Every man should seek his own desert – Every man should seek his own desert – Every man should seek his own desert

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

 

Italian, english, español

 

EVERY MAN SHOULD SEARCH FOR HIS DESERT

John the Baptist lives in an essential way, simple and without any form of narcissism, he is completely focused on those he doesn't yet know, but who he already recognizes as stronger than him. So from the Baptist we learn not to look so much at ourselves, but to open ourselves to others and to the Other and above all we learn to search, maybe even where we live, a little "desert" of ours where not only our voice resonates, but that of the only Word that saves.

.

PDF print format article – PDF Article print format – PDF Article in printed format

 

.

Not only the Gospels tell us about John the Baptist, but also historians, for example the Jew Flavius ​​Josephus who defined it in his work Jewish Antiquities as a "good man"., who exhorted the Jews to lead a virtuous life and to practice mutual justice and piety towards God, inviting them to approach the baptism together".

The Baptist imagines the figure of the Messiah as a ruthless judge, who would not come to save, but to settle the score by proposing the simplest solution, capable of remedying the spread of sin: the death of the sinner. But Jesus will never exercise his messianic role in this way and he will take up some of the Baptist's words, like the one on conversion (cf.. Mt 4,17: «Convert»), he will say that he came not for ruin, but for the salvation of sinners. This is the Gospel passage for the second Sunday of Advent:

"In those days, John the Baptist came and preached in the Judean desert saying: «Be converted, because the kingdom of heaven is near!». In fact, he is the one of whom the prophet Isaiah spoke when he said: «Voice of one crying in the desert: Prepare the way of the Lord, his paths straight!». And he, Giovanni, he wore a camel hair dress and a leather belt around his hips; his food was locusts and wild honey. Then Jerusalem, all Judea and the whole area along the Jordan flocked to him and were baptized by him in the Jordan River, confessing their sins. Seeing many Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he told them: "You brood of vipers!! Who made you believe you could escape the impending wrath? Therefore produce a fruit worthy of conversion, and don't think you can say it within yourselves: «We have Abraham as our father!». For I tell you that from these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. The ax is already placed at the roots of the trees; therefore every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. I baptize you in the water for conversion; but he who comes after me is stronger than I, and I am not worthy to carry his sandals; he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. He holds the shovel in his hand and will clean his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the granary, but he will burn the straw with unquenchable fire" (Mt 3,1-12).

In the words of John the Baptist we understand his urgent call for conversion, which distinguishes the season of Advent. The word used is metanoia, which we could literally break down into two concepts, "beyond" (meta) the "mind" (We), to indicate a "change of opinion". Especially Jesus, more than the Baptist, who called for a revision of customs and the correction of injustices, will ask for a conversion of the way of thinking to welcome the kingdom and its newness.

Giovanni al Giordano must have aroused considerable amazement at the time, finding themselves in a rather particular situation and condition, if not anomalous; so long as, we know from the Evangelist Luke (cf.. LC 1,5) who was the son of a priest, nevertheless he lives in the Judean desert. This fact must have impressed the memory of his contemporaries, the fact, that is, that Giovanni had distanced himself from his father's profession. A commentator writes: «The only son of a priest of Jerusalem had in fact the solemn obligation to take over from his father in his function and to guarantee, through marriage and children, the continuity of his priestly lineage. If this was the real historical situation, at a certain point John must have turned his back and must have scandalously - for Jewish eyes - refused his obligation to be a priest in his father's footsteps". A sensational gesture therefore takes place at the beginning of Giovanni's story, that Matthew's Gospel passage presents to us today. He goes near the place from which Elijah ascended to heaven, the fiery prophet of the Old Testament who attempted to bring Israel back to God and whose return would precede the Messiah. Perhaps for this reason John dresses like Elijah (2Re 1,8), but because his diet was based on Jewish rules of purity, locusts being insects that we can feed on (Lv 11,22), and bee honey as well kasher — that is, respectful of the laws of Kasherut, the suitability of a food to be consumed by the Jewish people - it is however possible that the Forerunner also had other concerns. Because impurity prevented one from approaching God, John does not only perform ascetic gestures, but avoid dressing in fabrics touched by women or eating foods elaborated by others, for fear of contamination.

As we wrote at the beginning John did not clearly see the face of the Messiah, yet he consistently lived his wait to the end, in the desert and near the Jordan, where he baptized. Looking at him, Christians experience the time of Advent as an opportunity not to be wasted and to be, Also today, in our desert, returning to ourselves, changing mentality and life, to open ourselves to Him, Jesus the Christ, that is to come.

Furthermore, the words spoken by John are still relevant today, not only because they announce conversion for forgiveness of sins, but also because they invite us to be credible by leading an authentic life. John the Baptist lives in an essential way, simple and without any form of narcissism, he is completely focused on those he doesn't yet know, but who he already recognizes as stronger than him. So from the Baptist we learn not to look so much at ourselves, but to open ourselves to others and to the Other and above all we learn to search, maybe even where we live, a little "desert" of ours where not only our voice resonates, but that of the only Word that saves.

In fact all the readings for the second Sunday of Advent converge in delivering a message centered on the Messiah. He is the one on whom the Spirit of God rests with his gifts (Is 11,1-10); Jesus is that Messiah who, according to the word of Scripture, he fulfilled the promises of God made to the fathers (RM 15,4-9); finally he is the one who will baptize with the Holy Spirit and fire: it is the strongest announced by the Baptist (Mt 3,1-12). It is revealed by the Spirit (first reading), prophesied by the Scriptures (second reading), indicated by a man, Giovanni, the prophet and precursor (Gospel). Therefore this second Sunday of Advent has at its center the biblical message of preparation for the coming of the Lord. This happens with the help of the Spirit to be invoked and to whose dynamism one submits, with the help of Scripture to listen to and meditate on, so that he transforms our hearts so that they are inclined towards conversion. Which is what Giovanni asks for by experiencing it firsthand. While exhorting others by saying: «Prepare the way of the Lord» (Mt 3,3), Giovanni is already preparing it, he makes himself the path that the Lord will follow. He is the forerunner, he who precedes the Messiah with his life anticipating in himself much of what the Messiah will then do.

from the Hermitage, 7 December 2025

.

______________________________

EVERY MAN SHOULD SEEK HIS OWN DESERT

John the Baptist lives in an essential, simple way and without any form of narcissism; he is wholly oriented toward the One whom he does not yet know, but whom he already recognises as stronger than himself. Thus from the Baptist we learn not to look so much at ourselves, but to open ourselves to others and to the Other; and above all we learn to seek — perhaps precisely where we live — our own small “desert”, where not only our own voice resounds, but the voice of the one Word that saves.

.

Not only the Gospels speak to us about John the Baptist, but also historians — for example the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who in his work Jewish Antiquities described him as “a good man, who exhorted the Jews to lead a virtuous life, to practice justice toward one another and piety toward God, inviting them to approach baptism together.” The Baptist imagined the figure of the Messiah as a ruthless judge who would come not to save but to settle accounts, proposing the simplest solution to remedy the spread of sin: the death of the sinner. But Jesus would never exercise His messianic role in such a manner, and even if He would take up some of the Baptist’s words — such as the call to conversion (cf. Mt 4:17: “Repent”) — He would declare that He had come not for the ruin but for the salvation of sinners. This is the Gospel passage of the Second Sunday of Advent:

«In those days John the Baptist appeared, preaching in the desert of Judea and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!” It was of him that the prophet Isaiah had spoken when he said: “A voice of one crying out in the desert, Prepare the way of the Lord, make straight his paths.” John wore clothing made of camel’s hair and a leather belt around his waist. His food was locusts and wild honey. At that time Jerusalem, all Judea, and the whole region around the Jordan were going out to him and were being baptized by him in the Jordan River as they acknowledged their sins. When he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? Produce good fruit as evidence of your repentance. And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you, God can raise up children to Abraham from these stones. Even now the ax lies at the root of the trees. Therefore every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. I am baptizing you with water, for repentance, but the one who is coming after me is mightier than I. I am not worthy to carry his sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. His winnowing fan is in his hand. He will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into his barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.”» (Mt 3:1–12).

In the words of John the Baptist we perceive his urgent appeal to conversion, which characterises the season of Advent. The word used is metanoia, which we could literally break into two concepts: “beyond” (meta) the “mind” (We), indicating a “change of mind” or “change of understanding”. Above all Jesus — more than the Baptist, who invited to a revision of customs and to the correction of injustices — will ask for a conversion of the way of thinking in order to welcome the kingdom and its newness.

John at the Jordan must have aroused considerable astonishment in his own time, finding himself in a situation and condition rather unusual, if not anomalous; for we know from the Evangelist Luke (cf. Page 1:5) that he was the son of a priest, and yet he lives in the desert of Judea. This fact must have impressed the memory of his contemporaries — that John had distanced himself from his father’s profession. A commentator writes: “The only son of a priest of Jerusalem had, in fact, the solemn obligation to take his father’s place in his function and to guarantee, through marriage and children, the continuity of his own priestly lineage. If this was the real historical situation, at a certain point John must have turned his back and — scandalously, to Jewish eyes — refused his obligation to be a priest in his father’s footsteps.”

Thus, a striking gesture stands at the beginning of John’s story, which today’s Gospel passage from Matthew presents to us. He goes near the place from which Elijah had been taken up into heaven, the fiery prophet of the Old Testament who had attempted to bring Israel back to God, and whose return was expected to precede the Messiah. Perhaps for this reason John dresses like Elijah (2 Kgs 1:8), but since his diet was based on Jewish purity rules — locusts being insects permitted for consumption (Lev 11:22), and wild honey likewise kasher, that is, in accordance with the laws of kashrut which determine whether a food is suitable for the Jewish people — it is possible that the Forerunner had other concerns as well. Since impurity prevented a person from approaching God, John not only performs ascetical acts, but avoids wearing fabrics touched by women or eating foods prepared by others, for fear of becoming ritually defiled.

As we wrote at the beginning, John did not clearly see the face of the Messiah, yet he lived his expectation coherently and to the full, in the desert and by the Jordan, where he was baptising. Looking at him, Christians live the season of Advent as an opportunity not to be wasted, and as a call to dwell, even today, in our own desert, returning within ourselves, changing our mindset and our lives, opening ourselves to Him — Jesus the Christ — who is to come.

Moreover, the words spoken by John today are still timely, not only because they proclaim conversion for the forgiveness of sins, but also because they invite us to be credible by leading an authentic life. John the Baptist lives in an essential, simple way and without any form of narcissism; he is wholly oriented toward the One whom he does not yet know, but whom he already recognises as stronger than himself. Thus from the Baptist we learn not to look so much at ourselves, but to open ourselves to others and to the Other; and above all we learn to seek — perhaps precisely where we live — our own small “desert”, where not only our own voice resounds, but the voice of the one Word that saves.

Indeed all the readings of the Second Sunday of Advent converge in delivering a message centred upon the Messiah. He is the one upon whom the Spirit of the Lord rests with His gifts (Is 11:1–10); Jesus is that Messiah who, according to Scripture, has fulfilled the promises of God made to the fathers (Rom 15:4–9); finally, He is the one who will baptise with the Holy Spirit and fire: He is the Mighty One announced by the Baptist (Mt 3:1–12). He is revealed by the Spirit (first reading), prophesied by the Scriptures (second reading), pointed out by a man — John — the prophet and forerunner (Gospel). Therefore this Second Sunday of Advent has at its centre the biblical message of preparation for the coming of the Lord. This takes place with the aid of the Spirit — to be invoked and to whose dynamism we must submit — and with the help of Scripture — to be heard and meditated — so that it may transform our heart and incline it toward conversion. This is what John asks, living it himself in the first person. While he exhorts others saying, “Prepare the way of the Lord” (Mt 3:3), John is already preparing it; he makes of himself the way that the Lord will follow. He is the forerunner, the one who precedes the Messiah with his life, anticipating in himself much of what the Messiah will later accomplish.

From the Hermitage, 7 December 2025

 

.

______________________________

EVERY MAN SHOULD LOOK FOR HIS OWN DESERT

John the Baptist lives in an essential way, simple and without any form of narcissism; is totally oriented towards Him whom he does not yet know, but who he already recognizes as stronger than him. This is how we learn from the Baptist not to look so much at ourselves, but to open ourselves to others and the Other; and above all we learn to look for — perhaps precisely where we live — a small “desert” of our own., where only our voice does not resonate, but the voice of the only Word that saves.

.

Not only the Gospels tell us about John the Baptist; so do historians — for example the Jew Flavius ​​Josephus, who in his work Jewish antiquities He described him as “a good man.”, who exhorted Jews to lead a virtuous life, to practice mutual justice and piety towards God, inviting them to approach baptism together.”. The Baptist imagined the figure of the Messiah as an implacable judge who would come not to save, but to settle accounts, proposing the simplest solution to remedy the spread of sin: the death of the sinner. But Jesus would never exercise his messianic mission in this way.; and although he will take up some words of the Baptist - such as that of conversion (cf. Mt 4,17: «Convert») - will say that he has come not for perdition, but for the salvation of sinners. This is the Gospel passage from the second Sunday of Advent:

«In those days John the Baptist appeared preaching in the desert of Judea: “Become, because the Kingdom of Heaven is near.”. He is the one of whom the prophet Isaiah spoke when he said: “Voice of one crying in the desert: Prepare the way of the Lord, make straight their paths!”. Juan wore a camel hair dress and a leather belt around his waist.; and their food was locusts and wild honey. Then Jerusalem came out to him, all Judea and all the region of the Jordan; and they were baptized by him in the Jordan River, confessing your sins. Seeing that many Pharisees and Sadducees came to his baptism, he told them: “Breed of vipers! Who has taught you to flee from the impending wrath? Dad, well, fruit worthy of conversion; and don't think that you can tell each other: 'We have Abraham as our father'. For I tell you that from these stones God is able to raise children to Abraham.. The ax is already placed at the root of the trees: and every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. I baptize you with water for conversion; but he who comes after me is stronger than me, and I am not worthy to carry his sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. He has the fork in his hand: He will clean his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn.; but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.". (Mt 3,1–12).

In the words of John the Baptist we perceive his urgent call to conversion, that characterizes the season of Advent. The word used is metanoia, which we could literally decompose into two concepts: "beyond" (meta) of the “mind” (We), to indicate a “change of mind” or “change of mentality”. Above all Jesus — more than the Baptist, who invited us to review customs and correct injustices - will ask for a conversion of the way of thinking to welcome the Kingdom and its novelty.

Juan, next to the Jordan, must have aroused great astonishment in its time, finding yourself in a very particular situation and condition, if not abnormal; because we know from the evangelist Luke (cf. LC 1,5) who was the son of a priest, and yet he lives in the Judean desert. This fact must have impressed the memory of his contemporaries.: that Juan had distanced himself from his father's profession. A commentator writes: "The only son of a priest in Jerusalem had, indeed, the solemn obligation to succeed his father in his office and to guarantee, through marriage and children, the continuity of his priestly lineage. If this was the real historical situation, At one point Juan must have turned his back and — scandalously —, for Jewish eyes — rejecting his obligation to be a priest following in his father's footsteps.". a gesture, therefore, clamorous is at the beginning of the story of Juan, that the Gospel passage of Matthew presents to us today. He goes to the place from where Elijah had been taken to heaven., the fiery prophet of the Old Testament who had tried to lead Israel back to God, and whose return would precede the Messiah. Maybe this is why Juan dresses like Elijah. (2 Re 1,8), but since their diet was based on the standards of Jewish purity—locusts being insects permitted for consumption (Lv 11,22), and wild honey likewise kasher, that is to say, in accordance with the laws of the kashrut about the nutritional suitability of the Jewish people — it is possible that the Precursor had other concerns as well. Since impurity prevented us from approaching God, Juan not only performs ascetic gestures, but avoids wearing fabrics touched by women or eating foods prepared by others., for fear of ritual contamination.

As we wrote at the beginning, John did not see the face of the Messiah clearly, and yet he lived coherently and to the bottom his expectation, in the desert and by the Jordan, where he baptized. looking at it, Christians live the season of Advent as an occasion that should not be wasted and as a call to remain, also today, in our own desert, returning to ourselves, changing mentality and life, to open ourselves to Him — Jesus the Christ — who is to come.

Besides, the words spoken today by Juan they are still current, not only because they announce conversion for the forgiveness of sins, but also because they invite us to be credible by leading an authentic life. John the Baptist lives in an essential way, simple and without any form of narcissism; is totally oriented towards Him whom he does not yet know, but who he already recognizes as stronger than him. This is how we learn from the Baptist not to look so much at ourselves, but to open ourselves to others and the Other; Above all, we learn to look for — perhaps precisely where we live — a small “desert” of our own., where only our voice does not resonate, but the voice of the only Word that saves.

Indeed, All the readings of the second Sunday of Advent converge to transmit a message centered on the Messiah. He is the one on whom the Spirit of the Lord rests with his gifts (Is 11,1-10); Jesus is that Messiah who, according to the scripture, has fulfilled the promises made by God to the parents (RM 15,4-9); Finally, is the one who will baptize with the Holy Spirit and fire: is the strongest announced by the Baptist (Mt 3,1-12). It is revealed by the Spirit (first reading), prophesied by the scriptures (second reading), pointed out by a man — John — the prophet and forerunner (Gospel). That is why this second Sunday of Advent has at its center the biblical message of preparation for the coming of the Lord.. This is done with the help of the Spirit — who we must invoke and whose dynamism we must welcome — and with the help of Scripture — which we must listen to and meditate on — so that it transforms our hearts and inclines our lives toward conversion.. That's what Juan asks, living it himself in first person. While exhorting others saying: "Prepare the way of the Lord" (Mt 3,3), Juan is already preparing it; makes himself the path that the Lord will follow. He is the forerunner, the one who precedes the Messiah with his life, anticipating in itself much of what the Messiah will later do.

From the wasteland, 7 December 2025

 

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Our Lord Jesus Christ King of the Universe – Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of the Universe – Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of the Universe

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

Italian, english, español

 

OUR LORD JESUS ​​CHRIST KING OF THE UNIVERSE

The title of king referring to Christ emerges with strength and frequency precisely in the Gospels of the Passion. It will be the Johannine Gospel that will make this theological theme one of the decisive arguments for understanding in depth the meaning of Jesus' saving death on the cross and its universal value.

.


 

.

