From Beatitudes in the mountains to love for enemies in the plains

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

From Beatitudes in the mountains to love for enemies in the plains

«Who uses the word of Jesus otherwise by acting, gives wrong to Jesus, denies the sermon on the mountain, does not implement his word. From a human point of view there are infinite possibilities of understanding and interpreting the sermon on the mountain. Jesus knows only one possibility: go and obey "

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

After the beatitudes proclaimed in the Gospel last Sunday, The reading of the sermon in the plain of Jesus edited by Luca continues, In the part in which the heart of his speech is accessed where the ethics of love aimed at enemies predominates, expressed in donating for free, exempt from judging, proactive when he invites you to offer another cheek. In the text, al v. 31, The famous "golden rule" is preserved: “How do you want men to do to you, So you do them too ".

The entire speech of Jesus, with his commands, It is held on the verb agapao, amare. And the sayings are expressed according to a sapiential style with verbs above all to the imperative. What emerges in the end is the desire of Jesus to unhinge the logic of reciprocity. We read the evangelical pericope.

"During that time, Jesus told his disciples: “To you who listen, I say: love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who cursed you, Pray for those who treat you badly. To those who strike you on the cheek, offer the other too; to those who tear your cloak to you, Do not reject even the tunic. Give it to anyone who asks you, and to those who take your things, Don't ask her back. And how do you want men to do to you, So you do them too. If you love those who love you, what gratitude is due to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who do good to you, what gratitude is due to you? Sinters also do the same. And if you lend to those from whom you hope to receive, what gratitude is due to you? Even sinners grant loans to sinners to receive the same. Instead love your enemies, do good and lend without hoping anything, And your reward will be great and you will be children of the very high, because he is benevolent to the ungrateful and the wicked. Be merciful, as your Father is merciful. Don't judge and you will not be judged; do not condemn and you will not be condemned; forgive and you will be forgiven. Dates and it will be given to you: a good size, pressing, Full and overflowing will be paid to the womb, because with the measure you measure with, will be measured to you in return”» (LC 6,27-38).

After the "trouble" (LC 6, 26), specular of the last bliss, The words of Jesus continue with a powerful adversive, "But to you who listen to I say" (v. 27), which opens the door to understanding the substantial difference in the Christian vocation in the world. At the heart of it is the love for the enemy who forms the inclusion of the entire passage of Luca 6, 27-35: "Love your enemies". Who is the enemy in the words of Jesus? It is the one who hates, cursed, ill -treatment and expresses its enmity with physical violence, with theft, with the request and the claim. Whatever the way of expressing itself of the inhabitation, the extraordinary proposal of Jesus who defines the main Christian difference rests in the non -violent response. Not any non -violence, but a proactive and active, since it, subtracting from specularity, puts in place a positive action of opposite sign. Not repeating the violent gesture suffered the disciple of Jesus comes out of the mimicry and passiveness. It is a question of doing something active after a time when violence has passed passively; not placing yourself, But, in front of the other how to do in a dispute or in a boxing meeting. I don't do what the violent does, I don't touch him where he touches me and I don't allow him to touch me in the same place. Yet I act starting from his first act, I come to his ground and there I present to him alterity. This text is telling us what to do if the goal is to make a relationship of otherness possible with someone who suffers and that makes it suffer. This is emblematically represented by the words of Jesus on the slap which is perhaps the passage of the best and iconic song: “To those who strike you on the cheek, offer the other too ". In the Greek Evangelical text, the word used to say "other cheek" is not what we would expect, If we were faced with simple symmetry: I am hit on a part of the face, I also present the other. The Greek word "is not used hereetheric»Used in the sense of" now one now the other ". Here the Gospel uses the term "garlic" what does it mean: another, different. It is not, so, the second cheek, It is another cheek. There is no sum, first the right and then the left, But a different cheek must be presented. The great novelty of these words of Jesus reveal that, If on the one hand in an adverse form at the same time mild and powerful, they contrast the feeling and the way of acting worldly, on the other hand they say it is possible to do the good of the enemy, making it feel a better person, offering him the opportunity to amend himself from violence. I tell him that he can love himself, because basically both the offender and the offended are recipients of a love whose greatness did not suspect.

And here the Christian theology on love helps us which helps us understand why it can even be commanded, as in the words of Jesus. Because the command also expresses an unsuspected possibility that Christ first has experienced, not in the mere form of feeling a feeling, but in the concreteness of the actions, Showing to love those who are not a lovable, like his enemies, thus revealing the unique source of that love up to the impossible which is God the Father: «In fact, God loved the world as to give His Son Unigenito ... Jesus, knowing that his time had come to pass from this world to the Father, having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them until the end" (GV 3, 16; 13, 1). Thus they also express themselves several first Christian authors. God showed his love for us why, while we were enemies and sinners, Christ died for us (cfr Rm 5,6-11). Christ on the cross has demolished the logic of the absence (cf.. Ef 2,14), He responded to the so on in over and violence by invoking forgiveness on his torturers (1PT 2,23; LC 23,34). In this sense, love can be commanded, because it must be understood in its height and depth: “Be merciful, like your Father is merciful " (v. 36); even before in its extension, even if we find that we all return to this, We like the next and even the enemy: "You will love your neighbor as yourself" (MC 12,31). It is also significant and innovative that Jesus has reworked, According to Luca, The gold rule in a positive and non -negative form as is found in other ancient texts and authors: “How do you want men to do to you, So you do them too ".

Luca to define strength or ability which allows you to go beyond the human measure of reciprocity uses the term "χάρις", curry (cf.. LC 6,32.33.34; to the bibbia translates: «What gratitude is due to you?»). Really the love that the Christian manages to even have towards his enemy is a grace, that is, it is a gift that comes from God.

To conclude it is necessary to mention how the words of Jesus, so demanding, have been variously interpreted. We narrow the two -point field of view. The Catholic position opts for the two ways, that of the majority that is invited to follow the precepts of Jesus and the other, more radical and demanding, For those few who together with the precepts also pursue the advice that are left to the free option and require a state of perfection. Then there is the position of Lutheran Orthodoxy who considers the speech of the mountain or the plain "impaired", since difficult to put into practice faithfully. In the same way as the impracticability of the mosaic law it highlights the sinful condition and therefore the necessary opening of the faith to the grace that saves. Rightly to this position, But at this point I would also say to Cattolica, Dietrich Bonheffer reacts in his most famous theological book:

«Who uses the word of Jesus otherwise by acting, gives wrong to Jesus, denies the sermon on the mountain, does not implement his word. From a human point of view there are infinite possibilities of understanding and interpreting the sermon on the mountain. Jesus knows only one possibility: go and obey " (Sequence).

The words of the Protestant theologian They still question our consistency today and challenge us. The speech of the plain of Luca can be put into practice, not thanks to our skills, but with the help of God. Christian ethics is practicable, as long as he keeps the grace in the center that comes from God.

From the hermitage, 23 February 2025

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Rediscover the beauty of the life of grace through the work of Blessed Angelico

REDISCOVERING THE BEAUTY OF GRAZIA'S LIFE THROUGH THE WORK OF BEATO ANGELICO

The feast of Beato Angelico remembers that every man, illuminated by grace, Although called to walk on steep paths, continually rediscover one's nature as a divine masterpiece. Creation, although disfigured by sin and the difficulties of life, it is always the place where the chiaroscuro of human existence intertwines with true and profound love.

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Fra Angelico, born Giovanni da Fiesole, he was a Dominican friar who lived his religious life between torment and ecstasy. Through this writing I would like to share some thoughts on this Dominican brother famous throughout the world for his art and his faith.

To illustrate life, Angelico's works and pictorial style I made use of the precious advice of the Dominican brothers Sister Paola Gobbo and Brother Manuel Russo. So let's start from life: Giovanni da Fiesole was born in the last years of the 14th century, between 1395 and the beginning of 1400, in Vicchio, a town in Mugello, today in the province of Florence. Since I was young, one of his most obvious gifts was painting. To follow this talent, he decided to leave his home. It is known with certainty that he moved to Florence for his apprenticeship. Experts maintain that his teacher was Lorenzo Monaco, a Camaldolese from the Florentine abbey of Santa Maria degli Angeli. His stay at Monaco lasted until 1417. As was typical of the shops of the time, in his early years Giovanni learned the art of miniature painting, of the panel and the fresco, depending on the master's commissions. The master took care of the most important parts of the works, leaving the secondary ones to his boys, who also had the task of preparing the materials and grinding the pigments. In this way, the disciples learned the trade by observing and practicing.

During the apprenticeship period, the composition of the works followed rigorous rules established by the iconographic tradition of Byzantine origin. The hierarchy established the size of the characters in proportion to their dignity, with the central place reserved for Christ. Even the scenic environment, the number and role of the characters, their attitudes were all set. The artists used traditional patterns, as if they had a ready-to-use manual that indicated the methods and subjects to paint. Even the color, fundamental for its expressive and iconographic value, was subject to significant limitations. For example, the gold background of the panels prevented a naturalistic setting and the colors of the clothes were fixed: yellow indicated Pietro, red and blue indicated Mary, blue and red indicated Christ.

In this context, artistic genius was expressed through rigid legislation, but with full creative freedom. The risk was high, since the works could be rejected by clients not ready for such innovations, or they could bring fame, precisely because novelty attracted and fascinated. This was the most important lesson that Giovanni learned in the Monk's workshop. The latter had drawn from the masters of the past, like Duccio da Buoninsegna, Simone Martini, the Lorenzetti brothers, Cimabue and Giotto. Giovanni Monaco's art took place in the transition between Gothic and Renaissance Humanism, learning from the greats of the past to "go beyond" tradition and studying the innovations of his time.

The first document concerning Fra Angelico it is dated 1417 and concerns his enrollment in the Company of San Nicolò, at the Carmine church in Florence, sign of a spiritual journey undertaken. In this document he is recognized as a «painter”. On that date, thanks to a posthumous gloss that reports the wording: «Fecesi friar of Saint Domenicho», we know he was still secular. He entered the reformed Dominican convent of Fiesole between 1420 and the 1422, by joining the Order of Preachers. We'll see you again, a few years later, also his brother Benedetto, miniaturist.

There were two Dominican convents in Florence: Santa Maria Novella and San Domenico in Fiesole. Of the first it is written that the priesthood was not granted to artists because they were considered servile workers. Beato Angelico instead fully entered the Fiesole convent. Religious education had a decisive impact on Fra Giovanni's life and art. To religious profession, he found himself at a crossroads: become a lay brother, today we would call him a lay brother, which would have ensured him greater freedom in his work, or friar cleric. He chose, with his superiors, the second street, probably because they judged him capable of being an authentic friar, priest and preacher through art. For this we must thank Saint Antoninus of Florence, who glimpsed the genius of Angelico and allowed it to develop and bear fruit.

In his works we find these themes predominant: the centrality of Christ, knowledge of the Holy Scripture, the magisterium of the Church, adherence to Thomistic theology, the exemplary nature of the saints and the attention to the requests and expectations of the people, and finally the simplicity of his creations. Among the numerous commissions that Angelico received, there was that of his prior Sant'Antonino, who wanted to create a series of wall paintings in the convent of the observants of San Marco. Work began in 1437 e, between 1439 and the 1445, Beato Angelico painted in fresco 54 compositions with over 320 figure umane.

Inside a convent they were legal, indeed requests, sacred images accompanying the common rooms, of the dormitory and cells. Non-sacred images were prohibited and precious materials were excluded. For this reason Fra Giovanni chose the fresco technique, whose compositional materials are simple, lowly, natural: lime, sand, terre. The beauty of these wall paintings is that they are found in the places intended by the artist. This is an advantage for us because we can grasp Angelico's thought, who created them in those precise places according to a project and a message that was very clear in his mind. For example, outside the entrance to the guesthouse of the convent he painted Christ the pilgrim welcomed by two friars. In the novitiate the figures of the crucified Christ stand out, support for those who entered religious life and an invitation to recognize and unite with love. Everything was designed to recall the minds of the friars to the divine, the divine that inhabits the human. It was a sort of help to maintain that climate of contemplation and deep listening that inhabited Dominican homes.

Let's look briefly at Angelico's pictorial work. It is transmitted to us by Vasari that he:

«He would never have put his hand to the brushes without first praying. He never made a crucifix that didn't wet his cheeks with tears.".

This tells us how mystical the soul of Beato Angelico was and how much his art came from deep contemplation, from an experience that becomes a message. Some authors tell us that he painted in a state of ecstasy. Obviously it's not the ecstasy we think it is, but something similar to a "kidnapping"; that is, being totally immersed, in what you are doing and thinking, with utmost dedication, placing all our faculties at that service. Angelico was immersed in the Mystery that he intended to celebrate with his art where he found that vital center where God lives and speaks to the heart.

Paola Mancinelli writes: «Artistic creation is always an event of truth and generosity as well as the possibility of humbly giving shape to the mystery of being after having received the call as a thirst for beauty» (cf.. The amazement of beauty, Oristampa, Florence, 2008). It's a wait, conceive and give birth to an intuition, an image that almost suddenly generates in our mind, before our eyes. Certain that what we produce will only be a reflection of that Beauty that flashed in our spirit.

As for the other aspect of tears that he indicates to us, he was reminiscent of Vasari, they are an expression of love, of pain, of involvement so Angelico was moved to the deepest fibers of his soul. If it is true that "the tongue speaks of the abundance of the heart", this also applies to artistic expression, through which Fra Giovanni showed his entire interior world. We cannot separate the man from the artist, the man from the consecrated, this unity which is not separable.

