THEOLOGY AND CANON LAW OF FREE TOILET PAPER: TURKEYS AND CLAMOROUS IDIOCIES ABOUT THE INVALIDITY OF THE RENUNCIATION OF THE GREAT PONTIFF BENEDICT XVI

.

If an election even took place through simony, that is, through exchanges of money or other goods or benefits, those who have put it all in place will incur excommunication automatic, But, the election of the Roman Pontiff, even though it occurred through the perpetration of this very serious crime already condemned by several Church councils and by ecclesiastical laws, it will not be considered invalid but in any case legitimate. So it is written, without penalty of denial, in the apostolic constitution Dominic Flock of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article
.

.

.

Let it be freely and properly disclosed …

If any Catholic was undecided whether to read The Manifesto, historic communist newspaper founded in 1971 by Rossana Rossanda and Lucio Magri, brilliant intellectuals and refined pens of Italian journalism, or the newspaper Free, founded by that nice gaga of Vittorio Feltri and directed today by that depressed gravedigger face of Alessandro Sallusti, read the first without hesitation and do not use the second even as a base for the waste separation basket. Indeed, this newspaper devoid of shame and a sense of ridicule has been giving ample space for months to a journalist who supports insane theses on the invalidity of the resignation from the sacred throne of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI. Having said that, it should be clarified that the right to think, word and expression cannot be confused with the right to manipulation, to the mystification and grave offense addressed to the Pontiff reigning today and to years and years of his pastoral government of the universal Church.

.

Qhis journalist grants visibility to characters out of balance, like the presbyter of the Archdiocese of Palermo who for years has been poisoning the simplest and most fragile Catholics with crazy theories through his daily videos-directed on Facebook. Before proceeding it is worth summing up, to then reply and deny, what this subject has been saying for four years now:

.

1. Benedict XVI's resignation is invalid because he was forced by force, therefore he continues to be the legitimate Supreme Pontiff;

2. What is called "Pope Francis" does not exist, he is an antipope, a usurper, an emissary of Satan, hence all its acts of government, his documents and appointments are invalid;

3. The election of the “false pope” Jorge Mario Bergoglio was orchestrated by a group of cardinals known as The St. Gallen mafia, who worked with the strong powers and international Freemasonry to dismiss Benedict XVI and elect him;

4. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a satanic destroyer of the Church and of Catholic doctrine, he is a heretic;

5. All priests who celebrate Holy Mass in communion with the “fake” usurper pope and heretic celebrate invalid Masses, indeed of the satanic masses;

6. The faithful who receive the Holy Eucharist from priests in communion with the false pope do not receive the Most Holy Body of Christ but the body of the Antichrist, in the same way all the sacraments administered by them are invalid;

7. When a conclave will be celebrated on the death of the usurper antipope, will in fact be invalid, because they will proceed with the election of the successor of the cardinals created by the antipope, then they will elect another antipope.

.

Even a child who has studied the catechism with dedication to prepare for the First Holy Communion would understand that it is genuine nonsense.

.

No One, including the conspiracy reporter of Free and the followers of this poor priest, he should be surprised if the author of such theses was first suspended peep, then excommunicated, at last, as a last extreme act, dismissed from the clerical state, given his obstinate persistence and the ferocious hatred he sows among the people, turning their followers into fanatics who in turn spread fanatic hatred towards the "false church", the "false pope" and the Priestly College composed, according to them, of "cowards who tremble before the usurper antipope".

.

With a question now let's close the discussion on the newspaper Free to move on to more serious dissertations: given that starting from the title of the newspaper the editors declare themselves free in their opinions, they would be willing to give space on the same columns to a reporter who similarly carried forward in a pounding way, for months and months, the most absurd destructive and offensive theories against Senator Matteo Salvini the Honorable Giorgia Meloni? Or, if only he tried to do it, he would be kicked out on the spot at the first attempt to publish something like this? And with this we have clarified how free this newspaper really is, directed by that depressed gravedigger face of Alessandro Sallusti. Because for these subjects, freedom seems to consist only in letting certain journalists free to throw shovels of shit on the Catholic Church and the Papacy. But they would never allow a flamenco dancer to throw a rose on the so-called populist Right at the end of her dance.. This is their freedom of information, this is their independence. Therefore, I reiterate the invitation: Catholics, buy and read The Manifesto, but don't buy and don't read Free.

.

Sui social media, which should never be underestimated with a spirit of intellectual snobbery, there are self-styled Catholics who deviated from the right path by these deformers of the news are convinced of their absurd theories, turning in turn into disseminators of "sensational truths". Like this, with the spirit of those who support Lazio instead of Roma or vice versa, with distressing superficiality they affirm:

.

