THE CASE OF THE BISHOP OF ALBENGA, WILL CAUSE THE REASON I “TRADITIONALISTS BEAUTY”?
[…] under his government have been welcomed in the Diocese - or he himself ordered - even priests defectors from various dioceses that define problematic is an understatement; and that's a fact, not a guess. Fell, the poor donkey, because the faithful and several priests of that particular church were sent to the Holy See is not mere documentation of the protests but terrifying, alleging among other problems also that no small concern that the presence of many priests with homosexual tendencies manifest …
Author Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
I wanted to take care of things a lot more interesting e, why not: rewarding. In short: make my "job" pastoral-theological. I work in a number of articles for our Theologica and many are the writings that I have sketched out some of the Fathers of the Church by offering them a present reading, because today more than ever, are of great current figures of men as St. Maximus the Confessor, or Saint Anselm of Aosta, Having said that the most shocking news reaches us daily by the Gospel: many are in fact the pages that seem to be written today for men and for modern society. This is a characteristic that only the Word of God is able to have, as proof of what it is divine, therefore permanently alive and able to communicate beyond the times.
Young priests of the seminary of Ecône of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X
Neither I nor my brothers with whom we have created this online magazine we want to continue battles against anyone:we are not members of a political party or are on the payroll of some demanding boss, as such engaged in battle and to take away the credibility of a party opponent. We are simply and only priests and Catholic theologians and the only battles that we intend to lead are those for diffusion and for the protection of the truths of faith. And the Church is not our party, is our mother, our wedding. Nothing so staff, less than ever livoroso to the world of so-called traditional wire-Lefebvrian. And in addition to not being livorosi, We are aware of a fact for years: induce the reason some people, especially in the face of evidence of the facts, would be a difficult task even to the Holy Spirit, then imagine us poor mortals.
donkey fell into a well
The world of the so-called tradition is full of contradictions and inconsistenciesthe greater the more bitter is the conviction of belonging to this world to be the only and only holders of the purity of the Catholic.And when the ass falls - the famous proverb: "It is here that falls on the ass!"- That's the good traditionalist pro-Lefebvrians and their various fan club not only do not see the fall, but behave as if the donkey did not exist.Instead there is the donkey, fell, and in this particular case it is a favorite, a landmark in the world of traditional: the Bishop of Albenga Mario Oliveri, no doubt a worthy pastor and a man of sound doctrine, which in recent days has been at the center of several controversies. We do not know if the Bishop will be deprived of the government of his small diocese, nor do we know whether to do so, the Holy See will appoint an auxiliary bishop, thereby avoiding the bishop Ligurian humiliation of dismissal from the chair close to the age of 75 years of age. All of these, for now, are only hypotheses and conjectures about journalism that you do not even have to enter.
The Bishop Mario Oliveri with a high jeweled miter, more or less 80 inches
More on the other hand, where it is almost a duty to enter: the donkey fell because under his rule were metin that Diocese - or ordained by himself - also some priests who have fled from various dioceses that to define problematic is an euphemism; and that's a fact, not a guess. Fell, the poor donkey, because the faithful and several priests of that particular church were sent to the Holy See is not mere documentation of the protests but terrifying, alleging among other problems also that no small concern that the presence of many priests with homosexual tendencies manifest; and the most striking in this respect were found to be the ones with the beautiful of the Latins always on the mouth and with handpieces, Episcopal gloves and hoods mag have the same artistic and professional relationship that the legendary Wanda Osiris had with roses throwing viewers, while the Afghan greyhound on a leash down the staircase illuminated, escorted by his boys and singing the famous song: «Sentimental, this withered rose " …
Some sites and blogs ultra conservative at first tried to scream to "purge franceschista", in conclusion: the “yet another persecution”. Then maybe they knew and kept quiet. And still today they continue to remain silent in a hypocritical and malicious silence, having decided that the donkey can not fall simply because the donkey does not exist, because in the world of so-called tradition is all pure, beautiful and spiritual; everything is sacred and inspired by the sacredness, but that "obscene Mass of Paul VI established Protestantism as a result of large aberration of the apostate Sacrosanctum Concilium», as we read for years around their sites and blogs where the contempt of the Magisterium of the Church seems to be the most popular sport, and all in the name of an unspecified “purity Catholic”.
Who took care to read my book, And Satan came Trino, in which I devote the entire second chapter to the problem of "omosessualizzazione of the Church",then the problem of dramatic and dangerous gay lobby within us; or who has had the opportunity to read my interview with Roberto Marchesini for The New Compass Daily [see who], not so much what I think will be perceived, but in what way and how seriously I faced the problem. And when addressing and analyzing a problem, you can not use two weights and two measures, seconded that the issue touches "our" or "their".
perhaps, with the opening of the grace of God and acceptance of His mercy, even the donkeys braying, can go to Heaven …
What reproach in this world of so-called tradition is the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and the extreme malleability of morality,about which tend to be very rigid when regards the other, on which they are ready to lay on the shoulders weights that they would not move them with their finger [LC 11,46-48.52], as he warned the Holy Father himself in his final keynote address at the Synod of Bishops, for which I refer to the two comments of Father John Cavalcoli published in this online magazine.
As far as the rest instead, or better with regard to "their", in that case, rather than being lenient, just do not see, precisely because the donkey does not exist.Here then is the pontifical dances, in which shine dalmatics, copes and chasubles, where the incense envelops perfect movements, theatrical, Studia al Millesimo, in fact involved mostly hordes of horsemen real or imagined, noble, more or less fallen, of would-be aristocrats who have their quarterings, who at best have a couple of divorces behind and at the time living with a girl who could be their daughter. But whether beninteso: live with each other as brother and sister. What to say: lucky them! I'd look good I dto take home with me a statuesque perpetual 25 years with measures 90-60-90. This is not because the canon law does not allow me and the Ecclesiastical Authority nor, but whyssuno would be willing to believe that we live as brother and sister, perhaps the first to believe it would not really me. And as, although not a “Christian adult” of pure school Dossettian, I think, however, to have grown up enough as a man and as a priest, I think I have learned that to escape situations of sin, the first step is to escape conservatively that create favorable opportunities to sin all prerequisites.
greeting of a little girl to the Holy Father
The signed esiste and cade, sometimes grotesquely.It is in these circumstances, through the charioteer virtue of prudence is necessary, through the Christian charity built on truth and justice, exert the most profound mercy on donkeys in free fall; the true mercy which, most likely, the Holy Father speaks behind his lines in the final inaugural address made at the Synod of Bishops on the Family.
Click here to listen Mercy Lord, performed by Luciano Pavarotti, Monreal 1978
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Patmos1.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150father arielHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngfather ariel2014-10-27 13:21:292014-11-01 00:18:21The case of the Bishop of Albenga, cause to reason “traditionalist aesthetic”?
THE SYNOD AND THE PROBLEM KARL RAHNER: THE GREAT “SORCERER'S APPRENTICE”
In his final keynote address at the Synod of Bishops, the Holy Father proposed as the right path to follow a middle way, summarizing and harmoniously combines the values in the two factions, unnaturally they separate and opposing …
to open the video click on the image on CTV
Author John Cavalcoli OP
Speech by the Holy Father to the Synod
It is remarkable that in commenting on the climate of the discussions at the synod in a recent speech the Holy Father had reassuring words against excessive alarmism, hinting at the beginning of his speech, as a normal thing in these circumstances, and with even tone of praise, the ongoing confrontation of ideas and certain legitimate contrasting views, of ideas and opinions.
The Holy Father Francis
In the course of the speech the tone of the Supreme Pontiff has gone from an initial kindness to a warning seriousness, showing that if certain contrasts can be normal and constructive, others, deeper, touching the doctrine and morals, the peace and unity of the Church and obedience to the Pope, can not be approved and must be removed to take away a truly Catholic and common, despite the diversity and plurality of opinions and legitimate pastoral choices, but in the light of Christ and in accordance with the teachings of the Church. The Holy Father Francis is listed first in the streets do not follow and then, in the end, showed the right way.
The Holy Father during his inaugural speech
The wrong ways seem to be reduced to two, each with a multiplicity of aspects, that, a leg vedere, together constitute a unilateral choice, we could say partial, ideological and extremist, of one side of the truth against the other, rather than tune it and temper it with each other in a wise and necessary synthesis, that captures the totality of the true and the good, so that one side, isolated, absolute and opposed to the other, itself becomes false and destructive, and one that should be balanced mutual complementarity, becomes hostility and mutual exclusion.
Image of Christ with hand on face
It is not difficult to recognize in the description of the Holy Father two parties that especially since the immediate post-Council contend so fierce, conceited and obstinate a privilege which in reality they don't have, but it is only the Successor of Peter, which is to be supremely and exclusively true faith, the true Catholicism and the true Church. The opposition between these two parties can be represented simply as a contrast between the too indulgent and too demanding. The Pope uses an image evangelical extremely effective: the temptation to turn the stone into bread to break a long-fasting, heavy and painful [cf. LC 4,1-4] and also to turn the stone into bread and throw it against the sinners, the weak and the sick [cf. GV 8,7] ie to turn it into “unbearable burdens” [LC 10, 27].
a heart filled … candy
On one hand, so here's "The temptation of doing good destructive”, that in the name of mercy deceptive bind up the wounds and cure them without first medicarle; that treats the symptoms and not the causes and roots. It is the temptation of “gooders”, fearful of and also the so-called “liberals and libertarians”. The temptation to come down from the cross, to please people, and not to stay, to fulfill the will of the Father; to bow to worldly spirit instead of purifying and bend to God's Spirit. … The temptation to neglect the deposit of credit, but do not consider themselves guardians of the owners and masters”. E’ clear allusion to the modernists and rahneriani.
The truth can not be an old rusty door barred …
On the other, "The temptation of stiffening hostile, that is, the desire to close in the written, the letter, not be surprised by God, the God of surprises, the spirit; within the law, in the certainty of what we know and what we still need to learn and achieve. From the time of Jesus, is the temptation of the zealots, of the scrupulous, thoughtful and of so-called — today — traditionalists and also of intellectualists. The temptation to ignore the reality of using a language and a language of meticulous sanding so many things to say and do not say anything! They called them Byzantine, I believe, these things…”. Instead, here the reference to Monsignor Lefèbvre and its followers.
That healthy “Middle of the road”, but that is not compromised balance …
The Holy Father proposed as a straight path to follow a via media, summarizing and harmoniously combines the values in the two factions, unnaturally they separate and opposing, excluding the extremes: Tradition and Scripture, continuity and progress, preservation of the necessary: what remains, and change in contingent: what passes; mercy and justice, firmness and flexibility, unity and pluralism, openness to new, and loyalty to one's identity, doctrine and pastoral, freedom and obedience, historicity of man and immutability of dogma.
Movie poster The Sorcerer's Apprentice
The line that is growing among the synod fathers, we can therefore say that it is, as might be expected, confirmation of the traditional doctrine of the unchanging Gospel and the Church, that certainly will be confirmed at the time in the words of the Holy Father, although we can imagine or hope that the Church will find new applications of the law in accordance with the requirements, prospects and to the needs of the families of our time. From the comments critical of the Pope However, you can not not take action or not take notice of the synod of a dark shadow of hostility to the bright prospects emerging evangelical, which are the subject of the records and the encouragement of the Pope. It deals with, in my opinion, suggestion of the dark, charmer and left rahnerismo, that fifty years from now hovers in the Church, ammorbandone now subtly and insidiously the atmosphere, one kind of smog that makes the air unhealthy.
Il Teologo Gesuiti Karl Rahner s.j.
The rahnerismo is a problem still unsolved, despite repeated reports of illustrious and wise pastors and scholars, including several cardinals, over the past fifty years. The evidence of the heresies of Rahner, the great sorcerer's apprentice, emerged in this long period of investigation, have long been publicly available to verify or look objective and dispassionate. For this you do not understand why should persist an undeserved reputation, that just makes the damage to the Church, and has repercussions disastrous in the field of moral, the pastoral care of Catholics and costume. This reputation has all the appearance of a reputation is not authentic, that is based on a true science, but artificially constructed by dark powers, who work objectively for the destruction of the Church. A disturbing sign of this is given by the ideas that are appearing between the Synod Fathers, ideas by the Pope rightly try again, and which had already been criticized by the now famous group of cardinals, who recently published a book: Remain in the truth of Christ [see who] in which, professing their fidelity to the Magisterium of the Church, recalled the fundamental values and essential household, expressing the belief that the church, applying justice and mercy, should maintain the current law regarding the treatment of irregular.
il padre Karl Rahner S. J.
