Say the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS 'Heretic' E 'APOSTATE ". AND IF YOU WERE A PROVIDENTIAL PIPER MAGIC ?

.

There is no historical memory of a Pope who like the ruling has been branded as “heretic” e “apostate” by a number of means insignificant Catholics and not linked solely to areas of “fundamentalists”. Therefore we believe that this new phenomenon merits a clear and honest answer at the theological and ecclesiological, given below by Fathers of The Island Patmos them in two different writings on the sensitive issue.

.

.

I understand well your maneuvering limits, say, however, that "the Holy Father is in a" cage "in which it was put by some obscure characters that surround him and from which unfortunately is not easy to get out ...", It is frankly not credible, considered the personality of the Holy Father, which he has now at his side whom he wanted. Others are marginalized. Or am I wrong?

Licio Zuliani

.

The Reverend Fathers of this island who support this theory [Ed. "The Holy Father is in a" cage "in which it was put by some obscure characters that surround him and from which unfortunately is not easy to get out"], They know not to further aggravate the situation. Make it a disservice which hurts the salvation of souls. The private doctor It is demolishing everything. What a scandal visiting the tomb of Don Milan, even he would like to emulate him by inviting priests to do the same. From the 2013 we have such a large amount of objective elements (writings, homilies, speeches, video) to define an apostate […]. Dear Fathers of this Island, have charity to say the whole truth is at stake is the salvation of souls that you will answer before the judgment seat of Christ. No one can be sure that the sun is a grain of salt.

Eagle

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF Articles print size

.

.

the late Lucio Battisti [Rieti 1943 – Milan 1998], one of the “sacred monsters” the history of Italian pop music, author of the song Confusion. To listen click on the image

The problem of the Holy Father Francis is a problem essentially moral, that is the question of his moral conduct and his pastoral, not of his doctrine of the Vicar of Christ. On this point we have to listen to good Catholics and not do as Lefebvre and Lutherans, who accuse him of heresy. And this, in essence, that the Father Ariel remembers in his snappy response.

.

The problem of the Holy Father, a common view of the Fathers de The Island of Patmos, that this theme devote two different answers, is precisely that of not having a strong personality, but being a person influenced, except to take sometimes authoritarian attitudes, but affect the weak and leave the strong prosper.

.

The Holy Father will find themselves pitted with a very powerful modernist environment, which is what prompted the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI to make an act of renunciation. The Pope is surrounded, circumvented and adulated by false friends and traitors. The Church has the enemy at home, It has now reached the highest places: we think of the case of Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, for which Masons are our "brothers" [cf. WHO, WHO] or of Cardinal Walter Kasper, for which the dogma is mutable, or General Superior of the Society of Jesus Arturo Sosa [cf. WHO], for which we do not know what Christ has taught, since at that time there were no recorders [cf. WHO], or Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, devotee of Pannella or Bianchi, for whom homosexuality is a gift from God.

.

Alberto Melloni is instead convinced now that the priesthood is over and that the Pope is on a par with the Patriarch of Constantinople [cf. WHO]. The modernists have penetrated the Pontifical Faculty, in the Roman Curia and in the same Secretary of State. The devil knocks at the Hospice Santa Marta disguised as a Muslim immigrant. The Pope is forced to choose collaborators among those who in fact is found to have around. He has to put the brave face on.

.

Modernists play wickedly the card of the Pope's strong capacity for human contact and human understanding, and having the great mass media in hand, spread the false image of a funny Pope, populist and revolutionary, "Leader of the international left" against Donald Trump, portrayed as a hater of poor immigrants and a servant of American capitalism, hiding from people his identity as Vicar of Christ and presenting him as a modernist or a new Che Guevara. The story really seems to have demoted to 1968 and today one has the impression of living, inside the church, in the early seventies of the twentieth century.

.

In this very difficult emergency situation, under this onslaught of diabolical forces never happened in the history of the Church, the Pope has to get by, should be careful at every step he takes, It must somehow adapt to their own situation to protect the role of the Roman Pontiff.

.

The modernists have indeed understood and favor the Pope his excessive affection for the people, organizing popular rallies, about which one can ask is true that success, that is, if it comes from a correct interpretation of the role of the Pope or perhaps rather by his very full of humanity. These crowds, what they see in the Pope? The messenger of the gospel or the large crowds exciting performances of conductor? This doubt success, in our opinion, makes the Pope swayed and yielding to the formidable, wealthy and smart modernist pressure.

.

This unfortunate situation It has dragged on since the time of Paul VI and today is even worse. The fact therefore that the Pope does not have the means to defend themselves and to defend the Church by modernists. The Pope must do, as they say, the best of a bad situation. This is why we do not feel absolutely accuse the Pope of favoring the heretics. And if you accusing us of 'not to say all », some would like us were to say that the Pope is a heretic, or even worse, an apostate, Well cavatevelo well as from the head, because what it would be impossible both as priests and as theologians. Besides the fact that to say this - that accuse the "reigning Pope heresy" or "apostasy" -, would "tell all", as calls for our Player, but saying instead the false.

.

No problem to state which in our opinion, the Holy Father is pliable is too condescending, O too good, as they say, motivated by the desire not to cause further suffering to the Church and not let her suffer more scandals. If in fact he openly revealed the plots of modernists, Church would happen in a bigger mess than it was in 1943 in Italy with the fall of Fascism.

.

In such a dramatic eventuality, the Pope could be tried and deposed and the modernists might be elected an anti-pope, John XXIV, Behind illuminated proposal Gianfranco Ravasi and Walter Kasper, offended, and Alberto Melloni and Andrea Grillo. The Lefebvrians, for reaction to this intolerable affront, could in turn elect, at the suggestion of Antonio Socci, Don Alexander Minutella and Excellencies Monsignori Marmet Bernard and Richard Williamson, un altro antiPope, Pio XIII, their party. So they would have three Popes, not counting the fourth, Benedict XVI, always it is still alive. Meanwhile, the deposed Francesco I, benefiting from a special pardon, It could devote himself full time to care for the immigrants on the island of Lampedusa. Of course, all it may sound sci-ecclesiology, but we have not so far.

.

Therefore, the faithfuls, not to be scandalized by the Pope and fail him due respect as Vicar of Christ, They have to do this reading of what is happening: we must fight the modernists and defend the Pope, because if in any way the Pope is attacked, explains Father Ariel in its response following commentary: it undermines the stone that holds the whole construction, with consequences not so hard to imagine ...

.

from The Island of Patmos, 26 June 2017

.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF Articles print size

.

.

an old 45 laps of complex I Chameleons: There is nothing new, a song that today would be fit to play and sing in different cathedrals, instead anthem Here Priest. To listen click on the image

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos they are conscious the ecclesial situation and current ecclesiastical and for that you look from going to break up the rock on which Christ built his Church [cf. Mt 13,16-20], they are men of faith. There is not the worst thing that destroy the house on the basis of “because I think”, “because I feel”…

.
The mysteries of faith not based on “I think”, “I feel”... two assumptions which give rise to a "faith" emotional, immature and childish, however devoid of a critical perspective related to the action of the Holy Spirit's grace that eventually turned, one snooty weak and timid as Peter, into a martyr and witness of faith.

.

If the reigning Pope is "apostate", as stated in our Player, at the same player should be remembered that Peter, chosen and willed by Christ Himself, It was much worse than Francis I. Also because Peter, act of apostasy from the faith in the incarnate Word of God made her seriously. Instead, Francis I., He has never publicly denied Christ and before the danger he has not taken flight. But Peter not only denied him publicly, but he did the false swearing and cursing: "Then he began to curse and to swear: "I do not know the man!”» [Mt 26,69-75].

.

We have never denied the defects, the theological deficiencies and ambiguous and confusing ministry of the Holy Father Francis, as do certain fearful ecclesiastical career, improvvisatisi today everyone poor&refugees. We never denied his faults to the same extent that we believe in the Holy Spirit "the Lord and the life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son" [cf. Symbol of faith], sent by Christ to the nascent Church at Pentecost. Therefore we do not exclude that a person limited and ambiguous as the exhibition can be the reigning Pontiff, Also at the end of his life, as happened with Peter, turn into a great confessor and defender of the faith.

.

From this perspective many are sadly lacking, simply because they have no faith in the action of grace, because their faith is played all over Clik the "I like it”, "I do not like”, because they live the Church as a socio-political phenomenon useful as an outlet for arguing in the microcosm of their backyard, where there is only black and white, good and bad, where sentences “that's just the way it is“, but not because they set out the objective data or amounts truths of faith, but because it establishes the “I think”, “I feel”, that ends up being the only true and objective, the new dogma tragic being and existence of many men immersed in the world of’iocentrism and self-referentiality. Lin faith, however, it is another thing: "Faith is the foundation of the things that are hoped for and the proof of those that are not seen" [EB 11, 1-7].

.

We never cease to give thanks to the Holy Father Francis for bringing into the open a so thick and numerous army of Christians whose "faith", de facto, It was based on nothing. Indeed, the first blast have fallen, screaming so excited and emotional "heresy!», "apostasy!», and any other kind of anger towards the Chair of Peter. But most of all we thank him for bringing into the open a subject even more serious, that is to say all those cardinals fringes, bishops and priests, besides an army of heretical theologians in the chair for a few decades, that under the pontificates of Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI, They have long worked with “admirable” patience in obscurity, behind the scenes, playing as long as they could to the transformation dictated by obvious career ambitions, all in accordance with the technique so acute as dangerous modernists, that lacks neither the planning nor patience.