Il Beato Angelico seppe to touche dalla "gracias gracias facens" (the grace that makes us welcome), a gift that illuminates the path of humanity, guiding her through the challenges and darknesses of life. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches:

«Our justification comes from the grace of God. Grace is favor, the free help that God gives us because we respond to his invitation: become children of God, adopted children, participate in the divine nature, of eternal life. Grace is a participation in the life of God; introduces us into the intimacy of Trinitarian life. Through Baptism the Christian participates in the grace of Christ, Head of his body. As an “adopted son”, he can now call God “Father”, in union with the only begotten Son. He receives the life of the Spirit which instills charity in him and forms the Church. This vocation to eternal life is supernatural. It depends entirely on the free initiative of God, since he alone can reveal himself and give himself. It surpasses the capabilities of man's intelligence and willpower, as of every creature" (cf.. CCC 1996, 1997, 1998).

Jesus Christ, with his sacrifice, he gave us "grace upon grace" (GV 1,16), a continuous flow of love and redemption that manifests divine glory. This is why Fra Angelico, with his art, continues to speak to our hearts, offering a path of beauty and light that shines in the darkest moments. His party, today, takes on an even deeper meaning, especially in an era marked by war, the division and isolation produced even by social media, when instead spiritual rebirth and beauty, including the artistic one, they are essential for all humanity.

God's grace is both a concept and a reality which truly expresses and represents the unconditional love and divine favor that is offered to us without merit. This grace makes the glory of God present, visible through the works of Christ and his followers.

Fra Angelico, with his art, he was able to capture this glory, transferring divine grace into his works with representations that speak directly to the soul. His works, such as «The Annunciation» and «The Last Judgment», they are visual testimonies of that grace, and they call us inviting us to reflect on our relationship with the divine.

In times of crisis like ours, beauty plays a fundamental role for our spiritual and moral rebirth, that of the rediscovery of the Good of Beauty. Scriveva Hans Urs Von Balthasar:

«In a world without beauty, in a world that is perhaps not without them, but he is no longer able to see her, to deal with it, even good has lost its attractive force, the evidence of its must-be-fulfilled; and man remains perplexed by it and wonders why he shouldn't rather prefer evil" (cf.. Gloria 1 – Perception of Form, Jaca Book, Milan, 2012, 18).

Fra Angelico, with his being an artist, he showed how beauty can be a vehicle of grace and redemption. Even the light that illuminates his paintings is a symbol of the divine light that guides our steps, even in the darkest moments.

The feast of Beato Angelico remembers that every man, illuminated by grace, Although called to walk on steep paths, continually rediscover one's nature as a divine masterpiece. Creation, although disfigured by sin and the difficulties of life, it is always the place where the chiaroscuro of human existence intertwines with true and profound love. Fra Angelico, with his art, invites us to see beyond appearances, to discover the beauty hidden in every corner of our lives.

The artists, like Fra Angelico, they have the gift of dragging us beyond immanence, beyond the paths of pure rationality and theoresis. Their art takes us between torment and ecstasy, making us live experiences that go beyond simply seeing. Beauty, in this sense, it becomes a way of knowing and experiencing the divine. It is a path that invites us to let ourselves be transformed by grace, to see the world with new eyes, illuminated by the light of faith.

In conclusion, the path of light through grace is a journey we are all called to take. Fra Angelico, offers us invaluable guidance on this journey, showing us how beauty and light can illuminate our darkest paths. His party, today, invites us to rediscover our nature as divine masterpieces, to let ourselves be transformed by grace and to walk with confidence towards glory. This celebration can be a time of rebirth for all of us, especially for artists who, with their work, continue to bring light and hope to the world.

The hope, which is also the guiding theme of this jubilee, as Holy Scripture reminds us, when it comes from God it is always founded and does not confuse. Hope, like art and the beauty that is its necessary corollary, is harmonious, integral and proportionate. So that we all become beautiful and hopeful, let's rediscover the art of Beato Angelico who depicted the beauty and uniqueness of Christ for us.

 

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 18 February 2025

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

Jesus highlights the faith by proposing trouble and beatitudes

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

Jesus highlights the faith by proposing trouble and beatitudes

«Blessed are your eyes because they see and your ears because they listen to. Verily I say unto you: Many prophets and many righteous have wanted to see what you look at, but they didn't see it, and listen to what you listen, but they didn't listen to him!»

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

On this Sunday we read the text of the Beatitudes According to Luca's version. A song that differs from the best known one, present in the first Gospel, For the number of beatitudes: Four against the eight of Matteo; and for the presence of as many "troubles" that form a precise contrast with them.

Fra Angelico, The beatitudes

If the poor are declared "blessed", the hungry, crying and persecuted, The troubles are directed to the rich, to the sazi, the laughing and to those who are praised. Moreover, If Matteo's beatitudes are included in the so -called Speech of the mountain (cf.. Mt 5,1), Those of Luca are pronounced in a flat place (cf.. LC 6,17). Let's read the text.

"During that time, Jesus, descended with the twelve, He stopped in a flat place. There was great crowd of his disciples and great multitude of people from all over Judea, from Jerusalem and from the coast of shooting and Sidòne. And he, Alzàti his eyes to his disciples, he said: “Blessed are you, poor, because yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you, that you are now hungry, because you will be satisfied. Blessed are you, what a cry, Because you will laugh. Blessed are you, When men are now there and when they ban it and insult you and despise your name as infamous, Because of the son of man. Rejoice on that day and exult because, there, Your reward is great in the sky. In the same way, in fact they acted their fathers with the prophets. But woe to you, rich, because you have already received your consolation. Woe to you, What are you knowing now, because you will be hungry. Woe to you, that now laughs, Because you will be in pain and cry. Trouble, When all men say good about you. In the same way, in fact they acted their fathers with the false prophets”» (LC 6,17.20-26).

Since there is no other evangelical page who has so interested thought and culture and has been the subject of various interpretations, I will try to highlight the point of view from which Luca intends to present the beatitudes of Jesus, But also the following troubles. They, indeed, they are necessary to explain the first, they assume them and are their counterpart, so that the beatitudes, placed on this negative background, they stand out better.

Immediately after having formed the twelve (LC 6,12-16) Jesus pronounces the beatitudes, which therefore assume a particularly significant value for that group "to which he gave the name of apostles" (LC 6,13). They, United to those who first followed Jesus, are the immediate recipients of these words: “Hyd your eyes to his disciples, he said " (LC 6,20). But there is also a large crowd that listens to the speech this time, made up of Jews and people from non -Jewish areas, Like the Phoenician cities of shooting and Sidone. With this annotation the evangelist does not only intend to show that the fame of Jesus has extended outside the borders of Israel, but wishes to prefigure the post-instance extension, also to the so -called kind, of the message of salvation of Jesus. Moreover, placed immediately after the annotation that the crowd "tried to touch him, Because a force came out of him that healed everyone " (LC 6,19), The words of Jesus who propose beatitudes and troubles intend to highlight the faith in those who follow him and are looking for him, instead of the magical or interested dimension. Report people to earth and therefore in terms of choices and responsibilities. For this reason the way of speaking in the public of Jesus, As already on the occasion of the homily in the Synagogue of Nazareth, It has a "kerygmatic" and pedagogical tone; they encourage to take a position and also predispose to an inevitable division, Since the words of Jesus reveal the thoughts of many hearts (cf.. LC 2,34-35). We can say that the evangelical page that puts direct comparison, in a brutal vis à vis, poor and rich, hungry and satisfied, Afflitti e jungle, persecuted and admired people, implies a necessary choice of field, An option that ultimately is between self -sufficiency and trust in the Lord, or between idolatry and faith.

As a rule, Matteo is thought to be the evangelist of the beatitudes, Instead Luca presents fifteen in his writing, two more than his colleague e, The Other Brother, It is also the only one who transmits the bliss of the listeners of the word: "Blessed are those who listen to the Word of God and keep it" (LC 11,28). This is in fact the key to seeing bliss in the various vital situations: listen and keep the word and the signs of God, as the Virgin Mary first did.

In the Old Testament, In particular in the psalms and in the sapiential literature, The beatitudes constitute those indications given so that the man reaches the finish line of happiness: "Blessed is the man who does not walk in the company of the wicked and in the street of sinners" (Shall 1,1). If you follow you will live happily, But if you prefer another road, trouble start, that they are needed on warning: not curses, but notices, like those who gave the ancient prophets (Is 1,4; 5,8-24; 30,1; 33,1). Compared to the Old Testament, The new presents some substantial differences in this regard. For Jesus there are no particular conditions for the beatitudes, because he already declares happy those who are in a certain situation and does not say for example: "Be poor!». It turns, By calling him blessed, To those who are already poor. To bliss, or "macarism" as it is defined in a technical sense in order to recall the Greek expression, It does not establish any behavior prior because it is the announcement of a novelty that comes from God and for this reason it is difficult to grasp at first sight, It is Paradossale, does not worldly and requires faith. In this lies the originality and the difference of meaning that the New Testament brings. The beatitudes, that is, More than an ethics to put into practice, they are the announcement of a novelty, a new way of living life and thinking it, because everything is seen in relation to God, or to its kingdom. Expenses, precisely, could find bliss in the poor, in the indigent, in the suffering, in the persecuted? Or better yet: as we too can, In our personal poverty, in our sufferings or within any other tiring situation, recognize us blessed? What does it allow you to read a situation and judge it as blessed and not a curse or a misfortune? Bliss works only for those who have faith. To use a very important image for the theology of revelation, We could say that the eyes of faith are needed (P. Rousselot, The eyes of faith, 1910; Trad.. en. The eyes of faith, Milan 1974).

In faith there is the possibility of seeing in a different way, since it makes the eyes capable of grasping what otherwise remains under the surface. By virtue of grace the believer recognizes those signs that God places in his life, otherwise, without grace, He only sees failure, the death, hunger, despair. With the faith in them it sees, in spite of everything, God's presence. It is then clear why Jesus does not put conditions to being blessed. Only one is the condition previa: believe his word.

The words of Jesus are understandable In light of the fact that the advent of the kingdom of God really manifests himself in him. Beatitudes and troubles are God's gaze on contradictory human situations and this appears paradoxical, Since he sees what man does not see, upsetting the human evaluation parameters. After all, what the beatitudes put in question is the relationship with the present that for some shows itself full, satisfactory and saturated (cf.. the vulgate that translates the "sazi" of LC 6,25 with: «who are satisfied») And for others it is desire and awaiting a change. These are the poor who for their situation of lack and indigence become the first recipients of the Kingdom. True poverty is not indigence or misery itself, But the state of whom, like the Clouds (anawim The poor and humble in Hebrew) of the Old Testament, they are able to welcome God because they know they have nothing and to expect everything from him. Woe to the rich, says Jesus, When they are slaves of wealth, because they put the safety of life in them and believe that their being depends on having (cf.. LC 12,15: “Be careful and keep away from all covetousness because, even if one is in abundance, his life does not depend on what he possesses"). It is no coincidence that the divine action celebrated in Magnificat The God who "has satisfied sings (filled) of goods hungry ", while "he postponed the rich empty" (LC 1,53). Or as in the metaphorical story of LC 16,19-31 where the rich, Sazio and Gaudent, is opposed to Lazzaro, poor, hungry, naked, homeless, while, in the eschatological perspective of the parable, The destinies of the two are completely overturned. That parable is a nice narrative comment on Jesus' speech that alternates Beatitudes and troubles.

Finally, bliss in poverty and hunger However, it does not leave us quiet or without pain for the situations that chase each other in the world and for the fate of many, Especially when they suffer are unarmed and children. Faith and trust in God, As Manzoni writes, It is not enough to keep the problems away, rather «" radolizes them, and makes them useful for a better life ". A conclusion "found by poor people", comments on the writer (The Betrothed, cap. XXXVIII). But the word blessed, that we read in Greek, Since the Gospel was transmitted to us in that language, Jesus has pronounced it in Aramaic and in his language does not mean just happy, But it also means «directing, orientation, walk »and where if not in the world? We cannot escape from this world, You have to stay there and learn to see things that most do not see, Not so much because a principle of faith is lacking, But because overwhelmed by life he no longer has time to think.

There is a particular bliss remembered by Matteo. These are extraordinarily dense words spoken by Jesus by referring to the ability that we have not so much to separate ourselves from things, from daily work, from the family, but to know how to see in our environment, in daily life, what is superficially not seen, What transcends our immediate vision:

«Blessed are your eyes because they see and your ears because they listen to. Verily I say unto you: Many prophets and many righteous have wanted to see what you look at, but they didn't see it, and listen to what you listen, but they didn't listen to him!» (Mt 13, 16-17).

From the hermitage, 16 February 2025

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

The ancient intelligent animal and the new artificial intelligence

THE ANCIENT INTELLIGENT ANIMAL AND THE NEW ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

These are the occasions in which man has demonstrated his intelligence, certainly not imposing itself as the strongest animal, or fast, or skilled, but showing himself capable of managing a superior instrument with his adaptable intelligence, exercising his ability with which he has always been able to adapt to those numerous historical changes which today are called technological changes.

- Actuality -

Author:
Jorge Facio Lynx
President of Editions The island of Patmos

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

In these days one of the most present topics in the news and in social media it is focusing on AI (Artificial Intelligences) and its positive implications, but above all negative, especially with the summit that is being celebrated in Paris: AI Action Summit.