The obstacle to solving the problem is still persistent Rahner are serious prejudice and illusion, last MORI, that Rahner was a theological genius far superior to San Tommaso Aquino, a bold explorer of the depths of the Christian mystery and then the discoverer of a theology much more advanced, consistent with the spirit of Vatican II, theology that would work out a new vision of faith, Catholicism andchurch, suited to modern culture, using the resources of modern philosophy from Descartes to Heidegger.However, vero ad onor, is not too difficult, for those who know history dShe theology, recognize in huge projects and enterprise rahneriani, acts to impress the gullible with a prodigious production journalism, that touches all aspects of the Christian life, a gigantic as well as astute and impudent re-proposal of modernism already condemned by Saint Pius X at the time.
il padre Karl Rahner S. J.
It should also be alert to recognize that the heresies of Rahner, First, we must clearly from a scoreboard in turn free from rahnerismo, unfortunately rare thing today, because now Rahner almost everywhere you purchased the fame of the great if not the sole and undisputed master of our tEmpo. Criticize Rahner seems to many an expression of a petty mind, resenting, closed and outdated, almost not even take into account. For others it seems shocking thing, intolerable and almost sacrilegious, or deserving of contempt or severe measures.
They accuse critics of Rahner's ignorance, while the real ignorant are rahneriani, that you are not bothered to personally deal with his difficult texts, and perhaps speak of Rahner hearsay or have some leggiucchiato his pious mystical elevation in an anthology of spirituality or one of those explanatory presentations of modern theology, so superficial as naive do-gooders. Those who like the undersigned has read all the works of Rahner during 30 years of studies and consultations with experts, familiar with the cunning of this man who always deftly mixes the real and fake and sweet poison propina not everything at once in a single work — you find immediately! —, but in small doses scattered in various books, it is only by connecting them to each other that you have the true and complete picture of imposture, a powder’ as the diligent investigator in the criminal investigation comes into possession of evidence only neatly putting together the scattered details, that, taken individually, seem insignificant.
The work of John Cavalcoli on Karl Rahner, the result of thirty years of scientific work: Karl Rahner betrayed the Council
To understand, therefore, Rahner, then it is clear that not just the material fact of having read it for thirty years, then if you proceed with partiality, fanatical subjection or eyes lined with prosciutto.Even many of his followers have spent a lifetime around their tutelary deity. To understand who is Rahner, the following conditions moral and theoretical: exclusive and selfless love for the truth, rectitude of intention, modesty in formulating interpretative hypotheses, acceptance of the positive aspects, honesty, prudence and humility intellectual, interest in the salvation of souls, possession of a good philosophy and theology (S.Tommaso d’Aquino and his school) and absolute respect for the Church's magisterium. At the risk of going through a papal, I dare say that the last condition is the decisive one, and that includes all the others. E’ here that the rub rahneriano, as the rahneriani want to give to understand, scrambling, that their darling reflects the teachings of the Church and the Second Vatican Council.
Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X founded by Bishop Marcel Lefebvre
There is, however, to rely on the criticism made by Rahner lefevriani,either because they do not know how to recognize the good sides of the theologian and is why, if they identify some of his heresy, accused of heresy and the Council, thus demonstrating that you have seriously misunderstood, because they think the Council would suffer the heresies of Rahner. The fact is that the most outspoken and defiant rahneriani, who know that it is untenable thesis of fidelity to the Magisterium of Rahner, so they do not scruple to follow the style of their master with impudence and threatening tone, similar to those of Luther, accuses the Church, also to reconcile, to be retracted and intimate to update and welcome to his early theology, if you do not want to stay on the edge of the historical evolution of human progress.
… Rahner, if necessary can emerge as a sinister shadow
From official reports and authoritative comments, that we hear about what you are saying to the synod and the same aforementioned words of the Pope, it is evident that between the synod fathers is emerging from the shadow left Rahner,with its peculiar vision of man and moral: every man is in God's grace, tends to Dio, is in communion with God, so it is good and you save. God has mercy on everyone and not punish anyone. The sin, act as a single categorical and has no particular importance, however, because it is canceled by the inevitable presence of grace - at the same time just and sinner — and all the fundamental option exists for at least atematica and transcendental God. Human acts or particular dogmatic concepts are uncertain things, changeable and relative, that have no importance. The important thing is the pre-conceptual experience of faith - the’ “encounter with Christ” —, they all have, even non-Catholics and atheists.
So this is not to condemn errors or sins, but simply to promote what is positive in all (“scaling principle”). The distinction between licit or illicit unions of couples, regular or irregular does not matter. The fact is that we are all still journeying towards God, we know or do not know (“anonymous Christianity”). There is no contrast or a prohibited, but only the different, which therefore must be respected; then you should not be condemned as evil or false what is simply different.
We need not doubt that the Pope will follow this movement of ideas at the right time and the correct, as has already begun to make. But it still remains the basic problem that, until it's resolved, the hurt and distress will rise again for the whole Church, as an undigested food remains in the stomach. Until it is expelled, the torment remains.
Fontanellato, 22 October 2014
Click below to listen to a Marian song from the popular tradition
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/cavalcoli56.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150Father GiovanniHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngFather Giovanni2014-10-24 23:27:122021-04-21 00:39:42The Synod of Bishops and the Rahner problem: the great “Sorcerer's Apprentice”
SISTER SINGING CRISTINA "MADONNA"? AND I'LL “MICKEY ROURKE” IN NINE AND A HALF WEEKS
.
If nothing were done by the bodies of the Holy See responsible for the rchoose yourself, in that case I could also feel entitled to offer to a director of video clips turn again to the soundtrack of the film Nine weeks and mezo …
the dialogue ahead of everything: Sister Cristina Scuccia, of the Congregation of the Ursuline Sisters of the Holy Family responds to the banana phone
Worse than we priests are able to be only the nuns.Sister Cristina Scuccia has a beautiful voice is out of the question. Of course, could make better use of this gift of God, for example, entering as a soloist in the choir of the great diocese the Holy Father's masterfully directed by Roman presbyter Marco Frisina.
.
The Good People of God, with which the writer lives in close contact, is somewhat annoyed by performanceof the religious. NNo faithful Catholic appreciates that a consecrated virgin makes fun of her virginity - moreover freely chosen as an offering and gift of consecration to God - singing the song of an author like Barbara Eleonora Ciccone, in arte "Madonna", who in the course of his long career has outraged and desecrated the Catholic faith and its most cherished symbols in every way: by Christ on the cross to the Mother of God. And to better understand who they are, I invite you to watch a couple of videos, right to enter the order of ideas of who really is the character Barbara Eleanor Ciccone, aka Madonna, which the improvident Ursuline played a song very special, only to its two-way [see who, who]. For this, we are disconcerted when we hear the improvident little nun who climbs on straws in an attempt to answer the interviewer of Future, as to other interviewers, about his desire to “Christianize” something objectively blasphemous, therefore in itself and of itself diabolic [see who].
Madonna and the crucifix used as a garter belt
The song of this satanassa Italian American that the little nun has chosen to interpret is a very particular song: Like a Virgin, like a virgin, willfully ignorant that virgins to which the good people of God pours out affection and veneration, including lukewarm Catholics and those seconded from the life of the Church, they are extraordinary figures such as Lucia of Syracuse or Agata of Catania, just to stay in the Sicilian area of origin of Sister Cristina. And neither Lucy nor Agata would have been glad to be accompanied in the blood of their martyrdom with the words of the song Like a virgin, launched by a brilliant businesswoman herself as Ms. Ciccone, in the eighties begins his career provOcando the audience with his own name of art, seen that universally, by believers and non-believers, Mary is identified with Mary of Nazareth. And for us who believe the Virgin Mary is the Mother of God, fMaybe it's good to remember it not so much nun butterfly, but to his Superior General, perhaps most of his young butterfly professes, seen that behind the bad pupils are always there and the penalty of bad teachers.
Madonna in one of her live shows singing half-naked on a kind of altar
To understand Sister Cristina, trained in Sicily and became a nun in the Ursulines of the Holy Family, one must enter the very complex ecclesial world of this island, where there are ancient churches of apostolic foundation or personally visited by the Apostle Paul, such as the glorious Church of Syracuse, built for the Prince of the Apostles after that of Antioch: Ecclesia Syracusana First Divi Petri Et Filia First Post Antiochenam, Christ Annual [The Church of Syracuse is the first daughter of St. Peter and the second after the Church of Antioch, dedicated to Christ].
.
With a brief sua epigraph, Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa in his Gattopardo summarizes the status and psychology of an entire society: "If we want everything to remain as it is, everything must change!». Or to put it in other words to those who claim to impose to other their lack of historical memory: yesterday, if the faithful do not Davanor vote for the Christian Democrats more insular and more corrupt collusion with the mafia powers, were threatened by the priests who would end up surely burn in the flames of hell. Today, changed the music but not the players, a considerable number of priests grew past four decades in the supreme worship of peggigold exponents of modernism e larded with Protestant exegesis - not least thanks to the prolific work of evil masters - they pass you byanti dressed in civilian clothes flaunting The Republic e Espresso arm in arm; and in their public speeches they cite you the latest article by Paolo Flores d'Arcais on Micromega, dialogue with secular “maturity” with lovers of abortion, dell'eutanasia, dell'omosessualismo …
.
From the crucifix crucifix suspenders used as the closing evening bag
And after four decades of devastation here finally comes to the supreme coup the army of those that Leonardo Sciascia used to define as men, the mezz'uomini, him ... but let's get straight to enunciate Sciascia his mythical classification, without inducing a priest to get dirty too much mouth:
"I have a certain experience of the world; and we say that humanity, and fill our mouths to say humanity, nice word full of wind, divide into five categories: the men, the mezz'uomini, the ominicchi, i (respectfully speaking) take a look and the quaquaraquà… Very few men; the few mezz'uomini, for I be content humanity stop with mezz'uomini ... But no, falls down even more, to ominicchi: who are like children who think they are great, monkeys that make the same moves of the big ... And even more down: the pigliainculo, ranging becoming an army ... And finally the quaquaraquà: that they should live like ducks in the puddles, because their life has no meaning and expression of that most of the ducks ... She, even if I grind to a halt on these cards as a Christ, she is a man ... "
[Don Mariano Arena Captain Bellodi - opera The Day of the Owl]
.
Madonna during one of his variousperformance with the crucifix held like a gun erotica
This is the social environment, ecclesial and ecclesiastical, in which was born, grows, studied and form Cristina Scuccia, cream the confiscation, in Ragusa, in the beautiful areas of South Eastern Sicily, then moved as a nun in Milan. Whoever therefore believes that the problem is Sister Cristina, wrong. The problem is a particular church no longer able to express a proper sense, thinking and living Catholic; not that happy about this eliminates the root as a problem or as a real attack of treason everything that is to live a Catholic, Catholic thought and Catholic theological thinking, with all the logic and consistent pastorality that from this it follows.
Sister Cristina is therefore a natural result the culture of ocelots, the natural result of generations of priests who have confused with heresies modernist modernity; who for four decades have now ignored the theology of the great Fathers of the Church and who thanks to the poisonous school of certain masters answer you that they have never studied the metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas because during the first lessons at the theological studio they explained to him which is now outdated, finally reaching the priesthood after having been trained on texts by non-Catholic theologians from the German area and after having been peppered with Hegelianism in the course of philosophical and theological studies sometimes reduced to a painful farce, where are offered as unique and especially indisputable reference points - in addition to twoHegel e Rahner —, authors such as Schillebeeckx, Teilhard of Chardin, Cox, Heidegger, Schleiermacher, Kierkegaard, Barth, Bohnöffer, Bultmann, Moltmann, Cullman, Luther, Loisy, Freud, Descartes, Side, Gentile …
Madonna crucified-holder boot
The problem of Sister Cristina is much more complesso, if analyzed from a socio-andSicilian church and using two literary geniuses as pertinent reading yardstick: Tomasi di Lampedusa and Sciascia. Therefore we must point out - which I point out to the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life - that Sister Cristina belongs to a religious congregation for which the Holy See should perhaps proceed as soon as possible with an adequate Apostolic Visitation, if its competent bodies were not too busy with other congregations, that in spite of some of their internal problems, in any case they always sang praises to God and to Our Lady Mother of God, not to the Madonna-Ciccone.
.
Madonna during one of his live performances blasphemous
The same withgregazione of nuns, in the heart of the Greek city of Syracuse he has found nothing better to do than changing their two former houses of formation in hotels, even in a Beauty Farm [see who], managed directly from sisters now transformed by consecrated virgins in entrepreneurs, devoid of life and common sense of religious life. A luxurious one beauty farm four-star and goes in disguise at the administrative level by “home Ferie” to which was given the name "House of Mary", with a spirit no less blasphemous than that of their younger sister who sings a hymn irreverent two-way virginity launchesed by a singer who has renamed Madonna in blatant contempt of Mater Dei.