.

No worries, on my part, to provide in this regard examples. Imagine if I, as we urge to do the same Supreme Pontiff [see WHO], I'm afraid to "denounce names and surnames". If anything, the problem is that the Holy Father, beyond his words uttered in predicozzi mornings, the complainants with your name if you keep them all around like ivy wrapped around the Chair of Peter, while the few who dared to report the den of snakes around the sacred throne, They are finished as they are finished, to the praise and glory of God. Therefore, the Supreme Pontiff, in addition to being limited it is unfortunately also inconsistent, because it shows that between his preaching to blows slogan Effect to the delight of the secularist press, and his concrete action, there is a mismatch.

.

Exhortation contained in this latest predicozzo morning, I answer thus providing the Holiness of Our Lord Jesus Christ Augustus reigning Pontiff, a high birth name that can apply to many other: Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, Archbishop of Perugia and today President of the Italian Episcopal Conference …

.

… Cardinal Bassetti, He was able to move forward with that "peasant cunning" which causes it to tell the host that it wishes to hear, up to believe that this simple settler acts as a very faithful servant in the best interests of the landlord and property. Now we will see how he carried out his climbing, as the Successor of Peter seems to enjoy them as much the 'complaints' accompanied by' first and last names "- as well as facts, naturally -, to which he urges us in his predicozzi mornings.

.

Gualtiero Bassetti, He entered in thanks Cardinal Silvano Piovanelli, Archbishop of Florence, Finally it favored in its promotion Episcopal. He has never been an eagle theological nor a man of deep culture, which it is not in itself and by itself no problem, indeed quite the opposite, In fact, we know well the enormous damage done under Pope Giovanni Paolo II from the last batches of dire bishops professors. It should therefore be pointed out that today, People of God and ourselves ministers of the sacred We venerate the saints who were people of a theological and cultural limitations sometimes bleak, but this did not affect the heroic nature of their virtues, up to be canonized and declared models of holiness for priests themselves, from our patron, that pace of the Supreme Pontiff and Cardinal Bassetti, remains the Holy Curé of Ars Giovanni Maria Vianney. Even despite, a few days ago, It has assisted the elevation of Don Lorenzo Milani Barbiana Prior to the sublime priestly model for the work of the Holiness of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the reigning Pontiff Augustus, to which Enzo Bianchi and Alberto Melloni on duty told directly or indirectly the two magic words before which Francis I even come to losing my mind, but above all objective spirit: "A true priest of the poor … a priest of the last … a frontier priest lost in existential suburbs …», and the game was made, a Bose heretic praise and politician no less heretical to the Bologna School.

.

The future cardinal bishop and president of C.E.I Gualtiero Bassetti, with certain saints certainly it shares the mediocrity and the limited, not, however, the heroic virtues and the sanctity. And apart from a juvenile “office appointment” to curate, in fact, he has spent his entire priestly life preceding the episcopate of the intricacies of the Florentine Curia: assistant at the Institute, then rector of the minor seminar, then rector of the major seminar, then pro-vicar general … In 1994 he was appointed bishop of the diocese of a small but ancient Tuscan Maremma, Massa Marittima, erected in the fifth century in the corner of that splendid Etruscan land and ruled by the proto-vescovo Cerbone; a particular church in which he, reasonably, he should achieve his 75 years of age.

.

But we know well, but above all we experienced several times bitterly on our priestly skin, both in our capacity as submitted both in our capacity as victims, that while men of God called to tremble if certain tasks, since most are equipped with wisdom, intellect, advise, fortress, science, compassion, fear of God, longer feel inadequate, contrary to their mediocre which tend to be cloaked in outward humility and above which the gifts of the Holy Spirit bounce back like rubber balls on a concrete wall, inside themselves they are never happy with what they got undeserved, why try to make up for all their demerits aspiring to get more and more. Here, then, that with all the typical loyalty of the loving and devoted husband, Gualtiero Bassetti leaves only after four years, In the 1998, the diocese of Massa Marittima, to become bishop of the Diocese of Arezzo, and for territorial extension and the number of priests is the second largest diocese in Tuscany. Obviously - God forbid! —, these subjects are accustomed contact their bishop's chair to the clergy and faithful with the tear from the eye of Dramatic Art Theater, uttering the fateful words that ... "against my will, beloved sons and daughters beloved, the Holy Father has commanded me, and I obey " …

.

… but also a bride as the Church of Arezzo It was not up to her husband so much, just like those husbands close to sixty years that once piazzatisi well in society as professionals or entrepreneurs and made a nest egg of money, first leaving his wife to struggle with her menopausal problems and take a girl as a girlfriend 25 years that could be their daughter, which it joins them for love, exclusively for deep passion of love. In this case, the devoted husband Gualtiero Bassetti, Arezzo leaves the bride to become Archbishop of Perugia. E, for the second time, repeats the dramatic art representation of rite, with the announcement made by the Arezzo Bishop's chair: "Unfortunately, the Holy Father has commanded me, and I obey ".

.

It's really unusual that over the last two decades, before these commands given by the Holy Father, if anything, he did not even know the existence, the name and geographical location of certain small and medium-sized Italian dioceses, but that even despite commanded and needless to say offered for the third time at a bride groom more “rich” e “bella” … May, I say never, only one of these “faithless husbands” that he replied: "Blessed Padre", I've already changed two brides, Therefore I beg: let me husband of my wife. Not assigned to me for the third time to a new and larger diocese ". No One faithful husband has instead acted in this way, in a episcopate that seems conducive to divorce and marriage to the second and third most attractive brides. Understandable why: because everyone is the penalty of hard-obedient when it comes to move from a small to a medium diocese, then by an average diocese to a great historical site that benefits the metropolitan pallium. In short, be a little man, first marriage, He had the final blow to marry the daughter of a baron of the province, then his second wife, the daughter of a city Count, It may perhaps be so foolish as to not accept to leave the second to take as a third wife, the daughter of a prince who lives in the capital? In conclusion, in pastoral programs of faith - because here is pure faith that it is, mind you! —, must on the one hand to aim higher and higher, the other point to the deep, ie take off, Christ teaches us in the Gospel of the miraculous catch, indeed it commands just Himself to Peter: "Put out into the deep" [LC 5,1-11]. However, it remains in doubt: Christ the Lord, to Peter, She made him chief of the fishers of men, or leader of a group of wives of fishermen increasingly high places?

.

By the way is clear, it is legitimate, indeed sometimes desirable that in certain large metropolitan locations are assigned the bishops who have already gained pastoral experience, which in rare cases also it occurred in the past, as well as a bishop, Once elected to a seat, It was immovable until death. But it is, precisely, very rare cases. For instance, in Italy, where we have over two hundred dioceses, the great locations that may require a bishop with pastoral experience already gained, will be about ten: Palermo, Naples, Florence, Bologna, Genoa, Milan, Torino … And here again I note that while the Diocese of Arezzo, largest and extensive Umbrian Archdiocese, has 245 parishes and a presbytery formed by 270 priests between secular and, the Archdiocese of Perugia has 155 parishes and a clergy composed of 190 priests, between secular and. But, to Perugia, It is a Metropolitan Archbishop, while that of Arezzo, Although the diocese of major proportions as parishes, clergy and territorial extension, It is a suffragan diocese of the underground headquarters of Florence. And at that Florence, city ​​that the future Cardinal hyper-bergogliano She gave birth, before certain figures it is usual jesting: «Eh, I know you, mask …».

.

Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti is a paradigm for a reason that now illustrate the end: under the pontificate of Giovanni Paolo II, everyone remembers this character, Massa Marittima before and Arezzo later, as a public defender of family and non-negotiable values. Under the pontificate of Benedict XVI, everyone remembers him in Perugia as a public defender of theological orthodoxy and good liturgy. Under Pope Francis I, all we are seeing, in his new role as President of the Italian Episcopal Conference, like a poor man all, refugees e soli juice. there, I wondered if by chance, the great fathers of Roman Law, in addition to soli juice, we do not even coined the legal institution of … juice sola.

.

Perhaps, the forked tongue of Pietro Aretino, before which Giovanni Boccaccio was almost a “shy student”, he made his debut with some sonnets more or less in this way ... "at least the whores customers Changing Images, but even if he was always there remain, to the contrary of other, that put instead quirks and shapes according to the different needs of their customers novi ".

.

How capita, we are talking about people not only lack coherence, but devoid of common sense of the ridiculous, convinced that the People of God may be poor Obtuse formed unable to grasp, understand and analyze. No problem, because they will understand, willy-nilly, you must want to forcibly, When arriving one day a party wall in the square of their cathedral church will feel screaming by a mob angry: "buffoons, buffoons!». And from this eventuality anything but science fiction and remote, Today I say to you - or if you allow me “you a prophet” - that we are not far away. And as, of this, They are also different in their hearts aware episcopets e cardinals, you can well understand why, before moral and social questions of unprecedented severity, They bent his head and fell silent on marriage between same-sex couples, shots on the nth data to the little that remains of the family, the violent ideological forms of an increasingly aggressive secularism towards every Christian sentiment, the dictatorship of gender, by the repressive police actions gaystapo and so on, because on one hand they do not have the manly courage, the other live in fear of losing their social and economic power, who soon will lose, because the countdown has started since the beginning of this new millennium, and today we are now running out of the last grains of sand in the hourglass. We want to understand it or not, that shortly, in Europe we will be outlawed, while the short-sighted Italian episcopate heats within the dangerous Islamic serpent that tomorrow will put our heads in bell towers instead of the clappers of the bells? It is that the heads will be our, not those of Gualtiero Bassetti and Nunzio Galantino, they will meanwhile emigrated to Switzerland, where they will step forward to speaking concierge on our skin and in our blood, continuing to ensure that Islam is a religion of peace.

