From all the valleys echo appeals to the Holy Father Francis: "As the Church ended ', the new book by Aldo Maria Valli

FROM ALL VALLEYS resonate APPEALS TO THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS: "HOW THE CHURCH purposes', THE NEW BOOK OF ALDO MARIA VALLEYS

.

It seems that in a recent conversation off to dramatic, a Cardinal has said very clearly to the Holy Father: "You're wrecking the Church!». If this really happened as it is said, the Holy Father, after a moment of outrage, hopefully we have been able to reflect, to invoke the Holy Spirit that wisdom and strength that will enable him to advance towards the Kingdom.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

.

I smite the righteous and the faithful blame me; but let the oil of not anoint my head [Shall 141,5]

.

.

.

The Vatican TG1 Aldo Maria Valli, author of the book Like the Church ended – see WHO

Aldo Maria Valli, renowned journalist of TG1 and friend of the Fathers de The Island Patmos, It is well known to Italian lovers Catholic Church and the Pope for his frank and courageous profession of faith, a rare thing in today's publicists; but although few, some are saved. Taking advantage of the freedom of opinion and the parresia, that the same reigning Pope urges, Also among the laity, his love for the Pope does not stop him express his difficulties and sufferings, and to make him critical respect and quietly suggest remedies or fixes in the field of its action, and not touching the doctrinal magisterium, but his moral character and his way of governing the Church.

.

That's how he published by Edizioni Liberalibri Macerata agile booklet, where once again he shows his writing skills to the general public, capable of dealing competently, simplicity and clarity delicate issues and moral problems and the life of the Church.

.

I think his style, his interests and his argument make Valli somewhat similar to the eighteenth-century Enlightenment, but with the big difference that, while critical of these the Church and the Pope were destructive and poisonous, those of Valli, based as they are on his Catholic faith, as severe, They are constructive and beneficial. This is why I would want to define it as a "Catholic Enlightenment".

.

The Enlightenment of the eighteenth century sophists were conceited and presumptuous, with a sarcastic language, vulgar, gossip and offensive. Valli instead expresses with a fine irony harmless, so that at each period of his writing is impossible to suppress a laugh. But be clear: Valli not tease anyone and is not a prankster: his is a noble reformer intent and educational head and members. It is the classic disciplines, laughing manners the footsteps of Juvenal, precious literary genre that arose in classical Latin, but that is rare in Catholic literature. Valli recovers with all the elegance that is temperamentally own. His pamphlet it seems the story of a good guy, Christian educated, who, being in a noisy gathering of adults who are accapigliando between them, while the shaken president fails to keep order, naively he manifested with simplicity and with its common sense, based on what he learned from his oratory masters, what should they do to create an agreement between them, confident of being heard.

.

Valli himself coined a special term - I have not even found in the dictionary -, calling this symbolic parenetic-story "dystopian", or, if I do not understand trivially and aggressively "out of place", as it might appear to some so-called "friends" of the Pope, but "out of place (tops) central", a little 'as you talk of the office "displaced" or a branch or subsidiary of an industrial company: is not the main headquarters, even if it has relationship with it and refers to it.

.

Why Valli has resorted to this curious contrivance? For a form, I can safely say, of modesty, not to sound like a know-it-or nosy disrespectful, though in what he says there is frankness and courage of those who know what it says and says it for love and not for anything else. Valli looks from another place, but from what he knows to see well. It intrudes, but participates.

.

Another clue the "story" is given, in my opinion, from the fact that in reality, under the veil of literary narrative that smacks of fable or parable, there's a real story, but there is the heartfelt openness of mind of a faithful son of the Church to his Father and Brother in Christ in faith, dad, to urge him to make good his duty, duty that the Pope knows better than him, so from all the calm and good-natured style of writing, reflected the firm conviction of the Author, based on faith in the charisma of the Recipient, he will listen, considering the terrible catastrophic consequences, that is nothing less than the end of the Church - and here the author obviously welcomes the paradox -, which would bring its excessive behavior concern not to displease the world and gain acclaim, at the expense of a faithful following of Christ.

.

It'll also want to disagree, but the veiled accusation background that the author makes to Pope Francis, and around which turns the whole story, It is carried out with clarity and consistency and, in my view, with validity and plausibility, and is the excessive tendency of the Pope to bring the world and the Church among them, then the attachment to the world and to himself, which appears as the hermeneutical key to explain a series of Pope Francis defects, of which, however, he can not be unaware and which he himself, probably, You might want to correct, although it slowed and flattered by unworthy and unable collaborators, that with their stables end up damaging rather than helping.

.

Pope francesco, for its peculiar human qualities and for his outstanding and friendly communication - suggests Valleys - is certainly very welcome to the world. But you should ask yourself what is true after all this success accounts; It should consider whether the success depends on the fact that attracts the crowds to Christ or just to himself? Christ interests him most of the crowds? Search the crowds to lead them to Christ or Christ is the means to communicate with the crowds? Christ's enough or he also needs to success in the world? If Christ's enough, because he cares so much about not receiving criticism from the world, as it happened with the previous Pontiffs? Why the world is so beneficial? It is perhaps converting, the world, to Christ? According to the facts does not seem right, indeed it seems that the world is always the same, if not worse. So what? Why were the traditional enemies of the Church today praise the Pope? It seems that they have given up their mistakes, indeed quite the opposite. At the same time he caused controversy and scandal in the Church. Certainly it has the consent of the modernists; but they are false Catholics and false friends. The Holy Father Francis speak of Christ to the crowds? What are the effects of his meetings with the crowds? Some approaches to Christ? Wanting to make themselves acceptable to the world itself is not bad, provided it is not at the price of making unwelcome to Christ. It should be added to the personal circumstances of Pope Francis, the nefarious and diabolical Masonic project, now it is taken up by the UN environments, of a single religion and universal meta-Christian, syncretic and rational, no supernatural and without dogmas revealed, mandatory for all, that involves the equal level all religions in their common elements, without hierarchies, with the rejection a priori of a great religion on the other.

.

This is not a nightmare, or a fantasy and morbid pre-conciliar Valleys, but it is a specific plan already in its time elaborated by Emmanuel Kant [1] and endorsed by Catholic theologians such as Edward Schillebeeckx, Karl Rahner, Jacques Dupuis e Timothy Radcliffe.

.

The de-construction of the Church

.

Valli imagine placing themselves in a future in which the Church, for misinterpreting the renewal and modernization promoted by Vatican II, shall lead, under the pressure of the masonry, to the extreme the current modernistic process of "self-demolition", as he called the Blessed Paul VI, thus suppressing the identity proper to the Church, towards its full approval to the world, under the pretext of "dialogue with the world" and of '' immersion in the world ". The Church in the world drowns.

.

As a paradigm of this solvent, Valli was in possession of several heretical projects, such as that of Rahner and Schillebeeckx to relativism or historicism Kasper or project of liberation theology or teilhardismo or "global religion" invented by Freemasonry. Instead, choose an author, of which today no one speaks, known only to heresiologists: the project Marcion, heretic of the second century. But Valli, with fine intuition, he grasped the enormous relevance of this clever seducer, and imagine that in the future worldly and modernistic Church will be the rehabilitation of Marcion [cf. pp. 99-102]. Of course this will happen - it means Valleys - not at the official level, because the Church will never approve a heretic, However, the Pope will leave this heresy spreads, neglecting to refute it and to protect the faithful. Herein lies the grave pastoral negligence of the Supreme Pontiff, in contrast this with its predecessors. This is what Valli wants to tell us: although the Pope free from heresy, nor could it be otherwise, But let the wolf face slaughter of the flock and does not care to heal the Christian intelligence evils, dell 'understanding faith.

.

But what constitutes Marcionism, Today I relive in the theology of Rahner? The exhibits in the Valleys 13 thesis, similar to the fees of a damn council [cf. pp. 101-102]. In summary: the good and merciful God, the true God, is the God of the Gospel, in contrast to the punishing and cruel God of the Old Testament. The Christian God, unlike the Jewish God grim - Marcion continues - is the God who welcomes us and approving us in everything we do, and that allows us to enjoy alot of this world, because the world is good, in the certainty of being always forgiven, without conditions, although we are not repentant, since at bottom, very bottom - "experience athematic, inexpressible and transcendental "-, all are good. Sin is not the cosmic tragedy guilt invented by the Old Testament with the myth of the "original sin", cruel myth, pessimistic and offensive to the dignity and human freedom. The sin, assuming it exists, as wisely says Teilhard de Chardin, It is but an inevitable and normal nell'inarrestabile hiccup ascending cosmic evolution to the Cosmic Christ, who fails to exercise any "repair" or "satisfaction" to God for sin, but Christ is simply the supreme model of the evolution of humanity to the point Omega.

.

The Church is the The light.

.

Ora but, let us understand Valleys, things are not like that at all. Christ is not simply a holy man among others. The Marcionism-rahnerismo is a drug that numbs the conscience and, in the words of the Catechism of St. Pius X, We delude us to save us without merit. The true Church, one that will not end, It is quite another thing and it is shown by the doctrine of Vatican II. So the book of Valli could just as well be titled "How the Church must start over", with much clarity is barely visible, between the lines of his fine irony, his great love for the Church, logically accompanied by grief and bewilderment, as well as when you love someone, one can not but be saddened by her woes. But in the case of the Church, we know that it has the strength to overcome the power of darkness. Indeed, one of the great documents of Vatican Council II, is its Dogmatic Constitution - which means infallible doctrine - the Church The light, wanted by Blessed Pope Paul VI, so at that point the teachings of the Council, until then, only Pastoral by the will of St. John XXIII, also they acquired a dogmatic aspect. This is the reference point of Valli. Who has not understood this, then of his book he did not understand anything.

.

"The Council", says the onset of The light [cf. n. 1] "Ardently desires that the light of Christ, shining on the face of the Church, enlighten all men, preaching the Gospel to every creature ". And it is certain that Valli has this unfailing duty of the Church, who founded the existence for eternity, which paradoxically allows you to speak of a Church which "ends", almost to challenge and to make fun of that satanic power, now it embodied by Freemasonry, he is certain to be defeated. But this power, in which Satan is a master, is none other than that of the world, or rather of "this world", of which Satan is the "prince" [cf. GV 12,31; 14,30; 16,11]. Indeed, according to Scripture, It is not the world as such is bad, quite the opposite; it is immensely good, as created by God; and were it not that, so lovable, Jesus would not have said: "God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son " [GV 3,16]. Instead it is bad, this world, as a slave to sin, of death and of Satan. In this sense John commands us to "love not the world" [The Gv 2,16]. Is this the world, which the Christian can not be a friend [cf. GC 4,4], world from which he is hated [cf. The Gv 3,13], because he does not belong, while it would be loved, if he owned [cf. GV 15,19] and from it leave deceive, if he yields to her charms, its allurements and all his empty promises or be frightened by his threats. This world must be escaped [cf. Pt II 2,20], fought [cf. The Tm 6,12] and won [cf. GV 16,33]. Precisely because of being light and saviors of the world. The end of the world", so, It is nothing but the end of this world. But the real and healthy world is destined to rise again and live for eternity.

.

Church and world

.

This is why the No.. 40 from the The joy and hope [2], which speaks of a 'mutual relationship between the Church and the world "- we say it frankly and knowledge of the facts - is an incomplete and deceptive speech, because it seems that the Church and the world are like the two sides of humanity, at the same level, with each other's qualities, only call to dialogue and to work peacefully with each other for the good of humanity itself. This vision, pushed to its extreme consequences, It leads to the identification of the Church with the world, which it is the unfortunate conception of modernism [3]. Unfortunately the council neglects in that section - and only here in the whole Council, mind you - to talk about the corruption of the world, the transcendence of the Church to the world, the superiority of his order than that of the world, the power and the duty of the Church to be the light and salvation of the world, as well as its ability to give the world a peace which the world can not give. Forget, in conclusion, the The light. This was the slot from which you entered the "smoke of Satan", ie have arisen that deleterious secularism and the progressive loss of the sense of the sacred and the Transcendent, leading to the fascinating, disastrous and devastating modernism, under the pretext of progress and reform, He is shaking the Church to its foundations. In this way the Church is no longer in God's service, but serving the world, because a beyond this world does not exist. The power that is not interested in the spiritual, of charity, but the mundane, self-affirmation in the world.

.

Like this, to the Eternal, It has replaced history, contemplation has replaced action; the liturgy of the feast of the community; religion has become political, spirituality in psychology, morality in sociology. It is missing the love of God, he's one scipito, arbitrary and unspecified "love of neighbor", who, being devoid of reference to God, flaw or by excess or by defect, while the world beyond the divine disappeared and the only world is this world. No more fear of God, but the fear of men. What matters is not the glory that comes from God, but the one that comes from the world. No more success at the good, but worldly success. The sacred was profaned and the profane has been sanctified. The dialogue - often hypocritical and ineffectual - was absolute and put in place the affirmation of the truth, while the moral law loses its absolute and is relativized.

.

As already he observed in Jacques Maritain 1966 in The peasant of the Garonne: "There has been brought to their knees before the world". You live under the terror of being "overcome". And the idol of the "modern world" arose, a new god, to which Satan wants us to bow down. The new becomes good for the simple fact of being new; the traditional, the perennial, the desire to preserve good and be faithful to it is cursed fundamentalism. For the modernists retain the Gospel is conservatism, while they hold more than ever to maintain their lavish bank account. Today, modernism, in large forces and bolder than ever, After climbing un'indefessa lasting half a century, It has now reached the same threshold of the See of Peter. It lacks only one step - so it believes - to establish a modernist papacy and to end so the Church. But Valli rightly has his doubts that this will never happen.

.

That the Church today is quiet - if you exclude a small group of troublemakers - and indeed has never had it so good as now, He opined as Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, It is the illusion of the modernists, who hold large slices of power. Indeed, it is precisely typical illusion of who holds the power, believe that things are going well, why go his way, at least while it lasts. At this point there is the need of real reform of the Roman Curia. Dad, in the eyes of the modernists, passes to be a great reformer Pope, but its does not seem clear idea of ​​reform: It is still one of the 1968, when he shouted "long live the change", "Down with the conservation!». But today, After fifty years of change often senseless, wise people feel the need to retrieve many non-negotiable values ​​foolishly abandoned. So the reform today - the true conciliar reform - stands out as the recovery of these values. And instead, Unfortunately, the Pope insists in this mindset sessantottino.

.

For modernists, naturally, is not it true; and then they are thrown to fish on this Pope to convince him to create a modernist-Lutheran-Mason Papacy, that has nothing to do with the reform of the Council, if not for the possible unhappy hooking n. 40 Of The joy and hope shortly before invoked between these lines. Dad, indeed, should have corrected the trend unrealistic and too optimistic that chapter, whereas, Unfortunately, exaggerates the scope, and this explains his worldly tendency, Valli who rightly accused him in her book.

.

In his recent speech to the Roman Curia, the Pope decried the formation of plots. Well, This is above the plot, which it seems that the Pope does not know. It is the diabolical attempt to secularize, curtail, scale down, desecration, Empty and desecrate the Church in order to reduce it to the poor measures of the world, the type of Amnesty International O Green Peace or gods Boy Scouts. This is the plot from which the Pope should look to protect himself and the Church on these plots of Satan. The real danger, for the Roman Curia, for the Pope and for the Church; the real "cancer", the real "traitors" and "infidels", let's say heretics and apostates, are not so noisy and restless Lefebvre, much less conservatives, They should work with progressives; the danger are the modernists, that I am there long hand of Freemasonry, of communists and within the Lutheran Church and the Roman Curia.

.

Traps oats meas

.

The duty to accommodate the values ​​of the world must not be a pretext for the Church mondanizzare; The duty to be modern must not be a pretext to promote modernism; the duty to encourage progress must not be a pretext to offend conservatives; the duty to avoid the conservatism, rigidity and stagnation should not be an excuse to denigrate those who want to be faithful to the immutable truth and to the absoluteness of the moral law; the duty of hospitality scompagnarsi can not distinguish from those who deserve to be the undeserving: an account is to welcome home a needy and a bill is to welcome a thief. The duty to appreciate the different should not be an excuse for not correcting the heretic. Respect for other religions, It does not exempt from the duty to correct their mistakes. The duty to rescue material poverty, should not overshadow the most important duty of treating diseases of the spirit. With the poor, the humble and repentant will be merciful, but with the cunning, the stubborn and arrogant you must be strict. The duty to practice ecumenism must not be a pretext to promote syncretism, relativism and indifference. The duty to appreciate pluralism should not be an excuse for neglecting the unity and universality - katholikos - of faith. The duty to obtain loyal employees must be accompanied to the differentiation between those sincere and impostors and flatterers.

.

Yet the Pope knows his duty. It is only attracted by the vertigo of success and power. It is therefore necessary that we remember him and tell him: So the glory of the world! "Switch the scene of this world!” [The Cor 7,31]. Repent and put in place the talent that God gave you, especially your office Petrine, that Christ has given you not to represent yourself, but to represent Him, not to create your own Church, but to serve, protect and preserve His Church.

.

In his writings suggest coming in Valli to propose the terms of a real reform, which it is to re-orient the Church from the gaze toward the ground at a look toward the sky. From the look of the hens at Eagle eyes. From this point we have to make a call to the conscience of the Holy Father and to trust that he will listen to us. A pope should in fact mimic the Popes Saints who preceded him and not theologians trendy, or the prophets who "preach peace if you have something in your teeth to bite" [Me 3,5]. It is not to say that Pope Francis does not have current models ahead. You could say, joking, who has not spoiled for choice, He could go down, for not going further back, until the nineteenth century Popes.

.

The Pope's relationship with Christ

.

Pope Francis seems to have loosened his relationship with Christ, compared to previous Papi. Hence the negligence in performing his duty as Vicar of Christ. It seems very concerned to maintain or improve a relationship with people and with the world, no matter what, provided that the relationship is. But Christ's mandate is not. He sends us so, all over the world, but not to proclaim a message like the world, although highly social, ecological or humanities, but to teach clearly and unequivocally, all the precise things that He has commanded us to teach, no more and no less, without bringing out the excuse that then there were no recorders, or that today times have changed.

.

The Pope, therefore, instructed by Christ, with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, to teach the gospel to all nations, infallibly to interpret the Word of God, to cherish, explain and defend the deposit of faith, convert and call people to Christ, to teach men of good will the fundamental duties of the natural moral law and human rights. He also received from Christ the power to "bind and loose" (power of the keys), namely to control and legislate, ie allow or prohibit in the field of the sacraments, of canon law and the conduct of the faithful in the name of the Law of Christ. He has the power of the high priest, that is to sanctify and cleanse the holy people of God, to rule and guide in the name of Christ, the Church towards the Kingdom of God, and the priestly service of "establish all things in Christ», according to the motto of the Saint Pius X. It has a duty to be filled with charity for all, just and merciful, to be "servant of the servants of God", according to the motto of the Holy Pope Gregory the Great, humbly listen to the prophets or seers, inspired by the Holy Spirit, who humbly remind him of his duties, There were also among them a poor young induced and as a commoner Catherine of Siena, and the duty finally to offer themselves with Christ as a sacrifice of sweet savor unto the Father in the Holy Mass and daily crosses for the salvation of mankind.

.

This Pope, that in the eyes of the world and the modernists It appears a "great reformer" (Walter Kasper), Pope a "revolutionary" (Eugenio Scalfari), a "prophetic" Papa (Marco Tarquinio), the Pope that "solves the old conflict of centuries and millennia" (Alberto Melloni), the "father of the peoples" (Nicolas Maduro), the "Pope of modernity" (Raniero La Valle), "Apologist of conscience" (Arturo Sosa); the "Pope of liberty" (Bianchi), the Pope of "spontaneous Church and relaxed" (Timothy Radcliffe), the 'protector of homosexuals' (Andrea Grillo); "the patron saint of the family ' (Vincenzo Paglia), the "defender of refugees' (Nunzio Galantine), "the leader of the international left" (Oscar Madariaga), "The enemy of Trump and capitalists" (Antonio Spadaro); the "Pope of mercy" (Raniero Cantalamessa), the "brother Masons' (Gianfranco Ravasi), "Islam's friend ' (Al-Fayyed) … But actually, regardless of all its merits, is the Pope who, finding themselves having to govern a church agitated and prone to a crisis of faith of a severity never happened in history, It can not seem to control the situation, so that, a most worthy Cardinal who occupied high posts to the Holy See, it seems that in a recent interview in dramatic goldeneye told him in no uncertain terms: "You're wrecking the Church!». At that - if this really happened as it is said - the Holy Father, after a moment of outrage, hopefully we have been able to reflect, to invoke the Holy Spirit that wisdom and strength that will enable him to advance towards the Kingdom.

.

Varazze, 1January 2018 – Blessed Virgin Mary Mother of God

.

______________

NOTE

[1] Religion within the limits of pure reason, The third, Bari 1985.

[2] Note that the The joy and hope, unlike the The light, It is a simple constitution pastoral, so do not bug-free, no doctrinal, but pastoral.

[3] This view tends Masonic, perhaps inspired Rahner, It must be corrected with the dogmatic doctrine of The light.

.

.

For purchases on-line see WHO

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

THE BOOK OF HOLY MASSES DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS, WHO

.

.

.

.

love joy: we thought it was love, instead it is a dramatic split within the Church. Strong doubts canonist Yorker Gerald Murray

THE JOY OF LOVE : We thought it was LOVE, INSTEAD IS A DRAMATIC SPLIT IN THE CHURCH. STRONG DOUBTS THE NEW YORK canonist GERALD MURRAY

.

" The love joy it had already been formulated by Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio at the time when he was archbishop of Buenos Aires. If at the time he had sent to Rome, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, after having examined, he would answer: “This text does not conform to the authentic magisterium taught by Canon Law, by John Paul II and Benedict XVI ' "

.

Author
Preparation of ’ island of Patmos

.

.

"I thought it was love, instead it was a gig »

Massimo Troisi [Naples 1953 – Rome 1994]

.

.

.

the late Massimo Troisi

After the statement by Father Thomas G. Weinandy, eminent theologian cappuccino Washington [see previous article WHO], these days more precise and detailed statements were made at a later American television program by our American brethren, canonist Gerald Murray, priest of the Archdiocese of New York and a distinguished scholar.

