L'last Perla di Silent I can't: "The responsibility of the ordinary on the incardinated priests"? Then let the money hunt out on cardinals and bishops: by Angelo Scola to follow …

L'last Perla di Silent I can't: "The responsibility of the ordinary on the incardinated priests"? Then let the money hunt out on cardinals and bishops: By Angelo Scola to follow …

Their knowledge of the Church, col loro capocomico che starnazza «noi in Vaticano … qua in Vaticano …» è tanta e tale da non arrivare a capire che quanto di peggio si possa fare coi vescovi — in particolare celati dietro il delatorio anonimato — è insegnar loro come gestire il clero, sino a richiamare oniriche e improbabili figure di reato non propriamente di poco conto, come per esempio la truffa ai danni dello Stato.

– The briefs of the Fathers of the Isle of Patmos –

(at the bottom of: tutti i precedenti articoli)

Author
Editors of The Island of Patmos

.

Sulla base del puro principio di casualità, after l’ultimo articolo del nostro Monaco Eremita, esce un chimerico articolo di fanta-diritto canonico sull’immancabile I cannot be silent, firmato — figurarsi, needless to say! —, da un anonimo.

Gli anonimi di I cannot be silent che salgono in cattedra a dar lezioni di correttezza istituzionale e giuridica alla Chiesa, equivalgono alla tenebrosa maestrina della pudibonda Inghilterra vittoriana di fine Ottocento, che con decisi richiami alla correttezza spiegava alle vogliose educande che potevano anche darsi ai vizi, però in privato, purché praticassero sulla piazza le pubbliche virtù della purezza.

Equiparabili ai vulcaniani cui apparteneva Mr. Spock della celeberrima saga di Star Treck, i sileriani superano in fantascienza persino le opere cult della cinematografia. Indeed, la loro conoscenza della Chiesa, col loro capocomico che starnazza «noi in Vaticano … qua in Vaticano …» è tanta e tale da non arrivare a capire che quanto di peggio si possa fare coi vescovi — in particolare celati dietro il delatorio anonimato — è insegnar loro come gestire il clero, sino a richiamare oniriche e improbabili figure di reato non propriamente di poco conto, come per esempio la truffa ai danni dello Stato.

L’anonimo sileriano, dopo aver praticato vari arzigogoli sulla incardinazione dei presbìteri, giunge a stabilire chi ha diritto e chi no al danaro dall’Ente Centrale Sostentamento Clero. Qualcuno lo informi che tutte le diocesi, in particolare quelle nei dintorni di Roma, hanno presbìteri privi di incarichi che operano col benestare dei propri ordinari diocesani al di fuori delle parrocchie o delle diocesi stesse. In una di queste fu scoperto di recente che un presbitero originario di tutt’altre zone era incardinato in essa solo quando fu promosso vescovo, perché i presbiteri non sapevano neppure che fosse membro del loro presbitèrio.

Lo stesso Marco Parrucchino da Montefeltro, da tempo sgamato informatore della Banda della Sileriana, se non fosse stato licenziato dalla Pontificia Accademia Ecclesiastica dal lungimirante Cardinale Beniamino Stella — che n’era all’epoca presidente — oggi sarebbe in giro per il mondo a fare chissà quali danni incalcolabili nel servizio diplomatico della Santa Sede, vivendo fuori diocesi senza incarichi pastorali nel suo luogo d’incardinazione.

Il Cardinale Angelo Scola, per citarne solo uno tra i vari divenuti a seguire anche vescovi, sebbene nativo di Milano, già studente dell’Università Cattolica e a seguire seminarista nel Seminario Arcivescovile di Venegono, per varie vicissitudini si spostò a Teramo, dove il Vescovo lo ordinò immediatamente suddiacono e a seguire diacono e presbitero. A quanto è dato sapere, in questa sua diocesi di incardinazione Angelo Scola soggiornò solo per ricevere gli ordini sacri e non vi svolse mai alcun ministero. Non sarebbe forse il caso che oggi, a questo ormai ottantatreenne Cardinale, siano chiesti in restituzione i sostegni a suo tempo percepiti in modo per così dire abusivo? In caso contrario il canonista sileriano, rigorosamente celato dietro al totale anonimato, potrebbe paventare la truffa ai danni dello Stato, or not?

From the island of Patmos, 31 March 2025

.

Our previous articles:

– 29 March 2025 — Always about I CAN'T BE SILENT: DAL “Vertical man” AI “PIGLIANCULO” E “QUAQUARAQUÀ” DI LEONARDO SCIASCIA per aprire l’articolo cliccare WHO)

– 21 March 2025 — I CAN'T BE SILENT And the story of that convinced seamstress that he can give Giorgio Armani high fashion lessons

– 12 February 2025 — The Opossum is to the knowledge of the Vatican as Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work Confessions OF SAINT AUGUSTINE (To open the article click WHO)

– 15 January 2025 — AT THE CLERICAL BORDERS WITH REALITY: THE WOMAN SUFFERS FROM FREUDIAN PENIS ENVY, The Opossum of the envy by Matteo Bruni Director of the Press Room of the Holy See (To open the article click WHO)

– 20 January 2025 — THE OPOSSUM IGNORE THAT A NUN CAN QUIETLY BECOME GOVERNOR OF THE VATICAN CITY STATE, As already was Giulio Sacchetti (To open the article click QUI)

– 22 November 2024 — THE EPISCOPAL APPOINTMENT OF RENATO TARANTELLI BACCARI. WHEN YOU ARE AFFECTED BY LIVER CANCER, THEY CHARGE ON THE ATTACK THOSE WHO CANNOT BE SILENT (To open the article click WHO)

– 31 May 2024 — A NOTE FROM FATHER ARIEL ON THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT: «AS ANNOYING AS A SEA URCHIN INSIDE YOUR UNDERPANTS» (To open the article click WHO)

– 8 December 2023 — WHO IS MARCO FELIPE PERFETTI REFERRING TO STATING FROM THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT «HERE IN THE VATICAN… WE IN THE VATICAN…», IF YOU CANNOT EVEN SET FOOT IN THE VATICAN? (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 October 2023 — THE ARCHABOT EMERITUS OF MONTECASSINO PIETRO VITTORELLI HAS DEAD: CHRISTIAN PIETY CAN ERASE THE SAD TRUTH? (To open the article click WHO)

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

Semperity of the proposed di Silent I can: from the “vertical man” to the “pick me up” e “somewhere” by Leonardo Sciascia

Always about I CAN'T BE SILENT: DAL “Vertical man"A" Fireculo "and" quadhow "of Leonardo Sciascia

Since it is reported that the SIG. Marco Perfetti started a training course in the Seminary of La Spezia, then to the community New horizons of Genoa, Then a couple of years in the Seminary of Massa Carrara where they report that they have accompanied him to the door; Since they report that he would attempt an approach to Assisi, where at the time he was the guardian of the sacred convent the future cardinal Mauro Gambetti, Currently archpriest of the papal archbasilical of San Pietro, object of dozens of violent insults for two years; Since they report that he would try to approach some traditionalist institutions and some monastic communities, However, since he denies it, maybe it should be clarified: Among the ecclesiastics and trainers of three different dioceses and the person concerned, Who says the truth and who says the false?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PDF print format article

 

.

We are very far from 1898 When Leo XIII, He was resumed with a camera as it crossed her legs. Images that ended even in places that are not very suitable or even lewd, so much so that the Vatican was forced to break the relationships with the Americans who had created those filming and established them with the Calcina brothers e i Light.

More recently Perhaps some remember that in 2015 The crediting to a long -term Vaticanist of the caliber of Sandro Master, guilty of having broken the embargo on the long -awaited encyclical of Pope Francis "Laudato yes", anticipating excerpts, A few days before the release, his Espresso.

All this seems prehistory Compared to the current panorama that, thanks to the spread of social, sees a proliferation of characters to accredit themselves as authoritative connoisseurs of the Vatican things and the life of the Church or its representatives. Case striking the blog I cannot be silent, than in their own social indicates as a place of “residence” the Vatican City State, With his blogghettaro who in his videos and articles repeats with great Sicumera: «… We in the Vatican … here in the Vatican …». In short: a joke, If there was no tragedy behind.

I social, as we know and experience, They are fabulous tools if used well, but they can be equally deleterious if used in a bad way, To hit someone, person or institution, or to delegitimize or bring discredit. Used without verification control or possibility of reasoned replica, they can lead to dangerous consequences, or at least annoying. It is not now that the alarm sounds due to those who use these means to spread fake news or distort the reality of the facts for their ends. If they are caught on the live or made subject to argued answers and try, Son able to revolt pinned, denial o, worse, Use an old invalo method at ancient institutions such as the Catholic Church: the use of the delator letter. It is a typical expedient of the subtle, that not knowing how to respond to the arguments, they turn to the superior of those who want to hit, to the head above, or, If it is a priest, even to the whole presbytery that that cleric is linked by affection, as well as for incardination. Just as Marco Perfetti did a few days ago, By sending a delusional lungent poison letter addressed to all members of the presbyitèrio of the diocese to which Father Ariel S belongs. Levi di Gualdo, The fourth in standard order, From November 2023 till today.

The purpose of this poisonous slimy is to hit low, It doesn't matter the person, his dignity and not even what he wrote to contradict incorrect news. What you want to achieve is the greatest discredit possible, Using even those Melense and greasy ecclesiastical tones that would like to pass the dirty operation for something healthy, right, providential with regard to that presbyterio, of that historical order or of that religious congregation looked at with commiseration to include cadent people who dare to contradict the new paladins of communication (sic!) Vatican and Ecclesial, those who define themselves as those who are not can, except to hide behind the most vile anonymity.

Not just father Ariel, which of the magazine is responsible director and figure among the founders together with the late Antonio Love, Last philosopher and theologian of the Roman school, and to the Dominican theologian Giovanni Cavalcoli, all the member of the scientific committee of the Editions The island of Patmos, All editors of the magazine The Island of Patmos The treatment recently described have recently been made. In particular, the thing could have passed in silence and similar subjects not even taken into consideration, following the adage of an imaginary character, the famous cetto the whatever, impersonated by the actor Antonio Albanese: «Don't spit you out if not you perfume!». But since the editors decetors de The Island of Patmos they have always had the good of their readers in the eyes and to follow intellectual honesty, they find themselves forced to speak even of these annoying faces, Which they would do very help in very much.

That Father Ariel uses strong tones not given today. It is written that it uses swear words. I am not capable of it, But I am sure that they are all present in the dictionaries of the Italian language and Treccani and that they made the fortune of Facondi writers such as Aldo Busi who wrote in 1994 Cocks and kangaroos (very few kangaroos) O You have to have the balls to take it in the ass, edited none other than Mondadori. And what about the prof. Vittorio Sgarbi, To which our thoughts goes in this moment of his physical and psychic difficulty, who made an emblem of the word. But if we want to take the ecclesiastics that made intelligent use of the foul language, not for vulgarity, But for healthy pedagogy, Just remember Benedict XIV, nee Prospero Lambertini, that speaking interspersed with saying «Fuck!»Every three words.

A little above I mentioned affixed Aldo Busi Because one of the accusations addressed in that subtle way to Father Ariel is that he always thinks about gays and the consequent lobby widespread in the Church, as if he knew it in Menadito and indeed he was part of it. Maybe he doesn't know, The poor writer of letters, that Father Ariel already discounted from 2011 (see WHO) with the intent to warn ecclesiastical managers from that drift? A little different from who - poor - instead of confronting each other, He prefers to pour poison to diocesan and superior ordinary on religious and priests, while on their blog the doors to statements are open on the relationship between Bible and homosexuality of this kind:

«Reading these texts carefully, so, there is nothing against homosexuality".

There is nothing? Then why then, in the same text, He is seen favorably a phantom homosexual relationship between a centurion and his servant healed by Jesus? In fact, I read on the page of I cannot be silent words that would never have come out even as imaginative hypotheses from Mario Mieli Circle of homosexual culture:

“It is not unpleasant to think so. Think if it really was like that, We should explain to blogs psycho repressed (sic!) that Jesus made the greatest praise to a homosexual. But this should not be surprised. The references could be many, There are also Greek expressions that specify certain types of love also in reference to the disciples and Jesus himself, between Lazzaro and Jesus, etc ... however it is, like always, to want to look for answers in writing that they are not offered to us, they are not necessary. It's as if we wanted to know, Reading the episode of the wedding at Cana, as the bride was dressed. Scripture does not say it. We don't care " (WHO).

What to say? Wanting we could call Paolo Poli to mind, that with regard to the absurd claims of certain excellent and inaciditis, he said:

«Gays may have the opportunity to express their own uniqueness and diversity in the most true sense of the term. But no, they want to play husband and wife and have the Pope's permission to fuck each other!» (From the interview to GayTv the 17 December 2003)

I then mentioned Sgarbi not surprisingly. Because, If true that he made the dirty word and the "goat" epithet of the battle horses, At least at the beginning of public career, His very vehement releases have always been explicit in excellent Italian. Which cannot be said of who, with the intent of spreading mud, He writes the aforementioned letters, that we must find by digging between spelling and syntax errors. Already, because there are also those. And from this we understand - at least we who are professionals of writing - that the articles published by the leader of I cannot be silent are reworked by a good concealer before publication, while the impetuous emotional letters sent without prior correction, Instead, they are the mirror of what is the real culture and syntax of their author: A perfect donkey on a grammar level.

Father Ariel uses strong words and does not escape the controversy, but it does it openly, with reasoning that follow a logic and that can also be countered, since opinions remain, Although based on a practice of the Church that is difficult to oppose, because at the basis of his debates, especially of the controversy, He always places Catholic doctrine and morality. Also in the magazine or on his page Facebook You can answer and say your own, Father Ariel has always allowed, To anyone, not only to counter, but even to insult it. Which cannot be done on the sites of those who prefer, Because point on the live of their inconsistencies or falsehoods, Write Dileggio letters. If in the magazine - from Father Ariel or by other editors - he sometimes took the aim of Tizio or Caio, priest or bishop who is, It has always been done in compliance with the person and the role. The same cannot be said of those who write letters of regret and then stand for the trainer of the spiritual and priestly life of the priests, Except then Irrude them, insolentirli e redarguirli, But always without the possibility of leaving room for comments or answers.

Bad letters are written to bishops on priests or religious superiors because they follow or write in the magazine The Island of Patmos so that they are alerted or redeemed or even discharged by the clerical state (sic!), Then you make articles or posts in which the bishops reproach themselves who do not protect their priests enough. Not to mention the injuries scattered to the right and missing, For the reading of which I refer to our recent article on the seamstress who gives lessons to Giorgio Armani (WHO), to which we could also combine another paradigmatic figure: The beautiful laundry.

As a hermit monk I could cite a few thousand expressions of holy spiritual fathers who invite to avoid slander, the hatred and the deterioration, In addition to passages from the New Testament that invite to respect, in particular of those who have a task of authority.

I hope who to receive such letters, Ordinary diocesan, Superior father, presbyter or simple secular that it is, It indicates the inexorable path of the trash to the same. Or call your priest or religious and after receiving the debt explanations respond to the sender with a nice: "We have more to think about and more important things to do".

In one of his four letters sent to all members of the presbytery of Father Ariel, that of 3 November 2023, Marco Perfetti says:

"Just think of the considerations that Di Gualdo makes on the undersigned regarding a never that has never occurred by any seminar and religious institute".

Since it is reported that Mr. Marco Perfetti started a training course in the Seminary of La Spezia, then to the community New horizons of Genoa - the same accused by him to exercise "abuse of consciences" -, Then a couple of years in the Seminary of Massa Carrara where they report that they have accompanied him to the door; Since they report that he would attempt an approach to Assisi, where at the time he was the guardian of the sacred convent the future cardinal Mauro Gambetti, Currently archpriest of the papal archbasilical of San Pietro, object of dozens of violent insults for two years, 57 in total to be precise; Since they report that he would try to approach some traditionalist institutions and some monastic communities, However, since he denies it, maybe it should be clarified: Among the ecclesiastics and trainers of three different dioceses and the person concerned, who says the truth and who the false? The question, aimed at the person concerned, it's simple and serene, It does not want any intimate sphere, But if I had not been clear then I repeat it: Who says the truth and who says the false?

To finish I bring a personal testimony. A few months ago I was invited for lunch by a parish priest who wanted to celebrate an anniversary with his family. Father Ariel was also present at that juncture and he also invited him, Indeed he insisted on why he was present. The Parish Priest, how to do among friends, he made a word to a confrere, among other things responsible for his pastoral area. This person, despite not being invited, heard that there was father Ariel made the devil four to be there. Not only, he did everything to sit next to him and be able to talk to it, disinteresting almost completely from the rest of the table which was also numerous. This is to say that an account are the slanders - for the outcome of which you refer to the famous apologist of San Filippo Neri and the slander of the woman who had gone to confess from him - and another thing is instead the estimate reserved for a known priest who has spent himself and spent for years to support with any means priest in any situation are located.

This is the difference that exists, To put it with the Spaniards, between a vertical man And who - forgive me -, He chooses other geometric figures to position himself, like the flat or right angle. And since it was about swearing, In this regard, the distinction is always useful, remaining classic, by Leonardo Sciascia in his book The Day of the Owl, that puts on the lips of the mafia, don Mariano Arena. So he turns to the captain of the Carabinieri Bellodi who had allowed himself to be a search at his home:

"I have a certain experience of the world; and we say that humanity, and fill our mouths to say humanity, nice word full of wind, divide into five categories: the men, the mezz'uomini, the ominicchi, i (respectfully speaking) Piglioinculo and the Quaquaraquà ... very few men; the few mezz'uomini, because I would keep me the humanity stopped at the middle of the men ... and instead not, falls down even more, to ominicchi: who are like children who think they are great, monkeys that make the same moves as the big ones ... and even further down: the pigliainculo, which are becoming an army ... and finally the Quaquaraquà: that they should live like ducks in the puddles, because their life no longer makes sense and more expression than that of the ducks ... she, even if I grind to a halt on these cards as a Christ, She is a man ... ".

I let the reader evaluate Who is the man who faces you with an open face and who the Piglianculo Quaquaraquà of Shaking Memory that sends poisonous displaced letters to bishops, Religious superiors and to whole presbyéri, teaching Giorgio Armani how men's jackets are cut.

From the Hermitage, 29 March 2025

.

Our previous articles:

 

– 29 March 2025 — Always about I CAN'T BE SILENT: DAL “Vertical man"A" Fireculo "and" quadhow "of Leonardo Sciascia (To open the article click WHO)

– 21 March 2025 — I CAN'T BE SILENT And the story of that convinced seamstress that he can give Giorgio Armani high fashion lessons (To open the article click WHO)

– 12 February 2025 — The Opossum is to the knowledge of the Vatican as Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work Confessions OF SAINT AUGUSTINE (To open the article click WHO)

– 15 January 2025 — AT THE CLERICAL BORDERS WITH REALITY: THE WOMAN SUFFERS FROM FREUDIAN PENIS ENVY, The Opossum of the envy by Matteo Bruni Director of the Press Room of the Holy See (To open the article click WHO)

– 20 January 2025 — THE OPOSSUM IGNORE THAT A NUN CAN QUIETLY BECOME GOVERNOR OF THE VATICAN CITY STATE, As already was Giulio Sacchetti (To open the article click WHO)

– 22 November 2024 — THE EPISCOPAL APPOINTMENT OF RENATO TARANTELLI BACCARI. WHEN YOU ARE AFFECTED BY LIVER CANCER, THEY CHARGE ON THE ATTACK THOSE WHO CANNOT BE SILENT (To open the article click WHO)

– 31 May 2024 — A NOTE FROM FATHER ARIEL ON THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT: «AS ANNOYING AS A SEA URCHIN INSIDE YOUR UNDERPANTS» (To open the article click WHO)

– 8 December 2023 — WHO IS MARCO FELIPE PERFETTI REFERRING TO STATING FROM THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT «HERE IN THE VATICAN… WE IN THE VATICAN…», IF YOU CANNOT EVEN SET FOOT IN THE VATICAN? (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 October 2023 — THE ARCHABOT EMERITUS OF MONTECASSINO PIETRO VITTORELLI HAS DEAD: CHRISTIAN PIETY CAN ERASE THE SAD TRUTH? (To open the article click WHO)

 

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Prayer in Sant'Agnese: the saint who makes the hair regrets

Prayer in Sant'Agnese: The saint who makes the hair regrets

«Gorgeous Agnese, Young you who naked challenge the protected martyrdom against the executioner from your courage and faith and protected by your thick hair from the looks of the emppi: intercede so that the Lord gives balance and relief to the suffering of those who instead lose the hair and help us who try to lighten his anxiety […]».

Hypatia's cogitatory

Author Hypatia Gatta Romana

Author
Hypatia Gatta Roman

.

.

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

On the occasion of the arrival of yet another love letter, I discovered a saint to whom those who suffer from hair loss can contact, elected protector of trichologists who cure baldness. I ignored its existence, This is why I decided to apply the skilful Augustinian motto I can not remain silent (cf.. SACTI Augustine, Sermon. 88, Trad.. “I can't keep silent”), because having discovered that behind certain miracles there is her, It is necessary to shout it from the roofs (cf.. Mt 10,26). It deals with, obviously, of Sant'Agnese, of which the official website of the doctors Trichologists speaks to us.

