The visible Church of the Patches passes in a wheelchair the Holy Door of irreversible decadence (Italian, english, español)

(English text after the Italian / Spanish text after English)

 

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY DOOR OF IRREVERSIBLE DECAY ON A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm shift: the Church of twenty-five years ago, even though she was already seriously ill, he tried to force himself to open, to open the doors to Christ; today's, patient in the department for terminally ill cancer patients, he tried to open, to open the doors to the world.

—Ecclesiastical current affairs—

.

 

PDF print format article

PDF article print format

PDF article for empriminr

.

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, if anything, we are increasingly incapable of reading the signs. And so, twenty-five years apart, two Supreme Pontiffs have opened the Door of the Holy Year, arriving before it with the weight of old age and their disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, the visible Church led by John Paul II arrived seriously ill before the Holy Door. This Pontiff debilitated by Parkinson's disease was a plastic paradigm of this, who was aided by a master of ceremonies dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical robe, he wanted to kneel anyway, albeit with obvious difficulty and great physical suffering. Never did he agree to waive the genuflections, especially before the Most Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion the Holy Father was dressed with a blanket which precedes the birth of the by centuries Christianitas. A wallpaper known in ancient times religion Roman pagan as downpipe, used by Pontifex Maximus to shelter from the rain, when from the top of Sublicio Bridge, located between the current Trastevere and Testaccio districts, at Porta Portese, he studied the movements of the waters and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of 2000 the Holy Father wore a cope on which much criticism was leveled. That save, packaged in Prato, it had been woven in very bright colors: rosso, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. Red tends to symbolize life and strength; blue is the union between sky and earth; yellow the divinity.

Reflecting on it in hindsight, that play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the dark gray that envelops us today and which cannot be attributed either to him or to the Supreme Pontiffs who have succeeded him since 2005 following, because the crisis of the Church begins from afar. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough - in this world that with memories only reaches yesterday, given that it doesn't even reach the day before yesterday - to understand that the seeds of the crisis giving rise to ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical decadence, boldly visible today, they were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius, between the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century.

If with John Paul II the disease was pressing at the door, with the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church has gone beyond it, entering a point of no return, pushed onto a wheelchair by the shadow of a gaunt priest clad in a pair of trousers, rather than with a dignified ecclesiastical dress. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church that has already been in crisis for decades, he always knelt before the Body and Blood of Christ, fighting against the unavoidable worsening of the disease. Francis's does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because she was now seriously ill and irreversibly ill. But he kneels down to wash and kiss the feet of convicts and prostitutes Mass of the Lord's Supper, despising the richness of our glorious places of worship, which are not the fruit of princely splendor, as some uneducated people might think, but of the faith of believers and the work of the greatest artists who with them wanted to honor God, offering the best and paying the maximum that could be paid to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. This is why the abbreviation D.O.M is carved on many ecclesiastical buildings., what does it mean: God is the Greatest. However, on the one hand there is contempt for what is not known, on the other hand there is no hesitation in glorifying prisons, in which one ends up having committed crimes, except in cases of innocent people unjustly convicted of judicial errors, or in the cases of the prisons of anti-democratic dictatorial regimes. Although some don't remember it, or they are not really aware of this incontrovertible reality, it is worth reminding them that criminals end up in prison.

How many are inside the prisons can be recovered from the company, after a re-education process, not exalted as if they were faithful devotees of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of bad society, guilty of not having fully understood them. If I'm in there someone, out, often more than one, sometimes even entire families, because of them they cried. It would therefore be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on the spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace which first forms and then transforms man through the expiation of what the laws of the State indicate as crimes, Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both as regards crimes and as regards sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church itself, they offer differently, but substantially similar, the possibility of atonement, which in itself implies that recovery which erases the guilt deriving from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is just surreal and harmful ideology, between foot rinses and "prisoner jubilees" of a Supreme Pontiff who arrives in front of the Holy Door in the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter being pushed in a wheelchair by an emaciated priest in trousers, because in that case he is unable to get up and walk. But he gets up and walks to pass the open Holy Door in the Rebibbia prison, comparing it to a basilica (cf.. video WHO). Someone wants to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs killed in hatred of faith and that the title basilica is not particularly suitable for a prison chapel? And right here the words of the Psalmist come to mind:

Until, man, you will continue to forget me?
Until you hide your face from me?
As long as I feel trouble in my soul,
sadness in my heart every moment?
Until the enemy triumphs over me?

Guard, answer me, Lord my God,
keep the light in my eyes,
so that the sleep of death does not surprise me,
so that my enemy does not say: «I won it!»
and let not my adversaries rejoice when I falter (Salmo 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called Holy Year, it has a great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. The heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and punishments for sins. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel. The official website of the Holy See provides a excursus history that I recommend reading (cf.. What is the Jubilee). It is so precise and well done that further explanation is unnecessary, because for my part I could only repeat what is contained and explained in it.

Now I would like to move from the spiritual sphere to the financial one, starting from the premise that I hope to be wrong in some of my personal beliefs and to have to make public amends for them in the following months. In fact, I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm shift: the Church of twenty-five years ago, even though she was already seriously ill, he tried to force himself to open, to open the doors to Christ (cf.. WHO); today's, patient in the department for terminally ill cancer patients, he tried to open, to open the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, the task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to counter it:

"If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you from the world, that's why the world hates you " (GV 15, 19).

Often images can summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For instance: what about the episcopessa Protestant sitting in the places of honor with the exponents of the various religions? But we are inclusive! Because of this, just to exclude everything that is Catholic, of necessity we must include everything that is not Catholic... of course, all expressed with due human respect for that Lady present in the grandstand as "bishop" in the Papal Archbasilica of St. Peter, without any of the clerical leaders realizing that in this way we run the risk of letting a message of normalization and approval pass through, given that a woman cannot define herself as a "bishop" and that no one, on the Catholic side, can somehow recognize it as such, even if belonging to a non-Catholic Christian religion born from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, who we remember was a heretic, not a reformer.

Luther did not produce any reforms at all, that was done by the Fathers at the Council of Trent, he tore the Church of Christ apart with a terrible schism, which remains so today, with all due respect to bishop in the grandstand at the opening of the Holy Year above the tomb of the Apostle Peter in the total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

We were talking about the economic discussion... for the Jubilee of 2000 the law decree of 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing «Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000», then converted into the law of 23 December 1996, n. 651. Work began on that event years before, subject to the passing of specific laws, but above all an astronomical sum of money was allocated: 3.500 billions of old lire, corresponding in today's money to one billion eight hundred million euros. Also in this case I refer to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, where everything is documented and detailed (cf.. WHO). Having said this, it should be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops of the time was Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, with an army of bishops following him who were not yet today's caricatures who compete with each other to see who wears the humblest and poorest wooden cross around their neck, possibly made with the material of a boat sunk off the coast of Lampedusa on which human traffickers transported poor desperate illegal immigrants, often including women and children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of 2000 it was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate... but above all another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. But here is an exhaustive example that can clarify everything: at the time, in Italy, if before the administrative elections some diocesan bishop expressed discontent towards one or some particularly polemical or aggressive candidates, these took care of correcting the aim and lowering the tone during the electoral campaign. But there's more: when in June of 2005 there was a referendum in Italy on assisted procreation, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go to vote. Outcome: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a fiasco (cf.. WHO). The fact that you personally appreciate and recognize certain evident and undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, regretting that today, figures of his high stature, unfortunately we no longer have any, nothing takes away from the fact that I would never have hoped to have him as my diocesan bishop. In fact, I still continue to consider it today, on a human and spiritual level, like "a cold dry bone covered in velvet", I had to define it as such, much to his little joy, a few years ago, oblivious on my part to how notoriously touchy he is, as well as having no sense of humor.

With completely different men and a completely different kind of Church, on the occasion of the great jubilee event of 2000, Rome was made new again. This is in the interest of the State, who recovered what was invested with high income and both economic and image interests, but also of the Church, which, thanks to the huge funds allocated for that extraordinary event, was able to take advantage of it to renovate most of its structures, many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here it should be remembered that Rome, even then, it was teeming with religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See. Works mostly erected in the 1930s, in a real competition between the historical Orders and the various religious Congregations, male and female, to those who built the largest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic drop in birth rate that began at the end of the 1960s, certain Catholic schools, nursery schools and various care institutions, they no longer had any reason to exist, being mostly pharaonic structures. It should then be considered that in 1978 that great social achievement of the law on abortion was approved, thanks to which even the orphanages disappeared, which was no longer needed, given that children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous curiae and general houses of the various male and female Orders and Congregations, almost always with novitiates or theological student houses within them, that led them to have, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one hundred or two hundred religious, between those who had professed solemn vows and the young simply professed people in training.

In Rome at the beginning of the seventies it was impossible not to meet everywhere, along the courses of urban streets, priests and nuns, friars and nuns. Then there were the young seminarians and theology students from the various national and international Roman seminaries and colleges, who when they went for a walk formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. Soon said: the decline in birth rates and the inexorable crisis in vocations had reduced in the following decades, most of these large structures, to be inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred, but by six or seven elderly religious men or women, with the buildings now in a state of semi-dilapidation, with obsolete systems and outside of all safety regulations. Thus it was that on the occasion of the Jubilee of 2000, not only were most of these institutions renovated, because it was decided to make them an income in some way, reserving a small wing for religious men and women now numerically reduced to a minimum and changing the bulk of the buildings into shelters, in fact in hotels, because that is what most of these institutes are today. It was a farsighted operation, thanks to which the buildings of many institutes were saved and put in a position to produce the necessary money to support themselves.