It is appropriate to start from two important premises: each of these systems is ultimately an instrument in the hands of man and for this reason reflects with an unimaginable enhancement nowadays the same research and way of thinking and acting of man. Therefore it is man himself who can direct the instrument to help and improve progress, science and human life itself, how can he use this tool for the worst nightmares ever experienced in history.

The very concept of Intelligence must be clarified: Due to their power and speed, the systems can achieve calculations and operations that human beings individually or in groups would not be able to easily achieve, but so far they are sectoral and specific operations; while the singularity of human Intelligence is characterized by creativity and simultaneity in operating multiple functions and themes. The fear is not so much about where artificial intelligence systems can arrive as tools, but to what point is laziness reaching, the reluctance, the ignorance and inactivity that people are reaching in everyday life, favoring leisure in an increasingly vain and superficial world, rather than trying to best develop one's qualities, gifts and abilities.

Today life itself is structured to be lived passively, in zombie or “amoeba” mode, despite having access to unlimited information at our fingertips and with such a vast range of technical tools and technologists with which we could work wonders.

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming society and the world of work, so much so that its development and diffusion raise important ethical questions, social and economic. While Europe pursues as a strategy a theoretical framework of a regulatory and human-centered approach, especially the protection of fundamental rights, the United States and Asia, especially China, they instead chose a pragmatic and economic approach where they left carte blanche for innovation and competition. There has been a massive investment in AI research and development by governments with the sole goal of achieving the leadership worldwide in the sector.

One of the main concerns about AI is its potential impact on the world of work: the automation of production processes would lead to an increase in unemployment and social inequality, especially in the manufacturing sectors, agricultural, of trade and services.

The other important issue is the ecological impact, AI models are complex and require enormous amounts of energy, with a consequent significant impact on the environment. The widespread use of smart devices and the production of large amounts of data also raise concerns about natural resource consumption and e-waste management. Exists, along with the two concerns just indicated, also the danger of losing control over AI and the consequent fear of developing capabilities that can surpass human control and generate unpredictable consequences for society. Equal fear generates the danger of the improper use of AI for harmful purposes, such as the creation of autonomous weapons or the manipulation of public opinion.

AIs have an immediate and devastating impact in different generations of society, especially the older ones, who are much more vulnerable, as well as defenseless and often unable to grasp the danger when they find themselves involved in scams , thefts and deceptions for which they are not prepared, not having received adequate information from anyone, today more pressing than ever, about the dangers that may arise.

If AI as a powerful technology offers great opportunities, at the same time it also raises big questions. On the one hand, an open dialogue that takes into account the potential benefits as well as the risks for workers and the environment appears essential, so that its development and use is ethical and sustainable and aimed at the good of humanity. But, as you know, when money is involved it is difficult to have a solid guarantee on the operation of the project, and everything could remain within the ideal scope of beautiful words.

Workplace AI will not lead to the abolition of human work if we accept the profound transformation of the labor market that is already taking place, It is therefore essential to invest in education and training to prepare workers to coexist with AI as humans did in the past with the arrival of the steam engine or the automobile.; because these are the occasions in which man has demonstrated his intelligence, certainly not imposing itself as the strongest animal, or fast, or skilled, but showing himself capable of managing a superior instrument with his adaptable intelligence, exercising his ability with which he has always been able to adapt to those numerous historical changes which today are called technological changes, reinventing new activities and developing new skills.

 

the Island of Patmos, 15 February 2025

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The Opossum is to the knowledge of the Vatican as Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work “Confessiones” of Sant’Agostino

The Opossum is to the knowledge of the Vatican as Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work Confessions OF SAINT AUGUSTINE

While that tarot movie was aired, Mister Noi-in-vatican, Qua-in-vatican, he shed the tarot like a trout in curve

– The briefs of the Fathers of the Isle of Patmos –

(at the bottom of: all previous articles)

Author
Editors of The Island of Patmos

.

Acid as a middle ground between a vestal virgin and an indomitable bisbetic, l’Opossum He launched thunder and lightning on the "participation" of the Holy Father Francesco at the Sanremo Festival.

This umpteenth shot is proof that he is up to the knowledge of the internal chores of the Vatican as he is Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work Confessiones of Sant’Agostino. Already, Because while that targeted movie was aired, Mister Noi-in-vatican, Qua-in-vatican, he shed the tarot like a trout in curve.

The video broadcast yesterday on the maxi screen of the Ariston Theater He has nothing to do with the singing event because he shot in May 2024 As a thank you of the Supreme Pontiff to the artists participating in the World Children's Day at the Olympic Stadium in Rome.

This is Mister's reliability Noi-in-vatican, Qua-in-vatican that in his gossip blog&Poisons ensures:

«In a historical moment in which journalism is a pastime for the elderly, I can not remain silent invests in competent young people who have seriously married a mission: change the communication on the Catholic and Vatican Church " (cf.. WHO)

The whole affirmed without human punishment of ridicule, Why I cannot be silent it is reliable as i Tango Bond Argentini of 2001.

Velletri of Rome, 12 February 2025

.

Our previous articles on the Band of the Silerian:

– 16 August 2025 — I CAN'T BE SILENT And that word taboo that he just can't pronounce: "HOMOSEXUALITY" (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 August 2025 — There is a homosexual? AT THAT TIME I CAN'T BE SILENT Also defends the indefensible (To open the article click WHO)

– 29 March 2025 — Always about I CAN'T BE SILENT: DAL “Vertical man"A" Fireculo "and" quadhow "of Leonardo Sciascia (To open the article click WHO)

– 21 March 2025 — I CAN'T BE SILENT And the story of that convinced seamstress that he can give Giorgio Armani high fashion lessons (To open the article click WHO)

– 12 February 2025 — The Opossum is to the knowledge of the Vatican as Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work Confessions OF SAINT AUGUSTINE (To open the article click WHO)

– 15 January 2025 — AT THE CLERICAL BORDERS WITH REALITY: THE WOMAN SUFFERS FROM FREUDIAN PENIS ENVY, The Opossum of the envy by Matteo Bruni Director of the Press Room of the Holy See (To open the article click WHO)

– 20 January 2025 — THE OPOSSUM IGNORE THAT A NUN CAN QUIETLY BECOME GOVERNOR OF THE VATICAN CITY STATE, As already was Giulio Sacchetti (To open the article click WHO)

– 22 November 2024 — THE EPISCOPAL APPOINTMENT OF RENATO TARANTELLI BACCARI. WHEN YOU ARE AFFECTED BY LIVER CANCER, THEY CHARGE ON THE ATTACK THOSE WHO CANNOT BE SILENT (To open the article click WHO)

– 31 May 2024 — A NOTE FROM FATHER ARIEL ON THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT: «AS ANNOYING AS A SEA URCHIN INSIDE YOUR UNDERPANTS» (To open the article click WHO)

– 8 December 2023 — WHO IS MARCO FELIPE PERFETTI REFERRING TO STATING FROM THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT «HERE IN THE VATICAN… WE IN THE VATICAN…», IF YOU CANNOT EVEN SET FOOT IN THE VATICAN? (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 October 2023 — THE ARCHABOT EMERITUS OF MONTECASSINO PIETRO VITTORELLI HAS DEAD: CHRISTIAN PIETY CAN ERASE THE SAD TRUTH? (To open the article click WHO)

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

When the devil puts his tail, between exorcisms and narcissisms … – When the Devil puts his tail on us, between exorcisms and narcissisms …

(English text after the Italian)

 

When the devil puts his tail, BETWEEN EXORCISMS AND NARCISSISMS…

Major exorcism is the therapy of choice to fight the Evil One? It's still: the action of the Evil One is always and only the extraordinary one or the ordinary action is not much more subtle and insidious? To answer these questions we make some further clarifications …

— Pastoral current events —

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

PDF print format article

PDF article print format

.

Perhaps a clarification is due, because as expected, my article from 7 last February (see WHO) caused some readers to turn up their noses, so much so that they came to interpret my writing as an attack (personal?) to all those beautiful souls who daily fight against the Devil.

In short, all we were missing was the killjoy Capuchin friar to hinder the army of those warriors of light who with Captain Jesus - who is not up there but down here with the flag in his hand - catch the devils red-handed as the good Angelo Branduardi sang (you see WHO).

I consider my writing extremely clear so much so that it acts as a corollary to the beautiful note from the International Association of Exorcists (you see WHO) who certainly cannot be blamed for being a group of partisans and exalted troublemakers. And of demonology and the related sacramental of exorcism, two Fathers of this island of Patmos of ours perhaps know something about it. Both myself and Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo we both underwent training for this delicate ministry, in the usual year 2009 and at the same academic-ecclesiastical institution. Certain alarms must also be given, we must warn the Christian faithful against certain deviations as the prophets in ancient Israel used to do with the stiff-necked people: «Whether they listen or not – because they are a bunch of rebels – they will at least know that a prophet is among them» (cf. This 2,2-5). Some things just have to be said.

I believe that the priest today must rediscover his role as prophet, of the one who speaks in the name of God, something that is increasingly rare in an ecclesial community where clerical-religious personalism has become hypertrophic. Being a prophet involves inevitable hardships, of misunderstandings, an inconvenience that is difficult to accept but necessary, until proclaiming – from the rooftops (cf. LC 12,3) – even what most people don't want to hear. And all this without veils of rash judgments but with that prophetic parrhesia that we find within the folds of the pastoral responsibility that we owe to the people of God entrusted to us with sacred ordination.

Having said this, I would like to return further to some well-known issues, so well known, which are routinely ignored, disregarded and needlessly cunningly manipulated.

1. What is an exorcism?

It is the invocation of the name of God made in order to ward off the devil from a person, from an animal, from a place or thing. When it is done in the name of the Church, by a legitimately appointed minister and according to the rites foreseen in the approved liturgical books, exorcism is called public and has the value of sacramentals. If not, this is a private practice. Public exorcisms are divided into simple and solemn or major. In this article I will not stop to analyze the simple exorcisms that were part of some blessing rites included in chapter IX of the old Roman ritual or those inherent to specific paths and stages of the catechumenate journey and the baptism of children and especially adults.

Clarified this, the public exorcisms foreseen for cases of obsession or diabolical possession are called solemn or major, or in cases where the devil, operating from the outside, permanently prevents the individual's actions or in cases where Satan works through the individual's organism by acting from within the body of the possessed person, exercising more or less full dominion.

The prayer of exorcism more sought after by certain demonopathic believers, needless to say, the solemn exorcism. The need is so strong that even some alleged prayers for liberation have the structure of real solemn exorcisms, complete with an accusative and imperative formula. As I have said many times, We are looking for the strongest exorcist or the most talented charismatic person who has the most effective command formula against the devil to definitively solve all problems. We have to smile bitterly because in everyday jargon we often hear about the skill or otherwise of an exorcist or a charismatic person.. This lexical distinction has no reason to exist from a theological-spiritual point of view, it's not about using the skill typical of a cleric fantasy di D&D but everything starts from the authority of Christ who acts in the person of the exorcist and who God the Father welcomes and grants in view of the ultimate good of the soul.

At this point in the discussion a question is de rigueur: major exorcism is the therapy of choice to fight the Evil One? It's still: the action of the Evil One is always and only the extraordinary one or the ordinary action is not much more subtle and insidious? To answer these questions we make some further clarifications, already mentioned in my previous article of 7 February.

2. Baptism and Confession to fight the Devil

We should first of all remember that the first form of fight against the Devil is baptismal life, that new life in the Spirit which is nourished by a radical change of mentality or Metanoia (dal greco repent – of methane), from which the Italian term conversion derives. The Metanoia it marks a passage from the mentality subject to sin and concupiscence - of which Satan is the prince and creator; origin and cause (cf. GV 12,31; Ef 2,2; 2Color 4,4; 1GV 5,19) – to that of the Holy Spirit in which the risen Lord reigns (cf. With the 1,13; RM 6,14; 8,2). This change of register - of mind and heart - is already in itself a powerful path of liberation as Christ has freed us so that we remain free (cf. Gal 5,1). In the catechumenate path, this joyful freedom that Christ has gained for us is contrasted with the slavery of sin that the devil never stops arousing in man with his plots in contempt of God (cf. Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults n. 78; 113; 156; 164; 171; 178; 255; 339; 372; 377; 379; 381 these are the different prayers that we define as simple exorcisms. Their analysis from both a liturgical and sacramental point of view would be useful to highlight the tension towards metanoia and the new life that the catechumen obtains with immersion in Christ's Easter).

Always remaining on the baptismal theme, how can we fail to include the Our Father prayer which was solemnly given to us in baptism and which asks God for liberation from the evil one. The Our Father is the prayer of children but it also constitutes the first simple supplicatory formula for liberation from the power of the evil one. The prayer of the Our Father is liturgically placed as the final culmination of the rite of Baptism (cf. Rite of Baptism of children n. 76 and Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults nos. 188-189), and this is to express the tension towards a daily conversion in which every day the baptized believer asks God to be freed from the evil one in order to be able to participate as worthily as possible in that sonship of a son in the Son.

Another necessary clarification. The fight against the Devil takes place with good sacramental practice in which confession constitutes the most effective and eloquent weapon of choice than any other exorcism prayer. Recognizing and renouncing the works of the devil in my personal life becomes essential to ward off Satan. If I can do this, I recognize the vital action of the Holy Spirit who acts and convinces me about sin, righteousness and judgment (cf. GV 16,8-9). In the majority of cases, a good priest confessor is enough to resolve what could take much longer due to negligence, with the not remote risk of opening the door to the extraordinary action of the devil, according to what the teaching of the Catechism of the Catholic Church already provides: «sin leads to sin; With the repetition of the same documents it generates the vice. The result is perverse inclinations that darken the conscience and alter the concrete evaluation of good and evil." (cf. n. 1865 and on the reality of sin cf. in nn. 1846-1876).