.

A report the video was a priest of the Archdiocese of New York that for some years he lived in Rome in contact with the Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, at the time when this American priest resided at the North American College during his specialized studies in a Roman pontifical universities.

.

Those who live in their subjective reality, which in itself it seems really more and more divorced from the real ecclesial and pastoral, with one now hovering spirit of sloth and indifference omission, They can also pretend that all is well, while we should take note that the ambiguity of the reigning Pontiff has nothing to do with reforms. Neither has nothing to do with the fact that throughout history the Church, many important reforms have generated over the centuries discussions and discontent to no end, before being accepted.

.

The obvious dramatic break today in the Church, It is due to the fact that the problems created by ambiguous expressions, ambivalent and two-way interpretative, such as providing answers were words even more ambiguous and confusing. Is this, to those to whom it was not yet clear, remember that is generating the chaos get in ed Extras ecclesial.

.

We could not translate from the video reported by New York priest but we can summarize that in it, the distinguished canonist interviewed, precise and remember:

.

"The love joy it had already been formulated by Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio at the time when he was Archbishop of Buenos Aires. If at the time he had sent to Rome, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, after having examined, he would answer: “This text does not conform to the authentic magisterium taught by Canon Law, by John Paul II and Benedict XVI " […] Today, however, we find ourselves faced with something defined by the Pope as his authentic magisterium, but which would never have been recognized as such in harmony with Catholic teaching, if he had it spread as archbishop of Buenos Aires […] Doctrine and discipline proceed together in an inseparable way, that's why this is worrying […] I therefore believe that the Cardinals who presented their dubia are right. If the moral teaching of the Church is not proposed and presented in a decisive and accurate, then we fall into chaos ".

.

We refer to the video viewing in which Father Gerald Murray exposes and explains the great and dangerous problem we are experiencing today.

.

.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.

From porn-theology of Avvenire ambiguity of the Argentine Bishops which can not produce clear and unequivocal pontifical magisterium

THEOLOGY OF THE PORN FUTURE Ambiguity ARGENTINE BISHOPS THAT CAN NOT MAKE CLEAR AND PAPAL UNEQUIVOCAL MAGISTERIUM

.

The publication of the Roman Pontiff's response to the Argentine bishops on the By Janet it is making the modernists cheer, but they do not realize that the issue is not entirely resolved, because unfortunately, the papal ruling, as useful and worthy of consideration, not yet full clarity about the vexed question, which is always the: Maybe if they can or not cases where the divorced and remarried may be admitted to Confession and Holy Communion; but above all what they are and what may be, these cases.

.

.

Authors
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p. – Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

Click on the cover to access the bookshop

.

 

.

.

.

.

.




«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:

or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

From the desert to Christmas: In the beginning was the Word, it was not the poor, It was not a refugee, born lo jus soli

— Advent catechesis —

CHRISTMAS IN THE DESERT: IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD, It WAS NOT THE POOR, It WAS NOT THE REFUGEE, NEITHER THE jus soli

.

during the Solemnity of Christmas, in all our churches proclaim again the Prologue of the Holy Gospel of Blessed John the Evangelist, which recites: "In the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God and the Word was God ". In no church whole Catholic world you can read, in accordance with the increasingly fashionable and politically correct scristianizzante: "In the beginning was the poor, and the poor was the refugee, and the fugitive was with God, and the fugitive claimed him soli juice from the columns of Future it's from The Osservatore Romano »

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

The beginning of the gospel of Jesus, Christ, Son of God. As it is written in the prophet Isaiah: "There, before thee I send my messenger: he will prepare your way. The voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord, make straight his paths ", There was John, who baptized in the wilderness and proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. They flocked to him all the country of Judea and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And they were baptized by him in Jordan, confessing their sins. John was camel hair suit, with a leather belt around his waist, and he ate locusts and wild honey. E proclaimed: "After me he is the one who is stronger than me: I am not worthy to stoop down and untie the laces of his sandals. I have baptized you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit " [MC 1, 1-18]

.

.

Saint Christmas 2017, imminent reopening of Bottega the politically correct

On this Second Sunday of Advent, in the opening sentence of the Holy Gospel of the Blessed Marco Evangelista: "The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God. As it is written in Isaiah the prophet: there, I send my messenger before thy face, You shall prepare thy way ", It is enclosed our remote start, our past, our present and our future. In the message, moving the living word of God is the totality of our being present and the future of our becoming and eternal. It is the mystery of the Christ God referred to as Christ the whole in the doctrine of the Holy Bishop and Doctor of the Church Augustine, recognized as the most fruitful point of his reflection on the Church, who moves up from the reflection of the Blessed Apostle Paul who said, "You are the body of Christ and individually members of it" [1].

.

Essential, and at times shady, almost wild like the locusts and the honey it ate, is the figure of John the Baptist said, the precursor. Man is not born from nothing, or end their lives dying in a quiet bed seized with senile natural death. Giovanni, who loved truth and justice, He was sacrificed for a dance of Salome; and his head, in the name of those political reasons which sometimes seems you can never say no, especially when damage the truth and justice, it was cut cleanly and placed on a tray for the perverse joy of Herodias who asked for it as a gift [2]. A gift does not denied, indeed readily granted, because it depended on the maintenance of so many fragile balance; no matter if immoral and perverse, what only mattered was keeping, yesterday as today, outside the church as inside the Church.

.

Saint Christmas 2017, imminent reopening of Bottega the politically correct ...

Blessed Precursor It completes an ancient and long prophetic season marked by equally extraordinary men: the great prophets of Israel. But what in common men like Jeremiah, finished stoned. Isaiah, sentenced to death, It seems to have been sawn in two. Daniele, thrown to the lions ... and the Baptist? All these men, servants also of truth and justice, John is not dead as of quiet natural death, among them they were united by intuition, a gift wrapped for instinct nature of every man, that if developed by the touch of God's grace can bring anyone to perceive and see beyond time and space constraints of this, in which we often do prisoners instead of free creatures, because if our existential space we develop freedom, our lives will be a continuing emancipation, Romanistic in the sense of emancipation, ie liberation from slavery, not to be confused with many other false emancipation, including those of the seventies of the twentieth century, that behind excuses of freedom they have often delivered to the worst forms of slavery. Or just rethink, going back in time, to the so-called era of Enlightenment, when they cried Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, and at the conclusion of these proclamations he is screaming "or death» [or death]. Indeed, in the revolutionary France of the great imbecility, a late eighteenth century, they are cutting off their heads on the guillotine in industrial quantities, summarily and without trial. But, be clear: everything always happened in the name of sacrosanct ... Liberty.

.

If we stay closed in our space, or if we throw ourselves thrown to false emancipation, thereby we reduce us to the limitations of that devastating "everything at once" which for years I constantly recall and that erases in us all yearning for the eternal. Here, then, that our existence is a prison, if anything, golden, but still a prison, still a bondage. And there is no worse slavery than that lives without even realizing it more because hidden behind false pretenses of freedom.

.

Another element on which today more than ever we should talk in depth, It is the concept of wilderness. From the Word of God we have just heard: "Voice of one crying in the desert". Let's think about what kinds of deserts deaf and dumb you are forced to live today in the noise, between the optical fibers that run unseen and super technological computer networks of our world of real-time news, not to mention artificial intelligence that will end in time with the completely annihilate the human intelligence. Yet ever, like today, man was just, in these our modern deserted spaces of the soul; totally different from the deserts in which man retreated in the past, to find himself and feel the breath of God's caress on him.

.

Saint Christmas 2017, imminent reopening of Bottega the politically correct …

What sense can have the words of the prophet Isaiah reported by the Evangelist: "Prepare the way of the Lord, his paths straight?» [3]. This is a clear sentence, undoubtedly. But only apparently clear. There is also a popular wise saying that paraphrasing this passage of the Holy Gospel's wit: "God straightens crooked streets». What that his grace ago and several times throughout history has shown to. In this case, But, the person called to account, or rather work, it seems that both the man. God needs of trails suitable for walking among men who, to meet his Divine Majesty, They must work to straighten the paths that anyway, all’origine, God had plotted rights. We are wishing we can add that sometimes the streets are not even the most crooked, but much more and much worse: apparently the roads are not exactly the most! It does not exist because the street is that great gift of grace but it can be destroyed by the free will of man through sin.

.

I admit to realize to be a priest and a theologian of those defined today unfashionable, because as some say I still speak of sin, "the old way", in our contemporary Church now made peace, Love hearts palpitating, birds chirping in the face of vegan cats who pine for emotional vegetarian passions before their song. Unfortunately I always believe that original sin is instead a fact and not an allegorical metaphor. But wanting it gets worse: I always believe the existence of God's judgment, I believe in Heaven and Hell to Purgatory. I think when we profess "... and one day come again in glory to judge the living and the dead", the Divine and Supreme Judge will not say to men: "Come on, all are safe!». Therefore, in the footsteps of the Apostle Paul Blessed, it is my duty to tell you:

.

“If even we ourselves or an Angel from heaven preached to you a different Gospel from the one we have preached to you, let him be accursed! We have already said it and now I repeat it: if any man preach a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be accursed! Indeed, It is perhaps the favor of men that I intend to earn, or rather that of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still pleasing men, do not be a servant of Christ!» [4].

.

If so preach the opposite of what is contained in the Holy Gospel it would mean that I would be like the «blind guides» [5] who have lost the way of God to follow the ways of men, unmindful that Christ God warns us in chapter VII of the Gospel of the Blessed Matthew Evangelista:

.

"Enter through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad the way that leads to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:; how narrow is the door and how narrow is the way that leads to life, and few there be that find!».

.

Saint Christmas 2017, imminent reopening of Bottega the politically correct …

How many ancient streets They have disappeared over time, swallowed up by the earth, by vegetation, from urban and architectural layers superimposed on each other? Just think of our ancient Rome, to which they were linked since ancient road networks spread throughout Europe and by which one could reach the ancient capital of Roman Gaul, which is the current France, as from Phrygia, the central Anatolia which is in present-day Turkey. Those ancient streets, most of which no longer exist, But in the past there were. Roads that were not only real, but also functional; and for longer periods of time they were crossed. Today, in addition to large stretches of motorway, our capital is also served by two international airports and rail access to high-speed trains. but yet, much more than yesterday, Today it really reaches the world seems unlikely that from Rome and from various suburbs of the world easily reaches Rome, because for some 'time it seems that Rome is offering its wide doors and spacious highways of nine very easy lane to go, while our natural way Christological, which it is narrow and full of obstacles, finally it brings us to a narrow access port.

.

The street, in addition to being a viable trait that leads to various destinations, It is therefore also element, sign and symbol of our memory. No coincidence that Christ God compares himself to a road:

.

"Thomas said,: "Man, we do not know where you are going and how can we know the way?”. Jesus told him: “I am the way, the truth and the life"» [6].

.

Saint Christmas 2017, imminent reopening of Bottega the politically correct

When man ceases to see the way God in Christ, how will he ever attain truth and life? Because to live in the truth and win the prize of eternal life you need to recognize, accept and follow Christ, God as a way. Here then sometimes, the street, in order to be prepared it requires a careful and laborious recovery, this thing that at the time John the Baptist intuited, so that from the desert drew the first recovery path leading to the purification and repentance of sins, then the preparation announcing:

.

"After me he is the one who is stronger than me: I am not worthy to stoop down and untie the laces of his sandals. I have baptized you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit " [7].

.

The opening words of the Holy Gospel "The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus, Christ, Son of God", Also enclose another meaning mystagogical: The Holy Gospel is in itself and by itself a beginning endless. In which of the Holy Gospels it is in fact written, or even only vaguely implied, the word "end"? He writes Blessed Evangelist Matthew:

.

“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And here, I'm with you every day until the end of the world " [8].

.

He writes Blessed Marco Evangelista:

.

"And they went forth and preached everywhere, while the Lord acted together with them and confirmed the Word with the signs that accompanied it " [9].

.

He writes Blessed Luca Evangelista:

.

"While he blessed them, he parted from them and was carried up, in the sky. And they fell before him; then they returned to Jerusalem with great joy and were continually in the temple blessing God " [10].

.

The Evangelist John, in his conclusion does not fail to point out:

.

"There are still many other things which Jesus, if they were written every one, I think that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written " [11].

 

Saint Christmas 2017, imminent reopening of Bottega the politically correct …

In a different way the Evangelists, at the end of their drafts do not put the word "end" in a story, but that story outline that contains the mystery of Revelation which starts early: ... now start from, make disciples and baptize [12] then they went out and began to preach everywhere [13] ... And after the Lord ascended to heaven they returned to Jerusalem and began to always go to the temple to praise God [14]. Of course: this is just a small part of everything that really happened, as stated in the conclusion of his Gospel the Blessed Giovanni Evangelista [15].

.

The Gospel proceeds from beginning to beginning until the Second Coming that will trace a new eternal beginning: God, who bursts in human experience so real, Physical and body through the incarnation. Until you reach, Christology after the whole experience that seems to culminate with the shame of the cross, the upturned stone of a tomb that does not mark the end of a story with a happy ending, but the beginning of the true history of mankind that as Christ is risen. "For we ', says the Blessed Apostle Peter in the second reading we have heard in this Liturgy of the Word: "According to his promise, We look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness " [16]. And only then will, as announced by the Prophet Isaiah, that

.

“The wolf will dwell with the lamb, the panther will lie down next to the kid; the calf and the young lion shall browse together, and a child shall lead them. The cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together. The lion shall eat straw, like the ox. And the sucking child shall play on the hole; the child put his hand on the adder's lair. No longer will act unjustly nor destroy in all my holy mountain, because the wisdom of the Lord will fill as the waters cover the sea " [17].

.

Saint Christmas 2017, imminent reopening of Bottega the politically correct …

None of this can understand the idolaters from the new vegan pagan religion, to name some leaders among the numerous expressions of modern paganism. If in fact today the lion tears the kid and if he devours, It is because Adam and Eve were altered and subverted his sin with the perfect nature created by God, leaving us inherited a sinful nature from their sin [18]. This nature will return to its pristine perfection after the Last Judgment, certainly not after protests Religious fundamentalists vegans, atheists and pagans, that give crazy in front of cattle, or in front of other farms that commit “great crimes”, those they say are the cheese production, dairy products and eggs. Incidentally: has anyone ever seen a fundamentalist religious vegan, always ready to tear his clothes for the suffering of a hen forced to produce eggs, to tear themselves apart in pain in front of hospitals where the lives of innocent human beings are taken away through the abomination of abortion, crying even more vengeance before God, compared to a poor cow forced to produce milk?

.

So that will be realized "new earth and new heaven", God certainly does not want viewers, but protagonists builders, to wet this new land with the water dripping from the eternal sources justice. The love of God is indeed justice and justice is the most perfect expression of God's infinite love, It is in fact the union of love and justice of God that comes to life his mercy. He who loves, It is always right; and justice finds meaning and expression of his love creature created in the image and likeness of the Living God, to which the sacrifice of Christ and regeneration at its new baptism cleanses us from the ancient guilt of original sin of Adam:

.

"... if by the fall of one, death reigned through that one man, much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ. How, then, for the fault of a single one it was upon all men to condemnation, so also through the work of justice of one it pours upon all men to justification of life. Similarly, as for the one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of one the many will be made righteous " [19].

.

This is the spirit by which the Advent season it is our Christian duty to prepare for Christmas. And at Christmas, it should be remembered, we relive the mystery of the Incarnation of the Word of God in a world, and in particular in an old is decadent Europe, Today more than ever, more and more distant from God. E, when they close the doors to God, always open the doors to the modern pagan religions, including the just mentioned religious fundamentalism vegan.

.

… and the workshop of scristianizzante politically correct, The step towards the blasphemy industry gaystapo It is always very short …

I fear that this year, as in recent past years, we will have to suffer and put up messages and statements already heard that will resonate proclamations type: "Even Jesus was a poor child of the poor", What among other untrue, as I have explained in the past [20] [see article WHO and video lessons WHO]. But above all, we will return to hear the Christmas Holy listed as: "Festival of peace and friendship among peoples", "Feast of solidarity", "The other is the celebration" ... in a swarm of crib representations that are a triumph of mangers built into barges, Bambinelli of Jesus lying on a raft with a lifeline around his waist, while Joseph and Mary both wearing life jackets. For several years now, the cribs are gone pastors, replaced by Coast Guard officers and operators of centers for real or alleged refugees. But wanting is not much worse, because it has already happened that in deference to the modern "dogma" of the culture of death introduced by the theory of gender - which we know is an absolute faith much higher than that on the Incarnation of the Word of God -, have already placed in some crib two Giuseppe, to follow along with various other amenities more or less scristianizzanti and not of sacrilegical infrequently.

.

Perhaps it should remember that during the Solemnity of Christmas, in all our churches proclaim again the Prologue of the Holy Gospel of Blessed John the Evangelist, which recites: "In the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God and the Word was God ". In no church whole Catholic world you can read, in accordance with the increasingly fashionable and politically correct scristianizzante: "In the beginning was the poor, and the poor was the refugee, and the fugitive was with God, and the fugitive claimed him soli juice from the columns of Future it's from The Osservatore Romano ».

.

but yet, all of this too It had been anticipated:

.

«The day will come, indeed, when they will not endure sound doctrine;, ma, having itching ears they, will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, refusing to listen to the truth to turn to fairy tales " [21] […] "Before that day will be a falling away and will be revealed the man of lawlessness, the son of perdition, the one who opposes and rises above every being who is called God or is an object of worship, up to sit in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God ".

.

… and the workshop of scristianizzante politically correct, The step towards the blasphemy industry gaystapo It is always very short …

Only after the end of time and the beginning of his kingdom will have no end, It will be that "the wolf shall dwell with the lamb ' [22], while for now, through impervious streets and narrow doors toward salvation, Christ, God has warned us very clearly and accurately: "I send you out as sheep among wolves" [23]. And once sent as "sheep among wolves", the sheep, that the continuation of this warning are invited by Christ God to be "wise as serpents and harmless as doves" [24], with wolves should not just treat and haggling, species all'accomodante downward and to the sellout, because the wolf does not build bridges, nor should he go looking for points of union or communion. It is needless to say that the sheep to the wolf: “Come on, dear wolf, We do not condemn you, indeed we want to talk with you and look for what unites us and not what divides us ". This is not possible, because the sheep can not become wolves and wolves can not become sheep, but mainly because the wolf is not good, It never has. It will return to be good until after the Last Judgment, When, after the end of time, the new beginning "the wolf shall dwell with the lamb ', But not before then, even under the new wickedness of that mercy destructive that caresses the wolves and sheep clubs is the sheepfold of Christ the Redeemer Good Shepherd.

.

the Island of Patmos, 10 December 2017

.

__________________

NOTE

[1] 1ª Letter of St. Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians: 12, 27.

[2] Gospel of St. Mark: 6, 17-29.

[3] Book of the Prophet Isaiah: 40,1-5.9-11.

[4] Letter of St. Paul to the Galatians: 8, 1-10.

[5] Gospel of St. Matthew: 16, 23 e 24.

[6] The Gospel of St. John 14, 5-7.

[7] Gospel of St. Matthew: 3, 11.

[8] Gospel of St. Matthew: 28, 19-20.

[9] Gospel of St. Mark: 16, 20.

[10] Gospel of Saint Luke: 24, 51-53.

[11] The Gospel of St. John: 21, 25.

[12] CF. Supra: St. Matthew.

[13] CF. Supra: St. Luke.

[14] CF. Supra: Saint Mark.

[15] CF. Supra: Saint John.

[16] IIª Letter of St. Peter: 3, 8-14.

[17] Book of the Prophet Isaiah: 11, 6-9.

[18] Book of Genesis: 3, 1-22.

[19] Letter of Saint Paul to the Romans: 5, 17-19.

[20] Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, The Island of Patmos the 19 July 2017: "Against the modern ideological idolatry of poverty: Jesus Christ was not poor and never lived in poverty, He ate and dressed, nor to his death he was buried as a poor ' [link WHO]. The video lessons of The Island of Patmos, 23 January 2016: «The gold of the magi and Judas Iscariot's false love for the poor» [link WHO].

[21] IIª Letter to Timothy, St. Paul the Apostle: 4, 3-4.

22] Book of the Prophet Isaiah: 11, 6-9.

[23] Gospel of St. Matthew: 10, 16.

[24] Gospel of St. Matthew: 10, 16.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

.

About the desire to proclaim some new “santi”: observations on the theology of Teilhard de Chardin and his dangerous poetic thought

ABOUT SMANIA OF CERTAIN NEW PROCLAIM "SAINTS": COMMENTS ON THE THEOLOGY OF Teilhard de Chardin AND HIS POETIC DANGEROUS THOUGHT

.

His theology is not driven by a rigorous and lucid speculative commitment based on sound philosophical base, and it is scarce in the same understanding faith, on which prevails a lively poetic imagination. Born then purely subjective visions, emotional and imaginative, to the detriment not only of the correct philosophical reasoning, ma, what is worse, the same doctrine of the faith. In Teilhard de Chardin is a substantial lack of docility to the Magisterium of the Church, he presumptuously replaced by its imaginative subjective view. This is why some have spoken rightly, about him, of "gnosis".

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

God the Father has made known to us the mystery of his will: the recap plan in Christ all things [Ef 1, 3-10]

They distracted by what, because the things seen are fair [Sap 13,7]

.

.

Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J. [1881-1981]

The information agency Vatican Insider reports:

.

"The plenary assembly of the Pontifical Council for Culture has overwhelmingly approved a proposal that must be brought to Pope Francis, It is asking you to contemplate whether it is possible to remove the Warning the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office on the works of Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J. The petition was approved on Saturday 18 November during the proceedings of the meeting held on the theme "The future of humanity: new challenges to anthropology ". the proposal, as raised by the online newspaper SIR [Ed. cf. WHO], It is motivated as well: "We believe that such an act not only rehabilitate the genuine effort of the pious Jesuit, in an attempt to reconcile the scientific view of the universe with Christian eschatology, but also it represents a formidable stimulus for all theologians and scientists of good will to collaborate in the construction of a Christian anthropological model, following the directions of the encyclical Laudato si, naturally you place in the wonderful frame of the cosmos' " [See article Vatican Insider, WHO].

