“They took the Lord away from the tomb and we don't know where they put him”

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

«THEY TOOK THE LORD FROM THE TOMB AND WE DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY PLACED HIM»

Every Christian hope is founded on the Resurrection of Christ, on which our resurrection with him is "anchored". However, Since we now we have risen with him: the whole fabric of our Christian life is woven with this unshakable certainty and this hidden reality, with the joy and dynamism that derive from it.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

The evangelical passage for Easter day does not present an ad, similar to a proclamation, of the resurrection of Jesus. This is the most surprising aspect of it, certainly diluted by the other liturgical readings and prayers that distinguish this solemnity.

The secret and reason for this absence lies in the quality of John's text which by not making it explicit reveals and in its movement, while describing what was true and physical of the disciple Magdalene together with Peter and another, it also drags readers along, almost as if they too were taking part in that race to the tomb, involved in what to all intents and purposes is the genesis of the Easter faith. Let's read the text.

«The first day of the week, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb in the morning, when it was still dark, and he saw that the stone had been removed from the tomb. He then ran and went to Simon Peter and the other disciple, what Jesus loved, and told them: “They took the Lord away from the tomb and we don't know where they placed him”. Peter then went out together with the other disciple and they went to the tomb. They both ran together, but the other disciple ran faster than Peter and reached the tomb first. He bent down, he saw the sheets laid there, but he did not enter. Meanwhile, Simon Pietro also arrived, who followed him, and he entered the tomb and observed the cloths laid there, and the shroud - which had been on his head - not placed there with the cloths, but wrapped in a place apart. Then the other disciple also entered, who had reached the tomb first, and he saw and believed. In fact they had not yet understood the Scripture, that is, he had to rise from the dead" (GV 20,1-9).

On that first day of the week which will later become a holiday for Christians, «day of the sun» (Saint Justin) and of the Lord, the event of the Resurrection of Christ is a fact that is revealed in the guise of testimony. In John's story we grasp the inchoative moment, the release of the spark that will set the world on fire. but yet, what Mary Magdalene first communicates is an observation far from faith in the Resurrection of the Lord, whom he will meet shortly thereafter, as soon as she is left alone. She reports the most obvious thing: "They have taken the Lord out of the tomb and we know not where they have laid!». In that plural we see the initial bewilderment of the disciples, underlined by an annotation, symbol of a faith that is not yet profound and convinced: "it was still dark". In the Fourth Gospel the darkness refers to the darkness that opposes the light of the Word that arrives (GV 1,5; 3,19); designates the problematic situation of the disciples in the absence of Jesus (GV 6,19), and it is the condition of uncertainty and confusion in which those who do not follow Jesus find themselves wandering (GV 8,12). Above all it is the condition of those who do not believe in him: «I came into the world as light, so that whoever believes in me may not remain in darkness" (GV 12,46). Maria is in that situation there, he peered into the empty tomb, but he has not yet understood because he has not seen with the eyes of faith and so he involves two important witnesses: Peter and another anonymous disciple. Only later will Mary of Magdala say with conviction: «I saw the Lord!». In this way the internal itinerary that will lead to the ecclesial announcement: «He is risen», passes through the evidence of death, consisting of the bandages and shroud that wrapped the body and the empty tomb in which it had been placed. According to the author of the Fourth Gospel, to arrive at a clear and certain profession of faith on the part of the believer - like that of St. Thomas: "My Lord and my God" - it must mature little by little in the consciousness of the disciples and he outlines its onset through the various degrees of seeing. It is worth highlighting how in the chapter 20 of San Giovanni the verb to see occurs well 13 times. Everywhere in the Gospel, but above all in this chapter the development of "seeing" is outlined, and it is Jesus himself who teaches his followers to look: it is his pedagogical method. Initially there is a sensitive seeing which subsequently leads to contemplation, so that the mystery is touched in the depth of the visible (cf.. GV 19,35: «He who has seen bears witness... so that you too may believe»).

At the Last Supper Jesus had stated: "Whoever has seen me has seen the father" (GV 14,9) and this is the central verse of the fourth Gospel. But physically seeing Jesus is not enough because, obviously, even his enemies see him, but consider him simply a man from Nazareth, indeed an impostor. Physically seeing and hearing Jesus, a man with a face, a flesh, it was indispensable to progressively come to contemplate in him, with the eye of faith, the Son of God, that is, to discover in him the Word made flesh. It is Jesus, with words and signs, with all his presence, which opens the door to the mystery and leads from "seeing" a man of flesh to recognition, in that flesh, the Word of God; so physical "seeing"., throughout the Gospel, it is the access route to this mystery that is revealed. The pedagogy of seeing becomes explicit, in fact, Jesus himself will explain it to Thomas, in our chapter 20. The starting point that becomes a pace, it is what we see with these fleshly eyes of ours; we start with the signs, like the empty tomb or the gardener, a real man whom Mary Magdalene encounters, in which he then recognizes the Risen Jesus. It's a progression, found in John's use of the verb to see. We go from Greek Bleppo with the meaning of seeing, notice something, like the cloths in the tomb, a theorein when the apostles and Magdalene look and observe more carefully. Finally the verb horan, to the perfect Greek, used by Saint John to express the fullness of Easter faith: «I saw the Lord» (heôraka ton Kyrion). Although we can't say much more here, what catches the eye, noting the concentric structure of the entire chapter 20 is that it describes the birth of faith in the risen Christ which however is based on the testimony of those who "saw" the empty tomb and the living Lord. This aspect is so important that the Risen Jesus will rebuke Thomas for his lack of trust in the testimony of the other disciples: «Because you saw me, you believed; Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed!» (GV 20,29).

The Resurrection of Christ is therefore done, but also an event inextricably linked to faith and testimony. So the Lord, once again and especially on this occasion of the Resurrection from the dead, he does not deviate from his pedagogy and from the way in which he wanted to meet and save men, that is, by incarnating himself.

The Gospel describes the dynamics of Easter faith very well and how the testimony on it is consolidated. Of the other disciple, who ran with Peter to the tomb, arriving first, it is said that "he began to believe" (in Greek: the epistemic, ingressive aorist) and he will say to Thomas the Risen One: «And don't be incredulous, but become a believer!» (GV 20,27). This aspect of progress and becoming is often not well underlined, since even the translations are sometimes not always happy, yet it makes us understand that the Christian faith is not something static and acquired, but a virtue that grows with experience, the intelligence of the Scriptures and the encounter with the testimony that becomes the living tradition of the Christian community. Initially it is dark: «In fact they had not yet understood the Scripture, that is, he had to rise from the dead. The disciples, therefore, they went home again.". But slowly, also thanks to the presence of the Risen One, faith becomes increasingly sure and clear until: «My Lord and my God!» by Thomas, which are the last words of the disciples in the Johannine Gospel in its first draft (GV 20,28). How important it is today for our communities to rediscover this link between events, faith and testimony, judge it for yourself. Many still follow the latest private revelation, yet another alleged Marian message, when in fact it's all there, in the Gospel. Even today Christ is risen, respecting as then our humanity that He himself assumed, asks for our testimony and our sincere faith in Him risen from the dead so that the world, our concrete situations and personal and collective stories are reborn.

I would like to conclude by reporting the words that Paul VI addressed the participants in the Symposium on the mystery of the Resurrection of Christ in the distant past 1970:

"Yup, every Christian hope is founded on the Resurrection of Christ, on which it is “anchored” our resurrection with Him. However, Since we now we have risen with him (cf.. With the 3,1): the whole fabric of our Christian life is woven with this unshakable certainty and this hidden reality, with the joy and dynamism that derive from it. It is therefore not surprising that such a mystery, so fundamental to our faith, so prodigious for our intelligence, has always aroused, with the passionate interest of the exegetes, a multifaceted contestation throughout history. This phenomenon was already evident when the evangelist Saint John was still alive, who deemed it necessary to point out that the unbelieving Thomas had been invited to touch with his hands the mark of the nails and the wounded side of the risen Word of life (cf.. GV 20, 24-29). How not to mention, since, the attempts at a gnosis, always reborn in multiple forms, to penetrate this mystery with all the resources of the human spirit, and also to strive to reduce it to the dimensions of entirely human categories? A temptation that is certainly understandable and undoubtedly inevitable, but which has a formidable tendency to insensibly empty all the riches and scope of what is first of all a fact: the Resurrection of the Savior. Even today - and we certainly don't need to remind you of this - we see this trend manifesting its extreme dramatic consequences, going so far as to deny it, among the faithful who call themselves Christians, the historical value of inspired testimonies or, more recently, to interpret in a purely mythical way, spiritual or moral, the physical resurrection of Jesus. How could we not deeply feel the disintegrating effect of these harmful discussions on many faithful? But We proclaim with strength: we consider all this without fear, Why, today as yesterday, the testimony "of the Eleven and their companions" is capable, with the grace of the Holy Spirit, to arouse true faith: “It's really true! The Lord was resurrected and appeared to Peter” (LC 24,34-35) (full text: WHO, my translation).

 

From the Hermitage, 20 April 2025

Easter of resurrection

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

The stone of Jesus and the ancient mouth of Rosa that put love above everything

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE STONE OF JESUS ​​AND THE ANCIENT ROSE MOUTH THAT PUT LOVE ABOVE EVERYTHING

«There are those who make love out of boredom, who chooses it by profession, Bocca di Rosa neither one nor the other, she did it out of passion"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PDF print format article

 

 

.

There is a thread that ties Jesus' sentence listened to two Sundays ago: "If you don't convert, all perish in the same way » (LC 13, 3); to that, became famous, that we read in the Gospel of this Fifth Sunday of Lent: "Which one of you is without sin, be the first to throw the stone at her ". It is the theme of mercy, masterfully represented by Jesus in the parable of the Prodigal Son proclaimed instead last Sunday.

Today, left Luca, Let's read the Gospel of John, where we find a statement from Jesus that explains the passage about the adulterous woman well:

«God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but for the world to be saved through him" (GV 3,17).

After many clashes with his opponents, finally these bring to Jesus a concrete case that intersects a social sin, adultery. They know that his teaching focuses on openness to sinners, he ate with them, he has already said to the paralytic "Sin no more" (GV 5,14), yet they insist on testing him, so much so that this openness of Jesus will become one of the reasons for his condemnation. Let's read the Gospel.

«Jesus set out towards the Mount of Olives. But in the morning he went again to the temple, and all the people came to him. And he sat down and began to teach them. Then the scribes and Pharisees brought to him a woman caught in adultery, they placed it in the middle and said to him: “Maestro, this woman was caught in adultery. now Moses, in the Law, He commanded us to stone such women. What do you think?”. They said this to test him and to have reason to accuse him. But Jesus bent down and began to write with his finger on the ground. However, because they insisted on questioning him, he stood up and told them: “Who among you is without sin, be the first to throw a stone at her.". E, bent down again, He wrote on the ground. Those, heard it, they went away one by one, starting with the older ones. They left him alone, and the woman was there in the middle. Then Jesus stood up and said to her: “Donna, where am I? Has no one condemned?”. And she answered: "Nobody, Man". And Jesus said: “I don't condemn you either; go and sin no more from now on" (GV 8,1-11).