Pope Pius XI, on December 11th 1925, with the encyclical What a first established the feast of Christ the King. One of the purposes set by the institution of the solemnity was to counteract secularism, defined by that pontiff: «plague of our age». He saw the exclusion of God from society as the main cause of the evils that afflicted the world of the time:

«And so that the fruits are more abundant and last more stably in human society, it is necessary that knowledge of the royal dignity of our Lord be disseminated as much as possible. To this end, it seems to us that nothing else can be more beneficial than the institution of a particular feast dedicated to Christ the King.".

However, as almost always happens in the Church, also this pronouncement of the pontifical magisterium, for the topics covered, it favored both the exegetical study of Scripture on those themes, as well as the consequent theological reflection. Thus new horizons have opened up, and useful and in-depth reflections were offered to the faithful on Christian testimony and spirituality. But here is the evangelical passage of the Solemnity:

From the Gospel according to Luke - «In that time, [after they had crucified Jesus,] the people were watching; the leaders instead mocked Jesus saying: “He saved others! Save yourself, if he is the Christ of God, the chosen one". Even the soldiers laughed at him, they approached him to hand him some vinegar and said: “If you are the king of the Jews, save yourself". Above him there was also a writing: “This is the king of the Jews”. One of the criminals hanging on the cross insulted him: “You are not the Christ? Save yourself and us!”. The other instead rebuked him saying: “You have no fear of God, you who are condemned to the same punishment? We, rightly, because we receive what we deserved for our actions; but he didn't do anything wrong.". And said: "Jesus, remember me when you enter your kingdom". She answered him: “Truly I tell you: today with me you will be in paradise" (LC 23,35-43).

For this year's Solemnity a passage taken from the passion of the Lord is proposed in the liturgical proclamation, According to Luca, which we had previously already encountered during Holy Week. In fact, the compilers of the Lectionary could have also drawn on other texts to highlight the idea of ​​the kingship of Christ. For instance, that of Jesus' entry into Jerusalem, where is that, According to Luca, He is proclaimed king:

«Blessed is he who comes, the king in the name of the Lord. Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!» (LC 19,38).

But it is equally true that the title of king referring to Christ emerges with strength and frequency precisely in the Gospels of the Passion. It will be the Johannine Gospel that will make this theological theme one of the decisive arguments for understanding in depth the meaning of Jesus' saving death on the cross and its universal value.

Who, in the Lucanian narrative of the passion, we are inside the section that describes the culminating phase of Jesus' execution, or his crucifixion, which includes vv. 32-49, a portion, so, broader than that proposed by the Liturgy of the Word. The lectionary focuses on two frameworks: a) The derision of religious leaders and soldiers; b) The dialogue of the two thieves, where again appears a derision and Jesus' response to one of the two that only Luke reports among the evangelists. Not only, Saint Luke is also the only one to record and offer readers the extraordinary words of Jesus on forgiveness:

"Dad, forgive them, for they know not what they do " (LC 23,34).

They are absent in some prestigious manuscript manuscripts, like «B», The Vatican, perhaps eliminated by the copyists due to anti-Jewish controversy or to underline that the subsequent fall of Jerusalem will be the work of divine punishment, according to the words of the Lord:

«Daughters of Jerusalem, don't cry over me, but weep for yourselves and for your children […] Because, if this is how you treat green wood, which will happen to dry wood?» (LC 23,28).

For those who don't know, in the Bible it sometimes happens that the most beautiful expressions are also those with the greatest problems from the point of view of the witnesses of the text who pass them down, so much so as to become a "cross" for textual critics, the scholars, that is, who dedicate their time and knowledge to offer us that text closest to the original, which is then reported in the critical editions which are the basis of the translations of the Holy Scripture into modern languages. Returning to the dialogue between Jesus and the thief, it was said that it is not found in the oldest text of the gospels, Marco's, nor in the two other lessons, that of Matthew and Saint John. On the contrary, in Mark it is clearly said that both those who were crucified with Jesus insulted him:

«And even those who were crucified with him reviled him» (MC 15,32).

The historical question also intrigued the Church Fathers, including Origen, Saint John Chrysostom, San Girolamo. They provided a simplified solution by imagining that both criminals initially attacked Jesus, as Marco reports; but then one of the two understood and then changed his opinion, while the other one continued to insult. The other solution instead, maybe more logical, is to believe that Luke drew the news from a different source and therefore consciously distances himself from Mark, knowing of the change of one of the two thieves.

But who are Luke's "thieves".? This evangelist does not use, like the other gospels, the term thief, but rather that of a malefactor, literally "who has caused damage through fraud or deception". In Mark and Matthew they are instead two bandits, weighted in Greek, a term that was also used to indicate rebels, as is the case with Barabbas, in the gospel of John. But as one commentator writes: «On every page of his story, Luke avoids any possible confusion between the Christian movement and the rebels who rose up against Rome" (François Bovon). An 8th century Latin manuscript. he also gives us the names of the two criminals: Joathas e Maggatras, while in the apocryphal Acts of Pilate we find different names: Weaning and Gestations. In short, at the end we notice that Jesus finds himself between two evildoers; rather, in v. 32 Luke writes that "two other criminals were also led to the gallows", making it clear that Jesus was assimilated to criminals.

The dialogue, in is beautiful and moving, it starts from the criminal who turns to the other crucified, rebuking him and admitting his sin. He makes a real act of repentance and by claiming to have made a mistake he demonstrates his conversion. Then he turns to the Lord, repeatedly. CEI translates «e disse», while in the Greek text we have an imperfect, as if to indicate an action repeated in the past: «And he said», maybe several times. Calling the Lord by his proper name, "Jesus", the crucified criminal turns out to be the only one in the gospels who addresses Him in such a direct way. It's a sign of confidence, perhaps because on the cross, while dying, there are no more formalities. The criminal continues: "Remember me", asking what the person praying asks of God in the Psalms, but we can also remember Samson dying in the book of Judges:

«Then Samson called upon the Lord, saying: “Lord God, remember me! Give me strength just this once again, oh God" (Gdc 16,28).

In the end, here is the reference to the Kingdom, the evildoer says: «in your Kingdom»; demonstrating that he understands which kingdom it is, of that of Jesus and not of any one of this world.

Jesus' response shows the typical Lucanian trait, thanks to the adverb «today», which occurs many times in the third gospel. He says that salvation is now, from now and it won't be until later. Jesus then expresses an extraordinary relationship if we think about who his interlocutor was, using the companion complement: "with me"; and finally he speaks of a "paradise", a term of Persian origin, which means garden and which recalls the book of Genesis. In fact, in an ancient Syriac translation we read that Jesus promised the criminal to stay with him "in the garden of Eden".

We have mentioned the importance of the theme of Jesus' kingship in the fourth Gospel, that of San Giovanni. But what is Luca telling us on this topic? We must consider that while telling a story, the evangelist Luke does not offer us a chronicle of what happened: «it does not describe the procedure of fixing the condemned man on the cross, rather it illustrates the theological and soteriological significance of what happened", which has to do with God and salvation. In fact, it is in the extreme moment of weakness that the kingdom and kingship Jesus has chosen is most evident. God carries out his will precisely in the moment of greatest weakness of his Son. It is with his death that the true liberation that Jesus spoke about and for which he came occurs, as Luca says in Blessed:

«To give to his people the knowledge of salvation in the remission of their sins» (LC 1,77).

The prophecy about the life of Jesus also comes true on the cross, engraved in the very name it bears; Jesus means "God saves", as the angel explains well to Joseph in Mt 1,21: «Ella (the Virgin) she will give birth to a son and you will call him Jesus: in fact he will save his people from their sins" This word is realized above all by the cross, on which the same name is engraved, accompanied by his royal title. Even from there, even from the cross of the Son, God is capable of saving. On the contrary, it is Jesus himself who, with the little breath he has left in that circumstance, announces salvation to one of the many sinners he encountered during the time of his ministry: "Today you will be with me in Heaven" (LC 23,43).

What salvation is Jesus capable of?? Naturally of a global salvation, which embraces the entire life of the criminal crucified with him, liberation from his sins, but also the promise to let him enter his kingdom. To do this, Jesus also expresses power, but not as the powerful people of the world exercise it, because it is disinterested as only the grace that entirely saves man can be, because its horizon is the ultimate good. Today's celebration thus helps us to put things back in the right order and to have a typically Christian vision of life and history. Even if everything around us is shaking, Governments and powerful people change and what happens sometimes scares us, Christians know that it is they who hold the reins of history, mysteriously, the Providence of God. On the contrary, precisely in moments when reality seems to deny the presence of God, as Pius XI underlined in the Encyclical mentioned above, Christians have a model that explains how things work: through the kingship exercised by Jesus Christ in the folds of history.

From the Hermitage, 22 November 2025

.

______________________________

OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, KING OF THE UNIVERSE

The title of King, applied to Christ, emerges with peculiar force and frequency precisely in the Passion narratives. The Johannine Gospel will make this theological theme one of the decisive keys for understanding in depth the meaning of Jesus’ salvific death upon the Cross and its universal significance.

.

Pope Pius XI, on 11 December 1925, instituted the feast of Christ the King with the encyclical What a first. One of the purposes he intended in establishing this solemnity was to counteract secularism, which that pontiff described as “the plague of our age”. He perceived in the exclusion of God from society the principal cause of the ills that afflicted the world of his time:

“And that the fruits [of the Jubilee] may be more abundant, and may last the more securely in human society, it is necessary that the knowledge of the regal dignity of our Lord should be spread as widely as possible. To this end it seems to Us that nothing would be more efficacious than the institution of a special feast in honour of Christ the King”.

Yet, as so often happens within the Church, even this pronouncement of the pontifical Magisterium — given the themes it touches — fostered both a deeper exegetical study of Scripture on these subjects and the consequent theological reflection. Thus new horizons opened, and useful and penetrating insights were offered to the faithful for Christian witness and for the spiritual life. And here is the Gospel passage of the Solemnity:

From the Holy Gospel according to Luke — “At that time, [after they had crucified Jesus,] the people stood by watching; but the leaders scoffed at him, saying, ‘He saved others; let him save himself if he is the Christ of God, his chosen one.’ The soldiers also mocked him, coming up to offer him sour wine and saying, ‘If you are the King of the Jews, save yourself.’There was also an inscription over him: ‘This is the King of the Jews.’ One of the criminals who were hanging there reviled him, saying, ‘Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!’ But the other rebuked him, saying, ‘Have you no fear of God, you who are subject to the same condemnation? And we indeed justly, for we are receiving what our deeds deserve; but this man has done nothing wrong.’ And he said, ‘Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.’ He replied, ‘Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise’” (Page 23:35-43).

For this year’s Solemnity, the liturgical proclamation presents a passage taken from the Lord’s Passion according to Luke, a text we had already encountered during Holy Week. Indeed, the compilers of the Lectionary might have drawn upon other passages to highlight the theme of Christ’s kingship. For example, the account of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem, where, according to Luke, He is acclaimed as King:

“Blessed is he who comes, the King, in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven and glory in the highest heavens!” (Page 19:38).

Yet it is equally true that the title of King, applied to Christ, emerges with peculiar force and frequency precisely in the Passion narratives. The Johannine Gospel will make this theological theme one of the decisive keys for understanding in depth the meaning of Jesus’ salvific death upon the Cross and its universal significance.

Here, in Luke’s Passion narrative, we find ourselves within the section that describes the culminating moment of Jesus’ execution — namely, His crucifixion — which spans verses 32–49, a portion therefore broader than that offered by the Liturgy of the Word. The lectionary focuses on two scenes: a) the mockery of the religious leaders and of the soldiers; b) the dialogue between the two criminals, in which mockery appears once more, together with the reply of Jesus to one of them — a detail recorded only by Luke among the evangelists. Not only so: Saint Luke is also the only one to preserve and offer to readers the extraordinary words of Jesus on forgiveness:

“Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing” (Page 23:34).

These words are absent from certain prestigious manuscript witnesses, such as Codex Vaticanus (“B”), perhaps removed by scribes either out of anti-Jewish polemic or in order to underscore that the subsequent fall of Jerusalem would be an act of divine punishment, according to the Lord’s own words:

“Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for me; weep rather for yourselves and for your children… For if this is what is done to the green wood, what will happen to the dry?” (Page 23:28).

For those unfamiliar with the matter, it often happens in the Bible that the most beautiful expressions are precisely those that pose the greatest problems from the point of view of the textual witnesses that transmit them — to the point of becoming a cross for textual critics, that is, for those scholars who devote their time and expertise to offering us the text closest to the original, upon which the critical editions used for modern translations of Holy Scripture are based. Returning to the dialogue between Jesus and the criminal, it was noted that this episode is absent both from the oldest Gospel text — that of Mark — and from the other two traditions, those of Matthew and John. Indeed, Mark states explicitly that both of the men crucified with Jesus reviled him:

“And those who were crucified with him also reviled him” (Mk 15:32).

This historical problem intrigued the Fathers of the Church — among them Origen, Saint John Chrysostom, and Saint Jerome. They proposed a simplified solution: that at the beginning both criminals attacked Jesus, as Mark reports; but that one of the two, at a certain point, understood, and then changed his attitude, while the other continued to insult Him. The other solution, perhaps more plausible, is that Luke drew this account from a different source, and therefore deliberately diverges from Mark, being aware of the change in the disposition of one of the criminals.

But who, then, are the “thieves” of Luke? This evangelist does not employ, as the other Gospels do, the term thief, but rather malefactor — literally, “one who has caused harm through fraud or deceit.” In Mark and Matthew, instead, we find two bandits freight in Greek — a term also used to indicate insurgents, as in the case of Barabbas in the Gospel of John. But, as one commentator notes, “On every page of his narrative, Luke avoids any possible confusion between the Christian movement and the rebels who rose up against Rome” (François Bovon).

A Latin manuscript of the eighth century even supplies us with the names of the two malefactors: Joathas and Maggatras; while in the apocryphal Acts of Pilate we encounter the names Desmas and Gestas. In the end, however, wha t matters is that Jesus finds Himself between two malefactors; indeed, in verse 32 Luke writes that “two others also, who were criminals, were led away to be put to death with him,” thus making it clear that Jesus was classified among offenders.

The dialogue — beautiful and deeply moving in itself — begins with the malefactor who turns toward the other crucified man, reproaching him and acknowledging his own sin. He makes a true act of repentance and shows his conversion precisely by admitting his wrongdoing. Then he turns repeatedly to the Lord. The Italian Bible renders it “and he said,” but in the Greek text the verb is in the imperfect: “he was saying,” suggesting a repeated or continuous action in the past — perhaps he said it several times. Addressing the Lord by His proper name, “Jesus,” the crucified malefactor proves to be the only one in all the Gospels who speaks to Him in so direct a manner. It is a sign of familiarity — perhaps because, upon the cross, at the threshold of death, all formalities fall away. The malefactor continues: “Remember me,” echoing what the supplicant so often asks of God in the Psalms; and we may also recall Samson, dying in the Book of Judges:

“Then Samson called to the Lord and said, ‘Lord God, remember me! Strengthen me once more, just this once, O God'” (Jgs 16:28).

Finally comes the reference to the Kingdom: the malefactor says, “when you come into your kingdom,” showing that he understands what Kingdom this is — the Kingdom of Jesus, not one of the kingdoms of this world.

The response of Jesus bears the distinctive mark of Luke, especially through the adverb “today,” which recurs so frequently in the third Gospel. He declares that salvation is from now, from this very moment, and not merely something that awaits beyond death. Jesus then expresses a relationship of extraordinary intimacy — all the more astonishing when we consider who His interlocutor is — by using the expression “with me”; and He concludes by speaking of “paradise,” a word of Persian origin meaning “garden,” recalling the Book of Genesis. Indeed, in an ancient Syriac translation we read that Jesus promises the malefactor that he will be with Him “in the garden of Eden.”

We have already touched upon the importance of the theme of the kingship of Jesus in the fourth Gospel, that of Saint John. But what, then, is Luke telling us on this matter? It must be borne in mind that, although narrating an event, the evangelist Luke does not offer us a chronicle of what happened: he “does not describe the procedure by which the condemned man was fixed to the cross; rather, he illustrates the theological and soteriological significance of what took place” — that which pertains to God and to salvation. Indeed, it is at the very moment of extremest weakness that the nature of the kingdom and kingship chosen by Jesus is displayed most clearly. God accomplishes His will precisely at the moment of the greatest weakness of His Son. It is through His death that the true liberation takes place — the liberation of which Jesus had spoken and for which He had come, as Luke states in the Blessed:

“to give his people knowledge of salvation through the forgiveness of their sins” (Page 1:77).

Upon the cross, moreover, the prophecy concerning the life of Jesus — inscribed within His very name — is fulfilled. Jesus means “God saves,” as the angel explains to Joseph in Mt 1:21: “She (the Virgin) will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” This word is fulfilled above all upon the cross, where the same name appears, accompanied by His royal title. Even there — even from the cross of the Son — God is able to save. Indeed, it is Jesus Himself who, with the little breath remaining to Him in that circumstance, announces salvation to one of the many sinners He encountered during His earthly ministry:

“Today you will be with me in paradise” (Page 23:43).

Of what salvation is Jesus capable? A salvation that is truly complete — one that embraces the whole life of the malefactor crucified beside Him: the forgiveness of his sins, yet also the promise that he will enter His kingdom. To effect this, Jesus too exercises a power, though not as the rulers of this world exercise power. His is a power entirely free of self-interest, as only grace can be — grace that saves the human person in his entirety, for its horizon is the ultimate good.

The feast we celebrate today helps us to set things once more in their proper order and to recover a vision of life and of history that is distinctively Christian. Even if all around us is in turmoil — governments change, powers rise and fall, and events at times frighten us — Christians know that it is, mysteriously, the Providence of God that holds the reins of history. Indeed, precisely in those moments when reality seems to deny the presence of God — as Pius XI emphasised in the encyclical mentioned above — Christians have a model that reveals how things truly work: the kingship exercised by Jesus Christ in the hidden folds of history.

From the Hermitage, 22 November 2025

.

______________________________

OUR LORD JESUS ​​CHRIST, KING OF THE UNIVERSE

The title of king applied to Christ appears with force and frequency precisely in the gospels of the Passion. It will be the Gospel of Saint John that will make this theological topic one of the decisive points to understand in depth the meaning of the saving death of Jesus on the cross and its universal value..

.

