Parables are never enough, because they do not pass and speak to eternity

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

PARABLES ARE NEVER ENOUGH, WHY DON'T THEY PASS AND SPEAK TO THE ETERNAL

«There is something that you cannot find anywhere in the world, yet there is a place where you can find it»

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Like a painter who, once the work is finished, places his signature on the side of the painting, so Matthew, with a phrase, initials the page of the Gospel where he depicted, in narrative form, the parables of Jesus, an entire speech dedicated to the Kingdom of God:

«For this every scribe, become a disciple of the kingdom of heaven, is like a landlord who extracts new and old things from his treasure » [Mt 13, 52].

Matthew the tax collector [Mt 9,9] he has now become the wise scribe who saw the work of reinterpretation of the ancient deposit of faith accomplished in Jesus, bringing new and unexpected realities to light. Therefore he invites his readers and disciples to become those owners who do not keep for themselves the riches of the unsuspected newness of the Kingdom, but they also know how to offer it generously.

The abundance of parables on the lips of Jesus that describe the Kingdom of God is not surprising, as well as the multiplication of metaphors, symbols and images. Because they compose a reality that continually exceeds and surpasses every human measure, while respecting it. Since the Kingdom belongs to God, it cannot be circumscribed or enclosed in a single formula. The different parables on the mouth of Jesus express the complexity and polysemy of this new theological reality and who collected them, as it will be for the Gospels which are four and not just one[1], he felt that by placing them next to each other, all together, had something important to say about the Kingdom of God that Jesus inaugurates, explains and makes present.

But here is finally the evangelical page of this XVII Sunday of time for a year:

«At that time Jesus said to his disciples: “The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field; a man finds it and hides it; then it goes, full of joy, he sells all his possessions and buys that field. The kingdom of heaven is also similar to a merchant who goes in search of precious pearls; found a pearl of great value, will, he sells all his possessions and buys it. Yet, the kingdom of heaven is like a net cast into the sea, which collects all kinds of fish. When it's full, the fishermen haul it ashore, they sit down, they collect the good fish in the baskets and throw away the bad ones. So it will be at the end of the world. The angels will come and separate the evil from the good and throw them into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. You have understood all these things?”. They answered: "Yes". And he said to them: “For this every scribe, become a disciple of the kingdom of heaven, it is similar to a householder who extracts new and old things from his treasure"".

The last parable is eschatological in tone and its location ultimately becomes important because it opens a window on how Jesus positioned himself in relation to the world. The fishing net elsewhere, for example in the last chapter of the fourth Gospel[2], it now symbolized the mission of the Church and the need for different traditions - in that case the synoptic and the Johannine one - to remain united because that was the intention of the Lord who had invited the disciples to fish[3]. In this circumstance the net that is pulled into the boat is a metaphor for the final judgment since it explicitly speaks of the "end of the world" or of history.

Allow me to make a small digression at this point which I hope does not exceed the limits of this commentary on the Sunday Gospel. It is now well established that Jesus' preaching was based on an eschatological vision. At least since Albert Schweitzer at the beginning of the 20th century in a famous book put an end to liberal exegesis and the first stage of research on the historical Jesus by stating that he could only be thought of except eschatologically[4].

In his preaching Jesus went beyond the thought of Jewish apocalypticism which predicted an imaginative future event. For him it is a reality that is already an object of experience, a current event in which the totality of history is recapitulated. the Kingdom of God as such, that is, the full unfolding of his redemptive sovereignty, it hasn't happened yet, but the time of the end has come and so, properly speaking, there is no longer historical development, but rather a recapitulation of the whole story called to trial. In Jesus and in his preaching it happens as a process of condensation whereby time becomes very short. “The time is fulfilled and the Kingdom of God is near: convert, and believe in the gospel" [MC 1, 14-15]. What is announced here is the time (the kairos) of definitive fulfillment, the promised coming of the Kingdom, the great turning point of the world inaugurated by Jesus whose final act is about to take place with his parousia. And the disciple lives in the condensed time that goes from the resurrection to the parousia. For this now, unlike Jewish eschatology, “faith in the gospel” is needed, that is, in Jesus Christ, in the Messiah, who is present as the one who came and who is coming[5].

Judgment on this world will certainly come at the end, says the gospel, but the world itself, in Jesus' preaching he entered the eschatological phase. Otherwise we would not understand the radical demands of Jesus addressed to the disciples and his fight with the evil one. Which is not a fight against the world, but against the one who deludes the world that he can be self-sufficient, without God and therefore to be able to find meaning only in himself and in his achievements. Against this powerful illusion, Jesus announces the Kingdom of God and at the same time heals and restores and even resurrects the dead.

I find this statement enlightening on the Christian that someone like Frederick Nietzsche could probably countersign:

"Because of this, for this nihilistic conscience of his, the presence of the Christian is unbearable, and doubly unbearable; because it denies meaning to the radical desire to be there and, so, denies the will to power, but at the same time he suffers within himself the passion of the world. He does not shy away from the world's aspiration for happiness, because the Kingdom does not exist other from this world; and therefore he wants and works for happiness in the profane order which continually passes away, but he knows that happiness cannot remain, since it itself aspires to pass away. It's the point where the heart breaks: in extreme happiness as in extreme pain. The Gospels give a sublime representation of this."[6].

All this preamble which I hope wasn't long-winded helps me to say that Jesus' parables are not bedtime stories at all, but they must be taken tremendously seriously. E, getting back on our tracks, allows us to understand the first two parables of today's Gospel. In both two men find something new - since in the words and deeds of Jesus the Kingdom is the "novelty” — and they sell everything they have to make it their own[7]. While the merchant is already a discoverer of beautiful pearls (hello daisykaloùs margaritas) and in this sense he is someone who is looking for something extraordinary and probably unique that is missing from his collection. The first, an unidentified man, instead, accidentally finds a treasure. Perhaps this is why his joy is also underlined, because he didn't expect the discovery. In both, what is central is the find what is finally enough for their life and which precludes any further search. It is at this point that they put everything they own up for sale to purchase what they have finally found. They must have understood the unique and definitive value of the Kingdom, what is worth risking everything for. There is no more time to wait than this or further hesitations, for this is the time of fulfillment.

The two characters of the Gospel thus they implement wise behavior. This is probably why the curators of the Liturgy compared Matthew's page to the story of the young Solomon who in the first reading this Sunday tries to obtain from God "A docile heart" [1Re 3,9], but in return he receives from Him an even more precious pearl, that of «a wise and intelligent heart: there was no one like you before you nor will there arise after you" and even much more in riches and glory [1Re 2, 12-13].

About the pearl, St. Augustine, acutely notices that the merchant was looking for more pearls, the plural, and in the end he finds the single pearl par excellence which is Christ, the Word in which everything is summed up:

"That man, who was looking for precious pearls, he finds one that is truly of great value and, sold everything he owned, the purchase. This guy, so, in seeking good men with whom to live profitably, Above all, he encounters one who is without any sin: the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. Perhaps he too was looking for precepts, observing which he could behave well with men, and encountered love for others, in which alone, as the Apostle says, all the others are contained. In fact, do not kill, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not bear false witness and every other commandment are the individual pearls that are summarized in this maxim: Love your neighbor as yourself. O, perhaps, it is a man who is looking for intelligible concepts and finds the one in whom all are contained, that is, the Word, which was in the beginning, he was with God and he was God: the luminous Word for the splendor of truth, stable because immutable in its eternity and in every respect similar to itself due to the beauty of divinity: that Word that those who manage to go beyond the covering of the flesh identify with God"[8].

Allow me to close this commentary on the Gospel of today's Sunday reporting an apologue by M. Buber on dreaming of seeking and ultimately finding. Because parables are never enough.

«To the young people who came to him for the first time, Rabbi Bunam used to tell the story of Rabbi Eisik, son of Rabbi Jekel of Krakow. After years and years of harsh poverty, which however had not shaken his trust in God, he received orders in a dream to go to Prague to look for treasure under the bridge that leads to the royal palace. When the dream repeated itself for the third time, Eisik set out and reached Prague on foot. But the bridge was guarded day and night by sentries and he did not have the courage to dig in the indicated place. However, he returned to the bridge every morning, wandering around it until the evening. Finally the captain of the guard, who had noticed his comings and goings, he approached him and asked him in a friendly way if he had lost something or if he was waiting for someone. Eisik told him the dream that had brought him there from his distant country. The captain burst out laughing: “And you, poor fellow, to follow a dream you came all this way on foot? Ah, ah, ah! Stay cool to trust dreams! Then I too would have had to set out to obey a dream and go to Krakow, in the house of a Jew, a certain Eisik, son of Jekel, to look for treasure under the stove! Eisik, son of Jekel, are you kidding? I can see myself going in and ransacking all the houses in a city where half the Jews are called Eisik and the other half Jekel.!”. And he laughed again. Eisik greeted him, he returned to his home and dug up the treasure with which he built the named synagogue “Reb Eisik School, son of Reb Jekel”. “Remember this story well - Rabbi Bunam added at the time - and understand the message it addresses to you: there is something that you cannot find anywhere in the world, yet there is a place where you can find it”»[9].