The text is complex — since ancient times it has posed problems of textual criticism due to its absence in the most important manuscripts — also due to the cultural distance that separates us from the themes expressed there, and in this way the interpretations have multiplied. Some, perhaps precisely because today's sensitivity has changed a lot compared to that ancient culture, they highlight the violence used towards women by those male men, in contrast to the kindness and attitude used by Jesus towards her. They wonder where the man who is also an adulterer is, whom the Law ordered to be put to death in the same way as the woman, if discovered (Dt 22, 22). They're not doing it, in this way, violence also against the Law, as well as the woman, those men who push her in the middle, there in front of everyone, then in the Temple, in order to frame Jesus?

For someone else it is likely not true adultery, but of a specious use of Jesus' words to put him in difficulty. These words are found in Mt 5, 31-32:

«It was also said: «Whoever repudiates his wife, give her the writ of repudiation". But I tell you: whoever divorces his wife, except in the case of illegitimate union, exposes her to adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman, commits adultery".

According to what Jesus says in Matthew the repudiation of his wife, although admitted by the Torah (Dt 24, 1-4) by means of a divorce decree, however, it exposes the divorced woman to adultery. The divorce document was intended to limit male agency and to grant it to the woman, after the separation, the possibility of remarrying without being accused of adultery. Jesus then said in the Sermon on the Mount: «Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish, but to fully fulfill " (Mt 5, 17). Therefore in those difficult words reported above we at least understand that for Jesus divorce is an act that goes against love for one's wife, exposing her to adultery. According to this interpretation it is possible that that woman thrown there in the middle was actually a remarried divorcee and according to those scribes and Pharisees she could not be reprobated, but since they learned that Jesus advanced that new hermeneutic of the Law, they use it to "test" him (cf.. GV 8, 6; Mt 19, 3). They thus demonstrate that they care more about chance and don't care about the person; perverting the teaching of Jesus they had already put their hands to stones to stone her. Thus comments Saint Augustine: «They were interested in the adulteress, and in the meantime they lost sight of themselves".

The gospel passage opens with the note of Jesus going to the Temple to teach a large crowd. Indeed the text says that "all the people" (GV 8,2) went to him. We also find a similar note in Luke:

«During the day Jesus taught in the Temple; at night he went out and spent the night outdoors on the mountain of olive trees. And all the people went to him in the Temple early in the morning to listen to him" (LC 21,37-38).

Jesus carries out a daily teaching activity in the Temple which probably generates annoyance and for this reason is interrupted suddenly and violently by some. Jesus distances himself from these, avoiding face to face with them; thus while it is twice underlined that the woman is among this group of people (vv. 3 e 9), it is also repeated twice that Jesus bends down to the ground to write (vv. 6 e 8). We don't know if he wanted to express solidarity towards the weakest, experiencing in her own body what she is experiencing, but this gesture certainly has a theological value. Let's retrace the various passages of the text. Jesus bends down for the first time and writes on the ground with his finger (v. 6), scribes and Pharisees insist on questioning him; then he stands up and speaks to them saying: "Let the one who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her" (v. 7). Immediately afterwards Jesus bends down again for the second time, He writes on the ground (v. 8), the scribes and Pharisees leave one by one, starting with the older ones and leaving Jesus alone with the woman (v. 9), then Jesus gets up (v. 10) and says to the woman: "go and sin no more" (v. 11). It's here, in all probability, a reference to the Old Testament, to the episode of Moses' double ascension to Mount Sinai where he twice receives the tablets of the Law "written by the finger of God" (Is 31,18). In that case Moses came down from the mountain for the first time and broke the tablets of the Law because the people were transgressing them with the sin of the golden calf (Is 32, 19). He ascends again and receives the tablets rewritten a second time together with the revelation of the name of the merciful and forgiving God.:

«The Lord passed before him, proclaiming: "The Sir, the Sir, Merciful and merciful God, slow to anger and rich in love and faithfulness, who preserves his love for a thousand generations, who forgives the guilt, transgression and sin..." (Is 34, 1-9).

So Jesus, with his gesture of bending, write and get up twice, seems to allude, mimetically, to the gift of the Law given twice, a Law that already contained the gift of mercy and forgiveness, so much so that the alliance in the eyes of the Lord God is not canceled by man's sin. Now it's Jesus, in the New Covenant, which reveals divine mercy and forgiveness, since in both cases where Jesus stands up and speaks uttering words that have to do with sin, of the scribes and Pharisees first and then of the woman, which has already been forgiven, even if he will tell her eventually: "Neither do I condemn; go and from now on don't sin anymore ". Jesus asks the woman to assume responsibility, therefore he sends her demonstrating trust in her. The fact then that in our text bending down precedes getting up unlike the story of Moses who first ascended and then descended at Sinai, it is a reference to the fundamental event of the incarnation of the Word who first descended and then was raised in glory: «He who descended is the same who also ascended above all the heavens, to be the fullness of all things" (Ef 4,10). In the mystery of Christ he reveals himself, so, the face of the Father God rich in mercy, according to the evangelical expression already mentioned initially: «God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but for the world to be saved through him" (GV 3,17).

Beyond any possible interpretation John's text 8,1-11 states that God's mercy becomes practice in Jesus. The words of Saint Augustine commenting on the meeting between the Lord and the adulteress have remained famous:

«Only the two of them remained: misery and mercy (miserable and Mercy.

Words that also struck Pope Francis who wrote:

«He couldn't [St. Augustine] find a more beautiful and coherent expression than this to make people understand the mystery of God's love when he comes to meet the sinner" (Apostolic Letter Mercy and misery of the Holy Father Francis at the conclusion of the Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy, 2016).

Rightly the liturgy on this Sunday it makes us pray:

«O Lord who sent your only begotten Son not to condemn but to save the world, forgive all our faults, so that the song of gratitude and joy may flourish in the heart".

From the Hermitage, 5 April 2025

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

If you don't convert you you will all perish in the same way – If you do not convert you will all perish in the same way

(English text after the Italian)

 

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

If you don't convert you you will all perish in the same way

It is a permanent duty of the Church to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, suitable for each generation, can answer the perennial questions of men on the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article – PDF Article print format

 

.

.

The philosopher Filone of Alessandria (Alexandria of Egypt, 20 a.C. circa – 45 D.C.. circa) He reports in one of his writings that Ponzio Pilato was a tyrannical and hard governor, "Inflexible by nature and cruel for its obstinacy", and that during his mandate were not counted in Judea «Corruption, violence, theft, assaults, unbridled abuse, continuous executions without process and boundless, wild cruelty " (Delegation to Gaius).

We also have a memory of these actions in the New Testament, outside the stories of the passion where Pilate is more mentioned. The verse that opens the Gospel of this third Sunday of Lent brings us to news that only the third Gospel knows (LC 13,1). According to some commentators, the fact that Jesus was Galileo could have influenced why. That tragic event was reported to him. Let's read the passage:

«In that same time some showed up to report to Jesus the fact of those Galilei, whose pilate blood had brought together with that of their sacrifices. Taking the floor, Jesus said to them,: "Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, for they suffered such things? No, I tell you, but unless you repent, you will all perish equally. Or those eighteen people, on which the Torre di Sìloe collapsed and killed them, You believe that they were worse offenders than all the inhabitants of Jerusalem? No, I tell you, but unless you repent, all perish in the same way ». This parable also said: “A man had planted a fig tree in his vineyard and came to look there, but he found it. Then he said to the winemaker: "There, I have been looking for fruits on this tree for three years, I find none. Therefore it! Why should it exhaust the soil?». But that replied that: "Master, Leave it again this year, As long as I have honeys around him and have put the fertilizer. We will see if it will bear fruit for the future; If no, you will cut it " (LC 13,1-9).

Not just a trend, But also the historian Giuseppe Flavio, in its Jewish antiquities, He writes that Pilate used to act with a firm wrist, especially if they were riots, Until being ready to kill the rioters without merciless. When the news reported in the Gospel could have happened? Due to the mention of the sacrifices it could have happened or while those Jews went to the temple, or during the actual sacrifice of animals; In this case it would be a sacrilegious act perpetuated during a religious ceremony. However it is for Jesus is an opportunity to invite the conversion:

"Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, for having suffered such a lot? No, I tell you, But if you don't convert you you will all perish in the same way ".

At the same conclusion it comes by commenting on another fact, The death of eighteen men caused by the collapse of a tower. The evangelical text opens with the annotation "in that same time" (LC 13,1), that binds the liturgical pericope to what precedes it. Or to Jesus' speech on the discernment of time and the ability to judge today and what is right (LC 12,54-57). It is precisely at that moment that some approach him to bring him the violent episode to him. They are made of history that question consciousness, then like today, And Jesus does not escape discernment and a judgment issued however with a perspective of faith. And the judgment of Jesus is first of all free, free from the belief still widespread at its time of a link between sin and misfortune.

Leaving this ancient theological scheme Jesus not only demonstrates his inner freedom, But also the ability to see men and non -sinners, victims and not only guilty, therefore proposing a reading of the events moved by faith and not by conformism, even it theological or spiritual. The spur therefore to the conversion, repeated twice, "But if you don't convert ...", It is an invitation to take life seriously, but also the needs of God. Not that God send misfortunes in order to convert us, But precisely because these inevitably happen, The person of faith does not escape discernment and interpretation, with the consequent risk of taking position. In this regard, the Second Vatican Council is expressed:

«It is the permanent duty of the Church to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, suitable for each generation, can answer the perennial questions of men on the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships. In fact, we must know and understand the world in which we live, his expectations, his aspirations and his often dramatic character " (The joy and hope n. 4).

It is the ability to discover the hand of God, His providence was once said, Behind the events, also those of each life. So for Jesus hearing about some seditious killed by Pilate or other deaths under a collapse is not an opportunity to see in those facts a divine punishment for sinners. In fact the same will repeat to those who, in the Gospel of John, will ask him about a blind birth, On who he had sinned because he finds himself in that condition: "Nor did he sin, nor his parents, but so might be made manifest in him the works of God " (GV 9,3).

So Jesus, leaving the easiest road, warns that you can learn from events. The fact of the death of some becomes a warning for others: "If you don't convert, all perish in the same way ». After all, the improductive fig parable also poses a similar problem. This fig tree seems alive, But in reality he died, since it does not produce anything. In the Lucanian Gospel we find several examples of people who, metaphorically, they are in the same condition as the cotton priest; they seem dead, nevertheless they arouse the interest of the Lord who is looking for who is lost. This is the case of Zaccheo: "The son of man in fact came to look for and save what was lost" (LC 19,10); of the prodigal son of the parable: "It was dead, And he came back to life " (LC 15,32); of the same crucified malfactor with him to whom Jesus promises: "Today you will be with me in Heaven" (LC 23,43).