Pope Pius XI, he 11 December 1925, with the encyclical What a first, instituted the feast of Christ the King. One of the intended purposes when establishing this solemnity was to counteract secularism., defined by that pontiff as "the plague of our time". He saw the exclusion of God from society as the main cause of the evils that afflicted the world at that time.:

«And so that the fruits may be more abundant and remain more firmly in human society, It is necessary that knowledge of the royal dignity of our Lord be disseminated as much as possible.. To this end, it seems to us that nothing else can be of greater benefit than the institution of a particular and proper festival of Christ the King..

However, as almost always happens in the Church, This pronouncement of the pontifical magisterium—due to the topics it addresses—has favored both the exegetical development of Sacred Scripture on such issues and the subsequent theological reflection.. Thus new horizons have been opened, and useful and profound reflections for Christian witness and spiritual life have been offered to the faithful.. And here is the evangelical passage of the Solemnity:

From the holy Gospel according to Saint Luke — «At that time, [after they had crucified Jesus,] the people stood there watching; the bosses, for his part, They mocked Jesus saying: “He has saved others; let him save himself, if he is the Messiah of God, the Chosen One”. The soldiers also made fun of him, They came up to offer him vinegar and said: “If you are the king of the Jews, save yourself!”. Above it was an inscription: “This is the king of the Jews”. One of the crucified criminals insulted him: “Aren't you the Messiah? Save yourself and us!”. But the other rebuked him saying: “Do you not fear God?”, you who are under the same sentence? Us, justly, because we received what our actions deserved; he, instead, "He hasn't done anything wrong.". And he added: "Jesus, “Remember me when you come to your Kingdom.”. Jesus replied: “Truly I tell you: Today you will be with me in paradise." (LC 23,35-43).

For this year's Solemnity a passage taken from the Passion of the Lord according to Saint Luke is proposed in the liturgical proclamation, which we had already found previously during Holy Week. Indeed, The editors of the Lectionary could also have turned to other texts to highlight the idea of ​​the kingship of Christ. For example, the story of Jesus' entry into Jerusalem, where, according to Luke, is proclaimed king:

«Blessed is he who comes, the king, in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven and glory in the highest heaven." (LC 19,38).

But it is equally true that the title of king applied to Christ appears with force and frequency precisely in the Gospels of the Passion. It will be the Gospel of Saint John that will make this theological topic one of the decisive points to understand in depth the meaning of the saving death of Jesus on the cross and its universal value..

Here, in the Lucan story of the Passion, we find ourselves within the section that describes the culminating phase of Jesus' execution, that is to say, his crucifixion, that includes the verses 32-49, a passage, therefore, broader than that proposed by the Liturgy of the Word. The Lectionary focuses on two tables: a) The mockery of religious leaders and soldiers; b) The dialogue of the two evildoers, where a mockery appears again and Jesus' response to one of them, that only Luke collects among the evangelists.

In addition, san Lucas is the only one that records and offers readers Jesus' extraordinary words about forgiveness:

"Dad, forgive them, because they don't know what they're doing." (LC 23,34).

These words are absent in some prestigious manuscript codices, like “B”, he The Vatican, perhaps suppressed by copyists because of the anti-Jewish controversy, or to emphasize that the subsequent fall of Jerusalem would be the work of divine punishment, according to the words of the Lord:

«Daughters of Jerusalem, don't cry for me; cry rather for yourselves and for your children […] Because if that's how they treat the green log, what will happen to the dry?» (LC 23,28).

For those who don't know, In the Bible it sometimes happens that the most beautiful expressions are also those that present the greatest problems from the point of view of the witnesses of the text who transmit them., until it became a “cross” for textual critics, that is to say, the scholars who dedicate their time and knowledge to offering us the text closest to the original, which is then reproduced in the critical editions that serve as the basis for translations of the Holy Scripture into modern languages.

Returning to the dialogue between Jesus and the evildoer, We said that it is not found even in the oldest text of the gospels, Mark's, nor in the other two stories, those of Matthew and Saint John. It's more, In Mark it is clearly stated that the two who had been crucified with Jesus insulted him:

"Those who had been crucified with him also insulted him" (MC 15,32).

The historical question also intrigued the Fathers of the Church, among them Origins, Saint John Chrysostom and Saint Jerome. They offered a simplified solution by imagining that at the beginning both criminals attacked Jesus, as Marcos actually refers; but then one of the two understood and then changed his mind, while the other continued insulting him.

The other solution, maybe more logical, consists of assuming that Luke obtained this information from a different source and that therefore he consciously distances himself from Mark, knowing of the change of attitude of one of the two criminals.

But who are Lucas' “thieves”?? This evangelist does not use, like the other gospels, the term “thief”, but rather that of malefactor, literally “one who has caused harm through fraud or deception”. In Mark and Matthew, however, there are two bandits (weighted in Greek), term that was also used to designate rebels, as is the case of Barabbas in the gospel of John. But, as one commentator writes:

«On each page of his story, Luke avoids any possible confusion between the Christian movement and the rebels against Rome. (François Bovon).

A Latin manuscript from the 8th century He even provides us with the names of the two criminals.: Joathas and Draw back, while in the apocrypha Acts of Pilate we find other names: Desmas and A gesture.

Ultimately, We see that Jesus is between two evildoers; it's more, in the v. 32, Luke writes that “two other evildoers were also led to the torture.”, clearly implying that Jesus was assimilated to criminals.

The dialogue, in itself beautiful and moving, begins with the evildoer who addresses the other crucified, rebuking him and admitting his own sin. Perform a true act of repentance and, by stating that he has done wrong, expresses his conversion.

Then he turns to the Lord, repeatedly. The EEC edition translates "and said", while in the Greek text an imperfect appears, as indicating a repeated action in the past: "And he said", maybe several times.

By calling the Lord by his proper name, "Jesus", This crucified evildoer turns out to be the only one in the gospels who addresses Him so directly. It is a sign of trust, maybe because on the cross, when you die, there is no longer any room for formalities.

The evildoer continues: "Remember me", asking what the prayer asks of God in the Psalms; but we can also remember Samson dying in the book of Judges:

"Then Samson called upon the Lord, saying: “Lord God, remember me! Grant me strength just this once, oh God” (Joe 16,28).

Finally comes the reference to the Kingdom: the evildoer says "in your Kingdom", demonstrating an understanding of what Kingdom it is – that of Jesus – and not just any one of this world.

Jesus' response shows the typical Lucan trait thanks to the adverb "today", that appears so many times in the third gospel. He affirms that salvation is from now on, from this very moment, and not only after.

Jesus also expresses an extraordinary relationship if we think who his interlocutor was, using the company plugin: "with me"; and finally he speaks of a "paradise", term of Persian origin that means garden and that evokes the book of Genesis.

In fact, In an ancient Syriac translation we read that Jesus promised the evildoer that he would be with Him "in the Garden of Eden.".

We had mentioned the importance of the topic of the kingship of Jesus in the fourth Gospel, that of Saint John. But what does Luke tell us about it?? It is necessary to consider that, still telling a story, the evangelist Luke does not offer us a chronicle of what happened: "does not describe the procedure of fixing the condemned on the cross, but rather it illustrates the theological and soteriological scope of what happened.", that is to say, that which has to do with God and salvation.

Indeed, It is in the extreme moment of weakness where it is best manifested what Kingdom and what royalty Jesus has chosen. God fulfills his will precisely at the moment of his Son's greatest weakness.. It is with his death that the true liberation of which Jesus has spoken and for which he has come is realized., As Luke says in Blessed:

"To give to his people the knowledge of salvation through the remission of their sins" (LC 1,77).

The prophecy about the life of Jesus is also fulfilled on the cross, registered in the same name that bears; Jesus means "God saves", as the angel clearly explains to Joseph on Mt 1,21:

«Ella (the Virgin) she will give birth to a son and you will name him Jesus, because He will save his people from their sins".

this word It is done above all from the cross, where the same name is inscribed, accompanied by his royal title. Even from there, from the cross of the Son, God is able to save. Even more: It is Jesus himself who, with the little breath that he has left in such circumstances, announces salvation to one of the many sinners he has encountered throughout his ministry:

«Today you will be with me in paradise» (LC 23,43).

What salvation is Jesus capable of?? Of course a global salvation, that encompasses the entire life of the evildoer crucified with Him: the deliverance from his sins and also the promise of making him enter his Kingdom. To do this, Jesus manifests a power, but not as the powerful of this world exercise it, because it is selfless as only the grace that saves the human being in its entirety can be., since its horizon is the ultimate good.

Today's party It thus helps us to put things in their right order and to have a truly Christian vision of life and history.. Although everything around us shakes, change governments and the powerful, and what happens sometimes scares us, Christians know that whoever holds the reins of history is, mysteriously, the Providence of God.

It's more: precisely in moments when reality seems to deny the presence of God - as Pius XI emphasized in the aforementioned encyclical -, Christians have a model that explains how things work: through the kingship exercised by Jesus Christ in the folds of history.

From the Hermitage, 22 November 2025

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Make way for us Pharisees, perfect champions of purity, to pass – Stand aside, for we pharisees, champions of purity, are coming through – get away, what happened, the pharisees, perfect champions of purity!

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

Italian, english, español

 

MAKE WAY FOR US TO PASS PHARISEES PERFECT CHAMPIONS OF PURITY

"Hate, I thank you because I am not like other men, thieves, unrighteous, adultery, nor even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and pay tithes of everything I own.".

.

PDF print format article – PDF article print format – PDF article in printed format

 

.

Like last Sunday's Gospel, this one from the XXX Sunday of Ordinary Time also contains a teaching on prayer. It is entrusted to the parable of the Pharisee and the publican in the temple, a text present only in the third gospel.

If Luca had specified the purpose for which Jesus had told the parable of the insistent widow and the unjust judge, or the need for persevering prayer (LC 18,1); this instead is narrated with specific recipients in mind: «He also spoke this parable for some who had the inner presumption of being righteous and despised others» (LC 18,9). In light of LC 16,15 where Jesus qualifies the Pharisees as those who "consider themselves righteous before men", one might think that the target of the story is precisely them alone, but the attitude targeted in the parable is a religious distortion that occurs everywhere and also affects Christian communities, and it is certainly these recipients that Luke is thinking of when writing his gospel. It is important to clarify this to avoid caricatural readings of the Pharisees, which unfortunately have not been lacking in Christianity precisely starting from the reading of this parable. And here is the evangelical text:

«Two men went up to the temple to pray: one was a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee, while standing, he prayed like this to himself: "Hate, I thank you because I am not like other men, thieves, unrighteous, adultery, nor even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and pay tithes of everything I own.". The publican instead, stopped at a distance, he didn't even dare roll his eyes, but he beat his chest saying: "Hate, be merciful to me a sinner! '. I tell you: these, unlike the other, He went down to his house justified, For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, those who humble themselves will be exalted " (LC 18,9-14).

The piece can easily be divided into three parts: An introduction, of a verse; a parable of four verses (vv. 10-13); and the conclusion, of Jesus: «I tell you». The protagonists of the parable are two men, who ascend to the holiest place in Israel, the temple. The verb ascend not only says that the temple was located high up, its a mountain, but also that to go to Jerusalem one ascends, almost as if to indicate the way, also physical, how to get closer to God. In this regard we can recall the "Psalms of the Ascensions", starting from Ps 120, but also, in the Gospel, the good Samaritan who worried about the man who fell into the hands of bandits while "going down from Jerusalem to Jericho" (LC 10,30). St. Luke here describes two opposing polarities in first-century Judaism, thus showing that the characters are not chosen at random. The Pharisees were the most pious and devout people, while tax collectors were often considered thieves, a category of professionals in the pay of Rome, as Zacchaeus of Jericho could have been (LC 19,1). It also emerges that prayer at the temple could be private, while the public one was held in the morning and in the evening, and was regulated by the Templar liturgy.

So we have two men who go to the temple to pray. Their movement is identical, their purpose is the same and the place to which they go is the same, yet a great distance separates them. They are close and at the same time far away, so much so that their co-presence in the place of prayer still raises the question today, to Christians, of what it means to pray together, side by side, next to each other in the same place. It is in fact possible to pray alongside and be separated from the comparison, from comparison and even contempt: "I'm not like this tax collector" (v. 11). The differences between the two characters are also relevant for the gestures and postures of their bodies and in their positioning in the sacred space. The publican remains at the back, «stops at a distance» (v. 13), he does not dare advance, it is inhabited by the fear of those who are not used to the liturgical place, he bows his head to the ground and beats his chest saying very few words. The Pharisee, instead, expresses his confidence, his being a accustomed of the sacred place and pray while standing with your forehead high, pronouncing many refined words in his articulated thanks. This self-awareness has nothing to do with the right self-esteem, ma, marrying with contempt for others, turns out to be ostentatious arrogance, from someone who is perhaps not so sure of himself, so much so that it does not harbor any doubt in itself. And the presence of others serves to corroborate his consciousness of superiority. The verb used by Luke, exoutheneine, translated as «despise», literally means "to retain nothing", and it will be Herod's attitude towards Jesus in the story of the passion (LC 23,11). The Pharisee's confidence in condemning others is necessary to sustain the confidence of his own being better and right.

In the words of the Pharisee it also emerges what image of God he has. He prays "within himself", that is, "turned to himself" (cf.. automatic process Of LC 18,11) and his prayer seems dominated by the ego. Formally he gives thanks, but in truth he thanks God not for what he has done for him, but rather for what he does for God. The sense of thanksgiving is thus distorted since his ego replaces God and his prayer ends up being a list of pious services and a satisfaction with his not being "like other men" (v. 11). The lofty image of himself clouds that of God so much that it prevents him from seeing as a brother the one who prays in the same place and feels so at ease that God only has to confirm what he is and does.: It does not require conversion or change. Thus Jesus reveals that God's gaze does not welcome his prayer: «the publican returned to his house justified, unlike the other" (v. 14). Revealing to the reader the quiet prayer of the two characters in the parable, Luke makes an incursion into their interiority and into the soul of those who pray, showing that background of prayer that can be one with it, or conflict with it. It opens like this, in this song, a glimpse of light on the heart and depths of those who pray, on the thoughts that inhabit him while he is collected in prayer. This is a bold but important operation, because behind the words that are pronounced in liturgical or personal prayer there are often images, thoughts, feelings that can also be in sensational contradiction with the words that are spoken and with the meaning of the gestures that are made.

It is the relationship between prayer and authenticity. The Pharisee's prayer is sincere, but not truthful. It is that of the publican, while that of the Pharisee remains only sincere, as it expresses what this man believes and feels, however, bringing to light the pathology hidden in his words. They, that is, truly believing what he says, at the same time he shows that what moves him to prayer is the intimate conviction that what he does is enough to justify him. Therefore his conviction is granitic and unshakable. His personal sincerity is consistent with the image of God that moves him.

Let us underline the verse again 13, that is, the posture and prayer of the publican which contrasts with that of the Pharisee. He stays behind, perhaps in the most remote space compared to the temple building, he doesn't roll his eyes, but he recognizes himself as a sinner by beating his chest, the way David said: "I have sinned against the Lord" (2Sam 12,13); like the "prodigal son" he says: «I have sinned against heaven and against you» (LC 15,21). The publican's prayer is not centered on himself, but he asks for only one thing - mercy - with the expression: «Have mercy», inexorably, what does it mean: propitiate, make benevolent, atone for sins. The publican makes no comparison, he considers himself the only sinner, a real sinner. In the end, al v.14, we encounter Jesus' comment, which highlights who is justified and who is not. The answer begins with the expression: «I tell you» (lego smile), as if to signal a significant conclusion, a request for solemn attention. Then Jesus says that of the two who had gone up to the temple, only the publican came away justified. The verb used by Jesus means to descend home (the CEI: "went home"). The sinner's prayer is accepted by God, that of the Pharisee, however, was not because he had nothing to ask. God, on the other hand, always welcomes requests for forgiveness when they are authentic and this parable therefore turns out to be a further teaching on prayer, like the one just above, of the judge and the widow.

The Christian reader through this parable understands that the authenticity of prayer passes through the good quality of relationships with others who pray with me and who with me form the body of Christ. And in the Christian space, in which Jesus Christ is "the image of the invisible God" (With the 1,15), prayer is a process of continuous purification of the images of God starting from the image revealed in Christ and him crucified (cf.. 1Color 2,2), image that contests all the counterfeit images of God. We can say that the Pharisee's attitude is emblematic of a religious type that replaces the relationship with the Lord with quantifiable performances, he fasts twice a week and pays tithes of everything he buys, also performing supererogatory works. To the relationship with the Lord under the sign of the Spirit and the gratuitousness of love, it replaces a form of seeking sanctification through control, which requires detachment from others. The prayer, instead, suggests Luca, requires humility. And humility is adherence to reality, to the poverty and smallness of the human condition, all’humus of which we are made. It is courageous self-knowledge in the face of the God who manifested himself in the humility and abasement of the Son. Where there is humility, there is openness to grace and there is charity and mercy is found.

From the Hermitage, 26 October 2025

.

______________________________

STAND ASIDE, FOR WE PHARISEES, CHAMPIONS OF PURITY, ARE COMING THROUGH

“Oh God, I thank Thee that I am not like other men — thieves, unjust, adulterers — nor even like this publican. I fast twice a week, and I pay tithes on all I possess».

.

As in last Sunday’s Gospel, so too in that of this Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time we find a teaching on prayer. It is conveyed through the parable of the Pharisee and the publican in the temple — a text found only in the third Gospel. If Saint Luke had specified the purpose for which Jesus told the parable of the persistent widow and the unjust judge, namely the necessity of persevering prayer (Page 18:1), this one, on the other hand, is told with certain hearers clearly in mind: “He also told this parable to some who were convinced of their own righteousness and despised others” (Page 18:9). In the light of Luke 16:15, where Jesus describes the Pharisees as those “who justify themselves in the sight of men”, one might suppose that they alone are the intended target of the narrative. Yet the attitude denounced in the parable is a religious distortion that can arise anywhere — it inhabits even Christian communities — and it is surely to such as these that Luke directs his Gospel. It is important to make this clarification so as to avoid caricatured readings of the Pharisees, which unfortunately have not been lacking within Christianity, often beginning precisely from this parable. And here is the Gospel text itself:

“Two people went up to the temple area to pray; one was a Pharisee and the other was a tax collector. The Pharisee took up his position and spoke this prayer to himself, 'Oh God, I thank you that I am not like the rest of humanity — greedy, dishonest, adulterous — or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week, and I pay tithes on all I possess.’ But the tax collector stood off at a distance and would not even raise his eyes to heaven but beat his breast and prayed, 'Oh God, be merciful to me a sinner ’. I tell you, the latter went home justified, not the former; for whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and the one who humbles himself will be exalted”. (Page 18:9–14).