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 30 July 2023

.

NOTE

[1] The quadriform Gospel [cf.. God's word 18; Irenaeus, Adv. Haer., III, 11, 8: PG 7, 885)

[2] GV 21, 3.6.11

[3] «Peter turned and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them, the one who had bent over his chest at dinner... Peter therefore, as he saw it, he said to Jesus: “man, what will become of him?”. Jesus answered him: “If I want him to stay until I come, what does it matter to you? You follow me”» (GV 21, 20.22)

[4] Albert Schweitzer History of research into the life of Jesus, Paideia, Brescia 1986, pp. 744 ff.

[5] «Come Lord Jesus» (AP 22, 20)

[6] Gaeta G., The time of the end, Any, p. 96

[7] "We ', sell what you own, give it to the poor and you will have treasure in heaven; then come and follow me" (Mt 19,21)

[8] Saint Aurelius Augustine, Seventeen questions on the Gospel according to Matthew, book one, PL 35

[9] Martin Buber, The path of man, Einaudi, 2023

.

San Giovanni all'Orfento. Abruzzo, Mount Maiella, it was a hermitage inhabited by Pietro da Morrone, called in 1294 to the Chair of Peter on which he ascended with the name of Celestine V (29 August – 13 December 1294).

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The merchant in search of the pearl of the Kingdom of God

Homiletic of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE MERCHANT IN SEARCH OF THE PEARL OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD

«The kingdom of heaven is also like a merchant who goes in search of precious pearls; found a pearl of great value, will, he sells all his possessions and buys it»

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

 

 

Dear Readers of The Island of Patmos,

summer time can become a propitious moment to try to deepen our faith and its contents. It is a period of freedom which is a sacred time in which, like God, let's rest. For this reason it becomes a time in which that rest can also be dedicated to reading and prayer. Our search for God, of our being with him never ceases to take place. Father Henri De Lubac wrote:

“The human mind is so made that it cannot have a truth and hold it, if not searching and always searching. The rest of thought is equivalent to its death.".

In the parables of Jesus, who have already been talking about the Kingdom for some Sundays, on this XVII Sunday of ordinary time we focus on the continuous search for the Kingdom. A research that continues incessantly for us. In fact, Jesus expresses three parables. What seems to me central is precisely that of the merchant and the pearl of great value in which the Lord narrates:

«The kingdom of heaven is also like a merchant who goes in search of precious pearls; found a pearl of great value, will, he sells all his possessions and buys it»

Jesus uses the analogy of the merchant. A figure who must have been well known to the Lord's listeners at the time. First we have a merchant who goes in search. A searching merchant is a person who is very attentive to the territory in which he is searching, to the movements of other prospectors and traders. He is a person who has informed himself precisely before setting off on the road, researched places to look for pearls before travelling.

The merchant is the metaphor of the believer who consistently seeks God. We Catholics have three great "signposts" on the path of faith: the Tradition, Sacred Scripture and the Magisterium. These are our prior sources, with which we then build our act of faith. Everyone has his personal yes to the Lord, in which he builds his own spirituality and his way of believing and living the faith.

The merchant is looking for pearls. Until he finds the precious pearl which he then decides to buy. A pearl that for listeners of the time is a stone of inestimable value, because imported from India. Therefore the merchant is the one who goes in search of different precious pearls and finally finds the pearl, the priceless one for which he sells everything.

Because Jesus uses the image of the pearl (margaritas in Greek)? The pearl is a biblical image found in several passages. For example, in the Song of Songs (Ct 1,10) pearls are the jewels that the Beloved wears around her neck. While in Apocalypse, the pearl is one of the materials with which the new Jerusalem is built (AP 21,21).

The Pearl that the believer seeks to acquire it is the kingdom of God. This kingdom of God is assimilated to the pearl of Song of Songs, we will be able to say that it is the Church. Indeed, the Canticle is traditionally considered a dialogue of love between the Beloved who is Christ and the Beloved who is the Church. If instead the pearl is the material with which the Celestial Jerusalem is built, we will say that the Kingdom of God to be appropriated in every way is Heaven.

Applied all to us believers we seek God, we could say that the precious pearl is to reach Eternal life in Paradise, walking in the Catholic Church, freeing us from everything that hinders our faith. Like this, also the other pearls which are second hand, they are therefore those both material and spiritual goods that seem so only in appearance, but which actually distance us from communion in the Catholic Church and with God, and that do not get us to the Kingdom of God in Heaven.

The metaphor of the merchant who sells everything and goes, finally it shows that the Lord places us on a path of faith in which he asks us to give everything to reach the kingdom, invites us to strive as much as possible to be consistent in faith, get involved knowing that you lose everything to gain everything (Fil 3, 8: R, Manes 211). That is, walking on the path to the kingdom of God all the sacrifices we would have made to get to Heaven, even now it will be spiritual gains, a hundredfold obtained with the grace of God.

We ask the Lord to be merchants more and more eager to obtain the pearls of God, to learn to love the whole world with the joy of one who has received the treasure of heaven.

Amen!

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 29 July 2023

.

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The defensive pathology of "it's just us" and the curative medicine of the Holy Gospel

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE DEFENSIVE PATHOLOGY OF «IT'S ONLY US» AND THE CURATIVE MEDICINE OF THE HOLY GOSPEL

The pathology of "it's just us" has not appeared now in our day, because already Jesus, narrates the Gospel of Luke, he was forced to rebuke two apostles, James and John, that, as the group had not been welcomed by the Samaritans, they wanted to invoke fire and flames from heaven.

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

The pathology of "it's just us" it has not appeared now in our days, because already Jesus, narrates the Gospel of Luke, he was forced to rebuke two apostles, James and John, that, as the group had not been welcomed by the Samaritans, they wanted to invoke fire and flames from heaven.

Vasco Rossi on the occasion of the presentation of the concert film All in one night, Live Kom 015′ in Milan, 14 March 2015. ANSA/DANIEL DAL ZENNARO

«It's just us» Vasco Rossi repeated in one of his old ones hit [cf.. WHO] where he listed situations in which those of his could relate fans who shared the ills of a generation of some time ago. Even in the Church, shaken by the vicissitudes of the modern world, a certain malaise has spread that we could define as "It's just us". It appears all those times that people or opinion groups express discontent and complaints, with the consequence of feeling as if attacked or besieged and therefore entrenched in a defensive position or in that of belonging only to elite capable of lasting and understanding what is convulsively happening.

The Pathology of "It's Only Us" it has not appeared now in our days, because already Jesus, narrates the Gospel of Luke, he was forced to rebuke two apostles, James and John, that, as the group had not been welcomed by the Samaritans, they wanted to invoke fire and flames from heaven[1].

To heal from this condition This Sunday's Gospel offers us a drug that from its name seems like a medicine: la macrothymia (forbearing), that is, patience. It is a term that is not actually present in the Gospel passage proclaimed today, but it expresses its meaning. We find it, instead, in the second letter of Peter where the apostle states:

«The Lord does not delay in fulfilling his promise, even if some talk about slowness. Instead he is patient - he is long-suffering makrothimei ― with you, because he doesn't want anyone to get lost, but that everyone has the opportunity to repent" [2PT 3, 9].