«It is now clear that Benedict XVI by renouncing the ministry did not renounce the papacy. Therefore he is the Supreme Pontiff, the usurper Jorge Mario Bergoglio is only an antipope and moreover also a heretic ".

.

Let's start by answering this statement totally outside any theological logic and law. To do this, you must first ask yourself: what do certain people prodded by their gurus mean by gift e ministry in reference to the Roman Pontiff Bishop of Rome? The gift of the Roman Pontiff is not an indelible sacrament, like the consecration of an episcope or the consecration of a presbyter, the Petrine one is only a primacy of jurisdiction. The Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI did not perform an act of renunciation while maintaining something of the apostolic primacy of this office, because the election in the conclave does not mark the person elected with an indelible sacrament that would continue to remain even after the resignation, as happens for bishops when they renounce the government of their dioceses and become emeritus bishops, but always remaining bishops, which as such have renounced the ministry, while maintaining that gift indelible linked to an indelible sacrament.

.

The fundamental step which escapes certain practitioners of theology do it yourself, to excommunicated priests who would be self-proclaimed biologists and to poor journalists with the dangerous hobby of the free conspiracy, it is precisely that the papacy is not a sacrament, then the gift it is not indelible. "Theologians" and "canonists" are sports bar they do not understand this and think they are disserting on extremely complex themes on the theological and canonical level, the only result will be to first confuse oneself, then all those simple people who, instead of listening to us priests and theologians of solid formation, drink on the internet to the insanity of these irrational imbalances..

.

To the Supreme Pontiff who renounces the ministry therefore remains the gift episcopal, not the gift of the papacy. The sacrament of the fullness of the priesthood remains, the episcopate, in that gift which derives from a sacrament that cannot be canceled in any way. This in the same way that I could never give up on gift priestly, I could give up the exercise of the priestly ministry, but not al gift. Or as if a baptized person wanted to renounce Holy Baptism, which is an indelible sacrament. He can't do it. If he wishes, he can deny his baptism and declare that he does not feel baptized and does not intend to belong to the Catholic Church., but the sacrament which he received in substance and form, no one will be able to take it away. Yet another example: a cardinal can be deprived of the dignity of a cardinal, because it is a pure ecclesiastical honorific. That of the cardinal is a dignity, not a sacrament. While the bishop or the presbyter, who with episcopal consecration and priestly consecration have received the ministerial priesthood of Christ and the sacramental fullness of the apostolic priesthood which imprint in consecrated persons an indelible character which has ontologically transformed them, they can renounce everything that the episcopate and the presbyterate entail in terms of duties and honors, but they will not cease never to be bishops and presbyters, because such they will be forever. In the same way that a bishop or a presbyter excommunicated and also subjected to the extreme act of dismissal from the clerical state, they will never cease to be bishops and priests.

.

The pontificate is acquired juridically and not through the sacraments. Hence Benedict XVI, with his act of renunciation he renounced the ministry and kept the gift episcopal to whom, him like any bishop, could never give up, why the gift episcopal - I said it but I repeat it again for particularly hard heads - it derives from an indelible sacrament that imprints a character, the papacy does not.

.

This is what the resignation of the Roman Pontiff entails. Unfortunately, certain poor and good people, more or less Catholic, they are committed to taking truly colossal nonsense at face value, to the point of stubbornly refusing to listen to the experts. At that point it is difficult for them to learn how things really stand on the level of sacramental dogmatics and on that of the canonical discipline of the Sacraments.. While it remains almost impossible for us to move them, because it's them, although he lacks theology and ecclesiastical law, to… explain to us how things really are (!?).

.

The free journalist is stupid in one way, the priest excommunicated and today discharged from the clerical state in another way, with the style of the famous Doctor Dulcamara cite the Code of Canon Law as irrefutable proof. It is of little use that they transform it into a sort of "premature supercazzola with right-hand scapellation", to refer to the saga of My friends, thanks to which today, the term super cazzola entered the philosophical lexicon to indicate a completely meaningless phrase or expression. What it's worth, But, is that citing a canon from the Code of Canon Law produces the same effect that the amazing relics of Friar Cipolla narrated by Giovanni Boccaccio produced in certain ignorant plebeians. And so, stupid journalist and priest excommunicated today discharged from the clerical state, solemnly they affirm:

.

«Benedict XVI is always the legitimate Supreme Pontiff because he did not do what the canon did 332 paragraph 2 requires ".

.

Just so, their trump card and irrefutable proof of the idiocies they affirm is that Code of Canon Law which, in fact, cannot even read. Let's go and read what is written in this canon 332 comma 2, this:

.

