THE SHAM OF THE DOCTRINE OF SUPPOSED mutability HUMAN LIFE. ABOUT THE THESIS OF MAURITIUS NAILS: THE TEACHINGS OF THE CHURCH DOES NOT LIE WITH S'INTERPRETE

.

The incoherent speech, opportunistic and flattering Maurizio Chiodi is part of the intellectual and emotional climate, Revolutionary in the negative, increasing collective excitement and false devotion to the Pope, fomented by the left, which in recent years it is rapidly spreading in the Church, since Eugenio Scalfari, famous interview in the beginning of the pontificate, It launched the successful eulogy Pope revolutionary

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the suffered last encyclical of Blessed Pope Paul VI, that never gave the other encyclicals prints over the next nine years of his pontificate.

The New Compass Daily the 2 February brings with comment Renzo Puccetti - "You write prohibited reads lawful: It is the poetry of Nails " [cf. item WHO] ―, some statements of the moralist Maurizio Chiodi on the Pontifical Commission will resume work they consider the encyclical Human life of Blessed Pope Paul VI with a view to its application in the context of contemporary social and ecclesial.

.

As I and the Father Ariel We recently explained, the doctrinal authority of this encyclical must be neither overestimated - as if to make a dogma -, nor underestimated, It considered mutable or, come disse Karl Rahner, even wrong [cf. our previous articles, WHO e WHO]. On the contrary, it is infallible doctrine, that is, absolutely true, unchangeable and tamper-proof, although, As he stated by Father Ariel in his recent article, it is not a defined dogma. It is not doctrine defined, yet it is final, to express ourselves with the Apostolic Letter The credit for the defense of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II of 1998 and quoted in the article of the Father Ariel. Indeed, matter of which is the encyclical of natural ethics, establishing the natural moral law, object of practical reason, law that, applied or put into practice by virtue of prudence, guides action to achieve its natural end last, that is God's greatest man Well.

.

However, as pointed out by the Pope in the same encyclical, the Church has had but from Christ the mandate to reveal to man the way of eternal salvation, so Christian duties are the subject of faith and can be dogmatizzati; ma, given that compliance with the supernatural revealed precepts must observe the natural law, the subject of natural reason, The Church also has the right and duty to teach men even the precepts of the natural law, despising them, You can not attain salvation.

.

If the Church wants or so wished, It could elevate even dogmas duties of the natural law, but he does, given that they, by their nature, They are understandable and demonstrable for the simple natural reason. For this reason the Pope justifies the prohibition of contraceptives with rational arguments, acceptable even by unbelievers, provided that reasonable men, Although the Catholic is required to submit to papal prescription with no divine faith, It was defined as a dogma, but with ecclesiastical faith, that befits the doctrine of the Church. However, the refusal of obedience does not constitute veritable heresy, but close to heresy error. He says Paul VI:

.

"No faithful will deny that it is up to the Magisterium of the Church to interpret the natural moral law. It is in fact indisputable, as we have repeatedly stated our Predecessors, that Jesus Christ, communicating to Peter and to the Apostles His divine authority and sending them to teach all nations His commandments, He constituted them as guardians and authentic interpreters of all the moral law, not only that of the evangelical law, but also of the natural, it also expression of the will of God, the faithful fulfillment of which is equally necessary for salvation " [n. 4, see text WHO].

.

Natural law does not permit derogations or exceptions. If there are the conditions of its applicability, not there are cases in which it may be suspended, as it can happen for a custom or a positive standard or conventional, I can admit handouts or suspensions or changes or repeal. If it is inapplicable only because they lack the conditions to be applied, which in certain cases occur.

.

Law enforcement natural resembles the absolute logic subjection of the individual to the species or the particular to the universal. No case can escape or be an exception. It would be absurd to think that there might be a man who is not a rational animal, or it can give the sum of 2+2 that does not face 4. Indeed, the natural law is the law of action of man as such, It equipped with a specific nature, which it is the same in all individuals. If an act of natural law is good, it is always good. If an act is bad compared to the natural law, It is always bad. It can not be that a good act becomes bad or an evil act becomes good. Worshiping God or honor their parents and be honest it is always good. To steal or kill or fornicate is always bad.

.

It must however be noted that moral values They are sorted hierarchically compared to the supreme good or final End, It gave, and that in the present life, marked by disorder and unrest following on original sin, the affirmation of the superior value often does not take place in harmony with the lower, but at his own expense. We must be ready, as Christ says, with strong language, that must be properly understood, to "hate" him for his soul, to give up an eye or a hand, just to be able to enter the kingdom of heaven. We should fight against the world and win. To save the life, necessary to death. This means, At that time, that if a value is absolute, no allowances or exceptions, but the fact is that, if this value hinders or impedes an absolutely necessary and vital higher value, it is not to make an exception to the rule, but simply aside to make way for a superior rule.

.

The review of 'Human life by the Pontifical Commission [cf. WHO] forms part probably in this order of considerations, but we do not believe to your mind, how does Nails, s'incammini the Church to embrace evolutionary ethic he proposed, which it was already condemned by Pope Pius X in Feeding of Dominic's Sheep as completely contrary to reason and faith.

.

Criticism at Nails positions

.

First point. As reported Puccetti, conscience, according Nails "coincides with the totality of the self (persona) - Descartes, the specific self-consciousness - in its value with theoretical and practical ' [cf. WHO].

.

We respond by saying that the consciousness It does not coincide with the totality of the self or the person. Consciousness is reflected act of the intellect, which is the person power. This is spiritual substance, composed of soul and body, whose being exceeds the being of consciousness, that, from what appears from the above, it is only an emanation or act of the person, and therefore part and spiritual manifestation of the person. As for the self, it is the manifestation of the self all'egli, that is the person of whom you speak in declarative sentence, as when, for example, say: Descartes was self-conscious. That see Descartes is the same or better I Descartes as it appeared to Descartes. So the self is not the person, but the appearance of the person intended to herself, in the self-consciousness of the person.

.

But the biggest mistake of Nails, consequence of the previous, It is that he confuses the human with the divine person. In fact not the human person, but God is Self-consciousness subsisting. This is convenient for Nails, why he, to argue that the doctrine of 'Human life can change, He would like to substantiate his thesis proposing a concept of person, for which the moral law is not immutably established by a transcendent divine will, to which man must adapt, but it is free expression of the same desire of the human person as self-subsistent, matched to God, and then as a principle of moral law itself, whose content is determined by a transcendent divine will, creative and norm of human nature, but it is the same human subject that determines its nature and, consequently, the law of his act. Instead, the doctrine of natural law contained in Human life supposedly the person conceived as the existence of a single human nature, created in God's image, a real substantial entity, whose act, It proposed to the practical reason and implemented by the desire, It is regulated precisely by this practical command of reason, which it is the natural law, known to every man's conscience, and imprinted in human reason from divine Reason.

.

Second point. Puccetti reports that nails writes that "the moral norms are not reducible to rational objectivity, but they ask to be inscribed in the human story, understood as a story of grace and salvation ". Puccetti saying comments that "discreetly poetic Chiodi asserts its subjective view of morality".

.

Big mistake is to Nails, to steal the moral norm to the judgment of reason, to replace the function of reason with the "human story", as if this could be human without the guidance of reason, not realizing that the irrational behavior is not that of man, but the beasts. Vano and senseless, At that time, in these conditions, keep talking about "thank you" and "salvation", divine gifts, which they are not granted to the beasts, but the animal reasonable.

.

third point. It reports that Puccetti Nails moral norms "guard the good", but states that it is a good "that is given in the experiences of life". Fake. Moral good, before that in "life experiences", It is offered by God to the practical reason enlightened by faith, starting from sense experience. If then the will puts into practice the good conceived by reason according to the command of virtue, At that time, but then the subject experiences the good done or loved, accomplished action controlled by the practical reason.

.

Puccetti right in pointing out that so emphasizes Nails, of these experiences, "The subjectivist character, not be pursued as a good in itself, but as well as it is known and esperienziato, everyone does their own experiences " [cf. Feeding of Dominic's Sheep, text WHO]. Indeed, the goods held by the natural moral norms is given already by itself and by itself in their intelligibility and universal rationality, abstracting from the experiences of life and above them, which, to be morally good, licit and praiseworthy, They have to compete on those standards, who otherwise would not "standards", ie rules of conduct; they must, that is, be faithful and their practical application in different circumstances and situations of life, after being intellectually conceived and understood in their universality and rationality.

.