This is to indicate that already in the very first Christian generation there was the desire to force the times and to put oneself in the place of the One for whom «[…] a single day is like a thousand years and a thousand years like a single day" [2PT 3, 8]. But here is the evangelical page of this sixteenth Sunday for a year (Mt 13, 24-43):

During that time, Jesus told the crowd another parable, saying: «The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. Ma, while everyone slept, his enemy came, he sowed weeds among the wheat and went away. Then when the stem grew and bore fruit, the weeds also sprang up. Then the servants went to the master of the house and told him: "Man, you have not sown good seed in your field? Where does the weeds come from??”. And he answered them: “An enemy did this!”. And the servants said: “You want us to go pick it up?”. "Do Not, He answered, because when you, collecting the weeds, with it also uproot the wheat. Let them both grow together until the harvest, and at the time of harvest I will say to the reapers: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to burn; instead put the wheat in my barn"". He told them another parable, saying: «The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and sowed in his field. It is the smallest of all the seeds but, once he grows up, it is larger than the other plants in the garden and becomes a tree, so much so that the birds of the sky come to make nests in its branches". He told them another parable: «The kingdom of heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and mixed in three measures of flour, until it was all leavened". All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds in parables and did not speak to them except in parables, so that what had been spoken through the prophet might be fulfilled: «I will open my mouth with parables, I will proclaim things that have been hidden since the foundation of the world.". Then he dismissed the crowd and entered the house; his disciples approached him to tell him: «Explain to us the parable of the weeds in the field». And he answered: «He who sows the good seed is the Son of man. The field is the world and the good seed are the children of the Kingdom. The weeds are the children of the Evil One and the enemy who sowed them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the world and the reapers are the angels. How then do we gather the weeds and burn them in the fire, so it will be at the end of the world. The Son of man will send his angels, who will gather out of his kingdom all those who sin and all those who commit iniquity and will throw them into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in their Father's kingdom. Who has ears, you listen!».

As I have already tried to explain [cf.. my previous homily]. Jesus loved speaking in parables, presenting immediately understandable realities taken from the peasant or household world as on this Sunday. Contextually, using metaphors, he staged paradoxical situations so that the same reality could be seen differently from how it is usually perceived. It is remodeled by Him not only for the purpose of presenting a new ethic, but above all to tell what the kingdom of God is, a reality that escapes any appropriation or cataloguing. It is the world of God that Jesus reveals and lives and which continually displaces.

The first parable of the good wheat and the weeds[2] it differs from that of the sower heard last Sunday because while there it was about sowing and receiving the land, here it is described together with sowing (v. 24), also the growth of the seed, its fruiting (v. 26) and the harvest (v. 30). However, unlike the master's servants, readers are immediately warned that someone, taking advantage of the darkness of the night, he sowed discord in the same field. The discovery of the weeds, operated by servants, leads the latter to express their amazement and bewilderment to the sower (v. 27). In their words one can perhaps also detect a hint of suspicion or doubt about sowing, and therefore on the master himself. But the sower's response shows that the presence of weeds among the wheat is not at all surprising, it shouldn't surprise or cause scandal. And so the reader's reaction is also oriented not so much towards questioning the origin of the discord, but on how to behave when noting their presence. The reader's confusion, like servants, it happens there. Do not uproot the weeds, which among other things is also similar to wheat, but let the two plants grow together: in fact, there would be a risk of tearing up even those made of wheat. The weeds will certainly be separated from the wheat, but in its own time. Not now. Now is the time for patience. Patience is strength towards oneself, it is the ability to refrain from intervening by dominating the instinct that would immediately lead to "cleaning up". But this is not God's action. God is patient and long-suffering.

How many times have men questioned themselves on the presence of evil in human history or in the individual life of each of us. Because if we sow goodness, sometimes evil is returned to us? Who is this night operator who, as a jealous enemy of the good fruits of life, causes many situations to arise in which we stumble as if over unwanted weeds??

Even in the Christian community this mix between good and bad can exist, between the just and the unjust as it was already in the small community of those who followed Jesus: someone betrayed him, another denied him and some fearful people ran away.

But the Son of Man, Jesus, He teaches his people to have patience behaving like sons of the Kingdom until the judgment comes that will liquefy every scandal and ugliness. The smoke of the adversary's works reduced to nothing has disappeared, finally only daylight will shine without sunset[3].

But until then we are in the time of the growth of the Kingdom of God which can encounter a thousand obstacles and difficulties. This is why it is important to learn the patience of God beautifully depicted in the book of Wisdom in the first reading of this Liturgy of the Word:

«[…] The fact that you are master of all, It makes you lenient with everyone. You show your strength when there is no belief in the fullness of your power, and reject the insolence of those who know it. Master of the Force, you judge with meekness and govern us with great indulgence, Why, Whenever you want, you wield power. With this way of acting you taught your people that the just must love men, and you have given your children good hope that, after the sins, you grant repentance" [Sap 12, 19-20].

The community of believers, the church, it is the place where one experiences this divine indulgence and it, around you, testifies it to the world. As is expressed in these beautiful words of the Council:

«The Church therefore, provided with the gifts of its founder and faithfully observing his precepts of charity, humility and self-sacrifice, receives the mission of announcing and establishing the kingdom of Christ and of God among all people, and of this kingdom it constitutes the germ and the beginning on earth. In the meantime, as it slowly grows, yearns for the perfect kingdom and with all his might hopes and longs to unite with his king in glory".[4]

In the words of the Council it is explicitly said that the Church is not the Kingdom of God, but it yearns for you as it walks through time. For it itself is made up of saints and sinners in need of divine patience and mercy. While a plant emerges to remain itself, either good wheat or weeds, people can change, come back, fall and even repent. A myriad of saints are there to bear witness to this and the apostle Paul himself recalls it several times in his letters. In the second reading of this Liturgy he goes so far as to state that not even "we know how to pray properly" if the Spirit of God did not intervene to intercede for the saints. This protects us from feeling like we have already arrived, but also better than others, the only pure and holy ones eager to eradicate from now on those who in our opinion are symbolically weeds.

In the other two parables that follow that of the wheat and the weeds Jesus speaks of the Kingdom as if it were a seed that from very small and humble origins unexpectedly becomes a tree capable of welcoming new life, symbolized by the nests that are built among its branches. An experience that the Church that harked back to the tradition of the Gospel of Matthew was already experiencing, because it is made up of people coming from both Judaism and paganism. Or he talks about it as the yeast that makes a large amount of flour grow. Three measures are forty kilograms! The Church rejoices in seeing this divine work and is amazed by it. In the same way as Sarah to whom Abraham asked to knead the same quantity of flour to welcome the Lord at the oak of Mamre[5]. For this reason the Church, like Abraham and Sarah in their time, is called to faith in the works of God. A little further on, indeed, in the Gospel of Matthew Jesus will say:

«If you have faith equal to a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain: “Move from here to there” and it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you" [Mt 17, 20].

At this point we can understand that the Kingdom is Jesus he loved to express it in parables, it is a divine reality that always transcends us. A reserve of grace, to use the words of a more mature theology, who teaches us to have patience towards sinners, mercy and faith in God until the end of time when the eschatological judgment will take place.

The two collection prayers also go in this direction that can be used in this Liturgy. The oldest first reads:

«Be kind to us, your faithful, o Lord, and give us abundantly the treasures of your grace".

The second newest one makes us pray like this:

«They always support us, or Father, the strength and patience of your love, because your word, seed and leaven of the kingdom, bear fruit in us and revive the hope of seeing the new humanity grow".

Happy Sunday everyone.

from the Hermitage, 23 July 2023

 

NOTE

[1] «…They entered a village of Samaritans to prepare their entrance. But they did not want to receive it, because he was clearly on his way to Jerusalem. When they saw this, the disciples James and John said: “man, you want us to say that fire will come down from heaven and consume them?”. He turned around and scolded them". (LC 9, 51-55)

[2] Gramineaeous plant (A drunken lollipop), that infests the cereal fields.

[3] «There will be no more night, and they will no longer need lamplight or sunlight, because the Lord God will enlighten them. And they will reign forever and ever.". (AP 22, 5)

[4] The light, 5.

[5] «Then Abraham hurriedly went into the tent, from Sarah, and said: “Presto, three seas of fine flour, knead it and make focaccia" (Gen 18,6).

 

.

San Giovanni all'Orfento. Abruzzo, Mount Maiella, it was a hermitage inhabited by Pietro da Morrone, called in 1294 to the Chair of Peter on which he ascended with the name of Celestine V (29 August – 13 December 1294).

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

It is very dangerous to state: "I am what I feel I am", because it means imposing the world of the unreal, often even violently

IT IS VERY DANGEROUS TO CLAIM «I AM WHAT I FEEL I AM», BECAUSE IT MEANS IMPOSING THE WORLD OF THE UNREAL, OFTEN EVEN IN A VIOLENT WAY

After half a century of feminist struggles, finally a boy wins first prize in a beauty contest for women. An extraordinary success for us men!

— History and current affairs —

.

PDF print format article

 

.

There are unbearable blacks, some even dangerous criminals belonging to notoriously very violent ethnic groups? Yup, but pace of Latin semantics black people should not be referred to as "niggers", but as “men of color”. The word "nigger" is a racist expression.

