.

"VOICE OF ONE CRYING IN THE DESERT". THE LETTER OF CARDINAL JOSPEPH ZEN ZE-KIUN ON THE DELICATE CHINESE QUESTION AND THE BAD NEGOTIATIONS OF THE HOLY SEE

"Maybe I think that the Vatican is selling off the Catholic Church in China? Yup, decidedly, If they go in the direction that is obvious in all they have done in recent months and recent years'.

.

.

Author
Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun

we received the letter addressed by His Eminence Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun At the Media Friends which we reproduce below. In this letter, so quiet as saddened, Bishop emeritus of Hon Kong, whose voice should be heard by the Holy See in a spirit of prayerful worship - and this is for his age and for his knowledge of civil society and politics of the People's Republic of China -, the elder, lucid and vital Cardinal has decided to make public his conversation with the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, the day before his departure for the last apostolic trip to Chile and Peru. At the Supreme Pontiff the Cardinal expressed his great concern about how dangerous and not a little clumsy with which several dignitaries of the Holy See have treated and continue undeterred to deal with the delicate problem of the Chinese Catholic Church. Forever, The main dispute between the Communist government and the Holy See concerns the appointment of Bishops. The communist authorities inescapable fact claims the right to approve the appointment of Bishops, that that in clearer terms the same as saying: has it that the bishops are in every way government-appointed, thus controlling for them by both the clergy and the faithful. These problems do not arise today, because many years ago, during a visit to a priestly house Aventine, several priests and religious, I remember that Cardinal, about the delicate Chinese problem, He had to define the then Secretary of State, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, "a malicious incompetent '. At the time we were in March 2010, but things do not seem to have changed, apparently are quite deteriorated.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

Dear Friends of the Media,

His Eminence Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun, Bishop Emeritus of Hon Kong

of when Asia News It revealed some recent events of the Church in China, legitimate bishops that the "Holy See" would be asked to give the resignation to make way for "bishops" illegitimate and even excommunicated explicitly, different versions and interpretation of the facts are creating confusion among people [Ed. cf WHO]. Many, knowing of my recent trip to Rome, They asked me some questions.

.

In October last, when Mons. Peter Zhuang received its first communication from the Holy See and asked for my help [Ed. cf. WHO], I sent someone to take her letter to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, included with a copy for the Holy Father. I do not know if that included copy has never reached the Holy Father's Desk. Fortunately, Mons. Savio Hon Taifai was still in Rome and was able to meet the Pope for a farewell visit. In that occasion, He has made known to the Holy Father the two cases of Shantou and Mindong. The Holy Father was surprised and promised that he would study the case.

.

Because of the words that the Holy Father He had called in Mons. Savio She, new facts in December were even more shocking and surprising to me. When the elderly and afflicted Mons. Zhuang asked me to bring to the Holy Father his reply to the message he received from the "Vatican delegation" in Beijing, I could not say no. But what could I do to make sure that his letter reached the Holy Father, When I'm not even sure if my letters come to him? To make sure that our voice reaches the Holy Father, I immediately took the decision to go to Rome. I left Hong Kong on the night of 9 January, coming to Rome in the early morning of 10 January, just in time — well, really slightly late — to attend the Wednesday general audience. At the end of the hearing, We cardinals and bishops are allowed to kiss hand and I had the opportunity to put in the hands of the Holy Father the envelope, He was just saying that he was in Rome in order to bring the letter from Bishop to him. Zhuang, the hope was that he found time to read it [in the envelope there was the original letter of the bishop in China, my translation into Italian and a letter from me].

.

For obvious reasons, I hoped that my presence at the hearing was not noticed, but my late arrival had been noticed in the classroom. Anyway, Now everyone can see the entire sequence from the Vatican Television [by the way, The hearing was held in the Paul VI, not in St. Peter's Square and I was late to enter the hearing, but I have "waited in line, cold ", as some article reported incorrectly].

.

Smell, I met Father Bernardo Cervellera Of Asia News. We exchanged information, but I told him not to write anything. And he has agreed. Now that someone else has published the news, I can say that I agree and confirm. Yup, as far as I know, things have happened just as they are told in Asia News [the article of Asia News "He believes" that the bishop who headed the Vatican delegation to China was Mons. Claudio Maria Celli. I do not know how official role he was there, but it is almost certain it was him in Beijing].

.

At this crucial time and because of the confusion that reigns in the media, knowing the situation in a direct way in Shantou and in an indirect way to Mindong [Ed. cf. WHO], I feel compelled to share my knowledge of the facts, so that people sincerely concerned for the good of the Church can know the truth to which they are entitled. I am very conscious that doing what, I'm talking about things that are technically qualified as "confidential". But my conscience tells me that in this case, the "right to the truth" should overcome any "duty of confidentiality".

.

With this conviction, I am going to share with you the following.

.

In the afternoon of that day, the 10 January, I received a call from Santa Marta, where I was told that the Holy Father would have received in a private audience on Friday evening 12 January [although the Vatican bulletin shall inform the 14 January]. That was my last day of my 85 years of life, a great gift of Heaven! [Also note that it was the eve of the departure of the Holy Father for Chile and Peru, and then the Holy Father had to be very busy].

.

That evening, the conversation lasted about half an hour. I was pretty messy in my talk, but I think I achieved the purpose of making known to the Holy Father the concerns of its faithful children in China. The most important question I posed to the Holy Father [which he was also mentioned in the letter] It was if he had had time to "study the case" [as he promised in Mons. Savio She]. Despite the danger of being accused of breaking the confidentiality, I decided to tell you what His Holiness said: "Yup, I told them [his aides in the Holy See] not to create another instance Mindszenty!». I was there in the presence of the Holy Father, on behalf of my Chinese brothers in suffering. His words should be well understood as a consolation and encouragement more for them than for me.

.

This historical reference to Cardinal. Josef Mindszenty, one of the heroes of our faith, It is very significant and appropriate by the Holy Father. The Card. Josef Mindszenty was archbishop of Budapest, Cardinal Primate of Hungary under Communist persecution. He suffered much in prison for several years. During the short life of the revolution 1956 He was freed by insurgents and, before the Red Army destroyed the revolution, She took refuge at the American embassy. Under pressure from the government, the Holy See ordered him to leave the country and appointed a successor to taste the communist government.

.

With this revelation, I hope I have satisfied the legitimate "right to know" of the media and of my brothers in China. The important thing for us is to pray for the Holy Father, singing very appropriate traditional anthem we pray: «Let us pray for our Pope Francis, May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and make him blessed upon the earth, and he will not surrender him to the will of his enemies, in the».

.

Perhaps it is necessary some further explanation.

.

1. Please note that the problem is not the resignation of the legitimate bishops, but the request to make room for illegitimate and excommunicated. Although the law on retirement for reasons of age has never been applied in China, many seniors underground bishops have urged a successor, but they never received any response from the Holy See. Others, who already have a successor appointed, and perhaps even the note signed by the Holy Father, They were ordered not to proceed with the order for fear of offending the government [Ed. cf. WHO].

.

2. I especially talked about the two cases of Shantou and Mindong. No further information, in addition to the copy of a letter written by an outstanding Catholic woman, an academic retired, very versed in the affairs of the Church in China, in which she warns Archbishop. Celli from pushing to legitimize the "bishop" She Shiying in Sichuan.

.

3. I recognize to be a pessimist about the present situation of the Church in China, but my pessimism is based on my long experience of the Church in China. From the 1989 al 1996 I always spent six months a year teaching in various seminaries of the official Catholic communities. And I have direct experience of slavery and humiliation to which our brother bishops are subject. Based on the latest information, there is no reason to change this pessimistic view. The communist government is producing new and harsher regulations limiting the religious freedom. They are now putting in place the regulations that until now were only on paper: from the 1 February 2018, the rally to the mass of an underground community will not be tolerated.

.

4. Some say that all efforts to reach agreement [between China and the Holy See] They are to avoid an ecclesial schism. This is ridiculous! The schism is already there, in independent church. The popes have avoided using the word "schism" because they knew that many in official Catholic communities were not there voluntarily, but under heavy pressures. The proposed "unification" will force anyone [to enter] in that community. The Vatican then would give his blessing to a new and stronger schismatic church, washing the bad conscience of those who are already willing renegades and others who are ready to join them.

.