The explanatory photos used to illustrate the trichological miracles of Sant'Agnese are public images taken from the Internet where they are available and visible by anyone

Of noble origins, belonging to the Clodia people, he suffered martyrdom at a very young age, as soon as 12 year old, During the persecution of Christians under Diocletian. The news relating to his life and martyrdom are different and conflicting. According to some sources, The son of the prefect of Rome had fallen in love with Agnese but was refused, having made a vow of chastity to Jesus. At that point the young man's father imposed her cloister among the vestals consecrated to the goddess Vesta, Protector of Rome, But she refused and was locked up in a cottage in which, But, Nobody dared to touch it except a man who, according to religious tradition, was blinded by a white angel and that, afterwards, he regained his sight precisely by intercession of Agnese, which for this reason was accused of magic and sentenced to the stake.

It is said that the flames divided under his body without touching him and that his hair suddenly grew to cover his nudity. Following this miracle he was pierced by a sword blow to the throat, modalities with which the lambs were killed, reason why the saint is often represented together with this animal. His body was buried in what is known today as a catacomb of S. Agnese while his skull is exhibited in a chapel in the church of S. Agnese in Agone.

There is also a prayer To be recited to the Holy Protector of Trichologists and of those suffering from hair loss:

«Gorgeous Agnese, Young you who naked challenge the protected martyrdom against the executioner from your courage and faith and protected by your thick hair from the looks of the emppi: intercede so that the Lord gives balance and relief to the suffering of those who instead lose the hair and help us who try to lighten his anxiety. man, With the intercession of Santa Agnese who was given to us as a protector, make us capable of taking on the commitments of daily work and be recognized at all times the signs of your spirit. Amen».

Source: WHO.

Having discovered the watter of certain miracles, I could perhaps silence the existence of this holy protector? No, Because as the Holy Father and Doctor of the Church would say: «I can't silent » (cf.. SACTI Augustine, Sermon. 88)

the Island of Patmos, 28 March 2025

.

Cesare guys

 

 

 

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Prayer of liberation and healing. Which insurmountable border separates theology and pastoral with the danger of falling into magical practices? – Prayer of liberation and healing. What imprescable boundary separates theology and pastoral care from the daner of falling into magical practices? –

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

Prayer of liberation and healing. Which insurmountable border separates theology and pastoral with the danger of falling into magical practices?

«Using the magical offices of certain charismatic shamans, Not only will the deceased of the whole family tree of applicants be freed, But also those who must always come to the world. Indeed, thanks to the power of the peregrifying liberator from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, Why, Once the imposition of the hands is received by a electrocuted in the brain, they will be born directly without original sin "

— Pastoral current events —

.

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

 

 

PDF Article in print format

 

PDF Article print format

PDF ARTICLE TO PRAY

.

.

In the face of my last two articles on the possible drifts of a method of understanding exorcism, combined with the conception that sees the devil as a marketing and profitless product (you see WHO e WHO), I believed it appropriate to write a third that will have as its object the prayer of liberation.

I want to clarify that my little contributions are nothing Compared to the most complete and exhaustive works of demonologists such as Mons. Renzo Lavatori or Father José Antonio Fortea.

How can we forget particularly expert exorcists like the Father Moreno Fiori o.p. and the Father Raffaele Talmelli S.P., Both left a flourishing bibliography on demonopathies. We cannot forget, against the other, All the other exorcist priests who carry out their ministry in fatigue and who are reliable masters in which to find a guide. Considering that some of them have written several books and articles on these issues, I invite the reader to a targeted bibliographic research with which it is possible to increase the knowledge of these topics. In the face of this, My article constitutes only a small tribute and thanksgiving.

Before defineing precisely the prayer of liberation, First of all, the boundaries and areas of competence must be established. First of all, This prayer is not an exorcism but it is a prayer of intercession with which we turn to God, to the Madonna or the Saints to ask for the liberation of a suffering person due to the evils caused by the influence of the evil one. With this definition we immediately exclude the conclaimed cases of real diabolical possession, that exist but they are very rare, and the cases of diabolical influences such as the obsessions and harassments that must require a particular care by the exorcist priest, joined to a multidisciplinary approach of the case.

To be even more precise We summarize how much the sacred congregation for the doctrine of the faith has established since 29 September 1985 in Letter to ordinary regarding the rules on exorcisms (cf.. WHO) And we apply what has been said to the liberation prayer:

– In the prayer of liberation it is never allowed, even when they do not deal with diabolical possession, contact the devil directly.

– Only the exorcist can be addressed directly to the devil, intimandogles, In the name of the Church, to leave.

– Lays cannot, even if they are prayers of liberation, Use the formulas of exorcism, Including the one published by Pope Leo XIII, nor use part of said prayer.

– Exorcism can only be exercised by a priest specially authorized by the local ordinary (cf.. Code of Canon Law, 1166; 1172).

Defining even better the prayers of liberation It is necessary to specify that they can be recited by anyone who intends to ask the Lord for themselves or for others healing and liberation from evil, On the basis of the invocation already contained in the prayer of the Our Father who recites "free of us from evil", that is, free us from the evil one.

Ask God to defend us from the evil one it means affirming a double truth: The defense against sin that is the main work of the evil one and the defense against the consequences of sin, whose fruits are represented by the countless infirmities and spiritual and bodily fragility of which man has had experiences already after his creation. Theologically it is more correct to see liberation and healing as aspects of the same reality of fighting to sin, on which Jesus, The Son of man, has full power (cf.. MC 2,1-12).

In the document entitled Education about prayers to get healing from God, The sacred congregation for the doctrine of faith, In the disciplinary provisions it establishes:

«To every faithful it is legitimate to raise prayers to God to obtain healing. However, when these take place in church or another sacred place, It is convenient that they are guided by an ordered minister " (cf.. art. 1).

Based on a correct theological vision of understanding of sin and its consequences, Each faithful has the opportunity to invoke God for liberation and healing from his evils, as well as ask the prayers brothers for this intention. Whether these evils have affected the spirit or body, with a wise assignment to Christ Celeste doctor, The faithful use all the remedies that grace and human science make available to be able to soothe as much as possible such suffering. As a result, in discernment between the different evils and the possible treatments, the faithful will be able to resort to the priest, to the doctor or other specialist based on his real situation of infirmity, without excluding that all these figures can work in communion to reach a happy resolution of the problem. We remember, about that, One of the cornerstones of health pastoral care that says that where it is not possible to heal it is always possible and duty to cure.

The prayers of liberation and healing They should be properly formulated in a context of full loyalty to the filing of the faith of the Catholic Church, in communion with the Magisterium, In obedience to the sacred shepherds and with their firm attention to never slip towards deviated and ambiguous forms that could generate misunderstandings or misunderstandings, As the last document of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith already mentioned indicates.

Only by inserting liberation into a sacramental journey We can then ask ourselves about when it is appropriate to resort to the so -called liberation prayers. I have already had the opportunity to explain that the path of liberation and fight against the devil is very complex and begins with the sacrament of baptism, In that daily path of conversion and change of mentality that constitutes the solid basis of a new life in the Holy Spirit, in which in the image of the child, The Holy Spirit is pushed in our soul and the voice of the Father recognizes us as loved children (cf.. Mt 3,17; MC 1,11; LC 3,22). Risorti as new creatures from the waters of baptism, We too are conducted in the desert to face the face to face to be against the spirit of evil. In Christ we already have the victory, His divine humanity strengthens our humanity; His divine Spirit and the same spirit of ours has been given to us and with whom we can say every time we are tempted: «Go Satan!» (cf.. Mt 4,10).

From the sacrament of baptism we move on to the sacrament of confession with which the Holy Spirit speaks to us as to the prodigal Son and invites us to return to the paternal house to be covered with that branch dignity that we have lost with sin (cf.. LC 15,17-20). It is precisely of sin, indeed, push man to the removal from God, Up to convince him that his father is the obstacle element for full happiness and a freeding realization. When the man with his concrete historical acts and with his current sins voluntarily opens the door of his heart to the ordinary action of the evil one, here the sin is consumed. And sin drags to sin, With the repetition of the same documents it generates the vice, from which the perverse inclinations then derive from it, which obtaining consciousness by altering it and leading man to an inability to evaluate and choice between good and evil (cf.. Catechism of the Catholic Church n. 1865).

Certain current sins with the consequent derivative vices, They involve a clear personal responsibility of the man - the divine question due to the fault of the progenitors and for the murder of Abel is quite eloquent: "What did you do?» (cf.. GN 3,13; 4,10) - An obvious fault, which can be recovered only and only when it is dissolved with the power of the keys that Jesus gave to Pietro (cf. Mt 16,18-19) and that in the sacramental forum is represented by the acquittal. If we are careful, we are faced with the celebration of a real exorcism, to the supreme act of liberation of man, which is not only an invoked liberation, but objectively realized in reality.

The sacramental path that leads from baptism to confession culminates with the Eucharist and Holy Mass. Indeed, The path of liberation does not stop but continues in a very special way in the Eucharist, In that divine banquet of the Holy Mass where the real presence is made, real and substantial of our Redeemer. In his true body, In his true blood, In his true soul and in his divinity he continues to defeat the power of the evil one-sin and death-and with his own person he wins the one who is the very incarnation of the "non-person" and leads the man towards a human and divine depersonalization[1].

I think it is useful to know that the new Roman Missal In the section "Masses and prayers for various needs" includes several specific formulars for the celebration of the Holy Mass which have as its object the sick and the dying (NN. 45-46) To then move on to all those spiritual situations of various needs that could be a consequence of the intervention of the spirit of evil and the rooted and hardened sin (n. 48 sez. A-B-C).

Keeping this sacramental vision of liberation well in mind that embraces the first three sacraments of the septenary, Allow me to borrow a thought of Cardinal Mauro Piacenza:

«The sacraments continually educate the struggle: especially the repetable sacraments, those who do not impress character and that can be celebrated many times in life, mean and indicate, full way, The "competitive" dimension - of agone - of the fight against evil ".

This is the focal point of the question that we set ourselves at the beginning of this paragraph: how decisive it is immediately to resort to liberation prayers if you are not constantly inserted within a sacramental path? Without a attitude preventive sacramental it is necessary to avoid prayers of liberation, especially if the actual utility is not warned, without a certain preparation by those who intercept on the person and without a prior and robust preparation of those who receive them.

It is necessary to clarify how the effectiveness of the sacramental (Exorcism or prayer of liberation) In the faithful it depends on their sacramental life. These are the sacraments that imprint the freeding and re -analyzed force to the sacramental, who are part of that affected and lived faith in daily by the faithful. Has no case in the Holy Mass, in the rites of communion, The priest before the exchange of peace says:

«Lord Jesus Christ, that you told your apostles: “I leave you peace, I give you my peace ", Don't look at our sins, But to the faith of your Church, and donale unity and peace according to your will. You who live and reign over the centuries of the centuries. Amen».

It is the faith that the Lord seeks from us, that faith received in baptism, strengthened in the recognition of our sins and the exercise of mutual charity, Nourished and increased by the body and blood of Christ. Without faith or in the absence of it there is no type of liberation or healing, Only superstitious palliative that often cause more damage than benefits from the soul and body. And in this superstitious vision we can also drop the holy things, like the use of sacramental and devotion to the saints.

When we talk about prayers of liberation We risk getting lost within a variety of truly diversified forms and content, It is therefore completely consequential to ask: which prayers of liberation to do? The collections of these prayers would impose an order that is above all of a theological nature. Indeed, The structure of these prayers is very varied and it is often difficult to go back to the exact origin: they range from apparently Catholic ones, to those with a devotional flavor related to some mystical or holy, to those with an oriental style that wink at the Greek world up to the prayers of some reformed Christian communities (Suffice it to mention the practice of liberation, of purification and healing of the genealogical tree of Kenneth Mcall) To finish then to Formulari with a clearly esoteric flavor.

The absence of a canon never transcribed constitutes the most evident problem from which the lack of an approved canonical collection to be drawn. This is perhaps one of the things that most promotes the possibility of resorting to wild improvisation. Certainly priests have the opportunity to resort to the blessing that it gives countless ideas, But the field of the fight against the devil and its influences is so specific that it would require some more attention, So as to avoid the morbid research of the averting and the most decisive invocation also at the cost of crossing the border from orthodoxy and garden.

The prayer of liberation is outlined as an invocative prayer which concerns the context of the Sacramentals. This requires having to verify at least two criteria in it:

– that is approved by the competent ecclesiastical authority;

– that has a very precise dogmatic and liturgical construction in its composition that it does not leave margins of confusion or misunderstanding.

In the directory on popular and liturgy piety, The congregation for divine cult and the discipline of the sacraments establishes:

«Although drawn up with language, as it were, Less rigorous than the prayers of the liturgy, The texts of prayers and formulas of devotion must draw inspiration from the pages of Sacred Scripture, of the liturgy, of the fathers and the magisterium, agree with the faith of the Church. The stable and public texts of prayers and acts of pity must approve the local ordinary " (cf.. full document WHO).

The prayer of liberation needs to be a prayer approved by the Church precisely because of the delicacy of the matter treated, containing of necessity inside that corpus of faith believed and professed that well summarizes that theological principle for which the the law of prayer And law of belief and vice versa. Although the prayers of liberation are not real liturgical prayers, which consist of a specific celebratory and liturgical area, This does not exempt from a less accurate composition of the texts and content.

But let's get to the specific. In my two previous articles, I have already had the opportunity to argue on the prayer of the Our Father that the Lord himself taught to his disciples (cf.. Mt 6,9-13; LC 11,1-4) and as such, It prefigures not only as the first prayer of liberation but first of all as prayers par excellence. Excluding this, We know that in the new exorcism ritual it is contained, In 2 appendage (NN. 1-10), A section of prayers for private use of the faithful who find themselves having to fight against the power of darkness. This list can well be considered as an official list and approved of prayers to be done privately and who affect all those who experience an action of the devil that goes beyond ordinary action. It is legitimate to think, so, that the ratio Inspiring of these prayers does not concern only those who are already subjected to greater exorcism but above all those who find themselves experimenting with a particular direct assault of the evil one.

Wanting us to unbalance in the interpretation, We can assume that the mens Of these prayers in the ritual it does not only concern the single faithful but also that largest community that is to travel the streets of this world of ours marked by the wound of sin and the fomite of the concupiscence. Useful in this sense it is to draw up an essential case that could suggest the use of a prayer of liberation, Just as the Church has always done in many litanic prayers that end with the invocation: Deliver us O. Let's think for example:

1) to frequent and repeated blasphemy;

2) to feelings of hatred, rancor, of destruction and despair;

3) to the inducement in severe sin and rooting to perform evil;

4) To the conflicts torn to families;

5) to situations of natural and epidemiological wars and disasters;

6) to those situations of widespread immorality, of desecration and scandals that also concern the public life of a country or a nation;

7) to the malicious and defacent management of human relationships and between peoples;

8) to persecutions against the Church and Christians because of faith in Christ;

9) to the attack on the integrity of weak and defenseless human life.

The case studies could also be much more diversified, But the use of a precise and mature discernment accompanied by the Church becomes the best choice to learn to distinguish the origin from the cause[2]. Because, If it is true that certain situations do not always have the devil as a direct cause it is also true that at the origin of these evils there is always its deceived and corrupted action.

Listing the prayers of official and approved liberation prayers, For argumentative completeness I believe is noteworthy the universal prayer that the Church elevates to God on Good Friday. The tenth intention, dedicated to all tributes, reads like this:

"We pray, Dear brothers, God the Almighty Father, because the world free from any disorder: remove diseases, Scacci hunger, Make prisoners freedom, justice to the oppressed, grant safety to those traveling, The return to the distant from home, Health to the sick, to the dying eternal salvation.
Almighty and eternal God, comfort of the afflicted, Support of Tribolates, Listen to the cry of suffering humanity, Because everyone rejoiced to have received the rescue of your mercy in their needs. For Christ our Lord " (Previous x, For tributes).

This high plea on the day when the Church recalls the passion of the Lord, has a clear value of liberation prayer. Indeed, God is asked that all evils and situations of fragility and danger for men come to be removed, To achieve the victory against the one who at the origin of all evil and sin. While being part of the official liturgy of Good Friday, Nothing prohibits a faithful to recite it privately and to ask God for himself and for others the help in the various situations of tribulation.

Finally, here we come to the problem of pastoral abuses in the prayers of liberation. In education about prayers to get healing from God, The congregation requires that these prayers take place preferably in church or another sacred place and that they are guided by an ordered minister. Unlike the exorcism which compulsorily requires the presence of a presbyter, The prayers of liberation, Just as we understood them in this article, they can also be guided by a deacon. But I immediately advance that this choice requires a certain prudence and guarantees for the reasons that I will explain later.

The presence of the ordered minister It is not simply important but just essential to guide prayer by updating that mandate that Christ has given those who sent two by two to free and heal (cf.. LC 10,1-20). Therefore, Public prayers guided by lay faithful cannot be promoted, who will have to look at each other from imposing their hands or make gestures reserved for ordered ministers, remaining within the limits and in the terms provided for by the precise provisions dictated by the Church (cf.. the, Blessings, Rome, 1992, 18).

Healing and liberation are united in the same theological gaze, As the sacred congregation for the doctrine of faith clarifies and how it is our priestly and pastoral duty to remember, Because it is only the Lord "the one who frees from all evil" (cf.. Sap 16,8) And in this action of grace the suffering that accompany the disease are also the subject of the profound desire of man of a total liberation that affects not only the corporal component but also the psychic and spiritual component (cf.. art. 1).

The Congregation has a regulatory will referred to those circumstances of public prayer, Leaving aside the sphere of life of private prayer of the faithful, Knowing that each baptized is asked to pray to God for the living and for the deceased and for their own and others conversion. As for the choice of the place, The sacred context strengthens the will to remain united to the Church and its shepherds, It also makes what the Lord recommends in the parable of the good Samaritan (cf.. LC 10,25-37) in which the unfortunate wayfarer is housed in the hospital-hospital represents the church. The image of the brigands is strongly symbolic and has a spiritual sense that has been described by the Fathers of the Church, who have been able to see the work of the devil and his angels who undress the man of the guise of immortality and strike him to death with the weapon of sin until he deprive him of the life of grace.

All other public places that are not a church, A chapel or an oratory are in themselves unsuitable, it should be superfluous to reiterate it, But it is good to do it in the light of the clear and precise discipline of the Church, certainly not of their personal opinions. Just as some channels and communication routes such as phones are unsuitable, cell phones, webcam I like. Unfortunately, cases have occurred, and continue to occur, in which exorcisms were made on the phone, Prayers of liberation on the radio or with the use of the various means of communication, Not to mention the exorcistic and liberating tours organized around Italian hotels on weekends with lots of promotional packages that offer liberations, healing, conversions or, As some confreres as well as sailed as it would now be disenchanted:

«Using the magical offices of certain charismatic shamans, Not only will the deceased of the whole family tree of applicants be freed, But also those who must always come to the world. Indeed, thanks to the power of the peregrifying liberator from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, Why, Once the imposition of the hands is received by a electrocuted in the brain, they will be born directly without original sin ".

A pastoral situation that deserves attention it is that relating to those who are really prey to the spirit of evil but whose situation of possession, obsession or harassment has not yet clearly revealed. The case in which, Following the healing or liberation prayer meetings, The evil spirit can manifest itself suddenly, as forced by the power of prayer combined with the faith of the Orante Assembly. Often there is not even the need for a particular liberation prayer but the simple prayer of praise or an invocation of the Holy Spirit is enough to find itself in a situation similar to that happened to Jesus in the Synagogue of Capernaum (cf.. MC 1, 21-28; LC 4, 31-37).

Management similar manifestations involves prudence and soul fortress, combined with faith in Christ and obedience to the Church. We must be seriously wondering if for these public prayer meetings there must be no preventive presence of a formally appointed and authorized exorcist, which has the name of Christ and the Church can lawfully intervene. We remember that facing the evil spirit without being exorcist, without being an orderly minister and with his own condition of fragility it is decidedly not very wise. Man has no power on demons and disproportion is the one between an angelic creature and a human creature. It is true that the history of the Church recalls men who have been able to make exorcisms and liberations, But this reality is determined by their particular holiness of life and by a special assistance of divine providence, I like to remember Sant'Antonio Abate, St. Benedict of Nursia, St. Francis of Assisi, Santa Chiara d'Assisi, San Salvatore da Horta. All of them were not priests and had not received the appointment of exorcist but their life shone with that holiness to which no devil could resist. Same speech can be done for San Pio da Pietrelcina, who fought his whole life against the devil, Although he has never received the authorization from the Ministry of Exorcist from the Diocesan Bishop and his Provincial Minister and his Provincial Minister.