In Jesus the divine patience and mercy is revealed who does not want the death of the sinner, but that converts and alive (cf.. This 18, 23). To perform this, the Lord respects the singer's times, as the farmer does with his call to care and waiting: "But that replied that: “Master, Leave it again this year, As long as I have honeys around him and have put the fertilizer. We will see if it will bear fruit for the future; If no, you can cut it”. While Giovanni Battista, at the beginning of the Gospel, he had preached an eschatological judgment without appeal, whereby: «The dark is placed at the root of the trees; Therefore every tree that does not give good fruit is cut and thrown into the fire " (LC 3, 9); Jesus, instead, It is the vineyard that not only knows how to wait, but it shows that he believes in the change and conversion of the sinner who at the moment not from good fruits or does not give at all. In front of the net: "Cut it!»; Jesus opposes his: "Leave it" (Aphes, as you, in Greek). A verb that among its main meanings has to leave free, put back a fault, season a debt. So this miniature parable becomes an important teaching for the time of Lent or for the jubilee year that is celebrating itself. We need a conversion time to reach healing and liberation. Perhaps it is no coincidence that immediately after the Fico parable for three years in the unsuccessful, Luca tells of a healing: that of a woman infirm for eighteen years (LC 13,10-13).

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 23 March 2025

.

_________________________________________________________

Homiletics the Fathers of The Isle of Patmos

.

IF YOU DO NOT CONVERT YOU WILL ALL PERISH IN THE SAME WAY

It is the Church’s permanent duty to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, in a way suited to each generation, it can respond to men’s perennial questions about the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

The philosopher Philo of Alexandria (Alexandria of Egypt, around 20 BC – around 45 SUCH) reports in one of his writings that Pontius Pilate was a tyrannical and harsh governor «inflexible by nature and cruel due to his obstinacy», and that during his mandate there was no shortage of «corruption, violence, theft, assaults, unbridled abuses, continuous executions without trial, savage cruelty” (Delegation to Gaius).

We also have a memory of these actions in the New Testament, outside of the passion stories where Pilate is mostly mentioned. The verse that opens the Gospel of this third Sunday of Lent tells us of news that only the third Gospel knows (Page 13,1). According to some commentators, the fact that Jesus was a Galilean may have influenced why. That tragic event was reported to him. Let’s read the passage:

«At that time some people who were present there told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with the blood of their sacrifices. He said to them in reply, “Do you think that because these Galileans suffered in this way they were greater sinners than all other Galileans? By no means! But I tell you, if you do not repent, you will all perish as they did! Or those eighteen people who were killed when the tower at Siloam fell on them, do you think they were more guilty than everyone else who lived in Jerusalem? By no means! But I tell you, if you do not repent, you will all perish as they did!”. And he told them this parable: “There once was a person who had a fig tree planted in his orchard, and when he came in search of fruit on it but found none, he said to the gardener, “For three years now I have come in search of fruit on this fig tree but have found none. [So] cut it down. Why should it exhaust the soil?” He said to him in reply, “Sir, leave it for this year also, and I shall cultivate the ground around it and fertilize it; it may bear fruit in the future. If not you can cut it down”» (Page 13, 1-9)

Not only Philo, but also the historian Josephus Flavius, in his Jewish Antiquities, writes that Pilate used to act with a firm hand, especially when it came to riots, to the point of being ready to mercilessly kill the rioters. When could the news event reported in the Gospel have happened? Due to the mention of sacrifices it could have happened either while those Jews were going to the Temple, or during the actual sacrifice of the animals; in this case it would be a sacrilegious act perpetuated during a religious ceremony. In any case, for Jesus it is an opportunity to invite conversion:

«Do you believe that those Galileans were more sinners than all the Galileans, for having suffered such a fate? No, I tell you, but if you do not convert you will all perish in the same way».

He reaches the same conclusion when commenting on another fact, the death of eighteen men caused by the collapse of a tower. The Gospel text opens with the annotation “at that same time” (Page 13:1), which links the liturgical pericope to what precedes it. That is, Jesus speech on discernment of time and the ability to judge today and what is right (Page 12,54-57). It is precisely at that moment that some approach Him to report the violent episode. They are facts of history that challenge the conscience, then as today, and Jesus does not shy away from discernment and a judgment issued, however, with a perspective of faith. And Jesus judgment is first and foremost free, free from the widespread belief still in his time of a link between sin and misfortune.

By moving away from this ancient theological scheme, Jesus not only demonstrates his inner freedom, but also the ability to see men and not sinners, victims and not just culprits, therefore proposing a reading of events driven by faith and not by conformism, be it theological or spiritual. The urge to conversion, therefore, repeated twice, “but if you do not convert…”, is an invitation to take life seriously, but also the needs of God. Not that God sends misfortunes in order to convert us, but precisely because these happen inevitably, the person of faith does not shy away from discernment and interpretation, with the consequent risk of taking a position. The Second Vatican Council expresses itself in this regard:

«It is the Church’s permanent duty to scrutinize the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the Gospel, so that, in a way suited to each generation, it can respond to men’s perennial questions about the meaning of present and future life and their mutual relationships. Indeed, we need to know and understand the world in which we live, its expectations, its aspirations and its often dramatic character” (The joy and hope n. 4).

It is the ability to discover the hand of God, his Providence was once said, behind the events, even those of each one’s life. So for Jesus hearing about some seditious people killed by Pilate or others who died under a collapse is not an opportunity to see in those facts a divine punishment for sinners. In fact, he will repeat the same thing to those who, in the Gospel of John, ask him about a man born blind, about who had sinned for him to find himself in that condition:

«Neither did he sin, nor did his parents, but it was so that the works of God might be manifested in him» (Jh 9,3).

Jesus therefore, leaving aside the easier path, warns that we can learn from events. The fact of the death of some becomes a warning for others: «If you do not convert, you will all perish in the same way». After all, the parable of the unproductive fig tree also poses a similar problem. This fig tree appears alive, but in reality it is dead, as it produces nothing. In the Luke Gospel we find several examples of people who, metaphorically, are in the same condition as the fig tree in the parable; they seem dead, nevertheless they arouse the interest of the Lord who goes in search of the lost. This is the case of Zacchaeus: «For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost» (Page 19,10); of the prodigal son of the parable: «he was dead, and is alive again» (Page 15,32); of the same criminal crucified with Him to whom Jesus promises: «Today you will be with me in paradise» (Page 23,43).

In Jesus, divine patience and mercy are revealed which does not want the sinner to die, but rather for him to convert and live (This 18, 23). To accomplish this, the Lord respects the times of the sinner, as the farmer does with his call to care and wait: «But he answered him: “Master, leave him again this year, until I have hoed around him and put the fertilizer. We’ll see if it bears fruit in the future; if not, you will cut it off”». While John the Baptist, at the beginning of the Gospel, had preached an eschatological judgment without appeal, for which: «The ax is placed at the root of the trees; therefore every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire» (Page 3,9).

Jesus, on the other hand, is the vinedresser who not only knows how to wait, but shows that he believes in the change and conversion of the sinner who at the moment does not produce good fruit or none at all. In front of the net: «Cut it!»; Jesus replies: «Leave him» (Aphes, as you, in Greek). A verb which among its main meanings has those of setting one free, remitting a fault, forgiving a debt. Thus this miniature parable becomes an important teaching for the season of Lent or for the Jubilee year that is being celebrated. We need a time of conversion to reach healing and liberation. Perhaps it is no coincidence that immediately after the parable of the fig tree which was fruitless for three years, Luke tells of a healing: that of a woman who had been ill for eighteen years (Page 13,10-13).

Happy Sunday to everyone!

from the Hermitage, March 23, 2025

 

 

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

He will transfigure our mortal body into the image of his glorious body – He will transfigure our mortal body by image of his glorious body

(English text after the Italian)

 

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

HE WILL TRANSFIGURE OUR MORTAL BODY IN THE IMAGE OF HIS GLORIOUS BODY

«Maestro, it's nice for us to be here. Let's do three huts, one for you, One for Moses and one for Elìa ". He did not know, But, what he said …

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article – PDF Article print format

 

.

.

Tradition has preserved the episode, rightly famous, of the Transfiguration of Jesus on the mountain, where the celestial epiphany of baptism is repeated, this time for the benefit of a few disciples.

The story, in its current location during the life of Jesus, partially obscures the meaning of the event, because it is Jesus himself who leads the disciples to the mountain where he undergoes a temporary transfiguration presented as a foretelling of the destiny of death and resurrection that awaits him. It is very likely that originally it was a story of the appearance of the Risen One, that Marco, who excluded those stories from his narration, would have placed it at the center of the Gospel, immediately after Peter's messianic confession, to balance the announcement of the death destiny of the Son of man (MC 8, 31) with the proleptic vision of his glorification (MC 9, 2-13); a choice that would also have determined its placement in Matthew and Luke. Supporting this hypothesis is the fact that throughout the three stories the disciples' misunderstanding of Jesus remains intact., despite some having witnessed such a sensational event. While, placed after his death, the story takes on a crucial meaning.

The three disciples receive, in a state of relaxed alert consciousness - "burdened by sleep", Peter "does not know what he says" - the revelation of the Son of man in a form transfigured by divine light. It's the turning point: the disciples, after his death, they have the vision of Jesus placed on the same level as Moses and Elijah, that is, of two biblical figures already raised to celestial glory and listening to the proclamation of his divine election, the same one that resonates at the moment of baptism. Finally the disciples "know" who Jesus is, and it is in the light of this understanding that the historical episode of baptism takes on its "true" meaning of divine investiture. Among the numerous stories of apparitions of the Risen One, that of the Transfiguration represents, so, most eloquently the process through which some disciples reached a superior understanding of the meaning of Jesus' human story after the shock of his death. Let's read it:

“About eight days after these talks, Jesus took Peter with him, John and James and went up the mountain to pray. While he prayed, his face changed in appearance and his dress became white and dazzling. And here, two men were talking to him: they were Moses and Elijah, appeared in glory, and they spoke of his exodus, which was about to take place in Jerusalem. Peter and his companions were oppressed by sleep; ma, when they woke up, they saw his glory and the two men who were with him. While they separated from him, Peter said to Jesus: “Maestro, it's nice for us to be here. Let's do three huts, one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah". He did not know, But, what he said. While he was talking like this, a cloud came and covered them with its shadow. Upon entering the cloud, they were afraid. And a voice came out of the cloud, who said: “This is my Son, the chosen one; listen!”. As soon as the voice stopped, Jesus remained alone. They remained silent and in those days did not tell anyone what they had seen." (LC 9,28-36).

The song of the transfiguration, as already mentioned at the beginning, it is among the most difficult to read and to place within the historical path of Jesus' life. It is full of suggestions because it presents many rich allusions to events and stories from the Old Testament.

The temporal annotation, placed at the beginning, «eight days later», while the other synoptics report: «six days later», connect the story with what just happened. Jesus has finished his first announcement of the passion, ma, at least according to Matthew and Mark, but not Luca, he also received a bitter disappointment from Peter. If shortly before he had recognized him as the Messiah, now he advises him instead, taking him aside, not to go to Jerusalem, because Christ should not have died. Simone, on the mouth of Jesus, he becomes like Satan. For this reason many modern commentators add a theological meaning to the traditional interpretation which sees a theological significance in the presence of Moses and Elijah next to Jesus., they would embody the Law and the Prophets, also another reason. These two characters would bring Jesus the consolation he needed. The biographies of Elijah and Moses, indeed, they tell us what the two had to go through and this allows them to know what Jesus is about to go through. Both went through daring trials to the point of even asking God to die. Moses in Is 32,32 immediately after the story of the golden calf he turns to the Lord begging forgiveness for his people: «if you would forgive their sin… Otherwise, erase me from your book that you wrote!». Elia in 1Re 19,4: «Take my life, because I am no better than my fathers". Ultimately, both of them had bitter disappointments, by which they are granted the vision of God (cf.. Is 33,21-22; 1Re 19,13).

