If you don't convert you you will all perish in the same way – If you do not convert you will all perish in the same way
/in Homiletics/by Hermit Monk(English text after the Italian)

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos
If you don't convert you you will all perish in the same way
It is a permanent duty of the Church to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, suitable for each generation, can answer the perennial questions of men on the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships.

Author
Hermit Monk
.
![]()
PDF print format article – PDF Article print format
.
.
The philosopher Filone of Alessandria (Alexandria of Egypt, 20 a.C. circa – 45 D.C.. circa) He reports in one of his writings that Ponzio Pilato was a tyrannical and hard governor, "Inflexible by nature and cruel for its obstinacy", and that during his mandate were not counted in Judea «Corruption, violence, theft, assaults, unbridled abuse, continuous executions without process and boundless, wild cruelty " (Delegation to Gaius).

We also have a memory of these actions in the New Testament, outside the stories of the passion where Pilate is more mentioned. The verse that opens the Gospel of this third Sunday of Lent brings us to news that only the third Gospel knows (LC 13,1). According to some commentators, the fact that Jesus was Galileo could have influenced why. That tragic event was reported to him. Let's read the passage:
«In that same time some showed up to report to Jesus the fact of those Galilei, whose pilate blood had brought together with that of their sacrifices. Taking the floor, Jesus said to them,: "Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, for they suffered such things? No, I tell you, but unless you repent, you will all perish equally. Or those eighteen people, on which the Torre di Sìloe collapsed and killed them, You believe that they were worse offenders than all the inhabitants of Jerusalem? No, I tell you, but unless you repent, all perish in the same way ». This parable also said: “A man had planted a fig tree in his vineyard and came to look there, but he found it. Then he said to the winemaker: "There, I have been looking for fruits on this tree for three years, I find none. Therefore it! Why should it exhaust the soil?». But that replied that: "Master, Leave it again this year, As long as I have honeys around him and have put the fertilizer. We will see if it will bear fruit for the future; If no, you will cut it " (LC 13,1-9).
Not just a trend, But also the historian Giuseppe Flavio, in its Jewish antiquities, He writes that Pilate used to act with a firm wrist, especially if they were riots, Until being ready to kill the rioters without merciless. When the news reported in the Gospel could have happened? Due to the mention of the sacrifices it could have happened or while those Jews went to the temple, or during the actual sacrifice of animals; In this case it would be a sacrilegious act perpetuated during a religious ceremony. However it is for Jesus is an opportunity to invite the conversion:
"Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, for having suffered such a lot? No, I tell you, But if you don't convert you you will all perish in the same way ".
At the same conclusion it comes by commenting on another fact, The death of eighteen men caused by the collapse of a tower. The evangelical text opens with the annotation "in that same time" (LC 13,1), that binds the liturgical pericope to what precedes it. Or to Jesus' speech on the discernment of time and the ability to judge today and what is right (LC 12,54-57). It is precisely at that moment that some approach him to bring him the violent episode to him. They are made of history that question consciousness, then like today, And Jesus does not escape discernment and a judgment issued however with a perspective of faith. And the judgment of Jesus is first of all free, free from the belief still widespread at its time of a link between sin and misfortune.
Leaving this ancient theological scheme Jesus not only demonstrates his inner freedom, But also the ability to see men and non -sinners, victims and not only guilty, therefore proposing a reading of the events moved by faith and not by conformism, even it theological or spiritual. The spur therefore to the conversion, repeated twice, "But if you don't convert ...", It is an invitation to take life seriously, but also the needs of God. Not that God send misfortunes in order to convert us, But precisely because these inevitably happen, The person of faith does not escape discernment and interpretation, with the consequent risk of taking position. In this regard, the Second Vatican Council is expressed:
«It is the permanent duty of the Church to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, suitable for each generation, can answer the perennial questions of men on the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships. In fact, we must know and understand the world in which we live, his expectations, his aspirations and his often dramatic character " (The joy and hope n. 4).
It is the ability to discover the hand of God, His providence was once said, Behind the events, also those of each life. So for Jesus hearing about some seditious killed by Pilate or other deaths under a collapse is not an opportunity to see in those facts a divine punishment for sinners. In fact the same will repeat to those who, in the Gospel of John, will ask him about a blind birth, On who he had sinned because he finds himself in that condition: "Nor did he sin, nor his parents, but so might be made manifest in him the works of God " (GV 9,3).
So Jesus, leaving the easiest road, warns that you can learn from events. The fact of the death of some becomes a warning for others: "If you don't convert, all perish in the same way ». After all, the improductive fig parable also poses a similar problem. This fig tree seems alive, But in reality he died, since it does not produce anything. In the Lucanian Gospel we find several examples of people who, metaphorically, they are in the same condition as the cotton priest; they seem dead, nevertheless they arouse the interest of the Lord who is looking for who is lost. This is the case of Zaccheo: "The son of man in fact came to look for and save what was lost" (LC 19,10); of the prodigal son of the parable: "It was dead, And he came back to life " (LC 15,32); of the same crucified malfactor with him to whom Jesus promises: "Today you will be with me in Heaven" (LC 23,43).
In Jesus the divine patience and mercy is revealed who does not want the death of the sinner, but that converts and alive (cf.. This 18, 23). To perform this, the Lord respects the singer's times, as the farmer does with his call to care and waiting: "But that replied that: “Master, Leave it again this year, As long as I have honeys around him and have put the fertilizer. We will see if it will bear fruit for the future; If no, you can cut it”. While Giovanni Battista, at the beginning of the Gospel, he had preached an eschatological judgment without appeal, whereby: «The dark is placed at the root of the trees; Therefore every tree that does not give good fruit is cut and thrown into the fire " (LC 3, 9); Jesus, instead, It is the vineyard that not only knows how to wait, but it shows that he believes in the change and conversion of the sinner who at the moment not from good fruits or does not give at all. In front of the net: "Cut it!»; Jesus opposes his: "Leave it" (Aphes, as you, in Greek). A verb that among its main meanings has to leave free, put back a fault, season a debt. So this miniature parable becomes an important teaching for the time of Lent or for the jubilee year that is celebrating itself. We need a conversion time to reach healing and liberation. Perhaps it is no coincidence that immediately after the Fico parable for three years in the unsuccessful, Luca tells of a healing: that of a woman infirm for eighteen years (LC 13,10-13).
Happy Sunday everyone!
from the Hermitage, 23 March 2025
.
_________________________________________________________

Homiletics the Fathers of The Isle of Patmos
.
IF YOU DO NOT CONVERT YOU WILL ALL PERISH IN THE SAME WAY
It is the Church’s permanent duty to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, in a way suited to each generation, it can respond to men’s perennial questions about the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships.

Author
Hermit Monk
.
![]()
.
The philosopher Philo of Alexandria (Alexandria of Egypt, around 20 BC – around 45 SUCH) reports in one of his writings that Pontius Pilate was a tyrannical and harsh governor «inflexible by nature and cruel due to his obstinacy», and that during his mandate there was no shortage of «corruption, violence, theft, assaults, unbridled abuses, continuous executions without trial, savage cruelty” (Delegation to Gaius).