5. It is no good to try to find common ground to bridge the decades-long division between the Vatican and China? But there may be something "common" with a totalitarian regime? Or you surrender or accept the persecution, but remaining true to yourself. One can imagine an agreement between Saint Joseph and King Herod?

.

6. So maybe I think that the Vatican is selling off the Catholic Church in China? Yup, decidedly, If they go in the direction that is obvious in all they have done in recent months and recent years.

.

7. Some expert of the Catholic Church in China says it is not logical to assume a more harsh religious policy by Xi Jinping. Anyhow, Here we are not talking logic, but the obvious and crude reality.

.

8. Am I the greatest obstacle to the process of agreement between the Vatican and China? If this deal is bad, are more than happy to be a hindrance.

.

Hong Kong, 29 January 2018

.

+ Joseph Card. Zen Ze-Kiun

Bishop Emeritus of Hon Kong

.

Titles to the text by the Editorial

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

VI NARRO A SAD STORY: IF THE ARCHBISHOP LUIGI NEGRI IS A LAWYER combative CHURCH disarray, I AM A LAWYER combative MORE THAN IT WAS THE HOLY POPE PIUS V DURING THE BATTLE OF LEPANTO AGAINST MUSLIMS OTTOMANI

.

A son must honor, ed if necessary defend your father; and it must do regardless, He was also a lousy father. But if the father abusing the mother, damages the family and also damages other, the child has to say that his is a degenerate father, while continuing to honor him as the father who has given life. Archbishop Luigi Negri is a father of the paradigm degenerate, albeit now elevated to a standard of pure and true traditio by circles of Catholics who in truth are just the politicians brawler in disarray.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

What could be more painful for a child, of telling the story of his father degenerate? Whereas I have nothing to “vent”, much rather laugh bitterly, for an imperative of conscience targeted to my pastoral duty to protect the body of believers of Christ Today more and more lost, I decided to tell the story of this degenerate father, Archbishop Luigi Negri, so no one will mutate into a cardboard idol.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

in the picture: Ariel S. Levi Gualdo that welcomes S.It is in Rome. Mons. Luigi Negri in front of the Church of Santa Prisca on the Aventine the day of his priestly ordination

Moved by imperative of conscience based on the knowledge of the person, the facts and circumstances - not for regular accounts, I do not want to adjust, or for one Cold revenge which would constitute a desecration of my priesthood -, I feel obliged to argue decisively to those eroizzano certain impression figures rather than pastoral policy. Figures of which I was able to experience firsthand all the pastoral deficiencies, the lack of consistency and political transformation, offering them witness - perhaps entirely useless - to those who are exploiting these figures the, using as a pretext to stage purely doctrinal questions on controversial political battles love joy and fiery discussion that followed on remarried divorcees and their admission to the sacraments.

.

One of the main figures erected today in the heroic defense of the "little remains" - to say for certain - the "healthy and authentic Catholic doctrine" is S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri, Emeritus Archbishop of Ferrara [2013-2017] and previously Bishop of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro [2005-2012].

.

Begin then the so-called Name of the Father, first of all to clarify the somewhat confused moral idea of ​​the Archbishop, that not many years ago, before the sad red light feasts organized by award-divorced Silvio Berlusconi at his villa in Arcore - also known as flowers -, before which such a bastion of defense of the Catholic doctrine stated that "a Prime Minister is judged by his actions targeted government to protect the common good and not from his private life ' [cf. WHO]. Given that the proponent of what was for many years professor of philosophy at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, where for a period of time also held the philosophy of law courses, one wonders if you've ever browsed the Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle, to follow with dissertations on ethics and morals of St. Thomas Aquinas. Why such an assertion, and others that will follow now, you can even derive from the work Prince Niccolo Machiavelli.

.

... until the Holy See found itself caught to remove the 2012 from the small Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, After that His Excellency and especially Prudent had created yet another diplomatic incident with the Republic of San Marino, historically linked by excellent relations with the Holy See, Despite the secular footprint and part of the Masonic small, former State. But let's see what happened: the Archbishop did not find something better to do than compare the two heads of state to two "puppets dressed up to the nines", all during a luncheon. Unfortunately, a few meters from His Excellency and Prudent was the Minister of Foreign Affairs, S. AND. Antonella Mularoni, He mailed the next day all the papal honors to the Holy See with a vibrant note of protest against the Bishop of San Marino-Montefeltro who had publicly insulted the Heads of State, namely the integrity of the smallest, but also the world's oldest Republic. To extinguish the fire lit by his Excellency and Prudent was the man of faith and of S.It is diplomatic experience. Mons. Adriano Bernardini, one of the best apostolic nuncios in Italy and the Republic of San Marino from 1929 till today, followed by another great diplomat, it Cardinale Jean-Louis Tauran, that follows you entertained at breakfast with the Foreign Minister and later, in a very delicate way, He had to mention this fact with myself during our private meeting at the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. At that point the Holy See, gravely mistaken he adopted the principle of bankruptcy promoted to be removed, appointing him to 71 years old Archbishop of Ferrara; a bishopric that yes title of Archdiocese, but that is not a Metropolia, but a suffragan diocese of the underground headquarters of Bologna. Uselessly, on my part, just made official the promotion of S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri to the headquarters of Ferrara - a town I knew well, having lived several years at the time of my university studies carried out between Ferrara and Bologna -, firmly and lovable I informed: "First, she manifests the Ferrara love for their city and care for them, but especially, as Bishop, we should always keep away from the strictly political-administrative matters that do not touch in any way or in any way the conscience of Catholics, because doing so she will be loved by Catholics and deeply respected by non-believers ". You want to know what was the textual response of His Excellency and Prudentissima, with lots of final engagement of the phone? Exactly this: «Listen, dickhead, I certainly did not learn to do it yourself Bishop!». He came to Ferrara accompanied by a secretary inept, after being surrounded as his use of weak and limited only able to say yes, and to please him and blow him even more to face its choices completely wrong, he did not leave even spend one hundred days to create a real problem of public order. But let's see what happened: unmindful of the great love that Ferrara feed for their beautiful city and how it should be proud, Archbishop he found something better to do than compare the city center to a brothel [cf WHO, WHO, etc. ..], made to him by the move Night of university and youth who rattled in pubs and bars in the center. Let me be clear, in question are not any reasons for the Prelate, but the little pastoral and provocative to adopt him, in conclusion: stuff imperious fascist mayor of the City. All this without considering that Ferrara has been up to 1860 the Papal State, that historical and social level is equivalent to saying "until just yesterday". And in this City, sometimes, anticlericalism also presents itself in deep-seated forms and decided. And so, His Excellency Most Prudent and was first observed that most of the trading funds that housed the recriminati pubs and bars in the center acting as fabbrichette booze, They were owned by the diocesan curia, to which operators were paying hefty monthly rentals. And shortly after, youth groups, supreme teasing Archbishop, They organized before the Cathedral on bordello Night [cf. WHO]. And so, in the corridors of the Holy See, it was soon to assert: "We sent in a pastorally sensitive and delicate cities like Ferrara a bishop who shortly you a real public danger is revealed". In short, almost as if he knew, or as if they had not already done extensive experience of what this man is capable when he decides to stick his nose into matters that do not relate in any way a bishop: chores strictly political-administrative.

.

Sua Eccellenza Reverendissima out of the Prudentissima, being Milanese to this and as such, coming from a culture of great comedians - because as known all the most famous comedians in Italy are Milan, for example Roberto Benigni, Giorgio Panariello, Enrico Brignano, Maurizio Crozza and so to follow -, He did not fail even to demonstrate his innate comic vein. And so, finding himself before the severe case of a young man of thirty-three Ferrarese, He born to a mother who had been raped as a teenager by a priest, who asked behalf and justice of that painful fact, but above all wondering why this priest had never been punished and suspended from the exercise of the sacred ministry, responding with an official of the Este curia statement - this is not therefore a phrase extrapolated and manipulated by the usual and recriminati journalists communist or Masonic tendencies -, the poor man he was told by the Archbishop in the typical tone of the satirical culture ambrosiana with these exact words:

.

«[…] Since, however, it seems to be a matter of history and time, and who he is accused of being responsible for things that happened over thirty years ago, Archbishop is keen to point, in order to avoid unpleasant misunderstandings in the future, who had no part in the declaration of World War I and even the second and certainly it is not intended with the American president for the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan. On these things it is better to refer to other ' [cf. WHO].