.

I must say that I support the initiative, I consider acceptable but with the necessary reservations about his motivation, so I would like to make some clarifications. First of all, it is not "rehabilitate" Teilhard de Chardin, as if that Warning the judge had erred and had to be corrected. It must be borne in mind that, when the Church condemns a doctrine that endangers the faith, can't be wrong, because it applies to that assistance of the Holy Spirit that Christ promised to Peter as the guardian of the truth of faith. And those who teach what the truth, It is obviously qualified to teach what is the opposite error.

.

But there are in Warning three pastoral-disciplinary aspects, which may be the subject of reserves, and then correction. Now, by order, we will see what:

.

First, care to preserve the seminarians by Teilhard errors it seems like a goal too limited: why worry only of seminarians and not even the teachers? Perhaps the ideas of Teilhard de Chardin did not cause even failures in academic circles?

.

Second, the tone of Warning, the 1962, understandably it reflects what until then had been the style of the Holy Office: limited to condemnation of errors, differently from what is the current procedure of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, which, having taken up the post-conciliar directives, accompanies the condemnation of the errors to the relief of the positive aspects of thought the author censored. But of course, of this fact you can not blame the Holy Office of the 1962, who, Dieting contemporary methods, He had simply done his duty.

.

However, what arouses true wonder - and this is the third observation, the most serious - is the fact that the condemnation of the errors remains on general and not precise what are the errors condemned, come of always instead it is customary in the Church and it is wise and necessary, to give way to precisely faithful to know from what evils you have to watch and, consequently, what are the appropriate care. So we must say frankly that we have a real defect, course of pastoral and not doctrinal, but it requires, already own, that the document is removed. And it was time, after so many contradictory and uncertain threads in these sixty years of which they are or are not the Teilhard de Chardin errors!

.

but be careful, because now there is an opposite danger the one that came from Warning. If this fact favored a harsh attitude towards Teilhard de Chardin without deciding the same time clearly the question, Now the risk is that of yet another subtle maneuver of the usual modernist, maneuver that is not hard to see behind the apparent homage to the Pope, expressed with refined hypocrisy in the petition. The modernists, indeed, under the pretext of respect for Teilhard, They hope the Pope to bite, merely remove the hated Warning accusing them, and everything ends there, for greater ease in continuing better spread their heresies, How do impunity from fifty. So, Needless to say very clearly that there is no question of "rehabilitate" doctrinally Teilhard. If the modernist dream of such a thing, if the take away immediately from the head. It deals with, instead, to correct pastoral attitude of Teilhard, treating it with greater justice and charity.

.

The Supreme Pontiff, in granting the removal of Warning, could and should, in my opinion, not to be mocked by the modernists, to test their sincerity, entrusting the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to publish a challenging doctrinal instruction knew Teilhard de Chardin, in which the praises for his merits are accompanied with a detailed list of the errors, What we are waiting unnecessarily from 1962. Then you will see if the drafters of the petition are animated by a sincere love for sound doctrine and the Church, and then by a true respect for Teilhard de Chardin, or they want to use him to continue to get away with it, although we do not know for how long.

.

I proceed now by presenting a list of possible theological errors of Teilhard de Chardin, on which you can not, nor should defer all, but rather bring greater clarity to.

.

  1. In Teilhard de Chardin it lacks the notion analog entity, which it allows to recognize the primacy and transcendence of spirit over matter.
  1. He therefore does not know how to conceive a pure spirit free from material. Because of this, for him God is so high spirit, but jointly is the maximum vertex of matter. It is a God material. The Scriptures speak of idolatry.
  1. For him, "God is the soul of the world": proposition pantheistic flavor. It confuses the relationship God-world with the soul-body relationship.
  1. His theology is the imaginary covering a substantial deification of the world.
  1. He wants to replace metaphysics, which is overcoming the physical to grasp the spiritual, with a "hyperphysicshis coinage ", which it is nothing but a fantastic increase of physics raised ("Evolved") the absolute.
  1. Based on these assumptions, Void is clear that the distinction between the natural order and the supernatural, being the grace, participation in divine life, pure spirit without matter.
  1. Based on these assumptions, the Holy Spirit should lead to an essential material component. That is evident heresy.
  1. It should be said against Teilhard de Chardin that the unity of God is not the union or synthesis of a multiplicity, but it is absolutely simple unity without composition. God divides and reassembles, but it is indivisible and reassembles what is divided.
  1. The Holy Trinity is not a "trinitization"God as an effect of its own internal movement of multiplication and reunification, but it is the same divine essence triune, unchangeable, no multiple and unmultipliable.
  1. God creates the world not in the sense of unifying assumed an infinite multiplicity of material coexisting with Him from eternity, but in the sense of creating the same multiplicity of nothing. God is not only the authorizing officer of the world, but because of its existence. When God created the world, He had nothing beside Him and independently of Him, but it created everything, creature of the single unit and the multiplicity of entities and from nothing.
  1. Nothingness is not something possible or practicable, that tends to being or needs to be, but it is a simple non-being. Designing for nothing in this direction is arbitrary imagination and does not correspond to the biblical concept of nowhere, from which God draws the be.
  1. It has not existed or may have existed from eternity, next to God and independently of Him, a pure infinite multiplicity as pure numerical quantities without the multiplicity of the respective entities, because the amount of the substance is accident and does not exist alone without its substance.
  1. So a pure multiplicity no corresponding subject can not be real, but it is a purely abstract entity and imaginary. The truth is that God, creating the world, does not simply an abstract unified preexisting multiplicity, but it created a real multiplicity of nowhere, which, however, it was not previously to eternity a pure multiplicity no real subjects, because otherwise it could not even be real, but it was and is created as a real and concrete multiplicity of individual institutions, because the multiplicity of real accident and substances.
  1. God is not essentially and necessarily connected to the world, but it is completely independent. It does not need the world to complete its essence. His creative act in the world is entirely free and he could very well exist alone without the world, because He is infinite Perfection, absolutely self-existent and self-sufficient.
  1. Because of this, Also the Incarnation of the Word and the Redemption by Christ were free and gratuitous acts of merciful love of the Father for the salvation of sinful man.
  1. If God is the summit of the world, the divine nature of Christ is the apex of human nature and it falls into heresy.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin admits in Christ "a third nature, it would be neither human nor divine, but cosmic "[1]. That is clearly a heretic.
  1. It gave, creating the world, It has not only created bodies that would evolve until the spirit level, but together with the bodies (visible), also created pure spirits, ie the angels (invisible).
  1. Teilhard de Chardin recognizes that the spirit is superior to matter, and it is right in saying that the matter evolves out in preparation for the creation of the spirit. However, He does not say clearly that the matter can only be a condition of existence of the spirit (the man), but it can not become spirit nor can cause the existence.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin overlooks the fact that the spirit can exist without material subject: It gave, the angel and the human soul separate from the body after death, while the matter can not exist or exist alone or by itself without its substantial form, that gives shape, so as to constitute in conjunction with her the material substance, composed of matter and form. He seems so confusing the matter with the material substance, which it is composed of matter and form.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin denies the human soul creation directly from God, stating mediation of matter: "The soul is created by means of materiality"[2].
  1. It is true that the material substance, ie the body, changes over time, It evolves and turns naturally tending to elevate its nature with bringing it closer to the spirit. But the body can not become spirit, because becoming physical or processing or bodily evolution involve the fact that a material changes shape, but remains matter with a form. Why become spirit, ie pure form subsisting without matter, It should disappear as a subject: which in fact it does not happen.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin is right to claim that matter and body are actually true and what good, date, innocent, useful, beneficial, not contrary to the spirit and not the enemy. God is the one and the other creator. But it errs in assuming that matter can become spirit (see previous issue.): would overstate the matter to the detriment of the loftiness of spirit over matter and fall into materialism, ie in the deification of matter.
  1. The deep, immutable and inescapable ontological difference and essential (visible and invisible) between matter and spirit is not a sign of division or conflict between them, but it is the effect of divine wisdom creator, without separating distinguishes and unites without confusing.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin seems to have taken account of the fact that among the material things and spiritual things is so different, but also similarity and analogy, in their common membership to reality, so that the human reason, starting from the experience of visible things, It can rise by analogy to the knowledge of spiritual things, and even of God (Sap 13,5; RM 1, 19-20). However, he realized that the experimental science leads to theology.
  1. It is not clear in Teilhard de Chardin, the distinction between living and nonliving. It should be said that the evolution from non-living to living was made possible thanks to the omnipotence of the Divine Creator, then not in the sense that the inanimate bodies contained originally already by itself and in itself life in a latent state, because this is pure imagination and does not correspond to the experience.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin is right in saying, come Darwin, that the species of living beings in the course of evolution were transient and were not fixed, but they have changed into one another, to higher and higher species, until it reaches the threshold of the human species, but without crossing, except perhaps thanks to the divine creative power.
  1. It is not documented by science that an animal can generate a man, although it is not metaphysically impossible. So it is not documented with certainty that man is descended from monkeys, if anything, they can have common genes. It should also be noted against Teilhard de Chardin that what we know by divine revelation on this topic, It is that all mankind originated, thanks to an act divine creator, a single pair in paradise place on earth.
  1. It's not impossible, but it is extremely unlikely and totally undesirable that the primitive couple Edenic, equipped with, according to the biblical revelation, of very high spiritual perfection, It was generated by a pair of monkeys in paradise.
  1. From science we know that the earth had originated long before humans, and that this appearance was preceded by monkey. But to this day it has never been shown that at some point the monkey has begun to generate men. And it is impossible, however, the existence of an intermediate living between man and monkey, because the human soul is not the result of an evolution, ma, It is a simple spiritual form, or there is all or not there.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin neglects the fact that the species or human nature or essence of man is fixed and immutable, why it, while allowing a certain "christogenesis”, It is not a transient stage of evolution, one stage of the cosmic become exceeded and surmountable, After becoming a precedent and start to become a more, but it is "fixed end of eternal counsel", because it is created in the image and likeness of God, it did not become and will not become.
  1. With everything, Teilhard de Chardin is right to claim that man must progress towards Christ and that Christ ("Christ Omega") drew has sé. But the human and Christian progress is not change in the nature or essence, and therefore the moral law which guides, but it is progress, increase, development, strengthening and growth of the powers of a subject that keeps the same nature, always in obedience to the same law.
  1. The moral law, so, It is not subject to evolution, but it can and should be getting better known and applied. The preservation of perennial values ​​is therefore the condition of real progress.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin is right in saying that God moves and intentionally finalistically the universe according to an upward trend from matter to spirit, whose purpose and supreme and unsurpassable summit is Jesus Christ. He recognizes that the efficient cause is moved from the final cause. However, It overlooks the fact that Christ is not simply the top and end of man and the world ("Cosmic Christ" as "Point Omega"), ma, as God, infinitely it transcends and has created out of nothing.
  1. According to the data of faith, the history of man does not consist in the fact that God unifies evolutionarily and gradually over time the manifold, so that at the end of all mankind is in communion with God (“pleromization”), but it shows the mercy of God, that exalts the humble, and his righteousness, that breaks down the proud.
  1. It is contrary to the faith to believe that every man will let attract by God, so that everyone is saved. On the contrary, by virtue of free will and the choices of each, there is who receives the divine mercy and is saved and there is one who refuses and is damned.
  1. According to the data of faith, the primitive couple were created in a state of high physical perfection, moral and spiritual, superior, for some aspects, that achieved today by the human species, though wounded by original sin. It therefore seems highly unlikely, although not impossible, God has given birth to the Edenic pair of parents monkeys.
  1. What is quite likely however that appears, in punishment for sin, the primitive couple, expulsion from Paradise on this miserable earth, I have taken an ape-like appearance. That is confirmed by the findings paleoanthropological, studied by Teilhard de Chardin, which testify with clarity upward evolution of the human form simian progressed to that of today's man. In this field of knowledge he undoubtedly has its merits.
  1. Sin has not simply originated from our wickedness, but it has a historical much deeper, that is the original sin committed by our first parents, whose fault, transmitted for generation, infected all humanity and is taken away by Baptism expiation thanks to the sacrifice of Christ.
  1. The sin is not a simple inevitable and negligible accident of evolution path towards the best, almost malriuscito or waste product in the production chain to a thriving industry, however,, but evil act of disobedience to God, subsequent to original sin, that makes the man fall into a misery that, from which it only raises the cross of Christ, which therefore radically it frees us from sin delivering us from its consequences, that the loss of grace, the pains of this life and the tendency to sin.
  1. polygenism is incompatible with the Christian faith, saying that mankind originated from a single pair, and that the original offense, committed by this pair, It has been transmitted from generation to this pair to all mankind. Only the Blessed Virgin Mary was preserved from this guilt.
  1. The previous history of the earth to man's creation and the Garden of Eden, as it is apparent from paleontology, It presents an unsuitable environment for human life, and therefore seems to be to relate, both with the sin of the angels, although both foreshadowed, with the consequences of original sin. In fact, the Edenic universe was perfectly under the dominion of man.
  1. The laws of nature on earth, object of science, given that regulate a hostile nature, harmful and dangerous for us, Although laws laid down by the Creator, beside beneficial laws, clearly represent, eyes of faith, a fallen nature from Edenic condition, as a punishment for sin (Gen 3, 17-19). Teilhard de Chardin seems to disregard this fact testified by the Bible.
  1. The sufferings of this life and the hostility of nature to us are not necessary moments in the evolution proceeds, are not just opportunities to take it forward, but are the consequences of original sin and also of our sins, that serve to join the redemptive cross of Christ.
  1. For Teilhard de Chardin Christ does not suffer to atone for our sins, but only to strengthen us and guide us in the suffering necessary for our ultimate fulfillment.
  1. The opposition and enmity between the "flesh" and "spirit", which speaks St. Paul the Apostle, They were not originally desired by God, but are a consequence of original sin and the Christian ethics leads to their reconciliation. Because of this, Christian asceticism order, under certain circumstances, know how to give up the pleasure of the body, not to lose the joys of the spirit.
  1. The excessive and indiscreet concern of Teilhard de Chardin to consider flesh and spirit as one, It raises fears of lax ethics and hedonistic, caused by the fact that, under the pretext of unity between spirit and flesh, the human subject, Prone in this life, following the original sin, to be dominated by passions, neglect the moral effort for the spirit over the flesh domain.
  1. "We declare," - says Teilhard de Chardin [3] - "to construct a conceivable future of the human species towards which could both stretch the communism that rationalism and Christianity". This statement smacks of duplicity and is irreconcilable with the Christian's duty to testify publicly his faith.
  1. The Church is not the apex of humanity evolving, but it is the community of God's children living in grace.
  1. The fact that the Church constantly progresses towards the Parousia does not mean that all members of the Church may progress equally. Some progress and some people downgrades or stops.
  1. The life of grace and divine sonship are not simply the evolution of man summits, but a divine life than the simple human life.
  1. The matter of the sacrament of the Eucharist is not the world ("Mass on the World"), but the bread and wine specially prepared for the Eucharistic Sacrifice of the Mass.
  1. Teilhard de Chardin argues that the Eucharistic transubstantiation does not matter only the bread, but it is completed in "transubstantiation of the world" [4]. In this way it falls into a clear idolatric falsification of the Eucharist.
  1. The Eucharistic transubstantiation of the Mass does not take place in the course of cosmic evolution, as believe Teilhard de Chardin, but when the celebrant pronounces the words of consecration of the bread and wine.
  1. Christ is not only the world's top evolving ("Cosmic Christ"), but first and foremost is the Son of God the Creator and Savior of the world.
  1. The Eucharistic Communion is not communion with the "cosmic Christ", but with the body and blood of the Lord under the Eucharistic species.
  1. It is true that in the Mass the celebrant consecrates himself to God with the Church. But we must not confuse this consecration cult, which it is a simple act of the virtue of religion, consequent to the consecration Eucharistic Bread and Wine, and its effect and purpose, with the same consecration of bread and wine, which act by which the priest, in persona Christi, the transubstantiation, which is the principle, reason and because of the cultic consecration.
  1. Christ at the end of the world is not welcome in the glory of the whole of humanity reached the apex of evolution (“pleromization”), why not all men want, but "will separate the sheep from the goats" (cf. Mt 25,32), ie welcome the right, while the reprobates will turn away from Him.

.

Overall Guest

.

the omega point did finally match by Teilhard de Chardin with the Risen Christ

It Padre Pierre Teilhard de Chardin It seems animated by a strong religious and mystical fervor, Christological in nature, with the laudable intention of harmonizing apologetic experimental science with the science and technology. His christocentrism, But, it appears immanentistic, while exaggerated is the exaltation of matter, the world and evolution, with prejudice to spiritual transcendence and God himself.

.

His theology is not driven by a rigorous and lucid speculative effort based on solid philosophical base, and it is scarce in the same understanding faith, on which prevails a lively poetic imagination. Born then purely subjective visions, emotional and imaginative, to the detriment not only of the correct philosophical reasoning, ma, what is worse, the same doctrine of the faith.

.

the omega point to the new ortogenesis

In Teilhard of Chardin there is a substantial lack of docility to the Magisterium of the Church, he presumptuously replaced by its imaginative subjective view. This is why some have spoken rightly, about him, of "gnosis".

.

It also has the impression of a kind of substitution of poetry to theology. But it is a dangerous poetry, this his, because it does not simply express the Word of God with poetic images - something quite legitimate and useful -, ma replaces personal with fantastic creations. Rightly, Jacques Maritain speaks of theology-fiction [5] or what has been called fantatheology. It's no wonder that Teilhard de Chardin confuse intellect with imagination, because he himself theorizes: "The thought is feeling transformed ' [6].

.

Remove the This orientation, without clarifying this "dangerous thought", or if you want ... "dangerously poetic", may create more dangers, especially then in a quite delicate moment like the one we are experiencing today in the Church and ecclesiastical level.

.

Varazze, 7 December 2017

.

.

The fantatheology Teilhard de Chardin in the film version

.

.

____________________

NOTE

[1] Cit. in G.Frénaud- L.Jugnet -Th.Calmel, The Teilhard de Chardin errors, tree Publishing, Torino,1963, p.38.

[2] A.Drexel-L.Villa, Analysis of an ideology. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Editions Civilization, Brescia 1970, p.129.

[3] Cit. in A.Drexel-L.Villa, op.cit., p.124.

[4] A.Drexel-L.Villa, op.cit., p.131.

[5] The peasant of the Garonne, Desclee de Brouwer, Paris 1966, p.177.

[6] Cit. in A.Drexel-L.Villa, Analysis of an ideology. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Editions Civilization, Brescia 1970, p114.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

The Supreme Pontiff who is not a province but a quartierale, when he "confirms his brothers in the faith" he is always ignored by secular newspapers and heretical theologasters

THE POPE WHO IS NOT A PROVINCIAL BUT A QUARTIERALE, WHEN 'CONFIRMS THE BROTHERS IN FAITH "IS ALWAYS IGNORED BY NEWSPAPERS AND THE secularists TEOLOGASTRI HERETICS.

.

The Pope Francis I is not a provincial, It is a quartierale. The latter term does not exist in the proper lexicon, I invented I, more so I provide the necessary explanations: quartieralismo is the worst of provincialism, because the quartierale is a person associated with psycho-social level to the neighborhood of a specific city or urban environment. The problems are so huge and incalculable damage, when it is required to submit to the size of the Catholic universality quartieralismo.

.

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

Dear Friend,

but by chance, the Holy Father, perhaps he reads our articles and then gives some of his homilies? You know how it is, Sometimes coincidences are a bit’ too many …

Ah, If this man were not surrounded by snakes, what it could do! Sometimes, He seems to me like the poor man who comes to the restaurant last, animated by the best and most honest intentions, but it does not even take a small appetizer, because it just gets inside is beset by management that have to foot the bill for what they have eaten all the others came for lunch and dinner before him. And we know very well how this, humanly, It is not fair.

Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, private message to a friend, 21.11.2017

.

.

.

Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, immortalized in that its quartierale dimension from which it has never moved and now demands applied to the whole Church, in which the particular should never be applied to the universal

The Supreme Pontiff Francis I is a complex personality, a man who does not fail to be convoluted and ambiguous. But how many times we wrote everything must be analyzed the sphere of the precise psychology. But to do that you have to start from a fundamental fact: each of us, including Popes, It possesses magnitudes and limits. All of us are burdened with the merits and de-merits, private vices and public virtues. This applies to all, including saints who are models of heroic virtue, but which they were not perfect. All this also applies to the Roman Pontiff, Successor of the Blessed Apostolo Pietro that - as I have often said and repeated in several of my writings -, in terms of limitations and inadequacies, He did not miss anything. but yet, just as his first Supreme Predecessor, the rock on which Christ everlasting rock, he built his Church, the reigning Pontiff could die as a saint and tomorrow also be a model of heroic virtues, despite all his human imperfections.

In one of my past articles I defined the reigning Pontiff a "argentinocentrico» [cf. article in the 2015, WHO], without missing him respect, let alone insolentirlo. With this expression wanted to give a precise definition psychological, to which I now add another: the reigning Pontiff, It is not a provincial, but it is a quartierale. The latter term does not exist in the proper lexicon, I invented I, more so I provide the necessary explanations: the quartieralismo is worse provincialism, because the quartierale is a person associated with psycho-social level to the neighborhood of a specific city or urban environment.

How many of you have read, to avert the probable appointment of S.It is unhappy. Mons. Nunzio Galantino the Archbishop of Naples, recently I have self-appointed Metropolitan Archbishop of the ancient Partenope [cf. WHO], where as I explained in my self-nomination, You had better send me, instead of a subject doctrinally and pastorally problematic as the Secretary General of the Italian Episcopal Conference, or even other worst done.

In a large and complex city like Naples, that still, at the level both historically and sociologically, It remains one of the great capitals of Europe - in fact, remember that Naples was the capital of a kingdom -, the quartieralismo is part of the psycho-social structure, just like in Buenos Aires, or as in other great capitals or megacities, consider, for example in Mexico City, whose metropolitan area has over twenty-five million inhabitants.