We also have a memory of these actions in the New Testament, outside of the passion stories where Pilate is mostly mentioned. The verse that opens the Gospel of this third Sunday of Lent tells us of news that only the third Gospel knows (Page 13,1). According to some commentators, the fact that Jesus was a Galilean may have influenced why. That tragic event was reported to him. Let’s read the passage:
«At that time some people who were present there told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with the blood of their sacrifices. He said to them in reply, “Do you think that because these Galileans suffered in this way they were greater sinners than all other Galileans? By no means! But I tell you, if you do not repent, you will all perish as they did! Or those eighteen people who were killed when the tower at Siloam fell on them, do you think they were more guilty than everyone else who lived in Jerusalem? By no means! But I tell you, if you do not repent, you will all perish as they did!”. And he told them this parable: “There once was a person who had a fig tree planted in his orchard, and when he came in search of fruit on it but found none, he said to the gardener, “For three years now I have come in search of fruit on this fig tree but have found none. [So] cut it down. Why should it exhaust the soil?” He said to him in reply, “Sir, leave it for this year also, and I shall cultivate the ground around it and fertilize it; it may bear fruit in the future. If not you can cut it down”» (Page 13, 1-9)
Not only Philo, but also the historian Josephus Flavius, in his Jewish Antiquities, writes that Pilate used to act with a firm hand, especially when it came to riots, to the point of being ready to mercilessly kill the rioters. When could the news event reported in the Gospel have happened? Due to the mention of sacrifices it could have happened either while those Jews were going to the Temple, or during the actual sacrifice of the animals; in this case it would be a sacrilegious act perpetuated during a religious ceremony. In any case, for Jesus it is an opportunity to invite conversion:
«Do you believe that those Galileans were more sinners than all the Galileans, for having suffered such a fate? No, I tell you, but if you do not convert you will all perish in the same way».
He reaches the same conclusion when commenting on another fact, the death of eighteen men caused by the collapse of a tower. The Gospel text opens with the annotation “at that same time” (Page 13:1), which links the liturgical pericope to what precedes it. That is, Jesus speech on discernment of time and the ability to judge today and what is right (Page 12,54-57). It is precisely at that moment that some approach Him to report the violent episode. They are facts of history that challenge the conscience, then as today, and Jesus does not shy away from discernment and a judgment issued, however, with a perspective of faith. And Jesus judgment is first and foremost free, free from the widespread belief still in his time of a link between sin and misfortune.
By moving away from this ancient theological scheme, Jesus not only demonstrates his inner freedom, but also the ability to see men and not sinners, victims and not just culprits, therefore proposing a reading of events driven by faith and not by conformism, be it theological or spiritual. The urge to conversion, therefore, repeated twice, “but if you do not convert…”, is an invitation to take life seriously, but also the needs of God. Not that God sends misfortunes in order to convert us, but precisely because these happen inevitably, the person of faith does not shy away from discernment and interpretation, with the consequent risk of taking a position. The Second Vatican Council expresses itself in this regard:
«It is the Church’s permanent duty to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, in a way suited to each generation, it can respond to men’s perennial questions about the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships. Indeed, we need to know and understand the world in which we live, its expectations, its aspirations and its often dramatic character” (The joy and hope n. 4).
It is the ability to discover the hand of God, his Providence was once said, behind the events, even those of each one’s life. So for Jesus hearing about some seditious people killed by Pilate or others who died under a collapse is not an opportunity to see in those facts a divine punishment for sinners. In fact, he will repeat the same thing to those who, in the Gospel of John, ask him about a man born blind, about who had sinned for him to find himself in that condition:
«Neither did he sin, nor did his parents, but it was so that the works of God might be manifested in him» (Jh 9,3).
Jesus therefore, leaving aside the easier path, warns that we can learn from events. The fact of the death of some becomes a warning for others: «If you do not convert, you will all perish in the same way». After all, the parable of the unproductive fig tree also poses a similar problem. This fig tree appears alive, but in reality it is dead, as it produces nothing. In the Luke Gospel we find several examples of people who, metaphorically, are in the same condition as the fig tree in the parable; they seem dead, nevertheless they arouse the interest of the Lord who goes in search of the lost. This is the case of Zacchaeus: «For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost» (Page 19,10); of the prodigal son of the parable: «he was dead, and is alive again» (Page 15,32); of the same criminal crucified with Him to whom Jesus promises: «Today you will be with me in paradise» (Page 23,43).
In Jesus, divine patience and mercy are revealed which does not want the sinner to die, but rather for him to convert and live (This 18, 23). To accomplish this, the Lord respects the times of the sinner, as the farmer does with his call to care and wait: «But he answered him: “Master, leave him again this year, until I have hoed around him and put the fertilizer. We’ll see if it bears fruit in the future; if not, you will cut it off”». While John the Baptist, at the beginning of the Gospel, had preached an eschatological judgment without appeal, for which: «The ax is placed at the root of the trees; therefore every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire» (Page 3,9).
Jesus, on the other hand, is the vinedresser who not only knows how to wait, but shows that he believes in the change and conversion of the sinner who at the moment does not produce good fruit or none at all. In front of the net: «Cut it!»; Jesus replies: «Leave him» (Aphes, as you, in Greek). A verb which among its main meanings has those of setting one free, remitting a fault, forgiving a debt. Thus this miniature parable becomes an important teaching for the season of Lent or for the Jubilee year that is being celebrated. We need a time of conversion to reach healing and liberation. Perhaps it is no coincidence that immediately after the parable of the fig tree which was fruitless for three years, Luke tells of a healing: that of a woman who had been ill for eighteen years (Page 13,10-13).
Happy Sunday to everyone!
from the Hermitage, March 23, 2025
.
.
.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)
.
Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.
.
______________________
Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:
Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos
![]()
n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21
If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com
We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.
The Fathers of the Island of Patmos
.
.
.
.
.
Benedict XVI and Dario Argento. The Holy Father Francesco remains on the chair of Pietro and avoid another trauma-Benedict XVI and the Film-Sirector Dario Argento. May the Holy Father Francis avoid us another trauma
/4 Comments/in Actuality/by father ariel(Italian, English)
Benedict XVI and Dario Argento. The Holy Father Francis remains on the chair of Peter and avoid another trauma
If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority - not existing in the Church and in the world of authority higher than his - he should decide to acknowledge renunciation, would aggravate our trauma and give life to a disastrous custom: The papacy as a product with expiry date.
- Church news -

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
PDF print format article – PDF article print format
![]()
.
It is always important to explain the meaning of words, even when it might appear superfluous.

In current language, spoken and written, certain terms have lost not only their original etymology, they are even used in negative meaning. This that happens even within the Church, where more often it happens to hear ecclesiastical to affirm that we need "less dogmas and more basic church", complaining "forms of excessive attachment to the doctrine", or exposing to the public to the public a priest or theologian defined with a "Tridentine" contempt.
Regarding the concept "less dogmas plus basic church", It is necessary to clarify that, if so, The first to make mistakes would have been the fathers of the Council of Nicea del 325, followed a few decades later by the Council of Constantinople of 381. Their obsession with the dogmas was in fact so strong to give life to the symbol of faith known as Niceno-Costantinopolitan, A concentrate of Christological and trinitarian dogmas that we persist in reciting every Sunday in the creed, through which, In addition to not understanding the "basic church", even pluralism and religious relativism is rejected by arrogantly affirming: "I think the Church one, holy catholic and apostolic. I professed only one baptism for the forgiveness of sins ". A real exclusivity not incident that he shouts revenge on the sky!
Our, Far from the "basic" Esser, However, it is the exact opposite: a church of summit by its foundative nature. Christ himself put Simone called Pietro at his summit, from which everything proceeds with a waterfall effect, from top to bottom (cf.. Mt 16, 13-20).
Use the term "tridentino" as an insult, denotes a lack of worrying Catholic culture, It would be enough to know the rudiments of history to know in what conditions of decline the church between the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries had sunk and what moral degradation afflicted the clergy, together with ignorance. The work of this great council was extraordinary in all doctrinal aspects, legal, pastoral, training, disciplinary and moral.
In the pudibonda society of the politically correct there are various terms emptied of one's own meaning and filled with other things, To then be used in a derogatory and offensive meaning. But here is a truly striking example. If using Office365 we type the word "Jesuit" and seek synonyms, The writing program indicates the following synonymous: "hypocritical, Pharisee, farisea, simulator, simulatrice». Instead, If we type the word "Jew" and seek synonyms, The same program will indicate these synonymous: "Jewish, Jewish". And here it should be remembered that in the German dictionaries of the 1930s, as synonyms of the word "Jew" these terms were indicated: «hypocritical, Pharisee, Simulator» (hypocritical, Pharisee, simulator). And with this we must take note that the modern Nazi of the 21st century have transferred their old hateful synonymies to other objects: by the Jews, that as such are children of a greater God, now untouchable, The same terminologies have been transferred to the Jesuits that, being children of a very minor God, they can be touched and can be insulted in the same way that the Nazis of the 1930s insult the Jews.

To communicate a language is needed, principal that can sound almost obvious but that is not at all at all, There are many people who, while speaking the same language, words give a completely different meaning. This obliges us to clarify and explain the meaning of the words that are intended to use. Example: To the word "punishment" I give a theological meaning linked to its correct etymology deriving from the Latin terms chaste e hint from which the word chastise was born, which means "to make pure" or "purify". Nothing to do with punitive or vindictive actions, In the biblical and theological lexicon, punishment is an action of grace of divine mercy, that is, an act of love, Why, as it is written in the book of Tobia:
«Benedict God who lives forever
His kingdom lasts for all centuries;
He chastise and uses mercy,
It drops into the abysses of the earth,
traces from the great perdition
And nothing escapes his hand " (Tb 13, 2).
The word Tràuma, deriving from the Greek wound (-this), which in the letter means "wound", begins to be used in medical literature around the 1650, in the psychological one starting from 1889 Thanks mainly to the research of the Viennese neuropathologist Sigmund Freud. There are several forms of trauma understood in its more adherent meaning of "wound". Of course, the most serious forms, they are not linked to physical injuries, but to the psychological ones, to the spiritual ones. And we were amazed expansions by the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI who made us spectators and protagonists of a historical event that the Church has known very rarely: The renunciation of a Roman Pontiff.
Through incorrect uses of words The act of renunciation of the pontificate soon took the improper and misleading name of "resignation". Since this was not enough, Benedict XVI cheered the dose by launching the tragically unhappy expression of "Pope emeritus". The unusual way, in many respects extravagant, through which this legitimate act of renunciation has been made and made official, He gave jobs scattered throughout the terracqueo orbe, fomenting the crazy theories of some poor priests out of balance and some little successful lyrical singer who started playing Dan Brown of noartri By printing an unlikely Ratzinx coder, promptly renamed by the undersigned Codice Katzinger.
The Supreme Pontiff Francis, Admitted to the Roman Polyclinic Agostino Gemelli, He has found himself several times between life and death over the past four weeks. He currently seems to be out of danger and after a month about the specialists have melted the prognosis. If the Holy Father comes out and returns to his residence in the Vatican, He will be a very fragile and deeply weakened elderly man, With walking problems and difficulties in breathing and talking, inclined to fatigue themselves to minimal physical effort, need to be monitored and cared for constantly.
To govern the Church it may be enough that a Roman pontiff is simply alive, even if unable to move and say a few words in a low voice, to appear in public and to receive people. To bring trauma instead it may be enough to implement what Benedict XVI brought to the scene of our history in February of 2013, not so much with its legitimate and valid act of renunciation, but in the manner chosen, resulting to the proof of the facts: unhappy, misleading and imprudent.
The detractors of the Supreme Pontiff Francesco The clothes for the effigy of the infamous Pachamama made the Vatican in August of the Vatican 2020 During the Synod on the Amazon. Perhaps it would be more appropriate and coherent to regret the eccentricity of Benedict XVI who in the Vatican had the director Dario Argento entered, By giving us a horror film entitled not by chance Trauma, With a screenplay entirely built on delusional thoughts that went from the "resignation" to the "emeritus popes", from the "active papacy and contemplative papacy" to the "extended papacy" (!?) ... Moreover, everyone torture, Sgozza and spreads blood on your cinematographic set as it can best can. Then, If the perverse psychology of decadent German romanticism comes into play, At that point the limits are lost and the inhibitory brakes as well. With the difference, But, that that of the silver master is fiction, that of Benedict XVI was our tragic ecclesial reality.
If with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority - not existing in the Church and in the world of authority higher than his - the Holy Father Francesco had to decide to acknowledge renunciation, would aggravate our trauma and give life to a disastrous custom: The papacy as a product with expiry date. I pray and I hope this does not happen and that it remains on the chair of the blessed apostle Pietro up to death, because the Dario Argento brought to the scene by Benedict XVI, It was enough for us and advanced for the next five hundred years.
From the island of Patmos, 19 March 2025
.
____________________
BENEDICT XVI AND THE FILM-DIRECTOR DARIO ARGENTO. MAY THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS AVOID US ANOTHER TRAUMA
If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority – there being no authority superior to his in the Church and world – were to decide to make free and unquestionable act of renunciation, he would aggravate our trauma and give rise to a disastrous custom: the papacy as one product with expiration date.
— Ecclesial actuality —

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
![]()
![]()
.
It is always important to explain the meaning of words, even when it might seem superfluous.