«In the event that the Roman Pontiff renounces his office, it is required for validity that the renunciation be made freely and duly manifested, instead it is not required that someone accept it ".

.

The Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI, after announcing his renunciation on 11 February 2013, until the day 28 of that same month he repeated several times the full freedom with which he had come to mature his decision. He reiterated this in his speech to the cardinals, in the address to the clergy of Rome, in two general audiences and in various public official greetings. Afterwards, after the election of his Supreme Successor, came back to repeat it again, to the point of affirming that not only his choice was totally free and considered, but that if anyone had put any pressure on him to give up, he would never give up for any reason.

.

It can be clearer? Of course not, but absurdly, from these very clear and unequivocal words, some manipulators build illogical sand castles to support:

.

"These words are proof that he was pressed by strong constraints and that Benedict XVI's coded message must be interpreted precisely behind these words of his" (!?).

.

Soon said: if things were as stated by the stupid free journalist and the excommunicated priest discharged today from the clerical state, Benedict XVI would be the greatest liar and the greatest coward in the entire history of the papacy, or not?

.

Faced with these disputes the characters in question begin to play on elements that would be comic in themselves, if behind there was not the disaster of the souls who drag themselves into error. For example by stating:

.

"In its declaration written in Latin Benedict XVI made numerous errors. And since this one declaration it must be perfect in shape, these Latin syntax errors make it invalid. This is something that Benedict XVI knew well, but having been forced to make an act of renunciation, drew up a formal deed, burdening him with invalidity due to errors in Latin syntax which he knowingly wanted ".

.

Let's clarify: if Benedict XVI had really done such a thing would arouse disgust even in the worst cowards in the history of mankind. Soon said: support such things, which also entail the reading of the deepest conscience of others and therefore the celebration of absurd trials with the most hidden intentions, is equivalent to claiming the presence of invisible aliens landed on planet Earth and hidden among us humans. But let's go further:

.

"Benedict XVI continued to sign himself by following his name with the initials" P.P. " what does it mean high priest!».

.

So it has been thundering for a few years in his direct on Facebook the ignorant priest excommunicated and today discharged from the clerical state, who at every turn boasts of having obtained two theological doctorates. This proves that doctorates have never instilled intelligence in the limited mediocre who by nature lack it and which have never been a guarantee of science and wisdom.. Indeed, the bidottore excommunicated for heresy and schism, he is so ignorant in ecclesiastical history that he does not even know that initials, all’origine, was born during the first great dogmatic councils celebrated in the East to indicate the Bishop of Rome as Father of the Poor, which literally translates: Father of the Poor, o Father of the Little ones, of the Simple. This acronym, the Bishop of Rome, he adopted it in times when the title of Supreme Pontiff or Roman Pontiff did not yet exist. How could he then, that acronym, mean Pontiff of the Popes, as the ignorant janitor has been saying for years? And he adopted it, this acronym, to give an elegant lesson - read slap - to the Patriarch of Constantinople who boasted about twenty high-sounding titles. This is the true and original meaning of that acronym, ass of a heretical janitor going mad on Facebook on the hunt for souls to be ruined!

.

You don't pay at all, the stupid free journalist and the bidoctor priest excommunicated and today discharged from the clerical state then launch into sophisms on the exegesis of the New Testament. They take two sentences contained in the Gospel texts and then make him say what is not written in them:

.

«The difference is that the gift is the authority of the Supreme Pontiff, "You are Peter" (cf.. Mt 16, 18), while the ministry it is its development: "Feed my lambs" (cf.. GV 21, 15).

.

The difference between gift e ministry and vice versa, of which the stupid free journalist and the excommunicated priest-bidder speak, it is a pure distinction of formal logic, or conceptual, which should be used in special manuals and books in which we advance - and in which we must advance - even the most absurd hypotheses to be able to understand and clarify all the sides necessary for the correct knowledge and competence of the subject. It is a speculative tool used since late scholasticism by William of Ockham up to the subjectivist "terministic" excess that gave the basis to the thought of the Jesuit jurist Francisco Suarez, which should be taken with a grain of salt by experienced experts. Not confronted by that mediocre and limited practitioner of an excommunicated priest ruffapopoli who boasts a bidoctor, but that if he came out of his room of filming for the direct on Facebook, where he is surrounded by his adoring caregivers, to publicly confront a real specialist, within five minutes, to this pompous turkey, not even a pen would remain stuck on him. All because, (c)hey speculative tools were used in specific academic contexts within philosophical discussions, theological and juridical in which the i preamble, that is, the specific historical-critical introductions they explained, on a purely pedagogical and logical level, how the current state of the problem and therefore the overrun problem. Once these parts that served as introduction and explanation were omitted, only the specific studies of the themes and of the synthetic or even eclectic exposures were left, aimed solely at establishing the truth of a writing.. Soon said: those who do not have - like this excommunicated bidoctor priest - an adequate philosophical and theological training that starts from a solid scholastic basis and an equally solid knowledge of the art of rhetoric and philosophical theological speculation; who boast traditionalists, but that in fact they are completely unconscious modernist heretics, because they don't even realize they are, they will not even be able to read and understand these texts, but putting their hand into it they will upset them, finally they will believe that they have discovered in them what had never jumped into the eyes of anyone else over the centuries.

