The fall: those ugly stories of the Vatican II that nobody tells to not damage the superdogma …
− Theologica −
THE FALL OF: THOSE BAD STORIES OF VATICAN II THAT NO ONE TELLS SO AS NOT TO DAMAGE THE SUPERDOGMA …
.
We are "Fall of " and in a few years the Catholic Church as we have known and understood it up to now will no longer exist; exist "other". Our ecclesial and ecclesiastical system has already smashed from the inside, and is currently in progress a disturbing transformation. Unfortunately, both in the College of Bishops in both the Priestly College we do not have even a minimum number of elements able to cope with this progressive decay.
.
.
.
.
"If we do not want to hide anything, we are certainly tempted to say that the Church is neither holy, neither Catholic: the Second Vatican Council could even speak not only of the Holy Church, but the sinful Church; though here, Member was reprimanded something, It is mostly that he was still too shy, We are so deep in the consciousness of all of us feel the sinfulness of the Church ".
Joseph Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity, 1968
.
.
.
To facilitate the modernists in their deadly attack diabolic, It was mainly the fact that we were totally unprepared to an internal attack, because they are accustomed from a couple of centuries, straddling the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, to having to defend against external attacks. Therefore we were not ready, or perhaps it is just never thought about the possibility of such an internal attack, because even in the presence of divisions, sometimes even stronger - that within the Church there have always been -, at the time that the body of the Church was attacked, the bishops, the priests and believers of Christ They were united in defending, then returning only after, in danger waned, their struggles and internal divisions. Today instead, before the desolation and fear doctrinal tendencies that are overcoming the crisis itself Arian heresy, in response we devour each other, because the 'omocentrismo egocentric, not only it took hold in the modernist, but perhaps, more and worse, well in conservatories and in the same traditionalists, that with their quarrelsome, and sometimes phobic Division, show to be the fiercest defenders of their own "I"Instead of the truth of God faith. Try to put them together in a compact and dangerous battle against the common enemy, disheartening to see instantly the results that they will, claiming over each other to have the most right ideas and the most Catholic of them all, unhealthily attached with tooth and nail to the microcosm of their small garden, unable to move beyond their devastating, "but I think", "I feel", so it is true and right only what I think and feel. Because the mutated faith in a subjective emotion type ego-omocentric, It is much stronger in the fringes of so-called traditionalists than in those of the modernists, not least because these latter are now in power for half a century. On socio-political emotion and the sentimental, the modernists we played fifty, sixty years ago, Today they do not have any need. Indeed, the modernist heretics, today no longer give emotional impulses, give orders mandatory, impose the appointment of bishops doctrinally deficient and often heterodox, which can continue to multiply and form a clergy doctrinally deficient and unorthodox, burdened as a result of all these serious moral problems arising from the dogma of the crisis generated by it, because as in the past I have written: the moral crisis was created and developed by a doctrinal crisis [It follows the full article …]
.
To open the ’ article click below:
..
.
.
Dear Readers,
every now and remember to support our apostolic and theological work with your valuable offerings.
Thank you!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.




