Unfortunately priests, brothers and sisters, they are capable - and truly are like few others - of throwing money away on useless expenses, sometimes even in harmful works from which great losses then arise, without having the ability to realize that certain structures require great care and careful maintenance. And so, twenty-five years ago, after being taken out of very serious trouble, faced with problems related to their large buildings which they were unable to restore, nor to store it adequately, nor to comply with legal regulations regarding safety, they found nothing better to do than to let them return to a state of semi-dilapidation over the next twenty-five years, not everybody, but most of it yes. This is what I usually call “clerical patch psychology”. The meaning of this definition will soon be revealed: a structure requires routine maintenance? Why ever spend money, just let it go, if anything saying, with all the typical and at times unique cynicism of priests, brothers and sisters: «It's not worth getting bitter blood unnecessarily, those who come after will then take care of it". A quel point, all ordinary maintenance operations omitted over the years, will end up turning into serious extraordinary maintenance needs, but it costs a lot. A quel point, the well-known priest-friar-nun foresight begins to attach patches to the right and left, if anything, spending exorbitant amounts in the belief of saving money, because there are few like priests, friars and nuns are such idiots to get cheated out of money, if they have not been adequately trained in concrete practical life with their feet firmly planted on the ground. Said and done: the walls were last whitewashed twenty years ago? Internal and external fixtures, air conditioners and radiators, the sanitary fixtures installed at the end of the 1990s and so on, on which the necessary ordinary maintenance interventions have never been carried out, today they are falling apart? No worries, a patch is attached, if anything - needless to say! — having the work done by people who, to change simple filters on air conditioners, they make the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns pay more than what the latest generation low consumption and high energy saving systems would cost.

Since there would be many examples I'll limit myself to just one: last year I had the opportunity to find myself in a nuns' institute while some painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled entirely of toxic chemical substances, I asked: «What brand of eco-friendly paint are you using?». After that, walking around the corridors, I noticed a riot of smudges not only on the walls, but also on the fixtures, on skirting boards and even on fire extinguishers dirtied with paint flows. I took the foreman and told him: «If law, in my house, had done something like that, I didn't let her out the door but out the window, I'm careful not to give her a single penny". the sera, the mother superior, she confronted me irritably and told me not to disturb their workers anymore. I answered her: «Of the people who placed the water drains of the air conditioners inside the shower cubicles of the guest bedrooms and who, not satisfied, even eliminated the earthing from the electrical system, they don't deserve to be called workers but criminals, while you demonstrate that you are only poor people incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace of being able to benefit".

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers inaugurated what we could reasonably define as "The Jubilee of the Patch" placed on our irreversible spiritual and financial decadence, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. Or perhaps someone forgets that the 24 December 1999 St. Peter's Square wasn't just packed, because the crowd of people reached Castel Sant'Angelo and the Lungotevere? Someone wants to deal with the fact as evident as it is sad that the 24 December 2024, as shown in the photo accompanying this article, the square itself was completely empty in the center and in the four squares of chairs placed under the steps of the churchyard, many empty seats are visible?

The final question is of rigor: a devout Catholic, why he should leave from Australia or Peru to travel to Rome? Perhaps to hear an elderly Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, talks about the poor and migrants, of migrants and the poor, of the poor and migrants...? As if the Word of God had come into this world only to speak and care for the poor of slums and those of Villas miseries (Villages of poverty)? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, they are also children of God, oppure no? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? He would find the homeless camped under Bernini's colonnade; would find Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter's Square respectively, where early in the morning traders are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to remove the acidic smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils in a nauseating way. And where should the jubilant pilgrim stay? Perhaps by the nuns or friars who after the Jubilee of 2000, once they had their structures rebuilt for free by the "Uncle Scrooge" of the Italian Republic, they have never asked themselves the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the bathroom fixtures; to repaint the plaster and paint the walls; who for breakfast offer you freeze-dried milk and substitute powders that rival the products put on the market during the period in which the old fascist regime proclaimed autarky, following which it was no longer possible to use foreign imported products, starting with coffee? Let's overlook the terrible quality of the food, in these houses which also offer meal service. Above all, we ignore the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries and taken to the religious houses of Rome and placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun as laborers equal to service women., which must be addressed in English, because despite living in Italy for ten years I am unable to understand and speak Italian. Let's fly over and draw a compassionate veil over all this and everything even worse that is circulating in certain houses...

At the end, how can we not mention the exotic characters who increasingly happen to be found working in shelters, especially the nuns, ranging from girls with bare bellies to boys sporting three bells in their ears, the piercing and the tattoos in plain sight? Of the series: we want to host pilgrims in religious reception homes, or in unsuccessful branches of the famous Muccassassina gay club in Rome? How come to the Holy See, sometimes even attentive to futilities, it hasn't yet occurred to us to send inspectors around to check whether certain houses are run by religious men and women, or by their lay representatives, they truly have all the necessary requirements to provide so-called religious hospitality in a dignified way?

Having opened the Holy Door in Rebibbia prison it was timely and far-sighted in its own way, being the most suitable place where many of us should be, and even for a long time, after having made an attack on the mystical body of Christ which is the Church (cf.. With the 1,18), on which today patches are stuck on day by day, which, however, cannot stop, let alone cure, the malignant metastases that have been circulating in his body for decades and decades, without this pontificate being blamed for them, who is not responsible for it, despite having done his, without backing down to the damage that has already largely existed for several decades, he decided to add others, as original as they are serious.

"But the Son of Man, when will, find faith on earth?» (LC 18, 8)

 

the Island of Patmos, 31 December 2024

.

_________________________

.

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY DOOR OF IRREVERSIBLE DECADENCE ON A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door opened, not so much on what we are not longer, worse! On what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite al-ready being seriously ill, tried to open, to throw open the doors to Christ; the Church’s today, a patient in the ward for terminal-ly patients, has tried to open, to throw open the doors to the world.

 

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, if anything we are increasingly incapable of reading the signs. And so, twenty-five years apart from each other, two Supreme Pontiffs opened the Door of the Holy Year, both with the weight of their seniority and their disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, the visible Church led by John Paul II appeared seriously ill in front of the Holy Door. This Pontiff, debilitated by Parkinson’s disease, was a clear example of this: aided by a master of ceremonies, dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical robe, he still wanted to kneel, albeit with obvious difficulty and great physical suffering. The Holy Father never agreed to give up genuflections, especially before the Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion the Holy Father was dressed in a cloak that precedes the birth of Christianity by centuries. A cloak known in the ancient Roman pagan religion as a “pluvial”, used by the Pontifex Maximus, starting from the 6th century BC, to protect himself from the rain, when from the top of the Sublicio Bridge, located between the current Roman districts of Trastevere and Testaccio, to the height of Porta Portese, he studied the movements of water and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of 2000 the Holy Father wore a cope which received much criticism. That liturgical vestment, made in the italian city of Prato, was woven with very bright colors: red, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. The red tends to symbolize life and strength; the blue the union between sky and earth; the yellow the divinity.

If we reflect on it in the present, that play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the dark-gray that envelops us today and which cannot be attributed either to him or to the Supreme Pontiffs who succeeded him from 2005 onwards, because the crisis of the Church begins from afar. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough — in this world which with memories barely reaches yesterday, given that it doesn’t even reach the day before yesterday — to understand that the seeds of the crisis ecclesiasial and ecclesiastical decadence, visible today, were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius X, between the end nineteenth century and the beginning twentieth century.

If with John Paul II the disease pressed in front of the door, with the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church has gone beyond it, entering a point of no return, pushed on a wheelchair by the shadow of a gaunt priest dressed in a pair of trousers, rather than with a dignified ecclesiastical robe. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church in crisis for decades, always tried to kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, trying not to become irreversibly ill. Francis’s does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because she is now seriously and irreversibly ill. However, he kneels down to wash and kiss the feet of convicts and prostitutes at the Mass of the Lord's Supper (Mass of the Lord’s Supper), despising the richness of our glorious places of worship, which are not the fruit of princely splendor, as some uneducated people might think, but of faith of believers and of the work of the greatest artists who with wanted to honor God offering the best and the maximum that could be paid to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all visible and invisible things. This is why the abbreviation D.O.M, which means: God is the Greatest (to God we always offer the best and the maximum), carved on many ecclesiastical buildings. However, if on the one hand there is contempt for what is not known, on the other there is no hesitation in glorifying prisons, in which one ends up having committed crimes, except in cases of innocent people unjustly convicted due to judicial errors, or in the cases of the prisons of anti-democratic dictatorial regimes. Although some do not remember it, or are not aware of this incontrovertible reality, it is worth reminding them that criminals end up in prison.

Those inside prisons must be recovered, not exalted as if they were devoted builders of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of the bad society guilty of not having fully understood them. If one is in there, you need to remember that outside, someone, often more than one, sometimes even entire families, have cried of cause him. It would therefore be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on a spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace which first forms and then transforms the man through the expiation of those that human law indicates as crimes, Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both as regards crimes and as regards sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church for its part, offer the possibility of atoning in a different but essentially similar way, which it implies that healing which erases the guilt deriving from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is just surreal and harmful ideology, between eccentric foot-washing to prisoners and prostitutes in the Mass of the Lord's Supper, and the ‘prison jubilees’ of a Supreme Pontiff who arrives before the Holy Door of the Papal Archbasilica of St Peter’s in a wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers, because he cannot get up and walk; yet he gets up and walks two days later to cross the Holy Door opened in Rome’s Rebibbia prison, where he compares the prison chapel to a basilica (see video HERE). Does anyone want to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs killed in hatred of the faith (hatred of faith) and that, for this reason, the title of basilica is not appropriate for a prison chapel? And right here the words of the Psalmist come to mind:

How long must I take counsel in my soul and have sorrow in my heart all the day?
How long shall my enemy be exalted over me?

Consider and answer me, O Lord my God; light up my eyes,
lest I sleep the sleep of death,
lest my enemy say, “I have prevailed over him,”
lest my foes rejoice because I am shaken.

But I have trusted in your steadfast love;
my heart shall rejoice in your salvation (Psalm 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called the Holy Year, has a great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. Heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and cancellation of the sentence. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel. The official website of the Holy See provides a historical excursus that I recommend reading (see: What is the Jubilee). It is so precise and well done that further explanations are superfluous, because for my part I could only repeat what is contained and explained in it.

Now I would like to move from the spiritual to the financial sphere, starting from the assumption that I hope to be wrong in some of my personal beliefs, and to publicly ask for forgiveness for them in the following months. I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure on the spiritual and economic front, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much on what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite already being seriously ill, tried to force itself to open, to throw open the doors to Christ (see HERE); the Church of today is in the ward for terminally ill cancer patients, because has tried to open, to throw open the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, the task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to oppose it:

«If you were of the world, you would be loved by the world: but because you are not of the world, but I have taken you out of the world, you are hated by the world» (John 15:19).