.

Or do you think that the Italian episcopate has prostituted up to smooth the hair at that devil incarnate by Marco Pannella for pure Christian charity? Come on, mica are children! If he bowed his head before the father of the abortion laws, on civil unions, on gay marriage, and untiring ideologue of homosexual culture, the gender, dell'eutanasia, of genetic testing, of wombs for rent … it was only for a simple reason: a Pope who on the one hand gave rise to his pontificate invoking a poor Church for the poor [cf. WHO], a strong economic crisis, and at the same time a free fall in the course of the credibility of the clergy, beset by moral and economic scandals unprecedented, in such a situation the possessed Marco Pannella would have been enough just half a whistle to mark an unprecedented electoral victory by calling the Italians vote in a referendum popular on the abolition of the Eight Thousand tribute to the Catholic Church; and the first to vote in favor would have been many Catholics. Just so … the Italian episcopate has been sold off as Esau sold off his birthright for a plate of lentils [Gen 12,50] …

.

… and for the first time, around the Chair of Peter, They were seen circling the henchmen of Satan as Marco Pannella and Emma Bonino, one who still called abortion "great social achievement worthy of a civilized country", while the Pontiff who dreams of a poor Church for the poor, He did not hesitate to accept it repeatedly - something instead repeatedly denied four cardinal pious -, and to call it "a large Italian", together with the communist atheist and anticlerical Giorgio Napolitano [cf. WHO]. And here we note in passing that the great atheist and communist Italian Giorgio Napolitano, He turned in his formal address these words to the Roman Pontiff:

.

"We were struck by the lack of dogmatism, the taking of distances from "positions are not touched by a margin of uncertainty", the reference to the "leave no room for doubt" of its "great leaders of God's people" » [Text of the speech, WHO].

.

Which translated means: Finally, a Pope who does not speak of the dogmas of the faith, or the fact that certain issues are not negotiable by the Catholic morality, as for example, the value and the protection of human life from the moment of conception and so forth. Then it follows a marked speech on relativism, anthropocentrism and so, behind which it is not difficult to identify, for us insiders, the hand of certain theologians, or rather of some theological school known Italian, whose founders attended too politics and political buildings …

.

Ah, The poor Church for the poor! Hopefully tomorrow the people there do not take shots with a steel bar in the street, when before long will run out of various scams priests trafficoni that overnight they have set up reception centers for “refugees”, managing one hand large sums of money and on the other by donating a few apartment to the beloved grandchildren. What will happen, the lack of supervision of our "blind guides" [cf. Mt 23,16], when several will be reported Onlus founded by priests for many different purposes benefits, social and welfare, including even a worthy association for the fight against pedophilia, and all species in Southern Italy, when you find that these “pie foundations” They have never submitted a budget, who receive generous funding from various state and European bodies, despite having the Association recommendations “top secret” trained everyone from siblings, sisters, nephews and cousins, none of which has, if anything, a job, but they live as they say on the great big market “charity”? And what will happen when they find out that thanks to “refugees”, different structures of Caritas, especially from Naples down, far from benefiting ninety percent of volunteers free the amor Dei, They have solved certain problems of unemployment, or more easily deficient desire to work, guaranteeing a salary brothers, sisters, grandchildren, cousins, friends and … even “fiancés” of certain priests?

.

Back then the bishops and the cardinals of our discourse in question, It is perhaps best …

.

Even the Cardinal Giuseppe Betori, current Archbishop of Florence, He was under the pontificate of Giovanni Paolo II, from when he was Secretary General of C.E.I. under the presidency of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, a defender of family and non-negotiable values; afterwards, as a diocesan bishop and as a cardinal, under Pope Benedict XVI was a defender of theological orthodoxy and good liturgy. The difference, however, runs between Cardinal Giuseppe Betori and Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, is that the first, mindful of what they thought both Giovanni Paolo II and Benedict XVI, and even before them, Paul VI and John XXIII, hath been careful not to beatify Don Lorenzo Milani, indeed said "to me is not holy" [cf. WHO, WHO], and thus he remained in the consciousness itself before the world and history. A completely different pasta Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, that does not change the nature, but simply changed customer, he immediately declared suitable "for me is holy", thus showing their miraculous himself in the trend of the times [cf. WHO, see video WHO], the so-called … juice sola.

.

In conclusion I repeat that the Holy Father Francis we have deep gratitude, because like the Pied Piper of Hamelin has brought into the open these mice; and here let me tell you, this analysis, I did not now, but four years ago, After just three months of his pontificate [see WHO]. And we, after the extraordinary work of the Pied Piper, mice take them all to jump into the river. Because tomorrow, These paralyzed people in this power, certain that this present is a kind of Unmoved Mover that will never, such as lack of an eschatological future perspective because paralyzed in everything and immediately, immediately, will not in any way be recycled on the new leader wagon, something that we will have to make deep thanks to Pope Francis I, forever. If not, before any attempt to gattopardesco clerical recycling, for us it will be a so-called brainer, remind everyone how they lived and how they acted under this pontificate flattery, in order to obtain ecclesiastical positions and benefits of every kind of merit of the poor, refugees and existential peripheries. Finally it will be our Christian mission “cut off their heads”, from that of Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, one of several that, if anything had been erected in the City, should have given the title of cardinals that of the Church of Santa Maria del Chameleon. Why does this man, tomorrow, as evidence amply lived his life, the minimum wind change would not hesitate to go out in public with seven meters magna hood and to declare that the Crusaders saved entire populations from Muslim attacks and therefore are revered as true defenders of the faith. But most of all, the first change of wind, would not hesitate to declare that should be restored to the healthy and holy old methods of the Inquisition to proceed to burn at the stake Enzo Bianchi and Alberto Melloni.

.

That the Church was holy and prostitute, This affirms the Holy Bishop and dottore Ambrogio, but saying this in his own sermon [chaste whore, in Luke: III, 23], He looked back to the Old Testament literature and particularly the episode of the prostitute Rahab of Jericho who helped the Israelites as a "chaste harlot", that "many lovers to attend the attractions of love but without the contamination of sin '. In opposite way, characters like Gualtiero Bassetti and related, instead they changed the Church in a whore who goes where the wind blows; and this is something else, compared to chaste harlotry. Or in the words of the Rev. Prof. Joseph Ratzinger, this means changing the Holy Church of Christ "in a structure of sin" [cf. Introduction to Christianity, ed 1968], pace the pretext of poor, of refugees, existential suburbs and many priests improvised street today, border and the outskirts, to follow along with all the stereotypes of the South American banana republic seventies now in vogue, on which many are doing dazzling and damaging ecclesiastical careers, without the Tenant Augusto Santa Marta is aware of the damage that is favoring, but most of what in the future will have to answer to Christ, he has entrusted his Holy Bride, not an ideal and idealized villas of misery …

.

Despite all this, we believe with deep faith and certain that what the Pope Francis I, through the work of the Holy Spirit grace, will end up being, and with the turn out in retrospect a pontificate that as few others have rendered great service and great good for the Church of Christ for his future.

.

In May 2016, when nobody could imagine certain events present, for sincere honesty deemed it appropriate to address these words to the President of the Italian Episcopal Conference, Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, towards which I was rough in 2013 for the funeral porcine the presbyter Andrea Gallo:

.

"Eminence Father Cardinal, will not be long that we, with a heavy heart and tears in my eyes risogneremo recent times in which we as a reference point and pastoral equilibrium models extraordinary men like her. Tomorrow we will live in your memory and feel dramatically your lack. And those who, like myself, at times they have treated harshly, repent - but if that's why I'm already regretting - of having been strict with you and make your old age less suffering COMING to kiss his hand and telling you with deep devotion that in truth you were authentic Church Fathers; and we'll tell sincere and convinced after trying the worst of it on our skin of priests faithful to the Holy Church of Christ and his teaching is now preparing ' [the entire article is legible WHO].

.

I've never jumped on the bandwagon, suffice it to say that I have lived through years of priestly formation in Rome and then another the following years as a priest in the Diocese of the Supreme Pontiff, without ever having seen once closely neither Giovanni Paolo II nor Benedict XVI nor Francis I.. Also because I have never tried to approach them, even when again and again I paid the pontifical liturgical service of Benedict XVI. And why would I? They mention every day the Holy Father in the Mass canon, this thing that just to them and just to me. If anything, I approach those from large wagon fell, ceasing to be the stars of their descent, and today no one seeks them, perhaps not even remember them, since the journalists chasing them like hounds. To those I have always been close, in their solitude and on their way; and that's where born the most beautiful relationships, when the relationship between the one who approaches, and one who can be approached, It is characterized by the total absence of any kind of interest, certainly not by the hope of ending the three candidates for appointment as bishop.

.