If a Neapolitan meets outside his city another Neapolitan, in making the knowledge of his fellow citizen who is saying he has to be Neapolitan, first asks him: "of Naples, where is that, may be?». Indeed, the large and complex Napoli, which it is a unified city, internally it is made up of many cities within a city. In Naples there are neighborhoods that are real cities in themselves, which they differ from other districts even in the dialect peculiarities, the uses, of customs and traditions.

The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio It is deeply attached and rooted in a precise and particular neighborhood reality of Buenos Aires, this thing that makes it more of a provincial closed. Needless to say what problems and damage can produce quartieralismo in what should be a Catholic universal dimension. Indeed, subdue the universal to the particular, at best it ends up creating a great imbalance.

The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio did not hesitate to show to Rome - which is the heart of the universality of the Church and leading historically enclosed within itself the best of the best in the centuries acquired by all the ancient civilizations -, the worst prejudices widespread in Latin America, but you pay attention: not spread by Latin Americans, but the Germans barbarians who used this continent as a place of experimentation and incubation of the worst historicisms, sociologisms and teologismi, being able to benefit from these barbarians, for such misdeeds, economic resources that the German Catholic Church derive from their opulent wealth. That said it is not clear why, just that the pontiff that he at once praised the poor Church for the poor, I never even raised a timid sigh on the opulent wealth of his - and let's face it! – “Teutonic voters”, who do not hesitate even to deny the sacraments to the faithful who are not in compliance with the payment of religious taxes to the German Catholic Church, only to then play the sacrilegious concelebrations “ecumeniche” and the inter-Eucharistic communion with the Lutherans. And here it must be remembered that the Eucharistic celebration with non-Catholic ministers of worship who do not have apostolic succession and do not recognize the priesthood as a sacrament fall within the category of sERIOUS oFFENSES, This is something that is of no interest to Germans and various Northern Europeans who have been practicing it for decades in the disregard of Rome, which knows but remains silent.. To this end we remember that it constitutes more serious offences the "Forbidden concelebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice with ministers of ecclesial communities which do not have apostolic succession, not recognize the sacramental dignity of priestly ordination " (See. Code of Canon Law, can. 908).

The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, bacchettare loves the Italian episcopate speaking more or less in private with his various interlocutors, the "princes bishops with whom no reasoning ', or to those "principles bishops before whom my hands are tied". E, in saying this, shows that he is unaware that his time recriminati "princes bishops', if you really want to find them all over their most arrogant and above all snooty "splendor", He must look for them among his electors of Germany, where after false pretenses of progressivism, opening, ecumenism and various doctrinal svecchiamenti, not only you will always find the bishops-principles, but the bishops find colonizers in Barbaresco so conquered and then impose their own rules of the game, from Cardinal Clàudio Hummes of Brazil devastated, who are trying, making use also of their ideological quartierale spirit - namely the lack of clergy in the Amazon region of Brazil -, to impose the universal Church married priests, obviously … to experiment. And we who are not exactly poor suckers know very well what things then turn into to experiment, because now we have half a century of experience behind devastated, some things to experiment then it becomes much more untouchable the great dogmas of the Catholic faith.

All this makes the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio unbalanced and unable to formulate polishes judgments, that is not able to formulate closed not for bad faith, but for lack of historical knowledge. And all this makes him - that should be the supreme master of impartiality -, a partial subject and humoral.

To circumvent, or as they say fooled a subject of this kind, the game is very simple: pretend to believe that his quartierale size is right and highest good for the Church. Consequently he will elect these very dangerous subjects as his trusted figures. Once they have entered into his good graces, these people - who I have personally defined several times as "authentic criminals" - will lock him up in a cage, without him even noticing, given that another of the characteristics of man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is its objective narrowness, particularly severe referred by its quartieralismo that leads him to treat the universal Church as if it were a special district of Buenos Aires.

The quartieralismo leads man Jorge Mario Bergoglio to a dangerous lack of historical and socio-religious analysis, with its ecclesial and pastoral problems of no small importance, especially when it is a few themes that are dear, but unfortunately could return - as in this case I have often said - in the sphere of real obsessive compulsive disorders. That means: poor, migrants and refugees.

The reigning Pope has in fact given ample proof in its so-called utterances or speeches to arm, not to understand that you can not talk about immigrants with categories related to reality, stories and memories of a context everything Argentine. Moreover - more importantly -, of memories tied to an even very old context, because it anchored to the migration of the twenties and thirties of the twentieth century.

Taking then a dangerous confusion between migrants and refugees, the reigning Pontiff seems to take into account that in his country of origin, immigrants, They were almost entirely all from a Christian-Catholic culture. E, among the few things put at the start inside their poor suitcases, there were holy pictures or statues of santi patroni revered Anthony of Padua in the Veneto and Justina, those of the revered patron of the Piedmont Giovanni Bosco and Mary Help of Christians, the venerated martyrs Sicilian Agata and Lucia, the patron saint of Palermo Rosalia, the revered saint of Calabria Francesco da Paola ...

… how can, the reigning Pontiff, to confuse all this with the Islamic hordes that for years and years, Hidden behind the migration of people to the vast majority do not run away at all from wars, persecution and famine, Europe come increasingly dechristianized programmed to aim to conquer and colonize? Because maybe it's good that someone, to the reigning Pontiff, explain in great historical, sociological and, not last, also pastoral, that while in Argentina and various other Latin American countries, immigrants, once they become paid workers gave offerings to the local diocese for the building of churches dedicated to their revered saints and holy, in Europa, Muslims settlers hidden behind the apparent guise of refugees and migrants, with the money of Saudi Arabia and Qatar they are building mosques next to our increasingly empty parish churches, while the wicked of that rag of Future praise the soli juice, soli juice !

Not then tap another painful and complex speech, that linked to the poor and poverty. Why is the reality of poverty, is the concept of poverty, in our European social contexts it is not comparable to that in some countries of Latin America. Or maybe the reigning Pontiff has ever seen in Italy or other countries in Europe, such as in Brazil and not only, of abandoned children below the age of ten living in herds in the metropolitan sewers, giving themselves to robberies and even murders?

The category of poverty and poor, in our countries it is quite different. Or maybe someone is able to indicate, for example in a country like ours Italy, the poor starving, of abandoned children walking barefoot in the street, of the elderly who die ill sheltered behind an overpass without any kind of healthcare? Because it is good for someone to document to the reigning Pontiff that outside the homes of our "poor" Italians there are satellite dishes and inside them we almost always find the most useless and expensive technological instruments. And when they present themselves at the Caritas to ask that he will pay the electricity bill, after spending all their money to play scratch cards&Vinci ed al super-enalotto, from the pockets pull out the phones of the latest generation more expensive. And we want to perhaps speak of the "poor" who come to Caritas directly with their cars to put the basic necessities in the trunk? And what about the young professional beggars, with their full force of perfect physical health, that instead of looking for a job prefer to bother all the parish priests of the city to ask for money?

I belong to a Catholic culture of European origin, I am not a Calvinist or a Mormon from the United States of America who considers poverty to be a punishment from God, but my poor brain it works well enough to understand and take notice of a fact upon which you should not be silent: many real or presumed poor are not poor due to the "ungrateful society", the "infamous governments", the "failing state", to the point of even "bad luck" and "bad luck" ... many are "poor" because they are totally incapable of managing money, others because they really don't want to work, while he is sheltering behind the "drama of unemployment '. How many of these "poor" are, for example ex-traders went belly up because, just cashed money, instead of taking into account that the first things the penalty to be paid are the employees, of suppliers and taxes, leaving employees without pay, of suppliers they did not pay taxes and not poured, but though they went to buy an extra car model to the luxury Mercedes dealership, while his wife and children were going to do shopping Ultra designer clothing in the more expensive boutiques? And you know, then, what do these former traders who inexorably failed and ended up in the middle of the street have to say? This: that "in Italy you can not live and work", because "taxes" - which incidentally they never paid for but always evaded - "eat you all», because of a state that is "a robber". It is not uncommon to discover, behind this kind of whiny poor who say they are victims of the entire cosmic universe, of those who in their lives have burned splendid opportunities or business social arrangement that many others have never had, although these deeply seconds lead decent lives despite their great economic hardship, without doing the rounds of the parish priests to beg to pay an electricity bill, but then going to spend what they have collected in lottery tickets.

Even in this case it is worth referring to the ingenuity and true Neapolitan genius, even because, since I got elected Archbishop of Naples, I love bringing such this city where, not a few people, to be able to meet their needs they are capable of even inventing jobs that don't exist. Some examples: do the valets of nonexistent parking, do the paid tour guides without permission, sell on stalls without a license and without paying taxes on public land, if anything, even taking in some backroom splint of contraband cigarettes. And not only that all these things are illegal, but also precise offenses. It finished the day, these people bring the so-called bread at home. It deals with, as I repeat, of businesses not strictly lawful and non-regular jobs. But in front of these people I put my beaver winter saturn out of my head - the one that the reigning Pontiff likes so much -, instead of trying at the same time a sense of disgust and perhaps even contempt towards all those who prefer to go whining to beg from one church, declaring themselves victims of an "ungrateful society", the "infamous governments", the "failing state", until you get to "bad luck" and the "bad luck". I will never give a cent to this kind of people, while the parking attendant and abusive all'ambulante we look for the not exactly legal maneuvers to gain the day, I am even capable of buying a carton of contraband cigarettes and then giving it as a gift to a craftsman who works illegally without a license; all decent people much of the professionals around beggars for our churches the pastors are always inevitable Obtuse subscribers that rag of Future ready to pay him lottery tickets, presented as electricity bill they can not pay.

In his homily Tuesday 21 November 2017 the Holy Father dealt with very delicate topics related to "ideological colonizations" [cf. text, WHO]. And he did it in such a profound and high doctrinal and pastoral way that it makes one wonder: we are dealing with a psychology borderline?

As a man of faith, as a priest and theologian, I think I'm quite able to distinguish a person acting affected by disease borderline, by a person who acts on impulse instead of the Holy Spirit. Indeed, the problems arise because certain hordes of Neocatechumenal, charismatic and possessed of Renewal in the Holy Spirit, confuse their spirit borderline with the so-called divine motions, by passing their psychopathology or their neurosis more or less severe obsessive, as revelations or imperatives of the Third Person of the Holy Trinity.

The homily in question It is part of the actions and gifts of grace of the Holy Spirit who spoke through the Successor of the Blessed Apostolo Pietro, that with extraordinary precision he has shown there between the lines:

  1. the condemnation of modernism;
  2. the condemnation of religious syncretism;
  3. the condemnation of transformation;
  4. the condemnation of false news;
  5. sentencing dell'uniformismo maverick.

Praising at the same time:

  1. the Defense of Tradition;
  2. fidelity to the law;
  3. Recall the absoluteness of the moral law;
  4. the duty to preserve the deposit of faith.

All this could displace modernist lobby maybe run for cover if anything making announce The Republic what the Pope did not say, or to pass through the top and infallible teaching some of his ill-timed joke made in private arm a few people leaving the cafeteria Domus Sanctae Martha.

In this splendid homily remain two precise points that the Pope should clarify, if he did not have Cardinal Walter Kasper and Archbishop Manuel Fernández as his theologians of reference.

First Step: We should not talk about “my faith” and of “your faith”, because true faith is one and the same for everyone: It is mine and it is yours. If I am in the truth and you're wrong, I need not tell you: "you have another faith and I respect it" ‒ as in the poisonous style of the false ecumenism of Walter Kasper and similar ‒, but it is my duty and imperative of conscience to correct you by error, because it is precisely for this reason that we are Pope and all of us are Cardinals, Bishops and Priests. Otherwise, the Catholic faith is no longer absolute Truth and the Word of God, addressed to everyone and a duty for everyone, for the salvation of all, it is just a fallible, subjective and relative human opinion. Otherwise you run the risk of falling into relativism and indifferentism.

Second point: the fact that the truth of faith is one and that it should be equal for all, It is not monotonous and flat uniformism, but it is logical necessity, because faith is an objective and universal truth, and it is required by faith itself ["One faith", Ef 4,5]. However, this does not in any way prevent the differences, but the bases and the legitimate, otherwise there would be pluralism, but chaos, just as it is happening today in the Church, where those who until yesterday shouted "more dialogue" and "collegiality more», under this pontificate they have created a real dictatorship of the Soviet regime, even worse, worthy of the small Korean dictator.

Meditating on this homily, I have come to a conclusion: the Holy Spirit is certainly making a great effort to operate on man Jorge Mario Bergoglio and through man Jorge Mario Bergoglio; but since the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is the Successor of the Blessed Apostolo Pietro, which enjoys such a very special care by the Holy Spirit, behold, albeit with difficulty, occasionally the Holy Spirit succeeds, if anything, taking him when he is tired or when it is thoughtfully, and especially in the very important things. Just as he succeeded with that sensational and limited blockhead, This was put to the test and according to the most accurate historical accounts of Santi Vangeli and the Acts of the Apostles Blessed Apostolo Pietro, that he was not elected by a conclave, but with all its more obvious limitatezze he was chosen by Christ, God himself [cf. Mt 16, 13-20], never forget, when in a respectful and legitimate way we mention the objective limitations of a Roman Pontiff whom we venerate and whom we truly love. And this is the exact opposite of ruffians in Business Today, to become bishops and cardinals, the same way as low-level whores that you grant to drunken sailors, cry so fake, hypocritical and calculated: «poor, poverty and soli juice !». Least of the reigning Pope is revered and loved by the army of cowards bishops today are silent "cautious", considering it with cynical clericalism that now he has already passed the eighty, expect him to go to the Creator and then go out again into the open and jump on the new bandwagon, because none of them interested in the good of the Church, but only the good of their careers. And I fear that these seconds, Today bowing their part in a spirit of calculated silence, But charging more and more poison day after day, Tomorrow will unfortunately our new directors, so that from bad it can go even worse, when it inevitably will change wind.

.

the Island of Patmos, 23 November 2017

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

THE BOOK OF HOLY MASSES DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS, TO OPEN WHO

.

.

.

Some grieving objections to Father Timothy Radcliffe, which should be expressed as the former Master General of the Dominican Order, not as the master of a Masonic lodge

SOME OBJECTIONS TO FATHER grieving TIMOTHY RADCLIFFE, WHO SHOULD EXPRESS AS THE FORMER MASTER GENERAL OF THE DOMINICAN ORDER, NOT AS THE MASTER OF A MASONIC LODGE

.

I wonder in a Dominican this language imprecision, which suggests a relativistic vision of religion and indifferentist. He seems to confuse faith with the view. Opinions may be many, Also in contrast to their, and this is normal. But faith in God is one, as well as the truth is only one, because it is objective truth, certain, absolute and universal.

.

.

Author
Giovanni Cavalcoli, o.p.

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

former Master General of the Order of Friars Preachers, Father Timothy Radcliff, o.p.

Having remained perplexed by various answers, sent me a text the reader an interview done by Alain Elkann to Father Timothy Radcliffe, former Master General of the Order of Preachers, to which I belong, asking me for an opinion in this regard [cf. interview on The Print, WHO].

.

I liked some things he said, as the importance of love for the truth and for silence, the beauty of faith in its relationship with reason, fraternal Dominican life, that every man is made to reach God and then called to salvation and the peaceful coexistence of the faithful of the various religions. I do not feel instead of sharing some of his statements, I quote here with my observations about. Do a number of the words of Father Timothy Radcliffe, and below I put my comments.

.

  1. Asked interviewer: "You think all religions are means to achieve the same place?"Father Timothy Radcliffe responds: "I'd be happy to say, but it is beyond our comprehension ".

.

I would have responded stating that all religions are more or less imperfect human means to reach God. But only the Catholic Christian religion is the highest among all, because it was founded by the Son of God, Jesus Christ, Unique and perfect Mediator, That tells us that God is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

.

  1. "The wars are part of human history and war using every means to win, much nationalism as religion. It is not correct to say that religion is the source of war. I would say that humans have cultivated violence using religion to impose it or to justify it ".

.

I observe that Father Timothy Radcliffe It makes a false generalization. The war may have a right end: for instance, homeland defense, the liberation of an oppressed people, the felling of a tyrannical regime, the recapture of territory occupied by the enemy, liberation from oppression of Christians by Islamic or communist.

.

Do not confuse violence with the proper use of force. Violence is wrong and is being punished by civil and military code; the proper use of force is an act of fortitude that can reach heroism and is the principle of military valor, worthy of the greatest honor. Contempt or indiscriminate condemnation of war as such, without distinguishing the right one from that unjust, It is a sign of mood petty, falsamente peace at the last e-hearted?, which eventually leads to tolerate the arrogant oppress the weak and leave them defenseless. The defense of religion can justify a war, as it happened, for example, at the Battle of Lepanto or wars narrated in the Old Testament Israel, although it is true that religion can be a pretext concealing greed for power or desire to dominate, as was the war of princes against the Lutheran Church to take possession of Church property.

.

Is not it, therefore, Karl Marx thought come, that wars are always made for material interests, and that those ideals serve only to cover the first. This idea is a sign of narrow-minded soul and barbaric, who does not understand that man is not a beast, but he holds the honor, to justice and the right.

.

You notice in the pacifist ideas of Father Timothy Radcliffe rationalist utopianism and naive and at the end, beyond the intentions, dangerous and warmongering, typical of Rousseau and the Enlightenment Masonic, which considers a "human nature" prepared at the table, taken abstractly and originally "good", regardless of its dramatic historical condition, subsequent to original sin, nature instead needs to be disciplined and braking, if necessary, even with severity. Indeed, revealed by experience, humanity with the sole force of reason and will not be able to correct deviations and to implement fully, through appropriate negotiations and policy actions, Justice and peace, moreover, in a purely earthly perspective, but it needs the help of grace, as the history of Christian civilization and the Church.

.

  1. "I'm a big fan of Pope Francis, It is making wonders advancing the Church in a more relaxed and less centralized. Of course, meets resistance, but there is driving toward freedom and spontaneity, managing to get in touch with each community ".

.

From the manner in which Father Timothy Radcliffe qualifying himself against the Roman Pontiff, - "Papa Francesco fans" - as if it were a movie star or a sports champion, it is understood that the visual evidence under which he places himself to consider and evaluate the performance of the Pope, It is totally inadequate and misleading, It is a gross superficiality and wonder a lot in a Dominican who was head of the Order for almost ten years.

.

For this reason the Father Timothy Radcliffe judgment on Pope It is completely false and clearly denotes that he comes from the deleterious modernist-liberal-Masonic environment, and with the greatest cunning and very heavy economic and media resources, for some time now exerts, towards the Successor of Peter, fine as dirty and shameless work of flattery and feigned devotion, which unfortunately does not fail to produce a certain effect on the masses of gullible believers and secularists, and the Pope himself, whose leadership of the church is extremely difficult both for the objective existence of fierce dramatic intra-ecclesial conflicts and because of the difficulty he has to give peace and concord, both for its own certain lack of impartiality and is even more due to inefficient staff and fake friends, that circuiscono him and shaped him.

.

Padre Timothy Radcliffe, with his statements, It gives shows to err in interpreting the Pope's action and did not understand at all - something heavy in a Dominican - or the true personality and apostolic mission, nor to understand the true, dramatic situation of the Church, repeatedly denounced by Benedict XVI, but also the Church in its true perspectives and hopes.

.

Padre Timothy Radcliffe, from what is expressed, It seems to live in a cozy and dreamy, made of naive youthful enthusiasm, absolutely no sense - now that people are talking about "discerning" - or the depth of the crisis, nor that the values ​​that are emerging, which are those of an authentic implementation of Vatican II, no interpretation modernist schillebexiana and Rahner, but according to the authentic teachings of the Popes of post-council, Blessed by Paul VI to this, not without being in continuity with Tradition supreme listening of the Word of God and what the "Spirit says to the Churches" [AP 2,7]. And when I say "tradition" I do not mean to The old rite of the Mass, but Sacred Tradition, ie to the custody, conservation and infallible apostolic oral transmission of the data revealed: in essence, the preaching of the Gospel.

.

Today the Pope does not need "fans » - these let them to football games, faith is a serious matter -, Nor acres accusers Pharisees, It does not need to be smoothed and pampered, It does not need to be 'correct' in the true faith, indeed he asks us to listen to him as teacher of the faith and infallible interpreter of Tradition and Scripture, and it needs to be helped and advised by loyal collaborators, wise and efficient, who do not give scandal to the people of God. It needs to be lit, comforted, consulate, encouraged and freed from the Judas, by schemers and the careerists, that surround him like bees around honey. Following the example of St. Catherine of Siena Pope it needs to be insistently urged frankly, love and respect to do his duty for the honor of Christ and the good of the Church.

.

Father Timothy Radcliffe imagines a promoter Pope of a Church "relaxed" as that, comfortably relaxed in an armchair, you will enjoy a TV show. His "decentralized" Church is a pitiful understatement but not too much, to conceal or ignore the confusional state in which the Church is today in a war of all against all cardinals, bishops, theology, priests and religious in matters of faith and morals.

.

According to Father Timothy Radcliffe Pope Francis He is guiding us toward a Church 'free and spontaneous'. But to achieve this end, there is no need for the Successor of Peter: just a good treatise on psychology. The Pope guides the Church far greater heights: listening to the Word of God, imitation of Christ, liberation from sin, the life of grace, the victory over the world and Satan, the communion of saints, the exercise of charity, for evangelical perfection, the availability to the Holy Spirit stresses, the conquest of the Kingdom of God, eternal happiness.

.

"The Pope is able to get in touch with each community"? Of course, he is the common father of all the children of God, He is sent by Christ to proclaim the Gospel to the whole world, It must understand the deeper needs of all, It must be able to appreciate the values ​​of all religions, must submit to Christ those who are "weary and oppressed" [Mt 11,28].

.

The Pope certainly demonstrates an extraordinary energy and attitude in contact with the crowds. Ma this, misled by a secularist interpretation of the action of the Pope by the great mass media, interpretation that the Pope himself does not seem sufficiently disprove, What then see the Pope? The cute propagandist of a moral "relaxed" or the man of God who calls us to look up? If the Pope 'meets resistance', should wonder what they mean. Of course there are the usual Lefebvre and Pharisees; but there is also those who love him and it's sincere friend and want to see him strive for holiness.