Sister Cristina is only the visible tip of a state of degradation and decadence of the religious life of this congregation for which appropriate measures are urgently needed. On the one hand, we have in fact the Ursulines of the Holy Family housing in their luxurious and expensive beauty farm of the rich seventy-year-olds who go to relax with their beloved granddaughter of 25 year old, without any pious nun dreams certainly ask him the marriage certificate, or to deny such a lovely couple a double room; the other the emblem of the new generation of their sisters who sings the songs of the well-known pop star Madonna Satanassa, instead of shelling holy rosary of the Blessed repair Virgin Mary. Experience and priestly sensitivity teach me that this nun is not destined to remain in religious life and that she will eventually be engulfed by the entertainment world, to have contact with which a presbyter, a man and woman religious must have a maturity and a solidity of faith which protects them from certain dangers. I hope and hope that Sister Cristina does not end up like Sister Sorriso [crf. who] and that you return serenely to secular life, as it will be in the more or less near future.
Mickey Rourke e Kim Basinger. in the film Nine and a half weeks
If nothing were done by the Holy Office competent bodies for rchoose yourself,in that case I could also feel entitled to offer myself to a director of video clipsturn again to the soundtrack of the film Nine and a half weeks [see who], where Kim Basinger sketched an innocent spogliarello that today could be screened in cinemas without problem parochial, so much will be chastised if compared with the truly indecent images that are served up to us today. And in the video I will play the role that young Mickey Rourke played in that film in those distant eighties.
.
It may be that before the video My holy bishop falls unconscious to the ground with the secretary who rushes to revive him with salts and robust with the diocesan vicar general who raises from the floor? It's not for sure, because it could be that my holy bishop and robust diocesan vicar general, both men being forged by great pastoral experience, on my video clipif the taste of saying laugh in private with one another: "In conclusion, view and considered Sister Cristina, even though we priests have a right to our part!», including saying what we think about this culture of decadence, of relativism and methodical destruction of Catholic theology and pastoral.
the Island of Patmos, 24 October 2014
.
.
.
.
.
.
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Patmos1.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150father arielHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngfather ariel2014-10-24 12:15:492022-11-22 15:47:20Sister Cristina sings “Madonna”? And I will “Mickey Rourke” Nine and a half weeks in
a historical-critical essayof great interest to orientate in this moment of ecclesial life.
Author DRAFTING
The defense of the family's social, a book written by Giuseppe Brienza (in the photo on the left) with a foreword Archbishop of Ferrara, Mons. Luigi Negri (in the lower right) and afterword by Mons. Antonio Love, that once again the attention of all the pastoral workers in Italy the example of the battle led by the Bishop of Prato, Mons. Peter Fiordelli, to emphasize the human and religious values of the family, against the civil legislation that gradually - first with divorce, then with abortion, then with the homosexual marriage and euthanasia — go deleting from the common principles of consciousness natural moral law, that the gospel non repealing but strengthens and elevates the supernatural order.
I'm, these, topics of perennial relevance but now need to be dealt with theological seriousness and sense of pastoral responsibility, taking into account the public discussions that preceded, accompanied and followed the work of the Extraordinary Synod on the Family, and that will intensify even more in view than the ordinary next year.
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Aquila-reale.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150DraftingHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngDrafting2014-10-23 12:19:282021-04-21 00:40:11The defense of the family's social, Giuseppe Brienza
It is useful to speak of the Church, When you call sayttamente or indirectly to the believers, in strictly theological terms. It is not utile, rather it is detrimental to talk in sociological terms, because these are the subject oflla which ideology - not faith - is the form.
Depiction of the Apostle John, who draws up the Book of Revelation on Patmos
Expenses, come ipromoters of this online magazine, live their faith in the Church with pastoral responsibility genuinely, limit its interventions on issues of current ecclesiological considerations historic-dogmatic that they always stay at the level that it is for a speech, precisely, strictly theological. The adjective "theological", other parte, makes sense only if derived from a concept of theology rigorously formulated agree with the Church's mission that the Church has always entrusted to the theologians. That mission - which I have exhibited in scientific terms in the epistemological treatise entitled True and false theology (1) - Is essentially always and everywhere in promoting the growth of the life of faith among believers through the 'rational investigation of the contents of revealed doctrine, that the ecclesiastical magisterium infallibly preserves, authoritatively interprets and transmits faithfully in every time and in every place.
The theological proposals,regardless of the method of their linguistic and conceptual expression, are valid only insofar as they depart from the dogma and illustrate it through interpretative hypothesis, must always be presented as provisional and relative, and to be always under consideration and eventual approval or disapproval of the ecclesiastical magisterium.
Landing on the Island …
For these solid and unquestionably valid reasons, the promoters of this online magazineare used to enter the theological debate sure, with a great sense of responsaidat theecclesial quantity, that their views do not deny even incidentally the verità of dogma, that is, the faith of the Church, Common to all of them before and on both sides of every hypothesis of theological interpretation, ending that is to relativize what is absolute in matters of faith. At the same time, they always try to avoid the use of peremptory tones, as if their theological interpretation was the only acceptable, with exclusion of all other; and ending that is for absolute what is relevant in matters of faith.
However, since not all those involved in the theological debate think like us, success is that our scientific contributions were sometimes rejected by newspapers at the head of which there are Catholic intellectuals of great nobility, but also too prone to inadvertently mix strictly theological opinions with the opinions of other: ideological, policies … always on the basis of sociological surveys, often inevitably partial and always unrelated to the substance of supernatural Church of Christ.
An image of the Holy Father which pose a lamb on his shoulders
From these Catholic intellectuals are also sometimes been accused of not openly criticize the Holy Father Francisand not to report his alleged intentions heretical and therefore not to oppose the "schism" that would be in place in the Church. We do not intend, however, to give in to these pressures. We are convinced that the task of theologians is not to contribute to doctrinal confusion, equating ogni externalization of a clergyman in a definitional pronouncement of the Magisterium, or even worse: interpreting any act of the Pope as an endorsement or promotion of ideological faction within the Church. Until now, by the Second Ecumenical Vatican Council to the Extraordinary Synod on the new evangelization in relation to the family, do not have any news of the publication of an official pronouncement of the Magisterium which has been modified with the substance of a dogma: nor ecclesiological, nor that concerning the sacraments of marriage, of Penance and the Eucharist.
It has often been talked about instead of some ambiguities in the text of some of the documents of Vatican IIthat they intended to propose a new formulation - the intent, more comprehensible to the mentality of modern man - of Catholic doctrine, and it is fair respectfully deprecate such ambiguities (2) and ask the post-conciliar magisterium of clarifying authoritatively (3), but without confusing even more the consciences of believers speaking in an irresponsible way of "heresies"; What theologically untenable because, according to the documents approved by the shareholders and confirmed by the Pope, Vatican II did not at all introduced new dogmatic formulas in opposition to or in place of those already laid down by the previous ecumenical councils infallibly.
There was also talk of operational choices, responding to conservative criteria adopted by the Popes who have succeeded in this period: Blessed Paul VI, St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI. Choices that may be deemed inappropriate or ineffective, from the pastoral point of view, but only on the basis of personal criteria as objectionable, certainly not based on any dogmatic or moral criterion established by the Church for all who exercise the Petrine ministry.
Assembly of the Council fathers
There has been talk finally, above all, of interventions by bishops who were fathers of the Council, the suo time, and which are now the Synod Fathers, which are expressed in terms doctrinally questionable, and in fact were then harshly criticized, also by other council fathers, during the course of the Second, just as today they are during the course of the Synod which will conclude at the end of the 2015, and with the apostolic exhortation that usually publishes the Pope collecting, at its discretion, the recommendations of the Assembly. The history and the record of this dialectic of the opinions of theologians and bishops' pastoral guidelines, although raising alarm in those who rightly care about the fate of the Catholic faith, not authorize but to talk about a real "schism" in place in the Church, seen that the different opinions "work in progress" not "make text", that is, they do not constitute the authentic magisterium of bishops in communion with the Pope and do not contribute to forming - much less to deform - the faith of the Church.
the weight of the mass media often falsifying information on the life of the Church
I do these things I keep repeating for years, without being neither understood nor approved by the fanatics of change and reform, which are based on systematic scientific theories not only unsustainable but also clearly heretical (4). Theories that they have always tried to impose Catholic public opinion through an image of the council as a doctrinal revolution, interpreting documents of this solemn act of the Magisterium in the light of an arbitrary "hermeneutic of rupture", as it had to complain about Pope Benedict XVI. Which Pope Ratzinger also spoke of a "Council of the mass media", only telling the backstory of the Assembly, favoring intervention of some theologians and some council fathers to speak of a '"soul of the Council", of a "spirit of the Council", artificially constructed systematically ignoring the texts officially approved, which instead are the true elements of doctrinal guidance of the faithful and the only "data" useful for a strictly theological interpretation.
Synod of Bishops 2014
Something very similar happens in our day with the Synod. Even today the most progressive reformers or fanatics go favoring intervention of some theologians and some Synod Fathers to imagine a Church that "goes forward in breaking the ties with the past" and blessing everything so far had been denounced as sinful situation and that did not allow full communion with the Church, if it had not been before the conversion. Some of them came to present themselves to the public as the Catholic faithful interpreters of the intentions of the Pope, which sounds a sacrilegious presumption and despicable manipulation of consciences, but it has no theological value, because of the Pope, whoever he is, imported for the purpose of obedience in faith, only its official pronouncements, those in which manifests actually the intention to speak as Pastor of the universal Church and to bring the Christian doctrine de fide a moribis, engaging the charism of infallibility that it is in exclusive.
Pictorial representation of the Church of Christ
If, therefore, on the one hand I have been fought by the progressives or reformers more fanatical and more equipped with means of coercion moral, Now that I am torn by the most fanatical among the traditionalists or conservatives, we understand that it has become a vital need to find a space that allows public law to carry out its apostolic mission without having to take the piece of the Progressive Party or the conservative. To this I willingly accepted the proposal made to me da don Ariel S. Levi Gualdo give life along with father John Cavalcoli to a site on the Internet that is dedicated only to the orientation of the faithful through doctrinal theological studies not related to the ideologies and not tied to political interests; a site that for this reason wants to protect from any abusive censorship and that undertakes to survive by self-financing.
_____________________
(1) See Antonio Livi, True and false theology. How to distinguish the authentic "science of faith" from an equivocal "religious philosophy", Leonardo da Vinci's publishing house, Rome 2012. For a discussion of my thesis, see the truth in theology, curated by Marco Bracchi and Giovanni Covino, with contributions by Nicola Bux, Giovanni Cavalcoli, Christian Ferraro, Serafino Lanzetta, Dario Sacchi and Piero Vassallo, Leonardo da Vinci's publishing house, Rome 2014. (2) This is what has made, among others, Enrico Maria Radaelli with his latest essay, titled The Church overturned. Survey aesthetic theology, on the form and language of the magisterium of Pope Francis, Editions Gondolin, Verona 2014. (3) This is what has made, with reasonable grounds pastoral, as an authoritative theologian Brunero Gherardini in Second Vatican Ecumenical Council. A speech to do, Mariana Publishing House, Frigento 2010. (4) See in this regard my first contribution to this online magazine: The ecclesiology of Hans Küng historicist [who].
Click below to listen to a Marian song of the popular tradition
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Antonio-Livi-Patmos2.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150Father AntonioHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngFather Antonio2014-10-22 03:29:362021-04-21 00:40:32Three priests in the boat to the site of the last revelation
[…] The world synod, for its part, has assumed a tone of doctrine that in reality is not its responsibility, given that there is not even an assembly reconcile, and the Popes have started a little dignity to do the taillights of the synods, with limited to validate and establish their conclusions, even if they do not say anything new from the point of view of doctrine nor could. This is not dignified for the Pope, which must take back their power driving towards the bishops.
.
.
Author Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON
.
.
According to Rahner, the task of the Bishop It is to take note of the real "faith" or "effective" expressed by the people of God, as thematic or categorical expression and "aposteriorica" of faith athematic transcendental and "priori", which is common to all men ("Supernatural existential") and then to non-Catholics and atheists themselves Explicit, from which the famous rahneriano concept of the "anonymous Christian" everywhere and always in grace, why all are saved and the damned in hell do not exist (gooders transcendental).