The passage can easily be divided into three parts: an introduction of one verse; a parable of four verses (vv. 10–13); and the conclusion spoken by Jesus: “I tell you.”The protagonists of the parable are two men who go up to the holiest place in Israel, the Temple. The verb to go up indicates not only that the Temple stood on high, upon a mountain, but also that one ascends when going to Jerusalem — almost as though to suggest, even in bodily movement, the manner in which one draws near to God. In this regard we may recall the Psalms of Ascent, beginning with Psalm 120, and likewise, in the Gospel, the Good Samaritan who took care of the man fallen among robbers while “going down from Jerusalem to Jericho” (Page 10:30). Saint Luke here depicts two opposing poles within first-century Judaism, showing that the characters were not chosen at random. The Pharisees were regarded as the most pious and devout, while the tax collectors were often seen as thieves — a class of professionals in the service of Rome, as Zacchaeus of Jericho may have been (Page 19:1). It also becomes clear that prayer in the Temple could be private, while public prayer was held in the morning and in the evening and was governed by the Temple liturgy.

We thus have two men who go to the Temple to pray. Their movement is identical, their purpose the same, and the place to which they go is one and the same; yet a great distance separates them. They are close to each other and yet far apart, so that their being together in the place of prayer raises, even for us Christians today, the question of what it truly means to pray together — side by side, one beside another, in the same sacred space. It is indeed possible to pray next to someone and yet be separated by comparison, by rivalry, or even by contempt: “I am not like this tax collector” (v. 11). The differences between the two characters are also evident in their gestures, in the posture of their bodies, and in the way they situate themselves within the sacred space. The tax collector remains at the back, “standing at a distance” (v. 13); he does not dare to come forward, he is filled with the awe of one unaccustomed to the liturgical place; he bows his head to the ground and beats his breast, uttering but a few words. The Pharisee, on the other hand, displays his assurance, his familiarity with the holy place; he prays standing upright, head held high, pronouncing many carefully chosen words in his elaborate thanksgiving. This self-awareness has nothing to do with proper self-respect; joined with contempt for others, it becomes a form of ostentatious arrogance — perhaps the posture of one who, in truth, is not so sure of himself, and who harbours no doubt within. The presence of others serves only to confirm his sense of superiority. The verb used by Luke, exoutheneine, translated as “to despise”, literally means “to regard as nothing”, and it will describe the attitude of Herod toward Jesus in the Passion narrative (Page 23:11). The Pharisee’s certainty in condemning others is the very means by which he sustains the illusion of his own righteousness and superiority.

In the words of the Pharisee there also emerges the image of God that he bears within himself. He prays “to himself” — that is, “turned toward himself” (pros heauton, Page 18:11) — and his prayer appears to be ruled entirely by the ego. Formally, he performs an act of thanksgiving, yet in truth he thanks God not for what God has done for him, but for what he does for God. The very meaning of thanksgiving is thus distorted, for his self takes the place of God, and his prayer becomes a catalogue of pious achievements and a self-satisfaction at not being “like other men” (v. 11). His exalted image of himself obscures that of God, to the point of preventing him from seeing as a brother the man who prays in the same holy place. He feels himself so perfectly righteous that God has nothing left to do but to confirm what he already is and does: he has no need of conversion, no need of change. Thus Jesus reveals that God’s gaze does not look with favour upon his prayer: “the tax collector went home justified, rather than the other” (v. 14). By unveiling for the reader the subdued prayer of the two figures in the parable, Luke ventures into their inner world — into the soul of the one who prays — showing that hidden background of prayer which may either be one with it or at odds with it. This passage thus opens a window of light upon the heart and the depths of the one who prays, upon the thoughts that dwell within him even as he stands in prayer. It is a bold but essential insight, for behind the words uttered in prayer — whether liturgical or personal — there often lie images, thoughts, and feelings that may stand in striking contradiction to the very words we speak and to the gestures we perform.

It is the relationship between prayer and authenticity. The prayer of the Pharisee is sincere, but not truthful. That of the tax collector is truthful, whereas the Pharisee’s remains merely sincere — in that it expresses what this man believes and feels, yet at the same time reveals the hidden pathology within his words. Believing truly what he says, he also shows that what moves him to pray is the inner conviction that what he does is sufficient to justify him. Hence his conviction is granite-like and unshakable. His personal sincerity is wholly consistent with the image of God that animates him.

Let us pause once more upon verse 13 — upon the posture and the prayer of the tax collector, which stands in direct contrast to that of the Pharisee. He remains at the back, perhaps in the most distant space of the Temple precincts; he does not lift his eyes to heaven but acknowledges himself as a sinner, beating his breast as David once said, “I have sinned against the Lord” (2 Sam 12:13); and as the prodigal son confessed, “I have sinned against heaven and against you” (Page 15:21). The prayer of the tax collector is not centred upon himself; he asks only one thing — mercy — with the expression “Be merciful” (hilaskomai), which means to propitiate, to make favourable, to atone for sins. The tax collector makes no comparison; he considers himself the only sinner, a true sinner. Finally, in verse 14, we find the comment of Jesus, who indicates who is justified and who is not. His response begins with the expression “I tell you” (lego smile), signalling a solemn conclusion, a call for attentive listening. Then Jesus declares that of the two who went up to the Temple, only the tax collector went down to his house justified. The verb used by Jesus means to go down to one’s house. The sinner’s prayer is received by God; the Pharisee’s is not, for he had nothing to ask. God, however, always welcomes the plea for forgiveness when it is sincere. This parable thus becomes yet another teaching on prayer — like the one just above, of the judge and the widow.

Through this parable, the Christian reader understands that the authenticity of prayer passes through the goodness and integrity of one’s relationships with others who pray alongside us and who, together with us, form the Body of Christ. In the Christian sphere, where Jesus Christ is “the image of the invisible God” (With the 1:15), prayer becomes a process of continual purification of our images of God, beginning from the image revealed in Christ — and in Him crucified (cf. 1 Color 2:2) — the image that contests and unmasks all false and distorted representations of God. The attitude of the Pharisee may be seen as emblematic of a religious type that replaces relationship with the Lord by measurable performance. He fasts twice a week and pays tithes on all he acquires, even undertaking works of supererogation. In place of a relationship with the Lord marked by the Spirit and by the gratuity of love, there arises a pursuit of sanctification through control — a striving that demands separation from others. Prayer, on the contrary, as Luke suggests, requires humility. And humility is an adhesion to reality — to the poverty and smallness of the human condition, to the humus from which we are made. It is the courageous knowledge of oneself before the God who has revealed Himself in the humility and self-emptying of the Son. Where there is humility, there is openness to grace, and there is charity, and mercy is found.

From the Hermitage October 26, 2025

.

______________________________

STAY AWAY, WHAT WE HAPPENED, THE PHARISEES, PERFECT CHAMPIONS OF PURITY!

«Oh God, I thank you because I am not like other men, thieves, unfair, adulterers, nor like this publican. "I fast twice a week and pay tithes of everything I own.".

.

Just like in last Sunday's Gospel, Also in that of this thirtieth Sunday of Ordinary Time we find a teaching on prayer. It is expressed through the parable of the Pharisee and the publican in the temple, a text present only in the third Gospel. If Saint Luke had specified the purpose for which Jesus told the parable of the persevering widow and the wicked judge—viz., the need to always pray without fainting (LC 18,1) —, in this other, instead, is narrated with specific recipients in mind: "He also told this parable for some who trusted in themselves because they considered themselves righteous and despised others." (LC 18,9). In the light of Lk 16,15, where Jesus describes the Pharisees as those "who consider themselves righteous before men", It could be thought that they are the only recipients of the story. However, The attitude denounced in the parable is a religious distortion that can manifest itself anywhere; also lives in Christian communities, and it is surely to these recipients that Luke addresses his Gospel.. It is important to specify this to avoid caricatured readings of the Pharisees, what, unfortunately, have not been lacking in Christianity, born precisely from the interpretation of this parable. And here is the evangelical text:

«Two men went up to the temple to pray; one was a Pharisee and the other a publican. The Pharisee, erected, He prayed inside saying: “Oh God, I thank you because I am not like other men, thieves, unfair, adulterers, nor like this publican. “I fast twice a week and pay tithes of everything I own.”. But the publican, staying at a distance, He didn't even dare to raise his eyes to the sky., but he beat his chest saying: “Oh God, have mercy on me, that I am a sinner. I tell you that this one went home justified and that one did not.; because everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted." (LC 18,9-14).

The passage can easily be divided into three parts: a verse introduction; a four verse parable (vv. 10-13); and the conclusion pronounced by Jesus: “I tell them”. The protagonists of the parable are two men who climb to the holiest place in Israel, the temple. The verb rise indicates not only that the temple was on top, on a mountain, but also that to go to Jerusalem one ascends, almost as if to suggest—even in physical movement—the way in which one approaches God. For this purpose we can remember the Psalms of the climbs, starting with the Psalm 120, and also, in the Gospel, the figure of the good Samaritan who took pity on the man who fell into the hands of bandits while "going down from Jerusalem to Jericho" (LC 10,30). Saint Luke presents here two opposite poles within 1st century Judaism, thus showing that the characters were not chosen at random. The Pharisees were considered the most pious and devout people, while tax collectors were often seen as thieves: a class of professionals at the service of Rome, What Zacchaeus of Jericho could have been like (LC 19,1). In this passage it is also made present that prayer in the temple could be private., while public prayer was held in the morning and afternoon, and was regulated by the temple liturgy.

Have, well, to two men who go up to the temple to pray. Their movement is identical, their purpose is the same and the place they are going is the same.; however, a great distance separates them. They are close and at the same time distant, so that their joint presence in the place of prayer also raises today, to Christians, the question of what it truly means to pray together, side by side, in the same sacred space. Indeed, it is possible to pray together with another and, however, be separated by comparison, rivalry or even contempt: "I am not like this publican" (v. 11).

The differences between the two characters They are also notable in the gestures, in the posture of their bodies and in the way they are situated within the sacred space. The publican remains in the background, "keeping at a distance" (v. 13); does not dare to move forward, is inhabited by the fear of those who are not accustomed to the liturgical place; He bows his head to the ground and beats his chest, saying just a few words.. The Pharisee, instead, expresses his security, his condition of habituation to the holy place; now raised, with your head held high, uttering many carefully chosen words in his elaborate thanks. This self-awareness has nothing to do with fair self-esteem.; linked to contempt for others, is revealed in a form of ostentatious arrogance perhaps on the part of someone who actually, he's not so sure of himself, to the point that he has no doubt inside. The presence of others only serves to reinforce his consciousness of superiority.. The verb used by Luke, exoutheneín, translated as "despise", literally means “to consider as nothing”, and describes Herod's attitude toward Jesus in the Passion story (LC 23,11). The Pharisee's confidence in condemning others is the means by which he sustains the illusion of his own righteousness and superiority..

In the words of the Pharisee the image of God that he carries within himself is also revealed. Pray “with yourself”, that is to say, "directed toward oneself" (Pros haughton, LC 18,11), and his prayer seems dominated by ego. Formally performs a thanksgiving, but in reality he thanks God not for what God has done for him, but for what he does for God. The sense of gratitude is thus denatured, for his own self takes the place of God, and his prayer becomes a catalog of pious practices and a self-congratulation for not being "like other men." (v. 11). The magnified image of himself obscures that of God to the point of preventing him from seeing the one who prays in the same holy place as a brother.. He feels so righteous that God has nothing to do but confirm what he already is and does.: does not need any conversion or change. So, Jesus reveals that God's gaze does not take pleasure in his prayer: «The publican went home justified, and the other doesn't" (v. 14). By revealing to the reader the silent prayer of the two characters in the parable, Luke penetrates into his inner world — into the soul of the one who prays — showing that undercurrent of the prayer that may coincide with it or conflict with it.. This passage opens, therefore, a slit of light on the heart and depths of those who pray, about the thoughts that inhabit him even while he is collected in prayer.
This is a bold observation, but necessary, because behind the words spoken in prayer - whether liturgical or personal - images are usually hidden, thoughts and feelings that may be in flagrant contradiction with the words that are said and with the meaning of the gestures that are made.

It's about the relationship between prayer and authenticity. The Pharisee's prayer is sincere, but not true. That of the publican on the other hand, it's true, while that of the Pharisee remains merely sincere, to the extent that it expresses what this man believes and feels, but at the same time it reveals the hidden pathology in his words. Truly believing in what he says, It also shows that what drives him to pray is the intimate conviction that what he does is enough to justify it.. That is why his conviction is granite and unbreakable.. His personal sincerity is fully consistent with the image of God that moves him..

Let's stop once again at the verse 13, in the posture and prayer of the publican, that serve as a counterweight to those of the Pharisee. Stay behind, perhaps in the space furthest from the temple precinct; does not raise his eyes to the sky, but he recognizes himself as a sinner by beating his chest, the way David said: "I have sinned against the Lord" (2 Sam 12,13); and as the prodigal son confessed: "I have sinned against heaven and against you" (LC 15,21). The Publican's Prayer Is Not Self-Centered; He asks for one thing—mercy—with the expression “Have compassion.” (hilaskomai), What does it mean to encourage?, become favorable, atone for sins. The publican makes no comparisons; he considers himself the only sinner, a true sinner. Finally, in the verse 14, we find Jesus' comment, that highlights who is justified and who is not. His response begins with the expression "I tell you." (lego smile), as to point out a significant conclusion, an invitation to listen attentively. After, Jesus declares that of the two who went up to the temple, only the publican went home justified. The verb used by Jesus means to descend home. The sinner's prayer is accepted by God; that of the Pharisee, instead, no, because he had nothing to ask for. God, however, always welcome pleas for forgiveness when they are authentic. This parable thus becomes a new teaching on prayer, just like the previous one, that of the judge and the widow.

Through this parable, The Christian reader understands that the authenticity of prayer depends on the quality and goodness of the relationships with others who pray with me and who, together with me, they form the Body of Christ. In the Christian sphere, where Jesus Christ is "the image of the invisible God" (With the 1,15), Prayer becomes a process of continuous purification of our images of God, from the image revealed in Christ — and in Him crucified (cf. 1 Color 2,2) —, image that questions and unmasks all false and distorted representations of God. The attitude of the Pharisee can be considered emblematic of a religious type that replaces the relationship with the Lord with quantifiable returns.. He fasts twice a week and pays tithes on everything he acquires., even performing supererogatory works. Instead of a relationship with the Lord under the sign of the Spirit and the gratuitousness of love, a form of search for sanctification appears through control, that requires distancing from others. The prayer, Instead—as Luke suggests—, requires humility. And humility is adherence to reality, to the poverty and smallness of the human condition, al humus what we are made of. It is the courageous knowledge of oneself before God that has manifested itself in the humility and self-emptying of the Son.. Where there is humility, there is openness to grace, there is charity and mercy is found.

From the Hermitage, 26 October 2025

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

Faith as resistance in the night of God. «When the son of man comes, find faith on earth?» – Faith as resistance in the night of God. “When the Son of man comes, will he find faith on earth?” – Faith as resistance in the night of God. "When the son of man comes, Will you find faith on earth?»

Homiletics of the Fathers of the Island of Patmos

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

(Italian, English, Español)

 

FAITH AS RESISTANCE IN THE NIGHT OF GOD. «WHEN THE SON OF MAN COMES, HE WILL FIND FAITH ON EARTH?»

When the Son of Man comes, perhaps he won't find many works, nor many institutions remained strong; but if he will find a small remnant who still believes, hope and love, then your question will have already been answered. For even one faith to live, even a single heart that continues to pray in the night, it is enough to keep the lamp of the Church lit.

.

.

PDF print format article – PDF article print format – PDF article in printed format

 

.

The final sentence of this Lucanian passage it arouses fear and trembling in my Christian and priestly soul. The parable of the judge and the widow does not end with consolation, but with a question.

Jesus does not promise better times, nor does it guarantee that God's justice will manifest itself according to our expectations; instead it leaves a question hanging, that spans the centuries and rests on every generation: «When the Son of man comes, find faith on earth?».

From the Gospel according to Luke (18, 1-8) — «At that time, Jesus told his disciples a parable about the need to pray, without ever getting tired: “In a city there lived a judge, who neither feared God nor had regard for anyone. There was also a widow in that city, who went to him and told him: 'Give me justice against my adversary'. For a while he didn't want to; but then he said to himself: “Even though I do not fear God and have no regard for anyone, since this widow bothers me so much, I will do justice to her so that she doesn't continually come to bother me.". And the Lord added: “Listen to what the dishonest judge says. And God will not perhaps do justice to his elect, who cry out to him day and night? It will probably make them wait a long time? I tell you he will do them justice promptly. But the Son of Man, when will, find faith on earth?”».

This question is the dramatic seal of the Gospel of the blessed evangelist Luke, because it reveals the paradox of the Christian faith: God is faithful, but often man is not. The risk is not that God forgets man, but rather that man becomes tired of God. This is why Jesus speaks of the need to always pray, without ever getting tired: not because God is deaf, but because prayer keeps faith alive in a time that consumes it to the point of emptying it, especially in this Europe of ours without memory, who denies their Christian roots in a sometimes violent and destructive way.

The widow in this parable represents the suffering soul of the Church mystical body of Christ: fragile, but stubborn. In the silence he continues to knock on the judge's door, even when everything seems useless. It is the faith that does not give in to the temptation of indifference; it is the faith that resists in the night of the apparent absence of God. And God is not like the dishonest judge, but sometimes it tests faith precisely at the moment in which it seems to behave as such: is silent, unresponsive, delays justice. This is where persevering prayer becomes an act of pure trust, a silent rebellion against despair.

When Jesus asks if, upon his return, find faith on earth, it does not speak of a vague belief or religious feeling; It's about faith that endures, the one that remains firm even when every appearance of religion seems to dissolve, that faith which is the foundation of things hoped for and proof of things not seen" (cf.. EB 11,1); that faith that will make us blessed because despite not having seen we believed (cf.. GV 20,29). It is the faith of Abraham, who believes against all hope (cf.. RM 4,18); the faith of the widow who continues to ask for justice (cf.. LC 18,3); the faith of the Church that does not stop praying even when the world mocks her.