In current language, spoken and written, certain terms have lost not only their original etymology, but are used in a negative sense. This is that happens even within the Church, where often we hear ecclesiastics affirm that we need «less dogmas and more basic Church», lamenting «excessive attachment to doctrine», or exposing to ridicule a priest or a theologian scornfully defined as «Tridentine».
Regarding the concept of «less dogmas, more church of basic», it is necessary to clarify that, if this were the case, the first to err were the Fathers of the Council of Nicaea in the year 325, followed a few decades later by the Council of Constantinople in the year 381. Their obsession with dogma was in fact so strong that it gave birth to the Symbol of Faith known as the Nicene-Constantinopolitan, a concentration of Christological and Trinitarian dogmas that we insist on reciting every Sunday in the Creed, through which, in addition to not understanding the «church of basic», we even reject pluralism and religious relativism by arrogantly stating: «I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. I profess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins». Horror! A true non-inclusive exclusivism that cries out to heaven for vengeance!
Ours Church, is’nt “of basic”, is the opposite: for very nature foundative is Church of vertex. Christ himself placed at its vertex Simon called Peter, from whom everything proceeds with a cascade effect, from the top to the bottom (Mt 16, 13-20).
Using the term “Tridentine” as an insult, denotes lack of Catholic culture, it would be enough to know the rudiments of history to know into what conditions of decadence the Church had sunk between the 15th and 16th centuries and what moral degradation afflicted the clergy, together with ignorance. The work of this great council was extraordinary in all doctrinal, juridical, pastoral, formative, disciplinary and moral aspects.
In the prudish society of political correctness, there are various terms emptied of their meaning and filled with something else, used in a derogatory and offensive sense. But here is a example. If we use Office365 to type the word “Jesuit” and look for synonyms, the writing program indicates the following synonyms: «hypocrite, Pharisee, simulator». Instead, if we type the word “Jew” and look for synonyms, the program indicate these synonyms: «Jewish, Judaic». And here it should be remembered that in the German dictionaries of the 1930s, the following terms were used as synonyms of the word “Jew”: «hypocritical, Pharisee, Simulator» (hypocrite, Pharisee, simulator). The modern Nazis of the 21st century have transferred their old hateful synonyms to other subjects: from the Jews, who as such are children of a greater God, today untouchable, the same terminologies have been transferred to the Jesuits who, being children of a much lesser God, are touchable and can be insulted in the same way in which the Nazis of the 1930s insulted the Jews.

To communicate, you need a language, a principle that may sound almost obvious but is not at all, many people, even though they speak the same language, give words a completely different meaning. This forces us to explain the meaning of the words that are intended to be used. For example: to the word “punishment” I give a theological meaning linked to its correct etymology deriving from the Latin terms “chaste” and “hint” from which the word castigare comes, which means “to make pure” or “to purify”. Nothing to do with or vengeful actions, in the biblical and theological lexicon punishment is an act of grace of divine mercy, an act of love, because, as it is written in the Book of Tobit:
«For he afflicts and shows mercy,
casts down to the depths of Hades,
brings up from the great abyss.
Give thanks to him, you Israelites,
in the presence of the nations,
for though he has scattered you among them,
even there recount his greatness» (Tb 13, 2).
The word tràuma, derived from the Greek τραῦμα (-this), which means “wound”, began to be used in medical literature around 1650, in psychological literature starting in 1889, thanks mainly to the research of the Viennese neuropathologist Sigmund Freud. There are different forms of trauma understood in its most adherent meaning of “wound”. Certainly, the most serious forms are not linked to physical wounds, but to psychological, spiritual ones. We have been extensively traumatized by the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI who made us spectators and protagonists of a historical event that the Church has very rarely known: the renunce of a Roman Pontiff.
Through incorrect uses of words, the act of renunce from the pontificate soon took the improper and misleading name of «dimissions». Since this was not enough, Benedict XVI doubled the dose by launching the unfortunate expression of «pope emeritus». The unusual, and in many ways bizarre, way in which this legitimate act of renunciation occurred has given work to conspiracy theorists all over the globe, fomenting the crazy theories of some poor, unbalanced priests and some fantasists who have started playing at being the Dan Brown of the situation.
The Supreme Pontiff Francis, hospitalized at the Agostino Gemelli Polyclinic in Rome, has found himself between life and death several times over the last four weeks. In the present time appears to be out of danger and after about a month the specialists have loose the prognosis. If the Holy Father leaves and returns to his residence in the Vatican, he will be and profoundly weakened elderly man, with walking problems and difficulty breathing and speaking, prone to fatigue at the slightest physical effort, in need of constant monitoring and care.
To govern the Church, it may be enough for a Roman Pontiff simply to be alive, even if unable to move and say a few words in a whisper, to appear in public and receive people. To cause trauma, however, it may be enough to implement what Benedict XVI brought to the stage of our history in February 2013, not so much with his legitimate and valid act of renunciation, but with the methods chosen, which proved to be unfortunate, misleading and imprudent when put to the test.
The detractors of the Supreme Pontiff Francis are still tearing their clothes over the effigy of the Pachamama brought into the Vatican in August 2020 during the Synod on the Amazon. Perhaps it would be more appropriate and coherent cry tears for the eccentricity by Benedict XVI who brought the famous Italian director Dario Argento into the Vatican, giving us a horror film not coincidentally entitled Trauma, with a screenplay entirely built on delusional thoughts that ranged from «resignations» to «popes emeritus», from the «active papacy and contemplative papacy» to the «extended papacy» (!?) … After all, everyone tortures, slaughters and sheds blood on their own film set as best they can. Then, if the perverse psychology of decadent German romanticism comes into play, at that point the limits are lost and so are the inhibitions. With the difference: that of film-director Dario Argento is fiction by horror films, that of Benedict XVI was our tragic ecclesial reality.
If the Holy Father Francis, with a very personal act, legitimate and not subject to discussion and acceptance by any authority – there being no authority superior to his in the Church and world – were to decide to make free and unquestionable act of renunciation, he would aggravate our trauma and give rise to a disastrous custom: the papacy as one product with expiration date. I pray and hope that this does not happen and that he remains on the chair of the Blessed Apostle Peter until his death, because the Dario Argento brought to the scene by Benedict XVI has been more than enough for the next five hundred years.
From The Island of Patmos, March 19, 2025
.
.
______________________
Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:
Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos
n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican
Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21
If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com
We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.
The Fathers of the Island of Patmos
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
He will transfigure our mortal body into the image of his glorious body – He will transfigure our mortal body by image of his glorious body
/in Homiletics/by Hermit Monk(English text after the Italian)

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos
HE WILL TRANSFIGURE OUR MORTAL BODY IN THE IMAGE OF HIS GLORIOUS BODY
«Maestro, it's nice for us to be here. Let's do three huts, one for you, One for Moses and one for Elìa ". He did not know, But, what he said …

Author
Hermit Monk
.
![]()
PDF print format article – PDF Article print format
.
.
Tradition has preserved the episode, rightly famous, of the Transfiguration of Jesus on the mountain, where the celestial epiphany of baptism is repeated, this time for the benefit of a few disciples.