In essence, Nails conceives the moral agent which he said is subject to the doctrine of Human life as irrational self-consciousness in a "human story, understood as a story of grace and salvation ": a monstrous character, half divine and half animal, as in greek-Roman mythology, except to be subject - do not know how - to a "story or history of grace and salvation", from which it appears that nails do not know or what is the grace, or what is the salvation.

.

Nails seems to be succumbing the moral conception of Human life a vision of moral action based on a Cartesian concept of the person as self-consciousness, whose practical dynamism, But, It is not driven, as in Descartes, the rational concept, and then from the universal objective, but from tendenzialità historical and experiential, ie existential and subjective, in the manner of Heidegger, as rightly observes Puccetti. So this is not immutable essence based action, but the self-consciousness to become, Factor in turn becoming and change. What matters is changing and transforming. There is no wonder then nails imagine that the Pope will change the doctrine of Human life. But the illusion completely, because the Pope, any Pope, also Bergoglio, referred to as "revolutionary pope", He knows that the natural law is immutable and is not a changeable product of the human will erected to self-consciousness existential. But Nails goes ahead anyway and thus comes to the idea of ​​an ethics without a fixed rule, but radically transforming, existential, experiential and revolutionary, on the type of that of Nietzsche.

.

revolutionary ethic

.

By then understand the root before watching Nails, let's stop on the theme of revolution, Today fashion back even in the teaching of Pope rifermento. The revolution therefore involves the idea of ​​a radical transformation, of a profound change or upheaval. It can be, it is true, subversion, but also renewal. It can lead to destruction, but also conquest. It suggests to violence, but also the regenerative power. However, "Revolution", in the usual sense - face it - especially social, It does not enjoy a good reputation; says more harm than good. He says new, usually, however, that does not involve, as perhaps some people mean, growth, improvement and progress in the true and the good already possessed and stored, which confirms their loyalty, which it is thus in fact strengthened and increased, while leaving the useless old, we free ourselves from evil and breaks with sin and falsehood. But mostly the revolution, in the most radical conception, is the arbitrary claim and nihilistic want to delete or cancel all thought and values, if it were possible, all the previous real already found a stable and grounded, to do it all at will and their will: what Nietzsche called the "transvaluation of all values", effect of the "will to power". The first revolutionary act of man, in this sense, It was the original sin.

.

We see then that the poisonous force and destructive of the revolutionary principle is not at all in action as such insurrectionary, in exceptional cases it is justified even by St. Thomas Aquinas [1] and by Blessed Pope Paul VI [2] and it is not even in a radical renewal or regeneration of thought and life, as in the conversion of great sinners or occurred in the transition from the Old to the New Covenant or will happen in the end times with the Return of Christ: that "recap (apokefalàios) of all things ", by Christ, of which St. Paul speaks [cf. Ef 1,10]. Because of this, in the Bible, in Tradition, in the Fathers, the Magisterium of the Church the term "revolution" does not exist or has a negative sense of revolt, sedition, riot, subversion. What is perhaps most approaches him in a positive sense is that of Metanoia, ie that healthy change in thought and conduct, in the light of God's Word, which is translated by the term conversion, which creates the son of God and the '' new man ', Risen with Christ.

.

Instead we have to say sorry frankness which unfortunately incoherent speech, opportunistic and flattering Maurizio Chiodi is part of the intellectual and emotional climate, Revolutionary in the negative, increasing collective excitement and false devotion to the Pope, fomented by the left, which in recent years it is rapidly spreading in the Church, since Eugenio Scalfari, famous interview in the beginning of the pontificate, It launched the successful eulogy Pope revolutionary, [cf. video WHO] very unwise title, that the Pope would have to disprove, which unfortunately does not. It so happened that a few days ago, the myth of the revolutionary Pope, It was re-launched in a big way even by Antonio Spadaro it La Civiltà Cattolica, by presenting the Pope as "the revolutionary who is changing the world by using Marxism ' [cf. WHO], coincidentally on the occasion of the Holy See negotiations with Beijing's Communist government, while tucking S.It is. Mons. Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, current Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, with incredible impudence dared to say that the Chinese regime is "the better implementation of the social doctrine of the Church and the encyclical Praised yes», arousing the serious concerns and protests of many in China and abroad, among which stands for authority and international prestige the wise old Cardinal Joseph Zen, courageous spokesman and defender of the persecuted Catholics in China [cf. WHO].

.

Qualify Pope as a "revolutionary", like a title of respect, it means to lack a sound criterion of judgment, taking a class at least profane, totally unfit to be the praises of a Pope. It is surprising then even more the fact that the Pope will leave quietly qualify in this way, without at least resize this unseemly title, but almost compiacendosene, something that certainly does not bode well for the benefit of his wisdom.

.

This dangerous infatuation with Revolution, ben contrasting al mercy pacifism and Jorge Mario Bergoglio, threatens to summon the ghosts of the past: French Revolution, Russian revolution, fascist revolution, Spanish revolution, Maoist revolution, to the countless African and South American revolutions, culminating in that of Fidel Castro or August Pinochet.

.

The mentality sessantottino

.

The Sixty himself was a reckless revolution, who introduced the Church as a dissolving principle modernistic, under false pretenses of progress and implementation of Vatican Council II. The message of the Sixty was founded on a vision of Hegelian-Marxist reality and human action, which gives the primacy to the shifting with respect to the immutable, It enhances the change against the fidelity, progress against conservation. The message was that sixty-eight must "abandon their certainties", everything had to be questioned, the permissive freedom of the "forbidden to forbid", imagination instead of reason by "power to the imagination", the self-production of culture through the teacher's removal, resulting in suppression of the merits buonistica, until reaching the "six political" and to all promoted, open up to the new revolutionary, understood as a break with tradition and rejection of the immutable.

.

Everything changes, and God changes.

.

God is still there, punishments threatening, but it becomes in us and with us. Do not hang on to anything because everything passes. Nothing is stable, but everything becomes. The rule of action is the history and experience, Modernity is assumed and lived, come dice Rahner, "In its totality", without question and without criticism in the light of immutable truth, that does not exist. The Church and the world are identified. All the action is resolved in the political, but at the same time the individual is a law unto himself. The act should not be obedience to an abstract and immutable law, but concrete and historical creating ever new in the evolution of freedom of situations. The obvious consequence of all was the refusal of the Magisterium of the Church with its monotonous and propose repeating the same things, empty schemes, boring and moldy past, to listen to new prophets, which in reality they were nothing more than heretics and charlatans, which, sold as interpreters of the Council, did no more than reproduce under a linguistic coating the heated broth of the old modernism of San Pio X times, He drank eagerly from the Hegelian worshiping crowds of history, but incapable of learning the lessons of history. So it happened that the Sixty introduced in the Church psychosis, if not the obsession of change and "progress", which then, in essence,, separated from respect for tradition on which must be based, and must explain and develop, It's not progress at all, but selfishness, skepticism, eroticism, relativism, destruction and nihilism.

.

An immense wealth of theological education painstakingly and diligently prepared by fathers in past centuries, always recommended by the Church and by the Second Vatican Council, be preserved and jealously guard and faithfully and to be handed on to future generations, It is so forgotten, dilapidated and remained closed and unused - when it went well - in libraries, Now unless these new barbarians do not want to destroy the libraries and replace them with theology narrative Mickey, Donald Duck, Pulcinella, flying saucers and Santa Claus.

.

The fascinating theological and spiritual alternative, offered by the latest modernism, with his eye on the future of the Church, his sting of renewed Christian life, open to the breath of the Spirit, It is now offering a multiplicity of chances and of imputs, of which I can mention only a few examples here, as the new direction of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith not to condemn the heresies, but only the conservatism and stiffness; allow a Lutheran access to pontificate the project of the Italian bishops to observe the rule of silence, in imitation of the Trappists; the idea of ​​the newspaper Future to dedicate a weekly column to the theology of masturbation; The project to replace the Jesuit Gregorian to now Old Course, repetitive, stale, worn out, Abstract and passed on the Trinity, a much more current and engaging undergraduate course immigratologia; the decision of the Dominicans to ask the Holy See to appoint Schillbeeckx a Doctor of the Church on the occasion of the forthcoming closure of the convent of San Marco in Florence; permission of the Congregation for Divine Worship the use of bicycles in the church following the example of Archbishop of Palermo and the use of churches for the night gay homeless; replacement, in Mass, al I believe, incomprehensible assembly of abstract and metaphysical formulas, the much more attractive and meaningful Dolce hear [cf. WHO, WHO]; elevate pedophilia free expression; Radio Maria put under the control of Freemasonry; S.It is the recommendation of the studies. Mons. Angelo Dirt on theological wisdom Marcion [cf. WHO]; listen to the recorder of the Father Christology lessons, Arturo Sosa [cf. WHO], or those on Andrea Grillo ecumenical church [CF. WHO], or those of Cardinal Walter Kasper immutability of dogma and morality, or meditations on the Eucharist mangereccia of Hermes Ronchi [cf. WHO] or erotic Eucharist Timothy Radcliffe [cf. WHO, WHO] or the Eucharist Manuel Belli button, or the series of conferences of S.It is Bishop Nunzio Galantino of "Luther, gift of the Holy Spirit " [cf. WHO] or S.It is. Mons. Vincenzo Paglia on the spirituality of Marco Pannella [cf. WHO], or the lessons of Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi on Freemasonry [cf. WHO, WHO] or the prophecies of Enzo Bianchi on homosexuality Charisma [cf. WHO, WHO], while our Catholic politicians should make a trip to China to see de visu the best application of the social doctrine of the Church or form an alliance with the Party and Bonino Cirinnà for the family institution reform.