The real threat is not atheism widespread throughout the world, but one that is increasingly widespread within the visible Church: the cleric atheism, extreme consequence of the spiritual apathy that erodes the heart and transforms faith into habit and hope into cynicism. but yet, It is precisely in this desert that God's faithfulness is revealed: when everything seems dead the seed of faith survives hidden in the earth, like a silent germ awaiting God's spring.

In the penitential rite we confess that we have sinned in thoughts, words, works and omissions. Among these sins, omission is perhaps the most serious, because it contains the root of all the others, a bit like pride, which is the queen and synthesis of all the deadly sins. And of the dramatic phrase that closes this evangelical passage - both hermetic and enigmatic - the sin of omission is, in his own way, paradigm. Just think about how many, in the face of the disorder and decadence that have afflicted the Church for decades, they wash their hands like Pilate in the praetorium, saying: "The Church is Christ, and is governed by the Holy Spirit". As if this formula were enough to justify inertia and failure to assume any responsibility. The house burns, but we reassure ourselves by saying: «It's his, He will take care of it. Did he not promise that the gates of hell will not prevail?».

We are faced with the sanctification of impotence, at the “theology” of "I mind my own business" disguised as trust in Providence. Then when the problems cannot be denied and evaded in any way, one is even capable of affirming: «Those who come after us will take care of it», a true triumph of the most nefarious irresponsible spirit.

If the question of Christ — «When the Son of man comes, find faith on earth?» — we put it in this realistic context, a disturbing echo would emerge. Yup, the Lord promised «not praevalebunt» and certainly, upon his return, he will still find the Church. But which Church? Because it could also find a visible Church emptied of Christ - of which we sometimes seem almost ashamed - and filled with something else: of humanitarianism without grace, of justice without truth and law, of spirituality without the Spirit … A Church that still exists in its external form, but who risks no longer having faith.

It's this one, perhaps, it is the most terrible of the prophecies implicit in that question: that faith can disappear not from the world, but precisely from the Church. Even in the face of this disturbing possibility - that the Son of Man may find his faith weakened, almost extinguished - the Gospel does not abandon us to fear, but it calls us to the hope that does not disappoint. Authentic faith is not a stable possession, it is a grace to be cherished and renewed every day. Like breathing, it lives only in continuity: I know if it interrupts, dies. For this reason prayer becomes the highest act of spiritual resistance: praying does not mean reminding God of our existence, but to remind ourselves that God exists and that his faithfulness precedes any of our infidelity.

When faith seems to be failing in the Church, God never ceases to inspire it in the little ones, in the humble, in the poor who cry out to Him day and night. This is the logic of the Kingdom: while structures become rigid and men become distracted, the Spirit continues to breathe in the silent hearts that believe even without seeing. Where the institution appears tired and decadent, God remains alive in his people. Where the word is silent, faith continues to whisper.

Christ's question — «I will find faith on earth?» — is not a condemnation, but an invitation and at the same time a challenge: “You will keep the faith when everything around you seems lost?” It is a call to stay awake in the night, not to delegate the responsibility of believing to others. The Son of Man does not ask for a triumphant Church in the worldly or political sense of the term, but a Church that watches, that doesn't stop knocking, who perseveres in prayer like the widow in the parable. And that widow, symbol of the poor and faithful Church, teaches us that the miracle of faith does not consist in changing God, but in letting ourselves be changed by Him, until we ourselves become a living prayer.

When the Son of Man comes, perhaps he will not find many works or many institutions that have remained strong; but if he will find a small remnant who still believes, hope and love, then your question will have already been answered. For even one faith to live, even a single heart that continues to pray in the night, it is enough to keep the lamp of the Church lit.

Praised be Jesus Christ!

From the island of Patmos, 20 October 2025

.

_________________________________________

FAITH AS RESISTANCE IN THE NIGHT OF GOD. “WHEN THE SON OF MAN COMES, WILL HE FIND FAITH ON EARTH?”

When the Son of Man comes, He may perhaps find few works and few institutions still standing firm; yet if He finds a small remnant that still believes, hopes, and loves, then His question will already have found its answer. For even a single living faith, even a single heart that continues to pray in the night, is enough to keep the lamp of the Church burning.

.

.

The concluding sentence of this Lucan passage awakens within my Christian and priestly soul a sense of awe and trembling. The parable of the judge and the widow does not end with consolation, but with a question. Our Lord does not promise brighter days, nor does He assure us that the justice of God will manifest itself according to our expectations; rather, He leaves a question suspended in the air — one that travels through the centuries and settles upon every generation: When the Son of Man comes, will He find faith upon the earth?

From the Gospel according to Luke (18:1-8) — At that time Jesus told His disciples a parable about the necessity of praying always without becoming weary. “In a certain city there was a judge who neither feared God nor respected any human being. And there was a widow in that city who kept coming to him and saying, ‘Render a just decision for me against my adversary.’ For a long time he was unwilling, but eventually he thought, ‘Even though I neither fear God nor respect any human being, because this widow keeps bothering me I shall deliver a just decision for her lest she finally come and strike me.’” And the Lord said, “Pay attention to what the dishonest judge says. Will not God then secure the rights of His chosen ones who call out to Him day and night? Will He be slow to answer them? I tell you, He will see to it that justice is done for them speedily. But when the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on earth?”

This question stands as the dramatic seal of the Gospel according to the blessed Evangelist Luke, for it discloses the paradox at the heart of Christian faith: God remains faithful, yet man so often does not. The danger is not that God should forget man, but that man should grow weary of God. Hence our Lord speaks of the need to pray always and never lose heart — not because God is deaf, but because prayer keeps faith alive in an age that exhausts and empties it, especially in this Europe of ours, grown amnesiac and intent on denying its Christian roots.

The widow in this parable represents the suffering soul of the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ: fragile, yet unyielding. In silence she keeps knocking at the judge’s door, even when all seems futile. Hers is the faith that does not yield to indifference; the faith that endures through the night of God’s apparent absence. And God, though unlike the unjust judge, at times tests faith precisely in the moment when He seems to act as one: He keeps silence, He withholds His answer, He delays justice. It is there that persevering prayer becomes an act of pure trust — a silent rebellion against despair.

When Jesus asks whether, at His return, He will find faith upon the earth, He is not speaking of a vague belief or a mere religious sentiment; He is speaking of the faith that endures — the faith that remains steadfast even when every outward form of religion seems to dissolve. It is that faith which is “the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen” (cf. Heb 11:1); the faith that will make us blessed, “for having not seen, we have yet believed” (cf. Jn 20:29). It is the faith of Abraham, who “hoped against hope” (cf. Rom 4:18); the faith of the widow who continues to plead for justice (cf. Page 18:3); the faith of the Church that does not cease to pray even when the world mocks her.

The true menace is not the atheism that pervades the world, but the one that spreads ever more within the visible Church — an ecclesiastical atheism, the ultimate consequence of spiritual apathy that corrodes the heart, turning faith into habit and hope into cynicism. Yet it is precisely in this desert that the faithfulness of God is revealed: when all seems dead, the seed of faith survives hidden within the soil, like a silent germ awaiting the springtime of God.

In the penitential rite we confess that we have sinned in thought, word, deed, and omission. Among these sins, omission is perhaps the most grievous, for it encloses within itself the root of all the others — much as pride, queen and synthesis of the capital sins, contains them all. The dramatic phrase that closes this Gospel passage — at once hermetic and enigmatic — finds in the sin of omission its fitting paradigm.

Consider, for example, how many, faced with the disorder and decay that for decades have afflicted the Church, wash their hands like Pilate in the praetorium, saying: “The Church belongs to Christ, and it is governed by the Holy Spirit.” As though that formula were sufficient to justify their inertia. The house is ablaze, yet we console ourselves by saying: “It is His; He will see to it. Did He not promise that the gates of hell shall not prevail?”

We are witnessing the sanctification of impotence — a theology of minding one’s own business disguised as trust in Providence. It is an evasion of responsibility that masquerades as faith. When problems cannot be denied or avoided in any way, we are even capable of saying: “Those who come after us will take care of it”, a true triumph of the most nefarious irresponsible spirit.

If we were to set Christ’s question — “When the Son of Man comes, will He find faith upon the earth?” — within this realistic context, an unsettling echo would emerge. Yes, the Lord has promised not praevalebunt, and assuredly, at His return, He will find the Church still standing. But which Church? For He may find, rather, a visible Church emptied of Christ — of whom at times we seem almost ashamed — and filled instead with something else: humanism without grace, diplomacy without truth, spirituality without the Spirit. A Church that yet exists in its outward form, but one that risks no longer possessing faith.

And this, perhaps, is the most terrible of all the prophecies implicit in that question: that faith might vanish not from the world, but from the very house of God. Even in the face of this disquieting possibility — that the Son of Man might find a faith grown dim, almost extinguished — the Gospel does not abandon us to fear; it recalls us instead to the hope that does not disappoint.

True faith is not a stable possession; it is a grace to be guarded and renewed each day. Like breath, it lives only in its continuity: if it ceases, it dies. This is why prayer becomes the highest act of spiritual resistance: to pray does not mean to remind God of our existence, but to remind ourselves that God exists, and that His faithfulness precedes every one of our infidelities.

When faith seems to falter within the Church, God does not cease to awaken it in the little ones, in the humble, in the poor who cry to Him day and night. This is the logic of the Kingdom: while structures grow rigid and men grow distracted, the Spirit continues to breathe within silent hearts that believe without seeing. Where the institution appears weary, God remains alive in His people. Where the word falls silent, faith continues to whisper.

The question of ChristWill I find faith upon the earth? — is not a condemnation but an invitation: Will you keep the faith when all around you seems lost?. It is a summons to remain awake in the night, not to delegate to others the responsibility of believing. The Son of Man does not ask for a triumphant Church in the worldly or political sense of the term, but for a Church that keeps vigil, that does not cease to knock, that perseveres in prayer like the widow of the parable. And that widow, symbol of the poor and faithful Church, teaches us that the miracle of faith does not consist in changing God, but in allowing ourselves to be changed by Him — until we ourselves become living prayer.

When the Son of Man comes, He may perhaps find few works and few institutions still standing firm; yet if He finds a small remnant that still believes, hopes, and loves, then His question will already have found its answer. For even a single living faith, even a single heart that continues to pray in the night, is enough to keep the lamp of the Church burning.

Praised be Jesus Christ!

From The Island of Patmos, 20 October 2025

.

_________________________________________

FAITH AS RESISTANCE IN THE NIGHT OF GOD. «WHEN THE SON OF MAN COMES, WILL YOU FIND FAITH ON EARTH?»

When the Son of Man comes, you may not find many works or many institutions that remain firm; but if you find a small remnant that still believes, wait and love, your question will have already found the answer. Because even a single faith lives, Even a single heart that continues to pray at night, It is enough to keep the lamp of the Church lit..

.

.

The final sentence of this Lucan passage arouses in my Christian and priestly spirit fear and trembling. The parable of the judge and the widow does not end with a consolation, but with a question. Jesus does not promise better times or guarantee that God's justice will manifest according to our expectations.; deja, rather, a suspended question that crosses the centuries and rests on each generation: "When the Son of Man comes, Will you find faith on earth?».

From the Holy Gospel according to Saint Luke (18, 1-8) — At that time, Jesus told his disciples a parable about the need to always pray without giving up.: "There was a judge in a city who neither feared God nor respected men.. In that same city there was a widow who came to him saying: “Do me justice against my adversary”. For some time he refused, but then he said to himself: “Although I do not fear God nor respect men, how this widow is bothering me, I will give him justice so that he does not continually come to bother me." And the Lord added: «Look at what the unjust judge says; well God, Will he not do justice to his chosen ones who cry out to him day and night? Will you make them wait? I tell you that he will give them justice soon. But when the Son of man comes, Will you find this faith on earth?».

This question is the dramatic seal of the Gospel of the blessed evangelist Lucas, because it reveals the paradigm of the Christian faith: God remains faithful, but often the man is not. The risk is not that God forgets man, but in man getting tired of God.

That is why Jesus talks about the need to always pray, without fainting: not because God is deaf, but because prayer keeps faith alive in a time that wears it down until it is empty., especially in this Europe of ours, no memory, that denies its Christian roots and seeks to build a world where God no longer has a place.

The widow of this parable represents the suffering soul of the Church, Mystical Body of Christ: fragile, but stubborn. Silently continue knocking on the judge's door, even when everything seems useless. It is the faith that does not give in to the temptation of indifference; the faith that endures in the night of God's apparent absence. And God is not like the unjust judge, but sometimes it tests faith precisely at the moment when it seems to behave as such: calla, does not respond, delays justice. This is when persevering prayer becomes an act of pure trust., a silent rebellion against despair.

When Jesus asks if, upon his return, you will find faith on earth, It does not speak of a vague belief or a religious feeling; speaks of the faith that resists, one that remains steadfast even when all semblance of religion seems to dissolve; that faith that is “the foundation of what is hoped for and the guarantee of what is not seen” (cf. Heb 11,1); that faith that will make us blessed because, "without having seen, “we have believed” (cf. Jn 20,29). It is the faith of Abraham, who “believed hoping against all hope” (cf. Rom 4,18); the faith of the widow who continues to ask for justice (cf. LC 18,3); the faith of the Church that does not stop praying even when the world mocks it.

The real threat is not atheism spread in the world, but that which spreads more and more within the visible Church: ecclesiastical atheism, extreme consequence of spiritual apathy that erodes the heart and transforms faith into habit and hope into cynicism. Y, however, It is precisely in this desert where God's faithfulness is revealed: when everything seems dead, the seed of faith survives hidden in the earth, like a silent germ waiting for God's spring.

In the penitential rite we confess to having sinned in thought, word, work and omission. Among these sins, the omission is perhaps the most serious, because it contains within itself the root of all the others, in the same way that pride, queen and synthesis of all the capital sins, contains them all. And the dramatic phrase that closes this evangelical passage — at the same time hermetic and enigmatic — involves the sin of omission., in your way, with the paradigm.

Just think about how many, in the face of the disorder and decadence that has afflicted the Church for decades, They wash their hands like Pilate in the praetorium saying: "The Church belongs to Christ and is governed by the Holy Spirit". As if that formula were enough to justify inertia. The house is on fire, but we calm ourselves by saying: «It's yours, He will take care. Hasn't he promised that the gates of hell will not prevail?».

We are facing the sanctification of impotence, facing a theology of “I take care of my own business” disguised as trust in Providence. It is an escape from responsibility that seeks to present itself as faith. When problems cannot be denied or avoided in any way, we are even able to say: “Those who come after us will take care of it.”, true triumph of the most nefarious irresponsible spirit.

If we inserted Christ's question — «When the Son of man comes, Will you find faith on earth?» — in this realistic context, a disturbing echo would resonate in it. Yeah, the Lord has promised not praevalebunt and, certainly, upon his return he will still find the Church. But what Church? Because I could also find a visible Church emptied of Christ — of whom we sometimes seem almost ashamed — and filled with something else.: of graceless humanitarianism, of diplomacy without truth, of spirituality without Spirit. A Church that continues to exist in its external form, but who runs the risk of no longer having faith.

And this is perhaps the most terrible of prophecies implicit in that question: that faith can disappear not from the world, but precisely from the house of God. Even in the face of this disturbing possibility—that the Son of Man may find faith weakened, almost extinct, the Gospel does not abandon us to fear, but calls us to hope that does not disappoint.

Authentic faith is not a stable possession; It is a grace that must be guarded and renewed every day. like breath, only live in continuity: if interrupted, die. That is why prayer becomes the highest act of spiritual resistance.: Praying does not mean reminding God of our existence, but to remind ourselves that God exists, and that his faithfulness precedes all our infidelities.

When faith seems to fail in the Church, God does not stop raising it in the little ones, in the humble, in the poor who cry out to Him day and night. This is the logic of the Kingdom: while structures harden and men become distracted, the Spirit continues to blow into the silent hearts that believe without having seen. Where the institution seems tired, God is still alive in his people. Where the word is silent, faith keeps whispering.

Christ's question — «Will I find faith on earth?» — is not a sentence, but an invitation: «Will you keep the faith when everything around you seems lost?» It is a call to stay awake at night, not to delegate the responsibility of believing to others. The Son of Man does not ask for a triumphant Church in the worldly or political sense of the term., but a Church that watches, that doesn't stop knocking on the door, who perseveres in prayer like the widow in the parable. And that widow, symbol of the poor and faithful Church, teaches us that the miracle of faith does not consist of changing God, but in letting ourselves be changed by Him, until we become living prayer ourselves.

When the Son of Man comes, perhaps you will not find many works or many institutions that remain firm; but if you find a small remnant that still believes, wait and love, your question will have already found the answer. Because even a single faith lives, Even a single heart that continues to pray at night, It is enough to keep the lamp of the Church lit..

Praise be Jesus Christ!

From the Island of Patmos, 20 October 2025

.

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of:

Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers:

Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff,

the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

The saving joy of being only useless servants – The saving joy of being only unworthy servants – The salvific joy of being only useless servants

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

Italian, english, español

 

THE SAVING JOY OF BEING ONLY USELESS SERVANTS

The authentic disciple of the Lord, after having done his service well, he must however recognize himself as useless because his work does not necessarily guarantee him salvation, as grace will always be a gift and not a boast for having done something.

.

PDF print format article – PDF article print format – PDF article in printed format

 

.

The Gospel of Luke today reports two sayings of Jesus. The first concerns faith, in response to a question from the apostles.

The second which is presented in extended form, almost a small parable, refers to the service that "useless servants" provide. The context is still that of Jesus' great journey to Jerusalem which began in LC 9,51 and will end in LC 19,45. Today's Gospel closes the second section of this pilgrimage of Jesus which is characterized by the invitation to enter the Kingdom by following certain conditions. What follows is the Gospel text:

"During that time, the apostles said to the Lord: «Increase our faith!». The Lord replied: «If you had faith as much as a mustard seed, you might say to this mulberry tree: «Uproot yourself and go and plant yourself in the sea, and it would obey you. Who among you, if he has a servant to plow or graze the flock, he will tell him, when he returns from the field: «Come quickly and sit at the table?» He won't tell him instead: «Prepare something to eat, stringiti le vesti ai fianchi e sérvimi, until I have eaten and drunk, and afterward you will eat and drink?» Perhaps he will be grateful to that servant, because he followed the orders he received? So do you, when you have done everything you were told to do, said: «We are useless servants. We did what we had to do" (LC 17,5-10).