“transsexual, Transylvanian” – The Rocky Horror Picture Show, Jim Sharman (1975)

I think a legitimate question: how come when they point to the White people (white men), they call us “whites” rather than “men of no color”? These niggas called "colored men", they are perhaps racist? How come it is racist to say niger (negro) but it is not to say bleach (bianco)? If in any European country, during an argument, one said to a black "dirty nigger", first it would end up in the media pillory, then before our courts on charges of racism, something on which one can also agree, given that there should not exist a contempt liable to the accusation of racism and a similar contempt considered instead only a heated expression coming out of the mouth during an argument, with the substantial and formal judgment which varies according to the color of the skin indicated. Or does anyone know maybe a case of some nigger shamed all over the press politically correct and then hauled off to a court on racism charges for telling someone “dirty white”?

Wanting to be fair, perhaps it would be appropriate to drag to the bar of the court even the African who addresses a European indicating him as white, or worse using the racist expression of “dirty white”. If in fact blacks are not blacks or negroes but "men of color", in turn we whites are not whites but "men without color", or if we prefer “men of non-dark coloring” or “men with bleached colors”. Then choose the most politically correct definition among these three, for so we should be called, in the same way that an African is not called a "negro" or "black" but a "colored man".

As for the various black populations of the African continent, it should be clarified that they are often very different from each other, roughly as a European from Norway may be from an Italian European native of the Calabria region. In this regard, the dictionary provides this indication:

«negroide, masculine and feminine adjective and noun [composed of negro and oide]. In physical anthropology, black bouquet, one of the two branches of the primary equatorial forms, including strains of steatopygids, of Pygmy and Negrids. In a generic sense (and often noun), of an individual who exhibits the characteristics of a Negro (very dark skin, camerrinia, prognathism, frizzy hair, dolicocefalia)» [cf.. Treccani Encyclopaedia].

But if we go to read the most unreliable encyclopedia of the entire globe, i.e. Wikipedia, where political correctness is often pushed to paroxysm and to the very denial of the foundations of the various sciences, including anthropological and biological ones, we can read:

“The term negroid or negride, sometimes congoid, indicates a now obsolete anthropological classification of’A wise man, definable starting from the shape of the skull and other craniometric and anthropometric characteristics: this term identifies the autochthonous human beings of sub-Saharan Africa» [cf.. WHO].

Come May quietly and silently certain American universities give black students of African-American descent easier entrance tests than those given to white students of European-American descent? It may be that this is in the same way that any white of European-American descent would have serious difficulty competing in certain sports competitions with African-Americans.? Worse than ever with pure Africans from certain particular populations of the Black Continent, notoriously favored in various sports by their happy physical conformation that we "men without color" do not have, due to our different genetics, because in many things we are inferior to them, endowed with abilities and physical resources that we do not have, including that vocal range that makes certain voices unique in singing, so much so that they are defined as black or negro voices precisely because of their particularity. Then, if some think it is possible and feasible to have Japanese compete against Cameroonians in a speed race with show jumping, let them do as well, but I fear that the results would be somewhat obvious, beyond ridiculous. In any case, the problem would not arise because the Japanese, mindful of their sizes but at the same time also of what could be certain of their physical limits in the face of other competitors, with the atavistic sense of honor they have they would never expose themselves to public ridicule. We Europeans, on the other hand, do, because we have long since lost the sense of human modesty, but even more that of shame.

Everyone is free to say that the greatest masters of philosophical thought and those of the main exact sciences were all born in the Congo, in Cameroon, in Togo, in Ghana, in Liberia and Burkina Faso, where archaeologists have discovered ancient sites that by engineering, architecture and artistic value far exceed those of ancient Egypt and the civilizations of the Incas and Aztecs, of the Etruscans, the Greeks and Romans. The undoubtedly tragic thing is that if someone said things like this before an audience of expert scholars and specialists, all will be silent and none of them will sigh. We ask: Why?

The most degenerate political correctness it even pushes us to believe in the existence of peoples and populations that no longer exist, for example the Egyptians and the Greeks. I understand both, considered the heritage linked to their lands, can boast certain ancient origins, however, the fact remains that the Egyptian civilization - and with it the Egyptians -, it has been extinct for centuries. Those who claim to be the current Egyptians are an Arab population; they have been since the "people of the sands", also known as Mohammedans, they invaded that region in the seventh century by making a clean sweep of what remained of that culture which for some centuries had already started a slow decline. The ancient Egyptian-Mohammedans were also lovers of big bonfires, because it was them, led by Caliph Omar, to set the final fire that destroyed the ancient library of Alexandria in 640. How centuries and centuries later it was Muslim jihadists who destroyed in August of 2015 the ancient archaeological site of Palmyra. It is true that those responsible for the destruction were Islamist fundamentalists, as Western masters of political correctness were quick to point out, but it is also true that these fundamentalists were Muslims anyway, as degenerate and unworthy as we like, but still Muslims. And at the completion of each of their criminal actions, including the filmed slaughtering of many Christian victims, they proclaimed themselves true followers of the Koran. All contrary to the much reviled Christians who never destroyed the ancient Roman and Greek pagan temples, they saved them by turning them into churches, bringing them to the present day.

Were true the black legend that the cruel conquerors Spanish, with just as many cruel Dominicans and Franciscans in tow, they destroyed the temples of those ancient civilizations, however, it remains to be understood why, in Mexico and Peru the archaeological sites are still intact and visible today. Why make up black legends and blame others, while not saying that many destructions were made by the local populations during the various civil wars that followed one another starting from the beginning of the 20th century, after the Spanish ceased to dominate those territories as their protectorates or colonies? With the Napoleonic invasion in 1808 the disintegration of the Spanish empire in South America began through the Spanish American wars of independence, the last of which in 1898, also known as the "great disaster". Not being able or wanting to say that the conquistadors, arrived in the Americas in the sixteenth century, found the Aztec civilization in an advanced state of decay and first of all prevented the continuation of the practice of human sacrifices, we prefer to continue spreading black legends about the Spaniards who arrived with Dominicans and Franciscans in tow who forced baptism on entire populations. The historical truth is quite different: to convert the indigenous populations of present-day Mexico in the 16th century, followed by those of Latin America, fu la Morenita Virgin, known as Our Lady of Guadalupe, which was not brought by the Spaniards, appeared to the young Aztec Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin. The same name "Guadalupe" is a term of Aztec origin that derives from Coatlaxopeuh and means "she who crushes the serpent". Also in this event the Spaniards, together with the trembling Dominicans and Franciscans they have nothing to do with it. Note also that in the Aztec culture the Quetzalcoatl it was the divine serpent that symbolized knowledge and warfare. So, she who crushes the serpent, in that ancient culture it symbolizes the defeat of war and the beginning of a new knowledge. That's who converted those ancient people, the Vergine Maria, not forced baptisms, always condemned and punished, moreover, by ecclesiastical law.

The present Egyptians they speak Arabic and write using the characters of the Arabic alphabet because in truth this was the original language they spoke in the 13th century. a.C. the Pharaoh Ramses II known as the Great, further proof of this are the internal inscriptions of the pyramids which abound in Arabic alphabetic characters, said not by chance: “cuneiform Arabic language”. Then, to the uninformed, it is enough to remember that Mohammed was inspired by the astral Egyptian hieroglyphics to understand exactly where to build Mecca.

The current Greeks they are more proud than ever of their history, feeling deeply and intimately so, pity they are not. If in fact by Greeks we mean the inhabitants of that geographical region, nothing to say, but taking into account that they are only geographically. The current inhabitants of that region are in fact Greeks in the same way that the inhabitants of that territory called Egypt are Egyptians. Therefore, the inhabitants of that region are heirs and descendants of the ancient Greeks in the same way that the Swedes are heirs and descendants of the inhabitants of Madgascar. In that geographical region called Greece the Turks dominated for four long centuries, from the 1453 al 1821. The ancient Greeks have left us a great heritage of art which bears witness to what was the morphology and physical conformation completely typical and characteristic of the men and women of that ancient people. The current Athenians boasting their ancient Greek far and wide, they should come to terms with a fact as simple as it is evident: whether he likes it or not, morphologically they are Turkish. Someone wants proof? It is enough to go for a walk through the streets of Istanbul and those of Athens to ascertain that there is no difference between the inhabitants of one city and the other, because the inhabitants of Istanbul are men of Turkish stock, just as the inhabitants of Athens are Turkish in their physical conformation, who after four centuries of domination claim to pass themselves off as descendants of the ancient Greeks, as if today they had the conformation and features of the sculptures of Skopas, Praxiteles and Lysippos. Free the Greek-Turks to feel exactly like the Riace bronzes, free at the same time any connoisseur of history, of anthropology and the art of laughing in his face at such claims.