Often images can summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For example: the Protestant woman bishop in places of honor among the exponents of the various religions. But let’s be inclusive! In fact, to exclude everything that is Catholic, it is necessary to necessarily include everything that is not Catholic… All expressed with due human respect for that Lady present as “bishop” in the Pontifical Archbasilica of St. Peter. The leaders ecclesiastics don’t realize that in this way they risk transmitting a message of normalization and approval, given that a woman cannot define herself as a “bishop” and that no one on the Catholic side can in any way recognize her as such. It should not be forgotten that this Lady belongs to a non-Catholic Christian religion born in the 16th century from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, who we remember was a heretic, not a reformer.

Luther did not produce any reforms. The true and only reform was made by the Fathers of the Council of Trent. Luther tore apart the Church of Christ with a terrible schism, which remains so even today, with all due respect to the Protestant women-bishops welcomed into places of honor for the opening of the Holy Year on the tomb of the apostle Peter. All this in total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

But let’s get to the economic question. For the Jubilee of 2000, work in Rome had begun years earlier. Specific laws have also been approved: Legislative Decree 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing «Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000», later converted into law 23 December 1996, n. 651. Above all, an astronomical sum of money was allocated: 3,500 billion of the old lire, corresponding in today’s money to one billion and eight hundred million euros (approximately 1,878,000,000.00 USD). Also in this case I refer you to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport of the Italian Republic, where everything is documented and detailed (see HERE). Having said this, it should be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops of the time was His Eminence the Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, with an army of bishops following him who were not caricatures like today’s bishops, who compete between of them to those who carry on their chest the humblest and poorest wooden cross, made with the material of a sunken boat off the sicilian coast of Lampedusa isla on which human traffickers transported poor desperate illegal immigrants, including women and innocents children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of 2000 was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate… but above all another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. But here is an exhaustive example capable of clarifying everything: at the time, in Italy, if before the administrative elections some diocesan bishop expressed discontent towards a particularly polemical or aggressive candidate, immediately the candidate corrected his tone during the electoral campaign. But there’s more: when the referendum on assisted procreation was held in Italy in June 2005, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go and vote. Result: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a flop (see HERE). The fact that I appreciate and recognize certain undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, stating that today, unfortunately, we no longer have figures of his high level, does not take anything away from the fact that I would never have hoped to have him as my diocesan bishop. Even today, on a human and spiritual level, I continue to consider it “a cold and dry bone covered in velvet”. This is how I defined him, to his scant joy, a few years ago, without caring how notoriously touchy and humorless the Cardinal is.

With completely different men and a completely different kind of Church, on the occasion of the great Jubilee event of 2000, Rome was remade new. This was in the interest of the State, which recovered what it had invested with high revenues and both economic and image interests, but also of the Church, which thanks to the huge funds allocated for that extraordinary event was able to take advantage of renovate most of its structures, many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here it should be remembered that Rome, already at the time, was teeming with religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See (in 1929, after the fall of the Papal State and the conquest of Rome in September 1870, the Kingdom of Italy recognized the Vatican City as an independent sovereign state governed by the Roman Pontiff). Works mostly erected in the 1930s, in a real competition between the historical Orders and the various religious Congregations, male and female, to see who built the largest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic decline in the birth rate that began at the end of the 1960s, certain Catholic schools, nursery schools and various care institutions no longer had any reason to exist, as they were mostly pharaonic structures. It should also be considered that in 1978, in Italy, the “great social conquest” of the law on abortion was approved, thanks to which orphanages also disappeared, for which no longer any need, given that children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous general houses of the various male and female Orders and Congregations, with novitiates or theological school within them, which led them to have, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one hundred or two hundred religious, among those who had professed solemn vows and the young simply professed people in training.

In Rome, at the beginning of the seventies, it was impossible not to encounter priests, friars and nuns everywhere along the urban streets. Then there were the young seminarians and theology students from the various national and international Roman seminaries and colleges, who when they went for a walk formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. In simple words: the decline in the birth rate and the inexorable crisis of vocations had reduced the majority of these large structures in the following decades to being inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred, but by six or seven elderly men and women religious, residing in buildings which were now in semi-degraded state, with obsolete systems and outside of any legal regulations regarding safety. So it was that on the occasion of the Jubilee of 2000, not only were a large part of these institutes renovated, but it was decided to make them profitable in some way, reserving a small wing for men and women religious, now reduced to a few members, and all the rest used for holiday home, in fact in hotels, because this is what most of these institutions are today: low-cost hotels. It was a far-sighted operation, thanks to which the buildings of many institutions were saved and made capable of producing the money necessary for their maintenance.

Unfortunately, priests, friars and nuns are capable — and they really are like few others — of wasting money on useless expenses, sometimes even on harmful works which then lead to great losses, without having the ability to realize that certain structures require a lot of care and maintenance. And so, the well-known sapience of priests, friars and nuns begins to attach patches left and right, spending exorbitant amounts in the belief of saving money, because few like priests, friars and nuns are so idiotic as to let themselves be robbed, if they have not been adequately trained in concrete practical life with their feet firmly planted on the ground. All said and done: were the walls, last painted twenty years ago? The internal and external fixtures, the air conditioners and radiators, the sanitar elements dilapidated and broken today fixtures, on which the necessary routine maintenance, has never been carried out they were installed in the late 90s? No problem, just apply a patch, entrusting the repairs to people who, to change banal filters on air conditioners, make the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns pay more than what the new latest generation air conditioners with low consumption and high energy savings would cost.

Since there are many examples, I will limit myself to just one: last year I had the opportunity to find myself in a nuns institute while some painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water, and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled entirely of toxic chemical substances, I asked: “What brand of ecological paint are you using?”. Then, walking around the corridors, I noticed a riot of smudges not only on the walls, but also on the fixtures, on the skirting boards and even on the fire extinguishers dirtied with paint flows. I took the foreman and told him: “If you had done something like this in my house, I wouldn’t have let you out through the door but through the window, being careful not to give you a single penny.” In the evening, the mother superior confronted me irritably and told me not to disturb their workers anymore. I replied to her: «The people who placed the water drains from the air conditioners inside the shower cubicles of the guest bedrooms and who, not satisfied, even eliminated the earthing from the electrical system, do not deserve to be called workers but criminals, while you nuns demonstrate that you are womens incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace of being able to benefit”.

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated priest in trousers inaugurates what we might reasonably call “The Jubilee of patch” focused on our irreversible spiritual and economic decadence, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. On 24 December 1999, the square of St. Peter’s, was not only packed, because the crowd of people reached as far as Castel Sant’Angelo. Same way, it is equally evident that on December 24, 2024 (as shown in the photo accompanying this article), the same square was completely empty in the central part, and in the four squares of chairs placed under the churchyard, several empty seats are visible.

The last question is obligatory: why should a devout Catholic leave Australia or Peru to go to Rome? Perhaps for hear an elderly Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, speaks only of poor and migrants, of migrants and poor, of poor and migrants…? As if the Verb of God had come into this world only to speak and care for the poor of the “slums” and “Villas miseries” (Villages of misery)? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, are they also sons of God, or not? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? The clochards under Bernini’s colonnade; Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, respectively to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter’s Square, where early in the morning traders are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to remove the acidic smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils nauseatingly? And where should the jubilant pilgrim lodge? Perhaps by the nuns or friars who after the Jubilee of 2000, once they had their religiouse homes renovated free of charge by the “Uncle Scrooge” of the Italian Republic, never asked themselves the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the bathroom fixtures; restore the plaster and paint the walls; that they offer freeze-dried milk and substitute powders for breakfast that rival the products put on the market during the period in which the old fascist regime proclaimed autarky, following which it was no longer possible to use products imported, starting with coffee? Better not even to mention the very poor quality of the food they offer in these houses where they also serve meals. Better to ignore, for Christian charity’s sake, the problem of the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries and brought to the religious houses in Rome, placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun and used as serving women, who, despite living in Italy for ten years, are unable to understand and speak Italian. Let us overlook and draw a veil over all this and all the worst that circulates in certain homes…

Finally, how can we not mention the exotic characters that we working in this religious houses, especially in those of nuns, who vary from girls with bare bellies to boys who show off three earrings in their ears, piercings and tattoos view? But do we want to host pilgrims in religious homes, or in failed branches of a gay village? Why has it not yet occurred to the Holy See to send around inspectors to verify whether certain houses managed by men and women religious, or by their lay preposed, really have all the necessary requirements to do so-called religious reception in a dignified way?

Having opened the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia was appropriate and in its own way farsighted, being the most suitable place where many of us should be, and also for a long time, after having launched an attack on the mystical body of Christ which is the Church (Colossians 1,18), on which attached day after day patches that cannot stop, much less cure, the malignant metastases that have been circulating in his body for decades and decades. A state of affairs for which this pontificate is certainly not responsible, despite having done its part, without holding back when, to the damage that has already largely existed for several decades, it decided to add others, as original as they are serious.

«But when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?» (Luke 18, 8)

 

From the Island of Patmos, 28 December 2024

.

______________________________________

.

THE CHURCH OF THE PATCHES PASSES THE HOLY GATE OF IRREVERSIBLE DECADENCE IN A WHEELCHAIR

This Jubilee will be a failure spiritually and economically, because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm inversion: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite being seriously ill, tried to force himself to open, to open wide the doors to Christ; the Church of today, Lying like a patient in the oncology hospice, she has tried to open wide the doors to the world..

 

.

In the experience of man and in the life of the Church nothing happens by chance, If perhaps we are increasingly incapable of reading certain signs. And so, twenty-five years apart, two Supreme Pontiffs opened the Door of the Holy Year, appearing before her with the weight of old age and her disabling illnesses.

At Christmas 1999, The visible Church led by His Holiness John Paul II arrived seriously ill before the Holy Door. This Pontiff, weakened by Parkinson's disease, It was a plastic example of this.: assisted by a master of ceremonies dressed in a dignified ecclesiastical vestment, who wanted, in any case, kneel although with obvious difficulties and great physical suffering. He never agreed to make exceptions with genuflections, especially before the Holy Eucharist. For the solemn occasion, The Holy Father wore a mantum that precedes the birth of Christianitas by centuries. A cloak known in ancient Roman pagan religion as a “pluvial”, used by him Pontifex Maximus to shelter from the rain, when from the top of the Sublicio Bridge, located between the current neighborhoods of Trastevere and Testaccio, at the height of Porta Portese, He studied the movements of water and the flight of birds to interpret the will of the gods.