Accordingly I conclude: these words written over a year ago to Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, is there someone who now intends to give me wrong, both before the new Italian episcopate, and before the new presidency of C.E.I, it sounds to me as much as the new president of juice sola on the bandwagon of the great carnival of Rio de Janeiro?

.

from The Island of Patmos, 26 June 2017

.

.

.

Dear Readers,

The Island of Patmos It is filled with the Spirit but does not live by spirit alone, and the maintenance of the site that hosts this observatory, this magazine, It has cost, among other things on the rise. We have always gone ahead thanks to your offers, of which we thank you. The truth I offer it for free with all our heart and our total “peril”, But remember that you work it, wrap it up and spread it, unfortunately coast.

God reward you.

.

.

.

.

.

.

LETTER OF CARDINAL CARLO CAFFARRA THE POPE: "INSPIRED BY OUR CONSCIENCE ..."

.

We reproduce the letter that Cardinal Carlo Caffarra sent in April to the Supreme Pontiff, and that after two months was made public. Theologian Carlo Caffarra is recognized as the most authoritative expert on issues related to family and life. The Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II considered it a point of reference and again made use of his cooperation in the preparation of important acts of the Magisterium. Even the Pope Francis I has for Him estimate, not least because of his fidelity to the Successor of Peter, but unfortunately, The Holy Father is in a “cage” in which it was put by some obscure characters that surround it and from which unfortunately is not easy to get out …

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the Pope Francis I and Cardinal Carlo Caffarra

The recent letter by Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, Archbishop Emeritus of Bologna, He was very touched Father Giovanni Cavalcoli and me, not on an emotional level, but in spiritual depth, as well as the theological and pastoral plan. Both deeply we value Cardinal Carlo Caffarra and knowing what we know is a genuine man of God, an authentic model of faith, a high caliber theologian.

.

These days there is little to smile, but with a devoted affection expression, we want to say to Cardinal: "Father Cardinal, the day when as we all, she will respond for their actions before God, maybe you will have to answer for some thoughts, for certain words, for some works … but not for the omissions! And maybe - though none of us can interpret and even more so in advance of God's judgment -, we like to hope that his manly, Pastoral and praiseworthy escape from complacent omissions, will result from the Supreme Judge, full forgiveness for any sin as we all in thoughts, word and deed. Indeed, escape from those omissions in which not only a large part of the episcopate has fallen, but on which it has its own characterized pavido act and operate pastoral, It is on his part an act of true heroism for which Christ the Bridegroom of the Church to make big merit ".

.

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra during Mass

The public talk by Cardinal Carlo Caffarra is a far cry from the mention of those in closed high prelatizi salons launch fires and lightning on to say and not to say the Holy Father, on the confusion in which the Successor of Peter has slid us with some of his ambiguous expressions. The mention of Cardinal Carlo Caffarra is moved by Free heroic love for Christ's Church, while the drawing-room gossip of certain bishops and curial is only due to a hatred that stems mainly from careers and not granted charges. Indeed, if some of them the Holy Father Francis had set the coveted cardinal's hat, Today they argue that The joy of love is the greatest document of the pontifical magisterium of the last five hundred years, and that a Pope like Francis I have not seen since the days when the Word of God Incarnate walked over the waters of ancient Palestine lakes.

.

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra

In men of God as Carlo Caffarra, we see that light of our Christological future hope before which we express faith more than ever: "I think the Church one, santa, catholic and apostolic ". Instead, before the politicians in Business, which are upstream of those responsible for the increasingly untenable situation in which we pour, we can only say: "It preserves the Church one, santa, catholic and apostolic "by the immense damage it went from defenders of the values “politicians” non-negotiable, that at the time when the wind pulling on the other hand, They could see already the cardinal about the defense of the values “politicians” non-negotiable. Characters whose life and work has been a life of slavery entirely conditioned by the desire to achieve a great seat of an archbishop and a cardinal's hat; bishops that at best have left diocese the collapse composed today by priests divided and contentious; bishops with their priests have been most evident with a more or less comparable to that of a watermelon paternity; bishops who before God and history will be judged as managers and childbirth fathers of today's bad episcopate, born to reactive mechanisms - after all understandable -, Italian episcopate facts emerge from the devastating subjects that preceded them yesterday …

.

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra during a conference

… it is true, Today we have an episcopate unfortunately formed by several elements imbued with the worst heresies modernist, But, even looking into a possible tragedy “positive outcome”, we can at least say that we no longer have those politiconi bishops and their priests in crisis abandoned the priesthood, they were in the House and talk to Gianni Letta to see if he, too, a good word, could facilitate their transfer to the archbishopric of Milan or the Patriarch of Venice. And having to choose among the bishops who came and went from the living rooms of the worst political award-investigated and those who today, perhaps for conformity or for convenience, They speak only of refugees obsessively, Alas, I would be forced to Christian intellectual honesty to choose these seconds, from santegidino S. AND. Mons. Matteo Maria Zuppi and from’child prodigy S.It is the school of Bologna. Mons. Corrado Lorefice, kissing one and the other ten times the hand. And with each hand kiss I would try to erase from the memory nefarious recent memory of their predecessors defenders “politicians” of non-negotiable values, that before the orgiastic feasts of Silvio Berlusconi made no bones to declare that … "One can not judge from his private life Prime Minister, but by his acts of government ", adding a reprimand to many Italians who dared even to remain outraged by certain feasts red light, that "The outrage is not a Christian sentiment". And today these bishops, retirees and as they say beautifully trumpet, They are the ones who most of all clamoring as parlor lions on the The joy of love and remarried divorcees, while Silvio Berlusconi, that was judged "not on his private life but by his acts of government", Today is eighty years old and as a third mate just thirty years old girl, It was in favor of all the anti-Christian legislation, and it is more or less pathetic as they were and are certain defenders bishops "politicians"Non-negotiable values, behind which only they hoped for a cardinal, thank God never come, while their darling, Berlusconi, like a tree we recognized all of them from the fruits that gave …

.

Is there any spare virgin vilified who intends to complain because today we have an Italian episcopate that reactively, and also understandably, It is for the most part all skewed to the left?

.

.

from The Island of Patmos, 20 June 2017

.

.

______________________________________________

.

.

Author
Carlo Card. Caffara

.

.

Most Holy Father,

.

it is with some trepidation that I address Your Holiness, During these days of the Easter season. I do so on behalf of Cardinals: Walter Brandmuller, Raymond L. Burke, Joachim Meisner, and my personal.

.

We would like first of all renew our total commitment and our unconditional love to the Chair of Peter, and for your august person, in which we recognize the Successor of Peter and Vicar of Jesus: the "sweet Christ on earth", as he put St. Caterina da Siena. There is minimally belongs the position of those who consider a vacancy in the See of Peter, nor to those who also want to attribute to others the responsibility of indivisible gift petrino. We are motivated only by the awareness of serious responsibility from the gift cardinal: be advisers to the Successor of Peter in his ministry sovereign. And the Sacramento Episcopate, that "he has placed us as bishops to nourish the Church, He has purchased with his own blood " [At 20, 28].

.

The 19 September 2016 we delivered to Your Holiness and to the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith five dubia, [Ed. cf. WHO] asking her to resolve uncertainties and to clarify some points of the Post-Synodal love joy.

.

Having received no response from Your Holiness, we came to the decision to ask you, respectfully and humbly, Hearing, together if it will appeal to Your Holiness. We enclose, as is the practice, Hearing a sheet in which we expose the two points on which we wish to entertain us with you.

.

Most Holy Father,

.

It is now one year after the publication of love joy. In this period they were publicly interpretations of certain passages objectively ambiguous of the Post-Synodal, not differ from, but contrary to the permanent Magisterium of the Church. Although the Prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith has repeatedly stated that the Church's teaching has not changed, They have appeared numerous statements of individual bishops, of Cardinals, and even of Episcopal Conferences, approving what the Magisterium of the Church has never approved. Not only access to the Holy Eucharist of those who objectively and openly living in a situation of serious sin, and intend to stay there, but also a conception of moral conscience contrary to the Church's Tradition. And so it is happening - oh how sad to say! - that what is sin in Poland is well in Germany, what is forbidden in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia it is permitted in Malta. And so on. This brings to mind the bitter realization of B. Pascal: “Justice on this side of the Pyrenees, injustice beyond; Justice on the left bank of the river, injustice on the right bank”.

.

Numerous competent lay, deeply love with the Church and solidly loyal to the Holy See, They have turned to their pastors and to Your Holiness, to be confirmed in the Holy Doctrine on the three sacraments of Marriage, Confession and the Eucharist. And in these days, in Rome, six lay people from every continent have proposed a much frequented Study Seminar, the significant title: "To clarify".

.

Faced with this serious situation, in which many Christian communities are splitting, we feel the weight of our responsibility, and our conscience pushes us to ask humbly and respectfully Audience.

.

Want Your Holiness remember us in your prayers, The as we assure you that we will do in our. And we ask for the gift of His Apostolic Blessing.

.

† Carlo Card. Caffara

.

Rome, 25 April 2017
Feast of San Marco Evangelista

.

.

SHEET HEARING

1. Request for clarification of the five points indicated by “dubia”; reasons for such a request.

2. of confusion and bewilderment Situation, especially in pastors, in the first place the pastors.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

PRIESTS TRENDY ? PIGLIATELI NOT SERIOUSLY, PIGLIATELI the piss, IS AN ACT OF EXTREME PERFECT CHRISTIAN CHARITY. AND NOW VI EXPLAIN WHAT REALLY COUCH …

.