.

Before this indecent text, you want to note that to be ironic about suffering and the human pain - particularly in the case of that of a wounded son, which it is always a very delicate and difficult to accommodate pain, treat and cure -, was a Bishop who has turned Italy far and wide to speak of the Social Doctrine of the Church and political values nonnegotiable family, ready to split hairs if there was to be discussed on a political condom, but ready to respond with mocking irony, however, to a young man who complained of being born to a teenage junior girl made pregnant by a priest. But it could be that the priest ingravidatore, in compliance with Catholic moral, He had been careful not to stain of shameful sin using a condom, thus making everything all right morally and canonical, or not?

.

Having said that the claim arises: I believe that such a bishop can be brought as a model of heroic courage and banner of defense of sound Catholic doctrine only by the revived Christian Democrats of The New Compass Daily [cf. WHO]. And if the defense of the deeds of the old award-divorced womanizer Silvio Berlusconi was not in itself sufficient, to this is added the prelate moves well reproach to those who declared himself outraged by the conduct of the Prime Minister, repeating that "the indignation is not a Christian sentiment" [cf. WHO, WHO]. And indeed, John the Baptist, who publicly rebuked in outraged tones Herod for his moral conduct of life, it was definitely not a Christian, nor could it as such nurturing Christian sentiments. Thus they did well to cut off his head for his indignation completely out of place, because good Herod had to be judged on the basis of his defense of common values, not for the fact that in private he went to bed with the wife of his brother, or had unhealthy attraction to his niece Salome - a kind of Ruby or Olgettina era [cf. WHO] ―, as it can be seen beyond the lines from the historic Gospel narratives.

.

If we were to take the Catholic morality of these kinds of figures as a model, then we should say that certain violations related to the sixth commandment, by those who today indicate some with fiery tones as concubines and adulterers, They are committed by them in their bedrooms or in related areas reserved. In essence: they commit sin in private, not in public. In short: do not go to consume mica embraces - these "dirty adulterous" - on the public square of the Church! Indeed it may be that in these so-called public law partner and adulterers are also defenders of so-called non-negotiable values. Just like at the time, to steal the Catholic vote, He defended them award-divorced Silvio Berlusconi, joyful organizer of private partying red light with girls of which could have been his grandfather, but he deserved in any case to be tried not for his private life but for his actions of government and for the defense of common values, Word of His Excellency Luigi Negri and Prudentissima.

.

Would not it be right that the poor adulterers towards which arise vehement the true Catholics defenders of true and authentic doctrine, they were also judged by their public life and their defense of common values, just like Silvio Berlusconi, not however for their lives and their private moral conduct? Also because otherwise we might go so far as to assume that His Excellency and Prudentissima, Proven poor philosophical education, unite just as little training in fundamental theology and in Catholic morality. And by the way is clear: I write these lines I have not fed and trained, regarding the scope of Catholic morality, the school of the worst lax born in the post-conciliar season, But the school of the late Cardinal Carlo Caffara, with whom I had long and fruitful relationships today so I miss. And if there's one thing I remember of this holy bishop, It is first and foremost the paternity, the pastoral and deep devotion which he always poured over his priests and the priests in general, he never left in a state of disarray and neglect to engage in quarrels and intrigues all policies and at all pastoral.

.

As for the heroism of His Excellency and Prudentissima, what escapes in good or bad faith to his laudatori and political exploiters is a fact that cannot be denied: his paternity spirit is comparable to that of a pickled artichoke. And here it is worth noting, who always presents him as one of the few heroic and courageous champions of the Church today in disarray, that when he was diocesan ordinary small Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, while he is spinning like a top in Italy between a journalist and the other, while he had time to come and go from Rome to travel to speak in Palazzo Montecitorio with Gianni Letta or Angelino Alfano and so to follow, in the space of one year and a half, especially in a small church that mattered at the time 51 secular priests, He lost three young priests, one of which had even an act of apostasy from the Catholic faith by switching to a Protestant sect. At another of the three, Diocesan manager - unbelievable, hear! - youth ministry, who instead insisted that it was the invalidity of his sacred ordination, because he said, at the time he was ordered did not feel ready, so, Always according to him, He claimed to have suffered psychological pressure while he was burdened with internal reserves, In response to His Excellency and Prudent said to continue to stay in the parish for another month and a half - then quietly to administer the sacraments (!?) ―, thus giving Bishop the time it takes to fix it. Now, I ask: a bishop who also knows and only the basic rudiments of canon law, to a priest who points his feet stating in a sure and decisive way that he has not been validly ordained a priest and who therefore declares his ordination invalid, Perhaps responding to this way, instead of immediately summon: as of this moment, you may not celebrate the Mass and not administer the sacraments as long as it has not been clarified? And this is easy to say that the defender no political Holy Communion for divorced and remarried, plus show at times lacking in philosophical and theological preparation, proof of the facts seems to be incomplete knowledge of the dogmatic and sacramental in its application of the Laws on the Canonical Discipline of the Sacraments.

.

If that's not enough, the amiable Bishop defender of non-negotiable political values, lost three young priests in one bang, he found better things to do, going a little later in audience by the then reigning Pope Benedict XVI, to get out from the meeting announcing in triumphal tones in all its many carers: "It was a frank and open conversation between bishop and bishop, and I could also take the opportunity to tell the Holy Father in that dire situation is the Diocese of Milan pouring now in total disarray [N.d.A. governed at the time by Dionigi Tettamanzi]». In practice he had dared to auto-run for office in Milan directly with the Roman Pontiff, heedless of not being able to govern a small diocese, until losing three priests in a short time while he was busy wandering between Marcello Pera, a Gianni Letta and an Angelino Alfano, in addition to dictate to journalists interviews in which he asked the questions and gave answers, like when you put in your mouth this title to effect his friend Camillo Langone so he spreads his umpteenth self-promotion to much bigger and more prestigious bishopric:

.

"The most Catholic of the few Italian Catholic bishops is abroad, in San Marino. "She lives in a postcard!"Said Benedict XVI last summer, during the visit in the diocese. "Yup, but it is a postcard that is never sent "replied Monsignor Luigi Negri" [cf. WHO].

.

Obviously, for "the most Catholic of the few Italian Catholic Bishops', it was necessary to think as soon as possible of a metropolitan archiepiscopal see which was also and strictly speaking the seat of cardinals. Or perhaps one can be so unconscious as to leave a bishop as a bridegroom to such a modest bride as the small Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro.? Never, we must give it as his second wife a great lady, because in some cases, desiring your neighbor's wife, abandoning their children and their families, It is not only desirable thing, but it is something entirely due, to the point that abandonment of the marital roof and divorce sometimes become completely legitimate and sacrosanct, but then go around to criticize the dangerous casuismo of the Jesuits.

.

Not to mention the games played to journalists by His Excellency and Prudentissima, that follow in all respects as the 'style I was misunderstood "to which he had to get used to the then Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, incidentally always to be judged for his actions of government and for the defense of common values, not for his private orgies. Unfortunately, the last to make spending was a few days ago the famous Vatican expert Andrea Tornielli, to which His Excellency and Prudent has released an interview for Vatican Insider [cf. WHO], only to declare a couple of days later The New Compass Daily not expressing those concepts. Easy chronological interpretation of the fact: after expressing those concepts - that Andrea Tornielli reported honestly, loyal and truthful -, The circulate the drummers laudatori He has perhaps shown some confusion way, so that, His Excellency and Prudentissima, He will answer them to sit tight, because "Sui divorced and remarried have not changed my opinion" [cf. WHO]. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who should ask me if I believe more in Andrea Tornielli or Luigi Negri, I would answer without hesitation: Andrea Tornielli. This is not only because Andrea Tornielli I know him well, but because the same Luigi Negri, This serious and honest journalist, Today ultra fifty, many of whom may not share or more positions, She knows him since he was barely fifteen, knowing as I do and maybe even more than I do what is honest. But unfortunately, the political and technical Berlusconi of His Excellency and this is Prudent, proven and established over time: when the’audience cala, shoot some bang, allows a few days so the news circles and controversy mounts, then saying denies being misunderstood, if anything, even fearing threats of lawsuits and various playfulness. By the way: the feared mega-lawsuit charged to the newspaper that reported the news of the interview of His Excellency and on Prudentissima’Eurostar, when it seems to have wished the reigning Pope to fly soon to the Creator [cf. WHO], where have you been? How many millions of euros in damages were awarded to him in the newspaper's conviction by the court for the serious damage to his public image through this defamation in the press? We'd like to know, rather through an article of information signed by Riccardo Cascioli, director de The New Compass Daily.