For the solemn jubilee event of the year 2000, The Holy Father wore a cape about which much criticism was made. That garment, made in Prato, It had been woven in very bright colors: rojo, blue and gold, symbols present in nature and in the human spiritual dimension. Red usually symbolizes life and strength.; the blue, the union of heaven and earth; the gold, divinity.

If we reflect on it in retrospect, That play of colors was like the last explosion of light before the arrival of the gloomy grayness that surrounds us today.; and that it is not attributable to him, nor to the Supreme Pontiffs who succeeded him from 2005; because the crisis of the Church began a long time ago. A minimal knowledge of history would be enough — in this world with memories that barely reach back to yesterday, since we do not even reach the day before yesterday - to understand that the germs of the crisis that caused the ecclesiastical and ecclesiastical decline, blatantly visible today, They were already present between the pontificates of Leo XIII and Pius, at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century.

If with John Paul II the illness pressed at the door, With the Supreme Pontiff Francis the visible Church crossed a point of no return, pushed onto a wheelchair by the shadow of an emaciated priest dressed in a pair of pants, instead of a dignified ecclesiastical vestment. That of John Paul II, despite being a Church in crisis for decades, always tried to kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, trying not to get irreversibly sick. The Church of Francis does not kneel before the Body and Blood of Christ, because now she is seriously and irreversibly ill. However, He kneels to wash and kiss the feet of prisoners and prostitutes in the Mass of the Lord's Supper, despising the wealth of our glorious places of worship, that they are not the fruit of princely splendor — as some uncultured people might think — but of the faith of believers and the work of the greatest artists who wanted to honor God, offering the best, paying the highest homage that could be offered to the Divine Creator of heaven and earth, of all visible and invisible things. That's why the abbreviation D.O.M, what does it mean: God is the Greatest, It is sculpted on many ecclesiastical buildings. If, on the one hand, what is not known is despised, on the other hand, there is no hesitation in exalting prisons, among those that end up having committed crimes, except the case of innocent people unjustly convicted due to judicial errors. Although some don't remember it, or are not really aware of this incontrovertible reality, It is worth reminding them that criminals end up in jail.

Those who are inside prisons must be recovered, not exalted as if they were faithful devotees of modern cathedrals, or unspecified victims of a bad society, guilty of not having fully understood them. If someone is in there, outside, often more than one, and sometimes even entire families, They have cried because of him. So, It would be good to remember that forgiveness is such if it goes hand in hand with the punishment inflicted by justice, which on the spiritual level acts as a purification of the condemned, transforming prison into an action of that divine grace that first forms and then transforms man through the atonement of those whom human law designates as crimes, and Catholic doctrine as sins. In both cases, both in regard to crimes and sins, secular states with a liberal-democratic imprint, like the Church for its part, They offer differently, but substantially similar, the possibility of atonement, which implies in itself that recovery that erases the guilt derived from the crime or sin committed. This is the apostolate in prisons, the rest is surreal and harmful ideology, between foot washing and “prisoners' jubilees” of a Supreme Pontiff arriving before the Holy Door of the Papal Archbasilica of Saint Peter pushed in a wheelchair by an emaciated priest in trousers, because in that case it is impossible to get up and walk. But he gets up and walks until he opens the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia, comparing it to a basilica (cf.. video WHO).

Does anyone want to remind the Holy Father that in Rome we have basilicas built on the blood of Christian martyrs cruelly murdered in hatred of faith (in hatred of the catholic faith) and that the title basilica is not particularly appropriate for a prison chapel? And this is where the words of the psalmist come to mind:

How long will I feel anguish in my soul and sadness in my heart, day after day? How long will my enemy triumph at my expense??
Señor, My God, look at me and answer me! Enlighten my eyes so that I don't sleep with the dead,
and let my enemy not say that he finished me, Nor will my adversaries rejoice to see me hesitate..
As for me, I trust in your goodness; I will know the joy of your salvation and I will sing to the Lord who has treated me well (Salmo 13, 2-5).

The Jubilee, also called Holy Year, It has great spiritual significance that affects the life of the entire universal Church. The heart of this event is the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins and the penalties for sins.. Its institution is lost in the mists of time and is linked to the experience of the ancient People of Israel.. The official website of the Holy See offers a historical tour that I recommend reading (watch: What is the Jubilee?). It is a text so precise and well done that there are no more explanations, For my part I could only repeat what was contained and explained in it..

Now I would like to move from the spiritual sphere to the financial one., starting from the premise that I hope to be wrong in certain personal convictions and have to publicly correct them in the coming months. I fear that this Jubilee will be a failure spiritually and economically., because a Holy Door has been opened, not so much about what we are no longer, worse! We have opened the Holy Door on what we have become through a paradigm reversal: the Church of twenty-five years ago, despite being seriously ill, tried to force himself to open, to open wide the doors to Christ (watch HERE); the Church of today, lying as a patient in the oncological hospice ward, has tried to open, to open wide the doors to the world. And as I have often had the opportunity to remember in recent years, The task that Christ God has entrusted to us by divine mission is not to please the world, but to oppose him:

«If you were of the world, the world would love them as their own. But since they are not of the world, but I chose them and took them out of him, "the world hates them" (Juan 15,19).

Images can often summarize an entire state of affairs without resorting to words. For example: What to say about the Protestant episcopese sitting in the seats of honor along with representatives of different religions? But we are inclusive!! Therefore, to exclude everything that is Catholic, we must necessarily include everything that is not Catholic… of course, all obviously expressed with due human respect towards the Lady present on the podium as “obispo” in the Papal Archbishopric of St. Peter, without any of the clerical solons realizing that in this way we run the risk of letting through a message of normalization and approval, because a woman cannot define herself as “bishop” and nobody, on the catholic side, in no way can you recognize it as such, not even if it belongs to a non-Catholic Christian religion born from the heresy and schism of Martin Luther, what we remember: He was a heretic and he was not a reformer.

Luther did not produce, in fact, some reform; the only true reform was carried out by the Fathers at the Council of Trent. Luther tore apart the Church of Christ with a terrible schism, which remains as is to this day, with due respect to the bishops on the platform of honor at the inauguration of the Holy Year, over the tomb of the apostle Peter, with the total indifference of inclusive clericalism.

We were talking about the economic discourse… for the Jubilee of 2000, The Decree Law of the 23 October 1996, n. 551, containing "Urgent measures for the Great Jubilee of 2000", later converted into law 23 December 1996, n. 651. Work for this event began years ago., after the approval of specific laws, but above all with the attribution of the astronomical sum of money: 3.500 billion of the old liras, which in current currency is equivalent to one thousand eight hundred million euros. Also in this case I refer to the official website of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, where everything is documented and detailed (watch HERE). That being said, It must be remembered that the president of the Italian bishops at that time was His Eminence Cardinal Camillo Ruini, endowed with rare political skills, followed by an army of bishops who were not yet like the current caricatures, who compete with each other to see who carries the most humble and poor wooden cross on their chest, possibly made from material from a sunken ship off the coast of the Sicilian island Lampedusa; boats on which human traffickers transport poor illegal and desperate immigrants, among whom there are often women and children.

That of the years preceding the Jubilee of the 2000 It was another Church, another episcopate, another pontificate… but above all, another society and another national and international geopolitical structure. Here is an exhaustive example capable of clarifying everything: in that period in Italy, if before the administrative elections any diocesan bishop expressed his dissatisfaction with one or more particularly controversial or aggressive candidates, They took measures to correct the objective and lower the tone during the course of their electoral campaigns.; but there is more: when in June 2005 There was a referendum in Italy on assisted procreation, Cardinal Camillo Ruini expressly invited Italians not to go to vote. Result: three out of four Italians did not go to the polls and the referendum was a fiasco (watch HERE). The fact of personally appreciating and recognizing certain evident and undoubted qualities of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, regretting that today figures of his high stature, unfortunately we no longer have, It takes nothing away from the fact that I would never have wanted to have him as a diocesan bishop.. In fact, I still consider it today., on a human and spiritual level, as “a cold, dry bone covered in velvet”, how I defined it, for your little joy, for a few years without repair, for my part, of anything he is notoriously susceptible to outside of lacking a sense of humor.

With all other types of men and all other types of Church completely different, on the occasion of the great jubilee event of the year 2000, Rome was made new. It was also the interest of the State, that he recovered everything he had invested with high income and interest, both economic and image, as the Church did, which thanks to the enormous funds allocated to that extraordinary event it was able to take advantage of to renovate most of its structures., many of which had already been in terrible conditions for years. And here we must remember that Rome, Even then it was full of religious institutes, most of which were built after the Concordat stipulated in February 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See (in it 1929, after the fall of the Papal State and the taking of Rome in September 1870; The Kingdom of Italy recognized Vatican City as an independent sovereign state governed by the Roman Pontiff). Works erected for the most part in the years 1930, in a true competition between the historical Orders and the different religious Congregations, male and female, to see who built the biggest institutes. At the gates of the Third Millennium, with a drastic decrease in the birth rate that began at the end of the years 1960, certain catholic schools, day care centers and various assistance institutions no longer had a reason to exist, since they were mostly pharaonic structures. It must also be considered that in the 1978 was approved in Italy “great social achievement” of the abortion law, thanks to which orphanages disappeared, no longer necessary, since children could be killed before they were born. Not to mention the numerous curias and general houses of the different male and female Orders and Congregations., almost always with novitiates or theology students inside, what led to having, between the fifties and sixties, communities that numbered one or two hundred religious, between those who had professed solemn vows and the young simple professed in formation.

In Rome in the early seventies, it was impossible not to find priests, friars and nuns everywhere along the urban roads. There were also young seminarians and theology students from the different national and international seminaries and Roman schools., that when they went out for a walk they formed lines of dozens and dozens of young clerics. In a nutshell: The decline in birth rates and the inexorable crisis of vocations had reduced, in the following decades, most of these large structures to being inhabited no longer by one hundred or two hundred., but by six or seven elderly men and women religious, with buildings that were now in a semi-ruinous state, with obsolete systems and outside of all legal regulations regarding security. So, on the occasion of the Jubilee of the year 2000, Not only were a large part of these institutes renovated, but it was decided to make them profitable in some way: reserving a small wing for religious men and women, now numerically reduced to a minimum and transforming the bulk of the buildings into hostels, actually in hotels, because that is what most of these institutions are today. It was a forward-thinking operation., Thanks to which the buildings of many institutes were saved and they were allowed to produce the money necessary to sustain themselves..