.

What however now urgently needed unpostponable stop is a good time with this one-sided, factious, false, gretta, bolsa and harmful rhetoric of "progress" and decide vigorously to implement a real progress, which - as we remember, for example, the Dominican theologian Servant of God Tomas Tyn - can not but be in harmony with the conservation and recovery of immutable values, stable and perennial, indeed eternal, which are the basis of civilization and Christianity and founded a real progress, that does not make us fall back into barbarism.

.

This is not to return to what has been passed and it is now useless, died, useless or harmful. It is valid rebuild what has been destroyed, to recover precious values, still useful or more useful, that have been forgotten. With Descartes we are deluded to remake the foundations of thought already thrown the Bible and Aristotle. But this is illusion and folly, because the foundation is not deducted, but dates. On those builds. It is inevitable to use them, even if it means destroying. Wisdom has it that you simply use no doubt. They are modernist and revolutionary who recede and subside, until you return to barbarism, because the new offering is the destruction of the old be preserved. Those who are close to what is genuinely new and advanced, He has no reason to appeal to tradition or immutable, because the genuine and beneficial new is nothing more than confirmation and development of the ancient. It is clear on the other hand you need to know what you can change and what not. You can also admit, being benevolent in the language, a revolutionary innovation; but when it is announced, necessary to ascertain whether it is a genuine novelty or is a hoax, comparing the utterance with knowledge certain and incorruptible that we have already acquired.

.

A novelty that contradicted two thousand years of Christian belief or practice, It is not necessarily heretical or rejected. Necessary to ascertain whether it relates or not to human values ​​or Christians that may mutate or cease. While the natural and divine laws can not change, but only to be better known and applied, positive and canonical laws of the Church can change by order of the Supreme Pontiff, also they were in force for two thousand years. But even then it would be improper to speak of a Pope "revolutionary", but at most innovator or reformer. And if you imagine that a "revolutionary" Pope can change the natural and divine law, such as no longer valid to declare the doctrine of Human life, it means that you have lost your mind.

.

Like this, the fact that for two thousand years the Church has not permitted women to distribute Communion or read Readings of the Mass, He did not prevent the church to give today to the woman this permit, because it is a field - power of the keys ―, in which the Church is free to legislate as it sees fit. It is not the length of time that makes the traditional authorities, but its dogmatic or less merits. The permit a woman to give Communion or to read the Mass Tradition, although only thirty years of life. Instead the view of the mutability of natural law supported by Chiodi is totally unacceptable not because it contradicts to two thousand years of Church teaching, but for the fact that it is philosophically wrong and then next heresy.

.

Unfortunately, instead, the mentality sessantottino It is seen in the ministry of the present Pope. It then explains how recently he has been able to do a very unwise eulogy of Sixty. And the newspaper Future, tucking, in the number of 14 last February, Pag. 21, He has had the unfortunate idea to evoke sympathy for the sixty-eight he had Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, praising him in these words: "The Archbishop of Milan was not referring to values ​​or principles, but stings in the century flesh " [cf. WHO], without realizing, the unhappy newspaper, of bad adopted metaphor, since, in truth, It is precisely the universal and perennial values ​​and the obvious principles, incontrovertible and immutable, the ones that move the intelligence and the will to truth and goodness, while the stingers are used to move the stubbornness of donkeys. E, If we want, Sixty-eight was actually a "sting in the flesh of the century", which, however, far from it bountifully, he deceived, mangled and corrupted by the prospect of a fake renewal, that ends in nihilism.

.

It is surprising and painful to see that even today, well after fifty, during which the bitter fruits of this revolution have appeared, There are still those who insist blindly to follow a dead end, rather than correct the course and take the path of true implementation of Council, rightly interpreted by the mortgage and free Modernist, which it is based on false and Hegelian opposition between being and becoming, preservation and progress, time and eternity. The real implementation of the Council involves, instead, the wise conjunction of essence and existence, preservation and progress, firmness and suppleness, abstract and concrete, stability and momentum, renewal and fidelity, metaphysics and history, and moving saldezza, permanence and development, identity and growth.

.

The strength subversive neo-modernist, apparently reliable and innovative, but in fact illusory and destructive, originated - as reflected by the very words of nails - from Cartesian spirit and Lutheran, nell'hegelismo matured and Marxism, and since then he began with steely determination and growing success, not hindered by a dormant episcopate, a climb to the ecclesiastical power, that, began in the workers' and student circles, among theologians and intellectuals and the lower clergy, in recent years he has contaminated the bishops themselves, until you get to Cardinals, the same rooms of the Holy See and pontifical academic institutions, without the Papacy, though supported by most worthy Popes, It managed to stop this rising tide for lack of sufficient cooperation from the episcopate.

.

The task that now has to be for the Church and the Holy Father, It is to maintain and develop both the good fruits of the Council, either to correct his persistent misapprehension and is to recover forgotten values. Forget the revolution. It 'just the "metanoia", conversion and penance, motions of the spirit and life, Sustained by the grace, far more intelligent, radicals and health of the revolution, Because that this is limited, at best and not troublemaker, to operate in this mortal life, while that works with a view of eternal life.

.

Let no man deceive you with enticing topics [With the 2,4]. Your people shall build the ancient ruins, ricostruirai the foundations of past ages [Is 58,12].

Varazze, 27 February 2018

.

_______________

NOTE

[1] QUESTION, II-II, q.42, a.2, 3m.

[2] CF. S.S. Paul VI, Encyclical Development of Peoples the 1967, n.31.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

THE BOOK OF HOLY MASSES DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS, SEE WHO

.

.

.

THE QUESTION OF HUMAN LIFE IS SIMPLE: MAKE LOVE AND DO IT WELL. WHO PROVIDES NEW DOGMAS IS ABOUT WORST I DOGMAS PUTS THEM IN DISCUSSION AND THEN deconstruct LI

.

Many of those who talk about environmentalism, nature and naturalness, ready to spend on a piece of clothing ten times as long as non-woven synthetic fibers, as unnatural and therefore potentially harmful to the human body, as may be considered instead put a natural rubber condom as a synthetic suit on the male member of the male during a very natural sexual intercourse? It's a track suit most harmful and unnatural made with synthetic fabrics, or a condom that comes between the man and the woman during the naturalness of love?

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

Click on the book cover to enter the bookshop

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

THE BOOK OF HOLY MASSES DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS, WHO

.

.

.

.

"VOICE OF ONE CRYING IN THE DESERT". THE LETTER OF CARDINAL JOSPEPH ZEN ZE-KIUN ON THE DELICATE CHINESE QUESTION AND THE BAD NEGOTIATIONS OF THE HOLY SEE

"Maybe I think that the Vatican is selling off the Catholic Church in China? Yup, decidedly, If they go in the direction that is obvious in all they have done in recent months and recent years'.

.

.

Author
Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun

we received the letter addressed by His Eminence Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun At the Media Friends which we reproduce below. In this letter, so quiet as saddened, Bishop emeritus of Hon Kong, whose voice should be heard by the Holy See in a spirit of prayerful worship - and this is for his age and for his knowledge of civil society and politics of the People's Republic of China -, the elder, lucid and vital Cardinal has decided to make public his conversation with the Supreme Pontiff Francis I, the day before his departure for the last apostolic trip to Chile and Peru. At the Supreme Pontiff the Cardinal expressed his great concern about how dangerous and not a little clumsy with which several dignitaries of the Holy See have treated and continue undeterred to deal with the delicate problem of the Chinese Catholic Church. Forever, The main dispute between the Communist government and the Holy See concerns the appointment of Bishops. The communist authorities inescapable fact claims the right to approve the appointment of Bishops, that that in clearer terms the same as saying: has it that the bishops are in every way government-appointed, thus controlling for them by both the clergy and the faithful. These problems do not arise today, because many years ago, during a visit to a priestly house Aventine, several priests and religious, I remember that Cardinal, about the delicate Chinese problem, He had to define the then Secretary of State, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, "a malicious incompetent '. At the time we were in March 2010, but things do not seem to have changed, apparently are quite deteriorated.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

Dear Friends of the Media,

His Eminence Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun, Bishop Emeritus of Hon Kong

of when Asia News It revealed some recent events of the Church in China, legitimate bishops that the "Holy See" would be asked to give the resignation to make way for "bishops" illegitimate and even excommunicated explicitly, different versions and interpretation of the facts are creating confusion among people [Ed. cf WHO]. Many, knowing of my recent trip to Rome, They asked me some questions.

