Parables are never enough, because they do not pass and speak to eternity

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

PARABLES ARE NEVER ENOUGH, WHY DON'T THEY PASS AND SPEAK TO THE ETERNAL

«There is something that you cannot find anywhere in the world, yet there is a place where you can find it»

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Like a painter who, once the work is finished, places his signature on the side of the painting, so Matthew, with a phrase, initials the page of the Gospel where he depicted, in narrative form, the parables of Jesus, an entire speech dedicated to the Kingdom of God:

«For this every scribe, become a disciple of the kingdom of heaven, is like a landlord who extracts new and old things from his treasure » [Mt 13, 52].

Matthew the tax collector [Mt 9,9] he has now become the wise scribe who saw the work of reinterpretation of the ancient deposit of faith accomplished in Jesus, bringing new and unexpected realities to light. Therefore he invites his readers and disciples to become those owners who do not keep for themselves the riches of the unsuspected newness of the Kingdom, but they also know how to offer it generously.

The abundance of parables on the lips of Jesus that describe the Kingdom of God is not surprising, as well as the multiplication of metaphors, symbols and images. Because they compose a reality that continually exceeds and surpasses every human measure, while respecting it. Since the Kingdom belongs to God, it cannot be circumscribed or enclosed in a single formula. The different parables on the mouth of Jesus express the complexity and polysemy of this new theological reality and who collected them, as it will be for the Gospels which are four and not just one[1], he felt that by placing them next to each other, all together, had something important to say about the Kingdom of God that Jesus inaugurates, explains and makes present.

But here is finally the evangelical page of this XVII Sunday of time for a year:

«At that time Jesus said to his disciples: “The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field; a man finds it and hides it; then it goes, full of joy, he sells all his possessions and buys that field. The kingdom of heaven is also similar to a merchant who goes in search of precious pearls; found a pearl of great value, will, he sells all his possessions and buys it. Yet, the kingdom of heaven is like a net cast into the sea, which collects all kinds of fish. When it's full, the fishermen haul it ashore, they sit down, they collect the good fish in the baskets and throw away the bad ones. So it will be at the end of the world. The angels will come and separate the evil from the good and throw them into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. You have understood all these things?”. They answered: "Yes". And he said to them: “For this every scribe, become a disciple of the kingdom of heaven, it is similar to a householder who extracts new and old things from his treasure"".

The last parable is eschatological in tone and its location ultimately becomes important because it opens a window on how Jesus positioned himself in relation to the world. The fishing net elsewhere, for example in the last chapter of the fourth Gospel[2], it now symbolized the mission of the Church and the need for different traditions - in that case the synoptic and the Johannine one - to remain united because that was the intention of the Lord who had invited the disciples to fish[3]. In this circumstance the net that is pulled into the boat is a metaphor for the final judgment since it explicitly speaks of the "end of the world" or of history.

Allow me to make a small digression at this point which I hope does not exceed the limits of this commentary on the Sunday Gospel. It is now well established that Jesus' preaching was based on an eschatological vision. At least since Albert Schweitzer at the beginning of the 20th century in a famous book put an end to liberal exegesis and the first stage of research on the historical Jesus by stating that he could only be thought of except eschatologically[4].

In his preaching Jesus went beyond the thought of Jewish apocalypticism which predicted an imaginative future event. For him it is a reality that is already an object of experience, a current event in which the totality of history is recapitulated. the Kingdom of God as such, that is, the full unfolding of his redemptive sovereignty, it hasn't happened yet, but the time of the end has come and so, properly speaking, there is no longer historical development, but rather a recapitulation of the whole story called to trial. In Jesus and in his preaching it happens as a process of condensation whereby time becomes very short. “The time is fulfilled and the Kingdom of God is near: convert, and believe in the gospel" [MC 1, 14-15]. What is announced here is the time (the kairos) of definitive fulfillment, the promised coming of the Kingdom, the great turning point of the world inaugurated by Jesus whose final act is about to take place with his parousia. And the disciple lives in the condensed time that goes from the resurrection to the parousia. For this now, unlike Jewish eschatology, “faith in the gospel” is needed, that is, in Jesus Christ, in the Messiah, who is present as the one who came and who is coming[5].

Judgment on this world will certainly come at the end, says the gospel, but the world itself, in Jesus' preaching he entered the eschatological phase. Otherwise we would not understand the radical demands of Jesus addressed to the disciples and his fight with the evil one. Which is not a fight against the world, but against the one who deludes the world that he can be self-sufficient, without God and therefore to be able to find meaning only in himself and in his achievements. Against this powerful illusion, Jesus announces the Kingdom of God and at the same time heals and restores and even resurrects the dead.

I find this statement enlightening on the Christian that someone like Frederick Nietzsche could probably countersign:

"Because of this, for this nihilistic conscience of his, the presence of the Christian is unbearable, and doubly unbearable; because it denies meaning to the radical desire to be there and, so, denies the will to power, but at the same time he suffers within himself the passion of the world. He does not shy away from the world's aspiration for happiness, because the Kingdom does not exist other from this world; and therefore he wants and works for happiness in the profane order which continually passes away, but he knows that happiness cannot remain, since it itself aspires to pass away. It's the point where the heart breaks: in extreme happiness as in extreme pain. The Gospels give a sublime representation of this."[6].

All this preamble which I hope wasn't long-winded helps me to say that Jesus' parables are not bedtime stories at all, but they must be taken tremendously seriously. E, getting back on our tracks, allows us to understand the first two parables of today's Gospel. In both two men find something new - since in the words and deeds of Jesus the Kingdom is the "novelty” — and they sell everything they have to make it their own[7]. While the merchant is already a discoverer of beautiful pearls (hello daisykaloùs margaritas) and in this sense he is someone who is looking for something extraordinary and probably unique that is missing from his collection. The first, an unidentified man, instead, accidentally finds a treasure. Perhaps this is why his joy is also underlined, because he didn't expect the discovery. In both, what is central is the find what is finally enough for their life and which precludes any further search. It is at this point that they put everything they own up for sale to purchase what they have finally found. They must have understood the unique and definitive value of the Kingdom, what is worth risking everything for. There is no more time to wait than this or further hesitations, for this is the time of fulfillment.

The two characters of the Gospel thus they implement wise behavior. This is probably why the curators of the Liturgy compared Matthew's page to the story of the young Solomon who in the first reading this Sunday tries to obtain from God "A docile heart" [1Re 3,9], but in return he receives from Him an even more precious pearl, that of «a wise and intelligent heart: there was no one like you before you nor will there arise after you" and even much more in riches and glory [1Re 2, 12-13].

About the pearl, St. Augustine, acutely notices that the merchant was looking for more pearls, the plural, and in the end he finds the single pearl par excellence which is Christ, the Word in which everything is summed up:

"That man, who was looking for precious pearls, he finds one that is truly of great value and, sold everything he owned, the purchase. This guy, so, in seeking good men with whom to live profitably, Above all, he encounters one who is without any sin: the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. Perhaps he too was looking for precepts, observing which he could behave well with men, and encountered love for others, in which alone, as the Apostle says, all the others are contained. In fact, do not kill, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not bear false witness and every other commandment are the individual pearls that are summarized in this maxim: Love your neighbor as yourself. O, perhaps, it is a man who is looking for intelligible concepts and finds the one in whom all are contained, that is, the Word, which was in the beginning, he was with God and he was God: the luminous Word for the splendor of truth, stable because immutable in its eternity and in every respect similar to itself due to the beauty of divinity: that Word that those who manage to go beyond the covering of the flesh identify with God"[8].

Allow me to close this commentary on the Gospel of today's Sunday reporting an apologue by M. Buber on dreaming of seeking and ultimately finding. Because parables are never enough.

«To the young people who came to him for the first time, Rabbi Bunam used to tell the story of Rabbi Eisik, son of Rabbi Jekel of Krakow. After years and years of harsh poverty, which however had not shaken his trust in God, he received orders in a dream to go to Prague to look for treasure under the bridge that leads to the royal palace. When the dream repeated itself for the third time, Eisik set out and reached Prague on foot. But the bridge was guarded day and night by sentries and he did not have the courage to dig in the indicated place. However, he returned to the bridge every morning, wandering around it until the evening. Finally the captain of the guard, who had noticed his comings and goings, he approached him and asked him in a friendly way if he had lost something or if he was waiting for someone. Eisik told him the dream that had brought him there from his distant country. The captain burst out laughing: “And you, poor fellow, to follow a dream you came all this way on foot? Ah, ah, ah! Stay cool to trust dreams! Then I too would have had to set out to obey a dream and go to Krakow, in the house of a Jew, a certain Eisik, son of Jekel, to look for treasure under the stove! Eisik, son of Jekel, are you kidding? I can see myself going in and ransacking all the houses in a city where half the Jews are called Eisik and the other half Jekel.!”. And he laughed again. Eisik greeted him, he returned to his home and dug up the treasure with which he built the named synagogue “Reb Eisik School, son of Reb Jekel”. “Remember this story well - Rabbi Bunam added at the time - and understand the message it addresses to you: there is something that you cannot find anywhere in the world, yet there is a place where you can find it”»[9].

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 30 July 2023

.

