The Supreme Pontiff has lied? Yes, He lied and he is a liar. But no nasty: Simon called Peter, chosen by Christ himself and not by a conclave of cardinals, It was a liar of him 1 June 20191 June 2019 isoladipatmos - Church news - IL SOMMO PONTEFICE HA MENTITO? AND, He LIED AND IS A LIAR. BUT NOT NASTY: SIMON PETER SAID, CHOSEN BY CHRIST HIMSELF AND NOT BY A CONCLAVE OF CARDINALS, WAS MORE OF HIM A LIAR. . tutti coloro che oggi si stanno godendo i loro dieci minuti di potere e di gloria, sappiano che questo pontificato non sarà eterno. Pertanto comincino a pensare sopra a quale delle isole della spazzatura galleggianti vorranno ritirarsi, perché domani, per loro — i grandi distruttori e deturpatori della Chiesa —, non ci sarà posto, costasse pure dover celebrare un conclave fatto a colpi di coltellate tra i Padri Cardinali, i quali si guarderanno bene dal far affacciare alla loggia centrale dell’Arcibasilica di San Pietro qualche elemento come il nano malefico, che vive di cattiverie, vendette e crudeltà, pur non trovando di meglio da fare che andare in giro per il mondo a proclamare i nuovi beati, perché questi sono i soggetti ai quali, man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, ha aperto le porte del prossimo conclave, con le sue fantastiche «svolte epocali». . AuthorAriel S. Levi Gualdo . . PDF format Print article . . il papinocchio [le vignette di Dorothy Lancel, 2019] Diversi Lettori affezionati mi hanno domandato dove fosse finita la mia «vena tagliente e ironica». Ho risposto varie volte dicendo che c’è poco da ironizzare di fronte a un morente ricoverato nel reparto dei malati terminali. A questo quesito oggi posso rispondere con più gravità ancóra: cosa c’è da ironizzare dentro un obitorio, dove la povera Chiesa visibile è distesa cadavere sul tavolo di marmo, in attesa di essere composta dentro la bara da quelli dell’impresa delle pompe funebri? . Sin dai nostri primi esordi nell’ottobre del 2014, certi fatti riguardanti il Sommo Pontefice li ho sempre commentati in ritardo, rispetto ad altri, inclusi giornalisti di lunga esperienza. La prudenza da parte nostra è di rigore. Quello che esprime e scrive un sacerdote ha tutt’altro genere di valenza e peso, rispetto a ciò che in modo ottimo e preciso possono scrivere dei professionisti dell’informazione. Su di noi pesa infatti una grave responsabilità: le mani con le quali scriviamo e le bocche con le quali ci esprimiamo sono le stesse con le quali celebriamo i sacri misteri, a partire dal Sacrificio Eucaristico. . Nell’uomo Jorge Mario Bergoglio ho riscontrata una caratteristica che nel corso del tempo è emersa in miei rapporti con diversi e illustri membri della Compagnia di Gesù, di quelli piazzati ai livelli più alti: the propensity to lie. In saying this I do not mean that the Jesuits are lying as such, I mean but claim to have had long relationships with the Jesuits, placed in various leadership roles in the Society of Jesus, that if necessary They lied shamelessly, feeling not only with a clear conscience, but also irritated if someone did not take seriously and true their lies. In its time, an eminent Jesuit, He even created problems of giving me a negative rating to the Ecclesiastical Authority, just because I refused to take at face value his blatant lies and leave with them manipulate. The Ecclesiastical Authority including so much good to say to me: "The problem with the Jesuits had finally been avoided, as long as the holy man of the Pope Pius VII - badly wrong - refounded in 1814 the Society of Jesus [cf. When the kindly solicitude for all the churches, 1814]. . The man Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a subject that in a manner similar to certain of his brothers mind knowing lie. And then, by his faithful killers, He does not hesitate to make you impallinare the hard way if you do not take good for his lies and if not lavish you to protect them and spread them as truth. Here's why, one of the characteristics of this pontificate is the fact that this man has surrounded himself with mediocre people, bad, and above all immoral blackmail. Because he knows from first to last all their iniquities, why can handle them with the worst weapon: blackmail. Instead, how he could handle men of faith from public life and private immaculate as Cardinal Carlo Caffara, or as the Cardinal Gerhard Müller? It is not by chance: the first, She died of a broken heart after being denied for over a year an application for a private audience, all while the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio received the worst furious of this world. For his part, Cardinal Gerhard Müller, as he himself has told, at the stroke of the five year term of office it was liquidated in the course of a minute and a half and replaced at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith by a gay friendly. What I wrote the latter with knowledge of the facts and evidence in 2017, without ever having been neither denied nor any recalled title order [cf. WHO]. Or more simply: the individual concerned could call me or call me at his department and asked that account and reason for my writing. But he did not, because my answer would have been: "Why do you call me to ask me aware of what you know and what you have actually done, favoring in any way subject to very high risk, especially one that ended up giving then a worldwide scandal of enormous proportions?» [cf. WHO and WHO]. And everyone who has to escape the confrontation, these days and under this pontificate so wonderful, indeed "epochal", or rather "revolutionary", before the truth that instead of unspoken, They are only able to react affondandoti a knife in the back. And someone even called the "Church of mercy" (!?). In conclusion … ‘ridatece Said Alexander VI Borgia. At least, under his pontificate, before proceeding to a conviction it was made a regular process ensuring best especially every right to defense of the accused, not like the present, ridiculous Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, where if you have received one of the worst injustices by a cardinal or a curial through abuse of authority that violates all the fundamental canon law, if unfortunately you turn to them, these before the powerful bully are scared to the point force you to run to the pharmacy to buy him - for good heart and Christian charity - a supply of absorbent for menstruation, as sudden it would reach the timeout cycle to that gang of … . The good Marco Tosatti, the 29 May reports in his blog disturbing interview [cf. WHO]. In short: interviewed by journalist Valentina Alazraki, the Pope responds to a question by saying that the story about the serial sex offender and long unpunished, Cardinal Theodor McKarrick: . «[…] I knew nothing, of course, nothing. I've said it several times, I knew nothing, I had no idea". . The Italian journalist, in reporting the shocking news comments between the lines postillando rightly: . "This statement borders on immodesty. "Several times"? A chi? When? Dove? He never said anything to the public, or even private later recorded in public. Such a statement is either pure lie, or it is the result of a disequlibrio ». . I repeat to Marco Tosatti that this response with the serious statement contained in it, It is the result of one and the other thing: of man's propensity to lie and Jorge Mario Bergoglio of his obvious psychological imbalance. . To own it is not clear I remember that the Church was not even precipitated the worst forms of Latin American dictatorships, but just in the typical forms of the dictatorship of young Korean dictator Kim Jong [the science WHO and recognize the popular methods today in Church of Mercy]. Suffice it to note how they reacted and acted journalists of modern Soviet Pravda Vatican: bringing the interview have deleted this phrase, as pointed out more and Marco Tosatti, only to reinstate later, after he reported in his blog a stylus assembly both the original text is the official text of the Holy See in which, this serious statement, however this was not [cf. WHO]. After that, of the capocomici justice Vaticana They have tried to believe that the phrase in question had escaped from the translation from Spanish into Italian. . These poor people, convinced that the People of God is really made up of a cluster of Obtuse, it is worth remembering that they, acting in this way, They are like such and such a shopkeeper who sometimes, when customers they saw that the rest given to them was wrong, He was justified by saying: «Oh, excuse me, I was wrong!». Well I tell you and I show why these executives justice Vaticana I totally disingenuous like this shopkeeper: because the shopkeeper, to give change, coincidentally it is always wrong to your advantage, always giving less, ever more. Just as the leaders of justice Vaticana: among the many phrases that interview by mistake could blow, coincidentally they have jumped right one in which the Supreme Pontiff lied. In this unusual forgetfulness then we add that we are not talking of a translation from Chinese to Italian, but a translation from Spanish to Italian. From this we can deduce that the liars are among them as the hands that wash, the lava the other and both are washed together. All this with all due respect of affections from the complex of cunning, certain and sure to let us all those fools. . This censorship, and the reintegration of the contested sentence, leads first to the fact itself much worse. Who has removed that phrase, She is mistaken as a dishonest merchant who always makes the mistake of giving less money and ever more, He did not take into