusti. Because for these subjects, freedom seems to consist only in letting certain journalists free to throw shovels of shit on the Catholic Church and the Papacy. But they would never allow a flamenco dancer to throw a rose on the so-called populist Right at the end of her dance.. This is their freedom of information, this is their independence. Therefore, I reiterate the invitation: Catholics, buy and read The Manifesto, but don't buy and don't read Free.

.

Sui social media, which should never be underestimated with a spirit of intellectual snobbery, there are self-styled Catholics who deviated from the right path by these deformers of the news are convinced of their absurd theories, turning in turn into disseminators of "sensational truths". Like this, with the spirit of those who support Lazio instead of Roma or vice versa, with distressing superficiality they affirm:

.

«It is now clear that Benedict XVI by renouncing the ministry did not renounce the papacy. Therefore he is the Supreme Pontiff, the usurper Jorge Mario Bergoglio is only an antipope and moreover also a heretic ".

.

Let's start by answering this statement totally outside any theological logic and law. To do this, you must first ask yourself: what do certain people prodded by their gurus mean by gift e ministry in reference to the Roman Pontiff Bishop of Rome? The gift of the Roman Pontiff is not an indelible sacrament, like the consecration of an episcope or the consecration of a presbyter, the Petrine one is only a primacy of jurisdiction. The Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI did not perform an act of renunciation while maintaining something of the apostolic primacy of this office, because the election in the conclave does not mark the person elected with an indelible sacrament that would continue to remain even after the resignation, as happens for bishops when they renounce the government of their dioceses and become emeritus bishops, but always remaining bishops, which as such have renounced the ministry, while maintaining that gift indelible linked to an indelible sacrament.

.

The fundamental step which escapes certain practitioners of theology do it yourself, to excommunicated priests who would be self-proclaimed biologists and to poor journalists with the dangerous hobby of the free conspiracy, it is precisely that the papacy is not a sacrament, then the gift it is not indelible. "Theologians" and "canonists" are sports bar they do not understand this and think they are disserting on extremely complex themes on the theological and canonical level, the only result will be to first confuse oneself, then all those simple people who, instead of listening to us priests and theologians of solid formation, drink on the internet to the insanity of these irrational imbalances..

.

To the Supreme Pontiff who renounces the ministry therefore remains the gift episcopal, not the gift of the papacy. The sacrament of the fullness of the priesthood remains, the episcopate, in that gift which derives from a sacrament that cannot be canceled in any way. This in the same way that I could never give up on gift priestly, I could give up the exercise of the priestly ministry, but not al gift. Or as if a baptized person wanted to renounce Holy Baptism, which is an indelible sacrament. He can't do it. If he wishes, he can deny his baptism and declare that he does not feel baptized and does not intend to belong to the Catholic Church., but the sacrament which he received in substance and form, no one will be able to take it away. Yet another example: a cardinal can be deprived of the dignity of a cardinal, because it is a pure ecclesiastical honorific. That of the cardinal is a dignity, not a sacrament. While the bishop or the presbyter, who with episcopal consecration and priestly consecration have received the ministerial priesthood of Christ and the sacramental fullness of the apostolic priesthood which imprint in consecrated persons an indelible character which has ontologically transformed them, they can renounce everything that the episcopate and the presbyterate entail in terms of duties and honors, but they will not cease never to be bishops and presbyters, because such they will be forever. In the same way that a bishop or a presbyter excommunicated and also subjected to the extreme act of dismissal from the clerical state, they will never cease to be bishops and priests.

.

The pontificate is acquired juridically and not through the sacraments. Hence Benedict XVI, with his act of renunciation he renounced the ministry and kept the gift episcopal to whom, him like any bishop, could never give up, why the gift episcopal - I said it but I repeat it again for particularly hard heads - it derives from an indelible sacrament that imprints a character, the papacy does not.

.

This is what the resignation of the Roman Pontiff entails. Unfortunately, certain poor and good people, more or less Catholic, they are committed to taking truly colossal nonsense at face value, to the point of stubbornly refusing to listen to the experts. At that point it is difficult for them to learn how things really stand on the level of sacramental dogmatics and on that of the canonical discipline of the Sacraments.. While it remains almost impossible for us to move them, because it's them, although he lacks theology and ecclesiastical law, to… explain to us how things really are (!?).