.

  1. We must pray for brotherhood between the faiths, not foment division.

.

I wonder in a Dominican this language imprecision, which suggests a relativistic vision of religion and indifferentist. He seems to confuse faith with the view. Opinions may be many, Also in contrast to their, and this is normal. But faith in God is one, as well as the truth is only one, because it is objective truth, certain, absolute and universal.

.

We must therefore promote brotherhood among the followers of different religions. It makes no sense instead speak of "brotherhood between the faiths", as it makes no sense brotherhood between true and false. It should not divide what should be united, but you have to divide what should be separated. The spirit of peace is not playing a double game or serve two masters. In this sense, Christ said he came to bring a 'sword' [Mt 10,34].

.

"Whoever is not with me ' - says the Lord [Mt 12,30] - "she is against me". If the Qur'an denies what Christ teaches, can not both be right Christ and the Koran. As a consequence, religions are not as parties in a parliament or the plurality of religious groups within the Catholic Church. In these cases the various formations are integrated and complement each other to represent the totality: or all the citizens of a nation or the entire ecclesial body.

.

Instead, the question of the relationship between religions is not just social order; It is not merely delegated to the State, in application of the right to religious freedom, for which the state must care for the peaceful coexistence of groups existing in it; not just to respect the differences among religions, but more deeply the question touches the problem of the truth of the doctrines of religions. And on this point, the Dominican should be particularly sensitive. To about, we must say that the Catholic Church recognizes the presence of saving values ​​in other religions, However, mixed with errors. Indeed, the fullness of the saving truth is exclusive patrimony of Catholic doctrine, as he still says the Second Vatican Council in the decree Reintegratio (II).

.

For this reason the Church also has the duty to reject or amend errors contained in other religions, that all men are called to be converted to Christ through the Church, As stated by the Council of Florence in 1442, although you can, as taught by the Second Vatican Council, belong to the Church unconsciously.

.

Father Timothy Radcliffe seems to share the theory of Edward Schillebeeckx, according to which the true religion is the sum of all religions, so that each of them would give his contribution to the building up of all, a little 'is like an encyclopedia from the contributions of collaborators. Indeed, secondo Schillebeeckx, "No particular religion exhaust the problem of truth"[1]. "Consequently, We can and we must say that there is more religious truth in all religions put together that every single religion "[2]. This is what it means? What the Koran adds saving truths that are not contained in the Gospel? That the Gospel can not afford to fix the Koran? Schillebeeckx does not realize that the saving truths were revealed by God through Christ and the Church in a number and harvested in the Apostles' Creed. Other religions do not add new truths, that are not already contained in the Christian creed, but rather they lack some. Because of this, the approach of Father Timothy Radcliffe, as a reflection of the ideas of Schillebeeckx, It is not at all conform to the doctrine of the faith, Unfortunately!

 

Varazze, 24 November 2017

.

__________________________

[1] Humanity, God's story, Queriniana 1992, p.215.

[2] Ibid., p.220.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

.

.

.

Down with the Mafia Toto’ Riina hooray pornstar Cicciolina: miseries and abuses of a Church governed by moodiness

- current events in the Church -

DOWN WITH THE MAFIA TOTO’ CHEERS THE RIINA PORNSTAR CICCIOLINA: MISERIES AND DERIVATIVES OF A CHURCH RULED BY HUMOR

.

In our own Roman Church, the pornstars Ilona Staller aka Cicciolina, during the celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice he went up the presbytery and ambo from which it administers to believers of Christ the nourishment of God's Word, ad: “We did a lot of poetry, You can say, because even if it was eroticism and pornography, for us it was poetry. Playing around, we did what, maybe, many people are afraid to do '. The missed only conclude by saying: "Praise Satan!».

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.


PDF print format article

.

«It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. Go and learn what this means: I desire mercy, not sacrifice. For I came not to call the righteous, but sinners " [Mt 9, 12-13]

.

.

Rome, December 2012, Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul, the Franciscan Francesco Bartolucci administers Holy Communion to the pornstars Ilona Staller, aka Cicciolina, the funeral of the greatest director and adult film producer Riccardo Schicchi

In the merciful Church, with the Supreme Pontiff who calls to a son of Lucifer as Marco Pannella to invite him to "hold on" or upholding the abortion proud and unrepentant Emma Bonino at the Vatican, which consistently followed unabated to define abortion "a social achievement" and a "great civil law ', Also in this case we would have expected a more balanced conduct in denying the funeral to boss Of Cosa Nostra Salvatore Riina, said Toto '. But unfortunately, it seems that the Church has exploded the tango of passion.

.

Rome, December 2012, Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul, the Franciscan Francesco Bartolucci administers Holy Communion to the pornstars Eva Henger, the funeral of the greatest director and adult film producer Riccardo Schicchi

We who we formed the largest teaching the Holy Father Giovanni Paolo II and that we continue to stand firm on the metaphysical and theological principles of Faith and Reason, we are uncomfortable in this Church in freefall living today in the name of Faith and Passion, but it is clear: wrapped in a passio that has nothing to do with the Christ's Passion, instead everything to do with the poisonous passio that come from an irrational moodiness.

 

.

Rome, December 2012, Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul, porn actor Rocco Siffredi holds ambo on the presbytery sacrilegious eulogy to the director and largest adult film producer Riccardo Schicchi

Who was the boss of Cosa Nostra Salvatore Riina said Toto ', we all know, and we also know of those crimes is guilty. But one thing is certain: It is not the first sinner in history, at least not for us regarding the original sin an objective fact and not a metaphor [cf. Gen 3, 1-19], just as we believe that the fratricide of Cain who killed his brother Abel is also a fact and not an allegory [cf Gen 4, 1-16]. Therefore, that before a Riina cry “to sin!” precisely the secularists who never believed in sin - starting from the original one - and who still continue to disbelieve it today, However, although on this occasion even invoking the power of a excommunication … well, how to understand, if everything were not grotesque and ridiculous, it would be tragic.

.

On the orders of Riina, were killed by killers many innocent people, some speak of about two hundred murders he ordered. His killers have managed to assassinate strictly adults who, while not succeeding, He could still somehow groped to defend himself, or at least to escape. And always on his orders they were murdered even people with state, because people at high risk of attacks, of complex safety systems, meticulous guards and armed escorts.

.

No security mechanism, least of all any meticulous protection e armed escort, instead it protects the innocent creatures and totally helpless that every day are deleted in total indifference through abortion, while the Pope calls Marco Pannella to invite him to "Sit tight," and while it counts, at the suggestion of some Jesuits close to him, Mrs Emma Bonino in candid rose of the great Italians.

.

Rome, December 2012, Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul, the famous “disturber” Gabriele Paolini [see WHO], publicly and repeatedly declared himself an atheist, anticlerical, in favor of homosexual culture, abortion and euthanasia, receives Holy Communion from the pious Franciscan at the funeral of the greatest director and producer of porn films Riccardo Schicchi

At this point it is worth remembering another big funeral just held in the Diocese of His Holiness, in December 2012, reigning Venerable Pope Benedict XVI. Vicar general of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome was the Iron bertoniano Cardinal Agostino Vallini, was shown several times indifferent to the violation of the sacred honor of Holy Mother Church as a surgeon is indifferent to human blood. Though, as I recently wrote, soon it will regret, so that diocese has gone from bad to worse …

.

In that sad December 2012, at the Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul, in the Roman neighborhood of 'EUR, It took place on funeral porcini the largest Italian director and producer of pornographic films, celebrated by Francesco Bartolucci, Order of Friars Minor Conventual. During the funeral obsequies, not only the Franciscan improvident administered Holy Communion to Ms. Ilona Staller, aka Cicciolina, and other famous pornstars present, but that the sacrilege was complete he allowed, both Mrs. Staller, is the famous Italian porn actor Rocco Siffredi, to get on the presbytery, ambo from which it administers to believers of Christ the spiritual food of God's Word, to keep a very satanic eulogy.

.

Ms. Ilona Staller, aka Cicciolina, with their backs toward the tabernacle in fact announced to all present:

.

“We did a lot of poetry, You can say, because even if it was eroticism and pornography, for us it was poetry… Playing around, we did what, maybe, many people are afraid to do '.

.

this only, But, and the “absolute evil” that shocked the modern social Church: Salvatore Riina, said Toto ', boss Of Cosa Nostra [Corleone 1930 – Parma 2017]

He then went to the presbytery Rocco Siffredi, pronouncing high mystical words that seem drawn from the deeper spiritual thoughts of St. Therese of the Child Jesus:

.

"They tell me I made clear porn, but I have not done anything sdoganare. Riccardo started and it is thanks to him that I am here and if they are what they are " [cf Andrea Tornielli, WHO].

.

I have nothing to add, if not a fact: the merciful Church, the one that asked for forgiveness for all: to the Jews, to Muslims, to Latin American indigenous people and so to follow, his faithful and devoted to his servants, because he never apologized for these great indecencies, I repeat that they have in every way of the satanic? No one has ever made even the era of that great mercy which Augustus Shepherd caressing wolves clubs and their faithful sheep. What in fact matters is that the newspaper The Republic, with all the papers hippies of the left radical chic near, with its chorus atheists and non-believers declared, all in favor of “sacred rights” dell'aborto, dell'eutanasia, the gender, genetic testing and so to follow, continue to praise the glory of Francesco "the great revolutionary", while Father Antonio Spadaro, instead of praying the breviary and the Rosary, He takes over the load from the fifth and ninety, above all, behind the scenes …

.

… He did not die for a charge of dynamite made by placing assassins Toto’ Riina nor a hail of machine gun of his killers, it is just a “lump of cells”. And before these insignificant “clumps of cells”, There is perhaps that the secularist newspapers ask the excommunications Church and funeral denied?

Or someone thinks that we are so naive not having understood who, to the Supreme Pontiff, She led him to the humiliating slips for the Church, the call from "hold on" to Marco Pannella to the title of "great Italian" given to Emma Bonino?

.

The episcopate is silent, as I wrote several times, but among the priests salt discontent more and more day after day. And to us, that The Republic shouts "Glory glory, Hallelujah Francis revolutionary», not interested in anything. And a day, the good Francis, We remember that we will end up in the Canon of the Mass, to remember him in prayer we are priests, Eugenio not Scafari, Non Emma Bonino, not the Pentecostal Pastor John Traettino …

.

the Island of Patmos, 20 November 2017

.

.

NOW PLEASE SEE THIS MOVIE, WHICH INDEED THE SATANIC, WHAT ALLOW, THE SAME CHURCH, DENY THAT THEN THE FUNERAL FUNERAL EVEN IN THE FORM TO A PRIVATE BOSS mAFIOSO

.

.

.

THE PRIEST BOLOGNESE FRANCESCO PIERI WONDERS: 'HAS MORE DEATHS ON CONSCIENCE TOTO’ RIINA OR EMMA BONINO?»..

.

Dear Brother Francesco Pieri,

if you were “tax”, from which there is political correctness killing, You do not apologize to anybody for having simply said the obvious. In fact, you're not, you need to clarify the obvious, Bonino have to clarify it is the lady says: "Don Pieri does not insult me, but millions of Italian women who have suffered in one way or another the trauma of abortion ". She now has to explain who, these "millions of women", would be "traumatized", seen that each of them has visited freely to abort and that the largely, when you tried to convince them not to suppress an innocent human life, They have denied any form of listening. So, those who have traumatized? And what about the army of teenagers that abortion practiced Thursday morning, Saturday nights were already perhaps the revelry at the disco, Who would have traumatized, but especially: Who would have offended? Because applying the same principle boniniano, one could argue with equal “impeccable logic” that the boss Riina was traumatized by the number of people he had killed and that the hard-hearted - like for example we who instead consider him a criminal and who consider the dead because of him innocent victims -, They can not understand his trauma and its resulting pain.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

AVAILABLE THE BOOK OF MASS DE L'ISLE OF PATMOS, TO OPEN WHO

.

.

.

.

.

It was held a council in the Dominican convent of Varazze who proceeded to condemn Karl Rahner errors under the auspices of St. Caterina da Siena beloved patron saint of this Ligurian City

It HAS DONE A SECOND IN THE DOMINICAN CONVENT OF VARAZZE WHICH HAS TO CONDEMN THE ERRORS OF KARL RAHNER under the auspices OF SAINT CATERINA DA SIENA PATRON OF THIS BELOVED CITY LIGURE

.

In recent times it The Island of Patmos There is great movement: Father Ariel S. Levi of Gualdo was appointed Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, while higher up to climb, along the Ligurian Sea, in Varazze City Father Giovanni Cavalcoli presided over a Holy Council of which we provide you with the Summary of fees.

.

.

Authors
Matilde Nicoletti, S.D.B.I.
Jorge Facio Lynx

.

.

PDF print format article

.

.

the concert of bells of Varazze Dominican Convent announcing the opening of the Council [click on image to open the video]

The councils of the Church They are not new to the conviction of those doctrinal errors that until a few decades ago seguitavano to be called heresy, but today they are called "precious diversity", which as such must be welcomed, questioning if anything where we missed in condemning certain errors in the past, sometimes even with a determined hardness. Those who yesterday were in fact called "serious doctrinal errors", Today seems to deserve to be welcomed as valuable diversity, until reaching Martin Lutero becomes a "gift of the Holy Spirit", as announced at the Pontifical University S.It is Lateranse. Mons. Nunzio Galantine, General Secretary of the C.E.I, thereby giving for granted - good or bad implicitly - that the darker the Fathers of Trent condemned him unfairly, presumably because of the hardness of their hearts [cf. Mt 19, 8] closed love and mercy [cf. WHO].

.

the Patroness of the Ligurian city Caterina da Siena, Santa and doctor, under whose auspices was held the Council of Varazze [click on image to open the video]

In history the Church there are examples of different councils that have established harsh sentences to those mistakes that we should not be afraid to call this day heresies. We provide a few examples: in the year 325 The Council of Nicea condemned the heresy of Arius which subordinated the Son to the Father, namely that the Son, previously non-existent, it was at a given point created by the Father. While in A profession of faith, known as Nicene Creed, professiamo «begotten th Judging from the original,consubstantial tῷ Father " [begotten not made, of the same substance as the Father], in quanto «begotten begotten from the Father" [He born of the Father before all ages]. To follow centuries later with another council, the Fourth Lateran, that condemns the heresy of Abbot Joachim of Fiore, known as heresy triteista, which it is to distinguish God in three Persons, or three different natures or essences, which in fact is to say: three gods. VA’ however, it stated that Joachim was condemned the erroneous doctrine, but the same Council Fathers who condemned him, They never put into question his undoubted holiness of life. Then comes later, in the 16th century, The Council of Trent, which condemns the errors of that great "gift of the Holy Spirit" Martin Luther [cf. WHO].

.

the Dominican convent of Varazze, XVI sec.

Following the style of the Councils, in Varazze Dominican Convent came together under the auspices of Caterina da Siena, Santa and Doctor of the Church, a group of scholars, which I showed in forty short rents some of the basic errors that cross theological speculation of the German Jesuit theologian Karl Rahner, It has become for decades, with its outrageous mistakes, a point of reference for theological speculation and for the academic teaching.

.

DECISIONS OF THE SACRED COUNCIL OF VARAZZE

.

new profiles. Walther Bunny, Catholic biblical scholar of the Old Testament Shepherd University International, Padre Dionysios Papavasileiou, Monaco Mount Athos, greek Orthodox Archimandrite residing in Bologna and Father Giovanni Cavalcoli, Order of Preachers, academic pontifical, gathered in the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Mother of God, la Theotokos, Varazze in the Dominican Convent in days 13-15 November 2017, to treat the

.

Problems raised by the influence of Hegel IN CHRISTOLOGY KARL RAHNER

.

we mean, following the first seven holy Ecumenical Councils of the Church A, Santa, Catholic and Apostolic, to introduce softly, confidently to our respective Prelates, Representatives of Our Lord Jesus Christ and the Keepers of the most holy Orthodox doctrine taught to us by our Divine Master, or

.

THE POPE OF OUR LORD JESUS ​​CHRIST THE ROMAN POPE FRANCIS I, BISHOP OF ROME, AND AT YOUR BLISS BARTOLOMEO II, PATRIARCH OF ISTANBUL, THEY dedicating filially, THE CONCLUSIONS WHICH ARE JOINTS

.

  1. The truth is no identity of the idea to reality, but adequacy of the idea to reality, because the reality is superior to the idea and the truth of the rule.

.

  1. Reality, independently of our ideas, It is not placed by our ideas, but it is created by God.

.

  1. The most holy dogmas of the Christian Orthodox faith and, insegnatici by the Church, are not mere words, human and perishable categories, pure human thoughts and passengers, contingent and profane, conventional signs, myths, symbols, images or figures of divine truth, arbitrary impositions that block freedom of thought, They are not relevant to the times and places, but they're infallible interpretations of God's Word, and Sacred Tradition of the Holy Fathers. They, formulated with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, Truth is absolute and most certain, which they reach conceive and luminously, truly, precisely, immutably and infallibly the infinite reality of the divine Mysteries, while leaving unfathomable and inscrutable to our limited intellect, while they stimulate us to the pious and mystical silence and adoration.

.

  1. God created the world not alienating itself and becoming world, but suscitandolo from nothing.

.

  1. We reject firmly as a Gnostic heresy called "transcendental pre-conceptual experience of God", Why, as taught by the Blessed Apostolo Paolo, We know God in this life by means of creatures (tois poiemasin, RM 1,19-20), while the divine Scriptures assert that he is unfailingly known to us "by analogy" ( kat'analoghìan Sap 13,5).

.

  1. The world the divine essence not complete, as if God can not exist without the world.

.

  1. It is heresy Modalist argue that the Three Divine Persons are three modes of subsistence of the only subsistent divine nature. On the contrary, they are three subjects subsisting or three hypostases.

.

  1. The Holy Trinity is not economic in essence, but only in fact, by free will. The economy of salvation does not enter into the essence of God, but due to its perfectly free decision.

.

  1. The original sin was a sin actually committed by the primitive couple at the instigation of the Tempter, and whose fault miserable and whose consequences have been transmitted generation to all humanity.

.

  1. It gave, for God, He did not need to incarnate.

.

  1. It is heresy to say that Marcionite, while the Old Testament God is a terrible God, avenger, irascible and punisher, the God of the New Testament is a merciful God, compassionate, merciful and loving. On the contrary, it is always the one same God, just and merciful, with the difference that in the New is a God Incarnate.

.

  1. Sa of heresy and hegelismo mention "story of God", even after the Incarnation, as if the essence of God to be immersed in time and limited by time and not quite eternal and immutable, above the space and time. God is not a temporal authority, but it is pure immortal Spirit, He who is the creator of time. With the Incarnation, God took and lifted up to Him, in-person units, in Christ, time and history, without time and history.

.

  1. Marcion's heresy to say that the true God we know only in the New Testament.

.

  1. It is heresy patripassiana and teopaschita assert that the divine nature is liable and deadly.

.

  1. It is heresy to affirm that God Eutiche, with the Incarnation, He has changed its nature in human nature. On the contrary, in the Incarnation, it remains unchanged (dare), because it is immutable.

.

  1. It is false to say that the concepts used in the Chalcedonian dogma are no longer relevant or have changed meaning or are reinterpreted.

.

  1. It is an absurdity Hegelian thesis Rahner, according to which God, in the Incarnation, wetsuit while remaining immutable.

.

  1. It is to be rejected as impiety Gnostic the so-called "transcendental Christology", affected by the "transcendental experience", referred to in subparagraph. 5.

.

  1. The "Elevated cristologia", namely the incarnate Logos in time, existed before the creation of the world (GV 17,5) and "Christology from below", that "Jesus came in the flesh" (The Gv 4,2; II Jn 7) not mutually exclusive, but rather they are mutually complementary, because this represents the historical way to initiate and elevate itself to that anagogicamente.

.

  1. In Christ there is no unity, but union of the two natures, do not pass by two at a, why they, though united and not separated (adiairetos, e achoristos), remain distinct and not confused (asynchitos).

.

  1. Christ on the cross has reconciled us with the Father, obtaining for the remission of sins and the resurrection enables us to resurrect us too. So, the Cross is paschal and expiatory sacrifice.

.

  1. You Nestorian heresy to assert that Christ, dying, He loses his human existence and become the Spirit, as if in Christ there were two people: a human person, it vanishes, and a divine Person, which remains.

.

  1. Rahner also falls in nestorianism another point. He takes the Hegelian concept of the person as self-consciousness. Now, because in Christ there are two self-consciousnesses, the human and the divine, it follows that there are two people. The fact is that the two self-consciousnesses depend on the two natures, no personal being of Christ, which it is only one.

.

  1. It is heresy Docetist and monophysite say that the body of the risen Christ was not seen significantly, touched and palpated, as if it were a mere appearance, vanished with the death.

.

  1. It is heresy to say that Christ is not risen after death, but in death, identifying almost Hegelian life with death.

.

  1. The Second Coming is not a myth that is a future already present, but it is really a prediction of future event.

.

  1. We are not born to grace, but with the original offense, that is removed from Baptism.

.

  1. We are created to tend to God, but we possess free will, whereby, de facto, depending on the choice that each one does, there are those who will and who tends there tends.

.

  1. In sin you lose grace, but with the metanoia it can regain.

.

  1. Incomplete grace human nature, which it is in itself endowed by God with a perfection, Although wounded by sin, but the healing and freedom from sin and sopraeleva the condition of divine sonship in the image of the Son.

.

  1. Christ is not only the model of, but also man's guide to the divine sonship.

.

  1. With the grace occurs deification (theosis), But not in the sense that man might become God, but in the sense that participates analogy of life (Methexis, koinonia) Divina.

.

  1. In the grace God gives us the essence, because it only does so with the Son (True God from true God, however,), but it tells us only one share in its life.

.

  1. Grace is not God, Why, if it was God, we could not destroy with sin, something that unfortunately happens. For God you can not destroy.

.