Unfortunately, priests, friars and nuns They are capable - and they really are like few others - of wasting money on useless expenses., sometimes even in harmful works that later cause great losses, without realizing that certain structures require a lot of care and careful maintenance. And so, twenty-five years ago after having been saved from very serious problems, related to their great buildings that they had not been able to restore, nor properly preserve, nor to adapt to legal standards regarding safety; They found nothing better to do than let them return to their semi-ruined state for the next twenty-five years., not all, but a good part of them do. This is what I usually call “clerical patch psychology.”. And it is easy to reveal the meaning of this definition: Does a structure require routine maintenance? Why spend money, just leave it like this, and just in case, say with all the cynicism typical and sometimes unique to priests, friars and nuns: “It's not worth the useless bitter blood, Those who will come later will take care of it”. At this point, all the ordinary maintenance interventions omitted over the years end up becoming serious needs for extraordinary maintenance, which however cost a lot. No problem, we will put a patch on it, entrusting the work to people who, to change the banal air conditioner filters, they will do that due to the inexperience of priests, friars and nuns are paid more than what they are paid in the latest generation systems, low consumption and high energy saving.

As there are many examples I will limit myself to just one: Last year I had the opportunity to find myself in an institute of nuns while painters were painting the rooms of their house-hotel. Seeing them mixing anonymous paints in buckets with plenty of water and smelling a rather unpleasant odor that smelled like toxic chemicals, I asked: “What brand of eco-friendly paint are you using??”. Then, as I walked through the hallways, I noticed an avalanche of stains not only on the walls, but also in furniture, on baseboards and even on fire extinguishers dirty with paint drips. I grabbed the foreman and told him: «If you had done something like that in my house, I wouldn't have let you out through the door but through the window., "taking care not to give you a cent". At night, The irritated Mother Superior told me not to bother the workers anymore.. I replied: «People who have placed water drains from air conditioners inside guest room showers and are not satisfied with that, They have even removed the outlets from the electrical system, They do not deserve to be called workers but criminals. While you nuns demonstrate that you are incapable of managing the considerable patrimony from which your congregation has the grace to benefit.".

A wheelchair pushed by an emaciated, pants-clad priest inaugurated what we could reasonably define as “Jubilee patch” focused on our irreversible spiritual and financial decline, of which our increasingly empty squares and churches are a paradigm. Or maybe someone forgets that the 24 December 1999 St. Peter's Square was so full of people that the crowd of faithful reached the Castel Sant'Angelo and the Lungotevere? Someone wants to address the obvious and sad fact that the 24 December 2024, as shown in the photo accompanying this article, the same square was completely empty in the center and in the four squares of chairs placed under the steps of the basilica you can see so many empty seats.

One last question is essential.: Why would a devout Catholic leave Australia or Peru to travel to Rome?? To listen to an old Pontiff who, when he opens his mouth, talks about poor and immigrants, of immigrants and poor, of poor and immigrants…? As if the Word of God had come to this world only to speak and care for the poor in the favelas and the Villas of misery?? And those who do not have the great privilege of being poor, They are also children of God, or not? And what would the jubilant pilgrim find in Rome? I would find the vagabonds camped under Bernini's colonnade; would find Borgo Santo Spirito and Borgo Pio, respectively to the left and right of the Vatican and St. Peter's Square, where early in the morning merchants are forced to throw buckets of bleach to try to eliminate the sour smell of urine that penetrates the nostrils. in a nauseating way. And where should the jubilant pilgrim stay?? Perhaps where the nuns or friars who, after the Jubilee of the 2000, once he Uncle McDuck O Scrooge McDuck of the Italian Republic renewed its structures free of charge, They never considered the problem of renewing beds and mattresses or redoing the toilets.; restore the plaster and paint the walls; that offer freeze-dried milk and powdered substitutes for breakfast that rival the products marketed during the period in which the former fascist regime proclaimed autarky, after which it was no longer possible to use products imported from abroad, starting with coffee? Let's ignore the poor quality of the food that these houses offer as catering services.. Above all, Let us ignore the sad reality of the Indian and Filipino nuns taken from their countries, taken to the religious houses of Rome and placed under the direction of an eighty-year-old Italian nun as domestic servants, who should be addressed in English, because even if they have lived in Italy for ten years, they do not understand or speak Italian. Let us overlook and draw a compassionate veil over all this and all the worst that circulates in certain houses.…

And finally, How can we not mention the exotic characters that we increasingly find working in these religious reception houses?, especially in the nuns' houses, ranging from girls with bare bellies to boys who wear three earrings in their ears, piercings and tattoos in sight? From the series: Do we want to welcome pilgrims in religious houses of hospitality, Or do we want to transform religious houses into failed branches of a gay village?? How is it possible that the Holy See, sometimes even attentive to trivialities, It has not occurred to them to send inspectors to verify whether certain houses run by religious men and women, or by their lay supervisors, really meet all the necessary requirements for religious reception in a dignified manner?

Having opened the opening of the Holy Door in the Roman prison of Rebibbia It was timely and farsighted in its own way., being the most appropriate place where many of us should be and even for a long time, after having attacked the mystical Body of Christ which is the Church (Colossians 1,18). A Holy Body on which today they are placed, day after day, patches that can't stop, much less cure, the malignant metastases that have been attacking him for decades. The metastases were not caused by this pontificate, who is not responsible for them, despite having done their part without stopping the damage that had already existed for several decades, decided instead to add others, so original, as equally serious.

"But, when the Son of man comes, Will you find faith on earth?» (Lucas 18,8)

 

From the Island of Patmos, 31 December 2024

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

The mystery of Christmas is enclosed in a silence that speaks to the history of humanity

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE MYSTERY OF CHRISTMAS IS ENCLOSED IN A SILENCE THAT SPEAKS TO THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY

By entering the silence of Bethlehem and penetrating the Gospel with love and contemplation, we therefore see something beautiful and new about God and about us, so we know Him better, but also ourselves, who we are, what mystery dwells within us, what meaning and value our life and that of the entire universe has.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

 

Fashion born in the United States of celebrating the sex of the unborn child in advance quickly spread to us too. But none baby shower O gender reveal party for the Holy Child Jesus.

More seriously and even more deeply in the Christmas of the Lord, especially in the three liturgies that distinguish this Solemnity, something of the mystery of God and man is revealed starting from the source one, source of all historical mysteries, which is the mystery of the incarnation of the Son of God. Let us therefore read the passage proclaimed in the Christmas Eve Mass, according to the Gospel of Luke:

"In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that a census should be of the whole earth. This first census was made when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Everyone went to be enrolled, each in their own city. Joseph also, from Galilee, from the city of Nazareth, went up to Judea to the city of David called Bethlehem: in fact, he belonged to the house and family of David. He had to be registered together with Maria, his bride, she was pregnant. While they were in that place, time came for her to be delivered. And she brought forth her firstborn son, She wrapped in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the accommodation. There were some shepherds in that region who, spending the night outdoors, they stayed up all night guarding their flock. An angel of the Lord presented himself to them and the glory of the Lord surrounded them with light. They were filled with great fear, But the angel said to them,: “Don't be afraid: there, you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people: today, the City of David, is born for you a Savior, which is Christ the Lord. This sign for you: You find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, placed in a manger”. And immediately a multitude of the heavenly army appeared with the angel, who praised God and said: “Glory to God in the highest heaven and on earth peace to men, that he loves”» (LC 2,1-14).

This well-known and exciting text proclaimed as the Gospel in the Christmas Eve Mass leaves one somewhat disappointed upon first reading. We would expect, at least from the main characters, a few words, an explanation or expression of their feelings. Instead they remain silent and the whole scene is surrounded by great silence. Joseph is silent as he ascends from the unknown Nazareth to the most famous and significant city of David called Bethlehem, due to the census. But it says nothing about itself, of what he feels or perceives. Maria remains silent, his bride, who accompanies her on the journey and silently gives birth to her first-born son. We are not told his feelings, what was moving in his heart. Except that she gives birth outside the hotel, forced to place the Child in a poor animal's crib. E, naturally, no cries of the newborn Baby are heard. The overall scene narrated presents a whole series of humble gestures punctuated by silence. While in the background are projected the actions of the power of Caesar Augustus who wants the census to reach the most distant provinces. Luke too, the evangelist writer, does not make any comments, as if to underline an extreme measure even in the poverty of expressive means. Out of the scene the shepherds emerge, frightened by the appearance of an angel, they too are struck dumb. Only the heavenly messenger breaks the silence by announcing the great joy: «A Savior is born for you, who is Christ the Lord". And then the multitude of the celestial army praises God, proclaiming his glory in the heavens and peace on the earth of men.

Silence is the key, as every mystery of God springs from it and takes us back to it. Because it's not easy, nor easy to say God, who He is or describe Him, silence is then there to signal that certain realities must first of all be contemplated and adored for a long time. This helps us understand the apparent and striking contrast between the silent poverty of the central scene of the Gospel passage and the magnificence of what is around it. It contains the mystery of God that must be contemplated and adored.

And it is in this context that it reveals itself, that is, the veil is lifted on the singular manifestation of God, whose first characteristic is undoubtedly the ability to surprise. Who would have expected a baby from God? What a superabundant message He brings, what light it propagates? The Gospel passage seems to invite us to go further, beyond modest appearances, to discover the divine riches that rest not in the noise, be it the announcement of the census of the time, or everything that today creates an audience or multiplies followers, but rather in the "subtle silent voice" that Elijah experienced (1Re 19, 12), in which God reveals himself to the soul capable of meditation and contemplation of the scriptures and the mystery contained therein.

Below, a second aspect reveals the evangelical scene about God. And that is that He is qualified by some paradoxes, from truths apparently beyond common sense and which the world carefully avoids. They could be expressed like this: before God the small often appears more important than the large, the poor more than the rich, the despised more than the important, the individual more than the multitude. Moreover, poverty is not the worst evil, since God permitted it for his Son; it's still, what on earth is loneliness and humiliation, may be great and glorious in heaven.

We notice, in tal modo, to gradually enter into a "Christian theology and anthropology", in a new way of understanding God and man. In that habit, first mentioned, of knowing how to go further we see that in the mystery of Bethlehem where everything is apparently secret and silence, God speaks to man in a new way and manifests himself as the One who ordinarily is on the side of the smallest and poorest; as someone whose omnipotence is shown first and foremost in the goodness of tenderness, in reliability and closeness to the simplest and most humble. We thus understand that we are dear to him, we are fragile, weak and poor children of Adam. Everything in the evangelical scene makes a single great announcement full of meaning emerge from the silence: God loves us freely, before we love him and for our good he comes to meet us.