.

The free journalist is stupid in one way, the priest excommunicated and today discharged from the clerical state in another way, with the style of the famous Doctor Dulcamara cite the Code of Canon Law as irrefutable proof. It is of little use that they transform it into a sort of "premature supercazzola with right-hand scapellation", to refer to the saga of My friends, thanks to which today, the term super cazzola entered the philosophical lexicon to indicate a completely meaningless phrase or expression. What it's worth, But, is that citing a canon from the Code of Canon Law produces the same effect that the amazing relics of Friar Cipolla narrated by Giovanni Boccaccio produced in certain ignorant plebeians. And so, stupid journalist and priest excommunicated today discharged from the clerical state, solemnly they affirm:

.

«Benedict XVI is always the legitimate Supreme Pontiff because he did not do what the canon did 332 paragraph 2 requires ".

.

Just so, their trump card and irrefutable proof of the idiocies they affirm is that Code of Canon Law which, in fact, cannot even read. Let's go and read what is written in this canon 332 comma 2, this:

.

«In the event that the Roman Pontiff renounces his office, it is required for validity that the renunciation be made freely and duly manifested, instead it is not required that someone accept it ".

.

The Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, after announcing his renunciation on 11 February 2013, until the day 28 of that same month he repeated several times the full freedom with which he had come to mature his decision. He reiterated this in his speech to the cardinals, in the address to the clergy of Rome, in two general audiences and in various public official greetings. Afterwards, after the election of his Supreme Successor, came back to repeat it again, to the point of affirming that not only his choice was totally free and considered, but that if anyone had put any pressure on him to give up, he would never give up for any reason.

.

It can be clearer? Of course not, but absurdly, from these very clear and unequivocal words, some manipulators build illogical sand castles to support:

.

"These words are proof that he was pressed by strong constraints and that Benedict XVI's coded message must be interpreted precisely behind these words of his" (!?).

.

Soon said: if things were as stated by the stupid free journalist and the excommunicated priest discharged today from the clerical state, Benedict XVI would be the greatest liar and the greatest coward in the entire history of the papacy, or not?

.

Faced with these disputes the characters in question begin to play on elements that would be comic in themselves, if behind there was not the disaster of the souls who drag themselves into error. For example by stating:

.

"In its declaration written in Latin Benedict XVI made numerous errors. And since this one declaration it must be perfect in shape, these Latin syntax errors make it invalid. This is something that Benedict XVI knew well, but having been forced to make an act of renunciation, drew up a formal deed, burdening him with invalidity due to errors in Latin syntax which he knowingly wanted ".

.

Let's clarify: if Benedict XVI had really done such a thing would arouse disgust even in the worst cowards in the history of mankind. Soon said: support such things, which also entail the reading of the deepest conscience of others and therefore the celebration of absurd trials with the most hidden intentions, is equivalent to claiming the presence of invisible aliens landed on planet Earth and hidden among us humans. But let's go further:

.

"Benedict XVI continued to sign himself by following his name with the initials" P.P. " what does it mean high priest!».

.

So it has been thundering for a few years in his direct on Facebook the ignorant priest excommunicated and today discharged from the clerical state, who at every turn boasts of having obtained two theological doctorates. This proves that doctorates have never instilled intelligence in the limited mediocre who by nature lack it and which have never been a guarantee of science and wisdom.. Indeed, the bidottore excommunicated for heresy and schism, he is so ignorant in ecclesiastical history that he does not even know that initials, all’origine, was born during the first great dogmatic councils celebrated in the East to indicate the Bishop of Rome as Father of the Poor, which literally translates: Father of the Poor, o Father of the Little ones, of the Simple. This acronym, the Bishop of Rome, he adopted it in times when the title of Supreme Pontiff or Roman Pontiff did not yet exist. How could he then, that acronym, mean Pontiff of the Popes, as the ignorant janitor has been saying for years? And he adopted it, this acronym, to give an elegant lesson - read slap - to the Patriarch of Constantinople who boasted about twenty high-sounding titles. This is the true and original meaning of that acronym, ass of a heretical janitor going mad on Facebook on the hunt for souls to be ruined!

