EDIZIONI L'ISOLA DI PATMOS
  • Home
  • Log in
    • Sign up
    • Profile
    • Go out
  • Shop
    • Books for sale
    • How to publish with our editions
  • Item categories
    • Actuality
    • Theologica
    • Pastoral Care
    • Liturgical pastoral care
    • Homiletics
    • Catechesis
    • Theology and canon law
    • Briefs of the Fathers
  • Video
  • Who we are
  • Drafting
  • Contact us
  • Editions and Magazine
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Le prostitute vi passano avanti nel regno di Dio ― Prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God before you ― Prostitutes go ahead of you in the kingdom of God

26 September 2026/in Homiletics/by Hermit Monk

Homiletics of the Fathers of The Island of Patmos

Italian, English, Español

 

PROSTITUTES PASS AHEAD OF YOU INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD

«John in fact came to you on the path of justice, and you didn't believe him; the tax collectors and the prostitutes believed him instead. Butter, on the contrary, you have seen these things, but then you didn't even repent enough to believe him"

.

AutoreMonaco Hermitage

Author
Hermit Monk

 

.

PDF print format article – article print format – article in printed format

.

In the chapter 21 of his Gospel Matthew shows how the confrontation between Jesus and the Jewish authorities becomes increasingly tense and embittered.

The Venerable Father Oreste Benzi, the angel of prostitutes

In particular, after a discussion with the chief priests and the elders of the people on his authority (Mt 21,23-27), Jesus speaks three parables all focused on rejection, by the leaders of Israel, of the offer of salvation. Here is the song for this XXVI Sunday in Ordinary Time:

 

"During that time, Jesus said to the chief priests and the elders of the people: “What do you think? A man had two sons. He turned to the first and said: 'Son, go and work in the vineyard today. And he answered: "I don't want to". But then he repented and went there. He turned to the second and said the same. And he answered: "Yup, Gentleman". But he didn't go. Which of the two fulfilled the will of the father?». They replied: «The first». And Jesus said to them,: "Truly I say to you: the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God. For John came to you on the path of righteousness, and you didn't believe him; the tax collectors and the prostitutes believed him instead. Butter, on the contrary, you have seen these things, but then you didn't even repent enough to believe him" (Mt 21,28-32).

This parable had a particular textual transmission. Some important witnesses of the text, like the Vatican Code (B), they reverse the order of the children, so he becomes the second son to respond to his father that he doesn't want to go, only to then go to the vineyard. It could be due to an ideological reason centered on a certain vision of the history of salvation: the first child, who says to go but then doesn't carry out his intention, it would have already been identified by some Christian copyists with the Jews, while the pagans would be represented by the son who says he doesn't want to go, but then he will go to work. And since this logic was not supported by the order in which the protagonists are presented, the order would have been reversed. On the level of textual criticism, the order currently present in the critical text is to be preferred, although some doubts remain.

The parabolic story in San Matteo it is the second to be set in a vineyard (the first is found in Mt 19,30–20,16), and it is part of the material of the first evangelist, therefore it has no parallels with Mark or Luke. Consisting of only three verses, it is framed by two questions that attract the interlocutor's attention - v. 28: «What do you think?», which is a classical rabbinical formula; and the v. 31: “Who of the two” — and is followed by his explanation that takes up the question again, left pending at v. 27, on the authority of Jesus and the baptism of John.

The interpretations of our song they have multiplied over time and vary depending on the author. For some Fathers of the Church, the son who will not go to work in the vineyard is unquestionably Israel. This reading conveyed that theology of "substitution", also called "supersessionism", according to which - as a consequence of the fact that all the Jews would have rejected Jesus - there would no longer be any role for the people of the alliance in the history of salvation, who would therefore be assumed by the Church. This theology is not sustainable since it would be enough to reread, per convincersene, chapters 9–11 of Paul's letter to the Romans.

But those to whom Jesus addresses in the text, that is, those who investigate his authority, they are not "all" Israel, but only some of the leaders of that people, as is specified just before the parable (cf.. Mt 21,23), and as the evangelist will say shortly afterwards (cf.. Mt 21,45). It is to these that Jesus is speaking and only to these will he say a little further on: “The kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a people who will produce its fruits” (Mt 21,43). This alternative interpretation can be based on literary reasons, but also on the fact that the identification of the son who refuses to go into the vineyard with Israel is not universal: for other Fathers, such as Saint Hilary of Poitiers, these would be only a part of the Jewish people: the Pharisees or those who allowed themselves to be influenced by them.

More than the problem of identification, that is, who Jesus is talking about, upon closer inspection, the parable seems to be centered above all on another question: the one concerning the classic relationship in the biblical and Jewish tradition between saying and doing. Carry out the will of the Father, for Jesus, it is not simply a question of words, but rather facts, as emerges in the Sermon on the Mount: «Not just anyone says to me «Lord, Lord" will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father in heaven" (Mt 7,21). The religious leaders addressed in the parable, who believe they can serve God by remaining faithful to the Torah, in fact they do not obey him.

For this Jesus rebukes them of not having listened to the message of John the Baptist who came on the path of observance of "justice" (Mt 21,32), while paradoxically those who were normally considered incapable of following God's commands listened to it and put it into practice, i.e. tax collectors and prostitutes. These are the children who actually go to work in the vineyard and will enter the kingdom first. They are the ones who repent (cf.. Mt 21,29.32) and knowing that they need divine grace they will open themselves to it and receive it. From this point of view, that is, by correlation between words and facts, the parable is very close to the concreteness of the Letter of James, especially when he insists on the contradiction between having faith but not works (cf.. GC 2,14-17).

At the conclusion of the parable, this expression - "the way of justice" - with which the story ends could refer both to the history of salvation in which the Baptist is also included as the precursor of Jesus, or the right behavior, in accordance with the will of God, that characterized Giovanni's life. The concept of justice, as Matthew has already made clear in the Sermon on the Mount, it takes on a specific meaning and, rather, it almost becomes a guiding concept. Matteo, indeed, will describe Jesus during the passion - (cf.. Mt 27,19, the words of Pilate's wife: «Don't have anything to do with that righteous man») — the same way the Baptist is defined. Since the beginning of the Gospel, justice has been the program that Jesus decided to fulfill and which was expressed in his first words, pronounced right in front of Giovanni (cf.. Mt 3,15: «Leave it for now, because it is fitting that we fulfill all righteousness"). For Matteo, so, It is above all important to carry out and practice justice (cf.. Mt 6,1), as the son in the parable who puts his father's will into practice shows himself to do.