To conclude: is the cure of the Church protecting the privacy of those who live spiritual manifestations of evil influence with a prompt accompaniment and free from indebted spectacularizations. All those protective situations for these suffering brothers must be taken into account so that their liberation takes place within a reserved context. For this reason, you avoid bringing these brothers suffering in the various tour liberation, exposing them to the public to make testimonies that often have the flavor of advertising campaigns aimed at increasing the "fame" and the self -centeredness of the charismatic healer or liberator, instead of seeking stability through a priest who starts accompaniment. To this it is useful to combine a group of prayer that can help in the spiritual battle elevating fervent intercessions to God. Just as happens in some practices of psychotherapy, The path of liberation and healing must aim to make man again autonomous and master of himself. The therapist does not have to tie the patient to his person, Thus the priest does not have to tie to his person or his charisma the faithful by forcing him to an infinite path of liberation prayers. If after a congruous period of time there are no tangible improvements, If you have not acquired a serious sacramental habitus, If there is no particular evidence, Then it is better to interrupt these prayers and start a more in -depth human and spiritual discernment.

In any case, the problem remains the same over the centuries, without ever having lost topicality, He clearly put him clearly the blessed Apostle Paul by writing to his disciple Timoteo:

«The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales. But you shall carefully, endure suffering, do the work of the gospel proclaimer, fulfill your ministry " (II Tm 4, 1-5).

Sanluri, 25 March 2025

NOTE

[1] For a greater study of what has been said in this paragraph, please refer to the intervention of Cardinal Mauro Piacenza: Exorcism and sacraments, On the occasion of the XI basic course on exorcism by the National Gris in collaboration with the Pontifical University Regina Apostolorum in Rome and the International Esorcisti Association. 4 April 2016 Thursday 15 September 2016.

[2] To this list is added how much William Bleiziffer says in his contribution: Exorcism and exorcist in the canonical discipline of the Church, in Studia Universitas Babeş-Bolyai, Demonology today: Theological foundations and practical aspects, 2019, p.154 Note 42.

.

_________________________________

PRAYER OF LIBERATION AND HEALING. WHAT IMPRESCABLE BOUNDARY SEPARATES THEOLOGY AND PASTORAL CARE FROM THE DANGER OF FALLING INTO MAGICAL PRACTICES?

«By using the magical offices of certain charismatic shamans, not only will the deceased of the entire family tree of the applicants be liberated, but also those who must always come into the world. In fact, thanks to the power of the liberator wandering from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, because, once they have received the imposition of hands from a lightning-struck person in the brain, they will be born directly without original sin».

— Pastoral actuality —

 

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

PDF Article print format

.

In light of my last two articles on the possible consequences of a way of understanding exorcism, combined with the concept that sees the Devil as a product of marketing and profit (see WHO, WHO), I thought it appropriate to write a third that will have as its subject the Prayer of Liberation.

I would like to clarify that my small contributions are nothing compared to the much more complete and exhaustive works of learned demonologists such as Mgr. Renzo Lavatori or Father José Antonio Fortea.

How can we not remember particularly expert exorcists such as the italians Father Moreno Fiori o.p. and Father Raffaele Talmelli S.P., both of whom have left a flourishing bibliography on demonopathies. We cannot forget, among other things, all the other exorcist priests who carry out their ministry in hardship and who are reliable teachers in whom to find guidance. Considering that some of them have written several books and articles on these topics, I invite the reader to do a targeted bibliographical research with which it is possible to increase the knowledge of these topics. In light of this, my article is only a small tribute and a thank you.

Before precisely defining the Prayer of Liberation, we must first establish its boundaries and areas of competence. First of all, this prayer is not an exorcism but a prayer of intercession with which one turns to God, the Madonna or the Saints to ask for the liberation of a person suffering from the evils caused by the influence of the evil one. With this definition we immediately exclude the clear cases of real diabolical possession, which exist but are very rare; and the cases of diabolical influences such as obsessions and vexations that must require special care on the part of the exorcist priest, combined with a multidisciplinary approach to the case. To be even more precise, let us summarize what the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has established since September 29, 1985 in the Letter to Ordinaries regarding the norms on exorcisms (see HERE) and let us apply what has been said to the Prayer of Liberation:

In the Prayer of Liberation, it is never permitted, even when it is not a question of diabolical possession, to address the Demon directly.

Only the exorcist can address the Demon directly, ordering him, in the name of the Church, to leave.

Lay people cannot, even when it is a question of Prayers of Liberation, use the formulas of exorcism, including that published by Pope Leo XIII, nor use part of said prayer.

Exorcism can only be practiced by a priest specifically authorized by the Ordinary of the place (cf. Code of Canon Law, 1166; 1172).

In further defining the Prayers of Liberation, it is necessary to specify that they can be recited by anyone who intends to ask the Lord for healing and deliverance from evil for themselves or for others, on the basis of the invocation already contained in the prayer of the Our Father which says «deliver us from evil», or deliver us from the Evil One.

Asking God to defend us from the Evil One means affirming a twofold truth: the defense from sin, which is the principal work of the Evil One, and the defense from the consequences of sin, the fruits of which are represented by the innumerable spiritual and physical infirmities and frailties that man has experienced since after his creation. Theologically, it is more correct to see liberation and healing as aspects of the same reality of the fight against sin, over which Jesus, the Son of Man, has full power (cf. Mk 2, 1-12).

In the document entitled Instruction on prayers to obtain healing from God, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in the disciplinary provisions establishes:

«”People are called to joy. Nevertheless each day they experience many forms of suffering and pain”. Therefore, the Lord, in his promises of redemption, announces the joy of the heart that comes from liberation from sufferings (cf. Is 30:29; 35:10; Bar 4:29). Indeed, he is the one «who delivers from every Evil» (Wis 16:8). Among the different forms of suffering, those which accompany illness are continually present in human history. They are also the object of man’s deep desire to be delivered from every Evil» (Official document SEE).

The Prayer of Liberation needs to be a prayer approved by the Church precisely because of the delicacy of the subject matter, necessarily containing within itself that corpus of faith believed and professed that well summarizes that theological principle for which the the law of prayer is law of belief. Although the Prayers of Liberation are not liturgical prayers in the true sense, consisting of a specific celebratory and liturgical context, this does not exempt from a less accurate composition of the texts and contents.

But let’s get to the specifics. In my two previous articles, I have already had the opportunity to argue about the prayer of the Our Father that the Lord himself taught to his disciples (cf. Mt 6,9-13; Page 11,1-4) and as such, it is prefigured not only as the first Prayer of Liberation but above all as prayers par excellence. Excluding this, we know that in the new Ritual of Exorcisms there is contained, in Appendix II (NN. 1-10), a section of prayers for the private use of the faithful who find themselves having to fight against the power of darkness. This list can well be considered as an official and approved list of prayers to be said privately and which concern all those who experience an action of the devil that goes beyond ordinary action. It is legitimate to think, therefore, that the inspiring ratio of these prayers does not concern only those who are already subjected to major exorcism but above all those who find themselves experiencing a particular direct assault of the Evil one.

If we want to enter into interpretation, we can assume that the mens of such prayers in the ritual does not only concern the individual believer but also that wider community that finds itself walking the paths of this world of ours marked by the wound of sin and the fomite of concupiscence. It is useful in this sense to draw up an essential case study that could suggest the use of a Prayer of Liberation, as the Church has always done in many litanic prayers that end with the invocation: Deliver us O. Let us think for example:

1) frequent and repeated blasphemy;
2) feelings of hatred, resentment, destruction and despair;
3) hardening in grave sin and in the rootedness to do evil;
4) tearing conflicts in families;
5) situations of war and natural and epidemiological disasters;
6) to those situations of widespread immorality, profanation and scandals that also affect the public life of a country or a nation;
7) to the malevolent and disfiguring management of human relations and between peoples;
8) to persecutions against the Church and Christians because of their faith in Christ;
9) to attacks on the integrity of weak and defenseless human life.

The casistic could also be much more diversified, but the use of a precise and mature discernment accompanied by the Church becomes the best choice to learn to distinguish the origin from the cause. Because, if it is true that certain situations do not always have the Devil as a direct cause, it is also true that at the origin of such evils there is always his deceptive and corrupting action.

Listing the official and approved Liberation Prayers, for completeness of argument I believe that the Universal Prayer that the Church raises to God on Good Friday is worthy of note. The tenth intention, dedicated to all the troubled, reads as follows:

Let us pray, dearest brothers, to God the Father almighty, that he may free the world from every disorder: that he may remove disease, banish hunger, give freedom to prisoners, justice to the oppressed, grant safety to those who travel, the return of those far from home, health to the sick, eternal salvation to the dying. Almighty and eternal God, comfort of the afflicted, support of the troubled, hear the cry of suffering humanity, that all may rejoice in having received in their needs the help of your mercy. Through Christ our Lord (Prayer X, For the troubled).

This supplication, raised on the day in which the Church remembers the Passion of the Lord, has a clear value of a Prayer of Liberation. In fact, it asks God that all evils and situations of fragility and danger for men be removed, to achieve victory against the one who is at the origin of all evil and sin. Although it is part of the official liturgy of Good Friday, nothing prevents a believer from reciting it privately and asking God for help for himself and for others in various situations of tribulation.

Here we finally come to the problem of pastoral abuses in the Prayers of Liberation. In the instruction on prayers to obtain healing from God, the Congregation requires that such prayers preferably take place in a church or another sacred place and that they be led by an ordained minister. Unlike exorcism, which requires the mandatory presence of a priest, the Prayers of Liberation, as we have understood them in this article, can also be led by a deacon. But I must immediately point out that this choice requires a certain amount of caution and guarantees for reasons I will explain later.

The presence of the ordained minister is not simply important but absolutely essential to guide prayer by actualizing that mandate that Christ conferred to those he sent two by two to free and heal (cf. Luke 10, 1-20). Therefore, public prayers led by lay faithful cannot be promoted, who must be careful not to lay on hands or perform gestures reserved for ordained ministers, remaining within the limits and terms established by the precise provisions dictated by the Church (Benedictional, Rome, 1992, 18).

Healing and liberation are united in the same theological vision, as the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith clarifies and as it is our priestly and pastoral duty to remember, because it is only the Lord «who frees from every Evil» (cf. Wis 16, 8) and in this act of grace the sufferings that accompany illness are also the object of man’s profound desire for a total liberation that concerns not only the physical component but also the psychic and spiritual one (cf. art. 1).

The Congregation has a normative will referring to those circumstances of public prayer, leaving aside the sphere of the private prayer life of the faithful, knowing that every baptized person is asked to pray to God for the living and the dead and for their own and othersconversion. As regards the choice of place, the sacred context strengthens the will to remain united to the Church and its pastors, and also pastorally realizes what the Lord recommends in the parable of the Good Samaritan (see Page 10:25-37) in which the unfortunate traveler is lodged in the inn-hospital that represents the Church. The image of the robbers is strongly symbolic and has a spiritual meaning that has been described by the Fathers of the Church, who were able to discern the work of the Devil and his Angels who strip man of the garment of immortality and strike him to death with the weapon of sin until they deprive him of the life of grace.

All other public places that are not a church, a chapel or an oratory are in themselves unsuitable, it should be superfluous to repeat it, but it is good to do so in light of the clear and precise discipline of the Church, certainly not of one’s personal opinions. Just as some channels and means of communication are unsuitable such as telephones, cell phones, webcams and the like. Unfortunately, cases have occurred, and continue to occur, in which exorcisms have been performed over the telephone, Liberation Prayers on the radio or with the use of various means of communication, not to mention the exorcism and liberation tours organized around hotels on weekends with promotional packages offering liberation, healing, conversion, or, as some experienced but now disenchanted confrere would say:

«By making use of the magical services of certain charismatic shamans, not only will the deceased of the entire family tree of the applicants be liberated, but also those who must always come into the world. In fact, thanks to the power of the liberator wandering from one hotel to another, posterity will no longer even need baptism, because, once they have received the imposition of hands by charismatic layman struck by lightning in the brain, they will be born directly without original sin».

A pastoral situation that deserves attention is that of those who are truly prey to the Spirit of Evil but whose situation of possession, obsession or harassment has not yet clearly revealed itself. It is not uncommon for the case in which, following prayer meetings for healing or liberation, the Evil Spirit can suddenly manifest itself, as forced by the power of prayer united with the faith of the praying assembly. Often there is not even the need for a particular Prayer of Liberation but a simple Prayer of Praise or an invocation of the Holy Spirit is enough to find oneself in a situation similar to that which happened to Jesus in the synagogue of Capernaum (see Mk 1:21-28; Page 4:31-37).

The management of such manifestations requires prudence and fortitude, combined with faith in Christ and obedience to the Church. We must seriously ask ourselves whether such public prayer meetings should not require the prior presence of a formally appointed and authorized exorcist, who has the name of Christ and the Church and can lawfully intervene. Let us remember that facing the Evil Spirit without being exorcists, without being an ordained minister and with one’s own condition of fragility is decidedly unwise. Man has no power over demons and the disproportion is that which exists between an angelic creature and a human creature. It is true that the history of the Church remembers men who were able to perform exorcisms and liberations, but this reality is determined by their particular holiness of life and by a special assistance of divine providence, I like to remember Saint Anthony the Abbot, Saint Benedict of Norcia, Saint Francis of Assisi, Saint Clare of Assisi, Saint Savior of Horta. All of these were not priests and had not received the appointment of exorcist but their lives shone with that sanctity that no demon could resist. The same can be said for Saint Pio of Pietrelcina, who fought all his life against the Devil, despite never having received authorization for the ministry of exorcist from the diocesan Bishop and his Provincial Minister.

In conclusion: it is the Church’s duty to protect the privacy of those who experience spiritual manifestations of evil influence with prompt accompaniment free from undue sensationalism. All those situations of protection for these suffering brothers must be taken into due consideration so that their liberation occurs within a private context. For this reason, one should avoid taking these suffering brothers on various liberation tours, exposing them to the public to give testimonies that often have the flavor of advertising campaigns aimed at increasing the “fame” and egocentrism of the charismatic healer or liberator, rather than seeking stability through a priest who begins the accompaniment. It is useful to combine this with a prayer group that can help in the spiritual battle by raising fervent intercessions to God. As happens in some practices of psychotherapy, the path of liberation and healing must aim to make man autonomous and master of himself again. The therapist must not bind the patient to his person, just as the priest must not bind the faithful to his person or his charisma by forcing them to an endless path of Liberation Prayers. If after a suitable period of time there are no tangible improvements, if one has not acquired a serious sacramental habitus, if there is no particular evidence, then it is better to interrupt these prayers and begin a more in-depth human and spiritual discernment.

In any case, the problem has remained the same throughout the centuries, without ever having lost its relevance, as was clearly highlighted in his time by the Blessed Apostle Paul when he wrote to his disciple Timothy:

«For the time will come when people will not tolerate sound doctrine but, following their own desires and insatiable curiosity, will accumulate teachers and will stop listening to the truth and will be diverted to myths. But you, be self-possessed in all circumstances; put up with hardship; perform the work of an evangelist; fulfill your ministry» (II Th 4, 3-4).

Sanluri, 25 March 2025

.

___________________________________

ORACIÓN DE LIBERACIÓN Y SANACIÓN. ¿CUÁL ES EL LÍMITE INVALICABLE QUE SEPARA LA TEOLOGÍA Y LA PASTORAL DEL PELIGRO DE CAER EN PRÁCTICAS MÁGICAS?

«Al hacer uso de los oficios mágicos de ciertos chamanes carismáticos, no sólo se liberarán los difuntos de todo el árbol genealógico, sino también aquellos que deberán venir al mundo. In fact, gracias al poder del libertador que vaga de un hotel a otro, la posteridad ya ni siquiera necesitará del bautismo, porque, una vez que hayan recibido esta imposición de las manos de alguien golpeado en el cerebro, nacerán directamente sin pecado original».

— Actualidad pastoral —

 

Author
Ivano Liguori, Ofm. Cap.

.

PDF ARTICLE TO PRAY

.

Teniendo en cuenta mis dos últimos artículos sobre las posibles derivas de una forma de entender el exorcismo, combinados con el concepto que ve al Diablo como un producto de marketing y de lucro (watch ON HERE and ON HERE), he creído oportuno escribir un tercero que tendrá como objeto la Oración de la Liberación. quiero aclarar que mis pequeñas aportaciones no son nada comparadas con los trabajos mucho más completos y exhaustivos de eruditos demonólogos como del italiano como Monseñor Renzo Lavatori o del padre José Antonio Fortea.

¿Cómo no recordar a exorcistas especialmente expertos como el Padre Moreno Fiori o.p. y el padre Raffaele Talmelli S.P., ambos han dejado una bibliografía muy rica sobre las demonopatías. No podemos olvidar, entre otras cosas, todos los demás sacerdotes exorcistas que desempeñan su ministerio con dificultad y que son maestros fiables en los que encontrar orientación. Considerando que algunos de ellos han escrito varios libros y artículos sobre estos temas, invito al lector a realizar una búsqueda bibliográfica con la que sea posible incrementar el conocimiento sobre estos temas. En vista de esto, mi artículo es sólo un pequeño homenaje y un agradecimiento.

Antes de definir con precisión la Oración de Liberación, debemos establecer sus límites y áreas de competencia. En primer lugar, esta oración no es un exorcismo sino una oración de intercesión con la que se dirige a Dios, a la Virgen o a los Santos para pedir la liberación de una persona que sufre males causados por la influencia del Maligno. Con esta definición excluimos inmediatamente los casos de una posesión diabólica real, que existen pero son muy raros, y los casos de influencias diabólicas como obsesiones y dolencias que deben requerir cuidados especiales por parte del sacerdote exorcista, combinados con una evaluación multidisciplinaria para cada caso.

Para ser aún más precisos, resumamos lo que la Sagrada Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe ha establecido el 29 de septiembre de 1985 in La Carta a los Ordinarios sobre las normas relativas a los exorcismos (watch AQUÌ) y apliquémoslo a la Oración de Liberación:

En la Oración de Liberación nunca está permitido, incluso cuando no se trate de posesión diabólica, dirigirse directamente al Diablo.
Sólo el exorcista puede dirigirse directamente al Diablo, ordenándole, en nombre de la Iglesia, que se vaya.
Los laicos no pueden, aunque sean Oraciones de Liberación, utilizar las fórmulas de exorcismo, incluyendo la realizada por el Papa León XIII, ni utilizar parte de dicha oración.
El exorcismo sólo puede ser realizado por un sacerdote específicamente autorizado por el Ordinario del lugar (watch Código de Derecho Canónico, cann. 1166; 1172).

Para definir aún mejor las Oraciones de Liberación, es necesario precisar que pueden ser recitadas por cualquier persona que pretenda pedir al Señor la curación y la liberación del mal para sí o para los demás, basándose en la invocación ya contenida en la oración del Padre Nuestro que dice «líbranos del mal», o líbranos del Maligno.

Pedir a Dios que nos defienda del Maligno significa afirmar una doble verdad: la defensa del pecado, que es la obra principal del Maligno, y la defensa de las consecuencias del pecado, cuyos frutos están representados por las innumerables enfermedades y flaquezas espirituales y corporales que el hombre ya ha experimentado desde su creación. Teológicamente es más correcto ver la liberación y la curación como aspectos de una misma realidad de lucha contra el pecado, sobre la cual Jesús, el Hijo del Hombre, tiene pleno poder (cf. MC 2,1-12).

En el documento titulado Instrucción sobre las oraciones para obtener la curación de Dios, la Sagrada Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe establece en sus disposiciones disciplinarias:

«Cada uno de los fieles es libre de elevar oraciones a Dios para obtener la curación. Cuando éstas se realizan en la Iglesia o en otro lugar sagrado, es conveniente que sean guiadas por un sacerdote o un diácono» (cf. ON HERE)

Partiendo de una correcta visión teológica de comprensión del pecado y sus consecuencias, todo creyente tiene la posibilidad de invocar a Dios para la liberación y curación de sus males, así como pedir a sus hermanos oraciones por esta intención. Ya sea que estos males hayan afectado al espíritu o al cuerpo, con una sabia confianza en Cristo médico celestial, los fieles deben utilizar todos los remedios que la gracia y la ciencia humana ponen a disposición para poder aliviar en lo posible tales sufrimientos. En consecuencia, al discernir entre las diferentes dolencias y sus posibles curas, los fieles podrán recurrir a un sacerdote, a un médico u otro especialista en función de su situación actual de enfermedad, sin excluir que todas estas figuras puedan trabajar en comunión para alcanzar una feliz resolución del problema. En este sentido, recordemos una de las piedras angulares de la pastoral de la salud que dice que donde no es posible sanar, siempre es posible y necesario curar.

Las Oraciones de liberación y de curación deben formularse adecuadamente en un contexto de plena fidelidad al depósito de la fe de la Iglesia católica, en comunión con el Magisterio, en obediencia a los sagrados pastores y con firme atención de no caer en formas desviadas y ambiguas que puedan generar equívocos o malentendidos, como se indica en el último documento de la Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe ya citado.