.

If therefore today we are in the dramatic situation in which we find ourselves, It is not the fault of the reigning Pontiff, to which pastoral choices and government I never spared openly harsh criticism, while stating, however,, as I wrote, Francesco I came last in a restaurant where even before he sat was attacked by management who presented the bill for all those who had had lunch and dinner handsomely before him [cf. WHO], after having given the Church for many years the most engaged in election campaigns instead of bishops in pastoral visits to parishes and in the care of their clergy. The current state of the Church is indeed guilty of those bad politiconi bishops which are now presented, by as many lay politicians, as defenders of the true Catholic faith. Are they, those responsible for the well-deserved election of a man like Jorge Mario Bergoglio, after that in 2013 we had reached a situation of unsustainability tied upstream to the weakness of government of the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI, which still has to be studied in the light of the terrible years of the post-conciliar, followed by the lack of a sense of authority that had completely crumbled under the pontificate of the Holy Father John Paul II, who also was a man of great authority, and finally to the almost total lack of government Venerable Pope Benedict XVI. In short: if history consists of facts and not by subjective moods, let's be careful in dealing with the actual and objective defects of the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, many of which are the result of gross errors made upstream by Blessed and Holy Pontiffs. E, said this, as already stated, I sometimes, I repeat that the Blessed and the Saints is not required perfection, but the heroic virtues, which are not prejudiced either by the lack of human defects or from mistakes, including also sometimes blunders or serious assessment committed in total good faith, or sometimes committed since betrayed and deceived.

.

It would therefore be appropriate for the lost and confused Catholics from today's ecclesial and ecclesiastical situation, were pointing to the most solid models is an example of both Christian virtue, because morality, much-vaunted and much pretense always some and penalty on people's skin, does not dwell in those political and ideological circles that behind pretexts of faith drunk at of the Latins and strict moral rectitude. If anything, before certain figures anything but heroic, the faithful should remember that holy reminder that warns us:

.

«[…] do not ye after their works, because they say and do. In fact, bind heavy burdens and impose them on the shoulders of the people, but they don't want to move them even with a finger " [Mt 23, 3-4].

.

That translated into other words, does this mean: the ancient Pharisees claimed to them so that "the indignation is not a Christian sentiment" and that Berlusconi does is judged by circolini red light of his private life, but by his public acts of government and "the defense of common values'.

.

Elevate to human models under certain characters is abhorrent, because they are those who still would cut ancòra head to John the Baptist, but what is worse is that the feeling would do with consciousness perfectly in place. Add to this another fact: if the reigning Pope prospettasse this retired archbishop a cardinal's hat, these, starting from the next day, dall'augurargli long way to go soon to the Creator - as it is said that His Excellency Revendissima and Prudent had to make jokingly talking on a Eurostar [cf. WHO, WHO] ―, It would say that a great Pontiff as Francis I had not had by the Holy Pope Gregory the Great, would you define love joy as clear and extraordinary document of the pontifical Magisterium of the entire history of the Church, but above all it would propose to the Holy See to request the building of Castel Sant’Angelo to be used by the Municipality of Rome in order to enclose all the ecclesiastics and theologians who showed even and only vague perplexity towards certain ambiguities of this document..

.

a collegiate press release S.It is. Mgr. Luigi Negri, Archbishop of Ferrara-Comacchio, signed with the Vicar General everlastingly the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro [to open the text click on this]

I did not mention a painful fact that I was the protagonist past and that to me is not a source of suffering but fun, as bitter, because at the bottom of this it is that eventually produce the ridiculous figures: the fun. So I only do it in the end, of pure title example, in case it was not clear ancòra the subject we are to tell the sad story. Before continuing, however, is necessary to clarify my status canon, premise that I received in Rome the sacred order of the diaconate, then he was ordained a priest in the Church of Santa Prisca on the Aventine for the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro from the hands of S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri. My training for the priesthood has unfolded entirely in Rome, then where I lived and where I work today. They are therefore a priest regularly "resident outside the diocese" with the authorization of the Bishop, I have my office of postulator of the Causes of Saints in Rome, I live in Rome, when I can I go to Sicily, awfull then for pastoral reasons mostly related to my ministry as a preacher and confessor in various parts of Italy …

.

… So that happened back in 25 May 2013 I wrote a very severe article in which he harshly criticized the then President of the Italian Bishops' Conference, Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, Metropolitan Archbishop of Genoa, who wanted to personally celebrate funeral porcini the heretic priest Andrea Gallo, despite having been able to prevent with all the best justifications, He is in these days in Rome for the plenary assembly of the Bishops of Italy, then delegating some other funeral for those that would have resolved fight. During the funeral, Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco was found to administer Holy Communion to Vladimiro Guadagno, aka Luxuria, who first showed women dressed to the Eucharistic table, then made even sacrilegious eulogy on the presbytery during the liturgical action, talking ambo from which it administers to believers of Christ God's Word. Before that my harsh criticism, His Excellency and Prudentissima, now politically committed to squirm around the Holy Communion for divorced and remarried, despite not having any more about me canonical jurisdiction, as now elected Archbishop of Ferrara, through a gross abuse canon and making use of fiery tones, He dreaded against me 'disciplinary decisions, and even canonical " [see text WHO], signing as Archbishop of Ferrara-Comacchio a senseless document against an elder not belonging to the Diocese of Ferrara, but he incardinated in that of San Marino-Montefeltro and as such solely dependent canonical jurisdiction of his Diocesan Ordinary, thank God today is lovable and gentle man of S.It is. Mons. Andrea Turazzi.

.

I then notice to today's supporters of this heroic Bishop elevated to a banner of defending the true Catholic tradition, which in this press, to deny my accusation addressed to Andrea Gallo, The petitioner maintains: "It is our firm conviction that the Church can coexist very different opinions». Read the text, because he wrote and signed this very, which is to say: Andrea Gallo, that at the end of the Mass waved the red Communist flag singing Bella Ciao [cf. WHO] and that he had several times accompanied the women to the clinic for an abortion [cf. WHO], it was not a shame of the Catholic priesthood as I had dared to define it, never! Because when the good Luigi Negri decides to tremble like a bunny in front of the powerful from whom he yearns for some sop, He is even able to affirm and sign that a subject like Andrea Gallo is just a simple "different opinion", declaring moved in such a statement also "firm conviction". And note: of the official text signed by him and sent out to the press it is written just like that, or maybe I'm not able to read and understand? No, I read and understand well, not wanting to understand are the drummers laudatori from The New Compass Daily, to follow with all the jungle and blog sites that the reigning Pontiff addressed criticism that respect for its ambiguity or for his unhappy pastoral choices, as I do, but they hate so sometimes very fierce, also inviting others to hatred. And so, i drummers laudatori, even before the evidence of the facts, for their ideological self-interest, for the sake of seeking political fight and to attack the reigning Pontiff, prefer just do not understand, so much they need to create themselves and then to present cardboard idols.

.

But above all I ask: if it is not legitimate to Communion for divorced and remarried, many of whom often animated by authentic and deep Christian sentiments, in which the title defender of the true faith and non-negotiable values, today elected champion vainer by the entire Catholic ultra right, He has publicly threatened - and I repeat: without having any canonical title -, a presbyter who instead declared himself upset by the sacrilegious Communion given to the trans Vladimiro Guadagno, not as trans, but as a promoter of homosexualism, dell'aborto, euthanasia and any other perverse aberration?

.