Frequently reiterate this teaching of the Church It absolutely doesn't mean throwing the baby out with the bathwater, demonizing exorcism. On the contrary, in doing so we intend to give a right place to a sacramental, contextualising it within a journey of mature and realistic faith that we are all called to follow, even with difficulty. Giving up Satan has never been an easy and immediate task.

3. The exorcist is not one Guest star

Another major clarification on exorcism concerns the one who is its minister par excellence. The canon 1172 of the Code of Canon Law declares that no one can legitimately perform exorcisms on the possessed if he has not obtained a special and express license from the local Ordinary (§ 1). This license must be granted by the local Ordinary only to a priest distinguished for piety, science, prudence and integrity of life (§ 2). The same things are reiterated by the "Letter to the Ordinaries concerning the norms on exorcisms" of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of 29 September 1985 (you see WHO) and from the ritual of the "Rite of Exorcisms and Prayers for particular circumstances", effective from 31 March 2002.

Therefore based on what has been established by the Church it is necessary for a person to perform solemn exorcisms in a legitimate way:

a) that it is only and exclusively a presbyter.

b) that such designated presbyter is licensed, conferred in a personal and direct way and expressed by the local Ordinary. The conferral of this faculty must therefore appear clearly from the bishop's decree. The license cannot be considered tacit or presumed. It can only be implied if connected to the office of exorcist.

(c)) in particular cases, for the exercise of the ministry of exorcism outside one's own diocese, the decision and judgment of the local Ordinary is necessary, who must be promptly informed by carrying out due discernment.

The ministerial action of the exorcist priest is meek and humble, he is the minus-ter is the smallest compared to Him who is Lord and Savior. No priest can undertake the fight against the demonic spirit alone, no layman or supposedly charismatic or psychic can have his own authority over demons. This authority was given by Christ to the apostles (cf. LC 9,1) and to the disciples who believe in him (cf. MC 16,17; LC 10,19) and who were established and sent by the Church as ministers of liberation and consolation.

4. Meetings and weekends of liberation and healing, all it takes is a little transparency

I have already explained in my previous article the danger posed by these parallel gatherings in the life of the Church, which look a lot like seditious gatherings. Gatherings managed by lay people without any authorization and competence which constitute a disorder for the faith journey of the faithful. What perhaps many still don't know is that stringent regulations have been issued in various dioceses of Italy regarding this type of demonstration and the like.. An example of this is the Sicilian Episcopal Conference (you see WHO), the Piedmontese Episcopal Conference (you see WHO); a note to this effect from the bishop of Trieste: «I saw Satan fall from heaven…» (you see WHO); and the excellent with a bailout of the diocese of Brescia which also includes various norms relating to the ministry of the exorcist (you see WHO).

I reiterate that prayer meetings and Christian formation must be carried out in ecclesial environments, except for those national convocations which involve thousands of people and which must guarantee very precise security and manageability criteria which are not always possible to have in official ecclesial contexts. It would be good practice, not of etiquette but of obedience to the Church, inform the diocesan bishop of these meetings. Inform the local Ordinary in good time with an official letter about the type of meeting, on the topic discussed, on the speakers who will speak and on the activities carried out at the same time. And only when approval has been received from him, together with his fatherly blessing we can proceed. Putting the bishops in front of a fait accompli, it is very reminiscent of the modus operandi of the fuitina of the past years with which rebellious parents were forced to agree to the marriage of their children. Personally I believe that everything must be documented to be transparent in view of the good that we want to bring to souls, knowing that the devil tends to hide and hide as much as possible. It would be appropriate to read the bishop's letter of approval in these assemblies to participate more fully in that ecclesial communion which has its center in the diocesan bishop. Unfortunately, the reality of the facts is of a very different kind and the bishops find themselves warning the clergy and the people of God against these meetings, enjoying the same success as the shouts against the bravos of Manzoni's memory. But there is more if the organizer of such meetings is from another diocese, it is enough to investigate a little to discover that these characters - both clerics and lay people - have been considered unmanageable since time immemorial and difficult to recover except with canonical sanctions and recourse to the competent departments.

5. Publishing about the devil: ecclesiastical approval still exists?

If we look around the most common Catholic bookstores, we often have to resign ourselves to not finding the requirement of catholicity, sometimes not even that of Christianity. But this would open a chapter that is better closed immediately. When dealing with the devil and exorcisms, it is now well established that this topic has found its perpetual youth in publishing, in other words we say that there is a good market. While we congratulate those who manage to live with these publications - you have to eat - I cannot help but offer constructive criticism. Dealing with specifically theological themes, the authors of these works of demonology, of pastoral care of exorcisms or prayers of liberation, they should obtain a permit from the competent ecclesiastical authority. What does this mean? What we are talking about is certainly not the permission to publish or not a book but the guarantee that what is published does not conflict with the faith, the moral, the magisterium and discipline of the Church. It means having the tranquility of mind to operate in continuity of intent with what the Church believes and lives regarding its teaching. Even in this area, editorial works on demonological topics approved by the competent ecclesiastical authority are very rare, Indeed, it is often enough to consider the single publishing house with which certain volumes are published to already have a more than satisfactory overview of the distance from any form of Catholicism and Christianity as well as a certain assonance with Christianized esotericism..

In conclusion I hope that this further article of mine be considered for what it really is, a heartfelt reflection on a very complex and delicate phenomenon such as exorcism and demonology. There is still so much to say and it is not excluded that he could return to the topic. For the moment, no one should feel attacked or compromised in their work but rather encouraged to live more and more in the light of the truth that makes everything clear., awaiting that definitive triumph of Christ over the devil at the end of time.

Sanluri, 11 February 2025

.

_________________________________

WHEN THE DEVIL PUTS HIS TAIL ON US, BETWEEN EXORCISMS AND NARCISSISMS…

Is major exorcism the therapy of choice to fight the Evil One? Is the action of the Evil One always and only the extraordinary one or isn’t the ordinary action much more subtle and insidious? To answer these questions let’s make some further clarifications…

— Pastoral actuality —

 

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

Perhaps a clarification is due, because as expected, my article of February 7th (see HERE) has raised doubts in some readers, so much so that they have come to interpret my writing as an attack on those beautiful souls who fight against the Devil on a daily basis.

All we needed was the Capuchin friar to hinder the army of those warriors of light who with Captain Jesus – who is not up there but down here with the flag in his hand – catch the devils red-handed as the Italian sing Angelo Branduardi sang (see HERE).

My writing extremely clear, and conform y to the optimal note from the International Association of Exorcists (see HERE) which certainly cannot be blamed for being a group of exalted partisans. Two Fathers of this island of Patmos know something about demonology and the related sacramental of exorcism. Father Ariel S. Levi of Gualdo and I both underwent training for this delicate ministry in the year 2009 at the same academic-ecclesiastical institution. Certain alarms must also be given, the Christian faithful must be warned against certain deviations as the prophets in ancient Israel: “Whether they listen or not – because they are a rebellious race – they will at least know that a prophet is among them” (cf. Ezekiel 2,2-5). Some things just have to be said.

I believe that the priest today must rediscover his role as a prophet who speaks in the name of God, which is increasingly rare in an ecclesial community where clerical-religious personalism has become hypertrophic. The prophetic mission involves inevitable hardships, misunderstandings, an inconvenience that is difficult to accept but necessary, to the point of proclaiming from the rooftops (cf. Luke 12, 3) even what most people would not like to hear. And all this without veils of rash judgments but with that prophetic parrhesia contained in the pastoral responsibilities that we must exercise towards the people that God has entrusted to us through sacred priestly ordination.

Having said this, I would like to return further to some issues that are so well known that they are regularly ignored or cunningly manipulated.

1. What is an exorcism?

It is the invocation of the name of God made to ward off the Devil from a person, an animal, a place or a thing. When it is carried out in the name of the Church, by an authorized minister according to the rites provided for in the approved liturgical books, the exorcism is called public and has the value of sacramentals. Otherwise is a private practice. Public exorcisms are divided into simple and solemn or major. I will not stop to analyze the simple exorcisms that were part of some blessing rites contained in chapter IX of the old Rituale Romanum or those inherent to specific paths and stages of the catechumenate journey and the baptism of children and especially of adults.

The public exorcisms foreseen for cases of obsession or diabolical possession are called solemn or major, or in cases in which the Devil, operating from the outside, permanently prevents the individual’s actions or in cases in which Satan operates through the individual’s organism, acting from within the body of the possessed person, exercising more or less full dominion.

The exorcism prayer most sought after by demonopathic issolemn exorcism. The need is so strong that even some alleged prayers of liberation have the structure of solemn exorcisms with an invocativ and imperative formula. Thas I have often had the opportunity to say, we are looking for the “strongest” exorcist or the charismatic person who possesses the most effective command formula against the Devil to definitively resolve all problems. We have to smile bitterly because in everyday jargon we often hear people talk about the skill or otherwise of an exorcist or a charismatic person. This distinction has no reason to exist from a theological-spiritual point of view, it is not a question of using the skills of a D&D fantasy cleric but everything starts from the authority of Christ who acts in the person of the exorcist and who God the Father welcomes and grants in view of the ultimate good of the soul.

At this point a question is necessary: is major exorcism the therapy of choice to fight the Evil One? Is the action of the Evil One always and only the extraordinary one or isn’t the ordinary action much more subtle and insidious? To answer these questions we make some further clarifications, already mentioned in my previous article of February 7th.

2. Baptism and Confession to fight the Devil

It should be remembered that the first form of fight against the Devil is baptismal life, that new life in the Spirit which is nourished by a radical change of mentality or metanoia (from the Greek μετανοεῖν – of methane), from which the term “conversion” derives. The Metanoia marks a transition from a mentality subject to sin and concupiscence – of which Satan is the prince and creator; origin and cause (cf. Jn 12.31; Eph 2.2; 2Color 4.4; 1Jn 5.19) – to that of the Holy Spirit in whom the risen Lord reigns (cf. With the 1.13; RM 6.14; 8.2). This change of register – of mind and heart – is already in itself a powerful path of liberation as Christ has freed us so that we remain free (cf. Gal 5.1). In the catechumenate path, this joyful freedom in Christ contrast with the slavery of sin that the Devil never ceases to arouse in man with his plots in contempt of God (cf. Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults nos. 78; 113; 156; 164; 171; 178; 255; 339; 372; 377; 379; 381 these are the different prayers that we define as simple exorcisms. Their analysis from both a liturgical and sacramental point of view would be useful to highlight the tension towards boredom and new life that the catechumen obtains with immersion in Christ’s Easter).

Still remaining on the baptismal theme, how can we not include the prayer of the “Our Father” which was solemnly given to us in baptism and which asks God for liberation from the Evil one. It is the prayer of the sons which also constitutes the first simple dedicatory formula for liberation from the power of theEvil one. The prayer of the Our Father is liturgically placed as the final culmination of the rite of Baptism (cf. Rite of the Baptism of children n. 76 and Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults n. 188-189), and this to express the tension towards a daily conversion in which every day the baptized believer asks God to be freed from the Evil One in order to be able to participate as worthily as possible in that sonship in the Divin Son.

Another necessary clarification. The fight against the Devil takes place with good sacramental practice in which confession constitutes the most effective and eloquent weapon of choice than any other exorcism prayer. Recognizing and renouncing the works of the Devil in my personal life becomes fundamental to ward off Satan. If I manage to do this, I recognize the vital action of the Holy Spirit who acts and convinces me regarding sin, justice and judgment (cf. Jh 16.8-9). In the majority of cases, a good priest confessor is enough to resolve what could take much longer due to negligence, with the not remote risk of opening the door to the extraordinary action of the Devil, according to what the teaching of the Catechism of the Catholic Church already foresees: «sin leads to sin; with the repetition of the same acts it generates vice. The result is perverse inclinations that darken the conscience and alter the concrete evaluation of good and evil” (cf. n. 1865 and on the reality of sin cf. n. 1846-1876).

Frequently reiterating this teaching of the Church absolutely does not mean debasing exorcism. On the contrary, we intend to give a right place to a sacramental, contextualising it within a journey of mature and realistic faith that we are all called to undertake, even with difficulty. Giving up Satan has never been an easy and immediate task.

3. The Exorcist is not a Guest Star

Another major clarification on exorcism concerns the one who is its minister par excellence. Canon 1172 of the Code of Canon Law declares that no one can legitimately perform exorcisms on the possessed if he has not obtained a special and express license from the local Ordinary (§ 1). This license must be granted by the local Ordinary only to a priest distinguished for piety, knowledge, prudence and integrity of life (§ 2). The same things are reiterated by the “Letter to the Ordinaries regarding the rules on exorcisms” of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of 29 September 1985 (see HERE) and by the ritual of the Rite of Exorcisms and Prayers for particular circumstances, in force since 31 March 2002.

Therefore, according to what has been established by the Church, for a person to be able to perform solemn exorcisms in a legitimate way it is necessary:

a) only and exclusively a presbyter.

b) that this designated presbyter has the license conferred by the local Ordinary. The conferral of this faculty must therefore appear clearly from the bishop’s decree. The license cannot be considered tacit or presumed. It can only be implied if connected to the office of exorcist.

(c)) in particular cases, for the exercise of the ministry of exorcism outside one’s own diocese, the decision and judgment of the local Ordinary is necessary, who must be promptly informed by carrying out due discernment.