We too enter the silence of Bethlehem and by penetrating the Gospel with love and contemplation we therefore see something beautiful and new about God and about us, so we know Him better, but also ourselves, who we are, what mystery dwells within us, what meaning and value our life and that of the entire universe has.

In the adorable mystery of Christmas let's realize that we are not alone, that the Lord came for us and remains with us. Even though we hear the roars of war all around, the message He brings is that of joy and peace. A divine and not ephemeral peace that comes from Him and passes through people's experiences, of nations and peoples.

Recently a new idea has been put forward in theological reflection that deals with the mystery of the incarnation. It is called "deep incarnation", a "radical". This is a recent theological sensitivity interested in rediscovering the inclusive and salvific scope of the incarnation for the entire creation. Without taking anything away from the new acquisitions, Let's remember that many have discussed this topic, especially the holy fathers since ancient times. And among these Saint Ambrose who commented on the writing of the evangelist Luke with these words:

«It is so that you could become a perfect man that Jesus wanted to be a little child. He was bound in swaddling clothes so that you would be freed from the bonds of death. He was in the stable to place you on the altars. He came to earth so that you could reach the stars, and he found no room in that inn so that you would have many homes in heaven. Even though he was rich, he became poor for us, so that we might become rich in his poverty. This indigence of God is therefore my wealth and the weakness of the Lord is my strength. He preferred privations for himself to give abundantly to everyone. The crying of his childhood in wails is a wash for me, those tears have washed away my sins".

Merry Christmas to all.

From the Hermitage, 25 December 2024

Christmas Day

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

We can have a Christmas without the birthday boy?

WE CAN HAVE A CHRISTMAS WITHOUT THE CELEBRATOR?

Christ Jesus our Lord, that on this day we remember embodied in our humanity and history, manifests the fundamental mystery of all the Christian mysteries that are related to our salvation.

 

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

 

PDF print format article

 

 

 

Christmas it is among the most loved and celebrated holidays in the world, because it is universally considered a moment of joy, of family reunion and sharing.

Cities in every part of the globe light up of glittering decorations, the Christmas markets are full of typical products of this period and the houses are filled with the scent of traditional dishes. But this Solemnity can be celebrated, specifically Christian, without mentioning the reason for the party? It is true that Christmas creates a magical atmosphere, but we can be satisfied with just this or let the commercial component prevail, without remembering the reason for this occasion, that is, without inviting to the party the One who is the reason and the reason for so much joy and peace desired and invoked?

We can have Christmas without the Celebrant, Christ Jesus our Lord, which on this very day we remember embodied in our humanity and history, thus manifesting the fundamental mystery of all the Christian mysteries that are related to our salvation? This is precisely the angelic message brought to the shepherds on the holy night of Christmas:

"Fear not:: there, you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people: today, the City of David, is born for you a Savior, who is Christ the Lord" (LC 2,10-11).

A merely "consumed" Christmas cannot be enough and satisfy us in the party or in the dishes, even if this is done with family or friends. Indeed, precisely the preparation of the latter, delicacies of all kinds that fill our Christmas tables, of panettone or pandoro, traditional Italian desserts of the period, that divide the sides of lovers of one or the other, they send us back to slowness, to that care that requires time and dedication, respect for tradition and patience.

So our faith also needs as much passion and care, especially when faced with the all-to-be-adored mystery of Jesus' birth. It cannot be overshadowed by the commercial aspect, from the frenzy of shopping Christmas looking for the perfect gift for the people dear to us. Nothing can obscure the message of love, hope and redemption that Christmas brings with it. Yet also the preparations, if done with love, with due attention to their meaning, they can help us keep alive this important aspect of the Christian faith which corresponds to the Incarnation of the divine Word.

Rediscover the authentic spirit of Christmas also through the things that are done in this period, in the family or in the Christian community, setting aside the purely worldly spirit of the celebration to live every occasion with deep faith and sincere love among ourselves and towards the Lord who was born in Bethlehem. Do simple things together, how to prepare the foods that will go on the table, take care of details to ensure that everyone feels welcomed and loved. Not forgetting sharing with those who are poorer or less fortunate, because precisely in this circumstance we can reevaluate and give significance to the virtue of charity, since it was precisely out of love that Christ was born for us. And then read Christmas stories, among all the Gospels of the Nativity, which make us understand the purpose and meaning of this mystery; and participate in the Christmas Mass to understand through liturgical action and prayer how much the Lord loved us by coming among us.

How precious it is, to this end, presence at home and obviously in Church, of a nativity scene. Widespread throughout the world, it was born right from us, thanks to the religious genius of Saint Francis who in 1223 he created the first living nativity scene in Greccio. Each figure of the nativity scene and the symbols hidden in it have a profound meaning of faith and culture: help tell the story of the birth of Baby Jesus.

It would be nice, as happens for example in religious Jewish families on the occasion of Passover, that also in Christian families, in front of the Nativity scene, the little ones were told the reason for those figures, of those poses and how the gift of the eternal Father was given to humanity, Baby Jesus light that brings salvation to the world, has passed through the availability of some people, particularly Joseph and the Virgin Mary.

Mary is the Mother that we perceive in the attitude of love and dedication: they recall his faith which abandoned itself to the divine will. St. Joseph, with his stick, it is the right silent and full of strength, placed to protect the family of Nazareth, figure of a Church to come. Immediately after the shepherds, which are located near Bethlehem, symbol of humility and simplicity. First to receive the announcement of the birth of Jesus and first to approach the mystery: they anticipate the future calling of the people, among which the humble and simple will stand out.

And how can we not mention the Magi, who arrive from afar guided by the star. They bring precious gifts: air, frankincense and myrrh, which help us meditate on kingship in advance, on the divinity and even on the future suffering of Jesus. Even the presence of the Magi in the nativity scene underlines the universality of the Christian message, which embraces every people and culture. Then the angels, which overlook the Nativity scene, they announce the good news of the birth of the Lord. They sing: «Glory to God in the highest and peace on earth to the men loved by the Lord», bringing a message of joy and hope. Finally, the star, who guides the Magi to the manger, symbol of divine light and grace that illuminates humanity's path towards salvation. Even the animals present in the nativity scene have their own spiritual relevance. The ox and the donkey, often depicted next to the manger, they represent patience and industriousness. According to tradition they warmed the Baby Jesus with their breath, thus indicating the simplicity and generosity of nature.

The nativity scene and every aspect linked to Holy Christmas, no matter how trivial it may be, It has its own meaning to which we can give the right value in order to help us understand Christmas today, although they have passed approx 2024 years from that Event. Even traditional things can marry with the innovations of modernity and what is apparently ancient in truth has a validity that never fades. Thus Christmas does not appear as a celebration of only consumption or lights, but it conveys a profound and beautiful message, full of hope for men and for the whole of creation, which never fades and which does not expire with the passage of time. God loves us and remains with us, this is why He sent His Son Jesus, born for us.

 

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 25 December 2024

Christmas Day

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

From the spirit of the world to the Holy Spirit. The necessary sanctification of priests is a certainty of sanctification also for the lay faithful

FROM THE SPIRIT OF THE WORLD TO THE HOLY SPIRIT. The necessary sanctification of the priests is a certainty of sanctification also for the lay faithful - when the spirit of the world is preferred to the Holy Spirit, a transmutation occurs in the life of the priest and his sanctification is no longer the work of the presence of agapic love but of that erotic love..

Premium Membership Required

You must be a Premium member to access this content.

Join Now

Already a member? Log in here

The Holy Father did well not to go to Notre-Dame to act as an extra for a mediocre Napoleonic caricature

THE HOLY FATHER DID WELL NOT TO GO TO NOTRE-DAME TO BE AN EXTRA FOR A NAPOLEONIC CARICATURE

If the boy prodigy had made the elderly and limping representative of the Committee of Sour Lesbians of France (Committee of Acid Lesbians of France) what could have happened?

— The Briefs of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos —

.

When the President of the French Republic, the boy wonder Emmanuel Macron (21 December 1977) announced that they had remade Notre-Dame, a plastic surgeon friend of mine, misunderstood the news he commented: “I hope they did it right for your wife again”. I explained to him that he had misunderstood and that the remade Notre-Dame was the metropolitan cathedral of Paris dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary, not the prodigy grandmother first lady of France Brigitte Marie-Claude Trogneux (13 April 1953).

Marseille, 23 September 2023 – The Supreme Pontiff Francis was visibly very annoyed and made to wait in the antechamber by the President of the Republic of France.

At the reopening of Notre-Dame rebuilt many complained of a great absence: the Supreme Pontiff Francis. We remind those who are not interested in history that a predecessor of the reigning August Pontiff was forced to act as an extra for Napoleon at Notre-Dame on 2 December 1804, where he suffered a serious affront. But the French deserved this, already sick at the time of grandeur, very proud of having removed the crown and cut off the head of a king who, for better or worse, descended from a thousand-year-old dynasty, so that a Corsica corporal of Italian origin would take the crown from the hands of the Supreme Pontiff invited to crown him, to put it on your head yourself. But that's how the French are: drunk on theirs Great Republic, except, however, to envy the Spanish neighbors who have a monarch. Suffice it to say that in none of the European countries governed by constitutional monarchies are there the aristocratic circles that are teeming in France, so sick are they of nobility in the shadow of theirs Great Republic.

Napoleon tried to humiliate the Papacy first capturing Pius VI in 1799, who died shortly afterwards in exile in France, followed by deportation of Pius VII in 1809. Emmanuel Macron, as is the historical fate of all mediocre people, he had to settle for much less and limit himself to making the Supreme Pontiff Francis wait in the antechamber, elderly and with walking problems, during their meeting in Marseille on 23 September 2023.

If the boy wonder had made the elderly and limping representative of the party wait in the antechamber Committee of Sour Lesbians of France (Committee of Acid Lesbians of France) what could have happened?