After having discussed the use of material goods, of relationships with others and of the Church with community instructions, for the first time in the Gospel of Luke the Lord speaks on the theme of faith in response to an intervention by the apostles: «Increase our faith» (LC 17,5). The question of the latter refers to a similar situation recalled by the Gospel of Mark. There, after the story of the transfiguration, the father of a possessed boy turns to Jesus to ask for his son's liberation, and tells him: «Credo; help my unbelief" (MC 9,24). The Lord answers him not in words, but with a gesture of power, exorcising the impure spirit. The gospel of Matthew tells the same episode but amplifies it, adding the reaction of the disciples not handed down by Saint Mark and recording however the same words of Jesus that we hear today: «Then the disciples approached Jesus, on the sidelines, and they asked him: «Because we couldn't drive him away?». And he answered them: «For your little faith. Verily I say unto you: if you have faith equal to a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain: «Move from here to there, and it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you" (Mt 17,19-20).

Actually Marco too preserves the same saying of Jesus in Luke, but in a different context, that of the fruitless fig tree: «Jesus answered them: «Have faith in God! Verily I say unto you: if one were to say to this mountain: Get up and throw yourself into the sea, without doubting in his heart, but believing that what he says happens, this will happen to him" (MC 11,22-23).

Are, as Archimedes said, to lift the world you need a point of support, this is undoubtedly faith for Jesus. Jesus has just spoken of the inevitability of scandals occurring in the Christian community and invited those who sin to be corrected and those who repent and openly recognize their sin to be infinitely forgiven. (LC 17,1-4). In this context we understand the prayer of the disciples to see their faith increased. How to hold up, indeed, the weight of scandals, of obstacles to the life of communion, of the stumbling block placed on the smallest or simplest in the ecclesial space? How to exercise fraternal correction that does not crush the brother but frees him? How to forgive again and always those who repent every time? Only through faith. Let it be, by way of example, to move a mulberry tree as in today's page of Luke or a mountain, as in the gospels of Mark and Matthew, the aforementioned "lever" to do this is faith, as big as a mustard seed, in fact what matters is quality and not quantity. In the evangelical miracles it is presupposed in the needy that Jesus encounters, allows us to avoid spectacularisation or idolatry, Jesus normally asks for faith before his intervention, since after that it is no longer guaranteed, as in the case of the ten healed lepers in next Sunday's Gospel: only one returned to say thank you (cf.. LC 17,11-19).

In the second part of the song a similarity is reported, almost a parable, which presents a situation that, Fortunately, today it is very difficult to trace, since slavery has been abolished and those who perform a service do so because they are competent and gratified and not simply because they are qualified as servants. However in the Bible these terms, net of social situations different from ours, are used to define a religious condition, often positive. For instance, in the Gospel of Luke, Mary herself proclaims herself the "servant" of the Lord (cf.. LC 1,38). How typical of Jesus, the parable places us before a paradoxical situation, as an invitation to look at reality from another point of view, which is that of God. In this case the paradox corresponds to the fact that the servant, having done his duty, it was necessary to his master. But the authentic disciple of the Lord, after having done his service well, he must however recognize himself as useless because his work does not necessarily guarantee him salvation, as grace will always be a gift and not a boast for having done something. The Greek term, used by Luca, acreios (achreioi), which has the original meaning of "worthless", applied to the people mentioned by Jesus it indicates any servants, to whom nothing is owed. It's a strong feeling, which could offend modern sensibilities, yet it hides a religious and salvific meaning that, eg, the apostle Paul captures it when speaking about faith in the Letter to the Romans: «Where then is the boasting?? He was excluded! By what law? From that of the works? No, but by the law of faith. For we hold that man is justified by faith, independently of the works of the Law" (Rom 3,27-28). And again in the Letter to the Ephesians: “For by grace you are saved through faith; and that doesn't come from you, but it is a gift from God; nor does it come from works, so that no one can boast about it" (Ef 2,8-9).

Therefore for the disciple and in the Christian community, faith is required for service and they walk together; this is the link that we can trace between the simile that Jesus makes and the exhortation to faith, although the size of a mustard seed. Jesus is instructing those who follow him and great faith is required of the disciple, which can only be continually asked of God. The effort and commitment that Christians must have to do what they do, often at the risk of their lives in some situations and parts of the world, he must also be able to recognize that one is saved not because one was good or achieved results, but because it is God who saves. All credit, even those legitimately obtained, they must be brought back to the merciful and savior God.

From the Hermitage, 5 October 2025

.

______________________________

THE SAVING JOY OF BEING ONLY UNWORTHY SERVANTS

The disciple of the Lord, after having carried out his service well, must still recognise himself as unprofitable, because his work does not of itself guarantee salvation; grace will always be a gift and never a boast for having done something.

.

The Gospel of Luke today reports two sayings of Jesus. The first concerns faith, in response to a request from the apostles.

The second, presented at greater length as a short parable, refers to the service rendered by the «unprofitable servants». The setting is still that of the great journey of Jesus to Jerusalem which began at Page 9:51 and will end at Page 19:45. With today’s Gospel we come to the close of the second section of this pilgrimage of Jesus, which is marked by the invitation to enter the Kingdom by following certain conditions. What follows is the Gospel text:

«And the apostles said to the Lord, “Increase our faith.” The Lord replied, “If you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you would say to [this] mulberry tree, ‘Be uprooted and planted in the sea,’ and it would obey you. “Who among you would say to your servant who has just come in from plowing or tending sheep in the field, ‘Come here immediately and take your place at table’? Would he not rather say to him, ‘Prepare something for me to eat. Put on your apron and wait on me while I eat and drink. You may eat and drink when I am finished’? Is he grateful to that servant because he did what was commanded? So should it be with you. When you have done all you have been commanded, say, ‘We are unprofitable servants; we have done what we were obliged to do.’” (Luke 17:5–10)».

After speaking about the use of material goods, relations with one’s neighbour and the life of the Church with her communal instructions, for the first time in Luke’s Gospel the Lord speaks about the theme of faith in response to a request from the apostles: «Increase our faith» (Page 17:5). Their plea recalls a similar situation noted by Mark. There, after the account of the Transfiguration, the father of a possessed boy turns to Jesus to ask for his son’s liberation and says to him: «I do believe, help my unbelief!» (Mk 9:24). The Lord answers him not with words but with a deed of power, by casting out the unclean spirit. Matthew recounts the same episode but expands it, adding the disciples’ reaction (which Mark does not record) and preserving the same words of Jesus that we hear today: «Then the disciples approached Jesus in private and said, “Why could we not drive it out?” He said to them, “Because of your little faith. Amen, I say to you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move; nothing will be impossible for you”» (Mt 17:19–20).

Mark also preserves the same saying of Jesus as Luke, but in a different context, that of the barren fig tree: «Jesus said to them in reply, “Have faith in God. Amen, I say to you, whoever says to this mountain, ‘Be lifted up and thrown into the sea,’ and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it shall be done for him”» (Mk 11:22–23).

If, as Archimedes said, to lift the world one needs a fixed point, for Jesus that point is undoubtedly faith. He has just spoken about the inevitability that scandals occur within the Christian community and has urged that the sinner be corrected and that the one who repents be forgiven without limit (Page 17:1-4). In this context one understands the disciples’ prayer to have their faith increased. How, indeed, can one bear the weight of scandals, of obstacles to communion, of stumbling blocks placed before the little ones in the Church’s life? How can one exercise fraternal correction that does not crush a brother but frees him? How can one forgive again and again those who repent each time? Only by means of faith. Whether, by way of example, it is a matter of moving a mulberry tree as in Luke, or a mountain as in Mark and Matthew, the “lever” to do so is faith — great even if only like a mustard seed — for what counts is its quality rather than its quantity. In the Gospel miracles faith is presupposed in those in need whom Jesus meets; it allows one to avoid spectacle or idolatry. Jesus normally asks for faith before he intervenes, because afterwards it is no longer guaranteed, as in the case of the ten lepers of next Sunday’s Gospel: only one returned to give thanks (cf. Page 17:11–19).

In the second part of the passage a comparison is reported, almost a parable, presenting a situation which, thankfully, is very hard to find today, since slavery has been abolished and those who perform a service do so because they are competent and fulfilled, not simply because they are labelled as servants. Nevertheless, in the Bible such terms, quite apart from social situations different from our own, are used to define a religious condition, often a positive one. For example, in Luke’s Gospel Mary herself proclaims herself the «handmaid» of the Lord (cf. Page 1:38). As is typical of Jesus, the parable sets before us a paradoxical situation that invites us to look at reality from another point of view, that of God. The paradox here is that the servant, having done his duty, has in fact been necessary to his master. But the true disciple of the Lord, after having carried out his service well, must still recognise himself as unprofitable, because his work does not of itself guarantee salvation; grace will always be a gift and never a boast for having done something. The Greek word used by Luke, acreios (achreioi), whose primary sense is “without claim,” applied to the persons in Jesus’ example indicates ordinary servants to whom nothing is owed. It is a strong expression that can jar modern sensibilities, yet it conceals a religious and saving meaning which, for example, the Apostle Paul brings out when he speaks about faith in the Letter to the Romans: «What occasion is there then for boasting? It is ruled out. On what principle, that of works? No, rather on the principle of faith. For we consider that a person is justified by faith apart from works of the law» (Rom 3:27–28). And again in the Letter to the Ephesians: «For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God; it is not from works, so no one may boast» (Eph 2:8–9).

For the disciple, then, and within the Christian community, faith is required for service and the two walk together. This is the link we can trace between the comparison that Jesus makes and the exhortation to a faith even the size of a mustard seed. Jesus is instructing those who follow him, and the disciple is asked for a great faith which can only be continually begged from God. The hard work and commitment Christians must put into what they do — often at the risk of their very lives in certain situations and parts of the world — must also be joined to the recognition that we are saved not because we have been good or have achieved results, but because it is God who saves. All merits, even those legitimately obtained, must be referred back to the merciful and saving God.

From the Hermitage October 5, 2025

.

______________________________

THE SALVIFIC JOY OF BEING ONLY USELESS SERVANTS

The true disciple of the Lord, after having performed your service well, must also be recognized as useless, because his work does not by itself guarantee his salvation; grace will always be a gift and not a reason to boast for having done something.

.

The Gospel of Luke today collects two sayings of Jesus. The first refers to faith, in response to a request from the apostles.

The second, presented more extensively as a small parable, refers to the service provided by "useless servants". The context remains that of Jesus' great journey to Jerusalem that began in LC 9,51 and will conclude in LC 19,45. With today's Gospel the second section of this pilgrimage of Jesus closes., which is characterized by the invitation to enter the Kingdom following certain conditions. Next, the evangelical text:

«At that time, the apostles said to the Lord: “Increase our faith!”. The Lord responded: “If you had faith like a mustard seed, would you say to this mulberry tree: 'Be uprooted and planted in the sea', and I would obey you. Which of you, If you have a servant plowing or shepherding the flock, will tell you, when he comes back from the field: 'Come right away and sit at the table'? Won't you rather tell him: 'Prepare me to eat; Gird yourself and serve me while I eat and drink, and then you will eat and drink? Do you thank the servant because he did what he was told?? So do you, when you have done everything that has been ordered of you, DECIDED: 'We are useless servants. “We have done what we had to do.” (LC 17,5–10).

After having tried of the use of material goods, of relationships with neighbors and the life of the Church with its community instructions, For the first time in the Gospel of Luke the Lord speaks on the topic of faith in response to a request from the apostles: «Increase our faith!» (LC 17,5). The plea refers to a similar situation remembered by the Gospel of Mark. Over there, after the story of the Transfiguration, The father of a possessed boy goes to Jesus to ask for his son's release and tells him: "Believe; help my disbelief!» (MC 9,24). The Lord answers him not with words, but with a gesture of power, expelling the impure spirit. Mateo narrates the same episode but expands it, adding the reaction of the disciples (that Marcos does not register) and preserving the same words of Jesus that we hear today: "Then the disciples came to Jesus apart and said to him: “Why couldn't we expel him??”. He told them: “Because of your little faith. Truly I tell you: If you have faith like a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain: 'Move from here to there', and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you” (Mt 17,19–20).

Actually, Mark also preserves the same saying of Jesus as Luke, but in a different context, the one with the barren fig tree: «Jesus answered them: “Have faith in God. Truly I tell you: whoever says to this mountain: 'Take off and throw yourself into the sea', without doubt in the heart, but believing that what he says will happen, It will happen to him." (Mc 11,22–23).

And, as Archimedes said, To move the world you need a support point, For Jesus that point is undoubtedly faith. He has just spoken about the inevitability of scandals in the Christian community and has invited people to correct those who sin and forgive without limit those who repent. (Lc 17,1–4). In this context the prayer of the disciples to increase their faith is understood.. How to endure, indeed, the weight of the scandals, of obstacles to communion, of the stumbling block placed on the little ones in ecclesial life? How to exercise a fraternal correction that does not crush the brother but rather frees him? How to forgive again and again someone who repents every time? Only through faith. Whether it is, as an example, to move a mulberry tree, like on today's page of Lucas, or a mountain, as in Mark and Matthew, the aforementioned “lever” to do so is faith, large even if it is the size of a mustard seed: quality matters, not the amount. Faith in the needy that Jesus encounters is presupposed in evangelical miracles.; allows you to escape from spectacle or idolatry. Jesus usually asks for faith before intervening, because after that it is no longer guaranteed, as in the case of the ten lepers of next Sunday's Gospel: only one returned to give thanks (cf. Lc 17,11–19).

In the second part The passage contains a comparison, almost a parable, which presents a situation that, fortunately, today it is very difficult to find, because slavery has been abolished and whoever provides a service does so because he is competent and performs, not simply by being qualified as a servant. However, In the Bible these terms—regardless of social situations different from ours—are used to define a religious condition., often positive. For example, in the Gospel of Luke, Mary herself proclaims herself a “servant” of the Lord (cf. LC 1,38). As is typical of Jesus, The parable places us before a paradoxical situation that invites us to look at reality from another point of view.: God's. The paradox here is that the servant, having fulfilled his duty, has been necessary to his lord. But the true disciple of the Lord, after having performed your service well, must also be recognized as useless, because his work does not by itself guarantee his salvation; grace will always be a gift and not a reason to boast for having done something. The Greek term used by Luke, acreios (achreioi), whose primary meaning is "without right", applied to the people of Jesus' example indicates ordinary servants to whom nothing is owed. It's a strong expression, that can shock modern sensibilities, but it contains a religious and salvific meaning that, For example, the apostle Paul captures when speaking about faith in the Letter to the Romans: "Where is, well, the reason to glory? is excluded. why law? For the works? No, by the law of faith. For we hold that man is justified by faith, without the works of the law" (Rom 3,27–28). And also in the Letter to the Ephesians: "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this does not come from you, but it is a gift from God; It doesn't come from the works, so that no one can boast." (Ef 2,8–9).

For the disciple, well, and within the Christian community, faith is required for service and both walk together; This is the link that we can trace between the comparison that Jesus makes and the exhortation to a faith, even if it's the size of a mustard seed. Jesus is instructing those who follow him, and great faith is asked of the disciple, that can only be asked of God continually. The effort and commitment that Christians must put into what they do—many times at the risk of their own lives in certain situations and places in the world—must be linked to the recognition that we are saved not because we have been good or achieved results., but because it is God who saves. All the merits, even those legitimately obtained, They must refer to the merciful and savior God.

From the Hermitage, 5 October 2025

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

The provocative praise of Jesus to the dishonest administrator

Homiletics of the Fathers of the Island of Patmos

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

THE PROVOCATOR LODE OF JESUS ​​TO THE DISHONEST ADMINISTRATOR

Who is faithful in small things, it is also faithful in important things; and who is dishonest in little things, It is also dishonest in important things. So if you have not been faithful in dishonest wealth, who will entrust the real one? And if you have not been faithful in the wealth of others, who will give you yours?

.

.

PDF print format article

.

Dear brothers and sisters,

the Gospel of this XXXV Sunday of Ordinary Time offers us the parable of the unfaithful administrator. A story that, at first sight, seems full of contradictions: an administrator, that he should have acted justly, he is praised for his cunning and dishonest behavior.

How can we reconcile this praise with Christian teaching on justice and honesty? Here is the text:

"During that time, Jesus said to the disciples: a rich man had a manager, and he was accused before him of squandering his possessions. He called him and told him: “What do I hear about you? Account for your stewardship, because you will no longer be able to manage". The administrator said to himself: “What will I do, now that my master takes away the administration from me? Hoeing, I don't have the strength; beg, I am ashamed. I know what I'll do because, when I have been removed from the administration, there is someone who will welcome me into his home". He called his master's debtors one by one and told the first one: “How much do you owe my master?”. He replied: “One hundred barrels of oil”. He told him: “Take your receipt, sit down right now and write fifty”. Then he said to another: “How much you owe?”. Answered: “One hundred measures of wheat”. He told him: “Take your receipt and write eighty”. The master praised that dishonest administrator, because he acted shrewdly. The children of this world, indeed, they are more cunning towards their peers than the children of light. Well, I tell you: make friends for yourselves with dishonest wealth, Why, when it fails, may they welcome you into eternal homes. Who is faithful in small things, it is also faithful in important things; and who is dishonest in little things, It is also dishonest in important things. So if you have not been faithful in dishonest wealth, who will entrust the real one? And if you have not been faithful in the wealth of others, who will give you yours? No servant can serve two masters, because either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will become fond of one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.". (LC 16, 1-13).

This administrator, that he should act with justice and loyalty towards his master, he ends up being praised precisely for his cunning and dishonest behavior. How can we reconcile this praise with the Christian virtue of honesty and justice? If the Gospel invites us to "give an account" of our actions and to live in justice (Mt 12,36), how we can read, but above all explain that the administrator's dishonest behavior occurs, in a sense, appreciated and even praised? The answer lies in the nature of the wisdom that Jesus intends to communicate. The parable, indeed, it does not glorify dishonesty itself, but the ability to look to the future and make wise choices, even if carried out in a fallacious context. Who is faithful in small things, it is also faithful in important things; and who is dishonest in little things, It is also dishonest in important things. So if you have not been faithful in dishonest wealth, who will entrust the real one? And if you have not been faithful in the wealth of others, who will give you yours?