Father Karl Rahner
The bishop, according to Rahner, must strive to understand how can such faith and interpret it correctly, must approve and support, must then follow it as it evolves and nelle its historical expressions, dictated by the Holy Spirit, should translate into doctrinal faith, ufficial and institutional. But it is clear that the primacy is always for the existential faith of ordinary Christians with the common baptismal priesthood, infallible listening direct interpretation of the Holy Spirit and the Word of God, though the dogmatic concepts with which it is interpreted that the Word is in constant evolution and for the various culture in which express.
.
seated in the First Vatican Council, stampa vintage
The Second Vatican Council, as you know, has enhanced, promoted and stimulated the activity of the laity, of the religious, priests and theologians and made from fifty years, many have been and are the various initiatives, some of which excellent, others instead, Unfortunately, - and perhaps the most numerous - influenced by anti-hierarchical conceptions and populist or demagogic Church, a certain "church from below", a certa popular church, or some "spontaneous groups or" base "of the 70s, or "charismatic movements" of the 80s. So these initiatives have taken his hand to the bishops, which, or naively seduced or intimidated in front of such intrusive, powerful and sometimes threatening effervescence, does not deprive the rest of the good sides, have come to assume certain not everyone welcomes the role outlined above by Rahner, yielding to excessive indulgence or tolerance of mistakes and bad behaviors that were spreading.
The bishops, when there are "strong with the weak", they have become like notaries who limit themselves to registering and ad ufficializzare or at least tolerate the "faith" or should I say the tales that mostly circulate among the faithful particularly the most disseminated by the mass media and educational and cultural institutions, but then they treat hard those few who, faithful to the evangelical concept of the shepherd, dare to remind them of their responsibility. At the same time the Council has increased the autonomy of the local church against Rome and established, as we know, le whatnferenze and episcopal synods of bishops worldwide to regular deadline.
Il Santo Padre Francesco during a udienza
Indeed, the Holy Father Francis He wants to make the bishops share in his doctrinal authority. This will mean then that the synod will become a kind of periodic Council fixed term and one wonders if it is not too artificial and impractical. The development of doctrine can not be programmed, but it depends on imponderables related to Divine Providence.
this institution certainly very important in itself was intended to strengthen the initiative and the pastoral responsibility of bishops individually or collectively, but unfortunately in many cases ended up creating a figure of bishop conformist and opportunist, without a universal vision of the Church, closed in his diocese or in his nation, ready to become independent from the Pope, so as not to upset their brethren the most influential or the most respected or their bishops' conference of the nationalist.
Synod of Bishops on the Family, 2014
The world synod, for its part, has assumed a tone of doctrine that in reality is not its responsibility, given that there is not even an assembly reconcile, and the Popes have started a little dignity to do the taillights of the synods,with limited to validate and establish their conclusions, even if they do not say anything new from the point of view of doctrine nor could. This is not dignified for the Pope, which must take back their power driving towards the bishops. The most serious drawback that is followed in all, without prejudice to the positive aspects, is that it has failed collaboration between the Pope and the bishops in teaching and defense of the doctrine of the faith. Of course, this function is not at all settled and we must recognize the great zeal with which such a man as the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was acquitted at his office at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith over twenty years, much less can we ignore the numerous interventions of the Popes and of good bishops, not excluding synods and episcopal conferences worldwide.
The Holy Father takes flight to a ball game that was launched during its passage in St. Peter's Square. To his right the commander of theVatican Gendarmerie Domenico Giani
As already noted, however, for many years, careful observers, the ecclesiastical authorities at all levels, by the Pope to the individual bishops, is not at all able to control a complex situation doctrinal and consequently moral, disciplinary and liturgical, is that it got out of hand and that has become ungovernable, with serious damage of the faithful. Often the data or the data theologian bishop or as prophet or seer take the place of the Magisterium, which is either ignored or ddespised.What do the bishops? Yes, of course, are watching, but with what mind? They can be happy? no cerly. It is not a pleasant sight to watch, ma, albeit in the midst of positive facts, a process of dissolution and disintegration of the Church, process that some will stop, because the Church is unwavering. However, God does not spare the trials and gives the means to overcome them.
the pastoral staff who are challenging the bishops during the sacred celebrations
The means are: necessary that the bishops with a humble and courageous leap of faith in their own charisma, resume control of the situation. At the bottom of the flock of Christ, bewildered by intriguers and rebels, can not wait. The shepherd is smitten and the sheep gone astray. But God will never miss the good shepherds? In no way! The Catholic world has still, thank God, at least in democratic countries, numerous media, of teaching, of pastoral action, of preaching: from the pulpits to the conferences of all kinds, from the parishes to school, from print to the internet, from publishers websites, contacts with movements and associations to those with private, from conference rooms to the squares. And the themes of possible and desirable interventions specific and exclusive jurisdiction of the bishop are numerous and urgent. I'm not even to list.
That a bishop to intervene at the party kiwi or the firework display or meeting with the Buddhists or the benefit concert can be certain sympathetic and bring the bishop to the people. However, it remains to bring people to Christ. How come the bishops feel or appear so little if only they would be the most qualified to speak? Do not just "be between people "; we need to see what is being done among the people. Why then let the laity, as competent and good will of the debate or even more the decision or judgment on matters of faith and morals where instead so important and irreplaceable, by the command of Christ Himself, is the word of the pastor?
Fontanellato, 1 April 2014
Click below to listen to a Marian song of the popular tradition
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/cavalcoli56.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150Father GiovanniHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngFather Giovanni2014-10-21 12:31:042021-04-21 00:40:53The Bishops are watching?
CARDINAL KASPER AND THE PARADIGM OF THE’USEFUL IDIOT
I offer my sincere esteem to Cardinal Kasper whose theology and ecumenism I do not at all share, but whose fidelity to his idea of Pietro, pushed to the point of offering himself to the public slaughter as a target practice, I appreciate, in this poor Church of ours which looks more and more like a amusement park where no one controls who enters and who exits and in which the roller coaster is now free of technical maintenance, without all this, however, erodes our assurance of faith: the gates of hell will never prevail over the Church founded on the rock of Peter, to whom Christ gave the keys of the kingdom [CF. Mt 16, 18].
.
.
Author Ariel S. Levi di Gualdo
.
.
QED …
After the release of the libretto by Cardinal Walter Kasper, in which the cardinal celebrates the praises of the heresiarch Luther and of Protestantism, I propose again on the columns ofPatmos Island one of the first articles written shortly after the opening of our online magazine. Perhaps it is worth mentioning that when I published and wrote about some two years ago useful nonsense, ran the 19 October 2014, as anyone can check from our archive, where all our writings are collected in order of date. I was really wrong? [ 7 June 2016 ]
That of "useful idiot" is not a term abusivebecause if it were, I would not dare use them, all the more towards a bishop like Cardinal Walter Kasper, famous theologian whose cristologia and ecclesiology we can discuss, species in this church so free, collegial and democratic in which Alberto Melloni seems only to be granted a right of thought, of speech and expression, up to go to Catholic bullshitting without restraint directly at the Masonic Lodges [cf. My previous article,who, who, who], happy to host not so much the "builders of peace" [CF. Mt 1, 5-10] that this work will be blessed Christological, but the de-builders of the Church, for this very welcome to the Masons today do not attack us more directly from outside but from inside.
.
The term of purely political "useful idiot"that nothing, I repeat, has in common with the concept of human idiocy, those loyalists who were mentioned in the countries of the West defended in all ways and at all costs the Soviet regime, even against the evidence of the facts. And of this, the true champions, were not the placid Italian communists from the sacristy, but hardened communists French and Spanish.
.
ET, Michelangelo, Judgement and … the Vaticanists
In the days preceding the opening of the Synod on the FamilyI've read many accounts of real or alleged vaticanologi, I have isolated their words by certain ecclesiastical dramas going on and I allowed myself a smile, because these characters in the immediate present paralyzed and unable to understand what heavy and ironic give feedback on them tomorrow history, are becoming more similar to ufologists discussing extraterrestrial aliens and visits to our planet, exercising their sacrosanct right to alienate the tragic ecclesial reality in corso. For the time being the only ones to get out of this chorus of flatterers by Kominform [seewho] seem to be Marco Tosatti [see who] e Sandro Magister [seewho].
.
In certain events that escapes is to practice the obvious:Cardinal Kasper fully deserves the loyalty bonus, because lending itself as useful idiot - and again I repeat: always within the meaning of the word used in the political sense totally flattering - is making a great service, offering to the attacks of various fringes of the Catholic world, of various theologians and not least to the objections expressed gracefully theological everything from a group of cardinals and scholars who have just published a book that examines some burning questions that have formed the subject of discussion at the Synod on the Family [who].
.
Cardinal Walter Kasper
From the ongoing affair, that Cardinal Kasper is making out of it?It is a bishop of the Catholic Church, is a cardinal elector no longer octogenarian, President Emeritus of the Pontifical Secretariat, theologian appreciated and rigorously imposed as the only verb in certain theological studies full of all the worst modernist and pro-Protestant heresies, that is, almost all of the existing ones… so it has very little to lose, little or nothing to gain, as opposed to other bishops always on the track instead groped no longer know how to please the Supreme Pontiff in a desperate attempt to get him the benefits and promotions …
.
a manifestation of popular faith in Peru
We seek to be clear: Latin Americans respect the authorities provided it is united and moved by profound authority. If one confronts the typical Latin American in a decisive and determined way, if you want even with a respectful but light touch of authority, there are two solutions: or that reacts ammazzandoti, upand reacts by loving you. However, if you choose to love you, at that point he will be ready to be to get killed if someone were to dare to touch him in whom he recognized all the trappings of masculinity and power of the man who deserves as such all the more indefatigable than. And as we all know, today, one of these typical psychologies sits on the Chair of Peter.
.
Who agrees with Cardinal Kasper, tends to tacere, as agreed and just; those who do not is, attacks him. And ever when it comes to gentle attacks prelatizi, that it is settled practice of certain members of the College of Cardinals before addentarti with the bite of the cobra you sprinkle the anesthetic to bite, everything is alright; however, when it comes to certain hard and pure Catholics or certain blogs and sites in the so-called ultra-traditionalist area, they don't even know where that respect always due to a bishop and a collaborator of the Roman Pontiff lives, things change somewhat, because in this case the German cardinal was overwhelmed by insults in which the slightest offense was that of "apostasy from the faith".
.
I have some experience of life lived in the midst of the Latin American,from my closest and valuable contributor, and one thing with which I have learned to familiarize yourself is this: for a discussion of culture and custom tend not to act in a direct way, but in an indirect way. Other times it happens that the things that they say they would like to say to other. All this to protect their authority figure, the person or persons subject to certain thoughts and expressions, then to preserve the serenity of the relationship between them, the person or persons.
.
Eleonora Barbara Ciccone, aka Madonna, interpretation Evita Peron
Rado says certian warlordsthey first sowed friction and created all the conditions for furious quarrels,then I finally intervened to sedarli with paternal kindness, Eleonora mentre Barbara Ciccone, aka Madonna, played Evita Peron singing from the balcony of the presidential palace: Don’t cry for meArgentina[who].
.
The Pied Piper
Let's try to analyze the obvious:it may be that the Holy Father has favored a real crawl space through an intermediary for the astute purpose of bringing out the rats in the open like the Pied Piper, to see who was in favor and who was against the hypothesis of certain discussions on delicate issues discussed in recent days at the synod on the family? It is my hypothesis, fperegrine bears, but it is worth reflecting on what, nothing else to give me wrong. In the event, however, was so, appear obvious to what extent the Holy Father could not have been put forward himself in the first person, because in this case no, in this climate of clerical cowardice, would never have come into the open [cf. My previous article,who], from the great defenders of the historical "non-negotiable values", but when they had to choose between certain non-negotiability and the possibility of finally reaching a prestigious bishopric, they promptly mitigated both the language is the fighting spirit, hiding behind the finger of spurious prudence; and in the face of his own interest or the possibility that made him see or hope purple red, if necessary they have become masters of negotiation even on “non-negotiable values”, rather: above all, on “non-negotiable values”.
.
Cardinal Walter Kasper during an interfaith prayer
I have much to disagree with on Cardinal Kasper's theologyand on its ecumenism, from which I believe that only the deleterious Catholic-Protestantism can arise over time, place under the lines its reference points tend to be Kant and Hegel, over the onnipotente Rahner, with an eye of sympathy for the heretic Küng. I feel, however, to say how much I appreciate him more of certain fringes which now represent only the alleged Catholic tradition of themselves and that of their loved ones and untouchables ghettos they started to growl at the dog, while others instead of pretending not to know who is the master and the dog took off the muzzle telling: "Come on Fido, barks! I want to see who will answer, but above all as. Then, in time and place, I'll think of it, perhaps in the way that no one can imagine ... ".