NOTE

[1] The quadriform Gospel [cf.. God's word 18; Irenaeus, Adv. Haer., III, 11, 8: PG 7, 885)

[2] GV 21, 3.6.11

[3] «Peter turned and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them, the one who had bent over his chest at dinner... Peter therefore, as he saw it, he said to Jesus: “man, what will become of him?”. Jesus answered him: “If I want him to stay until I come, what does it matter to you? You follow me”» (GV 21, 20.22)

[4] Albert Schweitzer History of research into the life of Jesus, Paideia, Brescia 1986, pp. 744 ff.

[5] «Come Lord Jesus» (AP 22, 20)

[6] Gaeta G., The time of the end, Any, p. 96

[7] "We ', sell what you own, give it to the poor and you will have treasure in heaven; then come and follow me" (Mt 19,21)

[8] Saint Aurelius Augustine, Seventeen questions on the Gospel according to Matthew, book one, PL 35

[9] Martin Buber, The path of man, Einaudi, 2023

.

San Giovanni all'Orfento. Abruzzo, Mount Maiella, it was a hermitage inhabited by Pietro da Morrone, called in 1294 to the Chair of Peter on which he ascended with the name of Celestine V (29 August – 13 December 1294).

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Gabriele

The merchant in search of the pearl of the Kingdom of God

Homiletic of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE MERCHANT IN SEARCH OF THE PEARL OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD

«The kingdom of heaven is also like a merchant who goes in search of precious pearls; found a pearl of great value, will, he sells all his possessions and buys it»

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

 

 

Dear Readers of The Island of Patmos,

summer time can become a propitious moment to try to deepen our faith and its contents. It is a period of freedom which is a sacred time in which, like God, let's rest. For this reason it becomes a time in which that rest can also be dedicated to reading and prayer. Our search for God, of our being with him never ceases to take place. Father Henri De Lubac wrote:

“The human mind is so made that it cannot have a truth and hold it, if not searching and always searching. The rest of thought is equivalent to its death.".

In the parables of Jesus, who have already been talking about the Kingdom for some Sundays, on this XVII Sunday of ordinary time we focus on the continuous search for the Kingdom. A research that continues incessantly for us. In fact, Jesus expresses three parables. What seems to me central is precisely that of the merchant and the pearl of great value in which the Lord narrates:

«The kingdom of heaven is also like a merchant who goes in search of precious pearls; found a pearl of great value, will, he sells all his possessions and buys it»

Jesus uses the analogy of the merchant. A figure who must have been well known to the Lord's listeners at the time. First we have a merchant who goes in search. A searching merchant is a person who is very attentive to the territory in which he is searching, to the movements of other prospectors and traders. He is a person who has informed himself precisely before setting off on the road, researched places to look for pearls before travelling.

The merchant is the metaphor of the believer who consistently seeks God. We Catholics have three great "signposts" on the path of faith: the Tradition, Sacred Scripture and the Magisterium. These are our prior sources, with which we then build our act of faith. Everyone has his personal yes to the Lord, in which he builds his own spirituality and his way of believing and living the faith.

The merchant is looking for pearls. Until he finds the precious pearl which he then decides to buy. A pearl that for listeners of the time is a stone of inestimable value, because imported from India. Therefore the merchant is the one who goes in search of different precious pearls and finally finds the pearl, the priceless one for which he sells everything.

Because Jesus uses the image of the pearl (margaritas in Greek)? The pearl is a biblical image found in several passages. For example, in the Song of Songs (Ct 1,10) pearls are the jewels that the Beloved wears around her neck. While in Apocalypse, the pearl is one of the materials with which the new Jerusalem is built (AP 21,21).

The Pearl that the believer seeks to acquire it is the kingdom of God. This kingdom of God is assimilated to the pearl of Song of Songs, we will be able to say that it is the Church. Indeed, the Canticle is traditionally considered a dialogue of love between the Beloved who is Christ and the Beloved who is the Church. If instead the pearl is the material with which the Celestial Jerusalem is built, we will say that the Kingdom of God to be appropriated in every way is Heaven.

Applied all to us believers we seek God, we could say that the precious pearl is to reach Eternal life in Paradise, walking in the Catholic Church, freeing us from everything that hinders our faith. Like this, also the other pearls which are second hand, they are therefore those both material and spiritual goods that seem so only in appearance, but which actually distance us from communion in the Catholic Church and with God, and that do not get us to the Kingdom of God in Heaven.

The metaphor of the merchant who sells everything and goes, finally it shows that the Lord places us on a path of faith in which he asks us to give everything to reach the kingdom, invites us to strive as much as possible to be consistent in faith, get involved knowing that you lose everything to gain everything (Fil 3, 8: R, Manes 211). That is, walking on the path to the kingdom of God all the sacrifices we would have made to get to Heaven, even now it will be spiritual gains, a hundredfold obtained with the grace of God.

We ask the Lord to be merchants more and more eager to obtain the pearls of God, to learn to love the whole world with the joy of one who has received the treasure of heaven.

Amen!

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 29 July 2023

.

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The defensive pathology of "it's just us" and the curative medicine of the Holy Gospel

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE DEFENSIVE PATHOLOGY OF «IT'S ONLY US» AND THE CURATIVE MEDICINE OF THE HOLY GOSPEL

The pathology of "it's just us" has not appeared now in our day, because already Jesus, narrates the Gospel of Luke, he was forced to rebuke two apostles, James and John, that, as the group had not been welcomed by the Samaritans, they wanted to invoke fire and flames from heaven.

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

The pathology of "it's just us" it has not appeared now in our days, because already Jesus, narrates the Gospel of Luke, he was forced to rebuke two apostles, James and John, that, as the group had not been welcomed by the Samaritans, they wanted to invoke fire and flames from heaven.

Vasco Rossi on the occasion of the presentation of the concert film All in one night, Live Kom 015′ in Milan, 14 March 2015. ANSA/DANIEL DAL ZENNARO

«It's just us» Vasco Rossi repeated in one of his old ones hit [cf.. WHO] where he listed situations in which those of his could relate fans who shared the ills of a generation of some time ago. Even in the Church, shaken by the vicissitudes of the modern world, a certain malaise has spread that we could define as "It's just us". It appears all those times that people or opinion groups express discontent and complaints, with the consequence of feeling as if attacked or besieged and therefore entrenched in a defensive position or in that of belonging only to elite capable of lasting and understanding what is convulsively happening.

The Pathology of "It's Only Us" it has not appeared now in our days, because already Jesus, narrates the Gospel of Luke, he was forced to rebuke two apostles, James and John, that, as the group had not been welcomed by the Samaritans, they wanted to invoke fire and flames from heaven[1].

To heal from this condition This Sunday's Gospel offers us a drug that from its name seems like a medicine: la macrothymia (forbearing), that is, patience. It is a term that is not actually present in the Gospel passage proclaimed today, but it expresses its meaning. We find it, instead, in the second letter of Peter where the apostle states:

«The Lord does not delay in fulfilling his promise, even if some talk about slowness. Instead he is patient - he is long-suffering makrothimei ― with you, because he doesn't want anyone to get lost, but that everyone has the opportunity to repent" [2PT 3, 9].

This is to indicate that already in the very first Christian generation there was the desire to force the times and to put oneself in the place of the One for whom «[…] a single day is like a thousand years and a thousand years like a single day" [2PT 3, 8]. But here is the evangelical page of this sixteenth Sunday for a year (Mt 13, 24-43):

During that time, Jesus told the crowd another parable, saying: «The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. Ma, while everyone slept, his enemy came, he sowed weeds among the wheat and went away. Then when the stem grew and bore fruit, the weeds also sprang up. Then the servants went to the master of the house and told him: "Man, you have not sown good seed in your field? Where does the weeds come from??”. And he answered them: “An enemy did this!”. And the servants said: “You want us to go pick it up?”. "Do Not, He answered, because when you, collecting the weeds, with it also uproot the wheat. Let them both grow together until the harvest, and at the time of harvest I will say to the reapers: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to burn; instead put the wheat in my barn"". He told them another parable, saying: «The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and sowed in his field. It is the smallest of all the seeds but, once he grows up, it is larger than the other plants in the garden and becomes a tree, so much so that the birds of the sky come to make nests in its branches". He told them another parable: «The kingdom of heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and mixed in three measures of flour, until it was all leavened". All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds in parables and did not speak to them except in parables, so that what had been spoken through the prophet might be fulfilled: «I will open my mouth with parables, I will proclaim things that have been hidden since the foundation of the world.". Then he dismissed the crowd and entered the house; his disciples approached him to tell him: «Explain to us the parable of the weeds in the field». And he answered: «He who sows the good seed is the Son of man. The field is the world and the good seed are the children of the Kingdom. The weeds are the children of the Evil One and the enemy who sowed them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the world and the reapers are the angels. How then do we gather the weeds and burn them in the fire, so it will be at the end of the world. The Son of man will send his angels, who will gather out of his kingdom all those who sin and all those who commit iniquity and will throw them into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in their Father's kingdom. Who has ears, you listen!».

As I have already tried to explain [cf.. my previous homily]. Jesus loved speaking in parables, presenting immediately understandable realities taken from the peasant or household world as on this Sunday. Contextually, using metaphors, he staged paradoxical situations so that the same reality could be seen differently from how it is usually perceived. It is remodeled by Him not only for the purpose of presenting a new ethic, but above all to tell what the kingdom of God is, a reality that escapes any appropriation or cataloguing. It is the world of God that Jesus reveals and lives and which continually displaces.