From this parable the Christian learns that obedience to the word and will of God could also involve denying his own word and will. Faith, indeed, he does not ask us not to make mistakes and not to sin, but to recognize the error and confess the sin. In that son's change of mind we glimpse his internal dialogue together with his awareness of reality; there is the audacity to look oneself in the face, to dare to see each other in truth, with a view to acting responsibly. In this sense, far from being a sign of weakness, repentance is a sign of courage and strength. As rare and unpopular as it is, also in the Church, the gesture of someone who recognizes having made a mistake, of those who admit having taken positions that have proven to be not in conformity with the Gospel and change their position trying to be more faithful to the Gospel, it is a sign of human and spiritual greatness.

From the Hermitage, 26 September 2026

.

PROSTITUTES ARE ENTERING THE KINGDOM OF GOD BEFORE YOU

«When John came to you in the way of righteousness, you did not believe him; but tax collectors and prostitutes did. Yet even when you saw that, you did not later change your minds and believe him»

.

AutoreMonaco Hermitage

Author
Hermit Monk

.

In chapter 21 of his Gospel, Matthew shows how the confrontation between Jesus and the Jewish authorities grows ever more pointed and bitter. In particular, after a dispute with the chief priests and the elders of the people over his authority (Mt 21:23–27), Jesus speaks three parables, all centred on the refusal, on the part of the leaders of Israel, of the offer of salvation. Here is the passage for this Twenty-Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time:

«At that time, Jesus said to the chief priests and elders of the people: “What is your opinion? A man had two sons. He came to the first and said, ‘Son, go out and work in the vineyard today.’ He said in reply, ‘I will not,’ but afterwards he changed his mind and went. The man came to the other son and gave the same order. He said in reply, ‘Yes, sir,’ but did not go. Which of the two did his father’s will?” They answered, “The first.” Jesus said to them, “Amen, I say to you, tax collectors and prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God before you. When John came to you in the way of righteousness, you did not believe him; but tax collectors and prostitutes did. Yet even when you saw that, you did not later change your minds and believe him» (Mt 21:28–32).

This parable has had a distinctive textual history. Some important witnesses to the text, such as Codex Vaticanus (B), reverse the order of the sons, so that it becomes the second son who answers the father that he will not go, only to go to the vineyard after all. This may be due to an ideological reason bound up with a particular reading of the history of salvation: the first son, who says he will go but then fails to act on his word, would already have been identified by some Christian copyists with the Jews, while the pagans would be represented by the son who says he will not go, but then goes to work. And since this logic was not, however, supported by the order in which the two figures are presented, the order would have been reversed. On the level of textual criticism, the order currently found in the critical text is to be preferred, even if some doubt remains.

The parabolic account in Saint Matthew is the second to be set in a vineyard (the first is found in Mt 19:30–20:16), and belongs to material proper to the first evangelist, and therefore has no parallels in Mark or Luke. Composed of only three verses, it is framed by two questions that draw the listener’s attention — v. 28: “What is your opinion?”, a classic rabbinic formula; and v. 31: “Which of the two” — and is followed by an explanation of his own that takes up the question, left open at v. 27, concerning the authority of Jesus and the baptism of John.

Interpretations of our passage have multiplied over time and vary according to the author. For some Fathers of the Church, the son who will not go to work in the vineyard is unquestionably Israel. This reading has carried within it that theology of “replacement”, also called “supersessionism”, according to which — as a consequence of the claim that all the Jews rejected Jesus — the people of the covenant would no longer have any role in the history of salvation, a role that the Church would then take up in their place. Such a theology is not sustainable, since it would suffice to reread, to be convinced of this, chapters 9–11 of Paul’s Letter to the Romans.

But those to whom Jesus is speaking in the text, those, that is, who are questioning his authority, are not “all” Israel, but only some of the leaders of that people, as is specified shortly before the parable (cf. Mt 21:23), and as the evangelist will say shortly afterward (cf. Mt 21:45). It is to these that Jesus is speaking, and only to these that he will say a little further on: “the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit” (Mt 21:43). This alternative interpretation can be grounded in reasons of a literary kind, but also in the fact that the identification of the son who refuses to go into the vineyard with Israel is not universal: for other Fathers, such as, for example, Saint Hilary of Poitiers, these would be only a part of the Jewish people: the Pharisees, or those who let themselves be influenced by them.

More than the problem of identification — that is, of whom Jesus is speaking to — on closer inspection the parable seems to be centred above all on another question: that concerning the classic relationship, in the biblical and Jewish tradition, between saying and doing. To do the will of the Father, for Jesus, is not simply a matter of words, but rather of deeds, as emerges in the Sermon on the Mount: “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven” (Mt 7:21). The religious leaders to whom the parable is addressed, who believe they can serve God while remaining faithful to the Torah, do not in fact obey him.

For this reason Jesus reproaches them for not having listened to the message of John the Baptist, who came in observance of “the way of righteousness” (Mt 21:32), while paradoxically it was heeded and put into practice by those who were normally considered incapable of following the commandments of God — namely, tax collectors and prostitutes. These are the sons who by their deeds go to work in the vineyard and will enter the Kingdom first. They are those who repent (cf. Mt 21:29,32) and, knowing that they need God’s grace, open themselves to it and receive it. From this point of view — that is, by correlation between words and deeds — the parable comes very close to the concreteness of the Letter of James, especially where it insists on the contradiction between having faith but not works (cf. Jas 2:14–17).

At the conclusion of the parable, this expression — “the way of righteousness” — with which the account closes could refer either to the history of salvation, into which the Baptist too is inserted as forerunner of Jesus, or to righteous conduct, in keeping with the will of God, which marked the life of John. The concept of righteousness, as Matthew has already made clear in the Sermon on the Mount, takes on a specific meaning and, indeed, becomes almost a guiding concept. Matthew, in fact, will describe Jesus during the passion — (cf. Mt 27:19, the words of Pilate’s wife: “Have nothing to do with that righteous man”) — in the same way that the Baptist is described. Righteousness is, from the very beginning of the Gospel, the programme that Jesus has resolved to carry out, and which was expressed in his very first words, spoken precisely in the presence of John (cf. Mt 3:15: “Allow it now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness”). For Matthew, then, it is above all important to do and practise righteousness (cf. Mt 6:1), as the son of the parable shows in putting his father’s will into practice.

From this parable the Christian learns that obedience to the word and the will of God may pass even through the disavowal of one’s own word and one’s own will. Faith, in fact, does not ask us never to err and never to sin, but to acknowledge our error and confess our sin. In that change of heart on the son’s part one glimpses his interior dialogue, together with his coming to terms with reality; there is the audacity of looking oneself in the face, of daring to see oneself in truth, with a view to acting responsibly. In this sense, far from being a sign of weakness, repentance is a sign of courage and strength. However rare and unpopular it may be, even within the Church, the gesture of one who acknowledges having erred, who admits to having taken positions that have proven not fully in keeping with the Gospel, and who changes his position in seeking to be more faithful to the Gospel, is a sign of human and spiritual greatness.