The presence of the two characters it is therefore not just for disciples, but it is the consolation for the Son who is about to go to Jerusalem. Jesus must be comforted and strengthened regarding his "exodus", that is, its near future; the angel will do the same in Gethsemane, according to Luke's story, in the moment of extreme struggle (LC 22,43-44).

The three synoptic Gospels they try to explain what happened on Tabor, the mountain of Galilee where, Since the dalct that tiet the humbs 348, according to Cyril of Jerusalem, the Transfiguration would have occurred and they describe that transformation in their own way. Both Matthew and Mark use a verb in the passive voice, the so-called "theological passive": "he was transformed"; which suggests that it was implicitly God who acted. For Marco, in particular, the Transfiguration plays an important role in the economy of his writing. For him it's not just about listening to Jesus, "This is my Son, the beloved: listen!» (MC 9, 7), but also to accept that He is truly the Son. Pietro, in MC 8, 29, he had stopped at a partial identification, recognizing Jesus only as Messiah: «Peter answered him: You are the Christ". The voice on Tabor, instead, points out that Jesus is indeed the Son, according to the name that had already been given to Him at baptism. This item, by itself, however, it has no confirmation in Matthew's story, where Peter had already seen in Jesus both the Messiah and the Son: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God " (Mt 16,16).

For the evangelist Luca, at last, the Transfiguration is not just a moment of consolation for Jesus or the way for Peter to understand who Jesus was and his destiny. Luke also introduces the motif of the glory that is manifested. Only this evangelist, indeed, he insists on this term twice: «gloria» (v. 31 e 32). Thus Jesus, on the mountain, prefiguring to the disciples what his destiny will be, after his "exodus", suggests that it will be fulfilled for them too, and for us. The announcement of the passion and death of Jesus is never complete if it is not associated with that of glory, of the resurrection. So too will our destiny as believers in Him be fulfilled when our body also, our life, they will be transfigured and so will we, like Pietro already did, John and James, we will see the Risen One "as he is" (1GV 3, 2), not just in his human form, but in its most complete reality. The transformation of Jesus is the revelation of the profound personality of Jesus, that of the elected, of the only begotten Son and is also a prophecy of our future transformation.

For this reason I would like to underline how recurrent it is, in today's song, the verb to see, which returns several times and in different forms (v. 27.30.31.36), as well as the term: to listen (v. 35). They describe well the current condition of believers who, thanks to faith, they can see the Lord present in the little ones, in the next or in the sacraments where, as Leo the Great wrote: «what was then visible in our Savior has passed» (sermons 74,2). And beyond seeing, they can also listen to him thanks to the Church which still prepares the table of His word.

To end, one last detail. Reading the passages from the Transfiguration, only Luke gives us at least one reason why Jesus goes up the mountain, that is, to pray and prayer is, incidentally, also one of the most relevant Lenten commitments. Among the evangelists, Luke is the one who insists more than the others on this aspect and lets Jesus pray even when the other gospels don't say so.: at baptism (LC 3,21: "Jesus, He also received the baptism, he was praying"); before choosing the Twelve (LC 6,12: «In those days he went to the mountain to pray and spent the whole night praying to God»); it's here, to the Transfiguration: “About eight days after these talks, Jesus took Peter with him, John and James and went up on the mountain to pray" (LC 9,28).

A few days earlier, according to Mark and Matthew, Jesus had received a setback, right from Pietro. Luke glosses over it and only recounts the announcement of the passion and the harsh demands that derive from it for the disciple: «If anyone wants to come after me, you deny yourself, take up his cross every day and follow me " (LC 9, 23). But the reaction to all this for Jesus is prayer which becomes an opportunity to create unity, to collect your most intimate feelings and let yourself be guided by God, even if you have to go through the storms of life. At the end of the experience only one voice remains. The final notation of the passage it reports: «Jesus remained alone», "he was found alone" (Jesus alone was found); it also talks about the condition of Jesus during the Transfiguration, or during the prayer that the disciples struggle to bear. On the Mount of Transfiguration, where he went up "to pray", Jesus is alone, even "while praying". The effort of the disciples, expressed by at least three annotations, suggests to us, in a negative way, three stages of an initiation, three moments of a journey to enter the mystery of Jesus' prayer. The disciples are burdened by sleep, their eyelids fall, the eyes close and the somatic fatigue of praying shines through. Then Peter pronounces words that appear confused, tangential to what happened. In the end, everyone is struck by fear. Their not saying anything to anyone ends the story (LC 9,36) it seems like the possible start of something new and positive. This silence could be their beginning to cherish an inner solitude, indication of praying, that is, the ability to rethink and meditate on the events that have happened and seek meaning in them before God. Like Mary who kept words and facts regarding her son Jesus, turning them over and over again in her heart (cf.. LC 2,19.51).

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 16 March 2025

.

_________________________________________________________

Homiletics the Fathers of The Isle of Patmos

.

HE WILL TRANSFIGURE OUR MORTAL BODY BY IMAGE OF HIS GLORIOUS BODY

«Master, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters — one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah». He did not know what he was saying …

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

The old Tradition has preserved the famous episode of the Transfiguration of Jesus on the mountain, where the celestial epiphany of baptism is repeated, this time for the benefit of a few disciples.

The story, in its current location during the life of Jesus, partly obscures the meaning of the event, because it is Jesus himself who leads the disciples to the mountain where he undergoes a temporary transfiguration presented as a preannouncement of the destiny of death and resurrection that awaits him. It is very likely that it was originally a story of the appearance of the Risen One, which Mark, who excluded those stories from his narrative, would have inserted at the center of the Gospel, immediately after Peter’s messianic confession, to balance the announcement of the destiny of death of the Son of Man (Mk 8:31) with the proleptic vision of his glorification (Mk 9:2-13); a choice that would have determined its placement also in Matthew and Luke. Supporting this hypothesis is the fact that in the continuation of the three stories the disciples’ misunderstanding of Jesus remains intact, despite the fact that some of them had witnessed such a sensational event. While, placed after his death, the story takes on a crucial meaning.

The three disciples receive, in a state of slackening of waking consciousness ― «burdened by sleep», Peter «does not know what he is saying» ― the revelation of the Son of Man in a form transfigured by divine light. This is the turning point: the disciples, after his death, have the vision of Jesus placed on the same level as Moses and Elijah, two gloriosus biblical figures already raised to heavenly glory and they hear the proclamation of his divine election, the same one that resounds at the moment of baptism. Finally the disciples “know” who Jesus is, and it is in the light of this understanding that the historical episode of the baptism takes on its “true” meaning of divine investiture. Among the numerous accounts of apparitions of the Risen One, that of the Transfiguration therefore represents in the most eloquent way the process through which some disciples have reached a superior understanding regarding the meaning of the human story of Jesus after the shock of his death. Let us read it:

«About eight days after Jesus said this, he took Peter, John and James with him and went up onto a mountain to pray. As he was praying, the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became as bright as a flash of lightning. Two men, Moses and Elijah, appeared in glorious splendor, talking with Jesus. They spoke about his departure, which he was about to bring to fulfillment at Jerusalem. Peter and his companions were very sleepy, but when they became fully awake, they saw his glory and the two men standing with him. As the men were leaving Jesus, Peter said to him, “Master, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters — one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah” (He did not know what he was saying). While he was speaking, a cloud appeared and covered them, and they were afraid as they entered the cloud. A voice came from the cloud, saying, “This is my Son, whom I have chosen; listen to him”. When the voice had spoken, they found that Jesus was alone. The disciples kept this to themselves and did not tell anyone at that time what they had seen» (Page 9, 28-36).

The passage of the Transfiguration, as already mentioned at the beginning, is among the most difficult to read and to place within the historical path of Jesus’ life. It is rich in suggestions because it presents many and rich allusions to events and stories of the Old Testament.

The temporal annotation, placed at the beginning, «eight days later», while the other synoptics report: “six days later”, connects the story with what has just happened. Jesus has finished his first announcement of the passion, but, at least according to Matthew and Mark, but not Luke, he has also received a bitter disappointment from Peter. If shortly before he had recognized him as the Messiah, now instead he advises him, taking him aside, not to go to Jerusalem, because the Christ should not have died. Simon, in the mouth of Jesus, becomes like Satan. For this reason many modern commentators add another motivation to the traditional interpretation that sees a theological meaning in the presence of Moses and Elijah next to Jesus, they would embody the Law and the Prophets. These two characters would bring Jesus the consolation he needed. The biographies of Elijah and Moses, in fact, tell us what the two had to go through and this makes them know what Jesus is about to go through. Both have experienced daring trials to the point of even asking God to die. In Exodus 32:32, immediately after the story of the golden calf, Moses turns to the Lord, imploring forgiveness for his people: «if you would forgive their sin… But if not, blot me out of your book which you have written!» Elijah and 1 Kings 19:4: «Take my life, for I am no better than my fathers». Finally, both have had bitter disappointments, for which they are granted the vision of God (Exodus 33:21-22; 1 Kings 19:13).

The presence of the two characters is therefore not only for the disciples, but is the consolation for the Son who is about to go to Jerusalem. Jesus must be comforted and strengthened regarding his “exodus”, or his near future; the angel will do the same in Gethsemane, according to Luke’s account, at the moment of the extreme struggle (Page 22:43-44).

The three Synoptic Gospels try to explain what happened on Tabor, the mountain in Galilee where, according to Cyril of Jerusalem, the Transfiguration took place since 348, and they describe that transformation in their own way. Both Matthew and Mark use a passive verb, the so-called “theological passive”: “he was transformed”; which implies that implicitly it was God who acted. For Mark, in particular, the Transfiguration plays an important role in the economy of his writing. For him it is not just a matter of listening to Jesus: «This is my beloved Son; listen to him!» (Mk 9:7), but also of accepting that He is truly the Son. Peter, in Mk 8:29, had stopped at a partial identification, recognizing Jesus only as the Messiah: «Peter answered him, You are the Christ». The voice on Tabor, however, emphasizes that Jesus is indeed the Son, according to the name that had already been given to Him at baptism. This element, in itself, has no correspondence in Matthew’s account, where Peter had already seen in Jesus both the Messiah and the Son: «You are the Christ, the Son of the living God» (Mt 16:16).

For the evangelist Luke, finally, the Transfiguration is not only a moment of consolation for Jesus or the way in which Peter must understand who Jesus was and his destiny. Luke also introduces the motif of the glory that manifests itself. Only this evangelist, in fact, insists twice on this term: «glory» (v. 31 and 32). In this way Jesus, on the mountain, prefiguring to the disciples what will be his destiny, after his “exodus”, lets it be understood that it will also be fulfilled for them, and for us. The announcement of the passion and death of Jesus is never complete if it is not associated with that of glory, of the resurrection. Thus also our destiny as believers in Him will be fulfilled when our body, our life, will be transfigured and we too, like Peter, John and James, will see the Risen One «just as he is» (1 Jh 3:2), not only in his human form, but in his most complete reality. The transformation of Jesus is the unveiling of the profound personality of Jesus, that of the chosen one, of the only-begotten Son and is also a prophecy of our future transformation.