The story, in its current location during the life of Jesus, partially obscures the meaning of the event, because it is Jesus himself who leads the disciples to the mountain where he undergoes a temporary transfiguration presented as a foretelling of the destiny of death and resurrection that awaits him. It is very likely that originally it was a story of the appearance of the Risen One, that Marco, who excluded those stories from his narration, would have placed it at the center of the Gospel, immediately after Peter's messianic confession, to balance the announcement of the death destiny of the Son of man (MC 8, 31) with the proleptic vision of his glorification (MC 9, 2-13); a choice that would also have determined its placement in Matthew and Luke. Supporting this hypothesis is the fact that throughout the three stories the disciples' misunderstanding of Jesus remains intact., despite some having witnessed such a sensational event. While, placed after his death, the story takes on a crucial meaning.
The three disciples receive, in a state of relaxed alert consciousness - "burdened by sleep", Peter "does not know what he says" - the revelation of the Son of man in a form transfigured by divine light. It's the turning point: the disciples, after his death, they have the vision of Jesus placed on the same level as Moses and Elijah, that is, of two biblical figures already raised to celestial glory and listening to the proclamation of his divine election, the same one that resonates at the moment of baptism. Finally the disciples "know" who Jesus is, and it is in the light of this understanding that the historical episode of baptism takes on its "true" meaning of divine investiture. Among the numerous stories of apparitions of the Risen One, that of the Transfiguration represents, so, most eloquently the process through which some disciples reached a superior understanding of the meaning of Jesus' human story after the shock of his death. Let's read it:
“About eight days after these talks, Jesus took Peter with him, John and James and went up the mountain to pray. While he prayed, his face changed in appearance and his dress became white and dazzling. And here, two men were talking to him: they were Moses and Elijah, appeared in glory, and they spoke of his exodus, which was about to take place in Jerusalem. Peter and his companions were oppressed by sleep; ma, when they woke up, they saw his glory and the two men who were with him. While they separated from him, Peter said to Jesus: “Maestro, it's nice for us to be here. Let's do three huts, one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah". He did not know, But, what he said. While he was talking like this, a cloud came and covered them with its shadow. Upon entering the cloud, they were afraid. And a voice came out of the cloud, who said: “This is my Son, the chosen one; listen!”. As soon as the voice stopped, Jesus remained alone. They remained silent and in those days did not tell anyone what they had seen." (LC 9,28-36).
The song of the transfiguration, as already mentioned at the beginning, it is among the most difficult to read and to place within the historical path of Jesus' life. It is full of suggestions because it presents many rich allusions to events and stories from the Old Testament.
The temporal annotation, placed at the beginning, «eight days later», while the other synoptics report: «six days later», connect the story with what just happened. Jesus has finished his first announcement of the passion, ma, at least according to Matthew and Mark, but not Luca, he also received a bitter disappointment from Peter. If shortly before he had recognized him as the Messiah, now he advises him instead, taking him aside, not to go to Jerusalem, because Christ should not have died. Simone, on the mouth of Jesus, he becomes like Satan. For this reason many modern commentators add a theological meaning to the traditional interpretation which sees a theological significance in the presence of Moses and Elijah next to Jesus., they would embody the Law and the Prophets, also another reason. These two characters would bring Jesus the consolation he needed. The biographies of Elijah and Moses, indeed, they tell us what the two had to go through and this allows them to know what Jesus is about to go through. Both went through daring trials to the point of even asking God to die. Moses in Is 32,32 immediately after the story of the golden calf he turns to the Lord begging forgiveness for his people: «if you would forgive their sin… Otherwise, erase me from your book that you wrote!». Elia in 1Re 19,4: «Take my life, because I am no better than my fathers". Ultimately, both of them had bitter disappointments, by which they are granted the vision of God (cf.. Is 33,21-22; 1Re 19,13).
The presence of the two characters it is therefore not just for disciples, but it is the consolation for the Son who is about to go to Jerusalem. Jesus must be comforted and strengthened regarding his "exodus", that is, its near future; the angel will do the same in Gethsemane, according to Luke's story, in the moment of extreme struggle (LC 22,43-44).
The three synoptic Gospels they try to explain what happened on Tabor, the mountain of Galilee where, Since the dalct that tiet the humbs 348, according to Cyril of Jerusalem, the Transfiguration would have occurred and they describe that transformation in their own way. Both Matthew and Mark use a verb in the passive voice, the so-called "theological passive": "he was transformed"; which suggests that it was implicitly God who acted. For Marco, in particular, the Transfiguration plays an important role in the economy of his writing. For him it's not just about listening to Jesus, "This is my Son, the beloved: listen!» (MC 9, 7), but also to accept that He is truly the Son. Pietro, in MC 8, 29, he had stopped at a partial identification, recognizing Jesus only as Messiah: «Peter answered him: You are the Christ". The voice on Tabor, instead, points out that Jesus is indeed the Son, according to the name that had already been given to Him at baptism. This item, by itself, however, it has no confirmation in Matthew's story, where Peter had already seen in Jesus both the Messiah and the Son: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God " (Mt 16,16).
For the evangelist Luca, at last, the Transfiguration is not just a moment of consolation for Jesus or the way for Peter to understand who Jesus was and his destiny. Luke also introduces the motif of the glory that is manifested. Only this evangelist, indeed, he insists on this term twice: «gloria» (v. 31 e 32). Thus Jesus, on the mountain, prefiguring to the disciples what his destiny will be, after his "exodus", suggests that it will be fulfilled for them too, and for us. The announcement of the passion and death of Jesus is never complete if it is not associated with that of glory, of the resurrection. So too will our destiny as believers in Him be fulfilled when our body also, our life, they will be transfigured and so will we, like Pietro already did, John and James, we will see the Risen One "as he is" (1GV 3, 2), not just in his human form, but in its most complete reality. The transformation of Jesus is the revelation of the profound personality of Jesus, that of the elected, of the only begotten Son and is also a prophecy of our future transformation.
For this reason I would like to underline how recurrent it is, in today's song, the verb to see, which returns several times and in different forms (v. 27.30.31.36), as well as the term: to listen (v. 35). They describe well the current condition of believers who, thanks to faith, they can see the Lord present in the little ones, in the next or in the sacraments where, as Leo the Great wrote: «what was then visible in our Savior has passed» (sermons 74,2). And beyond seeing, they can also listen to him thanks to the Church which still prepares the table of His word.
To end, one last detail. Reading the passages from the Transfiguration, only Luke gives us at least one reason why Jesus goes up the mountain, that is, to pray and prayer is, incidentally, also one of the most relevant Lenten commitments. Among the evangelists, Luke is the one who insists more than the others on this aspect and lets Jesus pray even when the other gospels don't say so.: at baptism (LC 3,21: "Jesus, He also received the baptism, he was praying"); before choosing the Twelve (LC 6,12: «In those days he went to the mountain to pray and spent the whole night praying to God»); it's here, to the Transfiguration: “About eight days after these talks, Jesus took Peter with him, John and James and went up on the mountain to pray" (LC 9,28).
A few days earlier, according to Mark and Matthew, Jesus had received a setback, right from Pietro. Luke glosses over it and only recounts the announcement of the passion and the harsh demands that derive from it for the disciple: «If anyone wants to come after me, you deny yourself, take up his cross every day and follow me " (LC 9, 23). But the reaction to all this for Jesus is prayer which becomes an opportunity to create unity, to collect your most intimate feelings and let yourself be guided by God, even if you have to go through the storms of life. At the end of the experience only one voice remains. The final notation of the passage it reports: «Jesus remained alone», "he was found alone" (Jesus alone was found); it also talks about the condition of Jesus during the Transfiguration, or during the prayer that the disciples struggle to bear. On the Mount of Transfiguration, where he went up "to pray", Jesus is alone, even "while praying". The effort of the disciples, expressed by at least three annotations, suggests to us, in a negative way, three stages of an initiation, three moments of a journey to enter the mystery of Jesus' prayer. The disciples are burdened by sleep, their eyelids fall, the eyes close and the somatic fatigue of praying shines through. Then Peter pronounces words that appear confused, tangential to what happened. In the end, everyone is struck by fear. Their not saying anything to anyone ends the story (LC 9,36) it seems like the possible start of something new and positive. This silence could be their beginning to cherish an inner solitude, indication of praying, that is, the ability to rethink and meditate on the events that have happened and seek meaning in them before God. Like Mary who kept words and facts regarding her son Jesus, turning them over and over again in her heart (cf.. LC 2,19.51).
Happy Sunday everyone!
from the Hermitage, 16 March 2025
.
_________________________________________________________

Homiletics the Fathers of The Isle of Patmos
.
HE WILL TRANSFIGURE OUR MORTAL BODY BY IMAGE OF HIS GLORIOUS BODY
«Master, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters — one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah». He did not know what he was saying …

Author
Hermit Monk
.
![]()

.
The old Tradition has preserved the famous episode of the Transfiguration of Jesus on the mountain, where the celestial epiphany of baptism is repeated, this time for the benefit of a few disciples.