Sólo incluyendo la liberación en un camino sacramental podremos entonces proceder a preguntarnos cuándo es apropiado recurrir a las llamadas Oraciones de Liberación. Ya he tenido oportunidad de explicar que el camino de liberación y lucha contra el Diablo es muy complejo y comienza con el Sacramento del bautismo, en ese camino diario de conversión y cambio de mentalidad que constituye la base sólida de una vida nueva en el Espíritu Santo, en el que a imagen del Hijo, el Espíritu Santo se derrama en nuestra alma y la voz del Padre nos reconoce como hijos amados (cf. Mt 3,17; MC 1,11; LC 3,22). Resucitados como nuevas criaturas en las aguas del bautismo, somos igualmente conducidos al desierto para afrontar en batalla cara a cara, al espíritu del mal. En Cristo ya tenemos la victoria, su divina humanidad fortalece nuestra humanidad; su divino Espíritu es el mismo espíritu que se nos ha sido dado y con el que podemos decir cada vez que somos tentados: «¡Vete, Satanás!» (cf. Mt 4,10).

Del Sacramento del Bautismo pasemos al Sacramento de la Confesión en el que el Espíritu Santo nos habla como al hijo pródigo y nos invita a regresar al hogar paterno para revestirnos de esa dignidad filial que hemos perdido por el pecado (watch LC 15,17-20). In fact, es precisamente el pecado el que aleja al hombre de Dios, hasta el punto de convencerlo de que el Padre es un obstáculo para la felicidad plena y la plenitud liberadora. En el momento en que el hombre, con sus actos históricos concretos y con sus pecados actuales, abre voluntariamente la puerta de su corazón a la acción ordinaria del maligno, el pecado queda consumado. Y el pecado arrastra al pecado, la repetición de los mismos actos genera el vicio, del que derivan inclinaciones perversas que oscurecen la conciencia, la alteran y llevan al hombre a la incapacidad de evaluar y elegir entre el bien y el mal (cf. Catecismo de la Iglesia Católica, n. 1865).

El camino sacramental que lleva del bautismo a la confesión culmina con la Eucaristía y la Santa Misa. In fact, el camino de la liberación no se detiene sino que continúa de manera muy especial en la Eucaristía, en ese banquete divino de la Santa Misa en el que se realiza la presencia verdadera, real y sustancial de nuestro Redentor. En su verdadero Cuerpo, en su verdadera Sangre, en su verdadera alma y en su divinidad sigue venciendo el poder del maligno ― pecado y muerte ― y con su propia persona vence a quien es la encarnación misma de lano personay conduce al hombre hacia una despersonalización humana y divina.

Ciertos pecados actuales, con los consiguientes vicios, entrañan una clara responsabilidad personal del hombre ― el interrogativo divino por la culpa de los progenitores y por el asesinato de Abel es bien elocuente: «¿Qué has hecho?» (cf. GN 3,13; 4,10) ―, una culpa evidente, que sólo y únicamente puede ser recuperada en el momento en que es desatada con el poder de las llaves que Jesús entregó a Pedro (cf. Mt 16,18-19) y que en el foro sacramental se representa con la absolución. Si prestamos atención, estamos ante la celebración de un verdadero exorcismo, el acto supremo de liberación del hombre, que no es sólo una liberación invocada, sino objetivamente realizada en la realidad.

Creo que es útil saber que el nuevo Misal Romano en el apartadoMisa y oraciones para las diversas necesidadesincluye varias formas específicas para la celebración de la Santa Misa que tienen por objeto los enfermos y moribundos (n. 45-46) para luego pasa a todas aquellas situaciones espirituales de necesidades diversas que podrían ser consecuencia de la intervención del espíritu del mal y del pecado arraigado y endurecido (n. 48 apartado A-B-C).

Teniendo presente esta visión sacramental de la liberación que abarca los tres primeros sacramentos del septenario, me permito tomar prestado un pensamiento del cardenal Mauro Piacenza:

«Los Sacramentos educan continuamente a la lucha: sobre todo los Sacramentos repetibles, aquellos que no imprimen carácter y que pueden celebrarse muchas veces en la vida, significan e indican plenamente la dimensión “agonística” ― de agonal― de la lucha contra el mal».

Este es precisamente este el punto focal del interrogativo que nos hacíamos al inicio de este párrafo: ¿qué tan decisivo es recurrir inmediatamente a las Oraciones de Liberación si no se es parte consistente de un camino sacramental? Sin un habitus sacramental preventivo es necesario evitar las Oraciones de Liberación, especialmente si no se siente su utilidad real, sin una cierta preparación por parte de quien intercede sobre la persona y sin una preparación preventiva y robusta por parte de quien las recibe.

Es necesario aclarar cómo la eficacia de los sacramentales (Exorcismo u Oración de Liberación) en los fieles depende de su vida sacramental. Son los Sacramentos los que imparten la fuerza liberadora y curativa a los sacramentales, que se insertan en esa fe afirmada y vivida diariamente por los fieles. No es casualidad que en la Santa Misa, en el Rito de la Comunión, el sacerdote antes del intercambio de la paz diga:

«Señor Jesucristo, que dijiste a tus apóstoles: “La paz os dejo, mi paz os doy”, no mires nuestros pecados, sino la fe de tu Iglesia, y conforme a tu palabra, concédele la paz y la unidad. Tú que vives y reinas por los siglos de los siglos. Amén”.

Es la fe que el Señor busca en nosotros, esa fe recibida en el bautismo, fortalecida en el reconocimiento de nuestros pecados y en el ejercicio de la caridad mutua, nutrida y aumentada por el Cuerpo y la Sangre de Cristo. Sin fe o falta de ella no hay ningún tipo de liberación o curación, sólo paliativos supersticiosos que muchas veces causan más daño que bien al alma y al cuerpo. Y en esta visión supersticiosa también podemos incluir las cosas santas, como el uso de los sacramentales y la devoción a los santos.

Cuando hablamos de Oraciones de Liberación corremos el riesgo de perdernos en una variedad de formas y contenidos verdaderamente diversos, por lo que es completamente consecuente preguntarnos: ¿qué Oraciones de Liberación hacer? Las colecciones de tales oraciones impondrían un orden que es ante todo de carácter teológico. In fact, la estructura de estas oraciones es extremadamente variada y a menudo resulta difícil rastrear su origen exacto: van desde aquellas aparentemente católicas, pasando por aquellas con un sabor devocional vinculado a algún místico o santo, o aquellas de estilo oriental que hacen un guiño al mundo griego y se incluyen las oraciones de algunas comunidades cristianas reformadas (basta mencionar la práctica de liberación, purificación y curación del árbol genealógico de Kenneth McAll) para terminar con las fórmulas con sabor claramente esotérico.

La ausencia de un canon transcrito constituye el problema más evidente, y de esto deriva la ausencia de una colección canónica aprobada sobre la cual basarse. Ésta es una de las cosas que más favorece la posibilidad de recurrir a una improvisación salvaje. Ciertamente los sacerdotes tienen la posibilidad de recurrir al Libro de Bendiciones que ofrece innumerables indicaciones, pero el campo de lucha contra el diablo y sus influencias es tan específico que requiere una mayor atención a fin de evitar la búsqueda morbosa de la suplica y la invocación más decisiva, aún a costa de traspasar la frontera entre ortodoxia y ortopraxis.

La Oración de la Liberación se delinea como una oración invocativa que pertenece a la esfera de los sacramentales. Esto hace necesario verificar al menos dos criterios en ella:

que sea aprobado por la autoridad eclesiástica competente;
que tenga en su composición una construcción dogmática y litúrgica muy precisa que no deja lugar a confusiones o malentendidos.

En el Directorio sobre la piedad popular y Liturgica, la Congregación para el Culto Divino y la Disciplina de los Sacramentos establece:

«Aunque redactados con un lenguaje, por así decirlo, menos riguroso que para las oraciones de la Liturgia, los textos de las oraciones y fórmulas de devoción deben encontrar su inspiración en las páginas de la Sagrada Escritura, en la Liturgia, de los Padres y del Magisterio, y estar concordados con la fe de la Iglesia. Los textos estables y públicos de oraciones y de actos de piedad deben llevar la aprobación del Ordinario del lugar» (Documento integral ON HERE: Introducion, 16).

La Oración de Liberación necesita ser una oración aprobada por la Iglesia precisamente por la delicadeza del tema, que necesariamente abarca en sí ese corpus de fe creída y profesada que bien resume aquel principio teológico según el cual la “the law of prayer” is “law of belief” y viceversa. Aunque Las Oraciones de Liberación no son oraciones litúrgicas propiamente dichas, por pertenecer un contexto celebrativo y litúrgico específico, esto no las exime de una composición menos precisa en los textos y contenidos.

Pero vayamos a lo concreto. En mis dos artículos anteriores ya tuve oportunidad de argumentar sobre la oración del Padre Nuestro que el mismo Señor enseñó a sus discípulos (cf. Mt 6,9-13; LC 11,1-4) y como tal, está prefigurada no sólo como la primera Oración de Liberación sino sobre todo como oraciones por excelencia. Aparte de esto, sabemos que el nuevo Ritual de los Exorcismos contiene, en el Anexo II (núms. 1-10), una sección de oraciones para uso privado de los fieles que se ven obligados a luchar contra el poder de las tinieblas. Esta lista bien puede considerarse como una lista oficial y aprobada de oraciones que se deben decir en privado y que conciernen a todos aquellos que experimentan una acción del Diablo que va más allá de la acción ordinaria. Es razonable pensar, por tanto, que la ratio inspiradora de estas oraciones no concierne sólo a quienes ya están sometidos al exorcismo mayor, sino sobre todo a quienes se encuentran experimentando un particular ataque directo del Maligno.

Queriendo desequilibrarnos en la interpretación, podemos suponer que la mens de tales oraciones en el ritual no concierne sólo al creyente individual sino también a esa comunidad más amplia que se encuentra recorriendo los caminos de este mundo nuestro marcado por la herida del pecado y el combustible de la concupiscencia. En este sentido, es útil trazar una casuística esencial que pueda sugerir el recurso a una Oración de Liberación, como siempre ha hecho la Iglesia en muchas oraciones de letanías que concluyen con la invocación: libera nos Domine. Pensemos por ejemplo:

1) a la blasfemia frecuente y repetida;
2) al sentimientos de odio, resentimiento, destrucción y desesperación;
3) al endurecimiento en el pecado grave y el radicalización arraigada en hacer el mal;
4) a los conflictos devastadores en las familias;
5) a las situaciones de guerra y desastres naturales y epidemiológicos;
6) a aquellas situaciones de inmoralidad generalizada, profanación y escándalos que afectan también a la vida pública de un país o nación;
7) a la gestión malévola y desfigurante de las relaciones humanas y entre los pueblos;
8) a las persecuciones contra la Iglesia y los cristianos a causa de su fe en Cristo;
9) al atentado a la integridad de la vida humana débil e indefensa.

La casuística también podrían ser mucho más diversificada, pero el uso de un discernimiento preciso y maduro acompañado de la Iglesia se convierte en la mejor opción para aprender a distinguir el origen de la causa. Porque, si es cierto que determinadas situaciones no siempre tienen como causa directa al Diablo, también lo es que en el origen de tales males siempre está su acción engañosa y corruptora.

Enumerando las Oraciones de Liberación oficiales y aprobadas, en aras de la integridad argumentativa, creo que la Oración Universal que la Iglesia eleva a Dios el Viernes Santo es digna de mención. La décima intención, dedicada a todos los que están atribulados, dice lo siguiente:

«Oremos, queridos hermanos, a Dios Padre todopoderoso, para que libre al mundo de todos sus errores, aleje las enfermedades, alimente a los que tienen hambre, libere a los encarcelados y haga justicia a los oprimidos, concede seguridad a los que viajan, un buen retorno a los que se hallan lejos del hogar, la salud a los enfermos y la salvación a los moribundos.

Dios todopoderoso y eterno, consuelo de los afligidos y fortaleza de los que sufren, escucha a los que te invocan en su tribulación, para que todos experimenten en sus necesidades la alegría de tu misericordia. Por Jesucristo, nuestro Señor. Por Cristo nuestro Señor» (Oración X, Por los atribulados).

Esta súplica elevada el día en que la Iglesia recuerda la Pasión del Señor tiene un claro valor de Oración de Liberación. In fact, pedimos a Dios que sean eliminados todos los males y situaciones de fragilidad y peligro para los hombres, para alcanzar la victoria contra aquel que está en el origen de todo mal y pecado. Aunque forma parte de la liturgia oficial del Viernes Santo, nada impide que un creyente lo recite en privado y pida ayuda a Dios en diversas situaciones de tribulación para sí mismo y para los demás.

Por último, llegamos finalmente al problema del abuso pastoral en las Oraciones de Liberación. En la instrucción sobre las oraciones para obtener la curación de Dios, la Congregación requiere que dichas oraciones se realicen preferentemente en la iglesia u otro lugar sagrado y que sean dirigidas por un ministro ordenado. A diferencia del exorcismo que requiere obligatoriamente la presencia de un sacerdote, las Oraciones de Liberación, tal como las hemos entendido en este artículo, también pueden ser dirigidas por un diácono. Pero anticipo enseguida que esta elección impone cierta prudencia y garantías por las razones que explicaré más adelante.

La presencia del ministro ordenado no es simplemente importante sino precisamente indispensable para dirigir la oración, realizando el mandato que Cristo dio a aquellos a quienes envió de dos en dos para liberar y sanar (cf. LC 10,1-20). So, no se pueden promover oraciones públicas dirigidas por fieles laicos, quienes deben tener cuidado de no imponer manos ni hacer gestos reservados a los ministros ordenados, manteniéndose dentro de los límites y plazos establecidos por las disposiciones precisas dictadas por la Iglesia (cf. Blessings, Rome, 1992, 18).

Curación y liberación están unidas en una misma perspectiva teológica, como aclara la Sagrada Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe y como es nuestro deber sacerdotal y pastoral recordar, porque es sólo el Señor «quien libera de todo mal» (cf. Sab 16,8) y en esta acción de la gracia los sufrimientos que acompañan a la enfermedad son también objeto del profundo deseo del hombre de una liberación total que afecta no sólo al componente corporal sino también al psíquico y espiritual (cf. art. 1).

La Congregación tiene una voluntad normativa referida a a esas circunstancias de la oración pública, dejando fuera el ámbito de la vida de oración privada de los fieles, sabiendo que todo bautizado está llamado a que ruegue a Dios por los vivos y los difuntos y por la conversión propia y ajena. En cuanto a la elección del lugar, el contexto sagrado refuerza el deseo de permanecer unidos a la Iglesia y a sus pastores, además implementa pastoralmente lo que el Señor recomienda en la parábola del buen samaritano (cf. LC 10,25-37), en la que el infortunado viajero es alojado en la posada-hospital que representa a la Iglesia. La imagen de los bandidos es altamente simbólica y tiene un significado espiritual que fue descrito por los Padres de la Iglesia, quienes pudieron ver la obra del Diablo y sus Ángeles que despojan al hombre del manto de la inmortalidad y lo golpean con el arma del pecado hasta privarlo de la vida de la gracia.

Todos los demás lugares públicos que no sean una iglesia, una capilla o un oratorio son en sí mismos inadecuados; sería superfluo reiterarlo, pero es bueno hacerlo a la luz de la disciplina clara y precisa de la Iglesia, y ciertamente no de las opiniones personales. Así como algunos canales y vías de comunicación como teléfonos, móviles, cámaras web y similares no son adecuados. Unfortunately, se han producido y se siguen produciendo casos en los que los exorcismos se han llevado a cabo por teléfono, las Oraciones de Liberación por la radio o mediante el uso de diversos medios de comunicación, por no hablar de las giras de exorcismos y de liberación organizadas en los hoteles italianos los fines de semana con paquetes promocionales que ofrecen la liberación, la curación, la conversión o, como dirían un cohermano experimentados y ahora mucho desencantados:

«Al hacer uso de los oficios mágicos de ciertos chamanes carismáticos, no sólo se liberarán los difuntos de todo el árbol genealógico, sino también aquellos que deberán venir al mundo. In fact, gracias al poder del libertador que vaga de un hotel a otro, la posteridad ya ni siquiera necesitará el bautismo, porque, una vez que hayan recibido la imposición de manos de alguien golpeado en el cerebro, nacerán directamente sin pecado original».

Una situación pastoral que merece atención es la relativa a aquellos que son verdaderamente presas del Espíritu del Mal pero cuya situación de posesión, obsesión o vejación que aún no se ha manifestado. No es raro que, tras reuniones de oración por la curación o liberación, el Espíritu Maligno pueda manifestarse súbitamente, al verse forzado por el poder de la oración combinado con la fe de la asamblea orante. A menudo ni siquiera es necesaria una determinada oración de liberación, sino que basta una simple oración de alabanza o una invocación del Espíritu Santo para encontrarse en una situación similar a la que le sucedió a Jesús en la sinagoga de Cafarnaúm (cf. MC 1, 21-28; LC 4, 31-37).

Gestionar acontecimientos similares implica prudencia y fortaleza, combinadas con fe en Cristo y obediencia a la Iglesia. Debemos preguntarnos seriamente si en tales reuniones públicas de oración no debería existir la presencia preventiva de un exorcista formalmente designado y autorizado, que en nombre de Cristo y de la Iglesia pueda intervenir legalmente. Recordemos que afrontar el Espíritu del Mal sin ser exorcista, sin ser ministro ordenado y con la propia condición frágil es decididamente imprudente. El hombre no tiene poder sobre los demonios y la desproporción es la que existe entre una criatura angelical y una criatura humana. Es cierto que la historia de la Iglesia recuerda a hombres que supieron realizar exorcismos y liberaciones, pero esta realidad está determinada por su particular santidad de vida y por una especial asistencia de la divina providencia; me gusta recordar a San Antonio Abad, a San Benito de Nursia, a San Francisco de Asís, a Santa Clara de Asís, a San Salvador de Horta. Todos ellos no eran sacerdotes y no habían recibido el nombramiento de exorcistas pero sus vidas brillaban con esa santidad a la que ningún demonio podía resistir. Lo mismo puede decirse de San Pío de Pietrelcina, que luchó contra el diablo toda su vida, a pesar de no haber recibido nunca autorización para el ministerio de exorcista por parte del obispo diocesano y de su ministro provincial.

Para concluir: es responsabilidad de la Iglesia proteger la privacidad de aquellos que experimentan manifestaciones espirituales de influencia maligna con un acompañamiento rápido y libre de espectacularización indebida. Todas aquellas situaciones de protección de estos hermanos sufrientes deben ser tenidas en cuenta para que su liberación se produzca en un contexto confidencial. Por esta razón, debemos evitar llevar a estos hermanos que sufren a diversas giras de liberación, exponiéndolos al público para dar testimonios que a menudo tienen sabor a campañas publicitarias destinadas a aumentar lafamay el egocentrismo del carismático sanador o libertador, en lugar de buscar la estabilidad a través de un sacerdote que inicia el acompañamiento. Para ello es útil unirse a un grupo de oración que pueda ayudar en la batalla espiritual elevando fervientes intercesiones a Dios. Como sucede en algunas prácticas de psicoterapia, el camino de liberación y curación debe tener como objetivo volver a hacer al hombre autónomo y dueño de sí mismo. El terapeuta no debe atar al paciente a su persona, así como el sacerdote no debe atar al creyente a su persona ni a su carisma, obligándolo a recorrer un camino infinito de Oraciones de Liberación. Si después de un tiempo adecuado no se observan mejoras tangibles, si no se ha adquirido un habitus sacramental serio, si no hay pruebas particulares, entonces es mejor interrumpir estas oraciones y comenzar un discernimiento humano y espiritual más profundo.

En cualquier caso, el problema sigue siendo el mismo a lo largo de los siglos, sin haber perdido nunca su actualidad, como claramente destacó en su tiempo el beato apóstol Pablo escribiendo a su discípulo Timoteo:

«Porque vendrá tiempo cuando no soportarán la sana doctrina, sino que teniendo comezón de oídos, se amontanarán maestros conforme a sus propias concupiscencias; y apartarán de la verdad el oído y se volverán a las fábulas. Pero tú, sé sobrio en todo soporta las aflicciones, haz obra de evangelisa, cumple tu ministerio» (2 Tim 4, 1-5).

Sanluri, 25 de Marzo 2025

 

 

.

The books of Ivano Liguori, to access the book shop click on the cover

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

 

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

 

.





If you don't convert you you will all perish in the same way – If you do not convert you will all perish in the same way

(English text after the Italian)

 

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

SE NON VI CONVERTITE PERIRETE TUTTI ALLO STESSO MODO

È dovere permanente della Chiesa scrutare i segni dei tempi e interpretarli alla luce del Vangelo, so that, suitable for each generation, possa rispondere ai perenni interrogativi degli uomini sul senso della vita presente e futura e sulle loro relazioni reciproche.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article – PDF Article print format

 

.

.

Il filosofo Filone di Alessandria (Alessandria d’Egitto, 20 a.C. circa – 45 D.C.. circa) riporta in un suo scritto che Ponzio Pilato fu un governatore tirannico e duro, «inflessibile per natura e crudele per la sua ostinazione», e che durante il suo mandato non si contavano in Giudea «corruzioni, violenze, theft, assalti, abusi sfrenati, continue esecuzioni senza processo e sconfinata, selvaggia crudeltà» (Legatio ad Gaium).