.

Explaining it all we have also provided implicit proof of the failure of this speculative approach, yesterday as today. Because people are not properly prepared upstream, in a deep and solid way, they will believe they can launch their sensational discovery or interpretation by centering everything on a little word separated from the complex context, excluding all the historical path, theological and juridical that conceal certainty behind them theological debates and every single section of canon law. All this for a simple and sad fact: because they do not know the subject and do not even know how certain academic disputes are to be framed, read and carried out. They take a little word, they extrapolate it after having misunderstood or not understood the whole context and build on it absurd truths then presented as irrefutable.

.

In certain speculations and dissertations academic based mostly on the principles of classical scholasticism, certain themes were carried up to the unbelievable, il cosiddetto paradoxical (paradox). Formerly Cicero, in the art of Latin rhetoric he resorted to paradox. Even the Blessed Apostle Paul himself in his exposition used the ὑπερβολή (hyperbole), which was typical of Greek rhetoric. In reality, But, these distinctions just don't exist, they are just rhetorical or thematic paradoxes, hyperbole or in any case excesses that aim to create speculative reasoning even on the most improbable and absurd hypotheses. Example: once, disserting with some confreres also trained in dogmatic theologians and historians of dogma, in a completely serious way - not because we were high on alcohol and hashish - we began to discuss the hypothetical existence of other lives in other worlds and planets outside the solar system. To this end we questioned ourselves: in case other forms of life existed, how to re-read the mystery of man's creation, but above all the incarnation of the Word of God and the sacrifice made through his saving death for the redemption of men? A dissertation, paradoxical, hyperbolic, pushed to the extreme paradox. Maybe though, if the free journalist and the priest excommunicated bidoctor were present, took and misunderstood four words, from then on they would give life to the alien theology.

.

For this, no canonist, until today, managed to carry this forward the breath of the voice without concept or reality, such as the invalid election of a Roman Pontiff or on the other hand the invalidity of an act of renunciation. This because, in the real world, true theologians are something quite different from practicons, amateurs and self-styled janitors, not to mention those who follow them and who in four ballets have in turn obtained doctorates in sacramental dogmatics and in canon law on Facebook e Instagram.

.

We who are true theologians, first of all because in obedience to the Church and its legitimate Authorities and because we were trained by our wise teachers to be rational and speculative minds, we speak on the basis of what exists and what has happened, namely this: Benedict XVI has freely, legitimately and validly renounced the Chair of Peter, confirming and reiterating the full freedom of his / her act of renunciation. Everything else is theology and canon law of everyday toilet paper Free and senseless follies shouted by a poor out of balance priest who goes crazy in the live broadcasts Facebook, from which he reminds his followers, every three nonsense shot at random, who holds two doctorates and is twice a doctor… twice a doctor! Except shortly after affirming that God revealed himself to the poor and ignorant to spite precisely the learned and the wise.

.

Sophistication about gift It is on ministry, or even invent a Benedict Code, as did the stupid free journalist on the telematic columns of Free, it means doing fantasy-theology and fantasy-canon law, clinging to little words and certain distinctions with not even a sophist spirit, but just illogical and irrational, looking for something that does not exist but that some, for them psychological or spiritual discomfort, they want it to exist at all costs. At that point, what does not exist if they invent it, giving words a different meaning or altering Church documents through manipulation, for example the Apostolic Constitution Dominic Flock of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, about the vacancy of the Apostolic See and the election of the Roman Pontiff. Indeed, the poor janitor, always specialized in making documents say what they do not say, he seems not to have even noticed what this Constitution writes in chapter VI, n. 78:

.

"If in the election of the Roman Pontiff - God forbid - the crime of simony were perpetrated, I decide and declare that all those who are guilty of it will incur excommunication automatic and that the nullity or non-validity of the same simoniacal provision is nevertheless removed, so that for this reason - as already established by my Predecessors - the validity of the election of the Roman Pontiff is not challenged ".