Today, before certain priests, on the one hand, we just have to cry, on the other hand, we just have to take the piss, because it raised the issue in these terms, the jack ass It will be the extreme act, most perfect and loving Christian charity, He says one sees it pretaccio scurrilous, He remains intimately too worried about not swallow camel of heresy [cf. Mt 23,24], to worry about the harmless midge a healthy swearword.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

PDF print format article

.

Dear Father Ariel,

I'm not a nostalgic old, I just task 24 year old, and at my age I tell you today as a priest don Camillo, He born from the imagination of my fellow emiliano Giovannino Guareschi, fill churches, especially of young people. While the priests in robes casual, everyone ecology, peace and love, Immigrants who come there's room for everyone and singing away to follow, the churches have emptied. Within the churches today were those who had them in twenty years 1970, They are now on their way to the seventy, but they are always there, to strum with chitarrine. He knows that I tell, maybe my language is vulgar and ask him for forgiveness, but don Camillo once were men with balls that inspired respect even those who did not believe. Today, many priests trendy they just want to take for a ride, especially by those who still believe, because a priest can forgive all, but it became a priest because it totally devoid of balls […]

Edoardo M. (Modena)

.

.

… the ways necessary polite and persuasive Don Camillo …

The young player Modena of which I quoted the first part of his letter, He was the inspiration for this new article in which, pulled to the edges of my garment, I return to face the problem of priest robe, although it is understood, as will be explained later, philosophically, theological, Mystical and moral. In this topic I have already addressed in a written published last year, placing in relation to the priests in the historic cradle of Christianity are camouflaged in civilian clothes, while Muslims flaunt all the marks of their tribal or religious affiliation, in a Europe now it becomes their former Christian easily conquered [see previous article WHO]. Spontaneous then the question arises: because you return to this topic? But most of all: How come, before more serious events, as the former Christian Europe to the total collapse, talk about "trifles" as the dress of the priest? Maybe so you do not run the risk of worrying about the daisies wilting from the heat produced by the fire, while the house completely enveloped in flames is burning? In an ecclesial situation like ours, that in many ways it has no historical precedents, there are perhaps far more serious things to think about? [see my previous article WHO]. An example of something far more serious is constituted by not a few priests that when they get to the altar show so clearly does not believe in what they do, after having forgotten that the day of their ordination as deacons received the Holy Gospel with these precise words:

.

"Receive the Gospel of Christ whose herald you have become: always believe what proclamations, teach what you have learned in faith, practice what you teach ".

.

then receiving priestly ordination, The priest knelt before the Bishop received the chalice and paten which contain the Body and Blood of Christ living God; and he received them with precise words that should be remembered for a lifetime. And if one day the priest was also affected by senile dementia or Alzheimer's disease, to the point of not even find the toilet door in the hallway of his house, anyhow, while not remembering his date of birth and your same name, however, remember these words:

.

"Receive the oblation of the holy people for the Eucharistic sacrifice. Understand what you will do, imitate what you celebrate. Conform your life to the mystery of the cross of Christ the Lord ".

.

… how we were: two farmers kneel to the pastor passageway to the Most Holy Eucharist to a sick

Faced with priests increasingly ill-formed, deformed or worse for years inside those devastating pretify to which now the seminaries have been reduced, is the case of open discourse on a seemingly marginal element as the dress of the priest, when many priests, celebrating the Eucharistic Sacrifice, demonstrate not believe that under the appearances of bread and wine, After transubstantiation [1], Christ the Lord is truly and really present, completely, in soul, body and divinity? And when referring to the Most Holy Eucharist, this kind of priests that we conventionally defined priests trendy, everything except speak of sacrifice alive and holy, that is their bad habit instead to call in various other manner: feast of love, joyful table, Dinner brothers, feast of joy ... in short,: Giovanni Calvino pure !

.

In fact ..., Christ gave, After giving us the mystery of His Body and His Blood [2], after sweating in Gethsemane [3], after being betrayed [4], then he abandoned by his disciples [5], unjustly prosecuted, insulted, whipped and crowned with thorns [6], eventually it came to Calvary with a heavy wood loaded on the shoulders singing one of those songs demenzial-pop that our poor ears must hear in many churches ...

.

"Unleash the joy, Today the feast is, dai, sing with us, the party here we are " [see WHO].

.

… how we were: a priest who takes the Most Holy Eucharist to a sick, accompanied by a child that precedes it carrying a lighted lamp el'acquasanta

... with the priest saved with the purple color of strong penitential time clapping his hands with beota air and that reassures all about the fact that he, the "feast of joy", what today it is no longer called the sacred liturgy and holy living memorial, much less Eucharistic Sacrifice, the center puts their own: four young nerds that if they were beautiful and stalwart not scatenerebbero joy dancing before the altar, but it would give the revelry in completely different places, for example dancing on cubes of discotheques.

And who thought that the center of the sacred liturgy, you culmen background of Christian life, Christ with the bloodless sacrifice of the cross that is renewed, wrong. And in addition to err it is old and anachronistic; and besides being old and anachronistic it is a "dull dogmatic", a "pre-Trent Council», a "haunted by the doctrine" …

.

It goes without saying that dogma e dogmatic They are not scurrilous profanity, although now reduced to such rank, because the dogma - starting with the Christological and Trinitarian dogmas -, are the columns that hold the implant of the faith and the whole of Revelation Mystery [7]. Trent term, o Council of Trent, now it used as the spoiled children used in Sessantotto the term "fascist" and "bourgeois", It is nothing untoward, because without the great Council of Trent, celebrated in a time of great crisis and moral decay and political and social Church, it would have been impossible even to imagine, five centuries later, the Second Vatican Council, preceded by short but equally great Vatican Council. Therefore, lifestyle and try to live their lives according to the Catholic doctrine and morals, It is not at all inconvenient, quite the opposite! It is the only system always known by which to live the Christian life that will lead us to the salvation of our souls, through forgiveness of our sins that preserves us from the fires of hell, bringing in all souls to heaven, especially those most in need of God's mercy, as he taught the Our Vergine Maria of Fatima to the shepherd children in a prayer atoning later became a prayer of the universal Church.

.

For years I have written about spiritual drifts, doctrinal and moral clergy, that if well analyzed would understand right away that in itself and by itself the Luciferian; because only the devil can bring souls consecrated to certain levels of human and moral degradation. All with a single result: give me a reason - place and given that on certain things and in certain of my analysis I have always wished and prayed to have entirely wrong -, They were in private a small army of bishops and cardinals, and a number of good priests unfortunately always lower, that in this debacle they continue to exist, although segregated rigor as plague victims in the most peripheral and marginal seats, so that with their being authentic models of faith and priestly virtues, do not disrupt the much larger number of bad priests, or priests who are real shame of the sacred priestly order, always placed penalty by their bishops in all the key posts in the diocese, starting with the largest and wealthiest parishes.

.

… a creativity totally different from that of the priests who improvise liturgies socks to the sound of bongo drums and dancing: American priest who established the portable confessional.

My analysis made in deference to the truth and straight on doctrinal bases, canonical and dogmatic sacramentarie, They never scratched these subjects? When I thundered that today's dogma crisis stems from a terrible moral crisis of clergy, because a moral crisis consequently generates a doctrinal crisis [see my previous article WHO], someone is probably ran for cover? My analyzes are written and published, surely I will do that in the future other, but omitting to practice, from now on, the road perhaps more effective: the irony, or if you prefer the so-called jack ass. Because some subjects, which they are insensitive to the truth of the Holy Catholic faith and morals in the same way that a surgeon is indifferent to human blood and scalpel cuts made on patients' meat, poorly tolerate being sfottuti; poorly tolerate that their malvezzi are turned into the subject of public mockery. Or to put it better with an example: If a tall one meter and sixty centimeters per hundred pounds of weight is believed to be a champion football ; if a girl one meter high and half poor on which are distributed ninety pounds of weight, He is so determined to get miniskirts and high heels because it is believed to be a supermodel, nothing worth getting them a deep psychological discourse aimed to recall the matter of objective fact, with related calls to the existential danger that entails for a man and for a woman the complete dissociation from reality, so that these people will step forward undeterred to feel more than ever: the first, a sample of football, the second one fotomodella. Otherwise, if one or the other, after showing in every way a determined refusal to face reality, They will instead be exposed to public ridicule, in one way or another they will be forced to understand. And all those who were convinced that even a woman can eighty, as a woman, participate in the contest Miss Italy, or that a ninety man suffering from rheumatoid arthritis can, for when man, participate in a race with show jumping, no longer believe in such "potential" tall tales, because the lack of logic will be clear and brought to light along with all its intrinsic element ridiculous.

.

During my happy and painful years of priestly ministry sacred I have repeatedly and unnecessarily called back - and God knows how sincere affection -, many brother priests to shy away sloppiness, to be treated in appearance and dignified in dress, because the outward appearance is not mere formality, but it reveals the inner aspect, the moral and spiritual sense of the person. A little’ such as facial expressions and eyes, which if properly observed reveal to the soul of the person. Or perhaps we forget that our soul is enclosed in a body that contains it and at the same time reveals it for what it really is?

.