The story, in its current location during the life of Jesus, partly obscures the meaning of the event, because it is Jesus himself who leads the disciples to the mountain where he undergoes a temporary transfiguration presented as a preannouncement of the destiny of death and resurrection that awaits him. It is very likely that it was originally a story of the appearance of the Risen One, which Mark, who excluded those stories from his narrative, would have inserted at the center of the Gospel, immediately after Peter’s messianic confession, to balance the announcement of the destiny of death of the Son of Man (Mk 8:31) with the proleptic vision of his glorification (Mk 9:2-13); a choice that would have determined its placement also in Matthew and Luke. Supporting this hypothesis is the fact that in the continuation of the three stories the disciples’ misunderstanding of Jesus remains intact, despite the fact that some of them had witnessed such a sensational event. While, placed after his death, the story takes on a crucial meaning.
The three disciples receive, in a state of slackening of waking consciousness ― «burdened by sleep», Peter «does not know what he is saying» ― the revelation of the Son of Man in a form transfigured by divine light. This is the turning point: the disciples, after his death, have the vision of Jesus placed on the same level as Moses and Elijah, two gloriosus biblical figures already raised to heavenly glory and they hear the proclamation of his divine election, the same one that resounds at the moment of baptism. Finally the disciples “know” who Jesus is, and it is in the light of this understanding that the historical episode of the baptism takes on its “true” meaning of divine investiture. Among the numerous accounts of apparitions of the Risen One, that of the Transfiguration therefore represents in the most eloquent way the process through which some disciples have reached a superior understanding regarding the meaning of the human story of Jesus after the shock of his death. Let us read it:
«About eight days after Jesus said this, he took Peter, John and James with him and went up onto a mountain to pray. As he was praying, the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became as bright as a flash of lightning. Two men, Moses and Elijah, appeared in glorious splendor, talking with Jesus. They spoke about his departure, which he was about to bring to fulfillment at Jerusalem. Peter and his companions were very sleepy, but when they became fully awake, they saw his glory and the two men standing with him. As the men were leaving Jesus, Peter said to him, “Master, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters — one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah” (He did not know what he was saying). While he was speaking, a cloud appeared and covered them, and they were afraid as they entered the cloud. A voice came from the cloud, saying, “This is my Son, whom I have chosen; listen to him”. When the voice had spoken, they found that Jesus was alone. The disciples kept this to themselves and did not tell anyone at that time what they had seen» (Page 9, 28-36).
The passage of the Transfiguration, as already mentioned at the beginning, is among the most difficult to read and to place within the historical path of Jesus’ life. It is rich in suggestions because it presents many and rich allusions to events and stories of the Old Testament.
The temporal annotation, placed at the beginning, «eight days later», while the other synoptics report: “six days later”, connects the story with what has just happened. Jesus has finished his first announcement of the passion, but, at least according to Matthew and Mark, but not Luke, he has also received a bitter disappointment from Peter. If shortly before he had recognized him as the Messiah, now instead he advises him, taking him aside, not to go to Jerusalem, because the Christ should not have died. Simon, in the mouth of Jesus, becomes like Satan. For this reason many modern commentators add another motivation to the traditional interpretation that sees a theological meaning in the presence of Moses and Elijah next to Jesus, they would embody the Law and the Prophets. These two characters would bring Jesus the consolation he needed. The biographies of Elijah and Moses, in fact, tell us what the two had to go through and this makes them know what Jesus is about to go through. Both have experienced daring trials to the point of even asking God to die. In Exodus 32:32, immediately after the story of the golden calf, Moses turns to the Lord, imploring forgiveness for his people: «if you would forgive their sin… But if not, blot me out of your book which you have written!» Elijah and 1 Kings 19:4: «Take my life, for I am no better than my fathers». Finally, both have had bitter disappointments, for which they are granted the vision of God (Exodus 33:21-22; 1 Kings 19:13).
The presence of the two characters is therefore not only for the disciples, but is the consolation for the Son who is about to go to Jerusalem. Jesus must be comforted and strengthened regarding his “exodus”, or his near future; the angel will do the same in Gethsemane, according to Luke’s account, at the moment of the extreme struggle (Page 22:43-44).
The three Synoptic Gospels try to explain what happened on Tabor, the mountain in Galilee where, according to Cyril of Jerusalem, the Transfiguration took place since 348, and they describe that transformation in their own way. Both Matthew and Mark use a passive verb, the so-called “theological passive”: “he was transformed”; which implies that implicitly it was God who acted. For Mark, in particular, the Transfiguration plays an important role in the economy of his writing. For him it is not just a matter of listening to Jesus: «This is my beloved Son; listen to him!» (Mk 9:7), but also of accepting that He is truly the Son. Peter, in Mk 8:29, had stopped at a partial identification, recognizing Jesus only as the Messiah: «Peter answered him, You are the Christ». The voice on Tabor, however, emphasizes that Jesus is indeed the Son, according to the name that had already been given to Him at baptism. This element, in itself, has no correspondence in Matthew’s account, where Peter had already seen in Jesus both the Messiah and the Son: «You are the Christ, the Son of the living God» (Mt 16:16).
For the evangelist Luke, finally, the Transfiguration is not only a moment of consolation for Jesus or the way in which Peter must understand who Jesus was and his destiny. Luke also introduces the motif of the glory that manifests itself. Only this evangelist, in fact, insists twice on this term: «glory» (v. 31 and 32). In this way Jesus, on the mountain, prefiguring to the disciples what will be his destiny, after his “exodus”, lets it be understood that it will also be fulfilled for them, and for us. The announcement of the passion and death of Jesus is never complete if it is not associated with that of glory, of the resurrection. Thus also our destiny as believers in Him will be fulfilled when our body, our life, will be transfigured and we too, like Peter, John and James, will see the Risen One «just as he is» (1 Jh 3:2), not only in his human form, but in his most complete reality. The transformation of Jesus is the unveiling of the profound personality of Jesus, that of the chosen one, of the only-begotten Son and is also a prophecy of our future transformation.
For this reason, I would like to emphasize how recurrent, in today’s passage, the verb to see is, which comes back several times and in different forms (in the verses 27, 30, 31, 36), as well as the term: to listen (in the verse 35). They describe well the current condition of believers who, thanks to faith, can see the Lord present in the little ones, in their neighbor or in the sacraments where, as Leo the Great wrote: “what was then visible in our Savior has passed away” (sermons 74, 2). And in addition to seeing, they can also listen to him thanks to the Church that still prepares the table of His word.
Finally, one last detail. Reading the passages of the Transfiguration, only Luke gives us at least one reason why Jesus goes up the mountain, that is, to pray and prayer is, incidentally, also one of the most important Lenten commitments. Among the evangelists, Luke is the one who insists more than the others on this aspect and lets Jesus pray even when the other Gospels do not say so: at the baptism (Luke 3:21: «When Jesus also had been baptized, he was praying»); before choosing the Twelve (Luke 6:12: «In those days he went out to the mountain to pray, and spent the whole night in prayer to God»); and here, at the Transfiguration: «About eight days after these sayings, Jesus took with him Peter and John and James and went up the mountain to pray» (Luke 9: 28).
A few days earlier, according to Mark and Matthew, Jesus had received a setback, precisely from Peter. Luke passes over it and only tells of the announcement of the passion and the harsh demands that descend from it for the disciple: «If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me» (Luke 9:23). But the reaction to all this for Jesus is prayer, which becomes the occasion to create unity, to gather the most intimate feelings and let oneself be guided by God, even if one has to go through the storms of life. At the end of the experience only one voice remains.
The final notation of the passage that reports: «Jesus remained alone», «he was found alone» (latin: "Jesus alone was found"); speaks of Jesus’ condition even during the Transfiguration, that is, during the prayer that the disciples struggle to sustain. On the mountain of the Transfiguration, where he went up «to pray», Jesus is alone, even «while praying». The fatigue of the disciples, expressed by at least three annotations, suggests to us, in a negative way, three stages of an initiation, three moments of a journey to enter into the mystery of Jesus’ prayer. The disciples are burdened by sleep, their eyelids fall, their eyes close and the somatic fatigue of praying shines through. Then Peter pronounces words that appear confused, to what has happened. Finally, everyone is gripped by fear. Their not saying anything to anyone with which the story ends (Page 9:36) seems the possible beginning of something new and positive. This silence could be their beginning to guard an interior solitude, a sign of prayer, or the ability to rethink and meditate on the events that happened and seek a meaning before God. Like Mary, who guarded words and facts about her son Jesus, in her heart (Luke 2:19.51).
Happy Sunday to everyone!
from the Hermitage, March 16, 2025
.
.
.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)
.
Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.
.
______________________
Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:
Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos
![]()
n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21
If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com
We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.
The Fathers of the Island of Patmos
.
.
.
.
.
From dust to water: The meaning of the austere symbol of the ashes – From dust to water: the meaning of the austere symbol of ashes
/in Liturgical pastoral care/by Father Simone(English text after the Italian)
From dust to water: The meaning of the austere symbol of the ashes
The holy ashes that are traditionally derived from the burning of the Benedetti olive branches for the Palm Sunday of the previous year perform their entrance door function for the strong time of Lent and already let the man renewed by the risen Christ already glimpsed in the waters of baptism, as the liturgy makes us relive in the holy vigil of Easter night.
— Liturgical ministry —
.