The first parable of the good wheat and the weeds[2] it differs from that of the sower heard last Sunday because while there it was about sowing and receiving the land, here it is described together with sowing (v. 24), also the growth of the seed, its fruiting (v. 26) and the harvest (v. 30). However, unlike the master's servants, readers are immediately warned that someone, taking advantage of the darkness of the night, he sowed discord in the same field. The discovery of the weeds, operated by servants, leads the latter to express their amazement and bewilderment to the sower (v. 27). In their words one can perhaps also detect a hint of suspicion or doubt about sowing, and therefore on the master himself. But the sower's response shows that the presence of weeds among the wheat is not at all surprising, it shouldn't surprise or cause scandal. And so the reader's reaction is also oriented not so much towards questioning the origin of the discord, but on how to behave when noting their presence. The reader's confusion, like servants, it happens there. Do not uproot the weeds, which among other things is also similar to wheat, but let the two plants grow together: in fact, there would be a risk of tearing up even those made of wheat. The weeds will certainly be separated from the wheat, but in its own time. Not now. Now is the time for patience. Patience is strength towards oneself, it is the ability to refrain from intervening by dominating the instinct that would immediately lead to "cleaning up". But this is not God's action. God is patient and long-suffering.

How many times have men questioned themselves on the presence of evil in human history or in the individual life of each of us. Because if we sow goodness, sometimes evil is returned to us? Who is this night operator who, as a jealous enemy of the good fruits of life, causes many situations to arise in which we stumble as if over unwanted weeds??

Even in the Christian community this mix between good and bad can exist, between the just and the unjust as it was already in the small community of those who followed Jesus: someone betrayed him, another denied him and some fearful people ran away.

But the Son of Man, Jesus, He teaches his people to have patience behaving like sons of the Kingdom until the judgment comes that will liquefy every scandal and ugliness. The smoke of the adversary's works reduced to nothing has disappeared, finally only daylight will shine without sunset[3].

But until then we are in the time of the growth of the Kingdom of God which can encounter a thousand obstacles and difficulties. This is why it is important to learn the patience of God beautifully depicted in the book of Wisdom in the first reading of this Liturgy of the Word:

«[…] The fact that you are master of all, It makes you lenient with everyone. You show your strength when there is no belief in the fullness of your power, and reject the insolence of those who know it. Master of the Force, you judge with meekness and govern us with great indulgence, Why, Whenever you want, you wield power. With this way of acting you taught your people that the just must love men, and you have given your children good hope that, after the sins, you grant repentance" [Sap 12, 19-20].

The community of believers, the church, it is the place where one experiences this divine indulgence and it, around you, testifies it to the world. As is expressed in these beautiful words of the Council:

«The Church therefore, provided with the gifts of its founder and faithfully observing his precepts of charity, humility and self-sacrifice, receives the mission of announcing and establishing the kingdom of Christ and of God among all people, and of this kingdom it constitutes the germ and the beginning on earth. In the meantime, as it slowly grows, yearns for the perfect kingdom and with all his might hopes and longs to unite with his king in glory".[4]

In the words of the Council it is explicitly said that the Church is not the Kingdom of God, but it yearns for you as it walks through time. For it itself is made up of saints and sinners in need of divine patience and mercy. While a plant emerges to remain itself, either good wheat or weeds, people can change, come back, fall and even repent. A myriad of saints are there to bear witness to this and the apostle Paul himself recalls it several times in his letters. In the second reading of this Liturgy he goes so far as to state that not even "we know how to pray properly" if the Spirit of God did not intervene to intercede for the saints. This protects us from feeling like we have already arrived, but also better than others, the only pure and holy ones eager to eradicate from now on those who in our opinion are symbolically weeds.

In the other two parables that follow that of the wheat and the weeds Jesus speaks of the Kingdom as if it were a seed that from very small and humble origins unexpectedly becomes a tree capable of welcoming new life, symbolized by the nests that are built among its branches. An experience that the Church that harked back to the tradition of the Gospel of Matthew was already experiencing, because it is made up of people coming from both Judaism and paganism. Or he talks about it as the yeast that makes a large amount of flour grow. Three measures are forty kilograms! The Church rejoices in seeing this divine work and is amazed by it. In the same way as Sarah to whom Abraham asked to knead the same quantity of flour to welcome the Lord at the oak of Mamre[5]. For this reason the Church, like Abraham and Sarah in their time, is called to faith in the works of God. A little further on, indeed, in the Gospel of Matthew Jesus will say:

«If you have faith equal to a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain: “Move from here to there” and it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you" [Mt 17, 20].

At this point we can understand that the Kingdom is Jesus he loved to express it in parables, it is a divine reality that always transcends us. A reserve of grace, to use the words of a more mature theology, who teaches us to have patience towards sinners, mercy and faith in God until the end of time when the eschatological judgment will take place.

The two collection prayers also go in this direction that can be used in this Liturgy. The oldest first reads:

«Be kind to us, your faithful, o Lord, and give us abundantly the treasures of your grace".

The second newest one makes us pray like this:

«They always support us, or Father, the strength and patience of your love, because your word, seed and leaven of the kingdom, bear fruit in us and revive the hope of seeing the new humanity grow".

Happy Sunday everyone.

from the Hermitage, 23 July 2023

 

NOTE

[1] «…They entered a village of Samaritans to prepare their entrance. But they did not want to receive it, because he was clearly on his way to Jerusalem. When they saw this, the disciples James and John said: “man, you want us to say that fire will come down from heaven and consume them?”. He turned around and scolded them". (LC 9, 51-55)

[2] Gramineaeous plant (A drunken lollipop), that infests the cereal fields.

[3] «There will be no more night, and they will no longer need lamplight or sunlight, because the Lord God will enlighten them. And they will reign forever and ever.". (AP 22, 5)

[4] The light, 5.

[5] «Then Abraham hurriedly went into the tent, from Sarah, and said: “Presto, three seas of fine flour, knead it and make focaccia" (Gen 18,6).

 

.

San Giovanni all'Orfento. Abruzzo, Mount Maiella, it was a hermitage inhabited by Pietro da Morrone, called in 1294 to the Chair of Peter on which he ascended with the name of Celestine V (29 August – 13 December 1294).

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

It is very dangerous to state: "I am what I feel I am", because it means imposing the world of the unreal, often even violently

IT IS VERY DANGEROUS TO CLAIM «I AM WHAT I FEEL I AM», BECAUSE IT MEANS IMPOSING THE WORLD OF THE UNREAL, OFTEN EVEN IN A VIOLENT WAY

After half a century of feminist struggles, finally a boy wins first prize in a beauty contest for women. An extraordinary success for us men!

— History and current affairs —

.

PDF print format article

 

.

There are unbearable blacks, some even dangerous criminals belonging to notoriously very violent ethnic groups? Yup, but pace of Latin semantics black people should not be referred to as "niggers", but as “men of color”. The word "nigger" is a racist expression.

“transsexual, Transylvanian” – The Rocky Horror Picture Show, Jim Sharman (1975)

I think a legitimate question: how come when they point to the White people (white men), they call us “whites” rather than “men of no color”? These niggas called "colored men", they are perhaps racist? How come it is racist to say niger (negro) but it is not to say bleach (bianco)? If in any European country, during an argument, one said to a black "dirty nigger", first it would end up in the media pillory, then before our courts on charges of racism, something on which one can also agree, given that there should not exist a contempt liable to the accusation of racism and a similar contempt considered instead only a heated expression coming out of the mouth during an argument, with the substantial and formal judgment which varies according to the color of the skin indicated. Or does anyone know maybe a case of some nigger shamed all over the press politically correct and then hauled off to a court on racism charges for telling someone “dirty white”?

Wanting to be fair, perhaps it would be appropriate to drag to the bar of the court even the African who addresses a European indicating him as white, or worse using the racist expression of “dirty white”. If in fact blacks are not blacks or negroes but "men of color", in turn we whites are not whites but "men without color", or if we prefer “men of non-dark coloring” or “men with bleached colors”. Then choose the most politically correct definition among these three, for so we should be called, in the same way that an African is not called a "negro" or "black" but a "colored man".

As for the various black populations of the African continent, it should be clarified that they are often very different from each other, roughly as a European from Norway may be from an Italian European native of the Calabria region. In this regard, the dictionary provides this indication:

«negroide, masculine and feminine adjective and noun [composed of negro and oide]. In physical anthropology, black bouquet, one of the two branches of the primary equatorial forms, including strains of steatopygids, of Pygmy and Negrids. In a generic sense (and often noun), of an individual who exhibits the characteristics of a Negro (very dark skin, camerrinia, prognathism, frizzy hair, dolicocefalia)» [cf.. Treccani Encyclopaedia].

But if we go to read the most unreliable encyclopedia of the entire globe, i.e. Wikipedia, where political correctness is often pushed to paroxysm and to the very denial of the foundations of the various sciences, including anthropological and biological ones, we can read:

“The term negroid or negride, sometimes congoid, indicates a now obsolete anthropological classification of’A wise man, definable starting from the shape of the skull and other craniometric and anthropometric characteristics: this term identifies the autochthonous human beings of sub-Saharan Africa» [cf.. WHO].