The ministerial action of the exorcist priest is meek and humble, he is the smallest compared to He who is Lord and Savior. No priest can undertake the fight against the demonic spirit alone, no layman or supposedly charismatic or sensitive person can have his own authority over demons. This authority was conferred by Christ on the Apostles (cf. Luke 9.1) and on the disciples who believe in him (cf. Mk 16.17; Page 10.19) and who were established and sent by the Church as ministers of liberation and consolation.

4. Meetings and weekends of liberation and healing, all it takes is a little transparency

I have already explained in my previous article the danger posed by these parallel gatherings in the life of the Church, which look so much like seditious gatherings. Gatherings managed by lay people without any authorization and competence which constitute a disorder for the faith journey of the faithful. What perhaps many still don’t know is that stringent regulations regarding this type of demonstration have been issued in various dioceses of our nation. An example of this is the Sicilian Episcopal Conference (see HERE), the Piedmont Episcopal Conference (see HERE); a note to this effect from the bishop of Trieste: «I saw Satan fall from heaven…» (see HERE); and the excellent handbook of the diocese of Brescia which also includes various regulations on the ministry of the exorcist (see HERE).

5. Publishing about the devil: does ecclesiastical approval still exist?

In Catholic bookstores we often no longer the Catholicity, sometimes not even Christianity. But this would open a chapter that is better closed immediately. When dealing with the Devil and exorcisms this topic in publishing has been able to find its perpetual youth, in other words let’s say that there is a good market. While we congratulate those who manage to survivewith these publications – you have to eat – I cannot help but offer constructive criticism. Dealing with specifically theological themes, the authors of these works of demonology, pastoral care of exorcisms or liberation prayers should obtain authorization from the competent ecclesiastical authority. What does this mean? What we are talking about is certainly not the permission to publish or not a book but the guarantee that what is published does not conflict with the faith, morality, magisterium and discipline of the Church. It means having the tranquility of mind to operate in continuity of intent with what the Church believes and lives regarding its teaching. Even in this area, editorial works on a demonological theme approved by the competent ecclesiastical authority are very rare; indeed, it is often enough to consider the single publishing house with which certain volumes are published to already have a more than satisfactory overview of the distance from any form of Catholicity and Christianity, but rather a certain assonance with Christianized esotericism.

In conclusion, I hope that this second article of mine is considered for what it really is: a serious reflection on a complex and delicate phenomenon such as exorcism and demonology. There is much more to say and it is not excluded that he could return to the topic. For the moment, no one should feel attacked in their work but encouraged to live more and more in the light of the truth that makes everything clear, awaiting that definitive triumph of Christ over the Devil at the end of time.

Sanluri, 11 February 2025

.

.

.

The books of Ivano Liguori, to access the book shop click on the cover

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

 

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

 

.





Pietro, expert fisherman son of fishermen, throws the nets on the word of the son of a carpenter

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

PIETRO, Expert fisherman son of fishermen, CAST THE NETS ON THE WORD OF A CARPENTER'S SON

Jesus, who was a carpenter, He was not a fishing expert, Yet Simone the fisherman trust this Rabbi, that does not give him answers but calls him to rely. His reaction to the miraculous catch is that of amazement and trepidation: "Man, depart from me, I am a sinner"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

Peter was a believing and observant Jew, confident in the active presence of God in the history of his people, and saddened by not seeing his powerful action in the events he was involved in, to the present, witness. At this juncture his first encounter with Jesus takes place.

The Synoptic Gospels inform us that Peter he is among the first four disciples of the Nazarene (LC 5,1-11), to which a fifth is added, according to the custom of each Rabbi to have five disciples (LC 5,27: Levi's call). When Jesus goes from five to twelve disciples (LC 9,1-6), finally the novelty of his mission will be clear. He is not one of many rabbis, but he came to gather eschatological Israel, symbolized by the number twelve, how many were the tribes of Israel. The Gospels allow us to follow Peter's spiritual journey step by step. The starting point is the call from Jesus. It happens on any given day, while Pietro is busy with his work as a fisherman. Jesus is at the lake of Gennesaret and the crowd crowds around him to listen to him. The number of listeners creates a certain discomfort. The Master sees two boats moored to the shore; the fishermen have come down and are washing their nets. He then asks to get on the boat, that of Simone, and begs him to move away from the ground. Sitting on that improvised desk, he begins to teach the crowds from the boat. And so Peter's boat becomes Jesus' chair. When he finished speaking, dice a Simone:

«”Take to the sea and lower the fishing nets! Simone replies: “Maestro, we toiled all night and caught nothing; but at your word I will let down the nets”».

Jesus, who was a carpenter, He was not a fishing expert, Yet Simone the fisherman trust this Rabbi, that does not give him answers but calls him to rely. His reaction to the miraculous catch is that of amazement and trepidation: "Man, depart from me, I am a sinner" (LC 5,8). Jesus responds by inviting him to trust and to open up to a project that goes beyond all his prospects: "Do not fear; from now on you will be a fisher of men". Let's reread this exciting story:

"During that time, while the crowd crowded around him to hear the word of God, Jesus, standing near the lake of Gennèsaret, he saw two boats pulled up to the shore. The fishermen had gone down and were washing their nets. He got into a boat, which was Simone's, and asked him to move away from the ground a little. He sat down and taught the crowds from the boat. When he finished speaking, said Simone: «Put out into the deep and cast your nets for a catch». Simone replied: «Maestro, we toiled all night and caught nothing; but at your word I will cast the nets ". They did so and caught a huge quantity of fish and their nets almost broke. Then they signaled to their companions on the other boat, to come and help them. They came and filled both boats until they almost sank. Upon seeing this, Simon Peter fell at Jesus' knees, saying: "Man, get away from me, because I am a sinner". In fact, amazement had invaded him and all those who were with him, for the fishing they had done; so also James and John, sons of Zebedee, who were Simone's partners. Jesus said to Simon: "Do not fear; from now on you will be a fisher of men". E, pull the boats ashore, they left everything and followed him" (LC 5,1-11).

Luke's story follows the outline of MC 1,16-20 to which it refers, but with its own insertions and the addition of a scene that closely resembles that of GV 21, where there is a now resurrected Jesus who dialogues with Peter for a definitive call to follow him. While two Sundays ago we left Jesus in Nazareth not understood and even rejected; here instead people are looking for Him and Peter, in particular, leaves everything to follow the Master. From this initial moment we grasp the particular attention and esteem that the evangelist Luke directs towards this disciple; something he had evidently learned and inherited from the primitive community. We note in fact that, while in Matthew and Mark the formula of vocation is in the plural, «Come after me, I will make you fishers of men " (MC 1, 17; Mt 4,19), in the Lucanian story it is in the second person, that of Peter. And in the background, in unsuccessful fishing, we can already metaphorically glimpse the apostolic labors of the first Christian communities.

The narrative of the miraculous catch, indeed, presents the features of a catechesis on faith through which the Lord overturns closed and hopeless human situations. Peter becomes its paradigm. In his words, "We struggled all night and didn't catch anything", there is not only bitterness and disappointment for the inane peach, but there is also a stronger meaning that designates exhaustion and physical tiredness (cf.. the verb I'm working hard (kopiao). An experience that we frequently find in the Bible, especially in the Psalms: «I am exhausted by my complaints» (Shall 6, 7; cf.. also Shall 69, 4; Shall 127, 1); and that ancient Israel had experienced several times during its events. There is therefore a space of disappointment and limitation in which God acts. For that relationship between the present text and the chapter 21 of the Gospel of John, mentioned above, we understand that without the presence of the Lord the disciples tire themselves out in vain to the point of exhaustion. But He is present, which invites us to cast our nets again, everything changes. The first transformation occurs in the trust of the disciple and here it is Peter who explains it: «on your word I will lower the nets" (LC 5,4).

But faced with the miraculous catch it seems the amazement recorded is not enough (v. 9) from Luca, since Peter feels he must say: «get away from me, because I am a sinner". For some, once again the parallel passage from John where the dialogue between the Risen One and Peter should help us, centered on love, it serves the apostle to heal the wound of denial on the night of passion. But maybe, simply, given that here the Apostle appears as the protagonist for the first time in the Gospel, the request for forgiveness is to be understood as the recognition of one's own fragility in the face of the manifestation of God's greatness and the fulfillment of "his word". But what is even more striking is Jesus' attitude towards the disciple from whom he heard the confession of guilt.. He doesn't underline it, he doesn't insist on it, since it does not say everything about Peter's life, who will have to go through multiple confessions. Jesus, rather than underlining the sinfulness of the future apostle, he prefers to invite him to trust and follow: "Do not fear; from now on you will be a fisher of men". Here it is worth underlining the verb used by Luke to designate this fishing of men and not of fish, since in Greek «zogreo» contains within itself both the word ζῷον (zoos vivo) that the verb ἀγορεύω (agreuo, take hunting or fishing). It is therefore a matter of taking alive, of a capture leaving alive (cf.. vocabulary Rocks). In this way the pastoral work of Peter and his associates (v.10), metaphorically expressed through fishing which was their original profession - and here the abundant fishing of GV 21, 11: 153 big fish hauled into the boat, without the network dividing – it will be a service to life. Those who, through their ministry, they will be reached by the Gospel, they will be drawn to Christ, the living bringer of life: "I have come so that they may have life and have it in abundance" (GV 10, 10).

 

From the Hermitage, 8 February 2025

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

The devil is said to be the pots but not the lids: For some it is undoubtedly a guarantee of gain and narcissistic visibility – It is said that the Devil makes the pans but not the lids: for some it is definitely a guarantee of earnings and narcissistic visibility – It is said that the devil makes the pot but not the lid: For some it is economic guarantee and narcissistic visibility

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

 

The devil is said to be the pots but not the lids: For some it is undoubtedly a guarantee of gain and narcissistic visibility

On the devil it is better and prudent to talk little about it and with precise references to the Word of God, to revelation and the magisterium. And you know why? Because our faith has never been founded - and it will never be - on the devil but on Christ and on his resurrection that wins the works of the devil: sin and death. If you understand at least this would no longer be the anguish of demonopathy with the feeling of being gripped by the devil.

— Pastoral current events —

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

.

PDF Article in print format

PDF Article print format

PDF Article

.

The 6 January of the year just started, In the solemnity of the Lord's epiphany, The International Association of Exorcists (A.I.E.) He published a note that I invite all our readers to read carefully (WHO), whose title is quite clear: "Note on some aspects of the Ministry of Exorcisms".

The note has no intention of reiterating the obvious on exorcisms and ecclesial discipline in this sense, But its objectives are others and concern only a few particular aspects. We say add:

"With this note we intend to offer the necessary clarifications in order to operate well in the erart of the Divine Mercy through the Ministry of Exarcism. The criteria to establish the conditions of implementation of the greater exorcism nor the guidelines of this delicate ministry will not be re -presented here [6], but they will simply offer observations on some pastoral practices which, Instead of making a service to the planted body of Christ, increase their suffering and cause disorientation, observations that the faithful (clerics, consecrated and lay people) It is desirable they can know in order to avoid attitudes and methods not responding to the authentic operating of the Christ the Lord, model for anyone who exercises the Ministry of Liberation from the extraordinary action of the evil one [7]».

Exorcism is a pastoral ministry of mercy and consolation, This is the basic reference to be able to understand it. Although it is a sacramental and not of a sacrament - given the particular personal subject faced -, it must not be considered lightly but also with great seriousness, human and Christian consciousness and maturity, both by the shepherds and from the lay faithful.

I talked about seriousness, of consciousness and maturity To emphasize that with the devil you don't play and do not joke but you can even exploit it for your ends: For example, to encourage economic performance or to obtain a certain gain and visibility at a social and ecclesial level. Said this, I focus only on some points that I want to reiterate and that the note of the A.I.E. clarifies and expresses in a very punctual way of what I will be able to do in these lines.

1. Obedience to the Church and the diocesan ordinary

The belief of being prey to the devil often pushes people to go to the spasmodic research of those who are in fact exorcists or those who have autonomized such on the field. In his wisdom, the Church first asks for serious discernment and this normally passes through his parish priest, one's confessor or a priest of reference to which he belongs to make a first diagnosis and then collect all the useful elements to be able to, in case, send to the appointed exorcist or suggest a serious conversion path to the person, combined with a serious sacramental practice with concrete and effective works of charity.

I am allowed the health comparison, It is like when the general practitioner sends his client by the specialist for subsequent insights. Only when there is the founded suspicion of a pathology that must be faced differently by a colleague who specializes in that matter, The specialist visit is required, otherwise it is lost time and the solutions must focus on other analyzes and fields. If this is true in the practice of physical care, The more this speech becomes true in the care of the soul and the baptismal path.

In this case It is only the Church that appoints and discerns on priests suitable for operating this great ministry, as well as on the specific case of the person who asks for spiritual help in this sense. You never improvise and never propose exorcists, Healers and liberators. Another fundamental thing is that there are no lay people (Not even the transe and permanent deacons can) authorized by the Church to perform exorcisms. Even the so -called prayers of liberation or healing must be made with wisdom and opportunity under the accompaniment of a prepared priest and following the rules that the Church has already established. EXitting out outside of these criteria means putting himself on the ground of disobedience to the Church to which the devil always pushes man, Just as our progenitors pushed to disobedience towards God (cf.. GN 3).