.
Peter and Paul in Antioch, Byzantine mosaic
How many bishops and cardinals, from the tireless defenders of sound doctrine and values are not negotiable,in his capacity as members of the Apostolic College, it crossed my mind to make that obvious which is also indicated with extreme clarity in the Gospel? And the obvious Christian and apostolic to do this would be: go to Antioch, ie in the Vatican, to the Casa di Santa Marta, clothed with manhood Pauline, take the Prince of the Apostles and ask: "Look here, 'Peter, you want to explain to your devoted and obedient brother apostles who share the honor and burden of the episcopate with you, what games certain fringes increasingly restless are trying to play under your eyes? Assuming they play under your eyes and it is not you who make them move like pawns?» [CF. Gal 1-2,7.14].
.
… qua the command!
I offer my sincere esteem to Cardinal Kasper whose theology and ecumenism I do not at all share, but whose fidelity to his idea of Pietro, pushed to the point of offering himself to the public slaughter as a shooting target, I appreciate,in this poor Church of ours which looks more and more like a amusement park where no one controls who enters and who exits and in which the roller coaster is now free of technical maintenance, without all this, however, erodes our assurance of faith: the gates of hell will never prevail over the Church founded on the rock of Peter, to whom Christ gave the keys of the kingdom [CF. Mt 16, 18].
.
… I will give you the keys of the kingdom
Like it or not some people today to Petercalled Francesco, and to him we owe devout and filial obedience. If you want to use and abuse the Catholic Church to be more, the question changes, since memo other with respect to the Church founded by Christ above Pietra precise, which is that of Peter. And today the stone is Francesco, Bishop of Rome and Pontifex Maximus, without the possibility of any Catholic discussion, if faithful to Catholic tradition we want to be, regardless of whether the Holy Father may or may not surround himself with bad company, of bad advisors and even of “useful idiots”.
.
.
.
.
.
.
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Patmos1.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150father arielHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngfather ariel2014-10-19 22:33:062016-06-22 14:40:57Cardinal Kasper and idiot profit paradigm
the, Giovanni, your brother and companion in tribulation, in the kingdom and patience of Christ, I was on the island called Patmos because of the Word of God and the testimony given to Jesus [AP 1, 9]
Author Giovanni Cavalcoli, ON
As is well known on the island of Patmos, archipelago of Greece, is linked to the exile of John the Evangelist,Auto dell'Apocasmooth, which begins precisely in his paper with the following words: "I, Giovanni, your brother and companion nshe tribulation, in the kingdom and patience of Christ, I was on the island called Patmos because of the word of DI and the testimony of Jesus " [AP 1,9].
The Apostle John has experienced the sufferings that Christ provides for those who will follow himand that he himself has suffered giving us the example and at the same time providing us with courage, patience, consolation and comfort, when Jesus warns us that the disciples will be retested and will suffer injustice and abuse of power by the civil and religious authorities, will be slandered, marginalized, betrayed and abandoned by relatives and friends because of the Gospel. But they must be regarded as blessed, why suffer the same who have suffered the prophets and the Son of Man [CF. Mt 5, 10-12].
The figure of '"exile" in opposition to the "homeland" is traditional in Christian symbolism:the man, driven out of Paradise, now lives in a land of exile, some created by God and not devoid of beauty, but also beset by many evils and miseries.
depiction of the expulsion from Paradise
The Christian life involves, therefore, the prospect of reaching the true homein heaven serenely accepting exile and in preparing it for entry into the true homeland of eternal life. As we know, this issue for which we now live in a nether world, in which we have fallen after a takeover original, detaching from the gods, is not absent even in certain ancient pagan wisdom, as for example in Plato, in Plotinus, Gnosticism and the same in Indian philosophy.
The difference with Christianityis given by the fact that while these visions Pagan dualistic, why the disgrace of the human spirit is to be dropped in the matter - which therefore should be abandoned in order to achieve the pure spirituality - in the Christian conception, which still houses a primacy of the spirit over body, also the material world this is basically good and created by God, why should not so much be abandoned, almost is bad in itself, but rather must be freed from evil. This is what is taught by the dogma of the resurrection of the flesh.
As you know John wrote the Apocalypse in Patmosto comfort the Christians and the Church in their trials and suffering for the Word of God. What is the meaning dedicate this site to the place where the Apostle and Evangelist gave us an example of that his heroic fidelity to the Lord?
The founders of the site: Monsignor Antonio Livi, Father Ariel S. Levi and I Gualdo,intend to resume and apply to the present the message of John and put under his patronage and intercession of our initiative, proven in the certainty that even in the Church today - and perhaps now more than ever - those Catholics who want to live the fullness of their faith and their ecclesial communion with the Church and with the Successor of Peter are in the apocalyptic message of the Word of God the light to understand the situation that the Church is living and the wisdom and the strength to live today by faithful sons of the Church.
nuclear explosion
The term apocalyptic in the vulgar language recalls the idea of huge upheaval,calamities and disasters; but biblical scholars know that apocalyptic simply means scriptural reference to the book of Revelation, which prophesies certainly those frightening events, but in a very specific theological key, that has nothing to do with the defeatist morbid taste for the horrible and cataclysmic end in themselves; and even for a pessimistic doom, that she is aware of the values and good sides of today's Church, and the elements of hope that are provided by Providence.
Then we have nothing to do with those "prophets of doom”,bitter and amareggianti, terrified and terrifying, desperate and despairing, to which St. John XXIII warned the Church in his famous keynote speech Mother Church rejoices opening of the Second Vatican Council of 11 October 1962 [who, who].
It is true that the biblical prophet and prophecy in general in the history of the Church often denounce the sins and injustices, which will be followed by the divine punishment; it is true that the evils and misfortunes that they identify and highlight them are presented as effects of infidelity Alliance, without fear and disgust with what stand against the powerful, doers, government officials and civil priestly, until sometimes pay with their lives that their courageous denunciation. But it is equally true that the false prophets are those who say, for pure self-interest or fear, that everything is okay not to irritate the powerful, and the crimes remain unpunished so.
The most urgent need of the church today,in our opinion, is that of harmony and mutual cooperation among Catholics on the basis of the one faith kept by the Successor of Peter. The Second Vatican Council, the name says it all, came to reconcile the opposing factions. It therefore indicates the path of unity and peace, in justice and truth. But unfortunately it happened that as the immediate post-conciliar Catholics were divided into two parties, lefebvriani and modernists, in conflict with each other and both claimants to the authenticity of being Catholic.
Undoubtedly, the Church itself remains a,as this is a necessary factor of its essence. This unity is realized in the communion of saints, that is, those who are in communion visible or invisible grace between them, participation in the explicit or implicit to the medesimi sacraments and obedience to the Supreme Pontiff, express or implied. They reject the extremists on both sides, though in each of these values exist and a partial communion with the Church. But the problem today is to join to the fact that values are partial agocts per se to create a unique synthesis and a single body that is the Church in the fullness of its elements, of its charisms and its factors. Instead, the opposite parties, of a cache of the values of the Church, opposed to the other one starts, rather than merge them together in a harmonious whole that that is precisely the Church. Thus for example the preservation must be combined with progress and change with the perennial, Tradition with Scripture, distinguendo the knowledge faithful, that continually progresses, by 'object of faith that, as divine truth, is fixed and immutable. In this way, you avoid both a rigid fixity that a relativistic theory of evolution.
The point of contention between the two parties is the interpretation of the Council, for which both believe to find a discontinuity with the previous Magisterium, for the fact that the council would have assumed in toto the modernity that until tollora the Church had fought: therefore a change in doctrinal, assume that what was rejected and condemned.
In lefebvriani and moderniststhis interpretation because of two opposing effects or insert in two opposing panels REFERENCEent: for Lefebvre, the Council would betray Tradition, changed the essence of the Church, and assumed the errors of Modernism already condemned by St. Pius X [seewho]. Hence the refusal of Lefebvre's doctrines the new Council judged false for not say heretical. They believe, therefore, of having to refuse appealing directly to Tradition, that the post-conciliar Papacy would leave to be swayed by the errori of the modern world [among the numerous examples, seewho]. For their part, the modernists have understood the intention of the Council of proporre an updated and modern Catholicism, but there has been the belief that the Church with the Council has finally taken, after centuries of closure, senseless sentences and sterile polemic, the values of modernity, for which you must deny or change or abandon the dogmas defined in the past. But for what the modernists do not make any problem, because according to them the Magisterium of the Church is not infallible, there is no unchanging truth, but it is always relative to the historical evolution and the diversity of cultures. There is nothing fixed and stable, and tutto speech ends, Everything is in flux, everything is relative. God himself becomes. Believe that there is something that does not change, mean vain and foolishly cling to that which inexorably changes and disappears, what is no longer present, means to retain what no longer serves, it does not say anything and is overtaken by history.
What was false yesterday for the modernists is true todayand not to be left behind in the march of history, you have to be to today, not tadorn the last. The truth is what the world thinks today, no matter if in contrast with what we thought yesterday, because today it is more advanced than yesterday. There are no values to recover lost, but you must always advance towards nuwin ove. There is no need to check if the new reflects the true; the truth is just the new one as new. Fromnque, for the modernist doctrinal progress normally involves quite contradictions with previous teaching jobsinstitutions of the Church. It is in the bottom of the Hegelian scheme of becoming. So for them in the past, the Church is wrong and finally with the Council has corrected its errors, long denounced by reformers of the past, as for example Luther. For this ecumenism is not understood by the modernists in harmony with the preservation of the Catholic dogmas integral, but as the host of the doctrines of the brothers sepplowed that in the past, especially the Council of Trent, were condemned by the Church. So there is no need to have any scruples to abandon or at least to relativize those Catholic dogmas which are not recognized by the Protestants.
the monaco Augustinian Martin Luther affix his thesis on the portal of the cathedral
This affinity that the modernists have with ProtestantsHe porta, in imitation of Luther, to promote the knowledge of Scripture and the Christian message, as well as theological progress regardless of the Magisterium, but by appealing directly to the Bible or to modern exegetes, Protestants also, as well as Lefebvre criticized the Council's teaching by appealing directly to the Tradition. So is the one that others bypass the Magisterium and placed on top of it, and found them, rather than - as they should if they were true Catholics - docility and confidently through the mediation of the Magisterium of the interpretation of Scripture and Tradition.
But there is this difference between modernists and lefebvriani,that while they have no scruples to challenge certain doctrines of the Council which they consider outdated or backward, as well as any other teaching of the Church according to their dogmatic evolutionism, Lefebvre at least know how to preserve with care the dogmas of the past, However, only up to the Council, after which, according to them, the Magisterium would have degenerated, so that they feel compelled to keep the "tradition" against the Magisterium itself.
Island of the Currents in the south eastern tip of Sicily, where they meet the currents of the three seas of the Italian peninsula
That in the Church there may be two currents,a traditionalist healthily, more sensitive to the preservation of the most sacred values and perennials, as for example those of the liturgy, ed un'altra, more careful historical element, development and progress of the dogma of the Christian life, current that we might call "progressive", is something completely normal, useful and even necessary to the integrity and smooth operation and funziration of the Church in her human and social. In fact, these two currents, If rEstaño within orthodoxy and ecclesiastical discipline, are specially made to complement each other and to work together in the promotion of the one faith and the one charity. Instead become hostile to each other when they divide the Church, out of ambition, presumption, or need to take center stage, protrude from the right faith, by a common obedience to the Pope and the observance of the same discipline and ecclesial charity. Must therefore ensure that lefebvriani and modernists, like brothers in faith, reach an agreement on the common basis of that Catholicism means that although all profess. E 'dunque urgent, really bringing the Council, highlight what can foster dialogue and agreement, factor which ultimately is summed, in short, in a sincere full acceptance of the Magisterium of the Church, noting in particular the fact that the doctrines of the Council implement a progress in the continuity.
… Besame mucho
The modernisyou must therefore love a healthy renouncing modernity to modernism, while the Lefebvrians is not prohibited, rather it is greatly commendable, maintain a special esteem for Tradition, to condition, however, to understand that the Council did not betray it at all, ma the conferma, interprets and develops. OCCorre also that both parties recognize the values in the other and waives the right to be considered as the one of being comfortableChurch and excluding or disregarding the other.
This our online magazinemodestly but honestly intends to contribute to this valuable outreach work reciproco and peace, in order to make the Church today a more credible witness to the world of salvation that Christ has given us.