… how we were: who has known priests in the youth of this genre, it always brings alive the memory and especially the model

Repeatedly, entering the summer in my cassock in some parish church, I happened to find myself before a brother with bermuda flowers, the t-shirt colorful flip flops and sandals; and at this sight I felt the spear of Longinus on the side of Christ. So I have not failed to take from this brother, explaining face to face how painful it was for me that spear. Faced with similar scenes and events, in practice it happened that the brother has variously derided me, combining its sloppiness and its lack of priestly decorum classic joke mocking: "Ah, I understand! You are one of those who has not heard about that in the Church there was a council '. At that point I said - wrongly -, that in truth, in the Church, of councils there were a total of twenty-one, and that from the fourth Lateran Council celebrated in 1215 until the four decades following the Second Vatican Council held between 1962 and the 1965, the Church and its Popes have in all ways emphasized the mandatory use apparel cassock, Recalling that the role of the priest's cassock and that in case of need, not common practice, It can be used clergyman. In vain I lost time to explain to many of these subjects the deeply spiritual and mystical element of the ecclesiastical, its being a sign of sobriety and moral detachment from the world, but especially testimony and necessary element of recognizability of the Priest. And while I was talking to the passion of faith and deep love I have for the Church of Christ and his ministers, they looked at me as you look at a poor demented, if anything, saying the end, as they say the crazy not to contradict them in vain ... "Okay ... okay, you are right!». All this with the tone of someone who agrees to a mentally ill that you have just broke my balls with his talk but you, person over the sanity, for this reason you do not want to irritate.

.

On this last line was written my sentence by clerics in shorts, Colorful shirt and flip flops sandals, because a priest can not dare, let alone write exegesis regarding the various breaking their priestly balls. And these clerical, be clear, are the modern whitewashed tombs "in full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness" [8], ready at any time, yesterday as today, to be vulgar to say that they were not. Vulgar, as well as aggressive in the language, it was Jesus Christ with some of his insulting expressions, enough to see each other again saddled with even the title of blasphemer. So vulgar is not a theologian steeped modernist heresy of the worst as Andrea Grillo, you can mock the Venerable Pope Benedict XVI and with him the holy man of God Cardinal Robert Sarah, after having already taken to teasing the Cardinal Carlo Caffarra and Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller. Vulgar is therefore not him, but I am if I dare say that these heretics in power, which on one side stick with arrogance the few good cardinal that there remain, and at the same time they remain in the chair in the pontifical universities to teach sacramental theology, I create such a light-balls that if they should put me into the water at the port of Ostia Antica would arrive in fifteen minutes in the port of Naples, where I was greeted with great fanfare by Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe, that would declare that my journey by sea carried out in record time for turning the balls as turbine propellers, a greater miracle of San Gennaro miracle [Andrea Grillo to see the last article of Giovanni Cavalcoli, WHO].

.

… how we were: City of Avezzano Abruzzo. A parish priest celebrates Mass in the open space of the church reduced to rubble after the bombings during World War II.

So I began to adopt another system, doing irritate many priests, several of which, as virgins vilified or as adolescents taken by the upheavals of the first menstruation, classes are by their bishops squawking like chickens referring excited that I would be vulgar and I dare even say bad words. Because, as I said earlier, the vernacular is me, guilty of calling great piece of shit a priest in slippers and shorts chatted inside the parish church with the faithful with their backs toward the Tabernacle. Vulgar, be clear, It is not this priest with his back to the tabernacle in slippers and short trousers that makes living in the presbytery, but I who called with a title that the poor did not deserve. And several of these poor people found themselves repeatedly in the face of a bishop, despite being one of the architects of the worst post-conciliar drifts, Bishops in its role has been forced, once seised to issue final judgment of condemnation toward me, not to process the request and to respond to the priest:

.

"Surely, the concentration of colorful language Tuscan-Roman is what it is! But, if he has mocked you because he found you in the parish church to speak to the faithful with their backs toward the Tabernacle, in shorts and slippers at the foot, a point at the bottom does not have them. Of course, as you say, a priest must not turn to another priest calling great piece of shit. But remember: that language as a longshoreman he used it because I found in the parish church in that state, if he had been kneeling with his breviary in his hand before the tabernacle, I doubt I would have called you great piece of shit, perhaps he would be kneeling to pray with you ".

.

The next day I will get a phone call from the bishop: I barely have time to respond "ready?»That he attacks me with exact words now mean as they are integrally:

.

"Senti un po ', great dickhead, how dare you, yesterday, to give the great piece of shit to a priest? Do you realize how much you asshole and vulgar? there, I called you for the joy of sending to hell I personally, and to tell you I have to be ashamed of your bad language, rather: thanks God if you do not suspend peep !».

.

After I sipped all that claptrap, I ask:

.

"Excellence, I understand all that he said, or I missed some passage between an aspiration and other?».

.

A quel point, the bishop, he laughs and says,:

.

"To be honest, I called you to tell you that you are on the side, But as long as you tell him around, because they see, the sloppiness of these priests I Have filled balls. However, if I dare to tell them anything, if they fail to devour then you just get me the hell. So you were right to tell him what he deserved, but unfortunately I can not tell you. He said that now to go see to do 'n ass, because I have to do, then I salute you, very great face of shit !».

.

… how we were: a Roman presbyter on a bridge over the Tiber. We are quite sure that young people, and threatens, They do not want them in this way?

I've never told anyone this pleasant conversation now a retired bishop, and now that I did I kept myself from also making a vague reference to people and places. From this vulgar subject I am but I can add another example, always linked to this bishop and what was at the time his diocese. Once he entered the dining room Episcopate, where a young priest of thirty, sitting with his legs on a chair, He was watching television. The Bishop will appeal to a young priest to information that remains sbracato the chair legs apart; and in that pose answers to the bishop who he is rather standing before him. After Bishop was left, I took the poor peasant, who also it had more than ten years of training in Blessed seminar, between minor and major seminar seminar, telling him amiably that when it enters the bishop remains seated, moreover legs apart, but we get up to his feet, He mentions the bowed his head and listen to what he says, responding to what he asks. Well, the first all hell broke loose against me for that totally private call, but he reportedly offended by the poor peasant, It was the vicar general everlastingly of that diocese, this indicated because it covers its role by three bishops who have succeeded in almost two decades at that venue (!?). But, like repeat, I am a vulgar priest. And because they are vulgar necessary I dare say even bad words, But always I kneel to kiss the hand especially to the worst bishops of this world, in the figures of which I shall never cease to see and venerate the mystery of Christ and the mystery of the Church. And if my father came out of the grave and suddenly I saw the front next to the bishop, First I would make tribute to Bishop, Then my father saluterei. But I, as they say certain priests trendy provincial when not know where to stick … "He can not understand, because he has not made the seminar, why he lives in a Church that has never existed ". Affirmation before which at the time I said: … Yes, blessing the grace of God I did not do Blessed seminar ! Also because the good Christian education and social family received from my parents and then cultivated by the santi vescovi and priests who later formed me to the priesthood, It would never be in any way even extirpated from most of satanic holy seminars of this world; from those many seminars where, also recently, They were discovered in the computer memories thousands and thousands of porn pics and gay porn movie. And to that end, please seek guidance to the Congregation for the Clergy and its efficient Prefect, Cardinal Beniamino Stella, canonically responsible for these seminars that nobody has yet decided to clean up, primarily by virtue of bad trainers that several of them have always relied. And if in these lines had given false and undocumented, so slanderous, that then the Prefect Eminence proceed with the due denials and related canonical penalties against me … I doubt - unfortunately! —, He raised a single sigh of what I said, if we consider that the cases with which the Holy See must struggle are more or less these … [open the attachment, WHO].

.

The thing that should worry today many bishops fugitives and omissions, is that the practice, These immense shame of the sacred priestly order, when they come to the pulpit to make the homily on the Gospel, repeated continuously: "As said Pope Francis ... as said Pope Francis ...". Taking the Holy Father not only of marginal discourses, or more or less happy beats or more or less appropriate, but above all, taking speeches dubious phrases drawn from interviews or reported by journalists, often far from Catholics and especially at all versed in our fundamental truths of faith. And I say that it should disturb the bishops because these same priests, Years ago, going up on the same pulpits, They are always very careful not to say: "As he wrote and said the Supreme Pontiff Giovanni Paolo II ... as he wrote and said the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI ...". E, mind you, not what these two Popes claimed Augusti in their talk of this and that the arm, to which both were not quite accustomed, but what they have written and said in important encyclicals and as many important acts of their supreme magisterium. For years, between the sacristies, the canonical and church halls, we heard and how, these priests changed today in large Phrasers of statements made entirely marginal and irrelevant by Pope Francis I, to quote the predecessors of the reigning Pontiff, but they cited them to say in a tone more or less rabid things like that:

.

"The" Polish "has made his new shot on family and sexual morality. But it is haunted! Have not you realize that the world has changed and that we need to meet the new needs of the people?».

.

And in their logic, they are right, because the theological principle that they now apply - the school of Cardinal Walter Kasper and the retinue of his - is in practice the following: “fottete, fottete so that God forgives all ".

.

Or:

.

"The" German Shepherd "made a pre-Tridentine speech on the" uniqueness of the Catholic Church ". What a shame! In one fell swoop has deleted Vatican Council II and ecumenism us back to the times when, the "old" Church, He claimed a monopoly of truth and salvation ".

.

… how we were: we are sure that young people, and threatens, They do not want them in this way?