From the Hermitage, 26 September 2026

.

PROSTITUTES GO AHEAD OF YOU IN THE KINGDOM OF GOD

"For John came to you, teaching you the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him."; instead, The publicans and prostitutes believed him.. Y, even after seeing this, "You did not repent nor believe him."

.

AutoreMonaco Hermitage

Author
Hermit Monk

.

In the chapter 21 of his Gospel, Mateo shows how the confrontation between Jesus and the Jewish authorities becomes increasingly tense and sharpens. In particular, after a discussion with the chief priests and elders of the people about his authority (Mt 21,23-27), Jesus speaks three parables, all focused on rejection, by the leaders of Israel, of the offer of salvation. Here is the passage from this XXVI Sunday in Ordinary Time:

«At that time, Jesus said to the chief priests and the elders of the people: What do you think? A man had two children. He approached the first one and said: 'Son, go to work in the vineyard today'. He answered her: 'I don't want to'. But later he repented and went. He approached the second and said the same thing.. He answered her: ‘Voy, señor’. But it wasn't. Which of the two fulfilled his father's will??’. They answered: 'The first'. Jesus told them: 'Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are ahead of you in the kingdom of God.. Because John came to you teaching you the way of righteousness and you did not believe him.; instead, The publicans and prostitutes believed him.. Y, even after seeing this, "You did not repent nor believe him." (Mt 21,28-32).

This parable has had a particular textual transmission. Some important witnesses of the text, like the Codex Vaticanus (B), they reverse the order of the children, so it becomes the second son who responds to the father that he will not go, for later, however, head to the vineyard. This could be due to an ideological reason focused on a certain vision of salvation history.: the first son, who says he will go but then does not put his purpose into practice, would have already been identified by some Christian copyists with the Jews, while the pagans would be represented by the son who says he does not want to go, but then he goes to work. And since this logic was not, however, supported by the order in which the two protagonists are presented, the order would have been reversed. At the level of textual criticism, the order currently present in the critical text is preferable., although some doubt remains.

The parabolic story in San Mateo It is the second to be set in a vineyard (the first is found in Mt 19,30-20,16), and is part of the material of the first evangelist, so it has no parallels in Mark or Luke. Composed of only three verses, is framed by two questions that demand the attention of the interlocutor — v. 28: «What do you think?», which is a classic rabbinic formula; and the v. 31: "Which of the two?» — and is followed by an own explanation that takes up the question, left in suspense in the v. 27, on the authority of Jesus and the baptism of John.

Interpretations of our passage They have multiplied over time and vary depending on the author.. For some Church Fathers, the son who will not go to work in the vineyard is, no discussion, Israel. This reading has conveyed that theology of "substitution", Also called "supersessionism", according to which — as a consequence of the fact that all the Jews had rejected Jesus — there would no longer be any role for the people of the covenant in the history of salvation, role that the Church would then assume in its place. Such theology is not sustainable, Well, it would be enough to reread, to convince yourself of it, the chapters 9-11 from Paul's letter to the Romans.

But those to whom Jesus addresses in the text, that is to say, those who inquire about his authority, They are not "all" Israel, but only some of the leaders of that town, as specified shortly before the parable (cf. Mt 21,23), and as the evangelist will say shortly after (cf. Mt 21,45). It is to these that Jesus addresses, and only to these he will tell a little later: "the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a people who will produce its fruits" (Mt 21,43). This alternative interpretation may be based on literary reasons., but also in the fact that the identification of the son who refuses to go to the vineyard with Israel is not universal: for other parents, as, For example, Saint Hilary of Poitiers, These would be only a part of the Jewish people: the pharisees, or those who were influenced by them.

More than the problem of identification, that is to say, Who Jesus is Addressing, Looking closely, the parable seems to focus above all on another issue.: the one referring to the classical relationship, in biblical and Jewish tradition, between saying and doing. Fulfill the will of the Father, for Jesus, It's not just a matter of words, but rather facts, as can be seen from the Mountain Speech: «Not everyone who says to me 'Lord, Lord" will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." (Mt 7,21). The religious leaders to whom the parable is addressed, who believe they can serve God by remaining faithful to the Torah, In fact they do not obey him.

That is why Jesus reproaches them not having heard the message of John the Baptist, come down the path of observance "of justice" (Mt 21,32), while, paradoxically, It was heard and put into practice by those normally considered incapable of following God's commandments., that is to say, publicans and prostitutes. These are the children who, with their deeds, will work in the vineyard and will enter the Kingdom first.. They are the ones who regret (cf. Mt 21,29.32) and, knowing that they need divine grace, they open to it and receive it. From this point of view, that is to say, by the correlation between words and deeds, The parable is very close to the concretion of the Letter of James, especially when he insists on the contradiction between having faith but not works (cf. St 2,14-17).

At the conclusion of the parable, This expression — “the path of justice” — with which the story closes could refer both to the history of salvation, in which the Baptist is also inserted as a precursor of Jesus, as to just conduct, according to the will of God, that characterized the life of Juan. The concept of justice, as Matthew has already implied in the Discourse on the Mount, acquires a specific meaning and, even more, becomes almost a guiding concept. Mateo, indeed, will describe Jesus during the passion — (cf. Mt 27,19, the words of Pilate's wife: «Don't have anything to do with that righteous man») — in the same way that the Baptist is defined. Justice is, from the very beginning of the Gospel, the program that Jesus has decided to fulfill, and that was expressed in his first words, pronounced precisely before Juan (cf. Mt 3,15: «Leave it now. It is appropriate that in this way we fulfill all justice."). For Matthew, therefore, It is important above all to comply and practice justice (cf. Mt 6,1), as the son in the parable shows by putting the father's will into practice.

From this parable The Christian learns that obedience to the word and will of God can even involve going back on one's own word and will.. faith, indeed, does not ask us not to make mistakes and not to sin, but to recognize the error and confess the sin. In the son's change of mind, his inner dialogue is glimpsed., along with awareness of reality; there is in it the audacity to look oneself in the face, to dare to see oneself truly, with a view to responsible acting. In this sense, far from being a sign of weakness, repentance is a sign of courage and strength. However rare and unpopular it may be, even in the Church, the gesture of someone who admits having made a mistake, of those who admit to having assumed positions that have been revealed to be little in accordance with the Gospel and change their positions seeking to be more faithful to the Gospel, It is a sign of human and spiritual greatness.