.

You don't pay at all, the stupid free journalist and the bidoctor priest excommunicated and today discharged from the clerical state then launch into sophisms on the exegesis of the New Testament. They take two sentences contained in the Gospel texts and then make him say what is not written in them:

.

«The difference is that the gift is the authority of the Supreme Pontiff, "You are Peter" (cf.. Mt 16, 18), while the ministry it is its development: "Feed my lambs" (cf.. GV 21, 15).

.

The difference between gift e ministry and vice versa, of which the stupid free journalist and the excommunicated priest-bidder speak, it is a pure distinction of formal logic, or conceptual, which should be used in special manuals and books in which we advance - and in which we must advance - even the most absurd hypotheses to be able to understand and clarify all the sides necessary for the correct knowledge and competence of the subject. It is a speculative tool used since late scholasticism by William of Ockham up to the subjectivist "terministic" excess that gave the basis to the thought of the Jesuit jurist Francisco Suarez, which should be taken with a grain of salt by experienced experts. Not confronted by that mediocre and limited practitioner of an excommunicated priest ruffapopoli who boasts a bidoctor, but that if he came out of his room of filming for the direct on Facebook, where he is surrounded by his adoring caregivers, to publicly confront a real specialist, within five minutes, to this pompous turkey, not even a pen would remain stuck on him. All because, (c)hey speculative tools were used in specific academic contexts within philosophical discussions, theological and juridical in which the i preamble, that is, the specific historical-critical introductions they explained, on a purely pedagogical and logical level, how the current state of the problem and therefore the overrun problem. Once these parts that served as introduction and explanation were omitted, only the specific studies of the themes and of the synthetic or even eclectic exposures were left, aimed solely at establishing the truth of a writing.. Soon said: those who do not have - like this excommunicated bidoctor priest - an adequate philosophical and theological training that starts from a solid scholastic basis and an equally solid knowledge of the art of rhetoric and philosophical theological speculation; who boast traditionalists, but that in fact they are completely unconscious modernist heretics, because they don't even realize they are, they will not even be able to read and understand these texts, but putting their hand into it they will upset them, finally they will believe that they have discovered in them what had never jumped into the eyes of anyone else over the centuries.

.

Explaining it all we have also provided implicit proof of the failure of this speculative approach, yesterday as today. Because people are not properly prepared upstream, in a deep and solid way, they will believe they can launch their sensational discovery or interpretation by centering everything on a little word separated from the complex context, excluding all the historical path, theological and juridical that conceal certainty behind them theological debates and every single section of canon law. All this for a simple and sad fact: because they do not know the subject and do not even know how certain academic disputes are to be framed, read and carried out. They take a little word, they extrapolate it after having misunderstood or not understood the whole context and build on it absurd truths then presented as irrefutable.

.

In certain speculations and dissertations academic based mostly on the principles of classical scholasticism, certain themes were carried up to the unbelievable, il cosiddetto paradoxical (paradox). Formerly Cicero, in the art of Latin rhetoric he resorted to paradox. Even the Blessed Apostle Paul himself in his exposition used the ὑπερβολή (hyperbole), which was typical of Greek rhetoric. In reality, But, these distinctions just don't exist, they are just rhetorical or thematic paradoxes, hyperbole or in any case excesses that aim to create speculative reasoning even on the most improbable and absurd hypotheses. Example: once, disserting with some confreres also trained in dogmatic theologians and historians of dogma, in a completely serious way - not because we were high on alcohol and hashish - we began to discuss the hypothetical existence of other lives in other worlds and planets outside the solar system. To this end we questioned ourselves: in case other forms of life existed, how to re-read the mystery of man's creation, but above all the incarnation of the Word of God and the sacrifice made through his saving death for the redemption of men? A dissertation, paradoxical, hyperbolic, pushed to the extreme paradox. Maybe though, if the free journalist and the priest excommunicated bidoctor were present, took and misunderstood four words, from then on they would give life to the alien theology.

.

For this, no canonist, until today, managed to carry this forward the breath of the voice without concept or reality, such as the invalid election of a Roman Pontiff or on the other hand the invalidity of an act of renunciation. This because, in the real world, true theologians are something quite different from practicons, amateurs and self-styled janitors, not to mention those who follow them and who in four ballets have in turn obtained doctorates in sacramental dogmatics and in canon law on Facebook e Instagram.