The book heretic Andrea Gallo displayed and sold in 2013 at the library of the Pontifical Lateran University and presented with a foreword heretic Vito Mancuso

Incidentally, at that informed me falsely accused stating: «S.E. Mons. Negri would like to clarify that he had intervened several times in recent months, in "camera caritatis" his gift Ariel, because it results in a different language of his speeches. On the contrary, recently it received responses dictated by attitudes of arrogance ". Unfortunately theand things are quite differently. Given the fact that 2011, nuanced even the Patriarch of Venice, good Luigi Negri was looking around doing the account of the various prominent Italian diocese about to be freed, every time I, somehow my article, I treated subjects far from insulting, but intended to annoy certain clerical “straw tails”, These were going to touch the Bishop in his most sensitive spot, into saying or understand that they were going supplies [the selection of candidates], for this or that archdiocese and, this priest harassing, He threatened to make it a few “image damage”. So that, intimandomi the first time he called me that I no longer publish articles - all while books heretic heretic and Andrea Gallo Vito Mancuso were exhibited and sold in the library of the Pontifical Lateran University, the total negligence of that bertoniano having less of S.It is. Mons. Enrico Dal Covolo, Its Rector -, sounding anything but arrogant answered: "Please, Your Excellency show me where I lie not telling the truth and where I lacked a doctrinal and theological level '. Textual came the reply: "No matter tell the truth, but knowing how to evaluate when to keep quiet and not say it. They are ongoing supplies for the new diocese and I can not hear me ask you so cryptic even as it comes to assign me to another diocese ". I replied: "Your Excellency agrees that if the Word of God made man had kept quiet, He would never died on the cross?». his reply: "You always have to throw a theological". I answer: "Excellence, but on what I have to throw it, Perhaps the gastronomic? I am a priest and a theologian, Mica a cook!" It's this one, to someone's opinion, it would be arrogance? In any case I remain also comforted by another fact: none of those within the church world know me - including the highest authorities of the Holy See -, would ever ready to believe that I have disrespected, not only to the Bishop, but also to the ordaining bishop, for more arrogantly. I do not believe nobody, knowing that I harbor for the Bishop sacred respect and who have always been industrious to instill this feeling branch also in all the priests who use me as a confessor and spiritual director. Unfortunately instead, His Excellency and Prudentissima, He has bestowed the sacred respect due to his episcopate, not to mention his particular Church and her children. Just as if the Word of God do not ever warned admonishing: "To whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " [LC 12, 48].

.

NShe Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, both the then Bishop Luigi Negri that the Vicar General everlastingly co-signer of that delusional text - and applies everlastingly because Vicar General by three bishops! ―, have over time very careful not to fear "those disciplinary decisions, and even canonical "against a priest who became the father of a delightful child and was never sanctioned, quite the opposite, before he was sent around the world at the expense of the Diocese, Finally ambushed by His Excellency and Prudent in another diocese. Similarly they were never feared similar action to that priest who was proven wrong in the public square by his mistress after the poor thing had discovered that he was a cockerel well with other women, feeling so betrayed by this unfaithful mate [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO]. I was never even taken several measures towards priests defectors, picked up from various parts of the world by the then Bishop of San Marino-Montefeltro S.It is. Mons. Paolo Rabbitti, often absent from the parishes and the diocesan territory for weeks or even months, several of which he has over time looted the parish coffers to the tune of travel and GRATUITIES made to their families of origin and so to follow ... With these and other reasons even worse for decency and Christian charity silent, I introduced myself with that statement in hand to the Apostolic Nunciature in Italy, the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura and the Congregation for Bishops.

.

At the Apostolic Signatura laughed and they answered me: "In your diocese, there is someone who knows the canon law?». It said that continued saying: "In this release you are not first given the canons that you would have violated, which makes this text legally null and even absurd, why not sign out of your legitimate diocesan ordinary, but signed in grave abuse to the canon by the bishop of another diocese and a priest who has no right and title to threaten sanctions and anything else at your expense ". I said I: "Ah, but this is not surprising, if we consider that this priest co-signer is the Vicar General everlastingly, the theological and canonical thickness of which is comparable to that of a sole!».

.

The Congregation for Bishops laughed instead more and even longer, and laughing was a High Priest who, receiving me in the absence of the Cardinal Prefect who in those days was outside Italy, mi said: "But who is it? Ah, you thought: Luigi Negri. But in this department it is famous! Thinks, when he was prefect, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, good Negri came and went pawing from this building saying they were two years that he was in the small diocese and that now he had done everything there was to do. Another time he said to the Cardinal Prefect: "I was given a diocese which is as big as a single parish of Milan" ". In short, It had only been two years now that his poor wife was standing too close. And so, the Apostolic Nuncio and the highest leaders of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura and of the Congregation for Bishops, They invited me to give up, although I have every reason to sue the case before the Court the two Ecclesiastical bad boys signatories of that collegiate press. Indeed, the three different church authorities surveyed answered me: "This rambling statement does not affect in any way you but qualifying and then disqualified in the worst way who signed it and then spread '. And still today, to my honor and to the utmost dishonor of those who signed and then disseminated it, anyone visiting the official website of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, entering the Vicar General of the page everlastingly, you do not find the canonical penalties mentioned at all paid to the father became a priest, or to the priest denounced by his mistress for infidelity, or those paid to priests who leave for weeks or months parishes to go around the world; none of this will find. But anyone can find the text of the statement written by those two bad boys in goliardie vein, Also still surviving in some media outlet [cf. WHO].

.

I honestly don't know, if the Vicar General everlastingly, with this collegiate press today maintained in glory in the diocese website on his personal page, he thought he was going to spite me, or to discredit my increasingly solid reputation as a pastor in the care of souls and theologian, because in actual fact he acted as the poor that to spite his wife took a pair of shears and then castrated. with me, indeed, It can not be fought on the basis of clerical and obtuse Montagnoli moods based on the "me is obnoxious ergo I make war"; He fights with me on the plane of moral, the pastoral level and theologically. And I'm an immoral priest, a bad pastor in the care of souls and a bad theologian, This is all to prove, with all due respect bad boys in goliardie vein.

.

As for the Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, on which years later I got to write words of profound affection [cf. WHO], anyone who wishes can ask His Eminence if his heart is estimated more - and especially if considered more reliable -, a subject very strict when necessary always to work face open like me, or His Excellency and Prudentissima. Just ask, because perhaps you will have a complete answer. Also because me, contrary to his Excellency and Prudentissima, though in the past I thought it appropriate to criticize severely Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco for the episode just been reported, I did it with manly dignity leonine, putting my face and my signature. Otherwise instead, His Excellency and Prudentissima, it would not happen to remember the more than a few jokes insolent season with phrase books from longshoreman, he made over the years around the lounges on Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco? Why not a few people - bishops "friends" included - that he has heard some irreverence in the private saloons, or even the corridors of the Paul VI during the meetings of the Italian Episcopal Conference, those of his jokes if Angelo Bagnasco always remember all, from first to last, and also very well.

.

This is in reality S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri, a wind vane that has spent its episcopate roaring with rabbits and playing rabbit with lions, to complain of an increasingly mediocre and banal [cf. WHO], and all the while he, the most dangerous and poor trivial, after having searched one by one with the lantern of Diogenes and then treacherously selected, if it is always placed around as collaborators, place turkey in any role of power usually it takes around him a golden eagle to help him and to assist him, and if necessary, that the recommendations and that the brakes in certain wrong choices. And how many times I have suffered in seeing how he was laughed at by members of the Italian Episcopal Conference, for overtly, naive and brash with whom, instead of taking care of their priests and the portion of the People of God entrusted to him, He spent and burned their valuable episcopate pawing to be assigned to some great bishopric, and it is naturally created Cardinal. man ever, in his childlike naivete, he managed to overcome his deep and personal trauma: the fact that his contemporary and companion in the ranks of Catholic Youth, then later become Communion and Liberation, also as he Luigi Giussani pupil, He had become the Patriarch of Venice, and Cardinal, but especially, afterwards, Archbishop of Milan. He was in fact some, after the appointment of Angelo Scola in Milan, that would be given to him "well-deserved" sweetener and was promoted as his replacement to the Patriarchal See of Venice. The elderly priests in particular, in what was his Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, Always remember that only failed to organize the festivities and to prepare the welcome speech to the Diocese and the settlement in Venice, so he had been convinced by those clerics who wickedly playing on some of his weaknesses, for years and years had fun teasing him to do so, giving hopes and expectations of pumping it. No coincidence that the priests, giving in those moments for granted his imminent departure, He repeated he could do for the moment plans for the future.

.

They are also aware that S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri It is ill with a disease today quite widespread among Ecclesiasts, which is called querelite, but I doubt that quereli me for telling the plain truth, because no member of the Italian Episcopal Conference, especially those that have well-known, you would never against a faithful man, honest and selfless like myself, to defend the indefensible, ie a person like him, that mystery of grace was still, in the fullness of his apostolic priesthood, a vehicle, sometimes even very privileged, of the Holy Spirit. I am a witness I, I was ordained a priest by this degenerate father, which one day, while it was the year 2010, I said:

.