For this reason, I would like to emphasize how recurrent, in today’s passage, the verb to see is, which comes back several times and in different forms (in the verses 27, 30, 31, 36), as well as the term: to listen (in the verse 35). They describe well the current condition of believers who, thanks to faith, can see the Lord present in the little ones, in their neighbor or in the sacraments where, as Leo the Great wrote: “what was then visible in our Savior has passed away” (sermons 74, 2). And in addition to seeing, they can also listen to him thanks to the Church that still prepares the table of His word.

Finally, one last detail. Reading the passages of the Transfiguration, only Luke gives us at least one reason why Jesus goes up the mountain, that is, to pray and prayer is, incidentally, also one of the most important Lenten commitments. Among the evangelists, Luke is the one who insists more than the others on this aspect and lets Jesus pray even when the other Gospels do not say so: at the baptism (Luke 3:21: «When Jesus also had been baptized, he was praying»); before choosing the Twelve (Luke 6:12: «In those days he went out to the mountain to pray, and spent the whole night in prayer to God»); and here, at the Transfiguration: «About eight days after these sayings, Jesus took with him Peter and John and James and went up the mountain to pray» (Luke 9: 28).

A few days earlier, according to Mark and Matthew, Jesus had received a setback, precisely from Peter. Luke passes over it and only tells of the announcement of the passion and the harsh demands that descend from it for the disciple: «If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me» (Luke 9:23). But the reaction to all this for Jesus is prayer, which becomes the occasion to create unity, to gather the most intimate feelings and let oneself be guided by God, even if one has to go through the storms of life. At the end of the experience only one voice remains.

The final notation of the passage that reports: «Jesus remained alone», «he was found alone» (latin: "Jesus alone was found"); speaks of Jesus’ condition even during the Transfiguration, that is, during the prayer that the disciples struggle to sustain. On the mountain of the Transfiguration, where he went up «to pray», Jesus is alone, even «while praying». The fatigue of the disciples, expressed by at least three annotations, suggests to us, in a negative way, three stages of an initiation, three moments of a journey to enter into the mystery of Jesus’ prayer. The disciples are burdened by sleep, their eyelids fall, their eyes close and the somatic fatigue of praying shines through. Then Peter pronounces words that appear confused, to what has happened. Finally, everyone is gripped by fear. Their not saying anything to anyone with which the story ends (Page 9:36) seems the possible beginning of something new and positive. This silence could be their beginning to guard an interior solitude, a sign of prayer, or the ability to rethink and meditate on the events that happened and seek a meaning before God. Like Mary, who guarded words and facts about her son Jesus, in her heart (Luke 2:19.51).

Happy Sunday to everyone!

from the Hermitage, March 16, 2025

 

 

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

From Beatitudes in the mountains to love for enemies in the plains

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

From Beatitudes in the mountains to love for enemies in the plains

«Who uses the word of Jesus otherwise by acting, gives wrong to Jesus, denies the sermon on the mountain, does not implement his word. From a human point of view there are infinite possibilities of understanding and interpreting the sermon on the mountain. Jesus knows only one possibility: go and obey "

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

After the beatitudes proclaimed in the Gospel last Sunday, The reading of the sermon in the plain of Jesus edited by Luca continues, In the part in which the heart of his speech is accessed where the ethics of love aimed at enemies predominates, expressed in donating for free, exempt from judging, proactive when he invites you to offer another cheek. In the text, al v. 31, The famous "golden rule" is preserved: “How do you want men to do to you, So you do them too ".

The entire speech of Jesus, with his commands, It is held on the verb agapao, amare. And the sayings are expressed according to a sapiential style with verbs above all to the imperative. What emerges in the end is the desire of Jesus to unhinge the logic of reciprocity. We read the evangelical pericope.

"During that time, Jesus told his disciples: “To you who listen, I say: love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who cursed you, Pray for those who treat you badly. To those who strike you on the cheek, offer the other too; to those who tear your cloak to you, Do not reject even the tunic. Give it to anyone who asks you, and to those who take your things, Don't ask her back. And how do you want men to do to you, So you do them too. If you love those who love you, what gratitude is due to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who do good to you, what gratitude is due to you? Sinters also do the same. And if you lend to those from whom you hope to receive, what gratitude is due to you? Even sinners grant loans to sinners to receive the same. Instead love your enemies, do good and lend without hoping anything, And your reward will be great and you will be children of the very high, because he is benevolent to the ungrateful and the wicked. Be merciful, as your Father is merciful. Don't judge and you will not be judged; do not condemn and you will not be condemned; forgive and you will be forgiven. Dates and it will be given to you: a good size, pressing, Full and overflowing will be paid to the womb, because with the measure you measure with, will be measured to you in return”» (LC 6,27-38).

After the "trouble" (LC 6, 26), specular of the last bliss, The words of Jesus continue with a powerful adversive, "But to you who listen to I say" (v. 27), which opens the door to understanding the substantial difference in the Christian vocation in the world. At the heart of it is the love for the enemy who forms the inclusion of the entire passage of Luca 6, 27-35: "Love your enemies". Who is the enemy in the words of Jesus? It is the one who hates, cursed, ill -treatment and expresses its enmity with physical violence, with theft, with the request and the claim. Whatever the way of expressing itself of the inhabitation, the extraordinary proposal of Jesus who defines the main Christian difference rests in the non -violent response. Not any non -violence, but a proactive and active, since it, subtracting from specularity, puts in place a positive action of opposite sign. Not repeating the violent gesture suffered the disciple of Jesus comes out of the mimicry and passiveness. It is a question of doing something active after a time when violence has passed passively; not placing yourself, But, in front of the other how to do in a dispute or in a boxing meeting. I don't do what the violent does, I don't touch him where he touches me and I don't allow him to touch me in the same place. Yet I act starting from his first act, I come to his ground and there I present to him alterity. This text is telling us what to do if the goal is to make a relationship of otherness possible with someone who suffers and that makes it suffer. This is emblematically represented by the words of Jesus on the slap which is perhaps the passage of the best and iconic song: “To those who strike you on the cheek, offer the other too ". In the Greek Evangelical text, the word used to say "other cheek" is not what we would expect, If we were faced with simple symmetry: I am hit on a part of the face, I also present the other. The Greek word "is not used hereetheric»Used in the sense of" now one now the other ". Here the Gospel uses the term "garlic" what does it mean: another, different. It is not, so, the second cheek, It is another cheek. There is no sum, first the right and then the left, But a different cheek must be presented. The great novelty of these words of Jesus reveal that, If on the one hand in an adverse form at the same time mild and powerful, they contrast the feeling and the way of acting worldly, on the other hand they say it is possible to do the good of the enemy, making it feel a better person, offering him the opportunity to amend himself from violence. I tell him that he can love himself, because basically both the offender and the offended are recipients of a love whose greatness did not suspect.

And here the Christian theology on love helps us which helps us understand why it can even be commanded, as in the words of Jesus. Because the command also expresses an unsuspected possibility that Christ first has experienced, not in the mere form of feeling a feeling, but in the concreteness of the actions, Showing to love those who are not a lovable, like his enemies, thus revealing the unique source of that love up to the impossible which is God the Father: «In fact, God loved the world as to give His Son Unigenito ... Jesus, knowing that his time had come to pass from this world to the Father, having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them until the end" (GV 3, 16; 13, 1). Thus they also express themselves several first Christian authors. God showed his love for us why, while we were enemies and sinners, Christ died for us (cfr Rm 5,6-11). Christ on the cross has demolished the logic of the absence (cf.. Ef 2,14), He responded to the so on in over and violence by invoking forgiveness on his torturers (1PT 2,23; LC 23,34). In this sense, love can be commanded, because it must be understood in its height and depth: “Be merciful, like your Father is merciful " (v. 36); even before in its extension, even if we find that we all return to this, We like the next and even the enemy: "You will love your neighbor as yourself" (MC 12,31). It is also significant and innovative that Jesus has reworked, According to Luca, The gold rule in a positive and non -negative form as is found in other ancient texts and authors: “How do you want men to do to you, So you do them too ".

Luca to define strength or ability which allows you to go beyond the human measure of reciprocity uses the term "χάρις", curry (cf.. LC 6,32.33.34; to the bibbia translates: «What gratitude is due to you?»). Really the love that the Christian manages to even have towards his enemy is a grace, that is, it is a gift that comes from God.

To conclude it is necessary to mention how the words of Jesus, so demanding, have been variously interpreted. We narrow the two -point field of view. The Catholic position opts for the two ways, that of the majority that is invited to follow the precepts of Jesus and the other, more radical and demanding, For those few who together with the precepts also pursue the advice that are left to the free option and require a state of perfection. Then there is the position of Lutheran Orthodoxy who considers the speech of the mountain or the plain "impaired", since difficult to put into practice faithfully. In the same way as the impracticability of the mosaic law it highlights the sinful condition and therefore the necessary opening of the faith to the grace that saves. Rightly to this position, But at this point I would also say to Cattolica, Dietrich Bonheffer reacts in his most famous theological book:

«Who uses the word of Jesus otherwise by acting, gives wrong to Jesus, denies the sermon on the mountain, does not implement his word. From a human point of view there are infinite possibilities of understanding and interpreting the sermon on the mountain. Jesus knows only one possibility: go and obey " (Sequence).

The words of the Protestant theologian They still question our consistency today and challenge us. The speech of the plain of Luca can be put into practice, not thanks to our skills, but with the help of God. Christian ethics is practicable, as long as he keeps the grace in the center that comes from God.

From the hermitage, 23 February 2025

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Jesus highlights the faith by proposing trouble and beatitudes

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

Jesus highlights the faith by proposing trouble and beatitudes

«Blessed are your eyes because they see and your ears because they listen to. Verily I say unto you: Many prophets and many righteous have wanted to see what you look at, but they didn't see it, and listen to what you listen, but they didn't listen to him!»

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

On this Sunday we read the text of the Beatitudes According to Luca's version. A song that differs from the best known one, present in the first Gospel, For the number of beatitudes: Four against the eight of Matteo; and for the presence of as many "troubles" that form a precise contrast with them.

Fra Angelico, The beatitudes

If the poor are declared "blessed", the hungry, crying and persecuted, The troubles are directed to the rich, to the sazi, the laughing and to those who are praised. Moreover, If Matteo's beatitudes are included in the so -called Speech of the mountain (cf.. Mt 5,1), Those of Luca are pronounced in a flat place (cf.. LC 6,17). Let's read the text.

"During that time, Jesus, descended with the twelve, He stopped in a flat place. There was great crowd of his disciples and great multitude of people from all over Judea, from Jerusalem and from the coast of shooting and Sidòne. And he, Alzàti his eyes to his disciples, he said: “Blessed are you, poor, because yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you, that you are now hungry, because you will be satisfied. Blessed are you, what a cry, Because you will laugh. Blessed are you, When men are now there and when they ban it and insult you and despise your name as infamous, Because of the son of man. Rejoice on that day and exult because, there, Your reward is great in the sky. In the same way, in fact they acted their fathers with the prophets. But woe to you, rich, because you have already received your consolation. Woe to you, What are you knowing now, because you will be hungry. Woe to you, that now laughs, Because you will be in pain and cry. Trouble, When all men say good about you. In the same way, in fact they acted their fathers with the false prophets”» (LC 6,17.20-26).