.

We who are true theologians, first of all because in obedience to the Church and its legitimate Authorities and because we were trained by our wise teachers to be rational and speculative minds, we speak on the basis of what exists and what has happened, namely this: Benedict XVI has freely, legitimately and validly renounced the Chair of Peter, confirming and reiterating the full freedom of his / her act of renunciation. Everything else is theology and canon law of everyday toilet paper Free and senseless follies shouted by a poor out of balance priest who goes crazy in the live broadcasts Facebook, from which he reminds his followers, every three nonsense shot at random, who holds two doctorates and is twice a doctor… twice a doctor! Except shortly after affirming that God revealed himself to the poor and ignorant to spite precisely the learned and the wise.

.

Sophistication about gift It is on ministry, or even invent a Benedict Code, as did the stupid free journalist on the telematic columns of Free, it means doing fantasy-theology and fantasy-canon law, clinging to little words and certain distinctions with not even a sophist spirit, but just illogical and irrational, looking for something that does not exist but that some, for them psychological or spiritual discomfort, they want it to exist at all costs. At that point, what does not exist if they invent it, giving words a different meaning or altering Church documents through manipulation, for example the Apostolic Constitution Dominic Flock of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, about the vacancy of the Apostolic See and the election of the Roman Pontiff. Indeed, the poor janitor, always specialized in making documents say what they do not say, he seems not to have even noticed what this Constitution writes in chapter VI, n. 78:

.

"If in the election of the Roman Pontiff - God forbid - the crime of simony were perpetrated, I decide and declare that all those who are guilty of it will incur excommunication automatic and that the nullity or non-validity of the same simoniacal provision is nevertheless removed, so that for this reason - as already established by my Predecessors - the validity of the election of the Roman Pontiff is not challenged ".

.

What does it all mean? It is clearly written: if an election even took place through simony, that is, through exchanges of money or other goods or benefits, those who have put it all in place will incur excommunication automatic, But, the election of the Roman Pontiff, even though it occurred through the perpetration of this very serious crime already condemned by several Church councils and by ecclesiastical laws, it will not be considered invalid but in any case legitimate. So it is written, without penalty of denial.

.

My dear followers of the excommunicated heretic priest that shoots nonsense in bursts on Facebook exhibiting to you, his audience, the amazing relics of Friar Cipolla. To you, that we pastors in the care of souls want in every way to recover from error and snatch from deception, I address myself with an invitation to reflect on this undeniable element: from a document as articulated as this Constitution, two words cannot be cut, isolate them from the whole context and then make the document say what is not written in it. Yup, the following n. 79 of the same chapter states:

.

«Also confirming the prescriptions of the Predecessors, I forbid anyone, even if he was awarded the dignity of cardinalate, to bargain, while the Pontiff is alive and without having consulted him, about the election of his Successor, or promise votes, or make decisions about this in private conventicles ".

.

Pay close attention: this precise and decisive prohibition, already contained in similar documents promulgated by other Supreme Predecessors of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, even if it was totally violated by cardinals, it absolutely does not contemplate the penalty of invalidity and nullity of the election. The document says so, it would be enough just to read, instead of taking as pure gold what unlikely claims that certain turkey that screams in live broadcasts Facebook. Therefore, compared to what has just been reported and explained, do you really intend to continue to give credit to this miserable subject who has been telling you for years that the election of the reigning Pontiff is invalid because it was orchestrated by a group of cardinals referred to as "The Mafia of St. Gallen"? Please reason, especially to read: if not even an election that took place through the shameful crime of simony renders the election of a Roman Pontiff invalid and null and void, do you really think it can be made such by cardinals who met every now and then in Switzerland to be together and talk to each other? Reason: it is the same document in question, which on the one hand condemns all kinds of pre-conclave pacts, but at the same time it does not question the legitimate and valid election of one who was also elected by this path. Think and above all read the documents, do not listen to what the roaring turkey pretends to make him say, of what certain documents never said and wrote.

.