  1. It is not true that men are always in grace: there are those who possess it and some people do not possess. And even the same man, You can now possess and may now lose.

.

  1. It is not true that everyone is saved, but only those who accept the grace and live accordingly.

.

  1. The purpose of the Christian life is not simply natural, but above all to become children of God.

.

  1. The goal of Christian conduct is not only reconciliation with God and be forgiven of sins, but above all get to communion with the Father through Christ in the Holy Spirit.

.

  1. The task and powers of the Christian are not the ones to shape its essence to your liking, but those to obey the laws of God based on a knowledge of human nature and its natural and supernatural ends.

.

  1. Among human nature in its finitude and the infinite God is an infinite difference in height. Yet the grace makes us children of God.

.

Praise and glory forever and ever to the Holy Trinity.

.

Varazze, 13-15 November 2017

.

.

Post scripts

The newly elected Archbishop of Naples, S. AND. Mons. Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo [cf. WHO], He could not take part in the Council of Varazze because it is located at the spa for a period of spiritual exercises before receiving episcopal consecration. It has in fact chosen as a retreat spas, Why, making sludge, He is preparing to enter its role as a poor bishop for the poor.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

WE REMEMBER THAT IS AVAILABLE THE BOOK OF MASS DE L'ISLE OF PATMOS THAT YOU CAN SEE WHO

.

.

.

.

Father Ariel S.. Levi Gualdo appointed the Archbishop of Naples. The Supreme Pontiff Francis was moved from his meditation: "The poor and poverty are the face of the Mystical Body of Christ"

FATHER ARIEL S. LEVI of GUALDO APPOINTED TO HEAD ARCHBISHOP OF NAPLES. THE POPE FRANCIS I HAVE BEEN MOVED FROM HIS MEDITATION: "THE POOR AND POVERTY IS THE FACE OF THE MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST"

.

Dear Letters of The Island of Patmos, is with trepidation and joy that I give you this good news: I was chosen as Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, and at the stroke of the 75th birthday of His Eminence Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe, I will take his place on the episcopal chair of San Gennaro. Since this ad, Now I intend to publish my writing through which, the Roman Pontiff, for friends "Father Francesco", She saw in me the ideal candidate and decided: "You will be the Bishop of existential outskirts of Naples".

.

Author
Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo

.

.

PDF text print format

.

.

God is the salvation of the poor in his true face and the refugee who is his body, He being the only son of a factory worker, said art Son of God.

I Yĕhošūah Joseph

.

.

the episcopal coat of arms of the Father Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo, He explained later in the second part of this short essay in which he is shown his theological and pastoral meditation on the poor and the poverty that earned him the appointment as bishop

This my short essay It opens and closes with an exhortation made by Blessed Apostolo Paolo in a letter addressed to his discepolo Timoteo:

.

"If a man desire the episcopate, He desires a noble task. But a bishop must be blameless, the husband of one time, sober, prudent, decent, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not attached to money […]» [The Tm 1, 2-3].

.

In another passage, the Blessed Apostle exhorts:

.

"But earnestly desire the higher gifts! And I'll show you a more excellent way […]» [The Cor 12, 31].

.

But most of all, the Word of God made Man is very clear when in a special parable speaks of the talents that each of us were given [cf. Mt 25, 14-30]. First of all, each of us, must be aware of the talents received, because if it were not could never outa. It goes without saying that the most talented in a particular way, They must never fall into the devil's schemes of pride, redoubtable Queen locomotive and all the other deadly sins, because awareness of their objective capacity must always be combined with another consciousness: the talents are not our own merit, but mysterious gift of God's grace; no data for our honor, but for the glory of God, to serve God through them Christ and His Church. I for one do not doubt that a bit 'I will have deserved Purgatory for the purification of my soul, but it is equally true that if I had to introduce myself shortly before the immediate judgment of God, one thing I would go safe in the presence of the Creator: the objective certainty of having loved, worshiped and obeyed the Church, and he has served in every way the people of God, spending my priestly life to make up for the thousand laziness of many my brothers, from those taking refuge behind unspecified "pastoral duties", They never have time to confess, to visit the sick, to bring them Holy Communion, to administer the sacred anointing of the sick and the dying, to stay close to people in need and so to follow, because for this we have become priests, not to send the "pious women", or as any intrusive "priestesses", to visit the sick and bring them Holy Communion.

.

I like to do the theologian and through the theology I think of making a valuable service to the Holy Church of God, especially in these times of wild widespread heterodoxy, but I would not hesitate to abandon any theological speculation if it meant neglecting the pastoral and apostolic dimension, why I became a priest to celebrate the Eucharistic Sacrifice, to absolve sins, to administer the sacraments according to the power of my sacramental able, to assist believers of Christ. That is the priority, and this priority is sacrificed everything, Also theological speculation. Or to quote an example: if the faithful, as it has often happened, They are calling me at home because they do not find a priest in every parish in the City going to give the anointing to a sick man - being young pastors engaged in exhausting and unspecified "pastoral activity" -, and I'm going out at that time to go and hold a keynote the mystery of the Incarnation of the Word of God, well: before I go to administer the holy anointing to the sick, then I'm going to hold keynote, Why, if it did so, I would prove not to have understood why, the Word of God became man. Which among priests, not have realized, are unfortunately very many, alas, more and more.

.

Do you want to know then where that are found, always and rigor, the kind of lazy and absentee priests poc'anzi mentioned? Soon said: placed by their bishops in the largest and wealthiest parishes of the diocese, protected and made untouchable by authentic mafias formed mostly from lazy and mediocre priests and how much they, who live with the terror that anyone can in any way alter the brain death was generated by them in the particular Churches, offering examples of priestly life totally different from their. E, if everything goes well, these priests often find them to make no grown children to the house of mothers and fathers, I repeat: if everything goes well. Or we find them surrounded by their beloved grandchildren, full of a thousand needs and many vices, which I await that throws priest uncle sooner or later the bucket, to have in rightful inheritance everything in a life of laziness and greed have stolen from the coffers of the Church, from whom everything had, and to which all should give - or at least return - to their death.

.

Despite my sins are clear about God's judgment, because it is not based on "divine emotion", For God is not emotional, it's right. And his justice sustains the pure aequitas, which if necessary is aequitas compensatory. How were the holy men and women who had a really bad temper, or when they opened their mouths were able - as they say - to leave if necessary bishops, priests, religious literally "thrown to the pigs"? Yet all of them were judged on charity, why they are sanctified; as well as each of us, It will be judged on charity. And charity, before the eyes and judgment of God, It produces a large compensatory effect. Or how often I happen to say in the confessional to penitents: "Love is like a baptism, which renews us the grace and erasing blame, sometimes, maybe, in the eyes of God you can erase even the sentence to be served for the sin forgiven, but that He alone can know, He alone, despite our faults and sins committed, may decide to admit us, for compensatory charity merits, directly into Paradise among the blessed souls ".

.

IF BY THE GIFT OF THE GRACE OF GOD I BELIEVE TO BE A PRIEST OF TALENT, WHY NOT ME THE SAY FRIENDS, BUT WHY THE CLAIM MY WORST ENEMIES

.

If I think of being a man of talent, It is not to believe it because they tell me friends, or the so-called admirers, because those do not own text. I think because I always say my worst enemies. Indeed, none of those clerics that if they could they would have taken me not only the Sacrament of Orders, but even the Sacrament of Baptism and then burned alive, He never said that I am a mediocre theologian, or an immoral priest, why my worst enemies, well-looked by any kind of confrontation with me in matters of doctrine and faith, They are always used to say: "It has brilliant intelligence and profound theological preparation". Adding below: "And what makes it very dangerous". To follow up with statements like,: "Ha one encyclopedic», "He has an evil intelligence", "It is not a sentimental emotional that can be done in the trap to fall into its sentimentality, because when harsh criticism directed always builds his thesis on objective data and criteria based on pure logic, in which case you should not deny it, because you run the risk of being made still more blacks from his bloody tongue and his even more bloody pen his tongue itself ". But most of all, despite themselves, They are forced to admit: "He leads a morally impeccable priestly life". If they do not admit this, They would laugh behind by people, as my life unfolds to the public sunlight, under the eyes of the people who always know where they are, with who I am and what I do, but above all they know what I do and who I am not. E, these enemies loved ones, mostly characterized by a bleak mediocrity, They have always kept me away from all academic ambits, without any ecclesiastical authority has never had urologic manly attributes to tell: "In conclusion, if God sends his Church to men of skill and talent, can we marginalize them not to irritate the army of highly poor people who are doing disappearing day after day the universal Church in the ridiculous, It uttering heresy bursts from the chairs of our academic institutions and from the pulpits of the largest historic churches?».

.

Having said that, we can then add that none of the bishops at the apostolic authority which have been subjected over the years, He never raised a half sigh about my way of life, Why, always the proof of facts not subject to easy refutation, I am a priest who never caused any problems of a moral nature, doctrinal and asset. Even despite, their Bishops who are impossible with a clergy in the most serious moral issues, doctrinal statement and balance sheet, to me they have never given any official pastoral assignment, because if they did there would be a violent uprising against them by priests whose moral conduct, doctrinal statement and balance sheet, constitute public scandals in the sunlight, strictly tolerated, sometimes even hidden and protected, by those same bishops ready then to hide behind pathetic speeches such as: "Ah, the situation is delicate, I have to handle fragile equilibrium ". By reaching out to the shameful concluding sentence: "What can I do?». And before this question, someone he was told to me in these terms: "When it was proposed the appointment as bishop, and along with it the was shown in a clear and realistic severe actual state besetting the diocese who wished to entrust, why she accepted? Maybe then say ... "What can I do?”».

.

Unfortunately it is the human mystery - certainly not the mystery of faith -, the poor little men prancing for certain honors, but by no direction and no reason, however, they want to take the well heaviest burdens arising from their high office.

.

BISHOPS ELECTED IN RECENT YEARS resemble snooty TEENS THAT GIVE TUNES FROM AUTHENTIC MULL FEMALES

.

Not a few, among the bishops elected in recent years, They resemble certain small and snooty teenagers, the break of the first fragile hair on pubis, they go around telling, as authentic mulls females, had made raids with amazing women in their thirties ultra surf, as well as almost impossible to achieve by virtue of their beauty and social position. This kind of adolescents, of always, in civil society make tenderness, Why, with their absurd-fanciful stories, cause to die laughing anyone who will listen. Unfortunately, in today's ecclesiastical body, this kind of adolescents are instead elected mulls females official of the Holy See, then declared the spouses of some great and ancient particular Church, for their, It should be entirely comparable to a woman almost impossible to achieve for its beauty and its social position. E, once it becomes bishops, tenderness nor do they die laughing, but do cry, because by their actions incompetent produce so many and such damage that only partially be repaired will require decades of work by vescovi santi, admitted that tomorrow they always find, saints bishops, after the terrible devastation of the earthly Jerusalem wrought by this new generation of bishops who first popped fragile hair on their pubic priestly suffering from diseases caused by congenital micropenis, But they believed most gifted of a thoroughbred stallion and most beautiful of Rodolfo Valentino.

.

He is now a man 54 year old, here in maturity, or rather now on the way to old age, I began to aspire to the "best gifts". E, as well capita, the face of ever larger slice of the episcopate showing that he had serious problems on knowledge of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, following the admonition of the Blessed Apostolo Paolo, "If a man desire the episcopate, He desires a noble task ", I began to aspire to the episcopate. And I sucked you animated by the serene and conscious awareness that these days would also be a great bishop, compared to some teenagers at the break of the first pubic hair they were declared by the Holy See stallions and then married some great and ancient particular Church.

.

CHURCH AND ECONOMY BANK. HOW FARMI ROAD TOWARDS EPISCOPATE, I CAN NOT BE RECEIVED WITH ONE OF THOSE CHECKS IN WHITE SIGN THE FACTS FROM A Roman Pontiff "COURT OF MIRACLES" FORMED BY THE AUTHENTIC bankrupts sessantottino POST IN POWER ?

.

Like all men of faith at the same time endowed with talents bestowed on me by mystery of grace from God, I first had to deal with those who are at the same time my great limitations; because a man is not able to confront their human limitations, It can be neither a man of genuine intelligence, or a man of faith. And my first insurmountable limitation was the fact of not having my part contacts with the "court of miracles" that have long encircles the Roman Pontiff, leading to His Holiness the pizzini with the names of the bishops in all the best trappings of modernism, but incensed with the smoke of the great censer of the poor and poverty. In short, just to be clear: we all know that the reigning Pope gave clear provisions on the selection of new bishops, stating that wants them "shepherds with the smell of the sheep" and a "special preference for the poor". Or good, I understand that the story would be very long, but perhaps, the reigning Pontiff, It is not sufficiently enlightened on what was, in a country like Italy, Sixty-eight. Then, in case the Holiness of Our Lord Jesus Christ I read, I try to narrarglielo me soon, What it was our pathetic Sixty-eight ...

.

... Sixty-eight Italian It was formed a protest movement and carried out by the richest children of fathers who spoke of the proletariat, the working class and the class struggle, and then return to their homes where they were served by the rulers and the liveried servants. Protesters with the proletariat odor on him, were the scions of industrial families and entrepreneurs took to struggle against bourgeois political class and the old academic baronies. They were also and above all the great uneducated, because while the old and commendably contested old academic barons, behind they had a great tradition, but above all a great culture, protesters faux-proletarian, behind instead they had an abysmal ignorance, and one after the other have graduated in political collective discussing the imagination in power, on forbidden to forbid, or discoursing on Cuban cigars smoked by Ernesto Guevara said Che. And so, Sixty-eight in the post, we ended up in schools and academic structures an army of ignorant licensed, just as it happened in the political class. Of ignorant characterized by a precise setting: were aggressive and coercive as few - or in some ways like never before had seen -, with those who did not think like them. E, since the seventies, these posts sessantottino in the chair have devastated entire generations of students, targeting rare destructive spirit with all those who were not willing to homologate their indisputable thought. And of this, Who is writing, He has been both victim and witness.

.

there, not knowing and not imagining with such opportunists and false-change would eventually play, the reigning Pontiff, shouting "Odor of sheep ', "Poor and poverty", to a fifty years away from Sessantotto Episcopate has created the same situation ruinous. A situation that, with all the most devoted and sacred respect, It could only be created by a naive Argentine who does not listen to anyone and that does not live in the world, but in his idea of ​​the world. E, said this, as far as my words, I conclude by saying that it will be the time, to give me right or wrong in tomorrow's day, while the episcopate post sessantottino sinks deeper and deeper, between ignorance of the sheep and the bleak poverty of the doctrine and spirit.

.

The members of this "court of miracles" clerical Sixty style, formed as I wrote several times and repeated by authentic delinquents, that with the proposal of certain episcopal appointments induce the Roman Pontiff to sign the blank checks without over them it is not even mentioned the figure for putting the collection, a person like me found them like smoke to the eyes, even worse: They consider more dangerous radiation of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor.

.

As for the matter of blank checks, It is first of all clear that certain relationships are not unilateral and bilateral. Indeed, When the Bishop that full and perfect communion with the Bishop of Rome has ordained me a priest, I promised obedience and filial respect to him and to all his successors, in a sense, I signed a blank check with notebook Checks drawn by the Bank of Faith, at which there are no spending limits, because the Bank of Faith coverage is unlimited. but be careful, because the Bishop in full and perfect communion with the Bishop of Rome, for its part has not signed, nor ever I put in my hands a blank check with no number and date for collection, why am I that I vowed to him, not he who had vowed to me. Unfortunately today, what's happening, It is a dangerous alteration and inversion of all the economic and commercial criteria: enough that present themselves to the Pope offenders in the "court of miracles" that the flatter and circuiscono, telling him that such and such a priest wrote a pamphlet on the poor and poverty to the highest socio-political trappings of Bologna School, or who hath been busy that other poor migrants and considers it soli juice more important than how much they are not the gloomy doctrines on the great Christological dogma, that these puts to sign burst hazardous blank checks of episcopal appointments, without indicating in them neither the figure nor the date. It goes without saying that, because at the Bank of Faith, for this kind of checks there is neither liquidity nor coverage, having left the Founder of the Church any kind of a guarantee fund for similar nefarious expenses, soon it will happen one after another, these checks, eventually protested. Because this offenders in the "court of miracles" we are conducting: to bankruptcy. In the end, all'improvvido signatory, the Divine Director of the bank will withdraw the checkbook, and little will be worth that he is going in and pawing claiming to be the only, valid, lawful and legitimate holder of the current account, because at that point, Director Divine, It will remind you that the wealth entrusted to him would have to manage it and make it bear fruit with the highest criteria of the economy Christological all of which are summarized in the famous Parabola faithful and wise administrator [cf. LC 12, 39-48]. Those who later suffered and suffered damage due to this large sale of bad checks, the Divine Judge of the Supreme Court - which is merciful, because first of all it is right -, ask it opened the company's bankruptcy proceedings Catholic Church and that we proceed immediately with the kidnappings to try to recover and also only partly credits. And maybe, the first real estate will be impounded, both the credit protection is to avoid further future damage, it will be the Sistine Chapel ...

.

... in this climate of receivership that is a prelude to bankruptcy proceedings, to achieve my goal I have taken literally the admonition of Christ God who calls us: "There: I send you as sheep among wolves; so be wise as serpents and harmless as doves " [Mt 10, 16], mindful of the fact that "the children of this world, indeed, towards their peers are wiser than the children of light " [LC 16, 8].

.

I HAVE TRIED TO LEARN FROM THE SERVANTS AND FALSE Hypocrites, THAT AS SUCH ARE pimps and infidels TO THE MASTER, AND ACTING LIKE THEM I HAD ME TOO MY BLANK CHECK WITHOUT COVER ...

.

Now I reveal publicly what I did to achieve my goal: first of all I removed the Roman cassock off, I burned the Saturn beaver who sometimes wear during the winter as the wind blows, I went into a church clothing store and I bought one of those hideous synthetic shirts with white removable Francobollino below the neck, which of course I left half undone; I put a couple of jeans under shirt, taking care of arrotolarmi up their sleeves to the elbow, I wore a pair of sneakers and I let the beard for three days. I then corrected my walk trying to bend your back, if anything appear too straight; I prudently refrained from proceeding with an elegant gait and took to walk dangling so. Finally, I showed up at the Vatican to Domus Sanctae Martha I was saying in the lodge prodigandomi for the protection of a Sinti gypsy ethnicity, who was subjected to severe discrimination because he had defended legitimately by questions from an annoying and insistent journalist, breaking his nose and slaughtering of its barrel cameraman [cf. video clips WHO, WHO, WHO]. And so hyear referred to the Supreme Pontiff in hall the hotel was a priest very pecoreccio who demanded to speak to the Supreme Pontiff for a matter arising from the poor discriminated against Gypsies. Well, maybe you will not believe, but he came in person in hall to receive me.

.

When I saw a tick away and then come back to me the Roman Pontiff, with the help of God's grace I corrected my instincts incorrigible imprinted in my DNA of priest, following which I bent my head, I would put on their knees to kiss the hand and, getting up, I would not open his mouth except to answer, because before the Roman Pontiff not start any speech, It heads down waiting for him to give a speech at the beginning; do not ask, It is liable only if he asks you, although today it is used that the Roman Pontiff will face even interviewed by journalists who have spent their lives to despise the most basic foundations of the deposit of the Catholic faith. I repeat, with the help of the grace of God I did not fall in this series of errors that would be lethal, and as soon as I saw it from a distance I started to sbracciare as a perfect lout calling out: "Father Francis!». And I rushed toward him, without bending the right knee before his Augusta person let alone kissing his hand, but hugging him tight. Then, clapping him on the shoulder, I told him: "Dad, I thank you for seeing me, because only you, in this increasingly discriminatory, you can help me do justice to a group of Gypsies discriminated against members of the family Sword. It is actually a really good for family clan, thanks to which is safeguarded and protected the great culture of these gypsies, that they are all people who live honest work [cf. WHO]. And I, Dear Francis, I can testify to the goodness, honesty and great working spirit of these people, because when I fell in Via Merulana my wallet, two Gypsy, one of them seriously injured, invalid with permanent and severe mobility problems - both incidentally belonging to around beggars organized in Rome by the Clan of Casamonica [cf. see movie WHO] ‒, He stood up from the ground from the corner where she was begging, running up after another together with the crutch, also invalid because with a mutilated arm, both shouting behind: "Man, the wallet, the wallet! man, the fell of his wallet!». E, told all, precisely to the Roman Pontiff: «Sai, Father Francis, They called in a gentle "Lord" because they knew I was a priest. Why me, being a priest for people, with the people and in the people - because this really means in terms mystagogical for Christ, with Christ and in Christ ―, always traveling in civilian clothes. Or maybe we want to go back to scare people with our long black robes sad crows and, if anything, even putting this ridiculous Saturn head that some diehards consider elegant?».

.

The eyes of the Holy Father have become bright e, see him I confess, at that moment is realized writing: "Then Jesus, looking upon, I love" [MC 10. 21].

.

MY POOR MOTHER who cleaned SCALE OF BUILDINGS TO LIGHT OF DAWN AND MY FATHER which collected PIECES GOOD CAST FOR ERROR BETWEEN THE WASTE OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

.

If the heart of the reigning Pope is a safe full of great spiritual treasures, I used to open the right combination: “Poor & poverty". So I did not go to him empty-handed, but like all the worst burglars I took four years behind the "combination of aperture", or rather my study entitled "The poor and poverty are the Mystical Body face of Christ". And when the Pope asked me what relationship I had with the poor and poverty, family and social level, first of all I replied telling him that my family was so poor, but so poor, that when mice entered the pantry of our cuisine, not finding anything inside it came out with tears in his eyes. Neither I felt humiliated to tell him that our house was so poor that we did not even swim, as we used the toilet cat litter box. Then I talked about the enormous sacrifices of my mother, at that time already a widow at a young age, having lost her husband to just 48 year old. And though torn by grief, five in the morning was already working curved to clean the buildings stairs before the sun ancòra sorger, to pay to the son of the courses in the United States of America, cost of which they were at the time 18.000 U.S.. $. So I explained in detail that this poor woman, in my travel expenses, the cost of the studies and stay, He had to clean the stairs of the buildings to the tune of approximately 25.000 U.S.. $, all in years when a dollar was equivalent to our old coinage 1.500/1.600 Italian Lire, roughly thirty million old lire. So much so that my mother began to anticipate the cleaning stairs work, and instead of beginning at five o'clock in the morning, beginning at four. The Pope was very moved and said: "Ah, what they are capable to do, poor mothers, for their children. You are truly the son of a saint!».