"Your Excellency has taught me more with their defects that by their own virtues. Thanks to you I have indeed acquired a holy lesson that will remain with me throughout my priestly life: I realized that if the devil can take ambition and lust for power and career, He will make us all he wants ".

.

a document of 2010

They He did not catch, or perhaps did not grasp these my words. However, shortly afterwards he signed and handed me the letter in which he certified that he had conferred on me the ministry of exorcist for the canonical uses permitted. [click to open the document WHO]

.

I have deeply loved Luigi Negri, to whom I have deep love today. Receiving him in Rome before ordination to the diaconate and then the priestly consecration, exchanging with the Bishop of the liturgical sign of peace whispered in his ear in both times: "You will not ever regret it!». And the proof of facts I believe to be the best priest he consecrated, certainly the most consistent, faithful and courageous. I guess I'm the one who put themselves up by the gifts of grace of the Holy Spirit has developed what the father was missing, or that it was lacking, starting first of all from my deep sense of fatherhood. But all, anyway, it was only possible thanks to the father and the state grace of this degenerate father.

.

That's why I think Luigi Negri, without ever admitting it with anyone, his heart will always be deeply proud of me, because I am what he is not, both in courage and in escape from all the conditioning and enslaving career ambition, both in consistency and in the pastoral care of souls is the actual theological culture and not smoky. But if I'm this really, it is thanks to him and about his faith and his action of sacramental grace on me. Therefore if you would come back he would not hesitate to consecrate a priest again without delay, because Luigi Negri is a true believer. And right now, not even merely a priest consecrate, because if I could consecrate Bishop, especially after what I wrote about him in these lines. Because just as he has known the pain of the unworthy sons who have maliciously betrayed and that despite repeated and unheeded My exhortation would still put next as employees increasingly complacent, more so he knows how to recognize the faithful son, if necessary, ready to beat him in public, but which, however, will never betray.

.

It does not matter that Tell him I'm his best son, I know him and I know, not necessary that this is declared in an official statement, because those - official press releases -, His Excellency Most Prudent and sometimes used them to proclaim authentic amenities the universe Cosmic along with that mountain wolf of his Vicar General everlastingly, the beautiful things, instead, the Serbian ones as Mary pondered them in her heart [cf. LC 2, 19].

.

the Island of Patmos, 17 January 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

THE PORNSTAR ILONA STALLER, IN ART CICCIOLINA, HE WILL BE INSIGNED OF THE PONTIFICAL SUPREME ORDER OF CHRIST

.

Cicciolina is a great woman whose multiple merits, rooted in the deepest bottom, in this church now in disarray and wavering between the theater of the tragic and the comic comedy of vaudeville, pushes everyone More about growing up.

.

Author
Roman cat Hypatia

.

.

To enter the bookshop click on the cover

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

FROM ALL VALLEYS resonate APPEALS TO THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS: "HOW THE CHURCH purposes', THE NEW BOOK OF ALDO MARIA VALLEYS

.

It seems that in a recent conversation off to dramatic, a Cardinal has said very clearly to the Holy Father: "You're wrecking the Church!». If this really happened as it is said, the Holy Father, after a moment of outrage, hopefully we have been able to reflect, to invoke the Holy Spirit that wisdom and strength that will enable him to advance towards the Kingdom.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

.

I smite the righteous and the faithful blame me; but let the oil of not anoint my head [Shall 141,5]

.

.

.

The Vatican TG1 Aldo Maria Valli, author of the book Like the Church ended – see WHO

Aldo Maria Valli, renowned journalist of TG1 and friend of the Fathers de The Island Patmos, It is well known to Italian lovers Catholic Church and the Pope for his frank and courageous profession of faith, a rare thing in today's publicists; but although few, some are saved. Taking advantage of the freedom of opinion and the parresia, that the same reigning Pope urges, Also among the laity, his love for the Pope does not stop him express his difficulties and sufferings, and to make him critical respect and quietly suggest remedies or fixes in the field of its action, and not touching the doctrinal magisterium, but his moral character and his way of governing the Church.

.

That's how he published by Edizioni Liberalibri Macerata agile booklet, where once again he shows his writing skills to the general public, capable of dealing competently, simplicity and clarity delicate issues and moral problems and the life of the Church.

.

I think his style, his interests and his argument make Valli somewhat similar to the eighteenth-century Enlightenment, but with the big difference that, while critical of these the Church and the Pope were destructive and poisonous, those of Valli, based as they are on his Catholic faith, as severe, They are constructive and beneficial. This is why I would want to define it as a "Catholic Enlightenment".

.

The Enlightenment of the eighteenth century sophists were conceited and presumptuous, with a sarcastic language, vulgar, gossip and offensive. Valli instead expresses with a fine irony harmless, so that at each period of his writing is impossible to suppress a laugh. But be clear: Valli not tease anyone and is not a prankster: his is a noble reformer intent and educational head and members. It is the classic disciplines, laughing manners the footsteps of Juvenal, precious literary genre that arose in classical Latin, but that is rare in Catholic literature. Valli recovers with all the elegance that is temperamentally own. His pamphlet it seems the story of a good guy, Christian educated, who, being in a noisy gathering of adults who are accapigliando between them, while the shaken president fails to keep order, naively he manifested with simplicity and with its common sense, based on what he learned from his oratory masters, what should they do to create an agreement between them, confident of being heard.

.

Valli himself coined a special term - I have not even found in the dictionary -, calling this symbolic parenetic-story "dystopian", or, if I do not understand trivially and aggressively "out of place", as it might appear to some so-called "friends" of the Pope, but "out of place (tops) central", a little 'as you talk of the office "displaced" or a branch or subsidiary of an industrial company: is not the main headquarters, even if it has relationship with it and refers to it.

.

Why Valli has resorted to this curious contrivance? For a form, I can safely say, of modesty, not to sound like a know-it-or nosy disrespectful, though in what he says there is frankness and courage of those who know what it says and says it for love and not for anything else. Valli looks from another place, but from what he knows to see well. It intrudes, but participates.

.

Another clue the "story" is given, in my opinion, from the fact that in reality, under the veil of literary narrative that smacks of fable or parable, there's a real story, but there is the heartfelt openness of mind of a faithful son of the Church to his Father and Brother in Christ in faith, dad, to urge him to make good his duty, duty that the Pope knows better than him, so from all the calm and good-natured style of writing, reflected the firm conviction of the Author, based on faith in the charisma of the Recipient, he will listen, considering the terrible catastrophic consequences, that is nothing less than the end of the Church - and here the author obviously welcomes the paradox -, which would bring its excessive behavior concern not to displease the world and gain acclaim, at the expense of a faithful following of Christ.

.

It'll also want to disagree, but the veiled accusation background that the author makes to Pope Francis, and around which turns the whole story, It is carried out with clarity and consistency and, in my view, with validity and plausibility, and is the excessive tendency of the Pope to bring the world and the Church among them, then the attachment to the world and to himself, which appears as the hermeneutical key to explain a series of Pope Francis defects, of which, however, he can not be unaware and which he himself, probably, You might want to correct, although it slowed and flattered by unworthy and unable collaborators, that with their stables end up damaging rather than helping.

.

Pope francesco, for its peculiar human qualities and for his outstanding and friendly communication - suggests Valleys - is certainly very welcome to the world. But you should ask yourself what is true after all this success accounts; It should consider whether the success depends on the fact that attracts the crowds to Christ or just to himself? Christ interests him most of the crowds? Search the crowds to lead them to Christ or Christ is the means to communicate with the crowds? Christ's enough or he also needs to success in the world? If Christ's enough, because he cares so much about not receiving criticism from the world, as it happened with the previous Pontiffs? Why the world is so beneficial? It is perhaps converting, the world, to Christ? According to the facts does not seem right, indeed it seems that the world is always the same, if not worse. So what? Why were the traditional enemies of the Church today praise the Pope? It seems that they have given up their mistakes, indeed quite the opposite. At the same time he caused controversy and scandal in the Church. Certainly it has the consent of the modernists; but they are false Catholics and false friends. The Holy Father Francis speak of Christ to the crowds? What are the effects of his meetings with the crowds? Some approaches to Christ? Wanting to make themselves acceptable to the world itself is not bad, provided it is not at the price of making unwelcome to Christ. It should be added to the personal circumstances of Pope Francis, the nefarious and diabolical Masonic project, now it is taken up by the UN environments, of a single religion and universal meta-Christian, syncretic and rational, no supernatural and without dogmas revealed, mandatory for all, that involves the equal level all religions in their common elements, without hierarchies, with the rejection a priori of a great religion on the other.