Fontanellato, 1October 2014
Click below to listen to a song popular tradition Marian
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/cavalcoli56.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150Father GiovanniHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngFather Giovanni2014-10-19 22:17:102021-04-21 00:59:16The apostle John on Patmos
[…] Küng is the inventor of the conceptual frameworks that govern the many revolutionary proposals advanced in recent months by theologians and representatives of the worldwide on the occasion of the Extraordinary Synod on the Family called by Pope Francis.
Author Antonio Love
Il teologo Svizzero Hans Küng, in its long history the human and intellectual, he never abandoned his "dress scene", that is the "bad teacher" at odds with the authentic magisterium of the Catholic Church. His favorite themes are those who yesterday were replicated by the Archbishop of Milan, cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, and today they are vulgarized pseudo-prophetic literature of Enzo Bianchi. Are the reform of the Church, the abolition of papal primacy, a "new" moral addressed to implement the "sexual revolution" sessantottino - mold Freudian-Marxist -, granting the priesthood to women, l'euthanasia. Lately Küng, ill with Parkinson's, has come to announce the intention to use it himself assisted suicide, in imitation of Cardinal Martini.
The Reverend Hans Küng in a photo juvenile
Küng's career started in the sixties with significant interventions in the preparatory phase of the Second. With the tempo andar, its positions open to contestation have found more and more space in newspapers, with articles or interviews focused on this or that topic, thus gaining a significant reputation not only in the theological circles, but also among the general public. One of the joints of his battle and controversy was and is the virulent challenge encyclical Human life of Paul VI: ideal sacramental - and therefore certainly divine, but for this very mysterious - the family and procreation Christian Küng is reduced by a restoration of medieval, up to accuse the document Pauline and subsequent claims of the popes on the topic, "The main cause of the spread of AIDS in the world".
The controversy of Küng, in the years, invested primarily the pontificate of John Paul II St. [seewho, who, who] and then Benedict XVI[see who, who] the first considered reactionary, the second even schismatic. But it is the blessed Paul VI, the pope who brought to fruition the Vatican, raged the controversy of the Swiss theologian, who could not tolerate his genuine insight reform of the Council, as opposed to an interpretation misleading - because historicist and humanistic - that was leveraging the "council of mass media», how keenly he had to say, then Benedict XVI.
The Rev. Prof. Hans Küng in a picture of maturity
Küng is the inventor of the conceptual frameworks that govern the many revolutionary proposals advanced in recent months by theologians and representatives of the worldwide on the occasion of the Extraordinary Synod on the Family called by Pope Francis. It will therefore be instructive to draw a doctrinal ecclesiology of the Swiss theologian. The ecclesiology of Hans Küng in fact deserves to be well known today because it has no theological weight marginal, indeed is precisely the philosophical-religious ideology dominant in the Catholic. The conceptual categories and the main sources of literature are those of the Lutheran Reformation and the religious philosophy of the matrix Lutheran, represented by the system in the nineteenth century idealism of Georg Friedrich Hegel and in the twentieth century by the "dogma of the Church" - the ecclesiastical Dogmatics — Karl Barth. The cornerstones of this philosophical-religious ideology are represented by historicism and dialectics immanentistic. The Catholic Church is thus interpreted as a historic moment of the dialectic of the Spirit - understood, this, not so much as the Agion Pneuma of Catholic dogma but rather as "the ghost» by Hegel —, which aims at a development in the near future that will see, as a first step, the removal of doctrinal barriers between Catholics and Protestants - with the full acceptance of the Lutheran view of "justification by grace alone" - and the creation of a single "Church of Christ" (ecumenism). In the end, as the second and final stage, the establishment of a "universal Church" based solely on ethical-political (the 'Weltethik»). This ideology permeates today, clearly identifiable as background a careful conceptual analysis, most of the proposals, doctrinal or pastoral, Catholic theologians most prominent, cominciare and Karl Rahner, that the same Hans Küng considers a master in theology and a model adopting Hegel's dialectic (1).
These teologi Catholics, many of whom became bishops, exerted a well-documented influence on the work of Vatican II, to then assume the role (arbitrary) the only authoritative interpreters of the Council in the next fiftyO, up to, today, the preparation and conduct of the work of the Synod on the possible changes to the dual prasis pastoral in relation to the problems of families.
A prominent figure of this theological current was Cardinal Walter Kasper, supported by most of the German and Italian by other theologians became cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi as Dionigi Tettamanzi and. His argument most characteristic, in line with the proposals of the theological-moral Hans Küng, is the need to accelerate the process of reform of the Church with a stronger adaptation to the moral conscience of the "men of our time" and alignment with the practice of ecclesial communities Protestant and Orthodox. In his speeches Leitmotiv is the need to de-dogmatise the Catholic Church, starting with a new pastoral family is separate and independent from the doctrine on the sacraments, temporarily not abolished but kept aloof (2). In Italy, the ideology of ecclesiological Hans Küng, especially as regards "ecumenical", is disclosed and constantly revived by Enzo Bianchi, "Prior" of the community of Bose, much heard by the majority of bishops and even the Holy See (3).
Photo of Dr.. Enzo Bianchi dress monaco (public image found on any internet search engine)
THE CONDITIONS DOCTRINE OF THE PROJECT
KUNGHIANO OF REFORM
CATHOLIC CHURCH
To understand well, in its theoretical and its practical implications, the ecclesiology of Hans Küng, it is essential to mention some biographical data, on the basis of the Swiss theologian works in which he narrated the process of his intellectual formation (4). From these data will be very clearly the nature Lutheran-idealistic reformers of his intentions and his ideal of Catholic Church life, based on its particular conception of the priesthood and pastoral, present in all his work, from the youth Justification the works of his maturity as Does God exist? and the "manifesto" conclusive "future Church", namely the Project Weltethos.
Reinhard Marx, Archbishop of München, during an interreligious prayer meeting
Hans Küng, born in 1928, is formed in a setting where you practice done some "inter-religious dialogue", by the contact quotidiyear, in the same class, with Catholics, Protestants and Jews (5). Although he had thought of becoming an architect medicoo, "Tended to something that was both more spiritual and more practical, more useful to young, so he decided to become a Catholic priest and theologian » (6). In following, these trends will become much more pronounced, that will have more resonance and evidence in its production. The show works like Truthfulness e Being a Christian, and then his activity in Rome as chaplain of employees and Sursee as a preacher in hospital (7).
Rome, the historic entrance of the Pontifical Germanic-Hungarian College
Arriving in Rome, In the 1948, Küng comes as a seminarian at the Pontifical German College and studied philosophy and theology at the Gregorian University. The Germanic, in those years, There were scholars such as Emerich Coreth, William Klein, W. Core, all engaged in the study of Hegel's Philosophy. Just at that time, In the 1952, Coreth had published an essay, titled The dialectical Being in Hegel's Logic. As stated in the same Küng, from him he learned to interpret the priestly spirituality and pastoral zeal in dialectical terms and storicistici, in frontal opposition with the doctrinal directives of the Magisterium of Pius XII, which included the recommendation not to abandon metaphysics and logic inherent in the Catholic theological tradition:
Father Wilhelm Klein
"He probably would not have lasted in those seven years without my spiritual father to the German College, Father Wilhelm Klein, which - prepared by a multiple activities as a professor of philosophy, as Provincial of the Jesuit Province of Northern Germany and as a visitor to the Society of Jesus from Scandinavia to Japan - carrying a horizon of views rare and very large […]. He was also the man who first made me careful about many philosophical and theological problems burning. I spoke with him especially of Hegel and then Karl Barth. And at first I showed him my brief theological manuscripts, that redigevo alone and that he mostly before he cut down in the most cutting edge and then force me to really think about a dialectical, that included already in the synthesis of the opposite " (8).
And it was Klein who led"Decisively" the young Küng to choose as a topic of doctoral thesis theology Barth. In another book, Küng, thanked for his help in drafting the text, remembers with gratitude Coreth, Small, Kern as his "venerable masters to the Germanic-Hungarian College in Rome», that, along with others, "I have given suggestions decisive for my theology in general and for the understanding of Hegel in particular ' (9).
Over the years, ranging from 1951 on Küng is mainly dedicated to the study of dialectical theology of Barth, and the theologian draws in Basel 1955 the licentiate thesis under the guidance of one of his professors of dogmatics at the Gregorian, ie Maurizio Flick, who would later become famous for his theory on the reduction of the dogma of original sin to a mere myth of origins. And Barth Küng recognizes then be grateful for having allowed to range overere the properly theological significance of Hegel's philosophy, then erasing not only the distinction between theology Catholic and Lutheran theology but also between theology and philosophy. Justification. The Doctrine of Karl Barth and a Catholic reflection is the first work of Küng and demonstrates the passion with which the theologians of Tübingen he devoted himself to assimilate the barthiano thought in the seven-year stay at the Collegio Germanico; the same Karl Barth wanted to emphasize then publicly:
"My joy comes first of all from the opening and the firmness with which she, at the German College in Rome […] as well as the brave fellow he studied my books and made it clear to himself dialectically the theological phenomenon that riscontrava » (10).
Another author passionately studied was de Lubac, then in the middle of the inevitable controversy for his book Supernatural. Historical studies(Paris 1946) that questioned the traditional doctrine about the gratuity of the supernatural. Such disputes, together with those on other issues relating to polygenism, evolutionism, to communism, led to the resolute stance of Pius XII in his encyclical The human race (1950). The Catholic scholar Antonio Russo, University of Trieste, admirer of Henri de Lubac, and therefore very understanding in regards to Küng, paints bleak the situation doctrinal, pastoral and discipline in the pre-conciliar Church, identifying with the vision of the Church that was typical of the progressives, and with them the young seminarian Swiss Hans Küng:
"In those same years, then, the spiritual atmosphere prevailing in Rome is anything but open to new. Magazines such as La Civiltà Cattolica host not infrequently articles as Perennial vitality of the Papacy; Action pacificatrice of the Papacy in old age; Peacemaking and charitable of the Papacy in the age contemporanea; The Vatican beacon of cultural progress. Excommunicate the Communists and those who offer their support; and announce solemn pilgrimages, acts of devotion to Mary and "enthusiasm even plebiscitary"; proclaimed the dogma of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Holy Year of 1950, the Marian Year of 1954. The young theologian, Anyway, lived continuously in contact with both the "Roman theology" with both the spiritual and cultural environment of the Germanic, being uncomfortable and threatening to wreck his Roman conversio. So much so that his readings are oriented towards the deepening of positions and authors such as Hegel, De Lubac, but especially of Karl Barth, the study of which will shape it in a sustainable way, because the open "access to evangelical theology ", pushing to get passionate for theology » (11).
As si Sciences, the influence received from Küng in the early years of its formation is decidedly Lutheran mold, and Lutheran is the conception of the Church and of ecclesial theology from the beginning that orients his studies. The result is a theological method, which proceeds from the substantial elimination of the Magisterium of the Church – especially the Pontificalor - as a basis for the scientific interpretation of the faith. Even the concrete life of the Church - the liturgy, popular piety - is seen as "outside", as something to be overcome or eliminated altogether because appartenent to the "Church of the past ', that should leave room for the "Church of the Future".
Küng warns a bitter annoyance to Marian devotion that the Church professes and practice, and conseguentance with is brought to devalue, not only of popular devotion but also a solemn dogmatic as that of the 1954 relative to the Assumption into Heaven, in body and soul, Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Having disconoscithe UTO The power of teaching of the hierarchical Church, Küng instead of the Magisterium adopted as the guiding principle for theology, ie for the interpretation of what Küng always calls "thechristlischer faith» (more "the Catholic faith»), the thought of Karl Barth Lutheran, which in turn introduces Küng to a practice of theology inspired exclusively to the Hegelian dialectic.
THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEOLOGICAL
ADOPTION OF Dialectic
HEGELIANA
It should be noted at this point that these methodological premises make the discourse on Church done by Küng is not exactly theological: none of his thesis can be considered - from a point of view rigorously critical-epistemological - as a hypothesis scientifically admissible, like one theological quaestio held, because the method he follows is by no means typical of ecclesial theology but rather to a "threadsofia religious ", in the precise sense that I give to this term in my treatise on True and false theology (12). and that the thought of Küng is to be considered mere "religious philosophy" is determined not only by the fact that is inspired by Hegel's dialectic - which reduces explicitly Christian theology to philosophy, and this one "Phenomenology of the Spirit» (13) – , but also by the fact that even the thought of Barth transcends the narrow methodological limitations of the "religious philosophy"; indeed, as I reiterated in a dialogue with the epistemological Brunero Gherardini (14), the assumption of a Lutheran "Sola Scriptura», with the exclusion a priori of the Magisterium from the scientific determination of the object of theology (what else can it be but the faith of the Church), means that what the scholar calls "thechristlischer faith"The"the word of god"Remains undetermined, or otherwise determined only by subjective choices, and then reduced to data obtainable only from the uncertain phenomenology of individual consciousness or historical-Community, that which is entrusted to interpret Scripture without the need for an ecclesiastical magisterium. Now, you can not develop a science without a clear determination of its specific object, which then depends on the adoption of the method more appropriate to interpret. A theology that does not have as its object the faith of the Church (and not the "feeling of faith" subjectively someone, inside or outside of the Church) can not be considered "theology" in the Catholic sense of the term, ie as ecclesial theology. E, within that theology, the ecclesiology of those who are not directly connected and essentially the Church's faith to the Magisterium of the Church is reduced to an ambiguous religious discourse which then ends up adopting the themes and rhetorical modes in a socio-political ideology, as was the case with the latest works by Hans Küng, come Projeckt Weltethos, that very little differ, in substance, by similar works of propaganda universalist ideology of the theosophical inspiration or Masonic. Indeed, for explicit admission of Küng, only after meeting with the works of Barth:
"I realized, what can be theology as a science. Barth kritischkonstruktive confrontation with the entire Christian tradition […] sat for me lasting yardsticks theological thought and action " (15).
Opera Masked ball: Archbishop woman. Below is a photo below right from the opera Funny mystery: women-priests
To put it even more explicit, and even more stringent in terms of epistemological,the ecclesiology of Hans Küng not be considered as "a theology with some mistakes": it is rather the negation of the "theology as a science"(theology as science), as a way to refer to the Church of Christ - that mystery of the Christian faith that the science and technology should take as their subject-specific and take into consideration - clearly shows that Küng refers to another. When parla di "ecumenism", It seems that simply refers to something – he detectable sociologically locates in the "lowest common denominator" of the various "confessions of faith" produced by Christian communities. This something sociologically need detectable then – just like Hegel in designing its historical synthesis of religious consciousness – to develop the project of "universal religion", that would mark the passing of the Catholic Church and all other Christian denominations, dialectical unity with Islam, with Buddhism, with Hinduism and also with atheism. Requests today Küng moves to speed up the "reform of the Church" (the annulment of the ecclesiastical magisterium and especially the primacy of the Pope, the synodical government in the Church, abolition of clerical celibacy, the admission of women to the ordained priesthood, the recognition of same-sex marriage, acceptance of euthanasia, etc.) are nothing but preparing what will be unavoidably tomorrow, will be fully realized when the fate inherent in the very essence of the Church as a phenomenon (= HandsfesTazion momentary) of the Spirit. Nothing different, both in terms of ch and concepts, from what Hegel said in early work The Spirit of Christianity and its fate; but nothing like what is a speech propriamente theological, that begins with the unconditional acceptance of the truth revealed (the dogma) e continues with the elaborateaction of rational interpretation hypothesis that privileged instrument metaphysics. As he rightly observed at the beginning of the twentieth century Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange, at odds with the modernist theologians and cattolici believe we can reconcile the dogma with the evolutionism of Bergson, the truth of the fefrom, contained in the "dogmatic formulas", can not be understood by believers if not based on evidence of "common sense", that are substantially metaphysical in nature and which in their turn constitute a prerequisite for the rational scientific interpretation of the dogma, ie for theology (16). Effectively, without metaphysics, without the logic that it is intrinsically linked, especially without the principle of non-contradiction, the dogma is no longer the divine truth preserved by the Church, but can and should be contradicted dialectically, in accordance with the cultural and social changes (17). This is what comes to support Küng in the church (1967) and in Infallible? A request (1970):
"Every formula of faith, not only the individual but also in the whole church, remains imperfect, incomplete, enigmatic […] This fragmentation not only based on the character often polemical and narrow doctrinal formulations of church, but the necessarily dialectical character of every human affirmation of the truth […]. Every proposition can be true and false » (18).
So it is not surprising that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued the following This orientation:
The Cardinal Franjo Šeper (Osijek, 2 October 1905 - Rome, 30 December 1981) at that time prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
"The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith fulfilling its duty to promote and safeguard the doctrine of the faith and of costume throughout the church has submitted to the two works of Professor Hans Küng, The church e Infallible? A question, that have been published in several languages. With two different letters, dated respectively 16 May 1971 e 12 July 1971, the congregation notified the author of the difficulties he found in his opinions and asked him to explain in writing how such views do not contradict Catholic doctrine. In a letter dated 4 July 1973 the congregaziProfessor Küng one offered a further opportunity to explain their ideas through an interview. With a sua lettera part 4 September 1974 he teacher. Küng also left out this possibility. On the other hand with his answers did not feel that some opinions about the church does not conflict with Catholic teaching but continued to support them even after the publication of the declaration The mystery of the church. Therefore, in order not remain doubts about the doctrine that the Catholic Church professes and because the faith of Christians is not in any way tarnished, this sacred congregation, invoking the doctrine of the magisterium shown in the statement The mystery of the church declares: In the works of Professor sopradette. Hans Küng some opinions that are contained, in different degree, are opposed to the doctrine of the Catholic Church, which must be professed by all the faithful. We note only the following most important now apart from a judgment about some others that Prof. Küng defends. The opinion that at least puts in doubt the dogma of the faith of the Church's infallibility and reduces it to a certain fundamental truths of the Church in indefectibility, with the ability to err in its judgments that the magisterium of the Church definitively teaches to believe, contradicts the doctrine defined by Vatican Council I and confirmed by the Second Vatican Council. Another error that seriously affects the doctrine of Professor. Küng regards his opinion of the Magisterium of the Church. In reality, he does not adhere to the authentic magisterium of the genuine concept according to which the bishops in the church are "authentic teachers, endowed with the authority of Christ and preach to the people committed to them the faith they must believe and put into practical life "; In fact, "the task of authentically interpreting the word of God, written or handed on, has been entrusted exclusively to the living teaching office of the Church". Even the opinion already insinuated by Professor. Küng nel book The church and according to which the Eucharist, at least in cases of necessity, can be validly consecrated by baptized without priestly order, can not be reconciled with the doctrine of the Councils of the Lateran IV and Vatican II " (19).
In 1979 Hans Küng accustom a revocata let missio canonical on the teaching of Catholic theology.
AN APPRAISAL OF THE TEACHINGS on ecclesiology
Historicist
Father Anthony De Mello S.j.. and his book: Pilot's license for eagles and chickens.
The ecclesiology of Hans Küng historicist, popularized by many authors nonfiction theological, found a note in a timely condemnation of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. It directly concerns not the Swiss theologian but an Indian follower, the Jesuit Anthony De Mello. In the document of the Congregation, made known in 1998 — the same year that Pope John Paul II published the Encyclical Faith and Reason - we read that in the works of De Mello is observed:
"A progressive distancing from the essential contents of the Christian faith. The revelation took place in Christ, he substitutes an intuition of God without form or image, to speak of God as a pure void. […] Religions, including the Christian, are one of the main obstacles to the discovery of truth. This truth, of altronde, it is never defined in its precise contents. To think that the God of their religion is the only one is, simply, fanaticism. "God" is seen as a cosmic reality, vague and onnipresente. His personal character is ignored and in practice denied ".
Enzo Bianchi, Donizetti theater Bergamo, 20 September 2012 (public image available on all internet search engines)
This is the Hegelian conception of the Absolute which is not transcendent, it is not personal, but is identified with the Holy Spirit and thus become dialectic with History. The Catholic Church, once denied the absolute value of revealed truth, is relativized and reduced to a transitory moment in the development of consciousness of humanity destined to unity based on global ethics. Christ - says the document signed by Josef Ratzinger - is to be considered"As a master alongside others. […] Is not recognized as the Son of God, but simply as the one who teaches us that all men are children of God ".
In this complaint the Magisterium meeting the a priori condemnation of that 'atheistic humanism I have noted many times in the writings of another follower of the Swiss theologian, ie Enzo Bianchi, Christ comes to qualify as a simple "creature" [Ed. See previous article by Antonio Livi, who].
NOTE
Cf. Hans Küng, Incarnation of God. An Introduction to Hegel's Theological Thought as Prolegomena to a future Christology, Publisher Herder, Freiburg - Basel - Vienna 1970, p. 643: "In the more recent Catholic theology was Karl Rahner to open new orizzoni […]. The spirit that distinguished hovers in the background of this study […] others do not is whether or not Hegel, although there also influences Heideggerians. His sporadic attempts to distance himself from Hegel in subtopics only confirm this fact " (my translation).
See Antonio Livi, in The New Compass Daily, 10 October 2014.
See Antonio Livi, in The New Compass Daily, 10 February 2012.
Cf. Hans Küng, Fought for freedom. memories, Munich 2002; The same thing, Controversial Truth. memories, Munich 2007.
Cf. Hans Küng, The justification, Trad.. en. T's. Federici, EDITRICE Queriniana, Brescia 1969, p. 21.
Hans Küng.Way and Work, a cura di Haring und K. (J). Stuffed, Piper publisher, Munich 1978, p. 123.
Cf. Hans Küng, interview with A. W. Scheiwiller, "Awkward Confederates: Hans Küng the faithful church reformer ", in Week, 14 June 1972, p. 23.
Hans Küng. Way and Work, cit., p. 128.
Hans Küng, Incarnation of God in Hegel. Prolegomena to a Future Christology, Trad.. it., Queriniana, Brescia 1970, p. 10.
Karl Barth, letter of safe conduct, in Hans Küng, Justification. The Doctrine of Karl Barth and a Catholic reflection, John Publisher, Einsiedeln 1957 cit.; Trad.. en: Letter to the author, in Hans Küng, The justification, cit., p. 8.
Antonio Russo, "Hans Kung and theology as science", in Study, 106 (2010), pp. 185-206, here p. 188.
See Antonio Livi, True and false theology. How to distinguish the authentic "science of faith" from an equivocal "religious philosophy", Leonardo da Vinci's publishing house, Rome 2012.
See Antonio Livi, True and false theology, cit., pp. 141-148.
(14) See Antonio Livi, Some clarification, in dialogue with fans and critics, in Truth of Theology. Discussion of logic aletica from"True and false theology", by Antonio Livi, curated by Marco Bracchi and Giovanni Covino, Leonardo da Vinci's publishing house, Rome 2014, pp. 167-185.
(15) Hans Küng. Way and Work, cit., p. 137.
(16) CFR Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, Common Sense, the philosophy of being and dogmatic formulas, Beauchesne, Paris 1912; Trad.. it.: The Common sense, the philosophy of being and dogmatic formulas, edited by Antonio Livi and Mario Padovano, Leonardo da Vinci's publishing house, Rome 2013.
(17) See in this regard Antonio Livi, Rationality of faith in Revelation. Philosophical analysis in the light of logic aletica, Leonardo da Vinci's publishing house, Rome 2005.
(18) Hans Küng, The church, Herder, Freiburg in Breisgau 1967, p. 397.
(19) Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Warning, 15 February 1975.
REFERENCES
Louis Bouyer, "Ecumenism without overpasses», in Catholic Studies, 13 (1969), pp. 30-35.
Pier Carlo Lad, «Here's Hans Küng», in Catholic Studies, 22 (1979), pp. 549-54.
Luigi Ibizugbe, Heretic Hans Küng. Christological heresies in the work "Christ sein", Editions Civilization, Brescia 1977.
Luigi Ibizugbe, Theology and Christology. "God exists", in Hans Küng, Editions Quadrivium Genoa 1982.
Antonio Love, "Dogma and Teaching after the" case Küng '", in Catholic Studies, 24 (1980), pp. 171-177.
Antonio Love, True and false theology. How to distinguish the authentic "science of faith" from an equivocal "religious philosophy", second edition increased, Leonardo da Vinci's publishing house, Rome 2012, pp. 241-246.
Emanuele Samek Lodovico, "The infallible dogma of Han Küng», in Catholic Studies, 16 (1971), pp. 171-177.
Emanuele Samek Lodovico, "The way to Hegel to Hans Küng», in Catholic Studies, 16 (1971), pp. 243-251.
Click below to listen to a song the folk tradition
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Antonio-Livi-Patmos2.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150Father AntonioHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngFather Antonio2014-10-19 21:51:232021-04-21 00:59:39The ecclesiology of the historian Hans Küng
The evil man can be moderated, often, tempering, measured, controlled, gentile, good manners, courteous, easy going, well-behaved, sympathetic, Allegro, psychically normal, cultured, from fine stretch, apparently pious and serene; indeed the devil preferably choose these alien people from the excesses of emotional, by outbursts of anger, by uncontrolled impulses, people who do not seem suspicious, maybe in high places, prelates, theologians or religious, and are therefore subject to estimation and respect, to make them instruments of his action when he wants to do really serious damage to the souls and long-lasting ...