.

In October last, when Mons. Peter Zhuang received its first communication from the Holy See and asked for my help [Ed. cf. WHO], I sent someone to take her letter to the Prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, included with a copy for the Holy Father. I do not know if that included copy has never reached the Holy Father's Desk. Fortunately, Mons. Savio Hon Taifai was still in Rome and was able to meet the Pope for a farewell visit. In that occasion, He has made known to the Holy Father the two cases of Shantou and Mindong. The Holy Father was surprised and promised that he would study the case.

.

Because of the words that the Holy Father He had called in Mons. Savio She, new facts in December were even more shocking and surprising to me. When the elderly and afflicted Mons. Zhuang asked me to bring to the Holy Father his reply to the message he received from the "Vatican delegation" in Beijing, I could not say no. But what could I do to make sure that his letter reached the Holy Father, When I'm not even sure if my letters come to him? To make sure that our voice reaches the Holy Father, I immediately took the decision to go to Rome. I left Hong Kong on the night of 9 January, coming to Rome in the early morning of 10 January, just in time — well, really slightly late — to attend the Wednesday general audience. At the end of the hearing, We cardinals and bishops are allowed to kiss hand and I had the opportunity to put in the hands of the Holy Father the envelope, He was just saying that he was in Rome in order to bring the letter from Bishop to him. Zhuang, the hope was that he found time to read it [in the envelope there was the original letter of the bishop in China, my translation into Italian and a letter from me].

.

For obvious reasons, I hoped that my presence at the hearing was not noticed, but my late arrival had been noticed in the classroom. Anyway, Now everyone can see the entire sequence from the Vatican Television [by the way, The hearing was held in the Paul VI, not in St. Peter's Square and I was late to enter the hearing, but I have "waited in line, cold ", as some article reported incorrectly].

.

Smell, I met Father Bernardo Cervellera Of Asia News. We exchanged information, but I told him not to write anything. And he has agreed. Now that someone else has published the news, I can say that I agree and confirm. Yup, as far as I know, things have happened just as they are told in Asia News [the article of Asia News "He believes" that the bishop who headed the Vatican delegation to China was Mons. Claudio Maria Celli. I do not know how official role he was there, but it is almost certain it was him in Beijing].

.

At this crucial time and because of the confusion that reigns in the media, knowing the situation in a direct way in Shantou and in an indirect way to Mindong [Ed. cf. WHO], I feel compelled to share my knowledge of the facts, so that people sincerely concerned for the good of the Church can know the truth to which they are entitled. I am very conscious that doing what, I'm talking about things that are technically qualified as "confidential". But my conscience tells me that in this case, the "right to the truth" should overcome any "duty of confidentiality".

.

With this conviction, I am going to share with you the following.

.

In the afternoon of that day, the 10 January, I received a call from Santa Marta, where I was told that the Holy Father would have received in a private audience on Friday evening 12 January [although the Vatican bulletin shall inform the 14 January]. That was my last day of my 85 years of life, a great gift of Heaven! [Also note that it was the eve of the departure of the Holy Father for Chile and Peru, and then the Holy Father had to be very busy].

.

That evening, the conversation lasted about half an hour. I was pretty messy in my talk, but I think I achieved the purpose of making known to the Holy Father the concerns of its faithful children in China. The most important question I posed to the Holy Father [which he was also mentioned in the letter] It was if he had had time to "study the case" [as he promised in Mons. Savio She]. Despite the danger of being accused of breaking the confidentiality, I decided to tell you what His Holiness said: "Yup, I told them [his aides in the Holy See] not to create another instance Mindszenty!». I was there in the presence of the Holy Father, on behalf of my Chinese brothers in suffering. His words should be well understood as a consolation and encouragement more for them than for me.

.

This historical reference to Cardinal. Josef Mindszenty, one of the heroes of our faith, It is very significant and appropriate by the Holy Father. The Card. Josef Mindszenty was archbishop of Budapest, Cardinal Primate of Hungary under Communist persecution. He suffered much in prison for several years. During the short life of the revolution 1956 He was freed by insurgents and, before the Red Army destroyed the revolution, She took refuge at the American embassy. Under pressure from the government, the Holy See ordered him to leave the country and appointed a successor to taste the communist government.

.

With this revelation, I hope I have satisfied the legitimate "right to know" of the media and of my brothers in China. The important thing for us is to pray for the Holy Father, singing very appropriate traditional anthem we pray: «Let us pray for our Pope Francis, May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and make him blessed upon the earth, and he will not surrender him to the will of his enemies, in the».

.

Perhaps it is necessary some further explanation.

.

1. Please note that the problem is not the resignation of the legitimate bishops, but the request to make room for illegitimate and excommunicated. Although the law on retirement for reasons of age has never been applied in China, many seniors underground bishops have urged a successor, but they never received any response from the Holy See. Others, who already have a successor appointed, and perhaps even the note signed by the Holy Father, They were ordered not to proceed with the order for fear of offending the government [Ed. cf. WHO].

.

2. I especially talked about the two cases of Shantou and Mindong. No further information, in addition to the copy of a letter written by an outstanding Catholic woman, an academic retired, very versed in the affairs of the Church in China, in which she warns Archbishop. Celli from pushing to legitimize the "bishop" She Shiying in Sichuan.

.

3. I recognize to be a pessimist about the present situation of the Church in China, but my pessimism is based on my long experience of the Church in China. From the 1989 al 1996 I always spent six months a year teaching in various seminaries of the official Catholic communities. And I have direct experience of slavery and humiliation to which our brother bishops are subject. Based on the latest information, there is no reason to change this pessimistic view. The communist government is producing new and harsher regulations limiting the religious freedom. They are now putting in place the regulations that until now were only on paper: from the 1 February 2018, the rally to the mass of an underground community will not be tolerated.

.

4. Some say that all efforts to reach agreement [between China and the Holy See] They are to avoid an ecclesial schism. This is ridiculous! The schism is already there, in independent church. The popes have avoided using the word "schism" because they knew that many in official Catholic communities were not there voluntarily, but under heavy pressures. The proposed "unification" will force anyone [to enter] in that community. The Vatican then would give his blessing to a new and stronger schismatic church, washing the bad conscience of those who are already willing renegades and others who are ready to join them.

.

5. It is no good to try to find common ground to bridge the decades-long division between the Vatican and China? But there may be something "common" with a totalitarian regime? Or you surrender or accept the persecution, but remaining true to yourself. One can imagine an agreement between Saint Joseph and King Herod?

.

6. So maybe I think that the Vatican is selling off the Catholic Church in China? Yup, decidedly, If they go in the direction that is obvious in all they have done in recent months and recent years.

.

7. Some expert of the Catholic Church in China says it is not logical to assume a more harsh religious policy by Xi Jinping. Anyhow, Here we are not talking logic, but the obvious and crude reality.

.

8. Am I the greatest obstacle to the process of agreement between the Vatican and China? If this deal is bad, are more than happy to be a hindrance.

.

Hong Kong, 29 January 2018

.

+ Joseph Card. Zen Ze-Kiun

Bishop Emeritus of Hon Kong

.

Titles to the text by the Editorial

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

VI NARRO A SAD STORY: IF THE ARCHBISHOP LUIGI NEGRI IS A LAWYER combative CHURCH disarray, I AM A LAWYER combative MORE THAN IT WAS THE HOLY POPE PIUS V DURING THE BATTLE OF LEPANTO AGAINST MUSLIMS OTTOMANI

.