Author
Simone Pifizzi
.
PDF print format article – PDF Article print format
.
Yesterday, with the liturgy of the ashes The Holy Time of Lent has begun for the Church. Once that, According to what reported in the rules for the liturgical year and the calendar, has the purpose of preparing for Easter. The Light Liturgy Guide to the celebration of the Easter mystery both the catechumens, through the different degrees of Christian initiation, both the faithful by means of the memory of baptism and through penance.
As everyone knows The Holy Time of Lent begins with a symbol that is called austere: Receive ash on the head. In the Old Testament the ash is a symbol of what is provisional, perishable and as such is reduced to powder, As you read in Job 10, 9; or because it is worthless (Gen 18, 27). Always in the Old Testament, ash was a sign of desolation and mourning. So here are the gestures to spread ash on the head (2Sam 13, 19), sit in ash as Job (Gib 2, 8), roll in ash (This 27, 30), feed on ash as of bread (Shall 102). Davide exposed his sins in ashes, The ninivites after the preaching of Jonah covered the ash's head. The ash was used in purification rites, When a red cow was burned whose ashes were then thrown into the water, used for the various ritual purifications (Num 19, 1 e ssg). Above all, the ash brings the thought to the words that God addresses to Adam after sin: "Dust, You are and in dust you will return " (Gen 3,19); They underline the punishment of death and the nothing of the creature shaped by soil powder.
In the Middle Ages, public penitents who had to atone for their faults and receive the sacrament of penance as a second baptism presented themselves at the beginning of Lent covered with ash and with the cilicio. In the Christian liturgy, also currently, The expression that the priest uses blessing and imposing the ashes on Wednesday that marks the beginning of Lent are these are: "Remember that you are dust and powder you will return". Accept, that is, The meaning of pain, of the mourning of death as a consequence of the sin and fragility of man. Hence the duty to recognize his faults and to engage in a healthy life, as the alternative formula of the imposition of the ashes urges: "Get converted and believe in the Gospel". The ashes reminding us that we are dust helps us to reinvigorate the sense of true Christian consciousness that accuses us of being guilty and does not give us peace until we have found remedy for our inclination to evil.
Penance becomes a need: We must make penance to denounce ourselves to the sky and the earth that we are miserable people. The obligation to implore mercy and to demonstrate with some of our acts that we repudiate the evil made and the evil we are able to do. Far from then to be a sign of superstition, The ash reminds us of a theological truth well synthesized by the words of the blessing, the oldest one, that can be used on Wednesday that from the beginning of the Holy Lent:
«O God who does not want death but the conversion of sinners, It does that recognizing that our body will return to dust, The exercise of penance obtains the forgiveness of sins and a renewed life in the image of the Risen Lord. For Christ, our Lord. Amen».
The same concept It is also expressed in the renewed formula of the blessing of the ashes that reads:
«O God who pity of those who regret and give your peace to those who convert, Listen with paternal goodness the prayers of your people and bless these children of yours who will receive the austere symbol of the ashes, Because through the spiritual itinerary of Lent they come completely renewed to celebrate your child's Easter ".
And it is also repeated in the alternative formula in which these words are used:
«O God who does not want the death of sinners but the conversion, Listen to our prayer benign and bless these ashes that we are about to receive on our boss, recognizing that we are dust and powder we will return. The exercise of Lenten penance obtains the forgiveness of sins and a renewed life in the image of your risen son, who lives and reigns over the centuries of the centuries. Amen».
Prayers, Remember above, They therefore present us the right perspective from which to look at the sign of the ashes imposed on the head of those who start the Lent itinerary with good will. It is essentially a gesture of humility, what does it mean: I recognize myself for what they are, A fragile creature, made of land and destined for the earth, but also made in the image of God and destined for him. Dust, Yes, but loved, shaped by the love of God, animated by his vital breath and capable of recognizing his voice and therefore to answer him; free e, because of this, even capable of disobeying him, giving in to the temptation of pride and self -sufficiency. Here is the sin, mortal disease soon entered to pollute the blessed land which is the human being. Created in the image of the saint and the right man has lost his innocence and now he can return to being right only thanks to the justice of God, the justice of love that, As San Paolo writes:
"It has manifested itself through faith in Christ" (RM 3,22).
Just the second reading of the Liturgy of the Word of Ash Wednesday, contains Paul's appeal to let himself be reconciled with God (cf. 2Color 5,20), Through one of his famous paradoxes that leads all the reflection on justice to the mystery of Christ. Saint Paul writes:
«He who had known no sin [that is, his son made man] God sinned him in our favor, because in him we could become justice of God " (2Color 5,21).
In the heart of Christ, that is, in the center of his divine-human person, All the drama of freedom has been played in decisive and definitive terms. God brought his own design of salvation to the extreme consequences, remaining faithful to his love even at the cost of delivering his unigenous son to death and death of Croce. Divine justice is discouraged here, deeply different from the human one: «Thanks to the action of Christ, We can enter "bigger" justice, which is that of love " (Benedict XVI, Message for Lent, 2010)
Holy Lent, while starting with the austere gesture of the ashes that makes us bow the head, However, it widens our horizon and oriented us towards eternal life, Since on this earth we are on pilgrimage:
«We have not here a stable city, But let's go in search of the future " (EB 13,14).
Lent while it makes us understand the relativity of the assets of this land and therefore it makes us capable of necessary renunciations, It also gives us the freedom to do the good, to open the earth in the light of the sky, in the presence of God among us.
So the holy ashes which are traditionally obtained from the burning of the Benedetti olive branches for the Palm Sunday of the previous year perform their entrance door function for the strong time of Lent and already let the man renewed by Christ risen and reborn in the waters of baptism, as the liturgy makes us relive in the holy vigil of Easter night.
Florence, 6 March 2025
Beginning of Lent
.
_____________________________
FROM DUST TO WATER: THE MEANING OF THE AUSTERE SYMBOL OF ASHES
The holy ashes which are traditionally obtained from the burning of the olive branches blessed for Palm Sunday of the previous year perform their function as the gateway to the strong season of Lent and already allow us to glimpse the man renewed by the Risen Christ and reborn in the waters of baptism, as the liturgy makes us relive in the Holy Vigil of Easter night
— liturgical pastoral —

Author
Simone Pifizzi
.
Yesterday, with the Liturgy of Ashes, the holy season of Lent began for the Church. A time which, according to what is reported in the norms and the calendar for the liturgical year, has the purpose of preparing for Easter. The Lenten Liturgy guides both the catechumens, through the different degrees of Christian initiation, and the faithful through the memory of baptism and through penance in the celebration of the Paschal mystery.
As everyone knows, the holy season of Lent begins with a symbol that is defined as austere: receiving ashes on the head. In the Old Testament, ashes are a symbol of what is temporary, perishable and as such is reduced to dust, as we read in Job 10:9; or because it is worthless (Gen 18:27). Also in the Old Testament, ashes were a sign of desolation and mourning. Here then are the gestures of sprinkling ashes on the head (2Sam 13:19), sitting in ashes like Job (Job 2:8), rolling in ashes (This 27:30), eating ashes like bread (Ps 102). David atoned for his sins in ashes, the Ninevites after Jonah’s preaching covered their heads in ashes. Ashes were used in purification rites, when a red cow was burned and its ashes were then thrown into the water used for the various ritual purifications (Num 19:1ff). Above all, ashes bring to mind the words that God addressed to Adam after his sin: “You are dust, and to dust you shall return” (Gen 3:19); they underline the punishment of death and the nothingness of the creature shaped from the dust of the ground.
In the Middle Ages, public penitents who had to atone for their sins and receive the Sacrament of Penance as a second baptism appeared at the beginning of Lent covered in ashes and wearing sackcloths. Today, In the Christian liturgy, the expression that the priest uses when blessing and imposing the ashes on Wednesday which marks the beginning of Lent are these:
«Remember that you are dust and to dust you will return».
That is, I accept the meaning of pain, of death mourning as a consequence of sin and man’s fragility. From this comes the duty to recognize one’s faults and to commit to a healthy life, as exhorted by the alternative formula for the imposition of ashes:
«Convert and believe in the Gospel».
The ash, reminding us that we are dust, helps us to reinvigorate the sense of true Christian conscience which accuses us of being guilty and does not give us peace until we have found a remedy for our inclination to evil.
Penance becomes a need: we must do penance to denounce ourselves to heaven and earth that we are miserable people. We have the obligation to implore mercy and to demonstrate with some of our actions that we repudiate the evil done and the evil we are capable of doing. Far from being a sign of superstition, the ash reminds us of a theological truth well summarized by the words of the blessing, the oldest one, which can be used on the Wednesday that begins Holy Lent:
«O God who does not want death but the conversion of sinners, grant that by recognizing that our body will return to dust, the exercise of penance obtains for us the forgiveness of sins and a renewed life in the image of the risen Lord. Through Christ, our Lord. Amen» (From the Roman ritual)
The same concept is also expressed in the renewed formula of the blessing of the ashes which reads:
«O God who has mercy on those who repent and gives your peace to those who convert, listen with paternal goodness to the prayers of your people and bless these children of yours who will receive the austere symbol of the ashes, so that through the spiritual itinerary of Lent they may arrive completely renewed to celebrate the Easter of your Son».
And it is also repeated in the alternative formula in which these words are used:
«O God who does not want the death of sinners but conversion, listen kindly to our prayer and bless these ashes that we are about to receive on our heads, recognizing that we are dust and to dust we will return. May the exercise of Lenten penance obtain for us the forgiveness of sins and a renewed life in the image of your risen Son, who lives and reigns forever and ever. Amen».
The prayers mentioned above therefore present us with the right perspective from which to look at the sign of the ashes placed on the heads of those who begin the Lenten journey with good will. It is essentially a gesture of humility, which means: I recognize myself for what I am, a fragile creature, made of earth and destined for the earth, but also made in the image of God and destined for Him. Dust, yes, but loved, shaped by the love of God, animated by his vital breath and capable of recognizing his voice and therefore responding to him; free and, for this reason, also capable of disobeying him, giving in to the temptation of pride and self-sufficiency. Here is sin, a deadly disease that soon began to pollute the blessed earth that is the human being. Created in the image of the Holy and the Just, man has lost his innocence and can now return to being just only thanks to the justice of God, the justice of love which, as Saint Paul writes:
«was manifested through faith in Christ» (Rom 3:22).
Precisely the second reading of the Liturgy of the Word on Ash Wednesday contains Paul’s appeal to be reconciled with God (see 2 Color 5:20), through one of his famous paradoxes which leads all reflection on justice to the mystery of Christ. Saint Paul writes:
«For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him» (2 Color 5:21).
In the heart of Christ, that is, in the center of his divine-human Person, the entire drama of freedom was played out in decisive and definitive terms. God took his plan of salvation to the extreme consequences, remaining faithful to his love even at the cost of handing over his only begotten Son to death and death on the cross. Here divine justice is revealed, profoundly different from human justice:
«Thanks to the action of Christ, we can enter into the “greater” justice, which is that of love» (Benedict XVI, Message for Lent, 2010)
Holy Lent, although it begins with the austere gesture of the ashes that makes us bow our heads, nevertheless broadens our horizon and orients us towards eternal life, since on this earth we are on a pilgrimage:
«For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the one that is to come» (Heb 13:14).
While Lent makes us understand the relativity of the goods of this earth and therefore makes us capable of necessary renunciations, it also gives us the freedom to do good, to open the earth to the light of Heaven, to the presence of God among us.
Thus the holy ashes which are traditionally obtained from the burning of the olive branches blessed for Palm Sunday of the previous year perform their function as the gateway to the strong season of Lent and already allow us to glimpse the man renewed by the Risen Christ and reborn in the waters of baptism, as the liturgy makes us relive in the Holy Vigil of Easter night.
Florence, 6 March 2025
Beginning of Lent
.
.
______________________
Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:
Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos
![]()
n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21
If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com
We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.
The Fathers of the Island of Patmos
.
.
.
The constraint to do the good: The conversion of Jean Valjean due to the bishop of Digne in "Les Misérables" – The conversion of Jean Valjean because of the Bishop of Digne in the work “The miserables” – The embarrassment to do good: Jean Valjean's conversion because of the bishop of Digne to "The Miserables"
/in Catechesis/by Eneas De Camargo BeteAnd if simonia was back in vogue to vogue? – What if the simony return again at the next conclave?
/1 Comment/in Actuality/by father ariel(English text after the Italian)
And if simonia was back in vogue to vogue?
At present, the poor so exalted in this pontificate were left hostage of the whims of the rich as they had never been before, After giving life to a college of cardinal voters who do not represent the various items, The most diverse opinions and positions that have always enriched the church inside, but an univocal voice, monocorde.
- Church news -