.

Then I narrated the misunderstandings suffered by my poor parents by the old church, one run by the Prince Bishops without love and mercy; an old church where a priest-Pharisee threatened my grandparents would not have baptized their son, that my father, just because they wanted to call it Palmiro, in honor of the leader of the Italian communist Palmiro Togliatti. Harsh from early childhood was the life of my father, that because of malnutrition fell ill from tuberculosis child, because his parents could not cure him and feed him, why grew stunted, and being bad later had major problems to marry. The still married my mother, partly to charity, partly because, because she too bad because of the after-effects of a childhood polio and then had a chicken pox in adults that left the whole skin pocked, He ended with my father to form an allied and united couple.

.

All his life my father worked to collect the discarded vegetables from greengrocers the general market of fruits and vegetables, and then sell a few money good pieces that could recover in the discard pile. But despite all this pain and this humiliation suffered by my poor family, there are even gossips Pharisees and sad Christians who dare to deny these truths making me the object of vile calumnies, just to cut my legs for appointment as bishop, for example telling around that I come from a wealthy family and that my father was as good as a Hollywood actor. But these are lies, pure and shameful slander circulated falsely on me to keep me from being able to be promoted to the episcopate. Suffice it to say that my brother, who is a paraplegic and that only the right part of the body is able to articulate, whereas in the lower Maremma, between Tuscany and Lazio, He makes his living as a guardian of a herd of breeding boars, in free time, with the use of only one hand, He is carving a pastoral made with olive wood, who wants to be a symbol of peace, Love and poverty.

.

After this story I had to stretch a tissue to wipe tears from his eyes to the Roman Pontiff, because now he was deeply moved. Having recovered from the emotion then after those poignant tales, he sighed, he beat his hand on my shoulder and told me: "Do not get angry, because to say certain falsehoods about you may be only those who I call the "bats Christians", those who seek evil everywhere ".

.

Later, when the Roman Pontiff told me that he saw in me a priest from the Episcopal profile, by virtue of my sensitivity to the poor, I hastened to reply: "Father Francis, I can also accept the appointment as bishop, But as long as I'll be given a full Diocese of existential suburbs and allow me to put, on the shield of my episcopal coat of arms, the image of the Little Match Girl " [Old fairy tale H.C. Andersen, readable text WHO]. The Roman Pontiff asked me what, among many, among too many Italian dioceses would be to me the most suitable to carry my good news to the poor, and me, unhesitatingly, I answered: "Father Francis, I think I'm born to be a bishop of Naples ". And I set: 'Note, Father Francis, I just said: Bishop. Mica I said Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, oldest and largest archbishopric, with twelve suffragan dioceses, traditionally the seat of cardinals, with a clergy more than a thousand priests and so to follow. No, none of this, because I would just be the bishop of the poor; and if it does not fit to the rich, They may go to look for a bishop-prince model old-feudal or Bourbon. And I'll tell you more, Father Francis: taking possession of the chair, I will not say trivial and obvious things, type I propose to bring the gospel again and sound Catholic doctrine in a pagan land that now more Christian, This is all Italy, but especially our South now reduced to a faith-pagan folklore. None of this, I announce clearly that the purpose of my episcopate will be to defeat the Camorra and the Camorra and, as a guiding compass of my episcopate, I take as a model the documents of the National Antimafia Commission. Because where governments have failed both Royalists and Republicans of the last hundred and fifty years, I shall succeed me with the power of an episcopal excommunication. And all the thousands and thousands of poor to whom the Camorra pays houses, salaries, pensions and insurance, entire families of keeping sentenced to prison for mafia crimes - because the Camorra is a veritable state within a state, with its own "law" and especially with its rich economy -, they shall come and rigor on my side, ready to rise en masse against the power of the Camorra, because I will be their social Bishop, their revolutionary Bishop ».

.

Dear Letters of The Island of Patmos, is with trepidation and joy that I so glad tidings: I was chosen as Metropolitan Archbishop of Naples, and at the stroke of the 75th birthday of His Eminence Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe Rev.ma, I will take his place on the episcopal chair of San Gennaro. Since this ad, Now I intend to publish my meditation through which, the Roman Pontiff, for friends "Father Francesco", She saw in me the ideal candidate and decided: "You will be the Bishop of existential outskirts of Naples". It is a meditation that will be the pastoral orientation and doctrinal compass of my episcopate.

.

.

HERE IS THE TEXT OF MEDITATION Theological Pastoral REWARDED WITH EPISCOPATE

.

.

BY VIRTUE OF THIS MEDITATION Theological-Pastoral: "THE POOR AND POVERTY ARE THE FACE OF THE MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST" FATHER ARIEL S. LEVI DI GUALDO HAS BEEN APPOINTED ARCHBISHOP OF NAPLES METROPOLITAN, IN HIS ARMS ARCHBISHOP'S IMAGE OF THE LITTLE MATCH GIRL WITH THE MOTTO "HERE IS THE FLAME OF THE POOR"

.

.

When the Roman Pontiff recognized in me a priest from the Episcopal profile and he asked what any diocese I would have liked to play the holy apostolic ministry, I replied that in my capacity as a member of our great multinational humanizing religious experiences, known for centuries as the Roman Catholic Church, I considered myself suited to coordinate the social activities of the old and glorious city of Naples and I thought of being a worthy representative and speaker of the truth of faith "poor Church for the poor". Especially if then coated in red, but it is clear: not the red is understood according to the stereotypes of the old church that it considered this fidelity until the martyrdom of blood, but it is seen as a red blood that must be paid to finally get the proletarian revolution of mercy.

.

It was indeed necessary - as I explained privately to the Pope - a charismatic person, at the same time he was like me also a showman, to organize and then manage the two mass events which in my opinion can be used to a greater combination of the Neapolitan population: The traditional devotion to the blood of San Gennaro and the football matches of Napoli. This is why one of my first pastoral duties, after fulfilling the main, that is my solemn declaration of excommunication against the Camorra and the Camorra, It will be to give life to inter-football partnership between the football teams and their supporters of Napoli with the Argentine team San Lorenzo and Boca Juniors. We can not forget that in Naples lived more than thirty years ago the man of God by Diego Armando Maradona, that good Argentina, as well as belonging to the species of resurrected lice [1], It left a lasting impression, especially among the poor and needy of the ancient Partenope, which today still tell him when, aboard his Ferrari, accompanied by an army of maids, It went to serve hot meals to the homeless.

.

My pastoral mission, in my capacity as teacher and guardian of the faith, It will focus on the reformulation Pauline concept of the Mystical Body [cf. With the 1,18], whose real meaning is the testimony of God among us through the poor man who is her face and the refugee who is his body according to the writings of Acts and the Pauline letters, up to 'Apocalypse of Blessed Apostolo Giovanni, which he tells of how the companions of Jesus brought in the most abandoned areas of domination by the Roman power, such as Africa and Asia, until the Iberian Peninsula, the manifesto of this new unified class and unified under the concept of "kingdom", which it is neither birth, nor race, or the skin, much less capital to determine the subject, but this equal dignity, upper and in conflict with the spirit and oppressive slave aristocracy royal and imperial Rome. The same testimonies written by Blessed Apostolo Pietro in Rome [cf. Pt Iᵃ e IIᵃ] tell us how this fellow revolutionary vanguard egalitarian, Jesus the Nazarene, poor among the poor, He led the mission only among the lower classes and among the marginalized, these were the slaves, prostitutes and refugees. May, Jesus attended the houses of the rich, He never took meals with them, It never was anointed by them with precious oils, much less is left coated with fine garments. Modern archeology has also shown that he, alla his death, He was not buried in a fine tomb provided by the ricco Giuseppe of Arimathea [cf. MC 15, 42-46; Mt 27, 57-60; LC 23, 50-53; GV 19, 38-42], because his body ended along with that of all the poor in a mass grave from which, as I will tell later, Then take life the great spiritual resurrection metaphor. This whole series of stories, Finished mostly in the Synoptic Gospels, are incorrect transcriptions that editors of the canonical Gospels were taken from untrusted text of the apocryphal gospels, imbued with many romantic and surreal tales. News therefore false and superimposed on the picture of the poor Jesus that very soon will be purged, thanks to improved scientific exegesis that four years is now at work through a special commission to study funded by a group of German theologians, able to pay these long and expensive studies, since the Church of Germany, great supporter of the concept of the poor Jesus for the poor, It can benefit from the Federal Republic of Germany of an annual contribution of about ten billion Euros deriving from tax revenue. And as, before long, the German bishops will have more Euro crammed into the coffers of their dioceses rather than faithful seated among the deserted benches of their churches, They may well employ more capital at their disposal to finish destroying what remains of the venerable old pre-merciful Church, or to finance the great ideological latest idea being: married priests in the Amazon region of Brazil.

.

Through their lives human companions Jesus of Nazareth They were the first great propagandists of this epochal revolutionary change. Indeed, most of them, after the destruction of Jerusalem were refugees [Mt 24:4-28], suffering as such non reception and, as we read in the various stories contained in Acts: the first Christian communities were to serve all, and within them there was the primitive holy communism, because they did not exist in that huge theft that was private property, because the goods were in common and personal possession was banned.

.

HISTORY OF THE FIRST EVANGELICAL-Proletarian Revolution: THE OLD CHURCH ONLY MERELY TO WELCOME THE SINNER, NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THE TRUE GOD'S MERCY, CI PUSHING TO WELCOME, TOGETHER WITH THE SINNER, EVEN THE WEALTH OF SIN

.

After the first revolution brought by the man Jesus of Nazareth, for which it was necessary to live outside of the slavery of human ideologies spread by upright religions of priestly castes - remember that Jesus was not a member of the caste of priests and Levites, But to the tribe of Benjamin and David, who was a warrior which led to the liberation of the people from the power of the external rulers -, for obvious consequence, centuries after, inevitably he had to reach the French Revolution, followed by liberalism and communism still below, which together with the great Martin Lutero reforms represent the biggest grace gifts bestowed by the Holy Spirit to mankind.

.

The man Jesus of Nazareth had no precise political projects, he has launched those seeds that in the centuries to come would then germinate thanks to his initial idea that aimed to transform individual and social ethics supported on the exaltation of the highest values ​​of humanity, in structural elements targeted to sustain the company on the principles of generosity, compassion and hospitality. And mind you: not only and not so much on the reception of the sinner, as a long time, badly mistaken, He is believed and taught, but on the reception of the same sin, which it is a great single and collective human wealth. Herein lies the real revolution of the new church, contrary to what has instead made the gloomy old church, which for centuries it has been stubborn to accept the sinner, if anything, even making him feel guilty for his sin and then pushing him to repentance, but proving unable to accept at the same time also with the sinner sin, because it is in this that consists the great ecclesial and ecclesiastical revolution of our time supported the concept of God's mercy: receive, together with the sinner, Also the great and inestimable wealth of sin.

.

Over the past few years, within the Church began to blow more strongly than ever a new wind, especially in the areas of theology and exegesis. This wind has led to the rediscovery of the true message of Jesus of Nazareth which for many centuries has been overshadowed by the dominant class of the Christian ideology that, since the bankruptcy mechanisms that were their rulers of the Roman Empire, They had transformed the free post gesuana Church in a pyramidal structure of castes, based on bureaucracy and legalism legal, away from the people and for what alien from teaching of universal love. This pyramid-shaped ecclesiastical caste that for centuries has supported the bureaucracy and legalism, He went so far as to express, on the ancient Roman Law model, the authentic anti-evangelical and anti-libertarian aberration that is the Code of Canon Law, thus limiting so terrible human and spiritual creativity, for one is the true law for the Christian: Law is true and authentic that I think, what I feel, so what I want.

.

The clearest statement of man Jesus of Nazareth against the power totalitarian is enclosed in its expression, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's" [Mt 22,21; MC 12,17; LC 20,12]. An expression that contains a very precise message, although for many centuries never correctly interpreted, that means: the power can not accumulate all the authority, whether it is effective or even only symbolic and, of a single human being, because those in power must be limited and subject to the same voice and the will of the sovereign people, because sovereignty belongs to the people and is exercised through the democratic mechanism of the Synod of Bishops, that soon they will return to be elected by the people themselves.

.

JESUS ​​OF NAZARETH, THE GREAT REVOLUTIONARY DE THE PEOPLE UNITED IN A CHURCH "CHRISTIANS ANONYMOUS"

.

Jesus of Nazareth was, first of all, a great revolutionary, very sensitive to that class struggle of which he throws the first fundamental pillars. To truly understand the revolutionary impact of his message, enough to understand the true meaning of his words when he says he did not come to bring peace but war and, or even among siblings within the same family would be put against each other, if either party had not accepted this change needed [Mt 10, 34-36], he that is not with him is against him [Mt 12,30].

.

The history of mankind is full of "anonymous Christians", as we learn from the great theologian of all time, the German Jesuit Karl Rahner, I hope is soon proclaimed a Doctor of the Church and a prophetic voice. Among the many "anonymous Christians" in history, Just think, for example, the Chinese Mao Zedong, that just inspired by this passage from the Gospel - without knowing it, he being an anonymous Christian "" -, during his glorious revolution imprinted on already experienced Soviet model, Also invited children, properly trained, to denounce their own parents; or the brothers necessary to denounce their brothers and sisters who also showed a faint sign of disagreement with this big rise Sol dell'Avvenire. And in doing this, if necessary get in each other, They were rightly convinced that in the end the proletarian revolution would be completed, because as it is written: not everybody, but only some of those who have been part of the revolution, not taste of death, till they see his kingdom, because this is the true meaning of this famous passage of the Gospel [cf. Mt 16,28]. At this point, the radical change wrought by recent steps taken by this revolution that gave birth to the new and true Church of Peace, of love and mercy, finally able to welcome the sinner together also sin, It has reached its climax, because this is the true meaning of the warning given by the man Jesus of Nazareth when he says: "Not before this generation that this should happen". [Mt 24,34].

.

The preaching of the Nazarene was centered on equality, as when he says that there are no masters, palesandosi well against bourgeois capitalism represented at that time by the temple merchants, , or by the ancient speculators Wall Street, they were rather the money changers [cf. MC 11, 7-19; Mt 21, 8-19; LC 19, 35-48; GV 2, 12-25]

.

The only time that the man Jesus of Nazareth looked at him ― «e I love watching ", as it is written in the Gospel - he was when he pointed to the rich young man the only thing he lacked to make: "We ', sell what you have and give to the poor " [cf. MC 10,21]. He is in fact very clear in saying that perfection can be achieved only when you sell all our possessions to give to the poor [Mt 19, 21]. Jesus of Nazareth, often blames the rich, especially when he says: woe to you rich! for ye have received your consolation [LC 6,24]. Unfortunately, for many centuries, the theologians of the old Church explained - of course gravely mistaken - that the term "wealth" is used by the man Jesus of Nazareth as a synonym for selfishness, lack of altruism, of attachment to the purely material dimension of life and being. Understandable the reason why the old church has supported this, because unfortunately she - and what we must never end up asking for forgiveness to the world proletariat -, He was in league with the rich, with the exploiters of the people. While in reality the wealth, for the man Jesus of Nazareth, it was just a dishonest means to earn protectors in difficult times [cf. LC 16, 9]. In fact, he affirms: «Well, I tell you: make friends for yourselves with dishonest wealth, Why, when it fails, they may receive you ". And it was so much his hatred of wealth, who later went on to launch invectives against the Pharisees who, They are attached to money, They heard all these things and you did insult him. As long as Jesus said to them,: "You are those who believe the righteous before men, but God knows your hearts: what is exalted among men, before God is an abomination " [LC 16, 14.15].

.

Allegory THE ORIGINAL SIN: THE TRUE ORIGINAL SIN IS BORN FOR THE LACK OF CARE FOR THE POOR

.

For centuries we have believed and taught that the allegory of original sin - because it is well established that original sin is not a fact, but only an allegory from which comes the traditional baptism just as allegorical and symbolic -, It was due to an act of rebellion against God the Creator through man's pride. Well, apart from the fact that another great "anonymous Christian", Sigmund Freud, Genesis tells us that the biblical passage is nothing but an allegory of the son who in childhood is legitimately rebels against his father's domain, if we really want to talk about original sin, this is not to recognize the healthy and legitimate rebellion against the parent domain, which it is in fact part of the human evolutionary dimension, but necessarily it arises in the lack of care for the poor and in the attachment to money. This is why, the metaphorical Garden of Eden, the man fell into the metaphorical original sin.

.

The mission of man Jesus of Nazareth was not the one to found a religion or caste, or a parallel power to dominate with ritualisms, ceremonies and brainwash the poor and oppressed, but to bring the good news to the poor, to proclaim release to the captives and to set at liberty those who are oppressed [cf. LC 4, 18], giving as the only bond of friendship, because the prospect of salvation and holiness that He offers us, It is to become his "friends" [GV 15,15]. Moreover, He is not only a great revolutionary, but it is a real radical revolutionary, it clarifies the same: «Who is not with me, it's against me " [cf. Mt 12,30]. And in the long line of several "anonymous Christians", many have followed this teaching of his radicalism, without even knowing what they were really and radically Christians to act in a certain way. For instance, between different contemporary, limited to only the twentieth century, suffice it to recall that great "man anonymous faith" that it was Stalin, This Gospel radicalism that brought him to the maximum fulfillment, so that thanks to his work, about twenty million Russians could reach Heaven in a few years.

.

The man Jesus of Nazareth then called to Himself those whom he wanted, and they came to him. So he appointed twelve to be with him and he could send them to preach, and they had the power to heal sicknesses and to cast out demons [cf. MC 3, 13-15]. Needless to say, the Demons, I am the allegory of the capital-imperialist bourgeois temptations that seek to corrupt the people. Therefore, The casting out demons, It is to be understood as a hunt capitalist ideology that corruption tends to possess the people. Unfortunately, the old church full of gifts to her attitudes arising from that great alters the Christianity that was the Roman emperor Constantine, he never realized that these Twelve were a collective based on the concepts of proletarian democracy, because the man Jesus of Nazareth summoned the Comrades from the fields and workshops [cf. WHO] to revolutionize the world; a revolution that passes through the transformation of the individual.

.

When the man Jesus of Nazareth, to Pontius Pilate, that represents the maximum charge representative of the Roman regime, dice: "My kingdom is not of this world", He refers to himself instead as a man in the front row as a victim oppressed, It called to be the symbol of dissociation from the realm of bondage and domination, of oppression and authoritarianism, poverty and war, widows and orphans, refugees and the poor for higher taxes and the continuous appropriation of land and capital. He did so, and proclaims the imminent social change propaganda began living with his conviction and execution as leader revolutionary that, failing to defeat the ideas contrary to the discussion, He has left that they express, because he knew that you can not defeat the misconceptions by force, because that would stop the free development, indeed, misconceptions, They must always be left free to develop to the maximum.

.

When the man Jesus of Nazareth told his companions not to greet the family and not bury the dead, what is intended to convey an invitation to never go back even to take a run, Also it costs falling into the abyss that lies between one bank and another.

.

When in the Gospel refers to Simon called the Zealot [cf. LC 6 14-16], which means guerrilla or partisan, what is meant is to say that the positive characteristic of warfare consists in the fact that each individual is willing to die not to defend an ideal abstractly, but for it to become reality, so that the imagination may come to power, because it is the imagination that comes the real, although this has never been understood by the old church, which for centuries has been stubborn to support their own theological thought on outdated and unrealistic criteria of Aristotelian logic, carried out so anachronistic by St. Thomas Aquinas, on which rests the great responsibility that it had restricted the great theological speculation until - thank goodness! ‒, the beginning of the twentieth century came to life that Modernism is now the point of reference and of doctrinal and pastoral action of most contemporary episcopate.

.

In Matthew we read that the man Jesus of Nazareth told his companions: ' Verily I say, hardly a rich man to enter the kingdom " [cf. Mt 19, 23-30]. This is enough to understand that he wanted to become poor and offer itself as a cornerstone of that great epoch-making revolution against bourgeois capitalism, only true great destruction of humanity. Unfortunately it took many centuries to come to understand that God can not be Catholic, but to everyone, because he knows everyone and it is for everyone, especially those who deny it and refuse. This is the reason why the Nazarene, in art the Son of God, preached during his earthly existence the clear distinction between the oppressed and the oppressors, thus laying the big bridge over the river of what would later be the poor Church for the poor.

.

ALLEGORICAL OF MIRACLES, THE TRUE MEANING OF THE EUCHARIST, THE DEATH OF JESUS ​​THE LIBERATOR AND HIS RESURRECTION

.

The man's greatest miracles Jesus of Nazareth They were not those of Lazarus' awakening from a clear state of apparent death, undiagnosed at that time for lack of scientific knowledge; let alone the signs worked by him on the sick. The real great miracle was to feed the proletarian masses in different occasions [cf. Mt 14, 13-21. 15, 32-39; MC 6, 30-44. 8,1-10; LC 9,10-17]. And here we perceive how deep the concern of Jesus of Nazareth for the hunger of the masses of the underclass, so much so that the last supper, before being sentenced to death by the imperial-capitalist power of that time, Jesus gave the job to his companions to feed the people with bread proletarian liberation [Mt 26, 20-30; MC 14, 17-26; LC 22,14-39; GV 13, 1-20], and for this purpose he used a great metaphor allegorical: "Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me and I in him" [GV 6, 56].

.