Di queste azioni abbiamo un ricordo anche nel Nuovo Testamento, al di fuori dei racconti della passione dove Pilato è maggiormente menzionato. Il versetto che apre il Vangelo di questa terza domenica di Quaresima ci riferisce di una notizia che solo il terzo Vangelo conosce (LC 13,1). Secondo alcuni commentatori, il fatto che Gesù fosse galileo potrebbe aver influito sul perché. Gli fu riferito proprio quel tragico evento. Let's read the passage:

«In quello stesso tempo si presentarono alcuni a riferire a Gesù il fatto di quei Galilei, il cui sangue Pilato aveva fatto scorrere insieme a quello dei loro sacrifici. Prendendo la parola, Jesus said to them,: "Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, for they suffered such things? No, I tell you, but unless you repent, you will all perish equally. O quelle diciotto persone, sulle quali crollò la torre di Sìloe e le uccise, You believe that they were worse offenders than all the inhabitants of Jerusalem? No, I tell you, but unless you repent, all perish in the same way ». Diceva anche questa parabola: «Un tale aveva piantato un albero di fichi nella sua vigna e venne a cercarvi frutti, but he found it. Then he said to the winemaker: "There, sono tre anni che vengo a cercare frutti su quest’albero, I find none. Tàglialo dunque! Why should it exhaust the soil?». Ma quello gli rispose: «Padrone, lascialo ancora quest’anno, finché gli avrò zappato attorno e avrò messo il concime. Vedremo se porterà frutti per l’avvenire; If no, lo taglierai» (LC 13,1-9).

Non solo Filone, ma anche lo storico Giuseppe Flavio, nelle sue Antichità Giudaiche, scrive che Pilato era solito agire con polso fermo, soprattutto se si trattava di sommosse, fino a essere pronto a uccidere senza pietà i rivoltosi. Quando è potuto accadere il fatto di cronaca riportato nel Vangelo? Per via della menzione dei sacrifici potrebbe essere avvenuto o mentre quegli ebrei si recavano al Tempio, oppure durante il sacrificio vero e proprio degli animali; in questo caso si tratterebbe di un atto sacrilego perpetuato durante una cerimonia religiosa. Comunque sia per Gesù è l’occasione per invitare alla conversione:

"Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, per aver subìto una tale sorte? No, I tell you, ma se non vi convertite perirete tutti allo stesso modo».

Alla medesima conclusione arriva commentando un altro fatto, la morte di diciotto uomini causata dal crollo di una torre. Il testo evangelico si apre con l’annotazione «in quello stesso tempo» (LC 13,1), che lega la pericope liturgica a ciò che la precede. Ovvero al discorso di Gesù sul discernimento del tempo e sulla capacità di giudicare l’oggi e ciò che è giusto (LC 12,54-57). È proprio in quel momento che alcuni si avvicinano a Lui per riportargli l’episodio violento. Sono fatti della storia che interpellano la coscienza, allora come oggi, e Gesù non si sottrae al discernimento e a un giudizio emesso però con un’ottica di fede. E il giudizio di Gesù è innanzitutto libero, svincolato dalla credenza diffusa ancora al suo tempo di un legame tra peccato e disgrazia.

Uscendo da questo antico schema teologico Gesù non solo dimostra la sua libertà interiore, ma anche la capacità di vedere uomini e non peccatori, vittime e non solo colpevoli, proponendo perciò una lettura degli eventi mossa dalla fede e non dal conformismo sia pure esso teologico o spirituale. Lo sprone dunque alla conversione, ripetuto due volte, «ma se non vi convertite…», è un invito a prendere sul serio la vita, ma anche le esigenze di Dio. Non che Dio mandi disgrazie al fine di convertirci, ma proprio perché queste accadono inevitabilmente, la persona di fede non si sottrae al discernimento e alla interpretazione, col conseguente rischio di prendere posizione. A questo proposito così si esprime il Concilio Vaticano II:

«È dovere permanente della Chiesa scrutare i segni dei tempi e interpretarli alla luce del Vangelo, so that, suitable for each generation, possa rispondere ai perenni interrogativi degli uomini sul senso della vita presente e futura e sulle loro relazioni reciproche. Bisogna infatti conoscere e comprendere il mondo in cui viviamo, le sue attese, le sue aspirazioni e il suo carattere spesso drammatico» (The joy and hope n. 4).

È la capacità di scoprire la mano di Dio, la sua Provvidenza si diceva un tempo, dietro gli eventi, anche quelli della vita di ciascuno. Così per Gesù sentir parlare di alcuni sediziosi uccisi da Pilato o di altri morti sotto un crollo non è l’occasione per vedere in quei fatti una punizione divina per i peccatori. Infatti lo stesso ripeterà a quelli che, nel Vangelo di Giovanni, gli domanderanno riguardo un nato cieco, su chi avesse peccato perché lui si ritrovi in quella condizione: «Né lui ha peccato, né i suoi genitori, but so might be made manifest in him the works of God " (GV 9,3).

So Jesus, tralasciando la strada più facile, avvisa che si può imparare dagli eventi. Il fatto della morte di alcuni diviene avvertimento per altri: «Se non vi convertite, all perish in the same way ». In fondo anche la parabola del fico improduttivo pone un problema analogo. Questo albero di fico sembra vivo, ma in realtà è morto, poiché non produce nulla. Nel Vangelo lucano troviamo diversi esempi di persone che, metaforicamente, sono nella stessa condizione del fico della parabola; sembrano morti, ciononostante suscitano l’interesse del Signore il quale va in cerca di chi è perduto. È il caso di Zaccheo: «Il Figlio dell’uomo infatti è venuto a cercare e a salvare ciò che era perduto» (LC 19,10); del figliol prodigo della parabola: «era morto, ed è tornato in vita» (LC 15,32); dello stesso malfattore crocifisso con Lui a cui Gesù promette: «Oggi sarai con me in paradiso» (LC 23,43).

In Gesù si rivela la pazienza divina e la misericordia che non vuole la morte del peccatore, ma che si converta e viva (cf.. This 18, 23). Per compiere ciò il Signore rispetta i tempi del peccatore, come fa l’agricoltore con il suo richiamo alla cura e all’attesa: «Ma quello gli rispose: “Master, lascialo ancora quest’anno, finché gli avrò zappato attorno e avrò messo il concime. Vedremo se porterà frutti per l’avvenire; If no, you can cut it”. Mentre Giovanni Battista, all’inizio del Vangelo, aveva predicato un giudizio escatologico senza appello, whereby: «la scure è posta alla radice degli alberi; perciò ogni albero che non dà buon frutto viene tagliato e gettato nel fuoco» (LC 3, 9); Jesus, instead, è il vignaiolo che non solo sa attendere, ma mostra di credere nel cambiamento e nella conversione del peccatore che sul momento non da frutti buoni o non ne da affatto. Di fronte al netto: «Taglialo!»; Gesù oppone il suo: «Lascialo» (aphes, ἄφες, in Greek). Un verbo che fra i suoi significati principali ha quelli di lasciare libero, rimettere una colpa, condonare un debito. Così questa parabola in miniatura diventa un insegnamento importante per il tempo della Quaresima o per l’anno giubilare che si sta celebrando. Abbiamo bisogno di un tempo di conversione per giungere alla guarigione e alla liberazione. Forse non è un caso che subito dopo la parabola del fico per tre anni infruttuoso, Luca racconti di una guarigione: quella di una donna inferma da diciotto anni (LC 13,10-13).

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 23 March 2025

.

_________________________________________________________

Homiletics the Fathers of The Isle of Patmos

.

IF YOU DO NOT CONVERT YOU WILL ALL PERISH IN THE SAME WAY

It is the Church’s permanent duty to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, in a way suited to each generation, it can respond to men’s perennial questions about the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

The philosopher Philo of Alexandria (Alexandria of Egypt, around 20 BC – around 45 SUCH) reports in one of his writings that Pontius Pilate was a tyrannical and harsh governor «inflexible by nature and cruel due to his obstinacy», and that during his mandate there was no shortage of «corruption, violence, theft, assaults, unbridled abuses, continuous executions without trial, savage cruelty” (Legatio ad Gaium).

We also have a memory of these actions in the New Testament, outside of the passion stories where Pilate is mostly mentioned. The verse that opens the Gospel of this third Sunday of Lent tells us of news that only the third Gospel knows (Page 13,1). According to some commentators, the fact that Jesus was a Galilean may have influenced why. That tragic event was reported to him. Let’s read the passage:

«At that time some people who were present there told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with the blood of their sacrifices. He said to them in reply, “Do you think that because these Galileans suffered in this way they were greater sinners than all other Galileans? By no means! But I tell you, if you do not repent, you will all perish as they did! Or those eighteen people who were killed when the tower at Siloam fell on them, do you think they were more guilty than everyone else who lived in Jerusalem? By no means! But I tell you, if you do not repent, you will all perish as they did!”. And he told them this parable: “There once was a person who had a fig tree planted in his orchard, and when he came in search of fruit on it but found none, he said to the gardener, “For three years now I have come in search of fruit on this fig tree but have found none. [So] cut it down. Why should it exhaust the soil?” He said to him in reply, “Sir, leave it for this year also, and I shall cultivate the ground around it and fertilize it; it may bear fruit in the future. If not you can cut it down”» (Page 13, 1-9)

Not only Philo, but also the historian Josephus Flavius, in his Jewish Antiquities, writes that Pilate used to act with a firm hand, especially when it came to riots, to the point of being ready to mercilessly kill the rioters. When could the news event reported in the Gospel have happened? Due to the mention of sacrifices it could have happened either while those Jews were going to the Temple, or during the actual sacrifice of the animals; in this case it would be a sacrilegious act perpetuated during a religious ceremony. In any case, for Jesus it is an opportunity to invite conversion:

«Do you believe that those Galileans were more sinners than all the Galileans, for having suffered such a fate? No, I tell you, but if you do not convert you will all perish in the same way».

He reaches the same conclusion when commenting on another fact, the death of eighteen men caused by the collapse of a tower. The Gospel text opens with the annotationat that same time” (Page 13:1), which links the liturgical pericope to what precedes it. That is, Jesus speech on discernment of time and the ability to judge today and what is right (Page 12,54-57). It is precisely at that moment that some approach Him to report the violent episode. They are facts of history that challenge the conscience, then as today, and Jesus does not shy away from discernment and a judgment issued, however, with a perspective of faith. And Jesus judgment is first and foremost free, free from the widespread belief still in his time of a link between sin and misfortune.

By moving away from this ancient theological scheme, Jesus not only demonstrates his inner freedom, but also the ability to see men and not sinners, victims and not just culprits, therefore proposing a reading of events driven by faith and not by conformism, be it theological or spiritual. The urge to conversion, therefore, repeated twice, “but if you do not convert…”, is an invitation to take life seriously, but also the needs of God. Not that God sends misfortunes in order to convert us, but precisely because these happen inevitably, the person of faith does not shy away from discernment and interpretation, with the consequent risk of taking a position. The Second Vatican Council expresses itself in this regard:

«It is the Church’s permanent duty to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, in a way suited to each generation, it can respond to men’s perennial questions about the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships. Indeed, we need to know and understand the world in which we live, its expectations, its aspirations and its often dramatic character” (The joy and hope n. 4).

It is the ability to discover the hand of God, his Providence was once said, behind the events, even those of each one’s life. So for Jesus hearing about some seditious people killed by Pilate or others who died under a collapse is not an opportunity to see in those facts a divine punishment for sinners. In fact, he will repeat the same thing to those who, in the Gospel of John, ask him about a man born blind, about who had sinned for him to find himself in that condition:

«Neither did he sin, nor did his parents, but it was so that the works of God might be manifested in him» (Jh 9,3).

Jesus therefore, leaving aside the easier path, warns that we can learn from events. The fact of the death of some becomes a warning for others: «If you do not convert, you will all perish in the same way». After all, the parable of the unproductive fig tree also poses a similar problem. This fig tree appears alive, but in reality it is dead, as it produces nothing. In the Luke Gospel we find several examples of people who, metaphorically, are in the same condition as the fig tree in the parable; they seem dead, nevertheless they arouse the interest of the Lord who goes in search of the lost. This is the case of Zacchaeus: «For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost» (Page 19,10); of the prodigal son of the parable: «he was dead, and is alive again» (Page 15,32); of the same criminal crucified with Him to whom Jesus promises: «Today you will be with me in paradise» (Page 23,43).

In Jesus, divine patience and mercy are revealed which does not want the sinner to die, but rather for him to convert and live (This 18, 23). To accomplish this, the Lord respects the times of the sinner, as the farmer does with his call to care and wait: «But he answered him: “Master, leave him again this year, until I have hoed around him and put the fertilizer. We’ll see if it bears fruit in the future; if not, you will cut it off”». While John the Baptist, at the beginning of the Gospel, had preached an eschatological judgment without appeal, for which: «The ax is placed at the root of the trees; therefore every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire» (Page 3,9).

Jesus, on the other hand, is the vinedresser who not only knows how to wait, but shows that he believes in the change and conversion of the sinner who at the moment does not produce good fruit or none at all. In front of the net: «Cut it!»; Jesus replies: «Leave him» (aphes, ἄφες, in Greek). A verb which among its main meanings has those of setting one free, remitting a fault, forgiving a debt. Thus this miniature parable becomes an important teaching for the season of Lent or for the Jubilee year that is being celebrated. We need a time of conversion to reach healing and liberation. Perhaps it is no coincidence that immediately after the parable of the fig tree which was fruitless for three years, Luke tells of a healing: that of a woman who had been ill for eighteen years (Page 13,10-13).

Happy Sunday to everyone!

from the Hermitage, March 23, 2025

 

 

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Messer Silere Non -Possum and the story of that convinced seamstress that he can give Giorgio Armani high tailoring lessons

I CAN'T BE SILENT And the story of that convinced seamstress that he can give Giorgio Armani high fashion lessons

I hope, Indeed I hope that Messer Tacer cannot not limit himself to writing only to the bishops of the priests who dare not to take it seriously, but what sending a letter also to the general teacher of the order of virgin cats, Pia company in which I am consecrated. I also thanks to being "resolved" and "educated in affectivity", Although sterilized, but not for this acid, rather, quite the opposite.

Hypatia's cogitatory

(In conclusion: Collection of previous articles)

Author Hypatia Gatta Romana

Author
Hypatia Gatta Roman

.

.

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Messer Tacer I can't It attacks in a methodical and violent cardinal way, bishops, Communications of the Holy See and all the ecclesiastics and lay people who in various capacities are not welcome to him and to the fear that write on his blog hidden behind the total anonymity. We are well beyond the legitimate right of criticism, as three years of their writings feel incontrovertible.

The main noble titles I give you in a munificent way by Messer Tacer I cannot: «idiots», «illiterate», «incompetent», "Incapaci", «Marcettari», «Request», "Frustrated failed", "Repressed unresolved", "People who steal salaries". Then if someone dares to complain about the deadly cancer with metastases spread by the gay lobby inside the church, now tragically powerful, There are two usual reactions: "They are matters regarding the private life of priests", "They are critical moved by unresolved homosexuals who do not accept their homosexuality" (!?). Finally the fateful closed: «... and we pay these people!». What you pay is not known, why neither the cardinal Mauro Gambetti, archpriest of the papal archbasilical of St. Peter's very vitupered by him with Dozens of insulting articles, right sweat Raffaella Petrini, President of the Governorate of the State of the Vatican City, Insolent by him with a lot of irreverent cartoon in which he portrayed her dressed as a housekeeper intent on leaving household chores; neither Paolo Ruffini Prefect of the Dicastery of Communications, neither Andrea Tornielli Director of the Vatican Media, neither Matteo Bruni Director of the press room of the Holy See, they have never received a euro of salary from Messer Tacer I can't, they confirm it themselves.

but yet, This harassing subject, can overturn mud tank on anyone, But he is indisputable. Otherwise he takes paper and pen and writes letters of protest to the poison to the bishops of the priests or religious who dared to attentive to his majesty asking him precise questions, by imparting with the occasion also improbable lessons of canon law, matter of which it is said eminent expert, but above all convinced of being even serious. With this with this, the great ecclesial and ecclesiastical matters - that the bishops are very jealous of their priests, as much and the major superiors are as well as they are.

Criticizes and attacks the laity and above all the lay people, forgetting that he is a lay, although it is presuming to give lessons on everything to ministers of the sacred, even on … "Education for affectivity" (!?). From the high top of his 29 he talks about formation of the clergy, Theme that would make eighty -year priests tremble who have dedicated a whole life to this delicate ministry. In the last of his articles he teaches religious and members of historical orders to be truly and worthily such (cf.. WHO).

Attitudes of this kind recall that provincial seamstress devoid of sense of measurement, but perhaps also of the ridiculous, who claimed to teach Giorgio Armani to cut and sew the men's jackets. His, King Giorgio, that the men's jacket reinvented it!

Said this I hope, Indeed I hope that Messer Tacer cannot not limit himself to writing only to the bishops of the priests who dare not to take it seriously, but what sending a letter also to the general teacher of the order of virgin cats, Pia company in which I am consecrated. I also thanks to being "resolved" and "educated in affectivity", Although sterilized, but not for this acid, rather, quite the opposite.

 

the Island of Patmos, 21 March 2025

.

Our previous articles:

– 12 February 2025 — The Opossum is to the knowledge of the Vatican as Henger is in chastity and like his deceased husband Riccardo Schicchi is at work Confessions OF SAINT AUGUSTINE (To open the article click WHO)

– 15 January 2025 — AT THE CLERICAL BORDERS WITH REALITY: THE WOMAN SUFFERS FROM FREUDIAN PENIS ENVY, The Opossum of the envy by Matteo Bruni Director of the Press Room of the Holy See (To open the article click WHO)

– 20 January 2025 — THE OPOSSUM IGNORE THAT A NUN CAN QUIETLY BECOME GOVERNOR OF THE VATICAN CITY STATE, As already was Giulio Sacchetti (To open the article click QUI)

– 22 November 2024 — THE EPISCOPAL APPOINTMENT OF RENATO TARANTELLI BACCARI. WHEN YOU ARE AFFECTED BY LIVER CANCER, THEY CHARGE ON THE ATTACK THOSE WHO CANNOT BE SILENT (To open the article click WHO)

– 31 May 2024 — A NOTE FROM FATHER ARIEL ON THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT: «Handle like a sea urchin inside the underwear» (To open the article click WHO)

– 8 December 2023 — WHO IS MARCO FELIPE PERFETTI REFERRING TO STATING FROM THE SITE I CAN'T BE SILENT «HERE IN THE VATICAN… WE IN THE VATICAN…», IF YOU CANNOT EVEN SET FOOT IN THE VATICAN? (To open the article click WHO)

– 14 October 2023 — THE ARCHABOT EMERITUS OF MONTECASSINO PIETRO VITTORELLI HAS DEAD: CHRISTIAN PIETY CAN ERASE THE SAD TRUTH? (To open the article click WHO)

 

 

 

 

 

Blessed Virgin Mary Gattara, protector of Catholic cats

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Benedict XVI and Dario Argento. The Holy Father Francesco remains on the chair of Pietro and avoid another trauma-Benedict XVI and the Film-Sirector Dario Argento. May the Holy Father Francis avoid us another trauma

(Italian, English)

 

Benedict XVI and Dario Argento. The Holy Father Francis remains on the chair of Peter and avoid another trauma

If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority - not existing in the Church and in the world of authority higher than his - he should decide to acknowledge renunciation, would aggravate our trauma and give life to a disastrous custom: The papacy as a product with expiry date.

- Church news -

.

PDF print format article – PDF article print format

.

It is always important to explain the meaning of words, even when it might appear superfluous.

In current language, spoken and written, certain terms have lost not only their original etymology, they are even used in negative meaning. This that happens even within the Church, where more often it happens to hear ecclesiastical to affirm that we need "less dogmas and more basic church", complaining "forms of excessive attachment to the doctrine", or exposing to the public to the public a priest or theologian defined with a "Tridentine" contempt.

Regarding the concept "less dogmas plus basic church", It is necessary to clarify that, if so, The first to make mistakes would have been the fathers of the Council of Nicea del 325, followed a few decades later by the Council of Constantinople of 381. Their obsession with the dogmas was in fact so strong to give life to the symbol of faith known as Niceno-Costantinopolitan, A concentrate of Christological and trinitarian dogmas that we persist in reciting every Sunday in the creed, through which, In addition to not understanding the "basic church", even pluralism and religious relativism is rejected by arrogantly affirming: "I think the Church one, holy catholic and apostolic. I professed only one baptism for the forgiveness of sins ". A real exclusivity not incident that he shouts revenge on the sky!

Our, Far from the "basic" Esser, However, it is the exact opposite: a church of summit by its foundative nature. Christ himself put Simone called Pietro at his summit, from which everything proceeds with a waterfall effect, from top to bottom (cf.. Mt 16, 13-20).