Come May quietly and silently certain American universities give black students of African-American descent easier entrance tests than those given to white students of European-American descent? It may be that this is in the same way that any white of European-American descent would have serious difficulty competing in certain sports competitions with African-Americans.? Worse than ever with pure Africans from certain particular populations of the Black Continent, notoriously favored in various sports by their happy physical conformation that we "men without color" do not have, due to our different genetics, because in many things we are inferior to them, endowed with abilities and physical resources that we do not have, including that vocal range that makes certain voices unique in singing, so much so that they are defined as black or negro voices precisely because of their particularity. Then, if some think it is possible and feasible to have Japanese compete against Cameroonians in a speed race with show jumping, let them do as well, but I fear that the results would be somewhat obvious, beyond ridiculous. In any case, the problem would not arise because the Japanese, mindful of their sizes but at the same time also of what could be certain of their physical limits in the face of other competitors, with the atavistic sense of honor they have they would never expose themselves to public ridicule. We Europeans, on the other hand, do, because we have long since lost the sense of human modesty, but even more that of shame.

Everyone is free to say that the greatest masters of philosophical thought and those of the main exact sciences were all born in the Congo, in Cameroon, in Togo, in Ghana, in Liberia and Burkina Faso, where archaeologists have discovered ancient sites that by engineering, architecture and artistic value far exceed those of ancient Egypt and the civilizations of the Incas and Aztecs, of the Etruscans, the Greeks and Romans. The undoubtedly tragic thing is that if someone said things like this before an audience of expert scholars and specialists, all will be silent and none of them will sigh. We ask: Why?

The most degenerate political correctness it even pushes us to believe in the existence of peoples and populations that no longer exist, for example the Egyptians and the Greeks. I understand both, considered the heritage linked to their lands, can boast certain ancient origins, however, the fact remains that the Egyptian civilization - and with it the Egyptians -, it has been extinct for centuries. Those who claim to be the current Egyptians are an Arab population; they have been since the "people of the sands", also known as Mohammedans, they invaded that region in the seventh century by making a clean sweep of what remained of that culture which for some centuries had already started a slow decline. The ancient Egyptian-Mohammedans were also lovers of big bonfires, because it was them, led by Caliph Omar, to set the final fire that destroyed the ancient library of Alexandria in 640. How centuries and centuries later it was Muslim jihadists who destroyed in August of 2015 the ancient archaeological site of Palmyra. It is true that those responsible for the destruction were Islamist fundamentalists, as Western masters of political correctness were quick to point out, but it is also true that these fundamentalists were Muslims anyway, as degenerate and unworthy as we like, but still Muslims. And at the completion of each of their criminal actions, including the filmed slaughtering of many Christian victims, they proclaimed themselves true followers of the Koran. All contrary to the much reviled Christians who never destroyed the ancient Roman and Greek pagan temples, they saved them by turning them into churches, bringing them to the present day.

Were true the black legend that the cruel conquerors Spanish, with just as many cruel Dominicans and Franciscans in tow, they destroyed the temples of those ancient civilizations, however, it remains to be understood why, in Mexico and Peru the archaeological sites are still intact and visible today. Why make up black legends and blame others, while not saying that many destructions were made by the local populations during the various civil wars that followed one another starting from the beginning of the 20th century, after the Spanish ceased to dominate those territories as their protectorates or colonies? With the Napoleonic invasion in 1808 the disintegration of the Spanish empire in South America began through the Spanish American wars of independence, the last of which in 1898, also known as the "great disaster". Not being able or wanting to say that the conquistadors, arrived in the Americas in the sixteenth century, found the Aztec civilization in an advanced state of decay and first of all prevented the continuation of the practice of human sacrifices, we prefer to continue spreading black legends about the Spaniards who arrived with Dominicans and Franciscans in tow who forced baptism on entire populations. The historical truth is quite different: to convert the indigenous populations of present-day Mexico in the 16th century, followed by those of Latin America, fu la Morenita Virgin, known as Our Lady of Guadalupe, which was not brought by the Spaniards, appeared to the young Aztec Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin. The same name "Guadalupe" is a term of Aztec origin that derives from Coatlaxopeuh and means "she who crushes the serpent". Also in this event the Spaniards, together with the trembling Dominicans and Franciscans they have nothing to do with it. Note also that in the Aztec culture the Quetzalcoatl it was the divine serpent that symbolized knowledge and warfare. So, she who crushes the serpent, in that ancient culture it symbolizes the defeat of war and the beginning of a new knowledge. That's who converted those ancient people, the Vergine Maria, not forced baptisms, always condemned and punished, moreover, by ecclesiastical law.

The present Egyptians they speak Arabic and write using the characters of the Arabic alphabet because in truth this was the original language they spoke in the 13th century. a.C. the Pharaoh Ramses II known as the Great, further proof of this are the internal inscriptions of the pyramids which abound in Arabic alphabetic characters, said not by chance: “cuneiform Arabic language”. Then, to the uninformed, it is enough to remember that Mohammed was inspired by the astral Egyptian hieroglyphics to understand exactly where to build Mecca.

The current Greeks they are more proud than ever of their history, feeling deeply and intimately so, pity they are not. If in fact by Greeks we mean the inhabitants of that geographical region, nothing to say, but taking into account that they are only geographically. The current inhabitants of that region are in fact Greeks in the same way that the inhabitants of that territory called Egypt are Egyptians. Therefore, the inhabitants of that region are heirs and descendants of the ancient Greeks in the same way that the Swedes are heirs and descendants of the inhabitants of Madgascar. In that geographical region called Greece the Turks dominated for four long centuries, from the 1453 al 1821. The ancient Greeks have left us a great heritage of art which bears witness to what was the morphology and physical conformation completely typical and characteristic of the men and women of that ancient people. The current Athenians boasting their ancient Greek far and wide, they should come to terms with a fact as simple as it is evident: whether he likes it or not, morphologically they are Turkish. Someone wants proof? It is enough to go for a walk through the streets of Istanbul and those of Athens to ascertain that there is no difference between the inhabitants of one city and the other, because the inhabitants of Istanbul are men of Turkish stock, just as the inhabitants of Athens are Turkish in their physical conformation, who after four centuries of domination claim to pass themselves off as descendants of the ancient Greeks, as if today they had the conformation and features of the sculptures of Skopas, Praxiteles and Lysippos. Free the Greek-Turks to feel exactly like the Riace bronzes, free at the same time any connoisseur of history, of anthropology and the art of laughing in his face at such claims.

We Italians don't have these problems, being one of the most bastard peoples in the world. Here is a comprehensive example: on one of our major islands, Sardinia, it is possible to see male figures of medium-short stature, stocky and heavy boned, dark haired and olive skinned, reminiscent of certain Muslims of the Kasbah of Algiers. At the same time it is possible to see blond men, tall in stature and with ice-blue eyes reminiscent of the Vikings of present-day Scandinavia. How is it possible, a naive Milanese on vacation asked an anthropologist from Cagliari, which with a great sense of humor he replied:

«Our grandmothers were very welcoming and hospitable women with all the foreigners who have visited our land over the centuries».

The late Indro Montanelli, when I was just 25 year old, with his sweet poison Florentine wit he told me:

«Italy has the geographical shape of a boot, but in actual fact it is comparable to a whore's bed, on which everyone lay down, making us the most bastard people in the world. This also has very positive implications, because, as is known, bastards - take dogs as an example - are more intelligent and also live longer than those of pure breed".

Smart and creative, I add, for better or for worse, but again with a difference: if we say that certain Neapolitans have carried out thefts and scams to deserve admiration, certainly not for the crime, of course, but for the ingenious ingenuity, this can be said, because it is allowed. If, on the other hand, it is stated that most of the gypsies - not some, but a large part of the so-called Roma ― live on theft and illicit trafficking, in this case one is accused of racism, all regardless of the sentences of the courts and the continuous recovery of stolen goods in the Roma camps. If in fact the Neapolitan carries out thefts and scams with rare ingenuity, he is a delinquent, but if a gypsy steals, in that case all the blame is involved, even the most unlikely ones, of society, according to the theses of that unfortunate ruiner of European legal thought Jean Jacques Rousseau, who gave birth in the eighteenth century to the theory of the so-called "noble savage". According to Roussean thinking, man was originally a “animated” good and peaceful and only later, corrupted by society and progress, both guilty, it has become evil. A very dangerous thought that is all the rage today and which often leads to the affirmation that those who commit crimes do not do it because they have chosen to pursue the path of crime, but because the fault lies with others, or worse than the whole society.

Soon said: the violent Negroes who, moved by tribal impulses, hack even women and children to pieces with machetes, they do not act out of criminal instincts moved by inhumanity, because their actions would be the cause of the colonial imperialism that has enraged them. Because, as known and known, before the arrival of the bad colonizers in the African Continent, they didn't butcher each other at all, but they lived peacefully as in an idyllic Paradise of Eden. And the colonizers were so ruthless and bad as to prohibit and prevent the practice of cannibalism widespread in many tribes together with human sacrifices. Among the many recent cases that deny those who identify the black man with the good, the victim and the exploited by the ruthlessness of the West, I mention the genocide in Rwanda which in the early 1990s produced around one million deaths in the tribal fights between the Hutu and the Tutsi. most of them women and children.