Since there is no other evangelical page who has so interested thought and culture and has been the subject of various interpretations, I will try to highlight the point of view from which Luca intends to present the beatitudes of Jesus, But also the following troubles. They, indeed, they are necessary to explain the first, they assume them and are their counterpart, so that the beatitudes, placed on this negative background, they stand out better.

Immediately after having formed the twelve (LC 6,12-16) Jesus pronounces the beatitudes, which therefore assume a particularly significant value for that group "to which he gave the name of apostles" (LC 6,13). They, United to those who first followed Jesus, are the immediate recipients of these words: “Hyd your eyes to his disciples, he said " (LC 6,20). But there is also a large crowd that listens to the speech this time, made up of Jews and people from non -Jewish areas, Like the Phoenician cities of shooting and Sidone. With this annotation the evangelist does not only intend to show that the fame of Jesus has extended outside the borders of Israel, but wishes to prefigure the post-instance extension, also to the so -called kind, of the message of salvation of Jesus. Moreover, placed immediately after the annotation that the crowd "tried to touch him, Because a force came out of him that healed everyone " (LC 6,19), The words of Jesus who propose beatitudes and troubles intend to highlight the faith in those who follow him and are looking for him, instead of the magical or interested dimension. Report people to earth and therefore in terms of choices and responsibilities. For this reason the way of speaking in the public of Jesus, As already on the occasion of the homily in the Synagogue of Nazareth, It has a "kerygmatic" and pedagogical tone; they encourage to take a position and also predispose to an inevitable division, Since the words of Jesus reveal the thoughts of many hearts (cf.. LC 2,34-35). We can say that the evangelical page that puts direct comparison, in a brutal vis à vis, poor and rich, hungry and satisfied, Afflitti e jungle, persecuted and admired people, implies a necessary choice of field, An option that ultimately is between self -sufficiency and trust in the Lord, or between idolatry and faith.

As a rule, Matteo is thought to be the evangelist of the beatitudes, Instead Luca presents fifteen in his writing, two more than his colleague e, The Other Brother, It is also the only one who transmits the bliss of the listeners of the word: "Blessed are those who listen to the Word of God and keep it" (LC 11,28). This is in fact the key to seeing bliss in the various vital situations: listen and keep the word and the signs of God, as the Virgin Mary first did.

In the Old Testament, In particular in the psalms and in the sapiential literature, The beatitudes constitute those indications given so that the man reaches the finish line of happiness: "Blessed is the man who does not walk in the company of the wicked and in the street of sinners" (Shall 1,1). If you follow you will live happily, But if you prefer another road, trouble start, that they are needed on warning: not curses, but notices, like those who gave the ancient prophets (Is 1,4; 5,8-24; 30,1; 33,1). Compared to the Old Testament, The new presents some substantial differences in this regard. For Jesus there are no particular conditions for the beatitudes, because he already declares happy those who are in a certain situation and does not say for example: "Be poor!». It turns, By calling him blessed, To those who are already poor. To bliss, or "macarism" as it is defined in a technical sense in order to recall the Greek expression, It does not establish any behavior prior because it is the announcement of a novelty that comes from God and for this reason it is difficult to grasp at first sight, It is Paradossale, does not worldly and requires faith. In this lies the originality and the difference of meaning that the New Testament brings. The beatitudes, that is, More than an ethics to put into practice, they are the announcement of a novelty, a new way of living life and thinking it, because everything is seen in relation to God, or to its kingdom. Expenses, precisely, could find bliss in the poor, in the indigent, in the suffering, in the persecuted? Or better yet: as we too can, In our personal poverty, in our sufferings or within any other tiring situation, recognize us blessed? What does it allow you to read a situation and judge it as blessed and not a curse or a misfortune? Bliss works only for those who have faith. To use a very important image for the theology of revelation, We could say that the eyes of faith are needed (P. Rousselot, The eyes of faith, 1910; Trad.. en. The eyes of faith, Milan 1974).

In faith there is the possibility of seeing in a different way, since it makes the eyes capable of grasping what otherwise remains under the surface. By virtue of grace the believer recognizes those signs that God places in his life, otherwise, without grace, He only sees failure, the death, hunger, despair. With the faith in them it sees, in spite of everything, God's presence. It is then clear why Jesus does not put conditions to being blessed. Only one is the condition previa: believe his word.

The words of Jesus are understandable In light of the fact that the advent of the kingdom of God really manifests himself in him. Beatitudes and troubles are God's gaze on contradictory human situations and this appears paradoxical, Since he sees what man does not see, upsetting the human evaluation parameters. After all, what the beatitudes put in question is the relationship with the present that for some shows itself full, satisfactory and saturated (cf.. the vulgate that translates the "sazi" of LC 6,25 with: «who are satisfied») And for others it is desire and awaiting a change. These are the poor who for their situation of lack and indigence become the first recipients of the Kingdom. True poverty is not indigence or misery itself, But the state of whom, like the Clouds (anawim The poor and humble in Hebrew) of the Old Testament, they are able to welcome God because they know they have nothing and to expect everything from him. Woe to the rich, says Jesus, When they are slaves of wealth, because they put the safety of life in them and believe that their being depends on having (cf.. LC 12,15: “Be careful and keep away from all covetousness because, even if one is in abundance, his life does not depend on what he possesses"). It is no coincidence that the divine action celebrated in Magnificat The God who "has satisfied sings (filled) of goods hungry ", while "he postponed the rich empty" (LC 1,53). Or as in the metaphorical story of LC 16,19-31 where the rich, Sazio and Gaudent, is opposed to Lazzaro, poor, hungry, naked, homeless, while, in the eschatological perspective of the parable, The destinies of the two are completely overturned. That parable is a nice narrative comment on Jesus' speech that alternates Beatitudes and troubles.

Finally, bliss in poverty and hunger However, it does not leave us quiet or without pain for the situations that chase each other in the world and for the fate of many, Especially when they suffer are unarmed and children. Faith and trust in God, As Manzoni writes, It is not enough to keep the problems away, rather «" radolizes them, and makes them useful for a better life ". A conclusion "found by poor people", comments on the writer (The Betrothed, cap. XXXVIII). But the word blessed, that we read in Greek, Since the Gospel was transmitted to us in that language, Jesus has pronounced it in Aramaic and in his language does not mean just happy, But it also means «directing, orientation, walk »and where if not in the world? We cannot escape from this world, You have to stay there and learn to see things that most do not see, Not so much because a principle of faith is lacking, But because overwhelmed by life he no longer has time to think.

There is a particular bliss remembered by Matteo. These are extraordinarily dense words spoken by Jesus by referring to the ability that we have not so much to separate ourselves from things, from daily work, from the family, but to know how to see in our environment, in daily life, what is superficially not seen, What transcends our immediate vision:

«Blessed are your eyes because they see and your ears because they listen to. Verily I say unto you: Many prophets and many righteous have wanted to see what you look at, but they didn't see it, and listen to what you listen, but they didn't listen to him!» (Mt 13, 16-17).

From the hermitage, 16 February 2025

.

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Pietro, expert fisherman son of fishermen, throws the nets on the word of the son of a carpenter

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

PIETRO, Expert fisherman son of fishermen, CAST THE NETS ON THE WORD OF A CARPENTER'S SON

Jesus, who was a carpenter, He was not a fishing expert, Yet Simone the fisherman trust this Rabbi, that does not give him answers but calls him to rely. His reaction to the miraculous catch is that of amazement and trepidation: "Man, depart from me, I am a sinner"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

.

Peter was a believing and observant Jew, confident in the active presence of God in the history of his people, and saddened by not seeing his powerful action in the events he was involved in, to the present, witness. At this juncture his first encounter with Jesus takes place.

The Synoptic Gospels inform us that Peter he is among the first four disciples of the Nazarene (LC 5,1-11), to which a fifth is added, according to the custom of each Rabbi to have five disciples (LC 5,27: Levi's call). When Jesus goes from five to twelve disciples (LC 9,1-6), finally the novelty of his mission will be clear. He is not one of many rabbis, but he came to gather eschatological Israel, symbolized by the number twelve, how many were the tribes of Israel. The Gospels allow us to follow Peter's spiritual journey step by step. The starting point is the call from Jesus. It happens on any given day, while Pietro is busy with his work as a fisherman. Jesus is at the lake of Gennesaret and the crowd crowds around him to listen to him. The number of listeners creates a certain discomfort. The Master sees two boats moored to the shore; the fishermen have come down and are washing their nets. He then asks to get on the boat, that of Simone, and begs him to move away from the ground. Sitting on that improvised desk, he begins to teach the crowds from the boat. And so Peter's boat becomes Jesus' chair. When he finished speaking, dice a Simone:

«”Take to the sea and lower the fishing nets! Simone replies: “Maestro, we toiled all night and caught nothing; but at your word I will let down the nets”».

Jesus, who was a carpenter, He was not a fishing expert, Yet Simone the fisherman trust this Rabbi, that does not give him answers but calls him to rely. His reaction to the miraculous catch is that of amazement and trepidation: "Man, depart from me, I am a sinner" (LC 5,8). Jesus responds by inviting him to trust and to open up to a project that goes beyond all his prospects: "Do not fear; from now on you will be a fisher of men". Let's reread this exciting story:

"During that time, while the crowd crowded around him to hear the word of God, Jesus, standing near the lake of Gennèsaret, he saw two boats pulled up to the shore. The fishermen had gone down and were washing their nets. He got into a boat, which was Simone's, and asked him to move away from the ground a little. He sat down and taught the crowds from the boat. When he finished speaking, said Simone: «Put out into the deep and cast your nets for a catch». Simone replied: «Maestro, we toiled all night and caught nothing; but at your word I will cast the nets ". They did so and caught a huge quantity of fish and their nets almost broke. Then they signaled to their companions on the other boat, to come and help them. They came and filled both boats until they almost sank. Upon seeing this, Simon Peter fell at Jesus' knees, saying: "Man, get away from me, because I am a sinner". In fact, amazement had invaded him and all those who were with him, for the fishing they had done; so also James and John, sons of Zebedee, who were Simone's partners. Jesus said to Simon: "Do not fear; from now on you will be a fisher of men". E, pull the boats ashore, they left everything and followed him" (LC 5,1-11).

Luke's story follows the outline of MC 1,16-20 to which it refers, but with its own insertions and the addition of a scene that closely resembles that of GV 21, where there is a now resurrected Jesus who dialogues with Peter for a definitive call to follow him. While two Sundays ago we left Jesus in Nazareth not understood and even rejected; here instead people are looking for Him and Peter, in particular, leaves everything to follow the Master. From this initial moment we grasp the particular attention and esteem that the evangelist Luke directs towards this disciple; something he had evidently learned and inherited from the primitive community. We note in fact that, while in Matthew and Mark the formula of vocation is in the plural, «Come after me, I will make you fishers of men " (MC 1, 17; Mt 4,19), in the Lucanian story it is in the second person, that of Peter. And in the background, in unsuccessful fishing, we can already metaphorically glimpse the apostolic labors of the first Christian communities.