We Italians don't have these problems, being one of the most bastard peoples in the world. Here is a comprehensive example: on one of our major islands, Sardinia, it is possible to see male figures of medium-short stature, stocky and heavy boned, dark haired and olive skinned, reminiscent of certain Muslims of the Kasbah of Algiers. At the same time it is possible to see blond men, tall in stature and with ice-blue eyes reminiscent of the Vikings of present-day Scandinavia. How is it possible, a naive Milanese on vacation asked an anthropologist from Cagliari, which with a great sense of humor he replied:

«Our grandmothers were very welcoming and hospitable women with all the foreigners who have visited our land over the centuries».

The late Indro Montanelli, when I was just 25 year old, with his sweet poison Florentine wit he told me:

«Italy has the geographical shape of a boot, but in actual fact it is comparable to a whore's bed, on which everyone lay down, making us the most bastard people in the world. This also has very positive implications, because, as is known, bastards - take dogs as an example - are more intelligent and also live longer than those of pure breed".

Smart and creative, I add, for better or for worse, but again with a difference: if we say that certain Neapolitans have carried out thefts and scams to deserve admiration, certainly not for the crime, of course, but for the ingenious ingenuity, this can be said, because it is allowed. If, on the other hand, it is stated that most of the gypsies - not some, but a large part of the so-called Roma ― live on theft and illicit trafficking, in this case one is accused of racism, all regardless of the sentences of the courts and the continuous recovery of stolen goods in the Roma camps. If in fact the Neapolitan carries out thefts and scams with rare ingenuity, he is a delinquent, but if a gypsy steals, in that case all the blame is involved, even the most unlikely ones, of society, according to the theses of that unfortunate ruiner of European legal thought Jean Jacques Rousseau, who gave birth in the eighteenth century to the theory of the so-called "noble savage". According to Roussean thinking, man was originally a “animated” good and peaceful and only later, corrupted by society and progress, both guilty, it has become evil. A very dangerous thought that is all the rage today and which often leads to the affirmation that those who commit crimes do not do it because they have chosen to pursue the path of crime, but because the fault lies with others, or worse than the whole society.

Soon said: the violent Negroes who, moved by tribal impulses, hack even women and children to pieces with machetes, they do not act out of criminal instincts moved by inhumanity, because their actions would be the cause of the colonial imperialism that has enraged them. Because, as known and known, before the arrival of the bad colonizers in the African Continent, they didn't butcher each other at all, but they lived peacefully as in an idyllic Paradise of Eden. And the colonizers were so ruthless and bad as to prohibit and prevent the practice of cannibalism widespread in many tribes together with human sacrifices. Among the many recent cases that deny those who identify the black man with the good, the victim and the exploited by the ruthlessness of the West, I mention the genocide in Rwanda which in the early 1990s produced around one million deaths in the tribal fights between the Hutu and the Tutsi. most of them women and children.

Data provided later by the National Bank of Rwanda, documented through thousands of international commercial transactions that approximately one million machetes used in the massacres had been imported through various channels and that the majority were Chinese-made. Bank transactions showed that they were purchased and paid for with funds allocated by various Western donor countries to support Rwanda's economic and social development. The allocation of funds stipulated that the money could never be used for weapons or other military materials. The agreement with the World Bank was even more restrictive and stipulated that the funds could not be used to import even civilian products, whether these were intended for military or paramilitary use. After careful investigations, the World Bank ascertained that the government of the dictator Juvénal Habyarimana (1973-1994) made use of World Bank funds to finance the importation of machetes from China, classifying it as an import of "civilian products" for non-military and non-para-military use. Anyhow, the bad, the "white man" remains in practice, while “the black man” is good, then, if it gets bad, the fault lies entirely with the West, certainly not of the impulses deriving from its never dormant tribal culture, that only another kind of culture has managed to put to sleep and in some cases even to defeat: Christianity.

The Arab-Egyptians they are free to feel like descendants of the ancient pharaohs just as the Turkish-Greeks can declare themselves descendants of the ancient Hellenic civilization. We can drag those who dare to say “nigger” instead of “black man” to the bars of the courts, obviously passing over the Negroes who call us “whites” with all the sunny obviousness of the case, because such we are: bianchi. We can continue to poison the thought of the decadent West with Roussean theories and believe that man is fundamentally good and that if he becomes evil, or delinquency, the fault is not his but the liberal-capitalist society.

In the same way, a man is free to feel like a woman, like the transsexual who won the Miss Universe prize in Holland a few days ago. Prize in front of which I admit that I too indulged myself on social media writing:

«After half a century of feminist struggles, finally a boy wins first prize in a beauty contest for women. An extraordinary success for us men!».

Faced with certain stubborn refusals of reality, often exercised even violently, sometimes even with coups of laws or with recourse to laws on unspecified "discrimination", anyone who reasons and intends to continue to do so, at first it can make her laugh, but after a reactive laugh he will immediately understand that in truth there would be crying.

I think it's legitimate and not at all racist and discriminating ask yourself a question: if a man decides to feel like a woman and to present himself in a beauty contest for women, as far as I'm concerned it's free to do so, as well as those responsible for admissions to the competition suffering from obvious idiocy, followed by a jury made up of obvious imbeciles, they are free both to admit a transsexual and to reward her as the most beautiful woman. But, in the same way, it should be just as legitimate, for example from me, ask a very ironic question, but truly innocent and above all realistic: if the newly elected Miss Universe dutch shemale was diagnosed with varicocele in her right testicle and needed surgery, of those to which even children are sometimes subjected, where we put it: in the gynecology department, in that she feels like a woman although biologically a man, or in the urology department, as in fact, although she feels like a woman, it's a man, enough to require a minor surgery on a testicle?

Any reasoning mind he understands well how insidious it is on a social level, political and juridical endorse the thesis that a person is not what he is in his physical and biological reality, but what he feels he is or believes or wants to be.

The words of Gilbert Keith Chesterton they ring prophetic more than ever, when in his work Heretics he wrote in the distant 1905:

"The great march of intellectual destruction continue. Everything will be denied. Everything will become a creed. It is a reasonable position to deny the stones of the street; will become a religious dogma to reaffirm. It is a rational argument that it takes all immersed in a dream; will be a sensible form of mysticism say that we are all awake. Fires will be stoked to witness that two plus two equals four. Swords will be drawn to show that the leaves are green in summer. We will find ourselves defending not only the incredible virtues and the incredible sense of human life, but something even more incredible, this immense, impossible universe staring at us in the face. We will fight for visible wonders as if they were invisible. We will look at the grass and the skies impossible with a strange courage. We will be among those who have seen and yet have believed ".

And so, in case of necessity, we will admit Miss Universe in the gynecology ward and not in the urology ward, even if she has to be operated on for a varicocele in the right testicle, because what matters is not the objective and biological fact that she has testicles; what matters is that this trans feels like a woman and claims the right to be one.

We are falling into the world of the unreal, but no one wants to notice, who then realizes it is silent out of fear or for a quiet life, thus avoiding being accused of homotransphobia. Because what is true is not true, but it is true what the subject wants, what he feels and what he likes.

the Island of Patmos, 16 July 2023

.

.

Father Ariel's new book has just been released and is being distributed, you can buy it by clicking directly on the cover image or by entering our bookshop WHO

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The hundred, the sixty, the thirty in the seed of God

Homiletic of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE HUNDRED, THE SIXTY, The thirty in the sacred seed of God

Faith in fact "is a personal act: It is the free response of man to the initiative of God who reveals himself ". Therefore it is an answer that we give to God and that some days can be more certain and others more insecure.

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

 

Dear readers of The island of Patmos,

Summer time is time when many of us often go on vacation, especially in sea destinations. We are unconsciously making an evangelical choice. Indeed, The sea is described in the evangelical passage of This XV Sunday of ordinary time what place where Jesus exposes and explains the parable of the sower. A parable that is a small map for all of us: A small key to reading the life of faith. The sea, so, It is the place where Jesus offers clarity for our path of believers. We could say with the poet Rainer Maria Rilke:

“When my thoughts are anxious, restless and bad, I go by the sea, and the sea drowns them and sends them away with its great wide sounds, purifies them with its noise, And it imposes a rhythm on everything that is disoriented and confused in me ".