A son must honor, ed if necessary defend your father; and it must do regardless, He was also a lousy father. But if the father abusing the mother, damages the family and also damages other, the child has to say that his is a degenerate father, while continuing to honor him as the father who has given life. Archbishop Luigi Negri is a father of the paradigm degenerate, albeit now elevated to a standard of pure and true traditio by circles of Catholics who in truth are just the politicians brawler in disarray.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

What could be more painful for a child, of telling the story of his father degenerate? Whereas I have nothing to “vent”, much rather laugh bitterly, for an imperative of conscience targeted to my pastoral duty to protect the body of believers of Christ Today more and more lost, I decided to tell the story of this degenerate father, Archbishop Luigi Negri, so no one will mutate into a cardboard idol.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

in the picture: Ariel S. Levi Gualdo that welcomes S.It is in Rome. Mons. Luigi Negri in front of the Church of Santa Prisca on the Aventine the day of his priestly ordination

Moved by imperative of conscience based on the knowledge of the person, the facts and circumstances - not for regular accounts, I do not want to adjust, or for one Cold revenge which would constitute a desecration of my priesthood -, I feel obliged to argue decisively to those eroizzano certain impression figures rather than pastoral policy. Figures of which I was able to experience firsthand all the pastoral deficiencies, the lack of consistency and political transformation, offering them witness - perhaps entirely useless - to those who are exploiting these figures the, using as a pretext to stage purely doctrinal questions on controversial political battles love joy and fiery discussion that followed on remarried divorcees and their admission to the sacraments.

.

One of the main figures erected today in the heroic defense of the "little remains" - to say for certain - the "healthy and authentic Catholic doctrine" is S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri, Emeritus Archbishop of Ferrara [2013-2017] and previously Bishop of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro [2005-2012].

.

Begin then the so-called Name of the Father, first of all to clarify the somewhat confused moral idea of ​​the Archbishop, that not many years ago, before the sad red light feasts organized by award-divorced Silvio Berlusconi at his villa in Arcore - also known as flowers -, before which such a bastion of defense of the Catholic doctrine stated that "a Prime Minister is judged by his actions targeted government to protect the common good and not from his private life ' [cf. WHO]. Given that the proponent of what was for many years professor of philosophy at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, where for a period of time also held the philosophy of law courses, one wonders if you've ever browsed the Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle, to follow with dissertations on ethics and morals of St. Thomas Aquinas. Why such an assertion, and others that will follow now, you can even derive from the work Prince Niccolo Machiavelli.

.

... until the Holy See found itself caught to remove the 2012 from the small Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, After that His Excellency and especially Prudent had created yet another diplomatic incident with the Republic of San Marino, historically linked by excellent relations with the Holy See, Despite the secular footprint and part of the Masonic small, former State. But let's see what happened: the Archbishop did not find something better to do than compare the two heads of state to two "puppets dressed up to the nines", all during a luncheon. Unfortunately, a few meters from His Excellency and Prudent was the Minister of Foreign Affairs, S. AND. Antonella Mularoni, He mailed the next day all the papal honors to the Holy See with a vibrant note of protest against the Bishop of San Marino-Montefeltro who had publicly insulted the Heads of State, namely the integrity of the smallest, but also the world's oldest Republic. To extinguish the fire lit by his Excellency and Prudent was the man of faith and of S.It is diplomatic experience. Mons. Adriano Bernardini, one of the best apostolic nuncios in Italy and the Republic of San Marino from 1929 till today, followed by another great diplomat, it Cardinale Jean-Louis Tauran, that follows you entertained at breakfast with the Foreign Minister and later, in a very delicate way, He had to mention this fact with myself during our private meeting at the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. At that point the Holy See, gravely mistaken he adopted the principle of bankruptcy promoted to be removed, appointing him to 71 years old Archbishop of Ferrara; a bishopric that yes title of Archdiocese, but that is not a Metropolia, but a suffragan diocese of the underground headquarters of Bologna. Uselessly, on my part, just made official the promotion of S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri to the headquarters of Ferrara - a town I knew well, having lived several years at the time of my university studies carried out between Ferrara and Bologna -, firmly and lovable I informed: "First, she manifests the Ferrara love for their city and care for them, but especially, as Bishop, we should always keep away from the strictly political-administrative matters that do not touch in any way or in any way the conscience of Catholics, because doing so she will be loved by Catholics and deeply respected by non-believers ". You want to know what was the textual response of His Excellency and Prudentissima, with lots of final engagement of the phone? Exactly this: «Listen, dickhead, I certainly did not learn to do it yourself Bishop!». He came to Ferrara accompanied by a secretary inept, after being surrounded as his use of weak and limited only able to say yes, and to please him and blow him even more to face its choices completely wrong, he did not leave even spend one hundred days to create a real problem of public order. But let's see what happened: unmindful of the great love that Ferrara feed for their beautiful city and how it should be proud, Archbishop he found something better to do than compare the city center to a brothel [cf WHO, WHO, etc. ..], made to him by the move Night of university and youth who rattled in pubs and bars in the center. Let me be clear, in question are not any reasons for the Prelate, but the little pastoral and provocative to adopt him, in conclusion: stuff imperious fascist mayor of the City. All this without considering that Ferrara has been up to 1860 the Papal State, that historical and social level is equivalent to saying "until just yesterday". And in this City, sometimes, anticlericalism also presents itself in deep-seated forms and decided. And so, His Excellency Most Prudent and was first observed that most of the trading funds that housed the recriminati pubs and bars in the center acting as fabbrichette booze, They were owned by the diocesan curia, to which operators were paying hefty monthly rentals. And shortly after, youth groups, supreme teasing Archbishop, They organized before the Cathedral on bordello Night [cf. WHO]. And so, in the corridors of the Holy See, it was soon to assert: "We sent in a pastorally sensitive and delicate cities like Ferrara a bishop who shortly you a real public danger is revealed". In short, almost as if he knew, or as if they had not already done extensive experience of what this man is capable when he decides to stick his nose into matters that do not relate in any way a bishop: chores strictly political-administrative.

.

Sua Eccellenza Reverendissima out of the Prudentissima, being Milanese to this and as such, coming from a culture of great comedians - because as known all the most famous comedians in Italy are Milan, for example Roberto Benigni, Giorgio Panariello, Enrico Brignano, Maurizio Crozza and so to follow -, He did not fail even to demonstrate his innate comic vein. And so, finding himself before the severe case of a young man of thirty-three Ferrarese, He born to a mother who had been raped as a teenager by a priest, who asked behalf and justice of that painful fact, but above all wondering why this priest had never been punished and suspended from the exercise of the sacred ministry, responding with an official of the Este curia statement - this is not therefore a phrase extrapolated and manipulated by the usual and recriminati journalists communist or Masonic tendencies -, the poor man he was told by the Archbishop in the typical tone of the satirical culture ambrosiana with these exact words:

.

«[…] Since, however, it seems to be a matter of history and time, and who he is accused of being responsible for things that happened over thirty years ago, Archbishop is keen to point, in order to avoid unpleasant misunderstandings in the future, who had no part in the declaration of World War I and even the second and certainly it is not intended with the American president for the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan. On these things it is better to refer to other ' [cf. WHO].

.

Before this indecent text, you want to note that to be ironic about suffering and the human pain - particularly in the case of that of a wounded son, which it is always a very delicate and difficult to accommodate pain, treat and cure -, was a Bishop who has turned Italy far and wide to speak of the Social Doctrine of the Church and political values nonnegotiable family, ready to split hairs if there was to be discussed on a political condom, but ready to respond with mocking irony, however, to a young man who complained of being born to a teenage junior girl made pregnant by a priest. But it could be that the priest ingravidatore, in compliance with Catholic moral, He had been careful not to stain of shameful sin using a condom, thus making everything all right morally and canonical, or not?

.

Having said that the claim arises: I believe that such a bishop can be brought as a model of heroic courage and banner of defense of sound Catholic doctrine only by the revived Christian Democrats of The New Compass Daily [cf. WHO]. And if the defense of the deeds of the old award-divorced womanizer Silvio Berlusconi was not in itself sufficient, to this is added the prelate moves well reproach to those who declared himself outraged by the conduct of the Prime Minister, repeating that "the indignation is not a Christian sentiment" [cf. WHO, WHO]. And indeed, John the Baptist, who publicly rebuked in outraged tones Herod for his moral conduct of life, it was definitely not a Christian, nor could it as such nurturing Christian sentiments. Thus they did well to cut off his head for his indignation completely out of place, because good Herod had to be judged on the basis of his defense of common values, not for the fact that in private he went to bed with the wife of his brother, or had unhealthy attraction to his niece Salome - a kind of Ruby or Olgettina era [cf. WHO] ―, as it can be seen beyond the lines from the historic Gospel narratives.

.

