Cardinal Carlo Caffarra and his teaching on the vital pluralism of thought within the Church
CARDINAL CARLO CAFFARRA AND HIS TEACHING ON THE VITAL PLURALISM OF THOUGHT WITHIN THE CHURCH
May these words lead to reflection certain emulators with the wooden cross hanging from their necks, the poor at heart, the sacred migrant on the mouth and the wooden crosier in the hand, terrified at the idea of not conforming to that system that the Archbishop Emeritus of Pisa Alessandro Plotti defined bluntly as the conformism of mediocre and pandering bishops.
— The Briefs of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos —
Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
I was very close to the Cardinal Carlo Caffara in the last years of his life and I knew his discomfort when some tried to pit him against the Supreme Pontiff Francis, this touched him so much that he made a statement:
«I would have been more pleased if it were said that the Archbishop of Bologna has a lover rather than if it were said that he has a view contrary to that of the Pope. If a bishop has a thought contrary to that of the Pope, he must leave, but just you have to go by the diocese. Because lead the faithful on a road that is not what Jesus Christ. So lose himself forever and would risk eternal loss of the faithful " (see video WHO).
Today someone tries to argue that statement he did it in October of 2014 and who changed his opinion in the following years, after the results of the Synod on the family (!?). I can testify that the whole thing is false and that in May 2017, four months before his death, in one of our long conversations he returned to the topic by telling me:
«In the Church, the different voices, they have always been extremely valuable. In fact, it would be fearful if the bishops all had the exact same thoughts. In the Church it is necessary for Bruno Forte and Carlo Caffarra to live together and express themselves. A Church formed solely by Bruno Forte or formed solely by Carlo Caffarra would be a dangerously unbalanced Church, if not worse dead to any form of theological speculation".
May these words lead certain emulators to reflection with the wooden cross hanging from his neck, the poor at heart, the sacred migrant on the mouth and the wooden crosier in the hand, terrified at the idea of not conforming to that system that the Archbishop Emeritus of Pisa Alessandro Plotti he defined bluntly as the conformism of mediocre and pandering bishops (the full text of the interview in the monthly magazine Jesus of February 2014 "Enough ruffians, now we need courage", is reported WHO).
the Island of Patmos, 17 November 2024
.
______________________
Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:
Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos
n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21
If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com
We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.
The Fathers of the Island of Patmos
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
In fact, Plotti was a Bergoglian “previously foreseen demerits”
John Paul II in 26 years of pontificate and Camillo Ruini president of the CEI for twenty years, they didn't make any mistakes, vero?
However, it takes a lot of courage to say and affirm that Alessandro Plotti was mediocre, especially before the current episcopal class.
I am sorry, but that interview by Plotti is a gratuitous attempt to spray venom on John Paul II (although not named) and Ruini. The '74 conference was a pretext to give voice to the usual protesters and supporters of a mimetic Church in tow of worldly fashions and follower of revolutionary and socialist manias. Evidently Plotti, who also made a career under the Polish Pope, he preferred to align himself with the breezy wind that recalls the “glorious” 70s in which the mess of the Church was free. He was the mediocre and pimp.