Jesus teaches us “where your treasure is, your heart will also be there" (Mt 6,21), so, it is not the illicit behavior that is praised, but the awareness that we must live wisely and responsibly, administering not only earthly goods, but above all the spiritual ones, with the intention of building a treasure that does not fade. As the Psalmist reminds us:

“The wicked man borrows and does not pay back, but the just is merciful and generous" (Shall 37,21).

Here we see the contrast between the unfaithful and the righteous it is also a comparison between two completely different visions of life: someone selfish and dishonest, the other charitable and just, oriented towards the common good.

What Jesus wants to teach us through this complex parable that is not easy to understand, at least on first listen, in which we talk about "dishonest wealth" and wisdom in daily actions? To understand it, it is first necessary to clarify that the Unfaithful Administrator is the plastic image of a deliberately ambiguous figure on whom lies the accusation of squandering his master's assets.. When the boss fires him, he finds himself in a desperate situation: he is unable to do manual labor and does not intend to end up begging. He therefore decides to reduce the debts of his master's creditors to create useful friendships who can guarantee his future when he is no longer employed.. Morally questionable behavior, that of the Administrator, which however Jesus does not condemn, at least in a clear and open way. The same Master, albeit damaged by his dishonesty, he praises him for the astuteness and promptness with which he has demonstrated his ability to think about the future.

The Master's admiring reaction, strange in itself and also unfair, constitutes the central point of the parable: Jesus does not approve of dishonesty, but recognizes the wisdom in acting with foresight and promptness of spirit. It does not glorify the illicit behavior of the administrator, but it invites us to reflect on our attitude towards the resources that God has entrusted to us, both material and spiritual. To guide us to a correct understanding of the passage, Saint John Chrysostom highlights that «this praise is not for dishonesty, but for the promptness with which the administrator used what he had in view of the future" (Commentary on Luke, Homily 114,5). It is therefore his ability to look forward and act wisely that is appreciated, even if this occurs in a morally ambiguous context, not his dishonesty.

The parable teaches us that, how clever the administrator was in preparing for a material future, so we too must be wise and far-sighted regarding our future projected towards the eternal. The wisdom Jesus speaks of is not about material cunning, but the spiritual one: we must learn to use the resources God has given us, not for selfish or temporary purposes, but to build our way towards his kingdom that will have no end, as we say in our Profession of Faith. The complex theme of spiritual wealth is also taken up by the holy bishop and doctor Augustine in where he states:

"So, what it means to lay up treasures in heaven? It is nothing other than love towards others. Indeed, the only heavenly treasure is charity, which sanctifies men" (Of the Lord's speech on the mountain, In conversation 19,3).

The heavenly riches that Jesus speaks of it is that which accumulates through disinterested love towards others and the charity that transforms life through sequela Christi of the Word of God made man who is away, Truth and the Life (cf.. GV 14,6).

One of Jesus' most provocative statements in this passage it is that "the children of this world are more cunning than the children of light". Jesus does not invite us to imitate the cunning of the children of this world, but to learn foresight and determination from them. We must be equally careful and far-sighted in our spiritual journey, orienting our actions towards eternal good. The Holy Bishop and Doctor Cyril of Alexandria explains:

«Jesus does not invite us to become cunning like the children of this world, but to be vigilant and far-sighted in the care of our soul, just like they are in taking care of their own affairs" (Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, 10, 33).

The wisdom that Jesus speaks of it is not about cunning for worldly gains, but spiritual wisdom, the one that leads us to use our time and resources not for selfish purposes, but to build the Kingdom of God, which has no end. It is a wisdom that looks beyond the temporary, projecting us towards eternity. The Holy Gospel reminds us that we are not owners of what we possess: we are just administrators. «Give account of your administration», says the master to the unfaithful administrator. This makes us think: how we are managing our lives, our resources? And here it is enclosed, incidentally, an implicit reference to the narrative contained in the Parable of the Talents (cf.. Mt 25, 14-30), as in fact the administrator has the task of accounting for his master's goods, we too are called to account for how we administer the gifts that God has given us: not just material wealth, but also our life, our capabilities, our love. It is an administration that, if lived faithfully, will lead us to salvation.

In a context of apparent dishonesty and cunning, such as to make this passage almost incomprehensible, the phrase of the Evangelist Luke «He who is faithful in small things, he is faithful even in the big ones" (LC 16,10) becomes clear after it has been grasped and clarified. These two elements are used as a paradigm, the holy bishop and doctor Basil the Great clarifies this by underlining how every small act of justice is a step towards the great faithfulness that we are called to live:

«If you are not faithful in small things, how can you be faithful in great times? The administration of what has been given to us by God is a test of fidelity to his love and his will" (Of the Holy Spirit, Par. 30).

When Jesus talks about “dishonest wealth” (in Greek: mammon of injustice), the term “dishonesty” it does not simply refer to wealth itself, but it highlights the deceptive and corrupt nature of this wealth, which can easily become the aim of dishonest or selfish actions. Wealth, in its most common form, it is easily linked to the accumulation of material and earthly goods, which can distract the human heart from the true purpose of life: the search for eternal good.

Jesus is not praising wealth itself, but it warns us against the distorted and idolatrous use of material goods, which can easily lead us to neglect the search for eternal good. The word "dishonest" (in Greek, injustice, adikia) refers to wealth acquired through unjust means, but also more generally to that wealth which, if not well managed, tends to separate man from the true purpose of his life, who is God. Indeed, as Saint Gregory the Great states, wealth is often a "false good", capable of deceiving the human soul and leading it away from virtue (cf.. Morals in Job).

When Jesus says «Make friends with dishonest wealth», he does not mean that we should use wealth dishonestly, nor does it invite us to make wealth the object of our love. Rather he urges us to use temporal goods wisely and generously, in order to create friendships, and more widely, of charity. Who, the central idea, is that we must manage material goods with a view to eternal good, because the wealth we accumulate in this life is not an end in itself, but a means that can be used to do good and prepare for the future life.

Saint John Chrysostom in his Commentary on Luke, observes that the praise is not aimed at the dishonest behavior of the administrator, but to his ability to use what he had for his own future good (cf.. Homily 114,5). In the same way, Jesus, he invites us to use material goods with a spiritual vision, that is, to build relationships of justice and charity that will accompany us towards eternity; as if Jesus invited us to use wealth not to accumulate for ourselves, but to help others, to do good, to prepare for the Kingdom of God.

Wealth can be the means to a greater end, that of salvation, if we use it to alleviate the suffering of others, to help those in need, to build a friendship that transcends time. Saint Cyprian of Carthage teaches us that «He who gives what he has in this world receives for himself an eternal reward» (On work and alms, 14), underlining that the right use of material goods is a way to "store up treasures" in heaven, where "neither rust nor the sickle can corrupt them" (Mt 6,19-20). When Jesus speaks of "eternal dwellings" (LC 16,9) invites us to reflect on what we will build during our lives. True wealth is not what is accumulated on this earth, but one that is based on love for God and neighbor, that transcends time and remains for eternity. The eternal home is our heart prepared to welcome God, which finds its place in the Kingdom of Heaven, where the treasure we have built with charity and faith will be our joyful reward.

This reflection leads us to understand that wealth can become an instrument of salvation if used correctly, until it becomes a means to accumulate "treasures in heaven" (Mt 6,20), in a spiritual investment that remains beyond time and space.

Jesus' final message in the parable is that «dishonest wealth» can therefore become, paradoxically, an opportunity to accumulate eternal goods. This is not a blessing of wealth for its own sake, much less, as explained, a blessing of dishonesty, but of the invitation to use it wisely and generously:

«He who uses wealth with justice, accumulate for himself a treasure that will never be stolen" (St. Augustine, Of the Lord's speech on the mountain, 19,4).

The use of earthly resources, if oriented towards charity and the common good, it becomes a means to grow in God's grace and prepare to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. This concept runs through the teaching of Jesus in the parables of the Good Samaritan (LC 10,25-37) and the final judgement (Mt 25,31-46), where love for others and the right use of resources constitute the criteria for being welcomed into the Kingdom of God:

«true wealth is that which we cannot retain on earth, but who will follow us into eternal life, where charity is the treasure that never perishes" (St. Augustine, Of the Lord's speech on the mountain, 2,4).

This complex parable of the unfaithful administrator invites us to reflect on how we manage our goods and resources, the talents that God has given us, asking ourselves if we are willing to live wisely, not only towards material things, but above all in our spiritual life. We are storing up treasures in heaven, using what God has given us to help others, to do good, to build our eternal future? Because this is the real cunning that Jesus, with this provocative story, invites us to follow, at the same time giving us a precise warning:

"Enter through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter it. How narrow is the door and narrow the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it!» (Mt 7, 13-14).

It is the price you pay for true wealth, the eternal one, which comes from heaven and which takes us to heaven into the eternal bliss of Him who for our salvation came down from heaven and became man, but which does not fall at all and like nothing from the sky.

From the island of Patmos, 21 September 2025

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of:

Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers:

Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff,

the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

The disciple is called not only to start, but also to complete

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

The disciple is called not only to start, BUT ALSO TO COMPLETE

It should be, also in the disciple, freedom and lightness to complete the path of life traveled as a sequence of Christ. Love is called to become responsibility and freedom perseverance: there lies the necessary renunciation, purification, stripping.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

The prevailing image is that of Jesus the Gospels have transmitted to us is that of an itinerant charismatic who imposes on those who intend to follow him a break withethos traditional exclusively by virtue of its word, the requests must have seemed and still seem extreme to us, as in the case of this one: «Let the dead bury their dead; you go instead’ and announces the kingdom of God" (LC 9,60).

But the ethics of Jesus is the ethics of waiting, incompatible with the modern ethics of progress or with the ethics of values. This Sunday's Gospel passage measures the quality of Jesus' relationship with his disciples, as well as the distance that separates us from his religious feeling as soon as we seriously look beyond the thick curtain of theological elaboration. Let's read it:

«A large crowd went with Jesus. He turned and told them: “If anyone comes to me and does not love me more than he loves his father, Mother, the wife, children, the brothers, sisters and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. He who does not carry his cross and does not come after me, he cannot be my disciple. Who among you, wanting to build a tower, he doesn't sit down first to calculate the expense and see if he has the means to carry it out? To avoid that, if he lays the foundation and is unable to finish the job, everyone who sees it begins to mock him, saying: 'This man started building, but he wasn't able to finish the job'. Or which king, going to war against another king, he does not sit down first to examine whether he can confront with ten thousand men whoever comes to meet him with twenty thousand? if not, while the other is still far away, he sends him messengers to ask for peace. So whoever of you does not give up all his possessions, he cannot be my disciple”» (LC 14,25-33).

The occasion for the short sayings of Jesus preserved from today's evangelical page is narrated in the opening verse: «A large crowd went with Jesus. He turned and said". People were going and Jesus turns: In this way the reader understands that the journey has resumed. So long as, previously, the Lord was caught at table with his disciples, invited by a leader of the Pharisees (LC 14,1). And we also remember the situation in last Sunday's Gospel regarding the choice of places and guests, while now the evangelist draws attention to the journey that Jesus has undertaken and which will come to completion in Jerusalem. The previous context of the banquet ended with words of invitation for all, so that the house would be filled: “Go out into the streets and along the hedges and force them in, so that my house may be filled" (LC 14,23); now, however, Jesus' words add something and clarify how to enter that house. These are demanding conditions to be able to follow Jesus, some rules, indeed, to be disciples, they are necessary. E, Once again, these words are for all those who want to call themselves Christians. The invitation to love Jesus more than your parents, to carry the cross, and giving up possessions is not something reserved for a select few, but it applies to every disciple who wants to be of Christ.

Words about family relationships we also find them in the Gospel of Matthew, almost identical, but the two short parables are missing in the first evangelist, the one about the tower and the one about the king going to war, which are therefore properly Lucanian material, drawn from a specific source of this evangelist. These are indeed striking words, modern sensibility perceives the contrast of loving and hating as very harsh when referring to one's family members or even to one's own life: «If anyone comes to me and does not love me more than he loves his father, Mother, the wife, children, the brothers, sisters and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple" (v.26). Jesus is really calling for a rejection of human relationships, a rigidity with others, even with those of your own family? Without weakening the eschatological tension that animated the preaching of Jesus we can affirm that here we are faced with a typical Judaism, where the verb hate means: «put it later, overshadow". We find this type of occurrence in the Old Testament, as well as in the Gospels, for example in the passage from Matthew: «No one can serve two masters, because either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will become fond of one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth." (Mt 6,24). Matthew himself helps us to better understand the demanding words of Jesus, because it brings them back in an attenuated form, that is, without using the verb to hate, but a comparative one: «Who loves father or mother more than me, It is not worthy of me; who loves son or daughter more than me, not worthy of me " (Mt 10,37). It deals with, in conclusion, to subordinate all love to that of the Lord, without ceasing to love those whom the law itself commands to love, like their parents. It means that being a disciple is a serious thing, even more so in the time that has become short, and these are valid indications for all believers in Christ, we have already said it, and for every moment of life.

They follow, then, Jesus' words about carrying the cross, already met in LC 9,23, and finally two short parables. As said at the beginning of this comment, this is where we must start to understand what being a disciple entails. These parables have in common the denominator of struggle and perseverance. Following Jesus is equivalent to build a tower, commitment and perseverance are needed, like building a house on the rock (cf.. Mt 7,24); is equivalent to go to war, knowing how to measure one's strengths well.

The following is demanding also because the disciple is called not only to initiate, but also to complete (vv. 28.29.30), and indispensable for following is the willingness to lose everything, also "one's life" (v.26). The good to be possessed is the renunciation of goods, learn the art of loss, of decreasing, of not falling into the trap of possession or the logic of having. Jesus, says Paul, "he emptied himself" (Fil 2,7) and «as rich as he was, he became poor" (2Color 8,9). It should be, also in the disciple, freedom and lightness to complete the path of life traveled as a sequence of Christ. Love is called to become responsibility and freedom perseverance: there lies the necessary renunciation, purification, stripping. The demands of discipleship therefore have to do with the whole of the person - his heart - and with the whole of his time, for the duration of his life. And they warn us against the risk of leaving the work undertaken halfway.

Clement of Alexandria (Protreptic X,39) he spoke of faith as "a big risk" (calos kíndynos). For the first Christians often adhere to Christ, in a context with a pagan majority, it involved persecution and even martyrdom. Today, in our countries of old and tired Christianity, the price of conversion is not felt and even less paid. We are looking for insurance that eliminates insecurity and risks, also with regard to faith and its testimony, When, instead, Jesus, invites you to lose everything to follow Him. We do not hide the fact that we experience difficulties when faced with the harsh and demanding words of Jesus, forgetting that the radicality of the Gospel has first of all a value of revelation, reveal, that is, perspectives that would otherwise remain inaccessible to us. Pope Leo XIV also remembered this in a recent Angelus:

«Brothers and sisters, The provocation that comes to us from today's Gospel is beautiful: while sometimes we happen to judge those who are far from the faith, Jesus puts in crisis “the safety of believers”. They, indeed, tells us that it is not enough to profess faith with words, eat and drink with Him celebrating the Eucharist or know Christian teachings well. Our faith is authentic when it embraces our entire life, when it becomes a criterion for our choices, when it makes us women and men who are committed to doing good and taking risks in love just like Jesus did; He did not choose the easy path of success or power but, just to save ourselves, he loved us until we crossed the “narrow door” of the Cross. He is the measure of our faith, He is the door we must walk through to be saved (See GV 10,9), living his own love and becoming, with our life, workers of justice and peace" (WHO).

From the Hermitage, 7 September 2025

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

«Magnificat», the great “hard rock” of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the solemnity of the Assumption

Homiletics of the Fathers of the Island of Patmos

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

«MAGNIFICAT», THE GREAT HARD ROCK OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY ON THE SOLEMNITY OF THE ASSUMPTION

Even the heresiarch Martin Luther, that the Blessed Virgin was always very devoted - which most of the Catholic faithful, But also many scholars ignore -, In the 1521 he composed an intense little book entitled The Magnificat translated into German and commented.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

On Christmas Day 1886 the young writer and poet, agnostic at the time, Paul Claudel, pass through the portal of Our Lady from Paris and the song of the Magnificat, evangelical text of the liturgy of Vespers.

He later confessed that he emerged from that experience transformed, destined to become the singer of the Christian faith known to all; many know his drama: Announcement made to Mary. Years after, In the 1913, will narrate:

«On that day I believed with such strength of adhesion, with such an elevation of my entire being, with such a strong belief, with such certainty, with such an absence of doubt that later nor the books, nor the reasoning, nor could the fate of a troubled life shake my faith".

The 15 August of each year, the calendar commemorates the solemnity of the assumption into heaven of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the mother of the Lord, despite the widespread secularized denomination of "Ferragosto". Well, that one enters a solemn cathedral like Our Lady or in a small chapel lost in the mountains, each one, on this day, will hear that song of the Magnificat which distinguishes the Holy Mass of this Solemnity. Here is the passage reported by the evangelist Luke.

«In those days Mary got up and went quickly towards the mountainous region, in a city of Judah. Entry into the house of Zaccarìa, greeted Elizabeth. As soon as Elizabeth heard Mary's greeting, the baby leapt in her womb. Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit and exclaimed in a loud voice: “Blessed are you among women and blessed is the fruit of your womb! To what do I owe the mother of my Lord to come to me? there, as soon as your greeting reached my ears, the baby leapt for joy in my womb. And blessed is she who believed in the fulfillment of what the Lord told her”. Mary said: “My soul magnifies the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God, my savior, because he looked at the humility of his servant. From now on all generations will call me blessed. The Almighty has done great things for me and Holy is his name; his mercy to those who fear him from generation to generation. He explained the power of his arm, he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts; he has overthrown the mighty from their thrones, he raised up the humble; he has filled the hungry with good things, he sent the rich away empty-handed. He helped Israel, his servant, remembering his mercy, as he had told our fathers, for Abraham and his descendants, forever”. Maria stayed with her about three months, then he returned to his home" (LC 1,39-56).

Maria, pregnant with Jesus, while he is visiting his relative Elizabeth, pregnant in turn with John the Baptist, intones this extraordinarily long hymn that Luke reports. It is the only time that the words of the Mother of Christ expand to the point of understanding well 102 words in Greek, including articles, pronouns and particles. The other times, only five in total, Mary's sentences reported in the Gospels are short and almost halting, as in Cana during the wedding in which his Son also participates: «They have no more wine» and «Whatever I tell you, do it" (GV 2, 3.5). Let's follow, At that time, the poetic flow of this Marian psalmody woven onto a palimpsest of biblical allusions.