2. Superstition and reiteration of formulas

Often the desire to drive away the devil makes you fall into the sin of superstition which also insinuates itself into the Catholic world, both on the side of the lay people and consecrated. For example, You put yourself in search of the most "powerful" exorcist (even outside its diocese or region) Just as if it were a virtue of its own and not of the work of the Holy Spirit who acts in the Minister ordered on behalf of the Church. They compulsively collect sacramentals that should more effectively remove the malignant influences as crucifixes, medals, candles, images or salt, water and oil.

The prayers of liberation multiply who have not had any ecclesiastical approval and which are often borrowed from extra Catholic environments or packaged on the moment by the "psychic" or by the alleged secular charismatic on duty. Or compulsively also reiterate the official prayers and formulas approved with the hope that the simple acts continued over time enough to operate the benefit. And we often find ourselves in front of the trend of the stock exchange indices in reference to the novels and the most suitable plea against the devil: the Madonna that melts the knots is fine, San Pio da Pietrelcina is the strongest, Santa Rita is not bad, Sant’Editito sometimes fails while San Vicinio works only if you are Emiliano or Romagna. Even in approaching the holy masses there is the risk of falling into superstition with a succession of desecrating exploitation to ask for liberation. It is thought that it is enough to command only the priest to officiate a mass without the need to participate in the first person and we are linked to the number of commanded celebrations, As if the quantity was the pre -eminent criterion for liberation. A similar mechanism, tied to the masses, It is found in some devotional books with reference to the souls of Purgatory, But this is another matter.

3. "Meeting and consent of Liberation" in the hotel

For some years, the use of the alleged "sensory" and secular charismatic of organizing prayer meetings in secular locations has been invaded, such as star hotels (at least 4 stars). Already this should make the nose tank a lot to the healthy Catholic faithful of mind that are seen diverting out of ecclesial contexts without the slightest motivation. It is one thing to organize an event for millions and millions of people, Just as it happens for jubilation and national events, It is one thing to organize for fifty or one hundred people. Instead of the hotels you could not opt ​​for a large parish hall or a religious house - which today are increasingly empty and deserted - so as to remain inside the enclosure of ecclesial normality? But the alleged "sensory" and charismatic knows very well that in doing so it remains far from the eyes and ears of the shepherds and can say and do with freedom everything he wants. In doing so, the package is advertised all inclusive that with 80 O 100 Euro per day, plus enrollment in the course and pass, By combining the single room, Full board and starred cuisine is a guarantee of being a little freed from the evil one and to be purified in your genealogical tree. In short, before we went to the spa now the weekend exorcistic.

4. Sale of books and manuals of dubious orthodoxy

Today the devil continues to be a product of marketing, from the afar 1973 When the film came out the exorcist by William Friedkin based on the novel of the same name by William Peter Blatty, The devil has not known practically moments of crisis. We can say that with the devil he lives ... and he also lives fairly well. And if once the devil was private property of Freemasonry, of the Satanists and the hermetic occult circles, For more than thirty years it has become a pop product that I can all use or abuse according to need. Indeed they are the lay people, not always Christians, To find in the "devil product" a mine from which fame and affirmation draws. The television was the first to know how to make on the topic: Not just movies, but special, documentaries, Investigations that cross with the news and with politics, In short, the devil is like salt and pepper in a recipe, The "enough" is sufficient to make that touch more of pleasantness to the dish to arouse the compliments. But it is perhaps in publishing that the theme of the devil has been able to find a new and perpetual youth. The bibliography in this regard is very boundless and among the authors you can really find everything. It starts from the Medjugorjana converted, to the former adept of a sect, To then move on to the priest Praticone who without ever having been appointed exorcist holds conferences on the devil, Finally with what the demonologist's qualification is attributed without having the minimum academic or practical-pastoral skills of the case. Then the evergreen cannot be missing, The alleged sensory or charismatic that are questioning on the devil and pack recipes to free themselves from the influences of evil, Obviously you have to buy their books. Very dangerous are those who feel invested by the spiritual legacy of some well -known exorcist now deceased - I recommend that it is deceased! - To boast of a whole series of spiritual inheritance and transmigrations of Carismi with annexed the canon of the perfect liberator.

When I was a child, in the 1980s, Of devil in Italy he heard only about Father Gabriele Amorth and Mons. Corrado Balducci, The latter said demonologist but who in his life never saw a true exorcism and that in his book the devil also reported some theological inaccuracies. But at least with them we had to do with honest priests who had their role well in mind and were obedient to the Church. Today everyone is good at writing on the devil, especially those who should do without it.

In conclusion, It is always true that on the devil it is better and prudent to speak little and with precise references to the Word of God, to revelation and the magisterium. And you know why? Because our faith has never been founded - and it will never be - on the devil but on Christ and on his resurrection that wins the works of the devil: sin and death. If you understand at least this would no longer be the anguish of demonopathy with the feeling of being gripped by the devil. Much more important and tiring is to create a profound consciousness that you want to live constantly in the presence of Christ and its Spirit. But this is what already the blessed apostle Giacomo tells us in his letter. He asks us to be submitted to God: This is what allows you to resist the devil and to escape from his works and pitfalls. Surely there are few exorcists in today's church, Certainly many of our bishops are often not inclined to appoint them and prefer instead to appoint presidents of diocesan Caritas and to use resources for social and welfare policies, Except then finding yourself a few kilometers from your diocesan curia the exorcistic weekend at one hundred euros per day of the alleged exorcist, charismatic or sensitive cry and not to make a sigh minimally. And yes, because even in the event that the diocesan bishop was also aware of the thing he would not give him the right weight: eye does not see, pastoral heart does not hurt. Unfortunately, the devil certain things also lets us do and when they ever do everything he comes to the closer, Just as it happens for certain things old as the world that are done but they do not say and how he loved to sing a well -known Italian musical quartet

«It is done, but it is not said, you do, but it is not said and who did it silent, He denies it and makes the mendace and never tells you the truth ".

Sanluri, 07 February 2025

.

_______________________

IT IS SAID THAT THE DEVIL MAKES THE PANS BUT NOT THE LIDS: FOR SOME IT IS DEFINITELY A GUARANTEE OF EARNINGS AND NARCISSISTIC VISIBILITY

— Pastoral actuality —

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

 

On January 6 of the year that has just begun, on the solemnity of the Epiphany of the Lord, the International Association of Exorcists (A.I.E.) published a note that I invite all our readers to read carefully (HERE), the title of which is quite clear: «Note on some aspects of the ministry of exorcisms».

The note has no intention of reiterating the obvious regarding exorcisms and ecclesial discipline in this sense, but its objectives are different and concern only some particular aspects. It reads:

«With this note we intend to offer the necessary clarifications in order to operate well in the provision of divine Mercy through the Ministry of Exorcism. The criteria for establishing the conditions of implementation of the Major Exorcism nor the Guidelines of this delicate Ministry [6] will not be presented here again, but observations will simply be offered on some pastoral practices which, instead of rendering a service to the wounded body of Christ, increase its suffering and cause disorientation, observations that the faithful (clerics, consecrated and lay people) should be able to know in order to avoid attitudes and methods that do not correspond to the authentic working of the Lord Christ, model for anyone who exercises the ministry of liberation from the extraordinary action of the Evil One [7]».

Exorcism is a pastoral ministry of mercy and consolation, this is the basic reference for being able to correctly understand it. Although it is a sacramental and not a sacrament – given the particular personal subject addressed –, it must not be considered lightly but also with great seriousness, conscience and human and Christian maturity, both by pastors and lay faithful.

I spoke of seriousness, conscience and maturity to underline that one cannot play or joke with the devil, but neither can one exploit him for one’s own ends: for example to favor an economic return or to obtain a certain gain and visibility on a social and ecclesial level. Having said this, I will only focus on some points that I would like to reiterate and that the A.I.E. note. clarifies and expresses in a very punctual way what I will be able to do in these lines.

1. Obedience to the Church and the Diocesan Ordinary

The belief of being prey to the Devil often pushes people to go in frantic search for those who are in fact exorcists or those who have self-appointed themselves as such in the field. The Church in its wisdom first of all asks for serious discernment and this normally passes through one’s parish priest, one’s confessor or a reference priest who is responsible for making an initial diagnosis and then gathering all the useful elements to be able, if necessary, to send to the appointed exorcist or to suggest to the person a serious path of conversion, combined with a serious sacramental practice with concrete and effective works of charity.

Allow me to make a healthcare comparison, it’s like when a general practitioner sends his patient to a specialist for further in-depth analysis. Only when there is a well-founded suspicion of a pathology that must be addressed differently from a colleague who specializes in that subject is a specialist visit required, otherwise it is a waste of time and the solutions must focus on other analyzes and fields. If this is true in the practice of physical care, how much more true does this discourse become in the care of the soul and the baptismal walking.

2. Superstition and reiteration of formulas

Often the desire to banish the Devil leads one to fall into the sin of superstition which also creeps into the Catholic world, both among lay people and consecrated people. For example, we start looking for the most “powerful” exorcist (even outside our own diocese or region) as if it were a specific virtue and not the work of the Holy Spirit who acts in the ordained minister on behalf of the Church. Sacramentals are compulsively collected which should ward off evil influences such as crucifixes, medals, candles, images or salt, water and oil more effectively than others.

Prayers for liberation are multiplying which have not had any ecclesiastical approval and which are often borrowed from non-Catholic environments or packaged on the spot by the “sensitive” or the presumed charismatic lay person on duty. Or even official prayers and approved formulas are compulsively reiterated with the hope that the simple recitation over time is enough to bring about the benefit. And we often find ourselves faced with the trend of stock market indices in reference to the most suitable novenas and supplications against the Devil: the Madonna who unties knots is good, San Pio da Pietrelcina is the strongest, Santa Rita is not bad, Sant’Espedito sometimes fails while San Vicinio only works if you are from Emilia Romagna Region. Even when approaching Holy Masses there is the risk of falling into superstition with a succession of desecrating exploitations to ask for liberation. It is thought that it is enough to command the priest alone to officiate a mass without the need to participate personally and it is linked to the number of celebrations commanded, as if quantity were the pre-eminent criterion for liberation. A similar mechanism, linked to masses, is found in some devotional books in reference to the souls in Purgatory, but that is another matter.

3. “Liberations Meetings and Conventions” in the hotel

For some years now, the practice of supposedly “sensitive” and charismatic lay people to organize prayer meetings in secular locations, such as starred hotels (at least 4 stars) has become widespread. This alone should make sane Catholic faithful turn up their noses a lot as they see themselves diverted away from ecclesial contexts without the slightest motivation. It’s one thing to organize an event for millions and millions of people, as happens with jubilee and national events, but it’s another thing to organize it for fifty or a hundred people. Instead of hotels, couldn’t we opt for a large parish hall or a religious house – which nowadays are increasingly empty and deserted – so as to remain within the confines of ecclesial normality? But the supposedly “sensitive” and charismatic person knows very well that by doing so he stays away from the eyes and ears of the shepherds and can freely say and do whatever he wants. In doing so, the all-inclusive package is advertised which with 80 or 100 euros per day, plus course registration and the pass, combining the single room, full board and starred cuisine you have the guarantee of being somewhat freed from the Evil one and of being purified in your family tree. In short, before people went to the spa, now exorcism weekends are in fashion.

4. Sale of books and manuals of dubious orthodoxy

Today the Devil continues to be a marketing product, ever since 1973 when the film “The Exorcist” by William Friedkin based on the novel of the same name by William Peter Blatty was released, the Devil has experienced practically no moments of crisis. We can say that you can live with the Devil… and you can even live reasonably well. And if once the Devil was the private property of Freemasonry, Satanists and hermetic occultist circles, for more than thirty years it has become a pop product that everyone can use or abuse as needed. Indeed, it is precisely the lay people, not always Christians, who find in the “devil product” a mine from which to draw notoriety and affirmation. Television was the first to know how to make money on the topic: not only films, but specials, documentaries, investigations that intersect with crime news and politics, in short, the Devil is like salt and pepper in a recipe, “just enough” is enough to give that extra touch of pleasantness to the dish to elicit compliments. But it is perhaps in publishing that the theme of the Devil has found a new and perpetual youth. The bibliography in this regard is extremely boundless and among the authors you can truly find everything. We start from the Medjugorjan convert, to the former follower of a sect, and then move on to the priest who without ever having been appointed an exorcist holds conferences on the devil, ending with the one who attributes himself the qualification of demonologist without having the minimum academic or practical-pastoral skills of the case. Then there are the evergreens, the alleged sensitives or charismatics who question the Devil and prepare recipes to free oneself from the influences of evil, obviously you have to buy their books. Very dangerous are those who feel invested by the spiritual legacy of some well-known exorcist now deceased! – I recommend that he is deceased! – to then boast a whole series of spiritual legacies and transmigrations of charisms with the attached canon of the perfect liberator.

When I was a child, in the 1980s, in Italy we only heard about the Devil from Father Gabriele Amorth and Monsignor Corrado Balducci, the latter known as a demonologist but who in his life never saw a real exorcism and who also reported some theological inaccuracies in his book “The Devil”. But at least with them we were dealing with honest priests who were well aware of their role and were obedient to the Church. Today everyone is good at writing about the Devil, especially those who should do without it.