Data provided later by the National Bank of Rwanda, documented through thousands of international commercial transactions that approximately one million machetes used in the massacres had been imported through various channels and that the majority were Chinese-made. Bank transactions showed that they were purchased and paid for with funds allocated by various Western donor countries to support Rwanda's economic and social development. The allocation of funds stipulated that the money could never be used for weapons or other military materials. The agreement with the World Bank was even more restrictive and stipulated that the funds could not be used to import even civilian products, whether these were intended for military or paramilitary use. After careful investigations, the World Bank ascertained that the government of the dictator Juvénal Habyarimana (1973-1994) made use of World Bank funds to finance the importation of machetes from China, classifying it as an import of "civilian products" for non-military and non-para-military use. Anyhow, the bad, the "white man" remains in practice, while “the black man” is good, then, if it gets bad, the fault lies entirely with the West, certainly not of the impulses deriving from its never dormant tribal culture, that only another kind of culture has managed to put to sleep and in some cases even to defeat: Christianity.

The Arab-Egyptians they are free to feel like descendants of the ancient pharaohs just as the Turkish-Greeks can declare themselves descendants of the ancient Hellenic civilization. We can drag those who dare to say “nigger” instead of “black man” to the bars of the courts, obviously passing over the Negroes who call us “whites” with all the sunny obviousness of the case, because such we are: bianchi. We can continue to poison the thought of the decadent West with Roussean theories and believe that man is fundamentally good and that if he becomes evil, or delinquency, the fault is not his but the liberal-capitalist society.

In the same way, a man is free to feel like a woman, like the transsexual who won the Miss Universe prize in Holland a few days ago. Prize in front of which I admit that I too indulged myself on social media writing:

«After half a century of feminist struggles, finally a boy wins first prize in a beauty contest for women. An extraordinary success for us men!».

Faced with certain stubborn refusals of reality, often exercised even violently, sometimes even with coups of laws or with recourse to laws on unspecified "discrimination", anyone who reasons and intends to continue to do so, at first it can make her laugh, but after a reactive laugh he will immediately understand that in truth there would be crying.

I think it's legitimate and not at all racist and discriminating ask yourself a question: if a man decides to feel like a woman and to present himself in a beauty contest for women, as far as I'm concerned it's free to do so, as well as those responsible for admissions to the competition suffering from obvious idiocy, followed by a jury made up of obvious imbeciles, they are free both to admit a transsexual and to reward her as the most beautiful woman. But, in the same way, it should be just as legitimate, for example from me, ask a very ironic question, but truly innocent and above all realistic: if the newly elected Miss Universe dutch shemale was diagnosed with varicocele in her right testicle and needed surgery, of those to which even children are sometimes subjected, where we put it: in the gynecology department, in that she feels like a woman although biologically a man, or in the urology department, as in fact, although she feels like a woman, it's a man, enough to require a minor surgery on a testicle?

Any reasoning mind he understands well how insidious it is on a social level, political and juridical endorse the thesis that a person is not what he is in his physical and biological reality, but what he feels he is or believes or wants to be.

The words of Gilbert Keith Chesterton they ring prophetic more than ever, when in his work Heretics he wrote in the distant 1905:

"The great march of intellectual destruction continue. Everything will be denied. Everything will become a creed. It is a reasonable position to deny the stones of the street; will become a religious dogma to reaffirm. It is a rational argument that it takes all immersed in a dream; will be a sensible form of mysticism say that we are all awake. Fires will be stoked to witness that two plus two equals four. Swords will be drawn to show that the leaves are green in summer. We will find ourselves defending not only the incredible virtues and the incredible sense of human life, but something even more incredible, this immense, impossible universe staring at us in the face. We will fight for visible wonders as if they were invisible. We will look at the grass and the skies impossible with a strange courage. We will be among those who have seen and yet have believed ".

And so, in case of necessity, we will admit Miss Universe in the gynecology ward and not in the urology ward, even if she has to be operated on for a varicocele in the right testicle, because what matters is not the objective and biological fact that she has testicles; what matters is that this trans feels like a woman and claims the right to be one.

We are falling into the world of the unreal, but no one wants to notice, who then realizes it is silent out of fear or for a quiet life, thus avoiding being accused of homotransphobia. Because what is true is not true, but it is true what the subject wants, what he feels and what he likes.

the Island of Patmos, 16 July 2023

.

.

Father Ariel's new book has just been released and is being distributed, you can buy it by clicking directly on the cover image or by entering our bookshop WHO

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Gabriele

The hundred, the sixty, the thirty in the seed of God

Homiletic of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE HUNDRED, THE SIXTY, IL TRENTA NEL SEME SACRO DI DIO

La fede infatti «è un atto personale: è la libera risposta dell’uomo all’iniziativa di Dio che si rivela». Therefore it is an answer that we give to God and that some days can be more certain and others more insecure.

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

 

Dear readers of The island of Patmos,

il tempo estivo è tempo in cui spesso molti di noi vanno in vacanza, specialmente nelle mete di mare. Inconsapevolmente stiamo facendo una scelta evangelica. Indeed, il mare è descritto nel brano evangelico di questa XV Domenica del tempo ordinario quale luogo in cui Gesù espone e spiega la parabola del seminatore. Una parabola che è una piccola mappa per tutti noi: una piccola chiave di lettura della vita di fede. Il mare, so, è il luogo dove Gesù offre chiarezza per il nostro cammino di credenti. Potremmo dire con il poeta Rainer Maria Rilke:

«Quando i miei pensieri sono ansiosi, inquieti e cattivi, vado in riva al mare, e il mare li annega e li manda via con i suoi grandi suoni larghi, li purifica con il suo rumore, e impone un ritmo su tutto ciò che in me è disorientato e confuso».

Il brano del Vangelo di oggi è composto per lo più da una parabola, una delle poche che Gesù decide di spiegare direttamente ai discepoli mentre invece rimane in forma di narrazione per tutti gli altri che lo ascoltano in riva al mare. Gesù usa le parabole. I discepoli gli domandano perché, Lui risponde:

«Perché a voi è dato conoscere i misteri del regno dei cieli, ma a loro non è dato. […] Per questo a loro parlo con parabole: perché guardando non vedono, udendo non ascoltano e non comprendono».

Sembra una risposta sibillina. Invece il Signore vuole far capire l’importanza della parabola.

Vorrei soffermarmi un momento sul perché. Effectively, la finalità delle parabole consiste nell’illuminare circa la natura del regno e di aprire alla comprensione di cose nuove, ad esempio su come agisce Dio. La parabola è un racconto basato sull’avvicinamento e la comparazione di due realtà, una reale e una fittizia che si richiamano ma non coincidono. Essa contiene metafore che fanno riferimento a una situazionediversa” rispetto a quella narrata. In tal modo le parabole spingono gli uditori a un esercizio che richiede intelligenza, fantasy, elasticità mentale e capacità riflessiva. In short: richiede a tutti di trasferirsi idealmente nel racconto fittizio per tornare al reale con un’acquisizione nuova. Dunque le parabole selezionano realtà quotidiane come elemento di comparazione, e allo stesso tempo manifestando il loro limite per far emergere lasporgenza” O “eccedenzadella realtà a cui rimandano. In tal modo esse operano un passaggio verso ciò che supera la mente umana e permettono agli uditori di esporsi personalmente a ”l’inedito” e “all’inaudito” di Dio. Diventano così rivelazioni “dell’atmosfera” amorevole e tenera di Dio e lo rendono in qualche modo più accessibile, conoscibile e attraente per chiunque le ascolti[1]

Ecco perché nella parabola del seminatore troviamo in controluce tutta la nostra vita di fede. Gesù spiega bene nei dettagli e offre una fenomenologia dei diversi credenti. Il seme seminato lungo la strada, potremmo dire che è il credente non praticante. Il seme seminato sul terreno sassoso è il credente che facilmente è preda dei facili entusiasmi, incostante nel tempo che spesso va in crisi, senza una scelta definitiva nella fede. Il seme seminato tra i rovi è il credente distratto tra le mille voci del mondo e della cultura attuale, mosso da buoni sentimenti e da una buona pratica di fede, ma che non riconosce poi facilmente i peccati e i vizi del tempo e così li asseconda. In the end, il seme seminato sul terreno buono che produce cento, sessanta e trenta è il credente che crede con convinzione forte e si sforza di essere coerente nella pratica della fede, ma date le sue fragilità non sempre riesce a dare il massimo. Gesù accetta però anche quei piccoli gesti di fede e carità attuati con tenerezza ed amore.

Tutti noi possiamo essere uno di questi credenti, dal meno fervoroso al più fervoroso. Direi anche che ciascuno di noi può avere delle fasi in cui passa dall’essere seme infecondo sulla strada a seme piantato sul terreno buono. Questi quattro semi descritti da Gesù possono rappresentare anche un momento della nostra vita di fede, in cui siamo più aridi o più convinti.

La fede infatti «è un atto personale: è la libera risposta dell’uomo all’iniziativa di Dio che si rivela» [cf.. CCC 166] Therefore it is an answer that we give to God and that some days can be more certain and others more insecure. A noi di essere sempre pronti a ricevere la grazia per un atto di fede sempre più fermo.

Chiediamo al Signore di crescere nella fede, per diventare un seme di vita eterna, un fermento sacro per tutto il mondo, affinché possiamo donare il nostro trenta, sessanta, cento al mondo sempre più orfano di Dio.

Amen!

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 16 July 2023

.

NOTE

[1] Cfr R. Manes Vangelo secondo Matteo, Yet, 2019, 197 – 198.