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
PDF print format article – PDF article print format
.
Everyone has their own style, single or collective. In the first, as in the second case, It can be spontaneous, or studied at the table. The Fathers of the Island of Patmos, During their ten years of publicity activity, Starting from October 2014, several times for opportunities, Others for virtue of prudence, have given up on dealing with certain emerging issues related to the Church and the Papacy, Being first of all presbyters; editors and publicists to follow, But forward at all presbyters. Certain themes may require not to be silent, or worse hidden, but treated when you have more cognitive elements that can lead to a truthful, fair judgment.

Because you don't write anything about the health of the Holy Father, They asked us for more readers? Yup, In fact, the Supreme Pontiff Francesco has been hospitalized at the Polyclinic Agostino Gemelli and his health and his state of health have not emitted from these colors of our columns. And on the basis of what we should have done it, Perhaps based on daily medical bulletins, giving to follow breath to the trumpets of interpretations and hypotheses, including the most absurd, which however arouse that unhealthy itching that for the social media It is like yeast in croissants?
When a supreme pontiff is seriously ill, Talking about the succession is inevitable. Who does it with competence and delicacy, who instead with incompetence and lack of respect for his Augusta person. To these seconds it would only be enough to ask who the new Roman Pontiff is successor, If of the one who died before him, or of the blessed apostle Pietro, thus grasping the level of their preparation. Someone complained that talking about conclave is lack of respect and regard towards a supreme pontiff mildly defined by medical bulletins in now "serious" conditions now "stationary", all alternating with various small improvements or worsening. The truth is that the Supreme Pontiff is a terminal patient who is concluding his life and the reserved prognosis will be dissolved after Cardinal Camerlengo will recite the solemn sentence: «The Pope is really dead», Then he will turn to his corpse by calling him with his name of baptism: Jorge Mario. This means that the papacy, being an office and not the extreme degree of the sacrament of the order, once acquired legally, certainly not for the sacramental way, With death ceases. Contrary to the priesthood, acquired sacramentally, which makes us priests for eternity: «You are a priest forever» (Shall 110,4).
At the time he died back in August 1990, My father had 34 less years of the current reigning pontiff. Today, in Italy, The average age of the Italian male is equal to 84 year old; in Argentina, that of the Argentine male, is equal to 74 year old. Dying at the age that is anything but tender 88 years old, After having already exceeded the Italian average and fourteen average of the Argentine one, It could be said very serenely that the Holy Father will certainly not have been cruelly torn by the amorous arms of the nurse. I fell on an engraved with the premature death of my parent who took place within a year for a metastatized tumor not diagnosed in time and therefore impossible to cure, To narrate that while he was in the terminal state I have never wished him to continue living, but I praised the mercy of God who took it as soon as possible. Today, under certain circumstances, even without wishing anyone death, I continue to pray to God so that certain suffering are brought soon to the house of the divine Father, without ever forgetting the salvific value of human suffering, of which the Holy Pope John Paul II spoke in his magisterium in his apostolic letter saving Passion, which opens with the words of the blessed apostle Paul:
«Complete in my flesh what is missing from Christ's sufferings, in favor of his body which is the Church "" (With the 1, 14).
Those who declare that they pray for the health and healing of the Holy Father, inviting to do the same, either they live in the world of the Irreale or think that in front of a dying elderly, all the more a Roman pontiff, Galateo rules are applied to pathetic, if not perhaps ridiculous. You have to pray yes, But so that God grant the Holy Father the grace of a peaceful death, limiting his physical suffering, human and spiritual. With the complex and serious pathological state that afflicts it, including a total absence of immune defenses, its public exhibition would be impossible, Equally problematic to receive people who could be a vehicle for transmission of micro bacteria. If he stayed alive for other months, would return to Martha House Sancthae in conditions of this physical debilitation for which it would be necessary to set up a space-like space at that residence with the constant control of a team of specialists present day and night. All of this, It is perhaps wishable to a man like the reigning pontiff for whom isolation and lack of free contact with people would be something unbearable and unsustainable? This is to respond to all those romantics who pray for the now lost health of the Holy Father and for his impossible healing.
Think right now about a next conclave, It has not fallen in style but simple obviousness. And when the doors of the Sistine Chapel will close, The church will have to deal with the various problems left inheritance by this pontificate, which remains judged overall only by history, perhaps even in many years. The Supreme Pontiff Francesco was elected after an act of renunciation by his predecessor, Rare event result for all of us traumatic, especially for the unhappy ways chosen at the time by Benedict XVI, complete with an extravagant invention of the "Emeritus Papacy", or of sviant terms as "extended papacy", "Active papacy and contemplative papacy" ...
That of the Holy Father Francis It is a pontificate that is placed in a social and geopolitical context of great decadence on a planetary level, With a sceristianization of Europe that has already reached irreversible levels for twenty years. Elsewhere, an bleeding of faithful was consumed in what were once the two lungs with which Catholicism breathed: Latin America and Africa. Francesco's was a pontificate full of problematicities, made of ambiguity and lack of clarity, There are no lack of forms of despotism put in place in the total contempt of ecclesiastical laws and rules. Deny that this pontiff will leave a confused church, divided and quarrelsome due to open processes on all fronts, based on the unusual principle that "the important thing is to open the processes" without however concluding and bringing them to full fulfillment, It means denying the most clear evidence of the facts. But, Those who tell us that in several years will not have to be made thanks to Francesco's pontificate for having preserved and saved the Church by problems and damage that without his action, not understandable on the spot, they would have been greater, or even irreparable? Francesco is a complicated man who fits as such in a very complicated historical moment, any judgment given to the present on him and his pontificate could be completely wrong tomorrow. Certain expressions or decisions judged as eccentric - and in fact they are -, how completely different could appear tomorrow? It wouldn't be the first time that certain men, not included at the moment in their action, they were subsequently celebrated as a personality that were on decades compared to the present time in which they lived. That's why sometimes, just when you are perplexed, disoriented and suffering for certain ambiguous attitudes and not easy even to decipher, while exercising the legitimate critical sense it deserves prudentially suspend the judgment.
One of the serious problems that this pontificate will leave to the next conclave it is given by the fact that the cardinal voters do not know each other among them. The last secret consistory took place in 2015. Let's clarify: The Consistor is the assembly of the cardinals convened by the Roman Pontiff and can be secret, public, semi-public (see WHO). The one in which only the cardinals gathered to discuss in private form are called "secret", i.e. secret, with the Supreme Pontiff, Regarding the various problems of the Church and its government. Today, to the serious problem of cardinals who do not know each other among them, Another unknown to the secularists of the international left who magnify the poor church for the poor adds it, so much poverty excites them in the houses and on the skin of others, praising this pontificate that would have appointed dozens of cardinals "from the suburbs of the world" and "from the poorest countries". We fly over the scarce doctrinal and theological formation by several of these sant'Uomini from those privileged situations for which today a cardinal purple can be deserved: "The suburbs" ... "poor countries"… Several of these cardinals are bishops of countries where the presence of Catholics cannot be called even a small minority: on the island of Tonga, whose bishop Cardinal Soane Patita Paini Mafi is, The baptized Catholics are about 10.000. Cardinal was created in the 2020, at the age of just 46 year old, Giorgio Marengo, Apostolic Vicar of Mongolia, where Catholics count 1.200 baptized on 3.300.000 inhabitants. These cardinal voters, Emblem of the "poor church for the poor" of the various "existential suburbs", they govern local churches that can survive and live in contexts of great discomfort and authentic poverty thanks to the donations that come to them as rich local churches, or by large foundations dependent or related to them. To be understood: A single Austrian parish, German, Australian, Canoeing About, North American … It can maintain an entire diocese in certain poor countries of Latin America, of Asia and Africa, where the relationship between the euro and the dollar and their national currency is totally disproportionate in purchase value.
Tomorrow, in the Sistine Chapel, a group of cardinals from these countries, rigorously chosen among the exponents of the so -called more advanced progressiveness, With delicate ease they will make people understand that the cords of the bag hold them, leaving dozens of "poor-peripheral-existential" cardinals the obligatory choice played on the survival of local churches that can live only thanks to external aid. Of course, once this was called simonia, Today it is called instead "poor church for the poor".
At present, the poor so exalted in this pontificate they were left hostage of the whims of the rich as never before, After giving life to a college of cardinal voters who do not represent the various items, The most diverse opinions and positions that have always enriched the church inside, but an univocal voice, monocorde. And among the various damage perpetrated, This will perhaps be the worst, because weighs as a heavy mortgage like lead on the next conclave. This with all due respect to the poor Church, that inside the Sistine chapel will beat the poor with the cords of the bag of the most progressive and more ideologized rich.
From the island of Patmos, 2 March 2025
.
____________________
WHAT IF THE SIMONY RETURN AGAIN AT THE NEXT CONCLAVE?
At present the poor so exalted in this pontificate have been left hostage to the whims of the rich as they had never been before, after having given life to a College of cardinal electors who do not represent the various and noumerous voices, opinions and positions that have always enriched the Church internally, but a single, monotonous voice.
— Ecclesial actuality —

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
Everyone has their own style, individual or collective. In the first, as in the second case, it can be spontaneous, or studied on the table. The Fathers of this magazine The Island of Patmos , during ten years of journalistic activity, starting from October 2014, several times due to opportunity, other times due to the virtue of prudence, have renounced dealing with emerging themes linked to the Church and the Papacy, being first and foremost presbyters ; editors and publicists to follow, but presbyters ahead of everything. Certain topics may require to be dealt with when there is greater knowledge that can lead to a truthful, fair and balanced judgement.