.

This is not a nightmare, or a fantasy and morbid pre-conciliar Valleys, but it is a specific plan already in its time elaborated by Emmanuel Kant [1] and endorsed by Catholic theologians such as Edward Schillebeeckx, Karl Rahner, Jacques Dupuis e Timothy Radcliffe.

.

The de-construction of the Church

.

Valli imagine placing themselves in a future in which the Church, for misinterpreting the renewal and modernization promoted by Vatican II, shall lead, under the pressure of the masonry, to the extreme the current modernistic process of "self-demolition", as he called the Blessed Paul VI, thus suppressing the identity proper to the Church, towards its full approval to the world, under the pretext of "dialogue with the world" and of '' immersion in the world ". The Church in the world drowns.

.

As a paradigm of this solvent, Valli was in possession of several heretical projects, such as that of Rahner and Schillebeeckx to relativism or historicism Kasper or project of liberation theology or teilhardismo or "global religion" invented by Freemasonry. Instead, choose an author, of which today no one speaks, known only to heresiologists: the project Marcion, heretic of the second century. But Valli, with fine intuition, he grasped the enormous relevance of this clever seducer, and imagine that in the future worldly and modernistic Church will be the rehabilitation of Marcion [cf. pp. 99-102]. Of course this will happen - it means Valleys - not at the official level, because the Church will never approve a heretic, However, the Pope will leave this heresy spreads, neglecting to refute it and to protect the faithful. Herein lies the grave pastoral negligence of the Supreme Pontiff, in contrast this with its predecessors. This is what Valli wants to tell us: although the Pope free from heresy, nor could it be otherwise, But let the wolf face slaughter of the flock and does not care to heal the Christian intelligence evils, dell 'understanding faith.

.

But what constitutes Marcionism, Today I relive in the theology of Rahner? The exhibits in the Valleys 13 thesis, similar to the fees of a damn council [cf. pp. 101-102]. In summary: the good and merciful God, the true God, is the God of the Gospel, in contrast to the punishing and cruel God of the Old Testament. The Christian God, unlike the Jewish God grim - Marcion continues - is the God who welcomes us and approving us in everything we do, and that allows us to enjoy alot of this world, because the world is good, in the certainty of being always forgiven, without conditions, although we are not repentant, since at bottom, very bottom - "experience athematic, inexpressible and transcendental "-, all are good. Sin is not the cosmic tragedy guilt invented by the Old Testament with the myth of the "original sin", cruel myth, pessimistic and offensive to the dignity and human freedom. The sin, assuming it exists, as wisely says Teilhard de Chardin, It is but an inevitable and normal nell'inarrestabile hiccup ascending cosmic evolution to the Cosmic Christ, who fails to exercise any "repair" or "satisfaction" to God for sin, but Christ is simply the supreme model of the evolution of humanity to the point Omega.

.

The Church is the The light.

.

Ora but, let us understand Valleys, things are not like that at all. Christ is not simply a holy man among others. The Marcionism-rahnerismo is a drug that numbs the conscience and, in the words of the Catechism of St. Pius X, We delude us to save us without merit. The true Church, one that will not end, It is quite another thing and it is shown by the doctrine of Vatican II. So the book of Valli could just as well be titled "How the Church must start over", with much clarity is barely visible, between the lines of his fine irony, his great love for the Church, logically accompanied by grief and bewilderment, as well as when you love someone, one can not but be saddened by her woes. But in the case of the Church, we know that it has the strength to overcome the power of darkness. Indeed, one of the great documents of Vatican Council II, is its Dogmatic Constitution - which means infallible doctrine - the Church The light, wanted by Blessed Pope Paul VI, so at that point the teachings of the Council, until then, only Pastoral by the will of St. John XXIII, also they acquired a dogmatic aspect. This is the reference point of Valli. Who has not understood this, then of his book he did not understand anything.

.

"The Council", says the onset of The light [cf. n. 1] "Ardently desires that the light of Christ, shining on the face of the Church, enlighten all men, preaching the Gospel to every creature ". And it is certain that Valli has this unfailing duty of the Church, who founded the existence for eternity, which paradoxically allows you to speak of a Church which "ends", almost to challenge and to make fun of that satanic power, now it embodied by Freemasonry, he is certain to be defeated. But this power, in which Satan is a master, is none other than that of the world, or rather of "this world", of which Satan is the "prince" [cf. GV 12,31; 14,30; 16,11]. Indeed, according to Scripture, It is not the world as such is bad, quite the opposite; it is immensely good, as created by God; and were it not that, so lovable, Jesus would not have said: "God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son " [GV 3,16]. Instead it is bad, this world, as a slave to sin, of death and of Satan. In this sense John commands us to "love not the world" [The Gv 2,16]. Is this the world, which the Christian can not be a friend [cf. GC 4,4], world from which he is hated [cf. The Gv 3,13], because he does not belong, while it would be loved, if he owned [cf. GV 15,19] and from it leave deceive, if he yields to her charms, its allurements and all his empty promises or be frightened by his threats. This world must be escaped [cf. Pt II 2,20], fought [cf. The Tm 6,12] and won [cf. GV 16,33]. Precisely because of being light and saviors of the world. The end of the world", so, It is nothing but the end of this world. But the real and healthy world is destined to rise again and live for eternity.

.

Church and world

.

This is why the No.. 40 from the The joy and hope [2], which speaks of a 'mutual relationship between the Church and the world "- we say it frankly and knowledge of the facts - is an incomplete and deceptive speech, because it seems that the Church and the world are like the two sides of humanity, at the same level, with each other's qualities, only call to dialogue and to work peacefully with each other for the good of humanity itself. This vision, pushed to its extreme consequences, It leads to the identification of the Church with the world, which it is the unfortunate conception of modernism [3]. Unfortunately the council neglects in that section - and only here in the whole Council, mind you - to talk about the corruption of the world, the transcendence of the Church to the world, the superiority of his order than that of the world, the power and the duty of the Church to be the light and salvation of the world, as well as its ability to give the world a peace which the world can not give. Forget, in conclusion, the The light. This was the slot from which you entered the "smoke of Satan", ie have arisen that deleterious secularism and the progressive loss of the sense of the sacred and the Transcendent, leading to the fascinating, disastrous and devastating modernism, under the pretext of progress and reform, He is shaking the Church to its foundations. In this way the Church is no longer in God's service, but serving the world, because a beyond this world does not exist. The power that is not interested in the spiritual, of charity, but the mundane, self-affirmation in the world.

.

Like this, to the Eternal, It has replaced history, contemplation has replaced action; the liturgy of the feast of the community; religion has become political, spirituality in psychology, morality in sociology. It is missing the love of God, he's one scipito, arbitrary and unspecified "love of neighbor", who, being devoid of reference to God, flaw or by excess or by defect, while the world beyond the divine disappeared and the only world is this world. No more fear of God, but the fear of men. What matters is not the glory that comes from God, but the one that comes from the world. No more success at the good, but worldly success. The sacred was profaned and the profane has been sanctified. The dialogue - often hypocritical and ineffectual - was absolute and put in place the affirmation of the truth, while the moral law loses its absolute and is relativized.

.

As already he observed in Jacques Maritain 1966 in The peasant of the Garonne: "There has been brought to their knees before the world". You live under the terror of being "overcome". And the idol of the "modern world" arose, a new god, to which Satan wants us to bow down. The new becomes good for the simple fact of being new; the traditional, the perennial, the desire to preserve good and be faithful to it is cursed fundamentalism. For the modernists retain the Gospel is conservatism, while they hold more than ever to maintain their lavish bank account. Today, modernism, in large forces and bolder than ever, After climbing un'indefessa lasting half a century, It has now reached the same threshold of the See of Peter. It lacks only one step - so it believes - to establish a modernist papacy and to end so the Church. But Valli rightly has his doubts that this will never happen.

.