Author John Cavalcoli OP
In recent years,, is thanks to the intervention of the Church or of the Shepherds, and thanks to the publication of valuable works on the subject or to the fame acquired by skilled exorcists, as the Father Gabriele Amorth and other, in many Catholic circles has been recovered awareness action of Satan in this world [CF. Pietro Cantoni, The Dark Lord,who], although much remains to be done to undoinate two persistent errors opposed to each other, the first, more prevalent in educated circles, consisting in the denial short existence deldigrandfather; The second one, instead present the working classes, which consists in spectacularization action satanic and in too much agocilitates with whom you would like to explain certain phenomena hateful or certain doom to repeat. It happens then to meet misconceptions about demtheyor both the first and in the second case.
With regard to the action ofthe Satangenerally gives space and advertising, sometimes for some useless curiosity or search for success by the publications on the subject, the most striking phenomena, puzzling and impressive, as possessions, appearances and Satanism. This phenomenology, But, thank God, is rather rare.
Vice versa, exists uNo other aspect of the action of Satan, more frequent and more important, but less flashy and more neglected, and that is what we have to close all, it is of primary interest to our path of salvation, although he did not own the spectacle of the first, unlike ma, placing itself purely in terms of the spirit – the rest, Satan is not a spirito? – affects less sense, the emotions and the imagination and challenges the more delicate work of the intelligence, of consciousness and volontà, especially in relation to the exercise of the theological virtues of faith, the speranzand a charity, and the exercise of the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
The phenomenon of possessions or harassmentall in all is a tough test for the obsessed and certainly engages the skilled exorcist, but in the end does not affect or endanger the moral conduct of the patient, since, as is known, during the presence of the devil, the patient is in an unconscious state, so it can not exercise the will.
Instead, the entry of Satan into the consciousness of the subject lucid and consciousis the real issue about the working of Satan, as he, with its suggestions, seductions and temptations, seriously jeopardizes the spiritual health of the subject, pushing him to sin. In fact, all the action of Satan in this world can be summed up in this single end: deceive man precisely with "doctrines of devils" to persuade him to sin knowing sin, making him look evil good or good evil;.
The imagine Satan as a being frightening or repellentstop means on the level of metaphor and imagination, without grasping the true meaning of the satanic, that is to say without seeing Satan in his real danger that, I repeat, lies in its fine art to lead us to sin, to show us the sin as attractive.
was the Prince of Light, the most beautiful of the angels
In this sense, Satan does not appear repugnant but otherwise looks fascinating,seductive and bewitching. Satan tries to dull our consciousness, yes you do not repent of the sin committed. This is the true characteristic, rest of the day for those who warn, s actionatanica. Or instills false guilt to block us in the fulfillment of the good and to lead us to despair.
In this respect, which is what should be there more to heartif we keep to our salvation, the working of Satan does not have an external character and material, relevant under, to emotions or states of our physical, as in the first case, but a thin appearance, inner, insinuating, we could say "serpentine", that's up toppunto the life of our spirit, our intimate, our ideas, our beliefs, feelings, trends or spiritual aspirations, our moral acts, our interpersonal relationship with others, our relationship with God. This raises the level of ideas, communication of thought, verbal messages, impulses or stimuli to the will.
The main aim of Satan is not even so much the corruption of passions but the corruption of the spirit.Do not push so much to carnal sins, but for the spiritual: the Superbia, the empietà, the presumption, the blind, hatred, the ipocrisia, the lie, duplicity. He poses the most serious obstacle to the achievement of good, of virtue, of God, obstacle that is not of the flesh but of the spirit or, as Christ says, not come from outside, but from the inside, from the heart, by the will.
He aims to make murky and false intelligence, unfair, double and the poor will. The sin of Satan was obviously a spiritual sin, since he is pure spirit, and for this the spiritual sins can be called "evil". These sins contaminate primarily the intellect and the will, thought and action, which are the powers proper to the spirit.
a poster advertising the “creative thinking”
The first sin spiritual, the starting point of perdition, therefore, concern the thought: what St. Paul calls "diabolical doctrine". It consists in instigating the lie into the advocacy of lying about the most important values, which are those that concern the salvation, then the falsification of the Word of God, of the truth of faith, of the doctrine of the Church.
In the sin of thought obviously plays a willingness, since every sin leads to ill will. But then the diabolical sin also concerns those acts that relate to the specific commitment of the will, in other words exactly sins or action related to the operation, the practical implementation of the diabolical thought, and here we have all of the most serious acts of violence, of cruelty, of sacrilege, dell'incredulità, of the desperation, of injustice, the theft, dell'assassinio, dell'aborto, the sadomasochismo, of contention, of defamation, of denigration, of disobedience, of sedition, of the massacre, terrorism.
The wolf and the lamb …
The evil man can be moderated, often, tempering, measured, controlled, gentile, good manners, courteous, easy going, beneducated, sympathetic, Allegro, psychically normal, cultured, from fine stretch, apparently pious and serene;indeed the devil preferably choose these alien people from the excesses of emotional, by outbursts of anger, by uncontrolled impulses, people who do not seem suspicious, maybe in high places, prelates, theologians or religious, and are therefore subject to estimation and respect, to make them instruments of his action when he wants to do really serious damage to the souls and long-term: This is especially the heretics, whose malignant influence is able to last for centuries.
These are the authors of what St. Paul calls "doctrines of devils"[CF. The Tm 4,2]. The evil person can put on an appearance noble, may seem like a very spiritual person, a profondo teoreta, an inspired prophet, un Wall ente, a mystic, Giacchè, as St. Paul says, "Satan disguises himself as an angel of light" [CF. II Cor 11,14].
Satan knows to some extent simulate even the sanctity, although the trained eye can easily recognize counterfeits and frauds, for Satan since he is a business after all too difficult. Hence the proverb: "The devil is, but not the covers ". The fiction evil can not last long.
Artistic representation of the Holy Spirit
It falls just who wants us fall.Ordinarily, the devil does not aim so high, because few love holiness, and he wants to conquer the highest possible number of fools and blockheads. For this ordinarily lies beneath the features and style of successful people that draw the crowds, false philosophers, theologasters, sophists and clever impostors, reformers of the Church and society, genes of thought and science, seducers, political leaders, spiritists, Hypnotists, atMarket, Withthose, poets and maghi.
But we mention Paul's expression in its context,which is very interesting: "The Spirit expressly says that in latter times some shall depart from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, lies in hypocrisy impostors, already seared in their own conscience ".
First, the reference to the Holy Spirit, that is the Spirit of truth,used to give certainty of this statement. The "last days" or "fullness of time" in the language of the Bible represent the apocalyptic times, ie those conclusive and decisive, the most highly dramatic, the history of salvation, the timing of the final battle. Recall the apostasy of which the Apostle speaks [Ii Ts 2,3]. Primarily concern the future, but can also affect the present, as early as this will decide our salvation, it builds our salvation.
The same coming of Christ,according to the Gospel, inaugurated the "last times" foretold by the prophets, yes the last in chronological order, but especially intensive: times more full of meaning, time solving, also called "end times", end of this world of sin and the beginning of the new world of justice, time of the final battle of the forces of good against those of evil.
Dr.. Enzo Bianchi and Prof. Alberto Melloni (Public photos can be found on any search engine on the internet)
In this final struggle emerging doctrines most dangerous, which are precisely the "doctrines of devils". They must be exposed and refuted with the same power of the Spirit, which reveals the appearance and the danger. It is the Holy Spirit, Spirit of truth, accompanied by prayer, that discovers and banishes the unclean spirit, the spirit of falsehood.
These doctrines are aimed above all the destruction or falsification of faith– – heresy, by that faith which is the beginning of salvation. The devil tries to suppress the Christian life to the root, turning off the light of faith with doctrines who make it appear false, odious, irrational, degrading, inhuman, intolerant, illiberal, exceeded, enslaving and many other deceptions such.
Iconography of the Apostle Paul with book and sword
St. Paul is very strict in judging these "seducing spirits" who spread heresy.Indeed, declares that they are "seared into their consciousness"; therefore are not in good faith, which, however, can happen when one defends heresy without knowing that it is a heresy. In this case, since the time of St. Augustine the Church speaks of heresy "material", who is not guilty, since the subject exchanges involuntaryously the error to the truth, and the truth for error.
Instead heresy veritable, this "Formale", there is real guilt, the fact that the heretic knows that his idea is heretical and everything defends presenting it as Catholic truth, or simply excluding it as if it were contrary to Catholic truth. It is a grave fault, well described by the Apostle with the expression "seared into their consciousness", as if to signify the fire of hell in this life begins to haunt the heretics.
Certainly it is not always easy in practice to distinguish the formal heretic from the material,but it is very important, though very different is the behavior that must be taken in the two cases. However there are signs that indirectly but with certainty allow us to distinguish and then to adopt the appropriate behavior that is necessary in the two cases.
The essential difference between the two types of heretic is given by the presence of certain characteristics moral:the formal heretic is superb, conceited, unfair, arrogant, obstinate, ambitious, vindictive, cruel, scornful and mocking towards opponents, an implacable hater of those who dare to criticize or rebuke, smart guardian of his image or his look, so as to obtain the highest possible reputation in the world, committed to seek ways and to form disciples and collaborators who support him in his unholy activities.
The heretic is the subject of fanatical admiration from the followers,that place it above any other authority, is almost a god. A classic example is Luther, though of course we should recognize in him some quality, as his "deep religiosity", as he said Blessed John Paul II.
Conversely the heretic simply material is actually orthodox and can also be a holy. You can not not even properly say heretic, but it is only one person who errs. Simply does not realize his mistake, and if they become aware, would reject decisively, but God can allow for a long time and maybe even for life not noticing. It is therefore not guilty of ignorance, so-called "invincible", or caused by insufficient training received or the inherent limitations of his intelligence or misinterpretations or misunderstandings insurmountable maybe related to the environment, language or character flaws or his psyche.
Blessed Antonio Rosmini, a life of holiness. Have fallen into the error of doctrine involuntary, not at all precluded the recognition of the heroic virtues.
The heretic material, we might even say heretical pseudo-,errs only in certain points within a system of thought essentially orthodox and indeed from this point of view can be of great value and do very well to the culture and the Church. It can even be a mystic and a master of holiness. It is faithful to the Church, conscientious, concerned about orthodoxy, enemy of heretics, humblee, pious, prudent, Modesto, disinterested, magnanimous, charitable, generous, ready to correct himself when he realizes the error, gentle and patient with opponents, who may mistreat him, not attached to his ideas, not worried about a worldly fame, but to please God unsoloed, not closed in his ideas, but always ready to learn. Famous example is the Blessed Antonio Rosmini.
As stated in the passage from St. Paul, Satan is the major contributor of Hypocrisy.How often Jesus throws accusations of hypocrisy! And against whom? Against the tax, prostitutes and sinners? No; against priests, Scribes and Pharisees! What a lesson for us priests, for us religious, Rated to perfection and the guide of souls! So between us that the devil is the most suitable soil to sow his doctrines!
peacock's tail, emblem della vanity
The first thing to do in life- And this is especially true for those who are called to insegnare theology or the truths of faith, and to lead souls to salvation - is to act in good conscience before God, detached from human glory, seek God first and at all costs: if men approve, well, and names willthey try, patience. It is therefore necessary to avoid human glory and not be a slave to other people's opinion. Instead the Heretic first seeks himself and the favor of men; God and religion are just a means for him to succeed in the world and to get a fleeting glory that opens to him and to his disciples on the road to perdition.
Bologna, 16 May 2013
Click below to listen to a song popular tradition Marian
HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/cavalcoli56.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1150150Father GiovanniHTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.pngFather Giovanni2014-10-19 21:22:092021-04-21 00:59:56The issue of “Doctrines of devils”
I had a half-sister after my father got married for the second time. download porn My new sister is a slacker watch porn He neither goes to school nor studies. sex story He skips school every chance he gets free porn That's why his family members are so angry at him brazzers porn Today, while there was no one at home, I thought I would do some exercise in the garden. sex stories Luckily I saw my sister, she didn't go to school and was hiding in her room. rokettube I shouted at him and forced him to go to school turkish porn When I left home, I started exercising in the garden. porno Shortly after, I received a notification on my phone that the alarm at home was disabled. incest stories He persuaded me to have sex by standing in front of me naked and with his provocative speeches..
Manage consent
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
![95-Thesis-de-Luther [1024x768]](https://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/95-Tesis-de-Lutero-1024x768.jpg?ssl=1)