The Holy Father did well not to go to Notre-Dame to act as an extra for a Napoleonic caricature who wanted to crown his head alone with his own little crown in December 2024, as happened differently but similarly in December of 1804.

the Island of Patmos, 11 December 2024

___________

THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS DID WELL NOT TO GO TO NOTRE-DAME TO APPEAR IN A NAPOLEONIAN CARICATURAL COMEDY

I ask: if the boy prodigy had made the representative wait in the anteroom, old and lame, of the Committee of Sour Lesbians of France, what would have happened?

 

 

When the President of the French Republic, the child prodigy prodigy Emmanuel Macron (21 December 1977), announced that they had rebuilt Notre-Dame, a plastic surgeon friend of mine, misunderstood the news and commented: “I hope they remake his wife well”. I explained to him that he had misunderstood and that Notre-Dame remade was the metropolitan cathedral of Paris dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary, and not the prodigy grandmother first lady of France Brigitte Marie-Claude Trogneux (13 avril 1953).

Marseille, the 23 september 2023 – The Supreme Pontiff Francis visibly irritated, made to wait in the antechamber by the President of the French Republic.

During the reopening of the renovated Notre-Dame, they complained about a truly major absence: the Supreme Pontiff Francis. Let us remind those who are not interested in history that Pio VII was forced to appear as a figure on 2 December 1804 as Napoleon's attendant at Notre-Dame, where he suffered a terrible affront. But the French deserved it, already sick in these times of greatness, very proud to have removed the crown and cut off the head of a king from a thousand-year-old dynasty. And shortly after, a Corsican corporal of Italian origin, took the crown from the hands of the Supreme Pontiff, invited to crown the nuove emperator, and placed it on his head himself. But the French are like that: drunk on their Great Republic, but envious of their Spanish neighbors who have a monarch. Suffice it to say that in none of the European countries governed by constitutional monarchies, we do not find the aristocratic circles which abound in France, so fanatical are they of the nobility in the shadow of their Great Republic.

Napoleon tried to humiliate the Papacy by capturing Pius VI in 1799, who died shortly after in exile in France, then by deporting Pius VII in 1809. Mr Emmanuel Macron, as is the historical destiny of all mediocre people, had to settle for much less : make the Supreme Pontiff Francis wait in the antechamber, elderly and having difficulty walking, during their meeting in Marseille on 23 september 2023. I ask: if the boy prodigy had made the representative wait in the anteroom, old and lame, of the Committee of Sour Lesbians of France, what could have happened?

The Holy Father Francis did well not to go to Notre-Dame to appear in the Napoleonic caricature comedy of Monsieur Emmanuel Macron who wanted to crown himself alone with his little crown in December 2024, as happened differently but similarly in December 1804.

From the Island of Patmos, the 11 December 2024

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Stories of ordinary schizophrenia: we kill children but we defend the bulls

STORIES OF ORDINARY SCHIZOPHRENIA: WE KILL CHILDREN BUT WE DEFEND BULLS

We don't appreciate bullfights and the slaughter of bulls either, remaining however at least perplexed to see similar protests staged by women who consider the massacre of innocents through the practice of abortion to be a right and highly civilized thing and who then raise protest signs: «bullfighting is a sin».

— The Briefs of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos —

Author:
Gabriele Giordano M. Scardocci, o.p.

.

Four devil-may-care feminists they carried out their umpteenth disruptive action on December 8th on Piazza di Spagna during the arrival of the Holy Father Francis. These are the same ladies who today celebrate abortion as one “great social conquest”, tomorrow they demonstrate in favor of those bulls who for their part do not seem to consider them in the slightest, the reason is not known.

The Fathers de The Island of Patmos they are very attached to pets, when he served at the large hospital complex in Cagliari Father Ivano hosted the cat Tac and her periodic litters in the apartment reserved for chaplains; Father Simone has Merlin the cat at home; Father Ariel, cats Hypatia and Bruno; Father Teodoro declares that he "loves all the animals in his surroundings", although without specifying which beasts he is referring to exactly.

We don't appreciate bullfights either and the slaughter of the bulls, remaining however at least perplexed to see similar protests staged by women who consider the massacre of innocents through the practice of abortion to be a right and highly civilized thing and who then raise protest signs: «bullfighting is a sin».

 

Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 10 December 2024

.

.

Subscribe to our Channel Jordan the Theological club directed by Father Gabriele by clicking on the image

 

THE LATEST EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ARCHIVE: WHO

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

It's hard to proclaim “Brothers all” on the blood of persecuted Christians

IT IS HARD TO PROCLAIM "BROTHERS ALL" ON THE BLOOD OF PERSECUTED CHRISTIANS

The winners have already started their favorite sport: the hunt for the Christian. But we are confident, because now the Supreme Pontiff Francis together with the Grand Imam of Cairo will provide, between kisses and hugs, to stop the inevitable massacres of Christians, reminding the fanatical and bloodthirsty Islamists how much we are Brothers all

– The briefs of the Fathers of the Isle of Patmos –

Author Teodoro Beccia

Author
Teodoro Beccia

 

Muhammad Gaddafi, shortly before being brutally murdered in Sirte, he said: «Get rid of me and you will fill Europe with terrorists», then he added: «[…] and Europe will have to face uncontrolled immigration".

At the time Future, the newspaper of the Bishops of Italy, titled: «The rais threatens Europe: you will be invaded by terrorists", proving - if there was ever any need - that he hadn't understood anything for the umpteenth time (cf.. article in the 2011, WHO).

After the chimera of “Arab Spring” fomented by various Western countries for the pure love of oil, one by one the bad dictators were eliminated after rounds of "smart bombs" with which - again certain so-called civilized Western countries - they were supposed to export democracy to those territories. So they hung Saddam Hussein from the gallows, But, democracy is far from coming, that country became the scene of massacres by Islamist terrorists. They took out Gaddafi, But, democracy is far from coming, that country has become an open-air slaughterhouse in the hands of Islamist terrorists.

In the night between Saturday and Sunday the rebels led by the bloody jihadist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham have entered Damascus, bringing down the regime of Bashar al Assad who saved his skin by fleeing to Russia from his friend and protector Vladimir Putin, But, also in this case, far from achieving democracy, power was seized by the fearsome Abu Muhammad al Jolani who has long intended to create an Islamic Republic.

The winners have already started their favorite sport: the hunt for the Christian. But we are confident, because now the Supreme Pontiff Francis together with the Grand Imam of Cairo will provide, between kisses and hugs, to stop the inevitable massacres of Christians, reminding the fanatical and bloodthirsty Islamists how much we are Brothers all.

Hugging a single Imam it does not mean dialogue, much less agreeing with Islam, which is not a unitary phenomenon governed by a central authority, but a socio-political-religious system extremely fragmented by internal currents fighting each other since Caliph Abū Bakr succeeded Muhammad. This is the reason why in Italy, where there are approximately one and a half million Muslims present, the various currents that form the different Islamic communities have never managed to present themselves in a united way to draw up an agreement with the State. Is this, in itself and by itself, should say it all, to those who think of solving certain problems, often colored even with Christian blood, between kisses and hugs.

Velletri of Rome, 9 December 2024

.

 

 

 

 

.

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

Doctor Luca's gynecological diagnosis: "And here, you will conceive in the womb"

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

DOCTOR LUCA'S GYNECOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS: «AND BEHOLD, YOU WILL CONCEPTURE IN THE WOMB"

An ancient tradition, which dates back to the Apostle Paul, reports that Luca was a doctor. a person, so, more suitable than others to tell the special conception; in fact Saint Luke makes use of all his wisdom here, maybe even the professional one, but above all the theological one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

PDF print format article

 

 

The passage from the Annunciation, which is also that of the Vocation of Mary, it is one of the most beautiful and profound in the Gospel of Luke. But also one of the most complex and difficult.

An ancient tradition, which dates back to the Apostle Paul (With the 4, 14), reports that Luca was a doctor. a person, so, more suitable than others to tell the special conception; in fact Saint Luke makes use of all his wisdom here, maybe even the professional one, but above all the theological one. Let's read the passage.

"During that time, the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a city in Galilee, called Nazareth, to a virgin, betrothed to a man of the house of David, named Joseph. The virgin's name was Maria. entering from the law, he said: “Rejoice, full of grace: the Lord is; with you”. At these words she was very upset and wondered what sense a greeting like this had. The angel told her: “Do not fear, Maria, because you have found favor with God. And here, you will conceive a son, you will give birth to him and you will call him Jesus. He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High; the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father and he will reign forever over the house of Jacob and his kingdom will have no end”. Then Mary said to the angel: “How this will happen, for I know no man?”. The Angel answered her: “The Holy Spirit will descend upon you and the power of the Most High will cover you with his shadow. Therefore he who will be born will be holy and will be called the Son of God. And here, Elisabetta, your relative, in her old age she also conceived a son and this is the sixth month for her, which was said to be sterile: nothing is impossible for God”. Mary said: “Here is the servant of the Lord: let it happen to me according to your word”. And the Angel moved away from her" (LC 1,26-38).

The Archangel Gabriel is sent by God to communicate to the Virgin Mary the announcement of the imminent Incarnation. A Maria, Joseph's betrothed, it is announced that she will virginally become the mother of the Son of God. The text tells us that God had already prepared Mary for a long time for this mission of hers, as She had experienced having been "made welcome" (cute, Kexaritoméne) to God, through the influence of grace. This is the true meaning of that «full of grace», which we still recite today in the prayer ofAve Maria, but often without fully understanding its meaning. The perfect passive participle of the verb cartoon indicates that it is a past action of grace on Mary, an action therefore prior to the Annunciation, through which Maria felt she was internally oriented towards a still unknown future event. Saint Thomas Aquinas explains it by saying that he experienced within himself a profound "desire for virginity"; so too for Saint Bernard of Clairvaux the grace of Mary was "the grace of virginity". Oriented by that grace, Mary had been prepared for this day: become the mother of the incarnate Son of God, but in a virginal way.

Such a birth appears paradoxical and difficult to believe, maybe even just imagine. Yet Saint Luke, in the Gospel text, it offers us important clues so that we can accept this truth, as all Tradition teaches us. Let's take a closer look at the verse of LC 1,31 which reads in Greek: "And here, you will conceive in the womb". This addition, «in the womb», it is singular, little noticed and often untranslated, as we have seen in the text of the CEI which is proclaimed in church today. There isn't one as it seems like a pleonastic integration, for it is evident that a woman always conceives in the womb. Yet the beginning of the verse integrates well into the overall description of the three moments:

  1. You will conceive in the womb;
  2. you will give birth to a son;
  3. you will call his name Jesus.

Only Mary, throughout Scripture, receives the announcement that his conception will take place entirely "in the womb", it will therefore be completely internal and therefore it will be a virginal conception. Let's see why.