From the Hermitage, 26 September of 2026

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/monaco-eremita-piccolo-.jpg?fit=150,150&ssl=1 150 150 Hermit Monk HTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.png Hermit Monk2026-09-26 16:49:122026-09-27 22:16:20Le prostitute vi passano avanti nel regno di Dio ― Prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God before you ― Prostitutes go ahead of you in the kingdom of God

The symbolic language of the liturgy – The symbolic language of the liturgy

26 September 2026/in Actuality/by Father Simone

Italian, english, español

 

THE SYMBOLIC LANGUAGE OF THE LITURGY

Standing or kneeling during liturgical prayer is anything but indifferent. Every gesture somehow falls within that dimension of announcement and instruction which is an integral part of the liturgical action and therefore cannot be left to the temporary taste of each individual.

— Liturgical ministry —

.

AuthorSimone Pifizzi

Author
Simone Pifizzi

.

PDF print format article – article print format – article in printed format

.

The liturgy is undoubtedly an announcement of salvation, but above all concrete communication of this salvation, which is expressed through gestures and attitudes. Consequently the liturgy does not only use words, but also of symbolic language; he uses signs that evoke the mystery and already give a foretaste of it, as many prayers after communion recall.

Jean François Millet, L'Angelus

When preparing a liturgical celebration we cannot forget this fundamental dimension at all, otherwise we risk overestimating the secondary and forgetting the essential; to have a beautiful, spectacular "ceremony"., which pleases the eye, but which leaves the heart empty; you risk saying a lot of words, but not to communicate anything at all.

FROM WALKING TOGETHER TO THE LITURGICAL PROCESSION

When it comes to procession, thoughts immediately turn to those public processions with images or statues of the Virgin Mary or the Saints. Processions that do not always constitute a clear and correct symbol of the Christian mystery, above all because heavy folkloric elements often intervene in them; and I say folkloric when things, after all, they're fine.

Every procession, even those that are done in church during Mass (entrance, presentation of gifts, Communion, etc.), has the aim of expressing the path of the Church, of the new people of God, towards the new temple and the new Jerusalem (cf.. AP 21,2), following in the footsteps of Christ.

The reference we can make, thinking about the procession, is at the Exodus: the event that saw the twelve tribes of Israel united on the same path. A journey guided by Moses and which brings together an entire people in its widest variety. A path that, according to the Bible, it has a fundamentally cultic purpose: God summons his people to worship him (cf.. Is 5,3). A journey that is undertaken in the name of union and which has a destination beyond the Red Sea, beyond the Jordan, beyond the waters of death. A path that is continually comforted by the real and mysterious presence of the Lord, who speaks to his people and gives them the law of life.

The procession is meant to remind us of this: we are Christians if we are on a journey; and we are not alone in making this journey, but we do it together with other brothers, supported and accompanied by the presence of the Risen One, as they summarize well, in sequence, the extraordinary images of the story of the disciples walking with Jesus towards Emmaus (cf.. LC 24,13-35).

STANDING AND KNEELING

Standing or kneeling during liturgical prayer he is anything but indifferent. Every gesture somehow falls within that dimension of announcement and instruction which is an integral part of the liturgical action and therefore cannot be left to the temporary taste of each individual. The attitudes to be assumed during the liturgical celebration are neither casual nor aimed at efficiency or external order. That is, they do not serve to change position to avoid boredom and tiredness, nor to make the ceremony more pleasing to the eye. I'm, rather, true symbolic actions. Among these, standing is undoubtedly one of the most important and significant.

Standing because children of God resurrected with Christ. The iconography of the catacombs always presents us with the figure of the standing person praying. Furthermore, it is symptomatic that the priest at the altar, since the beginning, say all presidential prayers standing. It is then very significant that in the ancient Church, according to many authoritative testimonies, it was even forbidden to kneel on Sunday and during the fifty days of Easter.

Standing it is therefore the normal attitude of the Christian who, even if a sinner, he is aware of his dignity as a child of God, received from that Jesus who died and rose again for the salvation of all.

In liturgical prayer the Church wants to make this announcement. In private, then, everyone can take the attitude they want. The conciliar reform therefore did not "secularize" the liturgy, but he gave it back its symbolic charge and also its function as an announcement to the world.

Standing waiting for the Lord to come. Standing in liturgical prayer also has a further meaning, always linked to the announcement of the Paschal mystery. That is, it is the eschatological announcement, of Christian life as the expectation of the final coming of Christ. Jesus himself invites his disciples to be like those servants who stand, with the belt around his hips and the lamps lit, they await their master when he returns from the wedding to open the door immediately as soon as he arrives and knocks (cf.. LC 12,35).

With this awareness it is beautiful and moving to pray standing. How beautiful and moving it is to walk together and on our feet to welcome the Body of Christ, true manna and bread come down from heaven, to support our journey towards eternity, towards those new heavens and that new earth. There are those who with Christ have conquered sin, standing, they sing the song of Moses and the song of the Lamb eternally before God (cf.. AP 15,2-3).

On your knees yes, but to get up again. Kneeling is also a significant attitude, which however finds its origin and space above all in private prayer. In fact, it expresses awareness of one's poverty, of one's sin. For this reason the attitude of kneeling entered the liturgy very slowly and with a certain parsimony, hand in hand with the spread of penitential rites, linked above all to the celebration of public penance. Liturgical attitudes that give space to kneeling are rare; moments that appropriately express the humble adoration and supplication of a whole people who feel crushed not so much by their own sin but rather by the infinite love of God. The General Instruction of the Roman Missal provides:

«They then kneel at the consecration, unless the state of health prevents it, the narrowness of the place, or the large number of those present, or other reasonable grounds. Those who do not kneel at the consecration, make a deep bow while the priest genuflects after the consecration" (n. 43).

In fact, one kneels not before the memory of a past event, but before the death and resurrection of the Lord who in that moment becomes truly present on the altar: and it is precisely because that death is already victorious, it's already Easter, that the knee bent before it is never the last word. But precisely thanks to this great love, man can and must get up to walk quickly towards that nuptial encounter which will make us fully participants in that divine life that is already within us and gives us the honor of standing before God as children.. Precisely for this reason in front of the tabernacle, in front of the maximum sign of that love that paid for our dignity, in private prayer of adoration, the normal attitude that comes naturally to us is to prostrate ourselves on our knees.

SIT TO LISTEN

Before the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council, sitting in Church was a simple functional attitude for the assembly; for the various ministers, sometimes, it was even regulated by meticulous choreographic details: body erect, hands on knees, feet together, hat on his head, various bows… Today, thanks to the reform of the Council which brought the liturgy back to its original sobriety, even sitting has returned to having a predominant symbolic function. In fact, nothing in the liturgy must be simply functional or worse, choreographic and ceremonial. For this reason it is important to know the meaning of these gestures in order to accept them and carry them out with the joy and enthusiasm of those who are aware of becoming in some way, with his person, sacramental instrument of announcement for the world.