And in their logic, Also they are right, because when we recite the profession of faith "I think the Church one, santa, catholic and apostolic ", this is not a fundamental truth and absolute, but only a saying that dates back to the times in which we were the sole agents obtuse. Indeed, Christ has not established on earth only one Church entrusted to Peter, but gave rise to a multiplicity of churches, including among many that the Catholic Church is waiting for the miracle required by practices established canonical order to proceed to the beatification of the Martin Lutero, unless the Cardinal Kasper does not intervene with a scholarly theological debate to argue that the real miracle of this heresiarch was his so-called "reform”, which has ... "anticipated and inspired the Second Vatican Council". He explains between the lines the Shepherd Waldensian Paolo Ricca directly from the columns of galantino official organ of the Italian Bishops' Conference, Future [cf. WHO], stating, by virtue of its subjective and wrong idea of ​​Vatican II, that with it he would "fall on charges of heresy 'within the Lutherans (!?). Well, I take this opportunity to inform the Reverend Pastor, He invited for years to teach courses in several of our pontifical universities, from Protestant St. Anselm Pontifical University, than for us, Lutheranism, It is always a dangerous heresy and Luther, pace of personal Congregation for the Causes of Saints established the his motu Cardinal Kasper, nor is it a simple and ordinary heretic, but it is a heretic. Besides the fact that, Lutheran doctrines, including teaching and transmitting the Reverend Pastor, They were yesterday and perhaps worse still a dangerous now concentrate of the worst heresies and deviations from the Apostolic Faith. If we consider that the original core Protestantism are in time multiplied heresies heresy, in this way we can reach the new heresies of third and fourth generation: Mormons Pentecostals. Not to mention the additional streams, for example, the Witnesses, that I am a prime example of a heresy heresy a heresy that arises always upstream from Protestantism, certainly not by a split from the Catholic nucleus or the nucleus of Orthodox Christians.

.

Now you understand well the true sense apparel with which I began this speech; but perhaps, people of faith and intelligent people, those with the grace of God Faith and Reason, have also realized that what really raunchy, and at the same time those who are my games rhetorical impact, structured both on the hyperbole is on what the Greeks called τόπος.

.

… an image of Saint Giovanni Bosco during the confessions of young people

The apparel loss which for years complaining unnecessarily, It is not the sale of the old cassock, but decided apparel inner rejection, of which the outer is only visible sign. In this paper, Seasoned with the rhetoric of science outlets ass e dizziness balls, I have joked, despite having given occasion to various heretics who demand not understand, to be able to stick to the fact that the undersigned pretaccio - that I boast of being -, says even swear words. Well yes, I say bad words more or less like saying the Word of God made man the Scribes and the Pharisees, just enough that certain exegetes of new theology the whole mercies and emotional little hearts irrational throbbing, They understood the severe extent and also very offensive to certain of its invective [9]. Ma, as known, Yesterday Pharisees and Sadducees, Today heretics and modernists flirting both with "Dear brothers Masons' [see WHO], are ready more than ever to avoid the scandalized midge the word colorful then swallow in one gulp the camel the terrible heresy [10]. Because the logic of clerical hypocrites of yesterday and today remains the same: deeply vulgar, is not that the Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi apron newspaper of Confindustria The sun 24 Ore directs a love letter to "Dear brothers Masons', Vulgar is me, that before a conceited Cardinal throwing the Holy Bride of Christ on the sidewalk like a whore by two lire, I could even react blurting: now stop, This "blind driving" [11] such is the Ravasi, we really broke my balls, at least to us who, thank God, we've got them!

.

Therefore, hyperbolic outlets ass Besides, I conclude by recalling that the dress, far from being a black rag that might in itself and by itself leave things as they are, It has a deep philosophical meaning, theological and mystical. The dress comes from the Latin word attitude, and is nothing but a translation of the greek term ἕξις [hexis]. In his deep philosophical meaning, dress means habit, and is a wholly erect habit on character [from greek ἔθος]; that new permanent and eternal character that we have marked us forever through the grace of the Sacrament of Holy Orders.

.

The dress is therefore a way of being [in greek ουτός ἐkείν] which manifests being and above all behave in a precise way, conform to what was and what is preached doctrinally and morally.

.

For Aristotle the dress It is "something similar to nature" [12], because through the practice of precise behavior it leads to highlight in us, through the natural characteristics that we possess in power, the changing characteristics in their clothes and constant, almost in a "second nature", that is an acquired nature [13], in our case through the sacramental grace that makes us priests forever after the order of Melchizedek [14].

.

… how we were: a group of priests

Think about it well: who is it, that between the late sixties and early eighties, on false pretexts modernity, Of abatement of distances and of divisions, but mostly based on the pretext of being and of being closer to the young, It destroyed the very concept, robe of the priest? But there is much worse: suffice to say that those who were so eager to strip the priests, They were the leaders of the radical left and the Masons. The Masons themselves that, in cahoots with the modernists, They planned in early twentieth century who had come to give Holy Communion to the faithful standing and holding. We ask: from what was dictated this interest, if not by a desire to attack the Church to the heart through the de-sanctification of the Holy Eucharist changed into a cross between a metaphor and a Social feast of joy ? But it is not appropriate to open a speech in the speech, therefore refer you to the Most Holy Eucharist when he expressed in his keynote Cardinal Robert Sarah [see articles, WHO] …

.

This article was inspired, as explained at the beginning, the letter addressed to me by a young Catholic Modena. Some people think that he is the only? I wrote days ago Melania, young Neapolitan mom 27 year old:

.

"Take away the guitars and bongos churches, put in line charismatics swinging and faint and Neocatechumenals dancing around the altars, filled the aisles with organ sounds and spread the classical liturgical songs, put back in the knee assemblies during Mass, place it at the center of the altar Christ crucified instead of the priest show-man, returned to speak in homilies of the mysteries of faith instead of social and ecological problems, because your mission is the salvation of souls, not the salvation of the animal species in danger of extinction. And you will see how quickly you return to have churches full of young '.

.

… to wear a cassock we were in a few: Don Matteo, but is an actor in a television series, along with a few other priests, who are not actors but real priests. Has anyone ever wondered why, filmmakers, in their fiction, priests that depict positive figures or even funny, They present them to the public more and rigor everyone with “old woman” speaker?

Is not it, but false, that young Catholics craved their priests in canvas trousers and sneakers; as it is not true that no child has ever longed to see his father move about the house among the guests dressed in a pair of underpants falling. It was the devastating psychologists e sociologists Seventies, grown Pane&Marx, who launched the pretext of liberation fashionable costumes and body, for the overthrow of the "bourgeois ideology", under which the parents had to flaunt nudity with their children and vice versa; they were to indicate how good and educational thing going together in the bathtub; they were to launch the "myth" of the "friend-accomplice Mom" ​​and "papà amicone '. It is however, Unfortunately, nobody takes care to go and see what were the subsequent outcomes of many of my peers in the mid seventies composed poignant in elementary schools supply telling her father and mother were their best friends. No one takes care to go and see what were the subsequent results of many of my peers teenagers, at the end of the seventies went clubbing together with their Moms-vamp in appearance of their friends and accomplices, that instead of making the mothers were the bricks, in all directions, reliable, and secure it with birth control pills and a box of condoms placed in a backpack of their small little dog in bloom, everything was in place, imparted sex education and sexual liberation perfectly processed …

.

… the author of this article with always wearing his “old rag anachronistic“

The same principle, iNo different but similar way, It has been applied as it is to the priests, the only difference being that they did not have to do with the father and mother, "my best friends", but with seminary rectors and bishops in the backpacks of these small heretics in bloom they put other kinds of birth control pills and boxes of condoms, Finally, to make totally barren seed of Christ, forget, except perhaps unaware, that God's grace perfects nature there, but it does not replace, and can not make the nature of the priest that there has never been and that therefore there can never be [15], even if the non-priest in soul and body was made years and years of Blessed seminar.

.

… the author of this article: "in summer, in areas where it is really hot, has always existed for priests an alternative to black robe, and the white robe, but certainly not the shorts on the presbytery of the church …»

I reiterate that these priests trendy, in some respects almost irredeemable and sunk in their airtight every action of God's grace, They should not be taken seriously or reprimanded; because they reproach it is useless. These priests trendy They are only taken for a ride. Trust a pretaccio saying bad words and follow my advice: to the cousin priest trendy which comes before you with jeans tight low-rise pants and with the horse in the new models is suspended from above, rimproveratelo not to get thrown to the winds his mystical attitude, ridendovi because that will react in the face and giving you the anachronistic. Or rather telling: "... but you do not know, that in the Church there was a council '? Then you close combat with this way: "Reverend, but what I wear trial was put? With the shooting ass undone by a widow who finds, this pant gives not just; but especially, for the lack of merchandise that she has between her legs, these pants with narrow suspension in high horse, It does not show what is, But just what is lacking in her dramatically, because grace perfects nature there, but it enhances certain that there is no. And she, Rev., for lack of grace He does not own the balls. there, in his place, since she does not have a physical swimmer, I would cover with a Roman toga ". And if anything,, this speech, or a different but similar speech, do not let it do by a man or men, but worse: let it do to women. There is not the worst thing for a man, more or less true, or even one man by birth and, to be told by women: «You have just the balls !»

.