The song of the Gospel of today it is mostly composed of a parable, One of the few that Jesus decides to explain directly to the disciples while instead he remains in the form of a narrative for all the others who listen to him by the sea. Jesus uses parables. The disciples ask him why, He replies:

«Because you are given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, But they are not given to them. […] For this I speak to them with parables: because looking at they don't see, By hearing they do not listen and do not understand ".

It looks like a sibylline response. Instead the Lord wants to make it clear the importance of the parable.

I would like to dwell a moment on why. Effectively, The purpose of the parables consists in lighting about the nature of the kingdom and to open up to the understanding of new things, for example on how God acts. The parable is a story based on the rapprochement and comparison of two realities, a real and a fictitious that refer but do not coincide. It contains metaphors that refer to a situation “different "compared to that narrated. In this way the parables push the listeners to an exercise that requires intelligence, fantasy, mental elasticity and reflective ability. In short: It requires everyone to ideally move to the fictitious story to return to reality with a new acquisition. Therefore the parables select daily realities as an element of comparison, and at the same time manifesting their limit to bring out the “ledge” O “surplus” of the reality to which they refer. In this way they operate a passage towards what exceeds the human mind and allow the auditors to expose themselves personally to "the unpublished" and "to the unudied" of God. Thus they become "atmosphere" revelations loving and tender of God and make it in some way more accessible, knowable and attractive for anyone who listens to them[1]

That's why in the parable of the sower We find our life of faith by light. Jesus explains well in detail and offers a phenomenology of the different believers. The seed sown along the road, We could say that it is the non -practicing believer. The seed sown on the stony ground is the believer who is easily prey to easy enthusiasm, inconstant in the time that often goes into crisis, without a definitive choice in faith. The seed sown among the brambles is the distracted believer between the thousand voices of the world and the current culture, moved by good feelings and a good practice of faith, but that then does not easily recognize the sins and vices of the time and thus indulged them. In the end, The seed sown on the good ground that produces one hundred, Sixty and thirty is the believer who believes with strong conviction and strives to be consistent in the practice of faith, but given his fragility he does not always manage to give his best. However, Jesus also accepts those small gestures of faith and charity implemented with tenderness and love.

We can all be one of these believers, from the least fervent to the most fervent. I would also say that each of us can have phases in which he passes from being infonctive seed on the seed road planted on the good ground. These four seeds described by Jesus can also represent a moment of our life of faith, in which we are more arid or more convinced.

Faith in fact "is a personal act: It is the free response of man to the initiative of God who reveals himself " [cf.. CCC 166] Therefore it is an answer that we give to God and that some days can be more certain and others more insecure. To us to always be ready to receive grace for an increasingly firm act of faith.

We ask the Lord to grow in faith, To become a seed of eternal life, A sacred ferment for the whole world, so that we can donate our thirty, sixty, One hundred in the world increasingly orphan than God.

Amen!

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 16 July 2023

.

NOTE

[1] Cfr R. Manes Gospel according to Matteo, Yet, 2019, 197 – 198.

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The Gospel narrates that the sower went out to sow, however, he does not tell us that he returned

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE GOSPEL NARRATES THAT THE SOWER WENT OUT TO SOW, HOWEVER HE DOES NOT TELL US THAT HE RETURNED

An Italian missionary killed in 1985 in Brazil he used to say: «The sower went out to sow, but he does not say that he then returned". And it went on: "The fate of the seed will be no different from the fate of the sower".

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

An Italian missionary[1] killed in 1985 in Brazil he used to say: «The sower went out to sow, but he does not say that he then returned". And it went on: "The fate of the seed will be no different from the fate of the sower".

Sower at sunset, Vincent Willem van Gogh

This very concise sentence condenses the heart of the evangelical message of this XV Sunday of Ordinary Time. The Gospel (Mt 13, 1-23) which will be proclaimed in the Liturgy of the Word opens, indeed, with one of the begins best known of all the Gospels: «The sower went out to sow». At this link you can find it the text in the longer version[2].

The passage begins the discourse in parables[3] third of the five great speeches that Matthew puts in the mouth of Jesus and is structured in four parts. A brief introduction (vv. 1-3a), the parable of the sower (vv. 3b-9) and his explanation (vv. 18-23). In the middle (vv. 10-17) there is a short pericope that addresses the methodological question: because Jesus speaks to the crowds in parables?

The parable is the genre that Jesus preferred when he wanted to present, in the form of a story, a hidden truth starting from situations, examples and realities that his listeners could immediately understand. It has thus become a pedagogical model which, transcending time, retains its value even today, when we live in an era of disenchantment.. An era, our, in which the symbolic has a strong impact and this is precisely what Jesus' speaking in parables tends to do: grasp the new and unexpected meaning of reality, presented symbolically. Putting farmers and winemakers on stage, kings and servants, fishermen or shepherds, a housewife or a woman who has lost a coin, all realities familiar to listeners, Jesus spoke in this way about the Kingdom of God, without even mentioning God.

But the immediacy and simplicity of the parable they must not deceive, since it also has a paradoxical value. Everyone knows the paradoxes of the Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea[4] – the famous one of Achilles and the tortoise – which had the aim of refuting multiplicity and movement. Jesus instead, with parables, it creates paradoxical realities to invite listeners and readers to grasp a further meaning, other, compared to what is normally seen, believes and lives. The unexpected inhabits daily life with Jesus.

In fact, no one throws precious seed everywhere if not in the prepared furrows, no one, after having sown wheat, no longer cares about the soil and only waits for the harvest. Who would leave an entire flock to go and find just one lost sheep? How does a very small grain become very large? Who gives the same pay to everyone without looking at the hours of work per day? Only God and it can be seen in the actions of Jesus as he announces his Kingdom. Ultimately, parables have this as their purpose: surprise and displace to help reshape reality, looking at it otherwise, according to a new logic, the paradoxical one of the Gospel, that Jesus embodies. He is in fact the living parable of God o, as Maximus the Confessor said: «He is a symbol of himself»[5].

In this Sunday's parable the seed is a symbol, according to the explanation that Jesus gives, of the Word of God, theological reality that must be listened to and understood. The paradoxical story is that it ends up on various terrains generating a whole series of reactions. The divine Word, indeed, as the prophet Isaiah says in today's first reading «it will not return to me without effect" in the same way as rain or snow that comes from the sky. Now God “makes his sun rise on the bad and the good, and makes it rain on the just and the unjust" Jesus said in the Sermon on the Mount (cf.. Mt 5, 45). The Word of God, so, it is not a mysterious reality aimed at initiates, but it compromises itself with human situations, also accepting failure, in the parable, it's big, since on four plots three will not produce fruit. In the explanation that Jesus gives, taking up the serious words of the book of Isaiah[6], people who will not listen to the Word will only become rigid in their situation, that is, they will not be able to change their reality or open up to the newness of the Kingdom. They are the ones who have a lack of interiority, the superficial ones who let the seed of the Word be taken away by the first thing that arrives, as if it were a fluttering sparrow. They are those who lack perseverance because for them life is like a stone that perhaps defends them from external assaults, but neither does it allow good and beautiful things to take root. The Gospel calls the men of the moment (temporary, proskairos v. 21) that catch fire at the moment. They certainly listen to the Word, but if it has to last everything becomes tiring. Having no roots, faced with the first difficulty they abandon. Then there are those who, despite having listened, then prefer the sirens of life behind riches and worldliness and therefore worries and anxieties envelop them like brambles and thorns that do not let the light filter through which would allow the Word to emerge and allow them to look and live life differently.

Finally there are those who, to use the image of the parable, they are the minority of the good soil that bears fruit according to its possibilities. They are those who not only know how to listen, but they also know how to understand the Word. That is, they know how to put it together (companions, synieis v. 23) composing them Word and life constantly. They have a profound understanding of the Word, spiritual and vital. But it is not easy, because the ground could become hard and refractory for them too, stony or filled with infesting thorns and brambles. Here then is the need for constant vigilance and spiritual work because as simple "hearers of the Word"[7] it becomes a reality that grows with them. As in the very happy expression of Gregory the Great: «The text grows with the reader»[8] (The text grows with the one who reads it).

At this point we can ask ourselves two questions, who gives the strength so that the Word grows and where do I find this strength? The first question can be answered by remembering another parable of the seed that we find this time in the fourth Gospel: «If the grain of wheat, fell to the ground, it doesn't die, it remains only; but if it dies, it produces much fruit ». (GV 12, 24). Jesus is talking about his death on the cross. The editor of the Gospel, indeed, reacting to Jesus' statement: «And me when I am raised from the ground, I will attract everyone to me" he comments: «He said this to indicate the death he was going to die» (GV 12, 32-33).