The so-called "Mafia of St. Gallen" is a simple humorous joke made by the late Cardinal Godfried Maria Jules Danneels to a journalist, to which he said, in a purely joking tone, that every now and then, a group of cardinals, including him, they met in this Swiss town. And laughing, he said: "We were a bit like a mafia gathering". The theory of a conspiracy was built on this joke that would have forced Benedict XVI to resign with coercion and psychological violence in order to elect the already prepared Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio in his place., supported by this Welsh cardinal mafia, with strong powers and international Freemasonry, as the excommunicated screaming priest has been saying for years.

.

My dear, I ask you in a pleading tone for divine charity which has endowed even the most limited with capacity, at least partial, to understand and want: how can you give credit to such things, denied by the facts, by ecclesiastical laws and by the Apostolic Constitution which regulates the election of the Roman Pontiff? Tall this for the sole purpose of denying, with illogical and irrational obstinacy, what really happened: Benedict XVI has freely, legitimately and validly renounced the Petrine ministry and some grammatical errors will certainly not make his formal resignation invalid. Those who deny this deny the reality of living in hyperuranium.

.

For all of us priests and theologians that we have given our entire existence to the Church and to the Holy People of God, it is really disheartening to try to counter people sunk in the most absurd error who do not accept any correction, because they refuse to see guides and teachers in us. In these painful circumstances, the tremendous prophetic words written by the Blessed Apostle Paul to his disciple Timothy resound in our hearts as shepherds in the care of souls:

.

«The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales. But you shall carefully, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry " (II Tm 4, 1-5).

.

Today we servants of the Church and of sound doctrine we all feel Timothy in the struggle, which is an often useless struggle against the idiocy produced by illogical and irrational minds that are dragging many souls towards ruin. And that they get angry, verbally attack us and seriously offend us, if only we try to bring them back to reason. Hard times for priests and theologians today, especially for pastors in the care of souls animated by profound faith, who therefore strongly feel the duty to defend the People of God at all costs from ravenous wolves and the Onion Friar who abuse their popular credulity with the display of amazing relics.

.

the Island of Patmos, 23 November 2021

.

.

I REFER TO THIS PREVIOUS VIDEO-LESSON FOR THOSE WHO WISH TO MORE ABOUT THE TOPIC HEREIN

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

HERE VERSION IN SPANISH

OPEN THE PROCESS OF BEATIFICATION OF THE LITTLE HERETIC CARMEN HERNANDEZ. THE FIRST MIRACLE HAS ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISHED: THE HEALING OF A MAN AFFECTED BY CONGENITAL MICROPENIS PATHOLOGY

.

«If they have opened the process of beatification of the first Holy Heretics, then we can also open that of Pietro Pacciani and after having canonized him, promote him as co-patron saint of lovers together with Valentine's Day. So much, from those of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, now there is nothing to be surprised about ".

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

.

The sect Neocatechumenal

I learned from the opening of the beatification process of a little heretic of the twentieth century, Carmen Hernandez Barrera (Olvega, 24 November 1930 – Madrid, 19 July 2016), co-initiator with Kiko Argüello of the worst para-Catholic and heterodox movement in the history of the twentieth century: the Neocatechumenal Way. And I say "small" because heresy is a very serious thing. Throughout the history of the Church, the great heretics were personalities endowed with excellent intellect and rare philosophical gifts, theological and speculative. Carmen Hernández, on the other hand, was a poor and pompous ignorant who mixed pseudo-poetic emotionality with a disastrous theology do it yourself, that in half a century has caused immense damage to an army of equally emotional and fragile subjects who have followed him and his companion Kiko Argüello. Therefore, in calling her heretical, as a dogmatic theologian and historian of dogma, I have an obligation, out of duty and intellectual honesty, to ask forgiveness first of all from speculative minds that were excelled, such were those of great heretics of the caliber of Arius and Pelagius.

.

On the occasion of the commemoration of the dead, an acquaintance who is an undertaker sought me out with urgency and trembling to ask me for guidance. He was very scared, the poor thing, after repeatedly hearing noises in the cemetery from two tombs inside which rest the mortal remains of two holy priests: the Servant of God Pier Carlo Lad, Roman presbyter, ed Enrico Zoffoli, Roman presbyter of the Passionist Order. Two authentic saints, which the gravedigger was also aware of, God-fearing man, who, with great bewilderment, asked me a question:

.