In conclusion, the fact remains true that it is better and prudent to talk little about the Devil and with precise references to the Word of God, to Revelation and to the Church’s Magisterium. And do you know why? Because our faith has never been founded – and never will be – on the Devil but on Christ and his resurrection which overcomes the works of the Devil: sin and death. If we understood at least this we would no longer have the anguish of demonopathy with the sensation of being gripped by the Devil. Much more important and tiring is creating a deep conscience that desires to live constantly in the presence of Christ and his Spirit. But this is what the blessed apostle James already tells us in his letter. He asks us to be submissive to God: this is what allows us to resist the Devil and escape from his works and snares. Surely there are few exorcists in the Church today, certainly many of our bishops are not often inclined to appoint any and prefer instead to appoint presidents of diocesan Caritas and to use resources for social and welfare policies, only to then find themselves a few kilometers from their diocesan curia on the weekend exorcism at one hundred euros a day of the alleged exorcist, charismatic or the famous sensitive and not even heave a sigh. And yes, because even if the diocesan bishop were aware of the matter, he would not give it the right weight: the eye does not see, the pastoral heart does not grieve.

Unfortunately, the Devil even lets us do certain things and when they are done everything comes out in the open, just as happens with certain things as old as the world that are done but not said and as a well-known Italian musical quartet loved to sing:

«It is done, but it is not said, it is done, but it is not said and whoever did it remains silent, denies it and is a liar and never tells you the truth».

Sanluri, 07 February 2025

.

___________________________

It is said that the devil makes the pot but not the lid: For some it is economic guarantee and narcissistic visibility

It is still true that it is better and prudent to speak little of the devil and with precise references to the Word of God, to revelation and teaching. And you know why? Because our faith has never been based - nor will it ever be - in the devil but in Christ and his resurrection that expires the works of the devil: Sin and death. If at least we understood this we would no longer have the anguish of demonopathy with the feeling of being tormented by the devil.

- Pastoral news -

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Capp.

.

In the solemnity of the Lord's epiphany, The International Exorcist Association (A.I.E.) He published a note that I invite you to read all our readers carefully (here), And whose title is quite clear: «Note on some aspects of the Ministry of Exorcisms».

The note does not intend to reiterate the obvious about exorcisms and ecclesial discipline, Its objectives are different and refer only to some particular aspects. Read:

«With this note we intend to offer the necessary clarifications to operate the donation of divine mercy through the Ministry of Exorcism. The criteria to establish the necessary conditions for the realization of the major exorcism will not be presented again, nor the guidelines for this delicate ministry[6]; but observations will simply be offered on some pastoral practices that, Instead of helping Christ's plague, increase their suffering and cause disorientation. Observations that the faithful (clergy, consecrated and laity) They must know to avoid attitudes and methods that do not correspond to the authentic work of Christ Lord, Model for anyone who exercises the Ministry of Liberation of Extraordinary Action of Malignant [7]”.

Exorcism is a pastoral ministry of mercy and consolation, This is the basilar reference to be able to understand it correctly. Yes ok, It is a sacramental and not a sacrament - given the particular personal subject that is addressed -, It should not be considered lightly but seriously, human and Christian conscience and maturity, both by the shepherds and the lay faithful.

I have talked about seriousness, of conscience and maturity to underline that the devil is not played or joined, nor can it be instrumentalized for their own benefits: favor an economic benefit or to obtain a certain gain and visibility at the social and ecclesial level. That being said, I will only focus on some points that I want to reiterate and that the A.I.E note. Clarify and express more punctually than it could do so in these lines.

1. Obedience to the church and the ordinary diocesan

The conviction of being presided by the demon, It often drives people to frantically seek who are by appointment exorcists or those who have self -proclaimed as such. The Church in his wisdom asks first of all, a serious discernment that normally passes through the pastor himself, of the confessor or a reference priest, who is concerned to make an initial diagnosis and gather all the useful elements to be able to, If this is the case, refer to the designated exorcist or suggest a serious way of conversion attached to the sacramental practice of concrete and effective charity works.

I am allowed to make a comparison with the healthcare system: It is equivalent to when a general practitioner sends the patient to a specialist to perform more specific analyzes. Only when there is a suspicion of a pathology must be faced differently by a specialized colleague, otherwise it is a loss of time and solutions must focus on other analysis and fields. If this is true regarding physical health care, How much more should the speech on the care of the soul and the baptismal path be.

In this case, It is only the church that names and discerns over the suitable priests to perform this great ministry, as well as on the specific case of the person who asks for spiritual help in this regard. It is never improvised or proposed as exorcists, healers and liberators. Another fundamental thing is that there are no laity (Not even temporary or permanent deacons) Authorized by the Church to perform exorcisms. Even the so -called liberation or healing sentences, They must be done with wisdom and opportunity under the accompaniment of a trained priest and following the norms that the Church has already established. Leaving these criteria means being in the field of disobedience to the Church, to which the demon always pushes man as in the past pushed our parents to disobedience to God (See Genesis 3).

2. Superstition and formula reiteration

Often the desire to scare away the demon leads to fall into the sin of superstition and also insinuates in the Catholic world, Between laity as consecrated. For example: The more exorcist search begins “powerful” (even outside the diocese or region) As if it were a personal virtue and not the work of the Holy Spirit that acts in the minister ordered in the name of the Church. They are compulsively sacramental that should more effectively move bad influences, as crucifixes, medallas, candle, images, sal, Water and oil.

Liberation sentences multiply that they have not obtained any ecclesiastical approval and that often, mutades of non -Catholic environments come; or are made during the function by the “sensible” or for the alleged charismatic layman on duty. Or even, Official sentences and approved formulas are reiterated compulsively with the hope that simple recitation over time will be sufficient to achieve benefit. And they are frequently chosen as if they were trends in stock indices the most appropriate novenas and plea against the demon: The Virgin who unleashes the knots is good, San Pio da Pietrelcina is the strongest, Santa Rita is not bad, San Esperito sometimes fails while San Vicinio only works if you are from the Emilia-Romaña region. Even, In relation to the holy masses there is a risk of falling into superstition due to continuous desecrating instrumentalization in asking for liberation. It is thought that it is enough to send the priest to officiate the Mass without the need to participate personally, It is believed to be the number of celebrations in charge, As if the amount were the preeminent criterion for liberation. A similar mechanism on the amount of masses is found in some devotional books in referee to the souls ofthe purgatory, But that's another issue.

3. "Meeting and Liberation Convention" in Hotels

For some years it has been generalized that assumptions “sensitive” and charismatic laity organize prayer encounters in lay locations such as hotels with stars (at least 4). This should generate disapproval in the faithful Catholics of healthy judgment that are deviated from ecclesial contexts without any motivation. It is one thing to organize an event for millions and millions of people as in Jubilees and National Events, Another thing is to organize for fifty or one hundred people. Instead of hotels, Couldn't you opt for a spacious parish hall or a religious house - that every day is more empty and deserted - thus remaining within the limits of ecclesial normality? But the alleged “sensible” or the charismatic know very well that in doing so they remain away from the eyes and ears of the shepherds and can freely say what he wants. In this way, The all inclusive package is announced with 80 O 100 euros a day: Registration to the course, function pass, Individual room, food included with Michelin kitchen, And you have the guarantee of being a little released from the evil one and being purified in the family tree. Ultimately before people went to the spa, Now for weekends with exorcism that are fashionable.

4. Sale of books and manuals of doubtful orthodoxy

Still today, The devil is still a marketing product since in 1973 The film was released by William Friedkin's exorcist based on William Peter Blatty's homonymous novel; The devil has practically not experienced moments of crisis. We can say that you can win using the devil… and you can even win reasonably well.

And if the devil was ever private property of Freemasonry, of the satanists and the occult circles; For more than thirty years it has become a pop product that everyone can use or abuse according to the need itself. Indeed, They are precisely the laity, Not always Christians, to find in the “devil product” a mine from which to get notoriety and affirmation. Television was the first to know how to profit from the subject: Not only with films, but also with specials, Documentaries, investigations that cross the crime and policy news; In short, The devil is like salt and pepper in a recipe, "Just enough" to give that extra touch to the plate and cause praise. Perhaps it is in the editorial where the theme of the devil has found a new and perpetual youth. The bibliography in this regard is extremely unlimited and among the authors you can really find everything: It begins with the convert of medjugorje, to the former follower of a sect, going through the priest who without having been appointed exorcista celebrates conferences about the demon, ending with which the title of demonologist is attributed without having the minimum academic or practical-pastoral competences of the case. You can not miss the psychic or charismatic assumptions that deal with the devil and prepare recipes to release the influences of evil, Obviously it is necessary to buy your books. Very dangerous are those who feel invested by spiritual legacy of a famous defective exorcist - it is recommended if he died in "smell" of holiness! - and then presume spiritual legacies and carism transmigrations attached to the title of perfect liberator.

When I was a child in the years 1980, In Italy we only heard about the devil by Boca del Father Gabriele Amorth and Monsignor Corrado Balducci, The latter known as the demonist but who in his life never saw a real exorcism and that related some theological inaccuracies in his book Il Diavolo. At least they were honest priests, aware of his role and obedient to the Church. Today everyone knows how to write about the devil, especially those who should not write anything.

In conclusion, It is still true that it is better and prudent to speak little of the devil and with precise references to the Word of God, to revelation and teaching. And you know why? Because our faith has never been based - nor will it ever be - In the devil but in Christ and his resurrection that expires the works of the devil: Sin and death. If at least we understood this we would no longer have the anguish of demonopathy with the feeling of being tormented by the devil. Much more important and exhausting is to create a deep conscience that you want to live constantly before the presence of Christ and his spirit. This is what the blessed apostle Santiago tells us in his letter. Asks us to be submissive to God: This is what allows us to resist the devil and escape his works and traps. Surely there are few exorcists in the church today, Surely many of our bishops are not willing to appoint them and prefer to appoint presidents of the Diocesan Caritas, Use resources for social and well -being policies, But then you can find a few kilometers from the diocesan curia with the exorcistical weekend one hundred euros a day of the alleged exorcist, charismatic or seer famous without even releasing a sigh. And although the diocesan bishop was aware of the event, I would not give it the right weight: EYE WHO DOES NOT SEE, Pastoral heart that does not feel. Unfortunately the devil certain things let them do, And when he ever does it, Everything comes to light, As with certain things as ancient as the world that are done but they do not say and how they loved to sing them to a well -known Italian musical quartet:

«It is done, But it is not said, It is done, But it is not said and who made it silent, He denies it and is a liar and never tells you the truth ».

Sanluri, 07 February 2025

.

.

The books of Ivano Liguori, to access the book shop click on the cover

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

 

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

 

.





Dirt in public places between sex and theology of the underwear – Dirty in public places between sex and theology of the underpant – Dirt in public places between sex and the theology of Calaconcillo

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

DIRT IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND UNDERPANT THEOLOGY

We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, free the amor Dei, without even asking for the Marchetta. This is why I usually say, in a serious and not at all joking way, indeed with a coherent theological spirit, that, if I hadn't been a priest, I definitely would have been a whore. However, I chose to do one or the other: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

- Church news -

.

PDF Article in print format – Article print format – Printable article

.

.

The State Police responsible for checking the laboratories of public places where food is packaged, a couple of weeks ago it sealed a well-known pastry shop in the heart of the historic center of Catania.

The video documenting the state of the premises is only an archetype necessary to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs and whatever the cost, ready to affirm this:

"… it's true, this video was filmed by the State Police in the center of Catania, in the parlor of the city, but something like this could also happen in the North!».

I open parentheses with an aside: the "could have been" theory reminds me of certain militants of the Left radical chic Italian people who live in the name of politically correct more dreamlike. Those, to be understood, with penthouses in Parioli and villas in Capalbio, that when faced with a girl raped by a gang of illegal North African immigrants they are quick to explain, around the various talk show televisions, that she could also have been raped by a group of Italians. Definitely, to the victim of rape which is almost always destined to leave indelible traumatic marks with all the most complex reactive implications on a psychological and behavioral level, the idea that her rapists could also have been Italians, it will be of great comfort to you, but above all of precious usefulness to overcome a traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I close the aside and return to the topic in question.

This video portrays the laboratory of a historic bar from the center of Catania and not from the center of Bolzano or Belluno, where hygiene and health standards are much higher and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily, it is an incontrovertible fact, regardless of the justifying theory “it could have happened elsewhere”.

Let's move from the hygienic-sanitary question to the doctrinal-moral one, because it was we priests who have obsessed teenagers for generations, as if the whole mystery of evil went strictly and exclusively from the waist down. Who has ever bothered to teach that a laboratory like the one represented here is a much more exaltation of mortal sin than the masturbation of an adolescent in the throes of hormonal storms?? And they don't arise, certain secular bigots, as has already happened several times, to teach the undersigned priest that they are two different things, thus demonstrating that he does not know how serious those sins against charity can be, which according to them, however, would be something else, compared to the deadly sin of adolescent autoeroticism and various falls in the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by five others and then followed by four others, although they are not of interest to these people who appear to be rigorous only in everything relating to the sphere of sexuality.

That we have exaggerated beyond measure on human sexuality, I already wrote it fifteen years ago (see WHO), the rigorous morality of John Paul II prevails, when the Holy Father Francis was still far from coming. Today, the things I stated almost twenty years ago, the Holy Father tells her, often even in ironic tones, lie to me, at the time, the great youthful Paulist moralophobia is in force, it was sung in clear notes: «Take it easy with this talk, or you risk not becoming a priest". I replied: "Sure, because the theology of the underpants always comes before everything and above everything else, vero?».

Five kilometers away from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “holy immediately!”, had the enormous human and moral disaster of the pastry shop of the Legionaries of Christ, presented well on the outside like the windows of this pastry shop in the historic center of Catania, except to hide inside all the worst rubbish of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his faithful accomplices. Being though, the Holy Father and his followers, too busy with the theology of the underpants, certain laboratories were not inspected, even though everyone knew its existence and internal filth.