Jesus therefore compares himself to a seed sent by the Father in the heart of the earth - "For God loved the world so much that he gave his only begotten Son" (GV 3, 16a) — and all this love that Jesus revealed during his existence will condense and bear its maximum fruit precisely at the moment of his death, on the cross. According to John, the first fruit of Jesus' death is the Spirit[9] who like water flows from his dead body towards believers: the mother and the beloved disciple.

This Spirit not only resurrected Jesus from the dead[10] but it is the hermeneutic who reveals the meaning of the Word of truth which is Jesus. Her words, indeed, I am spirit and life (GV 6, 63). It is therefore now the Spirit of Christ who helps believers to be that fertile ground that knows how to welcome the Word and makes it understood so that it bears good fruit..

In this sense, according to the words of the missionary reported at the beginning of this text, Jesus, who became a seed of love until the cross, through his Spirit he does not stop sowing the Word and will never return. This constant action is expressed by the words of the responsorial psalm of the Liturgy which it announces:

«You visit the earth and quench its thirst,
fill it with riches.
The river of God is full of waters;
you prepare wheat for men.
This is how you prepare the land:
you irrigate the furrows, wipe out the clods,
bathe it with rain and bless its buds" (Shall 64).

In the time of difficult gestation that the entire created work suffers, as Paul recalls in today's second reading. E, at last, to answer the second question, It is in the Eucharistic liturgy that the Church experiences this action of Jesus and the Spirit to the highest degree. When He states in this Sunday's Gospel passage: «But blessed are your eyes for they see and your ears for they hear» (v. 16) it is not privileging some while excluding others. It's true, the direct and concrete experience that the disciples had of encountering the humanity of Jesus was unique and unrepeatable, so much so that John stated in his first letter: «What we heard, what we saw with our own eyes, what we contemplated and what our hands touched of the Word of life" (1GV 1,1).

But this humanity, now glorified of the Word we can still "touch" it today when during the sacramental action, thanks to the same Spirit[11] which acts on the word and on the Eucharistic offerings, let us listen to that Word again and nourish ourselves with Christ. This grace descends abundantly, today, here and now, on the ground which is our vital situation, whatever condition it is in at the moment, in the hope that all this gift, which is the love of the Father in Jesus through the Spirit should not be lost, but bear fruit in turn.

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 15 July 2023

.

NOTE

[1] Father Ezekiel Ramin, Comboni missionary in Brazil, was killed 24 July 1985 while he defended small farmers and Indians in Mato Grosso. Saint John Paul II defined him as "a witness to the charity of Christ" during a Angelus.

[2] The liturgy also provides a shorter form.

[3] Mt 13, 1-52.

[4] Zeno of Elea (489 a.C. – 431 a.C.) was a pre-Socratic Ancient Greek philosopher of Magna Graecia and a member of the Eleatic School founded by Parmenides. Aristotle defines him as the inventor of dialectics.

[5] "The Sir […] he became his own precursor; he has become a type and symbol of himself. Symbolically he makes himself known through himself. That is, he leads all creation, starting from itself as it manifests itself, but to lead her to himself as it is unfathomably hidden" (Cantarella R., Mystagogy and other writings, 1931).

[6] Is 6,9-10.

[7] Rahner K., Hearers of the Word, Tassel, 1967.

[8] Bori P. C., The infinite interpretation, Ancient Christian hermeneutics and its transformations, 1988.

[9] «E, bowed his head, handed over the spirit" (GV 19, 30).

[10] «And if the Spirit of God, who raised Jesus from the dead, lives in you, He who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you " (Rom 8, 15).

[11] The eastern bishop Mons. Neofito Edelby, the 5 October 1964, during the work of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council he left an important mark by pronouncing these words: «The Holy Scripture is not just a written norm, rather, almost a consecration of the History of salvation under the guise of the human word, however, it is inseparable from the Eucharistic consecration in which the whole Body of Christ is summarized […] The mission of the Holy Spirit cannot be separated from the mission of the Incarnate Word. This is the first theological principle of any interpretation of Holy Scripture. And you can't forget that, as well as auxiliary sciences of all kinds, the ultimate goal of Christian exegesis is the spiritual understanding of Sacred Scripture in the light of the resurrected Christ".

.

San Giovanni all'Orfento. Abruzzo, Mount Maiella, it was a hermitage inhabited by Pietro da Morrone, called in 1294 to the Chair of Peter on which he ascended with the name of Celestine V (29 August – 13 December 1294).

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

“miss Universe”. The island of Patmos deals with beauty because it is a manifest expression of God and his gifts in human history

“MISS UNIVERSE”. THE ISLAND OF PATMOS DEALS WITH BEAUTY BECAUSE IT IS A MANIFEST EXPRESSION OF GOD AND HIS GIFTS IN THE HISTORY OF MAN

Awards ceremony in front of which only the diehard homotransphobics, representatives of the pro-fascist right-wing and fundamentalist Catholics will be able to raise objections.

— News in brief —

Author
Editors of The Island of Patmos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

A Dutch transsexual was crowned Miss Universe at the pageant held on July 8 in the Netherlands.

In addition to the undoubted and extraordinary beauty, this award ceremony was also a crowning moment for the European culture of diversity inclusion. Awards ceremony before which only the diehard homotransphobics, representatives of the pro-fascist right-wing and fundamentalist Catholics will be able to raise objections.

 

.
the Island of Patmos 10 July 2023

.

.HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltEAQNopUYM&t=2s

.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

Another “ran away from home” running with the schismatic heretic excommunicated and dismissed from the clerical state Alessandro Minutella

ANOTHER “RUNNER FROM HOME” RUNNING WITH THE SCHIMATIC HERETIC EXCOMMUNICATED AND RESIGNED FROM THE CLERICAL STATE ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA

Anyone despite the sentence given on them by the Church, listen to Mass and receive the sacraments from Mr. Minutella and by the priests who followed him, falling into the crime of heresy and schism, falls into sin and sins grievously, because the Church has hit them with a sentence.

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Members of ancient historical orders they have always lived with discomfort and suffering for deviations and betrayals of the doctrine of the faith of some of their members, especially when they slip into heresy and schism.

Just looking at recent times: the Benedictines had the case of Giovanni Franzoni, the Franciscans the case of Leonard Boff, the Jesuits the striking case of Alighiero Tondi. All historical orders and congregations have had some of their members who have caused problems by deviating from the doctrine of the faith or generated public scandals. All regret and pain, undoubtedly, but at the same time it shouldn't even arouse excessive amazement, just think of the betrayal of Judas Iscariot.

As in the best families, it may happen that some children are endowed with the best human and moral capacities, while one, albeit born of the same parents and educated like everyone else, instead take the wrong paths, sometimes even bad.

This is the case of the Dominican priest Vincenzo Avvinti, who after various problems generated within the Order of Preachers was hit by the extreme measure of dismissal - read expulsion - from our Religious Family. I won't dwell on the reasons, not because he can't, but just because I don't want to. In fact, I would like it to be clear that for me it is an enormous pain that a priest whom I personally met years ago and whom I respected so much for his human and intellectual caliber, have now taken this step.

Unfortunately, this former confrere of ours he has decided to add damage to damage and evil to evil by following the schismatic heretic excommunicated e dismissed from the clerical state Alessandro Minutella.

I think it is right to inform about it both our Readers and members of the Dominican Secular Third Order, making present to one and the other what St. Thomas Aquinas said in the question n. 82 which for years has been distorted and manipulated by Mr. Minutella:

«And therefore whoever hears their Mass or receives the Sacraments from them commits a sin. (And therefore anyone who hears their Mass or receives the Sacraments from them sinsi) [see Latin and Italian text WHO].

Because I say that he has been twisting and manipulating this for years question? For the simple fact that, as usual, he cuts pieces out of their context and presents them making them say what they don't say. Indeed, this passage he quoted as a mantra, is preceded by the part where it says:

«It differs, however, between the aforesaid sects. For the heretics and schismatics were excommunicated by the decision of the Church by the execution of consecration to private persons» (However, there are some differences between these categories. Indeed the heretics, the schismatics and the excommunicated are deprived of the exercise of their powers by a sentence of the Church).