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

The Gospel narrates that the sower went out to sow, however, he does not tell us that he returned

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE GOSPEL NARRATES THAT THE SOWER WENT OUT TO SOW, NON CI DICE PERÒ CHE FECE RITORNO

Un missionario italiano ucciso nel 1985 in Brazil he used to say: «The sower went out to sow, but he does not say that he then returned". And it went on: "The fate of the seed will be no different from the fate of the sower".

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Un missionario italiano[1] ucciso nel 1985 in Brazil he used to say: «The sower went out to sow, but he does not say that he then returned". And it went on: "The fate of the seed will be no different from the fate of the sower".

Seminatore al tramonto, Vincent Willem van Gogh

Questa frase molto concisa condensa il cuore del messaggio evangelico di questa XV Domenica del Tempo Ordinario. The Gospel (Mt 13, 1-23) che verrà proclamato nella Liturgia della Parola si apre, indeed, con uno degli begins più conosciuti di tutti i Vangeli: «Il seminatore uscì a seminare». A questo collegamento potrete trovare il testo nella versione più lunga[2].

Il brano da inizio al discorso in parabole[3] terzo dei cinque grandi discorsi che Matteo mette sulla bocca di Gesù ed è strutturato in quattro parti. Una breve introduzione (vv. 1-3a), la parabola del seminatore (vv. 3b-9) e la sua spiegazione (vv. 18-23). Nel mezzo (vv. 10-17) si trova una breve pericope che affronta la questione metodologica: perché Gesù parla alle folle in parabole?

La parabola è il genere che Gesù prediligeva quando voleva presentare, nella forma del racconto, una verità nascosta a partire da situazioni, esempi e realtà che i suoi uditori potevano immediatamente comprendere. È divenuta così un modello pedagogico che travalicando il tempo conserva il suo valore ancora oggi che viviamo nell’epoca del disincanto. Un’epoca, our, in cui il simbolico possiede un forte impatto e proprio a questo tende il parlare in parabole di Gesù: cogliere il significato nuovo ed inaspettato della realtà, presentata simbolicamente. Mettendo in scena contadini e vignaioli, re e servi, pescatori oppure pastori, una massaia o una donna che ha perso una moneta, tutte realtà familiari agli uditori, Gesù parlò a questo modo del Regno di Dio, addirittura senza nominare Dio.

Ma l’immediatezza e la semplicità della parabola non devono ingannare, poiché essa ha anche un valore paradossale. Tutti conoscono i paradossi del filosofo greco Zenone di Elea[4] – famoso quello di Achille e la tartaruga – che avevano lo scopo di confutare la molteplicità e il movimento. Gesù invece, con le parabole, pone in essere realtà paradossali per invitare uditori e lettori a cogliere un senso ulteriore, other, rispetto a ciò che normalmente si vede, crede e vive. L’inaspettato con Gesù abita la vita quotidiana.

Nessuno infatti getta del seme prezioso ovunque se non nei solchi preparati, nessuno dopo aver seminato frumento non si preoccupa più del terreno e aspetta solo la mietitura. Chi lascerebbe un gregge intero per andare a ritrovare una sola pecora perduta? Come fa un granello piccolissimo a diventare grandissimo? Chi dà la stessa paga a tutti senza guardare le ore di lavoro a giornata? Solo Dio e lo si può scorgere nell’agire di Gesù mentre annuncia il suo Regno. In fondo le parabole hanno questo come scopo: sorprendere e spiazzare per aiutare a rimodellare la realtà, guardandola altrimenti, secondo una logica nuova, quella paradossale del Vangelo, che Gesù incarna. Egli infatti è la parabola vivente di Dio o, come ebbe a dire Massimo il Confessore: «Egli è simbolo di sé stesso»[5].

Nella parabola di questa domenica il seme è simbolo, secondo la spiegazione che ne da Gesù, della Parola di Dio, realtà teologica che va ascoltata e compresa. La vicenda paradossale è che finisce su vari terreni generando tutta una serie di reazioni. La Parola divina, indeed, come dice il profeta Isaia nell’odierna prima lettura «non ritornerà a me senza effetto» allo stesso modo della pioggia o della neve che vengono dal cielo. Ora Dio «fa sorgere il suo sole sui cattivi e sui buoni, e fa piovere sui giusti e sugli ingiusti» aveva detto Gesù nel Discorso della Montagna (cf.. Mt 5, 45). The Word of God, so, non è una realtà misterica rivolta ad iniziati, ma si compromette con le situazioni umane accettando anche l’insuccesso che, in the parable, è grande, poiché su quattro terreni ben tre non produrranno frutti. Nella spiegazione che ne da Gesù, riprendendo le parole gravi del libro di Isaia[6], le persone che non ascolteranno la Parola non faranno altro che irrigidirsi nella loro situazione, non potranno cioè cambiare la loro realtà né aprirsi alla novità del Regno. Sono quelli che hanno mancanza di interiorità, i superficiali che si lasciano portar via il seme della Parola dalla prima cosa che arriva, come fosse un passero svolazzante. Sono quelli che mancano di perseveranza perché per loro la vita è come un sasso che forse difende dagli assalti esterni, ma neanche fa mettere radici alle cose buone e belle. Gli uomini dell’attimo li chiama il Vangelo (πρόσκαιρός, proskairos v. 21) che prendono fuoco al momento. La Parola l’ascoltano eccome, ma se c’è da durare tutto diventa faticoso. Non avendo radici di fronte alla prima difficoltà abbandonano. Ci sono poi quelli che pur avendo ascoltato poi preferiscono le sirene della vita dietro a ricchezze e mondanità e perciò le preoccupazioni e le ansie li avviluppano come rovi e spine che non lasciano filtrare la luce che permetterebbe alla Parola di emergere e permetter loro di guardare e vivere la vita diversamente.

Infine ci sono quelli che, per usare l’immagine della parabola, sono la minoranza del terreno buono che porta frutto a secondo delle possibilità. Sono coloro che non solo sanno ascoltare, ma sanno anche comprendere la Parola. Ovvero sanno mettere insieme (συνιείς, synieis v. 23) componendoli Parola e vita costantemente. Della Parola hanno una comprensione profonda, spirituale e vitale. Ma non è facile, perché il terreno potrebbe diventar duro e refrattario anche per loro, sassoso o riempirsi di spine e rovi infestanti. Ecco allora la necessità di una costante vigilanza e un lavoro spirituale perché da semplici “uditori della Parola”[7] essa divenga una realtà che cresca con loro. Come nella felicissima espressione di Gregorio Magno: «Textus crescit cum legenti»[8] (Il testo cresce con colui che lo legge).

Possiamo porci a questo punto due domande, chi da la forza affinché la Parola cresca e dove trovo questa forza? Alla prima domanda si può rispondere ricordando un’altra parabola del seme che troviamo stavolta nel quarto Vangelo: «Se il chicco di grano, caduto in terra, non muore, it remains only; but if it dies, it produces much fruit ». (GV 12, 24). Gesù sta parlando della sua morte sulla croce. Il redattore del Vangelo, indeed, reagendo all’affermazione di Gesù: «E io quando sarò innalzato da terra, attirerò tutti a me» commenta: «Diceva questo per indicare di quale morte doveva morire» (GV 12, 32-33).

Gesù dunque si paragona a un seme inviato dal Padre nel cuore della terra — «Dio infatti ha tanto amato il mondo da dare il Figlio unigenito» (GV 3, 16a) — e tutto questo amore che Gesù ha rivelato nel corso della sua esistenza si condenserà e porterà il suo massimo frutto proprio nel momento del suo morire, on the cross. Secondo Giovanni il primo frutto della morte di Gesù è lo Spirito[9] che come acqua scende dal suo corpo morto verso i credenti: la madre ed il discepolo amato.

Questo Spirito non solo ha risuscitato Gesù dai morti[10] ma è l’ermeneuta che svela il senso della Parola di verità che è Gesù. Her words, indeed, sono spirito e vita (GV 6, 63). È dunque ormai lo Spirito di Cristo che aiuta i credenti ad essere quel terreno fecondo che sa accogliere la Parola e la fa comprendere perché porti frutti buoni.

In this sense, secondo le parole del missionario riportate all’inizio di questo testo, Jesus, che si è fatto seme di amore fino alla croce, per mezzo del suo Spirito non smette di seminare la Parola e mai farà ritorno. Questa azione costante è espressa dalle parole del salmo responsoriale della Liturgia che annuncia:

«Tu visiti la terra e la disseti,
la ricolmi di ricchezze.
Il fiume di Dio è gonfio di acque;
tu prepari il frumento per gli uomini.
Così prepari la terra:
ne irrighi i solchi, ne spiani le zolle,
la bagni con le piogge e benedici i suoi germogli» (Shall 64).

Nel tempo della difficile gestazione che l’intera opera creata patisce, come ricorda Paolo nella odierna seconda lettura. E, at last, per rispondere alla seconda domanda, è nella liturgia eucaristica Che la Chiesa sperimenta al massimo grado questa azione di Gesù e dello Spirito. Quando Egli nel brano del Vangelo di questa domenica afferma: «Beati invece i vostri occhi perché vedono e i vostri orecchi perché ascoltano» (v. 16) non sta privilegiando alcuni escludendo altri. It's true, l’esperienza diretta e concreta che fecero i discepoli di incontrare l’umanità di Gesù fu unica e irripetibile tanto da far affermare a Giovanni nella sua prima lettera: «Quello che noi abbiamo udito, quello che abbiamo veduto con i nostri occhi, quello che contemplammo e che le nostre mani toccarono del Verbo della vita» (1GV 1,1).