Why don’t you write anything about the health of the Holy Father, several readers have asked us? Yes, in fact the Supreme Pontiff Francis has been hospitalized at the Agostino Gemelli Polyclinic for two weeks now and we have not uttered a sigh about him and his state of health in these columns of ours. And on the basis of what should we have done it, perhaps based on the daily medical bulletins, followed by interpretations and hypotheses, including the most absurd ones, which however arouse that unhealthy itch which for social media is like yeast in croissants?
When a Supreme Pontiff is seriously ill, talking about succession is inevitable. Some do it with competence and delicacy, some with incompetence and lack of respect for his August Person. These latter it would be enough ask, whose successor’s the new Roman Pontiff is: of the one who died before him, or of the Blessed Apostle Peter? Thus grasping the level of their preparation. Someone has complained that talking about a conclave is a lack of respect towards a Supreme Pontiff blandly defined by medical bulletins as being in sometimes “serious” and sometimes “stationary” conditions, all alternating with various small improvements or worsening. The truth is that the Supreme Pontiff is a terminally ill patient who is ending his life and the reserved prognosis will be dissolved after the cardinal chamberlain recites the solemn phrase: «The Pope is really dead» (The Pope is truly dead), then he will address his corpse by calling it by his baptismal name: Jorge Mario. This because the papacy, being an office, not the extreme degree of the Sacrament of Orders, once acquired by juridical means, not by sacramental means, ceases with death. Contrary to the priesthood, acquired through the Sacrament, which makes us priests for eternity: «You are a priest forever» (you are a priest forever) (Ps 110,4).
Way back in August 1990 my father died, he was 34 years younger than the current reigning Pontiff. Today, in Italy, the average age of the Italian male is 84 years; in Argentina, that of the Argentine male, is 74 years. Dying at the age of 88, after having already exceeded the Italian average by four years and the Argentine average by fourteen, one could say very serenely that the Holy Father will not be cruelly torn from the loving arms of the nanny. I mentioned the premature death of my parent which occurred within a year due to a metastasized tumor that was not diagnosed in time and therefore impossible to cure, to narrate that while he was in a terminal state I did not wish him to continue living, but I prayed to God’s mercy that he would take him as soon as possible. Today, in certain circumstances, without wishing death on anyone, I continue to pray to God that certain sufferers may be brought quickly to the House of the Divine Father, without ever forgetting the salvific value of human suffering, which the Holy Pontiff John Paul II spoke about in his magisterium in his Apostolic Letter Salvifici Pain, which opens with the words of the Blessed Apostle Paul:
«In my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the Church» (With the 1, 14).
Those who invite prayer for the health and healing of the Holy Father live in the world of the unreal. We must pray, yes, but so that God grants the Holy Father the grace of a peaceful death, limiting his physical, human and spiritual suffering. With the complex and serious pathological state that afflicts him, including a now total absence of immune defenses, his public exposure would be impossible, and it would be equally problematic to welcome people who could be a vehicle for the transmission of micro bacteria. If he remains alive for a few more months and returns to the Vatican, to the Martha House Sancthae, his conditions of physical debilitation will be so serious that it will be necessary to set up a hospital-type space in that residence with the constant presence of a team of specialists present day and night. Is all this perhaps desirable for a man like the reigning Pontiff for whom isolation and the lack of free contact with people would be something absolutely unbearable and unsustainable? This is to respond to all those romantics who pray for the now lost health of the Holy Father and for his impossible recovery.
Thinking at this moment about an upcoming conclave is not a fall in style but simple obviousness. And when the doors of the Sistine Chapel close, the Church will have to deal with the various problems left as a legacy by this pontificate, which remains judgeable, overall, only by history, perhaps even many years from now. The Supreme Pontiff Francis was elected after an act of renunciation by his predecessor, a rare event and a traumatic for all of us, especially due to the unfortunate methods chosen at the time by Benedict XVI, complete with the extravagant invention of the «emeritus papacy», or misleading terms such as «enlarged papacy», «active papacy and contemplative papacy» (!?)…
That of the Holy Father Francis is a pontificate that takes place in a social and geopolitical context of great decadence on a global level, with a de-Christianization of Europe that has already reached irreversible levels for twenty years. Elsewhere a hemorrhage of faithful has taken place in what were once the two lungs with which Catholicism breathed: Latin America and Africa.
Francis’ pontificate was full of problems, ambiguities and lack of clarity, there were also forms of despotism in total contempt of ecclesiastical laws and rules. To deny that this Pontiff will leave a confused, divided and quarrelsome Church due to trials open on all fronts, based on the unusual principle that «the important thing is to open the trials», without however concluding them and bringing them to full completion, is to deny the clearest evidence of the facts. However, who tells us that in several years we will not have to thank the pontificate of Francis for having preserved and saved the Church from problems and damage which without his actions, not understandable at the time, would have been greater, or even irreparable? Francis is a complicated man who fits into a very complicated historical moment, any judgment given in the present about him and his pontificate, could be completely wrong tomorrow.
It would not be the first time that certain men, not understood at the time in their actions, were later celebrated as extraordinary personalities who were decades ahead of the present time in which they lived. This is why sometimes, precisely when one is perplexed, disoriented and grieve for certain ambiguous attitudes and not even easy to decipher, despite exercising legitimate critical sense, is necessary and prudently suspending judgement..
One of the serious problems this pontificate will leave for the next conclave is this: tthe cardinal electors do not know each other. The last secret consistory took place in 2015. Let’s clarify: the consistory is the assembly of cardinals convened by the Roman Pontiff and can be secret, public, semi-public. What is called “secret” is that in which only the cardinals gathered to discuss in a private, i.e. secret, form with the Supreme Pontiff participate, regarding the various problems of the Church and its government. Today, to the serious problem of the cardinals who do not know each other, there is another one unknown to the secularists of the international left who glorify «the poor Church for the poor», so much does poverty in the homes and on the lives of others excites them, praising this pontificate which has appointed dozens of cardinals «coming from the peripheries of the world» and «from the poorest countries».
Let us not dwell the poor doctrinal and theological training of several of these holy men coming from those privileged situations for which today they can deserve a cardinal’s purple: «the suburbs» … «the poor countries». Several of these cardinals are bishops of countries where the presence of Catholics cannot be defined as even a small minority: on the island of Tonga, of which Cardinal Soane Patita Paini Mafi is bishop, there are around 10,000 baptized Catholics. Giorgio Marengo, apostolic vicar of Mongolia, where Catholics number 1,200 baptized out of 3,300,000 inhabitants, was created cardinal in 2020, at the age of just 46. These cardinal electors, emblem of the «poor Church for the poor» of the various «existential peripheries», govern local churches that can survive and live in contexts of great hardship and authentic poverty thanks to the donations that come to them from rich local churches, or from large foundations on linked to them. To be clear: a single Austrian, German, Australian, Canadian or North American parish can maintain an entire diocese in certain poor countries in Latin America, Asia and Africa, where the relationship between the Euro and the Dollar and their national currency is totally disproportionate in terms of purchase value.
Tomorrow, in the Sistine Chapel, a group of cardinals from these countries, rigorously chosen by Holy Father among the exponents of the so-called most advanced progressivism, will with delicate ease make it clear that they hold the purse strings, leaving dozens of “poor-peripheral-existential” cardinals the forced choice based on the survival of their local churches that can only live thanks to external aid. Of course, once this was called simony, today it is instead called «poor church for the poor».
At present the poor so exalted in this pontificate have been left hostage to the whims of the rich as they had never been before, after having given life to a College of cardinal electors who do not represent the various and noumerous voices, opinions and positions that have always enriched the Church internally, but a single, monotonous voice. And among the various damages perpetrated, this will perhaps be the worst, because it weighs like a lead-heavy mortgage on the next conclave. With all due respect to the poor Church, which inside the Sistine Chapel will strangle the poor, with the purse strings by rich most progressive and ideologicalized.
From The Island of Patmos, March 2, 2025
.
.
______________________
Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:
Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of: Editions The island of Patmos
n Agency. 59 Rome – Vatican
Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers: Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21
If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com
We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.
The Fathers of the Island of Patmos
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The website of this magazine and the editions take name from the Aegean island in which the Blessed Apostle John wrote the Book of the Apocalypse, isola also known as «the place of the last revelation»

«God revealed the secrets of others ALTIUS»
(in higher than the others, John has left the Church, the arcane mysteries of God)

The bezel used as the cover of our home page is a 16th century fresco by Correggio. preserved in the Church of San Giovanni Evangelista in Parma
Creator of the website of this magazine:
MANUELA LUZZARDI