Sign of listening. Within a liturgical celebration, sitting takes on precise meanings, out of any ambiguity and for this reason this attitude is not left to the individual taste of the moment. First of all, sitting is a sign of confidential interior listening, respectful and meditative. A listening experience that therefore matures deep feelings and courageous decisions. It is certainly no coincidence that even in human relationships when one wants to truly give space to listening to the other, we sit opposite each other. The norms of the Roman Missal remind us: «The prayer is over (collection) the reader goes to the ambo and proclaims the reading; everyone listens to it sitting down" (PNMR, 89). The rule is clear: it doesn't say that everyone reads for themselves. Because of this, while recognizing the positive services rendered by the "Mass leaflets", it is always legitimate and necessary to ask ourselves whether the price being paid is not too high. If in fact everyone or almost everyone reads on their own, the symbolic attitude that lies at the origin of sitting is nullified!

A Word that is addressed to a united people. But this attitude of listening described above is so important? It would not be enough for everyone to read the Word carefully on their own and try to put it into practice? A big temptation of which we are victims is that of being extremely insensitive to the liturgical dimension and of evaluating things only from an individual and moral efficiency perspective.. In doing so, however, we forget that Sacred Scripture is not primarily a book of meditation, but a word that God addresses to his people, a Word that aims above all to make the Church: «The people of God are gathered first and foremost through the Word of the living God» (Priesthood, n. 4).

The attitude of those who are seated and attentive to what is proclaimed therefore reveals the primary function of the Word of God which is to establish a dialogue of love not so much with individuals, but rather with the entire people of God, with the entire assembly considered as a single entity, in which the whole Church is visibly represented and truly present.

Here then is the ultimate meaning of every gesture described here: walk, stand, kneel, sit are not a script to be performed nor an ornament that veils otherwise poor words. The body of the assembly, in its moving and its stopping, it does not simply describe the faith of the Church: he does it. For this reason, no liturgical gesture can be left to chance or to the taste of the moment - because it is precisely through those gestures, even before through words, that the announced salvation becomes concretely present among his people.

From the island of Patmos, 26 September 2026

.

THE SYMBOLIC LANGUAGE OF THE LITURGY

Whether one stands or kneels, the posture assumed during liturgical prayer is anything but indifferent. Every gesture belongs, in some sense, to that dimension of proclamation and instruction which is integral to the liturgical action, and therefore it cannot be left to each person’s passing preference.

— Liturgical pastoral care —

.

AuthorSimone Pifizzi

Author
Simone Pifizzi

.

The liturgy is undoubtedly an announcement of salvation, but above all it is the concrete communication of that salvation, expressed through gestures and postures. The liturgy therefore does not rely on words alone, but also on symbolic language; it uses signs that evoke the mystery and already let us taste it in advance, as many post-communion prayers recall.

In preparing a liturgical celebration, this fundamental dimension can never be forgotten, or we risk overvaluing what is secondary and losing sight of what is essential — risk turning it into a beautiful, spectacular “ceremony” that pleases the eye but leaves the heart empty; risk saying a great many words while communicating nothing at all.

FROM WALKING TOGETHER TO THE LITURGICAL PROCESSION

When we speak of a procession, our thoughts turn at once to public processions carrying images or statues of the Virgin Mary or the Saints. Such processions do not always constitute a clear and correct symbol of the Christian mystery, not least because they are often burdened with heavy folkloric elements — and I say “folkloric” when, all things considered, matters have gone well.

Every procession, including those that take place inside the church during Mass (entrance, presentation of the gifts, communion, etc.), is meant to express the journey of the Church, the new People of God, toward the new temple and the new Jerusalem (cf. Rev 21:2), following in the footsteps of Christ.

The reference we can draw, thinking of the procession, is to the Exodus: the event that united the twelve tribes of Israel in a single journey. A journey led by Moses, gathering an entire people in all its breadth and variety. A journey which, according to the Bible, has a fundamentally cultic purpose: God summons his people so that they may worship him (cf. Ex 5:3). A journey accomplished in unity, with a destination beyond the Red Sea, beyond the Jordan, beyond the waters of death. A journey continually accompanied by the real and mysterious presence of the Lord, who speaks to his people and gives them the law of life.

The procession exists to remind us of this: we are Christians only if we are on the move; and this journey is not one we make alone, but together with our brothers and sisters, sustained and accompanied by the presence of the Risen One — as the extraordinary sequence of images in the story of the disciples walking with Jesus toward Emmaus so beautifully sums up (cf. Page 24:13-35).

STANDING AND KNEELING

Whether one stands or kneels, the posture assumed during liturgical prayer is anything but indifferent. Every gesture belongs, in some sense, to that dimension of proclamation and instruction which is integral to the liturgical action, and therefore it cannot be left to each person’s passing preference. The postures to be assumed during the liturgical celebration are neither arbitrary nor ordered toward mere efficiency or outward tidiness. They do not exist simply to change position out of boredom or fatigue, nor to make the ceremony more pleasing to the eye. They are, rather, true symbolic actions. Among these, standing is undoubtedly one of the most important and significant.

Standing, because we are children of God risen with Christ. The iconography of the catacombs always depicts the figure at prayer standing upright. It is likewise telling that, from the earliest times, the priest at the altar says all the presidential prayers standing. And it is deeply significant that, according to many authoritative witnesses, the early Church forbade kneeling altogether on Sundays and throughout the fifty days of Easter.

Standing, then, is the normal posture of the Christian who, sinner though he may be, is conscious of his dignity as a child of God, received from that same Jesus who died and rose again for the salvation of all. In liturgical prayer the Church wishes to make this proclamation. In private prayer, everyone is free to take whatever posture they wish. The conciliar reform, then, did not “secularize” the liturgy; rather, it restored to it its symbolic power and its function as proclamation to the world.

Standing, in expectation of the Lord who comes. Standing in liturgical prayer carries a further meaning as well, still tied to the proclamation of the paschal mystery: it is the eschatological announcement, Christian life as the expectation of Christ’s final coming. Jesus himself invites his disciples to be like those servants who, standing, with their belts fastened and their lamps lit, wait for their master to return from the wedding feast, ready to open the door the moment he arrives and knocks (cf. Page 12:35).

With this awareness, it is beautiful and moving to pray standing. Just as it is beautiful and moving to walk together, and standing, to receive the Body of Christ — true manna, bread come down from heaven, to sustain our journey toward eternity, toward those new heavens and that new earth. There, those who with Christ have conquered sin stand and sing forever before God the song of Moses and the song of the Lamb (cf. Rev 15:2-3).