That the Church today is quiet - if you exclude a small group of troublemakers - and indeed has never had it so good as now, He opined as Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, It is the illusion of the modernists, who hold large slices of power. Indeed, it is precisely typical illusion of who holds the power, believe that things are going well, why go his way, at least while it lasts. At this point there is the need of real reform of the Roman Curia. Dad, in the eyes of the modernists, passes to be a great reformer Pope, but its does not seem clear idea of ​​reform: It is still one of the 1968, when he shouted "long live the change", "Down with the conservation!». But today, After fifty years of change often senseless, wise people feel the need to retrieve many non-negotiable values ​​foolishly abandoned. So the reform today - the true conciliar reform - stands out as the recovery of these values. And instead, Unfortunately, the Pope insists in this mindset sessantottino.

.

For modernists, naturally, is not it true; and then they are thrown to fish on this Pope to convince him to create a modernist-Lutheran-Mason Papacy, that has nothing to do with the reform of the Council, if not for the possible unhappy hooking n. 40 Of The joy and hope shortly before invoked between these lines. Dad, indeed, should have corrected the trend unrealistic and too optimistic that chapter, whereas, Unfortunately, exaggerates the scope, and this explains his worldly tendency, Valli who rightly accused him in her book.

.

In his recent speech to the Roman Curia, the Pope decried the formation of plots. Well, This is above the plot, which it seems that the Pope does not know. It is the diabolical attempt to secularize, curtail, scale down, desecration, Empty and desecrate the Church in order to reduce it to the poor measures of the world, the type of Amnesty International O Green Peace or gods Boy Scouts. This is the plot from which the Pope should look to protect himself and the Church on these plots of Satan. The real danger, for the Roman Curia, for the Pope and for the Church; the real "cancer", the real "traitors" and "infidels", let's say heretics and apostates, are not so noisy and restless Lefebvre, much less conservatives, They should work with progressives; the danger are the modernists, that I am there long hand of Freemasonry, of communists and within the Lutheran Church and the Roman Curia.

.

Traps oats meas

.

The duty to accommodate the values ​​of the world must not be a pretext for the Church mondanizzare; The duty to be modern must not be a pretext to promote modernism; the duty to encourage progress must not be a pretext to offend conservatives; the duty to avoid the conservatism, rigidity and stagnation should not be an excuse to denigrate those who want to be faithful to the immutable truth and to the absoluteness of the moral law; the duty of hospitality scompagnarsi can not distinguish from those who deserve to be the undeserving: an account is to welcome home a needy and a bill is to welcome a thief. The duty to appreciate the different should not be an excuse for not correcting the heretic. Respect for other religions, It does not exempt from the duty to correct their mistakes. The duty to rescue material poverty, should not overshadow the most important duty of treating diseases of the spirit. With the poor, the humble and repentant will be merciful, but with the cunning, the stubborn and arrogant you must be strict. The duty to practice ecumenism must not be a pretext to promote syncretism, relativism and indifference. The duty to appreciate pluralism should not be an excuse for neglecting the unity and universality - katholikos - of faith. The duty to obtain loyal employees must be accompanied to the differentiation between those sincere and impostors and flatterers.

.

Yet the Pope knows his duty. It is only attracted by the vertigo of success and power. It is therefore necessary that we remember him and tell him: So the glory of the world! "Switch the scene of this world!” [The Cor 7,31]. Repent and put in place the talent that God gave you, especially your office Petrine, that Christ has given you not to represent yourself, but to represent Him, not to create your own Church, but to serve, protect and preserve His Church.

.

In his writings suggest coming in Valli to propose the terms of a real reform, which it is to re-orient the Church from the gaze toward the ground at a look toward the sky. From the look of the hens at Eagle eyes. From this point we have to make a call to the conscience of the Holy Father and to trust that he will listen to us. A pope should in fact mimic the Popes Saints who preceded him and not theologians trendy, or the prophets who "preach peace if you have something in your teeth to bite" [Me 3,5]. It is not to say that Pope Francis does not have current models ahead. You could say, joking, who has not spoiled for choice, He could go down, for not going further back, until the nineteenth century Popes.

.

The Pope's relationship with Christ

.

Pope Francis seems to have loosened his relationship with Christ, compared to previous Papi. Hence the negligence in performing his duty as Vicar of Christ. It seems very concerned to maintain or improve a relationship with people and with the world, no matter what, provided that the relationship is. But Christ's mandate is not. He sends us so, all over the world, but not to proclaim a message like the world, although highly social, ecological or humanities, but to teach clearly and unequivocally, all the precise things that He has commanded us to teach, no more and no less, without bringing out the excuse that then there were no recorders, or that today times have changed.

.

The Pope, therefore, instructed by Christ, with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, to teach the gospel to all nations, infallibly to interpret the Word of God, to cherish, explain and defend the deposit of faith, convert and call people to Christ, to teach men of good will the fundamental duties of the natural moral law and human rights. He also received from Christ the power to "bind and loose" (power of the keys), namely to control and legislate, ie allow or prohibit in the field of the sacraments, of canon law and the conduct of the faithful in the name of the Law of Christ. He has the power of the high priest, that is to sanctify and cleanse the holy people of God, to rule and guide in the name of Christ, the Church towards the Kingdom of God, and the priestly service of "establish all things in Christ», according to the motto of the Saint Pius X. It has a duty to be filled with charity for all, just and merciful, to be "servant of the servants of God", according to the motto of the Holy Pope Gregory the Great, humbly listen to the prophets or seers, inspired by the Holy Spirit, who humbly remind him of his duties, There were also among them a poor young induced and as a commoner Catherine of Siena, and the duty finally to offer themselves with Christ as a sacrifice of sweet savor unto the Father in the Holy Mass and daily crosses for the salvation of mankind.

.

This Pope, that in the eyes of the world and the modernists It appears a "great reformer" (Walter Kasper), Pope a "revolutionary" (Eugenio Scalfari), a "prophetic" Papa (Marco Tarquinio), the Pope that "solves the old conflict of centuries and millennia" (Alberto Melloni), the "father of the peoples" (Nicolas Maduro), the "Pope of modernity" (Raniero La Valle), "Apologist of conscience" (Arturo Sosa); the "Pope of liberty" (Bianchi), the Pope of "spontaneous Church and relaxed" (Timothy Radcliffe), the 'protector of homosexuals' (Andrea Grillo); "the patron saint of the family ' (Vincenzo Paglia), the "defender of refugees' (Nunzio Galantine), "the leader of the international left" (Oscar Madariaga), "The enemy of Trump and capitalists" (Antonio Spadaro); the "Pope of mercy" (Raniero Cantalamessa), the "brother Masons' (Gianfranco Ravasi), "Islam's friend ' (Al-Fayyed) … But actually, regardless of all its merits, is the Pope who, finding themselves having to govern a church agitated and prone to a crisis of faith of a severity never happened in history, It can not seem to control the situation, so that, a most worthy Cardinal who occupied high posts to the Holy See, it seems that in a recent interview in dramatic goldeneye told him in no uncertain terms: "You're wrecking the Church!». At that - if this really happened as it is said - the Holy Father, after a moment of outrage, hopefully we have been able to reflect, to invoke the Holy Spirit that wisdom and strength that will enable him to advance towards the Kingdom.

.

Varazze, 1January 2018 – Blessed Virgin Mary Mother of God

.

______________

NOTE

[1] Religion within the limits of pure reason, The third, Bari 1985.

[2] Note that the The joy and hope, unlike the The light, It is a simple constitution pastoral, so do not bug-free, no doctrinal, but pastoral.

[3] This view tends Masonic, perhaps inspired Rahner, It must be corrected with the dogmatic doctrine of The light.

.

.

For purchases on-line see WHO

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

THE BOOK OF HOLY MASSES DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS, WHO

.

.

.

.

THEOLOGY OF THE PORN FUTURE Ambiguity ARGENTINE BISHOPS THAT CAN NOT MAKE CLEAR AND PAPAL UNEQUIVOCAL MAGISTERIUM

.

The publication of the Roman Pontiff's response to the Argentine bishops on the By Janet it is making the modernists cheer, but they do not realize that the issue is not entirely resolved, because unfortunately, the papal ruling, as useful and worthy of consideration, not yet full clarity about the vexed question, which is always the: Maybe if they can or not cases where the divorced and remarried may be admitted to Confession and Holy Communion; but above all what they are and what may be, these cases.

.

.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p. – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

Click on the cover to access the bookshop

.

.

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]