Ideally the singing is for soloist and choir. The first movement is intoned by Maria's "I".: «My soul magnifies the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God, my savior, because he looked at the humility of his servant. From now on all generations will call me blessed. The Almighty has done great things for me." (LC 1,46-49). Origen asks (III):

«What did he have, the mother of the Lord, humble and low, she who carried the Son of God in her womb? Saying: “She looked at the humility of her handmaid”, it's as if he were saying: he looked upon the righteousness of his handmaiden, he looked at his temperance, he looked at his strength and his wisdom" (Origene, Homilies on Luke).

In the second movement of the hymn the voice of a choir enters into which Mary's voice joins, just like a soprano who lets her singing emerge. It is the choir of Christians, heirs of those "poor" of the Old Testament, the grapes (Anawim), those who are stooped, not only under the oppression of the powerful, but also in the humility of adoration towards God, thus overcoming the arrogance of the proud. These, socially poor, but above all faithful and just, they celebrate, ideally uniting with the voice of Mary, the particular divine choices that differ from worldly logic, privileging not the strong or the powerful, but the last and the marginalized; thus overturning historical hierarchies. The Evangelista Luca, using the Greek aorist tense called «gnomic», because it refers to experiences acquired beyond their temporal character, describes through seven verbs, a number that indicates fullness, the singular divine choices:

«He explained the power of his arm, / he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts, / he has overthrown the mighty from their thrones, / he raised up the humble, / he has filled the hungry with good things, / he sent the rich away empty-handed, / he has helped his servant Israel" (LC 1,51-54).

It is a constant logic of God which we also find on the lips of Jesus: «So the last will be first and the first, last" (Mt 20,16) and “Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted" (LC 14, 11).

The charm of Mary's words, In the Magnificat, it has been imprinted in Christian spirituality ever since, informing the lives of many saints and has given rise to a myriad of comments of all kinds and many works of art, both pictorial, how musical. Even the heresiarch Martin Luther, that the Blessed Virgin was always very devoted - which most of the Catholic faithful, But also many scholars ignore -, In the 1521 he composed an intense little book entitled The Magnificat translated into German and commented.

This beautiful song of Magnificat it is placed by the Liturgy as the setting of the Solemnity of the Assumption of Mary which is celebrated everywhere, in the East, as in the Christian West. Since the Dormition-Assumption of Mary is a sign of the ultimate realities, of what must happen in a future that is not so much chronological but rather meaningful, a sign of the fullness that our limits yearn for: in her we sense the glorification that awaits the entire cosmos at the end of time, when "God will be all in all" (1Color 15,28) and in everything. She, the Vergine Maria, it is the portion of humanity already redeemed, figure of that promised land to which we are called, strip of earth transplanted into the sky. A hymn of the Serbian Orthodox Church sings Mary as "land of heaven", earth now in God forever, anticipation of our common destiny.

I would like to conclude with the words of a famous prayer with which Saint Francis greets Mary today remembered as Assumption into heaven:

«Hail Madam, Santa Regina, holy parent of God, Maria, that you are a virgin made Church / and elected by the most holy heavenly Father, who consecrated you together with his most holy beloved Son and with the Holy Spirit Paraclete; / you in whom there was and is every fullness of grace and every good. / Ave, his palace, ave, his tabernacle, ave, your home. / Ave, his clothing, ave, his handmaiden, ave, his Mother. / And I greet you all, holy virtues, that by grace and illumination of the Holy Spirit you are infused into the hearts of the faithful, because they are unfaithful / make them faithful to God" (FF 259-260).

 

From the island of Patmos, 15 August 2025

Solemnity of the Assumption

.

.

______________________

Dear Readers, this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our Bank account in the name of:

Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican

Iban code: IT74R0503403259000000301118

For international bank transfers:

Codice SWIFT: BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff,

the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Be similar to those waiting for their master when he returns from the wedding

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

BEING SIMILAR TO THOSE WHO WAIT FOR THEIR MASTER WHEN HE RETURNS FROM THE WEDDING

Jesus' disciples live on earth, But like pilgrims, while their residence is in the skies. We are, therefore, called to an wait that many times exceeds us.

.

PDF print format article

 

.

«The night [of liberation] it was foretold to our fathers, so that they had courage".

These are the opening words of the first reading this Sunday, taken from the Book of Wisdom, and they prepare well for listening to the Gospel passage reported below:

"During that time, Jesus told his disciples: "Do not fear, small flock, because it pleased your Father to give you the Kingdom. Sell ​​what you own and give it as alms; make bags that don't age, a safe treasure in the heavens, where the thief does not reach and the woodworm does not consume. Because, where is your treasure, your heart will also be there. Be ready, with their robes tight at their sides and their lamps lit; be like those who wait for their master when he returns from the wedding, so that, when he comes and knocks, let them open immediately. Blessed are those servants whom the master finds still awake upon his return; verily I tell you, he will tighten his clothes around his waist, he will have them sit at the table and come to serve them. What if, arriving in the middle of the night or before dawn, he will find them like this, lucky them! Try to understand this: if the master of the house knew at what time the thief was coming, he wouldn't let his house be broken into. You too get ready because, in the hour you don't imagine, the Son of man is coming". Then Peter said: "Man, you say this parable for us or even for everyone?”. The Lord replied: “Who then is the trusted and prudent administrator, that the master will put in charge of his servants to give the food ration in due time? Blessed is that servant who is the master, arriving, will find himself acting like this. Truly I tell you that he will put him in charge of all his possessions. But if that servant said in his heart: “My master is late in coming.", and began to beat the male and female servants, to eat, to drink and get drunk, the master of that servant will arrive on a day when he doesn't expect it and at an hour he doesn't know, he will punish him severely and inflict on him the fate that infidels deserve. The servant who, knowing the master's will, he will not have disposed or acted according to his will, he will receive many beatings; that instead of, not knowing her, he will have done things worthy of beatings, he will receive few. To anyone who was given a lot, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, much more will be required”» (LC 12,32-48).

The first three verses of today's Gospel (12,32-34) they make their own text, because they close an entire pericope dedicated to Jesus' teaching on the possession of material goods. They are His final invitation, which can only be grasped if one has in mind what was written just before in the Gospel, but not reported in today's liturgy, or the verses from the 22 al 31 of the chapter 12 by Luca. Those who follow instead, part of today's song (vv. 35-48), are to be considered as an exhortation to vigilance. They are a set of sentences, of images and small parables - the exegete Maggioni calls them: «mentioned parables» — which have a common denominator: the return of the "Son of man", that, as was said, requires vigilant waiting.

To specify this wait Jesus compares himself from time to time to a Lord (the gentleman, v. 36.37.43) returning from a banquet, he comes to the door and knocks, then reward the servants who remained awake by serving them at the table. Or a thief (the thief, v. 39) who arrives at an hour that the owner of the house (the host) disavows. Or again to that Lord who promotes a trustworthy and prudent administrator with responsibility (the faithful steward, the wise one, v. 42). All these images finally, Jesus reveals to us, they fit the figure of that «Son of man [that] he will come at an hour you don't think" (v. 40).

Being attentive and vigilant at the cost of losing sleep is crucial, but who are those who wait? In the passage Jesus speaks of servants and administrators, but everywhere in the text the people called to supervise are indicated with the second person plural, as if to include both the disciples who then heard the Lord, both contemporary listeners or readers of the Gospel, so we too: "you be ready" (v. 35); «you must be similar to…» (v. 36); "get ready" (v. 40). Finally, the answer given to Peter who had asked emerges: «You are telling this parable for us or even for everyone?». The Lord, revealing a ranking of responsibility while waiting, says to him: "To whom much is given, much will be asked for; to whom men have committed much, It will ask the more ". In this way it is clarified that if the recipients of the teaching, all in all, they are all believers, However, the responsibility of the leaders of the Christian community to whom Jesus dedicates a specific parable stands out.

Let the discussion be addressed to the Church and its leaders is clear from the terms used, which refer to a precise space-time context, be it the house, of the night or of the extended time of waiting. Jesus speaks of "girded sides" (v.34), while the word "house" is explicitly mentioned and then there is the night because of the "lit lamps" (v.35) and of the "second and third watches" (v.38 in Greek). We have here a reference to the theme of the Exodus - the "girded loins" are an explicit citation of Is 12,11 — where the Easter celebration took place in the evening, at home and in the family (Is 12,3). The hasty departure from Egypt of the children of Israel which took place at night is evoked and lifting the edges of the long oriental dress and tying it at the hips with a belt made the journey easier. It seems that Jesus wants to urge the Church to set out, to make an exodus, but in reality it is a matter of proceeding in depth rather than in extension, a journey that makes us ready to receive the One who is about to arrive: the true path is made by the Lord who comes! The center of the announcement of the three parables is therefore the coming of the Lord and the name of the path to which the disciples are called is vigilance. In fact, Jesus has already given instructions so that it is not hindered by useless obstacles such as greed (LC 12,15), the worries (LC 12,22.26) and fears (LC 12,32) that occupy the heart and take away freedom.

The parable of the vigilant servants (vv. 36-38) seems to be the narrative version of a beatitude - "blessed are those servants" (v. 37); «lucky are they» (v.38) – which might sound like this: «Blessed are the vigilant servants, because the Lord himself will become their servant". The reversal of values ​​present in the Beatitudes is expressed here in the paradoxical figure of the master returning home, even late at night, e, finding his servants awake to open the door for him and welcome him to greet him, he himself begins to serve them. But this is the logic of Jesus which overturns worldly logic and which should apply in the Christian community: «Who is bigger? Who is at the table or who serves? Perhaps he is not the one who sits at the table? Yet I stand among you as one who serves" (LC 22,27).

A sense of imminence dominates the entire narrative for something that has yet to happen and yet implies anything but staticity or standing still. From everything we have seen above an indeterminacy seems to emerge, which however conveys the meaning of the Christian experience well. Jesus' disciples live on earth, But like pilgrims, while their residence is in the skies (Letter to Diognetus). We are, therefore, called to an expectation that often surpasses us. The problem of vigilance in these short parables, said another way, it is that of time, especially in everyday life, weekdays. Everyday, any weekday, if full of anticipation, it is "the day of the Lord". As in Luke's parable, every day is a good day to stay awake, keep the lamps lit and welcome the Son of man who will return. Thus he invited us to await the Collect prayer this Sunday: «Let not our lamp go out, because, vigilantly awaiting your hour, we are introduced by you into the eternal homeland".

From the Hermitage, 10 August 2025

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.

March, Mary and Jesus' lesson on the dimension of the Eternal

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

MARTA, Mary and Jesus' lesson on the dimension of the Eternal

«Marta, March, You struggle and you get acted for many things, But of one only one is needed. Maria chose the best part, that will not be removed "

.

PDF print format article

 

.

The evangelical song of this Sunday belongs to a tradition that only Luca knows, since it is not reported by the other Synoptics.

The fourth Gospel, however, knows Marta and Maria, The two women protagonists, and reports that they are resident in Bethany, with his brother Lazzaro. Over time, Pericopes has increased its strong influence on Christian spirituality, so much so that it becomes the paradigm of the contrast between active life to the contemplative one. For example, St. Francis of Assisi wrote a "rule" for the herds imagining that the friars should be inspired by these two sisters:

«Those who want to lead religious life in the hermitages, are three friars or at the most four. Two of them act as mothers […] and follow Marta's life, And the two who act as children that of Maria ".

Let's read the Evangelical text.

"During that time, while they were on the way, Jesus entered a village and a woman, named Marta, he hosted him. She had a sister, named Maria, which, Sitting at the foot of the Lord, he listened to his word. Marta, on the other hand, was distorted for the many services. Then he came forward and said: "Man, I don't care anything that my sister left me alone to serve? So say that help me ". But the Lord replied: «Marta, March, You struggle and you get acted for many things, But of one only one is needed. Maria chose the best part, that will not be removed " (LC 10,38-42).

This tale He is placed by Luca after the beginning of Jesus' journey to Jerusalem. More precisely after he stopped to answer the question of a doctor of the law on who is the "next" and having told the parable of the good Samaritan. Following, continuing his journey to the Holy City, before going up for the Monte degli Ulivi and then arrive in the city, Jesus enters a village where the meeting with the two sisters Marta and Maria takes place. We know of the two women and his brother Lazzaro who is not mentioned by Luca. Some hypothesized that they were celibates, Because in the Gospels we are not talking about husbands for Marta and Maria, nor of a wife for Lazzaro, e, according to some commentator, they could belong to the group of pii Israelites called Esseni. Perhaps Jesus conquered followers even between pious essenes who ardently desired eschatological salvation and that in the first century AD. Intensify, apparently, The expectation of the Messiah Davidico? Lazzaro and his sisters Maria and Marta, clearly unmarried people who lived in Bethany near the Mount of Ulivi, they could be examples of sympathizers of this kind.

Much more interesting For us it is the fact that Luca placed this meeting immediately after the parable of the good Samaritan, making the readers perceive the gospel that the two scenes are connected. The parable served to explain what it means to do close; This page instead speaks of love for the Lord. In this way Luca, counterbalanced a philanthropic ideal perhaps too high, Bring the example of Marta and Maria. Some exegetes underline the accurate choice of the evangelist in presenting below the two scenes: The teaching contained in the song of Marta and Maria can be read in relation to the previous parable of the Samaritan which is done next, completing it, since it offers the foundation of merciful behavior. It is important to, that is, listen to the word of Jesus, because authentic expression of the divine will expressed in the commandment of the love of others. Listening to the Word of Christ is therefore the foundation of Christian behavior and becomes the essential condition for inheriting eternal life, who was the request of the doctor of the law. The words of Jesus in Marta, like this, they restore a priority and invite not to lose sight of the essential, what you really need, or, stay at the feet of Jesus.

From the Gospel of John we know that the guests of Jesus are friends of the Lord, in particular it is said of Lazzaro, but here, in Luca, as shown above, he is not remembered, nor is there a failure to curiosity about the emotions or feelings of Jesus towards the guests. We have two sisters, Two women, one of which is even sitting at the feet of Jesus, taking, therefore, The posture of the disciple. Now, never a Jewish master of the time would have accepted that a woman assumed the attitude of a disciple towards him. Mary's behavior is alienating and contravenes the rules imposed by the culture of time. Unless rare exceptions are well known the said rabbinic according to which women should not have been disciple of any teacher and even studying the Torah. That's why this text had ample resonance among those who seek a favorable voice in the Gospel on the identity and condition of women in the Christian community. If we look, indeed, Marta and Maria, We discover that the way they are represented touches a very current theme. Maria is depicted like a disciple at the foot of an Rabbi, While by Marta, Luca, Speaking of his "many services", Use the verb diakone. Listening to the word (v.39) Perhaps it does not remember the Ministry of the Word and the verb "serve" (v.40) does not refer to the Ministry of the Table, to diaconal tasks? The Gospel seems to report a trivial gesture of a person's welcome in his own home, But as often happens when Jesus is half, A simple event has unpredictable consequences. Let's see it closely. Luca writes that Marta and not Mary welcome Jesus to welcome:

“While they were on the way, Jesus entered a village and a woman, named Marta, he hosted him " (v.38).

We do not know why only Marta is mentioned: perhaps because it is then she who actually deals with hospitality? And why there is no man to welcome, as it was of practice, Another man who enters the house, come, eg, Abraham made guests in Mamre under his tent? The rest, It is not the only case that Luca tells us: Let's think of Lidia, that in the book of the acts of the Apostles the author presents as a small entrepreneur who even obliges Paul to stop in his home (At 16,15).

Marta welcomes, so, Jesus, But in a way we would say today "hyperactive". Luca writes that it was: "Distralta for the many services" (v. 40, According to the CEI), So much to be totally absorbed. It is excessively worried and lets itself be taken by anxiety. But on this point we must be precise. Where lies marta's mistake? Her, evidently, He performs too much his "service" (Diakonia) that, while it should be positive, The result is in truth prejudiced. They are neither the welcome of Marta, nor his intention to serve to fall under the blows of criticism, But the excess of his actions and the concerns that are at the origin. The text does not contrast the Diacony of the table or what was the lovely listening to the word.

Marta advances her protest to the master Jesus, without entering dialogue with her sister Maria, which, in the text, never takes the floor; taciturn becomes the central character, In the end praised by the Lord. Marta instead speaks and moves, which refers to the episode preserved in Giovanni, where she always goes to Jesus, He speaks and disputes him that if he had been there his brother Lazzaro would not have died. Mary also in the Gospel of John remains sitting, It is Jesus who calls her and only then does it move towards him. In a situation similar to who knows how many, It happened in every family, What emerges here is the word of Jesus. This story has been preserved precisely to remember what Jesus says and not for the banality of the meeting. And Jesus, turning to Marta, with that double vocative - «Marta, Marta » - Typically biblical, reproaching it veiledly, but showing, But, also sympathy and affection for her, wishes to lead the woman to the essential, To that unique and priority part that Mary has chosen spontaneously.

Jesus tells Marta what he really needs, that is necessary, and now, through the story that Luca does, Readers are also aware of this. It is the good part, As the Greek text says. The CEI version, as we read, he feels to translate with: "Better part". The commentators here are divided, Some prefer the "best" qualifying adjective, others insist that the text, instead, would avoid comparison: improve, indeed, presupposes something less good. San Girolamo also translates, in the vulgate, adopting a superlative: Mary's best part of chosen.

Luca uses the Greek adjective hagathèn (it gives Hagas, «buono»), which in the New Testament first designates the incomparable goodness that distinguishes God in his essence. But then what is the meaning of the word of Jesus who underlines Mary's choice compared to that of Marta, his sister? The Word of Christ is very clear: No contempt for active life, nor much less for generous hospitality; But a clear call to the fact that the only really necessary thing is another: listen to the word of the Lord; And the Lord at that moment is there, present in the person of Jesus! Everything else will pass and will be removed, But the Word of God is eternal and gives meaning to our daily action.

From the Hermitage, 20 July 2025

.

.

Sant'Angelo Cave in Ripe (Civitella del Tronto)

 

.

Visit the pages of our book shop WHO and support our editions by purchasing and distributing our books.

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

.

.