Ma questa umanità, ormai glorificata del Verbo la possiamo “toccare” ancora oggi quando durante l’azione sacramentale, grazie al medesimo Spirito[11] che agisce sulla parola e sulle offerte eucaristiche, ascoltiamo di nuovo quella Parola e ci nutriamo di Cristo. Questa grazia scende abbondante, today, qui e ora, sul terreno che è la nostra situazione vitale, in qualsiasi condizione esso si trovi al momento, nella speranza che tutto questo dono, che è l’amore del Padre in Gesù per mezzo dello Spirito non vada perduto, ma porti frutto a sua volta.

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 15 July 2023

.

NOTE

[1] Padre Ezechiele Ramin, comboniano missionario in Brasile, fu ucciso il 24 July 1985 mentre difendeva i piccoli agricoltori e gli indios nel Mato Grosso. San Giovanni Paolo II lo definì «testimone della carità di Cristo» durante un Angelus.

[2] La liturgia prevede anche una forma più breve.

[3] Mt 13, 1-52.

[4] Zenone di Elea (489 a.C. – 431 a.C.) è stato un filosofo greco antico presocratico della Magna Grecia e un membro della Scuola eleatica fondata da Parmenide. Aristotele lo definisce inventore della dialettica.

[5] "The Sir […] he became his own precursor; he has become a type and symbol of himself. Simbolicamente fa conoscere se stesso attraverso se stesso. That is, he leads all creation, starting from itself as it manifests itself, but to lead her to himself as it is unfathomably hidden" (Cantarella R., Mistagogia ed altri scritti, 1931).

[6] Is 6,9-10.

[7] Rahner K., Uditori della Parola, Tassel, 1967.

[8] Bori P. C., L’interpretazione infinita, L’ermeneutica cristiana antica e le sue trasformazioni, 1988.

[9] «E, chinato il capo, consegnò lo spirito» (GV 19, 30).

[10] «E se lo Spirito di Dio, che ha risuscitato Gesù dai morti, abita in voi, He who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you " (Rom 8, 15).

[11] Il vescovo orientale Mons. Neofito Edelby, the 5 October 1964, durante i lavori del Concilio Ecumenico Vaticano II lasciò un segno importante pronunciando queste parole: «La Sacra Scrittura non è soltanto una norma scritta, piuttosto quasi consacrazione della Storia della salvezza sotto le specie della parola umana, inseparabile però dalla consacrazione eucaristica nella quale si ricapitola tutto il Corpo di Cristo […] Non si può separare la missione dello Spirito Santo dalla missione del Verbo Incarnato. È questo il primo principio teologico di qualsiasi interpretazione della Sacra Scrittura. E non si può dimenticare che, oltre alle scienze ausiliari di ogni genere, il fine ultimo dell’esegesi cristiana è la comprensione spirituale della Sacra Scrittura alla luce di Cristo risuscitato».

.

San Giovanni all'Orfento. Abruzzo, Mount Maiella, it was a hermitage inhabited by Pietro da Morrone, called in 1294 to the Chair of Peter on which he ascended with the name of Celestine V (29 August – 13 December 1294).

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

“miss Universe”. The island of Patmos deals with beauty because it is a manifest expression of God and his gifts in human history

“MISS UNIVERSE”. L’ISOLA DI PATMOS SI OCCUPA DEL BELLO PERCHÉ È UNA ESPRESSIONE MANIFESTA DI DIO E DEI SUOI DONI NELLA STORIA DELL’UOMO

Premiazione dinanzi alla quale solo gli irriducibili omotransfobici, representatives of the pro-fascist right-wing and fundamentalist Catholics will be able to raise objections.

— News in brief —

Author
Editors of The Island of Patmos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Una transessuale olandese è stata incoronata Miss Universo alla sfilata che si è tenuta l’8 luglio nei Paesi Bassi.

Oltre alla indubitabile e straordinaria bellezza, questa premiazione è stata anche una incoronazione per la cultura europea della inclusione delle diversità. Premiazione dinanzi alla quale solo gli irriducibili omotransfobici, representatives of the pro-fascist right-wing and fundamentalist Catholics will be able to raise objections.

 

.
the Island of Patmos 10 July 2023

.

.HTTPS://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltEAQNopUYM&t=2s

.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci
Of the Order of Preachers
Presbyter and Theologian

( Click on the name to read all its articles )
Father Gabriele

Another “ran away from home” running with the schismatic heretic excommunicated and dismissed from the clerical state Alessandro Minutella

ANOTHER “RUNNER FROM HOME” RUNNING WITH THE SCHIMATIC HERETIC EXCOMMUNICATED AND RESIGNED FROM THE CLERICAL STATE ALESSANDRO MINUTELLA

Anyone despite the sentence given on them by the Church, listen to Mass and receive the sacraments from Mr. Minutella and by the priests who followed him, falling into the crime of heresy and schism, falls into sin and sins grievously, because the Church has hit them with a sentence.

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Members of ancient historical orders they have always lived with discomfort and suffering for deviations and betrayals of the doctrine of the faith of some of their members, especially when they slip into heresy and schism.

Just looking at recent times: the Benedictines had the case of Giovanni Franzoni, the Franciscans the case of Leonard Boff, the Jesuits the striking case of Alighiero Tondi. All historical orders and congregations have had some of their members who have caused problems by deviating from the doctrine of the faith or generated public scandals. All regret and pain, undoubtedly, but at the same time it shouldn't even arouse excessive amazement, just think of the betrayal of Judas Iscariot.

As in the best families, it may happen that some children are endowed with the best human and moral capacities, while one, albeit born of the same parents and educated like everyone else, instead take the wrong paths, sometimes even bad.

This is the case of the Dominican priest Vincenzo Avvinti, who after various problems generated within the Order of Preachers was hit by the extreme measure of dismissal - read expulsion - from our Religious Family. I won't dwell on the reasons, not because he can't, but just because I don't want to. In fact, I would like it to be clear that for me it is an enormous pain that a priest whom I personally met years ago and whom I respected so much for his human and intellectual caliber, have now taken this step.

Unfortunately, this former confrere of ours he has decided to add damage to damage and evil to evil by following the schismatic heretic excommunicated e dismissed from the clerical state Alessandro Minutella.

I think it is right to inform about it both our Readers and members of the Dominican Secular Third Order, making present to one and the other what St. Thomas Aquinas said in the question n. 82 which for years has been distorted and manipulated by Mr. Minutella:

«And therefore whoever hears their Mass or receives the Sacraments from them commits a sin. (And therefore anyone who hears their Mass or receives the Sacraments from them sinsi) [see Latin and Italian text WHO].

Because I say that he has been twisting and manipulating this for years question? For the simple fact that, as usual, he cuts pieces out of their context and presents them making them say what they don't say. Indeed, this passage he quoted as a mantra, is preceded by the part where it says:

«It differs, however, between the aforesaid sects. For the heretics and schismatics were excommunicated by the decision of the Church by the execution of consecration to private persons» (However, there are some differences between these categories. Indeed the heretics, the schismatics and the excommunicated are deprived of the exercise of their powers by a sentence of the Church).

This is precisely the question. Mr. Minutella, with him also the former member of the Order of Preachers Vincenzo Avvinti, they are schismatic heretics who, as such, the Church has deprived with a sentence of the power to exercise the sacred priestly ministry. Therefore: «And therefore whoever hears their Mass or receives the sacraments from them commits a sin» (And therefore anyone who hears their Mass or receives the Sacraments from them sins).

Exactly like that: whoever, despite the sentence given on them by the Church, listen to Mass and receive the sacraments from Mr. Minutella and the priests who followed him, also falling into the crime of heresy and schism, falls into sin and sins grievously, because the Church has hit them with a sentence.

Staying in respect which is required of us by the Dominican Constitutions, but even more respectful of the salvation of souls ― which is the primary goal of our Order ― I offer this notice to our Readers praying for the conversion of this former brother of ours.

 

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 10 July 2023

.

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

From the controversy over crosses in the mountains to the peaks and heights of the Word of God

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

DALLE POLEMICHE SULLE CROCI IN MONTAGNA ALLE VETTE E ALTEZZE DELLA PAROLA DI DIO

«Venite a me, all of you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, that I am meek and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your life. Il mio giogo infatti è dolce e il mio peso leggero»

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

.

Come una tempesta in un bicchier d’acqua la settimana scorsa è scoppiata la polemica sulle croci di vetta [see, WHO], fra l’altro scaturita da affermazioni mai pronunciate, che ha tenuto banco per qualche giorno sui quotidiani nazionali. Once again, alla fine dei discorsi, si è rischiato di banalizzare e far passare come un’imposizione quello che è il simbolo per eccellenza del Cristianesimo, la croce di Gesù rappresentazione visiva dell’amore fino alla fine [cf.. GV 1, 3] offertoci dal Signore.