If we were to take the Catholic morality of these kinds of figures as a model, then we should say that certain violations related to the sixth commandment, by those who today indicate some with fiery tones as concubines and adulterers, They are committed by them in their bedrooms or in related areas reserved. In essence: they commit sin in private, not in public. In short: do not go to consume mica embraces - these "dirty adulterous" - on the public square of the Church! Indeed it may be that in these so-called public law partner and adulterers are also defenders of so-called non-negotiable values. Just like at the time, to steal the Catholic vote, He defended them award-divorced Silvio Berlusconi, joyful organizer of private partying red light with girls of which could have been his grandfather, but he deserved in any case to be tried not for his private life but for his actions of government and for the defense of common values, Word of His Excellency Luigi Negri and Prudentissima.

.

Would not it be right that the poor adulterers towards which arise vehement the true Catholics defenders of true and authentic doctrine, they were also judged by their public life and their defense of common values, just like Silvio Berlusconi, not however for their lives and their private moral conduct? Also because otherwise we might go so far as to assume that His Excellency and Prudentissima, Proven poor philosophical education, unite just as little training in fundamental theology and in Catholic morality. And by the way is clear: I write these lines I have not fed and trained, regarding the scope of Catholic morality, the school of the worst lax born in the post-conciliar season, But the school of the late Cardinal Carlo Caffara, with whom I had long and fruitful relationships today so I miss. And if there's one thing I remember of this holy bishop, It is first and foremost the paternity, the pastoral and deep devotion which he always poured over his priests and the priests in general, he never left in a state of disarray and neglect to engage in quarrels and intrigues all policies and at all pastoral.

.

As for the heroism of His Excellency and Prudentissima, what escapes in good or bad faith to his laudatori and political exploiters is a fact that cannot be denied: his paternity spirit is comparable to that of a pickled artichoke. And here it is worth noting, who always presents him as one of the few heroic and courageous champions of the Church today in disarray, that when he was diocesan ordinary small Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, while he is spinning like a top in Italy between a journalist and the other, while he had time to come and go from Rome to travel to speak in Palazzo Montecitorio with Gianni Letta or Angelino Alfano and so to follow, in the space of one year and a half, especially in a small church that mattered at the time 51 secular priests, He lost three young priests, one of which had even an act of apostasy from the Catholic faith by switching to a Protestant sect. At another of the three, Diocesan manager - unbelievable, hear! - youth ministry, who instead insisted that it was the invalidity of his sacred ordination, because he said, at the time he was ordered did not feel ready, so, Always according to him, He claimed to have suffered psychological pressure while he was burdened with internal reserves, In response to His Excellency and Prudent said to continue to stay in the parish for another month and a half - then quietly to administer the sacraments (!?) ―, thus giving Bishop the time it takes to fix it. Now, I ask: a bishop who also knows and only the basic rudiments of canon law, to a priest who points his feet stating in a sure and decisive way that he has not been validly ordained a priest and who therefore declares his ordination invalid, Perhaps responding to this way, instead of immediately summon: as of this moment, you may not celebrate the Mass and not administer the sacraments as long as it has not been clarified? And this is easy to say that the defender no political Holy Communion for divorced and remarried, plus show at times lacking in philosophical and theological preparation, proof of the facts seems to be incomplete knowledge of the dogmatic and sacramental in its application of the Laws on the Canonical Discipline of the Sacraments.

.

If that's not enough, the amiable Bishop defender of non-negotiable political values, lost three young priests in one bang, he found better things to do, going a little later in audience by the then reigning Pope Benedict XVI, to get out from the meeting announcing in triumphal tones in all its many carers: "It was a frank and open conversation between bishop and bishop, and I could also take the opportunity to tell the Holy Father in that dire situation is the Diocese of Milan pouring now in total disarray [N.d.A. governed at the time by Dionigi Tettamanzi]». In practice he had dared to auto-run for office in Milan directly with the Roman Pontiff, heedless of not being able to govern a small diocese, until losing three priests in a short time while he was busy wandering between Marcello Pera, a Gianni Letta and an Angelino Alfano, in addition to dictate to journalists interviews in which he asked the questions and gave answers, like when you put in your mouth this title to effect his friend Camillo Langone so he spreads his umpteenth self-promotion to much bigger and more prestigious bishopric:

.

"The most Catholic of the few Italian Catholic bishops is abroad, in San Marino. "She lives in a postcard!"Said Benedict XVI last summer, during the visit in the diocese. "Yup, but it is a postcard that is never sent "replied Monsignor Luigi Negri" [cf. WHO].

.

Obviously, for "the most Catholic of the few Italian Catholic Bishops', it was necessary to think as soon as possible of a metropolitan archiepiscopal see which was also and strictly speaking the seat of cardinals. Or perhaps one can be so unconscious as to leave a bishop as a bridegroom to such a modest bride as the small Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro.? Never, we must give it as his second wife a great lady, because in some cases, desiring your neighbor's wife, abandoning their children and their families, It is not only desirable thing, but it is something entirely due, to the point that abandonment of the marital roof and divorce sometimes become completely legitimate and sacrosanct, but then go around to criticize the dangerous casuismo of the Jesuits.

.

Not to mention the games played to journalists by His Excellency and Prudentissima, that follow in all respects as the 'style I was misunderstood "to which he had to get used to the then Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, incidentally always to be judged for his actions of government and for the defense of common values, not for his private orgies. Unfortunately, the last to make spending was a few days ago the famous Vatican expert Andrea Tornielli, to which His Excellency and Prudent has released an interview for Vatican Insider [cf. WHO], only to declare a couple of days later The New Compass Daily not expressing those concepts. Easy chronological interpretation of the fact: after expressing those concepts - that Andrea Tornielli reported honestly, loyal and truthful -, The circulate the drummers laudatori He has perhaps shown some confusion way, so that, His Excellency and Prudentissima, He will answer them to sit tight, because "Sui divorced and remarried have not changed my opinion" [cf. WHO]. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who should ask me if I believe more in Andrea Tornielli or Luigi Negri, I would answer without hesitation: Andrea Tornielli. This is not only because Andrea Tornielli I know him well, but because the same Luigi Negri, This serious and honest journalist, Today ultra fifty, many of whom may not share or more positions, She knows him since he was barely fifteen, knowing as I do and maybe even more than I do what is honest. But unfortunately, the political and technical Berlusconi of His Excellency and this is Prudent, proven and established over time: when the’audience cala, shoot some bang, allows a few days so the news circles and controversy mounts, then saying denies being misunderstood, if anything, even fearing threats of lawsuits and various playfulness. By the way: the feared mega-lawsuit charged to the newspaper that reported the news of the interview of His Excellency and on Prudentissima’Eurostar, when it seems to have wished the reigning Pope to fly soon to the Creator [cf. WHO], where have you been? How many millions of euros in damages were awarded to him in the newspaper's conviction by the court for the serious damage to his public image through this defamation in the press? We'd like to know, rather through an article of information signed by Riccardo Cascioli, director de The New Compass Daily.

.

If therefore today we are in the dramatic situation in which we find ourselves, It is not the fault of the reigning Pontiff, to which pastoral choices and government I never spared openly harsh criticism, while stating, however,, as I wrote, Francesco I came last in a restaurant where even before he sat was attacked by management who presented the bill for all those who had had lunch and dinner handsomely before him [cf. WHO], after having given the Church for many years the most engaged in election campaigns instead of bishops in pastoral visits to parishes and in the care of their clergy. The current state of the Church is indeed guilty of those bad politiconi bishops which are now presented, by as many lay politicians, as defenders of the true Catholic faith. Are they, those responsible for the well-deserved election of a man like Jorge Mario Bergoglio, after that in 2013 we had reached a situation of unsustainability tied upstream to the weakness of government of the Blessed Pontiff Paul VI, which still has to be studied in the light of the terrible years of the post-conciliar, followed by the lack of a sense of authority that had completely crumbled under the pontificate of the Holy Father John Paul II, who also was a man of great authority, and finally to the almost total lack of government Venerable Pope Benedict XVI. In short: if history consists of facts and not by subjective moods, let's be careful in dealing with the actual and objective defects of the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, many of which are the result of gross errors made upstream by Blessed and Holy Pontiffs. E, said this, as already stated, I sometimes, I repeat that the Blessed and the Saints is not required perfection, but the heroic virtues, which are not prejudiced either by the lack of human defects or from mistakes, including also sometimes blunders or serious assessment committed in total good faith, or sometimes committed since betrayed and deceived.

.

It would therefore be appropriate for the lost and confused Catholics from today's ecclesial and ecclesiastical situation, were pointing to the most solid models is an example of both Christian virtue, because morality, much-vaunted and much pretense always some and penalty on people's skin, does not dwell in those political and ideological circles that behind pretexts of faith drunk at of the Latins and strict moral rectitude. If anything, before certain figures anything but heroic, the faithful should remember that holy reminder that warns us:

.