When in record time, with an imprudence that we will soon pay in the face of history at a certainly very high price, John Paul II was beatified and then canonized, just as the pastry laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered between beatification and canonization, those who had decided to have the saint at all costs immediately declared: «The Holy Father had not been informed, in fact he was deceived". Regardless of the fact that he was informed several times and even in the most dangerous and scandalous details, as a document in one of my books (see WHO), even assuming he had not been informed and indeed deceived, even more so it remains to be clarified: who did not inform him, but above all who would have deceived him? Why deception - except in cases of self-deception -, necessarily involves the existence of a deceiver. So who, deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer.

These are our ecclesial and ecclesiastical pastry workshops, while, without shame and restraint we had nothing better to do than discuss the theology of underwear, beginning and center of the internal mystery of evil. And today, around the social media, we must read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, bigots beyond all limits of human decency, who affirm without penalty of ridicule that the Virgin Mary, a Fatima, to little Giacinta Marto, revealed that many souls were damned for the sins of lust, making her see the damned souls of the lustful in hell.

God deliver us from committed and militant Catholic bigots, because only their perversion and their sexual obsessions can come to believe and then spread as truth and certainty the absurd rumor that the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, started talking about lust and lustful people to an illiterate nine-year-old girl born and raised in one of the most isolated provinces, poor and retrograde of Portugal at the beginning of the twentieth century.

Priests have never liked pant theology always lived in contact with human material, aware of being sinners who by an ineffable mystery of grace have received a mandate from Christ God to absolve sinners from sins according to the ministry of the Church:

«Receive the Holy Spirit; to whom you forgive sins they will be forgiven and to whom you will not forgive them, they will not be remitted " (GV 20, 22-23)

The theology of the underpants is terribly liked by certain lay Catholics social media, behind which often hide frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage nieces who travel with the mattress tied firmly to their backs to be ready for use. But on the other hand it is an old, well-known and well-known story: all of them whores, but only and strictly other people's daughters, certainly not their own.

I see and experience certain things differently: we priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, gratis and love Dei, without even asking for the Marchetta. This is why I usually say, in a serious and not at all joking way, indeed with a coherent theological spirit, that, if I hadn't been a priest, I definitely would have been a whore. However, I chose to do one or the other: the priest and the whore.

From the island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

.

_____________________

DIRTY IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND THEOLOGY OF THE UNDERPANT

We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service offered. This is why I said, seriously and not at all jokingly, but rather with a coherent theological spirit, that if I hadn’t become a priest, I would have become a whore. But I chose to do both: the priest and the whore, for love of God.

- Church news -

.

The Italian State Police in charge of controlling the laboratories of public places where food is packaged, a couple of weeks ago sealed a well-known pastry shop in the heart of Catania’s historic center.

The video documenting the state of the premises is just a necessary archetype to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs, ready to justifier:

«… it’s true, this video was shot by the State Police in the very center of Catania, in the city’s good living room of this sicylian city, but such a thing could have happened also in North Italy!»

I open with a digression: the “it could have been” theory reminds me of certain militants of the Italian radical chic left who live in the name of the most dreamlike political correctness. Those, to be precise, with super-apartments in the rich residential neighborhoods of Rome and villas in the most exclusive areas of Tuscany, who, faced with a girl raped by a gang of illegal North African immigrants, are quick to explain in various television talk shows that the girl could have ended up raped even by a group of Italians. Surely, for the victim of a rape always destined to leave indelible traumatic marks with complex psychological and behavioral implications, the idea that her rapists could also have been Italians will be of great comfort, but more than anything else of precious usefulness to overcome a traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I’ll close this parentheses and get back to the topic at hand.

That this video portrays the laboratory of a historic bar in the center of Catania and not in the center of Bolzano or Belluno, where hygiene and health standards are far superior and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily, is an incontrovertible fact, regardless of the justifying theory “it could have happened elsewhere”.

Let’s move from the hygienic-health issue to the doctrinal-moral one, because it was we priests who for generations have obsessed adolescents, as if the whole mystery of evil went strictly and exclusively from the waist down. Who has ever bothered to teach that a workshop like the one represented in this video is a much more glorification of mortal sin than the masturbation of a teenager in the throes of hormonal storms? And let not these secular bigots rise up, as has already happened several times, to teach the undersigned priest that they are two different things, thus demonstrating that they do not know how serious those sins against charity can be, which to them however would be something different, compared to the the very mortal sin of adolescent autoeroticism and various falls in the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by five others and then followed by four others, although they are not of interest to these people rigorous only in everyhing that concerns the sexuality sphere.

That we have exaggerated beyond measure on human sexuality, I already wrote fifteen years ago (see HERE), when John Paul II’s strict morality prevailed, when the Holy Father Francis very far from reaching Rome. Today, the things I was saying almost twenty years ago are said by the Holy Father, often even in ironic tones, while I, at the time, with the great moralphobia in force under the pontificate of John Paul II, was told in clear terms: «Go easy with these speeches, or you risk not becoming a priest». I replied: «Sure, because before everything and above everything goes the theology of the underpant».

In Rome, five kilometers away from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “saint immediately!”, had the immense human and moral disaster of the Legionaries of Christ’s “pastry”, which looked as good on the outside as the shop windows of this pastry in the old city centre of Catania, except that it hid inside all the worst rubbish of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his faithful accomplices. Being us, however, too busy with the theology of the underpant, certain workshops were not inspected, even though everyone knew of their existence and their dirty interior.

When in record time, with an imprudence that we will soon pay dearly before history, John Paul II was beatified and then canonized, between his beatification and his canonization the confectionery laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered. Those who had decided to have John Paul II declared a saint at all costs, immediately justified this fact by saying: «The Holy Father had not been informed, is was deceived». In reality, the Holy Father was informed several times and even in the most dangerous and scandalous details, as documented in one of my books (see HERE). However, if he really had not been informed and had been deceived, this would be one more reason to clarify: who did not inform him, but above all who deceived him? Because deception – except in cases of self-deception – necessarily implies the existence of a deceiver. So who deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer.

These are our laboratories of ecclesial and ecclesiastical pastry, while, without shame or restraint, we had nothing better to do than discuss the underpant theology, the principle and center of the entire mystery of evil. And today, in the sea of social media, we must read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, bigots beyond all limits of human decency, who affirm without penalty of ridicule that the Virgin Mary, in Fatima, to little Jacinta Marto, baby of only nine-year-old, said that many souls were damned for the sins of lust, making her see damned souls of the lustful in hell.

God deliver us from committed and militant Catholic bigots! Only people obsessed with human sexuality can believe and spread the absurd rumor according to which the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, talking about lust and lustfuls to a little girl born and raised in one of the most isolated, poor and retrograde of Portugal by beginning of the 20th century.

The underpant theology has never pleased priests who have always lived in contact with human matter, aware of being sinners who by an ineffable mystery of grace have received from Christ God the mandate to absolve sinners from their sins according to the ministry of Church:

«When He had said this, He breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you withhold forgiveness from anyone, it is withheld”» (John 20, 22-23)

The underpant theology is terribly widespreadwith some lay Catholics on social media, behind which often hide frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage grandchildren who travel with the mattress tied firmly to their backs to be ready for use. But then again it’s an old and well-known story: all whores, but only other people’s daughters, not their own.

I see and experience certain things differently: we priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service offered. This is why I said, seriously and not at all jokingly, but rather with a coherent theological spirit, that if I hadn’t become a priest, I would have become a whore. But I chose to do both: the priest and the whore, for love of God.

From the Island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

.

____________________

DIRT IN PUBLIC PLACES BETWEEN SEX AND THE THEOLOGY OF UNDERPANTS

We priests must necessarily be all whores who try to give ourselves to everyone freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service. That's why I usually say seriously and not jokingly, even with a coherent theological spirit, that if I had not been a priest, I would have been a whore. However, I chose to be both: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

- Church news -

.

Italian State Police, in charge of controlling the workshops and kitchens of public places where food is packaged, A renowned pastry shop in the historic center of the Sicilian city of Catania closed a couple of weeks ago..

The video that documents the state of the premises is just an archetype necessary to talk about the disastrous psychology of justifiers at all costs, at any price, and ready to say:

«…If it is true that this video was recorded by the State Police in the center of Catania, but something like this could also be found in Northern Italy!!»

I open a parenthesis to make a digression: the theory of “could have been” It reminds me of certain militants of the Italian radical-chic left who live in the name of the most dreamlike political correctness. Those who are obviously from the penthouses in the residential neighborhoods of Rome and the villas in the most exclusive areas of the Tuscany region. And those who, faced with a girl raped by a gang of North Africans, rush to explain in different television programs: that the girl could also have been raped by a gang of Italians. Without a doubt, The victim of a rape is almost always destined to retain indelible traumatic marks with very complex reactive implications on a psychological and behavioral level.. The idea that her rapists could also have been Italian would be of great comfort to her., above all, of precious usefulness to overcome the traumatic event that is difficult to overcome. I close this parenthesis and return to the topic at hand..

Let the video show the laboratory of a historic bar in the city center of Catania, and not in the center of cities like Bolzano or Belluno where hygiene and health standards are much stricter and much more respected than in certain areas of Sicily., It is an incontrovertible fact., apart from the justifying theory of: “It could also happen in other places”.

From the hygienic-sanitary issue let's move on to the doctrinal-moral, because we ourselves priests, who for generations have obsessed teenagers in their intimate movements with their hands; as if the entire mystery of evil were de rigueur and only from the waist down. Who has gone out of their way to teach that a laboratory like the one recorded by the video, It is an exaltation of mortal sin more than the masturbation of a teenager in the midst of his hormonal storms.? And the secular fanatics who do not rise up and reply as has already happened in the past, teaching the priest who writes, which are two totally different things; demonstrating with this, of not knowing how serious sins against charity can be. According to them, They would be something else compared to the super mortal sin of adolescent autoeroticism and falling into the sixth commandment, which we remember is preceded by another five and followed by four other commandments; although this does not interest these people who are only rigorous in everything that concerns the sphere of sexuality.

That regarding sexuality we have exaggerated beyond all limits, I wrote it fifteen years ago (watch HERE), when the rigorous morality of John Paul II prevailed and the Holy Father Francis was still a long way off. Today the things that I stated almost twenty years ago, The Holy Father says them and often in an ironic tone. While at that time, with the great moralophobia of John Paul II, they told me in clear tones: «Stop talking like that, or you run the risk of not being ordained a priest". I then replied saying: "It's true, because above all and before all is the theology of underpants..

Five kilometers from the Apostolic Palace, the Holy Father “holy immediately!”, had the enormous human and moral disaster of “pastry laboratory” of the Legionaries of Christ, excellently presented on the outside like the pastry shop windows in the historic center of Catania, except hiding inside all the worst garbage of Marcial Maciel Degollado and his loyal accomplices. But the Holy Father and his collaborators were too busy with underpants theology, while certain laboratories were not inspected although everyone knew of their existence and their internal dirt..

When in record time and with a recklessness that we will soon pay in history with a very high price, John Paul II was beatified and later canonized. And during his beatification and canonization, the laboratory of the Legion of Christ and its founder was discovered.; for it, those who had decided to immediately obtain the saint at all costs declared: «The Holy Father had not been informed, On the contrary, he had been deceived.". Regardless of the fact that it was reported on several occasions and even with dangerous and lurid details as I have documented in one of my books (watch HERE) even, assuming that he had not been informed but on the contrary deceived, with all the more reason it should be clarified: Who wouldn't have reported it but above all, who would have deceived him? Because deception – except in cases of self-deception – necessarily implies the existence of a deceiver. Therefore, who deceived John Paul II? This is a question that no one intends to answer..

These are our ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical pastry workshops, while without shame or restraint we had nothing better to do than discuss the theology of underpants, beginning and center of all the mystery of evil. And today on social networks, we have to read the absurdities of an army of lay Catholics, fanatics beyond all the limits of human decency, who affirm without shame of ridicule: that the Virgin Mary in Fatima revealed to the little midwife Giacinta Marto that many souls were condemned for the sins of lust, showing the condemned souls of the lustful in hell.

God save us from committed and militant Catholic fanatics, because only their perversions and sexual obsessions can come to believe and spread the absurd rumor that the Virgin Mary, mother par excellence, great pedagogue and seat of human delicacy, spoke of lust and lustful people to an illiterate nine-year-old girl born and raised in one of the most isolated provinces, poor and backward in Portugal at the beginning of the 20th century.

Underpants theology has never pleased priests who have always lived in close contact with human matter, conscious of being sinners and that by an ineffable mystery of grace, have received the command from Christ God to absolve sinners of their sins according to the ministry of the Church:

Receive the Holy Spirit. Whom you forgive the sins, they will be forgiven; and those who do not forgive, they will be left unforgiven. (Jn, 20,22-23)

The theology of underpants certain lay Catholics terribly like it on social networks, behind which they often hide, frustrated and failed mothers and fathers who have multi-divorced and cohabiting sons and daughters, or teenage nieces traveling with the mattress firmly strapped to their backs, ready for use. But on the other hand, It's an old and well-known story: all whores, but only other people's daughters and certainly not their own.

I see and experience some things differently.: We priests must necessarily all be whores who try to give ourselves to everyone, freely and for the love of God, without even asking for compensation for the service. That's why I usually say, seriously and not a joke, even with a coherent theological spirit, that if I had not been a priest, I would have been a whore. However, I chose to be both: the priest and the whore, for the love of God.

From the Island of Patmos, 4 February 2025

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.