The man Jesus of Nazareth walked finally to Jerusalem with its companions because he knew that the time was ready for revolution, because the revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe, but it should be 'dropped. From this moment onwards he follows the so-called Gospel of the Passion, focused for centuries, in interpretations of the Old Church, in the bloody dimension of sacrifice, through which the man Jesus of Nazareth, equated to the Lamb of God, would wash the sin. It is, however,, also in this case, a misreading, very Tridentine and pre-conciliar, Two evangelical sentences: "Here is the Lamb of God, which takes away the sin of the world!» [GV 1,29], and again, "he looked at Jesus as he walked, he said: "Here is the lamb of God!”». The biggest misconception from which the misinterpretation born, It is linked to the very concept of sin, with whom for a long time the old Church has terrorized his faithful. The Gospels are indeed the writings merely allegorical, to interpret the categories of modern theology. And the term "sin" is a metaphor that must be interpreted in a broad sense not bloody and sacrificial, but in a social sense: the man Jesus of Nazareth, with all the gentleness of the non-violence that centuries later end up in a figure like Gandhi - lamb metaphor here -, lava from the world the great sin of social injustice and the oppression of the poor. To this, as I said earlier, relates that other great metaphor which is the Eucharist, whose real and true meaning is not to sacrifice, but to be the bread of Social Justice, the party of companions who gather around the table for the banquet of joy, of peace, of love and mercy, dancing around the altar to the rhythm of bongos.

.

Our faith is based on the large allegorical event of the resurrection of the Nazarene, for centuries considered the old church as a historical fact, as well as a physical fact, while we know that it is a spiritual event, an allegory interpreted as earthly experience conclusion of the man Jesus of Nazareth, in art the Son of God. For when in the Apostolic Letters states: "But if Christ has not been raised, then empty is our preaching is in vain and your faith " [cf. The Cor 15.14], It meant to say that the allegorical symbol of the Resurrection is the redemption of the poor and the oppressed people, is proved by the fact that in another passage states that we have already risen with Christ [cf. With the 3,1]. And who is it, who it was raised with the man Jesus of Nazareth, not the rich, Perhaps the bourgeois, or perhaps worse than the capitalists? Of course not, with the man Jesus of Nazareth, the great allegory of his resurrection are partakers poor, the marginalized, refugees; to rise with this really great revolutionary, It packs so that the law is approved on soli juice. The allegory of man Jesus of Nazareth who rises from the grave where his body was thrown together with that of the Underclass condemned by the imperial-capitalist power, is the image of Sol dell'Avvenire rising. It is not by chance, several famous "anonymous Christians" in history, as already mentioned Stalin and Mao Zedong, although unaware of expressing thus their belief in the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, I did just use the allegorical iconography Sol dell'Avvenire, thus showing extraordinary "anonymous Christians".

.

The other two events of our faith are allegories of the ascension to Darling man Jesus of Nazareth and the Holy Spirit Pentecost. The fact that after the resurrection, He has continued to appear and to be present among the democratic-proletarian disciples' collective, as told by one of the most famous allegorical tales - that of the two companions on a journey along the Way to Emmaus [cf. LC 20, 30-31] ‒, It indicates the fact that no real father of the revolution has never left the people, before the people was ripe. That's why this allegory joins the second allegory, the Holy Spirit Pentecost. With this second event, fellow fighting man Jesus of Nazareth become true Christian adults; Thus Pentecost holds that sublime metaphor for the great "anonymous Christian" Sigmund Freud defined as the son's emancipation from the dependence of the father. With Pentecost, We then the final overcoming of the Oedipus complex.

.

IN ORDER FOR THE DIALOGUE MAY LEAD TO syncretistic UNION it IS NECESSARY TO PUT BY THE FIGURE BULKY THE BLESSED VERGINE MARIA

.

Among these lines, I deliberately avoided talking about the mother figure, which is that of Mary the mother of the man Jesus of Nazareth. It is in fact a figure that may constitute an obstacle to dialogue with our brothers of different Christian Churches, even if still today, written in the Creed at Nicea and then perfected in Constantinople, resents unfortunately the exclusive and excluding spirit that the Fathers of these two councils acquired at the time by the romano Costantino. In this text we in fact reads: "I think the Church one, santa, catholic and apostolic ". This holiness and apostolic, however, it can not be the exclusive property of the Catholic Church, because it belongs to all the various Christian churches. Although over the centuries, the concept of unity, who flirted a real limiting obsession, He prevented us from welcoming the richness of diversity, to say the least: the old church has come to call heresy even the rupture of unity, unable to see and to grasp what an enormous wealth could arise from that diversity which often involves breaking of this great fetish unit, so that it can give space to the great preciousness of diversity. Among the many examples of this, think of the extraordinary figure of Martin Lutero.

.

Well, the figure of Mary is an obstacle reception of the various diversities and the great riches of the brothers of other Christian Churches, anch'esse apostolic and holy, that the Catholics of real forms repeatedly accused of Mariolatry, making it clear that this woman, in his own way too cumbersome, It was a serious obstacle to dialogue. Therefore, for the sake of dialogue and to achieve the common neighborhood, if it is necessary it must be sacrificed in the figure of this cumbersome mother. Both therefore blessed the work of those holy men of God Pentecostal pastors who recently, in Mexico, in Ecuador, Peru and so on, They have ventured into a sport as educational: crush and then wipe off the ground, in public, the statues of Beata Vergine of Guadalupe [see WHO, WHO, etc …]. Also because, if Pentecostals which has always enjoyed the special sympathy of the reigning Pontiff, they do this, they do it because no doubt inspired by the Holy Spirit.

.

It is in this that consists the true wealth of Mary: the ability to step aside, to leave aside and ensure that the Pentecostals to the conquest of Latin America do apart his effigy. Of all this, Mary is happy, so as not to obstruct the path of dialogue and closeness to the brothers of the other numerous and authentic Christian Churches. That's what makes me truly holy Maria, and it is in this new perspective that should be studied Mariology, avoiding the aptly be reprimanded by the brothers of the other true and authentic Christian Churches Mariolatry.

.

As though capita, this is a separate discussion that we face in following. Also because, As far I wrote and expressed, It was enough for my promotion to the episcopacy, exactly as Nunzio Galantino, who recently he called Martin Lutero and his great reform as a gift of the Holy Spirit [cf. WHO], his happy this statement was sufficient to keep the post of Secretary General of the Italian Episcopal Conference. If not, by relating instead to faith with the schemes of the old church, all it structured on gloomy oppressive doctrines and dogmas, through which some would hinder the triumph of mercy and love, not only, It does not become bishops, but it is likely to be pushed and relegated to the sound of beatings in the most forgotten and desert extremes of existential suburbs. But all of them are beaten - mind you -, fruit of the greatest mercy, of that mercy that arises from deeper than a holy shepherd carrying imprinted on it the smell of sheep.

.

.

C O N C L U S I O N E

.

.

that brief and memorable Talk 2013 with Cardinale Francis George, Metropolitan Archbishop of Chicago [1937-2015]

This writing, sull'ironico constructed and apparent paradox game, but devoid of any form of irreverence towards chicchessia, He speaks for itself. He speaks because it is a dramatically wrote seriously, I would dare to say, so humble and subdued, which is one written to his prophetic way. However, the line I chose to take a bit 'of time now, It was explained in a separate article in which I made clear to be taken where certain subjects and situations ... [see article WHO].

.

A few days after the conclave 2013, before he could return to the United States of America, I got to know at the North American College in Rome man of God Cardinal Francis George, Metropolitan Archbishop of Chicago [1937-2015], with whom I spoke in private for half an hour, sufficient time to grasp what I had to grasp. First of all, I declared myself struck by his statement dating back about a year ago, when he declared his understandable contrarierà bishop of the law on civil unions, and then continue to assert that the powerful and increasingly aggressive lobby gay, was turning through the Gay Pride in a "Ku Klux Klan manifesting in the streets against Catholicism". The statement struck me, But that was not addressed to the increasingly evident aggressive spirit of sodomites proud to anything that even vaguely reminiscent of the Catholic Church, it hit me by this man already seriously ill with cancer, It was the phrase: "I will die in my bed, my successor will die in prison, his successor will die a martyr '. Meditating on this sentence, I had the feeling that maybe, one day, bishop I would become really. And I could really become in my old age, together with a few other survivors Catholic priests to what the worst is yet to come, because in the not far at all, the Catholic Church will be reduced to a shapeless heap of ruins.

.

For three years now, the Dominican pontifical academician Giovanni Cavalcoli and myself, well known to the public as the Fathers de The Island of Patmos, ribattiamo tirelessly that the Church of Christ is not a static body to mummify stagnant water stops, but it is an evolving body, because in itself, a body, It is always growing, even at the stage of old age. If in fact the old marks on the one hand the physical decay, the other often marks the culmination of the spiritual and intellectual maturity. If it had not been, everything would be solved in the year 325 with the first great council held in Nicaea. But if the Church, of concilî, two millennia of life has celebrated it in total twenty-one, There must be a reason, or not? Hence the concept of The Church must always be reformed, provided that this need of the Church to always be reformed, does not end up being confused with the fact that the Church should end instead turned into another, instead reformed, ie purified. Is this, Unfortunately, It is what is happening today: a powerful and warlike group of criminals, They are trying to accomplish just this nefarious and diabolical project: transform the Church in another. And the transformation into another, It has nothing to do with the great reforms of some great Councils, from Trent to Vatican II.

.

That's why I go to as many years writing and stating that all this will lead the Church to be totally emptied of Christ, then be filled with another. In such a situation not far from being realized, be bishops will mean taking the risk of living a life of martyrs. Therefore the Blessed Apostolo Paolo, called not by chance at the beginning of my writing, stated that "If a man desire the episcopate, He desires a noble task " [The Cor 12, 31]. He claimed that because at the time, becoming bishops, He acted almost always die martyrs, shows us how the Roman martyrology and the Byzantine sinassario of the first centuries of Christianity.

.

Naturally, when we speak of martyrdom, we all have in mind the so-called martyrdom of blood. But this will not be, the slow and painful martyrdom that awaits us tomorrow, because our future will not be marked by a bloody martyrdom, but from a long white martyrdom that will last for generations.

.

What little remains of Catholicism and Catholics, It will end up being totally incompatible with the civil society, but especially with the laws that govern; they shall be of the radically anti-Christian laws. No One, He will belong to the small group of survivors Catholics scattered around in small groups in prison, nor anyone condemn them to death. O, as I said in the interview with Cardinale Francis George: "Do I believe that the successor of the successor of Your Eminence will die a martyr, but through a new form of martyrdom today, we, we can not possibly even imagine, because this new form of martyrdom will be the total indifference. Therefore, the power that will govern the way the States and civil society, will use towards us the exact same indifference that today, men of power of our decadent Church, they are using to all prophetic voices who continue to live and speak in that market '. And with that precisai: "The devil, intelligence being in a pure state, It is not a fool. Over the last twenty centuries of history very well the lesson learned, so he knows very well that the blood of martyrs has always cleansed, revitalized and thus sanctified the Church. And he certainly can not allow that the Church of Christ be purified, revitalized and especially sanctified. So what did he do, this authentic intelligence that essence is the Devil? Before, It seeded and favored the development of the utmost indifference among our increasingly miserable church authorities, then he reduced them to live and act in a spirit of total sloth omission, so this destructive indifference could hit us first from the inside, then from the outside ".

.

Perhaps, to illustrate all, It may be useful to the application of other examples clarifiers: I am going to read some of my writings, happen to be found in several of them real complaints built on circumstantial accusations, based on serious events not subject to denial. harsh and severe Words that I penned black on white certainly not inspired by the moods of myself, but the style of the ancient prophets and the style of the precursor San Giovanni Battista. Numerous writings in which I have often indicated that such people highly problematic, since burdened very serious moral and doctrinal problems and embarrassing for the Church and ecclesiastical society, They were even in spite places - thanks to the protection of persons in authority themselves burdened with moral and doctrinal issues - in roles of dangerous relief, with all that this may result in levels of bad management of ecclesiastical and pastoral structures, and public scandals level. Well, before written so severe, the least we would have to happen would be my ready convocation by the competent ecclesiastical authority. I am not in fact neither a journalist nor a opinion-maker, I am a priest and a theologian subject in all respects to the Ecclesiastical Authority. And this authority are not subject to "fixed-term employment contract of indefinite duration", but for the grace of Sacramento, as well as obedience. And a priest who in a public document explains that the current Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has been a promoter and protector of that young lord who reached the top of that delicate ministry was later declared gay and now lives happily married Spain with his beloved companion, at least it is called and, in tone, if anything too severe, he is asked: "How you dare you throw this accusation to the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith?» [see article WHO]. E, once this is done, if anything, it is called again asking: "How you dare you, to write your article in another fire, that the current vicar general of His Holiness for the diocese of Rome, has placed in one of the historic downtown parishes a priest in an ancient and prestigious Roman basilica was already known to all Church authorities because foraggiava barrel of money around a young prostitute Romanians? [see article WHO]. In short, if the Authorities, even in front of a known fact and acclarato, They have decided to turn a blind eye, You want to raise their issues, that you are nothing and nobody?». And if those in my statements, undoubtedly serious, indeed very serious, there had been even one and minimum distortion of the reality of the facts, here is that in that case, Authority Ecclesiastica, He was supposed to make me truly repent of all my sins through the most severe canonical sanctions.

.

Some church so-called expert, these my rhetorical questions answered and said again: "Forget, them to do anything like that, because it would give importance to what you write, which they will never do, because for them, the more you will cry "disaster" and the more accuse them of destroying the Church, the more you ignore, why not deserve any attention to them ».

.

Well, provided that in the Church of obsessive-compulsive mercy I don't want any attention, nor do I want anyone to give me consideration, Perhaps at this point it should first clarify that I am not a priest incattivito writing on a blog read by the sacristan, by two or three ladies that evening recite the Holy Rosary Church and the bartender at the bar located in the square in front of the house canonical. Because the pundits of the Holy See responsible for social communications, may determine at any time that the online magazine The Island of Patmos It is much followed, and has a number of far much higher visits instead of how many do not have the Italian edition of The Osservatore Romano, the newspaper of the Italian Episcopal Conference Future, the weekly Christian family and so to follow. Therefore, the principle of clerical-slothful "Do not give it importance", not hold their. And we do not talk about how much and how often, not only in Italy but also around the world, theologians and prelates have endorsed and elaborated certain analyzes made by the Fathers de The Island of Patmos, that far from having made a home blogs - given that ours is a magazine -, enjoy in the facts of all the authority of which however do not enjoy, the eyes of believers of Christ, certi cardinaloni e bishops forefront; the whole, obviously, but, as the facts, strictly provable and documentable. Therefore, the reality and the truth, it is quite another: let's say that someone scolding me, saying for example that my way of expressing myself, for its hardness and its complaint spirit, it is not acceptable. A quel point, Authority Ecclesiastica, You would feel to respond to me: "Given that I ask forgiveness on the spot for form, over the hard spirit, for the spirit of complaint; and also being said that in the manner and form that you booking me, I will extend this request for forgiveness in public, so that it is read by tens of thousands of readers in one day, once clarified, however, the shape, for what it concerns the substance, what you say to me? Or better understood: it is true that the current Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has carried on in his career and has protected a subject that has ended up giving in the Church one of the most sensational scandals of the last century? Why is this fact, I do not hypothesize, see the document. E, said this, proseguirei I am saying: to form part, for which I apologize not once but a thousand times, but the vicar general of His Holiness, that the square in one of the most prestigious parishes of central Rome a priest psychologically unstable photographing paid naked boys in the shower at the house of elders of an ancient Roman basilica, then collecting these photo shoots "artistic" ... Well, to form part, for what it concerns the concrete substance, what you say to me? Because apart from my recriminata form, the fact remains that the current vicar general of His Holiness, the bravado of this priest, It was fully aware, as they were and as they are all monsignorini conspiratorial who still work at the Vicariate of Rome and who by their sheer cowardice, allow the perpetration of certain abominations, because no mouse got inside the cheese form, He likes to be kicked out of it ".

.

The truth, I am not ignoring me, but they are simply afraid, because any eventual recall, involve the private first comparison, then, if it was subjected to any kind of arbitrary injustice - in this church at the height of Stalin's mercy in which a logical consequence the right no longer exists -, the private confrontation by what was possibly born a strictly arbitrary injustice would be made public, always provided that reading me are not the sacristan, the three old ladies who recite the Rosary in the church and the bartender at the bar across from the canonical.

.

While I am writing this long text, I traced the history of one of the bloodiest dictators in the modern era, which is not Adolf Hitler, as everyone thinks, but Stalin. The dead, They are in fact measured in numbers, place the numbers of murder victims are always many, They are always too many. So there are no numbers that weigh more, such as Jews slaughtered by the Nazi regime, which amount to about five million, compared with more than twenty million Russians murdered by Stalin, that the horrors of the historical scale can hardly weigh less for the simple fact that they were not Jews. The slain dead weigh in fact everyone equally, and their blood shed cries too "vengeance before God", to use this ancient biblical expression, whether they are Israelites or are former subjects of the Great Tsar of Russia came under the jaws of the Great Stalin Butcher.

.

By writing this article I thought about Stalin because they never ever, twenty years ago, I imagined that the destiny of the Church would end with risultar similar to those of the old Soviet regime. In fact, if we analyze well the facts historical, we will discover that the inexorable decay of the Soviet Union begins to come to life around 1954/1955, one two years after the death of the great and murderous dictator. It is wrong to say that Soviet Communism fell suddenly in 1989, because his fall had actually begun decades before. Just as the Catholic Church, that is not falling today, suddenly, because the gestation of this Chronicle of a Death Foretold, It began forty years ago, in the post-conciliar season, following all the typical patterns of those passionate and romantic revolutions from which the worst dictatorships are always born, since the French Revolution with its period of terror from which comes the season then inaugurated by the great warmonger Napoleon Bonaparte. And as the young protesters shouted Sixty-eight of the "Peace and Love" with iron bars in hand, throwing stones at police and bombs molotov between a cry of love and the other, Today in the Church, dictators were born in the post-conciliar season, menano locked knees and break your legs to anyone who dissents to the Grand Revolution of Mercy.

.

The fact that the term "revolution" and "revolutionary" is completely incompatible with the very essence of Christianity, or define the Word of God, Christ the Lord, as a "revolutionary", indeed borders on blasphemy, I will explain this in detail in a high subsequent written, because now I can not open a theme into the theme, especially in a final conclusion.

.

In my writing I referred also to the criminals, obviously in a purely figurative sense, not criminal and penal sense, referring several times to the great criminals who are killing the little that remains now of the Catholic Church. I can not conclude without having done this for at least the name of one of the most famous criminals figured, always insisting that the lemma "criminal" and "crime" is to be understood solely as a synonym for intellectual dishonesty. The intellectual thug in question is the increasingly powerful Alberto Melloni, great leader the School of Bologna and large direct or indirect placer of disastrous bishops. To understand the subject such intellectual delinquenzialità, apart from its symposia at the Masonic Lodges and various amenities [cf. WHO, pag. 6-9], one need only read, from the columns of Corriere della Sera, how contemptuous and aggressive way he says the prophecy, I dare say almost obvious, made by Cardinale Francis George in 2012 [read article WHO], up to accuse of homophobia. And homophobia, unlike my recriminata intellectual delinquency, which it is a pure figure of speech, it is instead considered a real offense under the criminal laws of different countries of the world.

.

there, Alberto Melloni, among the intellectual delinquents that hover around the Roman Pontiff like vultures on the carcass of the Church, It is one of the most quoted. And with this, I said and concluded all, both with regard to the vultures, it is about who, undaunted, if it keeps them around, in this self-destructive Church of obsessive-compulsive mercy, now reduced to a pantomime of the proletariat paradise of Stalin.

.

Maybe someday, when I am close to eighty years, modest dress in civilian clothes, because anything that reminds old religious symbols, Also in the same clothing, will not be allowed on the streets of a society now fully multi-ethnic, multi racial, but above all freed from the image and memory of God, accompanied by a few heroic candidates for holy orders, I personally follow, because there will no longer certain ecclesiastical structures, including seminars, strolling through Rome will indicate their large and prestigious hotels, offices of large companies, museums, Art exhibition centers, concert halls, theaters and so to follow, that once were our great religious structures. And I will tell them that, in my young age, I have also known and visited many of those environments. He went past the stable of what were the major pontifical universities, where you will find the offices of academic facilities where they will study the hermeneutics of the old religions, sponsored by the great center of world religious culture financed and dependent on a special department of the United Nations, I will tell them that in those stable, once, They taught our most "great" theologians, those to whom we owe this great 'the fall' [see previous article, WHO]. And if the two candidates heroic will turn to me, their old bishop, telling me: "Paternity, They must have been, those, some really good times'. I will answer them: "No, dear children, they were not just bad times, but terrible, in which a decaying church hierarchy was reduced to living on power for power, divorced from the real, paralyzed in everything at once, incapable of any future eschatological perspective ". And I will tell them: "Those who are living now, are the really good times, because it is the times of a slow, long and painful rebirth ".

.

It is in this situation, We can accomplish that which urges us the Blessed Apostolo Paolo: «[…] if one aspires episcopate, He desires a noble task " [The Tm 1, 2-3]. It will be a "noble work" when the episcopate, emptied of all worldly power and prestige, It can be experienced only and exclusively to the praise and glory of God. It will be in this little future, marginalized and dispersed Church that maybe, in my old age, Bishop become really, so that the dramatic question "But when the Son of man returns he will still find faith on earth?» [LC 18, 1-8], a small group of Christians can respond: Yes, our Lord and our God, we kept alight the lamp of faith until Your return, without ever having lost the conscious hope that to you is simply a small flame. And based on this knowledge,, They remain always on our faith and charity.

.

From the island of Patmos, 15 November 2017

Sant'Alberto Magno, Bishop and Doctor of the Church

.

.

_______________________

[1] Ed. “Louse climbed”, in English new riches O new money, people from poor social backgrounds who manages to rise by his own efforts or by making use of a particular talent, but it ends up becoming the embodiment of pride and more arrogant vulgarity.

.

.

.

«You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32],
but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of
risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island
with your offers through the secure Paypal system:



or you can use the bank account:
They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930
in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank
It does not provide your email and we could not send you a
thanks [ isoladipatmos@gmail.com ]

.

.

THE BOOK OF HOLY MASSES DE THE ISLAND OF PATMOS, YOU CAN view it OPENING WHO

.

.

.

.