Use the term "tridentino" as an insult, denotes a lack of worrying Catholic culture, It would be enough to know the rudiments of history to know in what conditions of decline the church between the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries had sunk and what moral degradation afflicted the clergy, together with ignorance. The work of this great council was extraordinary in all doctrinal aspects, legal, pastoral, training, disciplinary and moral.

In the pudibonda society of the politically correct there are various terms emptied of one's own meaning and filled with other things, To then be used in a derogatory and offensive meaning. But here is a truly striking example. If using Office365 we type the word "Jesuit" and seek synonyms, The writing program indicates the following synonymous: "hypocritical, Pharisee, farisea, simulator, simulatrice». Instead, If we type the word "Jew" and seek synonyms, The same program will indicate these synonymous: "Jewish, Jewish". And here it should be remembered that in the German dictionaries of the 1930s, as synonyms of the word "Jew" these terms were indicated: «hypocritical, Pharisee, Simulator» (hypocritical, Pharisee, simulator). And with this we must take note that the modern Nazi of the 21st century have transferred their old hateful synonymies to other objects: by the Jews, that as such are children of a greater God, now untouchable, The same terminologies have been transferred to the Jesuits that, being children of a very minor God, they can be touched and can be insulted in the same way that the Nazis of the 1930s insult the Jews.

To communicate a language is needed, principal that can sound almost obvious but that is not at all at all, There are many people who, while speaking the same language, words give a completely different meaning. This obliges us to clarify and explain the meaning of the words that are intended to use. Example: To the word "punishment" I give a theological meaning linked to its correct etymology deriving from the Latin terms chaste e hint from which the word chastise was born, which means "to make pure" or "purify". Nothing to do with punitive or vindictive actions, In the biblical and theological lexicon, punishment is an action of grace of divine mercy, that is, an act of love, Why, as it is written in the book of Tobia:

«Benedict God who lives forever
His kingdom lasts for all centuries;
He chastise and uses mercy,
It drops into the abysses of the earth,
traces from the great perdition
And nothing escapes his hand " (Tb 13, 2).

The word Tràuma, deriving from the Greek wound (-this), which in the letter means "wound", begins to be used in medical literature around the 1650, in the psychological one starting from 1889 Thanks mainly to the research of the Viennese neuropathologist Sigmund Freud. There are several forms of trauma understood in its more adherent meaning of "wound". Of course, the most serious forms, they are not linked to physical injuries, but to the psychological ones, to the spiritual ones. And we were amazed expansions by the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI who made us spectators and protagonists of a historical event that the Church has known very rarely: The renunciation of a Roman Pontiff.

Through incorrect uses of words The act of renunciation of the pontificate soon took the improper and misleading name of "resignation". Since this was not enough, Benedict XVI cheered the dose by launching the tragically unhappy expression of "Pope emeritus". The unusual way, in many respects extravagant, through which this legitimate act of renunciation has been made and made official, He gave jobs scattered throughout the terracqueo orbe, fomenting the crazy theories of some poor priests out of balance and some little successful lyrical singer who started playing Dan Brown of noartri By printing an unlikely Ratzinx coder, promptly renamed by the undersigned Codice Katzinger.

The Supreme Pontiff Francis, Admitted to the Roman Polyclinic Agostino Gemelli, He has found himself several times between life and death over the past four weeks. He currently seems to be out of danger and after a month about the specialists have melted the prognosis. If the Holy Father comes out and returns to his residence in the Vatican, He will be a very fragile and deeply weakened elderly man, With walking problems and difficulties in breathing and talking, inclined to fatigue themselves to minimal physical effort, need to be monitored and cared for constantly.

To govern the Church it may be enough that a Roman pontiff is simply alive, even if unable to move and say a few words in a low voice, to appear in public and to receive people. To bring trauma instead it may be enough to implement what Benedict XVI brought to the scene of our history in February of 2013, not so much with its legitimate and valid act of renunciation, but in the manner chosen, resulting to the proof of the facts: unhappy, misleading and imprudent.

The detractors of the Supreme Pontiff Francesco The clothes for the effigy of the infamous Pachamama made the Vatican in August of the Vatican 2020 During the Synod on the Amazon. Perhaps it would be more appropriate and coherent to regret the eccentricity of Benedict XVI who in the Vatican had the director Dario Argento entered, By giving us a horror film entitled not by chance Trauma, With a screenplay entirely built on delusional thoughts that went from the "resignation" to the "emeritus popes", from the "active papacy and contemplative papacy" to the "extended papacy" (!?) ... Moreover, everyone torture, Sgozza and spreads blood on your cinematographic set as it can best can. Then, If the perverse psychology of decadent German romanticism comes into play, At that point the limits are lost and the inhibitory brakes as well. With the difference, But, that that of the silver master is fiction, that of Benedict XVI was our tragic ecclesial reality.

If with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority - not existing in the Church and in the world of authority higher than his - the Holy Father Francesco had to decide to acknowledge renunciation, would aggravate our trauma and give life to a disastrous custom: The papacy as a product with expiry date. I pray and I hope this does not happen and that it remains on the chair of the blessed apostle Pietro up to death, because the Dario Argento brought to the scene by Benedict XVI, It was enough for us and advanced for the next five hundred years.

From the island of Patmos, 19 March 2025

.

____________________

BENEDICT XVI AND THE FILM-DIRECTOR DARIO ARGENTO. MAY THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS AVOID US ANOTHER TRAUMA

If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority – there being no authority superior to his in the Church and world – were to decide to make free and unquestionable act of renunciation, he would aggravate our trauma and give rise to a disastrous custom: the papacy as one product with expiration date.

— Ecclesial actuality —

.

PDF article print format

 

.

It is always important to explain the meaning of words, even when it might seem superfluous.

In current language, spoken and written, certain terms have lost not only their original etymology, but are used in a negative sense. This is that happens even within the Church, where often we hear ecclesiastics affirm that we need «less dogmas and more basic Church», lamenting «excessive attachment to doctrine», or exposing to ridicule a priest or a theologian scornfully defined as «Tridentine».

Regarding the concept of «less dogmas, more church of basic», it is necessary to clarify that, if this were the case, the first to err were the Fathers of the Council of Nicaea in the year 325, followed a few decades later by the Council of Constantinople in the year 381. Their obsession with dogma was in fact so strong that it gave birth to the Symbol of Faith known as the Nicene-Constantinopolitan, a concentration of Christological and Trinitarian dogmas that we insist on reciting every Sunday in the Creed, through which, in addition to not understanding the «church of basic», we even reject pluralism and religious relativism by arrogantly stating: «I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. I profess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins». Horror! A true non-inclusive exclusivism that cries out to heaven for vengeance!

Ours Church, is’nt “of basic”, is the opposite: for very nature foundative is Church of vertex. Christ himself placed at its vertex Simon called Peter, from whom everything proceeds with a cascade effect, from the top to the bottom (Mt 16, 13-20).

Using the term “Tridentine” as an insult, denotes lack of Catholic culture, it would be enough to know the rudiments of history to know into what conditions of decadence the Church had sunk between the 15th and 16th centuries and what moral degradation afflicted the clergy, together with ignorance. The work of this great council was extraordinary in all doctrinal, juridical, pastoral, formative, disciplinary and moral aspects.

In the prudish society of political correctness, there are various terms emptied of their meaning and filled with something else, used in a derogatory and offensive sense. But here is a example. If we use Office365 to type the word “Jesuit” and look for synonyms, the writing program indicates the following synonyms: «hypocrite, Pharisee, simulator». Instead, if we type the word “Jew” and look for synonyms, the program indicate these synonyms: «Jewish, Judaic». And here it should be remembered that in the German dictionaries of the 1930s, the following terms were used as synonyms of the word “Jew”: «hypocritical, Pharisee, Simulator» (hypocrite, Pharisee, simulator). The modern Nazis of the 21st century have transferred their old hateful synonyms to other subjects: from the Jews, who as such are children of a greater God, today untouchable, the same terminologies have been transferred to the Jesuits who, being children of a much lesser God, are touchable and can be insulted in the same way in which the Nazis of the 1930s insulted the Jews.

To communicate, you need a language, a principle that may sound almost obvious but is not at all, many people, even though they speak the same language, give words a completely different meaning. This forces us to explain the meaning of the words that are intended to be used. For example: to the word “punishment” I give a theological meaning linked to its correct etymology deriving from the Latin terms “chaste” and “hint” from which the word castigare comes, which means “to make pure” or “to purify”. Nothing to do with or vengeful actions, in the biblical and theological lexicon punishment is an act of grace of divine mercy, an act of love, because, as it is written in the Book of Tobit:

«For he afflicts and shows mercy,
casts down to the depths of Hades,
brings up from the great abyss.
Give thanks to him, you Israelites,
in the presence of the nations,
for though he has scattered you among them,
even there recount his greatness» (Tb 13, 2).

The word tràuma, derived from the Greek τραῦμα (-this), which means “wound”, began to be used in medical literature around 1650, in psychological literature starting in 1889, thanks mainly to the research of the Viennese neuropathologist Sigmund Freud. There are different forms of trauma understood in its most adherent meaning of “wound”. Certainly, the most serious forms are not linked to physical wounds, but to psychological, spiritual ones. We have been extensively traumatized by the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI who made us spectators and protagonists of a historical event that the Church has very rarely known: the renunce of a Roman Pontiff.

Through incorrect uses of words, the act of renunce from the pontificate soon took the improper and misleading name of «dimissions». Since this was not enough, Benedict XVI doubled the dose by launching the unfortunate expression of «pope emeritus». The unusual, and in many ways bizarre, way in which this legitimate act of renunciation occurred has given work to conspiracy theorists all over the globe, fomenting the crazy theories of some poor, unbalanced priests and some fantasists who have started playing at being the Dan Brown of the situation.

The Supreme Pontiff Francis, hospitalized at the Agostino Gemelli Polyclinic in Rome, has found himself between life and death several times over the last four weeks. In the present time appears to be out of danger and after about a month the specialists have loose the prognosis. If the Holy Father leaves and returns to his residence in the Vatican, he will be and profoundly weakened elderly man, with walking problems and difficulty breathing and speaking, prone to fatigue at the slightest physical effort, in need of constant monitoring and care.

To govern the Church, it may be enough for a Roman Pontiff simply to be alive, even if unable to move and say a few words in a whisper, to appear in public and receive people. To cause trauma, however, it may be enough to implement what Benedict XVI brought to the stage of our history in February 2013, not so much with his legitimate and valid act of renunciation, but with the methods chosen, which proved to be unfortunate, misleading and imprudent when put to the test.

The detractors of the Supreme Pontiff Francis are still tearing their clothes over the effigy of the Pachamama brought into the Vatican in August 2020 during the Synod on the Amazon. Perhaps it would be more appropriate and coherent cry tears for the eccentricity by Benedict XVI who brought the famous Italian director Dario Argento into the Vatican, giving us a horror film not coincidentally entitled Trauma, with a screenplay entirely built on delusional thoughts that ranged from «resignations» to «popes emeritus», from the «active papacy and contemplative papacy» to the «extended papacy» (!?) … After all, everyone tortures, slaughters and sheds blood on their own film set as best they can. Then, if the perverse psychology of decadent German romanticism comes into play, at that point the limits are lost and so are the inhibitions. With the difference: that of film-director Dario Argento is fiction by horror films, that of Benedict XVI was our tragic ecclesial reality.

If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority – there being no authority superior to his in the Church and world – were to decide to make free and unquestionable act of renunciation, he would aggravate our trauma and give rise to a disastrous custom: the papacy as one product with expiration date. I pray and hope that this does not happen and that he remains on the chair of the Blessed Apostle Peter until his death, because the Dario Argento brought to the scene by Benedict XVI has been more than enough for the next five hundred years.

From The Island of Patmos, March 19, 2025

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

He will transfigure our mortal body into the image of his glorious body – He will transfigure our mortal body by image of his glorious body

(English text after the Italian)

 

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

EGLI TRASFIGURERÀ IL NOSTRO CORPO MORTALE A IMMAGINE DEL SUO CORPO GLORIOSO

«Maestro, it's nice for us to be here. Let's do three huts, one for you, One for Moses and one for Elìa ". He did not know, But, what he said …

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article – PDF Article print format

 

.

.

La tradizione ha conservato l’episodio, giustamente famoso, della Trasfigurazione di Gesù sul monte, dove si ripete l’epifania celeste del battesimo, stavolta a beneficio di pochi discepoli.

Il racconto, nella sua attuale collocazione durante la vita di Gesù, oscura in parte il significato dell’evento, perché è Gesù stesso a condurre i discepoli sul monte dove subisce una trasfigurazione temporanea presentata come preannuncio del destino di morte e resurrezione che lo attende. È molto probabile che in origine si trattasse di un racconto di apparizione del Risorto, che Marco, il quale ha escluso dalla sua narrazione quei racconti, avrebbe inserito al centro del Vangelo, subito dopo la confessione messianica di Pietro, per bilanciare l’annuncio del destino di morte del Figlio dell’uomo (MC 8, 31) con la visione prolettica della sua glorificazione (MC 9, 2-13); una scelta che ne avrebbe determinato la collocazione anche in Matteo e Luca. A supporto di questa ipotesi sta il fatto che nel prosieguo dei tre racconti l’incomprensione dei discepoli nei riguardi di Gesù resta intatta, malgrado alcuni fossero stati testimoni di un evento tanto eclatante. While, collocato dopo la sua morte, il racconto assume un significato cruciale.

I tre discepoli ricevono, in uno stato di allentamento della coscienza vigile ― «gravati dal sonno», Pietro «non sa quel che dice» ― la rivelazione del Figlio dell’uomo in una forma trasfigurata dalla luce divina. È il punto di svolta: the disciples, after his death, hanno la visione di Gesù collocato allo stesso livello di Mosè ed Elia, cioè di due figure bibliche già innalzate alla gloria celeste e ascoltano la proclamazione della sua elezione divina, la stessa che risuona al momento del battesimo. Finalmente i discepoli «sanno» chi è Gesù, ed è alla luce di tale comprensione che l’episodio storico del battesimo assume il suo «vero» significato di investitura divina. Tra i numerosi racconti di apparizioni del Risorto, quello della Trasfigurazione rappresenta, so, nel modo più eloquente il processo attraverso il quale alcuni discepoli hanno raggiunto una comprensione superiore riguardo il significato della vicenda umana di Gesù dopo lo shock della sua morte. Let's read it:

“About eight days after these talks, Jesus took Peter with him, Giovanni e Giacomo e salì sul monte a pregare. Mentre pregava, il suo volto cambiò d’aspetto e la sua veste divenne candida e sfolgorante. And here, due uomini conversavano con lui: erano Mosè ed Elìa, apparsi nella gloria, e parlavano del suo esodo, che stava per compiersi a Gerusalemme. Pietro e i suoi compagni erano oppressi dal sonno; ma, quando si svegliarono, videro la sua gloria e i due uomini che stavano con lui. Mentre questi si separavano da lui, Pietro disse a Gesù: “Maestro, it's nice for us to be here. Let's do three huts, one for you, una per Mosè e una per Elìa”. He did not know, But, what he said. Mentre parlava così, venne una nube e li coprì con la sua ombra. All’entrare nella nube, ebbero paura. E dalla nube uscì una voce, who said: “Questi è il Figlio mio, the chosen one; listen!”. Appena la voce cessò, restò Gesù solo. Essi tacquero e in quei giorni non riferirono a nessuno ciò che avevano visto» (LC 9,28-36).

Il brano della trasfigurazione, come già all’inizio accennato, è tra i più difficili da leggere e da collocare all’interno del percorso storico della vita di Gesù. Esso è ricco di suggestioni perché presenta molte e ricche allusioni ad avvenimenti e racconti dell’Antico Testamento.

L’annotazione temporale, collocata all’inizio, «otto giorni dopo», mentre gli altri sinottici riportano: «sei giorni dopo», collega il racconto con quanto è appena accaduto. Gesù ha terminato il suo primo annuncio della passione, ma, almeno secondo Matteo e Marco, ma non Luca, ha anche ricevuto una cocente delusione da Pietro. Se poco prima l’aveva riconosciuto come Messia, ora invece gli consiglia, prendendolo da parte, di non recarsi a Gerusalemme, perché il Cristo non avrebbe dovuto morire. Simone, sulla bocca di Gesù, diviene come Satana. Per questa ragione molti commentatori moderni aggiungono all’interpretazione tradizionale che vede nella presenza di Mosè ed Elia accanto a Gesù un significato teologico, essi incarnerebbero la Legge ed i Profeti, anche un’altra motivazione. Questi due personaggi porterebbero a Gesù quella consolazione di cui aveva bisogno. Le biografie di Elia e Mosè, indeed, ci riportano quanto i due hanno dovuto passare e ciò fa si che conoscano quanto Gesù sta per attraversare. Ambedue hanno vissuto prove ardite fino a chiedere a Dio perfino di morire. Mosè in Is 32,32 subito dopo la vicenda del vitello d’oro si rivolge al Signore implorando il perdono per il suo popolo: «se tu perdonassi il loro peccato… Altrimenti, cancellami dal tuo libro che hai scritto!». Elia in 1Re 19,4: «Prendi la mia vita, perché io non sono migliore dei mie padri». Tutti e due infine hanno avuto cocenti delusioni, per le quali è loro concessa la visione di Dio (cf.. Is 33,21-22; 1Re 19,13).

La presenza dei due personaggi non è dunque solo per i discepoli, ma è la consolazione per il Figlio che sta per andare a Gerusalemme. Gesù deve essere confortato e rafforzato riguardo il suo «esodo», ovvero il suo futuro prossimo; allo stesso modo farà l’angelo al Getsemani, secondo il racconto di Luca, nel momento della lotta estrema (LC 22,43-44).

The three synoptic Gospels provano a spiegare quanto è accaduto sul Tabor, il monte della Galilea dove, sin dal 348, secondo Cirillo di Gerusalemme, sarebbe avvenuta la Trasfigurazione e descrivono a loro modo quella trasformazione. Sia Matteo che Marco usano un verbo al passivo, il cosiddetto «passivo teologico»: «fu trasformato»; il che lascia intendere che implicitamente fu Dio ad agire. For Marco, in particular, la Trasfigurazione riveste un ruolo importante per l’economia del suo scritto. Per lui non si tratta solo di ascoltare Gesù, "This is my Son, the beloved: listen!» (MC 9, 7), ma anche di accogliere che Egli è veramente il Figlio. Pietro, in MC 8, 29, si era fermato ad una identificazione parziale, riconoscendo Gesù solamente come Messia: «Pietro gli rispose: Tu sei il Cristo». La voce sul Tabor, instead, rimarca che Gesù è effettivamente il Figlio, secondo il nome che già Gli era stato conferito al battesimo. Questo elemento, by itself, non ha riscontro invece nel racconto di Matteo, dove Pietro aveva già visto in Gesù sia il Messia che il Figlio: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God " (Mt 16,16).

Per l’evangelista Luca, at last, la Trasfigurazione non è solo un momento di consolazione per Gesù o il modo in cui Pietro deve comprendere chi fosse Gesù ed il suo destino. Luca introduce anche il motivo della gloria che si manifesta. Solo questo evangelista, indeed, insiste per due volte su questo termine: «gloria» (v. 31 e 32). In tal modo Gesù, on the mountain, prefigurando ai discepoli quello che sarà il suo destino, dopo il suo «esodo», lascia intendere che esso si compirà anche per loro, e per noi. L’annuncio della passione e morte di Gesù non è mai completo se ad esso non è associato quello della gloria, della risurrezione. Così anche la nostra sorte di credenti in Lui si compirà quando anche il nostro corpo, our life, saranno trasfigurate e anche noi, come già Pietro, Giovanni e Giacomo, vedremo il Risorto «così come egli è» (1GV 3, 2), non solo nella sua forma umana, ma nella sua più completa realtà. La trasformazione di Gesù è lo svelamento della personalità profonda di Gesù, quella dell’eletto, del Figlio unigenito ed è anche profezia della nostra futura trasformazione.

A ragione di ciò vorrei sottolineare quanto sia ricorrente, nel brano odierno, il verbo vedere, che torna più volte ed in diverse forme (v. 27.30.31.36), così come il termine: to listen (v. 35). Essi descrivono bene la condizione attuale dei credenti che, grazie alla fede, possono vedere il Signore presente nei piccoli, nel prossimo o nei sacramenti dove, come scriveva Leone Magno: «è passato ciò che era allora visibile nel nostro Salvatore» (sermons 74,2). E oltre che vedere, lo possono anche ascoltare grazie alla Chiesa che ancora imbandisce la mensa della Sua parola.