«Si nun reposeno ‘n’pace n'a aschiera de b'beati’ sti du santi sacerdoti, who could ever rest there?».

.

I went to the cemetery myself and as soon as I approached the tombs I, the noises got louder still. I assure the undertaker:

.

«Uncle Remoletto, you don't have to be scared, I know that something will be communicated to us, I'm going to find out and then I'll let you know».

.

To discover and then understand the origin of this phenomenon, it is necessary to think about the life and works of certain deceased people. Indeed, it happened that Pier Carlo Landucci in 1983, Enrico Zoffoli in 1990, they raised a grave alarm on the dangerous heresies of the Neocatechumenal Way, denouncing and documenting years and years of grotesquely heterodox formative catechesis held by the two initiators of this coven to their mega-catechists. Analysis and denunciations that the two holy priests and theologians made to the competent Ecclesiastical Authorities and that I know very well, because I was the third to return to the subject years later, collecting the legacy of their studies and expanding the analysis of the Neocatechumenal phenomenon to the state it was in thirty years later. Also for this, as a sign of indelible gratitude to the theological science and the courage of these two men of God, my book The sect Neocatechumenal I dedicated it to their venerable memories.

.

I don't follow the various bulletins of the Holy See and related official or unofficial sites, because for a while the comic comedy amuses me with all its dwarfs, dancers and ruffians, but in the long run I get tired, finally it irritates me. Until a bishop friend throws me a provocation:

.

"What do you think of the opening of the diocesan phase of the beatification process of Carmen Hernández, held with a ceremony with great fanfare in the cathedral of Madrid?».

.

I take it all as a joke of pure ecclesiastical humor, because it couldn't be otherwise. So convinced that he was joking I reply:

.

«They want to bless her Santa del Cazzo? Or maybe we want to ignore that the word "fuck" was what Carmen pronounced as a colloquial intercalary even during their long and exotic liturgies. neokatekike?».

.

The bishop friend laughs, realizing that I hadn't taken it all for real and that I thought it was a satirical joke. To which he replies that he is speaking seriously. I promptly blurted out:

.

«If they have opened the process of beatification of the first Holy Heretics, then we can also open that of Pietro Pacciani and after having canonized him, promote him co-patron saint of lovers together with Valentine's Day. So much, from those of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, now there is nothing to be surprised about and we can expect anything ".

.

The bishop friend he sends me two official news reports on the event. Su Vatican News the journalist Salvatore Cernuzio [see WHO, WHO] flaunts all the typical ignorance of our demeaning Italian Vaticanists, first of all showing that he does not even know how to distinguish a cause for beatification, through which a blessed is proclaimed, from a cause of canonization, through which a blessed, who as such has already been beatified, instead he is proclaimed a saint. And in July of 2021 this ignorant Vatican scholar announces the opening of the "cause of canonization":

.

"Tonight will be presented to the Archdiocese of Madrid the Your humble little book, the request to open the diocesan phase for the cause of canonization, in which the members of the international team of this ecclesial reality branched out in the five continents are actors, or Kiko Argüello, father Mario Pezzi and Maria Ascension Romero. To the bishop of the diocese where the candidate died, a booklet that collects writings will be delivered, documents and testimonies that attest, precisely, those "heroic virtues" necessary to establish their holiness of life " [see WHO].

.

By saying that a bishop is not obliged to open a beatification process, since it is not at all a due act, with this all is said, starting from the level of the bishop in question. Many are asking ourselves - and we ask ourselves "seriously" so to speak -, what could be the "heroic virtues" of a woman who has wreaked havoc on Catholic doctrine, of the sacred liturgy and of the history of the Church, which together with Kiko Argüello gave birth to a pseudo-Catholic movement that in my critical essay I define with these precise words and up to now never denied by any reference from the competent Ecclesiastical Authorities:

.

"The Neocatechumenate is a community of Jewish-Protestant origin that is Catholic only in the outer shell emptied inside of what are the founding elements of Catholicism" [cf.. pag. 100 of the aforementioned work].

.