Then these subjects s'they will piss off quite a lot of, because you put them in ridiculous. And maybe, in extremis, although it is not said, learn anything, thanks to a healthy and very charitable jack ass. Because today, before certain priests, on the one hand, we just have to cry, on the other hand, we just have to take the piss, because it raised the issue in these terms, the jack ass It will be the extreme act, most perfect and loving Christian charity, He says one sees it pretaccio scurrilous, He remains intimately too worried about not swallow camel heresy and widespread immorality, to heal the harmless midge a healthy swearword.

.

the Island of Patmos, 12 June 2017

.

.

PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN 2017: «A CHURCH FOR EMPTY EMPTY »

.

Venerable Brother Bishops and Priests,

definitely want a "empty church for empty»? Then seguitate to invite to speak in your diocese and your priests these churches social-ecologists, everyone justice-social e sociologisms the thirty-year and experienced fallimentarità, in glory accompanied by their retinue of hippies of the left radical chic. Without this, you will see how the churches will be emptied definitely young, to finally be "empty for empty ', since almost no one now thinks the ecology of souls to be redeemed and to be saved from pollution of sin, It is the most urgent and politically correct to fight pollution from air conditioners.

Amen!

.

__________________

NOTE

[1] The text reads fee: « If someone says, sacrosanto the sacrament of the Eucharist, the substance of bread and wine as the body and blood of Christ, and denieth that wonderful and singular conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the body and of the whole substance of the wine into the blood,, unchanged only the bread and wine;, How to change the Catholic Church most aptly calls Transubstantiation ». Trad. "As, then, Christ, our redeemer, He said that it was truly his body that gave under the species of bread (216), so it was always persuasive, in the church of God, – and now declares again this sacred council – that by the consecration of the bread and wine effects the change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ, our lord, and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This transformation, so, appropriately and right it is called the holy Catholic Church transubstantiation " [Council of Trent, Sex. XIII, 15 October 1551, cap. IX transustanziazione].

[2] CF. synoptic Gospels: Mt 26, 20-20; MC 14, 17-26; LC 22, 14-39. The Gospel of St. John: 13, 1-20.

[3] CF. LC 22, 39-46.

[4] CF. Mt 26, 36-46; MC 14, 32-42; LC 22, 39-46; GV 18,1.

[5] CF. Mt 26, 47-56.

[6] CF. GV 19, 1-16.

[7] CF. Council of Nicaea (325), Council of Constantinople (381), Council of Ephesus (431), Concilio of Chalcedon (451), Second Council of Costantinopoli (553), Third Council of Constantinople (680-681), Second Council of Nicaea (787).

[8] CF. Mt 23, 27.

[9] CF. Mt 23, 1-39.

[10] CF. Mt 23, 24.

[11] CF. supra.

[12] Aristotle, in Rhetoric I 11, 1370° 7-8

[13] Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics (II) 1, 1103a 20 – 1103b 25

[14] CF. EB 7,17.

[15] «Grace does not destroy nature, but finish, The natural system must be subordinated faith, As the natural bent swirling ministers to charity», San Tommaso Aquino: S. Th. I, q.1 a 8, ad 2. Trad. Grace does not replace nature that there is no, but perfects nature which subsists …

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

― We help the Holy Father with childlike clarity ―

NOTE ABOUT SOME clarifying AMBIGUOUS WORDS OF THE HOLY FATHER: MAN OF GOD NEED, BUT GOD HAS NO NEED OF MAN

.

We simply can not even suspect that the Holy Father has heard such things, although his way of expressing himself was not the happiest, and would have required, in our opinion, at least some clarification. Moreover, the Holy Father would not hurt to warn against the risk of an interpretation which leads to pantheism and to atheism, very widespread today.

.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli o.p. – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

If you were hungry, you would not say it [Shall 50,12]

Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? [Gb 38,4]

To whom did he consult, because I instruct? [Is 40,14]

.

.

Hearing of 7 June 2017 – to open the video click on the image

In the general audience of 7 June, the Holy Father pronounced the following words:

.

«[…] the gospel of Jesus Christ reveals to us that God can not be without us: He will never be a God "no man"; it is he who can not stay without us, and this is a great mystery! God can not be God without man: great mystery is this! And this certainty is the source of our hope, that we kept in all invocations Our father» [Official text WHO].

.

These words You could at first make us to mind the famous thesis of Hegel: "God without the world is not God". If it really was, it would be very serious statement, fraught with disastrous consequences on the theological and on the moral level, since it is clear that God is completely sufficient in Himself and can well exist without man. And indeed, They, there was already perfect, Blessed and completely alone and the Self, from eternity, before He created the world. He is supreme perfection, infinite and absolute. The Nothing can be added. Nothing Short of. The Nothing you can donate. What The gifts we give are the ones who gave us. Since nothing its essence can be completed, even the most sublime creatures. God is Absolutely Necessary, while the man is contingent creature. He is all for Himself; the creatures are nothing in themselves and, all that the creature is, it is from God.

.

He certainly is Love by essence, He gave his Son for our salvation, but always it remains that could have very well not to exercise this love to the world, Why, If she wanted to, It might not create it.

.

God created the world out of pure love and an act of perfectly free advice - utmost freedom ―, as the Vatican Council says, it created for pure and selfless love, without being absolutely necessitated by the structure of its essence, as well as instead they operate physical agents subhuman.

.

To think that God, to exist, needs the active contribution or ideal man, Why he can't do it alone, He leads man to believe they can be essential to God and to shape the essence of God, that God becomes an idol, "Work of human hands' [Shall 135, 15], product of human thought, come in idealism. Hence the temptation of believing man or a god to identify with God or take God. Or to put it in other words: if man were not there, God would not.

.

In the literature of spirituality of Ashkenazi Jews, some rabbanim [the LORD] They tell us that "God had such a need to be loved and honored, that at some point he decided to create man in his own image and likeness, so that man would love and honor him". It deals with, naturally, an expression of the whole poetic. Although as we know, in theology, and especially in the dogmatic theology, the poetic licenses, however beautiful, and sometimes also effective to make the idea, They may be non-hazardous infrequently, if not explained, but most if not explained well and as such, ie as poetic licenses.

.

Now, we can not even suspect that the Holy Father has heard such things, although his way of expressing himself was not the happiest, and would have required, in our opinion, at least some clarification. Moreover, the Holy Father, it would not hurt to warn against the risk of an interpretation which leads to pantheism and to atheism, Today both very popular.

.

The Holy Father's words They can then be understood in a mystical-affective-operational sense and also as referring to the mystery, in three ways:

.

first, in a mystical-affective sense: It is like the language of lovers, as when the lover says to his beloved "without you I can not stand '. Or as when one says all'altra or viceversa: "I adore you". Word that makes the idea of ​​what it means to expression of deep emotional level, but in theological language has a meaning and above all a "application" very precise, because only God can be the object of adoration, unless otherwise run the serious risk of falling in idolatry.

.

Second, in Christ God has in some way to be in need of man. It shows Christ who asks for a drink to the Samaritan [cf. GV 4, 1-26], and even more it shows its request for cooperation all’opera of salvation, although then our free response is a gift of his mercy.

.

Third, the words of the Holy Father must be understood as referring to the mystery of the Incarnation: God has united Himself in Christ forever to man, and nothing will ever separate this union. The union therefore of God with man in Christ, however, is a necessity in fact, not in law. If the concepissimo as a fusion of the two human and divine natures, we would fall in heresy Christological contrary to the dogma of the distinction of the two natures of the Council of Chalcedon.

.

This awareness, the Holy Father tells us, God in Christ it is forever linked to man, It is certain for us the source of great confidence in the Father, consolation and hope, which, however, must not exceed in a false certainty to save in each case and without conditions, canceling a holy fear of God, because it always remains in each of us the responsibility to pay or not to so much love, Why, if there sottraessimo with sin, the work of redemption would be of no use to us. Recall the famous words of St. Augustine: « He who created you without you, he doesn't save you without you ».

.

it gives The Island of Patmos, 8 June 2017

.

.

.

__________________________________________

Dear Readers,

.

announced after the brackets we will inform the 19 May [see note WHO], we went back to work on The Island of Patmos. During their stay at the Convent of Padre Giovanni Cavalcoli we recorded several video lessons currently being assembled, they will soon be published for all of you on our channel.

.

Fathers de The Island of Patmos at work during the video shooting carried out in the San Domenico Convent in Varazze (Savona)

.

.

.

.

.

FATHERS DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS THESE DAYS I AM TOGETHER WORKING FOR YOU. We resume PUBLICATIONS AT THE BEGINNING JUNE.

.

.

Author
George A.. Faccio Lince

.

.

Dear Readers,

Convent of San Domenico of Varazze (Savona)

Father Ariel S. Levi Gualdo reach tomorrow with me the Father Giovanni Cavalcoli in her convent of Varazze, a beautiful resort located at the Cinque Terre in Liguria.

.

The Fathers of L'Island of Patmos, as well as talk about various publishing projects, a few days will work together for our Readers. They will in fact made of HD video footage of different theological lessons of Father Giovanni Cavalcoli, then we publish on Canal The Island of Patmos.

.

The Father Ariel and I then we will be traveling to different parts of Italy over the next ten days, Therefore, we caution you that we will take the publications at the beginning of June.

.

A prayer insured for all of our readers to the Blessed Vergine Maria of the Rosary.

.

.

NOTE OF 21 MAGGIO

Dear readers,

as you can see, Fathers de The Island of Patmos, They are already at work for you …

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.