To end, un ultimo dettaglio. Leggendo i brani della Trasfigurazione, solo Luca ci fornisce almeno un motivo per cui Gesù sale sul monte, ossia per pregare e la preghiera è, incidentally, anche uno degli impegni quaresimali più rilevanti. Luca è fra gli evangelisti colui che più degli altri insiste su questo aspetto e lascia pregare Gesù anche quando gli altri vangeli non lo dicono: al battesimo (LC 3,21: "Jesus, ricevuto anche lui il battesimo, stava in preghiera»); prima di scegliere i Dodici (LC 6,12: «In quei giorni egli se ne andò sul monte a pregare e passò tutta la notte pregando Dio»); it's here, to the Transfiguration: “About eight days after these talks, Jesus took Peter with him, John and James and went up on the mountain to pray" (LC 9,28).

Qualche giorno prima, secondo Marco e Matteo, Gesù aveva ricevuto uno smacco, proprio da Pietro. Luca ci passa sopra e racconta solo l’annuncio della passione e le dure esigenze che da quello discendono per il discepolo: «If anyone wants to come after me, you deny yourself, take up his cross every day and follow me " (LC 9, 23). Ma la reazione a tutto questo per Gesù è la preghiera che diviene l’occasione per fare unità, per raccogliere i sentimenti più intimi e lasciarsi guidare da Dio, anche se si dovranno attraversare le tempeste della vita. Alla fine dell’esperienza rimane solo una voce. La notazione finale del brano che riporta: «restò Gesù solo», «fu trovato solo» (inventus est Iesus solus); parla della condizione di Gesù anche durante la Trasfigurazione, ovvero durante la preghiera che i discepoli faticano a reggere. Sul monte della Trasfigurazione, dove è salito «per pregare», Gesù è solo, anche «mentre prega». La fatica dei discepoli, espressa da almeno tre annotazioni, ci suggerisce, per via negativa, tre tappe di una iniziazione, tre momenti di un cammino per entrare nel mistero della preghiera di Gesù. I discepoli sono gravati dal sonno, le loro palpebre cadono, gli occhi si chiudono e trapela la fatica anche somatica del pregare. Quindi Pietro pronuncia parole che appaiono confuse, tangenziali a ciò che è avvenuto. In the end, tutti vengono presi da paura. Il loro non dire niente a nessuno con cui si chiude il racconto (LC 9,36) sembra il possibile inizio di qualcosa di nuovo e di positivo. Questo silenzio potrebbe essere il loro cominciare a custodire una solitudine interiore, indizio del pregare, ovvero capacità di ripensare e meditare gli eventi successi e cercarne un senso davanti a Dio. Come Maria che custodiva parole e fatti riguardanti suo figlio Gesù volgendoli e rivolgendoli nel suo cuore (cf.. LC 2,19.51).

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 16 March 2025

.

_________________________________________________________

Homiletics the Fathers of The Isle of Patmos

.

HE WILL TRANSFIGURE OUR MORTAL BODY BY IMAGE OF HIS GLORIOUS BODY

«Master, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters — one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah». He did not know what he was saying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

The old Tradition has preserved the famous episode of the Transfiguration of Jesus on the mountain, where the celestial epiphany of baptism is repeated, this time for the benefit of a few disciples.

The story, in its current location during the life of Jesus, partly obscures the meaning of the event, because it is Jesus himself who leads the disciples to the mountain where he undergoes a temporary transfiguration presented as a preannouncement of the destiny of death and resurrection that awaits him. It is very likely that it was originally a story of the appearance of the Risen One, which Mark, who excluded those stories from his narrative, would have inserted at the center of the Gospel, immediately after Peter’s messianic confession, to balance the announcement of the destiny of death of the Son of Man (Mk 8:31) with the proleptic vision of his glorification (Mk 9:2-13); a choice that would have determined its placement also in Matthew and Luke. Supporting this hypothesis is the fact that in the continuation of the three stories the disciples’ misunderstanding of Jesus remains intact, despite the fact that some of them had witnessed such a sensational event. While, placed after his death, the story takes on a crucial meaning.

The three disciples receive, in a state of slackening of waking consciousness ― «burdened by sleep», Peter «does not know what he is saying» ― the revelation of the Son of Man in a form transfigured by divine light. This is the turning point: the disciples, after his death, have the vision of Jesus placed on the same level as Moses and Elijah, two gloriosus biblical figures already raised to heavenly glory and they hear the proclamation of his divine election, the same one that resounds at the moment of baptism. Finally the disciplesknowwho Jesus is, and it is in the light of this understanding that the historical episode of the baptism takes on its “true” meaning of divine investiture. Among the numerous accounts of apparitions of the Risen One, that of the Transfiguration therefore represents in the most eloquent way the process through which some disciples have reached a superior understanding regarding the meaning of the human story of Jesus after the shock of his death. Let us read it:

«About eight days after Jesus said this, he took Peter, John and James with him and went up onto a mountain to pray. As he was praying, the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became as bright as a flash of lightning. Two men, Moses and Elijah, appeared in glorious splendor, talking with Jesus. They spoke about his departure, which he was about to bring to fulfillment at Jerusalem. Peter and his companions were very sleepy, but when they became fully awake, they saw his glory and the two men standing with him. As the men were leaving Jesus, Peter said to him, “Master, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters — one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah” (He did not know what he was saying). While he was speaking, a cloud appeared and covered them, and they were afraid as they entered the cloud. A voice came from the cloud, saying, “This is my Son, whom I have chosen; listen to him”. When the voice had spoken, they found that Jesus was alone. The disciples kept this to themselves and did not tell anyone at that time what they had seen» (Page 9, 28-36).

The passage of the Transfiguration, as already mentioned at the beginning, is among the most difficult to read and to place within the historical path of Jesuslife. It is rich in suggestions because it presents many and rich allusions to events and stories of the Old Testament.

The temporal annotation, placed at the beginning, «eight days later», while the other synoptics report: “six days later”, connects the story with what has just happened. Jesus has finished his first announcement of the passion, but, at least according to Matthew and Mark, but not Luke, he has also received a bitter disappointment from Peter. If shortly before he had recognized him as the Messiah, now instead he advises him, taking him aside, not to go to Jerusalem, because the Christ should not have died. Simon, in the mouth of Jesus, becomes like Satan. For this reason many modern commentators add another motivation to the traditional interpretation that sees a theological meaning in the presence of Moses and Elijah next to Jesus, they would embody the Law and the Prophets. These two characters would bring Jesus the consolation he needed. The biographies of Elijah and Moses, in fact, tell us what the two had to go through and this makes them know what Jesus is about to go through. Both have experienced daring trials to the point of even asking God to die. In Exodus 32:32, immediately after the story of the golden calf, Moses turns to the Lord, imploring forgiveness for his people: «if you would forgive their sinBut if not, blot me out of your book which you have written!» Elijah in 1 Kings 19:4: «Take my life, for I am no better than my fathers». Finally, both have had bitter disappointments, for which they are granted the vision of God (Exodus 33:21-22; 1 Kings 19:13).

The presence of the two characters is therefore not only for the disciples, but is the consolation for the Son who is about to go to Jerusalem. Jesus must be comforted and strengthened regarding hisexodus”, or his near future; the angel will do the same in Gethsemane, according to Luke’s account, at the moment of the extreme struggle (Page 22:43-44).

The three Synoptic Gospels try to explain what happened on Tabor, the mountain in Galilee where, according to Cyril of Jerusalem, the Transfiguration took place since 348, and they describe that transformation in their own way. Both Matthew and Mark use a passive verb, the so-calledtheological passive”: “he was transformed”; which implies that implicitly it was God who acted. For Mark, in particular, the Transfiguration plays an important role in the economy of his writing. For him it is not just a matter of listening to Jesus: «This is my beloved Son; listen to him!» (Mk 9:7), but also of accepting that He is truly the Son. Peter, in Mk 8:29, had stopped at a partial identification, recognizing Jesus only as the Messiah: «Peter answered him, You are the Christ». The voice on Tabor, however, emphasizes that Jesus is indeed the Son, according to the name that had already been given to Him at baptism. This element, in itself, has no correspondence in Matthew’s account, where Peter had already seen in Jesus both the Messiah and the Son: «You are the Christ, the Son of the living God» (Mt 16:16).

For the evangelist Luke, finally, the Transfiguration is not only a moment of consolation for Jesus or the way in which Peter must understand who Jesus was and his destiny. Luke also introduces the motif of the glory that manifests itself. Only this evangelist, in fact, insists twice on this term: «glory» (v. 31 and 32). In this way Jesus, on the mountain, prefiguring to the disciples what will be his destiny, after his “exodus”, lets it be understood that it will also be fulfilled for them, and for us. The announcement of the passion and death of Jesus is never complete if it is not associated with that of glory, of the resurrection. Thus also our destiny as believers in Him will be fulfilled when our body, our life, will be transfigured and we too, like Peter, John and James, will see the Risen One «just as he is» (1 Jh 3:2), not only in his human form, but in his most complete reality. The transformation of Jesus is the unveiling of the profound personality of Jesus, that of the chosen one, of the only-begotten Son and is also a prophecy of our future transformation.

For this reason, I would like to emphasize how recurrent, in today’s passage, the verb to see is, which comes back several times and in different forms (in the verses 27, 30, 31, 36), as well as the term: to listen (in the verse 35). They describe well the current condition of believers who, thanks to faith, can see the Lord present in the little ones, in their neighbor or in the sacraments where, as Leo the Great wrote: “what was then visible in our Savior has passed away” (sermons 74, 2). And in addition to seeing, they can also listen to him thanks to the Church that still prepares the table of His word.

Finally, one last detail. Reading the passages of the Transfiguration, only Luke gives us at least one reason why Jesus goes up the mountain, that is, to pray and prayer is, incidentally, also one of the most important Lenten commitments. Among the evangelists, Luke is the one who insists more than the others on this aspect and lets Jesus pray even when the other Gospels do not say so: at the baptism (Luke 3:21: «When Jesus also had been baptized, he was praying»); before choosing the Twelve (Luke 6:12: «In those days he went out to the mountain to pray, and spent the whole night in prayer to God»); and here, at the Transfiguration: «About eight days after these sayings, Jesus took with him Peter and John and James and went up the mountain to pray» (Luke 9: 28).

A few days earlier, according to Mark and Matthew, Jesus had received a setback, precisely from Peter. Luke passes over it and only tells of the announcement of the passion and the harsh demands that descend from it for the disciple: «If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me» (Luke 9:23). But the reaction to all this for Jesus is prayer, which becomes the occasion to create unity, to gather the most intimate feelings and let oneself be guided by God, even if one has to go through the storms of life. At the end of the experience only one voice remains.

The final notation of the passage that reports: «Jesus remained alone», «he was found alone» (latin: «inventus est Iesus solus»); speaks of Jesuscondition even during the Transfiguration, that is, during the prayer that the disciples struggle to sustain. On the mountain of the Transfiguration, where he went up «to pray», Jesus is alone, even «while praying». The fatigue of the disciples, expressed by at least three annotations, suggests to us, in a negative way, three stages of an initiation, three moments of a journey to enter into the mystery of Jesusprayer. The disciples are burdened by sleep, their eyelids fall, their eyes close and the somatic fatigue of praying shines through. Then Peter pronounces words that appear confused, to what has happened. Finally, everyone is gripped by fear. Their not saying anything to anyone with which the story ends (Page 9:36) seems the possible beginning of something new and positive. This silence could be their beginning to guard an interior solitude, a sign of prayer, or the ability to rethink and meditate on the events that happened and seek a meaning before God. Like Mary, who guarded words and facts about her son Jesus, in her heart (Luke 2:19.51).

Happy Sunday to everyone!

from the Hermitage, March 16, 2025

 

 

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

From dust to water: The meaning of the austere symbol of the ashes – From dust to water: the meaning of the austere symbol of ashes

(English text after the Italian)

 

From dust to water: The meaning of the austere symbol of the ashes

The holy ashes that are traditionally derived from the burning of the Benedetti olive branches for the Palm Sunday of the previous year perform their entrance door function for the strong time of Lent and already let the man renewed by the risen Christ already glimpsed in the waters of baptism, as the liturgy makes us relive in the holy vigil of Easter night.

— Liturgical ministry —

.

Author
Simone Pifizzi

.

PDF print format article – PDF Article print format

.

Yesterday, with the liturgy of the ashes The Holy Time of Lent has begun for the Church. Once that, According to what reported in the rules for the liturgical year and the calendar, has the purpose of preparing for Easter. The Light Liturgy Guide to the celebration of the Easter mystery both the catechumens, through the different degrees of Christian initiation, both the faithful by means of the memory of baptism and through penance.

As everyone knows The Holy Time of Lent begins with a symbol that is called austere: Receive ash on the head. In the Old Testament the ash is a symbol of what is provisional, perishable and as such is reduced to powder, As you read in Job 10, 9; or because it is worthless (Gen 18, 27). Always in the Old Testament, ash was a sign of desolation and mourning. So here are the gestures to spread ash on the head (2Sam 13, 19), sit in ash as Job (Gib 2, 8), roll in ash (This 27, 30), feed on ash as of bread (Shall 102). Davide exposed his sins in ashes, The ninivites after the preaching of Jonah covered the ash's head. The ash was used in purification rites, When a red cow was burned whose ashes were then thrown into the water, used for the various ritual purifications (Num 19, 1 e ssg). Above all, the ash brings the thought to the words that God addresses to Adam after sin: "Dust, You are and in dust you will return " (Gen 3,19); They underline the punishment of death and the nothing of the creature shaped by soil powder.

In the Middle Ages, public penitents who had to atone for their faults and receive the sacrament of penance as a second baptism presented themselves at the beginning of Lent covered with ash and with the cilicio. In the Christian liturgy, also currently, The expression that the priest uses blessing and imposing the ashes on Wednesday that marks the beginning of Lent are these are: "Remember that you are dust and powder you will return". Accept, that is, The meaning of pain, of the mourning of death as a consequence of the sin and fragility of man. Hence the duty to recognize his faults and to engage in a healthy life, as the alternative formula of the imposition of the ashes urges: "Get converted and believe in the Gospel". The ashes reminding us that we are dust helps us to reinvigorate the sense of true Christian consciousness that accuses us of being guilty and does not give us peace until we have found remedy for our inclination to evil.

Penance becomes a need: We must make penance to denounce ourselves to the sky and the earth that we are miserable people. The obligation to implore mercy and to demonstrate with some of our acts that we repudiate the evil made and the evil we are able to do. Far from then to be a sign of superstition, The ash reminds us of a theological truth well synthesized by the words of the blessing, the oldest one, that can be used on Wednesday that from the beginning of the Holy Lent:

«O God who does not want death but the conversion of sinners, It does that recognizing that our body will return to dust, The exercise of penance obtains the forgiveness of sins and a renewed life in the image of the Risen Lord. For Christ, our Lord. Amen».

The same concept It is also expressed in the renewed formula of the blessing of the ashes that reads:

«O God who pity of those who regret and give your peace to those who convert, Listen with paternal goodness the prayers of your people and bless these children of yours who will receive the austere symbol of the ashes, Because through the spiritual itinerary of Lent they come completely renewed to celebrate your child's Easter ".

And it is also repeated in the alternative formula in which these words are used:

«O God who does not want the death of sinners but the conversion, Listen to our prayer benign and bless these ashes that we are about to receive on our boss, recognizing that we are dust and powder we will return. The exercise of Lenten penance obtains the forgiveness of sins and a renewed life in the image of your risen son, who lives and reigns over the centuries of the centuries. Amen».

Prayers, Remember above, They therefore present us the right perspective from which to look at the sign of the ashes imposed on the head of those who start the Lent itinerary with good will. It is essentially a gesture of humility, what does it mean: I recognize myself for what they are, A fragile creature, made of land and destined for the earth, but also made in the image of God and destined for him. Dust, Yes, but loved, shaped by the love of God, animated by his vital breath and capable of recognizing his voice and therefore to answer him; free e, because of this, even capable of disobeying him, giving in to the temptation of pride and self -sufficiency. Here is the sin, mortal disease soon entered to pollute the blessed land which is the human being. Created in the image of the saint and the right man has lost his innocence and now he can return to being right only thanks to the justice of God, the justice of love that, As San Paolo writes:

"It has manifested itself through faith in Christ" (RM 3,22).

Just the second reading of the Liturgy of the Word of Ash Wednesday, contains Paul's appeal to let himself be reconciled with God (cf. 2Color 5,20), Through one of his famous paradoxes that leads all the reflection on justice to the mystery of Christ. Saint Paul writes:

«He who had known no sin [that is, his son made man] God sinned him in our favor, because in him we could become justice of God " (2Color 5,21).

In the heart of Christ, that is, in the center of his divine-human person, All the drama of freedom has been played in decisive and definitive terms. God brought his own design of salvation to the extreme consequences, remaining faithful to his love even at the cost of delivering his unigenous son to death and death of Croce. Divine justice is discouraged here, deeply different from the human one: «Thanks to the action of Christ, We can enter "bigger" justice, which is that of love " (Benedict XVI, Message for Lent, 2010)

Holy Lent, while starting with the austere gesture of the ashes that makes us bow the head, However, it widens our horizon and oriented us towards eternal life, Since on this earth we are on pilgrimage:

«We have not here a stable city, But let's go in search of the future " (EB 13,14).

Lent while it makes us understand the relativity of the assets of this land and therefore it makes us capable of necessary renunciations, It also gives us the freedom to do the good, to open the earth in the light of the sky, in the presence of God among us.

So the holy ashes which are traditionally obtained from the burning of the Benedetti olive branches for the Palm Sunday of the previous year perform their entrance door function for the strong time of Lent and already let the man renewed by Christ risen and reborn in the waters of baptism, as the liturgy makes us relive in the holy vigil of Easter night.

Florence, 6 March 2025

Beginning of Lent

.

_____________________________

FROM DUST TO WATER: THE MEANING OF THE AUSTERE SYMBOL OF ASHES

The holy ashes which are traditionally obtained from the burning of the olive branches blessed for Palm Sunday of the previous year perform their function as the gateway to the strong season of Lent and already allow us to glimpse the man renewed by the Risen Christ and reborn in the waters of baptism, as the liturgy makes us relive in the Holy Vigil of Easter night

— liturgical pastoral —

Author
Simone Pifizzi

.

Yesterday, with the Liturgy of Ashes, the holy season of Lent began for the Church. A time which, according to what is reported in the norms and the calendar for the liturgical year, has the purpose of preparing for Easter. The Lenten Liturgy guides both the catechumens, through the different degrees of Christian initiation, and the faithful through the memory of baptism and through penance in the celebration of the Paschal mystery.

As everyone knows, the holy season of Lent begins with a symbol that is defined as austere: receiving ashes on the head. In the Old Testament, ashes are a symbol of what is temporary, perishable and as such is reduced to dust, as we read in Job 10:9; or because it is worthless (Gen 18:27). Also in the Old Testament, ashes were a sign of desolation and mourning. Here then are the gestures of sprinkling ashes on the head (2Sam 13:19), sitting in ashes like Job (Job 2:8), rolling in ashes (This 27:30), eating ashes like bread (Ps 102). David atoned for his sins in ashes, the Ninevites after Jonah’s preaching covered their heads in ashes. Ashes were used in purification rites, when a red cow was burned and its ashes were then thrown into the water used for the various ritual purifications (Num 19:1ff). Above all, ashes bring to mind the words that God addressed to Adam after his sin: “You are dust, and to dust you shall return” (Gen 3:19); they underline the punishment of death and the nothingness of the creature shaped from the dust of the ground.

In the Middle Ages, public penitents who had to atone for their sins and receive the Sacrament of Penance as a second baptism appeared at the beginning of Lent covered in ashes and wearing sackcloths. Today, In the Christian liturgy, the expression that the priest uses when blessing and imposing the ashes on Wednesday which marks the beginning of Lent are these:

«Remember that you are dust and to dust you will return».

That is, I accept the meaning of pain, of death mourning as a consequence of sin and man’s fragility. From this comes the duty to recognize one’s faults and to commit to a healthy life, as exhorted by the alternative formula for the imposition of ashes:

«Convert and believe in the Gospel».

The ash, reminding us that we are dust, helps us to reinvigorate the sense of true Christian conscience which accuses us of being guilty and does not give us peace until we have found a remedy for our inclination to evil.

Penance becomes a need: we must do penance to denounce ourselves to heaven and earth that we are miserable people. We have the obligation to implore mercy and to demonstrate with some of our actions that we repudiate the evil done and the evil we are capable of doing. Far from being a sign of superstition, the ash reminds us of a theological truth well summarized by the words of the blessing, the oldest one, which can be used on the Wednesday that begins Holy Lent:

«O God who does not want death but the conversion of sinners, grant that by recognizing that our body will return to dust, the exercise of penance obtains for us the forgiveness of sins and a renewed life in the image of the risen Lord. Through Christ, our Lord. Amen» (From the Roman ritual)

The same concept is also expressed in the renewed formula of the blessing of the ashes which reads:

«O God who has mercy on those who repent and gives your peace to those who convert, listen with paternal goodness to the prayers of your people and bless these children of yours who will receive the austere symbol of the ashes, so that through the spiritual itinerary of Lent they may arrive completely renewed to celebrate the Easter of your Son».