Croce di vetta di Piccola Legazuoi [immagine di Stefano Zardini cfr. WHO]

Because of this, proprio come quell’acqua fresca che a volte trovi in montagna dopo un’erta salita, ben venga la sequenza di letture di questa XIV Domenica del tempo for a year. Non sempre accade di trovare in un’unica Liturgia della Parola una serie di scritti dove ogni singola frase è bella di per sé tanto che andrebbero conservate e rimeditate nel corso della settimana. Al culmine di essa leggiamo la pericope evangelica [Mt 11, 25-30] che è tanto preziosa, quanto rara, perché ci offre uno spaccato di quella che fu la coscienza profonda di Gesù, la sua coscienza filiale. Non a caso questo brano di Matteo è stato definito come il più giovanneo di tutti i Vangeli sinottici. Usually, indeed, è nel quarto Vangelo che troviamo simili altezze e profondità, often, come qui in Matteo, in un contesto di preghiera nel quale Gesù si rivolge al Padre, come nella nota pericope, quella cosiddetta della sua ora: "Dad, è venuta l’ora: glorifica il Figlio tuo perché il Figlio glorifichi te» [GV 17, 1]. Ecco il brano del Vangelo della prossima domenica:

«In quel tempo Gesù disse: “Ti rendo lode, Dad, Lord of heaven and earth, perché hai nascosto queste cose ai sapienti e ai dotti e le hai rivelate ai piccoli. Yup, or Father, perché così hai deciso nella tua benevolenza. Tutto è stato dato a me dal Padre mio; nessuno conosce il Figlio se non il Padre, e nessuno conosce il Padre se non il Figlio e colui al quale il Figlio vorrà rivelarlo. Venite a me, all of you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, that I am meek and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your life. Il mio giogo infatti è dolce e il mio peso leggero”».

Il rigo iniziale del brano nel testo greco precisa: "During that time, answering[1], Gesù disse». A cosa Gesù sta rispondendo e perché in questo momento cruciale [2]? Agli eventi precedenti che non sono stati felici. Dapprima la domanda di Giovanni Battista tramite i discepoli, poiché lui era imprigionato: «Sei tu colui che deve venire o dobbiamo aspettare un altro?» [11,3] e poi la mancata risposta alla predicazione e all’azione di Gesù delle tre cittadine di Corazin, Betsaida e Cafarnao, dove egli ha sperimentato il fallimento o perlomeno uno scarso successo [11, 21-24].

Chi può dire di non aver provato scoramento a fronte di una situazione di impasse, di mancata riuscita o non comprensione da parte di altri di chi siamo veramente? Gesù integra queste situazioni spiacevoli nella preghiera. Mette tutto, anche l’insuccesso, davanti al Padre e rinnova il suo “Sì” [v. 26] poiché comprende che tutto è parte del suo progetto di benevolenza. Il “no” che ha ricevuto diviene un “Sì” svincolato dal successo in vista di una adesione più radicale.

Con la preghiera che si apre al ringraziamento ― «ti rendo lode» ― anche il fallimento, o ciò che noi giudichiamo tale, come il fallimento pastorale, l’assenza di frutti del ministero, la sterilità della predicazione, il rifiuto o il disinteresse degli altri, diviene non causa di scoraggiamento o di abbandono, ma momento di paradossale conferma della sequela del Signore.

È a questo punto che Gesù ci porta nella profondità del suo rapporto col Padre, in quanto Figlio suo. San Giovanni direbbe che è qui che si dovrebbe “rimanere” in quanto discepoli amati. Ma questo discorso, But, ci porterebbe troppo lontano. Matteo, instead, da by suo[3] presenta Gesù come colui che rivela[4] l’intenzione profonda del Padre che solo lui conosce perché solo a lui tutto è stato consegnato.

«Tutto mi è stato dato dal Padre mio; nessuno conosce il Figlio se non il Padre, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son wishes to reveal him ".

A Gesù è stato dato tutto perché è il Figlio del Padre, colui che il Padre solo conosce, fino a poter dire di lui: «Tu sei il mio Figlio, l’amato» [Mt 3,17; 17,5]. Ma anche Gesù solo conosce pienamente il Padre, It gave, perché da lui è venuto nel mondo, e solo Gesù può far conoscere Dio al suo discepolo, perché nessuno va al Padre se non attraverso di lui [GV 14,6]. Ecco la rivelazione dell’identità di Gesù, del suo rapporto con Dio e della conoscenza di Dio da parte del discepolo. Siamo al vertice della rivelazione divina di Gesù secondo il primo Vangelo. Questo mistero ora è consegnato al discepolo: mistero da adorare, da accogliere in silenzio, da viversi quotidianamente nella fedele sequela di Gesù che ci porta al Padre.

Il Vangelo ci dice anche a chi è rivolta questa rivelazione e chi può comprenderla. Sono i piccoli (νηπίοις), che in quanto tali sono senza voce. Sono coloro che testimoniano a Giovanni Battista che il regno è qui e non c’è bisogno d’aspettare altro: «i ciechi riacquistano la vista, the lame walk, i lebbrosi sono purificati, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, ai poveri è annunciato il Vangelo» [11, 5]. E il piccolo secondo Gesù è beato perché «non trova in me motivo di scandalo!» [11, 6].

Invece la rivelazione è chiusa per i sapienti ― «Perirà la sapienza dei sapienti e si eclisserà l’intelligenza degli intellettuali» [Is 29,14] ― perché, pur avendo visto e udito, non sono stati capaci di aprirsi alla buona notizia del Vangelo e di accoglierla.

Per tornare all’esempio iniziale, non so se avete fatto l’esperienza di salire in montagna. Quando si arriva sulla vetta, insieme alla soddisfazione di essere arrivati fin lì e godere la splendida visuale su ciò che circonda, la cosa più bella è potersi riposare, lasciare a terra lo zaino e i bastoncini, mangiare e bere, riprendere le forze.

Ugualmente Gesù dopo averci condotto sulla cima del suo intimo e profondo rapporto col Padre ora ci invita a riposare:

«Venite a me, all of you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, that I am meek and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your life. Il mio giogo infatti è dolce e il mio peso leggero» [vv 28-30].

Solo lui conosceva il sentiero, anzi lui stesso si è fatto via [GV 14, 6], che poteva portarci fin lassù. Ora qui riposiamo e ci ritempriamo, nell’intimità con lui che incarna la beatitudine di coloro ai quali è stata data la terra, che sono figli di Dio, figli nel Figlio[5]. Una terra presa non con la violenza e la guerra perché suo tratto distintivo è la pace, la giustizia e la misericordia[6].

Così Zaccaria prefigurava il Messia nella odierna prima lettura: «Farà sparire il carro da guerra da Èfraim e il cavallo da Gerusalemme, l’arco di guerra sarà spezzato, annuncerà la pace alle nazioni” [Zac 9, 10]. E il salmo gli risponde: «Misericordioso e pietoso è il Signore, slow to anger, abounding in love. Buono è il Signore verso tutti, la sua tenerezza si espande su tutte le creature» [Shall 144].

E per finire il giogo. Che cosa avrà voluto dire Gesù? Permettetemi ancora di far riferimento alla montagna. Se c’è una cosa fra le più sconsigliate da fare quando si percorre i sentieri è quella di uscirne fuori, di far di testa propria a sprezzo del pericolo e contro le indicazioni della guida. Soprattutto su certi terreni, non seguire la traccia, vuol dire mettere a rischio sé stessi e il gruppo. In positivo: è consigliabile rimanere in gruppo per non perdere nessuno, procedere sulla via segnata, ascoltare ciò che suggerisce la guida.

Ugualmente nella vita cristiana. Un giogo rimane tale e sembra un peso ed un’imposizione. Ma seguendo la linea che il Vangelo ha tracciato fin qui, nelle parole di Gesù esso appare più come un legame che ci tiene uniti senza assoggettarci. Non siamo per lui buoi muti. Egli la strada la fa con noi e se capita «sostiene quelli che vacillano e rialza chiunque è caduto» (salmo di oggi).

Happy Sunday everyone!

from the Hermitage, 9 July 2023

 

NOTE

[1] ἀποκριθεὶς: answering

[2] Ἐν ἐκείνῳ τῷ καιρῷ: in quel tempo

[3] Qualche commentatore ha colto nella struttura tripartita del brano matteano una somiglianza col testo sapienziale di Sir 51. Un inno di ringraziamento (vv. 25-26), un monologo sul rapporto tra Gesù e il Padre (v. 27) e l’invito a mettersi alla scuola di Gesù e ad assumere il suo giogo (vv. 28-30). in Sir 51 abbiamo un inno di ringraziamento (vv. 1-12), un monologo sulla ricerca della sapienza (vv. 13-22), un invito a mettersi alla scuola della sapienza e a prendere su di sé il suo giogo (vv. 23-30). Non è un caso che in Mt 11,19 si parli delle opere della Sapienza riferendosi alle opere del Messia (cf.. Mt 11,2-6): Cristo è la Sapienza di Dio.

[4] “nulla vi è di nascosto che non sarà svelato né di segreto che non sarà conosciuto” (10, 26)

[5] “Beati i miti, perché avranno in eredità la terra… Beati gli operatori di pace, perché saranno chiamati figli di Dio” (Mt 5, 5-9)

[6] “Beati quelli che hanno fame e sete della giustizia… Beati i misericordiosi… Beati gli operatori di pace” (Mt 5, 6-9)

.

San Giovanni all'Orfento. Abruzzo, Mount Maiella, it was a hermitage inhabited by Pietro da Morrone, called in 1294 to the Chair of Peter on which he ascended with the name of Celestine V (29 August – 13 December 1294).

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.