The narrative of the miraculous catch, indeed, presents the features of a catechesis on faith through which the Lord overturns closed and hopeless human situations. Peter becomes its paradigm. In his words, "We struggled all night and didn't catch anything", there is not only bitterness and disappointment for the inane peach, but there is also a stronger meaning that designates exhaustion and physical tiredness (cf.. the verb I'm working hard (kopiao). An experience that we frequently find in the Bible, especially in the Psalms: «I am exhausted by my complaints» (Shall 6, 7; cf.. also Shall 69, 4; Shall 127, 1); and that ancient Israel had experienced several times during its events. There is therefore a space of disappointment and limitation in which God acts. For that relationship between the present text and the chapter 21 of the Gospel of John, mentioned above, we understand that without the presence of the Lord the disciples tire themselves out in vain to the point of exhaustion. But He is present, which invites us to cast our nets again, everything changes. The first transformation occurs in the trust of the disciple and here it is Peter who explains it: «on your word I will lower the nets" (LC 5,4).

But faced with the miraculous catch it seems the amazement recorded is not enough (v. 9) from Luca, since Peter feels he must say: «get away from me, because I am a sinner". For some, once again the parallel passage from John where the dialogue between the Risen One and Peter should help us, centered on love, it serves the apostle to heal the wound of denial on the night of passion. But maybe, simply, given that here the Apostle appears as the protagonist for the first time in the Gospel, the request for forgiveness is to be understood as the recognition of one's own fragility in the face of the manifestation of God's greatness and the fulfillment of "his word". But what is even more striking is Jesus' attitude towards the disciple from whom he heard the confession of guilt.. He doesn't underline it, he doesn't insist on it, since it does not say everything about Peter's life, who will have to go through multiple confessions. Jesus, rather than underlining the sinfulness of the future apostle, he prefers to invite him to trust and follow: "Do not fear; from now on you will be a fisher of men". Here it is worth underlining the verb used by Luke to designate this fishing of men and not of fish, since in Greek «zogreo» contains within itself both the word ζῷον (zoos vivo) that the verb ἀγορεύω (agreuo, take hunting or fishing). It is therefore a matter of taking alive, of a capture leaving alive (cf.. vocabulary Rocks). In this way the pastoral work of Peter and his associates (v.10), metaphorically expressed through fishing which was their original profession - and here the abundant fishing of GV 21, 11: 153 big fish hauled into the boat, without the network dividing – it will be a service to life. Those who, through their ministry, they will be reached by the Gospel, they will be drawn to Christ, the living bringer of life: "I have come so that they may have life and have it in abundance" (GV 10, 10).

 

From the Hermitage, 8 February 2025

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Perhaps Jesus needed to be cleansed and forgiven of sins through baptism?

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

PERHAPS JESUS ​​NEEDED TO BE PURIFIED AND FORGIVEN FROM SINS THROUGH BAPTISM?

Jesus' immersion in the Jordan is a sign that reveals what fate the Word made flesh shared: that of sinners. As Paul writes: «He who had known no sin, God dealt with it from sin in our favor, because we could become through him justice of God ".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

A surprising episode, even embarrassing, that of the baptism of Jesus, who removes all doubts about his historicity.

Pietro Perugino Pala di Sant 'Agostino, Baptism of Jesus, 1512

Giovanni al Giordano gives a baptism of penance, According to what is written in LC 3,3. Jesus perhaps needed to be forgiven by sins? To try to answer, We follow the wire of the page of the evangelical story of this Sunday, in the Lucanian version.

"During that time, since the people were waiting and everyone, about Giovanni, they asked themselves in their hearts if he was not the Christ, Giovanni replied to everyone by saying: «I baptize you with water; but he comes the one who is stronger than me, to which I am not worthy of unrelating the laces of sandals. He will baptize you in the Holy Spirit and Fire ". And here, while all the people were baptized and Jesus, He also received the baptism, He was in prayer, The sky opened and descended the Holy Spirit over him in the body form, like a dove, and a voice came from heaven: «You are my son, the beloved: In you I placed my complacency " (LC 3,15-16.21-22).

In this evangelical song we notice some peculiarities. Only Luke tells us that Jesus received baptism in this way: "When all the people were baptized" (3,21). Lined up like the other Jesus is the last of a long procession. The expression "all the people" is typical of the evangelist Luca and is not a simple statement aimed at exaggerating reality to amplify it; instead has a theological thickness. The first use of this expression in the Bible is found in the book of Genesis, In the story of the sin of the inhabitants of Sodoma:

“Sodom's men gathered around the house [In Lot] From young people to old people, All the people in complete " (19,4).

This wording recalls the sinful condition of an entire group of men, the complicity in the sin of a specific multitude. Luca uses the expression "all the people" to affirm that the event of the baptism of Jesus in fact concerns all the people of Israel, How many have been touched by the testimony of Giovanni Battista and beyond. The immersion in the Jordanian waters was a sign of conversion and penance, The attitude to which everyone was called to welcome salvation. But San Luca also seems to look beyond the people of Israel and lets it leak that it is all humanity that is convened and embraced.

In the mystery of Christmas We meditated the incarnation of the Son of God, His coming as a man among men, assuming "in everything except sin" true human nature. Put in this way, Jesus' immersion in the Jordan is a sign that reveals what fate the Word made flesh shared: that of sinners. As Paul writes:

«He who had known no sin, God dealt with it from sin in our favor, because we could become through him justice of God " (2Color 5,21).

Rendered with greater loyalty to the Greek text, This passage of our song could be translated like this: “When all the people were immersed, Jesus was also immersed ", as if to mean that Jesus immerses himself in the immersion of the people. Not only is he a member of his people but immerses himself in his own condition and is with this act that he starts his public ministry, manifesting his profound solidarity with us humans, Even in our condition of sinners.

For the evangelist Luca, At that time, The episode of the Baptism of the Lord is of a fundamental theological function because Jesus, even before being attempted and then starting his ministry, starts from there. Although this aspect is more evident in the Gospel according to Matteo it is clear for the evangelist who in this mystery are summarized the various passages of the Jordan already accomplished in the history of salvation. From that of Israel fleeing from Egypt, To enter the promised land, Until the return of the same from Babylon after the exile. The Jordan also appears to be fundamental for Jesus; He crosses him to enter his mission, in a condition, at least outside, of penance. Everything will be clear to the other baptism that he has yet to receive (LC 12, 50: «I have a baptism in which I will be baptized, and how they are anguished until it is accomplished!»). From baptism in the waters of the Jordan to baptism in death and resurrection that is his Easter, The Lord has never ceased to immerse himself in the waters of our often sinful human condition, In the agitated waters of our existence. Comes to immerse yourself in our poor humanity to deposit the infinite love of the Father.

The other peculiarity of today's evangelical song It is represented by the fact that only Luke tells us that Jesus, received baptism, "He was in prayer". Just the third Gospel has particular attention to this aspect, Since the most decisive moments of the Ministry of Jesus are prepared or accompanied by a more intense prayer: his baptism, the choice of the twelve (LC 6,12), The question asked to the twelve about who is Jesus for people (9,18), the transfiguration (9,28) and passion (22,41-45). San Luca does not report any word of this prayer of Jesus and not even what God could have communicated to him. However, from the words got off the sky, We can understand that it is a branch prayer, An aspect the latter characteristic of the way of relating to Jesus to God as a Father, remarked here by Luca and above all from the fourth Gospel: "Dad, The time has come: glorifies your Son because the Son glorifies you ... all my things are yours, And yours are mine " (GV 17, 1. 10). The Father recognizes Jesus as his favorite son, with which it has a profound relationship that defines and distinguishes the personality of Jesus since childhood: «You didn't know that I have to deal with the things of my Father my Father?» (LC 2,49).

Finally the context of the evangelical scene Recalls the book of the prophet Isaiah and the vocation of the elect:

«Here is my servant that I support, my elected I take please. I placed my spirit about him; He will bring the right to nations " (Is 42,1).

The mission of the servant He begins with communion and communication with the Father and the gift of the Spirit. The Holy Spirit reaches the divinity of Jesus solemnly when he made, like any man, the penitential gesture, having subjected to John's baptism. During his earthly life, Jesus will never show himself as big as in the humility of gestures and words. An important lesson for us who see things so differently. Following Christ means taking this path of humility, that is, of truth. Christ, true God and true man, He teaches us the truth of our being. We too Christians have been given the grace of the Spirit and for us there is also a mission to do and a testimony to be given. We ask to know her, As Jesus knew his to the Jordan and to be able to live it. Why this happens, The gift of the Spirit must always be asked persistently:

«The behavior of Jesus who prays when the Spirit comes, must serve as an example to believers: The gift of the Holy Spirit is in fact the essential question of Christian prayer " (Gérard Rossé).

From the Hermitage, 12 January 2025

Baptism of the Lord

 

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

The mystery of Christmas is enclosed in a silence that speaks to the history of humanity

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE MYSTERY OF CHRISTMAS IS ENCLOSED IN A SILENCE THAT SPEAKS TO THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY

By entering the silence of Bethlehem and penetrating the Gospel with love and contemplation, we therefore see something beautiful and new about God and about us, so we know Him better, but also ourselves, who we are, what mystery dwells within us, what meaning and value our life and that of the entire universe has.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

 

Fashion born in the United States of celebrating the sex of the unborn child in advance quickly spread to us too. But none baby shower O gender reveal party for the Holy Child Jesus.

More seriously and even more deeply in the Christmas of the Lord, especially in the three liturgies that distinguish this Solemnity, something of the mystery of God and man is revealed starting from the source one, source of all historical mysteries, which is the mystery of the incarnation of the Son of God. Let us therefore read the passage proclaimed in the Christmas Eve Mass, according to the Gospel of Luke:

"In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that a census should be of the whole earth. This first census was made when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Everyone went to be enrolled, each in their own city. Joseph also, from Galilee, from the city of Nazareth, went up to Judea to the city of David called Bethlehem: in fact, he belonged to the house and family of David. He had to be registered together with Maria, his bride, she was pregnant. While they were in that place, time came for her to be delivered. And she brought forth her firstborn son, She wrapped in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the accommodation. There were some shepherds in that region who, spending the night outdoors, they stayed up all night guarding their flock. An angel of the Lord presented himself to them and the glory of the Lord surrounded them with light. They were filled with great fear, But the angel said to them,: “Don't be afraid: there, you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people: today, the City of David, is born for you a Savior, which is Christ the Lord. This sign for you: You find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, placed in a manger”. And immediately a multitude of the heavenly army appeared with the angel, who praised God and said: “Glory to God in the highest heaven and on earth peace to men, that he loves”» (LC 2,1-14).

This well-known and exciting text proclaimed as the Gospel in the Christmas Eve Mass leaves one somewhat disappointed upon first reading. We would expect, at least from the main characters, a few words, an explanation or expression of their feelings. Instead they remain silent and the whole scene is surrounded by great silence. Joseph is silent as he ascends from the unknown Nazareth to the most famous and significant city of David called Bethlehem, due to the census. But it says nothing about itself, of what he feels or perceives. Maria remains silent, his bride, who accompanies her on the journey and silently gives birth to her first-born son. We are not told his feelings, what was moving in his heart. Except that she gives birth outside the hotel, forced to place the Child in a poor animal's crib. E, naturally, no cries of the newborn Baby are heard. The overall scene narrated presents a whole series of humble gestures punctuated by silence. While in the background are projected the actions of the power of Caesar Augustus who wants the census to reach the most distant provinces. Luke too, the evangelist writer, does not make any comments, as if to underline an extreme measure even in the poverty of expressive means. Out of the scene the shepherds emerge, frightened by the appearance of an angel, they too are struck dumb. Only the heavenly messenger breaks the silence by announcing the great joy: «A Savior is born for you, who is Christ the Lord". And then the multitude of the celestial army praises God, proclaiming his glory in the heavens and peace on the earth of men.