«[…] do not ye after their works, because they say and do. In fact, bind heavy burdens and impose them on the shoulders of the people, but they don't want to move them even with a finger " [Mt 23, 3-4].

.

That translated into other words, does this mean: the ancient Pharisees claimed to them so that "the indignation is not a Christian sentiment" and that Berlusconi does is judged by circolini red light of his private life, but by his public acts of government and "the defense of common values'.

.

Elevate to human models under certain characters is abhorrent, because they are those who still would cut ancòra head to John the Baptist, but what is worse is that the feeling would do with consciousness perfectly in place. Add to this another fact: if the reigning Pope prospettasse this retired archbishop a cardinal's hat, these, starting from the next day, dall'augurargli long way to go soon to the Creator - as it is said that His Excellency Revendissima and Prudent had to make jokingly talking on a Eurostar [cf. WHO, WHO] ―, It would say that a great Pontiff as Francis I had not had by the Holy Pope Gregory the Great, would you define love joy as clear and extraordinary document of the pontifical Magisterium of the entire history of the Church, but above all it would propose to the Holy See to request the building of Castel Sant’Angelo to be used by the Municipality of Rome in order to enclose all the ecclesiastics and theologians who showed even and only vague perplexity towards certain ambiguities of this document..

.

a collegiate press release S.It is. Mgr. Luigi Negri, Archbishop of Ferrara-Comacchio, signed with the Vicar General everlastingly the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro [to open the text click on this]

I did not mention a painful fact that I was the protagonist past and that to me is not a source of suffering but fun, as bitter, because at the bottom of this it is that eventually produce the ridiculous figures: the fun. So I only do it in the end, of pure title example, in case it was not clear ancòra the subject we are to tell the sad story. Before continuing, however, is necessary to clarify my status canon, premise that I received in Rome the sacred order of the diaconate, then he was ordained a priest in the Church of Santa Prisca on the Aventine for the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro from the hands of S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri. My training for the priesthood has unfolded entirely in Rome, then where I lived and where I work today. They are therefore a priest regularly "resident outside the diocese" with the authorization of the Bishop, I have my office of postulator of the Causes of Saints in Rome, I live in Rome, when I can I go to Sicily, awfull then for pastoral reasons mostly related to my ministry as a preacher and confessor in various parts of Italy …

.

… So that happened back in 25 May 2013 I wrote a very severe article in which he harshly criticized the then President of the Italian Bishops' Conference, Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, Metropolitan Archbishop of Genoa, who wanted to personally celebrate funeral porcini the heretic priest Andrea Gallo, despite having been able to prevent with all the best justifications, He is in these days in Rome for the plenary assembly of the Bishops of Italy, then delegating some other funeral for those that would have resolved fight. During the funeral, Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco was found to administer Holy Communion to Vladimiro Guadagno, aka Luxuria, who first showed women dressed to the Eucharistic table, then made even sacrilegious eulogy on the presbytery during the liturgical action, talking ambo from which it administers to believers of Christ God's Word. Before that my harsh criticism, His Excellency and Prudentissima, now politically committed to squirm around the Holy Communion for divorced and remarried, despite not having any more about me canonical jurisdiction, as now elected Archbishop of Ferrara, through a gross abuse canon and making use of fiery tones, He dreaded against me 'disciplinary decisions, and even canonical " [see text WHO], signing as Archbishop of Ferrara-Comacchio a senseless document against an elder not belonging to the Diocese of Ferrara, but he incardinated in that of San Marino-Montefeltro and as such solely dependent canonical jurisdiction of his Diocesan Ordinary, thank God today is lovable and gentle man of S.It is. Mons. Andrea Turazzi.

.

I then notice to today's supporters of this heroic Bishop elevated to a banner of defending the true Catholic tradition, which in this press, to deny my accusation addressed to Andrea Gallo, The petitioner maintains: "It is our firm conviction that the Church can coexist very different opinions». Read the text, because he wrote and signed this very, which is to say: Andrea Gallo, that at the end of the Mass waved the red Communist flag singing Bella Ciao [cf. WHO] and that he had several times accompanied the women to the clinic for an abortion [cf. WHO], it was not a shame of the Catholic priesthood as I had dared to define it, never! Because when the good Luigi Negri decides to tremble like a bunny in front of the powerful from whom he yearns for some sop, He is even able to affirm and sign that a subject like Andrea Gallo is just a simple "different opinion", declaring moved in such a statement also "firm conviction". And note: of the official text signed by him and sent out to the press it is written just like that, or maybe I'm not able to read and understand? No, I read and understand well, not wanting to understand are the drummers laudatori from The New Compass Daily, to follow with all the jungle and blog sites that the reigning Pontiff addressed criticism that respect for its ambiguity or for his unhappy pastoral choices, as I do, but they hate so sometimes very fierce, also inviting others to hatred. And so, i drummers laudatori, even before the evidence of the facts, for their ideological self-interest, for the sake of seeking political fight and to attack the reigning Pontiff, prefer just do not understand, so much they need to create themselves and then to present cardboard idols.

.

But above all I ask: if it is not legitimate to Communion for divorced and remarried, many of whom often animated by authentic and deep Christian sentiments, in which the title defender of the true faith and non-negotiable values, today elected champion vainer by the entire Catholic ultra right, He has publicly threatened - and I repeat: without having any canonical title -, a presbyter who instead declared himself upset by the sacrilegious Communion given to the trans Vladimiro Guadagno, not as trans, but as a promoter of homosexualism, dell'aborto, euthanasia and any other perverse aberration?

.

The book heretic Andrea Gallo displayed and sold in 2013 at the library of the Pontifical Lateran University and presented with a foreword heretic Vito Mancuso

Incidentally, at that informed me falsely accused stating: «S.E. Mons. Negri would like to clarify that he had intervened several times in recent months, in "camera caritatis" his gift Ariel, because it results in a different language of his speeches. On the contrary, recently it received responses dictated by attitudes of arrogance ". Unfortunately theand things are quite differently. Given the fact that 2011, nuanced even the Patriarch of Venice, good Luigi Negri was looking around doing the account of the various prominent Italian diocese about to be freed, every time I, somehow my article, I treated subjects far from insulting, but intended to annoy certain clerical “straw tails”, These were going to touch the Bishop in his most sensitive spot, into saying or understand that they were going supplies [the selection of candidates], for this or that archdiocese and, this priest harassing, He threatened to make it a few “image damage”. So that, intimandomi the first time he called me that I no longer publish articles - all while books heretic heretic and Andrea Gallo Vito Mancuso were exhibited and sold in the library of the Pontifical Lateran University, the total negligence of that bertoniano having less of S.It is. Mons. Enrico Dal Covolo, Its Rector -, sounding anything but arrogant answered: "Please, Your Excellency show me where I lie not telling the truth and where I lacked a doctrinal and theological level '. Textual came the reply: "No matter tell the truth, but knowing how to evaluate when to keep quiet and not say it. They are ongoing supplies for the new diocese and I can not hear me ask you so cryptic even as it comes to assign me to another diocese ". I replied: "Your Excellency agrees that if the Word of God made man had kept quiet, He would never died on the cross?». his reply: "You always have to throw a theological". I answer: "Excellence, but on what I have to throw it, Perhaps the gastronomic? I am a priest and a theologian, Mica a cook!" It's this one, to someone's opinion, it would be arrogance? In any case I remain also comforted by another fact: none of those within the church world know me - including the highest authorities of the Holy See -, would ever ready to believe that I have disrespected, not only to the Bishop, but also to the ordaining bishop, for more arrogantly. I do not believe nobody, knowing that I harbor for the Bishop sacred respect and who have always been industrious to instill this feeling branch also in all the priests who use me as a confessor and spiritual director. Unfortunately instead, His Excellency and Prudentissima, He has bestowed the sacred respect due to his episcopate, not to mention his particular Church and her children. Just as if the Word of God do not ever warned admonishing: "To whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more " [LC 12, 48].

.