account the slightest warning given by Christ the Lord in a passage of the Holy Gospel more and more into disuse in the Church of the "epoch-making revolution", but above all the "mercy": . "No one tears a piece from a new cloak to attack an old one; otherwise he will rend the new, and the patch from the new will not match the old " [LC 5, 36]. . In truth, I confess that I do not know whether to get angry whether to laugh or fearful army of opportunists who are put - as they themselves say - "in a prudent waiting». And when they abuse this way the concept of prudence, that according to the wise definition of St. Thomas Aquinas is the charioteer virtues, I feel dismay and disgust. Because they, s of waiting patients, are assured that, as they say the Neapolitans: «He braces' night». . Undoubtedly, the night will go, but, when it passed, such damage and such debris remain? E chi, repair the damage, o chi, will rebuild on the ruins? Perhaps the timid cowards always hopeful careers that await, or maybe they really believe that the next Pope will give them the coveted episcopate, or the long-awaited cardinal's hat that had not given the current reigning Pope? That man Jorge Mario Bergoglio has manifested itself lacking in prudence and sanity I wrote in March 2018 [cf. WHO], without excluding the possibility that he may equally be an instrument of God's grace, indeed a tool even privileged. It is not by chance, the reigning Pontiff, It has a very great merit: He has invited all the hidden mice uncovered. And these mice infected and infectious, They are at this point discovered, shrouded as they are by megalomania, as to make them completely impossible any attempt to change suddenly flag and recycle tomorrow, while it is of extraordinary chameleons, but most shameless, restraint and dignity. . Currently, the real and serious problem, It is no longer the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio, but those that cut the pieces from his careless answers, that mystify, doctor and who insist on brand as "haters" and "enemies of the new course of Pope Francis Church" all those who show concern anything but hateful and disrespectful; but above all forgetting that the Church is not "of Pope Francis" to be modeled as such in man's image Jorge Mario Bergoglio, but it is Christ, to model, and as such conform to the mystery of the cross of Christ the Lord. In conclusion: I became a priest to bring my life to Christ, I would never become a priest to waste my life trying to conform to man's Jorge Mario Bergoglio. During the rite of my priestly consecration, Bishop told me solemnly: "Understand what you do, imitate what you celebrate, conform your life to the mystery of the cross of Christ the Lord ". Have they changed the ritual without my knowledge replacing it with this new formula: «[…] mimics the whims of the Pope on migrants, conform your life to the new course of man's Church Jorge Mario Bergoglio "? . Why Is That, Secretary of State, it is repeatedly played face defending on several occasions the indefensible? Perhaps because it is a devoted servant? No, perhaps because it is only one that hopefully in the next conclave; and hopefully by himself, is intende. The true and faithful servants, were the Secretaries of State Rafael Merry del Val, or Pietro Gasparri, or Eugenio Pacelli, who without hesitation, in several delicate occasions, They have put their foot down and told the Popes, with all due reverence, that the decision that they wanted to take that speech or that they intended to pronounce, It would be a serious mistake. Or perhaps he not said, Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, Blood Pius XI, that if at any given moment very delicate and critical, he really wanted to say the prepared speech against the Italian fascist regime, in this case she asked him to accept, before, his resignation as Secretary of State? . None of this is said and done, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, or in front of the sell-off of the Chinese martyrs who paid with a life of persecution their devout loyalty to Rome, or before the Cardinal electrician that with his improvident prank gave a million votes Catholics to Matteo Salvini [cf. WHO]. And nothing did, also, Secretary of State, opposite the entrance of the unreal clergy and political correctness in about the last election campaign for the European elections, making in this way an interference before which no one has longed, by members of the radical left to the possessed Pannella brand&Bonino, who for decades have deafened with cries against "clerical meddling ', whenever John Paul II and Benedict XVI have spoken out on issues closely related to the life, to morality and bioethics. And if neither possessed nor radical leftists Radical chic they shouted against "clerical meddling ', it is because of the pernicious subjects as Father Antonio Spadaro have turned directly to the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio in a leader della sinistra internazionale. . Non solo la diplomazia vaticana ha fallito, perché quella che una volta era una scuola di diplomazia guardata con sommo rispetto persino dal Soviet di Mosca dell’epoca di Stalin, oggi è caduta nel ridicolo, non ultimo a causa di tutte le graziose signorine vanesie in carriere dalle quali è stata riempita; un vero esercito di pretini che, of finocchieria in finocchieria, nelle nunziature apostoliche del mondo fanno ridere sulla Santa Sede persino i diplomatici della Repubblica delle Banane. . Il fallimento della diplomazia vaticana lo ha suggellato proprio il presidente di quella Repubblica Popolare Cinese con la quale, la lasciva Segreteria di Stato, si è letteralmente prostituita stilando un accordo col governo comunista che rimane tutt’oggi segreto (!?). I would note that the 21 marzo il Presidente Xi Jinping è venuto in visita ufficiale in Italia, guardandosi però bene dal fare anche e solo una visita privata al Sommo Pontefice. . E dopo avere mietuto questo successo, dopo che la Santa Sede è stata umiliata a questo modo dal governo cinese, col quale aveva poco prima stilato un accordo segretissimo, for case, il Cardinale Pietro Parolin, attende davvero paziente il proprio meritato premio al prossimo conclave, dopo che …‘a nuttata sarà passata? . Abbiamo cominciato dicendo che l’uomo Jorge Mario Bergoglio è bugiardo, proseguo concludendo: questo non deve spaventare più di tanto, al di là del comprensibile dispiacere dei devoti fedeli. Vi comunico infatti che anche l’uomo Simone figlio di Giona ribattezzato da Cristo Pietro, era un bugiardo, ed oltre a essere tale era pure vigliacco e traditore. Indeed, se assieme a quella del Our father non è uscita anche una versione corretta e aggiornata dei Santi Vangeli, sulle loro righe seguitiamo a leggere: . «Mentre Pietro era giù nel cortile, venne una serva del sommo sacerdote e, vedendo Pietro che stava a scaldarsi, lo fissò e gli disse: “Anche tu eri con il Nazareno, con Gesù». Ma egli negò: «Non so e non capisco quello che vuoi dire”. Uscì quindi fuori del cortile e il gallo cantò. E la serva, vedendolo, ricominciò a dire ai presenti: “Costui è di quelli”. Ma egli negò di nuovo. Dopo un poco i presenti dissero di nuovo a Pietro: “Tu sei certo di quelli, perché sei Galileo”. Ma egli cominciò a imprecare e a giurare: “Non conosco quell’uomo che voi dite”. Per la seconda volta un gallo cantò […]» [cf. MC 14, 66-72]. . Anyhow, man Jorge Mario Bergoglio le ha combinate meno grosse dell’uomo Simone detto Pietro, il quale non fu scelto da un conclave di cardinali, ma da Cristo in persona. E Pietro — lo ricordo a chi parla solo di migranti e non legge più i Santi Vangeli —, oltre a essere stato scelto da Cristo, fu formato per tre anni da Cristo e poté vedere per più volte, in tutta la sua gloria, il Corpo di Cristo risuscitato dalla morte apparso agli Apostoli. E se Pietro fu scelto, forse è stato perché Cristo sapeva bene che duemila anni dopo sarebbe giunto dall’Argentina un Suo vicario in terra più buono e misericordioso del Divino Maestro, surrounded by pimps coryphaeus ready to scream, to his every unhappy sortie, how wonderful, but above all "epochal" and "revolutionary" this pontificate. . An unsolicited advice: tutti coloro che oggi si stanno godendo i loro dieci minuti di potere e di gloria, know that this pontificate is not eternal. Pertanto comincino a pensare sopra a quale delle isole della spazzatura galleggianti vorranno ritirarsi [cf. WHO], perché domani, per loro — i grandi distruttori e deturpatori della Chiesa —, non ci sarà posto, costasse pure dover celebrare un conclave fatto a colpi di coltellate tra i Padri Cardinali, i quali si guarderanno bene dal far affacciare alla loggia centrale dell’Arcibasilica di San Pietro qualche elemento come il nano malefico, che vive di cattiverie, vendette e crudeltà, pur non trovando di meglio da fare che andare in giro per il mondo a proclamare i nuovi beati, because these are the people to whom the man Jorge Mario Bergoglio has opened the door of the next conclave, con le sue fantastiche «svolte epocali». Tell me if there's no crying … . From the island of Patmos, 31 May 2019 . . . «You will know the truth and the truth will set you free» [GV 8,32], but bring, spread and defend the truth not only of risks but also the costs. Help us supporting this Island with your offers through the secure Paypal system: or you can use the bank account: They were IT 08 (J) 02008 32974 001436620930 in this case, send us an email warning, because the bank It does not provide your email and we could not send you a thanksgiving [ firstname.lastname@example.org ] . . .. .