Silence is the key, as every mystery of God springs from it and takes us back to it. Because it's not easy, nor easy to say God, who He is or describe Him, silence is then there to signal that certain realities must first of all be contemplated and adored for a long time. This helps us understand the apparent and striking contrast between the silent poverty of the central scene of the Gospel passage and the magnificence of what is around it. It contains the mystery of God that must be contemplated and adored.

And it is in this context that it reveals itself, that is, the veil is lifted on the singular manifestation of God, whose first characteristic is undoubtedly the ability to surprise. Who would have expected a baby from God? What a superabundant message He brings, what light it propagates? The Gospel passage seems to invite us to go further, beyond modest appearances, to discover the divine riches that rest not in the noise, be it the announcement of the census of the time, or everything that today creates an audience or multiplies followers, but rather in the "subtle silent voice" that Elijah experienced (1Re 19, 12), in which God reveals himself to the soul capable of meditation and contemplation of the scriptures and the mystery contained therein.

Below, a second aspect reveals the evangelical scene about God. And that is that He is qualified by some paradoxes, from truths apparently beyond common sense and which the world carefully avoids. They could be expressed like this: before God the small often appears more important than the large, the poor more than the rich, the despised more than the important, the individual more than the multitude. Moreover, poverty is not the worst evil, since God permitted it for his Son; it's still, what on earth is loneliness and humiliation, may be great and glorious in heaven.

We notice, in tal modo, to gradually enter into a "Christian theology and anthropology", in a new way of understanding God and man. In that habit, first mentioned, of knowing how to go further we see that in the mystery of Bethlehem where everything is apparently secret and silence, God speaks to man in a new way and manifests himself as the One who ordinarily is on the side of the smallest and poorest; as someone whose omnipotence is shown first and foremost in the goodness of tenderness, in reliability and closeness to the simplest and most humble. We thus understand that we are dear to him, we are fragile, weak and poor children of Adam. Everything in the evangelical scene makes a single great announcement full of meaning emerge from the silence: God loves us freely, before we love him and for our good he comes to meet us.

We too enter the silence of Bethlehem and by penetrating the Gospel with love and contemplation we therefore see something beautiful and new about God and about us, so we know Him better, but also ourselves, who we are, what mystery dwells within us, what meaning and value our life and that of the entire universe has.

In the adorable mystery of Christmas let's realize that we are not alone, that the Lord came for us and remains with us. Even though we hear the roars of war all around, the message He brings is that of joy and peace. A divine and not ephemeral peace that comes from Him and passes through people's experiences, of nations and peoples.

Recently a new idea has been put forward in theological reflection that deals with the mystery of the incarnation. It is called "deep incarnation", a "radical". This is a recent theological sensitivity interested in rediscovering the inclusive and salvific scope of the incarnation for the entire creation. Without taking anything away from the new acquisitions, Let's remember that many have discussed this topic, especially the holy fathers since ancient times. And among these Saint Ambrose who commented on the writing of the evangelist Luke with these words:

«It is so that you could become a perfect man that Jesus wanted to be a little child. He was bound in swaddling clothes so that you would be freed from the bonds of death. He was in the stable to place you on the altars. He came to earth so that you could reach the stars, and he found no room in that inn so that you would have many homes in heaven. Even though he was rich, he became poor for us, so that we might become rich in his poverty. This indigence of God is therefore my wealth and the weakness of the Lord is my strength. He preferred privations for himself to give abundantly to everyone. The crying of his childhood in wails is a wash for me, those tears have washed away my sins".

Merry Christmas to all.

From the Hermitage, 25 December 2024

Christmas Day

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Doctor Luca's gynecological diagnosis: "And here, you will conceive in the womb"

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

DOCTOR LUCA'S GYNECOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS: «AND BEHOLD, YOU WILL CONCEPTURE IN THE WOMB"

An ancient tradition, which dates back to the Apostle Paul, reports that Luca was a doctor. a person, so, more suitable than others to tell the special conception; in fact Saint Luke makes use of all his wisdom here, maybe even the professional one, but above all the theological one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

 

The passage from the Annunciation, which is also that of the Vocation of Mary, it is one of the most beautiful and profound in the Gospel of Luke. But also one of the most complex and difficult.

An ancient tradition, which dates back to the Apostle Paul (With the 4, 14), reports that Luca was a doctor. a person, so, more suitable than others to tell the special conception; in fact Saint Luke makes use of all his wisdom here, maybe even the professional one, but above all the theological one. Let's read the passage.

"During that time, the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a city in Galilee, called Nazareth, to a virgin, betrothed to a man of the house of David, named Joseph. The virgin's name was Maria. entering from the law, he said: “Rejoice, full of grace: the Lord is; with you”. At these words she was very upset and wondered what sense a greeting like this had. The angel told her: “Do not fear, Maria, because you have found favor with God. And here, you will conceive a son, you will give birth to him and you will call him Jesus. He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High; the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father and he will reign forever over the house of Jacob and his kingdom will have no end”. Then Mary said to the angel: “How this will happen, for I know no man?”. The Angel answered her: “The Holy Spirit will descend upon you and the power of the Most High will cover you with his shadow. Therefore he who will be born will be holy and will be called the Son of God. And here, Elisabetta, your relative, in her old age she also conceived a son and this is the sixth month for her, which was said to be sterile: nothing is impossible for God”. Mary said: “Here is the servant of the Lord: let it happen to me according to your word”. And the Angel moved away from her" (LC 1,26-38).

The Archangel Gabriel is sent by God to communicate to the Virgin Mary the announcement of the imminent Incarnation. A Maria, Joseph's betrothed, it is announced that she will virginally become the mother of the Son of God. The text tells us that God had already prepared Mary for a long time for this mission of hers, as She had experienced having been "made welcome" (cute, Kexaritoméne) to God, through the influence of grace. This is the true meaning of that «full of grace», which we still recite today in the prayer ofAve Maria, but often without fully understanding its meaning. The perfect passive participle of the verb cartoon indicates that it is a past action of grace on Mary, an action therefore prior to the Annunciation, through which Maria felt she was internally oriented towards a still unknown future event. Saint Thomas Aquinas explains it by saying that he experienced within himself a profound "desire for virginity"; so too for Saint Bernard of Clairvaux the grace of Mary was "the grace of virginity". Oriented by that grace, Mary had been prepared for this day: become the mother of the incarnate Son of God, but in a virginal way.

Such a birth appears paradoxical and difficult to believe, maybe even just imagine. Yet Saint Luke, in the Gospel text, it offers us important clues so that we can accept this truth, as all Tradition teaches us. Let's take a closer look at the verse of LC 1,31 which reads in Greek: "And here, you will conceive in the womb". This addition, «in the womb», it is singular, little noticed and often untranslated, as we have seen in the text of the CEI which is proclaimed in church today. There isn't one as it seems like a pleonastic integration, for it is evident that a woman always conceives in the womb. Yet the beginning of the verse integrates well into the overall description of the three moments:

  1. You will conceive in the womb;
  2. you will give birth to a son;
  3. you will call his name Jesus.

Only Mary, throughout Scripture, receives the announcement that his conception will take place entirely "in the womb", it will therefore be completely internal and therefore it will be a virginal conception. Let's see why.

The verse clearly refers to Isaiah's prophecy 7, 14 (LXX version), also taken up by Matteo (1,23) during the announcement to Joseph in a dream:

"There the virgin will have in her womb and give birth to a son and they will call his name Emmanuel".

In San Luca, as it is a dialogue between the Angel and Mary, the second person is used (conceive) and the subject is clearly Mary, no longer the virgin of Isaiah or of Saint Matthew. Also because at the beginning of the song, The Other Brother, it had already been clearly stated twice that She was “a virgin, betrothed"; and that "the virgin was called Mary". But the most surprising thing is Luke's use of the verb. No more "you will have in your womb" as in Isaiah and Matthew, but "you will conceive in the womb". A new expression that goes in the direction of excluding any male participation, therefore human, from this conception. In the Old Testament a woman "receives into the womb" (Is 8, 3) the male seed, or «she has in her womb» (GN 38, 25) after intercourse with a man. But here in Luke it is clearly excluded from Mary's words: "I don't know a man" (LC 1, 34) that is, "I'm a virgin". This is why Saint Luke prefers to use the verb "conceive" (sullambánein), also very frequent in the Old Testament, but always without the addition "in the womb". In fact, the Evangelist uses the verb "conceive" twice, with the apparently superfluous addition of "in the womb" and does so solely by referring to Mary. It doesn't, for instance, with Elizabeth (LC 1, 24.36); for Maria, however, yes, in this passage and in Luke 2,21:

«…as he was called [Jesus] from the Angel, before being conceived in the womb".

They just seem like words, yet here Luke is saying that Mary's conception will be true, PLANT, as the revival of the ancient verb suggests: conceive; yet it will be new, unique and different for Maria, that is, without human participation, male, totally virginal. That is, it required a different "power"., a fertilizing action of a spiritual nature. This is what the Angel will explain to Mary in the face of her real objection:

«The Holy Spirit will come upon you and the power of the Most High will cover you with his shadow. Therefore he who is born will be holy and will be called the Son of God." (v. 35).

I apologize if, given today's Solemnity, I did not focus on the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception, on its historical and theological significance, on original sin for example, as is often done. It seemed more appropriate and compelling to me to focus on the scriptural foundations from which everything flows like a spring. If you notice, indeed, in today's passage from the Gospel of the Solemnity, a nice continuity. From the verse of LC 1, 28, where the Virgin is given the title of «full of grace», we know that Maria, long since, she was prepared by grace for her future mission. At the moment of the Incarnation, the Angel brings her the great and new message: his next conception will take place "in the womb", that is, without human participation. It will therefore be a virginal conception, carried out in Her by the Holy Spirit. Her Immaculate Conception is therefore admirably described by the long preparation of grace in Mary in view of the Incarnation, "in her womb", of the Son of God. There is therefore a perfect continuity well presented by the Evangelist Luke. Maria, full of Grace, after having "conceived" and given birth "holyly" (v. 35) his son under the action of the Holy Spirit, can present him to men as the Son of God, whose name is Jesus. This is the great mystery that is finally revealed to men. But at the center of the whole story is the Virgin Mary.

In this sense the words of Bishop Andrew of Crete are appropriate (+740) refer to Mary:

«The body of the Virgin is a land that God sowed, the firstfruits of Adamic matter divinized by Christ, the image that resembles primitive beauty, the clay shaped by the hands of the craftsman" (Homily 1 on the Dormition of the Blessed Virgin Mary (PG 97,1068).

From the Hermitage, 8 December 2024

Solemnity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Immaculate

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.