Kneeling, yes — but in order to rise. Kneeling is likewise a significant posture, though it finds its origin and its place above all in private prayer. It expresses an awareness of one’s own poverty, one’s own sin. For this reason, kneeling entered the liturgy only very slowly and sparingly, in step with the spread of penitential rites, tied above all to the celebration of public penance. There are few liturgical moments that make room for kneeling — moments that fittingly express the humble adoration and supplication of a whole people who feel overwhelmed not so much by their own sin as by the infinite love of God. The General Instruction of the Roman Missal states:

“The faithful should kneel at the consecration, unless prevented by reasons of health, lack of space, the large number of people present, or some other good reason. Those who do not kneel ought to make a profound bow when the priest genuflects after the consecration” (no. 43).

We kneel, in fact, not before the memory of a past event, but before the death and resurrection of the Lord, who at that very moment becomes truly present on the altar: and it is precisely because that death is already victorious, is already Easter, that the knee bent before it is never the last word — so that the acclamation “We proclaim your Death, O Lord, and profess your Resurrection until you come again” might, implicitly, sound like standing before the Risen One, living and true. But it is precisely because of this immense love that man can and must rise again, to walk swiftly toward that nuptial encounter which will make us fully sharers in that divine life already within us, and which grants us the honor of standing before God as his children. It is for this same reason that before the tabernacle — before the supreme sign of that love which paid the price for our dignity — the posture that comes to us spontaneously in private adoration is to prostrate ourselves on our knees.

SITTING TO LISTEN

Before the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council, sitting in church was, for the assembly, largely a simple matter of practicality; for the various ministers, at times, it was even governed by meticulous choreographic detail: an upright body, hands on the knees, feet together, biretta on the head, various bows… Today, thanks to the Council’s reform, which restored to the liturgy its original sobriety, sitting too has recovered a predominantly symbolic function. Nothing in the liturgy, in fact, should be merely functional or, worse, choreographed and ceremonial. This is why it matters to understand the meaning of these gestures, so as to embrace and perform them with the joy and enthusiasm of one who knows that, through his own person, he becomes in some way a sacramental instrument of proclamation to the world.

A sign of listening. Within a liturgical celebration, sitting takes on precise meanings, free of any ambiguity, and for this reason the posture is not left to individual taste in the moment. First, sitting is a sign of confidential, interior, respectful and meditative listening — a listening that matures deep feelings and courageous decisions. It is surely no accident that, even in human relationships, when we truly wish to make room for listening to another, we sit down facing them.

The norms of the Roman Missal remind us: “When the prayer has ended, the reader goes to the ambo and proclaims the reading; all listen while seated” (GIRM, 89). The rule is clear: it does not say that everyone reads for themselves. For this reason, while acknowledging the real service rendered by the “Mass leaflet,” it remains right and necessary to ask whether the price we pay for it is not too high. For if everyone, or nearly everyone, reads on their own, the symbolic gesture at the root of sitting is emptied of its meaning.

A Word addressed to a people united. But is this attitude of listening really so important? Would it not be enough for each person to read the Word attentively on their own and strive to put it into practice? A great temptation to which we fall victim is that of being largely insensitive to the liturgical dimension, judging everything only in individual and moral-efficiency terms. In doing so, however, we forget that Sacred Scripture is not, first and foremost, a book for meditation, but a word that God addresses to his people — a Word whose primary aim is to build the Church: “The People of God is formed into one, in the first place, through the word of the living God” (Priesthood, no. 4).

The posture of those who sit attentively to what is proclaimed thus reveals the primary function of the Word of God: to establish a dialogue of love not so much with individuals as with the whole People of God — with the entire assembly considered as a single subject, in which the whole Church is visibly represented and truly present.

Here, then, is the ultimate meaning of every gesture described above: walking, standing, kneeling, sitting are not a script to be performed, nor an ornament veiling words that would otherwise be poor. The body of the assembly, in its moving and in its stillness, does not merely describe the Church’s faith: it enacts it. This is why no liturgical gesture can be left to chance or to the whim of the moment — because it is precisely through these gestures, even before words, that the salvation proclaimed becomes concretely present in the midst of God’s people.

From The Island of Patmos, 26 September 2026

.

THE SYMBOLIC LANGUAGE OF THE LITURGY

Standing or kneeling during liturgical prayer is not at all indifferent. Each gesture forms part, in some way, of that dimension of announcement and instruction that is an integral part of the liturgical action, and therefore it cannot be left to the momentary pleasure of each one.

— Liturgical Pastoral —

.

AuthorSimone Pifizzi

Author
Simone Pifizzi

.

The liturgy is undoubtedly an announcement of salvation, but above all concrete communication of that salvation, which is also expressed through gestures and attitudes. That is why the liturgy does not use only words, but also of symbolic language: uses signs that evoke mystery and that, somehow, They let us taste it beforehand, as many prayers after communion remember.

When preparing a liturgical celebration this fundamental dimension cannot be forgotten at all; Otherwise there is a risk of overvaluing the secondary and forgetting the essential.: to make a spectacular “ceremony”, that satisfies the eye but leaves the heart empty; There is a risk of saying many words without communicating anything at all..

FROM WALKING TOGETHER TO THE LITURGICAL PROCESSION

When talking about procession, The thought immediately runs to those public processions with images or statues of the Virgin Mary or the Saints. Processions that, in fact, they do not always constitute a clear and correct symbol of the Christian mystery, especially because heavy elements of folklore often intervene in them; and I say folkloric when things are going well.

All procession, including those done in church during Mass (Prohibited, presentation of gifts, communion, etc.), Its purpose is to express the path of the Church, of the new people of God, towards the new temple and the new Jerusalem (cf. AP 21,2), following in the footsteps of Christ.

The reference we can make, thinking about the procession, It's the Exodus: event that united the twelve tribes of Israel on the same path. A path guided by Moses that brings together an entire people in its widest variety. A path that, according to the bible, It has a fundamentally cultic purpose: God summons his people to worship him (cf. Ex 5,3). A path that is carried out under the sign of union and that has a goal beyond the Red Sea, beyond the Jordan, beyond the waters of death. A path continually comforted by the real and mysterious presence of the Lord, who speaks to his people and gives them the law of life.

The procession is intended to remind us of this: We are Christians if we are on the way; and we do not travel this path alone, but with other brothers, sustained and accompanied by the presence of the Risen One, as a summary, in its sequence, the extraordinary images of the story of the disciples who walk with Jesus towards Emmaus (cf. LC 24,13-35).

STANDING AND KNEELING

Standing or kneeling during liturgical prayer is not at all indifferent. Each gesture forms part, in some way, of that dimension of announcement and instruction that is an integral part of the liturgical action, and therefore it cannot be left to the momentary pleasure of each one. The attitudes that must be assumed during the liturgical celebration are not casual nor are they ordered to efficiency or external order.. They are not used to change posture to avoid boredom or fatigue, nor to make the ceremony more pleasing to the eye. Son, rather, true symbolic actions. Among them, standing is undoubtedly one of the most important and significant.