To candidates for beatification a proven miracle is required, except for the martyrs, because the Church already considers martyrdom a miracle in itself linked to the action of God's grace. Well, I investigated further and discovered that the scientific commission appointed by the Metropolitan Archdiocese of Madrid has already subjected the miracle that would have occurred through the intercession of this candidate for beatification to the scrutiny of the most distinguished European clinicians and urologists..

.

The miraculous man is called Armando Bronca Segura, a young man from Madrid of the age of 25 year old. The best of European clinical science was unanimous in declaring that there is no scientific explanation for the fact. The young man suffered from a pathology experienced by many men with suffering and humiliation: penile hypoplasia, also known as congenital micropenis. The scientific commission explained that this pathology involves for the man who is affected an organ of normal morphology and with the outlet of the external urethral meatus in the seat, but which at birth has a length less than 2,5 inches. Urologists attest that considering the standard deviations to the mean it can be said to be in the presence of a micropenis when the length at birth is less than 1,9 inches. The causes of micropenis are attributable to a deficit of androgen secretion during the second and third trimester of pregnancy.

.

After meeting some mega-catechists and having entered the Neocatechumenal Way depressed, as soon as Armando Bronca Segura was stripped to his deepest conscience with those scrutinies that have always concealed true forms of public confessions, he spilled the beans by narrating his experience. Hence the insecurity, the shame he felt in the men's locker room, the pain he suffered when he was nicknamed Tom Thumb by insensitive and mocking peers. The mega-catechists did not delay beyond commanding him to turn to the pious intercession of Carmen Hernández. And so, one morning, epic, he noticed that between his legs he had ... and all the neighbors heard the screams of a male voice shouting "miracle … miracle!».

.

A few weeks later Armando Bronca Segura sent the entire Neocatechumenal Way to be blessed with his mega-catechists, completely changing life. Today she works in the world of porn, where he is one of the highest paid actors. His first film entitled The stallion of Vallecas, available in Italian version with title The Vallecas stallion, marked a resounding international success.

.

It is not at all irreverent I will indicate to future memory Carmen Hernández eats The Holy of Cock, because there is nothing vulgar in this expression, on the contrary, everything is true, all historical and documented. Numerous eyewitnesses are still healthy and vegetative today, clergy and laity of all nationalities, that during numerous public contexts they have heard it interspersed: «… And fuck… and fuck!». One time, that pious woman of Chiara Lubich, who was as sweet and delicate as a porcelain doll, being with Luigi Giussani at a meeting attended by all the founders and foundresses of lay movements on the occasion of the great Jubilee of 2000, he was about to pass out on the ground, hearing a short distance from her, the future Santa Carmen Hernández, that between one cigarette and the next he conversed by interspersing "... and fuck ... and fuck!».

.

If then this noble organ it is an element that usually surfaces on the mouths of candidates for beatification, at least one wonders ... what the fuck are they doing, those who work within the Holy Church with the causes of the Saints? Or maybe, in the face of the opening of the beatification process of a person who is, to say the least, impossible to propose such as Carmen Hernández, we must also take them seriously? No, unfortunately we just have to take them for the piss, we have no other suitable defense weapon, if not the wise and charitable taking of the ass towards those who think they can transform the Holy Church of Christ into a grotesque and squalid theater of ridicule, changing the heroic nature of the virtues, namely the sanctity, in an award even given to heretics and to coarse Spanish bullshit.

.

All this to perennial shame the Cardinal Carlos Osoro Sierra, to which perhaps no one has ever said that the Spanish College of Rome, promoter at the time of a lawsuit open in 1953 under the auspices of the Archdiocese of Madrid, he is rotting the documents of the beatification process of Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val in a basement, one of our great twentieth century giants, illustrious son of the blood of Spain. Always admitted that someone, to the Metropolitan Archbishop of Madrid, that just five years after his death opens the buffoonish diocesan phase of the beatification process of Carmen Hernández, explained who he was and what a giant like was for the Church of the twentieth century Rafael Merry del Val and Zuleta. Because he might not even know him, even knowing if anything, maybe even good, that Pedro Almodovar than the Spanish Catholic Church, for how it is reduced, he deserves it all, from his first to his latest anti-Catholic film.

.

the Island of Patmos, 18 November 2021

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.