.

What does it all mean? It is clearly written: if an election even took place through simony, that is, through exchanges of money or other goods or benefits, those who have put it all in place will incur excommunication automatic, But, the election of the Roman Pontiff, even though it occurred through the perpetration of this very serious crime already condemned by several Church councils and by ecclesiastical laws, it will not be considered invalid but in any case legitimate. So it is written, without penalty of denial.

.

My dear followers of the excommunicated heretic priest that shoots nonsense in bursts on Facebook exhibiting to you, his audience, the amazing relics of Friar Cipolla. To you, that we pastors in the care of souls want in every way to recover from error and snatch from deception, I address myself with an invitation to reflect on this undeniable element: from a document as articulated as this Constitution, two words cannot be cut, isolate them from the whole context and then make the document say what is not written in it. Yup, the following n. 79 of the same chapter states:

.

«Also confirming the prescriptions of the Predecessors, I forbid anyone, even if he was awarded the dignity of cardinalate, to bargain, while the Pontiff is alive and without having consulted him, about the election of his Successor, or promise votes, or make decisions about this in private conventicles ".

.

Pay close attention: this precise and decisive prohibition, already contained in similar documents promulgated by other Supreme Predecessors of the Holy Pontiff John Paul II, even if it was totally violated by cardinals, it absolutely does not contemplate the penalty of invalidity and nullity of the election. The document says so, it would be enough just to read, instead of taking as pure gold what unlikely claims that certain turkey that screams in live broadcasts Facebook. Therefore, compared to what has just been reported and explained, do you really intend to continue to give credit to this miserable subject who has been telling you for years that the election of the reigning Pontiff is invalid because it was orchestrated by a group of cardinals referred to as "The Mafia of St. Gallen"? Please reason, especially to read: if not even an election that took place through the shameful crime of simony renders the election of a Roman Pontiff invalid and null and void, do you really think it can be made such by cardinals who met every now and then in Switzerland to be together and talk to each other? Reason: it is the same document in question, which on the one hand condemns all kinds of pre-conclave pacts, but at the same time it does not question the legitimate and valid election of one who was also elected by this path. Think and above all read the documents, do not listen to what the roaring turkey pretends to make him say, of what certain documents never said and wrote.

.

The so-called "Mafia of St. Gallen" is a simple humorous joke made by the late Cardinal Godfried Maria Jules Danneels to a journalist, to which he said, in a purely joking tone, that every now and then, a group of cardinals, including him, they met in this Swiss town. And laughing, he said: "We were a bit like a mafia gathering". The theory of a conspiracy was built on this joke that would have forced Benedict XVI to resign with coercion and psychological violence in order to elect the already prepared Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio in his place., supported by this Welsh cardinal mafia, with strong powers and international Freemasonry, as the excommunicated screaming priest has been saying for years.

.

My dear, I ask you in a pleading tone for divine charity which has endowed even the most limited with capacity, at least partial, to understand and want: how can you give credit to such things, denied by the facts, by ecclesiastical laws and by the Apostolic Constitution which regulates the election of the Roman Pontiff? Tall this for the sole purpose of denying, with illogical and irrational obstinacy, what really happened: Benedict XVI has freely, legitimately and validly renounced the Petrine ministry and some grammatical errors will certainly not make his formal resignation invalid. Those who deny this deny the reality of living in hyperuranium.

.

For all of us priests and theologians that we have given our entire existence to the Church and to the Holy People of God, it is really disheartening to try to counter people sunk in the most absurd error who do not accept any correction, because they refuse to see guides and teachers in us. In these painful circumstances, the tremendous prophetic words written by the Blessed Apostle Paul to his disciple Timothy resound in our hearts as shepherds in the care of souls:

.

«The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales. But you shall carefully, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry " (II Tm 4, 1-5).

.

Today we servants of the Church and of sound doctrine we all feel Timothy in the struggle, which is an often useless struggle against the idiocy produced by illogical and irrational minds that are dragging many souls towards ruin. And that they get angry, verbally attack us and seriously offend us, if only we try to bring them back to reason. Hard times for priests and theologians today, especially for pastors in the care of souls animated by profound faith, who therefore strongly feel the duty to defend the People of God at all costs from ravenous wolves and the Onion Friar who abuse their popular credulity with the display of amazing relics.

.

the Island of Patmos, 23 November 2021

.

.

I REFER TO THIS PREVIOUS VIDEO-LESSON FOR THOSE WHO WISH TO MORE ABOUT THE TOPIC HEREIN

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

payable to Editions The island of Patmos

IBAN IT 74R0503403259000000301118
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.