The verse clearly refers to Isaiah's prophecy 7, 14 (LXX version), also taken up by Matteo (1,23) during the announcement to Joseph in a dream:

"There the virgin will have in her womb and give birth to a son and they will call his name Emmanuel".

In San Luca, as it is a dialogue between the Angel and Mary, the second person is used (conceive) and the subject is clearly Mary, no longer the virgin of Isaiah or of Saint Matthew. Also because at the beginning of the song, The Other Brother, it had already been clearly stated twice that She was “a virgin, betrothed"; and that "the virgin was called Mary". But the most surprising thing is Luke's use of the verb. No more "you will have in your womb" as in Isaiah and Matthew, but "you will conceive in the womb". A new expression that goes in the direction of excluding any male participation, therefore human, from this conception. In the Old Testament a woman "receives into the womb" (Is 8, 3) the male seed, or «she has in her womb» (GN 38, 25) after intercourse with a man. But here in Luke it is clearly excluded from Mary's words: "I don't know a man" (LC 1, 34) that is, "I'm a virgin". This is why Saint Luke prefers to use the verb "conceive" (sullambánein), also very frequent in the Old Testament, but always without the addition "in the womb". In fact, the Evangelist uses the verb "conceive" twice, with the apparently superfluous addition of "in the womb" and does so solely by referring to Mary. It doesn't, for instance, with Elizabeth (LC 1, 24.36); for Maria, however, yes, in this passage and in Luke 2,21:

«…as he was called [Jesus] from the Angel, before being conceived in the womb".

They just seem like words, yet here Luke is saying that Mary's conception will be true, PLANT, as the revival of the ancient verb suggests: conceive; yet it will be new, unique and different for Maria, that is, without human participation, male, totally virginal. That is, it required a different "power"., a fertilizing action of a spiritual nature. This is what the Angel will explain to Mary in the face of her real objection:

«The Holy Spirit will come upon you and the power of the Most High will cover you with his shadow. Therefore he who is born will be holy and will be called the Son of God." (v. 35).

I apologize if, given today's Solemnity, I did not focus on the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception, on its historical and theological significance, on original sin for example, as is often done. It seemed more appropriate and compelling to me to focus on the scriptural foundations from which everything flows like a spring. If you notice, indeed, in today's passage from the Gospel of the Solemnity, a nice continuity. From the verse of LC 1, 28, where the Virgin is given the title of «full of grace», we know that Maria, long since, she was prepared by grace for her future mission. At the moment of the Incarnation, the Angel brings her the great and new message: his next conception will take place "in the womb", that is, without human participation. It will therefore be a virginal conception, carried out in Her by the Holy Spirit. Her Immaculate Conception is therefore admirably described by the long preparation of grace in Mary in view of the Incarnation, "in her womb", of the Son of God. There is therefore a perfect continuity well presented by the Evangelist Luke. Maria, full of Grace, after having "conceived" and given birth "holyly" (v. 35) his son under the action of the Holy Spirit, can present him to men as the Son of God, whose name is Jesus. This is the great mystery that is finally revealed to men. But at the center of the whole story is the Virgin Mary.

In this sense the words of Bishop Andrew of Crete are appropriate (+740) refer to Mary:

«The body of the Virgin is a land that God sowed, the firstfruits of Adamic matter divinized by Christ, the image that resembles primitive beauty, the clay shaped by the hands of the craftsman" (Homily 1 on the Dormition of the Blessed Virgin Mary (PG 97,1068).

From the Hermitage, 8 December 2024

Solemnity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Immaculate

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Perhaps not even the Virgin Mary mourned the death of her son, Carlo Acutis' mother may have succeeded?

PERHAPS NOT EVEN THE VIRGIN MARY DID MOURN THE DEATH OF HER SON, CARLO ACUTIS' MOTHER MAY HAVE SUCCEEDED?

Carlo Acutis' mother goes around giving lectures on her holy son who died in 15 years in 2006 for fulminant leukemia. We are at tragicomedy? Of course not, we are only at the understandable tragedy of a mother who has chosen an unusual way to try to process her son's mourning.

—Ecclesiastical current affairs—

.

PDF print format article

 

.

I owe eternal gratitude to my two main trainers: Peter Gumpel S.J. (Hannover 1923 – †Roma, 2022) e Paolo Molinari, S.J (Torino 1924 – †Roma 2014) who for half a century directed the general postulation of the Society of Jesus and who also instructed me in the postulation of the causes of the Saints. We are not talking about remote times, but from an era in which the so-called "vamp postulators" with degrees were not yet in fashion of both rights at the Pontifical Lateran University, who change companions in the same way they change clothes designer labels and which together with the “manager postulators", also lay people, they are capable of extracting mind-boggling sums from the nuns of some congregation in agony, but endowed with considerable assets, who are unaware that they are now at the entrance door of the cremation centre, which will soon entrust their ashes to history, at all costs they want the founder to be blessed or saintly.

the theologian and historian of dogma Peter Gumpel, S.J. (1923 – 2022)

I was on the unforgettable third floor of the general curia of the Society of Jesus, at the civic 4 of Borgo Santo Spirito, where I believe I made some of the most fundamental decisions of my life, starting from the most important: become a priest. It was the month of September of the year 2011, I was helping Father Peter Gumpel in some work related to certain documents of the cause of beatification of Pius XII, when during a break he told me that various experts had great reservations regarding the beatification, then to follow for the canonization of Maria Goretti, because direct family members were always alive: brothers and sisters, but above all his mother Assunta. Father Peter told me this way:

«Although the matter is not known, before proceeding with the beatification, occurred 45 years after the death of the martyr - not six years later as is done today with the Roman Pontiffs -, was asked of the mother, to the brothers and sisters the promise that they would lead a private life and would never tell stories or make public testimonies about their daughter and sister, because the Church had taken care to say what there was to say and if anything had been necessary to add or integrate, the Church itself would always have provided".

Mother Assunta, with the brothers and sisters of the Goretti family, they complied with what was requested by the Ecclesiastical Authority and none: journalist, writer, scholar or simply curious has never gleaned a word from them beyond what the Church has told about the story of the teenage martyr.

The mother of Carlo Acutis he goes around giving lectures on the dead holy son a 15 years in 2006 for fulminant leukemia, without any Ecclesiastical Authority having invited her to exercise maximum discretion, quite the opposite, they stimulate her in this sense! We are at tragicomedy? Of course not, we are only at the understandable tragedy of a mother who has chosen an unusual way to try to process her son's mourning; a mourning that can never be processed, especially from a mother, so unnatural is the loss of a child for parents.

Proof of what has just been stated it is imprinted in the vocabulary: a child who loses his parents is an orphan, a wife who loses a husband is a widow, a husband who loses his wife is a widower. A parent who instead loses a child, what is it, with what term is it defined? There isn't even a term in the dictionary to define a parent who loses a child, with all due respect to the currents of certain wild psychology that speak of the mourning process for the death of a child.

Maybe, perhaps not even the Blessed Virgin Mary mourned the death of his son. Including divine plans, she acquired the awareness - we do not know when and through what gradual process over time - that the son she brought into the world was the incarnate Word of God "begotten not created of the same substance as the Father", who offered himself as a sacrificed lamb to wash away the sins of the world.

However, processing the mourning of the child is something else, even for the Blessed Virgin Mary, who despite being the mother of the incarnate God who died and rose again, even though she was born without original sin and assumed into heaven after having fallen asleep, he was still a created creature, was human, not divine. Just as a created creature she is the mother of San Carlo Acutis, which is not the Immaculate Conception.

 

the Island of Patmos, 7 December 2024

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Contemporary man changes words to erase his fears

CONTEMPORARY MAN CHANGES HIS WORDS TO ERASE HIS FEARS

Let's take the public figure of a Catholic, because if unfortunately we took someone else as an example, God forbid he was then a member of the protected gay species, we would end up in court for body shaming with the aggravating circumstance of homophobia. That said: Mario Adinolfi is not obese, but differently thin.

Hypatia's cogitatory

.

Author Hypatia Gatta Romana

Author
Hypatia Gatta Roman

.

.

.

 

 

 

 

 

.

In the past blind and deaf people have experienced situations of pain and discomfort, not anymore today, because since they were renamed “Blind” e “deaf” their condition has changed.

Mario Adinolfi, otherwise thin (click WHO to access his interview)

Once the word “abortion” it recalled the suppression of an innocent human being in the mother's womb. Today the holy souls of the children baptized in blood by the irons of abortionists arrive happy martyrs in Paradise, because they were not aborted, but subjected to Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy, which isn't even called that anymore, my abortion, which sounds in spoken language: he said.

Let's take the public figure of a Catholic as an example, because if we took some other, God forbid a member of the protected gay species, we would end up in court for body shaming with the aggravating circumstance of homophobia. That said: Mario Adinolfi is not obese at all, but differently thin.

Aggressive and violent more than men have ever been, although busy breaking balls with the big lie of “patriarchy” in an anthropological matriarchal society, where ancient Roman Law recognized those born to a Roman mother as legitimate citizens and certainly not those born to a patriarchal Roman father, give it, once, they used to say “how bad it is!», not anymore today, you are differently beautiful.

One who doesn't have protruding breasts like Sofia Loren in the splendor of her thirties, she is not a flat-chested woman, it is a differently increased one.

Micro-penis pathology it has been deleted from the list of clinical pathologies by urologists and andrologists, today we are gifted differently. Italian specialists proposed the wording at a European conference “differently Rocco Siffredi”, but those bigots of Northern European urologists filled with Calvinist puritanism rejected it.

You are no longer old, but differently young, nor are we stupid anymore, but differently intelligent. The poor no longer exist, but the otherwise rich …

Tizio said to Gaius: «My father died of cancer». Gaius disapproved of that way of expressing himself, and having also lost his father, he specified that his father had "failed" and that his "disappearance" occurred following a neoplasm.

In a society terrified of pain, from physical decay, from old age, from illness and death, just delete certain terms from the current lexicon, because basically, with words, ciascheduno se pija perculo come mejio vo', as if it were said where I come from.

the Island of Patmos, 1° December 2024

 

Blessed Virgin Mary Gattara, protector of Catholic cats

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.