This is precisely the question. Mr. Minutella, with him also the former member of the Order of Preachers Vincenzo Avvinti, they are schismatic heretics who, as such, the Church has deprived with a sentence of the power to exercise the sacred priestly ministry. Therefore: «And therefore whoever hears their Mass or receives the sacraments from them commits a sin» (And therefore anyone who hears their Mass or receives the Sacraments from them sins).

Exactly like that: whoever, despite the sentence given on them by the Church, listen to Mass and receive the sacraments from Mr. Minutella and the priests who followed him, also falling into the crime of heresy and schism, falls into sin and sins grievously, because the Church has hit them with a sentence.

Staying in respect which is required of us by the Dominican Constitutions, but even more respectful of the salvation of souls ― which is the primary goal of our Order ― I offer this notice to our Readers praying for the conversion of this former brother of ours.

 

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 10 July 2023

.

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

From the controversy over crosses in the mountains to the peaks and heights of the Word of God

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

FROM THE CONTROVERSY ABOUT CROSSES IN THE MOUNTAINS TO THE PEAKS AND HEIGHTS OF THE WORD OF GOD

«Venite a me, all of you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, that I am meek and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your life. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Like a storm in a glass of water last week the controversy over the summit crosses erupted [see, WHO], among other things, it arose from statements never made, which held the spotlight for a few days in national newspapers. Once again, at the end of the speeches, there was a risk of trivializing and passing off as an imposition what is the symbol par excellence of Christianity, the cross of Jesus visual representation of love until the end [cf.. GV 1, 3] offered to us by the Lord.

Piccola Legazuoi summit cross [image of Stefano Zardini cf. WHO]

Because of this, just like that fresh water that you sometimes find in the mountains after a steep climb, welcome the sequence of readings of this one XIV Sunday of time for a year. It is not always the case that in a single Liturgy of the Word we find a series of writings where every single phrase is so beautiful in itself that it should be preserved and remedied over the course of the week.. At the climax of it we read the evangelical pericope [Mt 11, 25-30] which is so precious, how rare, because it offers us a glimpse of what was the profound conscience of Jesus, his filial conscience. It is no coincidence that this passage from Matthew has been defined as the most Johannine of all the Synoptic Gospels. Usually, indeed, it is in the fourth Gospel that we find similar heights and depths, often, as here in Matthew, in a context of prayer in which Jesus addresses the Father, as in the well-known pericope, that so-called of his hour: "Dad, The time has come: glorify your Son so that the Son may glorify you" [GV 17, 1]. Here is the passage from next Sunday's Gospel:

«At that time Jesus said: “I give you praise, Dad, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned and have revealed them to little ones. Yup, or Father, because so you have decided in your benevolence. Everything was given to me by my Father; no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son wishes to reveal him. Venite a me, all of you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, that I am meek and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your life. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.".

The opening line of the passage in the Greek text specifies: "During that time, answering[1], Jesus said". What is Jesus responding to and why at this crucial moment [2]? To previous events that were not happy. First the question of John the Baptist through the disciples, for he was imprisoned: «Are you the one who must come or we must wait for someone else?» [11,3] and then the lack of response to the preaching and action of Jesus from the three towns of Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernao, where he experienced failure or at least limited success [11, 21-24].

Who can say they haven't felt discouraged faced with a situation of impasse, of failure or lack of understanding on the part of others of who we really are? Jesus integrates these unpleasant situations into prayer. He puts everything, even failure, before the Father and renews his "Yes" [v. 26] since he understands that everything is part of his benevolence project. The "no" he received becomes a "Yes" free from success in view of a more radical adhesion.

With prayer that opens to thanksgiving - "I give you praise" - even failure, or what we judge as such, like pastoral failure, the absence of fruits of the ministry, the sterility of preaching, the rejection or disinterest of others, becomes not a cause of discouragement or abandonment, but a moment of paradoxical confirmation of the following of the Lord.

It is at this point that Jesus takes us into the depths of his relationship with the Father, as his Son. St. John would say that this is where we should “remain” as beloved disciples. But this speech, But, it would take us too far. Matteo, instead, da by suo[3] presents Jesus as the one who reveals[4] the profound intention of the Father that only he knows because everything has been handed over to him alone.

«Everything was given to me by my Father; no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son wishes to reveal him ".

Everything was given to Jesus because he is the Son of the Father, he whom the Father alone knows, until we can say about him: «You are my Son, the beloved" [Mt 3,17; 17,5]. But even Jesus alone fully knows the Father, It gave, because from him came into the world, and only Jesus can make God known to his disciple, because no one goes to the Father except through him [GV 14,6]. Here is the revelation of the identity of Jesus, of his relationship with God and of the disciple's knowledge of God. We are at the summit of the divine revelation of Jesus according to the first Gospel. This mystery is now handed over to the disciple: mystery to be adored, to be welcomed in silence, to be lived daily in the faithful following of Jesus who leads us to the Father.

The Gospel also tells us to whom this revelation is addressed and who can understand it. They are the little ones (babies), who as such are voiceless. They are those who testify to John the Baptist that the kingdom is here and there is no need to wait for anything else: «the blind regain their sight, the lame walk, lepers are purified, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, the Gospel is proclaimed to the poor" [11, 5]. And the little one according to Jesus is blessed because «he finds no reason to scandalize me!» [11, 6].

Instead, revelation is closed to the wise – «The wisdom of the wise will perish and the intelligence of the intellectuals will be eclipsed» [Is 29,14] - Why, despite having seen and heard, they were not able to open themselves to the good news of the Gospel and welcome it.

To return to the initial example, I don't know if you have had the experience of climbing the mountains. When you reach the summit, together with the satisfaction of having arrived there and enjoying the splendid view of what is around, the best thing is being able to rest, leave your backpack and poles on the ground, eat and drink, regain your strength.

Likewise Jesus after having led us to the summit of his intimate and profound relationship with the Father now invites us to rest:

«Venite a me, all of you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, that I am meek and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your life. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light." [vv 28-30].

Only he knew the path, in fact he himself walked away [GV 14, 6], that could take us up there. Now here we rest and recuperate, in intimacy with him who embodies the bliss of those to whom the earth has been given, who are children of God, children in the Son[5]. A land taken not with violence and war because its distinctive feature is peace, justice and mercy[6].

Thus Zechariah prefigured the Messiah in today's first reading: «He will make the war chariot disappear from Ephraim and the horse from Jerusalem, the war arc will be broken, will announce peace to the nations" [Zac 9, 10]. And the psalm answers him: «The Lord is merciful and merciful, slow to anger, abounding in love. The Lord is good to all, his tenderness expands on all creatures" [Shall 144].

And finally the yoke. What did Jesus want to say?? Allow me to refer again to the mountain. If there is one of the most inadvisable things to do when walking along the paths, it is to go outside, to do their own thing despite the danger and against the guide's instructions. Especially on certain terrains, don't follow the trail, it means putting yourself and the group at risk. In a positive way: it is advisable to stay in a group so as not to miss anyone, proceed on the marked route, listen to what the guide suggests.

Likewise in the Christian life. A yoke remains a yoke and seems like a burden and an imposition. But following the line that the Gospel has traced up to this point, in the words of Jesus it appears more like a bond that keeps us united without subjugating us. We are not dumb oxen for him. He makes the journey with us and if it happens, "he supports those who falter and raises anyone who has fallen" (today's psalm).

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 9 July 2023

 

NOTE

[1] answered: answering

[2] At that time: at that time

[3] Some commentators have seen a similarity in the tripartite structure of Matthew's passage with the wisdom text of Sir 51. A hymn of thanks (vv. 25-26), a monologue on the relationship between Jesus and the Father (v. 27) and the invitation to learn from Jesus and take on his yoke (vv. 28-30). in Sir 51 we have a song of thanksgiving (vv. 1-12), a monologue on the search for wisdom (vv. 13-22), an invitation to go to the school of wisdom and take its yoke upon oneself (vv. 23-30). It is no coincidence that in Mt 11,19 we speak of the works of Wisdom referring to the works of the Messiah (cf.. Mt 11,2-6): Christ is the Wisdom of God.

[4] “There is nothing hidden that will not be revealed, nor secret that will not be known” (10, 26)

[5] "Beati and miti, because they will inherit the land... Blessed are the peacemakers, because they will be called children of God" (Mt 5, 5-9)

[6] “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice… Blessed are the merciful… Blessed are the peacemakers” (Mt 5, 6-9)

.

San Giovanni all'Orfento. Abruzzo, Mount Maiella, it was a hermitage inhabited by Pietro da Morrone, called in 1294 to the Chair of Peter on which he ascended with the name of Celestine V (29 August – 13 December 1294).

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.