NShe Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, both the then Bishop Luigi Negri that the Vicar General everlastingly co-signer of that delusional text - and applies everlastingly because Vicar General by three bishops! ―, have over time very careful not to fear "those disciplinary decisions, and even canonical "against a priest who became the father of a delightful child and was never sanctioned, quite the opposite, before he was sent around the world at the expense of the Diocese, Finally ambushed by His Excellency and Prudent in another diocese. Similarly they were never feared similar action to that priest who was proven wrong in the public square by his mistress after the poor thing had discovered that he was a cockerel well with other women, feeling so betrayed by this unfaithful mate [cf. WHO, WHO, WHO]. I was never even taken several measures towards priests defectors, picked up from various parts of the world by the then Bishop of San Marino-Montefeltro S.It is. Mons. Paolo Rabbitti, often absent from the parishes and the diocesan territory for weeks or even months, several of which he has over time looted the parish coffers to the tune of travel and GRATUITIES made to their families of origin and so to follow ... With these and other reasons even worse for decency and Christian charity silent, I introduced myself with that statement in hand to the Apostolic Nunciature in Italy, the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura and the Congregation for Bishops.

.

At the Apostolic Signatura laughed and they answered me: "In your diocese, there is someone who knows the canon law?». It said that continued saying: "In this release you are not first given the canons that you would have violated, which makes this text legally null and even absurd, why not sign out of your legitimate diocesan ordinary, but signed in grave abuse to the canon by the bishop of another diocese and a priest who has no right and title to threaten sanctions and anything else at your expense ". I said I: "Ah, but this is not surprising, if we consider that this priest co-signer is the Vicar General everlastingly, the theological and canonical thickness of which is comparable to that of a sole!».

.

The Congregation for Bishops laughed instead more and even longer, and laughing was a High Priest who, receiving me in the absence of the Cardinal Prefect who in those days was outside Italy, mi said: "But who is it? Ah, you thought: Luigi Negri. But in this department it is famous! Thinks, when he was prefect, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, good Negri came and went pawing from this building saying they were two years that he was in the small diocese and that now he had done everything there was to do. Another time he said to the Cardinal Prefect: "I was given a diocese which is as big as a single parish of Milan" ". In short, It had only been two years now that his poor wife was standing too close. And so, the Apostolic Nuncio and the highest leaders of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura and of the Congregation for Bishops, They invited me to give up, although I have every reason to sue the case before the Court the two Ecclesiastical bad boys signatories of that collegiate press. Indeed, the three different church authorities surveyed answered me: "This rambling statement does not affect in any way you but qualifying and then disqualified in the worst way who signed it and then spread '. And still today, to my honor and to the utmost dishonor of those who signed and then disseminated it, anyone visiting the official website of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, entering the Vicar General of the page everlastingly, you do not find the canonical penalties mentioned at all paid to the father became a priest, or to the priest denounced by his mistress for infidelity, or those paid to priests who leave for weeks or months parishes to go around the world; none of this will find. But anyone can find the text of the statement written by those two bad boys in goliardie vein, Also still surviving in some media outlet [cf. WHO].

.

I honestly don't know, if the Vicar General everlastingly, with this collegiate press today maintained in glory in the diocese website on his personal page, he thought he was going to spite me, or to discredit my increasingly solid reputation as a pastor in the care of souls and theologian, because in actual fact he acted as the poor that to spite his wife took a pair of shears and then castrated. with me, indeed, It can not be fought on the basis of clerical and obtuse Montagnoli moods based on the "me is obnoxious ergo I make war"; He fights with me on the plane of moral, the pastoral level and theologically. And I'm an immoral priest, a bad pastor in the care of souls and a bad theologian, This is all to prove, with all due respect bad boys in goliardie vein.

.

As for the Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, on which years later I got to write words of profound affection [cf. WHO], anyone who wishes can ask His Eminence if his heart is estimated more - and especially if considered more reliable -, a subject very strict when necessary always to work face open like me, or His Excellency and Prudentissima. Just ask, because perhaps you will have a complete answer. Also because me, contrary to his Excellency and Prudentissima, though in the past I thought it appropriate to criticize severely Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco for the episode just been reported, I did it with manly dignity leonine, putting my face and my signature. Otherwise instead, His Excellency and Prudentissima, it would not happen to remember the more than a few jokes insolent season with phrase books from longshoreman, he made over the years around the lounges on Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco? Why not a few people - bishops "friends" included - that he has heard some irreverence in the private saloons, or even the corridors of the Paul VI during the meetings of the Italian Episcopal Conference, those of his jokes if Angelo Bagnasco always remember all, from first to last, and also very well.

.

This is in reality S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri, a wind vane that has spent its episcopate roaring with rabbits and playing rabbit with lions, to complain of an increasingly mediocre and banal [cf. WHO], and all the while he, the most dangerous and poor trivial, after having searched one by one with the lantern of Diogenes and then treacherously selected, if it is always placed around as collaborators, place turkey in any role of power usually it takes around him a golden eagle to help him and to assist him, and if necessary, that the recommendations and that the brakes in certain wrong choices. And how many times I have suffered in seeing how he was laughed at by members of the Italian Episcopal Conference, for overtly, naive and brash with whom, instead of taking care of their priests and the portion of the People of God entrusted to him, He spent and burned their valuable episcopate pawing to be assigned to some great bishopric, and it is naturally created Cardinal. man ever, in his childlike naivete, he managed to overcome his deep and personal trauma: the fact that his contemporary and companion in the ranks of Catholic Youth, then later become Communion and Liberation, also as he Luigi Giussani pupil, He had become the Patriarch of Venice, and Cardinal, but especially, afterwards, Archbishop of Milan. He was in fact some, after the appointment of Angelo Scola in Milan, that would be given to him "well-deserved" sweetener and was promoted as his replacement to the Patriarchal See of Venice. The elderly priests in particular, in what was his Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro, Always remember that only failed to organize the festivities and to prepare the welcome speech to the Diocese and the settlement in Venice, so he had been convinced by those clerics who wickedly playing on some of his weaknesses, for years and years had fun teasing him to do so, giving hopes and expectations of pumping it. No coincidence that the priests, giving in those moments for granted his imminent departure, He repeated he could do for the moment plans for the future.

.

They are also aware that S.It is. Mons. Luigi Negri It is ill with a disease today quite widespread among Ecclesiasts, which is called querelite, but I doubt that quereli me for telling the plain truth, because no member of the Italian Episcopal Conference, especially those that have well-known, you would never against a faithful man, honest and selfless like myself, to defend the indefensible, ie a person like him, that mystery of grace was still, in the fullness of his apostolic priesthood, a vehicle, sometimes even very privileged, of the Holy Spirit. I am a witness I, I was ordained a priest by this degenerate father, which one day, while it was the year 2010, I said:

.

"Your Excellency has taught me more with their defects that by their own virtues. Thanks to you I have indeed acquired a holy lesson that will remain with me throughout my priestly life: I realized that if the devil can take ambition and lust for power and career, He will make us all he wants ".

.

a document of 2010

They He did not catch, or perhaps did not grasp these my words. However, shortly afterwards he signed and handed me the letter in which he certified that he had conferred on me the ministry of exorcist for the canonical uses permitted. [click to open the document WHO]

.

I have deeply loved Luigi Negri, to whom I have deep love today. Receiving him in Rome before ordination to the diaconate and then the priestly consecration, exchanging with the Bishop of the liturgical sign of peace whispered in his ear in both times: "You will not ever regret it!». And the proof of facts I believe to be the best priest he consecrated, certainly the most consistent, faithful and courageous. I guess I'm the one who put themselves up by the gifts of grace of the Holy Spirit has developed what the father was missing, or that it was lacking, starting first of all from my deep sense of fatherhood. But all, anyway, it was only possible thanks to the father and the state grace of this degenerate father.

.

That's why I think Luigi Negri, without ever admitting it with anyone, his heart will always be deeply proud of me, because I am what he is not, both in courage and in escape from all the conditioning and enslaving career ambition, both in consistency and in the pastoral care of souls is the actual theological culture and not smoky. But if I'm this really, it is thanks to him and about his faith and his action of sacramental grace on me. Therefore if you would come back he would not hesitate to consecrate a priest again without delay, because Luigi Negri is a true believer. And right now, not even merely a priest consecrate, because if I could consecrate Bishop, especially after what I wrote about him in these lines. Because just as he has known the pain of the unworthy sons who have maliciously betrayed and that despite repeated and unheeded My exhortation would still put next as employees increasingly complacent, more so he knows how to recognize the faithful son, if necessary, ready to beat him in public, but which, however, will never betray.

.

It does not matter that Tell him I'm his best son, I know him and I know, not necessary that this is declared in an official statement, because those - official press releases -, His Excellency Most Prudent and sometimes used them to proclaim authentic amenities the universe Cosmic along with that mountain wolf of his Vicar General everlastingly, the beautiful things, instead, the Serbian ones as Mary pondered them in her heart [cf. LC 2, 19].

.

the Island of Patmos, 17 January 2018

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.