Standing because we are children of God resurrected with Christ. The iconography of the catacombs always presents the figure of the praying man standing. Besides, It is significant that the priest, at the altar, say from the beginning all the presidential prayers standing. And it is very significant that in the ancient Church, according to numerous authorized testimonies, It was even forbidden to kneel on Sunday and during the fifty days of Easter.

Stand is, therefore, the normal attitude of the Christian who, even though I am a sinner, He is aware of his dignity as a child of God, received from that Jesus who died and rose again for the salvation of all.

In liturgical prayer The Church wants to make this announcement. In private, instead, everyone can assume the attitude they prefer. The conciliar reform, therefore, has not “secularized” the liturgy, but has given it back its symbolic load and also its function of announcement to the world.

standing, waiting for the Lord to come. Standing in liturgical prayer also has a further meaning, always linked to the announcement of the paschal mystery. It is about, indeed, of the eschatological announcement, of the Christian life as awaiting the final coming of Christ. Jesus himself invites his disciples to be like those servants who, standing, with the waist cinched and the lamps lit, They wait for their lord when he returns from the wedding, to open it as soon as it arrives and knocks (cf. LC 12,35).

With this awareness it is beautiful and moving to pray standing. How beautiful and moving it is to walk together and, standing, receive the Body of Christ, true manna and bread from heaven, to support our path to eternity, Towards those new skies and that new earth. Over there, those who have overcome sin with Christ sing standing, eternally, before God, the song of Moses and the song of the Lamb (cf. AP 15,2-3).

On your knees yes, but to get up. Being on your knees is also a significant attitude, which, however, finds its origin and its place above all in private prayer. Expresses awareness of one's own poverty, of one's own sin. That is why the attitude of kneeling entered the liturgy very slowly and with a certain parsimony., at the same rate that penitential rites spread, linked above all to the celebration of public penance. There are few liturgical moments that give space to be on our knees.; moments that opportunely express the humble adoration and supplication of an entire people who feel overwhelmed, not so much because of his own sin, how much for the infinite love of God. The General Ordination of the Roman Missal provides:

«Let them kneel in the consecration, unless health prevents it, the narrowness of the place, the large number of faithful present or other reasonable causes. Those who do not kneel for the consecration bow deeply while the priest genuflects after the consecration. (n. 43).

We kneel, indeed, not before the memory of a past event, but before the death and resurrection of the Lord, that at that very moment becomes truly present on the altar: and it is precisely because that death is already victorious, It's already Easter, so the knee bowed before her is never the last word - so the acclamation "We announce your death, we proclaim your resurrection. ¡Ven, Lord Jesus!» could implicitly sound like standing before the Risen One, alive and true. But it is precisely thanks to this great love that man can and must rise to walk without delay towards that nuptial encounter that will make us full participants in that divine life that is already in us., and that grants us the honor of standing before God as children. For that very reason, before the tabernacle, in front of the supreme sign of that love that paid for our dignity, In the private prayer of adoration the attitude that springs spontaneously to us is that of prostrating ourselves on our knees..

SITTING TO LISTEN

Before the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council, sitting in church was, for the assembly, a practically functional attitude; for the different ministers, instead, sometimes it was even regulated by minute choreographic details: upright body, hands on knees, feet together, biretta on the head, various inclinations… Today, thanks to the reform of the Council that has returned to the liturgy its original sobriety, sitting has also recovered a predominantly symbolic function. Nothing in the liturgy, indeed, must be simply functional or, even worse, choreographic and ceremonial. That is why it is important to know the meaning of these gestures to accept them and perform them with the joy and enthusiasm of someone who is aware of becoming, somehow, with his own person, into a sacramental instrument of announcement to the world.

Listening sign. Within a liturgical celebration, sitting takes on precise meanings, free of all ambiguity, and that is why this attitude is not left to the individual pleasure of the moment. First of all, sitting is a sign of confidential listening, interior, respectful and meditative; a listen that, for it, makes deep feelings and brave decisions mature. It is no coincidence that also in human relationships, when you really want to give space to listen to the other, let's sit in front of each other.

The norms of the Roman Missal remind us: «Finishing the collect prayer, the reader addresses the ambo and proclaims the reading; "Everyone listens to it sitting down." (OGMR, 89). The rule is clear: It doesn't say that everyone reads on their own.. That's why, recognizing the positive service provided by the “little sheets of Mass”, It is still legal and necessary to ask ourselves if the price paid for this is not too high. Yes indeed all, or almost all, they read on their own, the symbolic gesture that is at the origin of sitting is emptied of meaning.

A Word addressed to a united people. But is this attitude of listening that we have just described really so important?? Wouldn't it be enough for each one to read the Word on his own?, carefully, and will strive to put it into practice? A great temptation of which we are victims is to be extremely insensitive to the liturgical dimension and value things only in terms of individuality and moral efficacy.. By doing so, however, we forget that the Holy Scripture is not, first of all, a meditation book, but a word that God addresses to his people; a Word whose main purpose is to make the Church: “The people of God are gathered first and foremost through the word of the living God.” (Priesthood, n. 4).

The attitude of those who remain sitting and attentive to what is proclaimed and revealed, therefore, the primary function of the Word of God: establish a dialogue of love not so much with individuals as with all the people of God, with the entire assembly considered as a single subject, in which the entire Church is visibly represented and truly present.

Behold, so, the ultimate meaning of each gesture described here: walk, stand, kneel, sit are not a script that is recited nor an ornament that disguises otherwise poor words. The body of the assembly, in its moving and in its stopping, does not simply describe the faith of the Church: to achieve. That is why no liturgical gesture can be left to chance or to the pleasure of the moment — because it is precisely through those gestures, even before through words, how the announced salvation becomes concretely present in the midst of his people.

Desde The Island of Patmos, 26 September of 2026

.

______________________

Dear Readers,
this magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
Editions The island of Patmos

n Agency. 59 From Rome – Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message:
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

.

.

.