And it is also repeated in the alternative formula in which these words are used:

«O God who does not want the death of sinners but conversion, listen kindly to our prayer and bless these ashes that we are about to receive on our heads, recognizing that we are dust and to dust we will return. May the exercise of Lenten penance obtain for us the forgiveness of sins and a renewed life in the image of your risen Son, who lives and reigns forever and ever. Amen».

The prayers mentioned above therefore present us with the right perspective from which to look at the sign of the ashes placed on the heads of those who begin the Lenten journey with good will. It is essentially a gesture of humility, which means: I recognize myself for what I am, a fragile creature, made of earth and destined for the earth, but also made in the image of God and destined for Him. Dust, yes, but loved, shaped by the love of God, animated by his vital breath and capable of recognizing his voice and therefore responding to him; free and, for this reason, also capable of disobeying him, giving in to the temptation of pride and self-sufficiency. Here is sin, a deadly disease that soon began to pollute the blessed earth that is the human being. Created in the image of the Holy and the Just, man has lost his innocence and can now return to being just only thanks to the justice of God, the justice of love which, as Saint Paul writes:

«was manifested through faith in Christ» (Rom 3:22).

Precisely the second reading of the Liturgy of the Word on Ash Wednesday contains Paul’s appeal to be reconciled with God (see 2 Color 5:20), through one of his famous paradoxes which leads all reflection on justice to the mystery of Christ. Saint Paul writes:

«For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him» (2 Color 5:21).

In the heart of Christ, that is, in the center of his divine-human Person, the entire drama of freedom was played out in decisive and definitive terms. God took his plan of salvation to the extreme consequences, remaining faithful to his love even at the cost of handing over his only begotten Son to death and death on the cross. Here divine justice is revealed, profoundly different from human justice:

«Thanks to the action of Christ, we can enter into the “greater” justice, which is that of love» (Benedict XVI, Message for Lent, 2010)

Holy Lent, although it begins with the austere gesture of the ashes that makes us bow our heads, nevertheless broadens our horizon and orients us towards eternal life, since on this earth we are on a pilgrimage:

«For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the one that is to come» (Heb 13:14).

While Lent makes us understand the relativity of the goods of this earth and therefore makes us capable of necessary renunciations, it also gives us the freedom to do good, to open the earth to the light of Heaven, to the presence of God among us.

Thus the holy ashes which are traditionally obtained from the burning of the olive branches blessed for Palm Sunday of the previous year perform their function as the gateway to the strong season of Lent and already allow us to glimpse the man renewed by the Risen Christ and reborn in the waters of baptism, as the liturgy makes us relive in the Holy Vigil of Easter night.

Florence, 6 March 2025

Beginning of Lent

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The constraint to do the good: The conversion of Jean Valjean due to the bishop of Digne in "Les Misérables" – The conversion of Jean Valjean because of the Bishop of Digne in the work “The miserables” – The embarrassment to do good: Jean Valjean's conversion because of the bishop of Digne to "The Miserables"

(original text in Portuguese / english text after the portuguese originaly)

 

The constraint to do the good: The conversion of Jean Valjean due to the bishop of Digne in “The miserable

The question is: what to believe? In the doctrine? In the Bible? In the liturgy? Yup, ma soprattutto che Dio ci ama

- Pastoral reflections -

.

 

PDF print format article – PDF Article print format – PDF Artigo em tamanho impressable

.

La letteratura affronta frequentemente il tema della redenzione e della trasformazione morale dei suoi personaggi. Un esempio lampante è l’operaI Miserabili” (1862), Victor Hugo, in cui la conversione del protagonista Jean Valjean è innescata dall’atto di gentilezza e generosità del vescovo di Digne.

Valjean è presentato inizialmente come un ex detenuto that, dopo aver scontato una lunga pena per aver rubato il pane per sfamare la sua famiglia, deve affrontare il rifiuto e l’emarginazione dalla società. Questo ambiente ostile lo porta ad adottare una posizione indurita nei confronti dell’umanità.

In un momento cruciale della narrazione, Valjean ruba le posate d’argento al vescovo Myriel. Questa scena segna una svolta nella vita di Valjean. Nonostante la rapina, quando Valjean viene catturato e riportato dalla polizia alla casa vescovile, il vescovo Myriel mostra una compassione e una misericordia straordinarie. Dice alla polizia che le posate d’argento erano un regalo fatto a Valjean, e gli regala anche due candelieri d’argento, aumentando la generosità deldono”. Questo atto di gentilezza ha un profondo impatto su Valjean, influenzando le sue azioni per il resto della sua vita.

La reazione di Valjean alla gentilezza del vescovo rivela un’ambivalenza interna. On one side, si sente in imbarazzo e si vergogna della sua condotta precedente, riconoscendo la discrepanza tra le sue azioni e l’esempio di amore e di misericordia del vescovo. The other part, questa esperienza risveglia in lui un autentico desiderio di cambiamento e un desiderio di contraccambiare il bene ricevuto.

Da quel momento in poi, Valjean si impegna a diventare una persona migliore e a fare del bene agli altri. Inizia il suo viaggio di riscatto a Montreuil-sur-Mer, una piccola città dove fonda una fabbrica e implementa pratiche di lavoro innovative ed eque. La sua amministrazione non solo rivitalizza l’economia locale, ma migliora anche significativamente le condizioni di vita dei lavoratori. La sua reputazione di uomo giusto e caritatevole cresce e alla fine viene eletto sindaco della città.

La trasformazione di Valjean non si limita al successo aziendale e allo status sociale. Internamente, si dedica a vivere una vita di sacrificio e servizio agli altri, onorando la sua promessa al vescovo Myriel. Interviene in diverse situazioni per aiutare le persone in difficoltà, spesso mettendo a rischio la propria incolumità. Un esempio notevole è la sua interazione con Fantine, un’operaia caduta in disgrazia nella sua fabbrica. Dopo aver scoperto la situazione disperata di Fantine e di sua figlia Cosette, Valjean si impegna a prendersi cura della ragazza, promessa che mantiene con grande dedizione e amore.

Il parallelo tra l’esperienza di Valjean e il concetto di costrizione a fare del bene rivela una profonda riflessione sulla natura umana e sulla possibilità di redenzione. Presentando un personaggio che trova ispirazione e motivazione per diventare una persona migliore attraverso un atto di generosità, Victor Hugo sottolinea l’importanza dell’amore e del perdono nella trasformazione spirituale e morale.

Il racconto di Jean Valjean ne I Miserabili ci porta a riflettere sulla capacità dell’essere umano di riscattarsi e di cambiare il proprio percorso di vita. Attraverso il parallelo con il concetto di costrizione a fare il bene, ci rendiamo conto che l’esperienza di ricevere generosità e perdono incondizionato può innescare una profonda trasformazione. Come Valjean, ci confrontiamo con l’ambivalenza interna tra le nostre azioni passate e l’aspirazione a diventare esseri umani migliori e, ancor più, santi.

Come Valjean si è sentito costretto dall’atto di bontà del Vescovo di Digne, anche l’amore di Cristo vincola noi (cfr 2Cor 5,14). Il sacrificio supremo di Gesù sulla croce rivela l’amore incondizionato di Dio per l’umanità e l’estensione di quell’amore a tutti gli individui, indipendentemente dalla loro condizione o dai peccati passati. Questo amore ci vincola perché ci mette di fronte alla nostra stessa imperfezione e peccaminosità, portandoci a riconoscere il nostro bisogno di redenzione.

Ciò si traduce in una reale comprensione di cosa sia la santità, non semplicemente come atti morali, che è importante, ma come conseguenza del sentirsi amati da Dio. Il santo, so, è colui che comprende la sua miseria e si lascia profondamente condizionare dall’amore di Dio per noi in Gesù Cristo sulla croce, in modo tale da cambiare il corso della sua vita spirituale e morale:

«E morì per tutti, affinché quelli che vivono non vivano più per se stessi, ma per Colui che per loro è morto ed è risorto» (2 Color 5,15); «Dio infatti ha tanto amato il mondo che ha dato il suo Figlio unigenito, affinché chiunque crede in lui non muoia, ma abbia vita eterna» (GV 3, 16).

The question is: what to believe? In the doctrine? In the Bible? In the liturgy? Yup, ma soprattutto che Dio ci ama:

«All’inizio dell’essere cristiano non c’è una decisione etica o una grande idea, but the encounter with an event, with a person, che dà alla vita un nuovo orizzonte e con ciò la direzione decisiva. Nel suo Vangelo Giovanni aveva espresso quest’avvenimento con le seguenti “words: “Dio ha tanto amato il mondo da dare il suo Figlio unigenito, perché chiunque crede in luiabbia la vita eterna” (3, 16). Con la centralità dell’amore, la fede cristiana ha accolto quello che era il nucleo della fede d’Israele e al contempo ha dato a questo nucleo una nuova profondità e ampiezza. L’Israelita credente, indeed, prega ogni giorno con le parole del Libro del Deuteronomio, nelle quali egli sa che è racchiuso il centro della sua esistenza: “Ascolta, Israel: il Signore è il nostro Dio, il Signore è uno solo. Tu amerai il Signore tuo Dio con tutto il cuore, con tutta l’anima e con tutte le forze” (6, 4-5). Gesù ha unito, facendone un unico precetto, il comandamento dell’amore di Dio con quello dell’amore del prossimo, contenuto nel Libro del Levitico: "You will love your neighbor as yourself" (19, 18; cfr Mc 12, 29-31). Siccome Dio ci ha amati per primo (cf. 1 GV 4, 10), l’amore adesso non è più solo un “comandamento”, ma è la risposta al dono dell’amore, col quale Dio ci viene incontro» (Pope Benedict XVI Lettera Enciclica Deus Caritas Est, n.1).

Jundiaì, 3 March 2025

.

______________________________

 

THE CONVERSION OF JEAN VALJEAN BECAUSE OF THE BISHOP OF DIGNE IN THE WORKLES MISERABLES

The question is: what to believe in? In doctrine? In the Bible? In the liturgy? Yes, but above all that God loves us.

— pastoral reflections —

Author
Eneas de Camargo Beast

.

Literature frequently addresses the theme of redemption and the moral transformation of its characters. A striking example is Victor Hugo’sLes Misérables” (1862), in which the conversion of the protagonist Jean Valjean is triggered by the act of kindness and generosity of the Bishop of Digne.

Valjean is initially presented as a former convict who, after serving a long sentence for stealing bread to feed his family, must face rejection and marginalization from society. This hostile environment leads him to adopt a hardened position towards humanity.

At a crucial moment in the narrative, Valjean steals the silverware from Bishop Myriel. This scene marks a turning point in Valjean’s life. Despite the robbery, when Valjean is captured and brought back to the bishop’s house by the police, Bishop Myriel displays extraordinary compassion and mercy. He tells the police that the silverware was a gift to Valjean, and also gives him two silver candlesticks, increasing the generosity of thegift.This act of kindness has a profound impact on Valjean, influencing his actions for the rest of his life.

Valjean’s reaction to the bishop’s kindness reveals an internal ambivalence. On the one hand, he feels embarrassed and ashamed of his previous conduct, recognizing the discrepancy between his actions and the bishop’s example of love and mercy. On the other hand, this experience awakens in him a genuine desire for change and a desire to reciprocate the good received.

From that moment on, Valjean is committed to becoming a better person and doing good for others. He begins his journey of redemption in Montreuil-sur-Mer, a small town where he establishes a factory and implements innovative and fair labor practices. His administration not only revitalizes the local economy, but also significantly improves the living conditions of the workers. His reputation as a just and charitable man grows, and he is eventually elected mayor of the town.

Valjean’s transformation is not limited to business success and social status. Internally, he dedicates himself to living a life of sacrifice and service to others, honoring his promise to Bishop Myriel. He intervenes in various situations to help those in need, often risking his own safety. A notable example is his interaction with Fantine, a disgraced worker in his factory. After discovering the desperate situation of Fantine and her daughter Cosette, Valjean pledges to care for the girl, a promise he keeps with great dedication and love.

The parallel between Valjean’s experience and the concept of being forced to do good reveals a profound reflection on human nature and the possibility of redemption. By presenting a character who finds inspiration and motivation to become a better person through an act of generosity, Victor Hugo highlights the importance of love and forgiveness in spiritual and moral transformation.

The story of Jean Valjean inLes Misérables leads us to reflect on the ability of human beings to redeem themselves and change their life path. Through the parallel with the concept of being forced to do good, we realize that the experience of receiving generosity and unconditional forgiveness can trigger a profound transformation. Like Valjean, we are confronted with the internal ambivalence between our past actions and the aspiration to become better and, even more, saintly human beings.

Just as Valjean felt bound by the act of kindness of the Bishop of Digne, the love of Christ also binds us (cf. 2 Color 5:14). The supreme sacrifice of Jesus on the cross reveals God’s unconditional love for humanity and the extension of that love to all individuals, regardless of their condition or past sins. This love binds us because it confronts us with our own imperfection and sinfulness, leading us to recognize our need for redemption.

This translates into a real understanding of what holiness is, not simply as moral acts, which is important, but as a consequence of feeling loved by God. The saint, therefore, is one who understands his misery and allows himself to be profoundly conditioned by God’s love for us in Jesus Christ on the cross, so as to change the course of his spiritual and moral life:

«and that He died for all, that those who live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him who died for them and rose again» (2Color 5,15) «For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life» (Jn 3, 16).

The question is: what to believe in? In doctrine? In the Bible? In the liturgy? Yes, but above all that God loves us:

«We have come to believe in God’s love: in these words the Christian can express the fundamental decision of his life. Being Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction. Saint John’s Gospel describes that event in these words: “God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him shouldhave eternal life” (3:16). In acknowledging the centrality of love, Christian faith has retained the core of Israel’s faith, while at the same time giving it new depth and breadth. The pious Jew prayed daily the words of the Book of Deuteronomy which expressed the heart of his existence: “Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God is one Lord, and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul and with all your might” (6:4-5). Jesus united into a single precept this commandment of love for God and the commandment of love for neighbour found in the Book of Leviticus: “You shall love your neighbour as yourself” (19:18; cf. Mk 12:29-31). Since God has first loved us (cf. 1 Jn 4:10), love is now no longer a mere “command”; it is the response to the gift of love with which God draws near to us» (Benedict XVI, Deus Caritas est, 1).

Jundiaì, 3 March 2025

.

________________________________

O CONSTRANGIMENTO PARA FAZER O BEM: A CONVERSÃO DE JEAN VALJEAN POR CAUSA DO BISPO DE DIGNE EMOS MISERÁVEIS

A pergunta é crer no quê? Na doutrina? Na Bíblia? Na Liturgia? Sim, mas acima de tudo que Deus nos ama.

— Pastoral reflections —

Author
Eneas de Camargo Beast

 

A literatura frequentemente aborda a temática da redenção e da transformação moral de seus personagens. Um exemplo marcante é a obraOs Miseráveis” (1862), de Victor Hugo, em que a conversão do protagonista Jean Valjean é desencadeada pelo ato de bondade e generosidade do Bispo de Digne.

Valjean é inicialmente apresentado como um ex-presidiário que, após cumprir uma longa pena por roubar um pão para alimentar sua família, enfrenta a rejeição e a marginalização da sociedade. Esse ambiente hostil o leva a adotar uma postura endurecida em relação à humanidade.

No momento crucial da narrativa, Valjean rouba talheres de prata do Bispo Myriel. Esta cena marca um ponto de virada na vida de Valjean. Apesar do roubo, quando Valjean é capturado e levado de volta à casa do bispo pela polícia, o Bispo Myriel demonstra uma extraordinária compaixão e misericórdia. Ele diz à polícia que os talheres de prata foi um presente dado a Valjean, e ainda dá a ele dois castiçais de prata, aumentando a generosidade do “here I'm”. Este ato de bondade tem um impacto profundo em Valjean, influenciando suas ações pelo resto de sua vida.

A reação de Valjean diante da bondade do Bispo revela uma ambivalência interna. Por um lado, ele se sente constrangido e envergonhado por sua conduta anterior, reconhecendo a discrepância entre suas ações e o exemplo de amor e misericórdia do Bispo. Por outro lado, essa experiência desperta nele um desejo genuíno de mudança e uma vontade de retribuir o bem recebido.

A partir desse momento, Valjean se empenha em se tornar uma pessoa melhor e fazer o bem aos outros. Ele inicia sua jornada de redenção em Montreuil-sur-Mer, uma pequena cidade onde ele estabelece uma fábrica e implementa práticas de trabalho inovadoras e justas. Sua administração não só revitaliza a economia local, mas também melhora significativamente as condições de vida dos trabalhadores. Sua reputação como um homem justo e caridoso cresce, e ele é eventualmente eleito prefeito da cidade.

A transformação de Valjean não se limita ao sucesso empresarial e ao status social. Internamente, ele se dedica a viver uma vida de sacrifício e serviço aos outros, honrando sua promessa ao Bispo Myriel. Ele intervém em várias situações para ajudar pessoas em dificuldade, muitas vezes colocando sua própria segurança em risco. Um exemplo notável é sua interação com Fantine, uma trabalhadora de sua fábrica que caiu em desgraça. Ao descobrir a situação desesperadora de Fantine e sua filha, Cosette, Valjean se compromete a cuidar da menina, uma promessa que ele cumpre com grande dedicação e amor.

O paralelo entre a experiência de Valjean e o conceito do constrangimento para fazer o bem revela uma reflexão profunda sobre a natureza humana e a possibilidade de redenção. Ao apresentar um personagem que encontra a inspiração e a motivação para se tornar uma pessoa melhor através de um ato de generosidade, Victor Hugo ressalta a importância do amor e do perdão na transformação espiritual e moral.

A história de Jean Valjean emOs Miseráveis nos leva a refletir sobre a capacidade do ser humano de se redimir e mudar sua trajetória de vida. Através do paralelo com o conceito do constrangimento para fazer o bem, percebemos que a experiência de receber generosidade e perdão incondicional pode desencadear uma profunda transformação. Assim como Valjean, somos confrontados com a ambivalência interna entre nossas ações passadas e a aspiração de nos tornarmos melhores seres humanos e, mais ainda, santos.

Assim como Valjean sentiu-se constrangido pelo ato de bondade do Bispo de Digne, o amor de Cristo também nos constrange (cf. 2Color 5,14). O sacrifício supremo de Jesus na cruz revela o amor incondicional de Deus pela humanidade e a extensão desse amor a todos os indivíduos, independentemente de sua condição ou pecados passados. Esse amor nos constrange porque nos confronta com a nossa própria imperfeição e pecaminosidade, levando-nos a reconhecer nossa necessidade de redenção.

Disso resulta na real compreensão do que é santidade, não meramente como atos morais, que é importante, mas como consequência, do sentir-se amado por Deus. O santo, pois, é aquele que entende a sua miséria e se vê profundamente constrangido pelo amor de Deus por nós em Jesus Cristo na cruz, de forma que, muda o rumo de sua vida espiritual e moral:

«Disso resulta na real compreensão do que é santidade, não meramente como atos morais, que é importante, mas como consequência, do sentir-se amado por Deus. O santo, pois, é aquele que entende a sua miséria e se vê profundamente constrangido pelo amor de Deus por nós em Jesus Cristo na cruz, de forma que, muda o rumo de sua vida espiritual e moral: “E ele morreu por todos, para que os que vivem não vivam mais para si mesmos, mas para aquele que por eles morreu e ressuscitou”(2Color 5,15); ou ainda: “Com efeito, de tal modo Deus amou o mundo, que lhe deu seu Filho único, para que todo o que nele crer não pereça, mas tenha a vida eterna”(Jo 3,16).

A pergunta é crer no quê? Na doutrina? Na Bíblia? Na Liturgia? Sim, mas acima de tudo que Deus nos ama:

«Deste modo pode o cristão exprimir a opção fundamental da sua vida. Ao início do ser cristão, não há uma decisão ética ou uma grande ideia, mas o encontro com um acontecimento, com uma Pessoa que dá à vida um novo horizonte e, desta forma, o rumo decisivo. No seu Evangelho, João tinha expressado este acontecimento com as palavras seguintes: “Deus amou de tal modo o mundo que lhe deu o seu Filho único para que todo o que n’Ele crer (…) tenha a vida eterna” (3, 16). Com a centralidade do amor, a fé cristã acolheu o núcleo da fé de Israel e, ao mesmo tempo, deu a este núcleo uma nova profundidade e amplitude. O crente israelita, de facto, reza todos os dias com as palavras do Livro do Deuteronómio, nas quais sabe que está contido o centro da sua existência: “Escuta, ó Israel! O Senhor, nosso Deus, é o único Senhor! Amarás ao Senhor, teu Deus, com todo o teu coração, com toda a tua alma e com todas as tuas forças” (6, 4-5). Jesus uniu — fazendo deles um único preceito — o mandamento do amor a Deus com o do amor ao próximo, contido noLivro do Levítico: “Amarás o teu próximo como a ti mesmo” (Jo 4, 10), agora o amor já não é apenas ummandamento”, mas é a resposta ao dom do amor com que Deus vem ao nosso encontro» (Papa Bento XVI, Carta Encíclica Deus Caritas Est, n.1).

Jundiaì, 3 Marchar 2025

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

 

Read more