HTTPS://i0.wp.com/isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Padre-Simone-isola-piccola.jpeg?fit=150,150&ssl=1 150 150 Father Simone HTTPS://isoladipatmos.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/logo724c.png Father Simone2026-09-26 14:34:432026-09-28 10:42:03The symbolic language of the liturgy – The symbolic language of the liturgy

NOTEBOOKS AND NOTEBOOKS

BUY NOW

€22,00

BUY NOW

THE WAY OF THE THREE KEYS

SECOND EDITION

€25,00

BUY NOW

FREEDOM DENIED

€25,00

BUY NOW

I BELIEVE TO UNDERSTAND

€28,00

BUY NOW

DIGRESSIONS OF A LIBERAL PRIEST

€18,00

BUY NOW

SATIRICAL CATTLEQUIRES

€22,00

BUY NOW

THE SADNESS OF LOVE

€18,00

BUY NOW

WAR AND IDEOLOGICAL PROPAGANDA

€28,00

SATAN AND BECAME TRINO

BUY NOW

€30,00

BITTER HERBS

BUY NOW

€18,00

ARIANISM

BUY NOW

€22,00

The aspirin of moderate Islam

BUY NOW

€22,00

THE CHURCH AND THE CORONAVIRUS

BUY NOW

€24,00

Nothing trouble you

BUY NOW

€18,00

PIUS XII AND THE SHOAH

BUY NOW

€25,00

Sect Neocatechumenal

BUY NOW

€18,50

THE SIGN OF CAIN

BUY NOW

€20,00

FROM PROZAN TO PROZAC

BUY NOW

€24,00

THE GOLPE OF THE POLITICALLY CORRECT

BUY NOW

MAGAZINE ARTICLE ARCHIVE 2014 – 2024

By clicking on the image of the Editors you can access the complete collection of all their articles

Blog di Padre Ivano Liguori Blog di Padre Gabriele Scardocci Blog di Padre Giovanni Cavalcoli Blog di Padre Ariel Blog di Padre Ariel

follow us on Twitter

Social of the Island of Patmos

Facebook Edizioni Isola di PatmosFacebook Padre Ariel Levi di Gualdo Facebook Padre Ivano LiguoriFacebook Padre Gabriele ScardocciFacebook Padre SimoneCanale YouTube Isola Di Patmos

Translator / Translate

ItalianoItaliano
PortuguêsPortuguês
EnglishEnglish
EspañolEspañol
DeutschDeutsch
FrançaisFrançais
Set as default language
by Transposh - translation plugin for wordpress

Search Engine

Search Search
Popular
  • Marco Perfetti, alias “I can not remain silent”: the...10 December 2025 - 16:07
  • «We in the Vatican, here in the Vatican…». Silerian donkeys ...11 May 2025 - 10:59
  • The Sacrament of Marriage by Father Gabriele Giordano...13 May 2023 - 12:26
  • It is being distributed “Sadness of Love”, ultima...30 August 2022 - 15:24
  • The anti-covid vaccines19. That moral and that Christian charity ...29 July 2021 - 22:08
  • ANNOUNCEMENTS! "The sect Neocatechumenal. Heresy became ....15 September 2019 - 20:09
  • from the large “Sabrina” played by Audrey ...15 October 2019 - 19:16
  • Once upon a time there were the Eucharist and the Priesthood ...28 March 2019 - 0:54
  • I Neocatecumenali, to conquer Asia thanks ...31 July 2019 - 22:31
  • The Motu Proprio of Benedict XVI on the Mass is abolished..7 May 2020 - 19:27
  • Eventually it was discovered. The ghost-writer of the Supreme Pontiff ...16 July 2021 - 15:28
  • "Fideism idiot in power" … God save us from the ...30 March 2020 - 14:53
Recent
  • Marco Perfetti, alias “I can not remain silent”: the...10 December 2025 - 16:07
  • «We in the Vatican, here in the Vatican…». Silerian donkeys ...11 May 2025 - 10:59
  • The Sacrament of Marriage by Father Gabriele Giordano...13 May 2023 - 12:26
  • It is being distributed “Sadness of Love”, ultima...30 August 2022 - 15:24
  • That cancer that no surgeon has ever removed and the metastases...22 October 2026 - 14:23
  • Guerrilla warfare in Milan. Marco Rizzo and pedagogical wisdom...20 October 2026 - 23:19
  • The head and feet of Christ: Saint Chromatius of Aquileia against...19 October 2026 - 23:59
  • Francis of Assisi mystical saint, not holy, And...7 October 2026 - 12:05
  • «My free song» in a world that reacts before….30 September 2026 - 22:49
  • The unbearable lightness of those monastic privileges...29 September 2026 - 19:39
  • The decline of monasticism. The priest and that denied kiss...29 September 2026 - 19:36
  • France. Baptisms of faith or reactive baptisms? – France....28 September 2026 - 8:39
Comments
  • Padre ArielI don't know this episode but taking it as true I can....7 December 2025 - 10:27 by Padre Ariel
  • Alessandro L.The secularization of Christian doctrine is....20 November 2025 - 13:14 by Alessandro L.
  • mariacSome time ago I read that a Sicilian bishop threatened....16 November 2025 - 21:47 by mariac
  • GionataBeautiful and complete article, that, in my humble opinion...16 November 2025 - 11:26 by Jonathan
  • AntonelloWhat is emerging on the usual known sites and blogs regarding....7 November 2025 - 10:10 by Antonello
  • OKarolosThe reference to the Litany of Loreto pushes me to point out....6 November 2025 - 10:30 by OKarolos
  • lydia2005Our Hypatia is witty and caustic, Gatta Roma Very good!...17 October 2025 - 18:49 by lydia2005
  • lydia2005Wonderful homily for the funeral of the confrere. My ha ...16 September 2025 - 8:52 by lydia2005

Categories

Archives

Donate

Dear Readers.

This magazine requires management costs that we have always faced only with your free offers. Those who wish to support our apostolic work can send us their contribution through the convenient and safe way PayPal by clicking below:

Or if you prefer you can use our
Bank account in the name of:
The Island of Patmos Editions Association

n Agency. 59 From Rome - Vatican
Iban code:
IT74R0503403259000000301118
For international bank transfers:
Codice SWIFT:
BAPPIT21D21

If you make a bank transfer, send an email to the editorial staff, the bank does not provide your email and we will not be able to send you a thank you message: 
isoladipatmos@gmail.com

We thank you for the support you wish to offer to our apostolic service.

The Fathers of the Island of Patmos

 



September 2026
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Aug   Oct »

sites Friends

The website of this magazine and the editions take name from the Aegean island in which the Blessed Apostle John wrote the Book of the Apocalypse, isola also known as «the place of the last revelation»

«God revealed the secrets of others ALTIUS»

(in higher than the others, John has left the Church, the arcane mysteries of God)

The bezel used as the cover of our home page is a 16th century fresco by Correggio. preserved in the Church of San Giovanni Evangelista in Parma

Creator of the website of this magazine:

MANUELA LUZZARDI

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top
Manage Consent

We use cookies to improve your experience. You can accept them all or manage your preferences.

Functional Always active
Technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
Technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences which are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
Technical storage or access that is used solely for statistical purposes. Technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance by your Internet Service Provider, or further registrations by third parties, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used for identification.
Marketing
Technical storage or access is required to create profiles of users to send advertising, or to track you across a website or websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}